Stay Free - Russel Brand - DEBATE DAY SPECIAL: Is THIS How Google Will Steal The 2024 Election?! SF449

00:00:00.000 (birds chirping)

00:05:58.000 (upbeat music)

00:06:01.000 ♪ Nevertheless they could not understand ♪ ♪ I'm a black man and I could never be a better man ♪

00:06:07.000 ♪ On this big blue ocean ♪ ♪ I'm gonna rule the world ♪

00:06:11.000 ♪ So I'm looking for the sea ♪ In this video, you're going to see the future.

00:06:29.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wanderers.

00:06:30.000 Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.

00:06:33.000 Debate Eve, the very first time Kamala and Trump will meet across the podium.

00:06:40.000 How will it go?

00:06:41.000 Does it feel a little like the mating of giant pandas?

00:06:45.000 We will, of course, be streaming live for our watch along.

00:06:50.000 For you, with you, at 5.30 P.T., 8.30 E.T., and right in the middle of the night, just the way we like it here in the UK.

00:07:02.000 Join us, JackTheLad12, you wonderful and glorious awakened wonder, yeah.

00:07:07.000 Join us, Dagar, Digit or Hippie, Bobby Murner, Join us!

00:07:12.000 Join us!

00:07:13.000 We've got a fantastic guest for the show tonight.

00:07:14.000 I'm actually extremely excited.

00:07:16.000 Dr. Robert Epstein is joining us to discuss the over-incredible, almost immeasurable impact of Google when it comes to curating our reality.

00:07:28.000 Perhaps electoral interference is a Complicated subject to discuss, but when it comes to the 360 control of your reality, there's no doubt that alphabet or GERD organizations have an incredible ability to present particular political movements and particular stories in a very specific light.

00:07:49.000 We will be talking to him about that.

00:07:53.000 And yeah, I'm wearing a suit jacket.

00:07:56.000 Yeah, that's what I'm wearing.

00:07:57.000 Jackie O.

00:07:58.000 We'll be here, so join us.

00:08:00.000 But now we're gonna talk about, we've got a few things to discuss before beloved and dear and adored Dr. Robert Epstein joins us.

00:08:09.000 We're gonna be talking about... Hmm.

00:08:11.000 Hmm.

00:08:12.000 Let me have a look.

00:08:13.000 Would you like to refresh your memory with a little, like, this is not the kind of debate you're gonna get tonight, okay?

00:08:18.000 This is not the type of debate you'll get tonight.

00:08:21.000 This is a little flashback.

00:08:23.000 Oh, you want to see the t-shirt?

00:08:25.000 This is the t-shirt.

00:08:26.000 Bongino's doing one.

00:08:27.000 The Bongino Army.

00:08:28.000 We got anyone from the Bongino Army?

00:08:29.000 They're saying the volume's low, guys.

00:08:33.000 Thank you.

00:08:35.000 This... Is that an ironic Pfizer shirt?

00:08:39.000 Asks Lily Farm Girl in the chat. 0.53

00:08:42.000 No, Pfizer have been really... They've been sponsoring it.

00:08:47.000 Why are you wearing a Pfizer shirt?

00:08:50.000 Well, Actually, because, uh, as you surely know, Pfizer makes some pretty incredible products.

00:08:56.000 Say, for example, you were concerned about getting, um, what was the name of that?

00:09:00.000 COVID-19.

00:09:01.000 Now, they make, uh, it's... I don't know if you've read George's Marvelous Medicine by Roald Dahl.

00:09:08.000 A little boy with a dream makes a glorious concoction for his grandma.

00:09:14.000 And, uh, yeah, that's right.

00:09:18.000 Anyway, these guys at Pfizer, oh, they do very, very good work when it comes to mRNA gene therapies.

00:09:27.000 I'm hoping that irony is a concept that's travelled its glorious way across this globe in the same way that that very pandemic did.

00:09:38.000 Let's have a look at Hillary Clinton and Trump in 2016 to give ourselves a reassuring little booster shot of joy.

00:09:47.000 From everything I see, has no respect for this person.

00:09:53.000 Well, that's because he'd rather have a puppet as president of the United States.

00:09:56.000 No puppet.

00:09:57.000 No puppet.

00:09:57.000 And it's pretty clear.

00:09:58.000 You're the puppet.

00:09:59.000 It's pretty clear you won't admit that the Russians have engaged in cyber attacks against the United States of America, that you encouraged espionage against our people that you are willing to spout the Putin line, sign up for his wish list, break up NATO, do whatever he wants to do, and that you continue to get help from him because he has a very clear favorite in this race.

00:10:29.000 I don't know what you're going to get with no mics live tonight.

00:10:35.000 They're both aged.

00:10:36.000 It's been a tough time.

00:10:36.000 It's been a tough few years.

00:10:39.000 Let's have a look at CNN having a little panic about I'm having a little panic about Trump's recent polling, because it seems that the Kamala honeymoon is over, baby.

00:10:52.000 If you look at the white voters without college degrees, this is a Trump-based constituency, obviously.

00:10:59.000 You see his huge numbers with this group.

00:11:03.000 You see that this is a trouble sign for Harris.

00:11:06.000 She also, in a place like Georgia, is not doing well with white college educated voters. 1.00

00:11:12.000 She probably wants to make up some ground with white college educated voters across 1.00

00:11:16.000 these battlegrounds as well, Gay.

00:11:17.000 An important gut check for both campaigns on multiple levels in multiple states is what's

00:11:24.000 It's great to see you, David.

00:11:25.000 Chris Christie says that Donald Trump has got a very particular strategy in mind.

00:11:32.000 The ABC presidential debate is just two days away.

00:11:35.000 Let's bring in former DNC chair Donna Brazile and former New Jersey governor Chris Christie.

00:11:40.000 So, Chris, you have debated Donald Trump.

00:11:44.000 You have helped Donald Trump prepare for a debate.

00:11:48.000 You have seen this all play out.

00:11:51.000 What is going on with him right now?

00:11:53.000 How do you think he is actually getting ready for this debate?

00:11:57.000 He doesn't get ready.

00:11:58.000 I mean, as someone who was in charge of debate prep in 2016 and 2020 for him, it was a constant struggle.

00:12:04.000 There were times when we would go and debate prep would be scheduled.

00:12:08.000 We'd go in to sit with him and he would just say, no, I'm not doing it.

00:12:12.000 And that would be it, and it just wouldn't happen.

00:12:15.000 And so my guess is that, you know, especially now, as you said in the lead-up, you know, his seventh general election presidential debate, he really doesn't think he needs to prepare.

00:12:26.000 He believes that just whatever his gut instincts are, are what's going to carry him.

00:12:31.000 He will allow people to speak at him for a while.

00:12:34.000 I will guarantee you there's been no mock debates, there never has been.

00:12:38.000 He won't allow it, won't permit it.

00:12:40.000 So he will be— He won't allow a mock debate.

00:12:44.000 He sees that as somehow breaching the sanctity of the concept.

00:12:49.000 I mean, that don't make me like him less.

00:12:52.000 Do you remember when we learned that Joe Biden had been on a special holiday to prepare for that debate?

00:12:58.000 And then we saw it and even his dear wife Jill didn't seem sincere when she congratulated him on it.

00:13:05.000 I like the idea of a debate with a person that Let me know in the chat how you think it's going to go.

00:13:16.000 The mics are muted, there's no audience, so you're not going to get a because you'll be in jail type moment.

00:13:23.000 And again, do you think the Republican Party MAGA movement and Trump in particular are still in a process of adapting to the social There's a complexity that comes from transitioning from debating an elderly white male puppet of the establishment to debating a non-white female middle-aged puppet of the establishment.

00:13:54.000 What are the complexities?

00:13:56.000 There's all different types of puppet You can have one.

00:14:00.000 You could have one with tentacles.

00:14:01.000 You could have one with nine eyes.

00:14:04.000 You could have one that speaks out the top of its head with a kind of fluid, a hot piping lava-like fluid.

00:14:12.000 Still the same thing.

00:14:14.000 Trump's not preparing for any entity that he has to debate.

00:14:18.000 Typically, Donald Trump, which is, he's just going to go in there and wing it.

00:14:23.000 And that's why I think what Kamala Harris does in this debate is significantly more important than what Donald Trump does, because he's going to be him, he's just going to wing it.

00:14:32.000 You've seen this show before.

00:14:34.000 She's the one that's going to get the most attention. 1.00

00:14:37.000 She'll get the most attention.

00:14:38.000 Will Kamala get advantages? 1.00

00:14:40.000 Will this be a revelation of previously unexposed fissures?

00:14:43.000 Will new information come?

00:14:45.000 Will it make a difference?

00:14:46.000 Obviously, in a debate situation, both sides must believe that there is a value to doing it.

00:14:52.000 Even with all of the restrictions and controls, it's at least an indication of some kind of optimism, is it?

00:14:59.000 And of some good faith from both of the parties, is it?

00:15:02.000 Or is it little more than a spectacle?

00:15:06.000 Will we, on the other side of this debate that we're streaming live tonight, be holding a glowing orb of new information?

00:15:14.000 Or will the people that believe in Kamala say she won, the people that believe in Trump say he won?

00:15:19.000 Let me know!

00:15:19.000 Have a watch party, Shane Larson, at your house, and invite everybody Watch our stream on Rumble tonight.

00:15:27.000 Chris Christie says Trump ain't preparing and by the time you see this you will know whether that's true.

00:15:34.000 You know that Rumble are a unique and fantastic organisation.

00:15:39.000 You know that they have given me extraordinary opportunities and you know how much I love my dog Bear.

00:15:46.000 He's not with me now but he'll be with me for the debate.

00:15:49.000 I'll tell you that. 0.86

00:15:50.000 And one of the things I can tell you about that dog is he causes me a lot of heartache and arse ache. 0.87

00:15:56.000 You know like he sounds like just eats things off the floor.

00:15:59.000 He once ate a bunch of Neurofen.

00:16:00.000 That's a particular brand of ibuprofen.

00:16:03.000 And you're confronted in these situations with extraordinary challenges.

00:16:08.000 That dog has put me in a lot of jams with the things that he's eaten.

00:16:11.000 You can find yourself in a situation calling the vet with one hand and searching what to do if your dog eats a bra with the other.

00:16:18.000 That's why the Positive Emergency Kit is an absolute must-have.

00:16:23.000 Whether it's allergy attacks, mystery cuts, or being sick all over your carpet, this kit has got you covered.

00:16:30.000 Positive is backed by Rumble, the same free speech warriors, the same great army that stand up against the tyranny of Google, the tyranny of Alphabet, the tyranny of Globalism, banned from France, banned from Brazil, banned from Russia, Wait, who are the goodies?

00:16:48.000 What do you mean there's no goodies?

00:16:52.000 They will make sure that your pets get quality care without corporate BS.

00:16:56.000 Who knew that we could be so prepared by Chaos by making a simple couple of decisions to protect our pets' health?

00:17:03.000 And you know I'm doing this for my bear, and I'm going to be taking advantage of the 15% off code that I can get Because I am me.

00:17:10.000 All I have to do is put is brand and I'll get 15% off by going to Pawsitive.com.

00:17:14.000 That's pawsitive, not positive.

00:17:16.000 Pawsitive, like dogs have paws.

00:17:19.000 Pawsitive.com slash brand and grab a kit.

00:17:23.000 Let's face it, our dogs may be walking disasters, but they are our disasters and they deserve the best.

00:17:28.000 Head to Pawsitive.com forward slash brand and use the code brand to get your 15% off, protect your pet, protect free speech.

00:17:37.000 What more could you do with an afternoon?

00:17:39.000 Very little, if you ask me.

00:17:41.000 Now, overnight, even CNN have gone into a peculiar kind of meltdown while trying to reconcile Kamala Harris' current policy positions with her previous policy positions.

00:17:55.000 Kamala Harris is a mystery when it comes to policy, and every announcement makes it yet more opaque.

00:18:02.000 One moment she's emulating Trump, the very next it appears that there could be a subverted and concealed agenda.

00:18:09.000 While the debate may make things a little clearer, we've got to have a look at this to understand the true depths of the complexity of Kamala.

00:18:20.000 Let's have a look at this CNN report from Erin Burnett, who seems somewhat astonished.

00:18:28.000 Tonight, Kamala Harris releasing details of her policy positions for the first time on her campaign website.

00:18:34.000 A K-file investigation has been covered.

00:18:36.000 Meantime, a 2019 questionnaire.

00:18:39.000 And in this questionnaire, Harris laid out some much more liberal stances, among them on immigration.

00:18:46.000 So in 2019, in what Kay Fowle found, she said she would cut funding to ICE, writing, quote,

00:18:51.000 "Our immigrant detention system is out of control and I believe we must end the unfair incarceration 1.00

00:18:56.000 of thousands of individuals, families and children. I was one of the first senators,

00:19:00.000 after President Trump was elected, to advocate for a decrease in funding to ICE." 0.65

00:19:05.000 Well, now, of course, she's touting the Biden administration's executive order to crack down 0.93

00:19:10.000 KFOW's Andrew Kaczynski joins me now.

00:19:13.000 Andrew, that's pretty incredible on its own when you're talking about what you found here on ICE.

00:19:18.000 What else did you find?

00:19:19.000 Yeah, and this was a questionnaire that she filled out for the ACLU, and this questionnaire is really an interesting snapshot in time of that 2019 Democratic primary.

00:19:29.000 Kamala Harris was trying to get to the left of Bernie Sanders. 0.99

00:19:32.000 She was trying to get to the left of Elizabeth Warren, and you really see that in a lot of these answers, and I want to walk our viewers through a little bit of what she said.

00:19:39.000 Let's just take immigration and look at what she said here.

00:19:42.000 She said on immigration, she made this open-ended pledge to end And what, may I ask, is wrong with that?

00:19:47.000 She said she supported taxpayer-funded gender transition surgeries for detained migrants.

00:19:53.000 She also said she supported...

00:19:54.000 Taxpayer-funded gender transition surgeries for detained migrants.

00:19:56.000 For detained migrants.

00:19:57.000 She ag... 0.75

00:19:58.000 And what, may I ask, is wrong with that?

00:20:00.000 How do you propose elsewise that the gender would be altered of a detained migrant without 0.92

00:20:06.000 some sort of surgical procedure?

00:20:08.000 Are you imagining that the gender could be changed simply by imagination or self-will or by the weather itself?

00:20:16.000 It will require medical intervention.

00:20:18.000 What is the next policy?

00:20:21.000 She wrote, both wrote and answered in the affirmative when she was asked this.

00:20:27.000 And she said she also supported it for federal prisoners.

00:20:30.000 Now she also pledged to slash immigration detention by 50%, close all family and private facilities, and decrease funding for ICE and then end ICE detainers with local law enforcement.

00:20:43.000 I mean, these are, these are things that, you know, it would be hard to think that you would come up with taxpayer funding gender transitions for, uh, for detained migrants, and yet this... Surely trying to suggest that the American population at large don't want to fund...

00:21:00.000 The combined issues of gender transitioning surgery and immigration. 0.97

00:21:08.000 What, Erin, is your problem, you fascist? 0.90

00:21:12.000 You say, written and verbally. 0.94

00:21:15.000 You know, what else, you know, did you find?

00:21:18.000 Well, let's take a look at her answer here on drugs. 0.99

00:21:21.000 She got asked about, you know, the question from the ACLU was, since drug use is better addressed as a public health issue through treatment and other programming, will you support the decriminalization at the federal level of all drug possession for personal use?

00:21:37.000 And Harris answers, yes.

00:21:39.000 Now, what would that mean?

00:21:40.000 mean well I mean the federal all all drug possession that's not just marijuana

00:21:44.000 which she alluded to in her answer to this question but it also would mean

00:21:47.000 federal level all drug that no crap you know cocaine things like that yeah have

00:21:52.000 they respond may I ask you what possible problem you may have with not only

00:21:58.000 legalizing but celebrating fentanyl a drug that has done more to reduce the

00:22:03.000 population of America that even I don't know I can't run think of an example of

00:22:09.000 any other ways you could reduce a population Nope!

00:22:16.000 I'm blanking.

00:22:16.000 I'm blanking bad.

00:22:18.000 All I'm saying is, is getting populations down seems to be part of the agenda.

00:22:23.000 What's wrong with that?

00:22:24.000 The actual irony is, is I do believe in the decriminalizations of substances.

00:22:28.000 Believing that addiction is a spiritual problem brought about by a deep, deep despair.

00:22:32.000 The despair itself comes about from not being in alignment with God, and not being in alignment with God, of course, comes from a number of conditions.

00:22:39.000 Could be biological.

00:22:40.000 Could be familial.

00:22:41.000 But I would argue quite strongly that they are sociological.

00:22:44.000 Because we have cultivated and created a dark, near demonic society where the light of the Lord is extinguished by the bright Vegas-like glare of an endless Tokyo of neon lies bombarded continually into your consciousness by deceptive corporate globalist forces that only are able to get away with this Guile and cruelty because they pretend they are helping you while they're doing it.

00:23:15.000 So I'm not surprised that Kamala Harris has flipped flopped more than a 5th of July hot dog while trying to make sense Of the business of running for president, because if you don't actually have any principles at all, then simply say anything.

00:23:35.000 Believe anything.

00:23:37.000 If you are a cipher for a far deeper, potentially darker power, and I'm not suggesting that Kamala Harris is, like, aware of this while she's, what is it they're doing?

00:23:46.000 They're out sizzling up bacon for a nephew.

00:23:49.000 I was at home sizzling up bacon for a nephew, wasn't I, Chris?

00:23:52.000 That's right.

00:23:53.000 And I was, um, what was I doing?

00:23:55.000 I was being in the war with a gun in a war army.

00:23:57.000 I'm in a war army and I gunned them right up the war army.

00:24:00.000 Didn't your wife say, my wife says I have problems with grandma. 0.73

00:24:04.000 I'm having it now.

00:24:05.000 I'm not saying grandma correctly.

00:24:07.000 I was sizzling a bacon for a nephew.

00:24:10.000 Was it a niece?

00:24:10.000 I don't remember.

00:24:11.000 I never watched DuckTales in time.

00:24:13.000 Am I right?

00:24:14.000 Am I right though?

00:24:16.000 It's an extraordinary world that we're living in, when this slew of mania and insanity can be passed off to the beautiful people of America as some kind of political campaign.

00:24:30.000 And perhaps tonight in the debate, which I'm hoping you'll join us for, we will see A different perspective.

00:24:37.000 A different view.

00:24:38.000 Perhaps we will understand that life is not linear but neither is it circular.

00:24:44.000 It's more like a spiral.

00:24:46.000 That the same ideas come round and round again but perhaps this time you'll see them from a higher perspective or with a deeper understanding and having lived through several elections now and managed to glean above all else that they are part of a deceptive spectacle to ensure the ongoing power of institutions that sit beneath the reach of electoral democracy.

00:25:05.000 What we might see, at best, is a charismatic wrecking ball disrupting a trajectory towards globalist authoritarianism, which can easily be diagnosed by anyone looking at what happened during the pandemic period.

00:25:20.000 What we were told at the beginning, what we experienced, By the end.

00:25:24.000 It's a complicated idea.

00:25:26.000 And perhaps no perfect solution is yet available.

00:25:29.000 And perhaps it's not even our job to bring about a perfect solution.

00:25:32.000 But it is our best to be open-hearted, open-minded.

00:25:35.000 And it is our right to be able to speak freely and to move towards a healthy awakening together.

00:25:40.000 But that's just what I think.

00:25:42.000 Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.

00:25:45.000 Because if even CNN can't make head nor tail of Kamala's positions, how can the rest of us possibly?

00:25:51.000 Well, if you're watching us on YouTube, we're going to leave you now before I get one of my favourite guests ever on the show.

00:25:59.000 Robert Epstein.

00:26:00.000 It might be Epstein, because I'm never sure with Stine and Stein, okay?

00:26:04.000 I've made mistakes in the past, probably because of Harvey Weinstein.

00:26:07.000 I can't remember what his name is anymore.

00:26:10.000 Jeffrey Epstein.

00:26:11.000 I can't remember.

00:26:11.000 I don't remember the Steen-Stein situation.

00:26:14.000 But Dr. Robert Epstein.

00:26:15.000 I'm going to say Epstein.

00:26:16.000 Epstein.

00:26:17.000 He is a magnificent man who educated me brilliantly on the power of Google and their ability to manipulate information to a degree where you may not even know what you're voting for.

00:26:25.000 Click the link in the description.

00:26:27.000 Join us for this.

00:26:27.000 You are not going to want to miss it.

00:26:29.000 If you're watching us as an awakened wonder right now, remember to take advantage of the incredible array of content that we have available for you.

00:26:38.000 We do meditations together.

00:26:39.000 We do Bible studies together.

00:26:41.000 We do Russell Brand's Stand Up Break Down.

00:26:44.000 We answer the important questions in life, like this one from a member of our community called Ricky.

00:26:51.000 Watch this question and my response and I'll be back in a moment.

00:26:56.000 With my rather exciting and brilliant guest, Dr. Robert Epstein.

00:27:00.000 Do you contemplate the who made God question?

00:27:05.000 It's an interesting one, eh?

00:27:07.000 Yeah, it's infinite regress, isn't it, the who made God question?

00:27:11.000 Whenever you ask someone what happened before the Big Bang, the question you're also asking is who created God?

00:27:18.000 And in both cases, you will get an answer along the lines of, well, why does there have to be a before?

00:27:25.000 In the case, as a Christian, I would say that the Trinity represents eternity, that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit existed in an eternity of timeless, well, not timeless, atemporal life.

00:27:39.000 There's that Wittgenstein quote, isn't there?

00:27:42.000 When you consider eternity not to be a large duration of time, but the condition of timelessness, then perhaps eternity belongs to he who lives in the moment.

00:27:57.000 Oh yeah, Wittgenstein, that's who I'm quoting.

00:28:01.000 Now, would I have become as educated as I was able to using things like, I don't know, libraries and listening, had I lived as a boy in a 360 sphere curated by Google?

00:28:13.000 That's the subject we'll be discussing with Dr. Robert Epstein.

00:28:16.000 He's a psychologist, professor, author, and head of the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, was awarded a PhD in psychology at Harvard in 1981, and was editor-in-chief at Psychology Today and has held positions at several

00:28:28.000 universities including Boston, California, San Diego, Harvard and many more. One thing I'll

00:28:32.000 tell you is you will not reach that man using a Gmail account because he believes that it

00:28:37.000 is our duty to get out of the clutches, grasp and control of big tech and that it goes far deeper

00:28:45.000 and is far more nefarious than we ever dared to imagine. Dr. Robert, thank you for

00:28:50.000 joining us.

00:28:53.000 It's my pleasure.

00:28:54.000 It's always a pleasure to come back here.

00:28:57.000 Please tell me how to say the Steen or Stein so I don't feel so embarrassed.

00:29:00.000 Well, just think Einstein.

00:29:02.000 No one says Einstein, right?

00:29:04.000 No, they don't.

00:29:04.000 So just think Einstein with an F.

00:29:06.000 That's easy, isn't it?

00:29:07.000 And that works, yeah.

00:29:09.000 Yeah.

00:29:10.000 Einstein.

00:29:10.000 Epstein.

00:29:11.000 Yeah.

00:29:12.000 Let's not waste our time talking about that.

00:29:15.000 I want to get to it.

00:29:17.000 Do you think, on the precipice of this election, with the campaign being sort of a giddy carousel that's moving faster than a hydrant collider, How are we supposed to stay abreast of deeper truths?

00:29:33.000 How are we supposed to make informed decisions?

00:29:36.000 And what do Google do in particular that prevents us from assessing the election and the information emerging from both campaigns accurately and effectively?

00:29:48.000 Well, just a couple of hours ago, this is breaking news, a leaked video has been published from Google.

00:30:00.000 It's an employee of theirs named Dakota Leaser, and he is actually talking about how Google is deliberately manipulating online content to favor Kamala Harris.

00:30:12.000 Now, it turns out that since you and I last talked, my team and I have set up the world's first nationwide monitoring system to do to Google what Google does to us and our kids 24 hours a day.

00:30:26.000 They surveil us, now we're surveilling them.

00:30:30.000 So at the moment, we're collecting data, court-admissible data, through the computers of a politically balanced group of more than 15,000 registered voters in all 50 U.S.

00:30:42.000 states, and we are collecting the evidence.

00:30:47.000 We're actually collecting it by the millions.

00:30:50.000 If you go to Americas with an S, AmericasDigitalShield.com, you can actually see a dashboard where you can see the data coming in, and you can see the bias because we're measuring their manipulations in real time.

00:31:05.000 So what do we know, for example, about search results related to Kamala Harris?

00:31:12.000 What do we know?

00:31:13.000 Well, it turns out over the past four or five months, well, five months ago, they were not supporting her in search results.

00:31:21.000 They were sending people to both positive and negative content about her through their search results.

00:31:28.000 Now, very gradually, they've introduced extreme bias favoring Kamala Harris.

00:31:34.000 Well wait a second, let's pull that up right now.

00:31:36.000 Let's post the link in the description and let's have a look at the website.

00:31:45.000 Can we pull it up and have a look at it now?

00:31:46.000 So it's a dashboard that shows us in real time the way that these biases are accumulating.

00:31:52.000 And you've achieved that by getting 15,000 inverted commas neutral, although I've got to tell you Robert, I don't know how anyone could be neutral in this environment.

00:32:00.000 It's so incendiary, it's so intoxicating, it's so sort of potently driving and goading.

00:32:08.000 But you told me you were going to do this last time we communicated, but it seemed to

00:32:14.000 me to be an insurmountable task.

00:32:15.000 But nevertheless, you've done it.

00:32:16.000 Across the United States, there are 15,000 independent observers adjudicating and watching,

00:32:21.000 as you say, exactly what Google do to us, you are doing to them.

00:32:25.000 You are watching and accumulating data points so you can, in a sense, create a silhouette

00:32:31.000 of what Google's intention might be based on the observable light of their content.

00:32:36.000 Can you talk us through what we're watching?

00:32:37.000 There's 99 million ephemeral experiences, but I don't know what they mean.

00:32:41.000 I don't know if you can see it, Robert, but it's up on screen for us.

00:32:44.000 Can you talk us through what we're watching?

00:32:46.000 It's 99 million ephemeral experiences, but I don't know what they mean.

00:32:51.000 Tell me how to appreciate this data.

00:32:55.000 Google manipulates by showing people content that's very fleeting, that has an impact on them, and then disappears forever.

00:33:03.000 And internally at the company, they call those ephemeral experiences.

00:33:08.000 So at one point there was a leak of emails from Google to the Wall Street Journal, in which Google employees were saying, how can we use ephemeral experiences, again it's their term, to change people's views about Trump's travel ban.

00:33:23.000 Now, so they use ephemeral experiences like search suggestions, which disappear, search results, answer boxes, recommendations on YouTube for recommending the next video, then the up next video that plays automatically.

00:33:38.000 All that is ephemeral.

00:33:39.000 In other words, it disappears and it's gone forever.

00:33:42.000 That was always their biggest protection because they assumed no one could ever capture ephemeral experiences.

00:33:49.000 We've spent almost $7 million and about seven years developing increasingly powerful systems for capturing ephemeral content.

00:33:59.000 And yes, I told you last time I was on that we were planning to set up the world's first nationwide system.

00:34:04.000 And no, these are not independent people.

00:34:07.000 This is a politically balanced group.

00:34:09.000 It's around 25% Conservative, 25% liberal, 25% moderate, and 25% people who say other or unaffiliated.

00:34:18.000 So we're getting the full balance and we're collecting data in a scientifically valid fashion and in a manner which is now admissible in 19 or 20 states.

00:34:30.000 And we're collecting data from all 50 states 24 hours a day.

00:34:32.000 This This web page that you're seeing, which shows the bias in real time on Google, Bing, Yahoo, YouTube, and other platforms, this is court admissible.

00:34:45.000 This is the biggest threat these companies have ever faced.

00:34:49.000 The bigger this database gets, and we're getting very close to 100 million ephemeral experiences now preserved, Well actually, I think it might happen while we're sitting here.

00:34:59.000 The ephemeral experiences, they're accumulating, they're accumulating right now.

00:35:03.000 So some of the examples we have here are like Google searches for Trump showing up as results for Kamala, Google searches for Donald Trump showing negative stories about Trump, Google searches for the assassinations about Trump like disappearing.

00:35:17.000 Now we've seen Elon Musk Well, I don't know.

00:35:20.000 Now, given that this is primarily a story about objectivity, I feel it would be remiss for me not to ask you about,

00:35:26.000 I'm seeing a lot of comments in Rumble chat talking about Jimmy Dore.

00:35:30.000 Did you go on Jimmy Dore's show and what was that experience like and what happened?

00:35:34.000 I didn't see it myself, I'm just responding to comments saying that you were on Jimmy Dore

00:35:37.000 and maybe it was contentious, I don't know.

00:35:39.000 Well, I don't know.

00:35:41.000 I don't think he was feeling very well and I wish him all the best,

00:35:45.000 but he did kind of have a, He did kind of get angry on the show.

00:35:51.000 I've never seen that happen.

00:35:52.000 I used to have my own show on SiriusXM.

00:35:55.000 I had on Jimmy Carter, Jamie Lee Curtis, you know, Carrie Fisher.

00:36:00.000 I never got angry at a guest before, but he did kind of get angry at me.

00:36:05.000 And again, I wish him the best.

00:36:07.000 I hope he's okay.

00:36:09.000 But a couple of days ago, I was on, for the second time, I was on Joe Rogan, and that's going to air tomorrow.

00:36:16.000 And there I had a kind of a meltdown.

00:36:19.000 You had one?

00:36:22.000 I had a meltdown.

00:36:23.000 What's going on?

00:36:24.000 Are you going to be safe on this show?

00:36:26.000 I don't want anything happening.

00:36:29.000 Jimmy Dore, I absolutely love him.

00:36:30.000 Joe Rogan, I love him.

00:36:32.000 So me and you are going to be fantastic though and you're going to have a lovely delicate experience.

00:36:36.000 What happened to you on Rogan?

00:36:39.000 Well, Rogan handled it very well, and he told me afterwards that he thinks it was one of the best shows he's ever done, and he thinks it's going to go viral.

00:36:49.000 He says that to everyone!

00:36:51.000 He's playing with you!

00:36:52.000 He's playing with you, Robert!

00:36:54.000 Now, what happened, man?

00:36:57.000 Well, what happened was that we started out in the usual way, and he asked some straightforward questions.

00:37:03.000 And then I said, well, I can't really answer your questions because I need to have a meltdown first.

00:37:08.000 And he goes, a meltdown?

00:37:10.000 And I go, yes, I need to have a meltdown on your show.

00:37:14.000 Is that OK?

00:37:14.000 And he said, well, I guess so.

00:37:17.000 And I just started explaining to him how fed up I was. 1.00

00:37:21.000 How stupid people are, how complacent they are, that they don't seem to understand what's going on. 0.99

00:37:27.000 And I've been working for 12 years doing intensive, rigorous research, publishing in peer-reviewed journals, writing articles, going on shows like yours, trying to get the word out, and people just don't care. 1.00

00:37:42.000 And it's so frustrating because people are being manipulated to an extent that is unprecedented in history.

00:37:50.000 And this year alone, Google has the ability to shift between 6.5 million and 25.5 million

00:37:59.000 votes in our presidential election. And again, it's so rare that I find people who get it,

00:38:07.000 who understand what a big deal this is and what a threat it is to our democracy.

00:38:11.000 In the U.S., as far as I'm concerned, we've not had control of our own elections since 2012, because that's the power that these tech companies have to shift votes and opinions and attitudes and beliefs and purchases.

00:38:24.000 And they use this power Without any humility, they use this power 24 hours a day.

00:38:34.000 And I know because now we're catching them.

00:38:36.000 We're actually collecting the data.

00:38:39.000 So I just went on and on about how fed up I was.

00:38:41.000 That's what happened.

00:38:42.000 And then Joe kept kind of, you know, I'm checking you're alright.

00:38:46.000 That's nice to hear that level of sensitivity from a man who I know to be a tender-hearted individual in spite of his obvious macho-ness.

00:38:55.000 Now I want to talk to you about a few very particular stories and I'm going to show you some clips because you are a man who loves Data Doctor and I don't want any meltdowns.

00:39:06.000 Well this is first of all a story about Democrats Paying social media influencers up to $10,000 per post.

00:39:15.000 That's number 12.

00:39:16.000 I'm going to play that now.

00:39:18.000 This month, Sunny says she was hired by Protect Our Care, a progressive advocacy group that relies on anonymous donors.

00:39:25.000 She made a video warning about Trump's second term agenda.

00:39:29.000 They almost help you script it, right?

00:39:32.000 Right, definitely.

00:39:33.000 She takes their talking points and puts them into her own voice, saying she always discloses when she's being paid.

00:39:39.000 What's your rate?

00:39:40.000 So a video just for a creator in my size and average can go from $3,000 to $10,000 depending and upwards.

00:39:50.000 See well, this is an interesting story, Doctor.

00:39:53.000 I don't know if you can see my t-shirt, but we've done some interesting deals.

00:39:59.000 This is a nice... These are a bunch of guys that you can rely on.

00:40:03.000 They get a lot of bad press, primarily because of stuff that happened in the last few years, but I assure you that they're doing their absolute best over there at Pfizer and Moderna.

00:40:14.000 They're all very good, all of them, the whole lot of them.

00:40:16.000 Johnson & Johnson, but don't trust that third Johnson.

00:40:19.000 He was the worst of a lot of them.

00:40:21.000 So the example there on CBS Mornings, isn't that kind of... This is not precisely what you're talking about.

00:40:30.000 You're talking about the management of data and the manipulation of data and these ephemeral impressions I might just see when I'm looking at my YouTube feed or, of course, I only use Rumble.

00:40:41.000 I'm a company man.

00:40:43.000 But were I to be looking at some of those nefarious big tech hellholes What you would see is that the impressions are somehow being manipulated centrally to subtly guide people.

00:40:56.000 And you say it could be as many as 25 million people, which of course amounts to an election.

00:40:59.000 But one thing I wanted to follow up on, as well as seeing if you have anything to add to this clip we've just watched from CBS and Influence, is If it's been influencing every single election since 2012 then we've had victories for either side during that period so are Google available to either side and if so it's just another utensil and does it matter?

00:41:25.000 Okay, couple of things.

00:41:26.000 Number one, that clip that you just showed, that's not something we should worry about, because that's competitive.

00:41:32.000 That's like the campaigns buying television commercials, competing television commercials, competing billboards.

00:41:40.000 That's competitive.

00:41:41.000 There's always dirty tricks on both sides.

00:41:43.000 That's not a threat to democracy.

00:41:46.000 But we have Instead, we have something that's never existed before in history, and that is we have these couple of huge online platforms.

00:41:55.000 If Google wants to support a particular candidate, you cannot counteract what they're doing.

00:42:01.000 Let me give you an example of what we're detecting right this second.

00:42:05.000 And again, without a monitoring system, you would never know this is occurring.

00:42:08.000 Right now on Google's home page, which is seen 500 million times a day in the U.S., They are sending register-to-vote reminders to Democrats at two and a half times the rate they're sending them to Republicans.

00:42:23.000 Now that's going to turn into partisan mail-in-your-ballot reminders, and then that's going to turn into partisan go-vote reminders.

00:42:30.000 And those manipulations alone, those targeted messages on Google's homepage, you can't counteract it.

00:42:36.000 And if there's no monitoring system in place, you can't even see it.

00:42:40.000 And that shifts millions of votes literally Go vote reminders on election day itself will give one candidate an additional 450,000 votes that day.

00:42:53.000 That's why we have to have monitoring systems because without them you don't know what is going on.

00:43:00.000 What the tech companies are doing has nothing to do with dirty tricks.

00:43:04.000 It's literally these huge monopolies who have at their command incredibly powerful forms of manipulation that have never existed before.

00:43:13.000 And that's what we study.

00:43:14.000 That's what we publish.

00:43:17.000 And it's scary stuff.

00:43:18.000 The more we've learned about it, the scarier it gets.

00:43:21.000 Can I give you a quick example of some of our latest research?

00:43:25.000 Okay.

00:43:26.000 So we've done a lot of research showing that biased content, for example, in search results, search suggestions, answer boxes, can shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by between 20 and 80 percent.

00:43:41.000 So that we've known, that's been replicated, that's a real finding.

00:43:44.000 But what we discovered recently is even scarier, and that is this.

00:43:49.000 If we show one group biased content, we'll get a 20% shift or so in their voting preferences, and that we know.

00:43:58.000 But now we have another group, and this other group, we're sending them the same biased content, But it's coming from news sources that they say they trust.

00:44:08.000 In other words, we're personalizing the content.

00:44:11.000 We're personalizing it.

00:44:13.000 And when we personalize it, the effect triples.

00:44:15.000 We'll now get a shift of 60% or more.

00:44:19.000 Triple the effect just by personalizing the content.

00:44:22.000 Robert, sorry to interrupt you.

00:44:23.000 Can you give me a specific example of a personalized piece of manipulative content versus, you know, like, oh, if it comes from a CNN feed or if it comes, can you give us some actual literal examples of personalized versus the more neutral type of bias?

00:44:39.000 Sure.

00:44:39.000 So we could have a bias story that says Kamala Harris has the perfect health plan that's going to solve all our problems.

00:44:47.000 And we send it to people over here without any particular news source.

00:44:53.000 And then people over here we send it from a news source that they say they trust.

00:44:58.000 So we manipulate it.

00:44:59.000 So it looks like it's coming from a news source that they say they trust.

00:45:02.000 So now it's personalized to fit their particular likes and dislikes, and the effect triples.

00:45:11.000 Now, does Google send out personalized content?

00:45:14.000 Of course they do!

00:45:16.000 If you've been using Google for 20 years, they have the equivalent of more than 3 million pages of information about you.

00:45:24.000 And they use that information to both to manipulate and, of course, to sell you things.

00:45:30.000 And that's how they make their money.

00:45:32.000 So what we're collecting in this monitoring system is not just content from more than 15,000 registered voters throughout the U.S., it's personalized content.

00:45:43.000 We're looking over the shoulders with their permission of registered voters and we're capturing what they are getting on their screens.

00:45:50.000 We're capturing the content being sent to them by Google, Bing, Yahoo, YouTube, TikTok and other platforms.

00:45:57.000 Sure, but would you say then that Google would send a piece of content that would say Kamala's health plan is, you know, there's never been anything quite like it, says Rachel Maddow?

00:46:11.000 Because they would say that anyway!

00:46:13.000 So what would they say?

00:46:18.000 Says Dwayne The Rock Johnson?

00:46:20.000 Says Sean Hannity?

00:46:22.000 How would it look to the eye?

00:46:27.000 Because here's the search results.

00:46:29.000 You're typing in health care at the top.

00:46:32.000 They're showing you search suggestions.

00:46:33.000 They're showing you search results.

00:46:35.000 What I'm saying is they will order the search.

00:46:37.000 They'll filter and order the search results so that at the top there's content that they know you will trust, that they're personalizing it.

00:46:45.000 So it's real content coming from the internet, but they're ordering it in a way that you're likely to click on what's at the top, and that's what people do click on.

00:46:54.000 And that takes them to a web page that they're going to be very trusting of.

00:46:58.000 I see.

00:46:59.000 And that's what we test in our experiments to see how much power that has.

00:47:03.000 I see, because it would organically do that because it knows what sources you're continually using and the media will comply and provide that kind of content because that's what they functionally do.

00:47:13.000 I get it.

00:47:14.000 That makes sense.

00:47:14.000 Thank you, Robert.

00:47:15.000 Now I'm going to show you, if I may, a James O'Keefe piece Where a Google growth strategist exposes Google search engine manipulation for the Kamala campaign, which for you is going to be joyful.

00:47:30.000 That's going to be the opposite of your recent podcast appearances with Joe Rogan and Jimmy Dore.

00:47:35.000 Be set with meltdowns and confrontation.

00:47:38.000 This is going to be like laying back in a warm bath.

00:47:41.000 Or it's going to be like being in an airport knowing you are protected by Airstek, from whom we have a quick message because they're one of our sponsors.

00:47:47.000 Let me be explicit about that.

00:47:49.000 Here's a message from them.

00:47:50.000 Airports and planes are heavy EMF exposure zones due to the volume of people with individual devices and Wi-Fi within confined spaces.

00:47:58.000 I think that's sometimes with all of them phones, everyone staring at their devices.

00:48:02.000 It's important to protect yourself if you're undertaking such travel from EMF.

00:48:07.000 Imagine sitting on a commercial flight.

00:48:08.000 Every single person there smothered in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth earbuds, all that stuff.

00:48:13.000 You might as well be in a fuselage made of electromagnetic energy.

00:48:17.000 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classifies airline crew members as radiation workers precisely because of this fact.

00:48:24.000 Airstek, as you know, probably, are an official partner of the UFC.

00:48:28.000 They're the only scientifically validated EMF protection solution.

00:48:32.000 Hang that little thing around your neck.

00:48:34.000 Sups up those sweet little problems. 0.99

00:48:36.000 Airtek uses EMF modulation technology that is trusted and used around the world.

00:48:42.000 Go to airstek.com forward slash pages forward slash Russell dash brand.

00:48:46.000 Use code Russell 30 for 30% off.

00:48:49.000 That's code Russell 30 for 30% off.

00:48:51.000 Give yourself the advantages that these devices represent.

00:48:55.000 Thank you.

00:48:57.000 Hey, we mentioned before the commercial that we are going to play this clip of James O'Keefe who's doing a little sting on a Google growth strategist that's right in Dr Epstein's area of expertise.

00:49:13.000 Let's have a look.

00:49:14.000 Google was essentially promoting through its ads rhetoric that was very pro-Kamala, and it seemed to link out to legitimate news publication sites, so it seemed like it was an ad for PBS, but it was really an ad for the Kamala campaign or whatever.

00:49:30.000 Meet Dakota Liazer, growth strategist and ad salesman at Google.

00:49:35.000 The CODA liaison goes on to say they're "reorienting the search engine to favor Kamala Harris."

00:49:41.000 "It's like you go to Google, they're reorienting the search engine such that Kamala is favored."

00:49:50.000 Facebook, I feel like, is promoting content that is favorable towards her.

00:49:54.000 A lot of the AI stuff that's liberating right now is doing so in a way that's generally favorable to her.

00:50:03.000 Dakota Liazer, growth strategist at Google, reveals that, quote, Google is a very progressive company, unquote.

00:50:09.000 He admits that, quote, Google will allow a belief that one side will allow them to make more money.

00:50:16.000 I mean, Google's a very liberal, progressive company.

00:50:19.000 If they have a belief that one side will allow them to make more money.

00:50:27.000 I don't think it's, like, at the very, very top, I don't think it's political, I think it's, like, economic.

00:50:31.000 I think it's all about, like, the share or the stock price.

00:50:35.000 The Google growth strategist suggests that political headlines help generate ad revenue for Google.

00:50:40.000 These political headlines that are generating clicks, which generates ad revenue, it's all fueled out of hate.

00:50:47.000 Well, what do you say, Doctor?

00:50:49.000 Is this the very kind of thing that you're talking about from Dakota Leeser, this ad salesman?

00:50:55.000 In fact, you did use this example.

00:50:58.000 Do you think this is happening at scale?

00:51:01.000 Do you think that this kind of manipulation happens not only around elections, but to further promote stories that are in other ways beneficial to the establishment?

00:51:09.000 For example, are you familiar with the Trusted News Initiative, which includes numerous news organizations like the BBC, YouTube, I believe the New York Times are in it, certainly the Washington Post are.

00:51:22.000 So, for example, if they wanted to destroy Joe Rogan with the either Mectin story or attack me on the basis of allegations, those stories would be promoted.

00:51:35.000 Do you think it could be utilised across a variety of issues?

00:51:39.000 And do you imagine it was used in the pandemic?

00:51:41.000 Do you imagine it is used as part of smearing and taking down opponents?

00:51:46.000 I have no doubt that they have been using these techniques for many years, but what I'm trying to tell you is we've performed a miracle, because we have actually now built the world's first nationwide monitoring system, and what this David Liazar said in this clip, we have the proof We have court-admissible proof on a very large scale coming from all over the U.S.

00:52:14.000 showing not only the way they're using bias in their content to support Kamala Harris, but we actually can track what's happened over the past six months.

00:52:27.000 We can go back in time now because the database is growing and growing, and we can see that six months ago they were not supporting her.

00:52:35.000 And that they've gradually increased the support, and now the support is enormous.

00:52:40.000 It's astronomical.

00:52:41.000 It's enough to shift millions of votes in a national election.

00:52:46.000 And how do we know it shifts votes?

00:52:47.000 Because we've been doing research, controlled experiments since 2013, which we publish in peer-reviewed journals, which shows the power that bias and personalization has When they're presenting content that favors one candidate or another, that's how we can do the computations.

00:53:06.000 So we have the evidence coming from the computers of more than 15,000 registered voters in all 50 U.S.

00:53:14.000 states, politically balanced, And we have the scientific research that shows what the impact is of these manipulations.

00:53:23.000 So yeah, what this man is saying is true, but what he's saying is probably not court admissible.

00:53:30.000 And a lot of the news stories that pop up, the one recently about, for example, trying to look up the Trump assassination attempts, On Google, and you type that information in and they send you search suggestions, but all the suggestions are for Lincoln assassination and McKinley assassination.

00:53:49.000 Nothing.

00:53:50.000 They don't send any suggestions related to Trump.

00:53:53.000 But you know, that's anecdotal.

00:53:55.000 That's not admissible in court.

00:53:57.000 And that's what people keep doing.

00:53:58.000 They keep coming up with anecdotes.

00:54:00.000 But we're collecting those search suggestions by the millions.

00:54:04.000 We know what they're actually sending to a very, very large group of people across the U.S.

00:54:10.000 because we're looking over the shoulders of real people.

00:54:13.000 We're seeing the real content that they're sending.

00:54:16.000 And we know, by the way, when they're sending different content to conservatives and liberals.

00:54:23.000 We can track it that way, too.

00:54:24.000 We can break it down by demographic.

00:54:26.000 We know what's really happening now.

00:54:28.000 Stop saying you're looking over their shoulders, Dr. Robert.

00:54:32.000 It sounds unusual and eerie.

00:54:36.000 With their permission.

00:54:38.000 I know, I understand.

00:54:39.000 It's also somewhat metaphorical.

00:54:41.000 A few questions.

00:54:42.000 One, what are the next steps?

00:54:43.000 So, uh, with the data that you've accumulated, which you say, and I believe you, is empirical truth that these biases that we all understand take place anecdotally is indeed taking place now demonstrably.

00:54:56.000 Would you explain to me what the next steps are?

00:54:59.000 And also, like, you know, because further to that, I know that if I were to use YouTube, because whilst we are on Rumble, and Rumble's our home precisely because we believe in free speech, if I look at how my content's doing On YouTube, and by the way, it varies vastly.

00:55:14.000 Like the last time we did something about vaccines or mRNA therapies, for example, it looked to me like it was being controlled.

00:55:23.000 That there is definitely certain types of content that is shadow banned or in other ways impaired.

00:55:29.000 For the longest time, whenever I'd put my name in, because I don't use the Metrix app to look at YouTube, I just check how our content is doing on there.

00:55:38.000 I'm just trying to let you know that I do look at how my content does.

00:55:41.000 Shoot me! 0.98

00:55:42.000 Shoot me for caring about what we do! 1.00

00:55:44.000 Uh, like that when I put Russell Brand into YouTube, it's always trying to get me to go to, Russell Brand is a right bastard! 0.98

00:55:52.000 Like it's, YouTube, it doesn't appreciate what I've done for it. 0.89

00:55:56.000 Quite the opposite, as a matter of fact.

00:55:58.000 It seems to want to destroy me.

00:55:59.000 So is that, would you say that's further, uh, evidence of what you are dis-, well, what you have proved, basically, you know, anecdotal evidence?

00:56:08.000 Well, it turns into evidence when we make adjustments in what we're looking for, which we can do at any time.

00:56:15.000 So if we add your name into the content that we're searching for every day, so right now we're searching for about 600 different items, but we could add you in there as well.

00:56:24.000 I'm in!

00:56:24.000 Why am I not in there?

00:56:26.000 But moving forward, we can make adjustments of any sort and we can look for anything at all, any manipulations on any platforms.

00:56:34.000 I would at some point be able to use that as evidence to say, hey, look, Google is clearly biasing people towards these outcomes.

00:56:41.000 Could you do it?

00:56:42.000 Is it possible to do it retrospectively or is part of the problem that it's ephemeral?

00:56:46.000 Could you go back to, for example, September 2023 when a series of media organizations worked in coordination with several other NGOs and government agencies to propagate some pretty nefarious stories?

00:57:01.000 Well, right now we can go back about a year.

00:57:03.000 But moving forward, we're going to have years and years and years of data.

00:57:07.000 And we can, as I say, make adjustments in what we're searching for.

00:57:11.000 So right now, as a matter of fact, we're in the process of revising what it is we're searching for because the elections are so close here.

00:57:19.000 So we're going to be searching for more than a thousand different people and topics.

00:57:23.000 And you know, this as this system grows, because it's growing every day, we have more field agents at it every day.

00:57:30.000 And we're looking for more topics every day.

00:57:32.000 The system is just going to grow and grow and grow.

00:57:35.000 And yes, at some point in time, you'll be able to look back.

00:57:38.000 If you're in the system, you'll be able to look back and we'll gather all that data for you.

00:57:43.000 And then moving forward, we can look at anything that we want to look for, because we have access, thank goodness for these wonderful people who are allowing us to do this, because we have access to all of this data coming into the computers of real people.

00:57:59.000 You have to, if you want to know what they're doing, by the way, you have to, I know you don't like this phrase, but with their permission, you have to look over the shoulders of real people, because that's where you see personalized content.

00:58:12.000 And we do this without Google being able to detect what we're doing.

00:58:15.000 So this is called passive monitoring.

00:58:17.000 And we developed this technology from scratch starting in 2016.

00:58:21.000 And now it's very sophisticated.

00:58:23.000 What I told you we were going to do, which is about a year ago.

00:58:26.000 Okay, I never imagined we would have gotten this far.

00:58:31.000 And we are going to cross over that hundred million mark.

00:58:34.000 Uh, probably within hours or days, and that's amazing.

00:58:38.000 I think it's brilliant, Robert.

00:58:39.000 I don't know why you keep having such a tough time on other people's podcasts, because I think actually you're doing fantastic and important work, and I can see how personally I'd be able to use that data, but I do recognize at the moment there's an election coming up and you have other priorities, but if you get time to add me to the 600, 601, It's not such a round number.

00:59:01.000 Are you writing it down?

00:59:02.000 Good, yes.

00:59:02.000 Thank you, Robert.

00:59:03.000 Pop it in.

00:59:04.000 Pop it into the... Get it?

00:59:06.000 Peep over their shoulders at that one, is what I would say.

00:59:09.000 So, we've talked about how it will impact, you know, vote registrations, for example.

00:59:13.000 You've told me that it could affect between 6 and 25 million votes in the forthcoming presidential election.

00:59:20.000 Another person that has made claims of this nature, and in fact I think might have a The court case is the significant voice when it comes to the condemnation of the pharmaceutical industry and their insidious tactics.

00:59:34.000 Bobby Kennedy, who is his joining in fact of the Trump campaign and MAGA movement, that gives me some encouragement that there might be the ability to disrupt this tendency towards ...technological omniscience and governmental omnipotence that appears to be the current intention.

00:59:57.000 Where is Bobby Kennedy a particularly interesting case?

01:00:01.000 Is he someone that you have any examples around?

01:00:05.000 Yes, we do.

01:00:06.000 We've just generated an RFK Jr.

01:00:08.000 report.

01:00:09.000 I have not seen it yet myself, but apparently the report was finished yesterday.

01:00:12.000 I can't wait to see what's on it.

01:00:14.000 But now to go back to the big question you asked a couple of minutes ago, we have scheduled a meeting with RFK Jr.' 's staff for next week.

01:00:24.000 And basically, we are working now with AGs around the country, Attorneys General.

01:00:30.000 We're working with members of Congress.

01:00:32.000 We're working with public advocacy groups, parenting groups, election integrity groups.

01:00:38.000 So you're saying, what are we going to do with all this data?

01:00:41.000 Well, this data is going to be used in lawsuits, and it's going to be used in public pressure campaigns.

01:00:47.000 And it's going to be used to shame these companies, and it's going to be used to push them away from our elections and away from our kids.

01:00:56.000 Oh my god, that's amazing!

01:00:57.000 And the fact that you've done this in one year.

01:01:00.000 When we spoke a year ago, you were just a giddy young doctor with a dream.

01:01:04.000 Now you're a fantastic scientist with an incredible project out there breaking hearts and baffling some of the finest podcasters in the space.

01:01:13.000 Dr. Robert, Epstein, thank you so much for coming on the show.

01:01:17.000 Thank you for the incredible work that you are doing in exposing a power so all-consuming and ubiquitous that we almost don't notice it's there and wouldn't be able to prove that it was had it not been for your fantastic endeavor.

01:01:30.000 Thank you for your work and thank you for joining me today.

01:01:33.000 Absolutely.

01:01:34.000 And please go to AmericasDigitalShield.com if you want to see what we're doing.

01:01:38.000 Americas with an S. DigitalShield.com.

01:01:41.000 Thank you, Russell.

01:01:41.000 It's a pleasure.

01:01:42.000 Thank you, doctor.

01:01:43.000 Post those things in the chat.

01:01:44.000 Post them in the chat right now.

01:01:47.000 Well, thank you, Dr. Robert Epstein, for being such a fantastic guest.

01:01:50.000 Thanks all of you for joining us.

01:01:52.000 We have but a matter of hours before we will resume streaming to give you our debate live.

01:01:58.000 I've already made my predictions for the wonderful community of AwakendWonders over there, and for this month only, you can get a free month by using the code WALSH Why the code, Walsh, you may ask?

01:02:11.000 Why, in what context would that make sense?

01:02:14.000 Well, because Matt Walsh, and my interview with him, is paywalled on there right now, available only to our Awakened Wonders.

01:02:23.000 Along with Russell Brand's stand-up breakdown, meditation, Bible readings, and of course, perhaps the jewel in the crown of the Awakened Wonders, you can come and see me live Whenever you want, wherever you want, you know, assuming that I'm doing a live show, you can't just turn up at my house.

01:02:37.000 I've got to have some freedom, I've got to have some privacy.

01:02:39.000 Here is that Matt Walsh interview.

01:02:44.000 I wonder how much your Christianity affects your perspective when it comes to filmmaking.

01:02:50.000 As Christians, we have a really elegant and beautiful answer to all the racial strife, which is that we're all human beings, and we're all descended from Adam and Eve, and we are all part of that same fallen human condition.

01:03:06.000 We all need Christ in exactly the same degree.

01:03:10.000 From a spiritual perspective, whether you whatever your race is whatever your sex is we're

01:03:15.000 all children of god become an awakened wonder also if you're watching us on rumble

01:03:22.000 right now give us a like subscribe i'm seeing people saying we ain't got enough

01:03:26.000 likes give us some likes give us some subscriptions participate in this why don't you dr robert epstein

01:03:31.000 has just explained to us that we're in a digital and i believe it's powerful spiritual

01:03:36.000 war you're You've got to participate in it.

01:03:39.000 Remember, if you are an Awake and Wonder, if you address tickets at Russell Brand, you can come and see me at any event, anywhere, like this.

01:03:47.000 Rescue the Republic.

01:03:48.000 Join the resistance.

01:03:49.000 That's later on this month.

01:03:51.000 I'll be joining The likes of Bobby Kennedy and Brett Weinstein.

01:03:54.000 He might say a different C. That might be a different sign.

01:03:57.000 You can join me for that.

01:03:57.000 Look at some of these other people.

01:03:59.000 Jimmy Dore there.

01:04:00.000 I can ask him about what happened with Dr. Robert Epstein.

01:04:02.000 Tulsi Gabbard, Matt Taibbi will be there.

01:04:04.000 It'll be fantastic.

01:04:05.000 And if you are an Awakened one, all you have to do is write to tickets at Russell Brand and we will arrange a meet and greet for you if it's something you're interested in, if that is not a paid-for event. 0.90

01:04:15.000 Look at that.

01:04:15.000 Skillet, Struggle Jennings.

01:04:17.000 There's some interesting people appearing there.

01:04:18.000 Now, we will be back tomorrow with our reaction to the first, and likely only, debate.

01:04:26.000 If you're on Awake and Wonder, we've got meditations and Bible studies, as well as Russell Brand's stand-up breakdown, where I'm talking about Billy Connolly.

01:04:33.000 I'll show you a little bit of that later in the week.

01:04:36.000 You'll love it!

01:04:37.000 You'll love it!

01:04:38.000 But we will... The next thing you can see us do is, of course, the debate.

01:04:43.000 Tonight!

01:04:44.000 Live!

01:04:45.000 Watch along, talk along, and let us analyse together.

01:04:48.000 Until then, if you can, stay free!

01:05:05.000 Many switching, switching, switching Many switching, switching, switching Many switching, switching, switching Many switching, switching, switching Many switching, switching, switching Many switching, switching, switching Many switching, switching, switching Many switching, switching, switching Many switching, switching, switching

Stay Free - Russel Brand - September 11, 2024

DEBATE DAY SPECIAL: Is THIS How Google Will Steal The 2024 Election?! SF449

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript