RFK Jr. The Defender - March 24, 2021


Treating Coronavirus with Dr. Peter McCullough


Episode Stats

Length

47 minutes

Words per Minute

158.55505

Word Count

7,608

Sentence Count

534

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

1


Summary

Dr. Peter McCulloch is the most published person in his field in the history of medicine, and he s been on the front line of dealing with the COVID epidemic, a battle that has been left in the hands of independent physicians to try to find therapeutic treatments, off-the-shelf treatments, something that is not part of the pharmaceutical paradigm: non- expired patent medicines. And we ve seen this strange conflict really where many of those treatments that could save lives, instead of being promoted and investigated, by the health authorities, are instead being sabotaged and made inaccessible. Why is this happening? And why is that happening? In this episode, Dr. McCulloch talks about how he and his team at Texas A&M University managed to stop the spread of COVID, one of the most lethal viruses in history, from spreading across the globe and killing millions of people in the process. This episode is brought to you by Medical Mysteries, a podcast produced by Johns Hopkins University and the Johns Hopkins Center for Infectious Disease Research and Treatment, and edited by Cardiology and Cardiology, a unit of the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery. Copyright 2019. All rights reserved. This episode was produced for noncommercial use, including use of music and soundtracks. This podcast was used with permission from the composer, John Kennedy. John Kennedy and the original music used in this episode is available under a CC BY-SA license. If you like what you hear, please leave us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts. or wherever else you get your music is available, we'll be listening to this podcast on the next episode of Medical Mysteries. Please be kind enough to send us your feedback and we'll get a copy of the music on the podcast in the next week's next issue of the podcast. Thank you! -- Thank you. -- A big thank you to Dr. John Kennedy for the music we produced by John Kennedy, and the music used on this episode by Dr. Kennedy's new album "A Good Morning America" is available on SoundCloud: Good Morning, Good Life, Goodbye, Goodbye, Goodbye Goodbye, My Dear Mr. Good Death, Good Luck, My Name is Goodbye. -- Thank You, My Love, Mr. -- This is Yours Truly. -- John Kennedy -- This Is My Music is by Joseph McDade by Suneaters, Inc., Inc., Mr. John Rocha


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Let me introduce you first, Dr.
00:00:01.000 McCulloch.
00:00:02.000 Dr.
00:00:02.000 Peter McCulloch is an intern, he's a cardiologist, he's a professor of medicine At Texas A&M University.
00:00:10.000 He's an extraordinary academic physician, as well as a practicing physician.
00:00:15.000 He is the editor of two major journals.
00:00:18.000 It's a privilege to be able to say this about a guest, that he is the most published person in his field, which deals with heart and kidneys in the history of the world.
00:00:29.000 Let's make that clear.
00:00:31.000 And he's been on the front line of Dealing with the COVID epidemic of really in this battle that we've seen that has been left in the hands of independent physicians to try to find therapeutic treatments, off-the-shelf treatments, something that is not part of the pharmaceutical paradigm that are kind of non or expired patent medicines.
00:00:59.000 And we've seen this very strange Conflict really where it appears to many people who are standing on the sidelines like me that many of those treatments that could save lives instead of being promoted and investigated and studied by the health authorities are instead being sabotaged and made They're
00:01:29.000 inaccessible.
00:01:30.000 And Dr.
00:01:32.000 McCulloch has been part of a couple of different groups of physicians who have systematically gone out on the beginning of the pandemic and said, you know, we know these medicines.
00:01:43.000 We've been using them for many years.
00:01:46.000 Which ones make sense to treat these patients on?
00:01:49.000 And then looking at the literature all over the world and saying, why is it that We have Cuba, which was one of the first places that was infected and had a very, very high level of infection rate, but they have a death rate that was around 14 per 10,000 people, whereas the U.S. has 1,500 people.
00:02:18.000 And should we be applauding Tony Fauci and saying that that is a success story that we have among, I think, the two highest death rates in the world?
00:02:28.000 And why is that happening?
00:02:29.000 So I want to welcome you to the show.
00:02:32.000 You're not only a brilliant physician, but you're a very, very courageous man, because in your profession, it is lethal in some ways professionally.
00:02:41.000 It is a question that the paradigms are the kind of questions you've been asking about.
00:02:50.000 Why is that not happening?
00:02:52.000 Will you talk a little bit about your experience?
00:02:56.000 Well, thank you so much, Mr.
00:02:58.000 Kennedy, for having me on the show.
00:02:59.000 And these are my own opinions and not necessarily opinions of any organization or affiliation.
00:03:06.000 I'm an academic internist and cardiologist.
00:03:09.000 And when I saw this pandemic coming our way, I saw it as our medical Super Bowl.
00:03:14.000 There are no courses we took in medical school on pandemic response.
00:03:18.000 There was no training.
00:03:20.000 And this just absolutely hit us like a sledgehammer.
00:03:25.000 I felt morally and medically and ethically compelled to do everything I could to help patients.
00:03:32.000 This virus was causing death and hospitalization and extraordinary rates.
00:03:40.000 I really turned all my academic efforts towards COVID-19 in March and April.
00:03:47.000 I organized a team.
00:03:49.000 We were communicating with the Italians very closely on this.
00:03:52.000 They were absolutely getting killed in Milan and in the surrounding areas about what could we do to stop these hospitalizations and death.
00:04:01.000 And as we learn more about the virus, we learn that the virus replicates very quickly early on It causes what's called cytokine storm or the immune system to go crazy within about a week or two.
00:04:13.000 And then the final death sequence actually has to do with blood clotting.
00:04:17.000 When people die in the end, there's blood clots in the lungs, there's fatal strokes, fatal heart attacks, blood clots in the major blood vessels.
00:04:23.000 And so those three phases of the illness...
00:04:27.000 We made it very clear to us that a single drug was not going to work.
00:04:31.000 So anybody who came out there and said, aha, this drug works or doesn't do that, was a fool's errand.
00:04:37.000 That it was going to be a multi-drug approach, just like it is with HIV and hepatitis C. So we weren't surprised by this.
00:04:44.000 We organized it.
00:04:46.000 Yeah, we organized our findings and submitted it to the American Journal of Medicine in July 1st.
00:04:54.000 And at that time, there were 55,000 papers in the peer-reviewed literature.
00:04:59.000 Not a single one taught doctors How to treat COVID-19 to avoid hospitalization and death.
00:05:06.000 And so when that paper was published in the August 7th issue of the American Journal of Medicine, it was far and away the most widely quoted, cited, downloaded paper.
00:05:15.000 Still is the most widely downloaded paper.
00:05:17.000 And we fill the void.
00:05:19.000 Because the National Institutes of Health didn't have guidelines yet, the Infectious Disease Society of America didn't address how to treat outpatients, and the World Health Organization was missing that piece.
00:05:30.000 When the monoclonal antibodies came out, we had data on ivermectin, we had terrific data with colchicine, we updated the protocol, and we published that in the December issue of Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine in a dedicated issue.
00:05:43.000 Again, these are cited by the National Library of Medicine.
00:05:45.000 And that paper is now the most widely downloaded paper from that journal.
00:05:50.000 So in my view, we've played a role in filling the void.
00:05:54.000 Our approach has become the basis for the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons Patient Guide.
00:05:59.000 We testified on this in the Senate November 19th.
00:06:03.000 Then a follow-up testimony by others December 8th on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
00:06:10.000 There was a big push for early treatment in the fourth quarter of 2020.
00:06:14.000 And towards the end of December, early January, before the very first patient was vaccinated, we started to see dramatic drops in hospitalization, new cases, and death altogether.
00:06:24.000 It's the first time we saw that in the pandemic.
00:06:25.000 And so we know the message of early treatment came in.
00:06:28.000 It came in late.
00:06:30.000 We had two studies, one from Vladimir Zelenko, who I give tremendous credit for in New York, addressing the Orthodox Jewish community in the spring, and then one from Brian Proctor, which is now fully accepted in a peer-reviewed journal, From McKinney, Texas, both studies show that multi-drug early outpatient treatment for COVID-19 reduces hospitalization and death by 85%.
00:06:53.000 First of all, what kind of resistance do you get from the medical establishment in terms of publishing this?
00:07:05.000 I'm impressed that the Journal of JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, published it all.
00:07:11.000 Because they have so much pressure from the pharmaceutical advertisers.
00:07:17.000 What kind of pressure did you get from the medical establishment?
00:07:21.000 And why do you think that NIH is not doing these kind of studies?
00:07:28.000 Isn't that the first thing that should have happened?
00:07:32.000 Doctors have been brought together and said, what is the treatment for this?
00:07:37.000 How do we prevent deaths?
00:07:39.000 How do we treat this very early on?
00:07:43.000 Well, I think the first step would have been to recognize there's two bad outcomes, hospitalization and death.
00:07:50.000 The next step would have been a courageous statement.
00:07:54.000 And the courageous statement would have had to come from a leader.
00:07:57.000 Let's say a president or a senator or a governor.
00:08:02.000 And that statement would be as follows.
00:08:05.000 COVID-19 is a terrible problem.
00:08:08.000 These hospitalizations and deaths must be stopped.
00:08:11.000 I'm going to put together a panel of expert doctors who are learning and have experience in treating COVID patients and And we're going to get the best and brightest together and we're going to stop these hospitalizations and death.
00:08:25.000 And Mr.
00:08:26.000 Kennedy, what I can tell you is not a single leader had the courage anywhere in the world.
00:08:33.000 And it may not, maybe courage, maybe insight, maybe intellect, maybe perception, whatever it was, they didn't have the stuff.
00:08:41.000 To say that courageous statement.
00:08:44.000 I said that statement professionally in April, May.
00:08:47.000 I put together the team in June and July, and then I did it.
00:08:51.000 And the point I'm making is skill and the ability to synthesize, encourage.
00:08:58.000 Those are rare commodities.
00:08:59.000 We didn't see it in a single leader, not a single one.
00:09:03.000 What is your relationship with Dr.
00:09:05.000 B or Corey?
00:09:06.000 Because he made a lot of these same points in his testimony for this, and I think that was November.
00:09:13.000 Well, Dr.
00:09:14.000 Corey, Dr.
00:09:15.000 Merrick, and others, I give them tremendous credit.
00:09:18.000 And it's not uncommon in medicine that when people get the right ideas and right concepts, They work separately for quite some time.
00:09:27.000 And I was working purely from the outpatient perspective on the problem, and he was working purely from the inpatient perspective.
00:09:36.000 And so when Dr.
00:09:38.000 Corey and I, we kind of came together around the time of the Senate hearings.
00:09:43.000 In fact, I strongly supported him for the second set of Senate hearings.
00:09:46.000 Senator Johnson wanted me to come back again, and I said, no.
00:09:49.000 I said, get a whole new set of experts.
00:09:51.000 Let America hear from the critical care doctors like Dr.
00:09:55.000 Corey Merrick, Dr.
00:09:56.000 Rashter in Florida.
00:09:57.000 Let them hear about their experiences using ivermectin, steroids, blood thinners, and other drugs, and what they've come up with.
00:10:05.000 I wanted America to hear two separate sets of opinions, two separate sets of doctors coalescing on the same idea that we can prevent hospitalizations and death.
00:10:17.000 Is there any country in the world that did this right?
00:10:22.000 I give a lot of credit to countries that just early on did smart things.
00:10:29.000 So for instance, there is a Japanese drug called Favipiravir.
00:10:34.000 It inhibits the RNA-dependent polymerase of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
00:10:41.000 It's been used for years in Japan for influenza.
00:10:45.000 It has a mechanism similar to that of remdesivir.
00:10:48.000 What did Russia do?
00:10:49.000 What did India, Pakistan, other countries?
00:10:52.000 They right away onboarded favipiravir.
00:10:55.000 It was like Tamiflu, but except for COVID-19.
00:10:59.000 I give them a lot of credit for doing that.
00:11:01.000 India, early on, back in March, said hydroxychloroquine.
00:11:05.000 We use it for malaria.
00:11:07.000 We use it for rheumatoid arthritis.
00:11:08.000 It has a mild antiviral activity.
00:11:11.000 Let's use it for prophylaxis.
00:11:13.000 India ultimately front-lined hydroxychloroquine as their basic treatment and prevention approach.
00:11:18.000 So did Italy initially.
00:11:20.000 Italy did this.
00:11:21.000 They reversed their approach midway, realized their mistake, went back to hydroxychloroquine front-line.
00:11:27.000 Greece had hydroxychloroquine front-line.
00:11:31.000 Ivermectin came on later with the research, but right now, if you go to Mexico City, it's Ivermectin frontline.
00:11:38.000 There are about 30 countries now that have treatment kits where they combine either hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin plus an intracellular antibiotic, azithromycin, doxycycline, and then steroids, aspirin, as a combination of We tabulate those in our December 2020 paper.
00:11:57.000 And so they're treating COVID-19 high-risk patients over 50 with medical problems with some drugs to ease them through the illness.
00:12:04.000 Now, this isn't a curative process.
00:12:06.000 We don't cure the infection, but we get patients through the infection and avoid hospitalization and death.
00:12:12.000 The disappointing thing I'm sitting here in Texas, two hours south of me by plane in South America, they're handing out treatment kits, but the average person in Texas thinks there's no treatment for COVID-19.
00:12:24.000 They get handed a test result.
00:12:26.000 They're given no treatment.
00:12:27.000 They're given no information.
00:12:30.000 No access to research.
00:12:32.000 No hotline.
00:12:33.000 They're given no follow-up.
00:12:34.000 They're told to go home, wait until they can't breathe, and then go into the hospital, become hospitalized.
00:12:40.000 Many patients never see their loved ones again.
00:12:42.000 This is an absolutely horrifying experience.
00:12:46.000 And two hours south of us, they would get a treatment kit from the government and they'd be eased through the illness.
00:12:51.000 So what I'm saying is we have an incredible chasm that of ideas and approaches all over the world right now.
00:12:58.000 Things couldn't be more chaotic.
00:13:01.000 There's a tremendous variability in death rate, as we mentioned before, between all these other nations.
00:13:07.000 You know, what's surprising is one of the kind of the incongruities or anomalies that we see is in our country it is Black populations that are The highest mortality rates, and we can explain that maybe because of chronic vitamin D deficiencies in those populations, but in Africa, there's practically no deaths happening.
00:13:33.000 How do you explain these huge anomalies nation by nation?
00:13:39.000 Let's just take America, and what you said, Mr.
00:13:42.000 Kennedy, is correct, that African Americans and Hispanics have about double the mortality rate And, you know, the risk factors do include certainly vitamin D deficiency, obesity, diabetes, sleep apnea, heart and lung disease.
00:13:57.000 But many of these communities, they live in households, multi-generational households, so there's been...
00:14:03.000 A much greater degree of spread and probably inoculum, that is the dose of the virus received.
00:14:10.000 But they have borne the disproportionate rate of mortality.
00:14:15.000 Keep in mind, when you look at mortality rates per million population from country to country, the single greatest variable to account for is the age structure of the country.
00:14:24.000 Now, the age structure of some of these other countries you mentioned, let's say in Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, much younger.
00:14:31.000 So it's hard to compare apples to apples.
00:14:34.000 But the unique thing in Africa is there's widespread use of hydroxychloroquine.
00:14:38.000 They use it for malaria, prophylaxis anyway.
00:14:41.000 There is a widespread administration in most third-world countries of the BCG vaccine.
00:14:47.000 That's a vaccine that helps prevent tuberculosis.
00:14:50.000 But the BCG vaccine is a general vaccine that activates the immune system, and there have been analyses showing really a striking relationship to countries where there's BCG vaccination and markedly reduced number of cases and mortality of COVID-19.
00:15:06.000 People probably wonder, how come Haiti isn't wiped out and the Caribbean, Africa, some of these poorer nations, how are they kind of skating through the pandemic?
00:15:15.000 Many have thought younger age structure and the BCG vaccine may be associated factors.
00:15:20.000 How about Japan?
00:15:22.000 Because Japan has a very aging population.
00:15:25.000 How have they done?
00:15:27.000 Japan's taken an interesting approach.
00:15:29.000 Now, they feature Favipiravir as the oral antiviral, but they don't use it at home.
00:15:35.000 So they tend to hospitalize.
00:15:37.000 They have tremendous hospital capacity there.
00:15:39.000 So they start Favipiravir very early, but they hospitalize patients and observe them.
00:15:44.000 They may combine them with antibiotics, then later with steroids, but they have managed to keep their case count down and their mortality rate down, but they have very long hospital stays.
00:15:55.000 Favipiravir, like the other antiviral drugs, whether this be an antibody infusion, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, they work by speeding the clearance of the virus from the nasopharyngeal tract And also reducing the density of viral replication.
00:16:12.000 Now, they don't by any means cure the infection, but in my view, they do play an assistive role.
00:16:19.000 And what do you think, if we had done everything right in this country, what do you think the outcomes could have been if we focused on that early intervention as you've been advocating?
00:16:36.000 When I testified in the Senate on November 19th, I said that half of the deaths could have been avoided.
00:16:42.000 And the data have come in suggesting, again, hindsight being 20-20, that number is probably closer to 85%.
00:16:47.000 But what I would have done from the very beginning is I would have been much more balanced on what we call the four pillars of pandemic response.
00:16:57.000 The first pillar is contagion control, trying to reduce the spread, and we really had a major focus on this with masks and distancing, etc.
00:17:05.000 The second pillar is early treatment.
00:17:06.000 That was basically the missed opportunity.
00:17:09.000 The third pillar is hospitalized treatment.
00:17:11.000 I think we were pretty solid there and there was efforts there, but it became clear the hospital doesn't save everyone.
00:17:17.000 In fact, the majority of deaths, when they do occur, occur in the hospital.
00:17:20.000 And then the last pillar has been vaccination.
00:17:23.000 Well, what happened is the mistake was that we didn't off the bat start into multi-drug treatment.
00:17:31.000 We should have looked at this and said, you know what, this is a complicated virus.
00:17:34.000 We're not going to go single drug.
00:17:35.000 Let's get into multi-drug cocktails.
00:17:37.000 Let's test them in randomized control trials.
00:17:40.000 Let's look for signals of benefit.
00:17:43.000 Let's not look for overwhelming mortality reductions with a single drug.
00:17:47.000 It's unrealistic.
00:17:48.000 Let's look for signals of benefit, just like we do in cancer or complicated infections, and start to put together these protocols, test them one after another, and get everybody into research.
00:17:59.000 Let's have a national hotline for NIH research.
00:18:02.000 And let's get going.
00:18:03.000 What happened is the National Institutes of Health actually had one multi-drug study.
00:18:08.000 It was just hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.
00:18:11.000 And around the time it became known that the virus was going to be amenable to a vaccine, that study was dropped.
00:18:19.000 In fact, it was supposed to collect 2,000 patients.
00:18:21.000 They did 20.
00:18:22.000 And they said, we give up.
00:18:24.000 And then all efforts were focused on the vaccine.
00:18:27.000 So we made a gamble, and I published an op-ed in The Hill in the summer, and the title of the op-ed was The Great Gamble of COVID-19 Vaccine Development, which basically said, you know, we're gambling everything on the vaccine, and we're putting nothing on treatment now that's going to help sick patients right in front of us.
00:18:46.000 And it really posed the question, is it going to be worth it?
00:18:50.000 Is the ends going to justify the means?
00:18:53.000 And I can tell you, at about 550,000 deaths, I honestly don't think that the ends justify the means.
00:19:02.000 We missed the opportunity to treat the sick patient right in front of us.
00:19:05.000 You know, my mother's 93 years old, and she lives in Massachusetts.
00:19:12.000 And I talked to her doctor and said, what is the plan if she gets COVID? My whole family, of course, is terrified that she's going to get it.
00:19:22.000 And he said, well, you know, if she gets it, the chances are that she'll be okay.
00:19:27.000 But if she starts to have depleted oxygen levels or has trouble breathing, and we'll bring her to the hospital.
00:19:36.000 And I said, so there's no intervention to prevent her disease from progressing to that point.
00:19:43.000 And he said, no.
00:19:45.000 And these are, you know, some of the best doctors in the world, and this is in August.
00:19:52.000 What do you, I mean, aren't you kind of astonished by that kind of response from the medical community?
00:20:00.000 You know, the word that's been used, it's a sharp word, but it's called therapeutic nihilism, this idea that nothing can be done for patients, and it is the oddest observation.
00:20:11.000 That with all the skill and talent that we have in America, that not a single major academic institution got out there and fought the virus.
00:20:21.000 You know, where's the Harvard protocol to prevent hospitalization?
00:20:24.000 Or how about the Mayo Clinic or Johns Hopkins or Penn or any of these terrific institutions?
00:20:30.000 Not a single one actually even had a COVID clinic Not a single one actually tried to prevent a single hospitalization.
00:20:38.000 It was almost as if we were gripped in fear and that fear overtook everything.
00:20:44.000 And the only thing anybody could think of was playing defense.
00:20:47.000 Oh, let's just wait until the oxygen goes down and we'll put patients in the hospitalization.
00:20:52.000 That's kind of the innocent explanation for this is that it was just gripping fear.
00:20:56.000 For everything else, we have amazing protocols.
00:21:00.000 You know, Harvard's got protocols and clinical trials for treating heart attacks and Gallstones, and we have the University of Michigan criterion for cancers.
00:21:07.000 We seem to be great for every other disease except for COVID. And then when COVID hit, our academic institutions just went blank.
00:21:16.000 Because at that point, it was pretty clear that if you went to the hospital with this disease, that your chances of coming out if you're that age are very, very low.
00:21:27.000 And it seemed astonishing to me that You know, that that's the best, that her personal doctor who loves my mother, that's the best he would have come up with.
00:21:37.000 And, you know, why isn't this sort of occurring to individual doctors?
00:21:43.000 Why aren't they, you know, what would you expect?
00:21:46.000 Wouldn't you expect that they'd be going out into the literature and finding people like you and saying, okay, well, we're going to try this?
00:21:55.000 It became a mindset.
00:21:57.000 It's the most interesting thing.
00:21:59.000 Doctors just drew a blank, like, there's nothing I can do.
00:22:02.000 There's no treatment.
00:22:03.000 It became a mindset that in the media, you know, we have three, 4,000 TV newscasters.
00:22:10.000 It never came into their mind that they should give an update on treatment.
00:22:14.000 It never comes into the mind.
00:22:15.000 Oh, let's look at COVID. Oh, some more deaths.
00:22:18.000 Oh, terrible.
00:22:19.000 Let's bring in our media guest.
00:22:21.000 And the media doctor immediately, you know, through the spring and summer, Gosh darn it, we should wear masks.
00:22:27.000 As if masks treat the problem.
00:22:29.000 I mean, we have sick patients running right in front of us.
00:22:32.000 And then before you know it, the turn was, we should wear masks and wait for the vaccine.
00:22:37.000 But what happened to treatment?
00:22:39.000 We actually stopped giving updates on in-hospital treatment.
00:22:44.000 So the poor patients never even had an idea if there's been any advances in the hospital care.
00:22:48.000 And what really became incredible is when we had the emergency use authorization approval for antibodies, both the Lilly and the Regeneron products.
00:22:56.000 So these are This is, you know, this is the high-tech research that everybody wanted to see happen in high-tech products.
00:23:02.000 These antibodies got out there, no word of them.
00:23:05.000 There was no FAQs, no doctor reminders.
00:23:09.000 When patients got their COVID test, there was no hotline of how you get an antibody infusion, no update on TV. People would go on TV and they'd give their testimonials about how their loved ones would die.
00:23:21.000 And no one would think, wow, could my have loved one been treated with an antibody infusion or drugs?
00:23:29.000 We had...
00:23:30.000 Elizabeth Warren on the other night talking about her brother who passed away.
00:23:34.000 No mention of, could he have been treated?
00:23:36.000 On the TV Dallas News last night, there was a wonderful lady whose husband died and they talked about, but no mention of early treatment.
00:23:44.000 So the public, the media, the doctors, you know, I even say even the whole biotech industry, they just drew a blank on early treatment.
00:23:54.000 Everybody went blank.
00:23:56.000 On a fatal medical problem right in front of us.
00:23:59.000 The group think and the blind spot and the collective oblivion is beyond belief.
00:24:07.000 And meanwhile, that one leg of the stool that you talk about, which is preventing the spread, the science was very weak on masks.
00:24:18.000 The science was weak on lockdowns.
00:24:20.000 There were studies, I think you've pointed out, on asymptomatic spread of the disease where we really don't understand that.
00:24:29.000 We do not understand how this disease spreads and what is the risk of somebody who has no symptom actually spreading the disease.
00:24:40.000 What kind of protocol should we really have focused on in that area?
00:24:45.000 And what kind of studies should have been done?
00:24:47.000 You know, what should we have done?
00:24:50.000 Well, in my view, I think we just needed a huge dose of common sense.
00:24:54.000 So, for example, this debate about masks work.
00:24:58.000 You know, you go out in a group of people and you see masks that are below here and you can see their nose.
00:25:04.000 Obviously, the mask is not stopping anything.
00:25:07.000 So can these declarations or debates on masks work or not?
00:25:11.000 I mean, come on.
00:25:12.000 Half the time, the masks aren't on or they're below the nose.
00:25:16.000 And, you know, we spent an inordinate amount of time on this.
00:25:21.000 Hand sanitizer and things of this nature.
00:25:25.000 We were, I think, misled a bit by the PCR testing.
00:25:29.000 And just a word about that.
00:25:31.000 The testing that became the standard of care, the polymerase chain reaction, Those tests became more and more sensitive.
00:25:38.000 And so they could start to pick up fragments of RNA that weren't even COVID-19.
00:25:44.000 So if you keep running the cycler over and over again, it'll start to read some code of something up in the nose.
00:25:49.000 We have all kinds of different viruses and bacteria in the nose.
00:25:53.000 And so we started to have the problem of false positive PCRs.
00:25:56.000 So this whole thing started to go pretty crazy out there regarding whether or not contagion control methods made a difference.
00:26:04.000 I personally think they did, but the reasonableness was the real gauge of, are we being reasonable?
00:26:11.000 We never really had any school outbreaks.
00:26:14.000 We never had outbreaks among young doctors and nurses in hospitals.
00:26:17.000 We definitely had The spread of the virus from nursing home workers to nursing home patients, that happened.
00:26:25.000 So if we just follow the science, we would have been okay.
00:26:28.000 Some have said we never should have shut down the schools.
00:26:30.000 We should have protected the teachers and professors because the kids, if they get COVID-19, they get natural immunity, which is durable and complete.
00:26:38.000 Natural immunity is kind of the biggest blessing a kid can have because they're kind of free of that worry.
00:26:44.000 Many have said that, if anything, we should have prophylaxed the nursing homes and the nursing home workers, and we definitely should have vaccinated them first.
00:26:54.000 And the issue of, you know, kind of these other high-contact jobs and specialties, maybe the right thing was this home office and what we're doing right now.
00:27:05.000 So I think it's a blend.
00:27:07.000 Which is what?
00:27:08.000 You mean take people's temperature before they come through the door?
00:27:12.000 Well, I mean, most of it's optics, to be honest with you, but the Chinese and others have spent a lot of time on this.
00:27:19.000 How does this thing really spread?
00:27:21.000 And the distillation of that is it largely spreads from sick person to well person.
00:27:25.000 It's just a matter of, is the sick person perceptive that they're sick?
00:27:29.000 So a very low-level screen is a question.
00:27:31.000 Are you sick?
00:27:32.000 And in fact, these questions were asked before you went on airplanes and If you go to a laboratory today, they'll still ask you, are you sick?
00:27:41.000 That's okay.
00:27:43.000 Checking the temperature.
00:27:44.000 There's a culture now that people don't show up to work when they're sick.
00:27:48.000 And we have seen rates of influenza go way down.
00:27:50.000 So I think there's some reasonableness there.
00:27:53.000 An area which I think is not reasonable is this idea of doing nasal PCR testing in people who aren't sick.
00:28:01.000 That was done in the NBA. That was done in college basketball.
00:28:07.000 I just testified in the Texas Senate.
00:28:09.000 My wife and I recovered from COVID. We have complete and durable immunity.
00:28:14.000 There is no role in testing us before we go into the Senate.
00:28:18.000 We can't give the virus and we can't receive the virus.
00:28:22.000 So we've lost our sense of reasonability.
00:28:24.000 You know, does masks work when they're hanging down below the chin?
00:28:27.000 Come on, why are we wasting our time on that?
00:28:29.000 We ought to really focus on treating the sick patient in front of us.
00:28:33.000 We've spent, so far, the government, our government has committed $48 billion to developing vaccines.
00:28:42.000 We've committed $1.48 billion to new patented antivirals.
00:28:51.000 And I think we've committed almost zero to the area that you're talking about.
00:28:57.000 Does that make sense to you?
00:29:01.000 Well, there's so many people sick, and we want to keep them at home.
00:29:07.000 I mean, this would be the goal.
00:29:08.000 If people get sick and they...
00:29:10.000 They go home, they get treatment, and they don't leave the house until they are non-infectious.
00:29:16.000 That's a win.
00:29:17.000 So early home treatment and no more spread of the illness and delivering natural immunity on the back end.
00:29:25.000 That is the ultimate win.
00:29:26.000 The best way to do that is with oral drugs.
00:29:29.000 And the available oral drugs that I've mentioned takes about four to six of them do work.
00:29:34.000 Now, Sanofi has an oral drug.
00:29:38.000 Merck has an oral drug.
00:29:39.000 You know, if they put those on a fast track and they had mass distribution of them, that would be great.
00:29:45.000 Favipiravir, already approved in multiple countries and indicated to treat COVID-19.
00:29:50.000 What's the problem in bringing that one in?
00:29:52.000 That's like Tamiflu.
00:29:53.000 That's easy to use.
00:29:55.000 So, you know, I'm really oriented towards oral drugs because of the idea if we treat at home, we reduce the spread.
00:30:01.000 The antibody infusions are fine and I use those clinically But the problem is patients have to break containment and they have to go get an antibody infusion.
00:30:10.000 And with that, they're going to contaminate the drivers, their family members.
00:30:15.000 They can contaminate people in the hallways.
00:30:17.000 And when they get to the infusion, they're going to contaminate people there.
00:30:21.000 So I'm not so crazy about the infusions.
00:30:23.000 They're terrific medicines.
00:30:25.000 But the oral drugs, as you imply, in my view, are the way to go.
00:30:29.000 Why we didn't focus on those, if you were to ask me at face value right now, I think it's a global...
00:30:35.000 Certainly United States, massive blunder.
00:30:39.000 And how can we make a massive blunder?
00:30:42.000 There's one way to do it.
00:30:43.000 When we stop having fair exchange of ideas.
00:30:47.000 Remember, doctors always work in teams.
00:30:50.000 We always work in teams.
00:30:52.000 Anybody listening to this who's had a family member or themselves with cancer, the first thing that happens is there's a team decision.
00:30:59.000 There's a tumor board.
00:31:00.000 There's a team decision.
00:31:01.000 And one of the things we started to see in the media, for instance, Is that our CDC, NIH, White House Task Force, World Health Organization, it stopped being a team effort.
00:31:13.000 There stopped being any international collaboration.
00:31:16.000 There's no peer review on this, and now we're to the point where we pretty much just see one doctor on TV, and we see largely...
00:31:26.000 Media doctors that just reinforce what that one doctor has to say.
00:31:30.000 There's no more peer review.
00:31:32.000 There's no more exchange of information.
00:31:34.000 And it's exceedingly worrisome.
00:31:36.000 It's been said that no person is above the law.
00:31:39.000 And in medicine, we say no person's above peer review, myself included.
00:31:42.000 I love to be peer reviewed.
00:31:43.000 I love to be criticized.
00:31:45.000 We need the exchange of ideas to find the path forward.
00:31:48.000 We're not having that anymore.
00:31:50.000 And one of the issues, I think most of those doctors that we see on TV are government bureaucrats, or they are academic physicians, and they're not people who are actually on the front line treating patients and, you know, and doing the kind of early interventions that you're talking about, trying to figure out, break the code, and say, how do I keep this patient from ever having to go to the hospital?
00:32:16.000 Well, I mean, one of the best questions an interviewer can ever ask is, Doctor, let's just hear it.
00:32:22.000 Do you have any experience in treating patients with COVID-19 to prevent hospitalization and death?
00:32:28.000 And I can tell you, if you look across the array of White House Task Force members we've had, regular media doctors that we've had, NIH, CDC, FDA, WHO, we haven't had a single doctor Who has considerable experience in treating outpatient COVID-19, not a one.
00:32:49.000 And Senator Johnson kind of basically exposed this in the November 19th hearing, where we had a minority witness.
00:32:59.000 And that minority witness, who's a media doctor, he's on TV all the time.
00:33:03.000 He spent about two hours in his rebuttal of our approach.
00:33:07.000 And his rebuttal was largely, you don't have enough evidence.
00:33:09.000 And what you're proposing is not good enough for me.
00:33:12.000 That was kind of his argument.
00:33:14.000 And it's an argument we'll never win, right?
00:33:16.000 Because the idea is we don't have the resources.
00:33:19.000 I don't have $45 billion.
00:33:22.000 We're trying to piece together our approach using the most modest means.
00:33:27.000 And all the resources are for vaccines.
00:33:30.000 And this doctor, who's a big vaccine proponent, went on and kept advising no treatment for America, no treatment, no treatment.
00:33:37.000 It was two hours.
00:33:38.000 And finally, Senator Johnson asked him the loaded question.
00:33:41.000 Doctor, have you ever treated a patient with COVID-19?
00:33:45.000 And he says, no, I haven't.
00:33:48.000 And on our panel, we had George Fareed, who had treated hundreds upon hundreds His partner, Brian Tyson, has treated thousands.
00:33:56.000 I've treated over a hundred, and I've advised on several hundred more.
00:34:00.000 I mean, we have vast experience that is untapped.
00:34:04.000 And to this day, I've never had a call from...
00:34:12.000 I've had plenty of back calls from officials, staffers, others who get sick.
00:34:17.000 Oh, what can we do?
00:34:18.000 What can we take?
00:34:19.000 It's interesting.
00:34:20.000 So when it comes down to personal health, oh, everybody wants that advice.
00:34:23.000 But when it comes to advice for the country, there's been an approach of giving no advice.
00:34:29.000 Hope, no window for treatment, no advice on treatment, nothing.
00:34:34.000 It's almost as if there's a promotion of as much suffering, despair, anxiety, hospitalization, and death as possible in preparation for mass vaccination.
00:34:47.000 Let me ask you one final question that probably a lot of people are thinking about that you've just segued into this.
00:34:53.000 If you are a listener of this program, And you have a grandparent or an elderly parent and they get sick, what do you, Dr.
00:35:07.000 Peter McCulloch, what do you advise?
00:35:08.000 I suppose it's different for different parts of the country, but who can they call?
00:35:14.000 Do you have a prescription that you would try on them?
00:35:20.000 How can they reach a doctor who actually is going to treat them before they get to the hospital?
00:35:28.000 Well, the first thing everybody ought to do is call their primary care doctor and say, do you treat COVID-19?
00:35:34.000 That's going to be your first level.
00:35:36.000 And we've really stratified in the United States to those doctors who do do it and others who don't.
00:35:41.000 And you need to find that out.
00:35:42.000 If your doctor is not a treating doctor who treats COVID-19, Then the next question is, can you refer me to somebody who's going to do it if I get it?
00:35:51.000 If they said, no, there's nothing there for you, my advice is that that person go to the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, aapsonline.org, download the home treatment guide, go to the back in the appendix.
00:36:05.000 There's all the telemedicine networks that are available that will take on COVID-19 patients by telemedicine.
00:36:13.000 Get the medications prescribed and treat them appropriately.
00:36:17.000 And these services have had massive throughput and there's been a great treatment.
00:36:22.000 I wish it could have been even more.
00:36:24.000 And one of the reasons why we spend so much time In the media now, trying to get the message out, is that we are making progress.
00:36:33.000 AAPS keeps a list of all the treating centers and treating practices in the United States.
00:36:39.000 And so there's a great resource.
00:36:41.000 Okay, in my state, who can actually treat COVID-19?
00:36:45.000 Who can order me an antibody infusion, for instance?
00:36:48.000 It literally just takes a phone call.
00:36:50.000 The antibody infusions are pre-purchased by the government.
00:36:52.000 It takes a phone call.
00:36:54.000 I administered them twice this week.
00:36:56.000 It's just simply a phone call.
00:36:58.000 It's that easy to get up front an EUA approved treatment.
00:37:03.000 And then we sequence the other drugs in.
00:37:06.000 It's not much different than treating asthma and someone who's at risk for blood clots.
00:37:11.000 It's not much different.
00:37:11.000 The drugs aren't hard.
00:37:13.000 I think there's been such a tremendous fear.
00:37:15.000 There's been suppression of science.
00:37:17.000 I think some doctors, honestly, are afraid to engage.
00:37:21.000 They're afraid maybe there's professional repercussions.
00:37:24.000 Maybe there'll be views of their practicing community that are negative upon them.
00:37:29.000 And it's hard to imagine me as a doctor That as a doctor, you wouldn't want to care for a sick patient.
00:37:36.000 That's the Hippocratic Oath.
00:37:37.000 And when I ask doctors sometimes, you know, do you treat COVID? And some say, no, there's no treatment.
00:37:41.000 I don't treat COVID. And I say, well, when a patient calls and you tell them that, do you call them back in a couple days and check on them?
00:37:48.000 And usually there's silence.
00:37:50.000 And what my concern is through all the fear and isolation and loneliness and division we've had, my fear is actually compassion has been lost.
00:37:59.000 And the Hippocratic Oath is being now, is being abrogated.
00:38:04.000 I really believe that.
00:38:05.000 Because if doctors really cared, they would be calling.
00:38:08.000 They'd be doing everything.
00:38:09.000 Get oxygen.
00:38:10.000 Get a pulse oximeter.
00:38:11.000 Do something.
00:38:12.000 But this idea of, I don't treat COVID and hang up the phone, that's what Americans are facing right now.
00:38:18.000 And they are outraged.
00:38:19.000 The public is absolutely outraged on the lack of medical response for early treatment.
00:38:26.000 Final question.
00:38:27.000 In my pantry, we have a medicine cabinet.
00:38:30.000 I have ivermectin.
00:38:32.000 I have hydroxychloroquine.
00:38:34.000 I have Zibamax and vitamin D, glutathione, vitamin C, liposomal vitamin C. We have a pulse eczema, which is a little finger mechanism that is really critical to have in your home if you want to prepare for this.
00:38:53.000 That looks at your oxygen levels so that you can tell when you go to the hospital.
00:38:58.000 What do you have in your home?
00:39:01.000 It's funny you ask that because I contracted COVID myself.
00:39:05.000 My wife and I did in October.
00:39:07.000 She had it easier than I did.
00:39:09.000 I'm 58, but I have some medical problems, and it went into my lungs, so I developed the pulmonary part of COVID, and I felt the anxiety of having trouble breathing.
00:39:20.000 I just can't imagine being a senior citizen with heart and lung disease and having it.
00:39:24.000 It must be incredibly anxiety-provoking.
00:39:26.000 And during my recovery, I made a series of videos of what I did.
00:39:30.000 Now, fortunately, of course, I'm a doctor.
00:39:32.000 I got myself into a research protocol, and I took the drugs in sequence, and I did all the right things.
00:39:38.000 But one of my recovery videos, I did exactly that, what you just described.
00:39:43.000 I laid out the various drugs, the pulse oximeter, how to check blood pressure.
00:39:48.000 And I actually even had the packages of the medications.
00:39:51.000 And, you know, I wore a tie and it was a respectful, decent video.
00:39:57.000 I was amazed that YouTube struck that video down within two days and said that it violates the terms of the community.
00:40:04.000 My very first YouTube video was just the release of my scientific findings in American Journal of Medicine.
00:40:10.000 It was just four slides from the paper was struck down.
00:40:13.000 From a peer-reviewed paper.
00:40:16.000 Probably one of the three most prestigious journals in the country.
00:40:21.000 And you got purged off of YouTube.
00:40:25.000 So Dr.
00:40:27.000 Corey has also been scrubbed.
00:40:29.000 And then Dr.
00:40:30.000 Lowry in the UK has been scrubbed.
00:40:33.000 We're not the only ones.
00:40:34.000 This is a worldwide phenomenon.
00:40:36.000 Any word on early treatment, any word at all, there are powerful forces out there that can seek out Our findings and our message and scrub them from ever getting to patients in need.
00:40:50.000 What's going on is extraordinary right now, and I think a lot of investigation will be done.
00:40:57.000 Historians and investigative historians are going to look at this very carefully.
00:41:01.000 How can this be?
00:41:03.000 If I did a video on how to treat a heart attack, That wouldn't have been scrubbed.
00:41:07.000 I have 600 papers in the peer-reviewed literature.
00:41:11.000 600!
00:41:12.000 One of the most published people in the world.
00:41:14.000 Why is it one paper on COVID and trying to disseminate its findings are absolutely scrubbed?
00:41:21.000 Why is there such a massive resistance to getting these principles disseminated?
00:41:29.000 That is the It's a trillion dollar question on the table.
00:41:33.000 It's cost hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives worldwide.
00:41:36.000 And I think people need to understand and get to the bottom of what's going on.
00:41:41.000 I mean, don't you think, and I'm not asking you to get into, to explain a conspiracy, I think a lot of people have a feeling that something is happening that is not right, and that is not rational, it is not common sense.
00:41:58.000 And that all of these little things are corralling us toward that one vaccine solution and ignoring a lot of just the common sense thing that we would normally do in a democracy, in a community, you know, as medical doctors.
00:42:14.000 And that somehow when we talk about these things, they used to be permissible to talk about.
00:42:20.000 It's suddenly become impermissible unless it is consistent without orthodoxy that the only solution for this is vaccines.
00:42:32.000 Whatever it is, Mr.
00:42:33.000 Kennedy, it's in the minds.
00:42:35.000 It's in the minds of millions of people.
00:42:39.000 There's been conspiracy theorists saying, oh, it's this and it's the money or it's some secret memo that was sent out.
00:42:45.000 I gotta tell you, there's no memo that was sent out.
00:42:48.000 There's no playbook.
00:42:49.000 This is in the minds of people.
00:42:51.000 It's in the minds of people to behave in an unprecedented manner.
00:42:57.000 An unprecedented manner.
00:42:59.000 And scrubbing things.
00:43:01.000 I have to tell you, I was invited to give Medicine Grand Rounds, which is common, as an endowed lecturer at a prestigious East Coast University, which I've done my entire career for 30 years.
00:43:14.000 And I gave my topic.
00:43:16.000 I said, the pathophysiologic basis and rationale for the early ambulatory treatment of COVID-19.
00:43:22.000 My sponsor said, oh, that's interesting.
00:43:25.000 That's going to really get people's attention.
00:43:27.000 I said, yeah, that's what I want to talk about.
00:43:28.000 He said, fine.
00:43:29.000 He submitted it.
00:43:31.000 It was gone through the process.
00:43:33.000 I submitted all my forms for continuing medical education, my questions, my rationale, conflicts of interest, of which I have none.
00:43:41.000 I did everything by the book.
00:43:43.000 The night before I'm going to deliver this lecture by WebEx, I get a panic call.
00:43:49.000 He says, Dr.
00:43:50.000 McCullough, we can't have you give this lecture tomorrow.
00:43:54.000 I said, why?
00:43:55.000 This is scientific discourse.
00:43:58.000 This is what we do.
00:43:59.000 He said, our infectious disease doctors went to the chairman of medicine and said, we can't let Dr.
00:44:07.000 McCullough give that lecture.
00:44:09.000 And if he did, we would want to prepare a rebuttal to everything he said.
00:44:16.000 I have never witnessed this in my life.
00:44:18.000 I have given thousands of medical lectures.
00:44:21.000 I've lectured at the New York Academy of Sciences.
00:44:24.000 I've presented before the FDA and the Congressional Oversight Panel, the Senate.
00:44:29.000 I've lectured across the world.
00:44:32.000 I've never had a doctor group formulate an idea that there must be a rebuttal.
00:44:42.000 We never do this at Medical Grand Rounds.
00:44:44.000 We never do this.
00:44:45.000 So whatever's going on is in the minds of doctors.
00:44:49.000 In those doctors' minds, there must have been something that's telling them, no matter what, don't let any information get out there to other doctors anymore.
00:45:01.000 That we can treat the virus.
00:45:02.000 Let's keep that message suppressed strongly.
00:45:06.000 It was in their minds.
00:45:09.000 It's that same message is in the minds of every single reporter on TV. And I don't think it's a conscious thing.
00:45:15.000 I think it never comes up in their mind.
00:45:17.000 Oh, more people died.
00:45:19.000 Isn't that sad?
00:45:20.000 Let's talk about the vaccine.
00:45:21.000 But wait a minute.
00:45:22.000 There's thousands more people sick right now.
00:45:24.000 It's just not in their minds.
00:45:26.000 And so my testimony in the Texas Senate last week People said that I was a real firebrand, that I really lit a fire.
00:45:36.000 And I have to tell you, within 48 hours, there was draft legislation produced on the floor of the Texas Senate that proposed that each patient who gets a COVID positive test result at least gets some information.
00:45:50.000 Maybe we should get the AAPS guide.
00:45:51.000 It's an approved guide.
00:45:53.000 At least gets links to telemedicine.
00:45:55.000 Finds out about access to the EUA antibodies.
00:45:58.000 At least something.
00:46:00.000 So whatever's going on, Mr.
00:46:02.000 Kennedy, I have to tell you, it is profound.
00:46:05.000 And it's very disturbing.
00:46:08.000 Well, thank you very much.
00:46:09.000 I'm going to make you a bet that virtually all of those infectious disease academics who killed your speech are, if you look at their COIs and their publications, it will show grants for They are on Tony Fauci's payroll, but I'm not going to get you in trouble by asking you to do that research, but I hope that that is the case.
00:46:37.000 Anyway, you're a very courageous man.
00:46:39.000 You're a brilliant man.
00:46:41.000 You're a heroic American, and I want to thank you for Standing up against that tsunami of disapproval, of rebuke by your colleagues and by many, many other people, and really standing up for public health, for good ethics, for morality, and for our country and humanity.
00:47:03.000 Well, thanks to you.
00:47:05.000 Many journalists, again, there's just a blind spot.
00:47:09.000 It seems like people are just around the fringes of it.
00:47:12.000 They can't get it in their mind.
00:47:15.000 Sick patient, treat them.
00:47:17.000 They get close, but then they can't get it in mind.
00:47:19.000 Sick patient, treat them.
00:47:20.000 It's the most amazing thing.
00:47:23.000 But it is in the people's minds.
00:47:25.000 And I honestly don't think it's something so simple as being on the NIH payroll.
00:47:30.000 I really don't.
00:47:33.000 I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
00:47:35.000 I think that that mindset is reinforced professionally.
00:47:41.000 You know, it's fortified in a variety of ways.
00:47:44.000 And the people that, you know, Tony Fauci makes $7.6 billion worth of grants a year, and the people who get those grants are the people who then sit, you look at the ACIP committee, the VRBPAC committee,