Stand on Guard with David Krayden - EXPOSED： Carney is Stealing Our Freedom ｜ Stand on Guard

00:00:00.000 welcome back to another episode of stand on guard this is your host david creighton coming at you

00:00:07.380 live from ottawa and we try to do this live every day part of this broadcast won't exactly be live

00:00:14.260 it's a recording of an interview i had yesterday and that's the premier event we're going to be

00:00:18.600 getting that shortly before we do a couple of things to talk about

00:00:23.360 the prime minister lied and his menus continue to lie

00:00:30.380 we need a political change

00:00:38.140 so we also need to resolve to resist

00:00:43.280 thank you for watching please subscribe we've had a real dearth of subscribers

00:00:56.900 i think youtube is preventing people from subscribing is unsubscribing check to see if

00:01:02.520 you've been unsubscribed please because i i'll tell you why because i i suspected a lot of people

00:01:09.160 were unhappy that i was talking about the mid east and this is a sneak preview of what i'm going to be

00:01:15.280 showing you tomorrow we we have some polling on whether or not canadians and americans really want

00:01:22.380 the united states or donald trump to initiate a strike against iran and to become literally

00:01:30.320 enmeshed into this war in a shooting war now i did a poll asking should the u.s intervene

00:01:38.680 in the israel israel iran conflict or stay out of foreign wars as president trump promised

00:01:45.380 79 percent of you said yes stay out

00:01:49.740 and that's

00:01:54.460 and

00:01:57.160 sorry sorry 79 percent of you said no the u.s should not intervene

00:02:02.780 so i think you know that indicates that a lot of you are really not enthused about this now and

00:02:09.440 tomorrow i've got other polls to show you and i think and i've got a substat going up this afternoon

00:02:15.800 about this very issue i think it's reasonable i think it's something that we really need to

00:02:23.440 understand right now there is nothing inevitable about war we we can have we can give peace a chance

00:02:30.000 and that's how i start this this column but here's another story about those arson incident

00:02:36.580 at 30 incidents under investigation

00:02:38.900 for arson related to the wildfires and what did we hear within hours of the wildfires

00:02:46.640 outbreak has to be climate change couldn't be anything else 0.96

00:02:52.060 well clearly it's something else called arson these people are crazy

00:02:56.600 starting fires and i think because they're trying to link it to climate change that's how nuts these 0.94

00:03:03.580 people are

00:03:04.200 i would point you towards my latest article in blaze media

00:03:09.180 which just came out last night canada the solution to reliance on the u.s increasing commitments to europe

00:03:14.740 this is all about

00:03:15.520 how mark carney wants to spend 225 billion that's b that's billion with a capital b

00:03:21.860 on rearming europe this is insane this is absolutely insane

00:03:27.360 as i promised we're going to get to that john carpe interview is this is really worth

00:03:33.540 watching because we get into the latest toxic bills from the carney government and why they're toxic

00:03:40.760 we specifically deal with bill c2 and bill c5 and how carney is probably going to revisit

00:03:48.660 the online harms act so this is very serious i want to play a bit of this

00:03:53.100 this is michael barrett talking about how the conservatives want something in parliament here

00:03:58.640 commons and this is big news we had an opposition day motion last week that uh was on notice in my name

00:04:07.380 along and seconded by uh my colleague kelly mccauley you'll know him from uh the mighty ogo where kelly's

00:04:14.660 the chair and this motion was about the 64 million dollars in the arrive scam which the auditor general

00:04:23.540 determined was a project where there is uh in in many cases no proof that the work that was paid for by

00:04:33.700 taxpayers was done that security clearances weren't in place where they needed to be in place

00:04:41.220 and the government initially the liberals voted against having the auditor general even investigate

00:04:47.460 so we put this motion on notice last week and it was we used it as our opposition day

00:04:53.220 and there's a lot of things we could use for an opposition day motion but

00:04:56.500 here is a case where it's tens of millions of taxpayer dollars in a time when canadians are

00:05:03.860 struggling to get by and we have the liberals with prime minister carney saying it's a new government

00:05:09.940 he's a new prime minister it's going to be new days and new ways so we said you know what let's give

00:05:15.460 them a chance to do the right thing the wrong thing but that well i'm going to play the rest of that

00:05:22.260 tomorrow because i don't want to go too much over time here so we can have time for the interview

00:05:27.700 but i want to show you andrew sheer really hit the bell yesterday about what's going on

00:05:34.980 with this liberal desire to outlaw phase out gas-powered engines gas-powered vehicles what

00:05:43.860 what are they why are they doing this this liberal government is doubling down on its insane

00:05:57.860 ban on gas-powered vehicles the latest liberal overreach kicks in next year and soon your favorite

00:06:03.940 car truck and van will be illegal but this mandate is already driving up prices the average price of a

00:06:10.340 new car is 67 000 used cars are approaching 40 000 and this liberal mandate will add an additional

00:06:16.740 20 000 per vehicle they've already priced working canadians out of the housing market why are they 0.88

00:06:23.700 pricing working canadians out of the ability to buy a vehicle as well the honorable minister of the

00:06:29.700 environment and climate change mr speaker first let's start with the facts which is there is no ban on

00:06:35.540 gas-powered vehicles but more to the point let's also say once again we're seeing the conservatives

00:06:42.820 talking there's a ban in place in 2035 julie environment and climate change minister that's what 0.96

00:06:52.500 andrew's referring down one of our most important industries employing hard-working auto workers in our

00:06:59.220 country at the very moment that we're facing tariffs threats from the united states i find it rich that

00:07:05.940 they're choosing to take this position instead of talking up a growing and important industry we stand

00:07:10.900 with our auto workers there absolutely is a ban it starts to come into effect next year and it will

00:07:20.820 absolutely devastate the auto sector here in canada the auto sector is already under fire from unjustified

00:07:27.460 u.s tariffs and the pm's inability to get a deal but gm ford are all saying that this ban will kill

00:07:34.900 jobs in fact a new report says that this ban on gas-powered vehicles will kill 90 000 auto jobs instead

00:07:41.780 of sending even more jobs to the u.s why not end the ban on gas-powered vehicles and let canadians

00:07:48.660 decide what kind of vehicle they want to buy the honorable minister of the environment and climate

00:07:53.940 change mr speaker it's nice to hear that they're finally recognizing that we we're talking about an

00:07:59.940 industry that's facing unjustified tariffs from the united states but let's also talk about how our auto

00:08:06.900 sector is important we need to support it in this moment it's creating good-paying union jobs in our

00:08:13.380 country an ev standard actually makes sure that new electric vehicles are available to canadians they're

00:08:20.420 cheaper to operate they're cheaper on upkeep and canadians want to be able to have access

00:08:26.340 they're not cheaper on upkeep you can't keep your electric car charged and do the laundry in the

00:08:33.060 same week that's how cheap they are the honorable leader of the opposition you don't have to allow

00:08:40.420 canadians to buy one type of vehicle by banning their ability to buy the ones that actually

00:08:45.700 you know this is raising a lot of questions canadians auto workers 4gm they all don't want 0.72

00:08:53.460 the ev mandate but the prime minister's intent on pushing it through why well right before becoming

00:08:59.060 prime minister he was chair of brookfield and he advocated for a ban on gas-powered cars brookfield

00:09:04.900 is heavily invested in the ev supply chain yet this prime minister refuses to reveal his financial

00:09:10.020 interests or self-admitted conflicts isn't it true that this isn't about the environment this is about the

00:09:14.580 bottom line for brookfield and folks it always goes back to brookfield asset management when you're

00:09:21.860 talking about why mark carney makes decisions why mark carney behaves he does and why mark carney

00:09:28.500 is the way he is now without further ado let's get to this interview with john carpe i hope you enjoy

00:09:33.140 this folks john is a good friend and a fantastic fan of this station and he's always welcome here

00:09:39.380 one well welcome back to stand on gardens very happy to have john carpe of the justice center for

00:09:45.380 constitutional freedoms back on the show john has been here before the last time around john we were

00:09:50.820 talking about bill c63 and you were taking your message to canadians across the country about how

00:09:58.260 dangerous this bill was and we'll get we'll get back to how the liberals are going to revisit that bill i'm

00:10:04.500 sure but i want to lead off with bill c2 which i think the conservatives were a little slow to

00:10:12.820 recognize as being as bad as it is i i didn't hear a lot of discussion about it and when uh pure poly

00:10:19.940 it was asked by a reporter what do you think about bill c2 you think this is a danger and they said well

00:10:25.220 we'll have to look at the bill more closely a couple of days later of course uh calgary nose hill

00:10:32.180 member of parliament michelle rempel garner got up and started talking about bill c2 as being

00:10:38.420 potentially dangerous now why do you think this bill could be one of the most toxic pieces of

00:10:47.220 legislation the liberals have ever tried to foist on this country in a nutshell the bill if passed in its

00:10:56.340 current form would give government officials uh power to access all kinds of information about

00:11:04.980 citizens without a search warrant now as kind of as background the way that our criminal justice system

00:11:11.140 has been functioning generally the past 157 years since confederation and even prior to that there's a

00:11:17.860 presumption that a citizen has a right to privacy a citizen has a right to security in their home

00:11:23.460 uh police or or other law enforcement cannot barge into your home uh there there's the government does

00:11:30.500 not have some sort of a god-given right to have all kinds of information about everybody and you know

00:11:36.100 who's subscribing to rogers and who's on netflix and who stayed at which hotel when and who's renting a car

00:11:43.060 etc now law enforcement needs to do their job so we've struck a balance the past 157 years

00:11:50.180 whereby if the police have reasonable and probable grounds to think that somebody is engaging in

00:11:56.980 crime maybe something to do with you know child pornography or weapons or what fraud i mean whatever

00:12:05.060 if they have reasonable and probable grounds the police can go to a judge and they can apply for a

00:12:09.460 search warrant they have to swear an affidavit indicating what information they have and why they

00:12:14.420 think that that person should be further investigated why that individual's privacy rights should be

00:12:20.020 violated uh because he or she is probably uh engaging in criminal conduct they get a narrow search warrant

00:12:27.460 that allows them to barge into one home only and that's the home of somebody where they have

00:12:32.500 reasonable grounds to think that the crime criminal activity is taking place everybody else their home is

00:12:38.660 sacrosanct the police can't barge in it's the same for information um if the let's say the police think

00:12:46.260 that somebody named mark smith my apologies to all the mark smiths out there if they think that mark smith

00:12:52.260 is involved in in um producing distributing child pornography they can go to a big company like rogers and

00:13:00.340 say look we've got we suspect mark smith of such and such you know we want some information on him

00:13:07.940 and if the company doesn't comply police can get a search warrant or a court order and so there are

00:13:15.140 two you only have and then they could look at his email and you know maybe get into his computer look

00:13:20.980 at his internet activity whatever so this is just background information what c2 does is it gives

00:13:28.260 government this broad access without a search warrant to get the names and ip addresses and subscriber data

00:13:35.860 of every business in canada whether you're a hotel or a car rental company whether you're a church a

00:13:41.700 charity a non-profit the government would get legal access to say to the church um give me we want your

00:13:50.340 uh email list and uh we want we want the names and email addresses of of uh of all the people you

00:13:57.940 know most churches i assume they're they've got an email list they might have an email newsletter like

00:14:02.580 you know most groups do and so that's a really scary part is that that government would get access to

00:14:10.260 massive amounts of information about canadians

00:14:15.940 yeah i i think i think that's what concerns me about this this bill it would force me

00:14:22.260 to actually hand over a list of subscribers and their addresses which i think a huge invasion

00:14:27.700 of privacy but the the internet access of course and and the surveillance concerns me because that's

00:14:33.620 what this government has been doing for the last 10 years i know mike mark carney likes to call

00:14:39.140 it canada's new government he won't even call it canada's liberal government but and i think there's

00:14:45.780 a method to that and method to his madness there but before i got in i found it fascinating that this

00:14:52.340 bill would allow the rcmp and canada post workers to open mail now you know people might say well you

00:15:00.260 know i don't send a lot of information out by mail but you would you would recall the mcdonald commission

00:15:08.180 of the 1970s which was targeting what the the rcmp operations at that time which which was opening

00:15:16.420 people's mail and the government argued at the time that we needed to create a spy agency or an

00:15:24.100 intelligence network in this country to do that instead so so we would entrust that to what eventually

00:15:32.020 became the canadian security intelligence service ceases which was created as a result of mcdonald

00:15:38.260 commission but here we have a bill that's actually advocating we go back to a canada where the rcmp is

00:15:44.820 opening our mail and is compounding it by saying a canada post workers can can open our mail and without

00:15:53.060 without a warrant and i find this to be just once again you don't have to go too deep into mark

00:16:00.020 carney's legislation to find the toxicity in it and and to find the poison pill and and did this sort

00:16:08.340 of astound you that once again the government is recommending the rcmp get into the opening of mail

00:16:13.460 business it's the same it's it's the same attitude it's the same spirit that the government is entitled

00:16:21.140 to become as as omniscient as it would like to be and just get all this information now people who are

00:16:28.260 ignorant of history they have this naive trust in government you know government would never harm us

00:16:33.460 a government would never lie to us government has our best interests at heart uh which only those who 0.99

00:16:39.140 are ignorant of history could have that kind of an attitude but unfortunately there are a lot of people

00:16:43.140 in this country who have this naive uh fairy tale like trust which would be you know an appropriate

00:16:51.220 attitude for a kindergarten student to have towards their teacher or for a you know three four five six

00:16:56.180 year old to have towards their parents there's a time and a place for that kind of an attitude but

00:17:00.660 uh those who know history will know that in the 20th century uh in the 1900s more people were

00:17:09.220 murdered by their own government and that includes uh soviet union under stalin and other brutal dictators 0.58

00:17:17.780 china under mao germany under the national socialists nazi occupied europe polpot and cambodia

00:17:24.980 more people were murdered by their own government than the number of soldiers who died in the

00:17:29.380 battlefield which was also a huge number of course and so the point is not you know well i've got

00:17:37.540 nothing to fear you know if the uh if if the if canada post opens my mail they're just going to see a

00:17:43.140 friendly letter to my aunt martha wishing her happy birthday and i don't care if anybody sees that

00:17:47.540 it's not the point the point is that you don't want to give government this access to intrude into

00:17:53.700 privacy and to gather all this information and for true crime for and that crime is a problem we need

00:17:59.540 to fight it uh the police can go and get a search warrant and they can open the mail of one targeted

00:18:06.260 individual when they get a court approval to open the mail of mark smith they can do that but to twist that

00:18:13.300 into some broader right where any canada post worker on some you know reasonable suspicion

00:18:20.340 decides to open mail is is just uh it is it's creepy it's totalitarian it's it's inviting tyranny

00:18:29.620 well you know there's a pain there's a great line from the mystery novel the maltese falcon and which

00:18:35.620 of course is a famous film about everybody has something to hide uh which is what sam sam spade

00:18:42.500 says to the police at one point everybody's got something to hide so let's not let's not pretend

00:18:47.380 that there isn't uh a hidden motive here but i i find this to be just indicative of this of this

00:18:56.420 government right now and how it really believes it has the right to take away privacy and what really

00:19:02.980 concerns me here john is that governments finding discovering information in people's files on their

00:19:11.220 computers in their mail that wasn't there to begin with because we know when governments want to 0.78

00:19:18.980 cancel people well how did that get on the computer and i don't trust this government to not lay their

00:19:26.740 evidence to not to not actually plant evidence if they're looking to destroy somebody and and i can see

00:19:34.420 this being a huge problem for all of us who are doing social media broadcasts such as this show here

00:19:41.780 which consumes a lot of my time i still do do do stories for media outlets other than my own but this

00:19:52.340 is a driving force in my life right now and i know there are people who i offend largely mark carney

00:20:00.260 liberals right now who would just love to this to shut this down on on the basis of any criteria so i

00:20:06.900 i worry about governments planning evidence uh but i also worry about the third component of this of

00:20:13.860 this bill which is the promise of a cashless society or the threat of a cashless society because here

00:20:21.380 here we go transactions above ten thousand dollars will be banned you can put it in the bank

00:20:28.340 but don't expect to take it out and use it and i think i heard you say the other day you're being

00:20:34.180 interviewed and saying well if if you can say ten thousand you can say five thousand if you can say

00:20:39.620 five thousand you can say one thousand and you can take that marker down until you're basically dealing

00:20:45.460 with petty cash and i think the government would love to have this digital currency mark carney has been

00:20:51.700 arguing for it for most of his professional life as a governor of two banks bank of england bank of

00:20:57.860 canada he's advocated at economic summits where he's also talked about the chinese currency replacing the

00:21:05.380 us dollar as the global currency of choice but he's talked extensively about digital currency how this

00:21:10.580 makes us safer and of course no it doesn't make us safer it makes us more inclined to be abused by

00:21:18.900 governments that will then know exactly how i'm spending my money how i'm paying the bills where

00:21:25.060 my money is coming from and everything about my personal choices that that in some cases might

00:21:33.860 be offensive to people in government and it could be used against me so what do you think about this

00:21:40.020 component of the bill well government that knows everything about you is a government that can take

00:21:46.180 everything from you and currently we have i think a healthy separation where a certain branch of

00:21:52.500 government might know things about you for example if a police officer pulls you over for speeding

00:21:59.300 they've got a database there that will indicate uh whether where you live and they look at your

00:22:05.380 driver's license and so the policeman will know where you live whether there's an outstanding warrant for

00:22:09.780 your arrest whether you've got a criminal record so the police have this information but

00:22:15.140 it's the it's the police only and it's not you know the the health ministry or the the transportation

00:22:21.060 ministry or the minister of education that has that information and in the same way your your doctor

00:22:26.900 you know and and maybe because we have a government controlled health care system maybe the the health 0.83

00:22:32.340 department will have personal private confidential information about patients but the police can't just

00:22:40.500 call up the uh the health ministry and say hey uh you know give us bob's medical history jason kenny tried

00:22:48.020 that in alberta by the way that was eventually was was defeated to to give police access to medical records

00:22:55.780 so the important thing is that okay fine different government departments for different reasons will

00:23:01.780 have information on us i mean the cra the the revenue branch is going to have information on our

00:23:07.700 how much we earned and how taxes we've paid and you know charitable giving but it's got to be kept

00:23:13.460 separate but now we've got this potential uh you know part part of the the drift the general tendency in

00:23:19.940 the last five years with legislation pertaining to the internet is to give government more and more control

00:23:25.620 in the name of combating hate which nobody can define because it's entirely subjective

00:23:31.140 and uh what ends up happening is when the government says it's banning hate speech they're going to ban

00:23:36.580 speech that they hate and so um but getting back to your question uh a government that knows everything

00:23:44.820 about you is a government that can take everything from you and so we need to i hope we have a peaceful

00:23:52.180 massive uprising uh and people contact their member of parliament to say this c2

00:23:59.300 is a dangerous violation of civil liberties and people need to contact their mp even if their mp is uh 0.51

00:24:05.220 is a member of the government party uh it doesn't matter what party your mp is she or he has to hear

00:24:10.820 from constituents that that c2 is very bad i i would have to agree and i would hope the conservatives get a

00:24:18.980 little more aggressive in opposing this bill because uh so far i've gotten the sense from the official

00:24:25.860 opposition right now they're just marking time until the summer vacation comes around and they've

00:24:31.940 finally been raising the issue about the liberals wanting to outlaw gas-powered engines in another

00:24:38.900 10 years that's been i think their most successful point in question period but they have avoided talking

00:24:44.980 with bill c2 and i think bill c5 which i find uh fascinating this is this of course again ostensibly

00:24:53.380 is about eliminating inter-provincial trade barriers and the conservatives love this bill and they feel

00:25:00.980 like really can't oppose it too strenuously and will probably be supporting it but one of the liberals own

00:25:09.860 members who of course was very close to justin trudeau you know he was in mark carney's first cabinet

00:25:15.380 after he was appointed prime minister i'm talking of course of uh nate erskine smith ontario uh member

00:25:22.980 of parliament who was a minister and but was dropped by carney in the in the second stage of his uh of his

00:25:31.380 government and he made it clear that he was not happy about being bounced from the cabinet and he has been

00:25:38.020 a visceral opponent of carney but he has been not afraid to be critical and he says he's not going

00:25:45.780 to support bill c5 because the toxic pill in that one of course is that mark carney gets to approve it's

00:25:54.340 almost like a per on a personal basis he gets to approve these capital projects that he keeps talking

00:25:59.780 about it and the and erskine smith said yesterday and has promised he finds this to be a real

00:26:06.740 a contravention of the of the process of approving these sorts of ventures but i think there's also

00:26:14.020 and i've talked about this last week with premier daniel smith who was on the show and i said my concern

00:26:20.740 about mark carney's one government when he keeps talking about we're gonna have one government dealing

00:26:27.380 with trade in this country and we're going to reduce or eliminate all these inter-provincial

00:26:33.300 trade bearers my concern is that he's he's trying to worm his way into federal if not control

00:26:42.820 but at least federal influence over the provincial autonomy over natural resources now as the premier

00:26:48.980 pointed out to me these are rights that are guaranteed in the constitution and the constitution

00:26:54.340 would trump any legislation however i wouldn't put it past someone like mark carney to just ignore that

00:27:00.180 and say i'm not going to listen to the the supreme court that says hey it's in the constitution the

00:27:05.940 province reserves the right to natural resources where they sell them and and what they're going to do

00:27:11.380 with these with oil and gas for instance and especially in alberta but do you think there's

00:27:17.220 there's this potential for mark carney to try to interfere with that long-standing provincial

00:27:24.100 autonomy over over natural resources and and for the federal government to once again as it tried to

00:27:30.020 do under pierre trudeau in the 1970s try to try to get its hands on those natural resources well or or

00:27:38.980 prevent them from being developed because if you buy into this uh wild theory that mankind controls the

00:27:45.780 weather mankind controls climate which is demonstrably false when you look just even at the last 2000

00:27:51.540 years we've had significant uh decreases in temperature that increases decreases and there's no correlation

00:27:59.460 with with uh people you know driving cars or heating their homes in winter uh and mankind has flourished

00:28:06.900 and prospered when uh a thousand years ago the the world's climate was four degrees warmer than what it is

00:28:14.180 is today and now we're you know lighting our hair on fire being terrified of a temperature increase of

00:28:19.940 of one and a half degrees celsius so we've got we've got a hostility towards resource development um and

00:28:27.860 and that's a long-standing problem when it comes to respecting the constitution this is we've had decades

00:28:33.860 of of federal government not respecting the constitution especially in health care

00:28:38.900 the constitution says that health care is exclusively a provincial jurisdiction and yet we have the

00:28:44.980 federal government uh indirectly controlling all of the health care systems in canada by saying to

00:28:50.740 the provinces we're not going to fund you unless you comply with our conditions and so you have these

00:28:55.700 horribly inefficient and unaccountable government monopoly health care systems functioning in each province

00:29:02.980 and tens of thousands of canadians have died on waiting lists but the the important point is that

00:29:07.940 the provinces uh under the constitution have the freedom to experiment with their own health care

00:29:14.420 policies and potentially if if the constitution is being honored provinces can learn from each other

00:29:20.340 and they might see something that works really well in in bc and try to copy it or see something that

00:29:25.940 fails miserably in ontario and try to avoid it

00:29:29.620 and so we've got that lack of respect for the constitution uh has been uh has been a big problem

00:29:36.180 for decades it's not new

00:29:40.340 well i would i would suggest it's not new and we should always be vigilant in ensuring that the

00:29:46.580 government does not contravene those constant constitutional guarantees although i i really do think

00:29:52.420 we're on the precipice of a much more authoritarian federal government than we've ever seen mark carney is

00:29:58.180 very good at masquerading as a small c conservative he has literally stolen the talking points of the

00:30:05.460 conservative party of canada he has literally stolen a lot of the the campaign rhetoric of pure poly of

00:30:13.140 in the conservative party canada but i maintain when mark carney talks about things like safety or safe

00:30:20.020 streets or affordable housing he's not talking about the same thing that conservatives are i would i would

00:30:26.900 say a safe street for mark carney is a lockdown street where people have curfews and they're not

00:30:31.300 allowed to leave their homes that would be a safe street to mark carney affordable housing i don't

00:30:36.500 believe he's thinking thinking about the dream of so many canadian families of having a single family

00:30:42.020 dwelling of having their own home he would be content to see people living in slums or in government 0.89

00:30:48.500 style soviet style block housing which is how i like to describe it and i think that's where we're going

00:30:53.540 with mark carney's affordable housing but he's very good at pretending he really understands the more

00:31:01.380 moderate politicians in this country that he he can he can live with a a conservative interpretation

00:31:08.820 of of the laws he can live with a more conservative fiscal policy but i don't think any of this is real i don't

00:31:16.100 think any of this is much more than a a charade and as uh as professor jeffrey sachs always likes to say

00:31:25.780 it's government shambolic act behavior that this is a sham and that there's nothing really behind it

00:31:32.660 except a desire to co-opt his his opponents his political opponents to get them on side and god only

00:31:40.020 knows where he goes from there but you know i as i and once again i go back to talking to daniel smith

00:31:45.620 last week i said is this a guy we can trust and she says you know we'll certainly work with him but

00:31:51.220 no i and she is not somebody we can trust because she frankly described him as a socialist which of

00:31:59.140 course if you read mark carney's writings this is a man who says he most admires karl marx and vladimir

00:32:05.140 lennon as his political heroes now that should send a chill down the spine of any canadian and i

00:32:11.540 don't know how many times i repeated that during the election campaign or others repeated that it's

00:32:16.740 in his last book it's he has said it at symposiums however the mainstream media never got down to that

00:32:25.700 never questioned that talking point so i would ask you is mark carney somebody canadians can trust

00:32:30.260 look i i would answer by saying that that that politicians never this is broader than mark carney

00:32:37.780 politicians never take away your rights and freedoms without offering a nice sounding pretext

00:32:43.140 and they will violate your freedom of speech in the name of stopping hate and stopping misinformation

00:32:49.700 stopping disinformation uh which is you know obviously a huge problem who gets to decide what is

00:32:56.820 misinformation who gets to decide what's hate right if if uh they want to ban hate speech but their goal

00:33:02.340 is to ban speech that they hate um if they you know they they took away our right our freedom to

00:33:10.260 have christmas dinner with our own parents in in 2020 in the name of public health uh all kinds of

00:33:17.700 rights and freedoms were violated and governments admitted this in in the court actions that that

00:33:22.740 justice center lawyers across canada uh fought against the lockdowns and the vaccine passports

00:33:29.700 and government submitted in court that yes these measures did violate the charter freedoms of

00:33:34.820 conscience religion association peaceful assembly uh travel mobility bodily autonomy generally speaking

00:33:42.180 the government submitted that in court but they said it was justified under uh section one of of the

00:33:48.980 the charter uh and and historically uh you know we have we've got the uh the communists uh taking

00:33:55.860 power in russia which became the soviet union uh and they say well you know to uh to fight against

00:34:02.580 the evils of capitalism we've got to shut down your churches or burn them and we've got to send uh huge

00:34:09.140 numbers of people off to siberia and we have to shoot people but it's all in the name of of creating 0.98

00:34:14.420 the workers paradise uh barely 10 years later you've got adolf hitler in germany pointing to the

00:34:20.340 communist atrocities and promising to keep the germans safe from communism and so the politicians are

00:34:28.340 whenever they take away rights and freedoms you know it's the surveillance state it's got to be

00:34:32.820 to protect us from crime and money laundering uh you know it's always safety and security is trotted out

00:34:40.420 uh as a pretext and you'll never hear mark carney or any other politicians say they're they're power

00:34:49.140 hungry and they just uh enjoy power and they're you know dangerous tyrants and they want to oppress

00:34:55.460 the population that's not the kind of language that they use so i'll make that broader point uh you

00:35:01.060 know without commenting necessarily about mark carney but politicians never take away your rights and

00:35:06.580 freedoms without offering a very nice sounding pretext well that's true i worked for a few years

00:35:16.900 on parliament hill and largely for reform canadian alliance conservative party mps but i certainly left

00:35:24.820 there thinking that there's one thing you can say about politicians is that you can always rely on them

00:35:29.300 to let you down and they'll do it every time and they're followers they're followers yeah they they

00:35:36.660 follow the culture it's up to us it's up to us sorry to interrupt it's up to us to change to change the

00:35:41.940 culture like we can't have this victim mentality that oh we're just going to be forever deceived and

00:35:46.500 forever lied to and forever tricked if it's impossible for politicians to oppress a well-informed uh citizenry

00:35:57.380 of responsible virtuous adults who assume take charge of their own lives assume responsibility

00:36:04.180 for their own lives who are well-informed it's impossible for a tyrant to oppress uh a free people

00:36:12.100 like it it requires our our buy-in and our cooperation to to have our rights and freedoms taken away from us

00:36:20.500 i guess my final question because i don't think anybody fought quite as hard and long as you did on

00:36:27.060 trying to get bill c63 the online harms act stopped or amended changed to some degree and we all breathed

00:36:35.300 a sigh of relief when it never got past second reading and it died on the on the legislative

00:36:41.620 floor but i said this is not the end i i know very very well what's going to happen and during the

00:36:47.540 campaign mark herney addressed the online harms act by saying great idea it's it's it's all about safety

00:36:54.100 folks it's about protecting our children from from pornography from child pornography it's about

00:37:01.060 stopping revenge porn and of course if you just point you pointed out and i pointed out at the time

00:37:06.180 these are already offensive that are covered by the criminal code so why are we reintroducing them

00:37:12.100 obviously it's got nothing to do with protecting children or women or anything else it's all about

00:37:16.100 taking our free speech away censoring us as the liberals have do every every opportunity and this

00:37:22.900 this odious bill with with the thought crimes component when people were laughing at us around

00:37:28.900 the world saying how what kind of a country would have a thought crimes company you're locked up in

00:37:32.980 your house because your neighbor suspects you might say something hateful and as you point you point out

00:37:38.260 who defines hateful who defines disinformation and it's anything the government hates yeah and that's

00:37:43.540 what that's what it comes down to so my question for you john is you think we're i i'm sure you agree

00:37:50.020 we're going to see this bill resurface in some form do you think they will push it through the attorney

00:37:56.980 general or through heritage as the original bill like five how eight years ago i think they first toyed

00:38:04.580 with this idea but it died once again it died on the legislative table because parliament uh parliament uh

00:38:11.940 ended and elections were called that one died but that at the time if i'm not mistaken was going to be

00:38:19.620 entered as legislation through the heritage minister they changed that name around now but

00:38:26.420 that's the same heritage minister again this time they call him the minister of canadian identity

00:38:32.980 and it's it's it's none other than the former environment and climate change minister who

00:38:40.740 clearly is no friend of free speech so do you think the liberals will try to reintroduce this

00:38:46.580 through the ag or through the heritage minister because it might look less dangerous that way

00:38:53.380 i i i have no idea how they're going to do it it's unfortunate that uh mark carney has expressed

00:39:03.540 support for the contents of bill c63 i think the important thing is for again for citizens to contact

00:39:10.260 their mps canadians are very good at complaining to each other you know at the water cooler at the

00:39:15.700 workplace uh family gatherings etc etc canadians are very good at complaining to each other but uh politicians are

00:39:23.060 are followers not leaders and so if uh if politicians sense that something is very unpopular and you

00:39:30.260 see this from time to time there's a proposal put forward and there's such a massive public outcry

00:39:35.780 that the government just drops it uh we saw stephen harper uh a decade ago or so with this uh he had

00:39:44.100 a he had a bill that had some similarities to bill c2 that would give police the power to

00:39:50.980 acquire massive amounts of information about citizens without a search warrant and they dressed it up as

00:39:57.380 uh fighting uh child pornography and the predators and uh the minister famously said either you're with

00:40:05.220 us or you're with the child pornographers but the the pushback against it was was so strong that they

00:40:12.580 they dropped that bill if if mps particularly liberal mps uh if they cure from their constituents uh that

00:40:22.500 that this bill is going to violate freedom of speech and it's unacceptable and if people write in and say

00:40:27.860 if you vote for this i'm voting against you in the next election um that's the way canadians have to be

00:40:34.020 a lot more involved in the in the democratic process than than what they are now

00:40:42.580 i i i couldn't i couldn't agree more and that's what we need to get canadians mobilized common sense

00:40:47.620 canadians whether you're a small c conservative small libertarian if you really don't want the

00:40:52.980 government encroaching any further into our lives than it already has we need to fight back i think these

00:40:58.740 are ominous times we're living in right now uh not just in canada but we're if you see what's

00:41:05.300 happening around the world and what potentially could be a catastrophic war in the middle east

00:41:11.620 these are very ominous times but i i think we have to work start at home and we have to

00:41:16.420 be very very vigilant about opposing government overreach from the mark carney government and i think

00:41:22.980 it's very very likely to happen to this government so john carpe justice center for constitutional

00:41:30.180 freedoms thank you for the work you do not just on these files that we talked about today but for

00:41:34.580 defending a lot of canadians who couldn't defend themselves otherwise against government overreach

00:41:40.740 and against laws that are meant to stymie our free speech our freedom of assembly and our freedom to be

00:41:47.380 canadian which i think we're losing every year so thank you so much for joining me today john and

00:41:53.460 hope we we see you back here to do keep discussing these these bills and these these crises that are

00:41:59.220 facing canada well thanks so much for having me on your show david i look forward to the next time

00:42:04.900 okay bye for now john

00:42:12.260 and that of course was john carpe and always a pleasure to have john on the show

00:42:16.820 and we will have him back on again but we are facing a number of crises in this country right

00:42:23.620 now we have to be vigilant we have to keep fighting for freedom if we if we stop fighting for freedom

00:42:28.980 who is going to do it for us famous line from that my favorite film casablanca you know victor laszlo was

00:42:37.380 asked why do you keep fighting and he responds you might as well ask why do we keep breathing if we stop

00:42:45.140 breathing we'll die if we stop fighting the world will die or in our case canada will die so that's why

00:42:51.700 we're we're keeping this up youtube sat on this episode like they don't want numbers they don't

00:42:57.220 want people to know what's on they don't but please share this broadcast with your friends and families

00:43:02.660 re-subscribe if you must because i'm going to fight back and thank you for your your support

00:43:10.020 and we will see you again tomorrow possibly this afternoon i might have to do that

00:43:14.900 bye for now god bless canada god bless you and this has been david creighton broadcasting live from ottawa

Stand on Guard with David Krayden - June 19, 2025

EXPOSED： Carney is Stealing Our Freedom ｜ Stand on Guard

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript