Stand on Guard with David Krayden - Elon Musk EXPOSES Trudeau's $2B PLUS Internet Plan is a SCAM! ｜ Stand on Guard

00:00:01.000 Welcome back to another episode of Stand on Guard. I'm your host, David Creighton.

00:00:05.560 Thank you so much for joining me. It's Monday, September 16th, 2024, when we come back

00:00:11.320 a little bit about what's happening in this world today.

00:00:19.160 So we are in a very precarious position in this country.

00:00:23.400 We need political change, but we also need to resolve to resist.

00:00:30.000 Yes, please like the station. You've been doing a lot of that lately.

00:00:44.960 Let me get my head in here. I'm sorry. It's been quite a weekend.

00:00:49.860 Yeah. And it helps to really beat the YouTube suppression of what you're doing.

00:00:57.560 Thank you for so many people subscribing over the weekend. We're heading towards the $30,000

00:01:03.500 subscriber goal. Should be there perhaps by the end of this week, if things continue as they've

00:01:11.860 been going. So thank you so much. It's appreciated. Because the more membership we have, the more

00:01:16.800 subscribers we have, the greater outreach this program succeeds in achieving. And that's the

00:01:23.960 point. Let's get the word out to people about what's happening. What's happening today? Parliament

00:01:29.900 resumes. We're back after, what, three, four months of a Liberal Party and Trudeau government

00:01:40.180 drift. They say they've been listening to Canadians. You know, that's BS. You know, it's

00:01:44.480 balderdash. Crap. They haven't been listening to Canadians. They've been listening to themselves 1.00

00:01:49.280 tell themselves that they're just doing fine. They've got the formula. They've got the right

00:01:56.400 programs. Canadians are happy. They don't want elections. We saw that last week from Foreign 1.00

00:02:02.540 Affairs Minister Melanie Jolie, who said Canadians don't want elections. And of course, the mainstream

00:02:08.260 media is pushing this agenda, too, by saying, oh, Canadians don't really want elections in the

00:02:12.900 fall. Right. Nonsense. I don't trust the mainstream media to say anything truthfully.

00:02:19.280 And they just parrot the lies of the Liberal government. We're going to be watching some mainstream

00:02:24.600 media in a second here. But the big story for me from the weekend was this. Michael Barrett

00:02:33.860 asked Elon Musk, asking about why the Canadian government announced a loan of $2.34 billion to

00:02:48.240 help a Quebec company build a broadband satellite network that will connect more remote communities

00:02:55.120 through the Internet. This service already exists called Starlink, Elon Musk's product. So Michael

00:03:05.600 Barrett, Conservative MP, writes a little note to Elon Musk saying, hey, Elon Musk, how much would

00:03:14.700 it cost to provide Starlink to every Canadian household that doesn't have high speed? If this

00:03:20.180 $2.14 billion plan is the panacea of expanding access and competition and service, where is the

00:03:29.060 interest from private investors and banks? This is a complete scam. It just amazes me. Are you seeing any of

00:03:40.460 this on the mainstream media? Absolutely not. What does Elon Musk respond? Less than half of that

00:03:47.060 amount for Starlink. Like what? A billion? Maybe $900 million? Substantial savings. Just incredible.

00:03:57.020 Who's this going to? Uh-huh. My old friend, Andy Lee, who does a lot of great work on her own,

00:04:03.500 discovered where it's going. Dan Goldberg, CEO of Telesat. He's at the trough. Thank you, Mark Carney,

00:04:18.020 for inviting your friends into the liberal government to just get taxpayer money. This is just so

00:04:26.740 incredibly seamy. This just makes you want to wash your hands looking at it. It makes me nauseous.

00:04:33.660 This is what this government is all about, giving its friends money to do replicate services that are

00:04:40.440 already there. And of course, it's, and of course, who's going to benefit? Quebec. Now, would that have

00:04:47.280 anything to do with appeasing the Bloc Québécois right now? Would that have anything to do with it?

00:04:53.740 Providing jobs to good Quebecers, because the Bloc will say, hey, we delivered for Quebec.

00:05:01.580 We're not here to deliver for Canada. We're here to deliver for Quebec. And we got the liberal

00:05:07.540 government to sign a deal with a Quebec-based company, so Quebec will benefit. And the Bloc can

00:05:14.960 say, ah, I guess we can support the Trudeau government in the coming non-confidence vote,

00:05:20.700 which we'll discuss in a few minutes here. You know, Champagne, eh? Oh, Francois-Philippe Champagne,

00:05:30.660 our blessed minister of industry. And he says, typical poly of nonsense. They prefer giving money 0.95

00:05:39.380 to foreign billionaires instead of supporting your industry and our workers. Guess what, blowhard 0.91

00:05:48.520 Champagne? You know this idiot as well. He's the one that stands up in question period with the whiny 1.00

00:05:55.660 voice in English or French and just complains and talks the same liberal talking points about all

00:06:03.260 they're doing for Canadian industry when they're doing nothing except propping up their friends.

00:06:08.160 This one disgusts me because, yeah, he makes a big deal out of this. Guess what, though?

00:06:12.260 Elon Musk is a Canadian. He has dual citizenship. Francois-Philippe Champagne does not know that.

00:06:24.960 And by the way, I know there are great Quebecers who are conservative, small c, conservative.

00:06:31.980 And there happens to be a leader of the People's Party of Canada named Maxime Bernier, who's from Quebec,

00:06:37.360 who's got a lot of common sense ideas. And a lot of Quebecers who do have common sense ideas. But you

00:06:42.660 know this is about politics. Don't be naive. They're giving this contract to a liberal friend,

00:06:49.780 and they're making sure that liberal friend is in Quebec because they want to buy the support of

00:06:55.080 the Bloc Québécois. And the Bloc Québécois will say, we did it. We engineered it.

00:07:00.240 And they don't care if it's Friends of Trudeau. They're not there for Canada. They don't care about

00:07:06.760 Canadian taxpayers. Don't think for a minute. They care about where your money is going,

00:07:13.540 as long as they reap political dividends. That's all this is about. So I'm not going on an anti-Quebec

00:07:20.800 rant. I'm going on an anti-BQ rant. And I'm going on an anti-Friends of the Liberal Party rant. 0.52

00:07:28.080 And you know what this is all about. Do you think this would go to a firm in Alberta right now? No.

00:07:36.760 Not even Ontario. Certainly not Alberta. No. Because the Liberal Party doesn't have very many

00:07:43.200 friends there. So it wouldn't be getting any support. So this is where we're at as the House

00:07:49.820 reconvenes today. And Justin Trudeau, you heard him last week saying, I can't wait to get it on.

00:07:58.080 With Polly Ev. Yeah, I can't wait. And we're going to be watching an interview shortly with Karina

00:08:06.240 Gould, who is the bankrupt government House leader. This is the woman who posed proudly 1.00

00:08:13.560 for photographs with the Nazi that Justin Trudeau and the Speaker of the House at the time

00:08:21.760 and Karina Gould invited to speak to Parliament. About a year ago now. Remember that standing

00:08:30.220 ovation? Remember Karina Gould standing proudly behind him? And remember when she was revealed,

00:08:37.920 when we learned that they knew who this guy was? She said, let's strike that from the record.

00:08:44.600 Let's make it disappear. Let's do like George Orwell talked about in 1984 and just pretend it never

00:08:50.400 happened. We'll just excise the whole piece. Redact it all. Just like it never happened.

00:08:57.360 That's the kind of woman who says, oh, we're going to give Polly Ev a chance to introduce his 0.98

00:09:04.080 non-confidence motion. Just you wait and see. And we'll watch that in a minute. But to me,

00:09:10.200 what I just showed you from Twitter, excuse me, from X reveals the deep-hearted, deep-seated corruption

00:09:18.820 of this Trudeau government. And you're not seeing much of this reported in the mainstream. In fact,

00:09:25.880 you're seeing none of it reported in the mainstream media. Okay. I'm glad I got that off my shoulder.

00:09:34.160 Of course, I'd be remiss if I didn't say, here we go again with former President Donald Trump. I'm not

00:09:41.700 going to get into all of that here. There's just too much material for this morning. But we know the

00:09:50.900 guy accused of doing it, who's alive for now. We'll see if the FBI allows him to stay alive.

00:09:58.880 God help us if the FBI investigate this one too, that goddamn corrupt police organization, 1.00

00:10:04.860 because they'll do it again. They'll cover it up. But we know from his incredible archive 1.00

00:10:14.080 on social media, this guy was out there as an advocate for war with Russia. He was one of these 0.70

00:10:25.080 idiots who couldn't spend enough money of your money on giving money to Ukraine for the war. He was an 1.00

00:10:33.620 advocate, an acolyte of fighting the Russians, recruiting people to go fight the Russians, just desperate to

00:10:45.080 start a war with Russia. This guy, even if he hadn't, I don't, I'm not pronouncing anybody guilty, 0.53

00:10:53.660 but this is the chief suspect. And I think, I don't think they're going to find anybody else.

00:11:02.560 But it disgusts you to see. And can anybody put two and two together? This guy's obviously working

00:11:09.180 for the Democrats. He's obviously working for the whole Democratic Party, the policy.

00:11:15.540 And they're out to get Donald Trump. The Democratic Party wants to kill Donald Trump. 0.99

00:11:22.820 And the irresponsibility with which the Democrats throw around words like Hitler, 0.99

00:11:27.420 calling Trump Hitler, equating Trump to Hitler, saying he has to be stopped. And anything,

00:11:33.360 at any means, with any means possible, they say Trump has to be stopped. Well, that is just not just

00:11:43.740 provocation. It is reckless, irresponsible, and criminal to be saying things like that when he's already

00:11:59.540 had one assassination attempt. And this one is the second. In just over two months. I remember the

00:12:06.900 first, it was July 13th. This one was September 15th. That's two months and two days after the first

00:12:13.100 attempt. This is outrageous. I want to go to an interview here. You know, I'm so sick of YouTubers

00:12:20.800 saying, oh, we just love Vassie. She's just a wonderful journalist. She's just so dead on.

00:12:29.120 And she just, it's all crap. This is all nonsense. She's in the bag as well. And I'll prove it when 1.00

00:12:36.560 we watch this interview. Because she just recites liberal talking points. Yeah, she asks a few tough

00:12:42.820 questions. What the hell do you think her job is supposed to be? Stop being an acolyte for her. Stop 0.94

00:12:47.740 being so sycophantic about some CTV journalist who actually does her job once in a while. So I'm really

00:12:56.820 sick of these people out there on YouTube who go, oh, she's just wonderful. She's just wonderful.

00:13:02.360 Well, let's listen to how wonderful she is here with Karina Gould, your government house leader.

00:13:09.940 Welcome to welcome you back to the show. Thank you so much for making the time.

00:13:13.300 Thanks for having me, Vassie.

00:13:14.540 Last week, I was covering your cabinet in Halifax, the retreat in Halifax. And I remember very distinctly,

00:13:19.800 you said at the time you were confident, that's a quote, that your agreement with the NDP was a good

00:13:24.520 and strong one and quote, we'll get to the end of June. Do I assume from those comments,

00:13:29.320 you did not see this coming? That is correct. I'm quite surprised today.

00:13:33.820 So tell me a little bit more about that. How were you, how did you find out? And I'm asking,

00:13:38.800 like, not many Canadians who knows, but you would have a more, you know, a closer relationship with

00:13:43.480 your counterpart in the NDP than, for example, a lot of other people who have roles in government

00:13:47.580 or in cabinet. Was this never conveyed to you throughout the summer?

00:13:50.560 No, no, not once. No, I mean, I, I was, uh, very, you know, honest and clear and confident last

00:13:58.440 week, because, um, as far as I'm concerned, uh, we've had a very productive working relationship

00:14:03.600 over the last three years and have been able to deliver, uh, quite substantial programs,

00:14:07.840 uh, for Canadians. Of course, there's always points of, um,

00:14:11.120 I'm going to have to, I'm sorry. I got the, I have got the wrong interview here. I'm going to

00:14:18.860 have to find the, the other one. Just hold on folks. I won't disappoint you.

00:14:38.440 Here we go. Sorry about that.

00:14:41.120 By actually just getting you on the record about something that new Democrats and conservatives

00:14:46.220 are saying behind the scene. They're saying that they're the possibility of your government

00:14:49.840 proroguing parliament is there, particularly if you do suffer a by-election loss on Monday

00:14:54.980 in Montreal. Uh, can you say yes or no? Are you planning on sit, you know, being there for the

00:15:00.840 entire fall sitting? Uh, yeah, I'm looking forward to being there on Monday and working with the

00:15:07.260 opposition parties and whatever configuration that looks like. Okay. Just to get things back

00:15:12.200 on stream here. My apologies. We had a technical difficulty there. And that she's talking about

00:15:20.160 not proroguing. There's been a lot of talk about Trudeau proroguing. They, he's not going to prorogue

00:15:25.220 parliament because he wants the online harms act. She's not going to say that, but that's why they

00:15:30.520 won't prorogue parliament. They want this legislation to pass. And if they prorogue,

00:15:34.120 everything goes back to step one, to deliver on important pieces of legislation for Canadians.

00:15:40.860 You'll, our audience will have just heard, and you know, well now by now that over the last week,

00:15:45.240 the, uh, conservatives have said at the earliest possible opportunity, they'd like to force a vote

00:15:49.560 of confidence on your government, which likely would be an opposition day motion that they could

00:15:53.840 then introduce in that fashion. Do you plan to allot them one of those days before the end of the

00:16:00.440 month? Oh, well, look, um, there are 11 and a half sitting weeks, uh, in the fall session. There are

00:16:08.720 seven opposition days. Of course, the conservatives are going to get, uh, their opposition days. It's

00:16:14.860 not usual practice that we do it the first week back in, in any session, but I, I can say with

00:16:20.480 confidence that they will be getting an off day, you know, fairly soon. How has your government

00:16:25.360 changed its behavior over the last two months? Well, look, I think one of the very first things

00:16:31.680 that we did is we spent the summer listening to Canadians and, you know, this past, uh, week in

00:16:37.080 Nanaimo, that's what we talked about, uh, as caucus members, what we were hearing from people, uh, on the

00:16:42.340 ground in our communities and, you know, really reflecting on how that, how we, what do you think

00:16:48.460 they're talking to, like their immediate circle of friends and their family? That's what they say

00:16:52.620 constitutes talking to Canadians. You know, these people don't give a damn what you think. 0.98

00:16:59.340 They don't ask you. They don't really care if you think we should have an election. They don't think

00:17:04.760 we need an election and they think really they're doing just fine. You know, respond, uh, in the fall

00:17:10.000 this session, um, you know, this first week we're going to be, uh, you know, debating legislation like

00:17:16.520 lost Canadians, like military justice reform, like supply chains, uh, all important pieces of

00:17:21.640 legislation. But it's also about, I think, you know, really demonstrating, uh, to Canadians that

00:17:27.380 we've heard them and take their concerns seriously. I mean, um, that we hear them and we're responding

00:17:31.760 to what their needs are. Can I deduce from that though, Minister, that there are going to be any new

00:17:35.840 programs or policies that will address the issues that you and your ministerial colleagues laid out,

00:17:40.460 you are still very much hearing at the door, be it around affordability, the cost of living, a crisis

00:17:45.600 that Canadians very much feel they are in because so far over the summer, you've given no indication

00:17:50.560 right through the caucus retreat that there will be anything new. It's just more of the same

00:17:55.520 programming contrasted with the accusation that you've leveled against the Conservatives that the

00:17:59.940 Tories will take that programming away. Well, yeah, I mean, so in some regards, yes, it's more of

00:18:07.100 what we have already been doing because we know that those things are, are working. Um, but at the same

00:18:12.940 time, you know, what we've been also thinking about over the summer is. No, those things are not

00:18:17.900 working. They just make, they make the assumption these things are working because, oh, the Canadians 0.99

00:18:23.500 they talked to all summer told them so. Are there new ideas? Are there new policies? Are there new

00:18:28.060 things that we need to be doing? Um, you know, I, I don't want to get ahead of myself here, but that's

00:18:33.980 very much what, you know, being in government is about. It's about delivering on the things that

00:18:38.060 matter for Canadians, but also being able to pivot, um, and present new ideas that are going to be

00:18:44.940 meaningful for Canadians. Do you, do you can see that those new things are necessary though, because

00:18:49.900 the programs that you contend are delivering so fruitfully Canadian, for Canadians, Canadians do not 1.00

00:18:55.740 perceive them to be. And I'm going to put a few examples to you. Um, GDP per capita is down over the

00:19:01.020 last five quarters. You, and again, your ministerial colleagues keep telling us about how the macro picture

00:19:05.580 is very different. And it's true that GDP overall is set to increase in 2025. I think the IMF says at

00:19:11.900 the second highest level in the entire G seven, but at a per capita basis, it is incredibly different

00:19:17.180 story, which is part of the reason why Canadians are not feeling the message that you're putting

00:19:21.500 out there. See, once again, she's scratching at the surface here. We talked over the weekend

00:19:28.540 and we showed you slides about how Canada is really doing fiscally. It's not number two,

00:19:33.500 that see. No, we're last. The liberals are lying about this whole thing. And it's not just

00:19:41.900 the macroeconomics. She finally admits microeconomics here. Yes, Canadians are suffering.

00:19:49.420 Macroeconomics, we're suffering too. We're last, but you won't hear that.

00:19:53.260 The second statistic this week that really stuck out to, I know many Canadians across the country,

00:19:56.860 just over 1 million people visited a food bank in Ontario over the past year. Is it fair of your

00:20:02.700 government to keep contending that what you are doing is delivering for Canadians, so you keep

00:20:07.180 on delivering? Do you not concede that a whole lot more is necessary to meet Canadians in the crisis

00:20:11.980 moment they're in? Yeah, I do think there's more that we need to do. But I think if in absence of

00:20:18.460 those programs and the absence of those policies, things would be a lot worse. I think...

00:20:23.820 How would they be worse? In absence of what policies? What are you doing to improve my life?

00:20:29.420 You're stealing money from me and huge taxes. You're making life impossible. 43% of my income

00:20:36.380 goes to taxes because of you. What are you doing for Canadians? You keep talking about,

00:20:42.300 oh, we're doing these programs. What programs? Dental care is not a program. It's not working

00:20:48.780 for anybody except a very small proportion of the population. And even if it did, it's once again,

00:20:55.740 it's the government interfering in our lives, taking money from one hand and giving a little

00:20:59.580 bit back. The really important difference here is that, you know, what the Conservatives are

00:21:04.300 putting forward is not to do those things, which would actually make it a lot harder for Canadians

00:21:09.500 right across this country to have to face things like inflation, to have to face things, you know,

00:21:15.100 in terms of the global economic challenges and headwinds that every country in the world is.

00:21:20.140 You see how ass-backward this is? The Conservatives would make it harder to deal with inflation,

00:21:27.900 but you are the ones who created the inflation!

00:21:30.620 ...is facing. So I think there is more to do. That's exactly, you know, why we continue to be

00:21:38.700 thinking creatively on how we can deliver effective policies and programs that are going to make a

00:21:43.180 difference in the lives of Canadians. But those programs and policies that we have put in place

00:21:48.380 are really important to, you know, support Canadians today.

00:21:53.020 One of those interventions or programs, however, keeps losing popularity. I'm thinking specifically

00:21:57.820 of the consumer portion of the carbon tax this week. Two of your closest allies on the fight against

00:22:02.860 climate change, Jagmeet Singh at the federal NDP and Premier David Eby, an NDP Premier in BC,

00:22:08.780 essentially rejected that that consumer carbon tax is a sound policy and one that they would

00:22:13.500 continue to implement, even in Premier Evie's case, if your backstop were to be removed.

00:22:19.180 This is not like a conspiracy theory question. Climate change is real. It's an existential threat.

00:22:24.860 Okay, the next time I hear about wonderful Bassey and how she just, oh, asks the toughest questions,

00:22:31.820 here she is parroting the Liberal Party talking point about climate change being an existential threat.

00:22:39.660 In other words, that means she believes the world's going to end in 10 years, unless we adopt her

00:22:45.340 liberal policies. So this is absolute balderdash. And she, and of course, she's saying it because

00:22:53.100 that's the Liberal talking point. And that's the CTV talking point. And how many of you out there

00:22:58.700 believe it? You know, this is nonsense. You know what's, this is a scam to collect tax dollars. 0.85

00:23:05.500 And this, just incredible how, this is how a journalist, so-called journalist, has to talk

00:23:14.220 to the Liberal House leader. We, this is no, we don't believe in conspiracy theories here. Meaning,

00:23:20.620 we don't believe in questioning your Liberal Party talking point. So don't, don't tell me again,

00:23:26.220 but how tough this journalist is. Because people who say that aren't journalists. They don't know what a

00:23:31.980 journalist is supposed to do. You're supposed to ask tough questions of every political party.

00:23:38.540 Doesn't the action, don't the actions your government take to fight it need collective buy-in? Why are you

00:23:43.900 so rigidly wedded to this one portion of your suite of policies when it has proven to be so incredibly

00:23:50.940 unpopular that even your one provincial ally, David Eby, no longer wants it?

00:23:55.260 I mean, it's really interesting from Premier Eby's point of view, considering that BC was the very

00:24:01.900 first province to bring in a price on pollution. And actually, the federal backstop doesn't actually

00:24:06.620 apply to British Columbia. So let's recall there is... But doesn't that show you how deeply unpopular

00:24:12.060 it is that he felt he had to come out and say what would happen? Yeah, it's certainly interesting,

00:24:17.180 for sure. But I think also what it states is that, you know, there's... Yeah, no big deal. So CTV news

00:24:25.500 is finally caught up with the fact that most Canadians hate the carbon tax. Most Canadians resent the carbon

00:24:31.420 tax. And they had to finally, they asked a question to a minister about why are you people still shoving

00:24:37.580 this carbon tax down our throats when we don't want it? But watch Karina Gould. Oh, it's because we 0.99

00:24:44.220 believe in it. And we believe in it, you must do. There's only one political party in this country

00:24:48.780 that is, you know, firmly committed to fighting climate change, and that's the Liberal Party of

00:24:53.420 Canada. I think it's really interesting on Mr. Singh's part. This is the second time in as many weeks

00:24:58.860 that he has kind of capitulated to the demands of Pierre Polyev. First, Mr. Polyev asks him to back out

00:25:05.660 of SACA. Mr. Singh says, sure. The next thing Mr. Polyev says was, don't back the price on pollution.

00:25:11.900 Mr. Singh says, okay, no problem. So, you know, I think it's really interesting that Mr. Singh is

00:25:17.180 trying to position himself as someone who can stand up to Mr. Polyev, but says, you know, when

00:25:21.980 Mr. Polyev says jump, he just says how high. But, you know, but respectfully, Minister, my question's

00:25:27.420 not about Mr. Singh or the Conservatives. I have a potential problem, right? And it is and fight.

00:25:34.300 And, you know, I think what it comes down to at the end of the day is, what are the alternatives that are

00:25:40.460 being positioned in order to actually bring those greenhouse gas emissions down? And this is all

00:25:47.980 nonsense because it's not bringing greenhouse gas emissions down because you still are driving the

00:25:54.700 same amount. You're still heating your home the same amount in the winter, hopefully, unless you're

00:26:00.140 freezing. You're still using the air conditioning in the summer. I did all summer. But you're just

00:26:05.660 being taxed more on it. It's not bringing emissions down. This is a lunatic, lunatic proposal,

00:26:12.940 and it's a lunatic policy that doesn't work except to penalize people. This is all about penalizing 1.00

00:26:20.940 people and then pretending you're giving them money. Oh, it's a rebate. Yeah, it's the government

00:26:27.020 handing you free money every quarter. And just believe the government when it says 80% of Canadians

00:26:36.140 are getting more back in your stupid rebate than they're actually spending on the carbon tax. And 1.00

00:26:42.220 we know it's a lie. To actually make sure that we are building an economy of the 21st century that is

00:26:48.780 either low or no carbon and is creating those good green jobs and is making...

00:26:55.340 There are no good green jobs. We've said that a hundred times. They're janitorial positions.

00:27:01.260 They're building the economy of the 15th century. That's what they're building. Because they're going

00:27:05.660 to bring us back to a pre-industrial age where we're all going to be living in caves and freezing.

00:27:10.300 That's what they're building.

00:27:11.980 Ensure that we have a planet for our kids and grandkids to grow into.

00:27:16.300 I don't know that Premier Eby is saying let's not have a planet for our kids to grow into,

00:27:20.140 or Jagmeet Singh is saying anything like that. And I think even the lack of a climate plan

00:27:25.580 from other parties deserves questioning, but it doesn't absolve your government of culpability

00:27:30.300 around a policy now that has become so deeply unpopular that it seems you're not willing to give

00:27:36.060 no matter what. It's 9%. That's what the Canadian Climate Institute said of the total reductions by

00:27:40.860 2030. That's not even close to the majority of what will reduce emissions.

00:27:46.540 Why not stop for a moment? Recognize how deeply unpopular it has become.

00:27:50.700 And at least she recognized that it's a useless tax. It's not even achieving the result. 0.93

00:27:59.100 It's not getting the emissions down. Finally, somebody in the mainstream media at least said that.

00:28:03.660 Do something different if it gets you to the ultimate goal that your government wants to achieve,

00:28:08.220 to meet those climate change mitigation targets. I don't understand the rigidity. I just don't get it.

00:28:15.580 Well, it's part of a broader plan when it comes to fighting climate change. I mean,

00:28:19.820 there's many different pieces to what we're doing. And the price on pollution is one of those pieces

00:28:25.260 about changing consumer behavior. And recall that it also comes with the carbon rebate.

00:28:31.180 So it means that, you know, she's gulping down her breath here because she knows she's lying.

00:28:39.580 There's no plan here. This is not part of a bigger solution. This is just a scam. And it always has

00:28:47.900 been. And if she's honest for a moment with herself, which I doubt she can be as a Liberal cabinet

00:28:55.100 minister, it's impossible to be honest and occupy that position.

00:28:58.220 Because across this country are getting quarterly checks from the government of Canada,

00:29:04.940 where the provincial government has decided not to have their own price on pollution. But it is,

00:29:13.580 and it has been said by economists in Canada and around the world that this is one of the most

00:29:18.220 effective ways for us to fight climate change. Just to be clear, you'd never change that one

00:29:23.500 component if ultimately you could still get to the same end goal.

00:29:25.980 Well, it's part of that broad suite of policies. And it's one of those things that, you know,

00:29:32.540 we've tried to make it as cost neutral for individuals as possible so that, you know,

00:29:38.940 broad suite of policies, cost neutral, it's just a lot of blather. But just she's spouting talking points 0.77

00:29:47.740 that mean absolutely nothing.

00:29:50.220 They get that money returned to them. So because we don't want to send it to provinces that aren't

00:29:56.060 going to use it for ways to reduce pollution.

00:30:00.780 It's not carbon is not a pollution. How about actually trying to reduce real pollution?

00:30:06.220 These dunderheads can't even define pollution. They just keep repeating their own insanity. This woman 1.00

00:30:12.700 should have a bag over her head because she's a disgrace to the House of Commons for what she's done 1.00

00:30:18.220 in the past by inviting former members of the Waffen-SS to speak to Parliament and then advocating

00:30:23.980 that it all be excised from history. But, you know, at the end of the day, it's going to take

00:30:28.140 all of us as a country to be able to meet our climate objectives and to really be able to protect our

00:30:33.580 planet. Okay, I'm out of time, Minister. I got to leave it. And you're out of time too, Minister.

00:30:38.060 The clock is running out on all of these Liberals. We're back today.

00:30:42.860 Today, what I didn't mention at the beginning of the show, by election. And if I can find the time

00:30:51.260 to come on tonight, I will be coming on to talk about what that means. We have got a huge, huge

00:31:00.780 by election today in Winnipeg, in Montreal. The Liberals are probably going to lose both. But if

00:31:05.660 they lose the one in Montreal, it will be another nail in the coffin of Justin Trudeau's political

00:31:11.980 future. But he's already said, hey, I'm not going anywhere. But other people might have something

00:31:19.420 to say about that. So stay tuned today, folks. This is a big day. Parliament resumes, two by-elections.

00:31:27.100 We have the following, continuing follow-up from the, I believe, the Democratic Party assault

00:31:32.460 on Donald Trump, another attempted assassination. There is so much going on right now. And we are

00:31:38.780 inching closer to a nuclear war with Russia, thanks to the reckless abandon of democratic policies in

00:31:45.820 the states and liberal policies in Canada. These are exciting times, but they're incredibly dangerous

00:31:52.860 times. Be aware. Be wary. Keep watching this show. And I'll be back again tomorrow and maybe tonight.

00:32:03.260 I can't promise you that I'm going to do my best after my shift with the post-millennial,

00:32:09.020 where I spend most of my afternoons now. I'll be back tonight to talk about what is by-election,

00:32:14.860 what happened, and what it means for you. Thanks for watching, and I'll be back.

Stand on Guard with David Krayden - September 16, 2024

Elon Musk EXPOSES Trudeau's $2B PLUS Internet Plan is a SCAM! ｜ Stand on Guard

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript