Donald Trump and Justin Trudeau go head-to-head in an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper. Trump calls for Canada to become the 51st state, Trudeau says they should be a 51st US state, and Wayne Gretzky wants to be the next Prime Minister of Canada.
00:00:00.000But when you get a, I was going to say conflagration, but at least an intersection of both right-wing policy, right-wing attacks and social media,
00:00:15.800you end up with a lot of misinformation, disinformation, and responsible governments have to stay focused on the policies that are making a difference, and that's what we've been doing.
00:00:25.860Yeah, I'm sure a lot of you have already heard that.
00:00:30.000Snippet from an interview Trudeau did with CNN yesterday, Jake Tapper, who, of course, was never a fan of Donald Trump, but was a huge fan of Justin Trudeau, obviously.
00:00:43.320I'm still waiting to see if our guest from the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms, James, I was going to say James Mason, but he's, he was going to be on the show here.
00:00:57.720And it's James Manson from the, from the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms, was supposed to be on.
00:01:09.620I have not been able to contact him this morning.
00:01:11.900So we, I do have a alternative recording of James, if I have to use that.
00:01:21.320we want to talk about what happened yesterday.
00:01:27.480So much goes on, even when it's a slow news day these days.
00:01:32.400Let's listen to what Donald Trump said yesterday and then the responses from Justin Trudeau and Pierre Paglia, I think, was very enlightening in what he said.
00:01:46.220I'm going to Trudeau because they should be the 51st state, really.
00:07:42.320But when someone's paying $8 for a head of lettuce, it doesn't matter that you're doing better than they are in Spain or somewhere else.
00:07:50.440There's a sense that, okay, something's got to give.
00:07:54.720And that's where incumbents are in trouble everywhere around the world, not just in our two countries.
00:08:00.220The issue, though, is that in a time of crisis, responsible politics is around focusing on things that actually make a real difference in people's lives.
00:08:15.580It's like he's back in question period.
00:08:17.800And he actually brings out that carbon rebate lie.
00:08:21.760We're delivering a dental care program that provides free dental care to people who don't have coverage.
00:08:27.600We're moving forward on putting a price on pollution that puts more money in the pockets of 8 out of 10 Canadians, of middle-class Canadians.
00:08:34.420These are policies that are not short-term.
00:08:37.700They're policies that will have a deep impact in the well-being of Canadians and of our country for years to come.
00:08:44.520Now, you can take those policies, like a child care policy, and say, oh, see, that's just about wokeness and about women's rights.
00:09:02.440But when you get a conflagration, but at least an intersection of both right-wing policy, right-wing attacks and social media,
00:09:17.420you end up with a lot of misinformation, disinformation, and responsible governments have to stay focused on the policies that are making a difference.
00:09:39.160Wildfire is increasingly encroaching on urban areas.
00:09:42.460And that's an interface fire where we're having to train up more local municipal firefighters to deal with wildfires in a way that we never had before.
00:09:52.000I've been back and forth texting with Governor Newsom.
00:09:55.680We've offered a tremendous amount of equipment that they're already accepting.
00:15:37.720Either the NDP liberals who tax your food, punish your work, double your housing cost, unleash crime and chaos and weakness on the world stage,
00:15:49.040or common-sense conservatives who will axe the tax, build the homes, fix the budget, stop the crime and put Canada first.
00:16:00.000We will take back control of immigration, take back control of spending, take back control of our borders, take back control of inflation, taxes and interest rates.
00:16:11.960Let's take back control of the country that we knew and still love.
00:16:32.680We're going to take back control and put our country first.
00:16:35.320That means rebuilding our economy, bringing home production, rebuilding our military, supporting a strong border, reinstating controls on immigration,
00:16:47.020and most of all, being proud of our country and unapologetic for our history.
00:16:51.620We need to be, we need to honor our past and our shared values.
00:16:56.540We need to live out the dream that started with John A. MacDonald.
00:17:43.240But Pierre Polly needs to get into the narrative with Donald Trump.
00:17:47.040I don't know what's going on with Wayne Gretzky.
00:17:49.020This is beyond stupidity with talking about this.
00:17:51.900But anyway, he says here he's challenging Justin Trudeau to walk down to Rideau Hall and ask for Parliament to come back and to have an election.
00:18:08.180Now, I don't think Justin Trudeau has any intention of doing that.
00:18:11.320So how else can we get over this proroguing period, which is killing Canada?
00:18:44.360James Manson here, constitutional lawyer.
00:18:46.820By now, I think quite a number of you have probably seen the news on social media that the organization that I work with,
00:18:57.700we've been able to file a challenge to Prime Minister Trudeau's prorogation of Parliament that happened yesterday.
00:19:06.760That document was filed sometime this afternoon, and I would expect that hopefully we'll be getting going with that case on an urgent basis very soon.
00:19:18.760Certainly, the court will appreciate the gravity of the situation.
00:19:22.280But I wanted to reach out to explain to everybody who's interested exactly what the case is about and what we can expect maybe going forward.
00:19:32.160First of all, the case is interesting and very important and really quite unique in our country.
00:19:42.040It's never happened before that a couple of litigants, and in this case, the litigants are two citizens of Nova Scotia.
00:19:50.360They have challenged the Prime Minister's advice given to the Governor-General to, as I say, prorogue Parliament.
00:19:59.800That's never happened before in Canada.
00:20:04.200There have been many prorogations, and just so that we all understand, a prorogation is essentially a royal prerogative.
00:20:13.980It goes back to the days of the kings and queens back in England, back a long time ago, when the king or the queen was the boss,
00:20:21.440and they did whatever they wanted to, and they could, if they want to, suspend Parliament for however long they wanted to.
00:20:27.540And as time went on, of course, democracy took stronger hold, and then it was the Prime Minister who was able to essentially assert his power,
00:20:36.660or, well, it was always his power at that point, over the monarch in terms of when to suspend Parliament.
00:20:43.440So now what happens is the Governor-General, who acts for the king or the queen, will do essentially what the Prime Minister advises them to do,
00:20:52.000and in this case, that's what happened yesterday.
00:20:53.900So there's nothing inherently wrong with prorogation.
00:20:58.000Prorogation really is a temporary suspension of Parliament.
00:21:02.580And usually what that is, is to give everybody a chance to legislatively reset the situation.
00:21:10.380So oftentimes what happens is the government will have a speech from the throne.
00:21:14.360There will be a direction laid out by the Speaker, or pardon me, by the monarch, by the Governor-General in this case.
00:21:22.700And once that legislative agenda is finished, then there needs to be a new direction.
00:21:29.000There needs to be new department instructions given, and there needs to be new, you know, momentum established for new legislative policies, things like that.
00:21:39.240And that's normal. That usually happens probably once every Parliament or so.
00:21:44.720However, where it gets tricky is that you can't have it done.
00:21:50.600You can't prorogue Parliament to avoid political trouble.
00:21:54.420That's really what it comes down to in this case.
00:21:57.240Our case is remarkably similar, that's how, anyway, we will argue the point, to the case in 2019,
00:22:08.220when Prime Minister Boris Johnson in the United Kingdom, he attempted to prorogue Parliament for five weeks out of eight.
00:22:15.980And the timing was very, very tricky because, as you guys may recall, that was when the Brexit was coming and they needed to have an agreement with the European Union about how to exit from the EU.
00:22:30.500And if they didn't, there could be a hard exit and it would be very, would have been very catastrophic economically, politically for the UK and maybe for the EU.
00:22:38.820So, anyway, Johnson, Prime Minister Johnson at the time, decided anyway to prorogue Parliament for five weeks of the eight remaining weeks leading up to the Brexit.
00:22:50.560And essentially, he wanted to avoid scrutiny from Parliament.
00:22:55.420He wanted to avoid the tough questions, avoid all of the mess in the House of Commons that was happening at the time.
00:23:02.040And so, ultimately, this led to a challenge like the one that we've brought today.
00:23:06.800And the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled unanimously, 11 votes to zero, 11 to zero,
00:23:14.860that the exercise of the prorogation power by Prime Minister Johnson to advise, at that point, the Queen, to prorogue was unlawful.
00:23:26.220And essentially, what the Supreme Court of the UK said at that point was that you can't,
00:23:32.020in the course of proroguing, you can't frustrate or prevent the ability of Parliament to oversee the government,
00:23:42.320to do its job, which is to oversee the government, to supervise the government.
00:23:45.940Because as we all know, it's Parliament that is the supreme body in a Western parliamentary system.