Stay Free - Russel Brand - July 06, 2023


BANNING TRUMP, TWITTER FILES & MUSK | Jack Dorsey Opens Up - #162 - Stay Free With Russell Brand

Topics
RFK candidature and endorsement regulations and legislations Tucker Carlson live event
Hosted by
Russel Brand
Mentioned
Jack Dorsey Tucker Carlson Bitcoin Donald Trump Russell Brand Hunter Biden O.J. Simpson Larry King Elon Musk Robert F. Kennedy Julian Assange App Store Ross Awakening Wonders Mark Zuckerberg Jeremy Corbyn Howard Hughes Vandana Shiva Muhammad Ali Mark Fisher and 20 more
WTF! Biden & Gates Want To BLOCK OUT The Sun?! - #161 - Stay Free With Russell Brand Tucker Carlson

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 2 minutes

Words per minute

169.16

Word count

10,632

Sentence count

694

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

10

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Jack Dorsey joins me on the show to endorse Robert F. Kennedy s presidential campaign. We talk about why he thinks Joe Biden is the best choice to take on Hillary Clinton in 2020, and why he's willing to put his neck on the line in order to do so. And we talk about the censorship that's already been applied to RFK's campaign, and what that could mean for the future of free speech in America. We also talk about how much he's been influenced by the Kennedy family, and how he views the current state of the Democratic Party. And we answer some of your questions! Tweet me if you have any questions, suggestions, or suggestions on how we can improve the show. Timestamps: 1:00:00 - What does Joe Biden's refusal to engage with RFK publicly indicate about free speech? 4:30 - How much trust does the DNC have in the system 6:00 What does Biden's lack of trust from the American people remove from the democratic system 7:00 -- What does it mean about the election system? 8:15 - Why do we need to trust in our election systems 9:20 - Who's going to move the country forward? 11:30 -- Who's the best candidate for the country? 12:20 -- Is Joe Biden the best presidential candidate? 13:40 -- Why is Joe Biden better than RFK? 14:15 -- What do we should we trust in? 15:40 - Why does he have the best chance of winning the election? 16: What does he care about the most? 17:15: Who s going to make the country better? 18:00 | What is the most important thing? 19:10 | What does the best idea for us? 21:40 | Who s the most authentic? 22:30 | Why is he the best person to make us better than the other guy? 26:30 27:20 | What do you think we should trust in the country we can we can trust? 29:40 32:00 // Is he a good idea? 35:30 Is he good at making us all better than he s a good person? 31:10 36:00 Is he more authentic than we can change the world better than we should be better than that? 33:20

Transcript

Transcripts from "Stay Free - Russel Brand" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and get this guy.
00:00:40.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:00:56.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wonders!
00:00:57.000 Thanks for joining me on what is turning out to be the biggest week in Stay Free history, and perhaps the biggest week in the history of free speech, full stop.
00:01:06.000 We've already had RFK on the show, I'm about to talk to Jack Dorsey on the show tomorrow, independently, a rare A special conversation with Tucker Carlson.
00:01:17.000 You might as well start posting your questions for that chat now.
00:01:20.000 But joining me right now, I couldn't be more excited to announce one of the inaugural engineers, one of the initial mystics and wizards that founded this online space.
00:01:31.000 He co-founded Twitter in 2006.
00:01:33.000 He's since founded more tech companies.
00:01:34.000 He can't stop found in a block to blue sky among them and now he's endorsing the same presidential candidate as us once he and I shared an extraordinary and peculiar dinner at the house of Larry who's that guy Larry Larry Larry
00:01:54.000 King.
00:01:54.000 Yes, Larry King.
00:01:57.000 It is the incomparable, bearded, peculiar mystic, Jack Dorsey.
00:02:04.000 Jack, thank you for joining us.
00:02:06.000 Thank you, Ruslan, and thank you for everything you're doing to build up independent media as well.
00:02:10.000 That's really kind of you to say that.
00:02:12.000 That was really weird, that dinner.
00:02:14.000 You were different then.
00:02:15.000 You then seemed like that wave of tech engineers.
00:02:20.000 I remember, like, sitting near you.
00:02:22.000 I think I possibly felt intimidated because I was like, oh, no, this is one of them people that's going to be so rich.
00:02:27.000 And I didn't like it.
00:02:28.000 And I feel there were a lot of really unusual people there at that dinner.
00:02:31.000 It was like a sort of a dream, wasn't it?
00:02:34.000 Yeah, there were some characters.
00:02:35.000 It was a very weird dinner.
00:02:36.000 I didn't have a beard back then.
00:02:38.000 I wasn't sure to make it a whole thing.
00:02:41.000 I still don't understand what happened that day.
00:02:44.000 It ranks among the strangest.
00:02:45.000 It was sort of a TV show that Larry King, God rest his soul, was doing, but I don't think it's ever been aired, and I think that's probably for the best for everyone.
00:02:53.000 Jack, we share a mutual friend in the great Rick Rubin, another pursuit and brilliant man.
00:03:01.000 And similarly, you and I both endorse Robert F. Kennedy.
00:03:06.000 Why do you think he's the best choice for the Democrats?
00:03:09.000 What do you think is the significance of his emerging candidature at this time?
00:03:13.000 And significantly, mate, why have you been willing to put your name and neck on the line endorsing him?
00:03:20.000 I appreciate his authenticity.
00:03:22.000 Period.
00:03:23.000 He's curious.
00:03:24.000 He's willing to admit his mistakes and his failures.
00:03:29.000 He goes deep in pretty much every single topic that he covers.
00:03:32.000 I've listened to almost every single one of his podcasts just to learn more about him.
00:03:37.000 And in every conversation, I learn something new.
00:03:40.000 And he's willing to change his mind based on facts presented to him.
00:03:45.000 And I just haven't seen a lot of politicians recently, or a lot of public leadership, say the words, I don't know.
00:03:52.000 I don't know.
00:03:53.000 I'm going to go figure that out.
00:03:54.000 And that's so refreshing to see.
00:03:56.000 And he comes with every answer he has, comes with a humanitarian angle.
00:04:02.000 I do believe he truly cares about humanity and making This country better and making the world better because of that.
00:04:10.000 Yeah, I agree with you.
00:04:11.000 It's as if he has an intuitive recourse to principles and values like community service and he's quite loving and spiritually oriented man.
00:04:23.000 We spoke to him earlier this week with his wife Cheryl in a fantastic and exclusive interview.
00:04:28.000 If you're watching this right now on YouTube, we can only be on this platform for the first 15 minutes because There are a number of questions that I have for Jack.
00:04:36.000 I'm going to ask him what he thinks about RFK's stand on certain medications and medicines, what Jack thinks about the censorship that's already been applied to RFK, and of course, we're going to be talking about the Twitter files.
00:04:47.000 For now though, Jack, what do you think about Biden's refusal to engage with RFK publicly?
00:04:55.000 What does that indicate about free speech?
00:04:57.000 What does that indicate about Biden's personal capacities and abilities?
00:05:02.000 I don't know how much it is him versus the DNC.
00:05:05.000 I think it's extremely disappointing.
00:05:07.000 I think it removes trust from the system.
00:05:11.000 And I think we need to build more trust into our election systems and everything around them, including primaries and debates.
00:05:19.000 And I hope The administration and more broadly the DNC is open to actually allowing for debates.
00:05:25.000 I think it's critical.
00:05:28.000 It's the only way to see how people think about these ideas and for us to trust who's going to move the country forward the best.
00:05:35.000 There's a kind of misanthropy in the assumption that what's required for society to work is authoritarianism, censorship, surveillance.
00:05:45.000 What I figure, Jack, is that you exist in a pretty unique space.
00:05:51.000 You've been there for the gold rush Inauguration and establishment of essentially new colonies, new territories, new space, new communication dynamics.
00:06:02.000 It seems to me significant that you've had to take this time out.
00:06:07.000 I wonder what it was about your role at Twitter that, is it that you have been burned or hurt, burned out, worn out, disappointed, disillusioned?
00:06:18.000 What exactly is it that led you to step away from Twitter, mate?
00:06:24.000 There were a number of things.
00:06:25.000 I mean, the biggest is the realization that as a public company and as a public company CEO, with the dynamics that Twitter had to play in, Which was we were entirely dependent upon brand advertising.
00:06:40.000 The brand advertisers have huge sway over the very policies of the service, including the ability to protest and remove their ads from our service.
00:06:50.000 And when you have a service that's entirely dependent upon that brand advertising revenue, it really hurts your ability to do the right thing all the time.
00:07:01.000 Because if they pull back, Wall Street sees that.
00:07:05.000 And if Wall Street sees a pullback, they punish your stock.
00:07:08.000 And if they punish your stock, that affects every single employee because that's how all the employees are paid.
00:07:13.000 And they leave.
00:07:15.000 They go somewhere else where they have a better potential outcome for their equity and for their stock.
00:07:21.000 So it was more the realization that I just didn't believe Twitter could continue to exist as a public company.
00:07:29.000 If it could, I certainly wasn't the person to make it so.
00:07:33.000 I just did not... I didn't feel I had that in me.
00:07:36.000 And at the same time I was learning about... I come from an open source background.
00:07:40.000 I come from, you know, learning about the internet when it was truly decentralized and it was truly open.
00:07:47.000 And Bitcoin in 2009 was a great reminder to me of what the internet wants to be and what it needs to be.
00:07:55.000 And I just got fascinated more and more with open protocols, and that felt like the answer ultimately for what Twitter needed to be, what role it needed to play in the world in terms of the public square, whether that be global or more local.
00:08:09.000 And I wanted to put more of my efforts into that and those realizations and just, you know, all the mistakes I made and we made as a company, and a bunch of frustrations I had with the board and just the corporate aspects of the service.
00:08:24.000 led me to leave.
00:08:27.000 That's a really fascinating response.
00:08:30.000 Sometimes it's difficult for us to identify that immersed within our zombie capitalist state corporatist model, our systems of regulation that are not explicit and declarative, like you described, if the advertisers don't support Twitter, Wall Street will respond to that withdrawal, that will affect stock prices, that there is an ideology built into the commercial model That doesn't need to declare itself or make itself explicit even in a plainly innovative space like Twitter and comparable social media platforms which felt extraordinarily novel and that we were at the vanguard of something new.
00:09:14.000 It's interesting to see how quickly it can be colonized by the same kind of imperialist modalities that are More easy to observe in the last century.
00:09:24.000 Oh, look, there's this continent of Africa.
00:09:26.000 We can own that though.
00:09:27.000 There's this continent.
00:09:28.000 There's this nation of India that there is a certain mentality that is able to through kind of materialism.
00:09:35.000 I would say as the primary as the primary mentality, which is not that doesn't need to declare itself because as Mark Fisher wrote in his book capitalist realism, the ideology is so we are so submerged within this ideology that we don't have a context.
00:09:51.000 To judge it from outside of, but it seems to me that we're involved in nothing less than a kind of ideological war, Jack, and I sense that you might know that too, but we're at a point where, you know, I don't fully understand words like or terms like open protocol and open source, but it seems to me you're talking about decentral necessity for decentralized models in order to have truly open discourse and to protect significant Principles, which we hear Elon Musk, of course, your, what do I want to say, your descendant in running Twitter, talk about continually.
00:10:26.000 So can you tell us, do you care about decentralization?
00:10:29.000 Why do you care?
00:10:30.000 And do you agree with me that we're on the cusp of a kind of war between authoritarianism and kind of new unprecedented revolution?
00:10:38.000 I do agree with you and maybe it's always been that way and it's more and more visible now.
00:10:45.000 Because some of the structures are breaking down and we're seeing more of the incentives.
00:10:50.000 I think we live in a world of abstraction and as you said, it's very hard to see the levels and the layers of abstraction that we built upon ourselves because they're comfortable and we get used to them.
00:11:01.000 And that momentum is extremely strong.
00:11:04.000 It's like a riptide out to the ocean and you're trying to swim against the riptide instead of going to the side.
00:11:11.000 And to me, I'm a Absolute believer in decentralization.
00:11:16.000 Decentralization to me means removing single points of failure, recognizing single points of failure, and removing them.
00:11:22.000 And one of the single points of failure in the Twitter case was the singular control that one company has over the protocol, over discovery, and over distribution of the content.
00:11:36.000 And if those were separated just a bit, I think the people have more ownership over that.
00:11:41.000 So when you think of things like Bitcoin, or you think of a distributed decentralized protocol that I love, which is Nostr, these are services that have no leads.
00:11:53.000 They're not controlled by any one company, not controlled by any one government.
00:11:58.000 There's no one person leading them.
00:12:01.000 They are truly permissionless.
00:12:02.000 So if I want to build something to make Bitcoin better for myself or for millions of people, I can do it without asking for permission from a CEO or from a government agency or from anyone.
00:12:11.000 The same is true for Noster, which is building something equivalent to Twitter and ultimately, I hope, which will support Twitter.
00:12:18.000 Because it removes some of the burden that Twitter feels today, and it will continue to feel from government agencies, from customers, and also from advertisers, until they've truly diversified their revenue stream and they build resilience against just, you know, being dependent upon one ad model.
00:12:34.000 That's fantastic and important.
00:12:36.000 If you want to ask questions to Jack, you have to join our locals community.
00:12:40.000 Press the red button on your screen now to join our locals community to ask questions like this one.
00:12:47.000 Jack, I'm almost reluctant to say this out loud to you, but it's from our chat.
00:12:50.000 Chief411, why did you allow the US government to use Twitter to mislead the American people?
00:12:56.000 Now, you might need to provide some contacts Context for that, Chief 411.
00:13:00.000 If you're watching us on YouTube, I don't think Jack is able to answer that question on YouTube because it's clear that we're talking about the pandemic.
00:13:07.000 So to hear the answer to that question, why did you allow the American government to mislead the American people, click the red button.
00:13:14.000 If you're on Rumble, join us on Locals.
00:13:16.000 If you're watching us on YouTube, click the link in the description.
00:13:19.000 Join us over on there because we're talking about free speech.
00:13:21.000 To someone whose opinion matters, to someone who's in the position of knowledge, understanding, and also in a position, I believe, to change these dynamics.
00:13:29.000 So click the link in the description, join us on the comb of free speech rumble.
00:13:34.000 So Jack, I would add to that question, why did you allow, I'd add to that out of respect, because as you know I'm English, and I see you as a person that I want to form an alliance with, Did you indeed allow the US government to use Twitter to mislead the American people?
00:13:48.000 I guess we're talking about the Hunter Biden laptop story and presumably the shutting down of the debate around the coronavirus pandemic.
00:13:57.000 I suppose like my personal observations was not just Twitter, all social media and certainly mainstream media censored information in the words of your peer Mark Zuckerberg were ultimately debatable Or true.
00:14:09.000 And I can't help but thinking your endorsement for RFK is the revelation.
00:14:14.000 And in what you've already said in this fascinating conversation, is an appetite for you to improve free speech, improve decentralized models of communication.
00:14:24.000 So what do you think about at Chief4One's question?
00:14:27.000 You know, we have a lot of pretty out there people in our chat, thankfully.
00:14:30.000 How do you feel about even that question, really?
00:14:34.000 I welcome the question.
00:14:35.000 I welcome the critique.
00:14:36.000 It's the only way I'm gonna learn.
00:14:37.000 I mean, the simplest answer is on me.
00:14:40.000 I wasn't paying enough attention.
00:14:42.000 My focus was growing Twitter.
00:14:44.000 And, you know, we were in an extreme deficit when I came back as CEO.
00:14:48.000 And just to survive as a company, as a public company, as a service, we had to turn things around.
00:14:53.000 So I had to focus my time on particular things.
00:14:57.000 I do think, you know, we were a U.S.
00:15:02.000 company.
00:15:04.000 When your U.S.
00:15:05.000 company incorporated Delaware, bound by U.S.
00:15:08.000 law, any inquiry, any push by the hosting government of your service, of your company, of how your employees get money to feed their families, feels strong.
00:15:25.000 It feels like, you know, you have to act on it.
00:15:28.000 And it's It's yet another one of those things that just puts pressure, including, you know, the threat of advertisers leaving, the threat of people leaving.
00:15:36.000 The amount of times we saw RIP Twitter for policy changes we made or functionality changes we made was immense.
00:15:47.000 I think it was, you know, every three months we would read about how Twitter is dying because of something that we did.
00:15:54.000 I think Twitter is ultimately resilient, and the team and the service did push back on a lot of those requests, too, and you can see those in the Twitter files.
00:16:04.000 It didn't push back on all.
00:16:06.000 I was surprised.
00:16:08.000 I didn't see all those emails that were coming in to us.
00:16:10.000 I didn't see all those requests.
00:16:11.000 I wasn't aware of everything.
00:16:13.000 I was surprised by the volume.
00:16:15.000 I was not surprised that they were happening.
00:16:18.000 There were significant mistakes we made, like the Hunter Biden laptop story.
00:16:24.000 And the key issue there was blocking a publication and shutting down their account.
00:16:30.000 I do believe we reversed that within 24 hours, but the New York Post continued to lock out their account because they didn't want to delete the tweet and then that was our policy and we didn't change our policy.
00:16:41.000 But I do believe the company had a capacity to admit its mistakes.
00:16:47.000 I think we were fairly open, not as open as we could have been.
00:16:50.000 And I don't believe anyone in the company was intending to mislead anyone.
00:16:59.000 And, you know, it was a company that felt really strongly about humanity.
00:17:03.000 They may have different ideas from everyone else, but that's part of the problem, is we have this single point of failure.
00:17:09.000 We have people in the company, whether that be me, whether that be engineers, whether that be policymakers within the company, who could inject bias into their decisions and into policy.
00:17:22.000 And to me, the only way around that is to remove that element, put that policy into code itself, so that everyone can actually see it if they want to, if they want to work, do the work to understand it.
00:17:35.000 But ultimately, that is not owned by any one organization.
00:17:39.000 That, to me, is the most critical learning that I had.
00:17:42.000 And, you know, I regret, you know, not paying enough attention and All I know to do now is to fix those mistakes so they can never happen again in that way, and hopefully in ways that we're not even talking about right now.
00:17:59.000 Especially with the rise of AI and all this new regulation around the world, it's critical that if we do want platforms around free speech, around free expression, That we look towards protocols that are not owned by companies, by governments, and have no single leaders.
00:18:21.000 Oh, Jack, I mean, man, that is so fascinating to hear someone in your position say that and this is my interpretation.
00:18:29.000 I recognize this is not exactly what you said, but sometimes it feels to me listening to you that you are on a kind of journey of atonement.
00:18:36.000 I know that is a very sort of spiritual word and I certainly do not feel like I'm in a position to make any judgment because having been a person even with my own version of celebrity, I know these things.
00:18:46.000 I know that I've seen people say, Oh, Russell Brand, he's controlled opposition.
00:18:50.000 He's a person that's like in this space in order to ensure that true.
00:18:54.000 And I said, God, am I, am I not asking the right questions?
00:18:57.000 Am I not doing things?
00:18:58.000 Am I still selfish?
00:19:00.000 What are my limitations as a man?
00:19:02.000 Am I do, am I doing enough?
00:19:04.000 And I can't imagine what it's like to come up with a platform like Twitter.
00:19:08.000 I can't even, I don't even know how you do a thing like that.
00:19:10.000 And to see it grow exponentially to it.
00:19:13.000 I can't imagine that even the greatest vision and visionary on earth would say,
00:19:16.000 Oh, look, I've invented this thing.
00:19:18.000 People can do micro blogs.
00:19:19.000 What happened here is the media will start using this.
00:19:22.000 Celebrities will have unprecedented access to their audience.
00:19:24.000 Then it will become politicized.
00:19:26.000 Then it will become polarized.
00:19:28.000 Then it will become commercialized and commodified.
00:19:30.000 Then it will become a source of propaganda.
00:19:31.000 Like, you know, who's going to be able to preempt that when you're just like nerding out somewhere,
00:19:36.000 like inventing something, it seems to me like a difficult thing to preempt.
00:19:40.000 But when you find Twitter in this extraordinary position of being able to ban,
00:19:46.000 I don't know if he was still president or former president, you know, like Trump's ban.
00:19:49.000 That's where we start to sense that privately owned entities have a power that supersedes political power.
00:19:58.000 And I think what a lot of people said at the time was, you know, ISIS are on there, but Trump isn't.
00:20:03.000 You know what?
00:20:05.000 What do you think led to that kind of decision?
00:20:08.000 Because in a sense, you've already given us your answer.
00:20:10.000 You don't think any one person should be in power.
00:20:13.000 Because I think there's ideas that are right for me, that other people wouldn't want to live by.
00:20:13.000 That's what I believe.
00:20:17.000 I want to raise my children in a way that other people wouldn't want to raise their children.
00:20:21.000 Why would I spend the rest of my life arguing about that?
00:20:23.000 Just like you raised your children, now you want to raise my children, now I want to end.
00:20:27.000 But what I'd like to sort of ask you is, how do you feel about where it got Jack, you know, it got so powerful that Trump could be kicked off of there, and it sort of, I think, contributed to that sense that, oh, there's this new woke revolution, the Democrat Party are controlled by financial interests and are pretending that they care about people, but they don't.
00:20:48.000 Trump's just a loudmouth version of everything else.
00:20:51.000 A lot of people on our platform absolutely love Donald Trump, but me, I agree with you.
00:20:55.000 Decentralisation, no individuals.
00:20:57.000 We're all flawed, for God's sake.
00:21:00.000 So, how do you feel about that particular issue, if I may ask, sir?
00:21:03.000 I, well, I feel bad about it.
00:21:05.000 I feel bad that we had to take that action.
00:21:08.000 Um, I, um, you know, it was, it was a challenging time and I, I do believe the company was working in the, with its best efforts with the information it had.
00:21:21.000 Um, but as I said, a few days after that, uh, suspension, I believe it was probably the right decision for the company, but the wrong decision for the world.
00:21:31.000 And we saw a lot of follow-on companies such as AWS take Parler off their services and being removed from the App Store.
00:21:43.000 And I think it opened a gate that I'm not proud of at all.
00:21:48.000 And, you know, it was another one of those moments of, I don't want to do... I don't think this can work this way.
00:21:55.000 I don't want to do this.
00:21:57.000 It just...
00:22:00.000 Independent of who this person was or anyone that we permanently suspended off the network, it felt wrong to me.
00:22:10.000 And I was always searching for a different solution, but I just did not come up with a solution within that structure.
00:22:17.000 And I could not figure it out.
00:22:20.000 Like, personally, it was heartbreaking.
00:22:20.000 I don't know.
00:22:23.000 All of these actions that we took and actions that we didn't take as well.
00:22:26.000 I grew up as a punk.
00:22:28.000 I loved punk music.
00:22:31.000 I loved the ethos.
00:22:32.000 I loved the hip-hop ethos.
00:22:34.000 I loved questioning the system.
00:22:35.000 I didn't have a job, like a real job, until I was 29 years old.
00:22:39.000 I was an independent contractor.
00:22:41.000 I only worked on open-source stuff.
00:22:42.000 And I never wanted to be an entrepreneur.
00:22:45.000 I never wanted to build a company.
00:22:46.000 I never wanted to be a CEO.
00:22:49.000 But It was the path to grow Twitter and I had to learn what I had to learn and in that I learned what I had forgotten as well.
00:22:59.000 What I'd forgotten about what I loved about the internet and why I'm here in the first place and how grateful I am to the people that truly built a decentralized internet that a lot of companies, our peers, whether that be Google or Facebook or, you know, Yahoo, all these things centralized a lot of the internet that we used and that felt very, very free.
00:23:25.000 And now I think there's different answers.
00:23:27.000 And I just want to spend the rest of my life making sure those different answers work.
00:23:32.000 Yeah, that seems like a beautiful mission because I, as I indicated in an earlier question Jack, sense that we are in a precipitous place.
00:23:44.000 Whether it's the new EU proposed legislation to be able to fine social media platforms if they do not comply and censor, that's a bill that's going through now, Each of the Five Eyes countries, those are the countries that Snowden's revelations revealed shared data on their domestic populations, the anglophonic countries, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, USA, UK, those countries are all simultaneously trying to pass legislation that amount to anti-free speech laws.
00:24:13.000 As always, it's leveraged on understandable issues that any sane person would agree with.
00:24:20.000 Child pornography should be stopped.
00:24:22.000 Everyone agrees with that.
00:24:23.000 Hate speech is not optimal.
00:24:26.000 But I can't help but feel, Jack, that these issues are used to leverage a centralised and authoritarian model in a space that clearly doesn't need Centralised authoritarianism.
00:24:39.000 This is obviously, in my view, this is just my opinion, an attempt to retain a 20th century power model in a cyberspace that can afford decentralisation, which seems like a necessary social step.
00:24:53.000 It's clear to me that independent media necessarily becomes independently political Because how long can you talk about information without pointing out?
00:25:03.000 Laws are getting passed all around the world to censor, to surveil, to control, to social credit score, to shut down.
00:25:10.000 Once open spaces like Twitter, Facebook, Google, all bought about, let's assume, by idealistic entrepreneurs.
00:25:17.000 I'm touched by your words.
00:25:19.000 I knew as a punk you didn't want to end up a CEO that's working for the man, in inverted commas, and yet what happens is Stories end up being censored plainly in order to benefit the establishment.
00:25:29.000 That's just my opinion.
00:25:30.000 Political decisions get made that were right, in your words, for the company, but not right for the world.
00:25:34.000 That, for me, is an earth-shattering revelation.
00:25:37.000 And where we are now, it seems to me, is we precisely need to establish modes of communication, modes of media, modes of democracy, and modes of election that can respond to these changes.
00:25:48.000 Otherwise, what we are going to get Is the kind of centralized globalist authority that are actually regarded as wacko conspiracy theories.
00:25:57.000 I can see the map of that model being laid out before us.
00:26:01.000 Do you think that's where we're heading?
00:26:03.000 And do you think that there's a chance that your journey of atonement can begin to challenge such gargantuan centralizing forces?
00:26:11.000 I do.
00:26:12.000 I think it comes back to these single points of failure.
00:26:17.000 If you have a CEO that can be called before Congress, you're compromised.
00:26:21.000 And that technology is compromised.
00:26:23.000 If you're entirely dependent upon one revenue stream, you're compromised.
00:26:27.000 And everything that you do is essentially compromised.
00:26:29.000 And you can fight it.
00:26:30.000 And, you know, companies will fight it.
00:26:33.000 But it's ultimately a losing battle based on the foundation you're building upon.
00:26:37.000 And the only true answer is to build upon a different foundation, a foundation of open protocols
00:26:43.000 that's not owned by anyone.
00:26:44.000 And you know, the fortunate thing is that no, absolutely no one has to trust me with these
00:26:50.000 things. And they're designed in such a way that they should never trust me.
00:26:56.000 And they continue to work.
00:26:57.000 I could die tomorrow and the things would keep coming.
00:27:00.000 It's not dependent upon any one person or any one government passing any particular laws or regulation.
00:27:06.000 It's up to the people.
00:27:07.000 And the policy is actually in the code itself.
00:27:12.000 And anyone can change it, bring it to the market.
00:27:14.000 If the market likes it, more and more people use it, that's the winner.
00:27:17.000 It's all driven by consensus instead of top-down direction.
00:27:21.000 And I think that's really, really important to address a bunch of the issues that you just brought up.
00:27:28.000 That's true, I think.
00:27:32.000 In your phrase, which sounds like the kind of thing that a coder would come up with, single point of failure, I would sort of see that more as, all of us are fallible.
00:27:41.000 Solzhenitsyn said, the line between good and evil runs not between nations, creeds, races, or people, but through every human heart.
00:27:50.000 The inevitability of individual fallibility has to be addressed at the outset through the models we create.
00:27:57.000 And for me, there's something about the internet that is reflective of our potential to evolve.
00:28:03.000 That we are, that somehow omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence are represented in the internet.
00:28:10.000 And if you allow that kind of power to be seized in the same way that land was seized
00:28:15.000 a couple of hundred years ago, the way that finance was seized a hundred years ago,
00:28:20.000 then this will be unprecedented centralized control.
00:28:23.000 So it's great to hear that the solutions you're suggesting are precisely the kind of solutions I think could work.
00:28:30.000 When you heard... Can I just ask you this?
00:28:32.000 It seems like a question a lot of people want the answer to.
00:28:34.000 What was your emotional reaction when you heard that Elon Musk wanted to buy Twitter, Jack?
00:28:40.000 I was overjoyed.
00:28:41.000 I've been trying to get Elon onto the board for quite some time.
00:28:45.000 He was one of our biggest customers, our biggest users.
00:28:49.000 I was immediately drawn to his usage because it was authentic, it was vulnerable, it was transparent, and it was always on.
00:28:59.000 It was real time.
00:29:00.000 And he made, you know, he says what was on his mind.
00:29:03.000 There was no filter, and I love that.
00:29:06.000 And he is obviously a technologist, And an entrepreneur, one of the greatest entrepreneurs of all time.
00:29:13.000 So I have deep, deep respect for him.
00:29:16.000 And I left the company.
00:29:19.000 He invested, or he bought, I think, 9% of the company.
00:29:23.000 And he agreed to join the board.
00:29:27.000 Unfortunately, I think what he saw within that week of being on the board, I don't know if he was technically on the board, He realized a different answer, which was, I want to take this private.
00:29:39.000 And that was my hope for it as well, because I just don't think it can exist and persist as a public company, given all the incentives that that puts upon it.
00:29:50.000 Unfortunately, it was just really bad timing.
00:29:55.000 And the ad market, the digital ad market crashed.
00:30:00.000 All the COVID correction that like zoomed these companies up like Zoom, like Amazon, like Apple, like Google, like Facebook, like Snapchat, suddenly that floor fell away.
00:30:14.000 And every single company around them, especially within ads, just dropped in value massively.
00:30:20.000 And That timing and that, you know, that decision to buy before that happened, I think, unfortunately set up a series of events that, you know, didn't feel great.
00:30:34.000 I don't think... it became ultimately pretty reactive, in my view, and it put upon him a pretty immense constraint and burden.
00:30:45.000 To reduce the cost of the company as quickly as possible.
00:30:50.000 There was a lot of debt put upon the company and solving for that is not easy.
00:30:55.000 And I think that created an urgency that just created a bunch of reactive decisions.
00:31:00.000 None of which I necessarily disagree with over the long term.
00:31:04.000 It's just how they were rolled out.
00:31:07.000 But I believe, you know, I still own two to three percent of the company.
00:31:12.000 I didn't sell any of my shares.
00:31:13.000 I made no money on that deal.
00:31:16.000 All of my equity is with Elon right now.
00:31:19.000 I believe in him.
00:31:21.000 I believe that he will figure things out.
00:31:24.000 And I believe, and I want to do as much as possible to help Remove some of that burden because he is another single point of failure.
00:31:33.000 He is another person controlling these policies and these features and how we engage with these experiences.
00:31:39.000 And my hope and my desire is that we can build technologies like Bitcoin and Nostr, which are truly open protocols, and Twitter can build on top of them and remove a bunch of the liability they have.
00:31:50.000 Remove a bunch of the constraints that are going to be put upon them by foreign governments and our own government and the private market and Wall Street in the future.
00:31:58.000 So I think there's a path of intersection.
00:32:03.000 I think it makes Twitter even stronger.
00:32:05.000 And I think if there's anyone to do it and anyone to see value in that, I think it's Elon.
00:32:09.000 He believes in open source as well.
00:32:11.000 He's open sourced a bunch of Tesla for the greater good of the energy market, but also the greater good of Tesla.
00:32:20.000 You got more competitive electronic vehicle car makers using your grid, everybody
00:32:27.000 wins.
00:32:28.000 And that competition is fairly collaborative.
00:32:31.000 Principles like integrity, authenticity and transparency seem to run through the kind of proposals that you are
00:32:41.000 making, Jack.
00:32:42.000 Is it not going to be necessary on the economic level to regulate and decentralize these companies that have this vast amount of power in order to facilitate that?
00:32:57.000 If companies like Apple and Google, and Facebook of course, have the Amazon, have the amount of influence and power, are able to avoid in many cases paying domestic tax, are able to break down unions, is there not a requirement that beyond what you're suggesting for providing alternative open source platforms, that we also have to break down these structures on an economic level?
00:33:22.000 Is something this vast Not always going to be a tool for centralization and globalism.
00:33:28.000 Doesn't it have to at some point legislatively have to be decentralized?
00:33:37.000 I don't know if that's necessarily it's it's not my preferred answer.
00:33:40.000 My preferred answer is that we built something that solves a bunch of those problems and that people choose it because it solves their problems.
00:33:47.000 And these models such as the App Store centralization and Apple's stranglehold on what apps are in the App Store and what apps are not and, you know, how much you pay to Apple for that privilege.
00:33:59.000 Currently it's 30% of any revenue that goes over the App Store.
00:34:04.000 If we can build alternative models on the free web, on these free protocols, and they actually have quality developers and quality apps upon them, which I have no doubt they will, because they did before these structures existed, then the market is chosen.
00:34:20.000 And that regulation of an app store, potentially to break it up, is kind of for for not uh it may have mattered for a few short years but ultimately I believe the you know the market and the people will choose the the outcomes that are needed for them as long as they have the right technologies to do so and that those technologies are open and free and permissionless most importantly.
00:34:42.000 Do you feel that that fundamentally becomes political?
00:34:46.000 This model of communication, this model, this advance in technology has already redefined the way that politics takes space.
00:34:56.000 I can't believe that there's not a connection between the type of regulation and legislation that's being proposed almost at a global level, albeit through a few different bureaucratic agencies, whether it's the EU, the UN or the five countries that I just listed, which insignificantly include the United States, to me must be a response to the capacity for decentralised,
00:35:17.000 radical, independent movement in media and indeed politics. Just a couple of examples of
00:35:24.000 the anomalies that I imagine these new regulations are there to prevent are Brexit in
00:35:29.000 our country, Trump in your country and indeed the emergence of RFK. I can't believe that the
00:35:36.000 people that are responsible for this legislation aren't predicting that the way that media space
00:35:42.000 and political space is altering could lead to truly radical political movements. It could
00:35:48.000 lead to opt-out communities where people say we don't want to pay your taxes, we're not repaying
00:35:53.000 your debt, we're going to transact in this decentralised currency, we're going to
00:35:57.000 communicate through these modalities, we don't consider ourselves part of Canada or France or
00:36:02.000 England or America or whatever nation. We're part of a new separate alliance.
00:36:06.000 There's nothing to suggest that the nation-state is the zenith of all possible political evolution.
00:36:13.000 When we're talking about radical change politically, culturally, ecologically, What does that mean?
00:36:18.000 You know, everything has to be on the table.
00:36:20.000 You can't say we want radical change, but we have to have our flags stay the same.
00:36:23.000 I've learned the song now.
00:36:24.000 I've learned the anthem.
00:36:26.000 Everything has to be up for change.
00:36:28.000 Do you think that these regulations and legislations are to prohibit that?
00:36:32.000 And what use are the kind of technologies you're discussing, Jack, if they're not backed by political discourse?
00:36:39.000 I think you're absolutely spot on on the trend.
00:36:42.000 I think the trend is more towards hyper local communities.
00:36:46.000 I think smaller governance models is more important that are actually connected with one another.
00:36:51.000 I think it's already happening.
00:36:52.000 You're seeing this in the US.
00:36:53.000 Florida looks completely different from California, which looks completely different from Texas, and people are choosing to vote with their feet and to go to a governance that they ascribe to.
00:37:04.000 And I think that's going to happen more globally.
00:37:07.000 And I think it's, to your point around nation-states, like, you know, this concept of a micro-nation-state that actually has an understanding of what its people are feeling on the ground because it's in, it's within that community, versus today where we have decisions being made, many by unelected officials.
00:37:27.000 A lot of these regulators are unelected, they're appointed, um who have so many abstractions between themselves and the actual people so much so many levels of indirection that they can't possibly make policies that that solves for all so is there a
00:37:45.000 A fight to keep it all together?
00:37:47.000 Absolutely.
00:37:48.000 And I don't think it'll win.
00:37:53.000 I just think the trend is in the opposite direction.
00:37:55.000 And now, fortunately, we have the tools to actually make that possible.
00:37:58.000 And I think that's a trend that's been happening over time.
00:38:01.000 All of these things that we're seeing, what you said earlier about Twitter starting as this little thing and then being used potentially by governments all around the world to influence, That rhymes with every single technology we've ever built, whether that be television, radio, newspaper, the printing press, like, all of these have the similar models.
00:38:24.000 And all we can do is make the technology more and more resilient, more and more in the hands of the individual.
00:38:31.000 And ultimately, I think the biggest problem to solve is one of discovery.
00:38:35.000 How do I find Your podcast.
00:38:38.000 How do I find your work?
00:38:39.000 How do I find your voice?
00:38:41.000 That is what ultimately was centralized in the late 90s with the rise of Google and Facebook and Twitter and AOL and all these companies, is that we got the discovery problem really, really good.
00:38:55.000 And it was so good that people, waking up, we were the first consideration.
00:39:02.000 If I have a question, of course I'm going to Google.
00:39:04.000 There's no other consideration.
00:39:06.000 Because they nailed the discovery model.
00:39:08.000 They nailed that discovery problem.
00:39:10.000 And if we solve that, if we make that decentralized, which I believe we can, it upends so many different things and so much of what has happened in the world, especially with technology and its relationship with the individual, which I do believe is predatory.
00:39:28.000 It's a predatory relationship where they are looking to ultimately control attention and freedom itself.
00:39:34.000 It's interesting that many abstract ideas like BF Skinner's ideas on behaviouralism, nudges, you know, in our country, the UK, during the pandemic, there was a nudge unit that was designed to offer, essentially to get people to take medications who weren't really in the demographic that were most affected by, you know, by COVID.
00:39:50.000 Let's just call it as it was.
00:39:53.000 Now the potential to manipulate consciousness is so, as you say, it's so plausible that it must be, and indeed by your words and by your reckoning, has become predatory.
00:40:04.000 I'm struck, Jack, by the corollary between technology and mysticism I'll explain that in a very parochial and anecdotal way.
00:40:15.000 When I was first introduced to Twitter, my major honour from Ross, he's a TV presenter in our country, hosts all the big shows, he's our lemon or whatever.
00:40:24.000 He was like, look at this thing, Twitter!
00:40:25.000 You can just talk to people, it's mental!
00:40:26.000 And I was like, wow!
00:40:27.000 It's incredible!
00:40:28.000 And people were like, hey, I love you!
00:40:30.000 And it was also so friendly and joyful and like, it felt like magic.
00:40:34.000 It felt like, oh my god, I could just communicate with people all over the world.
00:40:37.000 It felt like something so beautiful.
00:40:40.000 But it was later, his wife, Jane, that said, you know, if you went to a pub, and like when you first went to that pub, everyone was really nice and convivial and, hey, come in, have fun, sit down. 1.00
00:40:50.000 And then you went back to that pub a year later and everyone's like, hey, you, why don't you go fuck yourself? 0.99
00:40:55.000 You know, like that's kind of what happened to Twitter. 0.99
00:40:57.000 It turned into this sort of place of darkness, and gossip, and cruelty, and nastiness, and oppositionism, and sort of so weighed down in ugliness.
00:41:09.000 And that was extraordinary.
00:41:10.000 That was almost before it became, I believe, a sort of tool of the kind of centralized interests, be they state or private and corporate, that felt like it could relieve us from. Like we can directly
00:41:23.000 communicate with one another.
00:41:24.000 You know, Trump I think became so notable because he became the master of it. He was a person,
00:41:29.000 sort of had the skills to sort of go, I'm going to bypass all your bullshit. People are going to 0.99
00:41:32.000 believe me rather than you. It's over. And in a sense, it like Musk's acquisition of your platform
00:41:38.000 is, it feels like a legitimate inheritance because he also seems to understand it in some intuitive,
00:41:46.000 essential way, as you described earlier. He's an organic user, I think was the phrase you used.
00:41:52.000 But it seems that what we're experiencing is the realization of something that would have
00:41:57.000 once been purely miraculous, and yet it is being colonized by the type of forces that colonize
00:42:05.000 So we are at an epochal moment and I think the signs of that are everywhere.
00:42:09.000 Bureaucratically and legislatively, what's happening with the EU and the questions we've touched upon.
00:42:13.000 But also in other news stories, and if you've got anything to say about my previous rant, bear it in mind, as I offer you this question from our chat.
00:42:19.000 This is a Locals member, and if you want to join us on Locals, press the red button and join us there now.
00:42:24.000 It is a decentralised community as far as I understand, I bloody hope it is.
00:42:28.000 This is from SMP2K.
00:42:31.000 Jack's last tweet was a UFO emoji.
00:42:34.000 What do you think about the subject of UFOs, military whistleblowers?
00:42:38.000 How do you feel about all that, Jack?
00:42:41.000 I tweeted that because it was World UFO Day yesterday.
00:42:47.000 I feel there's definitely something out there.
00:42:49.000 I feel they're probably with us.
00:42:52.000 I feel we will never get the information unless someone like RFK is elected president.
00:42:59.000 Because his one promise is that the government will tell the truth, to be transparent.
00:43:02.000 Obviously there are limitations to that for public safety, but that is refreshing.
00:43:10.000 I don't know any other way to answer that question than to understand what we've seen, what we haven't seen, what we think about it, and to bring other governments around the world into that same fold.
00:43:21.000 It only betters us.
00:43:23.000 Yeah and it seems now a lot of people know a lot of our community think oh this is a distraction it's being promoted now to keep our eyes off of stuff that's happening at a political level but I've been interested in this stuff for a long time I'm friends with like Jeremy Corbell who talks about it a lot and I've spoken to some pretty high profile incredible journalists who say that these are legitimate whistleblowers and that the CIA and deep state agencies are not happy about this stuff coming out and they're having a role with it it's not sort of like the kind of uh False flag operation that we've become sort of attuned to spot in these days.
00:43:55.000 Just like Leah, I want to sort of circle back on something I was saying a minute ago about the sort of incredible potential and how like what the the optimism around Twitter when it was created that it seemed like some sort of mercurial alchemical magical power that we all held in our hands that meant we could
00:44:14.000 connect and be funny and share culture around the world that ultimately becomes this sort of
00:44:19.000 weapon and is subject to all this controversy and hate speech and all these kind of things
00:44:23.000 that have sort of swirled around it. I can't help but think in part, given some of the
00:44:29.000 things you've said about what your plans are for the future, what your intentions are,
00:44:32.000 how important transparency is to you, decentralisation, your sort of fundamental principle that
00:44:37.000 you don't want there to be any authoritative figure that can be held up before
00:44:41.000 Congress in the way that you were, that that in itself means that there's a flaw in the model.
00:44:45.000 I can't help but feel that you are now, in a way, devoting your life to creating alternatives to these corruptible models.
00:44:54.000 Is that fair, Jack?
00:44:55.000 100%.
00:44:56.000 I'm dedicating my entire life to it.
00:44:59.000 I think the model that Twitter started in the early days and like when the magic that we felt and that I think you felt was it was like tapping into global consciousness.
00:45:15.000 I could be anywhere in the world and I could actually see people's thoughts.
00:45:19.000 I could see how they're thinking and that felt so amazing.
00:45:22.000 It felt like telepathy.
00:45:25.000 And it's probably the closest thing we have to it.
00:45:27.000 And, you know, I think it is ultimately a reflection of who we are and what society is.
00:45:34.000 And I don't think that's a bad thing, even though it might feel bad in the moment.
00:45:38.000 It's up to us to acknowledge that and choose to see that reflection and to make changes.
00:45:43.000 And I think we're in that period right now.
00:45:45.000 I think we're in the period of questioning these abstractions.
00:45:49.000 I think we're in the period of questioning the incentives.
00:45:52.000 And looking for much better answers.
00:45:54.000 And I'm so optimistic that we'll arrive at them.
00:45:58.000 It's going to be extremely painful.
00:46:00.000 It's going to take a while.
00:46:01.000 We have to be patient.
00:46:02.000 Not everything is going to happen immediately.
00:46:05.000 But slow and deliberate wins the race.
00:46:08.000 And as long as we continue to build open models that are truly owned by the people and not just individuals, not just individual institutions and governments, Um, they can't be compromised.
00:46:23.000 By definition, they cannot be compromised.
00:46:25.000 Yeah, so you don't, in a sense, that's like handing it over to God, the universe, something beyond the fallibility of humankind.
00:46:34.000 There's a few questions.
00:46:35.000 These are some of these are my questions.
00:46:36.000 If you guys have questions in the chat, then please send them through to me and Jack.
00:46:41.000 I wanted to, like, sort of a mixture of intense things and not that intense things.
00:46:46.000 One is, like, Julian Assange.
00:46:48.000 What do you think about Julian Assange being in the position he's in, mate?
00:46:53.000 Oh, he should be freed and pardoned.
00:46:55.000 The same with Snowden, the same with Ross.
00:46:58.000 Yeah, thanks.
00:47:00.000 Blue Sky, tell us a little bit about Blue Sky, like, which is, I understand, the new thing you're working on.
00:47:06.000 Two years before I left the company, as I said, I realized a bunch of what was working and what wasn't working as a corporation.
00:47:16.000 When you see the service versus the company, and I was very much focused on the service and what it could do for the world, I realized we needed to build a protocol.
00:47:24.000 We needed to build an open source protocol that was not owned by us, and we funded A individual who had built a protocol.
00:47:34.000 It's completely independent from Twitter.
00:47:36.000 We gave them 13 or 14 million dollars to build this up.
00:47:40.000 And they just launched it.
00:47:42.000 And it's one such experiment and path towards a more decentralized model.
00:47:47.000 There's another one I discovered which was not Directed by me or created by me and that is Noster.
00:47:55.000 I have a lot of belief in this one because it is the person who created it is a pseudonym.
00:48:03.000 He has no ego in the game whatsoever.
00:48:06.000 He's extremely opinionated.
00:48:10.000 It is entirely permissionless.
00:48:12.000 Anyone can build upon it instead of where Blue Sky right now.
00:48:16.000 A lot of it is still a bit centralized.
00:48:18.000 It's not truly decentralized yet.
00:48:19.000 It will get there.
00:48:20.000 But Nostra is completely decentralized and it really struck a chord with me in terms of how these things should be built.
00:48:29.000 So I've been doing everything I can to help it, to fund it.
00:48:34.000 I gave 14 Bitcoin to this student I'd never met.
00:48:37.000 I have no idea who this person is.
00:48:39.000 I think he lives somewhere in Brazil.
00:48:42.000 But I just believe in what he's created so much and how How good it is for the world that I wanted to make sure that he could focus entirely on it.
00:48:51.000 And there's a whole huge community now that are building upon it.
00:48:55.000 Unfortunately, the biggest client for it in iOS, Apple just forced them to remove one of the most significant features of this platform, which was being able to send Bitcoin to one another for free.
00:49:09.000 So for any post, you could actually what's called zap a post and you could get Pennies, you could get 25 cents, you could get $15.
00:49:18.000 The internet has never had micropayments.
00:49:22.000 This is what we've been dreaming about for 40 years.
00:49:26.000 If Twitter was started after Bitcoin, we would not be dependent upon the ad model.
00:49:31.000 We would not have many of the constraints and the issues and the burdens that we grew up with.
00:49:37.000 Because the internet never had a payment model that was native to it, such as Bitcoin, The ad model rose.
00:49:43.000 And that's where I think a lot of the predatory practices came from.
00:49:46.000 And that's what I want to fix.
00:49:49.000 I want to provide another option around.
00:49:51.000 That's really interesting because it seems that while I earlier in a more pessimistic way pointed out that I can see the mapping and conditions of a centralised, authoritarian,
00:50:03.000 global model that will undergird its authority by saying it's for your
00:50:07.000 security and to protect you from misinformation, disinformation, and corrupt and bad actors out there.
00:50:13.000 Also, you can see, necessarily, the alternative, the, if not utopian, certainly a model that is more
00:50:20.000 respectful of freedom.
00:50:22.000 Individual transactions without some mediating model, independent media, communities that do not share the same
00:50:29.000 geographical space but are timelessly connected, the ability, as you indicated
00:50:33.000 earlier, to almost read one another's thoughts.
00:50:36.000 So there is the possibility for, you know, like, almost what we're seeing in the authoritarianism
00:50:42.000 is the shadow cast by this new possibility, by the light of this new possibility.
00:50:48.000 Which I feel is deeply connected to spiritual practice in a more traditional sense.
00:50:53.000 Now, I know that a lot of... Well, I saw one mainstream media story that said that you were basically mad now because you'd grown a beard and were only eating one meal a day and were having salt shakes and ice baths.
00:51:05.000 Now, it's not jars of urine, but you... I want to check your fingernails are short before we go much further with this conversation. 1.00
00:51:11.000 That's good.
00:51:12.000 You're not gone full Howard Hughes.
00:51:13.000 You're not making a wooden airplane or anything out there, are you?
00:51:17.000 What's with the salt shakes, the ice baths, the eating one meal a day, and also what's with hanging out with Jay-Z and Beyonce?
00:51:23.000 What's going on?
00:51:27.000 I mean, I know you have a meditation practice.
00:51:29.000 I've always been interested in how I work, and I want to improve it every day.
00:51:36.000 I was doing one meal a day like 10 years ago, and I was doing ice baths like seven years ago.
00:51:42.000 I think I was pretty early with a lot of these things, and I did Five years in a row of Vipassana meditation, so the 10-day silent retreat, and all these things I learned from.
00:51:54.000 And I'm so grateful for the ability to experiment with these practices.
00:52:03.000 I've never felt healthier, and I've never felt clearer.
00:52:07.000 And I listen to podcasts like yours.
00:52:12.000 To discover some of these new things to try.
00:52:14.000 And I truly believe there's a saying in the Bitcoin community, don't trust, verify.
00:52:19.000 Don't trust, verify.
00:52:21.000 And I've taken that on for almost all my life.
00:52:24.000 I want to experience it myself and come up with my own conclusions and that those conclusions match others and that I can build upon them.
00:52:34.000 I found a community of people, including Jay, who feel like that, and do question a lot, and do have a bunch of pushbacks on the systems that we're talking about.
00:52:50.000 Maybe not as vocal in their everyday, but certainly within their music.
00:52:55.000 We bought Jay's company, Tidal, Because we see an opportunity to fix what's broken with musicians and specifically the contracts are put on, how they get paid, how they don't get paid, how they reach their fan base.
00:53:19.000 And I think as you consider AI and what AI is doing in terms of removing mechanical work, There's going to be a lot more people trying to do what you're doing, for instance.
00:53:30.000 Trying to do what Jay is doing.
00:53:31.000 Trying to do arts and creativity.
00:53:34.000 I think more of our work moves to creative... content is the wrong word, but creative production.
00:53:41.000 And creative consumption.
00:53:43.000 I think that the extremely tangible things of this mechanical work are coming more and more to a close.
00:53:52.000 It will always be necessary.
00:53:53.000 It will always be part of it.
00:53:55.000 But the industry and the economy is moving more towards creativity.
00:53:58.000 And it was important for me that we had answers to that.
00:54:02.000 And we had answers that were global.
00:54:04.000 And that, again, go towards a model where the people own it and the people benefit the most.
00:54:09.000 And we're not building predatory models against the artists.
00:54:12.000 And there's so many predatory models against artists and specifically musicians today.
00:54:17.000 Someone's asking, is your, Apologetic Pest says, is your one meal a 10 course meal?
00:54:24.000 Don't be so childish. 0.97
00:54:25.000 These are kind of ridiculous questions that are going to break down this revolution that we're working on. 0.95
00:54:31.000 I like that thing you said, don't trust, verify.
00:54:34.000 I just want to ask you this, it's pretty speculative and almost impossible to ask, but with your personal experiences where you're clearly investigating consciousness, Do you intuit that there is something unique about consciousness that cannot be replicated through technology?
00:54:48.000 While technology might be able to create intelligence through pattern recognition, consciousness is separate.
00:54:54.000 It is the crucible for information and intelligence and might even precede matter.
00:55:01.000 As a person who understands both the coding that creates these machines of vast intelligence and as a practitioner of meditation, Do you have a personal awareness of the distinction between consciousness and intelligence?
00:55:17.000 To your first point, to your first question, I believe we build technologies to... The technologies we build are really rebuilding our understanding of consciousness and our understanding of the human experience.
00:55:29.000 And I think they're a crutch.
00:55:31.000 I think all of the capabilities that we're building in technology, we're born with.
00:55:36.000 And maybe these technologies help us unlock them.
00:55:39.000 And if we see them as replacement instead of assistant and a way to reflect what we're born with and how to, you know, potentially, I know, I, I know you meditate a lot.
00:55:51.000 I know you've, you've found unlocks in your own consciousness and you found powers, whether they be small or large, um, in, in your view that you may have always thought you had, but kind of forgot or have been abstracted away.
00:56:07.000 And I've had that experience as well.
00:56:10.000 It's called intuition.
00:56:10.000 We all have it.
00:56:12.000 It's called coincidence.
00:56:14.000 There's so many of these occurrences that we quickly label and move to the side to then focus on what we are told is important that we lose sight of what is truly important which is what we're born with and I believe that technology can bring us back to that.
00:56:30.000 I don't think it's always seen that way.
00:56:32.000 It's seen as something that's scary and again as a replacement but It's only going to replace us if we choose to make it replace us.
00:56:39.000 It doesn't have to.
00:56:41.000 When you undergird these ideas with a materialistic model, then it becomes about commodity and replacement becomes possible.
00:56:47.000 But when you have a spiritual model, and by spiritual I simply mean that which is not material or measurable, discernible through the senses, and yet, as you say intuitively there, they become tools, they become an advancement on fire, the wheel, or flint axes, rather than a replacement for human beings, and love, and personal connection, and the divine felt experience of nature within yourself right now in this moment, the presence of God, Mate, we do this festival called Community that's between the 14th of July and the 17th of July.
00:57:18.000 Come!
00:57:19.000 Come there.
00:57:19.000 Wim Hof is going to be there doing ice baths and stuff like that.
00:57:22.000 Vandana Shiva, world teacher, she will be there.
00:57:26.000 We'll put you where you'll fit in.
00:57:27.000 No one will recognise you anyway.
00:57:28.000 Everyone else looks like you anyway. 0.90
00:57:29.000 Just people with beards wandering around, coming up with theories.
00:57:32.000 Just most of them can't turn it into an international platform within the hour.
00:57:38.000 Yeah, where is it?
00:57:40.000 It's on the River Wye, the border between Celtic Wales and Saxon England.
00:57:47.000 It's sort of a mystical place.
00:57:48.000 We did it there last year.
00:57:50.000 It's a pretty amazing festival.
00:57:51.000 It's kind of drug-free as far as we know, though we would not Thank you.
00:57:55.000 No, no, no.
00:57:55.000 Go on.
00:57:55.000 in substances in if that was their thing.
00:57:57.000 But there's no alcohol or anything like that there.
00:57:59.000 And so people do jujitsu there and breath work and cold plunges and stuff like that.
00:58:05.000 You'd be most welcome there.
00:58:06.000 And I would obviously look after you as best as I could facilitate.
00:58:09.000 So you're most welcome to come if you wanna.
00:58:11.000 Thank you.
00:58:12.000 Yeah.
00:58:13.000 And I'll talk to you on the stage and interview about this stuff.
00:58:16.000 You know, I'd take advantage of the facts, not in an exploitative way, I hope,
00:58:18.000 but in a sensible way.
00:58:19.000 I'll be there.
00:58:20.000 No, no, no.
00:58:21.000 All right, mate, we'll- We'll have a conversation.
00:58:23.000 We'll work out the admin.
00:58:24.000 Now this, we started off talking about RFK and how his candidature could be significant at a time where centralising forces are coalescing, looking to censor, surveil, shut down debate, find ways in order, they say, to prevent hate or child pornography or things that all of us would think should be curtailed and stopped.
00:58:42.000 Wherever possible, they're using that to close down free speech and free communication.
00:58:47.000 That's why we both, you and I, believe that the candidature of RFK is important.
00:58:53.000 Now, I was speaking to RFK and his wife earlier this week and I've ludicrously, and now I realize stupidly, agreed to do this pull-up challenge to raise money for his campaign.
00:59:05.000 We're going to do pull-ups. 0.89
00:59:06.000 Now, I already know that RFK is better than me At pull-ups, because I've seen him with his top off and he looks like a gnarly old man, all sort of like, sun-kissed, and like, some mad old farmer's body.
00:59:20.000 And now we're going to do a pull-up competition, which he's going to win.
00:59:24.000 The website is kennedy24.com forward slash Paul for Kennedy.
00:59:28.000 We've got to get to $100,000, which is a small number for some people, Jack.
00:59:32.000 I wondered if you'd be willing to make some sort of digital donation to that if we do it.
00:59:39.000 I'd be down.
00:59:39.000 I'm actually talking with RFK Jr.
00:59:41.000 here today, this afternoon.
00:59:43.000 Well, tell him about the pull-up competition and tell him that I'm gonna undermine his campaign
00:59:47.000 by saying that he's juicing from the get-go.
00:59:50.000 Even though I think he's been quite outspoken about Big Pharma, I'm gonna say,
00:59:53.000 that guy's jabbing himself with steroids day and night to win this thing.
00:59:57.000 Only one way to be sure to test it.
01:00:00.000 Oh yeah, test and write!
01:00:02.000 Verify!
01:00:03.000 Don't trust verify.
01:00:04.000 Although from a spiritual perspective, Jack, I've got questions.
01:00:07.000 We'll go deeper on that when we get the time.
01:00:09.000 Jack, thank you so much for joining us and for providing such a transparent Open and human appreciation of the position we're in.
01:00:19.000 I think people don't know what it's like to find yourself in a position of incredible power and that you end up dealing with a variety of vectors.
01:00:28.000 And certainly I understand differently more than I ever have done.
01:00:32.000 Oh yeah, imagine if you've got the complexity of running a company, you're dealing with the American government.
01:00:37.000 One thing I thought I've heard once was, you know when they made that documentary about O.J.
01:00:41.000 Simpson?
01:00:41.000 O.J.
01:00:41.000 used to, you know, this was before when O.J.
01:00:43.000 Simpson was just a regular athlete, people used to go, well, why aren't you doing what Muhammad Ali's doing? 0.94
01:00:47.000 You know, it's like, well, that dude's a pretty fucking out there person. 0.53
01:00:51.000 Like, all of us are on a journey and we're all moving at different paces, you know? 0.88
01:00:55.000 And I think that one of the ways we're going to form new alliances is with open hearts.
01:00:59.000 Open communication, a willingness to explore new territory and you've demonstrated a lot of real morality to me today.
01:01:06.000 Thank you, Jack.
01:01:07.000 I appreciate it.
01:01:08.000 Thank you, Russell, and thank you for giving me the space and also, again, everything you're doing for independent media and independent thought.
01:01:13.000 Thanks, man.
01:01:14.000 Stay on the line.
01:01:16.000 Can we change numbers so I can harass you and harangue you about stuff? 0.80
01:01:19.000 Absolutely.
01:01:20.000 Thanks, Jack.
01:01:21.000 Thanks.
01:01:21.000 Well, what a fantastic conversation.
01:01:23.000 If you want to join those kind of conversations live, join us on Locals.
01:01:28.000 People are there in a live conversation now, like Imagination and SensitiveHearts25, all sending love to Jack.
01:01:33.000 Tomorrow, we are being joined live in an extraordinary event.
01:01:38.000 Tucker Carlson is going to be in the studio.
01:01:40.000 We're going to reorganise it.
01:01:41.000 We're going to re-light it.
01:01:42.000 You've got to make sure Tucker Carlson looks fantastic, feels fantastic.
01:01:47.000 Send us your questions for Tucker right now.
01:01:49.000 Hit the red join button and join us live for the conversation.
01:01:52.000 Why wait?
01:01:53.000 Why sacrifice?
01:01:54.000 Why do anything except enjoy continual pleasure?
01:01:57.000 As well as these exclusive and fantastic conversations, you get weekly meditations, podcast recordings, access to our behind-the-scenes meetings, and first-come, first-served direct access to events like Community.
01:02:09.000 Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but Tucker Carlson style, more of the different.
01:02:14.000 Until then, stay free.
01:02:16.000 We've got such an exciting guest coming up.
01:02:17.000 I wish I could tell you.
01:02:18.000 See if you can guess who it's going to be.
01:02:19.000 No, don't guess, because then you'll give it away.
01:02:22.000 I'll give it away.
01:02:23.000 I'm so excited about this guest.
01:02:24.000 I won't text him.
01:02:25.000 Oh, them.
01:02:26.000 Oh, he's done it.
01:02:26.000 I knew it.
01:02:27.000 Look at it.
01:02:28.000 He can't help himself.
01:02:29.000 It's uniquely, primarily and extra specially on Stay Free with Russell Brand live in studio, Tucker Carlson.
01:02:41.000 It's Tucker Carlson.
01:02:44.000 Tucker Carlson is out at Fox News.
01:02:47.000 They're afraid.
01:02:48.000 They've given up persuasion.
01:02:50.000 They're resorting to force.