Dr. Merrill Nask is a physician who practices in Maine, although the Maine Medical Board has been trying to take her license away from her. She is also one of the leading bioweapon research experts. She has testified repeatedly before Congress on the anthrax attacks, and discovered key issues about the attacks. In this episode, Dr. Nask tells us about her work on the case, and about WHO, and how they have been involved in the cover-up of the crimes. She also talks about the drug overdose trials, and the role of Sir Jeremy Farrar, the Director of Science at WHO, in helping fund them. She also explains why the government should be worried about WHO declaring pandemics, when we know that they have a long history of declaring fake Pandemics. And we learn that Sir Jeremy was instrumental in funding the hydroxychloroquine overdose trial, which led to the discovery that hydrochlorine was effective against the deadly anthrax virus. We also learn that the government has no authority to approve new drugs that are effective against a disease that has been shown to be effective against hydrochloridin. This episode is sponsored by the pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly and Co., and is a must-listen episode for anyone who wants to know what it means to be safe in the 21st century, especially when it comes to protecting the public health system from a fake pandemic. It's a must listen! The podcast is produced by Alex Blumberg, an expert on pandemic epidemiology and public relations consultant, and it's a great resource, so you won't want to miss it. If you're interested in learning more about pandemic vaccines, then you'll want to check it out the next episode of The Dark Side of Pandemic Pandemic, by listening to it on our podcast, The Pandemic: Pandemic? and more, you'll get a copy of the podcast on the show on the podcast, right here on the PodCast, and much more, including the book that's all that's going to help you decide that's not going to be much better than that, right there on the other place on the place you should listen to it, it's it's not on it's own podcast, and more of it, right in the place, right down to it's podcasting it's all right, right out there, right on the whole thing, right at it's online, and all that is it's got it all right in your guide to it all is that's it, and so much more.
00:00:00.000Hey everybody, welcome back to the podcast.
00:00:03.000We have one of our perennial guests here and one of my favorite people in the world, Dr.
00:00:08.000Merrill Nask, who is a physician, a general practitioner who practices in Maine, although the Maine Medical Board has been trying to take her license and she's been making fools of them in her court case, which is really, by the way, one of the most enjoyable reads that I've had in years, the transcripts of that court case and the You know, just the humiliating situation these so-called experts have gotten themselves into.
00:00:36.000Meryl's also one of the leading bioweapons research experts.
00:00:41.000She's testified repeatedly before Congress, I think, like six occasions.
00:00:46.000She was one of the lead investigators who discovered key issues about the anthrax attacks and researchers on the anthrax attacks back in 2001.
00:00:57.000And of course, we know that anthrax, which originally was blamed on Saddam Hussein, and it ended up coming from federal bioweapons facilities, probably the Fort Detrick.
00:01:10.000The FBI found that it came from Fort Detrick, which is the Joint Army and CIA bioweapons facility in Maryland.
00:01:21.000The FBI never solved the case, never was able to show where it came from, and their theory of the case got criticized.
00:01:31.000They accused Bruce Ivins, who was a scientist in that lab, and then he allegedly committed suicide, and then they just dropped the case.
00:01:41.000They dropped the case, and the GAO wrote a report, and the National Academy of Sciences issued a report afterwards that criticized the FBI's theory of the case.
00:01:52.000So they dropped it because they didn't have to take it to court, but they still claimed in their Amerithrax report that Ivins had been the guilty party.
00:02:36.000And I think one of the lead investigators, the director of the lab for the FBI, I'm trying to remember his name, because he was on Fauci's NSABB. He was on his internal board that approved gain-of-function research, and then he ended up playing some key roles in the pandemic.
00:02:58.000There was a David Huxall, but that was before that, who was the commander at Fort Dietrich in 1991.
00:03:09.000So, and Meryl, I wanted you to be on the show today for a couple of reasons.
00:03:14.000First of all, I'd like to just get, you know, a lot of people are...
00:03:18.000Worried about the WHO initiatives that would put WHO in charge of pandemic response globally, that they would actually be able to impinge on U.S. sovereignty and on the management of our public health system once they declare a pandemic, and it would be up to them to declare the pandemic.
00:03:38.000And of course, we know that the Director of Science at WHO is Jeremy Farrar, now Sir Jeremy, who should be in a lot of trouble because his emails reveal that he was masterminding the cover-up of the COVID Lab League with Dr.
00:03:57.000And he was the scientist who fabricated the 2006 bird flu pandemic.
00:04:04.000Which, of course, never happened, but the pharmaceutical industry made, I think, $20 billion on a vaccine that, of course, didn't work, and there was no pandemic.
00:04:16.000But anyway, so tell us what's happening with the WHO right now.
00:04:20.000I'm just saying that because we don't really want that guy, Sir Jeremy, declaring pandemics when we know that he has a long record of declaring fake pandemics.
00:04:30.000Yes, and I'll just say about Sir Jeremy Farrar, that he was instrumental in the overdose trials of hydroxychloroquine.
00:04:40.000So he funded them, the WHO one, he was at the top of the heap deciding on those trials.
00:04:46.000And in the UK, he also helped fund that overdose trial.
00:04:51.000So our listeners understand that at the beginning of the pandemic, it was a desperate need to discredit therapeutic drugs that were effective against COVID, and particularly hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
00:05:08.000And because the U.S. law said that they could not give an emergency use authorization, the federal government cannot give an emergency use authorization to any vaccine if there is an existing drug that has been approved for any purposes that is shown effective against the target disease.
00:05:27.000Very early on, they knew that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were both devastatingly effective against COVID. And they ramped up this crusade to discredit them as horse warmer, warmer, etc., so that they could come back with a report that said that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, two of them, are the safest, most heavily utilized drugs in the history of the world.
00:06:06.000And so he and others are trying to drum up and successfully fears about avian flu, bird flu again.
00:06:15.000And now they are culling mink and some other mammals in Finland, I believe.
00:06:21.000But in the U.S., bird flu is widespread in the wild bird population.
00:06:28.000And USDA is requiring farmers to test for it.
00:06:32.000And if they find it, their whole flock has to be culled.
00:06:35.000So there have been something like 60 to 100 million chickens killed in the United States in a year because of this.
00:06:42.000But the avian flu mutated, so it's no longer dangerous to people.
00:06:47.000Most people don't have any symptoms when they get it.
00:06:50.000They got one person in England who had fatigue for four days.
00:06:53.000And on the basis of that, they're culling 100 million chickens and have got a bird flu vaccine for humans now, as well as developing bird flu vaccines for chickens.
00:08:18.000There's a whole series of these flus that they fabricated in the lead-up to COVID, and they finally got it right, and they got everybody convinced.
00:08:30.000But they also were funding gain-of-function studies in Wuhan to make sure that we would have a pandemic at some point.
00:08:39.000Right, and other places as well, including the United States.
00:08:43.000Okay, so what's going on with the WHO and the UN is that the claim is that we did such a terrible job on COVID that it turned into a catastrophe, and if only the nations had worked together and cooperated and shared their vaccines, everything would have been fine.
00:08:59.000So therefore, we need to have a pandemic treaty, which has never been developed before.
00:09:04.000And the pandemic treaty is not even going to require a declaration of a pandemic.
00:09:08.000It's going to be in effect all the time.
00:09:10.000And it incentivizes gain-of-function research, encourages all the nations to perform it, directs all the nations to go out and collect potential pandemic pathogens to be swabbing animals, humans, And wastewater.
00:09:26.000And when they find them, they are directed to share them globally.
00:09:30.000As Del Bigtry said, this is open source biological weapons.
00:09:51.000Maybe they aren't planning to put that in the final version of the treaty, but it's in the current version, which was written by the bureau, the WHO bureau staff.
00:10:01.000And this latest version was submitted on June 2nd.
00:10:05.000The international health regulations are something that was pre-existing, but the United States suggested amending them a couple of years ago.
00:10:14.000And so now all nations have been asked to submit potential new amendments to this existing treaty.
00:10:23.000And so these amendments do call for a declaration by the Director General of WHO. At the moment, there are no standards by which he would make a declaration of a pandemic, but he can also declare a potential pandemic.
00:10:40.000And the provisions of the international health regulations could be enforced before, during, and after a pandemic.
00:10:50.000Well, according to the IHRs, he could tell nations what drugs they must use and what drugs they won't be allowed to use during one of these declared pandemics.
00:11:01.000He can instruct a nation to manufacture a drug or vaccine for another country.
00:11:07.000And direct it to be sent there, or other materiel that are necessary.
00:11:11.000There is also a concept of One Health, which is something that started out as a benign idea that certain illnesses transmit between humans and animals, and therefore veterinarians and doctors should work together on those illnesses.
00:11:26.000But it was co-opted, it was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation starting in 2009, and Subsequently, the whole concept, even though very poorly defined, so nobody really knows what it is, but animals, plants, waterways, and ecosystems have been added to humans and animals so that everything in the world is now within the purview of One Health.
00:11:52.000The National Defense Authorization Act that is law now in the United States, passed last December, includes instructions for the U.S. government to obey.
00:12:02.000So there's a 17 or 18-page section within this omnibus bill on international pandemic preparedness and response.
00:12:11.000So it directs the U.S. government to basically follow the WHO and GAVI, And the global biosecurity agenda and to use the One Health approach, whatever it is, with problem solving and to embed this One Health approach and pandemic planning into the fabric of government.
00:12:34.000So these issues are now the issue of how you're being directed to respond to a pandemic is being embedded in the I've taken that to mean that they are...
00:13:04.000Trying to use public health as the means to gain sovereignty over anything that these agencies or governments claim is health-related.
00:13:20.000If they really were concerned with zoonotic pandemics, in other words, pandemics that jump from animals to humans, the first thing that they would do is shut down the wet markets globally, which is a minor economic molecule compared to what they did to us, you know, three years ago.
00:13:40.000And they would shut down all factory farming.
00:13:43.000Because the place that is absolutely the most dangerous place on Earth, if you're worried about pandemics, are factory farms where they're using sub-therapeutic antibiotics.
00:13:56.000And they're grounding these animals into these tiny, tiny spaces.
00:14:00.000They're food animals that are being shipped all over the world.
00:14:02.000And they're dosing them with just enough antibiotics to make them gain weight.
00:14:07.000What they found is if you dose an animal with antibiotics, it kills something in their gut biome, which makes them gain weight.
00:14:15.000But it's also a formula for developing antibiotics.
00:14:56.000And it could have been cured today because they didn't have antibiotics, right?
00:15:00.000But it could have been cured overnight.
00:15:03.000And so this idea that bacteria or that viruses are constantly jumping to human beings from the wild and causing pandemics is a myth that is utterly unsupported by history.
00:15:14.000And in fact, the number one guy in gain-of-function study Ralph Baric from the University of North Carolina.
00:15:21.000He's the guy, almost certainly, who is responsible for COVID-19, for the pandemic.
00:15:27.000If you had to show one guy who's probably responsible for it, it's Ralph Baric.
00:15:32.000You know, when they start suing people, his name is going to be at the top.
00:15:35.000With Fauci, Baric, Xi Xingwei, and a couple of others.
00:15:39.000And I guarantee you they are going to be named in a lawsuit for causing this pandemic.
00:15:45.000Ralph Baric wrote a paper Again, in 2008, in which he was trying to convince people to start investing in a new class of bioweapons using synthetic biology and some of his CRISPR technologies and his genomic engineering techniques.
00:16:05.000And what he says in that is really interesting because he says in the preface that it's very, very hard to develop new bioweapons from existing creatures.
00:16:16.000Because, number one, because the mutations that actually allow them to jump to humans are so rare in the wild and, you know, at the interface between where human beings are interacting with wilderness, with monkeys, etc.
00:16:32.000And that when they do jump, they quickly mutate into a benign form.
00:16:42.000And they don't, you know, they don't want to kill people because if you kill your host, you're killing yourself.
00:16:48.000You know, the ones that are most successful are the ones that don't even make you sick.
00:16:52.000So you're still out socializing and having sex and hugging people and doing all the feeling great and getting around.
00:17:00.000Those are the ones, those are the viruses, mutations that are going to, in a normal situation, dominate, quickly dominate the ecosystem.
00:17:09.000What he also says is there are so many good therapeutic drugs out there right now that even if a pandemic did develop out of zoonosis, you could quickly treat it with therapeutic drugs.
00:17:21.000And he said, that's why it's so important we start using synthetic biology.
00:17:26.000We'll never get a good bioweapon out of the wild.
00:17:31.000I mean, he literally says in that article, luckily, luckily, because it'll never happen naturally, but luckily...
00:17:38.000We now have these new synthetic biology techniques that allow us to get way ahead of nature and do things that nature would never produce.
00:17:48.000You know, it's a very interesting article.
00:17:50.000Nobody ever talks about it now, but it's, you know, it's in my new Wuhan book, which you've read.
00:17:56.000And it's interesting, because clearly they're not really worried about pandemics jumping for the wild.
00:18:01.000The place, you look at all, you know, most of the modern pandemics, including Ebola and HIV and Lyme disease and all of these others.
00:18:11.000And, you know, there are very, very strong arguments for each one of them for lab origins.
00:18:18.000We don't know, you know, this idea that even those epidemics came from the wild.
00:18:23.000We know there's not, you know, an RSV, which is now epidemic.
00:18:29.000RSV came from a lab in Maryland, and that's very, very well documented, where they had, you know, they brought monkeys in to do vaccine experiments.
00:18:37.000The monkeys got RSV. They put the RSV monkeys with the other monkeys that didn't have it and it spread.
00:18:44.000And then they put a lab worker in to see if it could jump the humans.
00:19:14.000All the flus, all the influenza pandemics come from farmed chickens or pigs and not from wild ones.
00:19:22.000So the whole concept, the whole idea that this pandemic planning and preparedness is built on is that we have to avoid spillover from wild animals.
00:19:34.000But hundreds of billions of dollars have gone into supporting it and paying most of the virologists in the world.
00:19:42.000And so they're not going to open their mouths and say this doesn't make any sense because they won't be funded.
00:19:50.000I want to say that in the 1918 flu, we don't know for certain what happened because we can't necessarily believe what Fauci says.
00:19:57.000But Fauci did say that, that the people were dying from bacterial secondary pneumonias after they had a viral illness.
00:20:05.000And he and Jeffrey Taubenberger, who is basically, you know, one of his top people at NIAID, wrote that.
00:20:13.000And Taubenberger studied influenza for a very long time, but is equally as crafty, perhaps, as Fauci.
00:20:23.000Anyway, I hesitate to even say this, but I read an article recently that also traced the ideology of that pandemic to a military base, a vaccine experiment in a military base in Kansas.
00:20:40.000Over the years, that story has come up, too, that it was actually due to vaccines that were being used during World War I. But I think the problem is you get somebody like Fauci and they can fund so much fake science that like he's done for HIV and for COVID, you just don't know what's up because you've got all these conflicting stories and you don't know exactly what he paid for.
00:22:05.000I don't know why he knew that then, but he saw that coming.
00:22:10.000I have to look up who wrote that speech and what went into it, because somebody was really smart who predicted that.
00:22:18.000Let's talk, you know, you had some other issues that you've been writing about recently that have been really interesting.
00:22:25.000You know, one of those, you've been writing a little bit about the COVID vaccine.
00:22:30.000Nobody really wants to talk a lot about that anymore.
00:22:33.000But, you know, some of your recent stuff is really interesting.
00:22:37.000So, as far as the COVID vaccine goes, the FDA just licensed a new version of COVID vaccine, and CDC rolled it out, approved it on Tuesday.
00:22:49.000So, it's licensed for adults and kids age 12 and up, and EUA for children younger than that.
00:22:57.000FDA had no business licensing it because it's a new product, but what they did was treat it like the flu shot.
00:23:04.000They grandfathered it in and made it for adults, you know, and those over 12, made it basically an amendment to the prior community license, the one that you and I wrote about that was never made available in the United States.
00:23:18.000Well, let me just explain to people who are not experts in this area what you mean.
00:23:23.000Normally, when you have a new product, it has to go through testing.
00:23:27.000It has to go through, I mean, normally, most new medical products would have to go through years of pre-licensure, placebo-controlled trials that looked at all health outcomes.
00:23:39.000In other words, they looked at who took the product and what their health condition Total health condition, autoimmune disease, neurological diseases, immunity to the target disease, et cetera, after a five-year period, and then do an assessment on that that assures that the people who take this drug are going to be healthier five years from now in all ways.
00:24:01.000That's what they're supposed to be doing.
00:24:03.000But with the flu vaccines, flu vaccines basically created this precedent where they licensed the first one, I got licensed after at least some process, but all subsequent ones, which are new products, are absolutely new vaccines that often have new ingredients in them and new, you know, everything's new.
00:24:30.000But as long as you call a flu vaccine, it never has to be tested again.
00:24:34.000And so nobody has any clue whether they're efficacious, nobody has any clue whether they're safe at all, whether they save lives, we don't know.
00:24:43.000And in fact, the Coffin Collaboration The ultimate arbiter of pharmaceutical clinical trials has said, yeah, there's no reduction in deaths from any of the flu vaccines.
00:25:03.000And in fact, there are a series of studies, many, many studies that show if you take a flu vaccine, you're much more likely to get a non-flu infection than if you didn't take the vaccine.
00:25:16.000So the vaccine may protect you against that one variant, but you're more likely to get sick from other stuff because you've wrecked your immune system.
00:25:27.000And so, you know, and anybody who wants to read the, you know, kind of a summary of all the flu data, you go to the internet and look up Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
00:25:37.000letter to Sanjay Gupta, because I got angry one day and I went and did all the research on flu vaccine.
00:25:54.000This method of sort of authorizing or approving a vaccine without data was only something that they were allowed to do for flu shots, but now the FDA has taken it upon itself to do that for COVID vaccines.
00:26:12.000And they are using data derived from the EU aid system.
00:26:18.000COVID vaccines, because of course in the United States we didn't have any licensed COVID vaccines.
00:26:24.000This time we're supposed to get a licensed product because they're actually putting a price tag on it.
00:26:28.000So it's between $120 and $130 a dose, depending whether you get the Pfizer-Moderna or the Novavax.
00:26:35.000And Novavax hasn't yet been licensed, but the other two were.
00:26:38.000But The government doesn't want any American to be left behind.
00:26:42.000They want everyone over six months to get this shot.
00:26:45.000So if insurance doesn't pay for it, the government is going to find a way.
00:26:49.000So they have a bridging program so they'll manage to get you a free shot if you can't get it paid.
00:26:54.000Fortunately, for the last shot that didn't work, called the bivalent booster, only 17% of Americans, one in six, only one in six people took it.
00:27:04.000And this one nobody should take because there's no data at all.
00:27:09.000So for one manufacturer, they took some blood out of 50 people that they had given an injection to and said, well, antibodies were produced, you know, call it good.
00:27:19.000For the other two, I think one used mice and one used monkeys.
00:27:22.000There is no safety or efficacy data really in humans on this new third version of the COVID vaccine.
00:27:42.000There's plenty of evidence that people were continuing to produce the toxic spike protein six months, some people, six months after they were injected.
00:27:54.000I read that study, I think, who came out a couple of weeks ago, and said, yeah, they're finding the spike protein, so it's clearly being remanufactured by the cells.
00:28:07.000You've taught your cells to manufacture something that is poisoning you and is causing all kinds of, and probably autoimmune diseases, etc., because you're constantly overstimulating your immune system.
00:28:22.000The vaccine is intended to permanently alter your immune system.
00:28:28.000So it's not a surprise that it does that.
00:28:30.000But this is terrifying because they said, first of all, they said it's going to stay in your arm.
00:28:36.000It's not going to move around your body.
00:28:38.000But now we know it goes into all of your organs.
00:28:41.000With women, it goes directly to the ovary and it concentrates there.
00:28:47.000You're putting toxic substances in your body.
00:28:51.000And now it appears that you're actually teaching your cells to manufacture that toxic substance, and they may not know how to stop.
00:28:59.000And a recent other issue arose, which might explain why so many people are sick after these shots, and that is the presence of DNA plasmids, which Initially were thought to be in the vaccine because of a cheap manufacturing process that didn't get rid of them.
00:29:18.000So the DNA plasmids from E. coli are used to manufacture the RNA in the vaccines.
00:29:24.000And the vaccines appear to be contaminated with at least 10 times more than should be residual in the vaccine.
00:29:31.000But then it also turned out that there are two proteins in the vaccine that were not disclosed on any labels, at least in the Pfizer vaccine, that come from the SV40 virus, simian virus 40, which is associated in some studies with several cancers.
00:29:49.000And, you know, came from it contaminated polio vaccines.
00:29:54.000So 100 million Americans apparently got SV40 from polio vaccines, myself being one.
00:30:07.000SV40, meaning simian virus 40, it's a virus that came out of the monkeys.
00:30:13.000It was a virus that was in the substrate of monkey flesh and kidneys that they used to cultivate the vaccine.
00:30:23.000So they were cultivating the polio vaccines on a substrate on petri dishes that were made up of masticated monkey kidneys from green monkeys.
00:30:33.000And they started finding, this is before they knew how to find viruses, and they started finding viruses that were indigenous monkeys, and people were worried, well, what will happen when you inject these into people?
00:30:46.000Because, you know, they've never been exposed.
00:32:13.000Not the whole virus, but two proteins, but they're important proteins.
00:32:18.000These are proteins that, in conjunction with the DNA, double-stranded DNA that is in the plasmids, work to allow that DNA to get into the nucleus of your cells, where it can then Yeah, We worried before, well, maybe the RNA could be reverse transcribed into DNA and maybe that would get into the nucleus.
00:32:44.000But now we find that we're actually being injected with double-stranded DNA already with the keys that open the door to the nucleus.
00:32:52.000So it appears that, again, this was Pfizer vaccines.
00:32:57.000It appears that there is a much higher chance of mutation from the COVID shots, or at least the COVID shots that have been studied.
00:33:07.000Any other bad news or good news, Meryl?
00:33:11.000The UN is having a meeting on pandemic preparedness next Wednesday, and they have issued a 13-page Booklet that they are using a silence procedure on, which means, you know, speak now, speak before the meeting or forever, hold your peace.
00:34:02.000They do demand that nations have to obey, basically.
00:34:06.000Nations will be accountable for following the pandemic program that is being rolled out by these international agencies.
00:34:16.000They demand that misinformation and disinformation be censored, which requires, of course, the nations to perform surveillance of their citizens' social media.
00:34:27.000They demand the necessity of One Health.
00:34:53.000There are other UN documents that talk about the new financing that they want to roll out for the world.
00:35:01.000And believe it or not, policy brief number six that came out in May from the UN says that our current system of money is no longer fit for purpose.
00:35:12.000And so they're going to build a whole new financial architecture for us.
00:35:36.000They want very long periods of time during which these loans can be paid off.
00:35:42.000And then they demand monitoring and, as I said, accountability, which means nations have to spend this money on things that the WHO or the UN says they need to do for pandemics.
00:35:54.000There are so many problems with this idea because it will cause indebtedness of poor countries, making it much easier to sort of gain power over them, take them over or gain their resources like embassies, military bases, ports, airports, etc.
00:36:11.000But it also causes the whole health care system to be shifted into one that is constantly looking for pandemics rather than trying to provide good health care to people.
00:36:23.000And it also gets rid of privacy because if everybody's medical records go online so that we can learn more about disease, you know, privacy is ended.
00:36:33.000So that's just a few of the things that they're planning.
00:37:19.000But go ahead and tell us what people...
00:37:21.000All right, so we've got a bill in the House, H.R. 79.
00:37:25.000It's been co-sponsored by 51 Republicans, and it says get out of the WHO and defund the WHO. It takes a year to get out, but we can start by defunding them immediately.
00:37:36.000Surprisingly, the foreign assistance budget, the State Department budget, actually has zeroed out at the moment funding for the WHO. And also zeroed out funding for a $125 million program run by USAID to find pandemic pathogens around the world.
00:37:56.000So we want all our members of Congress to continue to zero out this funding.
00:38:02.000I think the plan was probably to change it at the last minute.
00:38:05.000And so you, our audience, need to tell your representative and senators No funding for finding pandemic pathogens, for none of this nonsense from the WHO and UN, and ask them to co-sponsor HR 79.
00:38:19.000Now, if the treaty, which has many names, it's called an accord, a convention, an other, and an instrument, if it does get voted on in favor by the WHO members, we want the Senate to be required to ratify it.
00:38:35.000It turns out that 80 to 90 percent of treaties are not ratified by the Senate.
00:38:40.000They're simply signed off on by the administration.
00:38:43.000We don't want that to happen with these two treaties.
00:38:46.000The IHR amendments basically are also a treaty, but because they're amendments, they're not being treated like a treaty.
00:38:53.000WHO does not want those to go through a formal ratification process, but we want that to happen as well.
00:38:59.000So there is a bill in the House and a bill in the Senate, I've forgotten their numbers, that demands that the treaty go through Senate ratification process.
00:39:10.000And start looking around at what is happening around you and see, for example, the regulatory system for approval of drugs and vaccines is being dismantled.
00:39:22.000So a bill is being put forth in the European Parliament to reduce regulation there.
00:39:32.000We don't have a bill doing that, but what we see is the FDA is doing that in front of our eyes, as is the CDC. We don't want to be subjected to drugs and vaccines that have not been properly tested or that have been fake tested, like the COVID vaccines, where they've lied to us about the tests.
00:39:50.000They've conducted a Potemkin village of tests.
00:39:55.000So we need to tell that to our Congress members.
00:39:59.000And we all have to be responsible for our own health now because we can't trust the products that the federal agencies or the worldwide medical agencies, public health agencies, are putting in front of us.
00:40:12.000So we have to be very careful and use only products we can trust, if at all possible.
00:40:18.000And we need to get back real medicine again.
00:40:21.000Oh, Meryl, I wish everybody in our country had a physician like you and, you know, we'd be a much healthier nation today and we wouldn't be spending $4.3 trillion on healthcare.