Stand on Guard with David Krayden - Stand on Guard Law： Poilievre's Bold Move to Protect Homes

00:00:00.640 Your home is your castle. We're calling on the government to introduce and

00:00:06.240 immediately pass the Stand on Guard law.

00:00:14.540 Is it possible that Peter Polyev is watching our show? It's called, I'm just

00:00:20.680 asking because this new bill will be called the Stand on Guard law. Not only

00:00:28.080 a great bill, but a great reference to the show, I hope, when we come back in mere

00:00:34.480 moments. So we'll delve into this news conference yesterday. A couple of other

00:00:39.580 interesting stories I have for you.

00:00:44.220 The Prime Minister lied and his minions continue to lie.

00:00:53.520 We need it. What is the change?

00:00:58.080 But we also need to resolve to resist.

00:01:01.840 Yes, please like the station, like the show, subscribe. We've got to keep pushing our

00:01:14.980 subscriptions up. Thank you so much for your support. Oh, the dying days of August. I know

00:01:21.880 summer lasts until September 21st. But it seems like once you get past that Labor Day weekend,

00:01:30.840 and it's pretty early this year, summer seems to be over. You can't wear the white pants anymore.

00:01:37.880 And every dress code changes. And I love summer. And I'm praying for a summer in the future that's

00:01:47.380 absolutely free of grievance.

00:01:52.020 And that could happen. I want to show this little meme again, because our producer put a lot of work

00:02:00.480 into it. And it's wonderful. And of course, the forces of common sense, decency, and sanity won a huge

00:02:10.580 victory this week, when Cracker Barrel decided it wasn't going to change his logo to that horribly

00:02:19.220 sanitized version from the woke CEO. And not only that, thanks to the good work of people like Robbie Starbuck,

00:02:27.940 they took down their pride page in their DEI instructions. But here's, I think, a large part of the reason.

00:02:36.340 The US has a president in Donald Trump who cares about these matters and has the guts to speak out about them.

00:03:06.340 Yeah, that was, that's a celebrating moment. You know, that reminds me of when they used to do ads,

00:03:16.880 and they would put actors or personalities in the ad with current day actors who were long gone,

00:03:25.600 long deceased. I mean, Humphrey Bogart was in one. And they tried that in the movie too.

00:03:34.920 And like, the title escapes me right now, but it's, it's a work of art. I really, really enjoyed that.

00:03:43.380 And I can't say enough about it. Before, before we get into the poly of speech, this is a very,

00:03:50.340 very disturbing. So if you haven't noticed, you know, there's been a humanitarian crisis

00:03:59.880 crisis already in the Gaza Strip with, first of all, leveling of everything that's standing

00:04:08.020 and what's been going on with the lack of food for the people there. Now it looks like it's going to be,

00:04:17.480 everybody's going to be eradicated. So this is, I think, I should be of concern to everybody.

00:04:22.500 And I, I mentioned that at the risk of offending some, but we're here to talk the truth.

00:04:33.320 Now I want to show you something else that just, I came across this morning. Thank you to Steve,

00:04:39.660 who pointed this out to me. This is amazing. Bureaucrat booze bill costs taxpayers $51,000 a month.

00:04:51.500 This is global affairs. Thanks to the Canadian taxpayers federation. And it says working in

00:04:57.540 government may be a thirsty profession, but a boost have a $50,000 a month. It's definitely a problem.

00:05:06.020 And the problem gets worse when the bill is sent to taxpayers, global affairs, Canada bureaucrats spent

00:05:13.060 more than $3.3 million on alcohol between January, 2019 and May, 2024, according to an access to information

00:05:23.400 records obtained by the Canadian taxpayers federation.

00:05:29.840 What is coming? I could, I could read this whole thing, but read it and weep. This is,

00:05:35.020 this is, this is absolutely outrageous. The taxpayers are on the hook for the bar tab.

00:05:44.020 And it doesn't say, this is obviously the, they're whining and dining themselves and guests

00:05:49.720 at probably four and five star restaurants around the world.

00:05:54.320 What's the price of a bottle of red wine in Paris, France? Probably about $60, $70 Canadian easily.

00:06:03.120 So that's where the bar tab is. But I mean, you think the government would at least say, look,

00:06:07.840 we'll pay for your meals, but you want to booze it up, put it on your own tab.

00:06:12.180 You're paid well enough as it is. Don't expect the taxpayer to pay for this. But of course the

00:06:18.980 taxpayer is paying for this. So kind of outrageous, wouldn't you say? Got another story here for you

00:06:27.240 that I just noticed this morning. Can I share the screen? Yeah, here we go.

00:06:38.880 So, this is from the Guardian, a newspaper media outlook I don't generally like. But I'll read it

00:06:49.120 because I'd like to know what the other side is thinking. Here we go again. Beach returned to

00:06:56.580 First Nation after 170 years following Canada legal battle. So this is a beach off Lake Huron in Ontario.

00:07:04.600 And guess what? It's just been handed to another First Nation group. 270 years. A stretch of beach 0.85

00:07:15.660 will be returned to a First Nations in Canada. 170 years after it was mistakenly omitted from its reserve.

00:07:24.520 Now, this was contested by the local town. But Canada, the Canadian Supreme Court would not

00:07:38.960 even hear the case. This is problematic. Just like what happened recently in BC with private property

00:07:46.800 rights being overturned by the BC Supreme Court. Here we have the Supreme Court of Canada

00:07:51.800 essentially agreeing with the entitlement of First Nations peoples to override private property

00:07:59.340 rights, which are not guaranteed in the Canadian Constitution or the Charter of Rights,

00:08:04.860 as anybody will probably tell you.

00:08:09.020 In its application to the country's highest court, the town warned that a victory for the First Nation

00:08:14.580 would, quote, risk sowing uncertainty and unpredictability at the core of Canada's system

00:08:21.260 of private landholding, unquote. Same situation. Why am I flagging this? Because

00:08:30.440 this is an indication that the Supreme Court is going to back up British Columbia when its appeal

00:08:40.420 of the BC Supreme Court ruling in favor of First Nation entitlement comes before it.

00:08:48.100 So this is very, very, very problematic. And I'm extremely concerned about this.

00:08:57.220 All right, let's listen to this, a little bit of this speech yesterday, where Pierre Pauly again

00:09:03.660 said he supports castle law, meaning you don't have to use so-called reasonable force.

00:09:11.340 Use whatever force is necessary to eject a home intruder who has come there to harm you or your family

00:09:18.340 or to steal your property. You have a right to defend yourself. And he's calling this, I love it,

00:09:25.400 the stand-on-guard law. Like I say, is he watching this show? Because we've certainly been supporting that.

00:09:31.740 And Pierre Pauly also touches on other issues that we've been talking about specifically on this show.

00:09:40.220 Now, you know, I saw a lot of hyperbole about Pierre Pauly overnight in terms of, you know,

00:09:48.060 in terms of this is the greatest speech he's ever delivered. And he's on fire. He's talking like a

00:09:55.100 conservative. Yes, that's how he's supposed to talk. And he's talking to the grassroots because, as I pointed out,

00:10:01.900 to everybody over the last three months, he's not running for prime minister right now.

00:10:07.820 He's running to preserve his leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada and his soon-to-be

00:10:16.460 position of official opposition leader in the House of Commons. As soon as he accepts,

00:10:22.460 as he takes the oath for the seat in Battle River Crowfoot,

00:10:27.660 he automatically becomes the leader of official opposition again. So he's talking like a conservative.

00:10:34.620 Let's listen to some of this, because this is good, plain, common sense talk.

00:10:41.980 Your home is your castle. Your home is your castle. And you have the right to defend your family in your

00:10:50.540 home. And right now, unfortunately, that is not the case. You know, our purpose as conservatives

00:10:57.980 is to bring back a country where hard work gets you a beautiful house on a safe street under our proud flag.

00:11:06.460 That when you come home and put the key in the door and you turn it,

00:11:11.500 you're filled with peace, knowing that you can leave all of the day's troubles behind.

00:11:17.580 That your biggest problem will be how you get the kids to eat all of their dinner,

00:11:21.500 finish their homework and get to bed on time. I confess that we fail on the last one regularly

00:11:26.620 in the Paliyev household. But these are the kinds of problems that we all want to have. 1.00

00:11:31.100 Unfortunately, there are bigger problems that people face after 10 years of disastrous

00:11:37.500 liberal government that has driven costs, crime, immigration and employment through the roof.

00:11:45.500 People worry. They worry that they can't afford a home in the first place. That if they do have a home,

00:11:53.660 they can't afford to put food on the table because of high liberal taxes and inflation.

00:11:58.860 They worry about losing their jobs because of liberal taxes and temporary foreign worker programs

00:12:04.700 that take jobs away from Canadians. They worry that even if they have a job, a home and food on the table,

00:12:11.260 that they're not safe in their homes. They worry that their car might be gone from the driveway when

00:12:17.340 they wake up in the morning. Or worse, they worry that they might be awoken at 2am to the sound of

00:12:25.820 breaking glass and feet pounding on their living room floor as an invader storms in to steal the family's

00:12:36.620 goods or worse, harm the family itself. Now, Pierre Paliyev has a great issue here

00:12:44.940 because this is something not only conservative party voters or small c conservatives,

00:12:51.740 but I would say a vast majority of Canadians will agree with that, hey, somebody comes into my property,

00:12:58.300 enters my house, breaks into my house, steals my property, threatens my life, threatens the lives of my wife 0.79

00:13:04.540 and family or my husband and family. I have the right to eject this person. He or she does not have

00:13:13.260 the right to invade my home. I would hope 90% of Canadians would agree with that and would not agree

00:13:20.620 with columnists out there who are saying, yeah, we need to put reasonable in there because that's

00:13:25.340 reasonable. That's completely foolish to say that. Let's get back to this. 0.99

00:13:31.580 The police say that it is necessary to leave your keys at the front door to make it easier for

00:13:41.660 criminals to safely steal your car. And they worry when they think about what they might do to protect

00:13:49.020 their family if an intruder ever entered. What do you do if you've got a small child down the hallway

00:13:56.780 and you hear that ominous sound of a home invasion? The answer for any parent is we would do anything

00:14:03.740 necessary to protect our children. But unfortunately, people who've done that have been have faced the

00:14:12.220 brunt of the law. The system treats after 10 years of liberals, the system treats victims like criminals

00:14:19.900 and criminals like victims. Back in 2019, three mass intruders, one armed with a sawed-off shotgun,

00:14:26.860 broke into a residence in Collingwood. Cameron Gardner and his girlfriend were tied up.

00:14:33.900 When they finally freed themselves, they struggled with the intruders. The attacker's gun went off twice,

00:14:41.020 striking two of the attackers. One escaped. Now, when Cameron saw the police arrive, he was relieved

00:14:46.780 until he found out that they were going to put him in handcuffs. He'd fought for his life. He was

00:14:55.020 courageous. And this is the price he paid. He was in jail for six months. He was in a legal process for

00:15:02.940 over two years, spending an ungodly fortune on lawyers. And then there's Ali Mian. In February of 2023,

00:15:12.780 the Milton residence and licensed firearms owner awoke to find five, five intruders who were masked and

00:15:24.060 armed. They came in, broke into his house, carrying weapons, zip ties, and harmed his mother. After using

00:15:33.020 his legal firearm to shoot one of the intruders, he was able to fight them off. But he was arrested.

00:15:40.300 By the way, one of the intruders had a nine-millimeter handgun. And yet, the law went after this innocent

00:15:48.620 man trying to defend his home. He had to post $130,000 in bail for defending his family. After five months

00:16:01.340 of hell, the second-degree murder charge was finally dropped by the Crown because they realized there was

00:16:08.220 no reasonable chance of conviction. But it is outrageous that this man had to live through

00:16:12.860 that hell when he should have been focused on recovering from the trauma of fighting off

00:16:18.220 a dangerous criminal. And that is why conservatives are standing here today based on the principle

00:16:26.460 that your home is your castle. We're calling on the government to introduce and immediately pass

00:16:32.700 the stand-on-guard law, failing which one of our party's MPs will put forward such a bill. It will

00:16:42.220 amend section 34.2 of the criminal code, which right now says that you can defend yourself based on

00:16:51.420 nine very complicated and vague conditions. Now look, if you're defending your house, you don't have time to

00:16:59.340 think through nine different conditions. You have one condition to protect yourself and your kids.

00:17:06.540 And it is wrong for the law, for the police, and for judges to apply a complicated, indecipherable legal

00:17:13.580 doctrine against you when you were only doing what is right.

00:17:19.900 Ezra Levant of Rebel News was in the audience, was a journalist at this news conference. Ezra, by the way,

00:17:25.740 and Pierre and Polyam go back way back over 22, 23 years. They knew each other very well in Calgary.

00:17:33.900 Tell you that story some other time. But it's nice to see Ezra at these news conferences because

00:17:39.740 for years Rebel News was excluded from conservative party news conferences. So it's nice to see them there.

00:17:46.380 But here's a great question from Ezra Levant about this stand on guard lie and what could be possibly

00:17:53.980 be done in the meantime.

00:17:55.180 I see that Mark Carney's favorite premier, Doug Ford, has said he's for the Castle Law.

00:18:01.100 And other provinces like Alberta have said that too.

00:18:05.020 Will you call on Doug Ford not to wait for Carney to reconvene Parliament,

00:18:10.620 but rather to issue a statement that there will be no more prosecutions of homeowners who defend

00:18:17.180 their homes just as a matter of policy because right now his prosecutors are going after Jeremy

00:18:23.900 McDonald, whose home was invaded in Lindsay, Ontario. And those are provincial prosecutors

00:18:31.260 who are doing that? Well, I think that's a great idea. I don't know the legal powers that a premier

00:18:38.060 has to direct the prosecution service side. I would not comment on it, but I would hope prosecutors

00:18:44.700 would stop going after law-abiding people who are defending their property. We need prosecutors

00:18:52.620 to go after criminals. Now, as for their ability to do that, I've never been a Crown prosecutor,

00:19:01.100 so I don't know. We have a Crown prosecutor here, Larry Brock, so maybe he can jump in on this.

00:19:07.340 But I will say this. We need to change the law. Let's make the law clear. Let's bring into place

00:19:13.260 the idea that your home is your castle so that no prosecutor, judge, or police officer can ever go

00:19:20.460 after someone who is defending their home against an evader who presents a threat.

00:19:27.180 Okay, so Larry Brock comes in and says exactly what I've been saying all week about this. Doug Ford,

00:19:34.140 you have some leeway here. Larry Brock, who is the conservative party justice critic,

00:19:40.060 points out that provincial judges take their direction from the attorney general of the province,

00:19:46.940 who reports directly, of course, to the premier of the province. So Doug Ford can get up and say,

00:19:54.060 oh, it's just horrible how the law is not working for this guy who had a home invasion. And he got

00:20:02.060 charged. It's outrageous. And Ontarians are upset about this. Well, Doug, get off your corpulent butt

00:20:07.340 duff and do something about it. Tell your attorney general to direct the prosecutors not to prosecute 0.97

00:20:13.660 these people to throw these charges up because it's ridiculous. And you're the one whining and beefing 0.96

00:20:21.500 about it just so you can throw some red meat to the base so you can get your popularity figures just

00:20:28.140 a little bit higher. And God only knows why a premier like Doug Ford, who says Mark Carney's doing a

00:20:34.700 really, really good job. And as Ezra Levant points out, that's Mark Carney's favorite premier is Doug

00:20:41.020 Ford. He's totally in his pocket, just like he was in Justin Trudeau's pocket. So Doug Ford, you've got

00:20:48.380 some you've got the power to do something about this. Do it. That's what I say to you. Now, another great

00:20:54.380 moment from this news conference. What else have I been talking about all month? Identity politics are

00:21:02.860 toxic. Identity politics are bad. Identity politics leads to more people being more equal

00:21:11.180 than others. You know, the old animal farm phrase. When we have identity politics, we have two, three,

00:21:18.940 four tier justice systems. We have differing rights for differing people. We don't have equality under

00:21:27.020 the law. And this is what... Pierre Pauline gets a question here. And somebody suggested that

00:21:32.860 this journalist ruined his career. Well, the journalist, I don't think, is even there asking

00:21:38.380 the question. It's a global news question. And I think somebody's reading it on behalf of David

00:21:43.500 Akin, because I recognize David Akin's voice. I work with David Akin at Sun News. I don't think David

00:21:48.140 Akin is physically there asking the question. But had he been, I think people would have said,

00:21:55.260 Akin, I thought you knew better. But here it is.

00:22:01.020 One question. Global news with a question from David Akin from our Ottawa Bureau. In the spring

00:22:07.100 election, you did very well with voters in most demographic, but demographics, pardon me. But

00:22:12.380 you seem to struggle to win support among older women. Do you have some thoughts on how to address

00:22:17.020 the particular demographic of women 50 plus? Well, I don't believe in breaking the country down

00:22:25.100 by demographics. I believe in working for every Canadian of every age and every gender and every

00:22:30.220 race. I think we have to stop breaking... we have to stop dividing our country into categories.

00:22:36.460 Every Canadian, regardless of their age, should be... should enjoy peace and security in their homes,

00:22:44.140 should be able to afford food when they go to the grocery store,

00:22:48.540 should know that their children and grandchildren will be able to get a job and buy a home.

00:22:53.900 That was the promise of this country. And, you know, it is incredible how much that promise

00:23:01.260 has been destroyed after 10 years of Liberals. And the other thing I've noticed is how disappointed

00:23:08.060 people are in Mark Carney. He made such wonderful promises. And I don't blame people who voted for

00:23:15.980 him. He really promised the world. But look what's actually happened. Look how things have changed.

00:23:23.740 Inflation is now rising again. Unemployment is higher than it was under the previous government.

00:23:29.900 We all said that the last Prime Minister had lost control of spending.

00:23:33.580 But now, under Carney, the deficit is twice as big as the one Trudeau left behind.

00:23:40.860 So it seems that when Mr. Carney promised he'd be different, everything is worse.

00:23:45.180 I'm going to venture to make a guess here. I think the last half of that answer is conservative

00:23:54.220 talking points. Because once again, you don't blame people for voting for Mark Carney? Well,

00:24:00.220 that's a little too conciliatory. That's a little too forgiving.

00:24:04.780 I blame people for voting for Mark Carney. Because they should have known this man was not telling

00:24:09.740 them the truth and that he was not going to deliver on any of these promises and that he was going to

00:24:15.980 deliver on the other things he talked about, such as a carbon tariff. That's coming. But Mark Carney

00:24:25.100 never had any intention of this elbows-up nonsense with the United States. He used it as a fear tactic

00:24:31.020 to get boomers, older boomers, to vote for him in huge numbers. Of course, he didn't talk about the home

00:24:38.060 equity tax either that's coming. That might be a sore spot for boomers when they hear about that. 0.88

00:24:46.860 The first part of his answer, where he talks about identity politics, that's the old Pierre

00:24:51.500 Pauliev. That's the Pierre Pauliev who ran for the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada

00:24:55.340 three years ago. That's the Pierre Pauliev who's a principled Conservative. That's the Pierre Pauliev

00:25:01.980 we didn't always hear from during the election campaign. He was too focused on Donald Trump,

00:25:06.700 too focused on party talking points, listening too closely to his campaign manager. He should

00:25:12.700 have talked this way. Go off script! That was an excellent opportunity to talk about the toxicity

00:25:20.620 of identity politics and the absolute need to have a Canada that's based on equality under the law,

00:25:28.780 with no race-based fishing, hunting, or judicial system. That's an opportunity to say,

00:25:36.460 here's what Conservatives believe in. Individual rights, not collective rights. And he did that very

00:25:42.700 well. He didn't say, what a stupid question! Oh, how can you even bring that up? He just calmly turned it 1.00

00:25:49.580 around so that you've got people thinking, yeah, that was a stupid question. Why are the journalists, 1.00

00:25:56.300 why is the media obsessed with demographics or identity politics? Sounds like Pierre Pauliev isn't.

00:26:04.940 He seems to believe in equality under the law. Very, very good moment. Now, when we come back,

00:26:11.500 I'm going to show you one more good moment from this news conference and why I think Pierre Pauliev realizes

00:26:17.820 he's not running for prime minister right now. He's running to save his leadership at the leadership

00:26:26.540 review next February. And he needs to convince rank-and-file conservative voters and members

00:26:33.180 that he's still up to the job.

00:26:43.900 Thank you.

00:27:13.900 Thank you.

00:27:43.880 Thank you, Tamara Leach, for modeling that bit of merchandise there.

00:27:47.660 And that reminded me, when I saw that picture of Tamara, it's Labor Day, right, this Monday.

00:27:54.640 Do you remember two years ago?

00:27:56.860 The Freedom Convoy trial with Tamara Leach and Chris Barber on trial started two years ago, next month, two years, and they're still waiting for sentencing that's not going to happen until October.

00:28:10.320 We'll be there covering that.

00:28:13.040 But incredible.

00:28:15.360 The longest mischief trial in Canadian history, possibly world history, and they're still at it.

00:28:19.660 Still waiting for a verdict, which, you know, don't get me started, a verdict that could be eight years for Chris and seven years in jail for Tamara.

00:28:29.260 Outrageous.

00:28:31.500 And thank God, Pierre Paglia spoke out against that because he waited far too long to do so.

00:28:37.860 And it amazes me.

00:28:39.300 There were liberals out there saying, how dare he question the crown prosecutors?

00:28:44.280 How dare he question the Ontario crown?

00:28:49.380 That's his job as official opposition leader.

00:28:52.020 Because believe me, the Ontario provincial government is an appendage of the Mark Carney liberals at times.

00:28:58.680 In fact, most times.

00:29:00.460 So here's Pierre Paglia again speaking directly to grassroots conservatives about an issue that's important to them.

00:29:10.180 Immigration.

00:29:10.700 Because I know every time I get comments from people who really don't like Pierre Paglia and who are insistent that he's just another liberal, I hear about mass migration.

00:29:25.180 I hear about Paglia not getting tough enough on the immigration.

00:29:28.380 He's been talking about that a lot lately.

00:29:30.600 Now, whether or not he keeps talking about that when he secured his leadership, I'm not going to hazard a guess.

00:29:37.420 I hope so.

00:29:38.800 But he's talking about it right now because this is an issue that grassroots conservatives care deeply about.

00:29:45.360 And here he is addressing.

00:29:47.800 Rageous.

00:29:48.920 It is ridiculous that in our liberal justice system, someone gets a lower conviction simply because they came from another country.

00:29:59.720 And that is why Michelle Rempel, conservative immigration critic, is introducing a law that will ban judges from giving sentencing discounts to people on the basis of their immigration status.

00:30:15.300 Frankly, anyone who is visiting our country from abroad and applying for immigration who commits a crime should be deported from our country. 0.96

00:30:25.320 So you're telling me they're not.

00:30:30.040 Yes.

00:30:30.480 And this is what makes this so crazy.

00:30:33.100 When you when you listen to this, just like you listen to the other comments made about Castle Law and.

00:30:39.760 And the other problems you're probably have talks about at this news conference, you think, has Canada really gone that crazy that we reward people coming to this country?

00:30:52.760 Non-citizens by going lighter on them when they commit a crime? 0.98

00:30:57.620 We not only don't deport them, we judge them on a whole different set of criteria.

00:31:02.800 Canada has gone mad in so many ways under Trudeau and under Carney.

00:31:12.680 Carney is perpetuating the madness initiated by Justin Trudeau.

00:31:19.860 Carney is perpetuating and escalating the bad habits of Justin Trudeau, including deficit spending and woke politics and green energy policies.

00:31:32.800 He just doesn't look like Justin Trudeau and he doesn't advertise the color of his socks, but he is worse than Justin Trudeau.

00:31:41.560 And Pierre Pauly, I've mentioned this earlier in the week as well, said Mark Carney's worse.

00:31:45.700 Why is he worse?

00:31:46.880 Because he's smarter.

00:31:47.660 And he has a very definite agenda, and he's moving towards that agenda in a methodical way.

00:31:56.120 Unlike Justin Trudeau, who was not methodical, who could be very erratic at times, very divisive, very polarizing, and never understood that sometimes it's the soft sell that pushes through woke policies.

00:32:10.620 Because when people actually look at these woke policies, they say, that's crazy.

00:32:16.840 And that's what happened with Cracker Barrel this week in the United States.

00:32:20.800 We need that sort of momentum.

00:32:24.380 We need that sort of pushback in Canada to say, let's look at these policies in an honest, transparent manner.

00:32:32.560 Let's assess these policies in the broad light of day.

00:32:36.240 And let's say, no, these are toxic policies.

00:32:40.380 These are policies that are destroying the country, and they make no sense.

00:32:44.820 Why aren't we deporting non-citizens who commit crimes? 1.00

00:32:50.320 Why are we giving them lighter sentences?

00:32:52.180 Why?

00:32:52.440 Why are we prosecuting homeowners who defend their property rights, who defend their families?

00:33:01.180 Why are we prosecuting these people in Canada? 1.00

00:33:04.060 Why do we have some stupid laws on the books? 1.00

00:33:07.920 Why aren't we changing them? 1.00

00:33:10.040 And this was Pierre Paulyev's message yesterday.

00:33:13.660 And I'll say it again.

00:33:15.220 Yes, he's speaking to the grassroots.

00:33:17.260 He's speaking to that conservative voter who has to decide in February whether Pierre Paulyev should stay on as leader.

00:33:23.100 As I've said a hundred times, if I've said it once, I don't know who's waiting in the wings that could possibly replace Pierre Paulyev right now.

00:33:32.760 They've got some great rookie MPs, but rookie MPs don't become the leader of the conservative party.

00:33:37.540 It just doesn't happen.

00:33:40.280 What we need to do is ensure that Pierre Paulyev stays on a principled conservative course.

00:33:46.100 And that means when he strays from that course, we have to criticize it.

00:33:53.640 This is why I'm not a propagandist.

00:33:56.160 This is why I'm praising Pierre Paulyev today because he said something that was very good.

00:34:00.780 And he acted like a principled conservative.

00:34:04.040 And when he does that, I'm going to say, good job.

00:34:06.760 Because that's what we need.

00:34:07.980 An alternative to Mark Carney.

00:34:11.000 A different party than light liberal.

00:34:13.280 So we need a really conservative alternative in this country.

00:34:18.400 And this is what Pierre Paulyev needs to offer Canadians.

00:34:22.800 Thank you so much for watching today.

00:34:24.860 I hope you have a great Saturday.

00:34:27.440 And I hope you have a great weekend.

00:34:31.240 And I'll be back again tomorrow morning at 9.30.

00:34:34.280 Half hour earlier because of church.

00:34:39.080 To talk about the issues that matter to you.

00:34:42.000 And let's continue to resolve to resist.

00:34:43.920 Let's continue to fight back on toxic Carney policies.

00:34:50.200 I've been broadcasting to you live from Ottawa.

00:34:52.660 This is David Crayton.

00:34:54.420 Bidding you goodbye for now.

00:34:56.180 And we'll see you tomorrow.

00:34:57.180 Thank you.

Stand on Guard with David Krayden - August 30, 2025

Stand on Guard Law： Poilievre's Bold Move to Protect Homes

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript