Stay Free - Russel Brand - August 02, 2024


Britain BURNS! UK Riots & Migration CRISIS - What the Media ISN’T Telling You with Neil Oliver - SF 421


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 6 minutes

Words per Minute

157.26363

Word Count

10,479

Sentence Count

565

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

20


Summary

In this episode of Stay Free With Russell Brand, the comedian, writer and podcaster Neil Oliver joins Brand to discuss Luciferian worship, the Olympic Opening Ceremony and the culture war that is now reaching a global scale, and the growing number of nationalist movements that are not derided in the same way as they once were. Plus, there's a surprise guest appearance from the Queen herself, Lady Gaga! Stay Free with Russell Brand is available on all good podcast directories, if you search for Stay Free, you'll find us. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers and use the promo code: "WAKEUP" to receive 10% off your first purchase when you enter the invite code: AWAKeningWonders. To join the FB group, click here. To learn more about our sponsorships, go here. To find out who our sponsor is and how much they'll get you for your first month of free, click HERE. Thank you so much for supporting this podcast, we really appreciate it. Sincerely, R.I.P. - R.B. - Your Support is greatly appreciated and we're looking forward to hearing from you again next week! - The Awakening Worshipping Crew. Love Ghost of a Podcast? - Matt & Gabor Matelek - Thank you, Matt, Matt & Sam, R.J. & Gav, Gorms, Matt, Love Birds, Glynis, Gav & Vicky, Gabor, J.A. Gav and Gabor & Gervais, John, and G.J., R. & J.B., & Glyn, G.M. & Sarah, Michael, - Matthew, Sarah, & G.E. , . - Sarah, Sarah, and J.R. & JV, , & Jadynn, & R.A., - J.W. - , and Sam, & JUICY, ? - - John, & S. . . . , J.& J. J. & S&J. - JT. - G. & K. & A.M., , G.W., J.V. & C. ( )


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello you Awakening Wonders there on Spotify, Apple, Stink Whistle, Gurgle Dot, or wherever you download your podcasts these days to remain at least peripherally connected to some tendril of truth in a bewildering miasma of lies and propaganda.
00:00:18.000 We appreciate you, and we love you.
00:00:20.000 You're part of our community.
00:00:22.000 So that's why we're very happy to give you an audio version of our live Rumble Show five days a week.
00:00:27.000 It's on Monday to Friday.
00:00:28.000 We decipher the latest news stories, we break down current topics that the mainstream media
00:00:32.000 should be covering, and if they aren't, then we critique why they're not and what they
00:00:37.000 are covering.
00:00:38.000 Every week as well, right, we do brilliant conversations with people like Jordan Peterson,
00:00:43.000 RFK, Tucker, Carlson, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate.
00:00:48.000 These things are already up and you can listen to them now.
00:00:49.000 So remember, this is an audio version of our daily live show.
00:00:54.000 To tune in live, go to rumble.com/russellbrand.
00:00:56.000 4/RussellBrand You'll find it easily and I hope that you will love it.
00:01:02.000 Now please enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:01:05.000 Thanks.
00:01:16.000 Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:01:19.000 We've got a fantastic episode.
00:01:21.000 We're of course going to be talking about Luciferian worship.
00:01:24.000 We're going to be talking about the Culture War Reaching a global scale.
00:01:28.000 Can we even have a global culture anymore?
00:01:30.000 The more they push for globalism, the less likely it seems to be achieved when there is so much obvious division.
00:01:38.000 Once the Olympics would have been a happy distraction, now it is a battleground for the culture war with people being unable to agree as to whether or not Formerly male athletes that have transitioned ought be able to compete whether or not Christianity and its sacred artifacts ought be ridiculed.
00:01:54.000 We'll also be talking about the emergence of new nationalist movements and the fact that they are now not derided in the way they once were.
00:02:03.000 Perhaps because of the incredible overreach of globalism and who better to discuss all this with than your favorite Celtic Lilting poet, commentator, and creator of glorious content, Neil Oliver.
00:02:19.000 Neil, thanks so much for joining us today.
00:02:21.000 Always a pleasure, Russell.
00:02:23.000 Happy to be with you always.
00:02:24.000 Neil, we'll do the first 10 minutes of our conversation available widely, but then we'll be exclusively streaming on Rumble simply because the condition of your hair will be eventually subject to a ban.
00:02:35.000 You cannot be your age and have hair that silky on an alphabet or meta platform.
00:02:41.000 They won't allow it.
00:02:42.000 They'll censor it.
00:02:43.000 They will prohibit it.
00:02:45.000 You're looking very well today.
00:02:46.000 That's why I grew the beard to cover the chin strap that holds on the wig.
00:02:51.000 You look remarkable.
00:02:53.000 I know you've posted a lot about the Olympic Opening Ceremony and I suppose in a sense...
00:02:59.000 There are few people remaining that would say, oh it was appropriate, what's the big deal in the name of inclusivity and diversity?
00:03:07.000 It's helpful and acceptable to celebrate diverse forms of identity and ethnicity by deriding potent Christian imagery.
00:03:19.000 Diversity and inclusivity don't need to be earned at the cost of sacred traditional values, I suppose would be a good place to start.
00:03:27.000 And what's What's your perspective on it, mate?
00:03:31.000 Oh, it's so difficult to read what was or wasn't intended by any and all of it.
00:03:37.000 I think what amazes me is that we all know that something like the opening ceremony for the Olympic Games, which is a global spectacle, must have been reviewed and contemplated at length before it happened.
00:03:53.000 I mean, you know, anything, you know, be it a story before it goes in a newspaper or a feature before it turns up in a magazine or something is broadcast, people analyse it endlessly and painfully to see, you know, how such and such a thing might be interpreted.
00:04:10.000 So it just seems completely disingenuous the way that, well, the opening ceremony happened and then within a What you might describe almost as a matter of minutes, the French regime was kind of apologising for and withdrawing aspects of it and footage was being deleted from the internet as though, you know, nobody meant any harm here.
00:04:33.000 But I fail to see how you could have had a look at what was planned and not predicted that in the, you know, in the traditionally Christian West, Some of the imagery wasn't possibly going to cause offence.
00:04:46.000 It just seemed utterly disingenuous.
00:04:50.000 Okay, so what we will do is first of all, we will have some people dress up as Jesus Christ.
00:04:56.000 We will have a little child. We'll have some drag queens.
00:04:59.000 And then we reveal a blue cadaverous figure to be eaten.
00:05:03.000 Good, this is good so far.
00:05:05.000 Yes, check, check, check.
00:05:07.000 Let's just have a look at a few of the moments.
00:05:08.000 And yeah, it's difficult to imagine, Neil, that when at the planning stages, at the stages where it was being sort of plotted out just in terms of images and choreography, that it didn't cause some French eyebrows to be raised.
00:05:21.000 Let's have a look at a few moments together.
00:05:23.000 [MUSIC]
00:05:33.000 We could continue to play that without audio if you can facilitate that
00:05:47.000 in the gallery while Neil and I continue talking.
00:05:50.000 So go ahead Neil.
00:05:51.000 I don't know what is inclusive about what seems to be a preponderance of trans women, men, bearded men juxtaposed in a sexualised costume and choreography in proximity to kids.
00:06:13.000 I don't know what that's inclusive of.
00:06:16.000 Who that's inclusive of.
00:06:19.000 I've seen this thing.
00:06:21.000 The Guardian and others have suggested that while it might have a passing resemblance to the tableau that's known to everyone as Leonardo's Last Supper, it was actually the Feast of the Gods by a Dutch artist.
00:06:35.000 No, no, you must have looked at what was going to be the final result of that and thought that most people who aren't art critics or art historians are going to jump straight to the conclusion that you're parodying and mocking The Last Supper, which is a central image for Christians.
00:06:52.000 And also, then there was the way in which people were very quick to say, ah, you would never have done this about any Islamic You know, sacredness.
00:07:05.000 You wouldn't have done that.
00:07:06.000 Which is to completely overlook the fact that devout Islam absolutely loves Jesus.
00:07:16.000 The suggestion that Muslims anywhere would be rubbing their hands together in satisfaction at seeing Jesus mocked is absolute nonsense.
00:07:26.000 There's a whole chapter of the Quran about Miriam, which is to say Mary.
00:07:34.000 There are more references to Jesus in the Quran than there are to Muhammad.
00:07:38.000 So that divisive element about it, where immediately there was an opportunity to cast Christianity against Islam, is everything.
00:07:48.000 Did we just stumble, or are we just herding from one flashpoint to the next, where people with not enough time maybe to process things effectively, are just invited to be furious I like that phrase, one flashpoint to the next, invited to be furious about something all the time.
00:08:14.000 If I might guide you to my own interpretation of that flashpoint, isn't implicitly the problem Embedded in globalism, the idea that we have desanctified and desacralized our cultural spaces and replaced it with a new materialistic, rationalistic power.
00:08:38.000 I was speaking to a priest the other day, that's what I do, and he said that the Enlightenment, this is rather brilliant Neil, you'll like this, the Enlightenment might be regarded as the flooding Of the previous light of Christ, who bears the light to the world, with Luciferian light, i.e.
00:08:55.000 the Enlightenment, if it could be, and forgive the reductivism, be calcified into a single mental object, is the idea that mankind is the summit of all hierarchies.
00:09:09.000 And if human beings are the summit, and there is no God, and there are no principles, that the individual is the apex and the sovereign, Then, it's okay to meddle with nature, it's okay to alter your own nature, it's okay to denigrate sacred principles, it's okay to be morally relativist, all sorts of ideas become permissible when you extract God.
00:09:35.000 And don't you think that the Olympics as a ceremony, which I suppose would have always been pagan by its nature, at least at its point of origin, is now being used as an object to demonstrate that power now has overrun Christendom.
00:09:55.000 There is not, and not only as you point out, Christendom, but in fact a religious purview full stop.
00:10:00.000 Materialism as one, rationalism as one, globalism as one, be who you will, do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.
00:10:09.000 You know, Aleister Crowley's Luciferian edict, do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law, It's essentially the principle of government now.
00:10:19.000 While they simultaneously become more authoritarian and more controlling, they place at the apex of our systems of principle the fulfilment of your own goals.
00:10:27.000 You want to do this?
00:10:28.000 Do it.
00:10:29.000 You want to look this way?
00:10:31.000 You can do it.
00:10:32.000 So, whilst I believe absolutely in individual freedom, it's pretty clear that the culture is pushing some ideals and is repressing, attacking, savaging even, another set of ideals.
00:10:45.000 Yeah, but I hear all that.
00:10:47.000 Yeah, and you're right.
00:10:48.000 I mean, I suppose you could say it's like the replacement of the natural light of natural daylight and sunlight with, you know, with throbbing fluorescent tubes.
00:10:57.000 You know, there's just no comparison between the value to be derived from natural light in every sense and artificial light.
00:11:05.000 And if it's the replacement of the light of Religiosity, or not religiosity, spirituality, with materialism.
00:11:16.000 I can follow the line of that analogy and it works.
00:11:21.000 At what point do the people that have a problem with spirituality or God get over it?
00:11:29.000 I mean, you go all the way back to the English Revolution in the 17th century, you know, so that Cromwell felt the need to cut the head off the king.
00:11:39.000 And then there was the appalling things that happened in Ireland.
00:11:41.000 Felt the need!
00:11:43.000 Felt the need.
00:11:44.000 Felt the need?
00:11:45.000 I'm feeling the need!
00:11:47.000 The need for decapitation!
00:11:49.000 You couldn't just set that guy aside.
00:11:52.000 You couldn't just give him a job with a broom sweeping the streets or something.
00:11:55.000 You actually have to cut his head off.
00:11:57.000 To take it to the nth degree.
00:11:59.000 And then go off to Ireland and do terrible things there.
00:12:01.000 You're focusing on people of religion.
00:12:04.000 People of faith.
00:12:05.000 Priests and whatever.
00:12:06.000 And then, after the French Revolution, they could not...
00:12:10.000 They were instantaneously about installing an actress in Notre Dame in mockery of a sacred place and all sorts of terrible things again were done to... Was she an actress, Neil?
00:12:23.000 Was she an actress?
00:12:24.000 What part was she playing?
00:12:26.000 Quite so.
00:12:27.000 I think she was mocking Sophia or Wisdom or whatever.
00:12:31.000 And then you've got the canonisation of Judas Iscariot, you know, who betrayed Christ to his death.
00:12:37.000 That happens after the French Revolution.
00:12:39.000 Same thing happens after the Russian Revolution in 1917.
00:12:42.000 They canonise Judas Iscariot again, and then they get stuck in,
00:12:45.000 and then there's terrible bloodletting.
00:12:47.000 At what point have you made your point that religion or spirituality or belief in God
00:12:54.000 is to be set aside?
00:12:56.000 They've been at it for hundreds of years, literally.
00:12:59.000 And then you come to something that the Olympic Games, which, I mean, in essence, it's games.
00:13:04.000 It's all there in the world.
00:13:05.000 It's for fun.
00:13:07.000 It's supposed to be people coming together to compete at the amateur level to see who's fastest, who's strongest, who can jump highest, you know, and all of that happening in front just to give people something to watch.
00:13:21.000 Why do you have to traduce that by bringing in, oh and let's take time out here to mock God?
00:13:28.000 Why?
00:13:30.000 Does everything have to present an opportunity to have a go at something that means a great deal to more people alive on the face of the earth?
00:13:39.000 The no.
00:13:41.000 Most people on earth believe in God of one sort or another.
00:13:44.000 I like the idea that we're experiencing the end of fun, the end of games, but what actually a culture war, because culture might be an expression of humanity's creativity.
00:13:57.000 Love of the divine, the various ways that love of the divine might be expressed through nature, creativity and through music or worship or reverence of nature, rather.
00:14:08.000 And now we've reached the point where bagatelles and pastimes and festivals of fun and joy and diversion Have become so heavily maligned and politicised that almost the concept itself is over.
00:14:23.000 How can there be, Neil, would you say, a simultaneous push for globalism, a simultaneous push for diversity, when having such an antagonistic attitude towards the sacred views of, as you say, a significant demographic.
00:14:39.000 The largest demographic, in fact.
00:14:42.000 Well, there's something paradoxical about it, because you're trying to replace the very essence of something with meaning.
00:14:53.000 You're trying to replace meaning, the transcendent, with an empty void.
00:15:02.000 Why seek to replace something, in fact, by some estimates, everything, everything of any meaning, With the opposite.
00:15:12.000 With nothing.
00:15:13.000 With an emptiness.
00:15:14.000 Which is really, I mean, if you take materialism to its conclusion, we're not even convincing materialists.
00:15:22.000 Because if we were materialists, we would have respect for matter.
00:15:27.000 We would have respect for the stuff.
00:15:29.000 But we don't.
00:15:29.000 All we do is we just dig up the earth, we dig up Mother Earth, and we transform the matter that we find there into rubbish.
00:15:37.000 That we then after a couple of years throw into landfills that then leaks toxically back into the flesh and blood of Mother Earth.
00:15:44.000 The whole thing is so devoid of meaning and I think it's something, there's almost something hopeful about that because When you take globalism and materialism and all of that to its logical conclusion, you find out that at the end of it all, there's nothing there.
00:16:03.000 And people are instinctively angry because they sense that the natural law all around them, not just in terms of what was happening there in the Olympic Opening Ceremony, but everything that's natural, the natural law is being subverted.
00:16:16.000 It's being turned upside down, inside out.
00:16:19.000 And people who don't consider themselves to be spiritual or to be moved by the transcendent are feeling an instinctive upset with it, a physiological response to it, because it's unnatural.
00:16:31.000 What's being foisted upon people is the inversion of and the literal corruption of everything that has meaning for people.
00:16:42.000 Well, to use a phrase like unnatural, I think, is also a tacit acceptance of the idea of a divine order.
00:16:49.000 I suppose you could posit a natural order, but deviating from subverting or altering a natural order is only an aberration or abomination if there is something undergirding the natural order that is divine.
00:17:02.000 I'm going to let that question hang.
00:17:03.000 And as well, Neil, it sort of seems that the whole endeavour is somewhat demonic, a kind of a bewildering exercise in
00:17:13.000 attacking meaning itself.
00:17:15.000 If you... it seems that...
00:17:17.000 Diversity and inclusivity are beautiful ideas because they are already afforded in principles like
00:17:27.000 kindness and love and non-judgement and salvation and redemption.
00:17:32.000 Ideas that are all present, in fact, in the ideology that is being blithely traduced and attacked.
00:17:40.000 We're going to come off of YouTube now.
00:17:42.000 If you're watching this on YouTube, click the link in the description and join Neil and I on Rumble.
00:17:47.000 I want to talk a little more about the desacralisation of our planet.
00:17:51.000 One second, Neil.
00:17:52.000 I'll just do this throw, my darling.
00:17:54.000 The desacralisation of the planet.
00:17:56.000 We're going to talk a little bit about Tommy Robinson and the re-emergence of nationalism and if there are versions of nationalism that can themselves be inclusive, compassionate and loving or are they as they are continually assessed to be by their nature?
00:18:14.000 Malevolent.
00:18:14.000 We're going to talk a little bit about Kamala Harris as well and a number of other stories.
00:18:19.000 Click the link in the description.
00:18:20.000 See you over there.
00:18:22.000 Please carry on dear Neil.
00:18:24.000 Well, I was just going to say, when you talk about inclusivity and diversity, it's already there.
00:18:30.000 Talk about reinventing the wheel.
00:18:32.000 It is there if you want it.
00:18:35.000 In fact, how can you overlook it in the basics of the Christian message?
00:18:40.000 You know, when Jesus was put on the spot about exactly what he was about, you know, it was love God with all your heart and love your neighbour as yourself.
00:18:51.000 Love your neighbour as yourself.
00:18:53.000 Now what could be more diverse and inclusive than that?
00:18:55.000 Because Jesus was manifest in a world which was actually enthralled to an idea of a God that was exclusive.
00:19:03.000 You know, that there was just one chosen group of people and everybody else was to be utterly destroyed to make room for this one group.
00:19:11.000 And don't mix with the neighbours, don't get involved with anybody, keep the bloodlines, all that.
00:19:16.000 But Jesus was manifest in that world and said, on the contrary, the one God is for everyone.
00:19:24.000 And he loves everyone.
00:19:25.000 And he wants everyone to love him.
00:19:27.000 And as a living metaphor of that, he wants everyone to love their neighbour.
00:19:33.000 And take them into their heart every bit as much as they love themselves.
00:19:37.000 I mean, if it's diversity and inclusivity that you're after, it's all there in that simple message.
00:19:43.000 So why would you then mock The messenger that brought that message?
00:19:50.000 What's your neighbour?
00:19:51.000 I suppose the argument would be that institutional Christianity, they may argue, has become patriarchal or exclusive.
00:19:59.000 But early Christianity certainly, it seems to me at least, was defined by that principle of it being an open invitation to the Gentiles and to all of God's people to join the chosen through the electing to become baptised, electing to carry the cross.
00:20:16.000 alongside him. And then of course, in actual practice, Christianity is growing faster in
00:20:24.000 the continent of Africa and the country of China than anyone else precisely because of its
00:20:30.000 ability to be universally applied, because of these principles of inclusivity. So it's not
00:20:36.000 actually about inclusivity and diversity, it's more likely about nihilism and the extraction
00:20:42.000 and attack on meaning. And in order, excuse me, to attack meaning itself, you have to annihilate
00:20:50.000 its figurative representatives. You have to attack its myths, its tropes, its stories,
00:20:57.000 its icons, its heroes, and in the figure of Christ, I suppose, its king. And it seems to be,
00:21:04.000 I reckon what's fascinating about it, Neil, is that, you know, it feels to me like when we were
00:21:10.000 young, that the Olympics, if there was a controversy in it, it would be because of like...
00:21:15.000 African-American athletes protesting their civil rights, or it would become a stage upon which the Cold War may or may not play out from the inclusion or exclusion of particular nations.
00:21:29.000 But for there to be an ideology transcendent of nationality that's not overtly religious, it's not like Islam, or it's not like, you know, Buddhism, it's a set of cultural ideas that are Odd in a way, because when we unpack that set of ideals, what are they about?
00:21:48.000 The ability to choose your own sex and gender?
00:21:50.000 I don't think anyone has a problem with that among adults.
00:21:53.000 Sure, go ahead, of course.
00:21:55.000 And then it seems a lot to me about sexual identity, which sex, other than for procreation, is by definition about pleasure, or you could at best argue the expression of love.
00:22:08.000 But sex as, and if it is about pleasure, Or the pleasurable expression of love.
00:22:14.000 It's a very odd thing to place at the very center of a culture.
00:22:18.000 Freedom and freedom of expression.
00:22:21.000 Freedom to be who you are.
00:22:22.000 Freedom to love.
00:22:23.000 Of course these ideas are valid and, as we've already touched upon, already covered in the covenant between man of God to recognize that we are in his image, to recognize that there is no higher tribunal, to recognize that our primary duty, other than loving God, is to love our neighbor.
00:22:40.000 Yeah, but you can't choose your sex.
00:22:43.000 You can't.
00:22:44.000 You are what you are.
00:22:46.000 You is what you is.
00:22:48.000 That's an immutable law of nature.
00:22:50.000 That's something else that you can't really survive.
00:22:52.000 You can present yourself in any way you want.
00:22:53.000 Of course you can.
00:22:54.000 Adults can present in any way they want.
00:22:56.000 But you can't choose your sex.
00:22:57.000 Not in any meaningful way.
00:22:59.000 That's, again, that's just nature.
00:23:01.000 Just let it alone.
00:23:05.000 It's a lie to invite people, especially children, to think that you can change your city.
00:23:10.000 You can't.
00:23:11.000 I don't know if you can see our assets, Neil, on screen, but I'm bringing up assets during this conversation, and this one is a story from The Guardian about Some boxers who failed gender tests at the World Championships are competing.
00:23:23.000 Imane Khalifa of Algeria and Lin Yu-Ting are both competing as females.
00:23:31.000 And this is, they cite old Barry McGuigan.
00:23:34.000 God love him.
00:23:36.000 God, I just, do you remember when his dad used to sing Danny Boy in that?
00:23:38.000 Ah, that's when boxing was boxing.
00:23:40.000 It's shocking that they were actually allowed to go this far.
00:23:43.000 I suppose the argument around sport is why have gender categories at all?
00:23:49.000 No, I don't buy that at all.
00:23:52.000 What motivates the athletes that want to follow this path?
00:23:59.000 Because I'm not a sporty person.
00:24:03.000 I've taken part in sport and games down through the years.
00:24:07.000 I've played and done my best at things.
00:24:09.000 But to me, if you were a boxer, let's say, You would want to challenge and to find the strongest person that you thought you could be.
00:24:21.000 You know, you'd be aiming really to be the heavyweight champion of the world, able to dominate and knock down, or whatever, the next strongest person.
00:24:33.000 I don't understand the motivation that says, be it in boxing or swimming or cycling, where you're going, I need to find the people I can definitely beat.
00:24:42.000 I don't get that.
00:24:44.000 You know, I need to find someone that's not as strong as me.
00:24:46.000 I want that person.
00:24:49.000 I want to find someone that can, that doesn't have my upper body strength so that I can definitely beat them.
00:24:54.000 I would have thought the sporting ideal, and let's not forget, I mean, even as someone who's not, I don't watch sport, but I get it.
00:25:01.000 I mean, there are those transcendent moments where someone, through the perfection of the execution of their Tens of thousands of hours of practice and dedication rises above, almost literally transcends, and can bring an entire football stadium with 50,000 people in it to their feet as one.
00:25:23.000 Or it can bring the crowd at a hundred metres final.
00:25:28.000 It moves people.
00:25:30.000 Everyone can feel it because it's a manifestation of something true when you watch somebody reach like that.
00:25:38.000 One of the great moments during that Cold War period when the Soviet was dominating the marathon and basically You just got your turn.
00:25:49.000 If you were in the team long enough, it became your turn to get the gold medal.
00:25:53.000 And they would structure it, running and slowing down to let this year's nominated gold medalists come through.
00:25:59.000 Such was the domination.
00:26:01.000 I'm sure the African runner's name was something like Abid Bakila.
00:26:05.000 And he just, he was this slightly built guy and he just came, nobody knew he was coming.
00:26:10.000 And he came through and he ran past all the Soviet runners and he took the gold medal.
00:26:13.000 And the world was on its feet.
00:26:17.000 There are these transcendent moments about sport, and to then reduce it in that materialist sense where you're facilitating and enabling people who just want to get a gold medal, or presumably to enter women's tennis as a man, And get all the six-figure checks for winning all the big events.
00:26:40.000 It's such a corruption of everything that is the Olympic ideal.
00:26:45.000 And I find, Trudie actually pointed it out to me, my wife, she said, do you know it's the Olympics?
00:26:51.000 Because she had only just learned that as well.
00:26:53.000 Because we've gone through this metamorphosis where we don't watch the telly anymore and we don't read the newspapers, it completely passes by.
00:27:02.000 In the same way I missed Wimbledon.
00:27:04.000 I used to watch Wimbledon when I was a little boy.
00:27:06.000 I used to cheer for Björn Borg and latterly I was interested in Andy Murray's, you know, finally Scotland and Britain had a male tennis player winning the championship.
00:27:17.000 And I loved it.
00:27:18.000 And I missed it.
00:27:19.000 I don't watch it anymore.
00:27:20.000 That whole thing about bread and circuses for the masses.
00:27:23.000 I do wonder at the extent to which these things, because of the way in which they've been misused and because of the evolution that sport's been on, Sport itself is corrupted now.
00:27:34.000 We all know it's all about money and it's all about the big sponsorship deals and all of it.
00:27:38.000 And I think people are just quite naturally, and I mean that, I choose that word deliberately, are just naturally drifting away from it.
00:27:45.000 Because that thing about sport that used to lift people up, you know, working class guys that could, after their miserable week in the factory, they could go to the football on a Saturday afternoon and there might be a moment when one of their heroes did something that they couldn't do.
00:27:59.000 And it wasn't about earning a million pounds a week.
00:28:01.000 or something, I wasn't what they idolized.
00:28:03.000 They idolized the fact that here was somebody that's a bit like me from a world that I recognize
00:28:08.000 that goes and transcends.
00:28:10.000 Nice.
00:28:11.000 Well, the complex social chemistry may have just become more combustible
00:28:18.000 because if you deny the bread and circuses medicine and anesthetic to a culture and class
00:28:27.000 that could at any point bubble over, you may be surprised by the results.
00:28:33.000 As sport becomes politicized, as entertainment becomes politicized, as ordinary people become more evidently loathed by the generators of culture, it appears that working class and at movements are starting to reform and this time not in
00:28:50.000 the image that we might be familiar with those of us that still revere their civil rights
00:28:55.000 heroes of the 60s but in a new form that I don't think has entirely landed yet and might be
00:29:02.000 fascinating.
00:29:02.000 I want to talk a little more about some of the nation-first movements and whether or not they have to necessarily be predicated on exclusion.
00:29:11.000 Even though, of course, you would have to say that a nation is about inclusion and exclusion.
00:29:16.000 You can't have a nation unless it has flags, borders, an identity, a territory.
00:29:21.000 Maybe a constitution, or at least something resembling one, and a set of ideals.
00:29:26.000 Certainly, as globalism's power and reach has increased, we have seen an understandable growth in nationalism, as people feel impeded upon, yes, by migration, but also by global corporatism.
00:29:37.000 And I want to talk about some of those movements, and in particular the march that happened in our country, Neil, over the last week.
00:29:43.000 I'm talking about the Tommy Robinson march.
00:29:46.000 Before we get into that is a quick message from one of our partners here on Stay Free with Russell Brand on Rumble.
00:29:53.000 Remember to like and subscribe.
00:29:56.000 Sticker Mule!
00:29:57.000 Who don't love Sticker Mule?
00:29:59.000 You love Sticker Mule?
00:30:00.000 And we've got some exciting news.
00:30:00.000 I love Sticker Mule.
00:30:02.000 We've launched a brand new store on, yeah, Sticker Mule.
00:30:05.000 It's got loads of Stay Free merchandise, including stickers like these ones, plus shirts and stuff.
00:30:10.000 So go to stickermule.com forward slash Rusty Rockets and check it out now.
00:30:13.000 You can use it, look, Decorate your mic stand!
00:30:17.000 If you've got one, if you've got a podcast and stuff, a big portion of sales go directly to us, me, we, here at Stay Free, ensuring we can continue to bring you live, thought-provoking, paradigm-shattering, establishment-provoking conversation on issues that matter.
00:30:34.000 So whether you want to show your support or just grab some stickers, we've got you covered!
00:30:39.000 Sticker Mule!
00:30:40.000 That's StickerMule.com forward slash Rusty Rockets!
00:30:40.000 Sticker Mule!
00:30:43.000 Go check it out!
00:30:43.000 Go there now!
00:30:44.000 I'd love to Sticker Mule, look at this, look, I've made my mic stand better.
00:30:47.000 I love this stuff.
00:30:48.000 Sticker Mule!
00:30:50.000 So, mate, yeah, I just wanted to talk about this Tommy Robinson thing.
00:30:53.000 I've not looked at this before, but I understand that many, many thousands of people marched in London, that there were counter-marches, and I'm... I'm guessing we're similar ages, you and I, and in some ways have similar political perspectives, and my... I've been fascinated with Tommy Robinson for a long while.
00:31:10.000 I'll just tell you why that is, then we'll look at the footage, and then, you know, I'd love to hear what you feel about all of this.
00:31:16.000 I've always felt that any political movement that's going to be truly grassroots and have a chance of succeeding has to earnestly reach ordinary working people, and that would be, by my reckoning, a non-racial endeavor.
00:31:31.000 All working people, the working people of Britain, are drawn from many races and many religions, but due to the obvious demographics and history of these islands, will include a lot of White working-class people just because of where we are in Northern Europe and because we are a late industrial nation.
00:31:50.000 So that's why working-class is going to be a big part of it.
00:31:53.000 So I want to, for a moment, tackle and assess what these marches are about, how they compare to the rise in right-wing politics in France, the MAGA movement in the United States of America, and reformulating populism and whether it can ever have at its core in its heart Love rather than hate and whether that's a fair assessment
00:32:15.000 anyway Because the many detractors of movements like this are
00:32:19.000 obviously invested in saying are these groups racist and hateful
00:32:22.000 Let's have a look at a little compilation from the march the other day to give a nil
00:32:27.000 *Marching band playing* What a feeling
00:32:33.000 Most hated man in Britain All your lies didn't work.
00:32:50.000 And the best thing is, we're unifying the people.
00:32:54.000 Exactly what you wanted to stop.
00:32:56.000 You wanted to divide them.
00:32:58.000 You wanted to separate us.
00:32:59.000 So we look divided?
00:33:09.000 I'd love to have a look at some other footage from that day, like more broadly, because of course,
00:33:15.000 this very much centers on Tommy Robinson, who's been a sort of a central figure,
00:33:20.000 whether it was with the EDL, the English Defence League, or the kind of casual football movements
00:33:26.000 that came out of Luton.
00:33:27.000 He's got an interesting history.
00:33:29.000 I was very interested to see his interview with Jordan Peterson, and he's someone
00:33:33.000 that I've had a lot of interest in talking to.
00:33:35.000 But my own personal purview, Neil, has been, I wonder if there would ever be a moment
00:33:41.000 where you could unite the followers of Tommy Robinson, as well as leaders of Muslim communities in the UK,
00:33:51.000 in common cause against the kind of central government forces
00:33:56.000 that benefit from division.
00:33:59.000 Or do these movements always have to be somewhat characterised by an anti-Islamic sentiment?
00:34:07.000 Even though I know from listening to Tommy Robinson that the particular strain of Islam that they are addressing pertains to ideas
00:34:15.000 like grooming and gangs in Luton. In fact it's highly particular. It's not,
00:34:22.000 you know, sort of the Islam that you might know from like bloody the late Byzantine
00:34:29.000 Empire and the Ottomans. We're talking about sort of Islam in Luton
00:34:33.000 essentially and how that might have been replicated in places like Rochdale or
00:34:37.000 whatever.
00:34:37.000 So tell me mate what you think of this kind of movement and this kind of march and what role it will play in anti-establishment politics going forward.
00:34:48.000 It's a very febrile, volatile cocktail of ingredients that has been collected together in Britain.
00:34:57.000 And I would say it's been collected and curated deliberately against the interests really of everyone concerned.
00:35:08.000 We need, regardless of creed and colour, to look sideways and recognise the importance of coming together and looking up, because above us, whence the trouble comes, We're being manipulated and set at one another's throats by people that we don't pay attention to and instead our attention is directed by the people at the people either side.
00:35:39.000 If there's your problem, get them.
00:35:42.000 And acting on that impulse only serves them.
00:35:47.000 Because it just facilitates bringing whatever, martial law or mores or digital IDs or the further loss of freedom and rights for all.
00:35:58.000 Everyone, everyone with any kind of humanity is appalled by the grooming gangs and all of that kind of, you know, that's anti-human.
00:36:08.000 That's just appalling behaviour that everyone with a decent beating human heart is offended by.
00:36:18.000 I've a long time been friends with Majid Nawaz, late of LBC and now a hard to find podcaster because a lot of his content is so pushed down by algorithms and all the rest of it.
00:36:32.000 Majid, who is of, I think I'm right, I think he's of Pakistani lineage, He on LBC was calling out the grooming gangs and he was freely and honestly saying, you know, we're talking about people who are my people here, he was saying, and we have to speak about this and address this and exercise this evil.
00:36:55.000 So from within the heart of the very community that was being accused of it and that was guilty of it, there was also a voice and more than one voice saying, we must talk about this.
00:37:07.000 You know, and it's people, what you want is the synergy of bringing together people from all of those groups who understand that it is to love your neighbour and to honestly have the conversation and the confidence to have the conversation that says this from within my tribe is utterly abhorrent And we're calling it out, and we do not identify with it, and it's got nothing to do with us.
00:37:36.000 And that has to be listened to by all of the other tribes.
00:37:39.000 That's what I mean.
00:37:40.000 It's so volatile.
00:37:42.000 And the fatfall that civilizations make every time is by being tricked and brainwashed into behaving as the mob.
00:37:54.000 And when these things become violent then the mob is only and always a tool of the state.
00:38:00.000 It's made to look like it's the people doing something for themselves but it never is.
00:38:06.000 I know people that were on that march.
00:38:09.000 I've got people who are dear to me who were on that And I know the kind of people that they are and the good things that they are honestly motivated by.
00:38:20.000 You can't point at a gathering like that and say, well, just all these people are racist or all these people are whatever, nationalists in the very worst sense of the word.
00:38:28.000 Because Tommy Robinson is speaking to a congregation that is vilified and has been set aside and white working class being a large part of it.
00:38:37.000 And he speaks to that, he listens to their concerns and someone ought to be listening to their concerns.
00:38:43.000 He's a very clever guy, Tommy Robinson.
00:38:46.000 I've read his book and he's a clever operator.
00:38:52.000 He knows what he's talking about and he comes from that of which he speaks.
00:38:56.000 He's born and bred in it.
00:38:57.000 And so I wouldn't dismiss him for one minute.
00:39:00.000 But the crucial factor is that we have to learn once and for all that the trouble that we see on either side of us is put there to annoy us.
00:39:11.000 We're being shaken up like ants in a jar and the result is internecine violence.
00:39:16.000 Which is the objective of those above that we don't pay enough attention to.
00:39:19.000 And if they get their way, there will be something, you know, dreadful things will happen.
00:39:24.000 And the solutions that are offered for those dreadful things, the consequences that arise from those dreadful things, will not serve any of us.
00:39:31.000 Not in the long term.
00:39:32.000 Yes, it's extraordinary to try to even contemplate what a workable and viable solution might look like.
00:39:40.000 Obviously, Neil, over time we've gone from a kind of situation where the issue of migration was held up As a measure of where you stood on a scale of compassion.
00:39:58.000 Well, you have to be compassionate.
00:40:00.000 These refugee crises are often caused by the results of imperialism, colonialism, or more laterally, economic and commercial exploitation, or destabilization through wars.
00:40:16.000 There's almost a sense of culpability and guilt.
00:40:18.000 But now, whether or not they will be effective in doing so, even Keir Starmer's apparently left of centre, although if you were to, I'm sure, analyse them by policy, you would find that they're ultimately a sort of a kind of right-wing party in terms of social policy, and potentially only left-wing in terms of authority and government control.
00:40:41.000 They have accepted that the argument has been won on migration.
00:40:45.000 Most people are concerned about immigration in the UK.
00:40:48.000 Most people are concerned about immigration in the US.
00:40:52.000 And in both these countries, you've seen parties that would have once attacked their opponents as racists for vilifying or not being sympathetic to migrants, refugees, whatever you want to call them.
00:41:03.000 They now have adopted their policies, or at least seek to emulate their policies with a softer rhetoric.
00:41:10.000 What I sometimes wonder, Neil, is what a solution looks like in the event that you have nation-first governments elected.
00:41:20.000 You know, you have a MAGA president in the United States, obviously Donald Trump.
00:41:24.000 You have, say, a Nigel Farage coalition coming in at some point.
00:41:30.000 What happens around the subject of migration?
00:41:33.000 Yes, there's the idea of closed borders.
00:41:34.000 Yes, there's the idea of legal migration.
00:41:37.000 But I sometimes wonder what would be the relationship between the diverse existing communities in this country, or in any country.
00:41:45.000 And that's where I would like to return to your point.
00:41:48.000 That we surely have to find a set of ideals that are predicated mostly upon love rather than hate and othering.
00:41:57.000 I am so sympathetic to the ideas you've outlined and that Tommy Robinson represents, that essentially a manufacturing and military class are no longer required for manufacturing and the military in the way they once were.
00:42:12.000 So now they have been vilified and abandoned.
00:42:15.000 The jobs are gone, the wars that require them are gone, and now they are being essentially condemned and perjured so that people don't have to deal with the fact that the people that I wonder how a kind of thesis or rather a manifesto might be formed that shows us what that would Britain look like?
00:42:32.000 Do you see a chance for real if not real integration then happy cohabiting?
00:42:35.000 because of migration or globalism that their voices aren't heard. I wonder how a kind of thesis,
00:42:43.000 or rather a manifesto might be formed that shows us what that would Britain look like. Do you see
00:42:49.000 a chance for real, if not real integration, then happy cohabiting?
00:42:54.000 Because we're surely not saying, all right, you know, let's exercise the nation of all non-white
00:43:01.000 people or Pakistani people.
00:43:04.000 Like, you know, surely, like, when I spoke to Galloway about this, he said, I agree that immigration has to be controlled because if you flood the market with migrants, ordinary working people can't earn any bloody decent wedge.
00:43:15.000 But everyone that's already here, we're going to have to learn to get along.
00:43:18.000 And that, for me, kind of seemed like a good direction to take it.
00:43:22.000 And I wonder what your thoughts are on that, Neil.
00:43:25.000 Yeah, it's already happened.
00:43:28.000 The mass migration has already happened.
00:43:33.000 I think it's fair to say that on some metrics the British demographic has been altered to a greater extent more quickly than any other nation has experienced in certainly modern times.
00:43:48.000 It's unprecedented.
00:43:50.000 the the number of new people have arrived in my own mass all at once within a you know within half of a within a generation or less And obviously something similar.
00:44:02.000 I had somebody saying the other day that 50 odd million Americans, in fact it was Conor McGregor I think, 50 odd million Americans or 50 odd million people in America weren't born there.
00:44:13.000 You know, so something similar in terms of the scale and the speed is happening there.
00:44:19.000 And it's absolutely a defensible and a right stance to take that where there's an indigenous culture It must prevail.
00:44:31.000 It must not be obliterated by simply flooding that indigenous population, that indigenous culture with something else, regardless of what it is.
00:44:42.000 You know, UNESCO has a list of, you know, they've got the World Heritage Sites, you know, your pyramids and Stonehenge and so on.
00:44:51.000 But there's also a list of intangible cultural heritage.
00:44:56.000 Which refers to, like, folk myth and language and cuisine and dance.
00:45:03.000 All the things that everyone who belongs to a culture instinctively knows and recognises, but you can't actually lay a hand on them.
00:45:10.000 It's not like an architecture or whatever, it's song and all the intangibles.
00:45:15.000 And these things are rightfully defended.
00:45:18.000 Every two weeks, I think it is, by an estimate, a language disappears.
00:45:23.000 The last speaker of a language dies about twice a month, and taking with them what Wade Davis, the anthropologist, called a deep growth forest of the mind.
00:45:38.000 A whole way of perceiving reality Blinks out like an extinguished light when we lose a language and we're losing them in that way and being cavalier about the cultural inheritance of all the nations on earth built up over not just centuries but over millennia and to treat those things as disposable and to watch them be diluted to the point of extinction and disappearance is the most egregious wrong
00:46:07.000 And there's nothing wrong with seeing that has established over a couple of thousand years an indigenous culture and population in Britain and the people who have a stake in it and who are the inheritors of, in many ways, these intangible aspects of cultural heritage.
00:46:24.000 They've got a right to defend them and they've got a right to want to be able to pass them on to their own children and to see them passed on again.
00:46:31.000 Ad infinitum.
00:46:33.000 But George Galloway's right.
00:46:34.000 There are many ways to approach this.
00:46:36.000 George is right.
00:46:36.000 I speak to George.
00:46:39.000 To bring in people that are prepared to undercut the wages of the lowest paid anyway, that's an egregious wrong.
00:46:47.000 And it's happening against a backdrop where we know that birth rates are falling all around the world.
00:46:52.000 Every other nation isn't making enough babies simply to maintain its own existence.
00:46:58.000 A country like Japan stands to disappear within a century.
00:47:01.000 Because their birth rate is so low.
00:47:04.000 And there's a background music all the time of people saying that there's too many people on planet Earth.
00:47:10.000 And you cannot either.
00:47:13.000 I mean, the people that are arriving into Europe and arriving into Britain, that wouldn't be happening in many ways if we hadn't spent the last, since the end of the Second World War, bombing the shit out of every other country on Earth.
00:47:24.000 You know, all over, the West's exploitation of Africa, the West's abuse of the Middle East, bombing, invading, seeking regime change by political means and all the rest of it, causing that kind of disruption.
00:47:38.000 And then people are left with nothing but rubble and broken dreams and dead parents and dead babies.
00:47:44.000 What are they going to do?
00:47:45.000 Some of them get up and walk.
00:47:46.000 Which is all they can do, to go somewhere else.
00:47:49.000 And some of them arrive here.
00:47:50.000 Now why wouldn't they?
00:47:51.000 If my country had been bombed flat, generationally, by a stronger military power, and I had the wherewithal to get my boys and my daughter out of here to somewhere where the living was better, damn straight I'd be doing that.
00:48:04.000 And if they got there, I'd be saying, send me the address and mum and I'll come and join you.
00:48:08.000 I won't condemn that desperation but there are so many ingredients to all of this and again I say it's been confected and exploited by those above who never lose and only gain and by their exploitation of chaos and their sowing of internecine squabble and cultural and religious hatred and all of the rest of it and stoking of anger instead of friendship it benefits them and it's a zero-sum game for the rest of us.
00:48:37.000 With over 100,000 gas stations, petrol stations we call them, grocery stores, and that's a better term, and restaurants on the upside app, cashback is just around the corner on daily essentials.
00:48:49.000 Essentials like petrol or gas.
00:48:51.000 It's real cashback.
00:48:53.000 No confusing reward or points.
00:48:55.000 Rewards, points, what am I?
00:48:57.000 A dog?
00:48:58.000 Am I on a game show already?
00:49:00.000 Real money to transfer straight into your bank.
00:49:03.000 To find out how much you could earn as a person, click the link in the description to download Upside and use the code RUSSELL.
00:49:10.000 That's my name, remember.
00:49:11.000 RUSSELL.
00:49:11.000 Two S's, two L's.
00:49:12.000 To get an extra 25 cents back for every gallon on your first tank of gas or petrol, or scan the QR code here to claim this offer.
00:49:22.000 Download this for free at upside.app.link forward slash Russell.
00:49:26.000 That's upside.app.link forward slash Russell.
00:49:30.000 Two S's, two L's, you heathens.
00:49:32.000 Earn three times more cash back than other loyalty payments with confusing points and rewards.
00:49:37.000 We just want cash.
00:49:38.000 Hard cash, dollary dues, or pound sterling.
00:49:41.000 God bless you, mom.
00:49:42.000 We'll never forget you.
00:49:43.000 Okay, back to the content.
00:49:46.000 It's interesting to note the significance of the nihilism of the Olympic ceremony when it comes to the collapsing of those intangible cultural assets.
00:49:58.000 The richness of France is literary, artistic, musical, philosophical, religious, History collapsed into a really contemporary niche idea about individual freedom of expression at the cost of all else is extraordinary and you can see how that would be a useful tool in creating an environment where indigenous populations are prone to exploitation, assault and takeover.
00:50:25.000 I want to talk in a minute now about the great challenge the media faces in creating a new icon and hero in the Democrat Party nominee Kamala Harris.
00:50:35.000 They need to quickly turn around a public perception of her as maybe a little inept and flawed and not great at public speaking and having a pretty draconian record while in office as a lawyer and as an Attorney General into the hero that the establishment requires.
00:50:56.000 We'll get into that subject next.
00:50:58.000 First, we have a quick message from our partners.
00:51:01.000 Back in a second.
00:51:02.000 So Neil, what do you think about the Kamala Harris project?
00:51:08.000 There's this cover of her at the New York Times as an attempt to repackage some of her odd rambles as a sort of a positive and enjoyable thing.
00:51:18.000 It's an image that suggests unity but it's sort of somewhat slapdash.
00:51:23.000 I wonder if you saw The brilliant Bordasar amalgam.
00:51:29.000 Under Joe Biden, she was Bordasar with special purview and portfolio over border security.
00:51:38.000 And now that she's president, they're pretending that she never was.
00:51:41.000 There's a brilliant montage, which I'll show you at some point, of that.
00:51:44.000 And also, there's, I want to, carrying on from what we were just discussing, American
00:51:52.000 children are no longer the primary source of new residents within the country.
00:51:56.000 So in a sense, it relates to what we've been talking about throughout this show, a kind
00:52:00.000 of sense that we are being presented with a homogenized uni-culture to accompany the
00:52:07.000 homogenized systems of economics and governance and media that already dominate while claiming
00:52:13.000 to be about diversity.
00:52:15.000 But if you just start off by telling me what you've observed as the media has undertaken its attempt to get everyone on board with Kamala Harris.
00:52:25.000 I can't believe I'm watching it.
00:52:27.000 I can't believe it's being done with a straight face.
00:52:32.000 It's almost like watching, you know, if you kind of, you know, look into a room when your kids were like three and four or whatever and they're playing with another half a dozen kids and they're in this, they've made up this sort of make-believe thing and they're making it out like it's real.
00:52:48.000 And then, obviously, as soon as you get Mum and Dad walking, you know, the atmosphere changes and you stop.
00:52:53.000 Whatever.
00:52:54.000 I can't believe that anyone's trying to sell the American people Kamala Harris as a serious contender for anything.
00:53:05.000 Because it's all exposed and it's all out there.
00:53:07.000 Like you say, this thing where they're now, her having been Biden's border czar, because they had to give her something to do, and now they're saying, no she wasn't, no she wasn't.
00:53:17.000 That's the kiddie equivalent of eyes closed, fingers in ears, la la la la la.
00:53:22.000 It's not there.
00:53:23.000 It's absolute farce.
00:53:25.000 And they seem to really genuinely, they must have something else up their sleeves.
00:53:31.000 Either they're going to, surely they're going to spring someone else at the last minute or there's not going to be an election.
00:53:36.000 Because you can't seriously go into an election against Donald Trump unless you, unless you've just given up, unless you just, oh well we're never going to win that one and we will just expend Kamala Harris here and that'll be her, that'll be her time gone.
00:53:50.000 But you can't seriously, is she really, I mean, you know, she can't, she can't speak.
00:53:56.000 She doesn't make sense and she doesn't grasp principles about economics or anything else that you would explore or matters geopolitical that you would naturally be inclined to expect your commander-in-chief to be able to you know to talk off the cuff about as though they had spent five minutes studying any of those subjects before they started speaking about them.
00:54:16.000 She is utterly unbelievable and yet and yet here we are What does it tell us about how the Democratic Party must work, that it takes a little more than a couple of endorsements and some front covers to generate?
00:54:29.000 I was just watching a Jon Stewart piece, mate.
00:54:32.000 And like Jon Stewart sort of did this, you know, he's always funny, Jon Stewart.
00:54:36.000 I really love Jon Stewart as a comedian.
00:54:38.000 Like the, you know, the Democrat Party were in bewilderment and within the wilderness
00:54:43.000 and under Joe Biden, all was doomed.
00:54:46.000 But now Kamala Harris, it was done sort of somewhat tongue in cheek,
00:54:50.000 but what it wasn't was mocking of Kamala Harris as a political figure.
00:54:55.000 It was strongly suggesting that what the Democratic Party had to get,
00:55:00.000 well, you know, Democratic Party and Democrat voters had to get behind was Kamala Harris.
00:55:06.000 And when Jon Stewart came back, I thought this is an interesting mark
00:55:10.000 of how the culture's changed.
00:55:11.000 In his first episode back, he ridiculed Joe Biden, as well as Donald Trump.
00:55:16.000 By the second episode of him being back, he'd stopped ridiculing Joe Biden.
00:55:20.000 And what I feel this weird time shows us is something that became evident during COVID.
00:55:27.000 You've got a media machine that will just support and amplify the messaging of the establishment, whatever that messaging is.
00:55:34.000 When it was required to say Joe Biden is as sharp as a tack, it said that.
00:55:38.000 When it was required to say that Joe Biden was in decline and had to be replaced, it said that.
00:55:42.000 When it had to say that Kamala Harris was a proficient politician, It's saying that.
00:55:46.000 And how can it maintain its trust in a fractured, splintered media environment where now Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan compete to be the world's top podcasters and to a point political voices?
00:56:03.000 How can that old model Succeed.
00:56:07.000 And you seem to be suggesting that when it comes to the election, it can't and won't.
00:56:12.000 But can it even work reliably as a system of sort of propaganda and thought control, Neil?
00:56:21.000 No, I don't.
00:56:21.000 It can't.
00:56:22.000 I do wonder at the extent to which we're just being there in some sort of liminal period between the way things were, where there was credibility connected to politicians and the media by some people to some extent.
00:56:36.000 They've got into this position where hardly anybody trusts the media.
00:56:44.000 Politicians have now got a reputation lower than what the state agents were famous for having in the 90s.
00:56:49.000 No one treats them with any kind of respect whatsoever.
00:56:52.000 But I do wonder, as I say, are we transitioning to a point where they know that?
00:56:59.000 And they know that we know that and all of the rest of the, you know, sultanates and, you know, the way you roll that out, they know, we know, we know, they know.
00:57:07.000 Are they just saying it doesn't matter that you know?
00:57:09.000 It doesn't matter that you, because you people don't matter because, because votes and voting doesn't matter.
00:57:14.000 And here's the Democratic Party casting aside democracy itself and holding a coup within
00:57:23.000 its own borders and deciding without so much as a 'by your leave' that this person is no
00:57:29.000 longer wanted to be the president, won't be running for next president and here's the
00:57:35.000 next person that you're going to have.
00:57:37.000 And we're going to make her as ridiculous as possible to underline the fact that we
00:57:42.000 know that you know what we're about and it's important that you know what we're about because
00:57:47.000 this is how it's going to be.
00:57:48.000 There's a new sheriff in town and he just tells you how it's going to be and if we give you a ridiculous commander-in-chief that's utterly implausible, Well, we know that she's ridiculous and utterly implausible, but we want to see you accept it.
00:58:02.000 It's that kind of, it's that doublethink from, you know, that Orwellian doublethink, where they know that people know what they know, but they know that the people won't have the nerve to say it for fear of consequences.
00:58:12.000 Well, we've just endured Joe Biden for approaching four years, so it's pretty clear that whatever the ideal is, it bears some resemblance to what you're describing, that they don't really care.
00:58:27.000 And over the course of our conversation, Neil, I've started to notice that there's an ongoing and continual attempt to create, it seems, confusion and to rely on the fact that confusion by itself generates division.
00:58:42.000 This is the President of the United States.
00:58:44.000 He's sharp as a tack.
00:58:45.000 Hold on a minute.
00:58:45.000 For a couple of years now, we've been watching this guy bewildered.
00:58:48.000 He's not President now.
00:58:49.000 This person's gonna be your next President.
00:58:51.000 Wait a second.
00:58:52.000 We've just been watching her.
00:58:53.000 No, no, no.
00:58:53.000 She never was the Bordasar.
00:58:55.000 But we've got loads of footage of people saying and it being publicly acknowledged that she was Bordasar.
00:59:01.000 At the Olympic ceremony, where you have odd, extraordinary spectacles that don't seem to be about the principle of reverence, respect and love that all human beings warrant and is included and indeed central to Christianity.
00:59:17.000 It seems to be about a kind of mocking and ridicule.
00:59:21.000 And I suppose the questions I have when it comes to grassroots movements is, I can understand Because it is the community that I grew up in, in fact, why working-class communities would have anger in them.
00:59:34.000 I have that anger.
00:59:35.000 I've never lost it in spite of the years spent being adored and fated, particularly of how that culture is ultimately, how I've interacted with that culture, say, and what the, you know, where I currently stand within it.
00:59:47.000 Like you, I find it hard even to participate as a spectator now to cultural events because I see the culture as this
00:59:55.000 malign, disgusting, demonic, unjust, duplicitous demon, ultimately. But what I suppose it
01:00:06.000 becomes the happy task of the likes of you and me to work towards is that some good faith
01:00:14.000 enters into these complicated spaces.
01:00:17.000 Wouldn't it be good to know that nationalist movements were driven by love?
01:00:22.000 That it's like, we love this country, and we love the people that built this country, and we are open to inclusivity, but we will come to consensually between us, not some top-down Bleaching sheen shone down from unreliable centralised forces and resources.
01:00:43.000 I really hope, Neil, that the simple and somewhat trite idea of movements fuelled by love can somehow be all good.
01:00:54.000 We will.
01:00:57.000 I'm very conscious of, and people tell me all the time, that I'm bleak, that I'm just a monger of doom.
01:01:06.000 And I'm aware of that because I refuse to stop shaking the bone.
01:01:13.000 I'm still asking questions for which answers have not come and I won't stop doing it.
01:01:18.000 But in my heart, I know that there will be a better evolution.
01:01:28.000 We are going through something and to some extent you've got to be pleased almost.
01:01:33.000 What a time to be alive!
01:01:34.000 And I don't mean that ironically.
01:01:36.000 We are going through a time of great change, apocalypse in that sense of a revealing.
01:01:41.000 And people, so many people in response to so many of the problems are saying, are recognising that anything that seems to come as a global crisis For which only a one-size-fits-all top-down global solution applies.
01:01:57.000 People are seeing that for the nonsense that it is.
01:01:59.000 My friend Nick Hudson calls it, he uses Hudson's Razor.
01:02:03.000 He says, if it's presented as a global crisis, if they tell you that they're the only purveyors of the top-down solution, and thirdly, that any dissent is to be stamped on like heresy of old, you're dealing with a scam.
01:02:17.000 Every time those three things come together, you're dealing with a scam.
01:02:21.000 I learned that, and so many people have recognised that this top-down, globalist thing, they've seen it for what it is, and that's a good thing.
01:02:30.000 And people talk about, Ralph Schulhammer's another one that talks to me all the time about the necessity for local and for community.
01:02:38.000 And for grassroots.
01:02:40.000 Those are the words on the lips of more and more people who, like myself, previously did not involve themselves in conversations of this nature because I didn't think that I was required in them.
01:02:51.000 But my awakening has been that I have seen that that was a terrible dereliction of duty on my part.
01:02:58.000 You know, I am, you know, any man's death diminishes me for I am involved in mankind, you know, therefore never sent to know for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee.
01:03:06.000 That's right.
01:03:08.000 And it's not about rights so much as it's about obligations.
01:03:12.000 And people are realising that whether it's onerous or uncomfortable or not, they have not just a right, which is fine, rather they have an obligation to stand up in the face of this kind of tyranny and this kind of nonsense.
01:03:27.000 And out of that will come, out of that will come genuine love.
01:03:30.000 There's nothing wrong with love of country.
01:03:33.000 I sometimes think about the fact that we're all scattered around.
01:03:37.000 I lament all the time that some of the people I most enjoy talking to are nowhere near me.
01:03:43.000 You included, although you're only in London, you're only a one hour flight away.
01:03:47.000 But I talk to people in South Africa and I talk to people in North America and South America and Australia and New Zealand who are all sharing this.
01:03:53.000 And I think it's like we've got a virtual country.
01:03:56.000 You know, it's this brotherhood that's my country, it's this legion that's my country.
01:04:08.000 I think people are rediscovering that and remembering to love country, not in a way that means hating the neighbours, Not in a way that means hating people on the other side of the fence.
01:04:19.000 On the contrary, once you come to love your own country and culture and language and heritage, then a side benefit of that is appreciating everyone else.
01:04:31.000 As you just said a few minutes ago about France, The richness of the French culture, and happily, I haven't seen much in the way of people being angry with the French about what happened at the Olympics, which might have happened before.
01:04:45.000 Because of course it's got nothing to do with the French, it's got nothing to do with French people.
01:04:48.000 Presumably they're still just out there, still enjoying their baguettes and enjoying their strange pop music and doing all the things that French people are, that we love.
01:04:58.000 People have learned enough to go, it's the regime.
01:05:02.000 It's those bastards at the top.
01:05:03.000 They've just done this.
01:05:05.000 And we love the French, and we love France, and we love everything that France means.
01:05:08.000 So that's an evolution.
01:05:11.000 We might have been angry with the French before, but we're not.
01:05:13.000 We're saying, no, this is those politicians.
01:05:17.000 So you can see it coming.
01:05:18.000 People are moving in the right direction.
01:05:21.000 And there's a community forming.
01:05:23.000 And it's scattered at the moment, but in that way that it will, you know, it's also coalescing.
01:05:29.000 It's crystallizing into something and taking form.
01:05:32.000 And people are using the right language.
01:05:34.000 Be local.
01:05:34.000 Talk about community.
01:05:36.000 Talk down one size fits all is bad.
01:05:39.000 Globalism is bad.
01:05:40.000 I'm angry with the French, I've been angry with the French, and I remain angry with the French.
01:05:47.000 Neil, thank you so much for those brilliant exclamations, explications, stories, poems, rhymes, and good old-fashioned common sense spun so beautifully.
01:05:58.000 What we always accept and expect from a conversation with Neil Oliver.
01:06:02.000 If you want to follow Neil, you can.
01:06:05.000 Using the various links that we are posting right now.
01:06:08.000 I love you, Neil.
01:06:08.000 I hope we get to spend a week together doing a combined week of content.
01:06:14.000 How fun would that be?
01:06:15.000 I love you too, Russell.
01:06:16.000 We'll be together actually breathing the same air, properly conspiring someday soon.
01:06:21.000 Let's be conspiracy theorists together, Neil.
01:06:24.000 Thanks very much.
01:06:25.000 Thanks everyone for watching us today.
01:06:27.000 That's the end of our show.
01:06:28.000 Remember to follow us on Locals where you get additional content, and tomorrow we'll be back with Adam Carolla.
01:06:36.000 Not for more of the same, but for more of the different.