Stand on Guard with David Krayden - August 12, 2024


Trudeau's SNOWFLAKE Libs want to OUT Anon Social Accounts! Can't Stand MEAN Tweets | Stand on Guard


Episode Stats

Length

27 minutes

Words per Minute

138.60893

Word Count

3,805

Sentence Count

258

Misogynist Sentences

11

Hate Speech Sentences

3


Summary

We need political change, but we also need to resolve to resist Justin Trudeau's censorship, which is what this broadcast is all about. Have you ever noticed when you put a microphone in front of any liberal cabinet minister, they just can t wait to talk about ending free speech, misinformation, disinformation, and their latest buzzword, "toxicity," if it's toxic? And we're going to watch a clip here from Liberal MP Mark Holland from Ajax, Ontario. He's also the Health Minister, so that makes him the euthanasia czar as well.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Welcome back to another episode of Stand on Guard.
00:00:04.080 I'm your host, David Craig.
00:00:05.080 Thank you so much for joining me today.
00:00:06.580 It's Friday, August the 9th.
00:00:09.660 We've made it this far.
00:00:11.620 When we come back, the latest on Trudeau's attempts to muzzle you.
00:00:22.320 So we are in a very precarious position in this country.
00:00:25.300 We need political change, but we also need to resolve to resist.
00:00:55.300 Trudeau's censorship, which incidentally is what this broadcast is all about.
00:00:59.480 Trudeau's continuing censorship.
00:01:01.800 Have you ever noticed when you put a microphone in front of any liberal cabinet minister, they
00:01:07.200 just can't wait to talk about ending free speech or misinformation or disinformation or safeguarding
00:01:17.760 how we think on the Internet, how we communicate, what we're thinking about.
00:01:24.360 And their latest buzzword, toxicity, if it's toxic.
00:01:30.580 And we're going to watch a clip here from liberal MP Mark Holland from Ajax, Ontario.
00:01:36.800 He's also the health minister.
00:01:38.700 So that makes him the euthanasia czar as well.
00:01:41.780 Now, we've seen lots of clips of Mark Holland in the past.
00:01:45.040 I won't replay them all.
00:01:48.000 You recall him blathering on, actually going into a conniption about summer vacations, that
00:01:55.380 if you go for a trip in the car, that it's setting the world on fire and you have no concern
00:02:02.140 about climate change if you do so.
00:02:06.360 And it's going for that little summer vacation is akin to just turning a blind eye to all of
00:02:12.420 those wildfires out there.
00:02:14.940 Well, that's also the same Mark Holland who went berserk when somebody suggested that perhaps
00:02:21.920 it wasn't a good idea to put people with so-called mental health issues on his euthanasia blacklist.
00:02:31.560 He went nuts about that.
00:02:33.620 This is one of the most partisan MPs who has ever sat in the House of Commons.
00:02:39.380 I remember this joker when he first arrived as an opposition member.
00:02:44.020 They had a sort of a Rat Pack 2, if you will.
00:02:47.260 You remember the one Sheila Copps ran?
00:02:49.260 Well, there was another little trio during the Harper years with that Mark Holland ran.
00:02:55.180 And they were just, of course, always trying to cause trouble, trying to cause mischief.
00:02:59.000 That's what the opposition does, I know.
00:03:00.820 But this guy could never work with the government on any issue.
00:03:05.520 Just like now that he is government, he cannot work with the opposition on any issue because
00:03:11.140 he's so partisan.
00:03:13.080 He's such a liberal capital L.
00:03:15.900 And that's what this man's all about.
00:03:17.640 But here he is at a news conference on Wednesday.
00:03:22.840 He's talking about his wonderful dental plan, which, of course, nobody's really buying into
00:03:28.100 because it's only for those who have no teeth because they're too young or have no teeth
00:03:32.980 because they've lost them because they're too old.
00:03:35.260 But, of course, he has to get to censorship.
00:03:39.640 And it's interesting because he addresses, one of the reporters asked him about this,
00:03:44.180 about this, these peer poly of bots, supposed peer poly of bots that are out there.
00:03:50.760 And it's absolutely ludicrous because I don't believe for a minute poly of is even doing this.
00:03:59.020 I think it's Jagmeet Singh, actually.
00:04:01.360 I think it's Justin True.
00:04:02.660 But let's listen to Mark Holland explain why we have to get rid of all of the toxic speech
00:04:08.900 that's on social media.
00:04:11.420 And it's got to happen now.
00:04:13.220 On another topic, there's been conversation in recent days about the use of bot farms on
00:04:17.760 social media. I'm just wondering, from your perspective, is that something you're concerned
00:04:21.480 about heading into the next election? And do you think the federal government or the
00:04:24.620 Liberal Party needs to do more to try to combat the prevalence of these bot accounts?
00:04:29.400 Well, I don't know about you, Rachel, but I mean, you know, I, you go online, I don't stay
00:04:34.780 very long. It's, you know, it's, it's, it's pretty toxic. And we wouldn't talk to each
00:04:40.840 other on the street like that. And there are certainly forces in the world that are autocratic
00:04:45.820 and seek to undermine democracy who want to fuel divisions that are between us and get
00:04:50.400 us to talk to each other in incredibly disrespectful and cruel ways.
00:04:55.060 Ah, let's stop him there for a minute. Does that remind you of another liberal who's always
00:05:01.200 talking about how these forces are working against democracy? So, so he, Holland is suggesting
00:05:10.080 here. Actually, he's claiming here that he doesn't spend much time on the internet. Well,
00:05:15.740 that's virtually impossible today because that's just about where everything is happening on the
00:05:20.980 internet. So he doesn't spend, he doesn't spend much time. It's just too toxic for him. Just,
00:05:25.500 just too toxic. Is that because there's other alternatives to CBC existing on social media?
00:05:33.080 Is that perhaps what he's really getting at here? He's not getting the news that's reinforcing
00:05:39.480 his idea of how the world should be. He's not seeing the news on the internet a hundred percent of the
00:05:47.680 time that is reinforcing the liberal party policies. But once again, it's about toxicity. So what is
00:05:58.320 toxicity? Why was it toxic? This is one of the most toxic MPs that's ever existed. He is constantly
00:06:06.420 name-calling. He's constantly suggesting the opposition are authoritarian, that the opposition
00:06:12.900 have no concern for democracy. This is a very toxic MP, one of the, probably the most toxic health
00:06:19.300 minister we've ever had. But he's got the gall to suggest it's the internet and social media is toxic.
00:06:26.460 I think whether or not it's a bot or a human, when somebody is speaking without humanity,
00:06:33.680 when somebody is hiding behind, you know, username 12768, and they give you their opinion,
00:06:40.020 and that opinion is toxic and makes people feel bad, then we have to think about as a society why
00:06:45.460 that's allowed. It took us a long time with newspapers and television to figure out, you know,
00:06:52.280 how it worked. And there were some dark forces that use those new mediums in very nefarious ways.
00:06:58.740 And I think we're seeing that here. There's too much toxic negativity. An opinion is fine,
00:07:07.100 but the cruelty with which it's being unleashed should be rejected.
00:07:10.860 An opinion is fine, as long as it's an opinion that reflects my opinion. That's really what he's
00:07:19.020 saying here. And if it's not your opinion, if Mark Holland doesn't like your opinion, it's toxic.
00:07:26.620 Because, and that's just something I don't want to see, he says. So this is a typical liberal way
00:07:32.900 of dealing with any information they don't like on the internet. It's, it's toxic. This is where
00:07:40.780 they're going with this now, because they've pretty well tired out the expression misinformation,
00:07:47.700 disinformation, and they really didn't pander too much to male information in this country. That was
00:07:52.720 more a phenomena in the UK, in Europe. So they're, they realized we've woken up. I don't mean woke in
00:08:00.160 this progressive values. We have realized that these terms are meaningless, just like toxic is a
00:08:09.660 meaningless term. The closest Mark Holland comes to defining toxic in this little dissertation is
00:08:19.060 it makes you feel bad. Well, Mark Holland makes me feel bad all the time. Every time I listen to Mark
00:08:25.820 Holland in the House of Commons, whether he's talking about, I can't take summer trips because
00:08:29.760 that's consuming gas and that's creating a carbon footprint, or whether he's talking about how
00:08:36.580 great his euthanasia program is. I think it's very depressing what he's doing to people in hospitals.
00:08:43.820 I think that's very depressing. I think that makes me feel bad. His euthanasia program makes a lot of
00:08:48.980 Canadians feel bad. But maybe that's the point. When they feel bad, they apply for medical assistance in
00:08:55.560 dying, aka euthanasia. So is that what this is all about? But Mark Holland just can't get to the point.
00:09:04.440 I think we have to be very circumspect, unfortunately, about what we see online. There are forces that are
00:09:10.600 running these bots and trying to overwhelm the internet to give an appearance of a particular
00:09:16.080 opinion or a consensus around something that simply isn't true. And at worst is seeking to undermine our democracy.
00:09:26.480 So seeking to undermine our democracy. That is, once again, a Trudeau buzzword, is it not?
00:09:36.020 Because this is something Justin Trudeau is always warning us about, that there are people out there
00:09:45.900 trying to undermine our democracy. And that is what makes this so interesting. And that is why it's so
00:09:56.160 dangerous to allow people like this to be implementing policy. Because they use vague terms that really don't mean
00:10:07.760 anything. And I think that's the point of this news conference here, where he starts off talking about, and
00:10:15.140 actually, when he talks about why people aren't accepting his dental plan with open arms, why they're not embracing it
00:10:24.860 the way he thinks they should be. He blames the conservatives for their, yeah, you guessed it,
00:10:32.060 misinformation. So a little earlier in the news conference, he goes on about conservatives'
00:10:39.660 misinformation. And that just sort of leads into his tirade about all of this unpleasant material on the
00:10:47.220 internet that makes him feel bad. And for him to suggest that he doesn't talk,
00:10:54.860 talk to people that way, does it every day during question period. And have you ever seen this guy in
00:11:01.420 action? This is, this is a, this is a truly toxic MP. Anyway, but I wanted to mention that because
00:11:11.880 this leads into a story here. This is quite, quite funny. This Holly Doan of Blacklock's report
00:11:18.400 found this the other day. And I haven't, I've got like glasses on to read it, but she's, this is a
00:11:24.880 liberal MP, liberal MP from the Ottawa area here. And she says, Canada is slowly losing our democracy
00:11:34.680 due to mean tweets and clickbait media, says MP. I closed my constituency office. Yeah, you're kidding.
00:11:43.760 Because I fear for my safety. Well, maybe you should just shut down your computer. If that's,
00:11:50.820 that's your problem. Because I mean, this is, this is absolutely comical. She shuts down her
00:11:58.840 constituency office because she can't stand mean tweets. Well, in fact, she's, obviously she doesn't
00:12:06.200 understand. It's no, they're no longer tweets anymore. They're posts on X. Twitter has changed
00:12:11.780 his name. But this liberal MP obviously has not been attuned to changes in this, in this,
00:12:18.640 in social media for quite a while. So you're telling me she's getting all kinds of me. It's
00:12:23.800 in so bad. She can't go into her constituency office. Can you tell me how a correlates to be
00:12:30.220 if you don't want to read the mean tweets, just don't turn on your computer or just don't look at
00:12:38.740 social media, do the work you're supposed to be doing. And I wonder if she's doing any work.
00:12:45.800 But this, this has nothing to do with sitting in your office. Actually, it's the obverse.
00:12:51.980 If she really wants to commune one-on-one person to person and not have to deal with all of these
00:12:58.540 mean people in cyberspace, maybe she should try going to work and sitting in her constituency office
00:13:04.760 and listening to what her constituents say. Or is that just going to be more mean speech horror?
00:13:11.820 You know, anything that, that just makes me feel bad. So is this now where the liberals are going
00:13:18.840 with this war on free speech? It's, it just makes you feel bad. Anything that makes you feel bad
00:13:25.700 is toxic and therefore misinformation. Just, it seems to add, but of course there's no correlation
00:13:34.140 to any of this, but this is all designed for one basic thing. And what's that? It's to buttress
00:13:43.380 Justin Trudeau's justifying his war on free speech through the Online Harms Act. And I know a lot of
00:13:52.200 people get glassy eyed when I talk about the Online Harms Act, but this is coming, huh? This is coming,
00:13:57.940 folks. It's coming and it's going to mean things like house arrest for thinking the wrong thoughts.
00:14:05.700 We've all seen the video of, of the poor guy in the UK who was literally arrested for what he says.
00:14:15.060 Oh, this is a Facebook crime. And that's coming to Canada. If the Online Harms Act passes.
00:14:24.540 And you can bet the liberals are going to use every possible argument to suggest it's justified.
00:14:31.800 They started off the campaign by saying it was all about preventing harm and protecting children.
00:14:38.840 Of course, that was a complete red herring. It had nothing to do with what the legislation is designed
00:14:46.580 to do, which is to strangle free speech. Just like Mark Holland is saying here, just too much toxicity
00:14:52.800 on the internet. We have to stop it. We, we have to ensure it just doesn't, isn't allowed. You don't
00:15:00.220 have a right to read it. You don't have a right to know it's even there because it's just too toxic
00:15:05.380 and it's going to make you feel bad too. And, and when a liberal MP has the gall to shut down her
00:15:13.040 constituency office because she doesn't like what people are telling her on the internet, it goes to
00:15:17.880 show you this is just a pathetically inept and corrupt government. Are the conservatives going to do
00:15:26.600 any better? Well, this story alarmed me. I read this this morning and this is the conservative
00:15:35.200 house leader. And she's talking, she put a video up on her internet page talking about
00:15:48.440 defunding the CBC. Now, as we all know, that is probably the, the most popular, if not in the top,
00:15:58.660 well, next to acts, the carbon tax, defunding the CBC is the most popular platform Pierre Polyev
00:16:08.280 and the conservative party have. I have been to Polyev's rallies and every time he says,
00:16:14.480 we're going to defund the CBC, the crowd roars its approval because we've been waiting decades
00:16:23.520 for a conservative party of Canada leader or any leader in Canada to say, we've had enough with
00:16:31.080 spending $1.3 billion a year on this inept, bloated waste of money. An organization that fires journalists
00:16:43.900 while it gives bonuses to its executives. An organization that continues to whine every year
00:16:52.480 about it never having enough money, even though it gets paid advertising to supplement
00:16:59.140 the taxpayer dollars that keep it running. So when Pierre Polyev says, hey, we're going to defund
00:17:06.940 the CBC. Yes, there is a enormous appeal to that. But here's the hitch here. And this is what worries me
00:17:17.260 is because in the last couple of months of the parliamentary session, Polyev kept talking about
00:17:24.520 keeping Radio Canada alive with taxpayer dollars because that was somehow necessary for French
00:17:32.820 culture in this country. Now, I don't know why that is necessary to preserve French culture. Why do we need
00:17:39.760 a state broadcaster for Quebec alone? Quebec does just fine, thank you, with lots of French programming
00:17:48.740 on the radio, on the television, on the internet. They've been doing it for decades, actually.
00:17:56.100 So it's not an argument to suggest we have to preserve French culture with Radio Canada.
00:18:00.820 But what worries me here is this conservative MP talked about preserving CBC Radio, and she was told
00:18:10.200 to take it down immediately. She had to change the video and not talk about keeping CBC Radio alive.
00:18:19.680 And that, to me, is a double standard that's very bad. Now, I don't want to keep CBC Radio alive. I think it
00:18:24.600 should be privatized. I think it should be defunded. Nor do I think we should be somehow keeping
00:18:30.880 Radio Canada alive because it's somehow preserving French culture. There's a double standard here.
00:18:39.960 And this, to me, is a weak link in the conservative argument. It's got to be defunding all of the CBC,
00:18:49.080 Radio Canada included, and not to keep a little piece of it alive so it continues.
00:18:54.580 It will continue to grow because you know that's exactly what happens. When you allow a crown
00:19:01.820 corporation, government media, to sustain it in any way, it will continue to grow and the arguments
00:19:10.080 will continue that, oh, we need to expand this service. So I'm a little worried about that. I always say
00:19:19.080 when the conservatives say it right and they do it right, I applaud them. But when there's a problem,
00:19:26.440 I'll call them out on it. And I think I have to do that here because this is a double standard.
00:19:31.760 We do not need Radio Canada to continue to survive. And we should not be censoring MPs' videos
00:19:40.320 because they don't quite sync with the party policy. This is definitely an issue.
00:19:49.220 I want to move on to something else here because throughout the week, I've been working quite a lot
00:19:57.640 with the post-millennial. You know I do that. And I've been working a lot with it this week.
00:20:04.740 And to tell you the truth, I have not been reading a lot of mainstream media.
00:20:11.360 And I'll get to this story in a minute because this is quite fascinating because
00:20:15.320 Donald Trump actually said that if Kamala Harris is elected with her running mate,
00:20:23.940 this Governor Tim Walz, it's going to lead to a communist style government.
00:20:31.640 I think he's dead on with that.
00:20:34.740 And I just want to read from my story in the post-millennial. And I think you might
00:20:41.820 enjoy this. Because Donald Trump is asked what his reaction was
00:20:47.240 when Kamala Harris chose Tim Walz as her running mate. He says,
00:20:53.200 I would say my reaction is I can't believe it, Trump said of Walz being named as Harris' running mate.
00:20:58.960 I never thought that he was going to be the one that was picked.
00:21:02.060 Trump later added, there's never been a ticket like this. This is a ticket that would want this
00:21:07.560 country to go communist immediately, if not sooner, Trump said.
00:21:12.920 Trump summed up Harris' record as a far-left Democrat who was out of touch with ordinary Americans.
00:21:28.080 She's for no fracking. She's for defund the police. She was the original defunder of the police.
00:21:33.940 She was the original no-cash bail, cashless bail, which has caused havoc.
00:21:39.860 And look how she's destroyed San Francisco, Trump continued.
00:21:43.280 So while I was doing all of these stories this week, I must have written about 20 stories of the post-millennial.
00:21:55.620 I encourage you to go on and read some of those.
00:21:58.420 It's largely been United States news.
00:22:00.700 But of course, I did the story based on how Trudeau and Biden were colluding
00:22:07.140 to de-platform the Freedom Convoy.
00:22:12.000 But what I discovered is that if you don't watch the mainstream media,
00:22:18.480 and I increasingly watch social media,
00:22:22.820 not just because I'm on social media,
00:22:25.480 but because I think that's the dominant force in media today.
00:22:28.840 You see more and more people getting their news from YouTube, from Rumble, from X,
00:22:35.560 Facebook, and these media.
00:22:41.340 You see, less and less people are watching CNN, MSNBC, even Fox News.
00:22:49.600 But when you watch those mainstream media,
00:22:51.780 you get a completely different version of the world.
00:22:54.720 And what do I mean?
00:22:56.980 Well, the mainstream media insists that Kamala Harris is now the best thing
00:23:01.140 to ever happen to the Democratic Party.
00:23:02.900 And she's way ahead now, five points ahead of Donald Trump in the polls.
00:23:08.100 I don't believe that for a minute.
00:23:10.000 That is, how can a woman who was the most unpopular vice president in history
00:23:14.960 lower approval rating than Spiro Agnew
00:23:20.820 just before he was forced to resign over a tax evasion issue?
00:23:26.900 He was the most unpopular vice president in history.
00:23:30.380 She had ratings about 25% approval.
00:23:34.840 How can she suddenly go from that to five points ahead of Donald Trump in the presidential race
00:23:42.020 when she has said and done absolutely nothing new?
00:23:47.180 She's still the failed borders are.
00:23:50.400 She's still the woman who can't put a sentence together,
00:23:53.260 who has no conception of policy matters,
00:23:57.240 who has absolutely no idea of what she's talking about.
00:24:01.180 And she talks to people in baby talk half the time.
00:24:05.120 So how did she suddenly jump five percentage points ahead of Donald Trump
00:24:10.020 in this presidential campaign?
00:24:13.460 It's bogus.
00:24:14.760 And she's suddenly hugely popular with the American people.
00:24:22.120 I'm not buying it for a minute.
00:24:24.960 And she's getting huge crowds.
00:24:28.280 Have you seen the Donald Trump rallies?
00:24:33.440 I mean, you know what's going on here.
00:24:35.740 It's the Democrats knew they were going to lose under Biden.
00:24:39.340 And they even knew that they were going to lose under Kamala Harris.
00:24:45.320 Kamala Harris.
00:24:46.060 Sorry, don't ever say Kamala.
00:24:47.920 All right.
00:24:49.460 I don't ever mispronounce Kamala because it's bad news for you.
00:24:54.000 But the Democrats knew they had to do something.
00:24:57.640 And that is to create the illusion that she's unbeatable.
00:25:02.860 Even though she's entirely susceptible and vulnerable to a host of issues.
00:25:10.480 She has no policy background that's even worth bringing up.
00:25:16.020 And she's chosen a running mate in Tim Walsh,
00:25:19.560 who is as bad as she is on the issues,
00:25:23.000 who's as weak as she is on the issues.
00:25:25.480 So do you think this is going to work for the Democrats?
00:25:28.040 I don't think so.
00:25:29.040 Because most people are not watching the mainstream news that tells them these lies.
00:25:33.940 That tells them she's really great.
00:25:36.720 She's really popular.
00:25:38.600 And she's outselling Donald Trump at her rallies.
00:25:42.440 We know it's not true.
00:25:44.560 Because if you watch the alternative media,
00:25:47.800 if you're in tune with what's happening on social media,
00:25:50.440 you know what's really happening in the world.
00:25:54.400 And it's not Kamala Harris.
00:25:58.240 So I'm going to dive deeper into this throughout the week
00:26:01.760 in terms of what the mainstream media is not telling us,
00:26:05.580 that the social media is.
00:26:07.160 And we need to always be aware
00:26:11.240 that there is a narrative out there
00:26:15.180 that's being sold by politicians,
00:26:18.140 by woke politicians.
00:26:20.800 In Canada, it's the Liberal Party.
00:26:22.180 In the United States, it's the Democratic Party.
00:26:24.460 And it is a complete fabrication.
00:26:27.100 It does not reflect reality.
00:26:28.840 I want to thank you for watching today.
00:26:33.680 I hope you enjoyed the show.
00:26:36.520 I will be back again tomorrow
00:26:38.300 with more of the news you need to know.
00:26:41.720 And I can tell you this.
00:26:44.620 I'm going to fight this Online Harms Act
00:26:47.060 until we get it defeated in the House,
00:26:51.220 until it doesn't pass third reading.
00:26:54.040 And if it does,
00:26:56.820 I'm going to insist
00:26:58.680 that Pierre Pauly and the Conservatives
00:27:01.520 live up to their promise to axe that,
00:27:04.220 just like they promised to axe the carbon tax.
00:27:07.980 Because we are going to be in deep, deep trouble
00:27:12.480 if we lose our freedom of speech in this country.
00:27:14.840 And we're that close from it.
00:27:16.960 If you're watching what's happening in the UK,
00:27:18.900 if you're watching what's happening in Europe,
00:27:20.380 you can see they've already lost it.
00:27:22.200 Thanks for watching today, folks.
00:27:25.580 God bless you, and we'll be back tomorrow.