This episode is brought to you by Conspiracy Theory to Conspiracy Fact, a new show from The New York Times and Fox News covering the mother of all conspiracies: the coronavirus pandemic. In the fall of 2019, the first confirmed cases of the new virus came from a lab in China. Who were the first to be infected? Where did they come from? And how did they get infected? And what role did the Chinese government play in all of this? This is Conspiracy Theory To Conspiracy Fact and it s the Mother of All Conspiracyacies, hosted by Russell Brand and Michael Schellenberger. Stay tuned for Part 1 of a two-part series on the Wuhan lab leak, Patient Zero, the science around vaccinating pregnant women and lockdown data, and we re going to talk about lockdown data. The first part will be available on YouTube, then exclusively on Rumble. You ve got to like and subscribe to Like and subscribe when you get there, and subscribe on your favorite streaming platform. Plus, why not consider getting yourself a nice little hat, such as I'm wearing a as I don t know what you think we ain t covered because we re making it daily, and join us on Rumble five days a week. so you get our content when we make it daily on Rumble and make it made it daily and join our community of like-minded listeners everywhere else. And why not get your notification bell so you re never miss an episode of Conspiracy Theories to Conspiracy Theory! Subscribe to our new show on Rumble! Subscribe today using our new hashtag and stay safe and secure your spot on our social medias, . to stay up to date on conspiracy theories, conspiracies and conspiracy theories. . . . and more conspiracies! and more conspiracy theories to conspiracy theories on the right way. and so much more! And don t forget to subscribe and spread the word to your friends about conspiracy theory to conspiracy theory. Subscribe and spread it everywhere you can be heard on the internet. ! by Fyger, when I'm looking for conspiracies to spread conspiracies. , conspiracy facts . and conspiracy in this week's conspiracy theory Tuesday, conspiracy theory Monday, February 15th, 2020 we re talking all things conspiracies, conspiracy facts, conspiracy, conspiracy theories everywhere, conspiracy in the world, conspiracy , and more.
00:00:00.000🎵Never the less they could not understand that I'm a black man🎵
00:00:04.000🎵And I could never be a better runner🎵 🎵On the straight and narrow🎵
00:00:07.000🎵Watch the bulls eye when I roll to you🎵 🎵Brought to you by Fyger🎵
00:00:10.000🎵So I'm looking for the steal🎵 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:00:29.000Thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand Conspiracy Theory to Conspiracy Fact and it is the mother of all conspiracies.
00:00:35.000Remember when the pandemic revealed to us that in spite of saying what they cared about was the sanctity of human life and our duty to protect one another, it turned out that what they cared about was the centralization of authority, the ability to regulate and profit.
00:00:49.000We are going to show you a voluminous account Of when conspiracy theories became conspiracy facts and how the state utilised, along with corporate power, the crisis of the pandemic to legitimise their power.
00:01:02.000How far will you go when it comes to Covid?
00:01:06.000Let me know in the chat what you think we ain't covered because we're going to talk about the Wuhan lab leak, we're going to talk about patient zero, the science around vaccinating pregnant women, And we're going to talk about lockdown data.
00:01:16.000The first part will be available on YouTube, then exclusively on Rumble.
00:01:21.000You've got to like and subscribe when you get there, and download the app if you can.
00:01:24.000Plus, why not consider getting yourself a nice little hat, such as I'm wearing, as a kind of, I don't know, 2024 gift.
00:01:31.000Now, our first conspiracy theory to conspiracy fact.
00:01:37.000Now, after saying it came from a wet market or a raccoon dog, it was finally revealed that the first people who caught COVID were indeed scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
00:02:00.000What a voyage it is when the truth is continually concealed, undermined and denied by the most powerful institutions in the world, whether that's the state or the mainstream media.
00:02:10.000Turn on your notification bell right now so you get our content when we make it daily and join us on Rumble.
00:02:15.000Five days a week we make this show where we have interviews like the one we had with Matt
00:02:19.000Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger where they broke this story for the first time outside
00:02:23.000of their sub-stack that the first people that contracted coronavirus worked, by coincidence,
00:04:03.000It looks like a terrible high school building.
00:04:05.000They're not trying hard enough in there.
00:04:07.000They're probably not washing their hands.
00:04:08.000They're definitely not more than a meter and a half per side.
00:04:10.000And I bet they weren't even vaccinated.
00:04:12.000A new report on the online platform Substack says scientists at the lab in Wuhan were the first COVID-19 patients in the fall of 2019 while conducting controversial gain-of-function research.
00:04:24.000The story names the scientists as Ben Hu, Yu Peng, and Yan Zhu.
00:04:29.000Chinese scientists Ben Hu, Ping Yu and Yan Zhu were the first humans to contract COVID-19.
00:04:36.000Don't be childish and don't try and do that.
00:04:46.000That was the problem in the first place.
00:04:47.000FBI Director Christopher Wray told Brett Baer the Bureau's theory about COVID's origin back on February 28th.
00:04:54.000The FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan.
00:05:05.000Yet the White House Chief Medical Advisor during the pandemic has offered other explanations.
00:05:10.000Totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human.
00:05:15.000We have an open mind, but it looks very, very much like this was a natural occurrence.
00:05:20.000Be good if it was a natural occurrence, because that would mean it wasn't entirely my fault.
00:05:24.000Dr. Robert Redfield was CDC director during the pandemic.
00:05:28.000I'm very disappointed in how he's responded to this.
00:05:32.000Largely, I think it's grounded in his advocacy for gain-of-function research.
00:05:37.000Most scientists are exactly that, people that are interested in facts.
00:05:41.000Science can lead to dogma because research and experimentation can lead to temporary conclusions that are then held on to.
00:05:49.000But when science becomes commercialized, commodified, institutionalized, when they have financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies, when they have financial relationships with other nations, when they fund research that is potentially dangerous because it could one day be profitable, and I don't mean profitable to our species, profitable Commercially, you know how the pharmaceutical industry is run.
00:06:20.000If they can heal a few people along the way, that's fantastic.
00:06:23.000I'm not being reductive about science.
00:06:25.000I am reliant and dependent upon medical experts for the well-being of important members of my family, continually.
00:06:32.000And one of the One of the things that gives me faith in them is knowing that they are not driven by commercial objectives.
00:06:37.000Can we say the same about Anthony Fauci at this point?
00:06:40.000Can we say the same about the organizations and bureaucracies that surround the pharmaceutical industry, that funded this kind of research, that clearly push one narrative, presumably in order to avoid further analysis?
00:07:12.000taxpayer dollars flowed to Chinese entities, including the Wuhan lab, ahead of the COVID-19 outbreak.
00:07:18.000Just spend a moment reflecting on the fact that during all that time you were watching funerals on YouTube, you were locked in your house, you were worried about whether to wear masks, you were worried about whether or not to take particular medications, you were blaming other people for not taking medications, you were wondering which news sources you could rely on, you were querying conspiracy theories versus facts, you were wondering what information should be safely censored.
00:07:37.000The whole time you were paying for the whole farrago.
00:07:50.000US taxpayers supported research in three Chinese labs that included risky gain-of-function experiments with coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a new government report found on Wednesday.
00:08:00.000Maybe have risky gain-of-function research at Wuhan Institute of Virology, but could we vote on that?
00:08:06.000Wouldn't you like to be invited to participate in those kind of things?
00:08:08.000We're about to spend your money on gain-of-function research at a lab that we suspect might be a bit shady about the old window shutting and hand-washing.
00:08:24.000The National Institutes of Health and US Agency for International Development, USAID, provided 2.2 million, more or less, in grant funding to the Chinese research institutions between 2014 and 2021, according to the Government Accountability Office.
00:08:38.000The report shows 1.4 million in sub-grants allocated by the Manhattan-based EcoHealth Alliance went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology where hazardous research was conducted on bat coronaviruses.
00:08:49.000If you're going to do research on bat coronaviruses, it shouldn't be hazardous, should it?
00:08:55.000You might think that 1.4 and 2.2 are relatively low figures, but the whole way that this has been handled, obviously, involves obfuscation and deceit.
00:09:04.000How do you feel about trusting those same bodies, those same organisations, that same system and mindset, with ongoing current issues right now?
00:09:13.000The way that you're conveying information on a host of stories, the way that you're taxed on a raft of issues, intersects with these same agencies, and certainly this same mindset.
00:09:22.000Today, the GAO confirmed that US taxpayer dollars awarded from the National Institutes of Health and USAID were ultimately used for research by entities in China, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was known to be doing coronavirus research, said House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Mike Turner.
00:09:39.000We have long argued that the American people deserve the truth about COVID-19's origin and continue to take concrete actions to declassify intelligence related to the pandemic.
00:09:49.000There's a broader argument to assess here, the role that we afford science, and particularly corporatized, pharmacological, medical science, and the institutions around it.
00:09:59.000Of course, throughout the pandemic, they were presented as the solution to the problem, whereas this narrative suggests that they are the cause of the problem.
00:10:07.000As long as the narrative remains, oh, it just emerges from nature.
00:10:19.000Science is simply the investigation of data and conclusions drawn from exploration, experimentation, and trial.
00:10:25.000But when science is purposed politically and economically, it is no longer science.
00:10:30.000It's just a set of tools to serve a political aim and an economic aim.
00:10:34.000And what we were arguing throughout the pandemic period is you're calling this science, but it's only an aspect of science.
00:10:40.000You're shutting down some voices, you're elevating other voices.
00:10:44.000Now we're reaching the point where it's becoming difficult to ignore the possibility that American taxpayer dollars were ultimately spent at a substandard facility that ...caused this pandemic through malpractice or negligence or whatever you want to call it.
00:10:58.000The funding figure may not reflect the full amount since sub-awards of fewer than $30,000 don't need to be reported in government records.
00:11:05.000It also shows you how bureaucracy is used to mask and conceal facts that there's one agency then another agency and a sub-grant.
00:11:13.000And given that something so significant has happened it's obviously an opportunity to review the way these funding procedures take place and whether or not you even want experiments of this nature taking place at all.
00:11:23.000A 2017 video aired by Chinese state-run television reportedly shows Hu watching a lab worker handle specimens while neither is wearing protective gear, according to Public.
00:11:33.000If they were worried about being infected in the field, they would need full body suits with no gaps, said Alina Qian, who co-authored the book Viral, the search for the origin of COVID-19.
00:11:43.000She added that scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology conducted their research at a lower biohazard safety level of BSL-2, when we now know that the pandemic virus is even capable of escaping a BSL-3 lab and infecting fully vaccinated young lab workers.
00:11:57.000Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former director of NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, had denied to Congress earlier that year that US funding went to the controversial research project calling it a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who were world experts on coronavirus.
00:12:15.000Now it looks like clumsy Chinese scientists who weren't wearing the proper lab gear explicitly funded and oh look Anthony Fauci's retired now so he's nicely out of the way.
00:12:26.000All of the obscuring obfuscation and doublespeak has led to Something that many people suspected right back in early 2020.
00:12:37.000That lab takes funding from American interests.
00:12:40.000The American government knows about this and they're pushing an agenda and a narrative that it's come from nature in order to avoid the responsibility for causing this in the first place.
00:12:50.000That doesn't mean that the whole thing was a conspiracy, although there are plenty of people out there who believe that it is.
00:12:56.000But you can sort of follow a trail from the inception of this disease to enormous profits and expedient actions for government that start to make it look like it was either a colossal mistake that we were lied about or worse than that.
00:13:08.000Let me know in the chat in the comments which you think it is.
00:13:10.000Fauci, who retired at the end of last year, tangled with Senator Rand Paul, in particular over the research, telling the senator during a May 11th 2021 hearing that he was entirely and completely incorrect that the NIH has not never and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
00:13:26.000Well that's a lie under oath isn't it?
00:13:29.000Fauci has also repeatedly downplayed evidence of a lab leak and argued for the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 occurring naturally.
00:13:36.000Well there's two reasons why he might have argued for a natural emergence.
00:13:39.000One being that's because he genuinely believes that it's a possibility and another reason might be because if he is somehow culpable for the emergence of this virus. It would undermine his entire career, a
00:13:50.000career that many people argue has been smeared elsewhere with comparable errors that we can't
00:13:56.000go into now on this channel, but that we'd certainly go into on Rumble. The whole idea
00:14:00.000that science provided a solution to a problem caused by nature now looks increasingly unreliable.
00:14:05.000Increasingly, it looks like scientific experimentation underwritten by a corporate and commercial
00:14:11.000and profit-driven agenda has led to a crisis that affected the lives of everybody on the planet
00:14:16.000one way or another, and then we charged with coming up with a solution the same people that caused
00:14:21.000the problem in the first place, while allowing affiliated organisations to suggest to us the way
00:14:26.000that we should all conduct our own lives during that period.
00:14:29.000And the fact that we're being asked to just forget about it now, the fact that we shut
00:14:32.000down opposing voices that were trying to present views that we now know to be true, shows you
00:14:37.000that this can be used as a kind of scalpel to cut apart the corpse of a corrupt and decaying
00:14:42.000system, one that clearly is in need of much deeper analysis on the ongoing post-mortem
00:14:48.000of a system that appears to be dying before our very eyes.
00:14:54.000Now before we get into our next story about mRNA vaccines being good for pregnant and breastfeeding women, I'm going to have to ask you to join us on Rumble because, as you know, in another conspiracy fact, the WHO provide YouTube with their community guidelines.
00:15:10.000YouTube are also a member of the Trusted News Initiative, a set of big tech companies and legacy media outlets that come together to censor and control the public space where you have the opportunity and possibility to develop and participate in counter narratives that are antithetical to the interests of the powerful and they don't want that so watch the countdown we're leaving we're on our way click the link in the description join us over on rumble now
00:15:35.000Remember when they said, don't worry, it's the most tested drug in history?
00:15:38.000Well, it turns out the US government and the CDC may not have had enough scientific evidence before recommending mRNA vaccines to pregnant and breastfeeding women.
00:15:53.000Now during the pandemic and at its height many people were questioning the efficacy of vaccines and the plausibility of them being safe for breastfeeding and indeed pregnant women because how would you ever accurately clinically trial that?
00:16:06.000Now at the time it was very difficult to have those conversations because of online censorship of true information.
00:16:12.000Because of experts who had concerns and questions being censored, shut down, de-platformed, ignored.
00:16:18.000Extraordinary things went on during that period period, it's only a couple of years ago, let's not forget
00:16:23.000how that went down. Now new evidence has emerged that suggests that we were right to have those
00:16:29.000lines of inquiry. Let's have a look at the story now with a little more detail and see whether
00:16:34.000or not due process was undertaken by the CDC and American government before recommending mRNA
00:16:39.000vaccines and whether or not Facebook did indeed censor legitimate, truthful and helpful information.
00:16:45.000Today the CDC urged all pregnant women to get vaccinated. Tonight there's new guidance, the
00:16:50.000strongest yet, from the CDC urging women who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant to get
00:17:14.000So no increased risks to be vaccinated while pregnant.
00:17:18.000It is crystal clear why we're hearing all our professional organizations recommend imploring women in all three trimesters who are considering being pregnant or breastfeeding get vaccinated.
00:17:34.000Concerted effort to convey one particular message without dissent, without inquiry and propose it as science or fact.
00:17:43.000Let's have a look at some additional information that might help us to review the level of certainty and confidence we just witnessed from the legacy.
00:17:49.000It is unlikely that the vaccine lipid would enter the bloodstream and reach breast tissue.
00:17:54.000The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine assured mothers in a statement on the 14th of December 2020.
00:17:59.000If it does, it's even less likely that either the intact nanoparticle or mRNA transfer into milk.
00:18:05.000But now a pivotal new study reveals that this was always a lie.
00:18:09.000Isn't it curious how sometimes your intuition Your memory and your perception and understanding of reality had already kind of informed you that there would be risks when a novel to some degree experimental type of vaccine was being used across a population.
00:18:24.000That there would be perhaps additional complexity when it came to breastfeeding mothers or pregnant women that perhaps required further scrutiny.
00:18:32.000In the same way that we've subsequently learned that conversations around natural immunity were repressed, or vitamin D, or potential resolutions and solutions to COVID-19 that did not follow the prescribed course, we now know that some of those conversations were pressed and were controlled.
00:18:47.000Now it seems that this, one of the most sensitive aspects, one of the areas where the vulnerability is much more costly, is also being reviewed.
00:18:55.000The study, Biodistribution of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk, found that trace amounts of mRNA were detected in 10 out of 13 lactating women in a 45-hour period after vaccination.
00:19:06.000Our findings demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is not confined to the injection site, but spread systematically, the authors wrote.
00:19:14.000The study confirms previous results published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics last year.
00:19:20.000The 2022 paper, Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk, found trace mRNA amounts in 7 samples from 11 lactating women.
00:19:30.000Crucially, the new Lancet study concedes that mRNA vaccines do not stay in the arm.
00:19:36.000Initially, it was thought that the vaccine mRNA encapsulated in the NLP's lipid nanoparticles would remain localised at the injection site and quickly degrade, write the authors.
00:19:47.000However, several reports suggest that the NLP's mRNA can enter the bloodstream and accumulate in distant tissues.
00:19:54.000The authors further explain how vaccine mRNA is carried to mammary glands.
00:19:58.000For lactating mothers receiving the vaccine, our results suggest that the vaccine NLPs will reach the breast tissue, they write.
00:20:04.000Despite being excluded from the main vaccine trials, many pregnant and breastfeeding women were mandated to get vaccinated in accordance with CDC guidance.
00:20:14.000Does it not seem extraordinary to you that CDC guidance, as well as the media parroting this consistent message, did not have access to, and indeed the trials were not even undertaken, that could demonstrate the possible dangers or inconsistencies with that messaging?
00:20:30.000Does it not seem troubling to you that at that time, just a few short years ago, conversation was literally closed down?
00:20:37.000That there was uniform messaging, both in legacy media and on certain social media sites, where censorship was routinely undertaken, where deep state officials with direct contacts to some of these agencies were willing to censor, control, shut down and purge true information simply because it was inconvenient?
00:20:54.000Does this single story not demonstrate the necessity of absolutely questioning this type of information?
00:21:00.000The obvious intention to cleanse, control and dominate the media space in order to prevent reasonable conversations from taking place?
00:21:09.000Experts with valid opinions being heard?
00:21:14.000And what we're talking about now, symbolically, significantly, are mothers.
00:21:18.000The symbol, really, of the continuation of our species, the, in a sense, epicenter of many of our value systems.
00:21:25.000It seems casually unconscious that such a thing would be disregarded in this manner, but not at all surprising when we look at how the media has behaved regarding this issue and many others.
00:21:36.000The Lancet study demonstrates just how irresponsible and reckless the CDC's recommendations were.
00:21:41.000CDC encourages all pregnant people or people who are thinking about becoming pregnant and those breastfeeding to get vaccinated to protect themselves from COVID-19, said former CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky in August 2021.
00:21:53.000Walensky made a recommendation based not on science, but on faith alone.
00:21:57.000Oh my god, that's so extraordinary, isn't it?
00:21:59.000When you think how malign and neglected faith is, when you think how God or a belief in values and principles is regarded as some kind of hokey crap-pot superstition, and faith-based decisions were being made on the basis, or pretense at least, of science.
00:22:11.000Continually, people just chatting to their mates, what are you gonna do?
00:22:18.000And she's like, okay, neither are we, neither are we.
00:22:19.000Science just operated, I believe, for much of this period as a kind of new orthodoxy to shut down opposition.
00:22:27.000It functioned in the same way that a medieval use of theology might have done.
00:22:32.000If you question this, you are a heretic.
00:22:34.000If you oppose these views, there's something morally wrong with you.
00:22:37.000It just seems astonishing to me that this information continues to leak out like breast milk.
00:22:43.000At that time, Pfizer and Moderna had not completed trials on pregnant women.
00:22:46.000Behind the scenes, in 2021, reports journalist Marianne De Marcy, Pfizer was scrambling to conduct a clinical trial of its vaccine in pregnant women.
00:22:54.000To this day, Pfizer data on pregnant and breastfeeding women is still incomplete and has yet to appear in a peer-reviewed journal or pre-print and has not been submitted to the FDA for evaluation.
00:23:04.000Moderna's trial is also ongoing and the company has not released its data.
00:23:08.000So as of today, there is no clinical trial data available.
00:23:12.000So what was this we were watching on the mainstream news?
00:23:29.000It was essentially wishful thinking, authoritarianism, preferences, politicised.
00:23:35.000It was at odds with science at almost every step.
00:23:38.000And the people that questioned that were regarded as kind of crackpots, heretics and, as you know, conspiracy theorists.
00:23:43.000Demarcy reports that Pfizer's trial had major design flaws that would corrupt the data.
00:23:47.000Peculiarly, notes Demarcy, Pfizer planned to vaccinate all the mothers in the placebo group one month after giving birth to their babies, effectively getting rid of their control group.
00:24:40.000Also, we're not sure what happened to JFK yet, but this bullet sure got around.
00:24:44.000Proponents of vaccine mandates may argue that none of this matters because there have not been adverse events in breastfeeding children.
00:24:51.000But one of Pfizer's own post-marketing surveillance reports contradicts this assertion.
00:24:56.000Due to legal action, the FDA was forced to release the report last year.
00:24:59.000It showed that in 133 cases of breastfeeding babies tracked down by the company, 17 experienced clinical adverse events and three of these events were reported to be serious.
00:25:09.000So that's some more information that challenges the legacy media narrative.
00:25:13.000Another Pfizer document released by the FDA under court order found that there were 215 cases of exposure via breast milk, maternal exposure during breastfeeding reported to Pfizer's voluntary pharmacovigilance database.
00:25:38.000Because there is no precise or conclusive information being offered, because conversation keeps being shut down, dissenting voices keep being censored, legitimate experts who are offering alternative views are being shut down, silenced, shadow banned, whatever resources are available.
00:25:54.000That does not inspire a great deal of confidence, does it?
00:25:57.000Millions of women were compelled to get multiple doses of the mRNA vaccines under threat of losing their jobs, and in some cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago and New York City, being excluded from public life through vaccine passports.
00:26:10.000Other women who willingly got vaccinated were told they would have no effect on pregnancy and breastfeeding, but experts did not actually have the data to assert this was the case, and they still don't have it.
00:26:18.000The mandate in pregnant and breastfeeding women to take an experimental medical product that had not completed clinical trials in their cohort undermined the bedrock principle of medical ethics, informed consent.
00:26:28.000The disregard for informed consent was not exclusive to mothers.
00:26:32.000It affected all women of childbearing age because regulators, doctors and officials were equally dismissive of women's concerns about menstruation.
00:26:39.000In 2021, many women noticed changes in their menstrual cycles after getting vaccinated, but health experts claimed that vaccines were not responsible.
00:26:47.000In May 2021, Dr. Paula Hillard, a pediatric and adolescent gynecologist of Stanford Children's Health, told the San Francisco Chronicle that it was biologically impossible for the vaccine to impact menstrual cycles.
00:26:58.000The virus, she claimed, was far more likely to change women's cycles.
00:27:01.000I've noticed many times that coronavirus conveniently appears to offer up the symptoms and effects that a potentially malign vaccine or offer up.
00:27:11.000It's myocarditis, and it makes your breast milk taste the chemicals.
00:27:15.000So far, there's no data linking the vaccines to changes in menstruation.
00:27:19.000It does seem, based on the certainty of the mainstream media when it was relevant to encourage people to get vaccines, that there's potentially a bit of an agenda here, and certainly some questions that appear to require answering.
00:27:33.000Clinical trials that need to be undertaken in order to deduce what the truth of the situation might be.
00:27:39.000The next year, a large study in the journal Science Advances found that reports of changing cycles were far from anecdotal.
00:27:46.00042% of women in a survey of 39,000 reported that their menstrual cycle was heavier after vaccination.
00:27:52.000In October 2022, the European Union's drug regulator recommended adding heavy periods as a side effect of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.
00:28:00.000So after an initial denial, it was demonstrably true that the denial was a little polyautonomy and conspicuously absent from the conversation.
00:28:08.000It seems that as long as big pharma and legacy media are able to effectively control the conversation, there can be no dissent, there can be no opposition, there can be no reasonable conversation in a territory and area where you would imagine that ordinarily there would be outcry and outrage about the protection of vulnerable people.
00:28:26.000And indeed, who isn't vulnerable when it comes to a potentially intoxicating and, according to this, untrialled medication?
00:28:32.000The Lancet breast milk study highlights the major flaws of the Covid-19 vaccine rollout and the ensuing mandates.
00:28:38.000Government officials, esteemed medical organisations, doctors from prestigious universities and experienced journalists told pregnant and nursing women that they should all get vaccinated and that there was no cause for worry.
00:28:49.000Only malign disinformation agents, they said, would suggest that there could be any problem.
00:28:56.000Those two terms are becoming the same.
00:28:58.000Legislation is being passed to make it impossible to discern the difference between misinformation, malinformation, and just opposing views and dissent.
00:29:15.000We can't have a conversation about how we found ourselves supporting a proxy war between Russia and Ukraine and whether or not there were opportunities of peace that have been passed up.
00:29:22.000All of this is regarded as enabling or apologising.
00:29:33.000And simple and obvious basic questions about whether or not there are reliable clinical trials will will cause you to be called a conspiracy theorist when
00:29:39.000under ordinary circumstances a lack of clinical evidence to support breastfeeding mothers or be
00:29:44.000taken to medicine will be regarded as a significant piece of information.
00:30:04.000Best of all, it was all based on scientific data, except it turns out that they were political decisions, not scientific decisions, all along.
00:30:12.000Also in the US, a former FDA commissioner admitted that social distancing rules were made up.
00:30:25.000Chris Whitty, who was the UK strategist and scientific expert whose guidance was followed during the lockdown period here in this country, has revealed that he would not have recommended lockdowns without political intervention.
00:30:39.000Meanwhile, in the United States, a former FDA commissioner has said that social distancing rules were arbitrary.
00:30:46.000So remember how that whole discourse was conducted.
00:31:07.000I am actually interested in conspiracy theories.
00:31:09.000I don't think this is a conspiracy theory.
00:31:11.000I think what we are starting to be able to observe is either the conscious or unconscious biases of powerful interests and how they led to a set of measures and legislation that was either financially favorable to the corporate class or politically expedient to those already in government.
00:31:27.000Scientists would not have proposed lockdowns without ministers suggesting them, the UK's most senior doctor said.
00:31:35.000Sir Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer for England, told the COVID inquiry he would have been surprised if scientists had included national shutdowns as part of the planning for a pandemic.
00:31:45.000It's interesting that lockdowns were a key component of the strategy when it wasn't derived from science.
00:32:55.000Well, I'm going to go firstly into my imagination.
00:32:58.000And once I'm in there, I'm going to start leaping and bounding like a poet rather than an administrator who's supposed to use taxpayer dollars or pounds in order to administrate favorably for the people that I was elected to serve.
00:33:10.000That's what they're meant to be doing.
00:33:11.000He's not leaping about in their imagination.
00:33:13.000He also claimed that a lack of radical thinking had hindered the country's planning for the pandemic.
00:33:18.000Of course what this pertains to is the idea that potentially lockdown in some ways may have caused more deaths than they prevented.
00:33:23.000If not specifically related to the pandemic, then related to heart disease, people missing cancer treatments, people ending their own lives, the impact on mental health and addiction more broadly, diabetes, operations being missed, the list goes on and on and on.
00:33:46.000He became the latest senior figure to admit that the UK had a long-standing bias in favor of influenza when it came to pandemic planning and admitted there should be a separate plan for other types of viruses.
00:33:57.000That's a favorable way of looking at it.
00:33:59.000But whenever they're strategically looking at the idea of a pandemic, influenza is the template that they rely on, and in the event of an influenza-like virus, these measures will be useful.
00:34:08.000As Jordan Peterson says, never assume malfeasance when ineptitude will do.
00:34:13.000So perhaps these people that we're paying are just inept, rather than malfeasant, and didn't recognise that this is not influenza, it's not behaving like influenza, and measures that are required for influenza will not be successful in this instance.
00:34:24.000But, given that we know it wasn't scientific anyway, what else could it have been?
00:34:28.000Asked about some of the interventions used during the pandemic, Sir Chris said social measures such as quarantine and individual isolation were not new and some went back to the middle ages.
00:34:38.000Could we maybe put leeches on their skin?
00:34:41.000And maybe some of these people are witches.
00:34:43.000So if they float, I think that means they are a witch.
00:34:47.000And if they sink to the bottom, they wasn't a witch.
00:34:52.000You can't say that something was scientific and followed the science when the ideas come from the medieval days when people didn't even understand stuff like germs and Atoms!
00:35:16.000It's my favorite one of my lucky demon sticks.
00:35:18.000However he said that lockdown had not been considered in advance and that scientific committees would rarely plan for such extreme measures and subsequent measures was China as a very authoritarian centralized state tyrannical country were able to use a lot of stand in your house like you know get out of Tiananmen Square otherwise we're going to run you over type stuff and we went oh should we do that then but we're not Are we?
00:35:41.000Aren't we always claiming freedom, liberty?
00:35:47.000So when we see other people not doing it, we kill them.
00:35:50.000Particularly if they've got, I don't know, oil over there or if we can sell some weapons off the back of it.
00:35:54.000But the main thing always has been liberty and freedom.
00:35:56.000People have the first opportunity to bang people up in their houses when it's not scientifically necessary and there's no evidence to suggest it's something you should do and the ideas come from the Middle Ages.
00:36:05.000Starts to challenge the whole model, doesn't it?
00:36:07.000I would have thought it would be very surprising without this being requested by a senior politician or similar that a scientific committee would venture in between emergencies into that kind of extraordinarily major social intervention with huge economic and social impact ramifications.
00:36:22.000That's the dude that was in charge of the science now saying something that six months ago would have basically made you Joe Rogan's schizophrenic cousin.
00:36:32.000So let's say again, it would be very surprising, without being requested by a senior politician, so someone basically like the leader of a country, a president or a prime minister, that a scientific committee, right that means people that are just interested in data, would venture in between emergencies into that kind of extraordinarily major social intervention with huge economic and social impact ramifications.
00:36:52.000The very things that we were talking about.
00:37:31.000Do people in Congress own stocks and shares in certain organisations that they themselves regulate?
00:37:35.000Ask yourselves those questions and then, with the answers, just come up with your own ideas.
00:37:40.000Sir Chris was asked about written evidence from Matt Hancock, the former health secretary, as to whether there was focus on worst case scenarios.
00:38:30.000And what's happening in countries where they're not doing it?
00:38:32.000We should have used the data to reach conclusions that had the maximum benefit, risk-benefit mitigation strategies incorporated, and then regulate on that basis.
00:38:41.000The inquiry also heard from Sir Patrick Vallance, the former chief scientific officer, who said he regrets how long it took papers from SAGE, that was the body that was coordinating the response, to be made public.
00:38:52.000Oh, are you surprised by how long it takes for information to be made public?
00:38:55.000The real problem is Donald Trump and his little box of secrets, isn't it?
00:38:58.000Whereas regularly information is kept back.
00:39:00.000To protect us or could there be some other reason the information is kept back?
00:39:03.000I think, in principle, the science advice, unless it's national security related, should become public, he said, adding, the advice took longer than it should to be published.
00:39:11.000So now we know it's political, it's not scientific, and it was, if not censored, it was contained and kept back.
00:39:35.000Scientists from Johns Hopkins University and Lund University examined almost 20,000 studies on measures taken to protect populations against COVID across the world and said their findings showed that the draconian measures had a negligible impact on COVID mortality and were a policy failure of gigantic proportions.
00:39:51.000But of course the nature of the pandemic is it had an international impact.
00:39:54.000There were many, many suggestions that were made and enforced, proposed, put forward aggressively, where people were shamed, shut down if they didn't toe the line.
00:40:03.000Another one was social distancing, right?
00:40:06.000And again, if this is in order to save lives, if this is scientifically verifiable information that's come from scientists, then of course we're happy to obey, right?
00:40:13.000Because human life is sacred and we're all here to protect each other.
00:40:16.000That's the way we run the world, right?
00:40:18.000In December 2021, one of former President Trump's commissioners of the Food and Drug Administration, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, told CBS's Face the Nation the six-foot social distancing rule created to slow the spread of the coronavirus was arbitrary and has decreased confidence in the pandemic response.
00:40:33.000Yes, when you present something as science that is in fact arbitrary, that will decrease the authority of the people that make those suggestions.
00:40:40.000If you say, do not stand any closer than six feet, that's scientifically because of the vapour you see and the spores, what they do.
00:40:55.000That will decrease people's trust in the authority.
00:40:56.000The six foot rule, Gottlieb said, was a compromise between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which had recommended 10 feet, and an unnamed political appointee in the Trump administration who called 10 feet inoperable.
00:42:00.000Many people assume they're all traces to some old studies on the flu, which found droplets won't travel further than six feet, Gottlieb said.
00:42:08.000Well, I got these old studies on the flu, and they say droplets don't travel further than six feet.
00:42:25.000The six-foot rule was probably the single costliest recommendation that the CDC made, Gottlieb said, because the whole thing feels arbitrary and not science-based, which lowers public confidence.
00:42:35.000Well, in our country, we're locking people in their house for the same reason.
00:42:37.000Feels like the sort of thing you might do.
00:42:47.000These various anti-vaxxers and these conspiracy theorists and nutjobs that are not respecting science of numbers that we've made up and measures that we've gleaned from the medieval times.
00:42:57.000These idiots, these nutjobs, obviously ain't very patriotic and they deserve everything.
00:43:10.000As we continue to review the impact of the last three years, the general medical, psychological, ecological, economic impact of that time, we now have further evidence to suggest that the scientific experts did not have the authority that was claimed.
00:43:24.000In fact, many of these decisions were political, some of them were arbitrary, some of them
00:44:43.000You know, join us and participate and let me know what you think.
00:44:46.000Callie Means is coming on the show talking about big food, big pharma, and big obese children being used as kind of poo pie for the FDA's experiments, but basically we're being fed bad food and bad drugs.
00:45:11.000Remember, click the red awaken button to join our locals community to get early access to our interviews, readings, podcasts and solutions to global problems which will always come from decentralisation.
00:45:21.000Unified, decentralised opponents to the establishment, including our new members now, Sublime Sammy, DMS 0559, JustFlyOverCountry, JesusSquid606.