Stand on Guard with David Krayden - November 29, 2024


SHOCKING Poll: Liberals and NDP Face Total Collapse | Stand on Guard


Episode Stats

Length

37 minutes

Words per Minute

135.65887

Word Count

5,136

Sentence Count

429

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

11


Summary

In this episode of Stand On Guard, host Jordan Peterson talks about the current political climate in Canada and why we need to resist it. He also talks about his views on same-sex marriage and why he believes it should not be legalized.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 We will use every, I would like to emphasize this,
00:00:05.600 every means every weapon at our disposal.
00:00:09.160 We will not let this happen.
00:00:15.140 Welcome back to another edition of Stand on Guard.
00:00:18.880 We've been working hard this morning, as you can tell.
00:00:21.420 A few minutes late. Sorry about that.
00:00:23.760 Thanks for tuning in. Thanks for joining us this morning.
00:00:26.020 I think we try to give you all the news you need to know,
00:00:28.320 at least some of it.
00:00:30.000 And we've got a lot of stuff to go through this morning.
00:00:32.200 I think some of this was going to shock you,
00:00:35.000 what's going on here in this province of Ontario.
00:00:39.100 I know that's irrelevant to some of you in Alberta and BC,
00:00:42.800 but not really, because it all takes on a national flavor.
00:00:49.900 And of course, Justin Trudeau continues to run like a scared rabbit.
00:00:55.040 We'll be right back in a minute.
00:00:56.200 So we are in a very precarious position in this country.
00:01:03.220 We need political change, but we also need to resolve to resist.
00:01:07.700 Thanks for watching today, and please subscribe if you want to.
00:01:26.900 And it helps us to get over the YouTube suppression, which is there every day.
00:01:33.940 And I tell you what, I'm going to resolve to resist myself about one thing,
00:01:37.560 and that's to not worry about what those other morons out there are doing.
00:01:42.260 The ad hominem, constant ad hominem insults about people and laughing, giggling at clips.
00:01:52.420 Fine, you want to do that?
00:01:53.880 That's great.
00:01:54.680 I am going to do what this show needs to do,
00:01:57.340 which is examine and assess the political scene.
00:02:01.600 So that's what my 30 years in journalism and the military, industrial conflict,
00:02:10.660 no, in the military, really account for.
00:02:14.000 So I'm trying to use some of that expertise and that knowledge for everybody's good,
00:02:20.880 including my own at times.
00:02:23.240 So anyway, please subscribe if you can.
00:02:25.820 Share this broadcast with your friends and family.
00:02:27.780 Let people know about Stand on Guard and Resolve to Resist and Creighton's right.
00:02:33.740 You know where that title comes from?
00:02:36.600 I've got to tell you this at the beginning of the show here.
00:02:39.020 Excuse me.
00:02:39.580 I've got to tilt this a little further because, like I say, I was running crazy this morning.
00:02:46.740 I already did a news interview.
00:02:48.500 I did a radio interview.
00:02:49.560 It's 730.
00:02:51.240 I had to complete a post-millennial article that I couldn't finish last night.
00:02:57.780 So I've been running very fast here, and so I appreciate your patience.
00:03:03.200 But you know where that Creighton's right comes from?
00:03:06.700 Very interesting.
00:03:07.920 It was because of a column I wrote for the Calgary Herald.
00:03:13.940 And this was back during the same-sex marriage debate.
00:03:19.020 And, of course, you know yours truly was for traditional marriage, and as I still am.
00:03:27.500 And I wrote a column for the Calgary Herald arguing that traditional marriage could not be changed.
00:03:35.420 You can call it—you could have same-sex civil unions.
00:03:39.120 You could call it whatever you want, but don't call it marriage, is what I said in the article.
00:03:46.400 And I would say the same thing today.
00:03:47.620 I don't care who objects to that.
00:03:51.380 That doesn't mean I don't recognize the laws of the state, but my opinion remains the same.
00:03:56.940 I don't change because times change.
00:04:02.040 Times will change back again to other things.
00:04:04.540 Time is very much a product of the age we live in.
00:04:11.660 Anyway, there was a number of letters to the editor about that column.
00:04:16.800 And there was a competing column on the other side of the page arguing that Canada should adopt Jean Chrétien's same-sex marriage proposals.
00:04:27.960 Great.
00:04:28.760 You know, that's free speech.
00:04:30.620 I say one thing, the other person says the other.
00:04:33.160 You decide.
00:04:35.140 You know, that's what free speech is all about.
00:04:37.120 So one of the letters came back saying, Creighton's right.
00:04:42.840 I've used it ever since.
00:04:44.300 Because, yes, it is something that's applicable not only to what I think I'm, if I'm right about what I say, but it's also, yes, I am right of center.
00:04:53.880 But, you know, at times that doesn't mean much anymore, being right of center, because I have more in common with a lot of liberals who are free speech advocates.
00:05:04.980 A lot of people who believe, people I've had on this show, who at one time I would have said, you know,
00:05:13.900 I can't have that person on, or he or she is too liberal, or he or she is identified with the Democratic Party or the Liberal Party.
00:05:22.380 I identify today with people who are for freedom, who are for free speech, for the right of this station to continue to be on the air.
00:05:32.500 That's who I'm for.
00:05:33.340 That's my politics today.
00:05:34.480 And whether it's, whether you call that conservative, or libertarian, or classical liberal, I don't know anymore.
00:05:45.120 It's not, the labels don't necessarily apply anymore.
00:05:50.760 It's what you really believe in, in terms of freedom.
00:05:54.040 And if you believe in free speech, I'm on your side.
00:05:58.620 If you believe in liberty and freedom of the individual, to think, to speak, to work, I'm on your side.
00:06:09.060 That's what this show is all about.
00:06:10.760 Anyway, I've spent too much time blathering on about this stuff.
00:06:14.920 What are we talking about today?
00:06:16.660 Well, Jagmeet Singh.
00:06:18.560 I don't talk about Jagmeet Singh very often, because I really think he's irrelevant.
00:06:24.000 Now, I should be having, I should have a stand on guard cup here with me today.
00:06:28.880 But, you know, it is, it is a time to keep calm and carry on, even though we're in the brink of a nuclear war.
00:06:38.160 But we'll get to that in a minute.
00:06:39.780 But the problem here is that we really are not, the mainstream media is not covering the news at all.
00:06:50.000 And yes, I've ignored Jagmeet Singh, because he is irrelevant.
00:06:56.040 He's this third-party guy who could be, actually, and I'll show you this, I couldn't believe this call.
00:07:02.360 I showed this to you the other day, and I was incorrect in saying the Conservative Party was 20% ahead.
00:07:13.420 And actually, I discussed this poll earlier on the Mark Petron show, and Mark got the Conservative number wrong.
00:07:18.920 It's not 48%, it's 47%.
00:07:21.420 Because if you combine the 47% with the PPC, the People's Party, which is at 3% in this poll,
00:07:28.600 you get 50% of Canadians, 50% approving of a Conservative government, small-c Conservative government,
00:07:41.760 a government that supports, because we've never been more Conservative under pure polio.
00:07:51.420 Even under Stephen Harper.
00:07:54.320 I always argue Stephen Harper was the first conservative, truly conservative Prime Minister since
00:08:00.480 R.B. Bennett in 1930.
00:08:05.960 He was probably the first really conservative Prime Minister.
00:08:09.480 You really can't say anybody.
00:08:10.900 Brian Mulroney was not a Conservative.
00:08:13.620 He was a blue, he was a red Tory at the best of times.
00:08:20.700 He pretended to be a Conservative when he was going through the leadership, but he was not
00:08:26.780 a Conservative, a small-c Conservative.
00:08:29.000 He was a red Tory.
00:08:30.620 Joe Clark was a red Tory.
00:08:32.920 All of the others, even John Diefenbaker, was not really a hard Conservative.
00:08:39.080 He was better, but he was not a hard Conservative.
00:08:41.840 Stephen Harper was the first really conservative Prime Minister we've ever had in the modern age,
00:08:47.880 in post-Depression.
00:08:51.100 But pure polio has taken Stephen Harper to one more level.
00:08:55.720 And like I say, I hope it's sincere.
00:08:59.020 I hope he means it.
00:09:00.200 I hope he's saying what he really believes.
00:09:06.300 And I'll take him at his word until he disappoints me.
00:09:10.520 He's disappointed me on the free speech bill.
00:09:13.340 He's disappointed me on C-63, on the Online Harms Act, because he seems to want to replace
00:09:20.360 it, not kill it, which is stupidity.
00:09:22.760 Secondly, he's disappointed me on Ukraine, because he wants the same policy as Justin Trudeau,
00:09:27.240 keep the war going as long as it takes.
00:09:29.620 He wants the same policy on immigration, keep mass immigration going.
00:09:34.460 To some extent, they won't really define how he's going to do it differently.
00:09:39.460 But get back to this poll.
00:09:42.260 NDP are at 17%.
00:09:44.540 They're tied with the Liberals in second place.
00:09:47.140 So where do you think that puts Jagmeet Singh?
00:09:51.420 Okay, let's think about this for a second.
00:09:54.440 Jagmeet Singh is looking at this poll and other polls that have him in second or third place,
00:09:59.960 but in declining numbers.
00:10:03.900 So he's no longer saying, I mean, it's ridiculous to begin with, to say that Jagmeet Singh could
00:10:09.340 ever be Prime Minister of Canada.
00:10:11.540 He can't be Prime Minister of Canada.
00:10:13.140 He hasn't got the numbers anywhere.
00:10:14.960 No NDP leader in the history of Canada, or CCF leader for that matter, has ever had the
00:10:21.360 numbers to be Prime Minister of Canada.
00:10:24.040 But he could be the official opposition leader.
00:10:29.380 And this poll suggests he could.
00:10:33.700 And I just want to discuss for a minute, what do these numbers really mean?
00:10:37.560 17-17 for the Liberals and NDP?
00:10:40.080 See, this could be the annihilation of the Liberal Party and the NDP Party in one election.
00:10:48.600 And I'll tell you why.
00:10:51.660 Okay, if I can get back on the screen.
00:10:53.980 Think of these numbers.
00:10:54.800 47, the Conservatives are 30 percentage points ahead of the Liberals.
00:11:01.140 30, not 20, not 21, but 30.
00:11:04.720 So what does this mean?
00:11:07.980 All right.
00:11:08.500 One of my political science professors at Carleton University was Conrad Wynn, one of the most
00:11:14.500 brilliant pollsters in Canada.
00:11:16.280 He founded Compass Polling and gave me an A-plus in my first year.
00:11:23.020 But that's beside the point.
00:11:24.760 Anyway, Conrad Wynn was one of the few small C, I say small C, conservative professors at
00:11:33.120 Carlton at that time.
00:11:34.480 Most of the people in the political science department were all Marxists, bloody communists.
00:11:40.900 Yeah.
00:11:41.680 And Conrad Wynn, no, he was a solid classical liberal type guy, small C, conservative.
00:11:50.600 And the first thing he told me actually was, don't go into journalism.
00:11:54.740 Go into polling.
00:11:56.540 That's where the future is.
00:11:59.200 Don't go into journalism.
00:12:00.600 He said, change your major.
00:12:04.140 Well, as it turned out, I got a combined honors with political science and journalism.
00:12:09.440 But the point is, he was right about the future is in polling, because the pollsters control
00:12:18.140 everything today.
00:12:19.960 But what Conrad Wynn told me at the time was that polling is going to totally define the
00:12:29.620 future of politics.
00:12:31.160 We are going to decide who to vote for based on polling.
00:12:35.300 People are going to be very much influenced by the polling.
00:12:40.400 And he also said, if the polling gets below 25%, 20% for any political party, and this is what
00:12:50.840 I want you to listen to this morning.
00:12:52.560 If I say one thing this morning that's important, that's different than you're going to hear on
00:12:57.880 those other people's stations, okay?
00:12:59.420 I'm sorry.
00:12:59.860 I didn't want to mean that.
00:13:02.240 When a political party is in second place, in second place, when the second place political
00:13:08.700 party goes below 20%, and the third place political party goes up to meet them, the vote
00:13:20.580 splitting is going to be catastrophic for both of them.
00:13:25.600 Do you hear what I'm saying?
00:13:27.160 In the next election, we've already said Pyropoleev is going to win a mega majority.
00:13:33.220 Pyropoleev is going to win a huge majority in the next election.
00:13:37.480 Why?
00:13:38.960 Because he's got potentially almost 50% of the vote, which in a first-past-the-post system
00:13:47.080 like Canada translates into 75% of the seats, perhaps 80% of the seats.
00:13:56.000 We've seen this happen before, and both times it's been a conservative leader.
00:14:02.300 Brian Mulroney in 1984, John Diefenbaker in 1958.
00:14:08.780 And why is that?
00:14:10.720 I'm sorry.
00:14:11.380 I never want to see my tie askew, because Justin Trudeau always has his askew.
00:14:17.080 Why is that?
00:14:18.060 It's because people at that point in history were fed up with liberal governments.
00:14:25.200 In 1958, it was because John Diefenbaker had a minority government that the liberals said,
00:14:33.320 Canadians are through with you, or they're going to go back to a liberal government, which
00:14:38.080 they had had for literally 22 years, 1935 to 1957, Canada was ruled by liberal governments.
00:14:49.760 Largely Mackenzie King.
00:14:51.260 But it was an unbroken liberal dynasty.
00:15:00.540 Then, John Diefenbaker had a brief minority government, and the liberals said, it's over.
00:15:07.700 You had your chance.
00:15:09.380 We're coming back.
00:15:11.460 We're coming back, and we're taking over.
00:15:13.660 Remember, Canadians voted overwhelmingly for John Diefenbaker in 1958.
00:15:19.860 208 seats.
00:15:21.860 The largest majority in Canadian history.
00:15:24.600 How do I remember that?
00:15:25.560 I do, because I grew up reading this stuff.
00:15:29.720 1984.
00:15:31.120 Brian Mulroney.
00:15:32.260 He had just won the conservative leadership by saying he was the most conservative leader
00:15:38.840 the conservative party would ever have, or the progressive conservative party, as it was
00:15:43.480 known in those days.
00:15:44.640 An oxymoron, of course.
00:15:46.200 You can't be progressive and conservative at the same time.
00:15:48.800 But somehow that party survived for, what, 30, 40 years under that insane title.
00:15:55.500 But that's what happened.
00:15:57.520 Brian Mulroney won the election in 1984 after all of those years of Pierre Trudeau.
00:16:05.780 15 years of Pierre Trudeau.
00:16:07.480 If you don't include nine months of Joe Clark in 1979, who was a completely ineffectual leader,
00:16:16.180 a red Tory, no real damage to Trudeau.
00:16:22.700 So here we are in 2024.
00:16:25.660 We're on the verge of the biggest electoral victory for the Conservatives or any political
00:16:31.300 party in Canadian history.
00:16:32.720 And why?
00:16:33.380 I'll tell you this again.
00:16:34.740 It's because of vote splitting.
00:16:36.640 Vote splitting, when the second and third party are below 20%, means they're going to
00:16:42.100 annihilate each other.
00:16:43.420 They're going to eat each other in this next election.
00:16:46.160 You're going to see new Democrats and liberals vie for who should we vote for?
00:16:53.200 The liberals or the NDP?
00:16:54.940 Who's more woke?
00:16:58.060 So it might result in Conservatives winning writings that they don't even intend to win.
00:17:07.640 I'm going to make a prediction here.
00:17:09.620 If an election were held today or within the next 30 days, the Conservative Party of Canada
00:17:18.380 would win 90% of the seats in the House of Commons.
00:17:21.820 And the liberals would be reduced to maybe five or six seats along with the NDP.
00:17:29.240 And hopefully the Green will be eliminated.
00:17:33.720 Yes, I'd like to see one or two People's Party of Canada seats adjust to keep the debate going.
00:17:40.820 But the Conservative Party of Canada is on stream right now for the biggest majority in history of Canada.
00:17:48.220 Canada and the Liberal Party is going down to its biggest electoral disaster in history.
00:17:56.320 It might mean the end of the Liberal Party.
00:18:00.340 Because the numbers are saying that.
00:18:02.740 This poll says that to me.
00:18:05.140 So this is incredible.
00:18:06.520 So this brings us back to what are we talking about today?
00:18:09.840 Jagmeet Singh.
00:18:12.160 Now, Jagmeet Singh, of course.
00:18:14.000 What is he?
00:18:15.320 I'm going to show you this clip.
00:18:16.600 I can't believe he said this the other day.
00:18:19.620 He's not going to pass that GST break unless it includes seniors.
00:18:28.340 Unless the Liberals expand the bill.
00:18:32.300 No way, he said.
00:18:34.040 It's not going to happen.
00:18:34.900 Let's listen to it.
00:18:35.880 It's incredible.
00:18:36.540 This is the most unprincipled, unethical, immoral politician, I think, in the history of Canada.
00:18:43.740 And he surpasses Justin Trudeau in that.
00:18:45.720 If you were a new Democrat today, would you really want this clown leading your party
00:18:53.240 when he doesn't have a goddamn clue in hell what he's doing from one day to the next?
00:19:00.140 The Democrats are demanding that the GST tax holiday, the GST holiday, get passed immediately.
00:19:08.340 And to do that, we have cleared the way.
00:19:10.720 We've cleared the path so we can get this done immediately.
00:19:14.140 And then we want to reiterate our demand that the Liberals fix the checks.
00:19:20.220 They expand it to include seniors, people with living disabilities.
00:19:24.780 We need to see real relief for Canadians.
00:19:27.300 People are hurting right now.
00:19:28.760 People are saying that they cannot afford the things that they need for their family.
00:19:32.920 That they're drowning.
00:19:34.260 So we need to give them some relief.
00:19:36.160 We need to give people a GST holiday.
00:19:38.000 So we are demanding that that get done immediately.
00:19:40.900 Like I said, we've cleared the path to make it happen.
00:19:42.640 And then we need to see those Liberals fix the checks so that people who need it most get it.
00:19:48.780 Have the Liberals confirmed that they were split the two measures into two separate bills like you've asked?
00:19:54.860 We expect that to happen and we are demanding that that happen.
00:19:58.500 We do not have a concrete confirmation yet.
00:20:01.860 May, look at this client.
00:20:03.720 He's asking a question.
00:20:04.680 Is this going to happen?
00:20:05.560 Oh, no, we haven't got a concrete answer from the government, but we expect it's going to happen.
00:20:15.020 This idiot doesn't know from one day to the next.
00:20:18.600 And I hate the fact he can't make a God.
00:20:21.520 Sorry.
00:20:22.120 He can't make a comment.
00:20:23.960 He can't make a suggestion.
00:20:26.520 He can't have a news conference without these two backers standing behind him.
00:20:30.360 Like, we're here to protect you if you fall down, Mr. Singh.
00:20:35.380 We're here to protect you if you say something really stupid, because the NDP caucus doesn't even trust you.
00:20:42.020 This is what this says.
00:20:43.860 Does Pierre Paulyev stand up with two conservative MPs standing behind him at a news conference like this?
00:20:51.100 Like they can't trust him to say the right thing?
00:20:53.620 Like they don't think he's capable, intellectually capable, of getting the message out?
00:20:59.540 No.
00:21:00.740 Only Jagmeet Singh requires two handlers.
00:21:05.100 One of these is an MP, Peter Julian from Vancouver, standing behind him to say, say it or else.
00:21:13.720 Does Peter Julian have a gun to his back or something?
00:21:17.000 But what is this all about?
00:21:18.500 OK, it's about Jagmeet Singh's pension.
00:21:25.000 Because as we looked at those poll numbers, we looked at these poll numbers, Jagmeet Singh could lose his own seat.
00:21:35.620 And that's why he's propping up the Trudeau government.
00:21:40.520 That's the only reason at this point.
00:21:43.600 Listen to him a little longer, but I'll reiterate.
00:21:45.640 This is what we expect.
00:21:47.320 In fact, this is what we demand.
00:21:48.820 That the GSD tax holiday happened right away.
00:21:51.560 We've already agreed to clear the path to make that happen.
00:21:55.100 So now we are demanding the liberals do what's necessary to have the GSD holiday pass immediately.
00:22:01.520 All right.
00:22:02.180 So he's already cleared the path.
00:22:03.680 What the hell does that mean?
00:22:06.140 He's cleared the path.
00:22:08.620 He's made the legislation include pensioners.
00:22:13.500 No, it didn't.
00:22:15.260 It didn't include pensioners.
00:22:16.880 So he's lying.
00:22:19.360 Or he's being pretty damn optimistic about something that he thinks is going to happen in the next 24 hours and didn't.
00:22:27.920 Let's keep going.
00:22:30.160 It doesn't happen.
00:22:31.080 If it's all one bill, what happens?
00:22:32.780 What will the NDP do in that situation?
00:22:33.980 We will not support that.
00:22:35.640 We will not support that.
00:22:36.280 Did you hear that, people?
00:22:37.740 We will not support that if the bill doesn't include pensioners.
00:22:43.940 It didn't.
00:22:45.700 But he supported it.
00:22:47.120 Why do you suppose that is?
00:22:49.440 Why do you suppose he wants this government to survive so badly past Christmas?
00:22:54.300 And he's flailing, doing this big act about how he wants the government to fall, except it's not going to fall under his watch because he's not going to vote against the government and somebody else has to.
00:23:07.300 You, sorry, buddy, it's up to you, you with one suit in your inventory, which you wear every day to the House of Commons during question period.
00:23:18.700 It's up to you if you want this government to fall, but you don't want this government to fall.
00:23:23.840 And I'll tell you why.
00:23:25.240 It's because you want your pension and you need to stay in government.
00:23:29.860 You need to remain as an MP until March 2025.
00:23:33.560 Not support it.
00:23:34.080 We said very clearly we will not support checks that exclude the vulnerable.
00:23:38.100 People are hurting right now.
00:23:39.260 Seniors are hurting amongst the most with their fixed incomes and the high cost of living.
00:23:43.600 So we will not support unless there's a GSD holiday first and that the checks are fixed to include the people who are most vulnerable.
00:23:52.740 All right.
00:23:53.700 So did this happen?
00:23:56.460 No, no, it didn't.
00:23:59.040 Isn't that shocking?
00:24:01.520 Trey shocking.
00:24:02.700 Yes.
00:24:04.220 Here it is.
00:24:05.420 NDP, liberal NDP passed bill to enact two month GSD holiday in House of Commons.
00:24:10.480 And guess what?
00:24:11.420 There was no promise of a second bill to include pensioners.
00:24:18.160 Read it for yourself.
00:24:20.300 So Jagmeet, once again, got in line, voted with the liberals.
00:24:25.120 Why?
00:24:25.980 Because Jagmeet wants his pension in March.
00:24:31.260 Trudeau has already got his pension and Trudeau doesn't need his pension.
00:24:33.960 But he's pension pals with Jagmeet Singh because he needs to stay prime minister until he thinks it's safe to run again.
00:24:43.820 But guess what?
00:24:44.600 It's never going to be safe for Justin Trudeau to run again.
00:24:47.560 It's over.
00:24:49.440 It's really over.
00:24:50.980 Now, I want to go through a few things because I mentioned, probably haven't got time for the Putin video, but I want to discuss these things.
00:25:01.860 This has been one of the biggest stories on X that I did this week.
00:25:06.500 No, it was not original.
00:25:10.180 You know, I wish it was.
00:25:12.240 And I want to make this an original story next week by talking to the mayor of this town.
00:25:20.200 Township.
00:25:20.680 And I wrote this story and I thought, you know, this is this is horrible.
00:25:25.680 But I thought about it later.
00:25:27.720 I got thinking about what the ramifications and the consequences really are of this.
00:25:32.700 So this Human Rights Tribunal, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, read Doug Ford Human Rights Tribunal.
00:25:42.660 This is your faux conservative, your phony conservative Doug Ford, who loves to pretend he's on your side.
00:25:50.680 Doug Ford is on your side.
00:25:52.800 He's got journalists out there at the Toronto Sun who love him so much.
00:25:58.180 But Doug Ford is a fraud.
00:26:00.760 Doug Ford is not a conservative.
00:26:02.860 He never has been.
00:26:04.300 He wants power.
00:26:06.120 And I tell you this.
00:26:07.440 He is not going to intervene when the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal forces a township to give $10,000 to a gay rights activist group and $5,000 from a mayor, from his own pocket.
00:26:23.800 This story sickened me when I first read it and reported it.
00:26:28.880 And I am going to try to get this mayor on the air next week because, of course, CBC, who initially wrote the story, said they tried to get and the story was a completely stupid affair of how this poor little LGBTQ pride group in rural Ontario couldn't have its rights recognized.
00:26:54.380 And we tried to get a hold of the mayor, but he didn't respond.
00:27:00.600 Well, of course he didn't respond because you would make him look like a fool, like some sort of crazy Neanderthal, as CBC always does.
00:27:09.100 CBC is consistently trying to make people who oppose this agenda as idiots, fools, bigots, you know, the rest.
00:27:19.700 You've heard it all before.
00:27:20.760 I'm here to tell you that I want this mayor on the air and to say, how do you feel about paying $5,000 from your own pocket?
00:27:32.440 Because you listened to the constituents in your area who said, we don't want a damn Pride Week.
00:27:40.200 We don't want to raise the pride flag.
00:27:42.500 To hell with you.
00:27:44.120 That's where Canada's going.
00:27:45.740 Thanks to the work my Muslim friends are doing, Camille Al-Sheikh and others who are fighting the Pride flag intrusion into the lives of schoolchildren.
00:28:02.220 Thank you, Camille, for the work you're doing.
00:28:04.220 We need to target this news story and this town and demand that they get their money back from Doug Ford's human rights tribunal.
00:28:19.020 What about the human rights of the people who live here?
00:28:21.900 What about the human rights of this mayor?
00:28:24.620 Do they have any?
00:28:25.780 Do they have a right to respect what their voters want?
00:28:29.600 Do they have a right to say, no, we're not going to bend?
00:28:33.520 We're not going to be prostrate to gay Pride Week?
00:28:37.740 No, they don't in this province.
00:28:40.260 And Doug Ford doesn't give a damn.
00:28:42.160 It's another reason I continue to rail against Doug Ford.
00:28:45.420 And he's got the wrong strategy against the Trump tariffs.
00:28:51.420 Retaliate.
00:28:52.180 Get off.
00:28:52.760 Get in line with Daniel Smith in Alberta, who says, let's go with Canada first.
00:29:01.360 Doug Ford believes in Justin Trudeau's Team Canada.
00:29:05.640 I've got no time for Doug Ford.
00:29:07.500 Never have.
00:29:08.860 Another story here.
00:29:11.440 Mexico is not going to agree.
00:29:14.120 to Donald Trump's demand to seal the border.
00:29:21.500 Trump says Mexico's president agreed to stop migration.
00:29:29.140 That's not the slide I wanted.
00:29:30.780 But anyway, where are we here?
00:29:35.740 You have to find that.
00:29:38.780 But this is the story.
00:29:40.160 This is what I really want to talk about here, is that Rumble is suing California over Gavin Newsom's war against political speech.
00:29:49.860 Thank God.
00:29:52.120 Because I tell you, every one of us who has a podcast, who speaks on YouTube or Rumble, is constantly being forced to say things we don't believe in.
00:30:05.200 This is what happens all the time.
00:30:10.320 And I think that's why this lawsuit is so incredibly important.
00:30:16.720 Anyway, I want to show this, because what the heck.
00:30:25.100 This is where we are going to talk about the territory of Russia, with the big data of Western production, as it was already said, we will be able to answer, including, and for the possible continuation of the attacks of the war conditions, as it was done on January 21.
00:30:47.100 It seems like it's very difficult.
00:31:07.580 How do you think these ударs by the center are also possible to be an enemy?
00:31:17.580 Because you don't have to do anything else?
00:31:20.580 You know, in the Soviet Union there was a joke about the weather forecast.
00:31:27.580 The forecast is that today, during the day, everything is possible.
00:31:35.580 I'll remind you once again.
00:31:38.580 I'll remind you, as you asked me, as you asked me.
00:31:42.580 There are tens of bullets, some of these bullets,
00:31:48.580 attacks with a speed of 10 mc.
00:31:51.580 It's about 3 mc.
00:31:54.580 The temperature of the enemy reaches 4000 degrees.
00:31:59.580 If my memory doesn't change,
00:32:02.580 on the surface of the Sun,
00:32:04.580 the temperature is 5500 degrees.
00:32:07.580 That is probably enough.
00:32:11.580 I put that on specifically because it was from global news.
00:32:17.580 Because otherwise, I could be censored for putting that on the air.
00:32:22.580 And that is where we're at.
00:32:24.580 We can't talk about the N-word.
00:32:26.580 The new N-word.
00:32:27.580 The new N-word.
00:32:28.580 Yeah, you know the other N-word.
00:32:29.580 The new N-word is about nuclear.
00:32:32.580 We can't talk about that in conjunction with war.
00:32:35.580 Or else we get sidelined.
00:32:37.580 We get demonetized.
00:32:39.580 We get attacked.
00:32:41.580 We get called a Russian agent if we want peace in Ukraine.
00:32:45.580 And I said this this morning in an interview I did.
00:32:49.580 I said, why do you think there's lockstep between the conservatives and the liberals on Ukraine?
00:32:58.580 It's because there's a fear of being labeled as a Russian agent if you dare to support peace in Ukraine.
00:33:09.580 If you want an end to the war, you are a Russian agent.
00:33:14.580 And let me tell you, I'm not sitting here in my bench someplace in the hinterland making these comments.
00:33:24.580 I live and work in Ottawa.
00:33:26.580 I live and work with the National Press Corps.
00:33:28.580 And I can tell you, the attitude is insane right now.
00:33:33.580 Is insane.
00:33:35.580 If you have any desire to stop the war in Ukraine.
00:33:40.580 If you think we should negotiate with Vladimir Putin.
00:33:45.580 If you think that maybe Ukraine should not be a member of NATO.
00:33:51.580 At least for 20 years, as Donald Trump has said.
00:33:56.580 Then you're labeled as a Russian agent, a spy.
00:34:00.580 It's like living during the dark ages of the House Un-American Activities Committee.
00:34:06.580 And I call what's going on in the Security Committee right now, the House Un-Canadian Activities Committee.
00:34:12.580 Because it's that insane.
00:34:14.580 We are living through the new McCarthyism.
00:34:17.580 I know McCarthy was right about the communists.
00:34:20.580 Yes, there were communists everywhere.
00:34:22.580 But in his fight to stop communism, he libeled and destroyed and eviscerated and completely blacklisted hundreds, perhaps thousands of people.
00:34:35.580 And that's not the way we do things in democracies.
00:34:38.580 So he was wrong, maybe not in what he believed, but he was wrong in his tactics.
00:34:44.580 And I'll stick by that till the day I die.
00:34:47.580 I don't care how many people come on and say McCarthy was right.
00:34:50.580 McCarthy was wrong in the way he did it.
00:34:53.580 And had he done it right, had his tactics been correct, we might have actually stemmed the spread of communism and woke politics.
00:35:04.580 More than we actually have.
00:35:07.580 Because all that proved by McCarthy doing what he did, how he did it, was that woke politics could survive and reemerge in a different form.
00:35:21.580 And they're more powerful than ever.
00:35:23.580 The communists are more powerful than ever in the State Department, in the universities, in the media.
00:35:31.580 Today.
00:35:32.580 And I'm continuing to fight the communists.
00:35:35.580 But in the process, I don't think we have to somehow label everybody who wants peace in Ukraine as a Russian agent.
00:35:44.580 I think that's insane.
00:35:46.580 And I think that's the difference.
00:35:49.580 Anyway, I've gone over time.
00:35:51.580 We're considering moving the show not to a different time zone.
00:35:54.580 Like I told you yesterday, we've got to.
00:35:56.580 We're trying to stick to 10 o'clock.
00:35:58.580 It's going to be hard over the next week or so because I'm traveling.
00:36:02.580 But we're thinking about moving the show to an hour.
00:36:05.580 Do you think that's a good idea?
00:36:07.580 I put that out to you because one of my folks out there has his own show.
00:36:13.580 I've been on his show.
00:36:14.580 He suggested I do that.
00:36:16.580 And it's a person I consider to be highly credible and to dispensing good advice.
00:36:23.580 So I ask you that.
00:36:24.580 Do you think we should move to an hour?
00:36:26.580 Do you think that would hurt or help the show's perception and how it's getting routinely destroyed by YouTube in terms of the subscribers, in terms of the viewership?
00:36:42.580 Would that hurt or help?
00:36:44.580 I ask your advice on that because I, you know, I trust you because I mean, looking at the numbers right now, we are barely getting the usual we do.
00:36:54.580 So there is a once again, I am being I'm being sat on this broadcast is being sat on.
00:37:00.580 So fight back.
00:37:02.580 Resolve to resist.
00:37:03.580 I'm continuing to resolve to resist.
00:37:05.580 Thanks for your support.
00:37:06.580 Thanks for being a part of the show.
00:37:11.580 And don't forget Christmas.
00:37:13.580 Give me just a second here.
00:37:14.580 I'm sure I have the right one.
00:37:18.580 Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh.
00:37:40.580 That's all I can show you because there's a music problem here.
00:37:43.580 So thanks for watching today, folks.
00:37:45.580 We love you.
00:37:46.580 God bless you.
00:37:48.580 And we're with you.
00:37:49.580 Thank you.