Elon Musk EXPOSES Trudeau's $2B PLUS Internet Plan is a SCAM! ｜ Stand on Guard
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
156.99628
Summary
We need political change in this country, but we also need to resolve to resist it. We need to resist the Liberal government's attempts to get rid of our sovereignty, and we need to stand up to it.
Transcript
00:00:01.000
Welcome back to another episode of Stand on Guard. I'm your host, David Creighton.
00:00:05.560
Thank you so much for joining me. It's Monday, September 16th, 2024, when we come back
00:00:11.320
a little bit about what's happening in this world today.
00:00:19.160
So we are in a very precarious position in this country.
00:00:23.400
We need political change, but we also need to resolve to resist.
00:00:30.000
Yes, please like the station. You've been doing a lot of that lately.
00:00:44.960
Let me get my head in here. I'm sorry. It's been quite a weekend.
00:00:49.860
Yeah. And it helps to really beat the YouTube suppression of what you're doing.
00:00:57.560
Thank you for so many people subscribing over the weekend. We're heading towards the $30,000
00:01:03.500
subscriber goal. Should be there perhaps by the end of this week, if things continue as they've
00:01:11.860
been going. So thank you so much. It's appreciated. Because the more membership we have, the more
00:01:16.800
subscribers we have, the greater outreach this program succeeds in achieving. And that's the
00:01:23.960
point. Let's get the word out to people about what's happening. What's happening today? Parliament
00:01:29.900
resumes. We're back after, what, three, four months of a Liberal Party and Trudeau government
00:01:40.180
drift. They say they've been listening to Canadians. You know, that's BS. You know, it's
00:01:44.480
balderdash. Crap. They haven't been listening to Canadians. They've been listening to themselves
00:01:49.280
tell themselves that they're just doing fine. They've got the formula. They've got the right
00:01:56.400
programs. Canadians are happy. They don't want elections. We saw that last week from Foreign
00:02:02.540
Affairs Minister Melanie Jolie, who said Canadians don't want elections. And of course, the mainstream
00:02:08.260
media is pushing this agenda, too, by saying, oh, Canadians don't really want elections in the
00:02:12.900
fall. Right. Nonsense. I don't trust the mainstream media to say anything truthfully.
00:02:19.280
And they just parrot the lies of the Liberal government. We're going to be watching some mainstream
00:02:24.600
media in a second here. But the big story for me from the weekend was this. Michael Barrett
00:02:33.860
asked Elon Musk, asking about why the Canadian government announced a loan of $2.34 billion to
00:02:48.240
help a Quebec company build a broadband satellite network that will connect more remote communities
00:02:55.120
through the Internet. This service already exists called Starlink, Elon Musk's product. So Michael
00:03:05.600
Barrett, Conservative MP, writes a little note to Elon Musk saying, hey, Elon Musk, how much would
00:03:14.700
it cost to provide Starlink to every Canadian household that doesn't have high speed? If this
00:03:20.180
$2.14 billion plan is the panacea of expanding access and competition and service, where is the
00:03:29.060
interest from private investors and banks? This is a complete scam. It just amazes me. Are you seeing any of
00:03:40.460
this on the mainstream media? Absolutely not. What does Elon Musk respond? Less than half of that
00:03:47.060
amount for Starlink. Like what? A billion? Maybe $900 million? Substantial savings. Just incredible.
00:03:57.020
Who's this going to? Uh-huh. My old friend, Andy Lee, who does a lot of great work on her own,
00:04:03.500
discovered where it's going. Dan Goldberg, CEO of Telesat. He's at the trough. Thank you, Mark Carney,
00:04:18.020
for inviting your friends into the liberal government to just get taxpayer money. This is just so
00:04:26.740
incredibly seamy. This just makes you want to wash your hands looking at it. It makes me nauseous.
00:04:33.660
This is what this government is all about, giving its friends money to do replicate services that are
00:04:40.440
already there. And of course, it's, and of course, who's going to benefit? Quebec. Now, would that have
00:04:47.280
anything to do with appeasing the Bloc Québécois right now? Would that have anything to do with it?
00:04:53.740
Providing jobs to good Quebecers, because the Bloc will say, hey, we delivered for Quebec.
00:05:01.580
We're not here to deliver for Canada. We're here to deliver for Quebec. And we got the liberal
00:05:07.540
government to sign a deal with a Quebec-based company, so Quebec will benefit. And the Bloc can
00:05:14.960
say, ah, I guess we can support the Trudeau government in the coming non-confidence vote,
00:05:20.700
which we'll discuss in a few minutes here. You know, Champagne, eh? Oh, Francois-Philippe Champagne,
00:05:30.660
our blessed minister of industry. And he says, typical poly of nonsense. They prefer giving money
00:05:39.380
to foreign billionaires instead of supporting your industry and our workers. Guess what, blowhard
00:05:48.520
Champagne? You know this idiot as well. He's the one that stands up in question period with the whiny
00:05:55.660
voice in English or French and just complains and talks the same liberal talking points about all
00:06:03.260
they're doing for Canadian industry when they're doing nothing except propping up their friends.
00:06:08.160
This one disgusts me because, yeah, he makes a big deal out of this. Guess what, though?
00:06:12.260
Elon Musk is a Canadian. He has dual citizenship. Francois-Philippe Champagne does not know that.
00:06:24.960
And by the way, I know there are great Quebecers who are conservative, small c, conservative.
00:06:31.980
And there happens to be a leader of the People's Party of Canada named Maxime Bernier, who's from Quebec,
00:06:37.360
who's got a lot of common sense ideas. And a lot of Quebecers who do have common sense ideas. But you
00:06:42.660
know this is about politics. Don't be naive. They're giving this contract to a liberal friend,
00:06:49.780
and they're making sure that liberal friend is in Quebec because they want to buy the support of
00:06:55.080
the Bloc Québécois. And the Bloc Québécois will say, we did it. We engineered it.
00:07:00.240
And they don't care if it's Friends of Trudeau. They're not there for Canada. They don't care about
00:07:06.760
Canadian taxpayers. Don't think for a minute. They care about where your money is going,
00:07:13.540
as long as they reap political dividends. That's all this is about. So I'm not going on an anti-Quebec
00:07:20.800
rant. I'm going on an anti-BQ rant. And I'm going on an anti-Friends of the Liberal Party rant.
00:07:28.080
And you know what this is all about. Do you think this would go to a firm in Alberta right now? No.
00:07:36.760
Not even Ontario. Certainly not Alberta. No. Because the Liberal Party doesn't have very many
00:07:43.200
friends there. So it wouldn't be getting any support. So this is where we're at as the House
00:07:49.820
reconvenes today. And Justin Trudeau, you heard him last week saying, I can't wait to get it on.
00:07:58.080
With Polly Ev. Yeah, I can't wait. And we're going to be watching an interview shortly with Karina
00:08:06.240
Gould, who is the bankrupt government House leader. This is the woman who posed proudly
00:08:13.560
for photographs with the Nazi that Justin Trudeau and the Speaker of the House at the time
00:08:21.760
and Karina Gould invited to speak to Parliament. About a year ago now. Remember that standing
00:08:30.220
ovation? Remember Karina Gould standing proudly behind him? And remember when she was revealed,
00:08:37.920
when we learned that they knew who this guy was? She said, let's strike that from the record.
00:08:44.600
Let's make it disappear. Let's do like George Orwell talked about in 1984 and just pretend it never
00:08:50.400
happened. We'll just excise the whole piece. Redact it all. Just like it never happened.
00:08:57.360
That's the kind of woman who says, oh, we're going to give Polly Ev a chance to introduce his
00:09:04.080
non-confidence motion. Just you wait and see. And we'll watch that in a minute. But to me,
00:09:10.200
what I just showed you from Twitter, excuse me, from X reveals the deep-hearted, deep-seated corruption
00:09:18.820
of this Trudeau government. And you're not seeing much of this reported in the mainstream. In fact,
00:09:25.880
you're seeing none of it reported in the mainstream media. Okay. I'm glad I got that off my shoulder.
00:09:34.160
Of course, I'd be remiss if I didn't say, here we go again with former President Donald Trump. I'm not
00:09:41.700
going to get into all of that here. There's just too much material for this morning. But we know the
00:09:50.900
guy accused of doing it, who's alive for now. We'll see if the FBI allows him to stay alive.
00:09:58.880
God help us if the FBI investigate this one too, that goddamn corrupt police organization,
00:10:04.860
because they'll do it again. They'll cover it up. But we know from his incredible archive
00:10:14.080
on social media, this guy was out there as an advocate for war with Russia. He was one of these
00:10:25.080
idiots who couldn't spend enough money of your money on giving money to Ukraine for the war. He was an
00:10:33.620
advocate, an acolyte of fighting the Russians, recruiting people to go fight the Russians, just desperate to
00:10:45.080
start a war with Russia. This guy, even if he hadn't, I don't, I'm not pronouncing anybody guilty,
00:10:53.660
but this is the chief suspect. And I think, I don't think they're going to find anybody else.
00:11:02.560
But it disgusts you to see. And can anybody put two and two together? This guy's obviously working
00:11:09.180
for the Democrats. He's obviously working for the whole Democratic Party, the policy.
00:11:15.540
And they're out to get Donald Trump. The Democratic Party wants to kill Donald Trump.
00:11:22.820
And the irresponsibility with which the Democrats throw around words like Hitler,
00:11:27.420
calling Trump Hitler, equating Trump to Hitler, saying he has to be stopped. And anything,
00:11:33.360
at any means, with any means possible, they say Trump has to be stopped. Well, that is just not just
00:11:43.740
provocation. It is reckless, irresponsible, and criminal to be saying things like that when he's already
00:11:59.540
had one assassination attempt. And this one is the second. In just over two months. I remember the
00:12:06.900
first, it was July 13th. This one was September 15th. That's two months and two days after the first
00:12:13.100
attempt. This is outrageous. I want to go to an interview here. You know, I'm so sick of YouTubers
00:12:20.800
saying, oh, we just love Vassie. She's just a wonderful journalist. She's just so dead on.
00:12:29.120
And she just, it's all crap. This is all nonsense. She's in the bag as well. And I'll prove it when
00:12:36.560
we watch this interview. Because she just recites liberal talking points. Yeah, she asks a few tough
00:12:42.820
questions. What the hell do you think her job is supposed to be? Stop being an acolyte for her. Stop
00:12:47.740
being so sycophantic about some CTV journalist who actually does her job once in a while. So I'm really
00:12:56.820
sick of these people out there on YouTube who go, oh, she's just wonderful. She's just wonderful.
00:13:02.360
Well, let's listen to how wonderful she is here with Karina Gould, your government house leader.
00:13:09.940
Welcome to welcome you back to the show. Thank you so much for making the time.
00:13:14.540
Last week, I was covering your cabinet in Halifax, the retreat in Halifax. And I remember very distinctly,
00:13:19.800
you said at the time you were confident, that's a quote, that your agreement with the NDP was a good
00:13:24.520
and strong one and quote, we'll get to the end of June. Do I assume from those comments,
00:13:29.320
you did not see this coming? That is correct. I'm quite surprised today.
00:13:33.820
So tell me a little bit more about that. How were you, how did you find out? And I'm asking,
00:13:38.800
like, not many Canadians who knows, but you would have a more, you know, a closer relationship with
00:13:43.480
your counterpart in the NDP than, for example, a lot of other people who have roles in government
00:13:47.580
or in cabinet. Was this never conveyed to you throughout the summer?
00:13:50.560
No, no, not once. No, I mean, I, I was, uh, very, you know, honest and clear and confident last
00:13:58.440
week, because, um, as far as I'm concerned, uh, we've had a very productive working relationship
00:14:03.600
over the last three years and have been able to deliver, uh, quite substantial programs,
00:14:07.840
uh, for Canadians. Of course, there's always points of, um,
00:14:11.120
I'm going to have to, I'm sorry. I got the, I have got the wrong interview here. I'm going to
00:14:18.860
have to find the, the other one. Just hold on folks. I won't disappoint you.
00:14:41.120
By actually just getting you on the record about something that new Democrats and conservatives
00:14:46.220
are saying behind the scene. They're saying that they're the possibility of your government
00:14:49.840
proroguing parliament is there, particularly if you do suffer a by-election loss on Monday
00:14:54.980
in Montreal. Uh, can you say yes or no? Are you planning on sit, you know, being there for the
00:15:00.840
entire fall sitting? Uh, yeah, I'm looking forward to being there on Monday and working with the
00:15:07.260
opposition parties and whatever configuration that looks like. Okay. Just to get things back
00:15:12.200
on stream here. My apologies. We had a technical difficulty there. And that she's talking about
00:15:20.160
not proroguing. There's been a lot of talk about Trudeau proroguing. They, he's not going to prorogue
00:15:25.220
parliament because he wants the online harms act. She's not going to say that, but that's why they
00:15:30.520
won't prorogue parliament. They want this legislation to pass. And if they prorogue,
00:15:34.120
everything goes back to step one, to deliver on important pieces of legislation for Canadians.
00:15:40.860
You'll, our audience will have just heard, and you know, well now by now that over the last week,
00:15:45.240
the, uh, conservatives have said at the earliest possible opportunity, they'd like to force a vote
00:15:49.560
of confidence on your government, which likely would be an opposition day motion that they could
00:15:53.840
then introduce in that fashion. Do you plan to allot them one of those days before the end of the
00:16:00.440
month? Oh, well, look, um, there are 11 and a half sitting weeks, uh, in the fall session. There are
00:16:08.720
seven opposition days. Of course, the conservatives are going to get, uh, their opposition days. It's
00:16:14.860
not usual practice that we do it the first week back in, in any session, but I, I can say with
00:16:20.480
confidence that they will be getting an off day, you know, fairly soon. How has your government
00:16:25.360
changed its behavior over the last two months? Well, look, I think one of the very first things
00:16:31.680
that we did is we spent the summer listening to Canadians and, you know, this past, uh, week in
00:16:37.080
Nanaimo, that's what we talked about, uh, as caucus members, what we were hearing from people, uh, on the
00:16:42.340
ground in our communities and, you know, really reflecting on how that, how we, what do you think
00:16:48.460
they're talking to, like their immediate circle of friends and their family? That's what they say
00:16:52.620
constitutes talking to Canadians. You know, these people don't give a damn what you think.
00:16:59.340
They don't ask you. They don't really care if you think we should have an election. They don't think
00:17:04.760
we need an election and they think really they're doing just fine. You know, respond, uh, in the fall
00:17:10.000
this session, um, you know, this first week we're going to be, uh, you know, debating legislation like
00:17:16.520
lost Canadians, like military justice reform, like supply chains, uh, all important pieces of
00:17:21.640
legislation. But it's also about, I think, you know, really demonstrating, uh, to Canadians that
00:17:27.380
we've heard them and take their concerns seriously. I mean, um, that we hear them and we're responding
00:17:31.760
to what their needs are. Can I deduce from that though, Minister, that there are going to be any new
00:17:35.840
programs or policies that will address the issues that you and your ministerial colleagues laid out,
00:17:40.460
you are still very much hearing at the door, be it around affordability, the cost of living, a crisis
00:17:45.600
that Canadians very much feel they are in because so far over the summer, you've given no indication
00:17:50.560
right through the caucus retreat that there will be anything new. It's just more of the same
00:17:55.520
programming contrasted with the accusation that you've leveled against the Conservatives that the
00:17:59.940
Tories will take that programming away. Well, yeah, I mean, so in some regards, yes, it's more of
00:18:07.100
what we have already been doing because we know that those things are, are working. Um, but at the same
00:18:12.940
time, you know, what we've been also thinking about over the summer is. No, those things are not
00:18:17.900
working. They just make, they make the assumption these things are working because, oh, the Canadians
00:18:23.500
they talked to all summer told them so. Are there new ideas? Are there new policies? Are there new
00:18:28.060
things that we need to be doing? Um, you know, I, I don't want to get ahead of myself here, but that's
00:18:33.980
very much what, you know, being in government is about. It's about delivering on the things that
00:18:38.060
matter for Canadians, but also being able to pivot, um, and present new ideas that are going to be
00:18:44.940
meaningful for Canadians. Do you, do you can see that those new things are necessary though, because
00:18:49.900
the programs that you contend are delivering so fruitfully Canadian, for Canadians, Canadians do not
00:18:55.740
perceive them to be. And I'm going to put a few examples to you. Um, GDP per capita is down over the
00:19:01.020
last five quarters. You, and again, your ministerial colleagues keep telling us about how the macro picture
00:19:05.580
is very different. And it's true that GDP overall is set to increase in 2025. I think the IMF says at
00:19:11.900
the second highest level in the entire G seven, but at a per capita basis, it is incredibly different
00:19:17.180
story, which is part of the reason why Canadians are not feeling the message that you're putting
00:19:21.500
out there. See, once again, she's scratching at the surface here. We talked over the weekend
00:19:28.540
and we showed you slides about how Canada is really doing fiscally. It's not number two,
00:19:33.500
that see. No, we're last. The liberals are lying about this whole thing. And it's not just
00:19:41.900
the macroeconomics. She finally admits microeconomics here. Yes, Canadians are suffering.
00:19:49.420
Macroeconomics, we're suffering too. We're last, but you won't hear that.
00:19:53.260
The second statistic this week that really stuck out to, I know many Canadians across the country,
00:19:56.860
just over 1 million people visited a food bank in Ontario over the past year. Is it fair of your
00:20:02.700
government to keep contending that what you are doing is delivering for Canadians, so you keep
00:20:07.180
on delivering? Do you not concede that a whole lot more is necessary to meet Canadians in the crisis
00:20:11.980
moment they're in? Yeah, I do think there's more that we need to do. But I think if in absence of
00:20:18.460
those programs and the absence of those policies, things would be a lot worse. I think...
00:20:23.820
How would they be worse? In absence of what policies? What are you doing to improve my life?
00:20:29.420
You're stealing money from me and huge taxes. You're making life impossible. 43% of my income
00:20:36.380
goes to taxes because of you. What are you doing for Canadians? You keep talking about,
00:20:42.300
oh, we're doing these programs. What programs? Dental care is not a program. It's not working
00:20:48.780
for anybody except a very small proportion of the population. And even if it did, it's once again,
00:20:55.740
it's the government interfering in our lives, taking money from one hand and giving a little
00:20:59.580
bit back. The really important difference here is that, you know, what the Conservatives are
00:21:04.300
putting forward is not to do those things, which would actually make it a lot harder for Canadians
00:21:09.500
right across this country to have to face things like inflation, to have to face things, you know,
00:21:15.100
in terms of the global economic challenges and headwinds that every country in the world is.
00:21:20.140
You see how ass-backward this is? The Conservatives would make it harder to deal with inflation,
00:21:27.900
but you are the ones who created the inflation!
00:21:30.620
...is facing. So I think there is more to do. That's exactly, you know, why we continue to be
00:21:38.700
thinking creatively on how we can deliver effective policies and programs that are going to make a
00:21:43.180
difference in the lives of Canadians. But those programs and policies that we have put in place
00:21:48.380
are really important to, you know, support Canadians today.
00:21:53.020
One of those interventions or programs, however, keeps losing popularity. I'm thinking specifically
00:21:57.820
of the consumer portion of the carbon tax this week. Two of your closest allies on the fight against
00:22:02.860
climate change, Jagmeet Singh at the federal NDP and Premier David Eby, an NDP Premier in BC,
00:22:08.780
essentially rejected that that consumer carbon tax is a sound policy and one that they would
00:22:13.500
continue to implement, even in Premier Evie's case, if your backstop were to be removed.
00:22:19.180
This is not like a conspiracy theory question. Climate change is real. It's an existential threat.
00:22:24.860
Okay, the next time I hear about wonderful Bassey and how she just, oh, asks the toughest questions,
00:22:31.820
here she is parroting the Liberal Party talking point about climate change being an existential threat.
00:22:39.660
In other words, that means she believes the world's going to end in 10 years, unless we adopt her
00:22:45.340
liberal policies. So this is absolute balderdash. And she, and of course, she's saying it because
00:22:53.100
that's the Liberal talking point. And that's the CTV talking point. And how many of you out there
00:22:58.700
believe it? You know, this is nonsense. You know what's, this is a scam to collect tax dollars.
00:23:05.500
And this, just incredible how, this is how a journalist, so-called journalist, has to talk
00:23:14.220
to the Liberal House leader. We, this is no, we don't believe in conspiracy theories here. Meaning,
00:23:20.620
we don't believe in questioning your Liberal Party talking point. So don't, don't tell me again,
00:23:26.220
but how tough this journalist is. Because people who say that aren't journalists. They don't know what a
00:23:31.980
journalist is supposed to do. You're supposed to ask tough questions of every political party.
00:23:38.540
Doesn't the action, don't the actions your government take to fight it need collective buy-in? Why are you
00:23:43.900
so rigidly wedded to this one portion of your suite of policies when it has proven to be so incredibly
00:23:50.940
unpopular that even your one provincial ally, David Eby, no longer wants it?
00:23:55.260
I mean, it's really interesting from Premier Eby's point of view, considering that BC was the very
00:24:01.900
first province to bring in a price on pollution. And actually, the federal backstop doesn't actually
00:24:06.620
apply to British Columbia. So let's recall there is... But doesn't that show you how deeply unpopular
00:24:12.060
it is that he felt he had to come out and say what would happen? Yeah, it's certainly interesting,
00:24:17.180
for sure. But I think also what it states is that, you know, there's... Yeah, no big deal. So CTV news
00:24:25.500
is finally caught up with the fact that most Canadians hate the carbon tax. Most Canadians resent the carbon
00:24:31.420
tax. And they had to finally, they asked a question to a minister about why are you people still shoving
00:24:37.580
this carbon tax down our throats when we don't want it? But watch Karina Gould. Oh, it's because we
00:24:44.220
believe in it. And we believe in it, you must do. There's only one political party in this country
00:24:48.780
that is, you know, firmly committed to fighting climate change, and that's the Liberal Party of
00:24:53.420
Canada. I think it's really interesting on Mr. Singh's part. This is the second time in as many weeks
00:24:58.860
that he has kind of capitulated to the demands of Pierre Polyev. First, Mr. Polyev asks him to back out
00:25:05.660
of SACA. Mr. Singh says, sure. The next thing Mr. Polyev says was, don't back the price on pollution.
00:25:11.900
Mr. Singh says, okay, no problem. So, you know, I think it's really interesting that Mr. Singh is
00:25:17.180
trying to position himself as someone who can stand up to Mr. Polyev, but says, you know, when
00:25:21.980
Mr. Polyev says jump, he just says how high. But, you know, but respectfully, Minister, my question's
00:25:27.420
not about Mr. Singh or the Conservatives. I have a potential problem, right? And it is and fight.
00:25:34.300
And, you know, I think what it comes down to at the end of the day is, what are the alternatives that are
00:25:40.460
being positioned in order to actually bring those greenhouse gas emissions down? And this is all
00:25:47.980
nonsense because it's not bringing greenhouse gas emissions down because you still are driving the
00:25:54.700
same amount. You're still heating your home the same amount in the winter, hopefully, unless you're
00:26:00.140
freezing. You're still using the air conditioning in the summer. I did all summer. But you're just
00:26:05.660
being taxed more on it. It's not bringing emissions down. This is a lunatic, lunatic proposal,
00:26:12.940
and it's a lunatic policy that doesn't work except to penalize people. This is all about penalizing
00:26:20.940
people and then pretending you're giving them money. Oh, it's a rebate. Yeah, it's the government
00:26:27.020
handing you free money every quarter. And just believe the government when it says 80% of Canadians
00:26:36.140
are getting more back in your stupid rebate than they're actually spending on the carbon tax. And
00:26:42.220
we know it's a lie. To actually make sure that we are building an economy of the 21st century that is
00:26:48.780
either low or no carbon and is creating those good green jobs and is making...
00:26:55.340
There are no good green jobs. We've said that a hundred times. They're janitorial positions.
00:27:01.260
They're building the economy of the 15th century. That's what they're building. Because they're going
00:27:05.660
to bring us back to a pre-industrial age where we're all going to be living in caves and freezing.
00:27:11.980
Ensure that we have a planet for our kids and grandkids to grow into.
00:27:16.300
I don't know that Premier Eby is saying let's not have a planet for our kids to grow into,
00:27:20.140
or Jagmeet Singh is saying anything like that. And I think even the lack of a climate plan
00:27:25.580
from other parties deserves questioning, but it doesn't absolve your government of culpability
00:27:30.300
around a policy now that has become so deeply unpopular that it seems you're not willing to give
00:27:36.060
no matter what. It's 9%. That's what the Canadian Climate Institute said of the total reductions by
00:27:40.860
2030. That's not even close to the majority of what will reduce emissions.
00:27:46.540
Why not stop for a moment? Recognize how deeply unpopular it has become.
00:27:50.700
And at least she recognized that it's a useless tax. It's not even achieving the result.
00:27:59.100
It's not getting the emissions down. Finally, somebody in the mainstream media at least said that.
00:28:03.660
Do something different if it gets you to the ultimate goal that your government wants to achieve,
00:28:08.220
to meet those climate change mitigation targets. I don't understand the rigidity. I just don't get it.
00:28:15.580
Well, it's part of a broader plan when it comes to fighting climate change. I mean,
00:28:19.820
there's many different pieces to what we're doing. And the price on pollution is one of those pieces
00:28:25.260
about changing consumer behavior. And recall that it also comes with the carbon rebate.
00:28:31.180
So it means that, you know, she's gulping down her breath here because she knows she's lying.
00:28:39.580
There's no plan here. This is not part of a bigger solution. This is just a scam. And it always has
00:28:47.900
been. And if she's honest for a moment with herself, which I doubt she can be as a Liberal cabinet
00:28:55.100
minister, it's impossible to be honest and occupy that position.
00:28:58.220
Because across this country are getting quarterly checks from the government of Canada,
00:29:04.940
where the provincial government has decided not to have their own price on pollution. But it is,
00:29:13.580
and it has been said by economists in Canada and around the world that this is one of the most
00:29:18.220
effective ways for us to fight climate change. Just to be clear, you'd never change that one
00:29:23.500
component if ultimately you could still get to the same end goal.
00:29:25.980
Well, it's part of that broad suite of policies. And it's one of those things that, you know,
00:29:32.540
we've tried to make it as cost neutral for individuals as possible so that, you know,
00:29:38.940
broad suite of policies, cost neutral, it's just a lot of blather. But just she's spouting talking points
00:29:50.220
They get that money returned to them. So because we don't want to send it to provinces that aren't
00:30:00.780
It's not carbon is not a pollution. How about actually trying to reduce real pollution?
00:30:06.220
These dunderheads can't even define pollution. They just keep repeating their own insanity. This woman
00:30:12.700
should have a bag over her head because she's a disgrace to the House of Commons for what she's done
00:30:18.220
in the past by inviting former members of the Waffen-SS to speak to Parliament and then advocating
00:30:23.980
that it all be excised from history. But, you know, at the end of the day, it's going to take
00:30:28.140
all of us as a country to be able to meet our climate objectives and to really be able to protect our
00:30:33.580
planet. Okay, I'm out of time, Minister. I got to leave it. And you're out of time too, Minister.
00:30:38.060
The clock is running out on all of these Liberals. We're back today.
00:30:42.860
Today, what I didn't mention at the beginning of the show, by election. And if I can find the time
00:30:51.260
to come on tonight, I will be coming on to talk about what that means. We have got a huge, huge
00:31:00.780
by election today in Winnipeg, in Montreal. The Liberals are probably going to lose both. But if
00:31:05.660
they lose the one in Montreal, it will be another nail in the coffin of Justin Trudeau's political
00:31:11.980
future. But he's already said, hey, I'm not going anywhere. But other people might have something
00:31:19.420
to say about that. So stay tuned today, folks. This is a big day. Parliament resumes, two by-elections.
00:31:27.100
We have the following, continuing follow-up from the, I believe, the Democratic Party assault
00:31:32.460
on Donald Trump, another attempted assassination. There is so much going on right now. And we are
00:31:38.780
inching closer to a nuclear war with Russia, thanks to the reckless abandon of democratic policies in
00:31:45.820
the states and liberal policies in Canada. These are exciting times, but they're incredibly dangerous
00:31:52.860
times. Be aware. Be wary. Keep watching this show. And I'll be back again tomorrow and maybe tonight.
00:32:03.260
I can't promise you that I'm going to do my best after my shift with the post-millennial,
00:32:09.020
where I spend most of my afternoons now. I'll be back tonight to talk about what is by-election,
00:32:14.860
what happened, and what it means for you. Thanks for watching, and I'll be back.