RFK Jr. The Defender - March 18, 2022


Pfizer Fraud and Wall Street with Ed Dowd


Episode Stats

Length

35 minutes

Words per Minute

162.79266

Word Count

5,771

Sentence Count

399

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

2


Summary

Ed Dowd has worked on Wall Street most of his career, spanning both credit markets and equity markets. He s worked for some of the most prestigious firms in the world, including HSBC, Donaldson & Lufkin, and most notably at BlackRock, where he managed a $14B equity portfolio for 10 years. Ed has been making the rounds in the last couple of weeks talking about the potentially momentous fraud at Pfizer and Moderna, and what that means to the financial markets and also what it means to public health. And he s made some extraordinary observations and done some extraordinary things, including going into the weeds and analyzing the clinical data. In this episode, Ed talks about how he became a believer that the FDA is in on something, and why he thinks it s time to take matters into their own hands. He also talks about why he believes the FDA should be held accountable for what they ve done to make sure that patients get the drugs they need to live the lives they deserve. Ed is a good friend of mine, and I appreciate his candor and candor about what he s found out about the FDA. I hope you enjoy listening to this episode and share it with your friends, family, and colleagues. I know that it will have a profound impact on your day-to-day lives and on your own health and well-being. I ll be looking out for you in the next episode. -Timestamps: 1:00 - Why the FDA s cover-up is a big deal 3: What are the chances of catching the fraud? 4:30 - What can we do about it? 5: Who s the real culprit? 6:15 - Is the FDA responsible? 7: What s going on here? 8:40 - Who s responsible for this? 9:10 - How can we trust the FDA? 11:00 What s the FDA accountable? 12:15 13:30 15:40 14:00 What is the risk? 16:00 Does the FDA have a stake in this story? 17:00 Is this a good thing? 15, is it a good or bad? 18:00 Can we trust them? 19:20 - What s a good bet? 21:10 22:00 Do you think the FDA own the data? 23:30 Is this story a scam? 22 - Is there a fix?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey, everybody.
00:00:00.000 My guest today is Ed Dowd, who has worked on Wall Street most of his career, spanning both credit markets and equity markets.
00:00:09.000 Some of the firms he's worked for, including HSBC, Donaldson, and Lufkin at DLJ. Independence investments, and most notably at BlackRock as a portfolio manager, where he managed $14 billion, both equity portfolio for 10 years.
00:00:28.000 Currently, he's a consultant at Symphonic Capital and is in the process of trying to raise capital to start a hedge fund with Symphonic.
00:00:36.000 Ed, for those of you who don't know Ed, he's a famous Wall Street maverick and contrarian.
00:00:42.000 He was one of the few Wall Street Analyst who foresaw the dot-com fraud in 1999 and 2000 and predicted the financial crisis in 2008.
00:00:57.000 And then he moved to BlackRock because of his...
00:01:01.000 Presence and was given control at $14 billion growth equity fund.
00:01:08.000 Ed has been kind of making the rounds in the last couple of weeks talking about the potentially momentous fraud at Pfizer and Moderna and what that means to the financial markets and also what it means to public health.
00:01:27.000 And he's made some extraordinary observations and done Really gone into the weeds and analyzing the clinical data.
00:01:36.000 Ed, welcome to the show.
00:01:38.000 Thank you.
00:01:39.000 Good to be here.
00:01:39.000 I appreciate your time.
00:01:40.000 So tell us how you got kind of into this niche area.
00:01:45.000 Quite frankly, I saw what was going on and I was very concerned and I was a skeptic early.
00:01:51.000 And I Right around September of last year when the mandates are in full force and I thought this can't go on.
00:01:57.000 I actually prayed to God to be of service and Dr.
00:02:01.000 Malone came to the island and through a series of coincidences I was able to meet with him and he has enabled me to get a larger voice.
00:02:09.000 I was saying what I was saying on Twitter as a private citizen and by hooking up with him I've been able to, through him, show a different angle as to what's going on.
00:02:20.000 He's doing all the medical side of this.
00:02:22.000 I'm showing the Wall Street side.
00:02:24.000 And my goal is to show that fraud has occurred, or I believe fraud has occurred at Pfizer.
00:02:30.000 What tipped me off to the fraud was primarily the FDA's decision to hide the data for 75 years.
00:02:39.000 And in my world, when I see that, I don't need the Wall Street Journal or the New York Times to tell me fraud has occurred.
00:02:46.000 I make bets with capital, and my bet was that's fraud.
00:02:50.000 The FDA's in on the cover-up.
00:02:52.000 Something went down.
00:02:53.000 The other tip for me was in November of last year, A friend of mine from the biotech industry discovered that Pfizer had failed their all-cause mortality endpoint.
00:03:03.000 And that was not available to us when this fanfare occurred in November of 2020.
00:03:09.000 They all got excited about 95% efficacy.
00:03:13.000 And when we learned that data point, it came out in a FOIA request.
00:03:18.000 And the mainstream media ignored it.
00:03:20.000 And I said to him, look, I'm not a healthcare expert, but I remember from managing the portfolio and having a healthcare analyst, if you miss the all-cause mortality endpoint, the drug doesn't get approved.
00:03:30.000 He said to me, correct, it doesn't get approved.
00:03:32.000 It's the gold standard of the FDA. Well, they missed that endpoint.
00:03:37.000 And that's a big deal.
00:03:39.000 So I started really...
00:03:41.000 Thinking fraud had occurred.
00:03:43.000 And then I started to think, if the FDA is in on it, this reminds me of the great financial crisis where the rating agencies became corrupted and allowed that fraud to happen.
00:03:52.000 So what we had in the rating agencies in 2008, 8-9 was what I call the institutional imperative.
00:03:58.000 You've heard Warren Buffett talk about this.
00:04:01.000 It's where the, over time, an institution acts in the interests of itself rather than its shareholders, or in the case of the FDA, the stakeholders.
00:04:09.000 So I believe over time it's been corrupted.
00:04:12.000 And then with this Operation Warp Speed, when I heard that was announced, I thought disaster from the get-go.
00:04:18.000 Corners cut, things rushed, safety protocols ignored.
00:04:21.000 I came to the conclusion that the FDA Didn't really look at this clinical trial data.
00:04:28.000 They rushed it through due to political pressure, what have you.
00:04:32.000 Maybe straight up bribes.
00:04:33.000 We don't know, but what we do know is that this should never have been approved.
00:04:38.000 And because of the rise in my media profile, I was able to, I was reached out to by Brooke Jackson, the Ventavia whistleblower, who went public in November and Everybody ignored her.
00:04:50.000 The mainstream media ignored her.
00:04:51.000 She called me.
00:04:53.000 We talked for three hours.
00:04:54.000 Then I started to go on podcasts with her.
00:04:57.000 And, you know, the bottom line here is what she saw was so much fraud, it was mind-boggling.
00:05:03.000 But the fraud that I focused on related to the numbers, there was a thousand patients that she oversaw in the 44,000 clinical trial study, original study that was done by Pfizer.
00:05:16.000 All of them were unblinded, all 1,000.
00:05:19.000 And when that happens, that data is supposed to be thrown out per Pfizer protocols.
00:05:24.000 It was not.
00:05:25.000 It was rolled up.
00:05:26.000 When she became aware of that, she alerted her senior people in her company.
00:05:31.000 That's when the tone changed with her, obviously.
00:05:33.000 And then when they wanted her to get involved in a cover-up, that's when she went to the FDA, did an anonymous whistleblower complaint at 9 in the morning.
00:05:43.000 By 3 in the afternoon, she was fired.
00:05:46.000 And then five days later, a Pfizer lawyer reached out to her, and she ignored him.
00:05:52.000 It happened to be this guy, Mark Barnes, who apparently has a notorious history in the swamp.
00:06:00.000 So when I heard all this, and then I, so I became literally absolutely convinced that the study of the patient she saw was 100% unblinded.
00:06:11.000 So people say, the naysayers will say, well, it was only 1,000 patients.
00:06:15.000 Well, first of all, they shouldn't have been rolled up into the total 44,000.
00:06:19.000 But let's do the math on this.
00:06:21.000 The math is pretty simple.
00:06:22.000 In the whole trial of the 28-day study, which is also ridiculous, as you know, on its face, a study for 28 days...
00:06:30.000 There were eight patients in the vaccinated group and 164 in the unvaccinated group, in the placebo group.
00:06:37.000 So that's how they calculated 95% efficacy.
00:06:40.000 In just her 1,000 patients...
00:06:42.000 Wait a minute.
00:06:43.000 I mean, there were eight patients who got COVID. In the vaccinated group.
00:06:48.000 Yeah.
00:06:49.000 And in the placebo group, there were 164 patients who got COVID. Yeah.
00:06:54.000 Okay, so...
00:06:55.000 Yeah, go ahead.
00:06:56.000 So that's how they calculated the 95% efficacy.
00:07:00.000 That's the number that generated that headline, okay?
00:07:04.000 Let's think about this for a second.
00:07:06.000 When you unblind a study, what she told me was the doctors had on every patient's chart, whether they had the vaccine or they had the placebo, which was not supposed to happen.
00:07:16.000 So when a patient would come in and say, I'm not feeling well, the doctor could look at the chart and say, well, this person's vaccinated.
00:07:23.000 I'm sure it's not COVID and not test them or know not to test them if they wanted to, right?
00:07:28.000 So all you need from her 1000 patients There are 74 of those patients to move over to the vaccinated column because they didn't test them, and you have 50% efficacy.
00:07:40.000 You move all 164 over, you have 0% efficacy.
00:07:45.000 You don't need the other sites.
00:07:47.000 You just need that site to call into question the whole study.
00:07:50.000 It's fraud in my mind.
00:07:51.000 That's in my humble opinion.
00:07:52.000 And you know as well as I do that when you have a smoking gun in one area, her site's You know, this was probably done in other sites as well.
00:08:03.000 So this was a disaster in my mind.
00:08:06.000 And, you know, look, the fruits of their fraud are showing up in real-world results now.
00:08:12.000 You and I have been aware of it for a while, but now, unfortunately and tragically, it's showing up in real-world data, insurance companies and funeral homes.
00:08:20.000 And this is a disaster.
00:08:22.000 Yeah.
00:08:23.000 In the all-cause mortality data, there were 22,000 people who got the vaccine and roughly 22,000 who got the placebo.
00:08:32.000 Of the 22,000 who got the vaccine over the six-month run of that trial, one of them died from COVID. In the placebo group, two died from COVID. And that allowed Pfizer to claim And the vaccine was 100% effective against death because two is 100% of one.
00:08:55.000 And that's really all they got.
00:08:57.000 What it really means is you have to give 22,000 vaccines to prevent one COVID death.
00:09:03.000 And if you're going to give 22,000 vaccines, you better make sure that the vaccines don't kill anybody because if they kill one person, you've canceled out any benefit.
00:09:13.000 And as you point out, in the vaccine group, on the all-cause mortality chart, which they submitted to FDA to get their licensure, there were 17 people in the placebo group who died, 21 people in the vaccine group.
00:09:32.000 That's a 23% rise in all-cause mortality, and that would kill any other drug.
00:09:37.000 Here's what I was going to...
00:09:39.000 The point, to be a contrarian to you that this is going to affect them in the financial markets, very, very early on, some financial people came to me who were thinking of making big investments in the vaccine companies.
00:09:53.000 This was in around March, April, May of 2020.
00:09:58.000 The original monkey studies came out for the AstraZeneca vaccine.
00:10:03.000 And the monkey studies showed that the monkeys who were vaccinated got COVID and had an equal amount of viral load in their nose as vaccinated monkeys.
00:10:15.000 Vaccinated and unvaccinated have the same viral lows.
00:10:19.000 Clearly it couldn't prevent transmission.
00:10:21.000 And I advise these people, and it's a good idea not to take financial advice from me, I said this thing is DOA. And at that time, both Gates and Fauci were saying, well...
00:10:33.000 Maybe you won't prevent transmission.
00:10:36.000 If it's not going to prevent transmission, you can't mandate it.
00:10:40.000 And you probably can't sell it because it's not going to stop the pandemic.
00:10:46.000 But they did it anyway.
00:10:48.000 You know, the pessimistic part of my personality is saying that no matter what happens, they somehow have it wired so thoroughly that there is no consequences for these companies.
00:11:03.000 And I hope you're right, but why do you think there will be consequences?
00:11:08.000 Well, because I think there's enough proof for people to investigate fraud in the clinical data and the FDA's complicity in this, unfortunately, this is the tragic part of this.
00:11:20.000 We had to wait for real-world evidence.
00:11:22.000 And the real-world evidence is so awful that there's going to be a public outcry.
00:11:27.000 And even though the mainstream media is not participating with this yet, they will.
00:11:31.000 I mean, you can't hide this anymore.
00:11:34.000 This is devastating.
00:11:35.000 And What I came out with last week with my insurance industry analyst partner, who will be coming public shortly, we dove into the CDC data.
00:11:44.000 Their own data shows what's going on.
00:11:46.000 This is a disaster of epic proportions.
00:11:49.000 Last week, I made the claim, and I stand by it, that the millennial age group saw 61,000 deaths, excess deaths in a one-year timeframe with an acceleration into the mandates and the boosters in the fall.
00:12:04.000 I mean, they just experienced a Vietnam War in a year.
00:12:07.000 I don't know how this is going to be hidden for much longer.
00:12:10.000 I think the more we convince people what happened and we turn politicians against what just happened and they will or vote them out whatever.
00:12:20.000 Eventually, the reckoning will come.
00:12:22.000 It has to.
00:12:23.000 I don't care if they're going to distract us with the Ukraine war or whatever, but this is too big to hide.
00:12:29.000 I have faith that this is going to come to light, and there will be consequences.
00:12:34.000 I think what CDC will try to persuade the world is that those 61,000 excess deaths are from COVID and from Omicron.
00:12:44.000 How do they not pull that off?
00:12:47.000 Well, they'll try.
00:12:49.000 But let's think about this logically for a second.
00:12:52.000 If you look at the chart four that you guys have, basically, if you look at that chart, you see that there was a baseline of normal death rates pre-pandemic.
00:13:03.000 Then there was a spike into the fall pre-vaccine.
00:13:07.000 But it's gotten worse with vaccines and milder variants.
00:13:11.000 And by the way, Delta hit in the summer of 2021.
00:13:16.000 80% of all cases were Delta in June.
00:13:19.000 So they can't say it was Delta because, and what, Delta only affects 25 to 44 more than older folks.
00:13:27.000 The logic here makes no sense.
00:13:29.000 Delta was there in the summer.
00:13:31.000 That acceleration you see into the fall, it's the rate of change that's the smoking gun because it coincides with the mandates hitting.
00:13:39.000 And the boosters.
00:13:40.000 And they can't say it's Delta, because Delta was there in the summer.
00:13:43.000 They can't say it's Omicron, because Omicron came later, which was milder.
00:13:47.000 And they can't say it's fentanyl deaths, because what, everybody decided to overdose at the same time.
00:13:52.000 They can't say it's suicide, because everybody decided to kill themselves in the same two, three-month period.
00:13:58.000 You see, the rate of change is the smoking gun.
00:14:01.000 That's the smoke, the rate of change and the acceleration into mandates and boosters.
00:14:06.000 Basically, In my mind, it's case closed.
00:14:10.000 Someone asked me, if you wanted to be invited up to the Hill to testify, would you go?
00:14:14.000 My partner and I would go.
00:14:16.000 We haven't been invited yet.
00:14:18.000 We're willing to go anywhere and defend this.
00:14:21.000 And are there other people in the financial markets who are already taking an interest in this?
00:14:27.000 Yes.
00:14:27.000 People, the stocks of Moderna and Pfizer have been in downtrending modes.
00:14:32.000 Moderna is down 70 plus percent from its high.
00:14:35.000 That's Moderna.
00:14:36.000 Pfizer is down 20 plus percent from its high.
00:14:39.000 So the way Wall Street works is, you know, some crazy guy like me comes out with a conferring thesis, right?
00:14:46.000 They take note.
00:14:48.000 They start to listen.
00:14:49.000 They don't sell at all.
00:14:50.000 They do their own work.
00:14:52.000 So it's going to take some time, but it's in process.
00:14:56.000 The other thing that you need to know that's exciting is the work we did with the CDC data and the chart you just showed.
00:15:02.000 Independent actuaries that are still anonymous recreated our work from the database.
00:15:07.000 And Stay tuned.
00:15:09.000 The insurance industry is heating up here.
00:15:12.000 The other reason I think that we're going to see consequences is an industry that's been defrauded.
00:15:19.000 It's the insurance industry.
00:15:21.000 They are currently paying for excess deaths due to a product that kills.
00:15:27.000 And they're going to be paying for years disability from vaccine injuries.
00:15:30.000 I don't think they're going to put up with that once they realize what's happened and they're starting to wake up.
00:15:35.000 And I'm getting reached out to by actuaries who shall remain anonymous for now until they come forward at insurance companies that make a difference.
00:15:44.000 So the worm is turning.
00:15:46.000 This is the beginning of the worm turning, I think.
00:15:50.000 Let me play devil's advocate.
00:15:52.000 Sure.
00:15:53.000 I've watched public health decline precipitously over the time that I've been involved in this.
00:15:59.000 We've gone from 6% of our children having chronic disease to 54%.
00:16:04.000 Autism rates have dropped from 1 or 2 in 10,000 to 1 every 44 people.
00:16:12.000 Over the last 10 years, they've increased again by 144%.
00:16:17.000 Food allergies have appeared, autoimmune diseases have become epidemic, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, all these neurodevelopmental disorders.
00:16:26.000 And the insurance company, which ends up paying for a lot of those costs, or all of those costs, has sat on the sidelines and said nothing yet.
00:16:36.000 And people have wondered about that.
00:16:39.000 People in the community who are advocates for chronic disease, advocates to end toxic exposures to kids, have sat there for years, for decades, and say, why doesn't the insurance industry speak up?
00:16:55.000 An insurance, a high-level insurance analyst, explained to a group of us, and he said, Really, the more injury that you have in that society, the more the insurance company gets wealthy.
00:17:09.000 If there was only one shipwreck a year, is that a good thing for Lloyd's of London?
00:17:16.000 Or is it better if there's 500 shipwrecks a year?
00:17:20.000 Because now everybody needs shipwreck insurance.
00:17:22.000 And if you have a high level of injury, Over the long term, since the insurance industry really just makes money on friction, and the more injury you have, the more people demand the product, which is insurance.
00:17:39.000 And that's where their profits come from.
00:17:41.000 So they're less concerned with paying off individual liabilities.
00:17:47.000 What do you think of that?
00:17:48.000 So I agree with that.
00:17:51.000 We call that business as usual, right?
00:17:53.000 That makes sense to me.
00:17:54.000 But think about the insurance industry.
00:17:56.000 They make their money off of pretty steady death rates and injury rates.
00:18:02.000 And the key to their profit is predicting it and then charging a premium that covers the losses.
00:18:08.000 And so they make the spread.
00:18:09.000 They price it so that they don't lose money.
00:18:12.000 What just occurred...
00:18:14.000 Out of the words of one CEO's mouth was a 40% increase in non-COVID related deaths in the second half of 2021.
00:18:22.000 That was one American CEO, Scott Davison.
00:18:25.000 And he didn't blame the vaccine.
00:18:27.000 He didn't know what it was.
00:18:28.000 But he said that's a one in a 200 year flood.
00:18:31.000 A 10% increase would be a three standard deviation increase.
00:18:34.000 Unheard of event in the insurance industry.
00:18:36.000 So the insurance industry didn't price this.
00:18:39.000 So they're going to be...
00:18:40.000 This is the problem.
00:18:42.000 So it's such a catastrophic number.
00:18:45.000 And the injuries that are going to be created for years, they're not...
00:18:48.000 This is going to hurt their capitalization over time.
00:18:51.000 Let me put it this way.
00:18:51.000 The greed got...
00:18:52.000 You've been seeing a problem that's been going on for years.
00:18:55.000 But it was in all different smaller areas.
00:18:58.000 But now they bit off more than they can chew.
00:19:00.000 They just poisoned 220 million Americans.
00:19:03.000 This is literally like a bridge too far, and it's too fast, too far, too much death and injury.
00:19:09.000 And then the insurance industry did not price this.
00:19:12.000 They did not price this.
00:19:13.000 So I think that's why we're going to have more of an impact this time than business as usual with slower, predictable, chronic death.
00:19:22.000 Does that make sense?
00:19:24.000 Yeah.
00:19:24.000 Did you see the TV show, Dope Sick?
00:19:27.000 Yes.
00:19:28.000 And so, did you have any revelations from that about agency capture?
00:19:35.000 Yes, I have my own personal experiences with the healthcare system that made me aware of agency capture.
00:19:40.000 And, you know, it's not about getting you well, it's about keeping you constantly in the system on prescriptions.
00:19:47.000 And I had my own battle with mental health in 2011, and I got off the daisy train and I healed myself without the aid of the pharmaceutical industry.
00:19:56.000 And that That was a big eye-opening event for me, my own personal experience.
00:20:00.000 And that's when I, you know, really started to understand how the healthcare system worked.
00:20:04.000 Yeah, because you mentioned the Vietnam War, and for the people who haven't seen Topsy, I urge you to do it.
00:20:11.000 And it's also a vehicle, a really important vehicle.
00:20:15.000 Those of you who are having trouble persuading your relatives that maybe the FDA and the CDC are lying about vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry are lying about vaccines, show them dope-sick.
00:20:29.000 You can expect them to watch it because then you see how the sausage gets made across the system.
00:20:35.000 And what the story is, is how the pharmaceutical industry and FDA corrupt officials and FDA Put a phony label on OxyContin that said it was not addictive.
00:20:49.000 And that label was used by 20,000 pharmaceutical reps from Purdue Pharma and Johnson& Johnson to go out and persuade doctors all across America.
00:21:03.000 That OxyContin was not addictive.
00:21:06.000 And you could prescribe it for hangovers.
00:21:09.000 You could prescribe it for minor aches and pains that it was appropriate.
00:21:14.000 To me, the most important revelation that people have when they're looking at that is because the big pushback You get, at least that I get, when I try to explain to loved ones, family, friends, you know, that it's corrupt.
00:21:32.000 They say, we don't believe it.
00:21:36.000 You know, there's a million doctors out there and you're saying that they're all involved in a conspiracy, that they all know that they're giving this poison to people and that they're killing them.
00:21:47.000 There's no way that's happening.
00:21:48.000 Yeah.
00:21:49.000 And what I say is the doctors don't know it.
00:21:52.000 They believe what CDC and FDA tell them.
00:21:55.000 And they're the only source of information.
00:21:58.000 Very few of them are actually reading the peer-reviewed publications.
00:22:02.000 And we're thinking independently and questioning the authorities.
00:22:07.000 Nobody does that.
00:22:08.000 And that's exactly what happened.
00:22:10.000 You have, you know, the great thing about the service at film shows is It's these very well-meaning doctors who love their patients, they're born healers, they have a gift for healing, and they just accept what FDA said on that label is true.
00:22:29.000 It turns out the official who wrote that label was immediately left FDA, went to work for Purdue Pharma, Purdue A $367,000 annual salary, so it's a payoff.
00:22:44.000 And that's how this system works with these revolving doors and all these other instruments of agency capture.
00:22:50.000 Yeah, you know, you just hit on a point that I've harped on in many of my discussions with podcasters and media people.
00:22:58.000 The FDA is critical to this fraud for the doctors who trust the FDA. That's why It's just like the financial crisis with the rating agencies.
00:23:08.000 The rating agencies vetted the bonds, gave them AAA ratings, and people trusted the rating agencies so they didn't look too hard.
00:23:15.000 The doctors who don't read clinical data trial studies, who don't have backgrounds in statistical analysis, trust the FDA. So the key to this fraud is the FDA regulatory capture.
00:23:27.000 And the pharmaceutical industries have done, as you know, a fabulous job of doing that.
00:23:32.000 And that's what occurred with this vaccine.
00:23:34.000 That's why so many of these doctors, when you try to talk to them, and I've tried to talk to some, they think I'm crazy, but I know how fraud works and I know how psychopaths work.
00:23:43.000 The key to this is you corrupt a third-party trusted institution.
00:23:48.000 And it's the same thing as the Great Financial Crisis.
00:23:51.000 That's the tragedy is a lot of doctors who are well-meaning, like you said, who love their patients.
00:23:56.000 When this comes out and gets resolved and the awakening begins, it's going to really hurt the reputations of the medical profession for years to come, unfortunately.
00:24:05.000 One thing that people need to understand that I think is really kind of an important subtlety and nuance is that Medical school is different and science, you know, it doesn't make you a scientist.
00:24:19.000 Doctors are taught and doctors are high IQ people with amazing memories and they're forced to absorb huge amounts of information, but it's almost like an authoritarian system.
00:24:34.000 We're being told, this is what you do when you see this.
00:24:37.000 This is how to diagnose an illness.
00:24:39.000 This is how you treat it.
00:24:41.000 And it's kind of a pharmaceutical paradigm.
00:24:44.000 The pharma is paying for these medical schools.
00:24:46.000 They support them.
00:24:48.000 And they're not being taught critical thinking.
00:24:52.000 They're not being taught to question authority.
00:24:55.000 Scientists, it's the opposite.
00:24:57.000 You know, they're being taught, how do you read a scientific study critically?
00:25:02.000 How do you look for the errors, the deceptions, the little mistakes, the biases that are incorporated into the calculations?
00:25:12.000 And it's a completely different set of skills.
00:25:14.000 If you could become a scientist by absorbing information, all you'd have to do is watch the Discovery Channel, and you would be a scientist, right?
00:25:24.000 That's not how it works.
00:25:26.000 It's actually a set of skills that is unique to science, and it's not always taught in medical school.
00:25:32.000 Those skills are not always taught in medical schools.
00:25:35.000 Well, you know, it's funny.
00:25:37.000 On Wall Street, no one teaches you how to be a critical thinker.
00:25:40.000 I went to business school and I learned a bunch of things, but it didn't teach me to be a stock picker.
00:25:46.000 What taught me to be a stock picker was my innate critical thinking and ability to connect dots without someone telling me that I'm correct before the news hits.
00:25:55.000 You don't make money in the stock market by waiting for the Wall Street Journal to report something.
00:26:00.000 And you know, I will say something about some of the doctors that were early to call this, what they were seeing.
00:26:05.000 Dr.
00:26:06.000 Ryan Cole saw in his practice biopsies, cancer shooting up last year.
00:26:13.000 He's what I call a stock picker of doctors.
00:26:15.000 He saw a trend.
00:26:16.000 He didn't need someone from the CDC or FDA to tell him something was wrong.
00:26:21.000 He figured it out early and said, this is a signal.
00:26:24.000 And he didn't need any authority figure to tell him.
00:26:26.000 And that's why he's been such a critical voice in all this.
00:26:30.000 And Dr. Malone, these are people that can think by themselves.
00:26:33.000 And I would say all the people that have been vilified are critical thinkers.
00:26:38.000 It's pretty amazing.
00:26:39.000 If you don't take the marching orders and you question, you're vilified and pushed aside.
00:26:45.000 And this is literally a crisis of critical thinking across all industries.
00:26:49.000 There's something switched off in the country over the last two years.
00:26:53.000 I don't know what it is, but it's tragic.
00:26:56.000 If you want to disable critical thinking, the only ingredient you need is fear.
00:27:02.000 Correct.
00:27:03.000 To orchestrate fear, it completely paralyzed the capacity for critical thinking.
00:27:07.000 Just a word on Ryan Cole.
00:27:09.000 One of the advantages that Ryan Cole had is he runs one of the testing, laboratory testing company, because he was receiving data from hundreds of doctors.
00:27:20.000 Right.
00:27:21.000 And, you know, it's hard because there's a signal also at the end of lockdowns.
00:27:26.000 So many people deferred medical treatment.
00:27:29.000 And you don't know whether this explosion, this apparent explosion in cancer is an artifact of deferred medical treatment or whether it's actually an increased incident in cancer.
00:27:41.000 And the jury's still out on that question, but there's a lot of doctors reporting it.
00:27:45.000 And there's a lot of doctors reporting specific kinds of cancers that, you know, We should be looking at that.
00:27:53.000 We should be, you know, as a society and as our institution, ready to be saying, okay, is this an artifact of reporting or is the incident actually creating?
00:28:04.000 Unfortunately, we have regulatory agencies that have a knee-jerk reaction to cover up those kind of signals rather than to explore them and to actually do the kind of science that, you know, we need to make good healthcare decisions.
00:28:19.000 Yeah, it's tragic.
00:28:21.000 And I applaud all the frontline doctors who came forward early when they started seeing strange things, especially in the first year with early treatment, and now with vaccines.
00:28:30.000 It was a one-two punch.
00:28:32.000 They suppress early treatment.
00:28:35.000 Listen to add...
00:28:36.000 Before I let you go, I need some private financial advice.
00:28:41.000 How is the war?
00:28:43.000 Are we going to have a recession?
00:28:45.000 How is the war going to affect?
00:28:48.000 Is it going to accelerate and amplify that?
00:28:51.000 And, you know, it seems to me, I think we printed a couple trillion dollars in money.
00:28:56.000 It seems you would think we would have really dramatic inflation from that.
00:29:01.000 But what are your thoughts?
00:29:03.000 Well, my two cents is this.
00:29:06.000 You know, since the Great Financial Crisis, that bad debt that was created didn't go away.
00:29:11.000 It was put on the central bank's balance sheets through the bailouts and the government balance sheets through the bailouts.
00:29:17.000 So the last 10 years, the debt problem we had in the Great Financial Crisis didn't go away.
00:29:22.000 It just resides in a different entity.
00:29:23.000 And the central banks and the governments have over-indebted themselves.
00:29:27.000 So those of us in the financial world have been trying to figure out when that would pop, that sovereign debt bubble would pop.
00:29:35.000 And it looks like it's popping, unfortunately.
00:29:38.000 The Fed got a reprieve during COVID because they were able to print 65% money supply year over year, which is the highest increase in the history of the Federal Reserve.
00:29:47.000 But the second derivative of that money printing is rolling over.
00:29:51.000 And I think what we're going to see, and by the way, the last 10 years, most of the inflation we saw went into financial assets.
00:29:57.000 There was some inflation, but I think we're going to see financial assets deflate and things that we need inflate, like food and rent.
00:30:08.000 So in the real world, prices are going to go up and Financial world prices are going to go down.
00:30:12.000 It's a one-two punch.
00:30:13.000 And I do think we're going to hit recession in the third quarter of this year.
00:30:18.000 And also, the Fed is going to talk about their interest rate hike.
00:30:22.000 And I've seen data analysis that shows the Fed rate hike cycle is already over before it began because the market usually leads the Fed.
00:30:31.000 So they're probably going to be one and done, one rate hike and done, and then they're going to have to print money as the stock markets and bond markets become unhinged.
00:30:39.000 This is a term we've been talking about for years.
00:30:41.000 The Fed looks like it's finally trapped, and they don't have any way out.
00:30:44.000 So it's not going to be pretty, is my advice.
00:30:48.000 So, I mean, do you advise people to get into crypto?
00:30:51.000 Is that a place where people can hide?
00:30:54.000 Well, so in the financial market dislocation, which I think is coming, there's a lot of leverage in the system.
00:31:01.000 So I think everything goes down.
00:31:03.000 I think if I had to give you just one piece of investment advice, having some cash on the sidelines at the bottom of this You know, when JP Morgan famously said, buy when there's blood in the streets.
00:31:14.000 I mean, even though there's inflation, it's good to be able to have dry powder to buy when this dislocation happens, because I think everything's going to go down initially.
00:31:22.000 Then once we have like a rally, some things will go to new highs, maybe crypto, maybe gold, but some of these stocks are never going to see their highs again.
00:31:31.000 You know, like Facebook or Google.
00:31:34.000 I think these things have peaked and they're done for at least a decade or so.
00:31:39.000 Let me ask you this, Ed.
00:31:41.000 What do you think?
00:31:43.000 About the role of these big internet titans who have raked in billions and billions of visas and Sergey Brin and Harry Ellison and Zuckerberg and Gates and even Bloomberg, who have censored, systematically censored criticisms of the lockdowns that were yielding them,
00:32:03.000 you know, ultimately, collectively, probably $3.8 trillion shift in wealth from the poor to this New oligarchy of billionaires, many of them involved in media or social media that were censoring us.
00:32:20.000 Well, so I've labeled this total fraud we've seen with Pfizer.
00:32:25.000 It's a multi-siloed fraud.
00:32:26.000 So the fraud started with Pfizer and Moderna with the help of the government and the regulators.
00:32:33.000 And then the tech titans and the media titans are complicit in, I'm not a lawyer, but that's how I'm terming it, through their censorship.
00:32:41.000 And additionally, I also think they don't mind the COVID economy because they're going to have businesses that create new industries that create around COVID compliance, where they're able to create additional revenue streams from surveillance and monitoring of the world they want, which is quarterly where they're able to create additional revenue streams from surveillance and monitoring of the world And so they were in on it in my mind.
00:33:05.000 And let's also, I don't have proof of this, but let's also not underestimate the influence of intelligence agencies here, because we do know that a lot of these tech titans, especially the new companies, have contracts with intelligence agencies that they can't disclose.
00:33:21.000 And they've had these for years, and there may be some intelligence agency influence as well.
00:33:27.000 They'll never talk about these contracts, but we know they're there.
00:33:30.000 It's illegal for them to talk about it.
00:33:32.000 They can go to jail for 20 years with a secret court, no lawyers, and they lose all their assets.
00:33:39.000 Once you sign one of those state secrecy agreements, you essentially become a vassal of the military intelligence agencies or the CIA. I think there's over 3 million Americans who have signed those, but we know that In QTEL and the CIA have focused their investments in Silicon Valley.
00:34:06.000 And if you wanted to take that money from the devil, you had to sign that contract.
00:34:11.000 Or get the contract.
00:34:12.000 Because they show up at your door with government contracts and investment money.
00:34:19.000 And nobody can say no to that.
00:34:22.000 If you're a Silicon Valley CEO or a startup, you cannot say no to the CIA. So...
00:34:29.000 And we have no idea what percentage of their overall revenues come from the government.
00:34:34.000 That's never been disclosed.
00:34:35.000 I suspect undue influence and strong-arming from the intelligence agencies for these guys to censor because what they said initially about what they wanted to do with their companies is not what they're doing now.
00:34:46.000 And they pulled a 180.
00:34:48.000 They promised us it was going to democratize the internet.
00:34:51.000 And now they've become the primary instrumentality of control, of authoritarian and totalitarian control.
00:34:58.000 Correct.
00:34:59.000 So, no, I'm in full agreement with you.
00:35:01.000 I think we see eye to eye on many things.
00:35:04.000 Ed, thank you very much for speaking out for your courage and for your independence and for your continual exercise of critical thought.
00:35:15.000 Thank you so much for having me.
00:35:16.000 I appreciate being here.
00:35:17.000 And thank you so much for all your efforts that you have done over the years.
00:35:21.000 I mean, I applaud you.
00:35:23.000 And, you know, you are an early tip of the spear.
00:35:25.000 So thank you.
00:35:26.000 Thanks, Ed.