RFK Jr. The Defender - December 23, 2021


What Government Should Have Done with Former HHS Official Paul Elias Alexander


Episode Stats

Length

31 minutes

Words per Minute

142.31885

Word Count

4,419

Sentence Count

294

Misogynist Sentences

2

Hate Speech Sentences

1


Summary

In this episode, Dr. Paul Alexander, PhD, joins me to talk about his article, "The Power of It: A Summary of 37 Studies on the Efficacy of the COVID Vaccine" in the journal Curriculum Vitae, written in 2021. Dr. Alexander is a former epidemiologist, evidence synthesizer, and evidence synthesis advisor to the WHO in Washington, D.C., and a former senior advisor to CDC's pandemic policy in the U.S. government, HHS. He has worked and was appointed in 2008 at WHO as a Regional Specialist Epidemiologist in Europe s Regional Office in Denmark, and he worked also for WHO in Russia, Turkey, Ukraine, and Poland. He's worked as a government epidemiologist for Canada for the past 12 years and he also has worked on TB control and infectious disease control across Asia, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Pakistan, and all over the world. He has an expertise in epidemiology and teaching epidemiology. He's a former assistant professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine, a former Assistant Professor at McMaster, and an epidemiologist at the University of Toronto, and a Senior Advisor to the CDC's Center for Infectious Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Patrick Kennedy and I discuss the need for masks and PPE in the fight against HIV/AIDS, and how they can be used to prevent transmission of HIV and other infectious diseases. We discuss how to prevent, diagnose, and respond to epidemics. to prevent and manage epidemics, and fight against epidemics and pandemic outbreaks, and the importance of early detection and early intervention in order to prevent the spread of new pandemic pandemic viruses like HIV, Aedes aedes Aedes, the new strain of the Aedes Vibacterium, the Arugovirus. This episode is a must-listen to the world's most virulent strain of Aedes Arugavirus, which has been around for over a century and is rapidly spreading across the globe. and the need to prepare for epidemics in the 21st century. I hope you enjoy it! and learn from it, and share it with your friends, family, colleagues and loved ones. . Thank you for listening and tweet me to let me know what you thought of this episode! Timestamps: 1:00:00 - What do you think of it? 2:30 - Is it safe to wear masks?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 My guest today is Dr.
00:00:01.000 Paul Alexander, PhD.
00:00:02.000 He has an expertise in epidemiology and teaching epidemiology.
00:00:07.000 He's a former assistant professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine.
00:00:12.000 He's a former COVID pandemic Evidence-based synthesizer, evidence synthesis advisor to the WHO in Washington, D.C., and a former senior advisor to the COVID pandemic policy in the U.S. government, HHS. He worked and was appointed in 2008 at WHO as a regional specialist epidemiologist in Europe's regional office in Denmark.
00:00:40.000 And he worked also for the WHO in Russia, Turkey, Ukraine, and Poland.
00:00:46.000 He's worked as a government epidemiologist for Canada for the past 12 years.
00:00:52.000 And he also has worked on TB control and infectious disease control across Asia, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Pakistan, and all over the world.
00:01:05.000 You have an extraordinary...
00:01:07.000 CV, Curriculum Vitae, I invited you on here because you wrote an extraordinary article in October, I think it was October 28th, 2021, in Brownstone Institute.
00:01:23.000 And to me, it's the most useful summary of all of the studies that are relevant to vaccine efficacy.
00:01:30.000 It's 37 studies at that point.
00:01:33.000 That talk about the efficacy of the various COVID vaccines.
00:01:40.000 I one time read an obituary that C.S. Lewis, the kind of theologian, wrote about a friend of his where he described his friend who had died recently as honest as the daylight.
00:01:53.000 And when I read that description, I thought, you know, gosh, I'd really love for somebody to apply that phrase to me at some point in my life.
00:02:04.000 This article that you wrote, The Power of It, was really just incredible because what it is a very clear statement of what we do know and what we don't know about vaccines and without any prejudice, without any bias from one side or the other.
00:02:19.000 But in the end, it's a very devastating picture of this vaccine.
00:02:24.000 You don't say that it causes antibody and an enhancement, because we do not, or at least when you wrote this, we did not have that evidence.
00:02:33.000 It's just a very good summary of the best studies that are out there on vaccine efficacy.
00:02:39.000 And I know that you wrote this in part, Because there were lawyers all over the country, and I know that you work with Peter McCulloch and with Pierre Corey and Professor Harvey Rich, who are kind of the leading lights and treatment, and that a number of people were relying, attorneys began relying on your expertise, and you were motivated at some point to put together, to simply put together all of the studies in one place.
00:03:09.000 So will you tell us what the science says?
00:03:13.000 Thank you very much again, Mr.
00:03:14.000 Kennedy, and it's indeed an honor for me here.
00:03:16.000 Look, the reality about it is we have seen this explosion of infections in UK, Israel, Seychelles, Gibraltar, Iceland, Norway, etc.
00:03:28.000 So, including the United States, there was an outbreak in Barnstable, Massachusetts, that kind of caught everybody off guard because it showed that 74-75% of the vaccinated people were infected.
00:03:42.000 At that time, it was a seminal study that a company that published in the Lancet.
00:03:47.000 It was about an outbreak in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
00:03:51.000 And in that particular study, nurses were locked down for a period of time due to an outbreak.
00:03:57.000 And what we found at the end of the study were three or four important findings, which was one that double vaccinated people can and do Do become infected too.
00:04:10.000 Let me just lay the groundwork.
00:04:12.000 These were nurses in a hospital.
00:04:14.000 They were frontline workers and they were tested prior to getting vaccinated.
00:04:21.000 So they had PCR tests and they had tests of the levels of cultures in their noses.
00:04:30.000 Prior to getting the vaccine, then they received the vaccine.
00:04:34.000 They were then locked down because there was a surge.
00:04:38.000 And they were locked down for several weeks.
00:04:40.000 And that allowed a unique situation where you could look at, where you could examine the efficacy of masks You could examine the efficacy of vaccination against transmission.
00:04:53.000 And you could also look at what was happening, whether vaccinated people were getting sick or not, and what was going on in terms of their capacity to transmit that virus to other people.
00:05:08.000 So that's just the laying groundwork.
00:05:10.000 So what would happen?
00:05:11.000 Well, what I think the interesting things that we are finding in these studies, in that study, the one in similar, there was one in Israel by Chitrit, and there was one in Finland.
00:05:22.000 These three nosopomiel outbreaks in these three institutions, Vietnam, Israel, Finland, showed us that A, these nurses had masks and PPE. So that's a big problem.
00:05:35.000 That was not the principal finding.
00:05:37.000 But embedded in these papers, you are told that they wore masks and PPE. So that should be a concern.
00:05:45.000 It's not even laid out as a finding.
00:05:47.000 But to me, that is an important finding that is hidden.
00:05:51.000 That's number one.
00:05:52.000 Number two, it showed us that double vaccinated people spread.
00:05:55.000 In this Ho Chi Minh City study, they found that the phylogeny of the nurses...
00:06:02.000 The genetics of the virus, the infections, were all the same.
00:06:08.000 And that tells us, different from the community, it tells us that they all spread it amongst themselves.
00:06:14.000 That's a key finding.
00:06:15.000 They were not just disseminating.
00:06:18.000 They were not just double vaccinated, but they were spreading it.
00:06:20.000 They were spreading it.
00:06:22.000 That's the key.
00:06:23.000 It's not just they were double vaccinated, got infected.
00:06:26.000 They were transmitting.
00:06:27.000 And They found that the nurses harbored about 251 times viral load in the nasopharyngeal passage than earlier strains, the alpha strain, etc.
00:06:39.000 So it was a huge, huge problem because it demonstrated from that study and the bond stable that we have a problem.
00:06:48.000 And around that time, if you recall, Rochelle Walensky, CDC lead, came to the microphone to tell everyone, put back on the mask.
00:06:56.000 Because those studies were beginning to frighten everyone.
00:06:59.000 But right now we have these 37 studies that show us, it's not my words, this is the evidence.
00:07:07.000 It shows us that the vaccine doesn't hit the Delta.
00:07:10.000 The Delta bypasses the immunity from these vaccines because what the public still doesn't understand is the vaccine is comprised of the contents from the initial Wuhan strain in March of 2020.
00:07:26.000 That's gone a long time now.
00:07:28.000 So if your friend tells you, John, I'm going to take a vaccine tomorrow.
00:07:34.000 I have my appointment.
00:07:35.000 You should be able to tell them today, you know...
00:07:38.000 What you're going to take is going to be worthless because we have a study that told us that the Pfizer vaccine loses 40% antibodies per month.
00:07:49.000 That means after three months, you effectively have no immunity.
00:07:54.000 You're back to zero.
00:07:56.000 And people are not understanding this.
00:07:58.000 So when you're talking about let's continue running the vaccine clinics here, the public doesn't understand that you are getting something that in two months the vaccine, the efficacy wanes.
00:08:09.000 So it's a devastating situation and nobody's being told the truth.
00:08:13.000 And we are set up now with this routine.
00:08:16.000 Look, Israel is now prepping for a fourth booster and there are indications that the UK has started a fourth booster.
00:08:23.000 We don't know how the human immune system is going to respond to that level of boosting.
00:08:29.000 It could be catastrophic and that's why I put it together.
00:08:32.000 A lot of lawyers asking me, we need something for the court because of all these vaccine mandates.
00:08:38.000 So I said, okay, this is the evidence.
00:08:40.000 Put it in your legal document and argue your case because the evidence is clear.
00:08:45.000 The vaccine is...
00:08:46.000 I'm not here to talk about against vaccines or for vaccines.
00:08:52.000 The Barnstable study, because that's my hometown.
00:08:57.000 That's where I live.
00:08:58.000 I have my house there, and I was raised in Barnstable.
00:09:02.000 And that study, which is called Brown et al., there were 469 cases of COVID, and 74% of them were fully vaccinated.
00:09:13.000 And that was the first real shocking indicator that the vaccines were not protecting people against COVID. Yes.
00:09:23.000 Yes.
00:09:23.000 At the same time, we had a good study in Wisconsin by Rhinosma.
00:09:29.000 And what they were actually showing us is that the vaccinated and the unvaccinated carried the same level of viral load.
00:09:36.000 And also, we were seeing in the studies that the cycle count threshold, which is, and I know you know what I'm talking about, the TCR test, the number of cycles, To amplify the piece of virus from the swab.
00:09:52.000 The lower the cycle count is our proxy measure of how infectious you are.
00:09:58.000 And we know once you have psychocomb thresholds like 24 and below, that person has a massive load and very infectious.
00:10:07.000 Anything over 30, we know that you're probably not infected with COVID. You might be testing positive, but that's viral junk and fragments.
00:10:17.000 And we've been arguing that 95% Of all of these infections from last year and even this year are really not positive COVID. We can have that discussion another time.
00:10:30.000 I'm probably going to write about it.
00:10:31.000 The PCR test is a devastatingly flawed test.
00:10:36.000 But back to the vaccines, the reality about it is this.
00:10:40.000 Our concern is that Because of the, not just that the vaccine has failed, because you mentioned something earlier, the antibody-dependent enhancement.
00:10:49.000 And I think that is the issue for us, because we are seeing that the vaccinated is getting so infected.
00:10:55.000 In time, we might progress to more than just infection.
00:11:00.000 Now, if the vaccinated...
00:11:02.000 Let me just explain this to people who don't know what antibody-dependent enhancement is.
00:11:08.000 This is the big fear that everybody, including Tony Fauci and Paul Offit and Peter Hotez, talked about at the beginning, is that every COVID vaccine that had ever been made before, coronavirus vaccine in history, had made the animals that coronavirus vaccine in history, had made the animals that they gave it to sicker.
00:11:28.000 So when they first gave them the vaccine, it provoked a very robust antibody response.
00:11:33.000 And the vaccinologists thought, we hit the jackpot.
00:11:36.000 We got what we wanted.
00:11:37.000 We're getting a great antibody response.
00:11:39.000 But then when the wild virus comes back around, instead of resisting it, it facilitates, it amplifies its impacts, and it ended up killing the ferrets.
00:11:51.000 And it's much, much, the vaccinated get much sicker than the unvaccinated.
00:11:56.000 This was the big rock that everybody wanted to avoid.
00:12:01.000 Now the problem is, That Pfizer discontinued its study and blinded the placebo group in six months.
00:12:11.000 Yes.
00:12:11.000 And a lot of critics say the reason they did that is because they wanted to hide any evidence of an antibody-dependent enhancement.
00:12:19.000 So now we won't, we'll never see it in the data.
00:12:23.000 And what I'm going to ask you now Is there evidence anywhere in the world that we are seeing anybody dependent on Hanson, or is the jury still out on that?
00:12:36.000 Well, I would think, Mr.
00:12:38.000 Kendi, I like your explanation there.
00:12:40.000 I would think, yes.
00:12:41.000 When you look at the UK data, the UK data every week it gives us is probably the most granular data.
00:12:49.000 And it is showing us that the vaccinated is becoming, not is becoming, is routinely much more infected than the unvaccinated person.
00:12:58.000 Moreover, We are seeing that the vaccinated person in places like Israel, 60-65%, those are the ones being hospitalized.
00:13:07.000 In England also.
00:13:08.000 And the unvaccinated also.
00:13:11.000 So there is the chance now, what we are seeing is the vaccinated is spreading.
00:13:16.000 To the unvaccinated.
00:13:18.000 And I think to really answer your question, we have to touch on the concept of the original antigenic sin.
00:13:25.000 And I think to answer this antibody-dependent enhancement, we have to admit, or we have to be willing to look at that concept To try to explain the data.
00:13:35.000 And I think based on the data, what we are seeing now, we could actually explain that antibody-dependent enhancement is occurring.
00:13:44.000 Because the priming, the initial exposure to the pathogen is subverting the immune response so that the proper immune response is not happening in the vaccinated person.
00:13:57.000 And when you do bump up against that pathogen again in the environment, Your immune system is fighting this wrong and the response is catastrophic because you are getting more and more infected as a vaccinated person and your lungs are getting sicker and sicker and sicker.
00:14:15.000 And the problem is if we go by what the vaccine developers told us, they told us that our vaccine is suboptimal.
00:14:25.000 And this is a problem.
00:14:27.000 I don't know why they would bring a suboptimal vaccine that is non-sterilizing in the first place.
00:14:34.000 Because therefore, you would never ever be able to get out of this pandemic.
00:14:41.000 In fact, What we fear is if the initial exposure that the person had was a systemic exposure.
00:14:50.000 So if my exposure was vaccine to this SARS-CoV-2, I was not infected before.
00:14:58.000 I went and I took the vaccine as a good civil person.
00:15:01.000 You told me, take the vaccine, let's help each other and all this stuff.
00:15:05.000 I went and I took it.
00:15:06.000 So my first exposure is the vaccine.
00:15:10.000 The way the immune system operates, the immune system, when I take that vaccine, is faced with a choice.
00:15:19.000 Do I go to normal?
00:15:21.000 Because normally this virus, which should land, will land in my nostrils, my nasopharyngeal pastures, or my oral cavity.
00:15:29.000 The normal response is what we call the cytotoxic natural killer cell response.
00:15:36.000 Where those cells, CD8 plus cells, are zoned to the respiratory tract, the lung, et cetera, to deal with a respiratory pathogen.
00:15:48.000 Now, if my first exposure, though, was vaccine, and I have spike in my blood now, in my circulation, and it has produced antibodies for me, my immune system is We'll get that signal that there's something wrong, something taking place systemically.
00:16:08.000 It will divert my response, my first response, my initial priming to my circulation.
00:16:16.000 So the problem with using the original antigenic sin to try to explain this is that that first exposure prejudices.
00:16:24.000 That's the issue.
00:16:25.000 It biases your immune system.
00:16:28.000 To that direction for the rest of your life for that pathogen.
00:16:32.000 So that when you do bump up against SARS-CoV-2 in the environment for the first time, which you will, because we are within, we have pathogens circulating, that virus would land in your nasopharyngeal as normal.
00:16:47.000 The proper response, which is the cytotoxic immune response, Which will send the proper immune response cells, the CD8 cytotoxic natural killer cells, to clear the respiratory tract and kill the virus.
00:17:05.000 That is not happening, or at least at a much lower level, because the immune system has been biased and primed towards antibodies.
00:17:13.000 So even when you do get exposed in the wild, your immune system is getting signals that, look, my first exposure was vaccine.
00:17:22.000 And I produced antibodies and antibody response systemically because that was the signal I was getting.
00:17:28.000 Now you are getting exposed in the environment, in the nasal passage.
00:17:35.000 But I'm thinking, let me continue going the antibody response.
00:17:38.000 and the immune system will continue churning out antibodies in the circulation and not the proper cytotoxic cells at the respiratory tract where it is needed.
00:17:49.000 And it is at that point you have virus now in the nasopharyngeal.
00:17:54.000 You don't have the proper CD8 plus cytotoxic cells wiping them out.
00:17:59.000 And they're beginning to proliferate.
00:18:01.000 And they're beginning to-- your virus is replicating.
00:18:04.000 And your respiratory tract is getting sicker and sicker.
00:18:06.000 Your lungs are getting sicker and sicker.
00:18:08.000 So in other words, your immune system by the vaccine gets subverted or primed or prejudiced in the wrong direction.
00:18:19.000 And when you do get exposed, your immune system cannot react Optimally the way it should.
00:18:25.000 And therefore, those people we are seeing in the UK and Israel have been vaccinated.
00:18:32.000 It is because you were vaccinated.
00:18:34.000 You're trying to formulate this hypothesis to explain the data.
00:18:38.000 You were vaccinated.
00:18:40.000 Your immune system did mount an antibody response.
00:18:43.000 However, when it did do that, you actually biased the immune system lifelong.
00:18:53.000 Sort of clarify this with another concept, which is we've been told that if everybody gets the vaccine that we'll have herd immunity, which means the virus will stop spreading because the pool of people among whom it can spread has been reduced dramatically.
00:19:12.000 But what you're saying opens the possibility That the vaccine can permanently prevent us from obtaining herd immunity because You're going to have continually having these new variants come along and that the vaccine is so specific to that one variant and that one immune response that we don't get the lifetime immunity that could protect us against all variants and over a longer period
00:19:42.000 of time.
00:19:43.000 And so it actually could prevent us and make this virus go on forever.
00:19:48.000 And that's kind of what you're saying, right?
00:19:51.000 Yes, and I would echo something that Dr.
00:19:54.000 Vanden Bosch has been explaining.
00:19:56.000 The antibodies that we are producing, what we would call from the vaccine, the vaccinal antibodies, We are functioning to suppress and out-compete the other antibodies that our immune system produces, your innate antibodies and your naturally acquired antibodies.
00:20:17.000 And it is that out-competing and subversion that puts the vaccinated person in a devastating situation.
00:20:26.000 It is as though you become almost defenseless, and it's the argument to the children.
00:20:32.000 The vaccinal antibodies suppress the innate antibodies the children bring, the children come with and pre-activate it.
00:20:42.000 That is why children do so robustly and well against COVID and a host of other viruses, a host of other pathogens.
00:20:50.000 They have an innate immune system, unlike us, that is so vicious and potent that it will vanquish anything.
00:20:57.000 And the evidence is there and accumulating that we run the risk with vaccine because the vaccinal antibodies function to suppress the innate antibodies in children.
00:21:10.000 And that would mean that at that point, you will have children defenseless against not just SARS-CoV-2, but other pathogen out there.
00:21:19.000 And it could be catastrophic.
00:21:21.000 So that is why we've been writing, like I wrote that op-ed, In Brownstone about two months ago and the title was Dear Pfizer, Leave Our Children Alone and Parents Must Consider Their Children Already Vaccinated.
00:21:35.000 And I laid out studies that showed, biological studies, molecular studies that showed children actually have a molecular basis of immunity already.
00:21:45.000 Because of the ACE2 receptor limitation in their nostrils, children lack the apparatus to become infected.
00:21:51.000 And we know that by a study by Patel et al.
00:21:54.000 We understand why children have been spared.
00:21:57.000 We know this.
00:21:58.000 We know their innate immunity is pre-activated and primed.
00:22:02.000 Unlike an adult.
00:22:03.000 So, in other words, you would be creating a disaster to touch children.
00:22:09.000 In fact, if you leave children alone, children will have no problem with SARS-CoV-2.
00:22:15.000 None.
00:22:15.000 With none of the variants.
00:22:17.000 We have a situation now where this is so mild, so non-lethal.
00:22:23.000 Yet infectious, that it is almost as though if you let it run and you allow healthy, you don't stop it, but you don't promote it, but you allow people to live lives normally, naturally and harmlessly, be exposed.
00:22:39.000 Little children, young people, healthy people, their immune systems can handle it.
00:22:44.000 And Omicron will be no problem.
00:22:46.000 It has shown that already.
00:22:47.000 It is so mildly.
00:22:49.000 Some experts are saying the symptoms are less than even common cold.
00:22:54.000 So, you know, Mueller's ratchet.
00:22:56.000 As time has gone by, the virus is responding to the pressure we're putting on it, the pressure from the vaccine program, the pressure from the lockdowns, every single thing we do.
00:23:07.000 The virus responds, detects, senses, and it responds.
00:23:12.000 So now the virus is mutated down, mild, and it will continue.
00:23:17.000 Let me just point this out, because this is a law of biological evolution.
00:23:27.000 When a virus or an infectious disease, any infectious disease, strikes a naive population, the first surge, the first infection is by far the deadliest.
00:23:40.000 And then after that, through various mechanisms, even without any attempt to control the virus, the virus will quickly evolve into a much less pathogenic or virulent, dangerous form.
00:23:55.000 The reason for that, there's two reasons.
00:23:58.000 One is that when it hits the naive population, the most susceptible individuals are eliminated, are killed.
00:24:04.000 So the second surge hits the population that is more biologically fortified just naturally against the virus.
00:24:13.000 Secondly, and most importantly, these are organisms that are evolving rapidly.
00:24:18.000 You know, in some cases, thousands of times a day, they're breeding, so they're constantly mutating and evolving.
00:24:24.000 And the mutations that are the least dangerous are the ones that have the most advantage selectively.
00:24:33.000 Why is that?
00:24:34.000 If you are a parasite, You want your host to be healthy, to be happy, to be socializing, to be having sex, to be playing with people, because that's the way you spread.
00:24:50.000 The last thing you want is to kill your host, because then you're dead, and you don't want to debilitate your host or make him sick, because then he's not spreading your progeny to the rest of the population.
00:25:03.000 So the mutations that quickly get the most That progressively they're always the ones that are least less and less deadly.
00:25:18.000 And that ultimately all of these organisms reach a stasis with the population where they ultimately just stop killing people because the ones that don't kill or sick at anybody Are the ones that out-compete all of their brothers and sisters?
00:25:35.000 Well, you know, Mr.
00:25:37.000 Kennedy, I couldn't even explain it better.
00:25:39.000 And you know, like, what people should know is, I believe, OC43, which is one of the coronaviruses that circulate.
00:25:46.000 We have four mild coronaviruses that we live with for the last umpteen years.
00:25:51.000 And we're not talking about the serious ones like MERS and SARS-1 and this.
00:25:56.000 But OC43 as an example, I believe it came about as a pandemic in 1880 or so.
00:26:02.000 So like 150 years ago, it had different waves across time, different pandemics.
00:26:08.000 And the thing about it is OC43 obviously historically killed a bunch of people, but over time is exactly what you just said.
00:26:17.000 Antibodies, we develop antibodies.
00:26:19.000 They mutate.
00:26:19.000 Antibodies mutate.
00:26:21.000 They keep mutating downwards, mild and mild.
00:26:24.000 And over the last period of time, decades, this particular coronavirus lives with us endemically.
00:26:31.000 And it's very benign.
00:26:32.000 It causes mild common colds.
00:26:34.000 Whenever you get a cold every year, chances are it's one of the coronaviruses, the four mild coronaviruses.
00:26:41.000 So our argument is this would...
00:26:44.000 This SARS-2 would eventually get there based on what we're seeing now, especially with the advent of Omicron.
00:26:50.000 So, again, it has to go back to what we were arguing before.
00:26:54.000 When I was in the administration and I got a lot of heat and a lot of slander and stuff, it was because my argument at that point was, I had joined in May.
00:27:06.000 Scott Atlas joined in August.
00:27:08.000 We had the same focus, similar to Bhattacharya did at Stanford, which was you properly, properly protect the vulnerable in your society If that is the only thing you ever do, that will come for success.
00:27:25.000 But you see, the problem is we've never properly protected our elderly in nursing homes or in long-term care facilities.
00:27:31.000 And it was like killing fields there in the United States and in Canada.
00:27:35.000 Many of our people died, our elderly parents and grandparents.
00:27:39.000 But here's the key.
00:27:41.000 If you could properly secure a population, the vulnerable in your population, take care of them, Protect them.
00:27:48.000 And we knew that we had early outpatient treatment so that if the elderly in a nursing home got infected, you could provide treatment and you could clear that virus in the two-week period, they will become naturally immune and they will not go to hospital.
00:28:04.000 Because from the time an elderly person touches the emergency room door, their 28-day mortality rises to about 40%.
00:28:11.000 So strongly protect the elderly.
00:28:14.000 Use outpatient treatment, early treatment, as needed, but allow the complete rest of society, as normal as possible, to live normal lives taking reasonable, sensible precautions.
00:28:27.000 Don't touch it.
00:28:28.000 Don't interfere with it.
00:28:29.000 Don't lock down.
00:28:30.000 Don't close schools.
00:28:31.000 Don't do anything.
00:28:32.000 Let me ask you one more question.
00:28:35.000 We've run out of time, but what is your understanding of this?
00:28:40.000 We're seeing the death rate in the United States was 22,000, roughly, per million population.
00:28:47.000 In Europe, it's roughly 1,900 per million population.
00:28:52.000 Nigeria, 14 people per million population.
00:28:56.000 They use ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
00:28:58.000 The most vaccinated countries in the world, Gibraltar, has 2,900 per million population.
00:29:08.000 And we're seeing this around the world that the more vaccinated a country is, there's a direct correlation between the levels of vaccination and, number one, the infection rates, but also, I believe, the mortality rates from COVID. And so how do you explain that?
00:29:28.000 Could that be an antibody-dependent enhancement, or are we seeing something else?
00:29:34.000 Yes, well, the reality about it, well, yes, I agree.
00:29:37.000 I think it is antibody-dependent.
00:29:39.000 It's the only thing that we can bring to the situation to try to explain that data, such that the vaccinated person, because of the pressure, here's the key, Mr.
00:29:50.000 Kennedy, if this vaccine, I don't support it, But I'm saying, if you brought this vaccine to us and it was a sterilizing vaccine that it prevented transmission, the only way we could stop or we could calm a pandemic is to break the chain of transmission.
00:30:05.000 These vaccines cannot.
00:30:07.000 They could not and they cannot.
00:30:08.000 So 100%, we will never, ever, ever get to herd immunity, population herd, with these vaccines.
00:30:15.000 And The problem here is when we vaccinate someone or population, we are putting pressure on the virus that's circulating, but not complete knockout pressure.
00:30:28.000 We are just poking the virus, and it is that suboptimal pressure.
00:30:33.000 It's not that we have a vaccine that will wipe it out.
00:30:36.000 We're teaching it bad tricks.
00:30:39.000 Yes, and it's responding to that suboptimal pressure by naturally selecting Resistant variants.
00:30:50.000 Resistant variants.
00:30:51.000 And that is what is driving the infection, and it will not end.
00:30:55.000 Thank you very, very much, Dr.
00:30:57.000 Paul Alexander.
00:30:58.000 Thank you for all of your work and for your incredible scholarship.