Stay Free - Russel Brand - Dr Bob Gill - About COVID-19 Vaccines

In this episode, Dr Bob Gill, a former GP and family doctor, joins me to discuss the possibility that the MMR vaccine given to millions of people during the Pandemic was actually contaminated with DNA from another organism, the E. coli bacterium, and whether or not this contamination could have altered the DNA of our own cells. We also discuss the impact of DNA contamination on the human genome and the potential for it to be incorporated into our own DNA. This episode is sponsored by the World Health Council, and is available on all good podcasting platforms. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers and use the promo code: "ELISSA" at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase of a copy of the latest issue of Stay Free With Russell Brand's new book, Stay Free: The Truth About The MMR Vaccine: The New Science That Will Change Your Life, by Dr. Bruce Lipton, we hope you'll join us in our campaign to bring awareness to the truth about the MMR Vaccination Epidemic. Stay Free with Russell Brand: Stay Free, Don't Get Sick, Get Healthy, Get Safe, Get a Bulletproof, Get Your Shots, Get Vaccinated! by clicking here. and find out more about his new book: Stay Free! and get 10% discount code: STAY FREE! at stayfree.org.uk/STROKEPRODUCING at checkout! and save $10,000 by becoming a patron! Get in touch with us and receive $5,000 and receive 5% off the first month of your first month and get 5 VIP membership offer! We'll be giving you access to the Stay Free course! Learn more about the book: stay free for the book and get 20% off of the book, $50,000 or more, and get a discount on the second month of the course, $25,000 off the course: stayfree and get VIP access to a VIP membership and get 7 days of VIP membership, and all other VIP pricing, plus a VIP discount, plus 7 other VIP access and VIP discount to the course stay free shipping and VIP pricing throughout the world wide, plus all other perks including VIP access, including VIP pricing and VIP + VIP access plus a 3-day VIP membership! FREE PRICING! Stay free!

00:00:00.000 Hello there, you awakening wonders.

00:00:01.000 Thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand today.

00:00:04.000 Thank you for being a part of this movement.

00:00:06.000 Thank you for believing in revolution.

00:00:07.000 Thank you for being willing to take part in the change inside yourself that's necessary if we're gonna change the world.

00:00:14.000 Surely now, as close as we're likely to get on this channel to a returning messiah, is our next guest.

00:00:21.000 NHS Doctor, that in our country means the National Health Service in the UK, that means a general family doctor, but now public health activist, enlightened and awakened by events during the pandemic, Dr Bob Gill has become a prominent voice and ally for those of us, excuse me, that are questioning the way that the narrative unfolded during the pandemic.

00:00:43.000 Thanks for joining us, Dr Bob.

00:00:46.000 Great to be here, Russell.

00:00:48.000 So one of the stories that would be a great place for us to start would be this seemingly peculiar and surely not true claim that the version of the Pfizer vaccine that was initially tested, and as I understand, given to Pfizer employees, was different from the initial round of vaccines released in the UK.

00:01:11.000 Am I getting that right?

00:01:12.000 Because it doesn't sound like it should be true.

00:01:15.000 Yeah, that's right, Russell.

00:01:16.000 There were two processes used to produce the mRNA vaccine. 0.81

00:01:21.000 One was a quite expensive, but a clean process, which was using our DNA to sequence RNA.

00:01:29.000 And the second process, process two, which was used to mass produce the vaccine, was using E. coli and putting into E. coli plasmids and getting the E. coli to reproduce the mRNA.

00:01:45.000 So it's a cheaper form of producing the vaccine, but the problem with that is you can get contamination.

00:01:51.000 So you can get genetic material from the E. coli into your vaccine vial.

00:01:58.000 Now, there's a very low threshold of tolerating contamination within vaccines.

00:02:04.000 However, you know, researchers looked into this matter and found very high levels of contamination with DNA.

00:02:13.000 Now the problem with DNA is it can potentially get incorporated into your own genome and also the presence of DNA can actually spark anaphylaxis.

00:02:25.000 That's when you get a severe allergic reaction.

00:02:29.000 I don't know if you remember but once the Pfizer vaccine came out Later on, a week or two later, they started telling practitioners to keep the patients with you for 15 minutes, keep an eye on them for 15 minutes after the vaccine.

00:02:44.000 Now, that was related to the potential reaction to the endotoxin from the E. coli contamination.

00:02:51.000 So that's where that came from.

00:02:53.000 And, you know, this research initially done by Dr. Kevin McKernan, who's a very highly qualified, respected academic whose whole life is devoted to, you know, researching these matters.

00:03:07.000 He was part of the Human Genome Project, a highly credentialed person.

00:03:13.000 Now, his work has been replicated in Japan, in Europe, in other units in the US and they've all found very worrying high

00:03:23.000 levels of contamination.

00:03:26.000 And the problem was Pfizer didn't declare this to the regulator.

00:03:31.000 So that's the problem.

00:03:32.000 And later on, they were forced to declare it to the European regulator.

00:03:35.000 So they've actually confirmed it themselves that this problem exists.

00:03:40.000 It's been extraordinary the way that information has begun in the protean swamp of conspiracy

00:03:50.000 theory and bubbled its way up through the various channels and valves to accepted medical

00:03:59.000 data.

00:04:00.000 For example, I remember hearing very early in the pandemic period posts that would definitely have been censored that the The problem with this vaccine is it has the potential to alter your DNA.

00:04:11.000 I feel like that was one of the kind of stories where I thought, oh, even for me, a person that's open to almost any anti-authoritarian narrative, that has no trust in the legacy media, that has very little trust in Big Pharma at all, no trust in the state, surely it doesn't have the potential to alter your genetics.

00:04:29.000 I thought that was sort of highfalutin, but you're saying that that actually is one of those conspiracy theories that's kind of true.

00:04:39.000 Yeah, there is a risk.

00:04:40.000 So, you know, the DNA contamination poses several threats.

00:04:43.000 It promotes clotting.

00:04:46.000 It promotes immune dysfunction.

00:04:48.000 And at some level, it can promote cancerous transformation.

00:04:52.000 Now, if you have, you know, some of this DNA being entered into your own cell's DNA, it can actually turn on the process of cancer.

00:05:01.000 And if you add that in with immune dysfunction, then the risk becomes real.

00:05:06.000 And that risk has been documented elsewhere.

00:05:09.000 So, you know, this is coming from highly respected sources.

00:05:12.000 If people want to look into this further, I suggest they look on the World Health Council's Twitter and they've got a three-hour lecture going into the detail of all of this most recent revelation and analysing the implications.

00:05:26.000 You're talking, I suppose, about SV40 DNA.

00:05:29.000 That's specifically the name, is it, of the aspect of this malformant component that can induce, can be carcinogenic?

00:05:40.000 That's right.

00:05:41.000 So it was recognized this SV40, simian virus 40, a, you know, a strip of genetic code has the potential to be a cancer-promoting gene.

00:05:51.000 It needs other factors to line up.

00:05:54.000 But there is no rational explanation as to why this even got into the Pfizer vaccine.

00:06:00.000 That is the problem with all of this.

00:06:01.000 What is it doing there?

00:06:02.000 Why is that contamination?

00:06:04.000 Why is that sequence of code even in the vaccine?

00:06:07.000 So it raises lots of questions about what's gone on in the production.

00:06:11.000 What questions?

00:06:12.000 What questions?

00:06:13.000 Why shouldn't it be in there?

00:06:14.000 What do you mean they can't identify what the function of that is?

00:06:20.000 You can't explain why that was in the vaccine, you know, why that specific coding, which is recognised to be potentially dangerous, how did that end up in the vaccine?

00:06:30.000 It wasn't required for the production of the vaccine.

00:06:34.000 That's the problem.

00:06:35.000 So between the testing and, you know, Albert Baller turning up on TV shows saying it's 98% effective, Claiming it was a kind of wonder drug, that it was a moonshot.

00:06:46.000 A few weird little things happened.

00:06:47.000 They started using plasma out of E. coli that they hadn't previously been doing.

00:06:52.000 And there's the odd introduction of SV40 DNA that promotes cancer.

00:06:58.000 Are you saying that both of those things happened between trial-in and release?

00:07:04.000 Yeah, they used a different, cleaner process for the trial and a cheaper mass production process for the vaccine that was rolled out to the public.

00:07:14.000 Now, to use E. coli to produce mRNA in this way is not uncommon.

00:07:19.000 The problem is the contamination issue.

00:07:21.000 If your quality control isn't good enough, if you outsource the production to labs you've got no control over, that's where the problems arise.

00:07:30.000 Yeah, I suppose you're alluding to the many stories about the lack of standards in many of the labs where clinical trials took place.

00:07:39.000 They're almost too difficult to number and they're certainly difficult to locate due to the clandestine shrouding of these issues.

00:07:47.000 Another thing that seems pertinent to talk about, you and I both being in the UK right now, is the British politician Andrew Bridgen last night, or earlier this week, a couple of days ago I think, Raising the question of excess deaths in British Parliament.

00:08:02.000 There's a few things I want to point out.

00:08:04.000 Like this phenomena of excess deaths is one of the things that's been masked.

00:08:08.000 Many people that were in this space questioning the way that COVID was being reported on noted that there appeared to be an attempt to attribute to coronavirus itself Adverse side effects that could potentially have been caused by the vaccine.

00:08:26.000 This 60,000 additional deaths that took place in the United States, I think I'm right in saying between 21 and 23, as was pointed out in, tell me the name of that author when you get a minute, James, was pointed out in the book about excess deaths, was, you know, a Vietnam War worth of casualties.

00:08:44.000 America lost as many young people in the Vietnam War over a 12 year period as it did in that Two year period to excess deaths.

00:08:53.000 How come excess deaths is still a difficult subject to talk about?

00:08:57.000 How come there was hardly anyone in Parliament, that's our form of Congress, when Andrew Bridgen raised the matter?

00:09:04.000 What's going on with excess deaths?

00:09:06.000 Is this going to be another of the strands around this period of time that's going to disclose important information to us?

00:09:14.000 Well, I think that the politicians, unfortunately, have a vested interest in covering all of this up, don't they?

00:09:20.000 Because they've followed the narrative of the drug companies.

00:09:24.000 They've allowed us to do what amounts to a mass experiment, vaccinating the whole population against a virus which a lot of us had developed natural immunity to.

00:09:36.000 So they were pushing this vaccine down our throat.

00:09:40.000 And now that the Chickens are coming home to roost.

00:09:44.000 They don't want the impact of their decisions to be known widely amongst the public, so they might share some of these concerns.

00:09:52.000 You know, Andrew Brigden and others have done a lot to try and bring this to the attention of politicians, and they're willfully being blind about what's going on here.

00:10:01.000 Yeah, it does seem like that because of the many concerns, shall we call them, that sprung up around this period after the initial explosion of euphoria and excitement that accompanied the advent of the vaccine, which many media institutions try to artificially maintain, When inquiry did begin, it was, I suppose, focused on the potential that the vaccine could have consequences that are worse than the problem that it was invented to solve.

00:10:36.000 Now, As time goes on it seems that we're moving closer to that conclusion rather than further away from it.

00:10:45.000 It did seem that there were a number of sudden unexplained deaths.

00:10:49.000 It's another one of those subjects that people were discouraged from discussing even though it became almost anecdotally observable.

00:10:57.000 The evidence of your own eyes when people were dropping dead on sports fields, young famous people dying and therefore being reported on, the number of You know, the number of morticians and people working in various funeral services saying that they were seeing stuff that didn't make sense.

00:11:15.000 People in our country, the health service, pointing out that deaths were being reported inaccurately.

00:11:21.000 At this point, we've arrived now It seems to me a point where there needs to be a kind of reckoning.

00:11:32.000 That even if you were to take this subject in isolation, away from the concerns around the military industrial complex, the nature of legacy media, the obvious hypocrisy and corruption of the years leading up to coronavirus, but that period is simply revealed rather than created.

00:11:50.000 So it seems that there's a necessity for a kind of a pandemic reckoning.

00:11:56.000 But that's unlikely to take place, isn't it?

00:11:59.000 When in this country and in America, broadly speaking, both political parties have a general alliance and very little appetite to hold to account the powerful interests that contributed to, if not caused, many of these problems.

00:12:14.000 Yeah, I think you get to the heart of the matter.

00:12:17.000 There is a distinct lack of accountability.

00:12:19.000 There is no reckoning.

00:12:21.000 We have a media that is docile and complicit, you know, repeating without question the political talking points.

00:12:29.000 So you have a corporate capture of the state and you have a complicit media.

00:12:34.000 So accountability becomes a rarity.

00:12:37.000 You know, if we ever get close to accountability, it's normally lip service.

00:12:40.000 How many public inquiries do we have where nobody goes to jail for major failings?

00:12:45.000 You know, they get a rap on the knuckles and 20 years down the line we get close to the truth.

00:12:51.000 This is a built-in design.

00:12:54.000 It's not a flaw.

00:12:55.000 That's the design of the system.

00:12:57.000 to set up regulatory bodies that give the impression of independent oversight, but they're

00:13:03.000 generally toothless and you appoint people from the very corporate interests that you're supposed

00:13:08.000 to be regulating. So, you know, an idiot might make the, you know, anybody might make a mistake, 1.00

00:13:14.000 but an idiot makes the same mistake again and again. You've got a 50% chance of being right, 1.00

00:13:19.000 even as a fool, right? 0.99

00:13:20.000 In a binary decision. 0.99

00:13:22.000 But these people keep making the same decision, time and time again, and you can only conclude this is deliberate, this is part of the system.

00:13:29.000 Yeah, another of the components of this has been the changing nature of reporting around myocarditis and pericarditis.

00:13:39.000 That's another one of the subjects that just couldn't be discussed, that was regarded as a conspiracy theory.

00:13:45.000 You know, when initial adverse events were reported or when anecdotes Totally.

00:13:49.000 People talked about stuff like that.

00:13:51.000 It was regarded as a kind of cultural heresy.

00:13:54.000 But now Pfizer have been forced to confirm the increased risk of myocarditis in young males.

00:14:03.000 What does that shift tell us?

00:14:04.000 Are we likely to see further shifts?

00:14:06.000 And at what point do these shifts become tantamount to admission of a failure of the whole project?

00:14:13.000 Yeah, they've been dragged kicking and screaming to this point.

00:14:17.000 You know, people like Peter McCullough have done a lot of work, you know, the famous cardiologist, done a lot of work raising the awareness about myocarditis with the vaccine.

00:14:27.000 At the beginning, you know, people were conflating having the illness with the vaccine, but actually you can do specific tests which show that what was present on post-mortem examination, special stains can identify that the protein within the heart The genetic material within the heart was spike protein produced by the vaccine.

00:14:48.000 So you can do very clever tests to find out, was it the virus or was it the vaccine?

00:14:53.000 And it was work done by, I think it was a team in Germany that looked at post-mortems of people with sudden death.

00:15:00.000 to look unexplained sudden death, to look was there myocarditis and what was the source of

00:15:04.000 that myocarditis. So the hard work has been done and I think Pfizer's, you know, eventual admission

00:15:10.000 of the problem is, I think, their way of managing their corporate image and corporate trust.

00:15:18.000 If you give a little bit, you may come across as having an ounce of integrity.

00:15:22.000 I think that's what's going on there.

00:15:24.000 Yeah, and they're obvious and it's hardly necessary to state that the financial, institutional, corporate and global structures that undergird these types of issues and these types of organizations are Never able to be fully interrogated and investigated, because if you were to, you would no longer be able to sustain this model.

00:15:53.000 With Black Rock's Larry Fink showing support, or I think vocalising support, for the Labour leader Keir Starmer, who's the Leader of the Opposition, equivalent I suppose to the Democrats in this country.

00:16:04.000 Does that further Demonstrate the impossibility of ever addressing these issues for established democracy.

00:16:12.000 If you put together Andrew Brigdon talking to an empty parliament with Keir Starmer essentially being verified by the, you know, global financial interests, should we say, for the sake of simplicity.

00:16:25.000 How, through parliament, through congress, through conventional democracy, a democracy that many people believe to have been entirely corrupted, are we ever Able to have the reckoning that appears to be necessary.

00:16:41.000 Read you a quote from Mussolini.

00:16:44.000 Fascism should be rightly called corporatism as it is a merger of state and corporate power.

00:16:50.000 That's what Larry Fink has demonstrated.

00:16:52.000 He's given Keir Starmer his blessing.

00:16:55.000 Why?

00:16:56.000 Not because, based on some moral principles or righteousness, based on how he's going to maximize the return for his investors.

00:17:05.000 That's what it's all about.

00:17:06.000 So, you know, That's where the power comes from.

00:17:11.000 It's money.

00:17:11.000 And the politicians are looking for big backers because in due course, no doubt, after they leave politics, they want to cash up for their compliance with corporate power.

00:17:22.000 So this is the belly of the beast, I'm afraid.

00:17:26.000 And, you know, unless we get a critical mass of informed public, awakened public, There can be no reckoning.

00:17:33.000 There can be no change to the system that is endemically putting money above the environment, above human life, above everything else.

00:17:42.000 That is unfortunately the power.

00:17:44.000 And the pandemic we have is of greed and of self-interest.

00:17:49.000 That's the real pandemic.

00:17:51.000 Yeah, and it's difficult to address that kind of pandemic without spiritual measures, without personal awakening, without a set of cultural values that very much are at odds with the current momentum.

00:18:03.000 As well, I would say, Bob, with a culture that seems very fractured, where a lot of energy seems to be spent through the legacy media crushing the scenting of voices and discrediting them.

00:18:15.000 And ensuring that there is ongoing cultural conflict between people who in alliance, the kind of alliance that might be achieved if power were wherever possible decentralised and people able to run their lives culturally however they want to.

00:18:31.000 It seems Very difficult to imagine that kind of awakening take place.

00:18:36.000 So can you just for a moment talk on the importance of independent media?

00:18:41.000 Talk for a moment on the kind of spiritual principles that appear to be somewhat lacking and need to be promoted and how you have gone from being like a family doctor to someone who, like when you're talking and you're sort of quoting Mussolini, not favourably, not as a hero, but as a warning from history, Where do you see this journey going for you?

00:19:05.000 So there's a few questions there.

00:19:06.000 Independent media, spiritual values, and your personal journey.

00:19:10.000 Because it sounds like you're going to get yourself in a lot of trouble.

00:19:14.000 Yeah.

00:19:14.000 So, you know, independent media are clearly a threat to the narrative that corporate media generates.

00:19:21.000 And that's why they're trying to shut people down.

00:19:24.000 People as yourself, you know, other important voices out there are a real problem for them.

00:19:30.000 So, you know, if you're getting attacked, you clearly you're doing something right.

00:19:36.000 The spiritual point you make is important because the values we all share are to be able to look after ourselves, our families, and live a reasonably happy life.

00:19:48.000 These are not unreasonable demands, but that is not allowed to happen.

00:19:53.000 We don't have peace of mind.

00:19:54.000 We don't have secure work.

00:19:56.000 We don't have a welfare state or a social security system which is up to the needs that are out there.

00:20:04.000 In order for us to not look up, not look at the people controlling this system, but to spend our time fighting each other, you need to generate these divide and rule narratives, be it on cultural issues, be it on trans rights, be it whatever.

00:20:23.000 Every one of those narratives is used to divide the people at the bottom, so they don't have time or headspace to look up.

00:20:34.000 When everybody, when all media are pushing a certain line, you need to smell a rat.

00:20:39.000 There's a problem there.

00:20:40.000 When you have the CIA pushing out memes about trans rights, you have to suspect what they're really up to, right?

00:20:49.000 You know, we pay lip service to respecting the rights of women and children in Afghanistan, yet we're quite happy to bomb women and children in Gaza at the moment. 1.00

00:20:59.000 So these things don't add up.

00:21:01.000 And where, you know, where there is no consistency in the application of stated principles, we need to be suspicious and start looking more critically into that matter.

00:21:12.000 So where are you taking it yourself?

00:21:14.000 Because it seems like it's going to be very difficult for you to sit in a surgery and just, you know, as a doctor, say, well, here's your fifth booster shot.

00:21:22.000 I mean, what are you saying to patients at this point?

00:21:25.000 And how is the conflation of your roles as a doctor and as an activist balancing out now?

00:21:33.000 So, you know, when Asim Malhotra, who you had on your show, I believe it was last week, he produced a paper looking at Pfizer's own research evidence and actually sent it to me before he published it.

00:21:47.000 He said, what do you think about this?

00:21:48.000 And once I read that, he said, can you give me a quote before we get it published, put it out in the media?

00:21:55.000 Reading that, I cannot in any good conscience give anybody an mRNA shot.

00:22:00.000 I can't do it anymore.

00:22:01.000 So I had to stop.

00:22:03.000 I would be a total hypocrite if I came on here pointing out the problems and concerns out there about myocarditis and the contamination, and then to carry on giving them, although there is a significant financial incentive to keep doing so.

00:22:18.000 That is the problem.

00:22:19.000 There are perverse incentives for us to act against our conscience, for us to be selectively and willfully blind about what's going on around us.

00:22:28.000 And you know, I've reached the stage of my career that I don't.

00:22:34.000 If they come for me, I'm taking that risk.

00:22:37.000 I'm not prepared to do something.

00:22:38.000 I came into medicine not to harm people, right?

00:22:41.000 And if you come across enough evidence and concern that you might be doing harm, I'm not going to go there.

00:22:47.000 I'm not going to be blind to it either.

00:22:48.000 It's just not for me.

00:22:51.000 And if that means losing my job, well, so be it.

00:22:55.000 It's frightening though, isn't it Bob?

00:22:58.000 It seems that in the United States, Biden's given a green light to corporate control in healthcare.

00:23:06.000 UnitedHealth Group's enrolment growth over the past decade is solely from Medicare and Medicaid, with taxpayers significantly contributing to the company's profits.

00:23:14.000 The Medicare programme has transformed into the insurance industry's primary revenue source.

00:23:19.000 Tell me how Biden's posturing around Medicare and Medicaid is actually just another form of profiteering, corporatism and monetisation of the health industry.

00:23:37.000 Yeah, so, you know, Medicare and Medicaid are state-funded health provision for those people who are left out of the insurance-based system because they're too sick or they're too poor.

00:23:49.000 They can't make money out of those people.

00:23:51.000 So the state has had to step in as a last resort.

00:23:55.000 Now, when the state was providing that care itself, There wasn't money being siphoned away.

00:24:02.000 But what's happened over recent years is they've actually appointed people from UnitedHealth and other healthcare companies to run the federally funded service.

00:24:12.000 So the revolving door, we have the revolving door again.

00:24:15.000 And what has that allowed?

00:24:16.000 That's allowed them to bring in, to loosen regulation and to allow the insurance companies to come in and run what is paid by the taxpayer.

00:24:25.000 So they can siphon yet more money into their own coffers.

00:24:29.000 And that's what's happened in the UK.

00:24:31.000 So, you know, legislation passed last year replicated the American managed care system in law, breaking these up into 42 funding units.

00:24:41.000 And guess who's slipping in?

00:24:43.000 The backdoor, UnitedHealth.

00:24:45.000 So the plan is whatever money is spent, be it through taxpayer or be it through the individual buying private insurance, these companies want a slice of the action.

00:24:58.000 They're intermediaries.

00:24:59.000 You don't actually need them to run a self-service.

00:25:01.000 What you need is a hospital, doctors and nurses, and some drugs, right?

00:25:06.000 You do not need insurance managers and CEOs and all these legions of administrators.

00:25:12.000 They're totally unnecessary.

00:25:15.000 But the growth of the intermediarization in healthcare is worth draining.

00:25:20.000 One in three dollars in the U.S.

00:25:22.000 spent on healthcare is going out to these people who provide not one second of care.

00:25:28.000 Now, what a lunatic system that is that we have chosen to replicate in this country.

00:25:34.000 Tell me about your documentary, Bob.

00:25:36.000 I feel like you're covering in the film, The Great NHS Heist, how the corporatisation of our still nominally state-run welfare-oriented health service has been co-opted and almost that's not something that's been voted on or even explained.

00:25:54.000 What is the subject of your documentary, Bob?

00:25:58.000 Yes, it's really to highlight, you know, what the NHS to corporations are a series of assets, which are to be stripped or to be mined for the recurrent, you know, taxpayer funded money that comes in.

00:26:13.000 So this is, to them, bags of cash.

00:26:16.000 And, you know, what the government should be doing is protecting the public's interest with our taxes, but what it's actually doing is selling us out.

00:26:24.000 So, you know, healthcare can be divided up into three assets.

00:26:27.000 You've got the real estate, you've got the patient data, which is an increasingly commercialisable asset, and you've got the funding.

00:26:36.000 But the control of those assets now is very much transferred into the private sector.

00:26:43.000 And in order for them to maximise profit, they do it through the denial of care.

00:26:47.000 And what the film tries to do is to not make a humanitarian case, to not make an ethical case.

00:26:54.000 We make an economic case for why this is a disaster, not only for the sick people, but for the economy in general.

00:27:02.000 Because the more you waste on healthcare, the less you can do For, you know, investment in infrastructure or whatever it might be, because there's an opportunity cost.

00:27:12.000 If you're wasting 30% on overheads and CEO bonuses, well, you're not spending it on delivering health care.

00:27:19.000 So that is what the film explains.

00:27:23.000 And it tries to merge the US experience with what's happening here to have a wider appeal.

00:27:30.000 And, you know, in my dreams, I thought we'd be inundated with calls from Americans telling us, what the hell are you guys doing copying our crazy system?

00:27:38.000 Right?

00:27:39.000 I was inspired by watching Michael Moore's Sicko and, you know, that's what led me to do this.

00:27:45.000 Why did it fall on me as a GP to do this in my spare time?

00:27:48.000 Because of what we discussed earlier, the corporate media are doing a job of keeping us in the dark.

00:27:54.000 That's all they're interested in.

00:27:57.000 Bob, you're a really great ally and you're a great person.

00:28:01.000 Thank God there are people in your position that are willing to take the risks and make the sacrifices that you're making.

00:28:08.000 Thanks very much for coming on our show.

00:28:10.000 Good luck with your documentary and good luck with your ongoing mission.

00:28:14.000 Thank you very much, Russell.

00:28:15.000 Keep up your great work too.

00:28:17.000 Certainly shall try to.

00:28:18.000 Thank you, sir.

00:28:19.000 Thanks, Doctor.

00:28:20.000 Dr. Bob's documentary, The Great NHS Heist, is available now.

00:28:23.000 We'll post a link right away and you can follow him on X, at DrBobGill.

00:28:28.000 He's worth following because he's a doctor who's willing to confront authority and willing to say to him personally expensive and risky truth.

00:28:39.000 On the show tomorrow, we've got Neil Oliver, who you might know from GB News, you might know as a public commentator.

00:28:45.000 He's someone who appears to have really captured a lot of attention through his ability to analyse and explain many of the events in recent years and also I feel like I look a bit like him.

00:28:56.000 It's going to be interesting.

00:28:57.000 I think he's Scottish.

00:28:58.000 He's got a mellifluous, lilting accent.

00:29:01.000 I think it's going to be a pretty good conversation.

00:29:02.000 Join us for that.

00:29:04.000 If you want to become a member of our community and get all sorts of additional content, press the red button that's on the screen now.

00:29:09.000 You get early access to interviews.

00:29:11.000 I do meditations with you.

00:29:12.000 You get readings like we're going through the Bible now.

00:29:15.000 Plus we discuss how we might move on from where we are now.

00:29:19.000 Seems to me pretty obvious.

00:29:20.000 Awaken everybody that you possibly can.

00:29:23.000 Find people in positions of authority and experience that are interested in living in a new way.

00:29:29.000 Accumulate a new system adjacent to this current corrupt one and vivify it with our powerful spiritual energy and be willing to engage in this spiritual war like these people.

00:29:39.000 These new AwakendWonders are Creature61, welcome to the movement.

00:29:43.000 John Gore, SOS, you're gonna love it here.

00:29:46.000 Handsman, I could not love you more.

00:29:48.000 Fubar123, how I love you. 1.00

00:29:51.000 And where would we be without Enough Shit Fuckery? 1.00

00:29:55.000 It's difficult to imagine a world without you. 1.00

00:29:58.000 That is ingeniously spelt, but when pronounced, it amounts to little more than swearing.

00:30:03.000 You are an AwakendWonder, you're welcome with us.

00:30:05.000 Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.

00:30:08.000 Until then, if you can,

Stay Free - Russel Brand - October 24, 2023

Dr Bob Gill - About COVID-19 Vaccines

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript