RFK Jr. The Defender - January 20, 2022


War Against Doctors with Conscience with Dr Meryl Nass

Topics
medical authoritarianism
Hosted by
Robert F. Kennedy
Guests
Meryl Nast Dr Meryl Nass
Mentioned
Meryl Nass Ron Johnson Anthony Fauci Peter McCullough Robert Malone Pierre Corey Jane Orient Manoeuvre Clintons Marilyn Mercola Ryuji Errol Said Lyme
Clinical Trial Nightmare with Brianne Dressen Mob Psychology with Dr Mattias Desmet

Episode Stats


Length

32 minutes

Words per minute

151.66

Word count

4,972

Sentence count

316

Harmful content

Misogyny

8

sentences flagged

Toxicity

8

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, Dr. Meryl Nast joins me to talk about her work as a pediatric infectious disease physician, her opposition to biological weapons, and her fight for public health and public safety. Dr. Nast is an expert in public health, bioweapon research, and public policy, and has been involved in the fight against the use of biological weapons. She is a force to be reckoned with in the field of infectious disease research and public health. She has been a champion of public safety, and is a fierce opponent of the war on Ebola and other infectious diseases. She is also a fierce critic of the government's response to the Ebola crisis, and a fierce advocate for public safety and public trust in the CDC and other agencies involved in fighting against the spread of infectious diseases like Ebola, Lyme disease, and other diseases that pose a threat to our health and liberty. We talk about how important it is to have access to basic medical care, and the need to protect our children, and our families, from infectious diseases and other agents that threaten to devastate our health, and how we can protect ourselves and our children from these agents and their families from them. I m so grateful to have her on the show, and I hope you do the same. Thank you for listening and supporting this podcast. I really appreciate your support and your support of this podcast! and I ll see you at the rally in DC on Nov. 19, where I ll be speaking in Washington, D.C. in the coming days. Thanks for listening, Meryl! - Tom and I appreciate you, Tom. . Tom -Tom Bill Tim ( ) (p. (Tom) (Bill) . (Sue (Meryl ) (Marilyn (John) ( ) (P. ( ) . (Karen ) ( ) (Julia (J. (Alicia ) and Sarah (R) (Alyssa ) . ) (S. (R.) (Sandra (B. (J.) (A. ) ) (K. ) (R. (M. (D) ) & J. (V. (C. (B.) ) ) .) (J) (C.) ) (V) (SORRY FOR SUPPORTING THIS PODCAST)

Transcript

Transcripts from "RFK Jr. The Defender" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Hi, everybody.
00:00:00.000 I wanted to do this podcast with one of my favorite people in the world, and I don't say that lightly.
00:00:08.000 My guest today is Dr.
00:00:10.000 Meryl Nast.
00:00:11.000 And many of you who have been around this movement for any period of time know her name.
00:00:18.000 She's a major figure in public health and protecting children. 0.87
00:00:23.000 And also, she's one of the, I think, the most reliable experts on bioweapons and biowarfare and She was one of the most eloquent critics of the anthrax vaccines.
00:00:38.000 She played a key role in the court cases to protect the military from those vaccines.
00:00:44.000 She was a critic of the Ebola response.
00:00:46.000 She's an incredible researcher, very, very careful, diligent, and she's one of the people that I rely on Or fact checking.
00:00:56.000 So if I say something that is wrong, I usually get a very polite note from Meryl saying you can't say that because the facts don't support it.
00:01:08.000 So we rely on Meryl.
00:01:10.000 But she's more than that.
00:01:12.000 She's really one of the best people I've ever met from a lot of every important viewpoint or integrity or values.
00:01:21.000 And her competence as a physician, if I or a member of my family had a really serious problem, I cannot think of a physician that I'd rather entrust my personal health to, my family's health to, than Marilyn has.
00:01:39.000 And she's amazing because she has this great curiosity about the world.
00:01:45.000 She's explored all over the world.
00:01:47.000 She has a curiosity and a love for humanity and for human beings individually.
00:01:54.000 She's somebody all of us rely on.
00:01:56.000 Even Robert Malone when he got married.
00:01:59.000 Sick from COVID, Meryl was a physician that he consulted, and Meryl has been with us on meeting with Attorney General.
00:02:12.000 She's somebody that everybody relies on in her integrity, and the reason that I have her on here today, I think if Hippocrates had to Describe an ideal physician that would look like Meryl Nass.
00:02:26.000 The reason I have her on here today is because Meryl is from Maine, and the Medical Licensing Board of Maine has just delicensed her for prescribing ivermectin. 0.97
00:02:41.000 Not only that, but in a Manoeuvre that is frighteningly reminiscent of the old Soviet state. 0.78
00:02:52.000 They have ordered her a psychiatric evaluation.
00:02:57.000 And, you know, it's really, it's an amazing story about where we are in this country.
00:03:04.000 We're actually practicing physicians who are healers are being punished and are being punished.
00:03:13.000 Vilified, gaslighted, marginalized, destroyed, delicensed, and then, you know, potentially, you know, clearly the ambition is to lock her in a mental institution and rid ourselves of these people who ask questions about official marriage. 0.66
00:03:34.000 Meryl, I'm about to take off for a couple of weeks, including to the Washington DC rally, where I think you're going to be speaking.
00:03:43.000 But I wanted to, I really wanted to have you on to talk about this because it's so alarming what is happening to you today.
00:03:52.000 It's so deeply disturbing that in my country, We are seeing this rise of this medical authoritarianism, and so many doctors are involved in this assault on the American Constitution.
00:04:13.000 That, I think, is one of the most disturbing things to me.
00:04:18.000 Tell us what happened.
00:04:20.000 Well, as you know, I have followed COVID with intense interest since the very beginning because I have a background in biological warfare and pandemics and I'm an internist.
00:04:36.000 So everything about the pandemic was of interest to me and I could make a lot of sense of it.
00:04:42.000 and I wrote many articles trying to explain all aspects of it to people, the testing, the masks, the treatments.
00:04:51.000 And I discovered early on that the chloroquine drugs were highly effective if used early, and I used them on my son.
00:04:59.000 The Chinese were using them widely early.
00:05:02.000 They told us in February of 2020 that chloroquine was one of their best drugs.
00:05:09.000 They had 20 clinical trials and it was easy to obtain until Trump said it was a good drug.
00:05:16.000 And then suddenly at the end of March last year, all sorts of measures were taken in the United States and other countries to suppress its availability, its use, and to give it a black mark, to give it a stain and to stop people using it.
00:05:31.000 I was familiar with the drug.
00:05:32.000 I've spent time in Africa.
00:05:34.000 I have taken chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.
00:05:38.000 I've had malaria.
00:05:39.000 So I've taken it prophylactically.
00:05:41.000 And for treatment, I've treated a lot of Lyme patients, probably a couple of hundred Lyme patients with the drug.
00:05:48.000 I've used it for autoimmune diseases.
00:05:50.000 So I was very familiar with it.
00:05:52.000 I couldn't believe what I was seeing.
00:05:54.000 And I think very few doctors were as familiar with this drug as I was.
00:05:59.000 So I started paying attention at that point to the suppression and then started writing articles in May and June describing the suppression, which eventually resulted in 58 different methods by which hydroxychloroquine was being suppressed around the world.
00:06:16.000 And then the same thing happened with ivermectin, not on quite as grand a scale, at least I didn't document it as well, but the same thing happened with ivermectin.
00:06:26.000 And Then toward the middle of 2021, there was a shift.
00:06:33.000 As you know, the medical profession has been given these dreadful guidelines by which they are supposed to treat patients, which is go home, don't do anything except Tylenol and ibuprofen until your lips are blue and then show up in the ER, and then we'll admit you and give you oxygen and maybe remdesivir.
00:06:54.000 And then we got monoclonal antibodies and the criteria for using monoclonals varied all over the country.
00:07:01.000 So in some places you couldn't get it and in some places a patient could call up and make their own appointment and get it.
00:07:07.000 So really the use of monoclonals was not regulated properly and the side effects were not provided to people.
00:07:14.000 It's not clear what the side effects are, but I had a couple of patients who had bad reactions to it.
00:07:19.000 It is another experimental drug.
00:07:21.000 It's under EUA. Remdesivir was initially under EUA. It got licensed, but it got licensed without data supporting its benefit, and that was very strange.
00:07:32.000 So first I saw the suppression of hydroxychloroquine, then I saw the ascent of remdesivir, which didn't make any sense, was not being used in the rest of the world.
00:07:42.000 A dangerous drug with very little benefit.
00:07:44.000 It wasn't even being used at the right time.
00:07:47.000 It might have been somewhat effective if used early when hydroxychloroquine must be used, but it was being used late.
00:07:53.000 Then a couple of other drugs came in.
00:07:56.000 People were using low doses of dexamethasone, which is somewhat effective.
00:08:00.000 But the medical profession was basically being kept in the dark.
00:08:04.000 And what shocked me was that they didn't pull the mask off and start reading the literature.
00:08:10.000 Paying attention, looking at what other people were doing.
00:08:12.000 And even when Pierre Corey and Peter McCullough and Jane Orient went to Congress in December of 2020 and explained how wonderfully well these drugs worked in combinations and that we could really solve the problem of COVID, Ron Johnson had held that hearing.
00:08:33.000 Right before he lost his chairmanship when the Dems took over the Senate, YouTube suppressed part of the Senate hearing, one of the Senate hearings, and YouTube decided that any treatment guidelines that were different than the WHO's went against their community guidelines and should not be allowed to be broadcast.
00:08:53.000 So I saw...
00:08:55.000 Go ahead.
00:08:58.000 ...that YouTube made WHO... The arbiter of what treatments could be discussed except with remdesivir because WHO doesn't work.
00:09:14.000 And yet YouTube was not censoring endorsements of remdesivir.
00:09:23.000 What Ryuji was doing was very, very selective.
00:09:26.000 The only consistency was support for Tony Fauci's policy for the pharmaceutical industry.
00:09:32.000 It had nothing to do with public health.
00:09:36.000 Yes.
00:09:36.000 So, I mean, that was, for whatever reason, YouTube, which is owned by Google and the CEO is the ex-wife of one of the Google founders, for whatever reason, decided to go on a rampage and start censoring medical information.
00:09:51.000 Subsequently, all sorts of other social media and channels on the internet also started censoring.
00:09:57.000 Censoring this information.
00:09:59.000 So here I am, you know, I'm used to living in the United States and really, you know, I've been a doctor 40 years, never seen anything like this before.
00:10:07.000 Maybe it happened and I missed it, but it seemed crazy to me.
00:10:11.000 And here we had the biggest pandemic ever.
00:10:14.000 So, you know, I wrote more and more about it and I, you know, I got more upset.
00:10:19.000 I had learned a little bit about the Constitution when I was involved with the anthrax vaccine 20 years ago, and I had learned about FDA law and the CDC, HHS, WHO, NIH, through that time, time, and I knew what they could legally do and what they couldn't legally do and found that they were actually exceeding their authorities, their legal authorities.
00:10:44.000 And in fact, Ron Johnson had asked the FDA how it was that it was now telling doctors how to practice medicine rather than simply describing how to use drugs, which is what its mission is supposed to be.
00:10:57.000 CDC also started exceeding its mission.
00:11:01.000 It started deciding whether landlords could get rid of tenants who didn't pay their bills.
00:11:07.000 I mean, this is not a public health measure.
00:11:10.000 I mean, CDC claimed it was, but this was an authority that was not granted to it, which the Supreme Court eventually took away from it.
00:11:18.000 CDC has a history of acting very politically, but it became extraordinarily political during the pandemic and started creating a lot of statistics that were completely off the wall, statistics regarding numbers of cases Severity of cases,
00:11:38.000 efficacy of masks, efficacy of distancing, all sorts of things that was not in accord with the data that was coming out of any other country, and particularly the number of people getting COVID who were vaccinated, where CDC was saying you were 20 times as likely to get COVID if you were unvaccinated, you were 20 times as likely to die.
00:11:58.000 This simply wasn't true.
00:11:59.000 We had data from Israel, from the U.K., From Iceland, from Denmark, other places.
00:12:05.000 We knew this was not true.
00:12:06.000 They were using the same vaccines we were using, and the data were very different.
00:12:10.000 So CDC became a completely corrupt, if it wasn't already, institution.
00:12:16.000 And they're all under HHS. And so is HRSA. HRSA manages the payments to people who've been injured by countermeasures.
00:12:27.000 Countermeasures are all the EUA products.
00:12:31.000 So the initial remdesivir The monoclonal antibodies, the masks, the tests, the vaccines are all under emergency use authorization.
00:12:39.000 If you're injured, you can only go to HRSA, which is a health resources agency in HHS, and ask them to pay you damages.
00:12:48.000 For COVID, there have been now about 5,000 applications for damages for people who say they've been damaged by an emergency use authorized product.
00:12:58.000 And I This CICP, which is within HRSA, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, has apparently said one person It has so far been granted damages.
00:13:10.000 That's significant because there's a one-year statute of limitations.
00:13:13.000 So you have to prove that your injury was caused by the countermeasure, but CDC and NIH and FDA are suppressing the information that would allow you to prove whether or not your injury was due to a countermeasure.
00:13:27.000 So you've got this very brief statute of limitations.
00:13:30.000 You can't prove anything.
00:13:31.000 And it looks like the federal government is trying to basically hang on and wait people out And they'll never be able to collect.
00:13:39.000 And, you know, when lots of time has gone by, then they may allow us access to the information so we can figure out how dangerous or safe all of these products are.
00:13:50.000 So that's where we stand.
00:13:51.000 And of course, so I've been writing about this.
00:13:53.000 And then my medical board, along with about 15 other medical boards in the country, who were urged to do this by a nonprofit organization called the Federation of State Medical Boards, Said they were going to prosecute doctors for misinformation and disinformation.
00:14:09.000 So if I wasn't already upset with where medicine was going, that made me even more upset.
00:14:17.000 And I wrote to them and told them, will you please define misinformation and disinformation and tell me under what authority you can create this new crime?
00:14:26.000 Because our legislature hasn't been meeting.
00:14:29.000 Nobody voted in a new crime of misinformation. 1.00
00:14:34.000 And these idiots, you know, were told by a nonprofit organization that probably was paid off to advise them to do this. 1.00
00:14:42.000 And they just sucked it up and spit it out and started threatening doctors. 1.00
00:14:48.000 And at that point, you know, I decided I was willing to risk my license because this was...
00:14:55.000 This was something I was not going to accept.
00:14:58.000 And I asked them, I said, look, here's what I told the New Hampshire legislature, which I testified to a couple of months ago.
00:15:05.000 This is what I told them.
00:15:07.000 I told them about how the vaccines didn't work.
00:15:09.000 I gave them the evidence.
00:15:10.000 I told them other things about COVID. I asked them, is this misinformation?
00:15:14.000 And of course, they didn't answer me.
00:15:16.000 So eventually, and so just like the Stasi in East Germany, and this was after World War II, remember, this was up until 1990, the Board of Information told doctors, if you see something, say something.
00:15:29.000 If you see misinformation, tell us.
00:15:32.000 So now they've basically told the medical profession to start ratting out each other.
00:15:37.000 And so two doctors did.
00:15:39.000 And two random people off the street did as well.
00:15:44.000 The two random people said, I saw Dr. 0.82
00:15:46.000 Nass on a video online.
00:15:48.000 I've never met her.
00:15:49.000 And she's spouting misinformation, so I'm reporting it to the medical board.
00:15:53.000 And then a nurse practitioner and a doctor said, Dr.
00:15:57.000 Nass treated a patient that I also saw, and she gave that patient hydroxychloroquine in one case and ivermectin in the other.
00:16:04.000 And this is horse paste, and she has no business using these drugs, and so I thought I better report it to you. 0.63
00:16:10.000 None of these four complaints had anything to do with the patient being harmed, and none of my patients have complained.
00:16:17.000 And there was one more complaint, which was I wanted to prescribe hydroxychloroquine to a patient, which is a legal drug.
00:16:24.000 I am legally able to do so, and in my state...
00:16:28.000 The governor requires that the patient must have COVID in order to get hydroxychloroquine.
00:16:33.000 And this patient did have COVID. So I wrote a prescription.
00:16:36.000 I actually called it in.
00:16:37.000 And the pharmacist, which because they've been threatened too, they have to check on these prescriptions and find out whether it's an appropriate, legitimate prescription.
00:16:46.000 So he called and asked me, what was it for?
00:16:49.000 And had I said it was for COVID, he wouldn't have filled it because they're scared they will be investigated by the pharmacy board.
00:16:57.000 So I said it was for Lyme, and he filled it.
00:17:00.000 The patient got the prescription, and I immediately informed, within minutes, informed the medical board that I had done this and that this was a problem they and the pharmacy board had created, that this was a legal prescription.
00:17:13.000 You know, it's my obligation to take care of my patient.
00:17:16.000 I was trying to do so, and in order to take the best care of my patient, I was put in a position where I was forced to tell a lie.
00:17:24.000 And so that was the fifth matter that the board accused me of.
00:17:29.000 Now, I still thought that under the Constitution, there was something called free speech.
00:17:35.000 It was an amendment.
00:17:36.000 It hasn't been overturned yet.
00:17:39.000 And I thought I would be fine.
00:17:41.000 I didn't realize when I went into a very odd meeting on Tuesday that they really were planning to destroy me however they could.
00:17:52.000 So I was told I could watch the media, and my lawyer quit the day before.
00:17:58.000 So I went in without a lawyer, but the lawyer isn't allowed to speak either.
00:18:01.000 I was told I can't speak, but I can watch.
00:18:04.000 And then they asked me to open up my camera so they could make sure there was nobody else in the room with me.
00:18:09.000 I thought that was odd.
00:18:10.000 And then they asked me to pledge that I was not going to record the meeting.
00:18:14.000 I thought that was odd.
00:18:15.000 I said, how do I get a transcript of the meeting?
00:18:18.000 I said, you don't.
00:18:19.000 Okay.
00:18:20.000 So then they met for a couple...
00:18:22.000 And then they went into executive session and produced a litany of complaints against me.
00:18:28.000 All these things I had said to Dr. Mercola and, oh, my medical records weren't, my telehealth was not up to snuff, even though what they were calling telehealth visits was really little short notes on phone calls, text messages, and emails.
00:18:45.000 And then they said, you know, my competency with technical things, because I hadn't sent them the text messages exactly right.
00:18:56.000 And they had to remind me twice how to send the text messages from a patient encounter.
00:19:02.000 that maybe I was, you know, implied maybe I was a little demented.
00:19:07.000 I was certainly attention-seeking.
00:19:10.000 Maybe I was crazy.
00:19:11.000 They didn't seem to know who I was.
00:19:14.000 I imagine the lawyers did, but the doctor who presented my case said, I don't know if she's ever published a paper.
00:19:21.000 She said, she seems to read a lot.
00:19:25.000 Is that a crime now?
00:19:28.000 I read a lot.
00:19:30.000 So anyway, then they said, we're very upset.
00:19:34.000 We consider you a danger to your patients, an immediate danger.
00:19:39.000 And we are immediately taking your license away unless you surrender it, basically, and go into an active status.
00:19:47.000 And we are demanding you submit to a neuropsych exam.
00:19:52.000 And we have 25 questions we need you to answer, which was a fishing expedition.
00:19:58.000 You know, what kind of advertising do you do?
00:20:01.000 Do you offer vaccines?
00:20:03.000 You know, how many patients do you see in a week?
00:20:05.000 All sorts of things.
00:20:06.000 And then they said they want 10 charts.
00:20:09.000 Well, I have a practice where I don't take Medicare and Medicaid.
00:20:13.000 I charge very low fees, and people can pay what they want if they are short of money.
00:20:22.000 So there are no Medicare, Medicaid, federal, state agencies don't have copies of my records.
00:20:29.000 So I wondered how they would get, how would they figure this out?
00:20:33.000 So they immediately went to the controlled substances database and picked out the two patients I have who are on controlled substances.
00:20:42.000 And they said, we want these charts.
00:20:44.000 And then they said, we want a list of every patient you've seen in the last six months.
00:20:48.000 So I thought, huh, now they're going to probably try to figure out where, you know, where they can get the most bang for the buck.
00:20:55.000 So they're now on a fishing expedition because they didn't have anything in those first five matters that would be sufficient to really take away my license or show me as crazy.
00:21:07.000 They're going to look for something else.
00:21:08.000 And when I realized that, you know, I realized there's no reason.
00:21:12.000 I mean, also what they did By choosing to force me, because I'm required to, as a doctor, submit to a neuropsych exam, that then takes my case to a whole new level.
00:21:26.000 So instead of me being simply an alcoholic or a drug addict that they can rehabilitate, now my name immediately goes to the National Practitioner Database, which means it's going to be hard for me to get another job, hard for me to get a license in another state.
00:21:42.000 And the media are informed immediately about my case.
00:21:46.000 And that was unusual because for a little, you know, fiddling little case like this, you wouldn't normally put this kind of information out there.
00:21:55.000 So anyway, I thought, well, if they wanted to get media on this case, they can get media on the case.
00:22:02.000 And I will say exactly what I think.
00:22:05.000 And we'll see where this goes.
00:22:08.000 So let me just reiterate, there has not been a single complaint to the board by a patient in this case, not one.
00:22:17.000 You have never been accused or charged with malpractice in 41 years of practicing medicine.
00:22:24.000 You only had one complaint to a medical board 15 years ago.
00:22:30.000 And that complainant apologized to you after the investigation, once he learned that your treatment was excellent.
00:22:38.000 The board found it in your favor at that time.
00:22:41.000 You are listed in who's who in America and who's who in the world for your accomplishments, including the first scientific analysis of an epidemic that proved it was due to biological warfare.
00:22:55.000 You have spent a career trying to serve patients who were left behind by the prevailing medical system.
00:23:01.000 This includes soldiers being forced to receive dangerous anthrax vaccines and those who were injured by veterans with Gulf War syndrome, patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, With Lyme disease, other doctors were unable to diagnose and treat.
00:23:20.000 You have pivoted your practice to focus on the best care of COVID precisely because other doctors failed to prescribe treatments that would keep the vast majority out of the hospitals.
00:23:31.000 You charge, this is the kind of doctor Meryl Nass is, $60 to treat COVID. This is a one-time fee.
00:23:42.000 And you get the patients that get as much treatment as needed with no additional cost.
00:23:48.000 So this is the ideal doctor.
00:23:53.000 This is the doctor that we all wish we had.
00:23:57.000 And this is the doctor who's being railroaded by these criminal technocrats on the main licensing board for medicine. 0.54
00:24:09.000 And the question is, who are these people and how do we figure out ways to punish them?
00:24:17.000 How do the American people figure out ways to punish this criminal enterprise that is trying to silence this wonderful doctor because they don't want patients healed.
00:24:32.000 They want to be able to support patients The pharmaceutical narrative, pharmaceutical paradigm, pharmaceutical products, and silence people who are questioning these authorities.
00:24:48.000 Who are these people, Errol?
00:24:50.000 You know who they are, the people who are sitting on this board.
00:24:54.000 No, I don't know any of them.
00:24:56.000 Some of them are doctors.
00:24:57.000 Some of them are citizens.
00:24:59.000 And they are a state agency.
00:25:02.000 So these are volunteers who probably get paid per diem to sit on the board.
00:25:07.000 I think they may be well-meaning.
00:25:09.000 I think they have drunk the Kool-Aid.
00:25:11.000 They cannot see beyond what the government is telling them.
00:25:16.000 I understand that we have a system right now where the decision was made to, quote, flood the waves, flood the airwaves, flood the zone, and a uniform message about the dangers of these drugs.
00:25:31.000 And the benefits of the garbage that the government is prescribing for people is universally heard if you turn on the TV or the radio.
00:25:40.000 However, probably about 30 or 40% of the population has not bought into that. 0.81
00:25:46.000 And these are the people who seek me out.
00:25:48.000 I don't advertise.
00:25:49.000 I don't go looking for patients.
00:25:51.000 Every single one of my patients is a word of mouth.
00:25:54.000 And so these people chose something different and the state using these people on the board as their, you know, lackeys is doing its best to prevent people from getting information because I have a blog and they obviously don't like my blog.
00:26:12.000 and preventing them from accessing the drugs.
00:26:15.000 The idea is to force everybody into government-determined medical care.
00:26:21.000 Shoot everybody up with the same vaccine, give them the same medications.
00:26:25.000 I tell you, looking back on the last 20 years, I think the system has been trying to destroy the reputation of doctors, destroy the doctor-patient relationship, force this electronic medical record spits out treatments for doctors.
00:26:41.000 So if they punch in COVID, the computer tells them remdesivir.
00:26:46.000 It tells them whatever.
00:26:49.000 One person came to me, their mother was in the hospital, and the doctors wanted to give a woman this Janus kinase drug.
00:27:01.000 Well, it's another experimental drug for COVID. I looked it up.
00:27:06.000 The label says that if you take it, the mortality rate is higher than if you don't.
00:27:12.000 And so, you know, I don't know if the mother was going to be enrolled in a clinical trial. 0.75
00:27:17.000 The doctor couldn't tell the family very much about it.
00:27:20.000 But the medical system here in Maine, we have two large medical systems and everybody else, all other doctors were not part of those two systems.
00:27:30.000 Are being pushed out, squeezed out.
00:27:33.000 We are competition.
00:27:35.000 And they want to be able to dictate.
00:27:38.000 I mean, when you go to medical school, it's a very, very hierarchical method of training.
00:27:44.000 And you have to basically do whatever the people ahead of you tell you.
00:27:50.000 Otherwise, you will not succeed through medical school and residency.
00:27:53.000 That's a minimum seven-year commitment.
00:27:55.000 When my son went through it, it was a total of 14 years.
00:27:59.000 And You learn to keep your mouth shut and do what you're told.
00:28:04.000 And unfortunately, then you get a job.
00:28:07.000 In the old days, once you got a job and you were out of that, you could sort of be independent and do what you thought.
00:28:12.000 But now you can't.
00:28:14.000 Now almost everybody is an employee.
00:28:16.000 I remember the Clintons saw that medicine was a huge cottage industry that was taking up about 15% of GNP. And they said, we have to get our hands on this.
00:28:27.000 And, you know, they did.
00:28:29.000 I mean, they encouraged larger and larger institutions to form.
00:28:34.000 So if you've got a doctor's office and you've got one or two doctors and a couple of nurses and a couple of secretaries, everybody knows you.
00:28:42.000 And the doctors remember your history.
00:28:46.000 If you have a system where there's 100 doctors and 500 nurses, nobody knows you and nobody is responsible.
00:28:53.000 And the entire feeling of medical care changes.
00:28:58.000 So that seems to be what we're dealing with now, and I don't like it, and I'm happy.
00:29:04.000 If it's necessary for me to lose my license to fight this, I will do so.
00:29:10.000 This has to stop.
00:29:11.000 I mean, my profession is being destroyed from the inside, and I don't want to stand for it.
00:29:16.000 So, 400 years before Christ, Hippocrates set out the code for doctors, which doctors have followed up.
00:29:27.000 Every doctor when they're in medical school takes a Hippocratic oath, and that oath says that the relationship between the doctor and patient is sacred.
00:29:36.000 That the obligation of the doctor is to the patient.
00:29:42.000 It is not to the state.
00:29:44.000 It is not to any outside institution.
00:29:47.000 And this is recognized in our law.
00:29:50.000 There's a doctor-patient privilege.
00:29:53.000 But you tell your doctor it's privileged information because we want that confidentiality.
00:29:58.000 We want individuals to have faith that their doctor is the two of them against the world, that the doctor has no obligation to anybody else except the individual he's treating.
00:30:12.000 It is the central basis of Western medicine for 2,500 years.
00:30:17.000 And now you have these technocrats like Tony Fauci Who are saying we're going to change that relationship.
00:30:25.000 He said the obligation of the doctor is not to the patient.
00:30:30.000 The obligation is to the state.
00:30:33.000 The doctor is an instrument of state policy.
00:30:37.000 And once you make that decision, Medicine is no longer medicine.
00:30:42.000 Every decision the doctor makes is no longer for the health of that patient, but it's for the good of the society at all.
00:30:50.000 What we need to do now is to fight back. 0.81
00:30:53.000 And they say this medical committee, these quacks, these charlatans in Maine...
00:30:59.000 Who are attacking this doctor are saying, we're going to flood the zone. 0.70
00:31:03.000 We're going to publicly embarrass her. 0.76
00:31:05.000 We're going to condemn her as an insane person to discredit her. 1.00
00:31:10.000 We need to fight back.
00:31:12.000 And I am asking everybody who is listening to this podcast today, we are going to post, attached to this podcast to our website, a list of the names of all the members of this medical board.
00:31:27.000 And Meryl doesn't know that I'm going to say this to you today, but I am so angry at what they're doing to her.
00:31:33.000 And I hope all of the people who are listening to this podcast share my rage at these charlatans, these frauds, these quacks outers. 1.00
00:31:45.000 We need to tell them that we are not going to stand for it.
00:31:49.000 We're going to tell them that we want our medical advice given to us by doctors who are healers and not technocrats who are functionaries of a medical cartel and a pharmaceutical industry.
00:32:06.000 I'm going to post the names of all of these members of this rogue board And I hope that all of you will take the time to write them a note and express your feelings about what you're doing.
00:32:18.000 And I can tell you I'm going to be sitting around.
00:32:22.000 Trying to figure out if there's a way to sue them, sue them individually, sue them as a group, sue them for racketeering and fraud, whatever we can do to get justice and to return the medical profession to what it's supposed to do, which is healing.
00:32:39.000 Meryl Nass, thank you so much for your courage.
00:32:42.000 You know, we support you, we love you, and we will continue to do so.
00:32:47.000 Thank you.