Stay Free - Russel Brand - ELECTION FRAUD! Dems CAUGHT Ballot Stuffing!! - Stay Free #237

00:00:00.000 So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a walkthrough of the game. I'm going to be playing it on my PC. So, I'm

00:00:07.000 So, I'm going to be playing it on my PC.

00:00:07.000 going to be playing it on my PC.

00:00:27.000 So, I'm going to be playing it on my PC.

00:00:43.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.

00:00:58.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.

00:00:59.000 Thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand.

00:01:02.000 We stream in a variety of places that we may speak freely.

00:01:07.000 Due to new restrictions, I have to not tell you where we are primarily available.

00:01:15.000 It's complicated, but we've got some fantastic stuff.

00:01:18.000 An analysis of recent changes to our content on YouTube and how that intersects with ideas of monopolization.

00:01:26.000 And free speech.

00:01:27.000 Also, I'm very excited to speak to Dr Peter McCulloch about sudden deaths and vaccines, and we've got a variety of stories around that subject that I know you're going to enjoy.

00:01:38.000 We will be available for 15 minutes on YouTube, then you'll have to intuit for yourselves whether or not we're available anywhere else.

00:01:47.000 Yes, Carl Reino on Rumble.

00:01:49.000 Thank you for that comment.

00:01:52.000 Thank you, LimbicBeauty, all of you.

00:01:54.000 And if you want to support our content, there's a red button that you can click to become an awakened wonder.

00:02:00.000 But first, let's talk about free speech right now and how it's functioning.

00:02:05.000 You are aware that we are living in a state of increased global tension, that we are lurching from one crisis to another.

00:02:13.000 And these crises, appalling crises, with Death and despair spilling out immeasurably everywhere appear always to legitimize either more centralized authoritarianism or the ability to profit by very powerful interests and also extraordinary prevarications from people that previously you would have thought were absolutely aligned with important democratic principles.

00:02:40.000 Have a look at John Fettman who I really thought was a guy who believed in freedom.

00:02:44.000 Certainly he's Shorts and attire, generally suggested.

00:02:47.000 He was a guy who was up for letting it all hang out.

00:02:50.000 Now he wants everybody thrown out.

00:02:53.000 Actually, guys, this isn't on the stream deck here.

00:02:57.000 So I'm unable to show that.

00:02:58.000 So why don't you run the clip of Jon Fetterman and then make sure this gets switched on.

00:03:03.000 Let's go, guys.

00:03:03.000 Thanks.

00:03:06.000 Can you play that?

00:03:07.000 If you guys, if I'm talking, hello there, if you stay with us, we use a lot of rumble, all five and a half thousand of you.

00:03:12.000 I voted for him, I'm sorry, this isn't democracy.

00:03:25.000 It absolutely is.

00:03:26.000 Yeah, yeah, but kind of, sort of.

00:03:29.000 Why?

00:03:30.000 10,000 people in Gaza have been killed.

00:03:32.000 Half are children.

00:03:34.000 The Pope's calling for a ceasefire.

00:03:36.000 The UN has called for it.

00:03:38.000 I'm just asking you.

00:03:39.000 You're a good guy.

00:03:40.000 I voted for you.

00:03:41.000 I know you're a nice guy.

00:03:42.000 This is important.

00:03:44.000 Here, can I give you a card?

00:03:45.000 I'll tell you what we're gonna do Why don't we speak to Dr. Peter McCulloch right now and we will sort out this stuff immediately.

00:03:59.000 Why don't we take this where it has to go?

00:04:01.000 And those of you that are saying we're an hour late, what happened is the clocks changed in the UK.

00:04:06.000 We in Britain have abandoned summertime and now accepted fully Now is the winter of our discontent and not May's glorious summer.

00:04:14.000 It literally just is the winter of our discontent.

00:04:16.000 So we're not an hour late, but we were a bit late.

00:04:18.000 And for that, we apologize.

00:04:19.000 We're not going to be streaming on YouTube anymore because we are welcoming Dr. Peter McCulloch.

00:04:24.000 You'll have to, for yourselves, work out whether or not you can watch us elsewhere.

00:04:29.000 We've got so much fantastic content for you.

00:04:32.000 You are going to love it.

00:04:33.000 Please try and follow.

00:04:34.000 We're like the A-team now.

00:04:35.000 If you have a problem, Like you're living in an authoritarian system that wants to censor you and seems to be implementing some peculiar measures to prevent any kind of uprising or consensus or movement of opposition.

00:04:47.000 If you want some help and if you can find us, maybe you can join the Stay Free movement.

00:04:52.000 I can't even tell you where we're going, but have a look at this set.

00:04:54.000 I think there are indications of where you might find us and where you might find free speech and where you might find a conversation with Dr Peter McCulloch, who I'm going to be speaking to right now.

00:05:03.000 Peter, thank you so much for Thank you for joining us.

00:05:05.000 It's a pleasure to finally meet you.

00:05:06.000 Sorry for keeping you waiting.

00:05:09.000 Thanks for having me.

00:05:10.000 Peter, can you tell us about the recent study that suggests there's a potential link between the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and sudden cardiac deaths?

00:05:21.000 And can I just check we're off YouTube before Peter answers that?

00:05:24.000 Fantastic.

00:05:25.000 Yeah, so can you tell us what about this new study?

00:05:28.000 Sure, I think this is a little too strong for YouTube, so the science here is very disturbing.

00:05:34.000 Schreckenberg and colleagues from Germany showed that when Pfizer and Moderna is directly applied to heart muscle cells, they start to have very abnormal function and electrical currents within about 48 hours.

00:05:46.000 I mean, this is evidence of direct cardiac toxicity.

00:05:51.000 Separately, Crosson and colleagues from Harvard showed the messenger RNA is physically stuck in the human heart in people who are dying.

00:05:58.000 After the vaccine and now Nakahara and colleagues in a big study, 700 people took the vaccine, 300 who didn't.

00:06:07.000 Their cardiac PET scans or positron emission tomography heart scans are very abnormal in those who took the vaccine.

00:06:15.000 There's a shift towards the abnormal uptake of what's called fluorodeoxyglucose in positron emission tomography.

00:06:22.000 This is basically a sick heart pattern on PET scanning.

00:06:26.000 And the astonishing finding was that virtually everybody who took the shot has an abnormal cardiac PET scan.

00:06:32.000 Those with sore arms as a sign of inflammation or potentially even potential dose of messenger RNA have worsened cardiac findings.

00:06:39.000 So what we've learned now is that it's possible to actually have cardiac dysfunction, maybe even a cardiac arrest, without myocarditis.

00:06:49.000 Peter, that sounds terrifying and so beyond the official and heavily propagated narrative that it was impossible to gainsay for such a long time that it is difficult for me to accept, primed even though I've been with all manner of complex and contrary information over the last year.

00:07:11.000 Does this represent a significant shift?

00:07:14.000 How How do you think this will be publicly addressed and does this amount to a yet more significant failure of the vaccine itself and the surrounding cultural paraphernalia?

00:07:26.000 Are we now at the point where we have to acknowledge that that vaccine has caused more harm than good?

00:07:37.000 Information's converging for sure.

00:07:39.000 I've led the largest autopsy study now.

00:07:42.000 Over 300 autopsies.

00:07:44.000 People have died after the vaccine.

00:07:45.000 We've extracted all the data from the individual case reports, individually adjudicated all of them, and determined that 73.9% of all the deaths that are occurring, you know, assessed by autopsy after the vaccine, in fact the vaccine has caused the death, When we believe it's a cardiac abnormality in a separate paper, first off, there's full sharing colleagues, 100% are actually due to the vaccine.

00:08:09.000 So, what we found is the COVID-19 vaccine is the clear cause of cardiac arrest and sudden death in people who have no obvious other explanation.

00:08:20.000 This is very important.

00:08:22.000 Normally, when someone dies, The cause is known heart disease or known cancer or other problems like a motor vehicle accident, homicide, suicide, drug overdose, but very rarely is death ever a mystery.

00:08:35.000 So these cases that are reporting in death, no obvious cause, now the first thing we think of is did they take a COVID-19 vaccine?

00:08:44.000 Yes, in fact, it's true, isn't it, that Edward Dowd's information attests that 60,000 young people died from causes unknown.

00:08:58.000 The cause was not Covid and He as he phrases it there was a you know over the 12-year period of the Vietnam War 60,000 American young people died and that many people have died Presumably I suppose in the manner that you've described is that what you are you saying that when we were all culturally and anecdotally Experiencing athletes or famous people or young people elsewhere dying that what we were this is what was behind it scientifically This is the explanation

00:09:28.000 That's what we're piecing together.

00:09:29.000 What Dowd has done is he's made the case that all-cause mortality is rising across data systems.

00:09:37.000 Our Center for National Health Statistics in the United States has reported in a report by Hoyart, disturbingly, that maternal mortality, women who are pregnant and then 42 days after delivery, maternal mortality is at an all-time high Since the 1960s and that was for the 2021 calendar year, now the CDC reported just a few days ago that infant mortality has started to turn upwards.

00:10:03.000 This is the first upward turn we've seen in 20 years.

00:10:06.000 So from adults, pregnant women, infants None of it looks good. 0.91

00:10:12.000 Public health officials should be having an all-hands-on-deck investigation into why mortality is going up.

00:10:19.000 The only new thing introduced now is the COVID-19 mass vaccination program.

00:10:25.000 That's terrifying.

00:10:26.000 It seems that the way that the information is being released is incrementally.

00:10:31.000 Like you'll hear that, oh yeah, it does cause myocarditis in this demographic.

00:10:36.000 Oh, there are traces to be found in the milk of breastfeeding mothers.

00:10:41.000 And then you start to realise that there's an increase in infant mortality and then perhaps you'll learn that miscarriages increased.

00:10:50.000 Peter, perhaps this is beyond even your vast wheelhouse, but it doesn't seem to me likely that such an extraordinary error could have occurred without... I don't know.

00:11:03.000 How could something of this scale have happened when there are meant to be so many agencies, both national and global and international, that are meant to be safeguarding, regulating and examining and preventing a travesty of this scale taking place?

00:11:21.000 I was the only person in the public view in August of 2020.

00:11:26.000 On August 17, 2020, I published In the Hill, which is a widely read journal for the House, the Senate, White House, people in Washington, people all over the country.

00:11:37.000 The title of the op-ed was The Great Gamble of the COVID-19 Vaccine Program.

00:11:42.000 You know, I was the only public figure and the only person in academic medicine to question these COVID-19 vaccines.

00:11:50.000 Everybody had basically fallen into a trance of thinking the vaccines were going to save the world, that they were, you know, presumed to be safe and effective.

00:12:01.000 The reason why this should be questioned from the very beginning is the vaccines are the genetic code for the spike protein.

00:12:07.000 The spike protein is the spine on the surface of the virus.

00:12:10.000 It's the lethal part of SARS-CoV-2.

00:12:13.000 So the genetic code, which we have no ability to shut off, was injected into people's bodies.

00:12:20.000 And once the genetic code started to produce the spike protein in some people, it was going to be too much for too long, and it was going to be fatal.

00:12:29.000 Now we've learned in a paper by Brogna and colleagues that the vaccine spike protein is circulating in the bloodstream for six months or longer after people take these shots.

00:12:39.000 I can tell you having a foreign protein whose genetic code and engineering occurred in a Chinese biosecurity lab floating around in the bloodstream of billions of people who took the vaccine, you know, this is a reality now that's mind-blowing. 0.96

00:12:54.000 As a doctor I can't possibly even conceived this happened, and now we're seeing disasters, including the tsunami of cardiac arrests, blood clots, strokes, immunologic problems, and now even signals that cancer is on the way up.

00:13:11.000 Wow.

00:13:12.000 Thank you for your extraordinary bravery right at the advent.

00:13:15.000 I suppose to you it felt like duty.

00:13:18.000 How were you treated at the commencement of this pandemic period when you were making these proclamations, offering a counter narrative and indeed information, vitally, to back up your perspective?

00:13:32.000 How do you feel you were treated by the scientific community and their partners in media, Peter?

00:13:41.000 I put it all in a book called Courage to Face COVID-19, which is a five-star bestseller on Amazon.

00:13:47.000 Interestingly, that book just suffered about two weeks of censorship on Amazon.

00:13:52.000 Our book joined just a half-dozen books that was banned from Amazon, including one by Adolf Hitler.

00:13:59.000 For no reason.

00:14:00.000 They said our book had offensive content.

00:14:02.000 We appealed multiple times.

00:14:04.000 It took a lot of public pressure.

00:14:06.000 Now our book is restored.

00:14:07.000 Courage to Face COVID-19 is back on Amazon.

00:14:10.000 But I put it all in the book because it was such an extraordinary story.

00:14:14.000 I wasn't just being a critic or a skeptic.

00:14:16.000 I was offering solutions.

00:14:18.000 I had basically devised the first early treatment protocol for COVID-19, had it published in a very high-level journal, the American Journal of Medicine.

00:14:27.000 It became the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Home Treatment Guide.

00:14:31.000 I testified in the U.S.

00:14:32.000 Senate very early in November 19th of 2020 that we had a solution to treat patients and prevent complications.

00:14:42.000 By December 2020, I kept working in the medical literature.

00:14:45.000 We had Clear and convincing evidence early treatment worked.

00:14:48.000 What I was shocked with is that my junior colleagues didn't follow along, that they didn't step in and help people get through the illness all over the world.

00:14:58.000 It was astonishing.

00:15:00.000 So at this point in time, you know, what I've experienced is not a warm welcome, but in fact, just a vehement wave of antipathy.

00:15:11.000 And it's come from the American Board of Internal Medicine, as well as, you know, general pundits out there.

00:15:18.000 No, I've never had somebody of my stature, like a chief of medicine, a dean, division chief, ever face me face to face and tell me they disagree with the principles of early treatment or The issues of vaccine safety.

00:15:32.000 Never.

00:15:33.000 And when I've testified three times in the U.S.

00:15:35.000 Senate, we've been invited ahead of time with plenty of advance notice.

00:15:38.000 Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Lewinsky, Ashish Jha, Murthy, you know, all the public health officials, none of them have showed up to face me or people in my circles.

00:15:49.000 That's terrifying.

00:15:50.000 A vehement wave of antipathy, you say.

00:15:53.000 Your book was banned from Amazon.

00:15:56.000 Your protocols that were demonstrably effective were not only not taken up, but in some cases discredited.

00:16:05.000 And now that only 3% of Americans are taking the most recent COVID booster, it seems that, generally speaking, the mistrust of the vaccines has reached a tipping point.

00:16:16.000 I wonder what you think about the story that Anthony Fauci was supporting a project that was collaborating with the Wuhan virus some months or even years prior to this outbreak.

00:16:33.000 That, taken in conjunction with how long it's taking the truth to be broadly conveyed or even discussed, the obvious and evident censorship that took place during the pandemic, the challenges you've just described with both the book that you've published and your protocols, what do you feel that suggests?

00:16:53.000 It suggests that the US, as well as many other Western countries, were deep into biological threat development.

00:17:00.000 A paper by Leilani and colleagues, British Medical Journal, indicates the United States has been in messenger RNA development since 1985.

00:17:10.000 It's put tens of billions of dollars into this.

00:17:13.000 DARPA, our research unit of the military, in 2012, it's still on the website, has a program.

00:17:19.000 It's called the ADEPT P3 program.

00:17:21.000 It has the aspiration of ending pandemics in 60 days using messenger RNA.

00:17:27.000 Now a paper by Lee and colleagues indicate there's over 9,000 patents on messenger RNA.

00:17:33.000 So no single person invented it.

00:17:35.000 Obviously 9,000 patents.

00:17:37.000 The lead patent assignees are Sanofi, CureVac, BioNTech, Moderna, and the U.S.

00:17:44.000 government.

00:17:45.000 So the U.S.

00:17:46.000 is deeply involved in this.

00:17:49.000 Fauci and his division at the NIH worked with Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Peter Daszak at the EcoHealth Alliance, Dr. Xingling Li at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, And they actually created this chimeric virus.

00:18:06.000 They published it in 2015 and 2016.

00:18:09.000 Nature Medicine and Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

00:18:11.000 They basically showed the world they created SARS-CoV-2 in 2016 and it gets out of the lab in 2019.

00:18:19.000 Now all this is coming out in the U.S.

00:18:21.000 House of Representatives Select Committee for Coronavirus Investigation led by Dr. Bren Wenstrup.

00:18:27.000 So Fauci is deeply involved in the creation of SARS-CoV-2 and in the cover-up where he pretends as if this came out of nature and it coordinated a deceptive program to mislead the world.

00:18:43.000 I was about to sort of say, will there ever be a kind of reckoning now that it seems that there is sufficient evidence to warrant one?

00:18:51.000 And whilst you yourself have participated in Senate hearings and here in our country, there is a kind of rather gentle partisan inquiry into COVID that will likely lead to the conclusion that but one half of our political system ought be damned in favour of the other all too similar half.

00:19:11.000 It seems that the scale of the reckoning that is required is such that it would amount to a dismantling of such powerful institutions and economic interests, a kind of unravelling of deep relationships between the media, big pharma and the state, that the system itself would be challenged.

00:19:27.000 Therefore, Peter, it seems unlikely that that reckoning can ever take place, particularly given that A few, if any, lessons appear to have been learned from this period.

00:19:36.000 I don't mean from there are now cultural groups that will never trust the government again, never trust the media again, but because there is a doubling down on the crushing of dissent and escalation of censorship and even sort of attempts by the FDA to shut down over-the-counter drugs and measures that amount to trying to create Further tyranny and dominion over the pharmaceutical solutions to relatively ordinary or common viruses like colds and flus, it suggests that this agenda is continuing.

00:20:08.000 So do you feel that there will ever be a reckoning?

00:20:10.000 And do you feel that the agenda that brought us the pandemic and its problems is still at work?

00:20:17.000 I think you summarized it very well.

00:20:20.000 In my book, we call it a biopharmaceutical complex, a powerful syndicate with non-governmental organizations, governmental regulatory agencies.

00:20:29.000 They're all working together.

00:20:31.000 The one thing that's clear about the complex, you know what they want?

00:20:34.000 A single solution for every problem, and that's a vaccine.

00:20:38.000 It's a vaccine-only strategy.

00:20:40.000 And it's working to try to reduce medicinal opportunities for people.

00:20:44.000 It's clearly undermined all our efforts on early treatment from nasal sprays and gargles to over-the-counter vitamin supplements, other things we can use to treat illness.

00:20:54.000 It's clearly a plan, and the best plan to read is actually the business plan by CEPI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, And that was put together by Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum in 2017.

00:21:08.000 CEPI says there will be a wave of pandemics, and there will be only one solution each time, and that is a vaccine.

00:21:15.000 We've already had two of them now.

00:21:16.000 We've had SARS-CoV-2, and don't forget monkeypox.

00:21:19.000 The World Health Organization declared monkeypox a worldwide emergency.

00:21:24.000 Get ready for another one.

00:21:26.000 I don't think people are going to fall for it.

00:21:28.000 People didn't fall for monkeypox, and they're going to start to follow people who they can trust, who are bringing solutions, and that is prevention and treatment of these illnesses as opposed to a vaccine.

00:21:40.000 Covid was very much the Beatles.

00:21:43.000 Monkey Pox was the monkeys.

00:21:45.000 It was a poor imitation.

00:21:47.000 It's never going to take off.

00:21:49.000 Do you know Monkey Pox didn't even write its own mRNA?

00:21:52.000 It had it written elsewhere.

00:21:55.000 Hey, Dr. Peter, I'm sort of terrified.

00:21:59.000 By all of this.

00:22:01.000 How is it possible for you to keep your head in these spaces with your evident and obvious scientific understanding and enormous integrity and not fall into total despair?

00:22:12.000 How is it possible for you to be able to identify figures like Bill Gates, who are still deified

00:22:18.000 in certain portions of the media and presented as kind of liberal titans and heroes before

00:22:25.000 whom we all hurl ourselves down in front of in worship?

00:22:30.000 How are you coping with this?

00:22:32.000 And how do we deal with the fact that so many things that were regarded as conspiracies

00:22:36.000 I still remember the talk shows where people were singing Andy Fauci's name and wearing

00:22:40.000 t-shirts and pencil cases and badges like he was the anti-Trump and that he was some

00:22:46.000 kind of a science messiah.

00:22:48.000 In fact, messianically he declared, Christ-like, that he was science.

00:22:53.000 He was the epitome that the only way to science is through me, like a latter-day secular pharmacological Christ.

00:23:01.000 How are you coping with this, Peter?

00:23:04.000 And how are we going to freely convey this information to enough people to generate the kind of uprising that such disturbing truths would seemingly warrant?

00:23:17.000 You know, I was over in the UK in September and your picture was all over the tabloids.

00:23:22.000 And so I can tell you, Russell, I must be like you, that we're bold and relentless.

00:23:27.000 We know that the truth will prevail.

00:23:29.000 The truth is far more powerful than the false narrative.

00:23:32.000 We're not conspiracy theorists.

00:23:35.000 We're rational theorists, meaning we're interpreting what's going on and we have a rational approach.

00:23:40.000 To our understanding, we can debate and talk about these issues.

00:23:44.000 We know the other side, this biopharmaceutical complex, they cannot have any face-to-face discussion on any of this.

00:23:52.000 Early treatment of COVID, vaccine safety and efficacy, the false declaration of a monkeypox emergency, and we can continue to find this.

00:24:02.000 They seem to believe That by manipulation of people through the major media and through social media, that they can actually change human thought.

00:24:11.000 And we know this because there's a very important case.

00:24:15.000 It's called Missouri versus Biden.

00:24:17.000 And the U.S.

00:24:18.000 government is knee deep in manipulating human thought through social media.

00:24:22.000 And the Biden administration is fighting desperately to continue to have government agents turning the levers in social media.

00:24:32.000 Australia, the same thing.

00:24:33.000 Australia is going to have the first of this year a very draconian new law go into place where people will not be able to challenge the government false narrative in social media in Australia.

00:24:44.000 Rumble is, by the way, not available in France right now.

00:24:49.000 So we can see this going on all over.

00:24:51.000 It's a global totalitarian takeover.

00:24:53.000 The only way we will prevail is to continue to bring people the truth.

00:24:58.000 And you know what?

00:24:59.000 They gravitate to us because they know we're on the right side of history.

00:25:04.000 Yes, I pray to God that you are right.

00:25:06.000 A lot of people are pointing out that Fauci could be a literal antichrist and pointing out that they love Jesus Christ.

00:25:14.000 I share that love with you and I certainly share concerns about some sort of Anti-rapture going on in the world of Big Pharma.

00:25:24.000 But Peter, surely this hysteria is unwarranted.

00:25:27.000 It's not like the WHO are putting together a treaty that means that they will be able to bypass national sovereignty in the event of another pandemic and that this treaty is so carooming and open that even climate change under its auspices could be regarded as a kind of pandemic.

00:25:44.000 Is it, Peter?

00:25:47.000 Yes, it's all true.

00:25:48.000 The WHO aspires to have complete dominion over all plants, animals, and humans with authority binding by international law to declare pandemics, to declare emergency countermeasures, to have lockdowns, forced vaccinations, all of it.

00:26:07.000 And to influence our livestock, farming, management of energy.

00:26:12.000 It's a giant overreach, and people are opposing this.

00:26:16.000 I testified in the European Parliament on September 13th, 2023, and I told the EU, pull out of the WHO.

00:26:24.000 Trump's instincts were right.

00:26:26.000 Pull out of the WHO.

00:26:28.000 He says if he gets back in the office, that's going to be job one.

00:26:31.000 Pull the US out. 0.93

00:26:32.000 We don't want to get tied up in international court.

00:26:35.000 As a doctor, Russell, I'm not going to follow anything the WHO says.

00:26:39.000 I'm going to follow my medical judgment and do the right thing for patients.

00:26:43.000 This seems to be the kind of solution that more people should be pursuing.

00:26:48.000 Individual freedom, community freedom, an end to these peculiar International Global Goliaths that seek to impose new legislation and order on free individuals and formerly free nations.

00:27:02.000 Peter, I want to thank you so much for joining us and I want to thank you for your great work and your bravery at a time when many people were afraid to speak out.

00:27:09.000 You kind of did so automatically and it had great impact and the truth has borne out and thank you for your great work.

00:27:16.000 It's a real honor and privilege to meet you.

00:27:19.000 Thank you.

00:27:20.000 Thanks for having me.

00:27:21.000 Follow me on my website, PeterMcCullochMD.com.

00:27:24.000 We're going to post the link in the description, PeterMcCullochMD.com.

00:27:28.000 Also, Peter is on Substack, and if you want to be ahead of where things are apparently, even now, gravitating, then Dr. Peter McCulloch is one of the voices that you should be listening to and one of the men you should be following.

00:27:43.000 Thank you very much, sir.

00:27:45.000 Thank you.

00:27:46.000 There you go, guys.

00:27:47.000 We've just had a couple of doses of truth.

00:27:49.000 I've had my booster shot there, and I feel resistant to deception and lies like never before.

00:27:54.000 I just hope that spike protein don't get loose and migrate right to the midst of my tender, tender heart.

00:28:01.000 Now, listen, before we brought Peter on, because he's a busy man, he's a doctor.

00:28:08.000 Do you think the interview's too short, says Mitch Mitch Mitch over on the Rumble chat?

00:28:11.000 Yeah, Goliath, I said, un-come-undone.

00:28:14.000 Hey, you lot, if you're watching us on Rumble, why don't you become a member of our locals community?

00:28:17.000 Then you get access to our early interviews.

00:28:20.000 For example, and we are 20, oh my god, we're over 20,000.

00:28:23.000 Yesterday, we promised you a festive pukka special. 0.77

00:28:27.000 If you're Christian, you can regard it as a Do you want to regard it as a Christmas special?

00:28:31.000 Because you can.

00:28:32.000 Christmas with Tucker.

00:28:34.000 I mean, we are going to bring him to you.

00:28:36.000 It's already agreed.

00:28:37.000 It's happening.

00:28:38.000 So that's what, you know, you guys make a demand and we immediately try to fulfill you.

00:28:44.000 Russell has nice teeth, says SmallMouthSlayer603.

00:28:47.000 Thanks for that.

00:28:47.000 Thanks for that, mate.

00:28:48.000 Dr. Peter McCulloch, he hits you with some pretty hard home truths, doesn't he?

00:28:51.000 I mean, how do you feel, guys, after that?

00:28:53.000 Do you trust Dr. Peter McCulloch or Dr. Anthony Fauci?

00:28:58.000 If it's Dr. Peter McCulloch, can you put one in the chat for me now?

00:29:01.000 And if it's Anthony Fauci, can you put two?

00:29:04.000 I'm planning, I'm guessing we're not going to see a whole lot of twos.

00:29:08.000 So there are good people out there.

00:29:09.000 There are legitimate medics.

00:29:11.000 There are experts that we can trust.

00:29:13.000 There are people in positions of authority.

00:29:16.000 Worthy of that name. 0.97

00:29:17.000 It's just those people tend to be crushed by a system that wants you ignorant and disempowered. 0.94

00:29:22.000 One person did press two, but I think you were being cheeky, weren't you? 0.93

00:29:25.000 Because you're anti-establishment.

00:29:27.000 Okay, I'll tell you one thing you won't get away with.

00:29:29.000 If you ever Turn up to one of Hillary Clinton's lectures, and I can tell you now, they're worth attending.

00:29:36.000 Do not mention Epstein Island, because that is not a popular topic there, I tell you that.

00:29:42.000 In fact, you might be asked to leave.

00:29:45.000 In fact, not asked to leave, you might be dragged out aggressively.

00:29:49.000 Then you want somebody who's going to get up every day.

00:29:52.000 Hey Hillary, why is your husband in the empty island 26 times?

00:29:56.000 I sort of like the atmosphere of that guy.

00:30:13.000 He's doing it in a very sort of, like, fun way, isn't he?

00:30:15.000 Hey, Hillary, why's your husband going to Epstein Island 23 times? 0.68

00:30:19.000 He's sort of kind of jolly about it.

00:30:20.000 It's like he doesn't realise that that's going to be contentious.

00:30:24.000 He's sort of saying it in good faith, like he was expecting that Hillary might go, look, the first 20 times were holidays, and the last three, he happened to leave some stuff there.

00:30:34.000 I'm not going to tell you what type of stuff it was, but it's kind of like what he left on Monica's dress.

00:30:40.000 I tell ya, man, there's a lot of things you can't say.

00:30:42.000 I mean, like, if you want a scandal, check out that island, man.

00:30:45.000 I hope that guy's gonna be okay.

00:30:57.000 There's not a long history of people with connections to the Clinton Foundation, you know, turning up.

00:31:02.000 Well, I'll allow you to finish that stuff in the chat.

00:31:07.000 SHEILA!

00:31:23.000 SHEILA Is this really necessary?

00:31:30.000 Is this really necessary, guys?

00:31:31.000 Is this really necessary?

00:31:33.000 Who's saying is that really necessary?

00:31:35.000 Is that the guy?

00:31:36.000 He's enjoying it.

00:31:37.000 The guy, check out his little face.

00:31:38.000 He's like, hey, I'm being dragged out.

00:31:41.000 I'm having a, I'm in a theme park and it's my own t-shirt.

00:31:45.000 Hey, one thing you guys should make sure that you never get involved in is election fraud, because people hate that.

00:31:52.000 As you know, Donald Trump, under a deluge of attacks from every direction, is accused of election meddling out there in Georgia, I believe, currently.

00:32:02.000 But election fraud is pretty popular in a number of places, not least Bridgeport election.

00:32:08.000 Bridgeport, in Bridgeport, in the Bridgeport election.

00:32:11.000 This is, I think, a mayoral campaign rather than, I don't know, a state or federal one.

00:32:17.000 I don't know all of your political words, I've just got an overview.

00:32:20.000 Let's have a look at this particular piece of election fraud, see if you can spot it.

00:32:23.000 First, election fraud has been thrown around way too many times in the past few years without any serious evidence to back up those claims.

00:32:33.000 But tonight, an election for mayor has just been thrown out by a judge who concluded that fraud did impact a recent vote and ordered a new election.

00:32:47.000 And it was based on absentee ballots.

00:32:49.000 Happened in Bridgeport, Connecticut, where a state superior court judge has just ordered a new election between incumbent mayor Joe Gannon and his mayoral primary opponent, John Gomez, after Gomez successfully argued that he was the victim of absentee ballot fraud.

00:33:08.000 Stunning video put out by the Gomez campaign appeared to show a Bridgeport City employee and local Democratic Party official walking up to a drop box in the early hours of the morning of September 5th and making multiple deposits of absentee ballots.

00:33:28.000 You can see a woman who the Gomez campaign identifies as Bridgeport City Hall employee Wanda Jeter-Patiki Walking up to the drop box and placing multiple ballots inside.

00:33:42.000 And a few seconds later, she comes back, does it again.

00:33:45.000 That could still be democracy, though.

00:33:47.000 She maybe just really thinks that person should be mayor.

00:33:51.000 So good, I voted a hundred times!

00:33:53.000 This campaign posted this on social media as part of a three-minute compilation showing irregularities in the vote.

00:34:01.000 That woman was questioned during a court hearing challenging the election results and pleaded the fifth.

00:34:08.000 Were you paid for any of your work on the Gannon campaign?

00:34:12.000 I would object at this point.

00:34:17.000 The Gomez campaign played in court nine different people, making 24 drops of apparently multiple ballots into absentee ballot boxes.

00:34:17.000 And it wasn't just her.

00:34:28.000 Democracy's broken.

00:34:28.000 Well, there you go.

00:34:30.000 Doesn't work.

00:34:30.000 Whole thing.

00:34:31.000 We need an entirely new system.

00:34:33.000 Now, if you saw our conversation just now with Peter McCulloch and the whole thing, we'll be up, of course, on Rumble.

00:34:39.000 And we're just on Rumble now.

00:34:40.000 Because the other thing is now on YouTube, we can't say Rumble.

00:34:42.000 Do you know about this?

00:34:43.000 We can't even say it.

00:34:44.000 It's gone totally crazy.

00:34:47.000 We talked briefly with McCulloch a second ago about the Anthony Fauci-run lab in Montana that experimented with coronaviruses shipped in from Wuhan a year before the Covid pandemic began.

00:35:02.000 Is this true?

00:35:03.000 Let's have a look at the story.

00:35:04.000 Antony Fauci... U.S.

00:35:06.000 taxpayer money, also if you're an American and you funded this, U.S.

00:35:11.000 taxpayer money was used to experiment with coronaviruses from a Chinese lab thought to be the source of the COVID pandemic more than a year before the global outbreak and investigation was found.

00:35:21.000 The National Institutes of Health, NIH, under Dr. Antony Fauci's leadership, infected 12 Egyptian fruit bats with... What is their issue with bats?

00:35:32.000 Is it that the Batman franchise has really got to them?

00:35:36.000 Fruit bats with a SARS-like virus called WIVI.

00:35:40.000 W-I-V-I. 1.00

00:35:41.000 That would never caught on.

00:35:41.000 Coronavirus.

00:35:42.000 It's catchy.

00:35:43.000 I mean, you know, it is catchy.

00:35:46.000 In Montana in 2018.

00:35:47.000 The W1V1 coronavirus was shipped from the Wuhan lab the FBI believes caused the COVID pandemic. 0.97

00:35:54.000 It's good the FBI putting a shift in because Lately, remember we had those couple of guys from the FBI on the show, those whistleblowers, that say January 6th was investigated in a peculiar way.

00:36:04.000 Okay, so they're doing some good investigations right now.

00:36:07.000 They believe that it was shipped in from the Wuhan lab, the FBI say, excuse me, that caused the Covid pandemic and was tested on bats.

00:36:15.000 Acquired from a roadside?

00:36:17.000 Mary Lanzu, that's not how you get bats.

00:36:19.000 What kind of lab are you running out doing deals for bats like junkies scoring bats in a street?

00:36:26.000 The research revealed this week by a campaign group is more evidence of ties between the US government and the Wuhan lab as well as the funding of dangerous virus research across the globe.

00:36:35.000 Well, There's credit Bobby Kennedy, where it's due.

00:36:38.000 He's been telling us about this stuff for a long, long time.

00:36:42.000 There's credit Peter McCulloch, where it's due.

00:36:44.000 You know, there have been people trying to tell us this stuff for a long, long while.

00:36:48.000 Were you listening?

00:36:49.000 You awakened wonders?

00:36:50.000 Were you across this stuff?

00:36:51.000 Were you well aware of the extent of this?

00:36:54.000 Because some people were telling a very different story.

00:36:57.000 I'll tell you one, and I know you guys love him, because why wouldn't you?

00:37:00.000 He's got great hair.

00:37:02.000 He's a friend of democracy.

00:37:03.000 He's Justin Trudeau.

00:37:06.000 He's always been very consistent on vaccines and, you know, your body, your choice.

00:37:11.000 Let's have a look.

00:37:13.000 Misinformation and disinformation is carrying people to believe things that are untrue.

00:37:21.000 Vaccinations is a perfect example of it. 1.00

00:37:24.000 Any vaccine we distribute to Canadians will be safe for Canadians.

00:37:29.000 There are people who've probably gotten very sick from vaccinations.

00:37:33.000 Every vaccine that is approved is safe for Canadians, is uncompromising.

00:37:38.000 Individuals are allowed to make their own choices.

00:37:40.000 There may be all sorts of different reasons why someone is hesitant to get vaccinated.

00:37:45.000 There's no more excuses to not get your shot.

00:37:48.000 And therefore, while not forcing anyone To get vaccinated.

00:37:52.000 Enforcement measures in place will make sure that everyone is vaccinated.

00:37:58.000 I chose to make sure that all the incentives.

00:38:01.000 Travelers across the country need to be fully vaccinated.

00:38:05.000 People coming into the country need to be fully vaccinated. 1.00

00:38:08.000 were there. Don't get to work in the public service, don't get to go to movie theatres or

00:38:12.000 gyms or restaurants to encourage Canadians to get vaccinated and that's exactly what they did. We got 0.75

00:38:17.000 vaccinated to a higher level than just about any other of our peer countries. Unknown causes was

00:38:23.000 the leading cause of death in Alberta last year. Oh no!

00:38:28.000 Well done Milk Bar TV, whoever you are for that piece of, that's a beautiful piece of content and that's terrifying because what that's presented to all of us is what liberalism is supposed to mean, the kind of tone and timbre of tolerance, the nomenclature of inclusivity.

00:38:48.000 But meanwhile, round the back, what's that?

00:38:51.000 Tyranny! 0.75

00:38:52.000 What is it?

00:38:53.000 Evocation of emergency laws.

00:38:55.000 What is it?

00:38:56.000 Shutting down of bank accounts.

00:38:58.000 What is it?

00:38:59.000 New legislature that prevents people from speaking freely.

00:39:03.000 New censorship.

00:39:04.000 New censorship laws across Canada.

00:39:06.000 What an extraordinary time we are living in.

00:39:09.000 We are going to need radical change.

00:39:12.000 Listen, we're going to show you our main story.

00:39:15.000 In a minute.

00:39:16.000 It's a good one because it's us talking about how YouTube are promoting legacy media content and shutting down alternative media and monopolizing.

00:39:25.000 But before we watch that, I'm going to give you a little choice.

00:39:28.000 What would you like to see first?

00:39:30.000 Let's go back to that WEF thing, guys.

00:39:33.000 And we're going to show you that in a second.

00:39:36.000 Is it the WEF discussing how only rich people will be allowed to travel?

00:39:42.000 Oh, That's interesting.

00:39:43.000 Oh my god.

00:39:43.000 So press W1 if you want to... not W1, just 1.

00:39:46.000 You can't press W1.

00:39:47.000 That's that new coronavirus that we're going to be getting any day now.

00:39:50.000 Press 1 if you want to see a story about the WEF discussing how only rich people will be allowed to travel or 2 if you want to see a story about Pfizer's new Covid flu combo vaccine stroke risks.

00:40:02.000 I want number 1, don't you?

00:40:03.000 So tell me what you're putting.

00:40:05.000 Yeah, most of you are down with 1.

00:40:06.000 Let me just wait for the rumble stream.

00:40:08.000 To catch up our Awaken Wonders on locals there who get first access to our content like our Jordan Peterson interview, our Tucker Carlson interview, chat we just had with Brett Weinstein just then.

00:40:17.000 Like you can watch that stuff first if you are an Awaken Wonder.

00:40:21.000 Plus you can support us as we try to change the world by creating a political movement that opposes this sort of tyranny.

00:40:29.000 One has won or what we call W1 now.

00:40:31.000 It's catchy!

00:40:32.000 It's the new coronavirus.

00:40:34.000 So let's see, let's have a look at the WF saying that Surely only rich people will be able to travel, which is sort of what happened during the last pandemic anyway, remember?

00:40:44.000 Sorry, that's uh... Which button's that on, guys?

00:40:46.000 Six, is it?

00:40:48.000 Six.

00:40:49.000 Two of the countries which were most successful in getting good coverage of vaccination...

00:40:54.000 ...based this, not at all, on getting their citizens to try and understand... It's not that, I don't know who she is.

00:40:59.000 Is it, it's on 7.

00:41:00.000 Okay, 7.

00:41:01.000 There's going to be people, um, of means who are going to travel.

00:41:05.000 He seems like a nice sort of a guy anyway.

00:41:09.000 I love that, W. I've seen it in the chat right now, the 666 thing.

00:41:12.000 I can't believe I didn't spot that.

00:41:12.000 use an Oculus or a Magic Leap or some other kind of device to travel to the same place.

00:41:18.000 I love that W. I've seen it in the chat right now, the 666 thing. I can't believe I didn't

00:41:23.000 spot that. You use us some good, hot conspiracy theorists in this chat.

00:41:29.000 Like, you've noticed that the O's in World Economic Forum are bifurcated by that curve, which is the connection, I suppose.

00:41:36.000 Like, semiotically, that represents the world is going to be held in a sort of forum.

00:41:41.000 And it's economics.

00:41:42.000 And according to this, the bifurcated O's, it's a 666 satanic... That is... 0.97

00:41:50.000 That is a good spot, that.

00:41:51.000 That's got to get out there.

00:41:53.000 That's mother's milk to a conspiracy theorist, and I just hope that mother didn't take any vaccines.

00:41:58.000 From their own couch.

00:42:01.000 So they say the rich shall inherit the earth.

00:42:03.000 There you go.

00:42:04.000 Well, naked evil!

00:42:06.000 There it is.

00:42:08.000 Four people use headsets.

00:42:10.000 Four people use headsets?

00:42:11.000 God help us.

00:42:12.000 What, they can do a virtual?

00:42:15.000 Well there you go, you're going to be forced into some sort of metaverse.

00:42:18.000 That seems to be the way that it's going.

00:42:21.000 Guys, I'll tell you, I'm so glad that you're here with us.

00:42:24.000 I'm so glad that you're a member of this community.

00:42:27.000 I'm so glad that you support us.

00:42:30.000 It means the world.

00:42:31.000 It's very, very important.

00:42:33.000 Now this story is amazing.

00:42:35.000 Tomorrow we've got Bret Weinstein on the show.

00:42:37.000 We're going to be talking about just the loss of meaning, the limitations of rationalism,

00:42:41.000 the omni-crisis and the way that it's controlling us and shutting us down.

00:42:46.000 I want you to have a look at, in a minute, our story, Here's the News Now, Here's the

00:42:50.000 Effing News.

00:42:51.000 We cover what's going on on YouTube, how they are promoting legacy media and how they're

00:42:55.000 looking for, it seems to me, to find new ways to shut down independent voices and to ensure

00:43:00.000 that people like Peter McCulloch, for example, who years ago, literally, were telling you,

00:43:05.000 hey, I'm concerned about this vaccine, that those voices can't get out there.

00:43:09.000 They realise now That there is a movement, that there is a resistance, that there is hope and there is possibilities.

00:43:15.000 I want to thank those of you that are supporting us like MGP99, AyersRobin, KeepRusbyFree, Tom997 and RoneyMalone16.

00:43:24.000 You have become awakened wonders and it means the world to us.

00:43:26.000 Keep Supporting us.

00:43:28.000 Remain with us.

00:43:29.000 We are determined to grow this movement.

00:43:31.000 Now you know we've been demonetized on YouTube after the British government stepped in and asked for that.

00:43:36.000 Well now they're also restricting our ability to link to other platforms.

00:43:39.000 Free speech platforms like this one because I suppose they'll say there's hate speech in here.

00:43:43.000 That's why I prefer if you didn't do any hate speech in that chat because I'd like them to be wrong.

00:43:47.000 It's also intensifying its efforts to boost news content from what it calls credible sources.

00:43:53.000 But we know what they mean by credible sources.

00:43:55.000 They mean the kind of media that amplify the interests of the powerful.

00:44:00.000 Amplify and normalize the interests of the powerful.

00:44:03.000 You saw what legacy media did during the pandemic.

00:44:06.000 Well, everyone's got to take these vaccines.

00:44:08.000 You saw how Trudeau has changed from then to now.

00:44:11.000 It's astonishing and incredible.

00:44:13.000 Well, there's going to be a lot more of it unless we bind together like never before.

00:44:17.000 Here's the news.

00:44:18.000 No, here's the effing news.

00:44:20.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.

00:44:21.000 You're just the dude. 1.00

00:44:22.000 No, here's the fucking news. 0.99

00:44:25.000 YouTube are continuing to censor our channel while promoting legacy media outlets on their platform. 0.99

00:44:32.000 I'm beginning to think they've got an agenda and that they're out to get me.

00:44:35.000 Or rather, they're out to get you.

00:44:37.000 And I'm just in the way.

00:44:38.000 I'm telling you this because we've just received an email from YouTube telling us that they're going to further

00:44:45.000 impede, control, shut down and censor our channel.

00:44:48.000 As you know, a month or so ago, the government reached out to all social media sites demanding that I be demonetized and many, including YouTube, complied.

00:44:57.000 Of course, Rumble, which is our home, opposed it and notably Elon Musk and ex Stood up to the establishment and I'm very grateful for that.

00:45:06.000 This censorship is being amplified now while they simultaneously continue to promote legacy media outlets on their platform.

00:45:13.000 You will have noticed it's become increasingly difficult to oppose, for example, war and military action.

00:45:20.000 It's become increasingly difficult to criticize big companies and And also, generally, we're living in a more and more fractured space.

00:45:28.000 I would say we need more decentralization, more ability to freely communicate, more opportunity to form new alliances against the establishment interests that are plainly trying to control us.

00:45:39.000 They're not interested in relatively insignificant figures like me.

00:45:42.000 They are interested in total control of the population.

00:45:46.000 And they're heading in the right direction, because you know that legislation is being passed all around the world that allows them to penalise social media companies that promote or platform content that they don't like.

00:45:55.000 Of course it always starts with hate speech, because they know, generally speaking, we are opposed to hate.

00:45:59.000 But it always ends up advancing the interests of the powerful.

00:46:02.000 Firstly, we'll talk through the email that we've received and how it affects us and our ability to communicate freely with you.

00:46:08.000 Let's get into it where it affects me and then let's move on to the rest of the world.

00:46:11.000 That's the way I think.

00:46:12.000 So here's the email sent to our channel.

00:46:14.000 To help keep our community safe, we limit some of our more powerful features to channels who have built and maintained a positive channel history or who have provided verification.

00:46:23.000 As of now, your channel doesn't have sufficient channel history.

00:46:27.000 This is the kind of Kafkaesque bureaucratic language that fascinates me.

00:46:30.000 Where did history go?

00:46:31.000 We burnt it.

00:46:32.000 We got rid of history.

00:46:33.000 Why?

00:46:34.000 We didn't agree with it.

00:46:35.000 Don't you notice again and again this kind of peculiar, banal, anodyne bureaucratic language being used to prevent people communicating, to prevent people being It's for your safety, it's for your convenience.

00:46:45.000 Have you noticed an amplification in the police state?

00:46:48.000 Have you noticed police having more powers to enter your property, to prevent you from leaving your home, to persecute you for something you've said online?

00:46:56.000 Have you noticed that?

00:46:57.000 Meanwhile, it appears that other types of crime are escalating.

00:47:01.000 Often, this is masked by this kind of bureaucratic language.

00:47:05.000 Again, we're not grandiose about our importance or impact, although some recent events made me think, God, you must be making some sort of difference for people to spend this amount of time on you.

00:47:13.000 But when you see an enormous, unprecedentedly large organisation like Google going to such trouble to shut down independent voices, and you look at the wider content, again, the legislation that's being passed globally, then you realise something important is happening.

00:47:28.000 You know that, don't you?

00:47:29.000 You know this is a significant moment.

00:47:32.000 Here's more evidence.

00:47:33.000 It has lost access to advanced features.

00:47:35.000 This may have happened because your channel did not follow our community guidelines.

00:47:39.000 I can imagine this in a sort of AI voice.

00:47:41.000 This may have happened because your channel did not follow our community guidelines.

00:47:46.000 It doesn't even tell you that it did happen.

00:47:48.000 Who are you talking to at this point?

00:47:50.000 Do you remember the prisoner?

00:47:51.000 Isn't this Patrick McKeown territory?

00:47:52.000 Who is number one?

00:47:54.000 Who is it?

00:47:54.000 I am not a number!

00:47:56.000 I am a free man!

00:47:57.000 No one is willing to say this is the person that's in a position of authority, this is why they've made that decision, if you want to refute that decision here is how you do it.

00:48:05.000 It's too vast.

00:48:06.000 The great criticism, one of, other than the genocides, of communism was that it created vast centralized bureaucracies where ordinary people were irrelevant and could be controlled.

00:48:17.000 Well look at what you've got now.

00:48:19.000 You've got vast Centralised bureaucracies!

00:48:22.000 Who is it that I'm arguing with?

00:48:24.000 This has happened in real life as well.

00:48:25.000 This has happened notably with the Grenfell situation.

00:48:28.000 That's a tower block that burned down in this country.

00:48:29.000 When you try and see whose fault it is, oh this person subcontracted to that person, that firm subcontracted to that firm.

00:48:34.000 It's very difficult to say who's causing this?

00:48:37.000 Who's behind this?

00:48:38.000 Where is power?

00:48:39.000 Who's in control?

00:48:40.000 There are these vast, invisible, bureaucratic organisations where you can't actually access or purchase power.

00:48:46.000 You can't say, well hold on a minute, what are these community guidelines?

00:48:49.000 Who do we talk to?

00:48:50.000 What did we do wrong?

00:48:51.000 Tell us so that we can amend it.

00:48:53.000 That's literally Cathco-esque.

00:48:55.000 Someone must have been telling lies about Joseph K, because he was arrested one morning.

00:48:58.000 That's, like, how, of course, the book The Trial starts.

00:49:01.000 Who said it?

00:49:02.000 I'm afraid we can't tell you that.

00:49:02.000 What am I supposed to have done?

00:49:04.000 What have I done?

00:49:04.000 We can't tell you that.

00:49:05.000 How this impacts your channel.

00:49:07.000 You won't be able to do things like...

00:49:08.000 Get higher daily limits for live streams, shorts and video uploads, embed live streams, pin comments, add external links to your video descriptions.

00:49:16.000 That obviously prevents us making revenue through advertisements, which is obviously important to our business, but also prevents us linking to any external site like Rumble.

00:49:24.000 And you might think, well, it's competition, but it's only competition in the same way.

00:49:28.000 This is not McDonald's versus Burger King.

00:49:30.000 This is McDonald's versus your mum making you a burger because you didn't want to go to school that day.

00:49:35.000 This is Monopolisation.

00:49:37.000 The more monopolisation you have, the more centralised authority you have.

00:49:41.000 And if you have a monopoly that does what a government asks it to do, you have... How did Mussolini describe that?

00:49:47.000 Fascism.

00:49:48.000 When corporations and the state are in lockstep together, that is truly what fascism is.

00:49:53.000 There are other inflections, there are other exorcisations of that power.

00:49:56.000 There are potentially minority groups that are persecuted.

00:49:59.000 That is of course one of the worst aspects.

00:50:00.000 There are new rules that are undemocratically brought about.

00:50:03.000 But what we What we are seeing, I believe, is an advance towards centralised authoritarianism being oddly legitimised as protecting people and helping people and protecting a community.

00:50:14.000 What community?

00:50:15.000 Any of you that saw our interview with Dr Robert Epstein will know that Google have an incredible amount of power when it comes to managing media spaces.

00:50:24.000 news narratives. His work is incredible. He showed how, for example, Google can

00:50:28.000 promote stories that could change the outcome of an election. Of course, if

00:50:32.000 whenever you Google something, what comes up is favorable to one political party

00:50:36.000 or one political movement, say, obviously that's going to influence the reality

00:50:39.000 that people live within. Now, Google don't want anyone else doing that. Google

00:50:44.000 don't want anyone else offering an alternative version of reality, an 1.00

00:50:47.000 alternative narrative. For example, a decentralized world where the individual

00:50:51.000 is sacred, where community is sacred, where we have the maximum amount of

00:50:55.000 ability to control our own communities through democracy, debate, discussion. The

00:51:00.000 fact is that due to technologies, miraculous technologies like this, that

00:51:03.000 have to a degree come about as a result of competition and capitalism, but also

00:51:06.000 have received significant funding from, for example, the CIA in the early days of

00:51:10.000 some of those organizations. Those are stories you are familiar with. They don't

00:51:12.000 want anyone rising up now to give alternative versions of reality. For

00:51:18.000 example, Rumble, our home. They don't want that happening and here's further

00:51:22.000 evidence of that fact. In a significant event leading up to the Republican

00:51:27.000 presidential primary debate in August, Rumble was granted exclusive rights to

00:51:31.000 provide a free online broadcast.

00:51:33.000 However, it became apparent that Google search had buried references to Rumble's stream of the debate.

00:51:38.000 Users searching for the debate stream on Google were ushered to links from YouTube, Fox News, and various news reports instead of Rumble.

00:51:46.000 Remember, Rumble was streaming the presidential primaries for free, whereas Fox News was charging.

00:51:51.000 So even if you just reduce yourself to a consumer, and believe me, they've reduced you to that.

00:51:55.000 You're getting a worse deal even from that narrow and limiting perspective.

00:51:59.000 This incident holds significant implications for digital free speech and competition in the online sphere.

00:52:04.000 It also raises important questions about the role and responsibilities of dominant internet platforms in relation to smaller emerging entities.

00:52:12.000 When we view this through the lens of censorship, It serves as a poignant reminder of how tech giants can shape what is accessible to users.

00:52:19.000 Practices like these could lead to a monopolistic information environment where curiosity choice and access are limited.

00:52:26.000 Rumble is currently in discovery regarding legal action against Google, accusing the tech behemoth of Anti-competitive practices Rumble alleges that Google is unfairly promoting its own video platform, YouTube, at the expense of competitors.

00:52:40.000 Why does this matter?

00:52:41.000 Because it becomes about free speech.

00:52:42.000 It becomes about what information you have access to.

00:52:45.000 It becomes about who determines what version of reality is promoted and what ...version of reality is de-amplified to the point you're not even aware that it's there.

00:52:55.000 Ultimately, because of the ability for these monopolies to form powerful relationships with the state, it creates the possibility for centralization and authoritarianism on an unprecedented scale.

00:53:06.000 If that gets underwritten by law, as is currently happening, you'll soon be in a space where you literally can't say anything that's anti-establishment.

00:53:14.000 They've already created that principle by saying, these things can never be said.

00:53:18.000 You can't say that.

00:53:19.000 You can't criticise this.

00:53:20.000 You can't criticise that.

00:53:21.000 Once you agree around anything, then you've established that principle, haven't you?

00:53:25.000 Oh, there are certain things we agree you can't say.

00:53:27.000 You don't want people using racist or hateful language.

00:53:27.000 Yeah, I suppose so.

00:53:29.000 Good.

00:53:30.000 And also, what about criticising wars?

00:53:30.000 Absolutely.

00:53:32.000 What about criticising COVID?

00:53:33.000 What about criticising Big Pharma?

00:53:35.000 What about criticising the state?

00:53:36.000 Watch this space.

00:53:37.000 Or rather, watch Rumble.

00:53:38.000 The lawsuit, which has drawn significant attention in the tech and legal sectors, claims that Google's algorithms unduly prioritise YouTube content in search results.

00:53:47.000 Additionally, Rumble points to the pre-installation of the YouTube app on Android devices as a major competitive disadvantage for other video platforms.

00:53:54.000 You literally can't get Rumble on an Android.

00:53:57.000 Now, some people might say that's because there is hate speech on rumble or bad language, but you'll find hate speech and bad language wherever you find human beings.

00:54:04.000 It's part of being human.

00:54:05.000 And using that to delegitimize and shut down what ultimately amounts to an alternative platform that could ultimately house and does ultimately house anti-establishment views is censorship.

00:54:17.000 By all means, only watch YouTube, or only watch the BBC, or MSNBC, or whatever it is you're into.

00:54:23.000 But you should certainly have the ability to choose, shouldn't you?

00:54:26.000 Now it's not just about shutting down alternative platforms, it's about promoting a particular news agenda.

00:54:31.000 Remember, we continually tell you, here on our channel, the function of the media is not to give you information.

00:54:36.000 Here's some information, make your own choice.

00:54:37.000 You might get that from a great journalist like Matt Taibbi, or Glenn Greenwald, or Barry Weiss.

00:54:41.000 Here's some information, you work it out for yourself.

00:54:43.000 But what you'll get in legacy media is the Amplification of the agenda of the powerful.

00:54:48.000 The normalization of the agenda of the powerful.

00:54:50.000 Oh, everyone's staying indoors now and wearing masks.

00:54:52.000 Okay, are we sure we've done enough tests?

00:54:54.000 Yeah, yeah, tests have been done on that.

00:54:55.000 Okay, everyone, this is gonna happen now.

00:54:57.000 These wars are happening.

00:54:58.000 Have we looked into that?

00:54:58.000 What?

00:54:59.000 Is there a peaceful solution?

00:55:01.000 You're not allowed to discuss those things.

00:55:02.000 So recognise that it's okay for us to disagree.

00:55:05.000 It's alright.

00:55:06.000 It's necessary.

00:55:07.000 It's part of being human.

00:55:08.000 But don't hand over that degree of power to centralised authoritarian regimes and organisations that do not have your best interests at heart because they want you neutralised.

00:55:19.000 That's what they primarily want.

00:55:20.000 Neutralisation.

00:55:21.000 They want you neutered. 1.00

00:55:22.000 YouTube is intensifying its efforts to boost news content from what it thinks are credible sources.

00:55:28.000 Amid an era where people are demonstrating an aversion to traditional mass media outlets.

00:55:33.000 Currently, YouTube is launching a revamped user interface designed to enhance the viewing experience by introducing additional news-oriented content suggestions when users are engaged in watching news videos.

00:55:44.000 Google, the parent company of YouTube, plans to channel $1.6 million into increasing the volume of news-oriented content on its short-form video feature, Shorts.

00:55:53.000 Remember how the news has become more politicised?

00:55:55.000 Remember how the culture has become more politicised?

00:55:58.000 Notice now that shorts, which used to be make-up tutorials, someone scoring a touchdown or a goal or something, now even that is becoming increasingly politicised and not in an unbiased way, in a way that operates in alliance with their policy.

00:56:10.000 Notice how we're seeing legacy media outlets promoted, WHO guidelines accepted, legislation passed that allows control and surveillance.

00:56:19.000 This, I believe, is to prohibit the natural human tendency towards the maximum amount of freedom.

00:56:25.000 That doesn't mean freedom from responsibility.

00:56:27.000 The price of freedom is responsibility.

00:56:28.000 But your only responsibility now is to just consume and sit there And if you do not comply, believe me, there will be consequences, particularly if your non-compliance starts to make any kind of difference.

00:56:42.000 An example of this new feature entails that a user watching a video about floods in Pakistan published by PBS will be directed towards more related videos about the same event.

00:56:51.000 This also includes major news publishers such as the Associated Press.

00:56:55.000 Look at how they're funded and regulated.

00:56:57.000 CBS Evening News and Sky News.

00:56:59.000 You know how they're regulated and funded and who their biggest advertisers are so you know what interests they have.

00:57:05.000 You know what they promote and you know what they deny.

00:57:07.000 Initial deployment of this improved watch page experience will take place across 40 countries on mobile and will later be extended to desktop and living room interfaces.

00:57:16.000 So essentially, your reality is being curated now.

00:57:19.000 What you see and don't see will be controlled.

00:57:21.000 In a sense, what they're trying to do is return to the previous era, where if you were in America, you're getting your news from CNN or NBC or whatever.

00:57:29.000 And if you're in my country, BBC, and if you're in Australia or Canada, do you see what the legislation is doing?

00:57:34.000 We're going to just help you and protect you.

00:57:35.000 By controlling you.

00:57:35.000 How?

00:57:37.000 Now, there's obviously a crossover between protection and control.

00:57:39.000 Any parent knows that.

00:57:40.000 Don't walk into the road, being an example.

00:57:43.000 But what type of relationship do you want with the state?

00:57:45.000 What type of relationship do you want with these behemoth organizations?

00:57:49.000 What do you think their agenda is?

00:57:50.000 Do you trust them?

00:57:52.000 Besides the interface overhaul, YouTube also intends to invest a substantial $1.6 million to boost the creation of short-form news content on its short service in partnership with 20 organizations across 10 nations.

00:58:03.000 This initiative will involve collaboration with news outlets that already generate long-form content on YouTube.

00:58:08.000 The essence of digital platforms like YouTube lies in their ability to offer a level playing field for all creators, regardless of their size or affiliation.

00:58:15.000 However, with this new venture, YouTube risks alienating a significant portion of its content creator community as it moves to give more real estate to its legacy competitors.

00:58:23.000 In a sense, this is just like colonisation.

00:58:25.000 Initially, you have this apparently new, uninhabited terrain and territory, and people or corporations or nations, whatever you want to call it, arrive, oh wow, let's prospect for gold, let's get involved in the fur trade.

00:58:37.000 Then eventually, it gets piled over.

00:58:40.000 The internet for a minute was about miracles like Napster, Or uprisings in the Middle East.

00:58:46.000 Now what it's about is how do we tile over that space with the logos, the image of Google, or Facebook, or whoever else is willing to comply with the broader, deeper, harder to observe, elitist, globalist agenda.

00:59:00.000 It may also inadvertently stifle the diversity of perspectives essential for a well-rounded public discourse.

00:59:06.000 Well, that's not unintentional.

00:59:07.000 That's part of the function.

00:59:09.000 Which many years ago was seen as one of the digital space's most profound advantages over traditional media outlets.

00:59:14.000 Yeah, for you, but not for traditional media outlets.

00:59:17.000 They liked having total control, monopoly.

00:59:19.000 Of course they did.

00:59:20.000 Wouldn't it be lovely if this was the only channel and I was in charge of YouTube?

00:59:23.000 Well, yeah, that would be terrific.

00:59:24.000 But that's not reality.

00:59:25.000 What we would all benefit from is less centralised authority, less monopolies, less government intervention, less legacy media power, less big tech power.

00:59:35.000 But the tendency is towards more in each one of those cases because they don't care about you, except in so much as they want to control your ability to make decisions for yourself, and they are creating the conditions where that is inevitable.

00:59:47.000 A fair analysis of the 100 most subscribed YouTube news channels worldwide found that the majority of top news channels on the platform are not independent.

00:59:55.000 83 of the top 100 YouTube news channels are corporate media, meaning owned and funded by large companies or conglomerates.

01:00:01.000 Only 4 of the top 100 news channels are independently run.

01:00:04.000 While YouTube offers the possibility for independent sites to reach a wider audience, its most subscribed news channels remain largely reflective of the corporate biases of the global media landscape as a whole.

01:00:14.000 What a coincidence!

01:00:15.000 Essentially, what was once a space where independent voices could thrive and flourish, and independent voices and independent businesses and independent movements could all come to the fore, of course the monopolistic, elitist establishment goes, we can't have that going on.

01:00:30.000 Look at the consequences.

01:00:31.000 You can have someone like Robert F. Kennedy just bypassing legacy media and chatting to independent news and having a significant impact.

01:00:37.000 You can have the Trump phenomena, you can have Brexit in the UK.

01:00:41.000 Now it doesn't matter whether or not you agree with the outcomes of those elections, what you have to observe is populism, or the ability for people to be reached in different ways and be empowered in different ways and to have opinions, sometimes, perhaps you might argue if you are an authoritarian and parental person, for ill.

01:00:54.000 I don't think ordinary people should be able to make decisions.

01:00:57.000 Well you just have to acknowledge that if you believe that, you don't believe in democracy.

01:01:00.000 And a lot of people actually don't believe in democracy.

01:01:03.000 A lot of people don't believe in many of the things they claim to.

01:01:05.000 Innocent till proven guilty.

01:01:07.000 Democracy.

01:01:08.000 What they believe in is I want my team to win.

01:01:11.000 The two knowable exceptions to Big Tech's willingness to comply with the government were Chris Pavlovsky at Rumble and Elon Musk at X. Those two voices were alone in saying, we're not playing this game.

01:01:22.000 And that's a bold move because there's legislation being passed all around the world to punish, persecute, and even in some cases maybe imprison Big Tech platform owners that stand up against this flow towards censorship.

01:01:34.000 Demonstrating its commitment to upholding principles of free expression, X recently affirmed that it would continue to financially support comedian Russell Brand.

01:01:41.000 Elon Musk has promoted the position of not penalising account holders unless they deviate from the platform's guidelines or violate local laws.

01:01:48.000 Detailing its stance in a letter addressed to Dame Carolyn Dainich, who chairs the Commons Culture, Media and Sports Committee and who was widely criticised for asking platforms whether they would allow Brand to earn a living from online platforms.

01:01:59.000 Which is a bit like a mob boss asking you if you want your legs broken or not.

01:02:02.000 Any words for the mayor?

01:02:04.000 Hello, Mayor Quimby.

01:02:05.000 I would like to remind you that accidents will happen.

01:02:08.000 The company explained that its resolution to allow brands financial pursuits on the platform aligns with its intent to protect free expression.

01:02:14.000 It added, we do not take action on accounts where they have not violated our own rules or local laws.

01:02:19.000 This is essential to protect free expression on the service.

01:02:22.000 In order to ensure that all people can participate in the public conversation freely and safely, all content on X, including monetized content, is subject to our user agreement and the X rules.

01:02:31.000 That's called principles.

01:02:32.000 Principles that rumble, convey principles that echo.

01:02:34.000 X are conveying now.

01:02:36.000 The alternative to that is complying with government edicts.

01:02:39.000 And of course, you might agree that a certain person should be shut down.

01:02:42.000 It might be someone that you don't like.

01:02:43.000 But once you've established the principle, then you can do it again.

01:02:46.000 Well, remember, we shut people down when we don't like them.

01:02:49.000 Remember, we can cancel people for saying that.

01:02:50.000 We can cancel people if this happens to them in the public sphere.

01:02:53.000 Once you've established that, you can repeat it ad infinitum.

01:02:56.000 That's why it's important to remember the context of what's happening.

01:02:58.000 And why it's happening.

01:03:00.000 And when it's happening.

01:03:01.000 And who it's happening to.

01:03:03.000 Is it happening to people that are like, this is why you should vote for Joe Biden?

01:03:06.000 Is it happening to people that are saying, this is why it's important that we all wear masks and stay indoors?

01:03:11.000 Who's it happening to?

01:03:12.000 Just notice that.

01:03:13.000 Is it happening at a time when a swathe of legislation is being passed across the land to control free speech?

01:03:18.000 The answer to that question is simply yes.

01:03:20.000 Is that relevant?

01:03:21.000 Yes.

01:03:21.000 Is that the reason for it?

01:03:23.000 Yes.

01:03:23.000 Dame Caroline had written to Linda Iaccarino, Twitter chief's executive, saying the committee was concerned that he may be able to profit from his content on the platform.

01:03:30.000 She'd also asked if Mr. Muskan intervened in Mr. Brown's case after the social network's billionaire owner appeared to defend him.

01:03:35.000 Video site Rumble, where Mr. Brand regularly posts videos, responded to Dame Caroline saying,

01:03:40.000 We regard it as deeply inappropriate and dangerous that the UK Parliament would attempt to control

01:03:44.000 who is allowed to speak on our platform or to earn a living from doing so.

01:03:47.000 It's a very important principle, this.

01:03:49.000 It's very important and it includes and involves other principles like innocent until proven guilty.

01:03:55.000 It's granting further authority to the government and big tech to deperson, declassify, shut down and remove voices that, in my case I would say, fundamentally disagree with their authority.

01:04:06.000 Disagree that what they're doing is democratic.

01:04:08.000 Free speech is non-negotiable.

01:04:09.000 The alliance between big tech and government, as we are seeing now, between YouTube and the government, is dangerous.

01:04:14.000 The legacy media amplify and normalise the agenda of the powerful.

01:04:15.000 nations from and it will give you a little further illumination.

01:04:18.000 Free speech is non-negotiable. The alliance between big tech and government, as we are

01:04:22.000 seeing now, between YouTube and the government, is dangerous. The legacy media amplify and

01:04:27.000 normalise the agenda of the powerful. If this model won't even permit mild counter-narrative,

01:04:33.000 mild discourse, mild criticism, What does that tell you about their goals and agenda?

01:04:38.000 That it's good, it's so good, that no one should ever criticise it?

01:04:41.000 Let me know in the comments, let me know in the chat.

01:04:42.000 It added, Although it may be politically and socially easier for Rumble

01:04:45.000 to join a cancelled culture mob, doing so would be a violation of our company's values and

01:04:49.000 We emphatically reject the UK Parliament's demands.

01:04:49.000 mission.

01:04:52.000 It is extraordinary, isn't it, that what's required is for big tech entrepreneurs and giants

01:04:57.000 like Rumble and X and Chris Pavlovsky and Elon Musk to stand up and say

01:05:01.000 free speech in order for free speech to be protected.

01:05:04.000 You can't rely on the government.

01:05:05.000 You can't rely on most big tech platforms.

01:05:07.000 Where will that lead?

01:05:08.000 Of course I'm interested in myself.

01:05:10.000 I am myself.

01:05:11.000 But I'm more interested in you.

01:05:12.000 I'm more interested in where this leads.

01:05:14.000 I'm more interested in what this indicates about what's happening in the culture.

01:05:17.000 I'm more interested in what this tells us about the last three years and perhaps the next three years, particularly in the context of all of this new legislature that seems to be about controlling free speech and shutting it down under the auspices and camouflage of protecting us.

01:05:29.000 I don't want to be protected by the state and big tech.

01:05:32.000 I want to be facilitated.

01:05:33.000 I see the state as a servant.

01:05:35.000 I see big tech as a tool, just about utility.

01:05:38.000 And what should it be serving?

01:05:39.000 Free speech.

01:05:40.000 Free communication of ideas.

01:05:42.000 Maximum creativity.

01:05:43.000 Maximum amount of freedom.

01:05:45.000 Maximum ability to build new communities.

01:05:47.000 Maximum ability to realise your independent free spirit.

01:05:50.000 To build new worlds.

01:05:52.000 Personal, communal and even global.

01:05:54.000 And that will never happen if you grant centralised authoritarian power to this new and horrifying partnership by, other than a few notable exceptions, big tech and the state.

01:06:05.000 Even Mussolini knew the word for that.

01:06:07.000 But that's just what I think.

01:06:08.000 Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments in the chat while you still can.

01:06:12.000 Become a member of our community.

01:06:13.000 We are under attack.

01:06:14.000 We will do everything we can to represent you.

01:06:17.000 We will do everything we can to participate in our movement to oppose these forces.

01:06:21.000 If not now, it may be never.

Stay Free - Russel Brand - November 02, 2023

ELECTION FRAUD! Dems CAUGHT Ballot Stuffing!! - Stay Free #237

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript