SNEAKO - SNEAKO Interviews Mohammed Hijab After His Debate With Epstein's Lawyer!

00:00:00 assalamu alaikum yes you're live can you see and hear me how you doing you okay i'm good i'm good

00:00:05 uh thanks for coming on uh last moment's notice no worries at all how are you doing okay doing

00:00:11 good i just wanted to to look at your review your debate with um dershowitz and i thought it'd be

00:00:17 interesting to call you before how did it go well i mean i think it was um enjoyable from my end

00:00:26 it was uh interesting you know i mean the thing is this now has become like when you go in pierce

00:00:31 morgan uncensored it's not meant to be like a formal academic debate and i learned my lesson

00:00:38 the first time when i asked i had a debate with a guy called schmoley yeah um and i asked him like

00:00:45 because the the common protocol like the typical protocol with the debate is you know one person

00:00:52 speaks for a certain amount of time uninterrupted and then the other person speaks for a certain

00:00:57 amount of time uninterrupted etc and then there's like cross-examination and then there's like

00:01:02 questions and answers or something to that effect so when i proposed that to the production team

00:01:08 the first time they were not interested in that kind of thing so i realized what kind of game is

00:01:12 being played because the first thing you got to do with these things is to see what kind of game is

00:01:16 being played and the game is the loudest person the most assertive person the most aggressive person

00:01:23 usually gets center of the ring so the strategy going into this one was okay well if that's how

00:01:30 you guys are going to play it um then i'm going to have to play this game as well and i can play this

00:01:35 game and i had to do a psychological assessment of a piers morgan and dershowitz and i found that there

00:01:41 were two individuals with extremely fragile egos and quite um averse to or you could say hypersensitive

00:01:49 to criticism but i would just have in my pocket all of these ad hominems that anytime where i thought

00:01:56 like i was losing the center of the ring i'd throw an ad hominem because for me

00:02:03 people don't look necessarily at arguments when it comes to these engagements

00:02:06 i think the arguments are important but there are a secondary priority the first priority is

00:02:12 actually optics and it's a genocide support or someone like piers morgan or an apologist really

00:02:19 for the palestine genocide he tries to pretend or feign that he's on the fence but after a year like i

00:02:26 mean 50 000 people effectively died in more than one country israel acting in the same way in palestine

00:02:33 acting in the same way in gaza acting in the same way lebanon i was not gonna be questioned by this

00:02:40 guy and i don't mind if anyone comes and says well you're very arrogant the way you've dealt with this

00:02:46 very distasteful uh very unbecoming i say you know what it doesn't matter what you think because with

00:02:52 respect i would rather look arrogant and um and be dominating with an enemy or with an individual

00:03:00 as an apologist for the genocide then look uh professional but a weak at the same time so it's

00:03:06 a trade-off i was happy to have and i think this is the only way to deal with people like this and um

00:03:13 i think it was from my perspective it fulfilled the strategic function of showing the hypocrisy of

00:03:20 piers morgan because when he was questioned with the same words and the same interrogations

00:03:25 that he uses to question other people about israel does israel have a right to defend itself you know

00:03:31 there's is what's the proportionate response literally his exact words were used against him

00:03:36 and you saw him contradict himself in the span of a minute just does iran have a right to defend

00:03:42 itself yes no no yes literally going from one answer to another answer in the span of 20 or 30 seconds

00:03:50 not knowing how to respond to that question you know getting a taste of his own medicine

00:03:55 you know he's been doing it like i i will never forget the interview that he conducted

00:04:00 with jeremy corbyn right jeremy if you saw that interview bro who's basically trying to ravage jeremy

00:04:07 corbyn with like 15 or 16 or 20 times asking the same thing you condemn this or do you does israel

00:04:14 have a right to defend itself okay well have a taste of your own medicine piers morgan because it's not

00:04:19 just you that can try and act the bully if you can try and dish it out and you want to dish it out to

00:04:24 people like jeremy corbyn and this one and that one the other one abdul wahid who the the gp who lost

00:04:30 his job subsequently because of that interview um and other people as well who he's been trying to bully

00:04:37 if you if you act like that you know you're not about that life really because there's always going

00:04:42 to be someone who can do that to you in a better way than that you can do it to other people

00:04:45 and that person's mohammed hijab and when he came and he did it to you in dershowitz 0.53

00:04:50 i mean he really didn't have a response i mean the physiognomy of piers morgan said it all his

00:04:58 facial expressions his um physiological reactions he was a defeated man and that's all i wanted to do

00:05:06 and uh yeah some people say it's distasteful but to be honest with you i don't care what i have to say

00:05:10 about that yeah some people said that he started to cry that he he started to team up i thought he's

00:05:14 supposed to be moderating what do you think is the the best way to to navigate these sort of debates

00:05:21 because i'm sure you get criticism from people saying that you go guns blazing too much but i like

00:05:26 the way you describe a debate as uh as the ring you're not in just in there to have a friendly

00:05:31 conversation when it's somebody who's opposing your entire world view and you know it's all about optics and

00:05:37 there's a big stage it really is a fight how do you navigate conversations like that without

00:05:42 destroying your reputation but also upholding the point of view that you hold so dearly

00:05:48 i think debates are more of an art than a science some people think that debates are are you coming

00:05:53 with these arguments and you have to act in this way you have to not be afraid to break formalities

00:05:58 at the end of the day there are some formalities with these things and when you're going on piers

00:06:03 morgan's uncensored for example someone would think you have to assume the posture of an

00:06:08 interviewee i didn't take that as a granted assumption so i took the frank quite frankly as

00:06:15 much as i could with the tools that i had uh the uh i took the role of the interviewer i actually said

00:06:23 i'm going to get the center of the ring and and the way i did that and i'm going to reveal the secret

00:06:27 since i don't think i'm going to be debating this issue with piers morgan again

00:06:30 is like i said before piers you just reviewed a psychological profile of the person that you're

00:06:35 dealing with a lot of it is just psychological advantage someone will say why did you start with

00:06:39 an ad hominem and ad hominem isn't that a kind of informal fallacy it's only an informal fallacy if

00:06:44 you connect it to an argument and you say for example you know you are such and such therefore

00:06:49 you are wrong i mean no one's making an argument in that kind of crude manner an ad hominem is actually a

00:06:55 very effective means of discrediting your opponent of setting a psychological scene of creating a

00:07:03 certain thing so to remove ad hominems for from a public debate on these kinds of issues is actually 0.53

00:07:08 quite ridiculous and foolish and there's no reason to do so the only reason why the term ad hominem

00:07:15 has a bad reputation is because people think it's a fallacy but it's only a fallacy if you connect it 0.97

00:07:20 explicitly to a kind of logical proposition we're not doing that so so you can throw as many ad hominems

00:07:25 as you want i mean sometimes ad hominems are like the spice like you know salt in on the food you put

00:07:31 ad hominems there and and and you entertain the public with some ad hominem and say well well that's

00:07:36 a bad argument like he did i said i'm not making an argument i'm just making a point and making a point

00:07:42 about your character by his character about someone else's character and that's just for the public to see

00:07:47 because look the debate is a bit like a performance it is a performance you you're coming out there

00:07:52 you're trying to convince the public and so i want to say that it's an art because you you first have

00:07:58 to look at the psychological profile of the person that you're dealing with knowing piers morgan the

00:08:03 thing about him is as i mentioned he's hypersensitive to criticism and he always feels the need to justify

00:08:08 his actions to the public right in a in a very in a in a i mean everyone can do that to some extent i mean

00:08:16 there's a healthy amount of doing that to just explain to the public or whatever if people are really curious

00:08:21 but he does it because he and it came out in his interview if if you really paid attention

00:08:26 he really he cares too much what even his adversaries think about him he said what do you think of me muhammad

00:08:34 what do you think of me who cares what i think of him i mean i don't care what he thinks of me

00:08:39 why does he care so much if i like him or don't like him or these kind of things so that's a it's a

00:08:44 psychological weakness okay and because for him he's not basing his stances on principles or he's

00:08:51 basing on money okay he's basing on on these kind of things he's money over moral peers so someone with

00:08:57 that kind of psychological profile it's easy to break him okay it's actually quite easy to break him

00:09:01 it's a mind game that must be played with him because the first thing is the dash which is the same by

00:09:06 the way you'd have noticed so when i was speaking to him about epstein's island he he kind of crossed

00:09:09 his arm he became like a little girl oh i'm telling you i you know i didn't go to the island

00:09:14 i mean why are you i mean the the way he spoke about that is it people are saying in the comment

00:09:21 section it's very incriminating you know people are saying that he sounded like he sounded people

00:09:25 are saying he sounds guilty i mean it was it's unbelievable like you know he went down with a jab

00:09:31 really because both of them are like i say fragile uh psychologically so if if you know that the

00:09:37 person's a disturbing is a liar and is a is playing a game with you he doesn't really know the facts 0.84

00:09:42 and every single thing that i said about international relations has been fact checked 0.96

00:09:46 and turned out to be correct every single thing about international law has been fact checked that he

00:09:50 said it was wrong and it turned out to be correct so if these people are going to poison the

00:09:55 well and lie about the facts okay well let's play a game i know your weaknesses you you can't really

00:10:01 get to me because you can't reach me in that way psychologically let's let's let's see let's see

00:10:07 so that the ad hom in the beginning was a way of really like um if you like putting the jab

00:10:14 the face of the opposite the nose of the opponent in the beginning just letting them respect who you

00:10:18 are it's like a psychological event then after that we'll throw the arguments we'll mention all

00:10:22 these points all the kind of thing but you need to maintain center of the ring in a place like

00:10:26 pierce morgan uncensored you have to as soon as you get in there the tactic is to get the center of the

00:10:32 ring and ask the questions and be the interviewer and yes be ready for anything else but that's um

00:10:37 that's what i've done with him and people will not like it but to be i'll be honest i i cannot care

00:10:42 what their opinion is because i'm pretty sure that for the minority of people that don't like it like

00:10:47 two percent three percent who said you went a bit overboard or whatever if they were on pierce morgan they'd

00:10:51 probably get ravaged by him and they get if it was a two-on-one situation they'd get even more

00:10:56 ravaged and they would be spoken over and they would be interrupted and they would be and i would

00:11:01 rather be like i said before i would rather look arrogant i'd love rather look whatever than look

00:11:06 weak on that show with that man defending that position for me that was not an option that's a good

00:11:12 strategy and i think it's worked time and time again against shmoli and against uh that major debate

00:11:16 you had just on palestine israel against piers morgan last year you got to get dirty you know

00:11:20 the uh formal debate strategy does not work on a live show like that it's a it's a different type

00:11:25 of ball game so it was it was good to see that i'm looking for do you recommend that i watch the

00:11:30 the full interview or should i watch the highlights that you put up on your channel no you can do a bit

00:11:35 of both i mean if i mean that i put some highlights uh the guys that are working with me benjamin

00:11:39 icra is a fantastic uh you know person who manages the the social media platforms and i have to give

00:11:46 him a shout out because he's he's the one who puts the things together uh you can watch that as a taster

00:11:51 and stuff some things that he put on the shorts and all these kind of things they're good but i mean

00:11:55 you can watch the whole thing because you'll see i mean just pay attention to the body language pay

00:12:00 attention to the psychology of these people pay attention to how weak they look because that for me is

00:12:05 more important than anything for me for me um optically how a debate looks is as important

00:12:10 as how it sounds so so for example if someone were to turn off all the sound and children were

00:12:16 to come into a room and they had to judge who is the winner of this debate the child should be able

00:12:22 to point without hearing a word at the winner of the debate just by the body language and the demeanor

00:12:27 and the confidence levels of the interlocutor and that's for me uh a very very integral part of

00:12:33 debates what about the uh the you had another debate recently with um that you were preparing

00:12:41 for for a long time what is his name again it's uh william lane craig yeah william lane craig i i

00:12:46 didn't get to see that yet how did that that one it seemed like that was i saw some highlights but

00:12:50 it seemed like that was unanimously in the in your favor it was i mean but the thing is that william

00:12:56 lane craig is no um you know durschwitz he's he's a person who's quite frankly i have to say he is

00:13:02 academically honest and he is a heavyweight in the world of academia in the field that i've

00:13:09 you know completed my phd on completing my phd is philosophy of religion he's really one of the

00:13:13 biggest names in the last hundred years and in christian debates he could be said to be

00:13:18 the biggest name in the last hundred years so william lane craig is if you've watched any of

00:13:23 these christian apologists usually in some way shape or form the teacher of your favorite christian

00:13:29 apologist debater like for example david would have a big debate with david would in 2018

00:13:33 and william lane craig would be considered to be in a way his teacher so he's a big big fish and and

00:13:39 you can't really get away with things with him he's written a book on logic he's written so many peer

00:13:43 reviewed papers so i actually prepared for that debate very rigorously and very um you know uh

00:13:51 strenuously like every day i would be reading his books i've read most of not all his books i've read

00:13:56 most of not all his um seen most of if not all his debates and all of his public lectures and

00:14:01 everything that there is to do with this guy because for me this was more of an academic debate

00:14:07 yeah i was assertive but it's not like that debate is not going to get as much traction as this one

00:14:11 because the the performative aspect of the entertainment aspect was much less uh because it

00:14:17 was about the facts and i think it was good i think we went back and forth um there was nothing that he

00:14:24 said that really threw me off or that something i didn't hear before except for one um example that

00:14:32 he gave about some candles which i miss heard because he said that you know if you put two

00:14:35 matchsticks together and uh and you know both of them will light a candle will look like a light a

00:14:41 candle and i heard him differently in my head saying that if you put two candles together it will become

00:14:46 a bigger flame so in my mind that that was that was a mistake that i made in hearing what he had to say

00:14:51 um and that was the only thing that he brought that i didn't expect him to bring because i

00:14:56 didn't really read it in any of his works this thing about over determination i think he thought

00:15:00 about it on the spot um however obviously now having heard what he said i think it's even a weaker

00:15:07 argument than i thought it was in the beginning because uh what he was trying to say was that you

00:15:11 know if god i'm saying that it's father the son the holy spirit how could all three of them create the

00:15:16 universe fully and totally uh and at the same time together how is that possible so he said that

00:15:23 well if you get two matches okay and you bring it to the wick of a candle okay then those two matches

00:15:33 both of them are fully uh necessary for the lighting of the wick of that particular candle and that's a

00:15:40 very very very very very weak argument because the truth is if if you've got two matches and you

00:15:46 from a physics perspective if one of them produces enough energy to light the candle you don't need

00:15:52 the other match becomes superfluous it's unnecessary completely so you can't say that actually two

00:15:57 matches are the ones which lit the candle because actually only one match was required to like the

00:16:02 candle and the other one was there as a redundant feature from a physical perspective like the heat of the

00:16:08 second one is no is not required because there's a threshold that was used for the first match but

00:16:14 that's the only thing i think that some christians came out and said well you said this and this and

00:16:18 whatever but nevertheless even what i did say which i misheard what he said was correct if you do bring

00:16:24 two flames together the flame will become bigger there's no controversy in that um so the point is is

00:16:30 that you cannot have two entities okay which create the universe to a degree of 100 each and the

00:16:36 the similitude of saying that you can is the same similitude of saying that you can have two mothers

00:16:42 that are 100 responsible for the production or the creation or the giving birth to one child

00:16:49 to having two mothers that are 100 capable of uh producing one child and i've given this example

00:16:54 before and it's something that william lanecraig did not respond to and cannot respond to and will not

00:16:58 respond to because it's something which is too um clear for anyone to dispute and to be honest if he

00:17:06 can't do it with two phds a master's degree and a ba and all these books and 30 books i mean in this

00:17:12 library behind me i've got some of little uh library i've got some of his books as you can see here

00:17:19 you know this is a book you can see he's written on time and eternity you can see with copious notes

00:17:25 attached to it he's uh william lanecraig you know lots of books of his that um that i've got here that

00:17:33 it's not even related to the topic he's written many many books he's a man that is probably the

00:17:38 foremost philosopher you know um in the christian world and he if he couldn't answer these questions

00:17:44 i'm sorry to say yeah who can who can so the trinity cannot be defended yeah he compared it to a three

00:17:50 headed dog correct he exactly that bro i mean i mean comparing the trinity the father the son of the

00:17:57 he's saying look his argument is this he's saying you've got a three if you've got a three-headed

00:18:02 dog you've got a three-headed dog it's actually just one dog with three heads the response is a

00:18:07 very simple response and christians have themselves responded to it and said actually if you've got a

00:18:12 dog with three heads you've got three dogs with one overlapping body in the same way as if you had a

00:18:17 conjoined twin or siamese twin you know if you've got a conjoined twin that's two people but it's just

00:18:23 got some connection between those two people you so if that's your strongest argument bringing a

00:18:29 three-headed dog to prove the trinity then you know how false christianity is that itself you have

00:18:34 the top man top dog no pun intended you've got the top dog of the christian world okay yeah in the last

00:18:41 hundred years last hundred years you know and this is this guy is the one who defeated so many people

00:18:48 and argumentation somehow is this one that one written books peer-reviewed you know 50 years in

00:18:55 the game 50 years half a century in the game and this is his best attempt there's no way i'm sorry to

00:19:02 say there's no way uh this can be made sense of you cannot make sense of the trinity and if you can't

00:19:08 make sense of the trinity you still believe in jesus islam is the only religion really only world 0.93

00:19:13 major world religion if you still believe in jesus you want to believe in the messiah and you can't make

00:19:17 sense of the trinity then you have to believe he's the prophet and the messenger and that he's not

00:19:21 god or the son of god because it doesn't make sense for him to be part of the trinity and if that's it

00:19:24 if you've understood that then islam is really the only option for you what do you have coming up for 0.99

00:19:29 because you're coming off of two big wins i i see on twitter that you're you're very selective with

00:19:34 your debates and i think that's the right strategy right when you get to a certain point when you when

00:19:38 you have like major victories under your belt a lot of other debaters will want to come in there

00:19:42 and try to do a quick one because they get to steal some of that aura they get to steal that

00:19:48 that win it is a lot like fighting you need to be selective with it what do you have uh coming up

00:19:52 forward do you anything major or do you think that you should relax for a bit by the end of the month

00:19:58 i've got something to announce um which will be in my understanding quite major but uh the announcement

00:20:05 will come at the end of uh the month in terms of debating though i'm going to give it a rest until

00:20:11 something comes to my attention which is interesting i mean to be honest there's like

00:20:15 seven or eight people now that are lining up on a waiting list to debate to debate me and i have no

00:20:20 problem maybe one day they'll get their chance but they also need to understand that i've been debating

00:20:25 for a very long time and that now my debates have garnered some of the most views and interactions

00:20:30 and engagements in the world okay that's a fact i mean in multiple languages so just being fair

00:20:37 if they were in my position and then they had the same kind of resume i'm putting aside whether you

00:20:43 think i won or lost any of those debates that's a subjective value judgment and of course if you

00:20:47 don't agree with me ideologically you're going to think i lost every single debate i've ever been in

00:20:51 it's not a problem but the fact remains that from an influential perspective or from a prominence

00:20:56 perspective that that my debate has my debates for the last since especially since 2018 but well

00:21:03 beyond that have garnered the the kind of traction that they've garnered so if somebody was a tenth of

00:21:09 the you know if someone was a tenth of the um uh with the numbers that i've got has the audacity to

00:21:17 come and speak to me as if oh you're a coward if you don't do such and such and you're such and such

00:21:22 if you don't do such and such i mean why do you think i owe you a debate i don't owe anybody a debate 0.95

00:21:28 you know what i mean so i mean until you come and done what even a fraction i'm not even telling you

00:21:32 to do what mahammad hijab done that might be an impossible thing for you to do but go ahead and 0.99

00:21:36 do some of that go and go and do 20 in your community get that level of 20 on track 30 maybe

00:21:44 you know i like debating i enjoy it you can come to me and you can fulfill like somebody called jay

00:21:50 dyer or sam uh the wife b or anybody else who wants to you know engage uh shmoli came the other day

00:21:58 this guy uh musab uh ibn yusuf or i don't know his full name or or this one of that there's so many of

00:22:05 them that have come and and and presented themselves this other guy called i don't know andrew wilson or

00:22:11 is that his name yeah i yeah that's his name and he's he's like yeah come and speak to me i mean

00:22:17 there's so many of them i mean so go in and then i click on the all i have to do is click on their

00:22:22 thing and see their engagements and they're not really big figures so okay i'm a coward or i'm a

00:22:27 bad man or i'm a scared man because i don't want to accept a debate with an individual or individuals

00:22:33 that have a tenth of my following or a tenth of my or have not really achieved much in their

00:22:37 communities if that's what you want to say to yourself to make yourself feel good then by all

00:22:43 means yeah with that i think the william lane craig debate that does kind of encompass a lot

00:22:47 of the other christian apologists so there's there's no need to you know as a as a viewer's

00:22:53 perspective there's no need they i have to be excited for it because at the end of the day i'm

00:22:58 not excited by these names i mean that you know these names are not they're not exciting me and it's

00:23:03 i'm sorry to say you know i have to be motivated so when piers morgan gave me andrew does which

00:23:08 and i thought 2-1 i'm going to make this into it this it's going to be a 2-1 engagement here's

00:23:13 morgan he gets the numbers okay humiliating him in front of the public and stuff like that

00:23:18 is there a need for that is there is there a utility in that i said okay no problem

00:23:22 and i did it in one day's notice i checked out you know because i've read some of that

00:23:26 dershowitz stuff before so i just looked at my notes from the library and stuff like that and

00:23:30 saw and spoke to a few people international relations experts and stuff and we went for it but if

00:23:36 if you're not going to be what you get what you bring into the table at the end of the day for

00:23:39 all those people who want to debate mohammed hijab the question really remains what are you bringing to

00:23:45 the table it's not like you're bringing most of these people are unqualified a lot of these people

00:23:50 don't even have a single qualification they're so you're not an academic you're not you don't even

00:23:54 have social media reach you're not even loved in your own communities you don't so what is it

00:24:00 about the yani but the point is you can go and prove yourself go get a few wins under your belt

00:24:06 go and let the community but back you and then if i see and if my team finds that you know that

00:24:11 you're you're at a certain level maybe one day no problem i'll be around i'm 30 i'm just turned 33

00:24:17 years old i mean i'm still quite young there's you know years and years of my life you maybe we'll meet

00:24:22 one day but the point is i mean it's uh for them to think that they are they're in what kind of

00:24:28 entitlement must they have i mean for me when i approached william lane craig i i approached him with a

00:24:33 a certain level of respect i mean this guy's way my my senior he's much more if he said no because

00:24:38 you're not on my level honestly if he said that to me i'd be okay fine he's right i'm not on his

00:24:42 level he's he's done much more than i have and he's been in the game for more than i have that's

00:24:46 simple as that if someone like even to be fair even like richard dawkins who i would love to debate

00:24:51 one day but if he says look i'm sorry but you know go and build yourself up a little bit more and

00:24:56 come back to me i'll say to him yeah fair enough you can say things like that but you might not be alive

00:25:00 you know i might not be alive you might not be alive nobody might be alive but he's 18 something

00:25:05 years old you know fine if you're the a side you can speak like that but if you're not the a side you

00:25:12 can't speak like that so by the end of the month there's going to be uh some uh some uh some some

00:25:18 announcements that we're going to make uh about uh some things that's going to happen but i'm

00:25:24 definitely going to give debating a bit of a rest for now until something comes up i figured you were

00:25:29 going to that's probably um that's probably the smart decision are you good friends for us a

00:25:33 hobby because we were i'm planning a stream with him to go out to montreal i'm headed to canada

00:25:38 tomorrow are you are you good friends with them very good friends with him i think he's i even

00:25:43 watched i've actually watched most of his videos as well uh people don't know that he's got he's

00:25:47 actually got this kind of he's got a website called jujuclub.com and i've and that website he he

00:25:53 puts tutorials about uh jiu-jitsu striking tutorials a lot of like mixed martial arts stuff

00:26:00 and they're really good he's a good teacher like he shows how to he breaks things down analytically

00:26:07 um he's a grappling expert under john danaha who's like you know really and truly one of the greatest

00:26:13 grapplers alive today um and he's obviously an mma expert he's joe rogan described him as the best

00:26:20 mma coach in the world today actually and uh gsp uh was a student of his so you can imagine gsp is

00:26:28 considered really the best mma fighter in the world today oh of all time actually because of all time

00:26:33 so this is the level that we're doing is a treasure in the community because he combines between like

00:26:39 the philosophical understanding the intelligence but also the the warrior spirit and also the you know

00:26:45 the love for martial arts so i think he's a great friend of mine and uh uh someone i've learned a

00:26:51 lot from uh and uh taking a lot from personally okay that's a good recommendation there's a lot

00:26:58 anything that i should ask him just in general i probably just pick his brain i think so i mean look

00:27:05 i mean you know um it depends on what you wanted what your objectives are if your objectives are to get

00:27:10 good at uh mixed martial arts then um clearly you can ask him a good template speak to him in a macro

00:27:18 sense what is because if you go to if you go to montreal for a couple of weeks you're not going

00:27:22 to go and come back as uh you know gsp but what you might go and come back it with is the way to

00:27:28 become like the new gsp in a sense that he'll give you the tools he'll give you the routines he'll give you

00:27:33 the like anything to do with routines i think is always good when you ask a person of that caliber

00:27:41 what are the routines that i must employ i think these are the kinds of things you've got to ask

00:27:44 yourself what your objectives are and then ask him how how do you meet those objectives so that when

00:27:50 you come back to florida that you you're able to are you in florida now yeah i'm back in miami

00:27:56 is there alligators i saw some alligators on this on the streets no alligators the hurricane is uh

00:28:00 you can probably see a little bit outside it's nice and sunny i think it was overhyped by the media

00:28:05 it's okay here oh really i saw some alligators and stuff like that no gators here

00:28:08 yeah but yeah i mean that's what it is bro like you know give a man a fish feed him for a day

00:28:14 teach him how to fish you know feed him for a lifetime so someone like for us a hobby you don't ask

00:28:18 him for a fish you ask him you know to to know how to fish and um and that's what i would do that's um

00:28:27 that's yeah that's the best thing to go with it but i mean i wasn't planning to go for a couple

00:28:31 weeks but it seems like there might be the it's gonna be cold up there how's everything in london

00:28:38 it's good it's it's now it's like autumn here um weather's good we're all waiting for you bro you

00:28:43 need to come back i think really you need to relocate here i know you don't like the weather

00:28:46 you don't we don't have the the florida weather but actually to be honest i think our weather is

00:28:50 probably better than your guys's at least this week you know it's alligators but that's the first

00:28:55 week in a long time yeah i miss london i've been spending quite a bit of time there this year

00:29:00 but yeah things have quieted down and speaking of uh things in london we tried to set up a debate i

00:29:05 don't know if you know aiden ross we tried to set up a debate with uh dan bilzerian and and

00:29:10 tel aviv tommy robinson tommy uh didn't he refused he didn't respond to it he ran away from the debate

00:29:17 unfortunately it's on me tommy uh robinson has run away from multiple debates

00:29:22 um and dan from my understanding has a greater reach than tommy robinson yeah and since uh yeah

00:29:29 and he's well more well known more respected he's come out and said some fantastic things about

00:29:35 palestine he's shown to be open-minded and uh you know we have uh we have good opinions about this man

00:29:41 and we hope that he continues with this principal stance because to be honest with you he's shown quite

00:29:46 a good level of courage and uh valor in the face of these uh ops and enemies that are on social

00:29:53 media yes he would he wouldn't debate someone like uh tommy wouldn't debate someone like him because

00:29:57 he knows that the crowd will be against him he'll know he knows that um that dan will put him in his

00:30:04 place because he he speaks sense and he doesn't he doesn't want to debate another white man he wants

00:30:08 to go and debate tommy wants to debate brown people with low iq that's who that's the the usual 1.00

00:30:13 target he wants to debate somebody's unknown quantity with a very low iq so that he can say

00:30:20 and tommy's not a debater tommy's not an academic tommy's not anything tommy's a street agitator

00:30:27 that's fine he can he can say on the street but in fact what's worse is that he's a street agitator

00:30:31 that's not even an agitator on the streets of the uk because he agitates from greece when other people

00:30:38 with his uh lackeys and followers and whipping boys here in the uk will do his work for him

00:30:44 because they uh feel disenfranchised and have no one else to go to i mean dan's not a debater either

00:30:50 dan bozerian is a business mogul as a poker player he does not have a debate background whatsoever so i

00:30:56 thought it was pretty well matched and also they had a back and forth on twitter there were

00:31:01 what's his name tommy robinson was accusing myself and dan bozerian of being paid by iran and saudi

00:31:06 and i had this funny conversation with dan it's like if someone was going to offer us money to don't

00:31:11 pose and take pictures with the quran we i would i would take the money if somebody was offering up 0.79

00:31:16 some giant sums of money in order to promote islam i would gladly take it but there there is none well 1.00

00:31:21 what tommy robinson is doing is project psychological projection because that he is

00:31:26 um on the record of getting money through zionist entities so he thinks everyone deals with life the 0.97

00:31:32 way he deals with it you know he gets money money over morals all these kind of things then he does

00:31:37 so he's on the record of you know getting funds and stuff like that and people have shown loki for

00:31:43 example has shown uh the trail to the zionist uh causes and so he's he's projecting he's saying oh you

00:31:51 know sneaker is getting money from saudi arabia but somehow now i didn't know that saudi arabia was

00:31:57 offering money for people that are doing uh dawah that's that's the first time i've heard of it

00:32:03 because if they were i mean i've been in the game for a very long time i think i deserve the first

00:32:08 one in the line i should be getting some money from the saudi to be honest with you but um you know i

00:32:15 mean it's it's a modest cause honest genuinely i mean the thing is that that was a very modest cause

00:32:21 and you'll find that no one probably offered you anything in the time the only thing we offer in

00:32:26 islam is truth and brotherhood and and that's all the things we need that's it uh dan mozerian

00:32:33 same thing he's saying that he's only lost money talking about this he's lost millions of dollars

00:32:38 people have pulled out of his businesses the shareholders want to get rid of him as the ceo

00:32:42 because he's speaking up about palestine it's uh it's a cause that you you lose a lot for but

00:32:46 you you gain a nobility and respect from the community

00:32:51 yeah because if you i mean some look the people who have stood up for these causes

00:32:56 are going to be etched in history as people who spoke the truth people like muhammad ali people

00:33:01 like malcolm x there's no question even at their time if you read malcolm x which i know that you have

00:33:07 you'll find that he found um you know people in his time really opposing him you know for what he was

00:33:14 saying they considered him to be an extremist they considered him to be out of the ordinary and he was

00:33:19 fighting against the tide but at the end of the day you know this is actually what gives us meaning

00:33:24 and power and strength because we can either decide to be sheep or shepherd there's no third option in

00:33:32 the age of social media now you can either decide to bring people to a noble cause and to the truth

00:33:38 or you can decide to follow everyone else in what they're doing and go go with the modern ideology of

00:33:44 the day the fad of the day whether it's lgbtq ideology whether it's trans ideology whatever it is

00:33:51 you can decide to go with that and you'll be forgotten and rendered uh irrelevant in the dust

00:33:57 bins of history the trash heap of history or you could decide to speak the truth and then you can have

00:34:02 a legacy which is inshallah from our perspective as muslims sadaqatun jariya or this idea of a continual

00:34:10 charity you know it's a continuous after you die if you leave something good then your your good deeds

00:34:17 continue we believe if you've left something good like for example if we leave an orphanage or for

00:34:22 example if you leave a water well or for example if you've left good knowledge or good dawah that

00:34:27 brings people to islam and that removes the doubts away from the people this kind of thing we believe will

00:34:33 continue after your death in a spiritual sense and in a material sense what they have is not going to

00:34:39 continue uh even within their own lives let alone after their death i appreciate you for coming on

00:34:45 this was uh informative a good uh precursor to watching this debate so thanks a lot i know that

00:34:51 it's very late over there in london mohammed a job thanks so much no no thank you so much bro 1.00

00:34:55 i'll see you soon bro all right see you soon assalamualaikum

`witch hunt`	Both words, anywhere in the episode.
`"witch hunt"`	The exact phrase.
`witch OR hunt`	Either word.
`"alpha male" -"high value"`	The first phrase, but not the second.
`(feminist OR feminism) AND (marriage OR divorce)`	Parentheses group alternatives.
`"decline civilization"~5`	Both words within 5 words of each other.

`misogyn*`	Any word starting with "misogyn": misogyny, misogynist, misogynistic…
`feminizm~1`	Words one letter off: catches typos and transcription errors.

`person:"Andrew Tate"`	Episodes where they host, guest, or are mentioned.
`host:"Glenn Beck"`	Episodes they host.
`guest:"Jordan Peterson"`	Episodes they appear on as a guest.
`mentioned:"Andrew Tate" -host:"Andrew Tate"`	Talked about on other people's shows.
`show:"Bannon's War Room"`	Episodes from one show.

`topics:abortion`	Episodes tagged with a topic (see the Topics page).
`summary:"Andrew Tate"`	Words in the episode summary. Summaries are machine-written and can be wrong.

`"great replacement" AND episode_date:[NOW-1YEAR TO NOW]`	From the past 12 months.
`lockdown AND episode_date:[2020-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2020-12-31T23:59:59Z]`	From one year. Dates need the full time, as shown.
`"high value" AND misogyny_count:[100 TO *]`	Episodes with 100 or more sentences flagged as misogynistic. Also: hate_speech_count, toxicity_count, word_count.

SNEAKO - October 13, 2024

SNEAKO Interviews Mohammed Hijab After His Debate With Epstein's Lawyer!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript