In this episode of RUMBLE, host Russell Brand is joined by journalist Dave Martin to discuss the dangers of the pharmaceutical industry, and the media's role in them. Plus, President Trump attends UFC Fight Night in NYC, where he's joined by Tucker Carlson and Dana White, and hosts a special pre-run coverage of the event from President Trump's side seat in the Octagon at UFC 295, which takes place in a matter of moments in Madison Square Garden on Nov. 26th. This episode is brought to you by R/GA and is produced by Vevolution. Our theme song is Come Alone by Suneaters, courtesy of Lotuspool Records. Art: Mackenzie Moore Music: Hayden Coplen Editor: Will Witwer Editor-in-Chief: Christian Bladt Mixer: Matthew Boll Additional audio mixing and mastering: Patrick Muldowney Additional production: Alex Blanner Editor and Editor: Ben Kotnik Audio Engineer: Ben Koppel Graphic Design: Matthew Kuchta Special thanks to the late John Rocha Art Direction: Matthew McConaughey Music by Jeff Kaale (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 35, 36, 36 & 36, 37, 39, 38, 40, 41, 45, 42, 47, 45 & 45, 45 , 47, 48, 51, 50, 54, 56, 57, 58, , 51, 56, Theme Music: , Theme Music by Ian Dorsch (1 1, 6 , 6, 1, , 5, 6, 5 , Theme Song: 6 & 6, 1, 5 , 6 , 1 , 1, 7 , 7, 5, 8 , 8, & 7, 9 , 9, 8, 8 , 8 & 9, 9 , , 10, 7 2, 9, 1 & 8 , 8 We are , 4, 2 , 5 , 9 (2, 3, 4
00:14:44.000Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand, where we've got so much information that's likely to awaken you and arm you with the necessary tools to cope with a world that seems to sway between various crises, that wants you dumb, that wants you distracted, that wants you numb.
00:14:59.000I got distracted because my dog just sort of coiled out of the room, the peculiar guy.
00:15:04.000Thanks all of you that join us on rumble like authoritative conclusions like Gabrielle like luaram
00:15:09.000I'm watching all of you guys if you want you can join our locals community
00:15:14.000There's loads of you there like sensitive hearts 25 jumping Jeff sue biz 22 primal Colin 2 because you get more
00:15:20.000Access to the kind of tools we're going to need to reorganize reality as we approach some kind of apex experience
00:15:27.000I don't know what tradition you're into.
00:15:29.000I don't know what scripture you're reading.
00:15:31.000I don't know what monotheistic or pantheistic or pagan faith you're leaning into in these end times where the material world is clearly cracking and crumbling.
00:15:40.000But you're going to need some divine light to get you through this.
00:15:44.000And that's why later today we're going to be speaking to Dave Martin.
00:15:47.000Surely you saw Dave Martin address the EU where he hit on his home truths right at the beginning of this pandemic, where he first posed, and we're still on YouTube right now, so I'll be disciplined in the manner in which I convey this information, but he confronted them with some truth around lockdown measures, medical measures, things that you've
00:16:08.000You were ahead of the curve. You've known for a long while something wasn't right. You sensed it.
00:16:12.000Your intuition was correct. You researched it. And now we're a little further along the path.
00:16:16.000Well, Dave Martin, he's got information that is going to, I would say, well, a lot of it's
00:16:23.000Some of the things he says about the WHO, the way that it was founded, you can back this up with incredible research, it's gonna astonish you, I think, but I'm gonna wait for Dave to convey it.
00:16:33.000We've got an incredible article about the AstraZeneca vaccine's defective status.
00:16:39.000Once we're off YouTube, we're gonna be a lot more free.
00:16:42.000Now, I want to talk to you today about the spectacle of contemporary politics.
00:16:45.000I want to talk to you today about the spectacle of legacy media.
00:16:48.000Where do you think this fits into the spectacular?
00:16:52.000You've already surely seen Trump attending UFC with Tucker like it's sort of like a supergroup, like it's cream.
00:18:17.000And I feel like the detractors of Trump and those that see this new emergent form of populism that's taking form in a pejorative way will say, well, look at this.
00:19:28.000After the mad anecdotes, the fist bumps with Saudi Arabian leaders that were going to be condemned as pariahs, the building, the wall that was condemned, the mitigated and mealy-mouthed big pharma deal.
00:19:51.000Is there some sort of prosecution of Trump going on right now?
00:19:54.000Of course, Trump's perspective of what's happening with his ongoing, not indictments, but his ongoing, uh, like a, like, yeah, indictments is that that is politically motivated.
00:20:05.000A lot of you feel that that's politically motivated.
00:20:07.000So, I suppose that what Jen Psaki is advocating for is not easy because it doesn't seem like we live in a particularly valid and transparent and open state.
00:20:33.000One, loud and extraordinary and vivid.
00:20:37.000The other, kind of intellectual, somewhat, uh, what do I want to say?
00:20:42.000Kind of offered to you in bespoke media terms.
00:20:46.000It's on protesters, and essentially unravel the rule of law as we know it.
00:20:50.000And this time, he plans to align his administration with people who will actually help him do it.
00:20:55.000Why wouldn't you have done that in the first place?
00:20:57.000But sure, Joe Biden is three years older and occasionally trips over things.
00:21:00.000Look, there's a lot to be concerned about right now when it comes to a second Trump term.
00:21:05.000The speeches are getting much more disturbing and much more unhinged and we should all hear it that way.
00:21:11.000OK, now this is where it starts to advance and the kind of Putin comparisons begin to increase, where Trump in particular is conveyed as a dictator and as a tyrant.
00:21:25.000But you have to look at the last couple of years and the extraordinary misleading and contradictory policies that played out.
00:21:31.000When he said this week, if they're beating me, go down and indict them, and some of the pronouncements he's made over the weekend, I've heard that as kind of his authoritarian impulses getting worse.
00:21:56.000It would look a lot like Vladimir Putin in Russia.
00:21:58.000It would look a lot like Viktor Orban in Hungary.
00:22:01.000Illiberal democracy, meaning democracy without rights or liberties or respect for the due process system, the rule of law.
00:22:10.000And in fact, there's not much democracy left to it because their position is that They don't accept the integrity of any election where they lose.
00:22:20.000But that also seems to be true of both sides.
00:22:24.000It's a hallmark of an authoritarian party.
00:22:27.000They don't accept elections that don't go their ways.
00:22:29.000They refuse to disavow political violence.
00:22:32.000They embrace political violence as an instrument for obtaining power.
00:22:36.000And then everything flows from the will of a charismatic politician, and that is Donald Trump.
00:22:44.000in their book. So we're clearly headed into a completely different form of government
00:22:50.000than any of us would recognize as continuous with the past.
00:22:54.000Right-wing authoritarian government in league with Putin, Xi, Orban, Bolsonaro, you name it.
00:23:02.000This spectacle is presented to you as verifiable truth, as academic, as considered
00:23:08.000But what you're witnessing, I would offer you, is every bit as hyperbolic and bombastic as seeing Donald Trump and Tucker rolling out of the UFC.
00:23:17.000That might engender feelings of excitement and power.
00:23:22.000This might engender feelings of condescension.
00:23:24.000But in either case, there's a kind of reductivism that Prevent you, I think, from looking at the full fact.
00:23:30.000But this is where this gets extraordinary.
00:24:18.000You guys on locals, is the stream sorted out now?
00:24:20.000You're still struggling and we're watching you.
00:24:22.000I see that you're having a little trouble with that stream.
00:24:24.000Mohammed bin Salman, he pocketed that after four years of rendering favours to Saudi Arabia, including covering up the assassination, dismemberment, drawing and quartering of a Saudi American journalist.
00:24:39.000Of course, like Biden, subsequently went on to do massive deals with Saudi Arabia.
00:24:44.000So there's a complete lack of consistency.
00:24:49.000I suppose much of my despair about our current political system is derived from the observation that there seems to be a lack of consistent principles everywhere.
00:24:59.000If you believe in free speech, it's got to be the free speech of the people you oppose.
00:25:03.000Have you noticed that Well, in the last couple of years, we've had a lot of censorship around Covid, a lot of censorship around Ukraine.
00:25:09.000I would say that's broadly coming from the left.
00:25:11.000Now we're beginning to see calls for censorship when it comes to the Middle Eastern conflict.
00:25:17.000If you believe in free speech, isn't that an absolute principle?
00:25:20.000Tell me, is free speech an absolute principle?
00:25:22.000One, or are there some instances where you shouldn't have free speech?
00:25:27.000One, if you believe in absolute free speech.
00:25:29.000Two, if you think there are some situations where free speech should be banned.
00:25:32.000Now look, in on locals there, in our AwakendWonder community, that you can become a member of and you can see early conversations like our chat with Alex Jones, which is... I'm still putting me back together after that conversation.
00:25:42.000That's up already in our locals community. You can join us live
00:25:46.000for a lot of conversations there and ones all over Rumble as well. We seem to believe in
00:26:06.000Well, multiply that times every authoritarian despot on earth and that's what we're getting with Donald Trump because they've made relationships with every autocratic, plutocratic, kleptocratic regime on earth.
00:26:20.000Biden sells weapons to 57% of the world's dubbed autocratic nations.
00:26:26.000It's extraordinary to watch this kind of discourse.
00:26:30.000Now, I've not watched it, but I can imagine a legacy media outlet seeing Trump appearing at the UFC with Tucker and saying, oh my God, look at this sort of bombast.
00:27:21.000Anyone who's been to San Francisco knows there's a pretty serious homelessness problem.
00:27:24.000Have a look at this before and after shot.
00:27:27.000Okay so look that's like an area where there's like a homeless encampment and you know maybe we need to have a little conversation about that that's sort of about American infrastructure and American resources and American expenditure on foreign wars when it seems that domestically there are some pretty Serious problems.
00:27:44.000I wonder how many of the people in those tents are former veterans.
00:27:48.000I wonder how many of the people in those tents have mental health issues and addiction issues that can't be addressed because of a lack of infrastructure that's being filtered through the military-industrial complex, which requires forever wars to legitimize them.
00:28:00.000Now, let me know how you feel about that.
00:28:02.000Would you rather see American infrastructure improved or would you rather see the perpetuation of these forever wars?
00:28:13.000Let's have a while you're doing that, while you're letting me know, let's have a look at how the legacy media report on this homelessness issue and the extraordinary phenomena of cleansing homeless folk from the streets just for a state visit rather than, you know, doing it more deliberately and permanently.
00:28:31.000While San Francisco is in the spotlight for the Asia-Pacific Economic Conference, city leaders are making sure the city shines.
00:28:37.000Tourism is our business here in San Francisco and we need to focus on making sure that the... I'm doing my part.
00:28:43.000I got this feather in my hat that's gonna draw in a few tourists and maybe one or two homeless guys could shelter under the brim.
00:28:52.000Caltrans repaving major roadways like the Harrison Street off-ramp from the I-80.
00:28:57.000BART doubling down by deep cleaning their stations overnight more often.
00:29:01.000The city had gotten a little bit dingy.
00:29:04.000Even the idea that tourism actually is how a city or a location generates its revenue is yielding to the idea that spectacle precedes reality.
00:29:13.000It's a place that you visit, it's not a place that you live in.
00:29:17.000I understand the necessary economics of the tourist industry, I know that, but doesn't it sort of tell you that primarily a place is to be observed and no one cares in reality?
00:29:26.000Scrubbing and power washing is happening all over the city.
00:29:28.000Yeah, the bottom of my shoes look clean.
00:29:29.000the political spectrum all of you would rather see money, your tax dollars spent in the United States
00:29:35.000rather than you know perpetuating forever wars and I guess there should be some sort of referendum
00:29:41.000on that. Over time scrubbing and power washing is happening all over the city. Yeah the bottom of my
00:29:47.000shoes look clean. It's noticeable how clear the streets look and how few homeless encampments
00:29:52.000there are on major thoroughfares. Having been a long-time resident in the Bay Area you just
00:29:57.000naturally start to wonder of like houseless folks being displaced.
00:30:00.000Public Works is installing decorative crosswalks in North Beach and Chinatown.
00:30:05.000And the Webster Street pedestrian bridge... It's odd, isn't it?
00:30:07.000You sort of decorate in the surface of something, while deep down it is being eroded and falling apart.
00:30:15.000They're just sort of slightly further out.
00:30:30.000Put a homeless person, paint that homeless person so they look like a crosswalk.
00:30:33.000The gardens at the Moscone Center are decked out with new colorful landscaping and murals
00:30:38.000paid for by the Clean California Grant. Just in time for the 20,000 high-profile CEOs and
00:30:44.000heads of state coming. For a moment, occasionally, do you glimpse a world where it's not about murals?
00:30:48.000Do you see a world where people that have lost their ability to support themselves are retrained, reintroduced to dignity, able to contribute to community?
00:30:57.000Are you able to imagine a world where democracy becomes localised, accessible, where your individuality is regarded and respected as divine?
00:31:05.000Therefore, diffusing all of the numerous, ongoing, endless cultural arguments about how you want to identify, how you want to be seen, that whether you've got a traditional or progressive identity, it's your business and it's up to you that you have local democracy.
00:31:18.000Do you see how the more that we centralise power, the more that we censor and surveil, the more that power coalesces in unelected organisations that straddle the globe like Goliaths?
00:31:35.000All of these things are taking your power and in many cases your tax dollars and certainly they are funneling down to you through their fellows, through their friends, through their affiliates.
00:31:45.000You know, are you astonished by how many political figures have ties with the WF?
00:32:02.000If you're watching us on YouTube, we're only going to be on YouTube for a few more minutes.
00:32:06.000Then our Dave Martin interview, which is too explosive to broadcast on that platform, will be on as well as our reporting on the recent AstraZeneca court case, which I think is the first time we're getting real close to admitting that vaccines cause Serious, possibly even lethal injuries is something we're going to be looking at, not on YouTube, for obvious reasons.
00:32:28.000So if you're watching us on YouTube, get ready to, as Michael Jackson would have said, make that change.
00:32:34.000We've just bought back one of them WEF Stooges that we used to have as Prime Minister for a little while, but we didn't.
00:32:39.000Mike, when he was our Prime Minister, you won't be that excited about him, but God, the news, the propagandists, legacy media, news in our country, they're double excited to see this guy come tumbling out of a car.
00:32:50.000I don't know if you have Into the Nightgarden in your country, but who is the guy out of Into the Nightgarden?
00:35:37.000Like, the World Economic Forum, as you know, is one of those organizations that sort of soft-sells greenwashes, like, those kind of ideas before we get them hoisted and foisted upon us.
00:35:47.000You're looking now, right now, aren't you, at those three bifurcated O's and that 666?
00:36:47.000Tomorrow, I think, we're talking about CBDCs.
00:36:50.000We're talking about how digital currencies will go global, and we're talking about how they're, in a sense, normalizing under-the-skin technology.
00:36:59.000It's extraordinary, because those are the kind of things that only Alex Jones would talk about once.
00:37:03.000And you'll love the chat with Alex, because I try to sort of go, Alex, come on, mate.
00:37:34.000I tell you, when I walk out of this damn bank, I'm gonna get on Twitter, I'm gonna blast the hell out of JP Morgan for not taking cash out of the bank.
00:37:41.000That's the most stupidest thing I've ever heard.
00:38:46.000I feel like this guy filming it with, like, an Addams Family thing at the very front of the set, and he's also just acting like he's trying to act normal, but he's the auteur behind this masterpiece.
00:39:00.000So if my mom walks in with a $50 bill, you're not going to take the cash from her?
00:39:10.000See, I guess we should just... We've got Trump taking shots at Ron DeSantis.
00:39:15.000Oh, that's a good... There's a brilliant post in the locals chat there of Klaus Schwab with cracked reptilian skin licking flies off his head.
00:39:31.000If you're watching us on YouTube, we're gonna...
00:39:33.000We're gonna just speak freely now on Rumble, so if you're watching this over on YouTube, click the link in the description, get over on Rumble and watch my conversation with Dave Martin.
00:39:42.000If you haven't seen his viral video yet where he talked about, where he confronted the EU with what he believes is the kind of twisted legacy of the pandemic and the twisted origins.
00:39:54.000He talks about times that things got patented, like Things were patented.
00:39:59.000He can show the receipts back in 2002.
00:42:14.000There is such a strong will to shut down dissent.
00:42:17.000You see it because we have nothing to hide.
00:42:19.000Move your angle, relax your perspective, pull back, open your mind.
00:42:23.000I wonder if you've ever been concerned that you are mentally ill.
00:42:29.000If you want to watch that, you can watch that conversation right now on Locals.
00:42:34.000Press the red button and you can join us probably live for our friend Dave Rubin as well.
00:42:40.000Hey, I want to thank some of you new Awaken Wonders, Mary Rose, Calpham 4, Barking Moon, Pajama Time, Dennis Ochka, Thanks for being awakened, Wanders.
00:42:50.000It's an exciting conversation, but another informative and brilliant conversation coming up in just a few minutes is my conversation with Dave Martin, where his revelations about the WHO, his revelations about... He basically says the WHO was like a criminal organization from the beginning.
00:43:56.000Does that mean we're going to have many more legal cases now and that perhaps these medical products were rushed to market without sufficient investigation and clinical trialing?
00:44:09.000Truth of a few years ago is just falling apart, has fallen away.
00:44:46.000The first thing we'll look at is a piece of propaganda from the British establishment, the BBC, revealing for the first time that there were problems, that there was clotting being caused by AstraZeneca.
00:45:04.000The biggest member states of the European Union have now joined the list of nations questioning the performance of the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine.
00:45:12.000Germany, France, Spain and Italy are all taking the precautionary measure of suspending use of the vaccine because of fears about possible side effects, including blood clots.
00:45:25.000Look at how the language has altered and has been altering.
00:45:29.000This Covid inquiry that's happening in the UK would not be happening if independent media voices, and I mean yours actually, had not at the beginning gone, wait, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, what's going on here?
00:45:38.000We're all Jay Bhattacharya, Robert Malone, Peter McCulloch, Dave Martin, Judy Miskin, all these people that were just, you crackpots, shut up!
00:46:05.000That with something of this scale, granting that much power to potential exploitative forces, whether they're governmental or private, is ridiculous and dangerous?
00:46:23.000Let's make sure we pay close attention to what they say.
00:46:26.000Now, the World Health Organisation, along with the EU's very own medicines regulator, say that there is no justification for this temporary ban.
00:47:15.000The only way we can bring you an update on this story is with the often banned, derided and YouTube strike receiving online commentator friend of the show, John Campbell.
00:48:32.000It's gonna be the taxpayers that will end up footing the bill for this travesty.
00:48:36.000Same way that we paid for the development and release of most of the products themselves, even though the profits found their way to, oh yeah, Moderna and Pfizer.
00:48:43.000I wonder who invests in those products?
00:48:46.000The AstraZeneca vaccine caused a small group of individuals to suffer catastrophic injury and bereavement.
00:48:52.000To make this statement is not to dabble in anti-vaccine conspiracy theories, which, I mean, what do you mean by anti-vaccine conspiracy theory at this point?
00:48:59.000You have to describe what you mean is an anti-vaccine conspiracy theory.
00:49:03.000You're against it because of a conspiracy.
00:49:07.000This is a fact evidenced by the reports of clinicians, medical experts, and coroners across the UK.
00:49:13.000Clinicians, medical experts, and coroners.
00:49:15.000Not crackpots, nutjobs, and conspiracy theorists.
00:49:18.000For those who want to maintain a narrative that vaccines do no harm, the experience of the vaccine-injured and bereaved constitutes an inconvenient truth.
00:49:31.000Why don't we shame these bereaved people?
00:49:33.000We can maybe shame them into silence and anyone who tries to propagate these ideas will just find some reason they shouldn't be able to speak either.
00:49:38.000I'm sure we can come up with something!
00:49:40.000This is a truth that to date has been easier for the government and much of the media to ignore.
00:49:44.000By beginning a legal battle against AstraZeneca, the vaccine injured and bereaved can no longer be silenced.
00:49:50.000The Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine has been branded defective in a multi-million pound landmark legal action that will suggest claims over its efficacy were vastly overstated.
00:50:01.000Not only were they vastly overstated, those claims were amplified by the media and people that tried to challenge these vastly overstated claims were shamed and silenced and still to this day there are consequences for speaking out in this way.
00:50:14.000The pharmaceutical giant is being sued in the High Court in a test case by Jamie Scott, a father of two, who suffered a significant permanent brain injury that's left him unable to work as a result of a blood clot after receiving the jab in April 2021.
00:50:26.000A second claim is being brought by the widower and two young children of 35-year-old Alpa Taylor, who died after having the jab made by AstraZeneca, the UK-based pharmaceutical giant.
00:50:35.000It's interesting this man received the jab in April 2021 when it had been revealed that the AstraZeneca vaccine caused blood clots, but the WHO was still saying it was okay.
00:50:44.000If they want to introduce a global treaty that means they'll be able to mandate vaccines across the world and censor opposition to those measures, we should definitely all sign up to that right now and definitely not sign this petition in the link below that would prevent that mad treaty.
00:50:57.000The test cases could pave the way for as many as 80 damages claims worth an estimated $80 million over a new condition known as vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia.
00:51:08.000That was identified by specialists in the wake of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine rollout.
00:51:12.000The vaccine, which was heralded at its launch by Boris Johnson as a triumph for British science, is no longer used in the UK.
00:51:18.000The government recommends three other vaccines for its autumn booster program.
00:51:22.000Let's not ask any questions about those then.
00:51:24.000And the idea that it's like just Boris Johnson rather than a coordinated global event to which every political party signed up is ridiculous and convenient.
00:51:32.000What this is trying to suggest is, well if you just get rid of Boris Johnson and AstraZeneca, there, there's the problem solved.
00:51:38.000It's not as if there was a global campaign to prevent you from thinking or saying or daring to believe anything else.
00:51:45.000In the months following the rollout, the potential serious side effect of the AstraZeneca jab was identified by scientists.
00:51:51.000Following this, it was recommended it no longer be given to the under 40s in the UK because the risk of receiving the jab outweighed the harm posed by COVID.
00:51:58.000AstraZeneca last night told The Telegraph that patient safety was its highest priority.
00:52:06.000And is patient safety a sort of by-product, an inadvertent consequence of the pursuit of this profit?
00:52:11.000Official figures from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, MHRA, show at least 81 deaths in the UK are suspected to have been linked to the adverse reaction that caused clotting in people who also had low blood platelets.
00:52:35.000Official figures obtained under a Freedom of Information request show that out of 148 payouts made by the government under the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, which provides compensation to those injured by vaccines or to bereaved necks of kin, at least 144 went to recipients of the AstraZeneca vaccine.
00:52:51.000Fewer than five people under the scheme received vaccines other than AstraZeneca.
00:52:56.000Is it me, or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?
00:53:05.000For those who are in the United States, there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
00:53:10.000American Heart for Gold make it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.
00:53:16.000With one phone call, they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door Or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.
00:53:26.000American Hartford Gold is the highest-rated firm in the U.S.
00:53:28.000with an A-plus rating from the BBB and thousands of satisfied clients.
00:53:33.000Right now, they will give you up to $5,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.
00:54:11.000The case will raise questions about what the UK authorities knew about concerns over the vaccine and how they were handled.
00:54:17.000An examination of WhatsApp messages sent by or to Matt Hancock, the then Health Secretary obtained by The Telegraph as part of the lockdown files and which have been passed to the COVID public inquiry, suggests concerns were aired by US authorities.
00:54:30.000AstraZeneca never in the end applied for a license in the US.
00:54:33.000At the time, a number of European countries were pausing the vaccine rollout over fears it caused clotting in some people.
00:54:38.000I suppose what will take place now is an attempt to minimise and mitigate the impact of this
00:54:42.000information and make it like this is an anomalous outlier, this is not some institutional thing
00:55:08.000This was coordinated. This was a global event.
00:55:11.000We're all going to have to collectively forget that there was an advertising campaign, that there was public shaming, that there were shows where vaccines danced about on the TV, where almost everyone you know anecdotally would say, yeah, this happened to me and I know this person that had this happen, and morticians contributing.
00:55:28.000Why would you need to censor and control the conversation unless there was something to suppress and control?
00:55:34.000Let me know in the chat and the comments.
00:55:36.000Political action will also examine the role of the government in reassuring the public after Matt Hancock authorised an indemnity for AstraZeneca in the very unexpected event of any adverse reactions that could not have been foreseen through the robust checks and procedures that have been put in place.
00:55:50.000But we better give them indemnity anyway.
00:55:52.000If their measures have been so robust, what's the requirement for the indemnity?
00:55:56.000So while AstraZeneca didn't apply for a license in the US, European nations were stopping using it.
00:56:01.000Britain was granting indemnity even though there was plainly some fear that it caused blood clotting.
00:56:07.000This is a international travesty and I think it's just the beginning.
00:56:11.000Lawyers point out in the legal claim that Mr. Hancock, in an accompanying departmental minute, said the data so far on this vaccine suggests there will be no adverse reactions and so no liability.
00:56:21.000Writing for The Telegraph, Sarah Moore, partner at Housefield, the law firm bringing the claim, says the group of individuals whom we represent have always been clear they do not dabble in anti-vaccine conspiracy theories.
00:56:31.000However, it is plainly factually inaccurate to claim that vaccines do no harm given the experience of our client group, the vaccine injured and bereaved.
00:56:38.000They still have to sort of distance themselves from vaccine conspiracy, but what does that constitute at this time?
00:56:43.000That term was invented to prevent people from asking questions and having a legitimate conversation about a
00:56:49.000pretty unique and evidently dangerous event.
00:56:53.000There's no conspiracy theory beyond that.
00:56:55.000There are, of course, like in any subject, people that have views that are on a spectrum of extremity.
00:57:01.000But you can't use that to delegitimize the skepticism that accompanied a unique global event that was, let me say it
00:57:07.000again, exploited to introduce regulations and legislation that would never have been accepted otherwise,
00:57:12.000normalized the idea of censorship, normalized the idea of mass compliance, creating credible profits for Pfizer and
00:57:18.000Moderna and other companies with some pretty interesting ties to very powerful figures in the US government and UK
00:57:24.000government, as well as creating a general climate of compliance and
00:57:28.000normalizing the control of a population.
00:57:30.000Now, I suppose it gets into conspiracy theory when you start to contemplate how that might be used or misused in the future, but it's no longer a conspiracy theory in the same sense that some unfounded and absurd proposition could be put forward without any evidence at all.
00:57:46.000The idea of anti-vax rhetoric now has to be paused and parked, like the AstraZeneca vaccine should have been, and if it had been, there'd be some people that are dead now that would be alive.
00:57:55.000Sir Jeremy Wright Casey, the former Attorney General, urged the government to step in and settle the legal claims before they came to court, given that ministers had indemnified AstraZeneca.
00:58:04.000So Jeremy, who has raised the case of Mr Scott, who is one of his constituents with Rishi
00:58:08.000Sunak said, It's very, very strange the government has not come up with
00:58:11.000a way to settle these cases where the cause is clear.
00:58:14.000I don't get it from a professional point of view or from the political point of view because
00:58:17.000of the damage done if these cases are not settled quickly.
00:58:20.000And the damage is of course that people begin to recognise that there were some appalling
00:58:24.000decisions made in the last couple of years.
00:58:26.000People rode roughshod over democracy, over human rights, over enshrined principles.
00:58:30.000And that, again, being normalised everywhere now.
00:59:03.000That almost sort of sounds like a threat, doesn't it?
00:59:05.000Like, you know, we're going to definitely need mass vaccination and how can we have confidence in mass vaccination?
00:59:09.000Well, we can't have confidence in mass vaccination because of everything we've learned.
00:59:12.000This is in the mainstream now because it's going through legal and official channels and there's a COVID inquiry.
00:59:17.000But if you're aware of the broader narrative around vaccines and around the measures taken around vaccines, the way they were introduced, the undemocratic nature of them, you're aware that this is just the tip of the iceberg.
00:59:25.000This is just a small part of an enormous an extraordinary story that requires a reckoning that
00:59:31.000ultimately leaves us in a situation where we cannot trust the government, cannot trust the legacy
00:59:35.000media, cannot trust Big Pharma, cannot trust the bodies that are supposed to regulate them,
00:59:39.000can't trust the individuals within parliament, can't trust parliament itself, can't
00:59:42.000trust the individuals in congress, can't trust the system of congress.
00:59:45.000It leads you to not a bleak appraisal but a necessary scepticism to systemic power.
00:59:50.000The Covid pandemic was in one way unique, but what it revealed was not unique.
00:59:55.000What it revealed was the convergence of interests in media, big tech, big pharma, and government, and how those things operate if a crisis affords You don't need to believe in conspiracies.
01:00:05.000You just need to now look at the last few years, see what happened, and this is merely one piece of evidence that allows you to reassess the entire last three years with a degree of clarity that the mainstream media still wouldn't afford you.
01:00:18.000They're still not reporting on this, for example.
01:00:19.000During an attempt to mandate jabs on NHS staff, some health and social care workers, with a principled objection to being told what to do with their bodies by the government, would be forced out of their jobs.
01:00:28.000All the while, individuals and organisations with genuine concerns about aspects of vaccination policy were smeared and silenced in a disgraceful state-sponsored campaign to suppress vaccine safety and efficacy-related debate.
01:00:44.000Tried to pretend this is just a minor issue?
01:00:46.000And tried to control dissent wherever possible using some of the most unspeakable means?
01:00:50.000The victims had the vaccination out of a sense of duty.
01:00:52.000It felt the right thing to do to help Britain out of the pandemic and to prevent more vulnerable people being made ill by stopping transmission of the virus.
01:00:59.000But the result for them and their families has been catastrophic.
01:01:01.000And it doesn't stop transmission either.
01:01:03.000The entire thing has been a fiasco, a fallacy, and an almost unprecedented global lie.
01:01:09.000Many have been left wondering why they bothered those that are still alive.
01:01:12.000Because this doesn't get into excess deaths.
01:01:13.000This story doesn't get into the phenomena of excess deaths, because that's still on the side of the line that this used to be.
01:01:20.000When the WHO, you saw it on the BBC, went, it's actually fine, excess death still lives in that territory.
01:01:26.000Soon, one day, unless for some reason independent media was really attacked and independent voices were dissented and shut down in silence, and I don't see any evidence of that happening, do you see any evidence of that happening anywhere?
01:01:36.000Then excess deaths will That's not normal.
01:01:38.000That will have to come into the fray for contemplation and consideration.
01:01:42.000They'll resist it for as long as possible.
01:01:44.000That's not normal that this healthy athlete dropped dead from a heart attack. That's not
01:01:48.000normal that these young people died. 60,000 excess deaths in the United States in 2021 and 2022.
01:01:53.000That's not normal. That will have to come into the fray for contemplation and consideration.
01:01:58.000Sometimes they'll resist it for as long as possible. They'll try and control it. But
01:02:01.000as with the AstraZeneca case, in the end, it will have to come out. A World Health Organization
01:02:05.000report in June 2022 was unclear about whether the vaccine stopped transmission of the virus.
01:02:09.000No substantive data are available related to the impact of vaccine on transmission or viral shedding, states the report in relation to AstraZeneca.
01:02:17.000So in June 2022, they knew there was no substantive data.
01:02:20.000Of course, now we know a lot more about it.
01:02:22.000The World Health Organization seems to have an agenda beyond world health.
01:02:27.000They are quite well organized, though.
01:02:28.000So at least one word in their name is sort of true.
01:02:30.000Lawyers claim that the vaccine was less safe than the public was led to expect.
01:02:34.000Let me know in the comments if you agree with that.
01:02:35.000Should the courts agree, the damages in compensation are likely to be huge.
01:02:39.000One lesson to be learned is that young healthy people should not have been forced through restrictions on their movements to be vaccinated against a disease that hardly affected them.
01:02:51.000In a sense, the entire narrative is beginning to crack.
01:02:54.000Would this narrative have cracked were it not for voices like John Campbell and other voices contributing to this conversation?
01:03:00.000Remember at the height of this pandemic, when Joe Rogan dared to take ivermectin, that there was a global attack on him that seemed to coordinate The media appears to be able to behave like one unit, like a swarm of insects or like geese flying in formation when it comes to amplifying the message of the powerful.
01:03:20.000Similarly, they have a power to shut down dissenting voices.
01:03:26.000It's likely there'll be a small portion of justice, just as much as they can manage.
01:03:30.000Still excess deaths have to be dealt with, still the consequences of lockdown, the people whose cancers were exacerbated, heart diseases were exacerbated, myocarditis, pericarditis, the impact on young people and children, the economy, businesses, all so much to be considered.
01:03:42.000A reckoning that is unlikely to take place unless independent media voices are But that's just what I think.
01:03:48.000Let me know what you think in the chat.
01:03:49.000Here are the number of ways that's likely to be stopped.
01:03:52.000The WHO have got a treaty that has a censorship proposal in it.
01:03:55.000Legislation's being passed all over the world to stop independent media being able to speak on big tech platforms
01:04:00.000because the big tech platforms themselves will be controlled and censored.
01:04:03.000And of course, dissenting voices are regularly, routinely attacked to a staggering degree.
01:04:08.000We have to unite. We have to stand up against this.
01:04:10.000We have to realize that the truth is coming out.
01:04:13.000But that's just what I think. Let me know what you think in the chat.
01:04:21.000I'm being joined by Dr. David Martin, scientist and inventor, who's been a beyond outspoken voice, who's been an evangelical voice of reason during the COVID and vaccine era, holding Big Pharma and even the WHO to account.
01:04:37.000He's spoken before the EU on two occasions, even though the audience radically diminished at the point of his arrival because they're not there to assemble and listen to truth.
01:04:46.000David Martin, thank you so much for joining us.
01:04:53.000I see that you have adorned your set with great figures of the movement, whether it's that truth teller and science personified himself, Dr. Anthony Fauci, or various other figures from the pharmaceutical industrial complex.
01:05:08.000Do you agree, David, that the last three years revealed to us Institutional hypocrisy and corruption that must have been long present, but didn't become evident until this unique event brought many things together.
01:05:22.000And I must remind you, we're still on YouTube, so can you tiptoe through this information nimbly until we step off?
01:05:31.000Listen, it's no mistake that I put behind me on my image the three co-conspirators, which actually were the architects of what we refer to in the modern era as this most recent campaign of terror.
01:05:48.000But it's important to realize that their collaboration began in 2002, not in 2020.
01:05:58.000And we also have to understand that their collaboration was not one that was about a health concern or a public health interest.
01:06:08.000Their collaboration was, at its earliest days, a racketeering and antitrust collusive activity which was meant to establish, once and for all, a universal injection which would be the stuff of the dreams of Gavi and others who wanted to have a single injection that would be put into every arm of every child at birth and get them permanently addicted to the injectable complex called the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex.
01:06:37.000So, these guys got their start in 2002 in their official, proprietary, patent-controlled way and have been at it ever since.
01:06:47.000I recognize, of course, Anthony Fauci.
01:06:49.000The other two figures, can you just give me a brief resume of the other two members of the Triumvirate?
01:06:56.000Yeah, well, the parrot on my shoulder is none other than Ralph Baric.
01:07:01.000He, the ultimate pirate, he was the one who came up not only with the deadly biowarfare-enabling technology in 2005 called synthetic coronavirus, the model of biowarfare-enabling technologies for DARPA and for the MITRE Corporation, and put the same on his CV.
01:07:18.000So the good news is you can go and pull it right off his CV.
01:07:22.000The man slightly lower under Ralph was the most famous quote of all of the lead up to the pandemic when in 2015 he said, until an infectious disease crisis is real and present, it is often largely ignored.
01:07:39.000To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding for the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus and then the V.
01:07:51.000A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype.
01:07:56.000We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.
01:08:00.000Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.
01:08:04.000None other than our very own Peter Daszak, who was the one who the World Health Organization was kind enough to put in charge of the investigation of where all this nonsense came from as the guy who actually invented the nonsense.
01:08:17.000So it's kind of like a bank robber being asked to investigate a heist.
01:08:22.000If it was a very honest bank robber, he would be the perfect person to conduct that investigation, because the whole riddle... You know how you feel that way, don't you?
01:08:29.000Within a couple of minutes, wait a minute, it was me, I did those things.
01:08:33.000It's extraordinary that not only of these three figures, this trident of malfeasance being culpable in the manner that you describe, allegedly at least, but Anthony Fauci has been celebrated as a kind of hero, as a warm, avuncular, cuddly patriarch, the embodiment and epitomization of science.
01:08:56.000Peter Daszak there, in spite of his name turning up in conjunction with DARPA, for those of us that were occupying the kind of spaces in which you are an expert and guide, it's one of those names that you became most familiar with.
01:09:09.000and your man Ralph there, the parrot on your shoulder, it seems that he's deeply embedded
01:09:14.000in these systems even prior to the outbreak. So in a sense the narrative that you're offering us,
01:09:20.000Dave, is that these are not events that began in 2019, they simply began to unfold in the
01:09:27.000public consciousness in that era. I was very interested in what you said, that Dasik said,
01:09:31.000that the public has to be educated as to the necessity the investment will follow.
01:09:36.000Is this, this is just a publicly available quote, this isn't something that you've made up or invented?
01:09:44.000Oh, no, and all of these things, Russell, it's really tough.
01:09:47.000I mean, you have to read these very complex, very esoteric, you know, runes that are hidden underneath the pyramids.
01:09:56.000But no, it's in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
01:10:03.000And neither is Ralph Baric's patent on the first version of the wonderful thing now known as coronavirus, where he patented in 2002, and you'll recall the date here, 2002, one year before SARS 1.0, he patented and I quote, an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus, which was the first time in human history we were able to
01:10:27.000Turn a simple gastrointestinal virus and a simple allegedly cold-associated virus into something that targeted human heart tissue and human lung tissue a year before SARS 1.0.
01:10:41.000And that infectious replication defective clone, that line, and the entire nonsense around his virus that he created, was in a patent that is filed in the United States Patent Office.
01:10:55.000So yeah, I've really had to dive deep into the deciphering of hieroglyphs and runes to figure this one out.
01:11:03.000At the Patent Office, and in their own documentation, and in their own words, the footprints that have led us to this recent travesty are observable.
01:11:14.000Now, bearing in mind that we're still on YouTube, and I can't imagine that you're very popular on that platform, given that they use the WHO's guidelines in order to formulate their own community guidelines, you're aware that we've been penalised there, but of course we have 6.7 million followers on that platform, so we feel a real obligation to continue to communicate openly with all of you while we can.
01:11:38.000I would like to say, before we leave YouTube to speak about this specifically and openly in all of its galling and terrifying detail, can you just sketch out for us, Dave, that your general sense that humanity is Oh, wonderful.
01:11:53.000from a kind of centralized technological tyranny.
01:12:10.000And yes, as a matter of fact, I mean, I've spent the last, as you know, three and a half years on that tightrope.
01:12:17.000Kim and I have had the butterfly of the week, which has been, with the exception of only two episodes, uncensored on YouTube.
01:12:25.000So we've tiptoed through this tulip patch quite a few times.
01:12:29.000But if we really examine the question, Russell, one of the things that Kim and I do is we teach a course called the 12 Senses course, and it is the reactivation of all the 12 cranial nerves that people have inside of their neural anatomy.
01:12:44.000The cranial nerves are the nerves that are wired directly into the brain, which give us the 12 senses that we were born with.
01:12:50.000And I've pointed out many times that if we had a very clear picture of reality, what we would understand is that this assault was not an assault that started in December of 2019.
01:13:01.000This assault goes back thousands of years and has been well orchestrated and specifically goes after targeted senses of the human system which actually disrupt the ability for the person or the brain or the soul to process information in an orderly fashion.
01:13:20.000You will recall that with this particular injection we took Direct shot at a couple very important senses.
01:13:28.000We took direct shot at the sense of smell.
01:13:32.000And most people haven't studied neural anatomy.
01:13:34.000They don't know that the sense of smell is one of the very first senses that you actually have formed in utero.
01:13:41.000And the homing mechanism of that sense is to actually have you be able to identify your biological mother.
01:13:48.000It's the reason why calves can run across a meadow past tons and tons of udders and they find the udder of their mother rather than any other, you know, milk-laden udder somewhere else in the field.
01:14:00.000If you go back and ask yourself, why is it that we would put an injection together, which we would encourage children to take, that would in fact directly assault the sense of smell.
01:14:14.000That is not an accident any more than the accidents of the clerical collar when Pope Innocent III in the 13th century put the clerical collar on to cover the ninth cranial nerve, which is the hypoglossal nerve.
01:14:29.000It's the nerve that sits up in your neck.
01:14:32.000And he invented the clerical collar so that he would be able to mask your ability to detect the truth.
01:14:39.000Because the ninth cranial nerve is actually the cranial nerve that gives you the ability to detect whether you're being told the truth or whether they're being lied to.
01:14:47.000And that's because the vascularity around your neck changes.
01:14:51.000And the reason I point this out is because in every single instance, it's not just this accidental, oops, we didn't see that coming.
01:15:00.000It's an intentional part of a much larger plan.
01:15:03.000So we create this thing, which turns into A sensory deprivation around smell.
01:15:38.000There's a lot of esoteric information in there that obviously relates to deep biological truths and perhaps things that even are ulterior to that, as well as what sounds to me like data that might intersect with deep occultism.
01:15:53.000So, given that you've said it's taking place over millennia, We are going to leave YouTube now because Dave doesn't seem to me to be the kind of person that I can keep shepherded into the paddocks of ordinary discourse.
01:16:06.000Coming up, we are going to be asking about the inception of the WHO.
01:16:11.000Do you know which single individual provides 88% of the funding?
01:16:16.000Click the link in the description, come over onto Rumble and answer that question and maybe we'll work out some sort of deal for people to come and do your course, Dave, if they can answer that question correctly.
01:16:39.000If you're watching this now on YouTube, if you want to have a 6.7 million Awaken Wonders that we love so well, you're going to have to click the link in the description.
01:16:46.000I'm going to be talking Today more about that sensory deprivation technology that began clerically and is being carried out now chemically, as well as a whole host of questions about the way that the last three year period has conducted and been and has visibly unfolded in order to inhibit, prohibit and constrict freedom.
01:18:01.000There's a few more senses, though, that I would like to get attuned.
01:18:05.000So can you tell me a little more about that?
01:18:07.000Can you tell us firstly about these 12 senses?
01:18:09.000And then we'll jump into the WHO and its unique and particular funding.
01:18:14.000Well, I know it's going to come as a giant shock, but the Catholic Church decided to authorize the Aristotelian model of five senses actually quite a long time ago.
01:18:23.000So the fact is that people can be forgiven for not knowing that when you were born, wired into your brain, there were 12 what we call cranial nerves.
01:18:32.000These are the nerves that go from various parts of your body up to your brain or from your brain out to give you the ability to sense your surroundings.
01:18:42.000And you've been taught that you have the sense of smell, the sense of sight, the sense of temperature or pain, the sense of taste and hearing, which are the five authorized senses.
01:18:52.000But what you haven't been taught is that you have a sense of memory, a sense of light.
01:18:57.000And light is not the same as sight, the ability to actually detect the presence and absence of light, a variety of wavelengths.
01:19:24.000And that actually gives you the ability to navigate your sleeping space and your outward dreaming and outward vision space.
01:19:31.000We have the sense of expression, the sense of balance, the sense of truth, the sense of intuition and calm, the sense of tension, and finally, the 12th cranial nerve, my all-time favorite, the sense of enunciation, the ability to say I am, the essence of what allows you to be the human being that you are, uniquely wired, uniquely presented to make a contribution to the world.
01:19:57.000These 12 senses have been hijacked very specifically over a period, and we go into this quite in detail, in over 8,000 years.
01:20:05.000And those senses, if you think for a simple expression like, you know, what happened with The corporal punishment of the United Kingdom in the 1700s and 1800s when it became routine to do whacking children on the back of the head as a way to discipline them.
01:20:24.000People don't understand that while we talk about that in the NFL as micro-brain traumas or CETs, what we don't understand is the fourth cranial nerve Which is very, very sensitive is the sense that gives you the sense of esteem, the ability to meet someone's gaze, the ability to look up and engage someone face-to-face.
01:20:44.000It turns out that if you have people engaging face-to-face, they are actually harder to control.
01:20:51.000As you institutionalize micro-brain traumas at a childhood age where the fourth cranial nerve gets damaged and lo and behold you get a compliant population walking around with their head down.
01:21:09.000So you're saying that this is a sort of an 8,000 year journey, sort of in a sense precedes our ordinary understanding of civilized history, that is a kind of a project I suppose you're going to perhaps say by occultist elite interests that have managed to remain somewhat undiscerned throughout the Periods of history that we're discussing and even now are still present and making decisions Such as the ones we've experienced in the last couple of years your course sounds amazing I'd really like to get into it, but it seems that these days these power structures hide behind bureaucracies behind financial interests behind National governments and just us now that we're on rumble.
01:22:09.000You say, Dave, that the WHO is like a criminal cartel.
01:22:13.000Now, we stand on the brink of granting them the power to change national law, to impose lockdown, to mandate vaccines through the WHO treaty.
01:22:32.000Can you tell us why you claim that the WHO is a criminal cartel and how The events of the last few years somehow demonstrate or at least utilize that.
01:22:45.000And the receipts, unfortunately, and all of this stuff are part of the history of what my organization has done.
01:22:51.000I mean, we maintain the chain of custody documentation that has been used by governments around the world, including intelligence, law enforcement, everybody else.
01:23:01.000We maintain the data that is the receipts for the things that we say.
01:23:05.000And what's really important with respect to The question about the World Health Organization is that in its founding document, and by the way, I encourage people to make sure that they take time, look into these things and actually read them.
01:23:20.000But in the founding document of the World Health Organization, they gave themselves the right to be exempt from all criminal prosecution of any kind whatsoever.
01:23:32.000Now, if you ask the question, why would an organization need to give itself exemption from criminal prosecution?
01:23:41.000This is criminal prosecution, including investigations into misdeeds and misbehavior.
01:23:49.000Why on earth would it be so important for in a founding charter of a document to make sure that anybody who is operating under the auspices of the World Health Organization is absolutely exempt from all criminal proceedings.
01:24:04.000And the reason why they wrote that into their founding charter is because they knew they were already breaking the law.
01:24:12.000Remember that in the 1940s, when all of this nonsense got started, What we had was an organization that the Rockefeller Foundation funded, and funded the first Director General of the World Health Organization, who happened to be, are you ready for this?
01:24:29.000A prisoner from Dachau, who was emancipated and brought in to run what became the Biologics Lab of the Rockefeller Foundation and the Wellcome Trust at the time.
01:24:42.000And those two organizations selected a Dachau physician to be the first director general of the World Health Organization.
01:24:50.000And in less than five years, the World Health Organization's official documentation was actually once again to put in motion the eugenics mandate saying that the role of the World Health Organization was population control.
01:25:12.000If you go back and read the wonderful story of the contorted pathway that led the Rockefeller Foundation to hire Dr. Sand from what was allegedly this kind of really bizarre location.
01:25:27.000So at Dachau, let's be clear, he was actually in the welcome embrace of the Nazis during that period of time.
01:25:36.000He was actually in some sort of In some sort of bizarre location, where as a physician slash prisoner slash indentured servant, he was actually working at Dachau.
01:25:49.000There are questions, if you go back and read the actual record of how he was found.
01:25:54.000whether he was officially a prisoner, or whether what he was was kind of this
01:25:59.000aid to get the camp at the Dachau concentration camp itself.
01:26:05.000There are disputed records of whether he was actually in the camp,
01:26:10.000or whether he was at a facility next to the camp.
01:26:12.000But it is without question that he was at Dachau, and the Rockefeller Foundation sought him out
01:26:21.000as the first director general, and appointed him as first director general
01:26:25.000at the formation of the World Health Organization in the late 1940s.
01:26:32.000I mean, obviously, if it's someone that was held a prisoner at Dachau, then it's like, well, this is a hell of a success story.
01:26:39.000But if it's not, if it's someone that was implicit in the crimes of the Holocaust, then it's a very different story.
01:26:47.000Well, and here, that's exactly the reason why the point is so fascinating, because if you go back and you read the official, you know, Clinic Cliffs notes that World Health Organization likes to put up, it implies that he is somehow a prisoner there.
01:27:00.000But if you go back and try to find the records of it, it appears that he was actually working there, not necessarily against his will.
01:27:08.000I mean, and once again, the records are what records are, Russell.
01:27:12.000We can only use what's available to us.
01:27:15.000What is particularly ironic in my estimation, however, and this is actually just a fact of reality, there is a particular problem with the fact that the Rockefeller Foundation finds this guy and puts him up as the head of the World Health Organization, and then in a very short period of time immediately commences vaccination clinical trials, which is the very first thing that the World Health Organization put in place.
01:27:41.000Cholera, malaria, and other vaccine clinical trials.
01:27:45.000And this was done because the Rockefeller Foundation and the Wellcome Trust at the time specifically stated that that was the intention for which they put these processes in motion.
01:27:59.000With the previous, we've previously discussed the 88% funding that Gates provides, the WHO, is it true that WHO is in violation of competition laws in the US and in Europe?
01:28:31.000Code Section 19, which is a part of the section of the code that very few people pay attention to, actually makes one of their institutions absolutely illegal.
01:28:41.000Section 19 sets forth what's called the Interlocking Directorate's prohibition, which means you cannot have entities who are otherwise commercial competitors sharing a common board.
01:28:53.000But the Global Preparedness Moderning Board is the interlocking directorate of the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the World Health Organization.
01:29:05.000And then, giant surprise, Anthony Fauci sits on that board from NIAID.
01:29:10.000Dr. Gao from the Chinese CDC sits on that board.
01:29:14.000Dr. Bill Elias sits on that board from the Gates Foundation.
01:29:18.000These are actually clear, unequivocal violations of Section 19 of 15 U.S.
01:29:26.000And it is without question illegal that every act that they have taken, including the run-up to and all of the actions of the pandemic, are absolute violations of antitrust laws and racketeering laws in the United States and competitiveness laws in Europe.
01:29:44.000So this is of course important for a number of reasons because it does seem to be a significant pillar in what many people would probably argue is a cadre of globalist organizations that are not democratically elected, that are transcendent of all national law, that have the ability to raise revenue, your tax revenue, can be accrued by the WHO and they sit among other
01:30:04.000comparable organisations as one of the component parts of a system of
01:30:09.000globalism which I think negates any even imagined power of national democracy or even individual
01:30:17.000freedom. Is it true that... a few questions I've got here, because we've been talking a lot
01:30:22.000about the FDA lately and this is much more parochial,
01:30:27.000observable and down to earth, the kind of revolving door between
01:30:31.000Moderna and for example the FDA, a couple of executives have recently taken
01:30:39.000Pfizer knew that coronavirus vaccines would not be effective since 1990, that the whole sort of narrative of, oh no, there's this pandemic, oh look, Operation Warp Speed, wow, a solution, Fauci celebrated on talk shows, people dressed up as syringes on entertainment programs, Albert Baller interviewed as if he were a young Elvis Presley, never asked Just a taxing question.
01:31:05.000Once in all the TV appearances that we saw him make, never asked about adverse events or any of that stuff.
01:31:10.000Is it true then that I guess a lot of your data comes from looking at when things were patented, which I guess is an indicator that if something's patented, it exists or was perhaps about to exist.
01:31:22.000So is it true that there was evidence that the coronavirus vaccines could fail even in 1990 or would fail?
01:31:32.000Pfizer patented them and knew that it was a total train wreck.
01:31:36.000They knew that when they injected it into animals, the animals died.
01:31:41.000Ralph Baric knew that in the late 1990s, as he was working on the modification of what he called coronavirus, so that he could inject it into other things and infect other tissues.
01:31:51.000He knew that it targeted the heart and created a condition called cardiomyopathy.
01:31:55.000And for the last, I don't know, what is that?
01:31:58.000The last 24 years, we've known that cardiomyopathy is a direct result of the thing he engineered.
01:32:04.000So is there any data out there, possibly hundreds and thousands of pieces of literature, including patents and scientific publications that actually show That they knew that the heart was the target?
01:32:15.000Is it possible that we could figure that out if we knew that and we put it into patent documents in 1999 and 2002?
01:32:23.000Is there any way we could have deciphered that maybe cardiovascular problems were going to happen?
01:32:29.000Is there any data that shows that by 2011, 2012, and then again in 2014, publications showed that the pseudouridine that was being used in the mRNA shots was a pro-oncologic, pro-tumor generator technology?
01:32:44.000Did we know that it was going to kill people with rapid cancers?
01:32:48.000Of course we did, because we knew that it was published just like we knew in 2018.
01:32:54.000That Ralph Baric's remdesivir had a 53% lethality in clinical trials done in, if you want to call them clinical trials, I call them biological torture trials, done in Africa.
01:33:08.00053% mortality if you got remdesivir and yet that was chosen by the FDA as the drug of choice to use when people were hospitalized with COVID.
01:33:18.000These things, Russell, a 53% mortality exceeds any lethal agent we know in nature.
01:33:25.000There is no such thing as a 53% lethality of anything nature does.
01:33:30.000But we were able to inject that into people with impunity and the publication on that, let's get really clear on that, the publication of that data, the 53% mortality data, That publication was the World Health Organization's own clinical trials where they, in their own discretion, determined that it was unethical to inject Africans with this stuff because 53% of them were dying.
01:33:54.000And in the paper, It's important to point out, it said, regardless of viral load.
01:34:01.000Russell, let's unpack for the common listener what the heck that means.
01:34:05.000That means we were killing people who didn't even have Ebola, who didn't even have another disease.
01:34:11.000Regardless of viral load means we were killing people because we were injecting them with an agent we knew was toxic.
01:34:18.000And that's what we chose to use in COVID.
01:34:20.000Anybody who wants to pretend like this was the unknowable, how could we possibly have ever seen this coming?
01:34:26.000Every single agent, every single side effect was known.
01:34:31.000And in 2018, the coup de grace was they changed the definition of adverse event so that an adverse event can only exist if, and are you ready for this?
01:34:42.000The adverse event has been proven to be causal in previous scientific data.
01:35:00.000Because there was no data published around these injections and it won't be published for another four and a half years because that's how long it takes to finish the clinical trial.
01:35:15.000It sounds like many of the viruses that have caught the public imagination, as well as being very powerful and terrifying diseases, whether it's SARS or Ebola, have had some kind of Secondary parallel history.
01:35:32.000Do you think that that's why the idea is being cultivated that natural origin viruses will continue to reach the public perhaps because of a depletion of forests or various other reasons?
01:35:44.000People going into bat caves hither and thon.
01:35:47.000Why is it that many of these stories of which I'm sort of aware of appear to have this peculiar connection to this organization and this extraordinary story that you're telling us?
01:35:59.000Yeah, isn't it fascinating that I have in front of me this beautiful article, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, where, and let's just make sure we're clear on this, the date on that is March the 15th, 2016, where Ralph Baric was kind enough to say the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 was, and I quote, poised for human emergence.
01:36:23.000Does that sound like a random event in a wet market somewhere in Wuhan?
01:36:27.000Does it sound like somewhere along a bat and a pangolin went to a bar and got it on one night and lo and behold, poof, out came a little baby coronavirus?
01:36:42.000It's the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 that was uploaded and reproduced at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
01:36:49.000In 2016, during the gain-of-function moratorium, that's the one that's ready to be poised for human emergence.
01:36:56.000And we're supposed to believe that in December 2019, a wet market accident is how a pandemic got started, despite the fact that the guy who invented the thing and patented it told us that it was ready to be released In 2016.
01:37:14.000And then in September of 2019, three months before the alleged outbreak, said there was going to be, and I quote, an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen.
01:37:25.000Does that sound like nature just oopsing it out of the melting of the ice caps?
01:37:30.000Where does it say that there will be an accidental or intentional release, Dave?
01:37:36.000Yeah, wouldn't it be nice if I was just making that shit up?
01:37:40.000It's the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board World at Risk document and it was published on September 18th, 2019, signed by none other than Anthony Fauci and Dr. Elias from the Gates Foundation and Dr. Gao from the Chinese CDC and all of the other wonderful actors from the Wellcome Trust and the Gates Foundation, all of whom were more than happy to say we're going to have an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen.
01:38:07.000And I'm quoting from their own document, so that by September 2020, the public is willing to accept a universal vaccine.
01:38:15.000What were them trials that were carried out that Fauci knew about and I bet our man from DARPA was involved in 2016 in the US.
01:38:23.000What was that collaboration between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and something that Fauci was sponsoring that took place in your country there like a few years back?
01:38:33.000Well, we've been doing it, by the way, since 2005.
01:38:37.000The P3 program has been in place since 2005, officially funded after Ralph Baric's presentation at the DARPA MITRE conference in 2005, where he said he was going to do, quote, biohacking.
01:38:50.000Using coronavirus as a biological warfare enabling technology.
01:38:54.000That conference is what put in motion what was then called the P3 program.
01:38:58.000In 2007, Sequoia Pharmaceuticals was the first one to file and get issued a patent on the vaccine for SARS.
01:39:07.000And that patent in 2007 was then transferred to a group of companies in 2008 And after that, over 1,700 patents were filed and ultimately clinical trials done in the United States on coronavirus vaccines.
01:39:24.000And if you go back and you look at the historical record of them, they are notoriously lethal.
01:39:30.000Things died of heart failure, things died of cancers, things died of acute respiratory distress.
01:39:38.000And lo and behold, when this particular clinical trial, Russell, was put in motion, It's important to point out that according to the head of the Institutional Review Board at the University of California Systems, this protocol was, and I quote, a straight-to-humans experiment protocol.
01:39:58.000They did not have any data to evaluate safety.
01:40:03.000They actually did, and I'm quoting from their own statement, a straight-to-humans protocol.
01:40:11.000How did you find yourself in a position to speak before the EU, and I feel you're scheduled to speak before the British Parliament?
01:40:18.000I know there have been Senate inquiries, I know there's a Covid inquiry in our country right now, but my sense is that these inquiries will be quite limited in their scope and will be designed to sort of mitigate fear rather than genuinely excavate some of the Deeply troubling truths.
01:40:38.000In fact, we've said before on our channel that if you were to have the reckoning required, and this is before I spoke to you and gained a deeper and fuller understanding of this issue, that if there was to be a full reckoning, you would have to dismantle the FDA, the WHO, the United States of America would have to undergo some pretty significant restructuring.
01:40:58.000And plainly, when you start talking about things in the scope of history being like 8,000 years deep, it's going to be like a significant shift.
01:41:07.000So, when you speak to the EU, what are you able to convey?
01:41:13.000Do you only offer a certain amount of information and that which is most demonstrably true?
01:41:19.000How do you handle that as well as what was the result when you did speak before the EU?
01:41:25.000Yeah, well, I began my public appearances on these types of topics back in the 1980s with what became then known as the Iran-Contra scandal.
01:41:34.000So my first testimony in Congress was in 1983.
01:41:38.000So I've been at this game for a very, very, very long time, and I've been unambiguously pointing out corruption and Um, clear violations of our own laws and laws that we, as a civilized society, say that we live up to.
01:41:53.000In the early 2000s and late 90s, I was actually involved in a lot of the early observational work around biological and chemical weapons proliferations.
01:42:03.000That's the reason why in 2002, three and four, I was all over the world looking at this technology readiness level of biological weapons programs.
01:42:13.000And I briefed governments on both sides of the Atlantic about what was coming as emerging threats.
01:42:19.000And what I found out in 2003 was unfortunately, um, I was being asked to look into things and I was encouraged not to find the things that we actually found.
01:42:30.000My first briefing that included the coronavirus as a biological weapon was published in 2003.
01:42:37.000It was briefed in 2002, but the first publication was in 2003.
01:42:41.000Since then, I was in places like Tehran and Slovenia and India and all across the world trying to bring this kind of information to the public's knowledge because I felt that it was important, given the fact that the public thinks that after the Second World War, We had prohibitions on biological and chemical weapons, and we actually thought that that meant that prohibition meant we weren't going to do anything.
01:43:05.000And the public did not know that we had a very active program going on in the United States and around the world.
01:43:11.000And what I have done is I have never softened the message once.
01:43:17.000I try every way I can to make sure that every word that comes out of my mouth, I can actually go back and provide the source reference for absolutely every statement I make.
01:43:26.000And the reason why I am still able to do what I'm doing, including the two appearances at the European Union Parliament, is every single statement I made was cited with the original source documentation.
01:43:38.000And the thing that blew people's minds when I was in Brussels is I pointed out that the coronavirus model actually was derived only a few years after DNA was first characterized by Watson and Crick, ultimately gaining them the Nobel Prize.
01:43:53.000But ironically, I pointed out that it was in the 1960s that the United States and the United Kingdom began collaboration on cross-Atlantic transmission of coronavirus to see if we could infect populations on either side of the Atlantic, starting with the U.S.
01:44:08.000transferring coronavirus samples, allegedly, into the United Kingdom to infect, quote, healthy volunteers.
01:44:17.000By the 1970s, we had a full program of taking various pathogens on both sides of the Atlantic, and the United States and the United Kingdom were collaborating in infecting each other's populations with each other's pathogens to see how well these things could transmit.
01:44:33.000And that information, which I shared in the European Union Parliament in Brussels, is the reason why that video reportedly wound up going to several billion viewers.
01:44:44.000Because it turns out a lot of people were quite disturbed by that information when it came out.
01:44:49.000And that's why I got invited back to Strasbourg.
01:44:54.000So the story of coronavirus is quite a long and important one that only really penetrates the consciousness of most people in 2019 but is even visibly and documented and I know that coronavirus is a piece of sort of nomenclature ultimately just a piece of vocabulary but it's been used in extraordinary ways.
01:45:17.000There's documentation that it's that its origin is as a weapon. It features as a patent, it's
01:45:23.000sort of part of a patent, it seems extraordinary that viruses are part of a patent.
01:45:27.000So specifically with the outbreaks of 2019 to recent times, what is the function, what is the
01:45:43.000I guess from talking to you, I get the idea that it goes beyond making a lot of money for Pfizer and Moderna.
01:45:50.000It goes perhaps way beyond national governments being able to regulate, introduce ID, lock people in their homes, radically alter the expectations of what can be achieved without democracy or recourse to public discourse.
01:46:05.000even beyond what is the agenda and were they successful?
01:46:40.000And therefore, what should we look out for next?
01:46:42.000Well, I think we need to reiterate the criminal's own words because the criminal's own words say that this was to create the public understanding of a need for a medical countermeasure.
01:47:51.000That was conditioning a population to accept That a giant scary thing, produced by the way, by the people who are wielding it, is going to actually potentially cause harm and you are going to be protected by following their orders.
01:48:07.000And so it's not a surprise that we, whether it is the world falling apart with the Cold War and everybody was going to have a nuclear fallout shelter, Whether it was the we're going to be afraid of terrorists, which once upon a time back in the good old days was Northern Ireland was a terrorist and suddenly we freaking relabeled that and all of the terrorists moved south.
01:48:33.000Every time we actually have a government instituting a mechanistic approach to instilling fear in a population, it is for coercive behaviors to adjust the population's response and ultimately get that population to call on the very perpetrators to save them from the thing that they were just told to be afraid of.
01:48:54.000The great news is that in the COVID craziness, about a third of the population in the world fell for it hook, line, and sinker.
01:49:02.000And about a third of it had to be coerced into it.
01:49:22.000We're not going to go along with this again.
01:49:25.000And that's why I say that they failed in their mission, because their mission was to test how much coercion, how much manipulation, how much abuse could the population take before they finally broke.
01:49:38.000And that, I would submit to you, is the large driving force behind the central bank digital currency move now, which is we didn't fall for the terrifying alleged bug that was going to kill us, and we didn't fall for the alleged, you know, we were going to sneeze on somebody and they were going to catch their death.
01:49:56.000Since that didn't work, we're now going to go after a number of other things to see if we can destabilize the population.
01:50:01.000And what I have found encouraging is that the public largely has said, you know what?
01:50:09.000And more and more people are coming alongside.
01:50:12.000The tragedy is that unfortunately, conversations like this one, and let's face it, I've been doing this same presentation since April of 2020, and we are now sitting in the fall of 2023, near winter, and we are having our first conversation.
01:50:30.000And tragically, what has been the downfall of the, what I would call the movement towards freedom and liberty, is that we have been very ineffective at committing to keeping a very simple standard.
01:50:43.000And the standard is, we have been subject to an assault on our intelligence and on our intellects so egregiously.
01:50:52.000We have the guy sitting behind me who says he is science, right?
01:50:58.000These are people who took advantage of the willful ignorance of a population.
01:51:04.000But unfortunately, as the other side, it is taking platforms like Rumble, platforms like Twitter now under its new configuration, You know, Tucker Carlson now coming out from under the umbrella of Fox and being on Twitter.
01:51:22.000It's taking these alternative medias and attempt to open up a dialogue channel wide enough that allows the public to actually hear information.
01:51:32.000But the problem we still have is that we're still missing a fundamental commitment to stating that if we are going to take the mantle of liberty and carry it forward, we have to commit to the integrity of saying that the words that come out of our mouths have to be verified.
01:51:47.000The facts that we recite as facts have to be things that we can actually verify.
01:51:52.000And unfortunately, we're allowing innuendo to crossbreed with facts, and that is diminishing the entire public conversation.
01:51:59.000So while I would say the incumbency lost, Because they didn't get everybody shot, and they didn't get everybody coerced, and they didn't get everybody to take the knee.
01:52:09.000I think in another way, we still have to take pause and recognize that as a populace, we still are doing a woefully inadequate job of informing ourselves and holding ourselves to a standard that says we are committed to the truth as deeply as we can access it, and the facts as clearly as we can articulate them.
01:52:29.000And I think we're still a long way away from winning that one.
01:52:33.000That's why I suppose there's a necessary commitment at the level of the individual to a kind of spiritual awakening and deep connection.
01:52:44.000Because without that, you lack the resources.
01:52:46.000If you're trying to resource yourself from the culture, and it seems increasingly obvious that the culture is malign, is a kind of toxicity in itself, you're gonna struggle.
01:52:56.000You have to have a relationship with your spirit, or with God, or however you formulate it.
01:53:02.000access to a power that is greater than yourself and enables you to cooperate with other people
01:53:06.000and perhaps even overlook significant cultural differences in order to align and fight for
01:53:12.000what seems to be an extremely significant, necessary and precipitous war. Let's call
01:53:17.000it a war. I wonder Dave, if you are concerned then about the concomitant attacks on independent
01:53:27.000I figure that if you imagine zero independent media during the past five years, I don't think there would even be a Covid inquiry in the UK.
01:53:36.000I don't think you'd have the hearings in the Senate.
01:53:37.000I don't think you'd have been invited to the EU.
01:53:40.000Certainly you wouldn't have a video that reached potentially billions of people.
01:53:45.000So What do you think's happening with the same Five Eyes countries you referenced earlier, introducing near-simultaneous legislature to prohibit free speech, to punish platforms if they house messaging, the government or various bureaucratic bodies, because it won't be the government ultimately, because there are powers transcendent of national government, quite plainly, quite plainly we're seeing that.
01:54:09.000How do you feel about this new raft of legislation, as well as this sort of overt crushing of dissent?
01:54:16.000Well, so I think you're raising a very important point.
01:54:20.000Number one is that I recently gave a speech in Germany on the Nuremberg fallacy.
01:54:27.000And it was very important to deliver that speech.
01:54:29.000It was very important to do it in Germany.
01:54:31.000And I was warned by people that I could be treading on some sensitive new German legislation by doing what I said.
01:54:38.000But once again, committing to the facts, what I did was I reviewed the 16,000 pages of the Nuremberg transcripts.
01:54:46.000And committed to everything I said had to be derived directly from the record of the prosecution at Nuremberg, which is what I did.
01:54:53.000And it turns out that that was an amazingly effective speech in spite of the crazy new rules that are put in place in Germany.
01:55:01.000I know around the world, people are passing all kinds of legislation, which is part of the reason why Kim and I have been committed throughout our entire life together.
01:55:10.000And certainly I've been committed to this throughout my absolutely entire life.
01:55:14.000I like to sit down with people in analog.
01:55:16.000I like to sit with people in assemblies, whether that's in a coffee shop, whether that's in a stadium.
01:55:22.000I love to sit with people in the analog because it is impossible to control what happens in those environments.
01:55:30.000The reason why we have been so committed lately to making ourselves available around the world, and I've traveled extensively over the last couple of years now.
01:55:41.000The reason why we've done that is I want to show that no matter how much they try to control platforms, they cannot control people.
01:55:48.000And the freedom of assembly is something which may be impaired, and there may be all kinds of impediments that are put up to try to block that from happening.
01:55:57.000But the fact of the matter is, in the white hot core of the pandemic, we were still gathering people left, right, and center.
01:56:07.000We were still doing the things that put human connection together.
01:56:10.000And I think That that analog human to human connection is in fact what will keep us going.
01:56:16.000And I'd encourage you to think about your own career.
01:56:19.000Nothing like being on stage at a comedy show.
01:56:22.000Nothing like being on stage at a major venue where you actually have the will and the power and the enthusiasm and the audience feeding you and you're feeding it back and so forth.
01:56:32.000That dynamic of what it means to be human and have that analog connection with people is what is fueling the future and the digital Dependency of the incumbency is going to be its downfall.
01:56:46.000We the people can still stand together.
01:56:49.000We can still hang out each other's houses.
01:56:51.000We can still go to each other's giant parks and open spaces.
01:56:55.000We can still do those things and we can still connect.
01:56:58.000And I think that we need to redouble our efforts for analog connection because as long as we hand it over to the digital, unfortunately, because of the way the laws were written all the way back to the National Telecommunications Acts in the 1950s and 60s, Every signal can be blocked.
01:57:23.000Obviously I don't need to paraphrase what you said, I just heard what you said, but it appears that in conjunction with real connections conducted via the human senses, and I imagine based on what you told me earlier on about the sort of cranial neural connections and the additional senses, I mean additional to the sort of ordinary discussion of such matters, that that people having connections that go beyond these digital
01:57:49.000interfaces, it's going to be absolutely vital. What I myself have spent a lot of time
01:57:54.000thinking about is how our systems of power are abstract, inflated and gargantuan, and do not
01:58:00.000replicate any kind of system that we might animalistically relate to as tribal creatures, as
01:58:08.000blessed primates with a connection to the sublime.
01:58:12.000How are we ever supposed to coordinate a mentality within a nation of 300 million people or 60 million people or even in cities of 8, 10, 12 million people?
01:58:22.000In the end, you feel like you're living a wash in a kind of sea of futility that leads to nihilism in a sort of a post-enlightenment rationalist mindset that tells you that unless you can measure it, unless you can eat it, unless you can sell it, It isn't there.
01:58:36.000The intuitive, the divine, all obfuscated and relegated from the field of our discussion.
01:58:43.000Again, makes me return to the point that yes, we need an awakening at the level of the individual and we need to recognize as sacred that which takes place within us.
01:58:52.000Each of us is a portal to something divine and unknowable within the limitations of the rational mind and we have to somehow instantiate systems that are reflective not only of our origins, the way we might have lived for Who knows?
01:59:04.000Hundreds of thousands of years, maybe millions of years.
01:59:06.000I just don't have the access to the right books or even the right history, perhaps.
01:59:10.000But it would be lovely to think that we might live differently.
01:59:13.000And the foreclosure on the possibility of different systems is one of the great masterpieces of an apparently progressive civilization.
01:59:21.000The Egyptians may have done this and whatever happened down there in Atlantis, this is the best it's been and the best it ever yet could be.
01:59:28.000We are at the apex and soon the machines will do our, certainly not your, Bidding!
01:59:34.000You can live as a tyrannised blob, staring at a screen, imbibing sugar, being injected every one or two months, depending on what's decreed.
01:59:43.000Unless there's an alternative spiritual vision conveyed, and you're right, I don't see how that can happen without face-to-face, in-real-life meetings, without radical movements that radically propose the idea that we can be unified but decentralised.
01:59:55.000Without this movement being advanced immediately, Dave, then I don't see that there's a lot of hope.
02:00:05.000A couple of weeks ago, I was walking down Bond Street in London and I was, you know, just minding my own business, going to a meeting with one of my companies.
02:00:14.000And I was accosted by a group of young men who were on the opposite side of the street, came running across in front of traffic.
02:00:23.000I was wearing my bow tie and they ran up to me and they said, you're David Martin.
02:00:46.000I'm celebrating the fact that we can have this conversation and I can be sitting in my studio in the United States.
02:00:52.000You can be sitting in your studio in the UK and we can have this conversation, but I can guarantee you that the fuel that not only fueled their behavior, But the fuel that actually led them to run across Bond Street in London, to actually share their analog human experience with me, was the stuff that the incumbency cannot, nor does it even understand.
02:01:16.000And it cannot understand because it believes that the loudest voice is the one in the room that will control the day.
02:01:24.000But what they fail to understand is it is the human connection, the ability to actually say, your life matters.
02:01:32.000Which is something that unfortunately, as you said before, without some sort of spiritual connection to a meaning statement, without the presence of a reality that says, hold on a second, I think that this thing called human is pretty freaking amazing.
02:01:48.000And it's not just a meat puppet to be in service to somebody's incumbent will and whim.
02:01:54.000This is actually an amazing sacred vessel.
02:01:57.000And once we actually allow that connection to exist, even if it's nothing more than running across Bond Street to say, Oh my God, you're the bow tie wearing American.
02:02:09.000No matter what it is, those human-to-human connections are the fuel that will keep me going, keep you going, keep us all going, regardless of the tyranny that we face.
02:02:19.000And we have to look across the whole of human history and recognize that it is until we embrace the fact that the incumbency only has the power we're willing to cede to it.
02:02:31.000The minute we actually stop ceding that power, we wind up reclaiming our sovereignty as humans, and we start connecting with each other as humans, and the outcome is brilliant and unstoppable.
02:02:47.000That's a beautiful rallying cry for our kind and a great opportunity for us to form independent selves across the world that can diversely unify against what appears to be a pretty immersive and plain and transparent attempt to control us.
02:03:03.000I can just see the background of your studio.
02:03:05.000Make it, type it, hijack liberty with it.
02:03:10.000Dave, thank you so much for your incredible contribution to this movement, for conveying such complex information so, not gently, but plainly and accessibly.