SNEAKO - June 25, 2023SNEAKO AND SHAYKH UTHMAN CONVERTING NORMIES TO ISLAM
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
170.66953
Summary
In this episode, we pray with the One Message Foundation in San Diego, California. We talk about God, the Quran, and whether or not Jesus was a Muslim in his life. We also talk about the concept of God being a creator and why we should not worry about the things we should be worrying about.
Transcript
00:00:16.140
Yeah, I mean, we can go pray and then I'll give this camera to somebody to film us while we pray.
00:00:39.200
Peace be upon them all, they're all giving the same
00:00:41.000
message that we're supposed to worship the one true God.
00:00:43.220
There's a sign over there I want to show you that says Jesus
00:00:49.000
I want to see if there's going to be some debates
00:01:01.040
Hey, chat, why is this guy, he's like, I used to watch your streams.
00:01:20.240
Yeah, I guess you're going to like chip it up so good.
00:01:22.300
So, well, we need to go pray, but can you give us five minutes?
00:01:25.400
Maybe there's some things we want to talk about.
00:01:39.600
I'm planning a trip out to Ireland, inshallah, soon.
00:01:43.660
But in Islam, we believe there's only one creator, one God.
00:02:05.060
But, if you think of the concept, do you believe there is a creator?
00:02:17.060
If you know that there's a purpose to life and you don't worry about it, and you die,
00:02:21.060
and you find out that you were supposed to be doing something, wouldn't that suck?
00:02:34.060
What if there's an everlasting life that you should have been worrying about?
00:02:55.580
We believe all of them were sent from the same God.
00:03:22.060
Shake shake you have a brother who can hold this for us. Oh, yeah
00:03:28.420
Yeah, can you can you hold it doing he's at the point it towards us like this
00:03:37.120
My filmer can't even film because he has to pray
00:11:17.300
Chad, one, if you can hear me, everything's good?
00:11:23.280
so yeah let's uh let's go save some lives let's go do it
00:12:08.460
Well, as I was telling your colleagues, I'm, well, am I going to be on the internet here?
00:12:14.260
This is, I mean, this is, what is it called? Live streams?
00:12:20.980
My friend Amin had, you know, put the backpack on properly.
00:12:25.500
You can put it on me. It's okay. You don't have to have to put him into it.
00:12:36.120
All right, so let me ask you this. Where do you think we came from?
00:12:44.120
Yeah, I'm asking, what do you think? Free country, give your opinion and relax.
00:12:48.120
Well, I think the evolutionary account is persuasive.
00:12:52.120
Do you believe we evolved from a single-style organism?
00:12:55.120
That I don't know. I mean, how did we evolve to be where we are today?
00:12:59.120
I mean, just ask your opinion. It's a conversation. Relax.
00:13:03.120
Like, I believe there's a creator that created this, right?
00:13:06.800
And let me ask you something, like, if you study, there's a concept, you can look it up,
00:13:13.940
Where even a single living cell had to have had a minimum set of genetics
00:13:19.180
for it to have survived, or it would have collapsed.
00:13:21.820
And this is something we can scientifically prove, unlike the theory of evolution.
00:13:25.320
Well, no, organisms have to fit into their environment, otherwise they'll perish.
00:13:29.460
There's nothing wrong with an organism adapting to its environment.
00:13:36.480
But where did we begin from? That's the question.
00:13:41.580
This is what's called the minimum gene concept,
00:13:43.660
meaning the single-cell organism could not have survived
00:13:53.800
So that means it could not have evolved by itself
00:13:56.180
because the first cell had to have had that minimum set in place.
00:14:08.540
The inevitable question is, well, then who created God?
00:14:11.220
Great question. Ask. That's what I'm here to answer, right?
00:14:17.060
Okay, so when you see a puppet show, you see the puppet has strings, right?
00:14:23.100
stay with me. A puppet has strings, right? So when you see a puppet with strings, you think
00:14:28.420
there must be a puppeteer pulling the strings, right? Right or wrong? Well, these are rhetorical
00:14:33.640
questions. So we're having a conversation. You ask the question, I'm answering. So it's
00:14:37.960
a conversation. So when you see strings on a puppet, you realize there is a puppeteer,
00:14:42.460
right? All right. If you go to the back and you go to the puppeteer, you're like, where
00:14:46.280
are your strings? Does that make sense to you? It doesn't, right? So God is uncreated.
00:14:51.460
He's always been there. He'll always be there. That's the greatness of God. He's not a human. He's not a monkey
00:14:56.860
He's not a cow. He's not a prophet. He is the great creator. That is all-powerful
00:15:04.060
Excellent great question. This is this is the conversation. I wanted right?
00:15:07.540
How do I know that because the Quran tells us that how do I know the Quran is the truth that the next question you're gonna ask?
00:15:22.680
So you know the Prophet Muhammad couldn't read or write
00:15:41.700
The Jews will tell me about Moses and all these people had a direct conduit.
00:15:51.840
When you talk about the mark of Cain, you know about that?
00:15:57.740
Supposedly this was a reason for discriminating against black people.
00:16:02.200
What's the mark of Cain in the Mormon religion?
00:16:04.400
Well, from the Genesis story, of course, about...
00:16:07.000
No, because in Genesis it doesn't mention any color.
00:16:09.920
But according to the Mormon faith, the mark of Cain was dark skinned.
00:16:13.720
So that would mean, if you believe in the Book of Mormon and the teaching of Brigham Young and Joseph Smith,
00:16:19.060
then you would say that black people were cursed with dark skin because they didn't choose a sign.
00:16:23.860
Yeah, fortunately the Mormons have backed off from that time.
00:16:26.560
So, I mean, you can't just switch your scripture out when it's not politically acceptable.
00:16:29.920
Oh, we can find a lot of horrible things in the scripture.
00:16:35.420
We have a Quran here, you can show me if you find anything horrible.
00:16:38.880
So that's why I'm saying our boots is not like other boots.
00:16:42.340
The Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, he split the moon with Joseph Smith.
00:16:47.640
The Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, the people told him, show us a miracle.
00:16:51.500
And I can give you documentation, historic eyewitness accounts.
00:17:07.040
Well, you hear the same story from these different people that, no, no, it's our Prophet, they got it right, we have the revelation, you've got to believe what we said, our Prophet got it right.
00:17:15.700
There's even a booth there, which I found rather offensive, about anti-Muslim Jews.
00:17:23.720
The question here is, I'm not telling you you have to disbelieve, I'm giving you evidence, right?
00:17:27.940
What I'm saying is the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, could not read or write.
00:17:32.300
How could he produce a book that none of the liberally giant poets of the time could not respond to?
00:17:38.100
How could he know the phases of the child development inside the womb?
00:17:41.540
How could he split a moon where many, numerous eyewitness accounts from...
00:17:46.620
My Mormon friends tell me the same stories about Joseph Smith.
00:17:50.260
No, about being illiterate and suddenly he gets this revelation.
00:17:53.780
Look, my neighbors are Mormon. I know a lot of Mormons.
00:17:56.060
I've been to Utah, I've debated Mormons, I've discussed it with them.
00:17:59.260
I have never seen them claim that Joseph Smith split the moon, right?
00:18:02.680
The Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, and again, I'm telling you that I have a video on this.
00:18:06.680
You can look it up, Othman ibn Farooq, moon splitting, where I scan the books.
00:18:10.920
I show historic first-person accounts of those people, Muslim and non-Muslim,
00:18:16.100
even the enemies of the Prophet, peace be upon him, that said, yes, the moon split and came back together.
00:18:21.380
I talk about NASA's discovery, about the cracks around the moon.
00:18:29.180
But I'm asking you, how can a man who doesn't have the power of God behind him
00:18:36.020
Well, there are a lot of legends that we find in Scripture.
00:18:41.080
Well, these people all came to have eyewitnesses.
00:18:55.360
We don't even know the authors of those accounts, right?
00:19:06.740
But what I'm asking you, can you name any eyewitness that saw that?
00:19:12.280
Right, but when you go home, can you look it up?
00:19:15.260
When the Prophet Muhammad, peace of the blood of Qanem, he split the moon.
00:19:20.420
Can you guys get the brother of the chair for my kitchen?
00:19:28.640
It's a very Christian attitude. I appreciate that.
00:19:47.020
So, when we talk about eyewitness accounts, if you look at the miracles in the Old Testament,
00:19:54.500
we don't actually have the names of the eyewitnesses.
00:19:56.360
These are oral traditions that over time, they develop, right?
00:20:00.480
That's not something you can put to a test as we're looking at history.
00:20:46.680
Okay, so that means, again, going back to Moses' miracle, you end up with no eyewitness accounts,
00:20:52.180
and even the accounts here, you have doubts about.
00:20:54.740
But the Prophet Muhammad, please be upon him, the moon being split is in the Quran, Surah al-Qamar, first ayah.
00:21:00.120
And Abdullah ibn Abbas, Anas ibn Malik, Abdullah ibn Umar, I can name to you those people who were present,
00:21:06.980
not just the Muslims, not just you're going to say, oh, they were Muslims, they were biased.
00:21:10.220
No, even the enemies of the Prophet, like at that time, Abu Sufyan was not a Muslim.
00:21:44.240
You don't have anything like that for the Bible or the miracles of the past.
00:21:47.680
No, I think there's a lot of that in the Old Testament.
00:21:51.840
No, no, no, it's not a debate, it's a discussion, right?
00:21:53.840
To go through the Old Testament, but there are a lot of people who have witnessed miracles.
00:21:59.380
Can you go home and tell me who's an eyewitness to Moses and miracles?
00:22:06.560
Like, this is not me trying to put, I'm relaxed.
00:22:12.740
But I named you, I named to you all of those that were eyewitness accounts of the Prophet Muhammad ï·º, right?
00:22:24.060
You can look at the scams, you can watch that, no problem.
00:22:36.240
Look, again, like I said, you can research it and you can come back.
00:22:42.280
Thank you Ron. I'll tell you what, when you go home, look up Uthman ibn Farooq, moon splitting.
00:23:04.240
So, anyway, before we got rudely interrupted there.
00:23:14.240
So basically, Sheikh Uthman has live hecklers that come every time
00:23:22.260
They've had about 2,000 shahadas, I think, this year.
00:23:24.800
Shahada is when they get people to accept that Muhammad, peace be upon him,
00:23:27.740
was the final prophet and God is the one true God.
00:23:30.220
And so the Christians, I mean, no disrespect to a lot of Christians in the chat,
00:23:33.360
they don't do as good a job of converting and then they come here.
00:23:36.620
I mean, don't give them free clout, but they come and try to interrupt.
00:23:48.700
These guys have already been refuted so many times.
00:23:52.700
They're here walking around with a tripod trying to interrupt.
00:23:55.700
But you see that guy, the guy we spoke to, he had a very respectful conversation.
00:24:19.120
But this is clearly because, you know, they're trying to say that.
00:24:29.440
You didn't even let me read the verse in the Bible last time.
00:24:47.180
It's not going to come out right. You can't see it.
00:24:55.180
beating and all that stuff. We've already talked to you about it.
00:24:59.180
contradictions. The videos are there. Let me finish.
00:25:07.180
Okay, so you just want, let me explain, let me explain, I'm willing to listen, I want to say something to you, I appreciate it, but this is a discussion then, that's all I'm here for today, listen, you have your table, you have your table, go to your table, go to your table, because all you, so you go, you go do your da'wah, but you're not, you're not, I'll tell you why you're not, I'll tell you why you're not, because you came before, the videos are on our channel, you clipped them,
00:26:05.580
And it's a waste of time for both sides because we're not going to like now it's getting
00:26:11.660
We're not talking to anybody else like any of the non-believers. Now you just have two believers arguing about nothing
00:26:16.600
Well, I don't know why this guy doesn't just go to his own table to his own thing
00:26:21.120
He comes over here because Christians like Chris in the chat
00:26:24.320
That makes absolutely no sense that you can't just go to your own booth to start your own thing
00:26:27.540
They come over here to interrupt like we don't care. They we would never come over to their table
00:27:16.860
I'm talking to you, but he's already disturbing.
00:27:22.860
No, but Shay, you have somebody over there that's touching my stuff.
00:28:00.040
Hold on, hold on a second. You bringing up some type of commentary or whatever, it doesn't mean anything.
00:28:09.040
Okay, cool, because I already answered this when someone else brought this up.
00:28:11.040
You guys can all check out God-Logic Apologetics, go ahead and check out the channel.
00:28:15.040
You guys can see the answer when we was debunking Islam and debunking a Muslim who brought up this objection, and I answered it.
00:28:28.460
He ruled once when he was 22, got kidnapped by the Arabians and the Philistines,
00:28:39.280
He only ruled one year, twice, because one, he was a co-ruler with his father
00:28:50.240
Then he ruled again when he came back to Jerusalem,
00:29:13.720
This is the hypocrisy that's going to get caught live right now.
00:29:16.080
this man and the videos on our channel and probably his channel right this man brought this
00:29:21.580
mccarthy study bible right i brought the bible yeah no no not the bible the mccarthy study bible
00:29:27.360
so what he brought it here to our tent to tell us this is the authoritative work that he answered
00:29:32.740
our questions from now you heard his answer me using me using no no no listen you see you see
00:29:38.260
this you see this you see him interrupt me now is he interrupting me is he interrupting me
00:29:54.880
Now, this man, and you can go check the One Message Foundation channel.
00:29:57.880
You can see the video when he came here to Balboa Park with this exact same book.
00:30:02.880
And he told me the answers for these are from here.
00:30:05.880
And when I questioned him, he told me this is the McCarthy Study Bible and this.
00:30:12.340
What does the MacArthur Study Bible say about Isaiah's reign?
00:30:27.000
Wait, so the explanation is not that he ruled twice, but that it's a copyist error?
00:30:30.880
42, this is a copyist error easily made due to the small strokes that differentiate two Hebrew letters.
00:30:51.540
So now, the hypocrisy cut live is this man brought this book, used this as a reference,
00:30:57.540
gave me reference to answer the contradictions from it,
00:31:00.540
and today when it clearly shows that his answer is not that of the McCarthy Study Bible,
00:31:38.360
So he's posing this as if John MacArthur is my ultimate authority.
00:31:42.500
I used John MacArthur to answer a certain question.
00:31:45.260
And that doesn't mean that he's my authority on everything.
00:31:47.660
So to be fair, I did bring the MacArthur Study Bible.
00:31:55.780
But in my understanding, in fuller understanding, with this particular one, I used the Bible.
00:32:00.800
And I used Bible verses to answer this apparent objection.
00:32:05.120
So the Bible talks about how Ahaziah ruled twice, how he ruled joint with his father, right, in the book of Chronicles,
00:32:12.260
and how it talked about how he was kidnapped and taken and plundered.
00:32:18.560
No, it's not a contradiction because it's talking about him ruling twice.
00:32:21.480
If he ruled once when he was 22, and then he ruled later on when he was 42, is that a contradiction?
00:32:30.520
That's someone's opinion saying it's a textual variant.
00:32:34.920
I'm going to let you finish because I'm the better listener.
00:32:37.660
So if the answer that I gave you, that in one particular context,
00:32:42.580
he rules once when he's 22, and the other one he rules later when he's 42,
00:32:47.560
Sure, but the book you brought, you do not agree with that?
00:32:57.840
If at one point he ruled at 22, and then later ruled at 42,
00:33:21.220
But before he answers, I am going to tell my man something.
00:33:46.400
Okay, so I answered your question, and then I'm returning the question back to you.
00:33:48.860
I can't answer your question properly if we don't even establish that the book is correct or not.
00:33:52.140
Because if you find a contradiction, then we can't agree with it.
00:33:54.400
It has nothing to do with whether you believe if the book is established or not.
00:33:57.840
my question is very simple if let's say let's say if we take the book out of it let's say sneaker
00:34:02.860
you how old are you bro 24 you're 24 okay so let's say when did you start your youtube channel
00:34:07.140
14 14 let's say you let's say um um and uh one one one tech says that sneaker did a youtube video
00:34:15.800
when he was 14 right and then another tech said sneaker did a youtube video when he was 24 is
00:34:21.740
that a contradiction let me ask you before i believe let me ask you something bro let him
00:34:25.940
answer is that a contradiction is that a contradiction to what so what is that a
00:34:31.400
contradiction it does can you do a video at one point at one year and then do another video
00:34:37.860
uh in another year is that a i wouldn't say that i stopped i wouldn't say that i started youtube
00:34:42.640
twice i'm not saying thank you for tenure my i would never write that i did it twice because
00:34:47.080
i'm still but you did but you did do a video twice i never lost my title
00:34:51.900
Listen, let's do any videos different than you're Nico.
00:34:59.900
He said that's my answer. Now let me talk to you.
00:35:05.900
Listen, if you were on YouTube for one year, and then you deleted your account, and then you were on YouTube for four years, how many years were on YouTube?
00:35:18.900
He was 22 years old when he became king, and he reigned for one year in Jerusalem.
00:35:26.040
Now, in the same Bible, when you go to the next one, you see the interruption?
00:35:36.720
Now, here it says when he was 42 when he rules, but he only ruled for one year.
00:35:41.480
So that means his reign, no, it does not say twice.
00:35:49.280
Now, ask him in the NIV version, did they change this or not?
00:36:07.320
Two things that cannot be true at the same time.
00:36:11.860
You see, you're not answering the NIV question.
00:36:12.980
No, because we're dealing with the so-called contradiction.
00:36:23.220
So, if somebody's ruling at 22, and they only rule for one year because an invasion happens.
00:36:29.240
And so, you're saying that it's impossible for 20 years later for him to return to the city and then become king again and rule for one year?
00:36:42.100
if somebody ruled that you see that yes or no you see that it's somebody ruled that at one year at
00:36:49.140
22 and then he came back and ruled another year i would say he ruled for two years no that's because
00:36:54.540
i can add unfortunately these guys can't add if tico had a channel and he did one year and he
00:37:00.680
deleted it and then he started again i would say he's been on youtube for five years because this
00:37:06.000
is the the total amount if somebody ruled for one year and they were taken out and they ruled again
00:37:11.660
for a year, then you would say he ruled for two years. Now, now, my question, why did the
00:37:18.100
NIV version take that age of 42 out? Because they think it's a textual variant. And you
00:37:26.460
are the one, you are the one that said the NIV version. Now, now, listen, listen, listen,
00:37:32.560
I'm not done speaking. I'm not done speaking. I'm not done speaking. I'm not done speaking.
00:37:38.440
Wait, but you just finished your mic and you asked the question.
00:37:45.160
You literally just said, so then why did they change it in the NIV?
00:37:48.660
You are the one that came to our table and said the NIV version is the best.
00:37:59.320
So on your video, I want you to pull up the clip where I brought it and I said the NIV.
00:38:13.800
Okay, if we find a clip from you praising NIV, then?
00:38:23.000
Now, when you can't find the clip, will you admit that you lied?
00:38:30.820
And so if we find your NIV clip, and you praise NIV.
00:38:35.020
And then we find that NIV changed the dates knowing it's an error, as your McCarthy Bible said as well.
00:38:56.080
No, but no, but he just said that he's going to talk and I'm going to listen to you.
00:39:02.300
Now he's like, this is the tactic of Ufman all day, every day.
00:39:25.040
So let me show you the straw man and what he did.
00:39:29.760
If I said that he was ruling as king one year, and then he ruled, I mentioned another year that he ruled,
00:39:37.320
then that's, in total, he ruled a cumulative of that gap.
00:39:42.140
I'm saying that no, according to the text, his rule stopped twice.
00:39:47.400
He stopped ruling at 22, and then he ruled again.
00:39:51.120
It's not that he ruled at 22 and then continued until he was 42.
00:39:57.660
he ruled at 22 the arabians and the philistines invaded jerusalem kidnapped him for 20 years he
00:40:04.320
was gone not the king anymore he came back at 42 they made him king again and he ruled only one
00:40:10.800
year that year because he was sinful to god that's two years no that's two years total his reign
00:40:16.020
let me finish look listen i listen to you right i'm listening thank you i'm listening so if you're
00:40:20.420
trying to say then in all his in all his life he ruled two years sure no problem but that's not
00:40:26.320
what the text is talking about the text is talking about specifically when he started to rule at the
00:40:31.080
particular age that he started to rule okay so that's the straw man that you did i hope that
00:40:35.760
you understand when you look i'm respectfully beautiful he continued to respectfully listen
00:40:40.520
so before you bring a straw man analogy when you bring an analogy make sure it matches with the
00:40:46.700
actual uh situation all right so i answered your question now you know i need to answer what you
00:41:02.340
But you said, you said, if I can answer this, which I did, that you will answer my question.
00:41:06.660
You guys was wooing and oohing off of a textual variant that some people believe.
00:41:11.640
So if you believe in textual variants that disprove the Bible, then you have to explain
00:41:15.640
for us the textual variants that you still haven't translated.
00:41:18.720
I want you to tell me, first of all, in chapter 37, verse 12, who is it that's surprised?
00:41:23.500
Is it Muhammad that's surprised or is it Allah who's surprised?
00:41:29.280
Now, you noticed I told you you're not going to jump.
00:41:31.760
No, you told me that once I answered you, we'll change the subject.
00:41:34.960
You promised once I answered you, we could change.
00:41:46.100
He did say if you answer this question, I'll answer yours, right?
00:42:06.060
and gave an explanation that clearly people better-
00:42:29.800
All right, now, what I made clear is him trying to jump from the subject.
00:42:37.420
And I told him he's going to jump, and that's exactly what he did, right?
00:42:40.680
We said, okay, if we find the clip of him praising an IV, and inshallah, we will, and
00:42:45.280
we post that, he's going to admit to being a liar, inshallah.
00:42:48.600
Because I always say Inshallah, that is not true.
00:42:51.700
Now, once again, now, the answer that he, you don't even know, we don't say we'll lie before something in the future.
00:43:01.900
Now, what he jumped with is the fact that the great Christian scholars that he brought as an authority, which the videos are online, disagree with him.
00:43:13.940
In fact, in the NIV, we will find our praise, but even if you don't, the NIV clearly said that this was...
00:43:20.260
Oh, even if you don't now, you're getting nervous about it?
00:43:27.080
No, no, I'm not going to let him escape from stuff.
00:43:34.460
Now, when you look at the variant, Christian scholars who updated the Bible said that this story is not true.
00:44:03.140
Are there manuscripts that mention 22 for both ages?
00:44:14.920
If you're saying there's variants, then you're sure.
00:44:21.360
He asked, are there manuscripts that in both verses, in the same manuscript, mention the
00:44:28.780
I just know that in one manuscript, it'll say 22.
00:45:25.820
I'm not getting paid to be here, I choose to be here
00:45:34.820
For people who love the match they want to support
00:45:54.160
Don't try to act like you don't make money from.
00:46:40.320
Well, Lice, Nico, tonight, I'm going to poke OMF taxes.
00:46:43.820
He just said I'm a liar, and he said that I do get paid, and now that he's caught, now
00:46:48.160
that he's caught, he said I do get paid, but I don't.
00:46:55.180
He's running from the same thing he's getting paid.
00:47:54.360
They believe it's a textual variant there, so they're going with the other variant.
00:47:57.480
So that means, in this Bible, there was an error in the age.
00:48:10.600
Now, the lie that's taught is NIV shows that their research, that this was an error.
00:48:22.100
right now he mentioned here 42 right and he said he ruled twice niv and mccarthy they all said
00:48:29.080
that this was a copious error in the bible and they even changed it because they said he didn't
00:48:33.960
rule twice this was a clear error in fact if you look at the commentaries on the niv and and i have
00:48:39.960
some at home that i can bring for you if you haven't read them right they say that no doubt
00:48:44.060
this was a copious error as well no doubt i'll bring them to you don't worry right now now
00:48:53.840
You brought this one, and it's also saying it's a copy of Sarah.
00:49:01.020
So what I'm saying is that when he asked me a particular question,
00:49:11.540
I used the NIV study Bible to use an answer that I agreed with
00:49:44.540
Because there was a particular question that he asked
00:49:47.180
That I agreed with that it was in line with the scripture
00:49:49.960
Right here, what this textual variant that they're saying is a copyist error, I don't agree with
00:49:54.800
because there's a scriptural answer regarding this particular apparent objection.
00:50:01.040
Wait, do you know better than the makers of the narrative?
00:50:02.200
So my point is, he has not been able to refute the answer about Ahaziah ruling at 22 and then ruling at 42.
00:50:12.200
The only thing that he's done is, well, in this Bible it says this, or in this Bible it says this.
00:50:17.320
but he has not been able to answer the explanation that i gave with the scripture that's my point
00:50:23.040
so we've dealt with this explanation that it's an error no my explanation is that he ruled twice
00:50:27.420
once at 22 got kidnapped by the philistines and arabians so you disagree with the book that you
00:50:31.840
i disagree with their explanation okay there you go there we can leave it at that i said that in
00:50:37.900
the beginning i think that's why a lot of people resonate with islam because we don't disagree with
00:50:41.200
the scripture oh we'll see we'll see in a second all right so no you said you're gonna answer
00:51:02.700
Because I'm about to show you that you disagree with the Quran.
00:51:10.700
Get your hops or the wash or whatever one you use.
00:51:41.820
I have no problem admitting if I made a mistake
00:52:39.960
Muhammad was a style. Now you go to the Hamza Quran, same birth, or the Kalib. Hamza or Kalib, whatever you want to call it.
00:52:46.160
Show it to him. Yeah, I'll show it to you. And that one, it says something different.
00:52:50.300
Okay, let's see it. All right, let's show you. What's the Hamza Quran?
00:52:53.140
What's the Hamza Quran? You don't know what the Hamza Quran is? You don't know what the color?
00:52:56.320
What is it called? Kalib? You don't even know what it is. What about Al-Qasai?
00:53:00.160
Hamza has a Quran? Uh-huh. Hamza, Al-Fan, Hamza. Yes.
00:53:03.800
And all these are recitations, they're not Quran. They're not Quran.
00:53:10.920
Okay, so we're talking about all these recitations of the Quran.
00:53:48.840
Now, this is where you're going to see them get buried.
00:53:55.240
in the original mushaf, were there these lines?
00:54:37.040
Now, what the mistake they made is the fact that the...
00:54:54.300
Now, is the Mus'haf Qutman radiallahu anhu, the original Mus'haf has no dietary marks.
00:55:02.000
And I'll show it to you tonight again, inshaAllah, okay?
00:55:17.440
now let me finish, he's not going to finish, right?
00:55:19.800
In South Africa, when they ask you, how are you?
00:55:23.980
They're talking to you, but they say, how is the brother?