Stay Free - Russel Brand - January 25, 2024


Excess Deaths In Children Are INCREASING!” Dr Drew On Excess Deaths, Fauci & More - STAY FREE #292


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 6 minutes

Words per Minute

179.44165

Word Count

11,891

Sentence Count

771

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

13


Summary

Dr. Drew Pinsky joins Russell Brand to talk about how he went from being an admirer, an adherent to Anthony Fauci, to being deeply cynical and suspicious of the man who helped fight the AIDS pandemic. Dr. Pinsky is a board certified physician and legacy celebrity talent, with over 35 years of national radio, New York Times best selling books, and countless telly shows bearing his name. He's on Rumble streaming with his show, Ask Dr. Drew, plus he's on RBM with his new show, "Ask Dr Drew" on the streaming service Rumble, where he's a regular guest host and host of the show Ask Dr Drew. You can check out his work at drdrewpinsky.net, plus his show on Rumble, which is streaming on the App Store or Google Play, and on YouTube, where you can watch the whole thing. You won't want to miss it! Stay free, my friends. Be safe out there, be safe in your home. In this video, you're going to see the future. in this episode, we're talking about mutant coronavirus strain. We also got on this show a fantastic guest, a man who has a brilliant perspective on the AIDS epidemic, and it's a brilliant conversation. You are going to love it. You are not going to wanna miss this one. - Russell Brand - Stay Free, Be Safe Out There, Be safe in Your Home - Be Safe, You're Going to See The Future, Be Brave, You'll Love You, You Awaken Wonders! - - In this, My Dear Friend, Russell Brand - in the future, (Podcasts: Stay Free With Russell Brand and I hope you'll love it! - P.S. - Thank You! -Podcast: Stay Safe Out there, You Will Love It? - PRAISE Me, Will ya? - PSA: I'll See the Future, Will Ya? Thank You, Will You? (featuring: Dr. You'll Know It, Willy O'O'O Adverse, Willi? ) - Will You Hear It? - Will ya, Will YA? , Will You Be Safe In Your Home? - Is That a Good Thing? - And I'll Know That I'll Be Back? - I'll Let Me Know It Soon? - Can I Help You?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 you you
00:01:51.000 Thank you for watching.
00:02:12.000 Be safe out there.
00:02:12.000 Be safe in your home.
00:02:18.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:02:29.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
00:02:31.000 Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:02:34.000 We're going to be talking about mutant coronavirus strain.
00:02:36.000 Obviously, we ain't doing that on YouTube.
00:02:38.000 Too crazy.
00:02:39.000 Too W.H.O.
00:02:41.000 adverse.
00:02:42.000 We also got on this show a fantastic guest.
00:02:44.000 Dr. Drew Pinsky is with us, and we're going to be talking about... This is my favorite bit of the whole conversation.
00:02:51.000 We're going to be talking about how he went from being an admirer, an adherent to Anthony Fauci, because they worked together, get this, around the AIDS pandemic, to being deeply cynical and suspicious of Fauci.
00:03:03.000 This is a brilliant conversation.
00:03:04.000 It's an education.
00:03:05.000 You are going to love it.
00:03:07.000 Of course, we're on YouTube.
00:03:07.000 We love you, you Awaken Wonders, for the first 15 minutes, then freely on Rumble, where the speech might stream without impediment, without prohibition.
00:03:17.000 And of course, you'll be told that it's actually hate speech that we're Nothing could be further from the truth.
00:03:24.000 As usual, the Orwellian language inversion is taking place.
00:03:27.000 When we talk about love, when we talk about bringing people together, when we talk about inspiring your independent individual sovereignty, when we talk about control of your communities, when we talk about your right to be whoever you are, they consider that hate speech.
00:03:40.000 Because that brings us together.
00:03:40.000 Why?
00:03:42.000 To create the one force that can stop this globalist, elitist project.
00:03:47.000 Unity among the people.
00:03:48.000 Decentralised, that means we have control over our own lives, but unified in opposition to them.
00:03:53.000 The first part of the show will be available on YouTube.
00:03:56.000 Then, download the app, will ya?
00:03:58.000 Download the Rumble app, then you'll know every time we're broadcasting.
00:04:00.000 And if you want to support our work and get additional content every single week, like this week we did a brilliant report, if I may say so.
00:04:06.000 I don't do all the working, there's a brilliant team of people working here.
00:04:09.000 On the agricultural protests, we've got Vandana Shiva's views on why these agricultural protests are happening and how your food sovereignty relates to your freedom.
00:04:18.000 It's kind of obvious.
00:04:19.000 Why are there spontaneously protests all over the world?
00:04:22.000 You are not going to want to miss this video.
00:04:23.000 In fact, have a look at it.
00:04:28.000 I don't think them farmers are all there at the Brandenburg Gate going, Do you know what I'm sick and tired of?
00:04:33.000 Dual use toilets!
00:04:34.000 You know, it's like they're trying to make it about the culture because I think most people do respect the legitimacy of people to be different religions and cultures.
00:04:41.000 I think most people are cool with that.
00:04:43.000 What the issue is, is inequality and the oppression and annihilation of working people across the world because of the advance of automation and the requirement for totalitarian control.
00:04:53.000 That's what it is, isn't it?
00:04:58.000 Time now to get right into it.
00:05:00.000 We'll let you watch the first part of our conversation, you wonderful people of YouTube, but this is a medical physician who's got strong views on a variety of subjects, including Anthony Fauci, so we won't be able to do the whole thing.
00:05:11.000 You'll probably know Dr. Drew because he's been in media for years.
00:05:13.000 He's a board certified physician and legacy celebrity talent.
00:05:17.000 With over 35 years of national radio, New York Times best-selling books and countless telly shows bearing his name.
00:05:23.000 You can check out his work at drdrew.com plus he's on Rumble streaming with his show Ask Dr. Drew.
00:05:30.000 Now let's get into our conversation.
00:05:32.000 Dr. Drew, thanks for joining us.
00:05:34.000 It's great to see you, sir.
00:05:35.000 And as we were just starting to mention before the mics heated up, we were together a few years ago, we did a we did a speech together about recovery.
00:05:44.000 And as I think about our last meeting, and then this one, I Many roads have been traveled.
00:05:51.000 Would you have imagined the world would evolve the way it has?
00:05:55.000 No, and the only people that did imagine it were kind of peripheral, zealous, fringe evangelists that were at the time regarded as conspiracy theorists.
00:06:08.000 I always, you know, felt that in our conversations before because we're talking about medicine, we were talking about mental health, we were talking about addiction and wellness.
00:06:15.000 I know that in our previous conversations we would have touched on the social implications of a condition like addiction.
00:06:21.000 That addiction is somewhat related to social pressures.
00:06:25.000 We may even have got as far as saying That the pharmaceutical industry possibly exploits addiction.
00:06:30.000 We may not have been in a position to talk about Purdue and Big Pharma and the Sackler family and the way that the opioid crisis has been handled.
00:06:38.000 But, you know, I know that's the kind of thing we would have touched on before.
00:06:40.000 But as you say, we're in a very different territory now.
00:06:44.000 From your perspective, Doc, what lines have been crossed and how is it we found ourselves here?
00:06:50.000 Well, there are... I mean...
00:06:55.000 So I've become a student of history because of this and much to my shock, but I think there's, I want to answer that two ways that are a little bit glib and a little bit just so.
00:07:06.000 One is post-structuralism has taken a hold in this country in particular in a way that has been destructive.
00:07:12.000 The idea of truth has been undermined, and the reality is there is a truth, and our goal should be to ascend to some approximation of truth.
00:07:21.000 We've forsaken that, and that has bled into science and everything, so that's a problem.
00:07:29.000 Number two, that's the sort of historical sort of note, but number two, you mentioned the Sackler family and the excesses of the opioid industry, But the real perpetrators of the opioid crisis were evangelical physicians.
00:07:44.000 In this country and in the UK as well, pain medicine became this cudgel that went around and forced physicians, sound familiar now?
00:07:54.000 Forced physicians to make pain the fifth vital sign.
00:07:57.000 Pain was more important.
00:07:58.000 There should be no pain ever.
00:08:00.000 To the point where 90% of the Vicodin prescribed in the world was prescribed in this country.
00:08:04.000 That was not the drug company.
00:08:06.000 That was me and my peers.
00:08:07.000 Not me.
00:08:08.000 That was my peers.
00:08:09.000 And evangelical physicians are dangerous.
00:08:12.000 Fast forward to COVID.
00:08:14.000 In this country, we have a Deborah Birx who evangelizes for lockdowns.
00:08:19.000 An evangelical physician went state to state, governor to governor, and persuaded, frightened these governors that if they didn't lock down, they'd be killing people.
00:08:29.000 Same phenomenon, same playbook, same disaster.
00:08:33.000 It's interesting that we're talking about two subjects that both of which I'm fascinated by.
00:08:38.000 The impact of post-structuralism and relativism.
00:08:40.000 The idea that there perhaps is that there's a degree of ambiguity and look I'm sympathetic to the idea that there are institutions that have been deemed just and granted authority that could benefit from open-ended analysis.
00:08:57.000 These are some of the areas of Poststructuralism, you know, not necessarily talking about semiotics and the semantic component of that, but certainly looking at power from an open-minded perspective.
00:09:09.000 But also the idea that when you say evangelical physicians, it shows that there's a sort of component to prescribing medicine and issue in medical care that is emotional rather than practical.
00:09:23.000 These days, these days, for sure!
00:09:26.000 For sure, not only emotional but also social, because now we are having these movements in medicine where people are, you know, I was a scientist, I was a clinician, and the idea that we have social movements within medicine and focusing on things that are away, I mean, it's good that we're paying attention to these things, but that those are sweeping us away from science is really very, very concerning.
00:09:49.000 Yeah, it's extraordinary, and I don't know how Or why that's happened?
00:09:54.000 Because the post-structuralist idea, does that lead to the over-emotionalization of everything?
00:10:01.000 I would have thought that it was quite an academic, quite cold, atheistic, materialistic, rationalistic ideology.
00:10:07.000 And yet what we are talking about now is a type of hysteria within the medical profession.
00:10:13.000 But the hysteria was, we were all, the world, much to my amazement, seemed to have been prone to this hysteria.
00:10:18.000 You're absolutely right.
00:10:19.000 So now, you know, again, I was giving you just so things that came to mind when you asked your initial question.
00:10:25.000 My other sort of frame is, and I know you'll agree with this, is we've had, particularly again in this country, a narcissistic turn.
00:10:36.000 The general trait structure of our personalities have gone towards what's called cluster B, borderline sociopath, narcissist.
00:10:44.000 And I'd not seen a lot of history on it, but it was waiting in the background, clearly, with the hysterias right on the heels of it.
00:10:51.000 And I can go on and on.
00:10:52.000 I wrote a book about that 20 years ago, and it's something I can talk a great deal about.
00:10:57.000 I saw it coming.
00:10:58.000 I predicted.
00:10:59.000 And I knew that the liability of narcissism is scapegoating.
00:11:03.000 I knew there would be scapegoating and I knew there would be mobs and man, I didn't know it would look like this though.
00:11:10.000 Do you think that this narcissism and this emergence of kind of pathological conditions
00:11:17.000 that would have before been regarded as extraordinary and maybe even rare and certainly as problems,
00:11:25.000 it sounds like you're saying they've become normalized.
00:11:28.000 Is this because of individualism?
00:11:31.000 And what do you mean by that, that everyone's become borderline sociopaths?
00:11:36.000 So I'll tell you where I noticed it.
00:11:38.000 I'm an internist, but I worked in a psychiatric hospital for 35 years.
00:11:43.000 I ran their addiction services for 20 while I was practicing general medicine in a hospital outpatient setting.
00:11:48.000 I've been 40 years in medicine.
00:11:51.000 And in the early, mid 80s, when I first started working at the psychiatric hospital, I would look at all the admitting forms, you know, patients coming in, and I would see there was always a window where we put in the personality diagnoses.
00:12:03.000 And the psychiatrist would put in all kinds, I saw all kinds of things, dependent personalities, and obsessive compulsive, all the full spectrum of the A, B, and C disorders that you find in the DSM-5.
00:12:15.000 I noticed toward the end of the 80s, all of a sudden I was seeing In the female, predominantly borderline.
00:12:22.000 And by the 1990s, only cluster B. That's all we admitted were cluster B patients.
00:12:30.000 And I thought at the time, if you remember I did a radio show back then, and I was talking to people, you know, by the hundreds every night.
00:12:39.000 And all I was hearing about was childhood trauma, childhood trauma, childhood trauma.
00:12:44.000 And the outcome of childhood trauma is commonly a cluster B personality, at least trait, if not disorder.
00:12:52.000 Just to reiterate, because so that I understand properly cluster B, it would be, could you just tell me what the indicators are again?
00:12:59.000 That's, that's the borderline narcissist, sociopath, and histrionic.
00:13:03.000 Those are the cluster B disorders.
00:13:05.000 They're all, they're considered the narcissistic disorders.
00:13:08.000 And so, and so having seen that evolution, I wrote a book in the probably 2000, I don't know what it was, eight or 10 or something.
00:13:17.000 Where we actually did personality inventories on celebrities.
00:13:21.000 Because I started seeing that they were really struggling with this stuff.
00:13:25.000 A lot of trauma.
00:13:26.000 Yeah, you're shaking your head.
00:13:28.000 And of course we documented that they had a higher incidence of narcissistic traits than other populations.
00:13:34.000 And even our control population.
00:13:36.000 We used our control population.
00:13:37.000 It was business school students.
00:13:38.000 And they were above previously documented average.
00:13:40.000 It was very clear.
00:13:41.000 Everything was moving that direction.
00:13:43.000 And it was all childhood trauma.
00:13:45.000 That's the underlying, the underpinning issue.
00:13:46.000 And as you know, as we used to discuss, one of the rocket fuels for addiction is trauma.
00:13:55.000 So do you think that there's been a greater increase in trauma or a tendency to diagnose trauma?
00:14:02.000 What are the prevailing ambient factors that have caused this phenomenon?
00:14:09.000 It took until the 2000s for my profession to go, Oh, adverse childhood experiences affect people's mental health and health.
00:14:18.000 Hmm.
00:14:18.000 Amazing.
00:14:19.000 Isn't that amazing?
00:14:20.000 So they developed the ACE scale.
00:14:22.000 What is on the ACE scale, which are adverse childhood experience scale, things like divorce, domestic abuse, somebody in the family in prison, somebody using substances.
00:14:32.000 And if you have more than two of those.
00:14:34.000 You're, and of course overt trauma and all those sorts of things we would think of as trauma, but in this world where families are decayed, where people are using substances, where there's a lot of violence and aggression, who isn't exposed to that?
00:14:45.000 It's extremely common to be exposed to adverse childhood experience.
00:14:49.000 And then add to that screens.
00:14:51.000 We have no idea how that's amplifying everything and what they're being exposed to there, whether that's an independent trauma.
00:14:58.000 So here we go.
00:14:59.000 I mean, it is on.
00:15:00.000 And of course, of course, it's happening more than ever.
00:15:04.000 The only period of history that I could find similar experiences of that kind of abandonment and neglect and abuse of kids was pre-revolutionary France.
00:15:13.000 And I wanted to write a chapter in my book about that.
00:15:17.000 And I was told by the editor was too speculative.
00:15:19.000 I said, look, there's gonna be, I just don't know.
00:15:21.000 I don't, there's gonna be guillotines.
00:15:22.000 There's gonna be mobs.
00:15:23.000 That's what narcissists do.
00:15:24.000 They start, they have so much unregulated aggression.
00:15:28.000 They have to form mobs and focus it on somebody else.
00:15:31.000 And that's, here we are now, cancellation, everybody.
00:15:34.000 Welcome to our world.
00:15:36.000 So if you have a culture that fetishizes the individual that is histrionic and narcissistic, sociopathic,
00:15:42.000 the characteristics that you laid out, one of the symptoms when that becomes ubiquitous
00:15:49.000 is the emergence of scapegoat in it.
00:15:51.000 It has to, the sort of culture or the society requires it.
00:15:55.000 And you're saying revolutionary France, obviously with the guillotine practice that in a Visible, demonstrable and dramatic way.
00:16:03.000 But you're saying that our culture is bearing those signs also.
00:16:08.000 If something's happening at that scale, it can't be moving up through individuals, can it doctor?
00:16:13.000 There must be some sort of central social factor.
00:16:19.000 Well, I haven't thought about it that way.
00:16:20.000 What do you, uh, it's an interesting question.
00:16:23.000 You mean like somebody taking advantage of that and sort of, uh, amplifying it or manipulating it in some way?
00:16:29.000 It means, for me, my sense is that, you know, whether there was a radical increase in addiction, you think, well, why would that be?
00:16:37.000 Is there the availability of substances?
00:16:39.000 Is there economic inequality?
00:16:41.000 Is there increased poverty?
00:16:43.000 What are the social factors that likely lead to epidemic proportions being reached?
00:16:50.000 And I feel that you indicated at the beginning that the values of the culture have shifted,
00:16:56.000 and I feel that that's true also.
00:16:59.000 On some level, and it's a difficult thing to entirely articulate, some people in our
00:17:02.000 chat are saying the breakdown of the family, and I feel like we have lost our connection
00:17:07.000 with God.
00:17:08.000 I feel that our values have become narcissistic, that even identity politics, and I'm sympathetic to the civil rights movements around each of the categories, but what I sense is that the individual has become the sort of apex of value, that what you are as a person and what you feel and what you want is the kind of summit of the social values rather than who we are as a member of a community, who we are as a member of a movement, or even a nation or a religion.
00:17:39.000 I feel that that plays a part somehow.
00:17:41.000 Yes, there's no doubt, right?
00:17:43.000 I mean, what are the first couple of steps of recovery from a substance use which is Letting go, not controlling everything, which means, you know, as many of my patients say, they feel like they're a piece of ass around which the whole world revolves.
00:17:57.000 That needs to let go.
00:18:00.000 You need to let go of being in.
00:18:02.000 No, no, no, no.
00:18:03.000 You're not the center of the universe.
00:18:05.000 And then having for people to do that fully, They have to have some sort of concept of faith, something.
00:18:12.000 I don't care.
00:18:12.000 I don't know what that is for everybody.
00:18:14.000 It's kind of magical to me to some extent, but I know that it's necessary for people to fully let go of their self-centric, whether it's white-centric or Eurocentric or whatever centric it is, they have to let go.
00:18:28.000 They have to let go and be open to what the world has.
00:18:32.000 Now, doing that, it sounds just so.
00:18:36.000 It sounds like everyone should be able to do that.
00:18:38.000 It isn't easy.
00:18:39.000 It's not easy to do that, really.
00:18:41.000 And to find some sort of spiritual something, it's hard for people, but I do think we miss it badly.
00:18:48.000 I've been saying there's a spiritual malady for 20 years.
00:18:51.000 You have too.
00:18:52.000 The last time we were together, that's one of the things we sort of agreed upon with clarity, that there's something up.
00:18:57.000 um how we fill that that emptiness I don't I don't to me that I don't claim to be the the carrier of that information but I do know we need to solve it yeah you're right because of course we were talking before about addiction and you were kind enough to help me with my book Recovery, I remember, and I went on your radio show or podcast.
00:19:20.000 I can't remember what medium was flourishing at that time, but I do know that when we did the live event together, you, yeah, well, yeah, it was a print and we were talking about that.
00:19:30.000 You agreed with my interpretation of the 12 steps is about having, as you've just described, a spiritual awakening and the support of a community.
00:19:39.000 and ultimately being able to overcome the inclination towards the type of self-centeredness that you're describing in your cluster B diagnosis there.
00:19:48.000 I want to interrupt you because I left out one thing that I was going to comment on your last construct of how you were describing the lack of connection.
00:19:56.000 Lack of connection is really what you're talking about.
00:19:58.000 Lack of connection to other, lack of connection to community, lack of connection to God, lack of connection to self, frankly.
00:20:04.000 We are disconnected.
00:20:06.000 And guess what trauma does?
00:20:07.000 It disintegrates us, disconnects us.
00:20:10.000 But I want to make one more comment because I think people will assail us for saying people aren't connected to their community.
00:20:16.000 There is a phenomenon afoot right now I call grandiose caring, which is still the narcissism.
00:20:22.000 I care!
00:20:23.000 I care so much about this group and that!
00:20:26.000 I care!
00:20:27.000 I don't care what you care about.
00:20:28.000 If you actually care about somebody, Develop a skill, develop some sort of wisdom, and go and offer it to another person.
00:20:36.000 A person.
00:20:37.000 Don't stand on the stage and beat your chest and gnash your teeth.
00:20:41.000 That is grandiose caring, that is narcissism.
00:20:44.000 I'm glad you care, I want you to care about other people, but that is not going to help the present moment.
00:20:50.000 In Christianity, I know that it's significant to do God's work privately and quietly and with humility so that it doesn't become performative.
00:20:58.000 And I guess a component of the scapegoat in has become something that's often discussed, virtue performed publicly, the appearance of morality.
00:21:08.000 And I was thinking about the culture at the moment.
00:21:10.000 I was thinking, how are people getting it up, Dr. Drew, to talk about The Oscars or the Golden Globes when there is this immersive sense that we are in some kind of crisis.
00:21:22.000 I was so fascinated to hear your diagnosis because it's one that I agree with because continually from a kind of from this odd globalist humanitarian perspective people will continually cite confidence statistics around well do you know more people have been pulled out of poverty than ever before and the standard of living this and this is better than ever and I always feel what I don't No, that's the reality a lot of people are living in.
00:21:44.000 It feels like we're in a highly precipitous and dangerous moment in a massive crisis of meaning and this kind of shared psychopathy seems relevant.
00:21:55.000 Crisis of meaning.
00:21:57.000 Yes.
00:21:58.000 What does it mean to live a good life?
00:22:02.000 And it may well be That these measures, these instruments that we measure economic well-being and people being pulled out of poverty, all that stuff you just referenced, is not relevant to the crisis of the present.
00:22:17.000 I mean, it's always relevant, let's be fair.
00:22:19.000 People need to be safe, they need to be able to, you know...
00:22:21.000 But they need to be able to thrive.
00:22:23.000 If you don't get people, if people are in pain, they can't thrive.
00:22:26.000 Let's just state it such.
00:22:29.000 But the reality of the present moment may be something different.
00:22:33.000 Spiritual crisis, lack of meaning.
00:22:36.000 What does it mean to lead a good life?
00:22:38.000 What does that mean?
00:22:40.000 And when I say it, people, and again, I only have this country, but I'm deeply embedded here.
00:22:45.000 So I have this as my reference point.
00:22:47.000 They confuse a good life with happiness.
00:22:51.000 And hedonic happiness is a dead-end street.
00:22:54.000 is I'm sure you say Schopenhauer's you go from happy to wanting more happiness to happy to
00:23:00.000 wanting more it's hedonic happiness is a is a dead-end street it's it's it's nice it's good
00:23:08.000 but eudaimonic happiness as Aristotle called it is something that's much more nourishing
00:23:14.000 and is the source of a good life so we have to just we have to each of us figure out what that
00:23:21.000 meaning is for us and there's some you know people have thought about that for thousands of years and
00:23:26.000 there are people that have suggested certain things we might return to some of that stuff perhaps
00:23:30.000 Yeah, the inward generation of joy compared to the external application of pleasure is a confusion that seems to have been with us some time.
00:23:40.000 I was chatting to someone about Epicureanism.
00:23:42.000 They're sort of like Epicurus was kind of got associated with pleasure seeking, but someone explained to me recently, no, he wasn't about pleasure.
00:23:49.000 He was about joy.
00:23:50.000 And when we start talking about pleasure over joy and transient happiness, which is easily commodified, it's very distinct from The generation of independent joy.
00:24:00.000 Joy coming from within.
00:24:02.000 Joy in your nature.
00:24:03.000 You said independent joy.
00:24:05.000 I'm of the opinion, and I may be wrong about this, but I've always noticed that real joy tends to be a shared experience.
00:24:13.000 It's something that people have together, or at least it's amplified in such a way that it becomes more substantial when it is experienced with at least an other, if not many others.
00:24:26.000 Yes, I think that's a fair assessment, although sometimes when I think of someone like Yogananda, like he's talking about there being an ever-present bliss that we're blocked off from because of layers of samskara and layers of injury, and I try sometimes to contemplate what does Christ, what's meant by the kingdom of heaven being within.
00:24:45.000 So there's no doubt, I don't want to double down on the kind of individualism that you and I are both decrying, and I reckon that there's a certain joy that couldn't be derived from relationship and service, but The idea that what I'm trying to establish and explain is that as a recovering addict, the idea that pleasure is going to come from the outside, whether it's through sex or through food or through heroin or alcohol, that I can consume somehow pleasure rather than through service and good conduct.
00:25:15.000 Through right conduct, joy will be generated as a byproduct rather than as the aim.
00:25:22.000 Isn't right conduct something that is in short supply also?
00:25:25.000 You know, Kant's first principles.
00:25:27.000 I just, you know, I always think it's kind of amusing.
00:25:30.000 I mean, his first principle was, of course, that, you know, behave as though your behavior can be judged as universal principle, which is essentially another way of saying behave in such a way that people can see all your choices, as though there's a camera going at all times.
00:25:43.000 And guess what, everybody?
00:25:44.000 Now there is a camera going at all times.
00:25:46.000 So you are going to be judged.
00:25:48.000 So you might as well fall in line.
00:25:51.000 OK, before you answer the next question, Doctor, I have to tell our beloved viewers on YouTube, we need you to join us.
00:25:57.000 We need you to be a part of this movement because we're going to discuss stuff that would be contraband on a WHO platform, on a platform that listens to the British government when they say demonetise Russell Brand.
00:26:08.000 This is part of our movement.
00:26:10.000 We need you with us right now.
00:26:12.000 We're going to be talking about Dr Drew's views on Joe Rogan and the Covid protocol that he espoused and why the legacy media responded the way they did with that massive powload.
00:26:21.000 You know, Pylon, excuse me, ain't it weird when the whole media responds with one voice as if there is one agenda to amplify and normalize the power, the agenda of the powerful?
00:26:33.000 We're talking about Fauci, we're talking about excess deaths, all sorts of stuff we wouldn't be able to do on YouTube, so click the link in the description and join us there.
00:26:40.000 And please, see you in a second, consider Becoming a supporter of our content, becoming an Awaken Wonder to get an additional video every single week.
00:26:47.000 Brilliant ones on excess deaths, on farmer protests, and more importantly, perhaps, support our work so we can grow together.
00:26:56.000 So in particular, Doctor, do you consider that a seismic occurrence took place at the commencement of the pandemic and the regulations that were imposed and the attitudes around vaccine mandates?
00:27:10.000 Was that a pivotal moment in modern history?
00:27:14.000 Did it reveal something to us?
00:27:17.000 I believe it did.
00:27:18.000 It certainly revealed something to me.
00:27:19.000 And not just a something, a lot of things.
00:27:22.000 And it's so funny when I was, you know, thinking about how you frame your, you identify your program as stay free.
00:27:33.000 I thought to myself, gosh, I used to, my entire career, I used to tell people to stay well.
00:27:38.000 But my shift because of COVID has been stay free also.
00:27:43.000 And that is astonishing to me.
00:27:48.000 I always thought that was a foregone conclusion.
00:27:50.000 And the fact that we have to stand up and fight for that is just astonishing to me.
00:27:59.000 Who I talk to... I mean, I was thinking about some of the interviews I used to do on HLN and CNN.
00:28:04.000 I used to interview white supremacists.
00:28:07.000 I used to interview people that are way out there.
00:28:10.000 See what they're all about.
00:28:11.000 Learn what I can from them.
00:28:13.000 Now you're not allowed to even speak.
00:28:15.000 Not allowed to show.
00:28:16.000 What is that?
00:28:17.000 Who I talk to?
00:28:19.000 And by the way, I was thinking about like Joe Rogan when he got treatment for his COVID.
00:28:24.000 His doctor gave him ivermectin and a monoclonal antibody and a NAD infusions.
00:28:30.000 Two NAD infusions.
00:28:32.000 And the press, of course, freaked out about the ivermectin.
00:28:34.000 But the NAD infusions was the really interesting thing.
00:28:37.000 An outlying treatment.
00:28:39.000 That was outlying.
00:28:40.000 No one has ever suggested that.
00:28:42.000 And it seemed to help them.
00:28:42.000 And I thought, wow, how interesting.
00:28:45.000 And whatever the hell he does with his doctors is his effing business.
00:28:49.000 Between the two of them, nobody has any business even directing their attention in that direction, let alone commenting on it.
00:28:57.000 It's disgusting.
00:28:59.000 It is disgusting that people feel at their privilege to intervene and to try to disrupt basic relationship, basic liberties.
00:29:09.000 That's mind-boggling to me.
00:29:11.000 Like you said, it became hysterical, it became political.
00:29:14.000 They were unable to constrain themselves.
00:29:16.000 There was a concerted legacy media effort to shut him down, to silence and smear and disgrace him.
00:29:22.000 They dug up things from the past about him, his use of profane language.
00:29:28.000 It was extraordinary how that was coordinated and it revealed a degree of authoritarianism that, as you said, Doctor, we assumed was Off the menu.
00:29:40.000 Whether you're Democrat or Republican, we care about individual freedom and free speech.
00:29:44.000 Well, no, that isn't what's happening anymore.
00:29:46.000 That's not the dynamic.
00:29:48.000 Who knew, right?
00:29:49.000 I did never imagine that who you speak to would somebody would want to regulate or that they would... Again, this is the mob stuff.
00:29:57.000 This is mob, this is scapegoating, this is guillotines, this is conframing the world as pure and impure.
00:30:04.000 It's this whole model of You know, it's a religious model, really.
00:30:10.000 They've gone bad, right, in terms of organized religion.
00:30:14.000 It's just come into this sort of social construct.
00:30:17.000 And just like they did in the French Revolution, you were never pure enough of a Republican, so you had to go on the guillotine.
00:30:23.000 And by Republican, I mean somebody who supported the New Republic.
00:30:27.000 They were called Republicans.
00:30:28.000 So, you know, first you're the Jacobins, and then all the Jacobins got their heads cut off, and by the Sainte-Colette, and then Sainte-Colette and Robespierre got their heads cut off by the Royalists, and then the Royalists got put in prison by Napoleon.
00:30:40.000 It was one thing.
00:30:41.000 It does not go well, everybody.
00:30:43.000 You are in the interest of all to stop now.
00:30:47.000 Stop this nonsense now.
00:30:49.000 Doc, is this a good time for us to talk about the wellness company that are promoting and are partnering us with our content today that I believe you are affiliated with?
00:30:58.000 We've already done a promo for the wellness company for the medical kits, where in the event of an emergency, you would have in your home necessary medicines, including the controversial prize winning Ivermectin, as well as a variety of other products.
00:31:14.000 Can you tell us what that kit is and what in particular what your affiliation with it is?
00:31:19.000 I'm a member of their chief medical board.
00:31:21.000 There is a variety of physicians on that board with differing opinions.
00:31:25.000 We're not all in complete unison on everything, but we all agree that the physician-patient relationship has been adulterated.
00:31:32.000 We were just talking about Joe Rogan and how people tried to adulterate his relationship with his doctor.
00:31:38.000 The physician is powerless in this country right now.
00:31:40.000 So I am interested in empowering patients.
00:31:42.000 They should have access to things that they know how to use, that are simple to use, that we can teach them to use.
00:31:47.000 They can have backup with telehealth.
00:31:48.000 There's more efficient and certainly much less expensive ways to do that.
00:31:52.000 And that's what the wellness company is all about.
00:31:53.000 There's many more things to come.
00:31:55.000 Pay attention.
00:31:56.000 We have some other readiness kits coming that I think you'll be amazed by.
00:32:00.000 When you think about it, of course you should have these things on hand.
00:32:03.000 They're easy to use.
00:32:04.000 You know how to use them.
00:32:05.000 And I'm just proud to be a part of their organization.
00:32:08.000 I'm a paid member of that board and I'm happy to be a part of it.
00:32:11.000 It's not prepper type stuff then.
00:32:13.000 It's not necessarily in the event of an emergency, you should have antibiotics, antivirals.
00:32:18.000 You think it's just a sort of a sensible thing for people to have in their home anyway?
00:32:23.000 Both.
00:32:24.000 I think, look, my wife is lucky because, you know, if it's an after hours situation and her physician's unavailable, I can kind of step in and help out.
00:32:34.000 It's not a great idea to treat your family, but there's certain things that are just so easy to use that people should just have.
00:32:41.000 When people travel, I give them a batch of medicines.
00:32:45.000 I teach them how to use them.
00:32:46.000 Here's how you use these things if this happens.
00:32:49.000 And guess what?
00:32:50.000 I've been doing that for 20 years.
00:32:52.000 Never been a problem.
00:32:53.000 Our travel kits are coming next.
00:32:53.000 Guess what?
00:32:55.000 Right, so things like antibiotics, antiparasitics, medicines that are likely to be useful in the event of a variety of kind of common conditions.
00:33:05.000 Common, urgent, after hours.
00:33:08.000 For God's sakes, don't go to an urgent care where you pay for all that real estate, all that equipment, all those employees.
00:33:13.000 You pay for that when you walk in there.
00:33:16.000 Our system could be infinitely more efficient, and this is an attempt to bring it that way.
00:33:20.000 Well, brilliant.
00:33:21.000 Well, we'll post the link for that right now.
00:33:22.000 And I guess we're doing some kind of discount, I would hope, given that we are like affiliated in some way.
00:33:29.000 But we'll post that right now.
00:33:31.000 Thank you, Doctor.
00:33:32.000 Can we move elegantly onto the subject of Excess deaths.
00:33:37.000 It's a difficult thing to talk about because of censorship as well as the fact that, you know, well, take this example.
00:33:42.000 There's been an 8% increase in excess deaths among children in the United Kingdom.
00:33:47.000 It's difficult to countenance that that means there's a higher likelihood that your own children are going to die.
00:33:53.000 Why is this?
00:33:55.000 And I saw recently a Channel 4 documentary that, interestingly, were one of the companies that attacked me recently in conjunction with other legacy media organizations simultaneously.
00:34:04.000 Working together on their investigation.
00:34:06.000 When they were talking about excess death, they literally did an item on the news.
00:34:10.000 There's a mystery thing!
00:34:12.000 People are just dying!
00:34:13.000 We don't know what it is!
00:34:15.000 And like that, every single comment under the video is, we know what this is!
00:34:18.000 Everyone knows what this is!
00:34:20.000 Like, they say, what's happening?
00:34:23.000 And why is there not an appetite to investigate this in a fearless and thorough way?
00:34:29.000 That is the bigger mystery, right?
00:34:31.000 That's the part that is nefarious, concerning, egregious.
00:34:38.000 Your country is beginning to have some hearings on this in the parliament, though it's just getting started.
00:34:44.000 I've watched some of that.
00:34:45.000 They're being done well and properly and thoughtfully and non-hysterically.
00:34:50.000 And we have to be open to any and all explanation.
00:34:54.000 My own belief is, my suspicion is, I shouldn't say belief because it is science, my suspicion is we're going to find that the real culprit is the spike protein.
00:35:05.000 However you are exposed to it.
00:35:07.000 And so the more exposure to spike, the more we're going to see difficulty.
00:35:11.000 It's, it is clearly the pathogenic part of the virus.
00:35:16.000 And of course, many of the vaccines, that's what we're creating to create the immune reaction is more spike.
00:35:23.000 And maybe some people produce more spike than are something I will find out, but it is, it is going to be the spike, but the astonishing thing.
00:35:32.000 Is that there are more people dying in this excess death pandemic than died in COVID.
00:35:39.000 And yet we shut the world down for that.
00:35:42.000 What is going on here?
00:35:43.000 I'm not saying on any given day there's more people dying.
00:35:45.000 I'm saying the cumulative effect of excess deaths persisting year in and year out, we're going to easily surpass COVID.
00:35:54.000 And so why isn't there, forget the urgency, just Why is no country doing that?
00:36:01.000 This is the astonishing thing to me, that the whole world shut down, the whole world became hysterical, and the entire world is ignoring this thing.
00:36:12.000 Now maybe they don't feel it's the place of government, maybe it's the medical system that has to come up with that.
00:36:18.000 And we take a long time to to cull through stuff, to come up with the evidence of what's going on.
00:36:23.000 If you leave it just to the medical system, who's going to pay for the studies?
00:36:27.000 How's that going to get done?
00:36:29.000 Obviously pharmaceuticals not very interested in it.
00:36:32.000 So I think government's going to have to step up and do it.
00:36:35.000 Yeah, I hope you're right.
00:36:36.000 Just to give you some information on the COVID inquiry in the UK, it's cost £145 million up until now.
00:36:42.000 They're delaying the significant questions indefinitely.
00:36:45.000 They've not said when they're going to continue the inquiry, but it will certainly be after the elections in the summer.
00:36:50.000 So there's the kind of opacity that's defined investigations in your country as well.
00:36:55.000 And obviously being a sceptical person, I can't help but think that some powerful interests are being served or protected.
00:37:02.000 by the way that this is subsequently being handled.
00:37:05.000 And on that subject, Anthony Fauci has gone from being a sort of a hero, very deliberately portrayed in that manner as well, from late night talk shows, holding dance numbers, and we're all invited to adore Anthony Fauci.
00:37:20.000 He proclaimed himself as being the science, in inverted commas, and he also said publicly that people, when the right measures are imposed on them, will lose their ideological BS.
00:37:32.000 I wonder if you think that irreparable damage has been done in the institutions that surround American medicine, the CDC, the NIH, etc.
00:37:40.000 due to Fauci's conduct and some of the odd financial relationships around that time.
00:37:47.000 Well, again, a lot packed into your questions as always.
00:37:50.000 And I don't know about irreparable damage because they were adulterated and we didn't know it and thank God we know it now.
00:37:59.000 So maybe we can do something about it.
00:38:01.000 Maybe.
00:38:02.000 The fact that it had gone so far in a certain direction where regulators and pharmaceutical companies are so intertwined.
00:38:10.000 And by the way, the publishing infrastructure and major medical journals.
00:38:18.000 I'm not allowed even to allow a drug rep into my office to give me a pen with a drug name on it.
00:38:24.000 And yet these guys go back and forth between and amongst each other and share each other's jobs and livelihoods.
00:38:32.000 You got it.
00:38:32.000 This needs a very careful analysis.
00:38:35.000 Number one.
00:38:36.000 Number two, you mentioned how Dr. Fauci was a hero.
00:38:38.000 Dr. Fauci has been my hero my whole career.
00:38:41.000 He was the reason I got involved in radio.
00:38:44.000 I was deeply involved in treating AIDS patients.
00:38:46.000 And in 19 mid early 80s, when we were just starting to go from calling this thing grids to AIDS, he was saying, you know, you got to get out there.
00:38:53.000 And we actually was telling us to go out and scare people.
00:38:55.000 Sound familiar?
00:38:56.000 That's gonna be millions of dead, millions of dead.
00:38:59.000 And I dutifully did that, and I scared the hell out of a whole generation of high school students that they were all going to get AIDS, and they were all equally likely to get it, and they had to use a condom.
00:39:09.000 And I believed that.
00:39:10.000 I thought we stopped that from happening by scaring the crap out of these kids.
00:39:16.000 But I apologize now if that had adverse effect.
00:39:20.000 I see now the inadvantageous outcome of using fear.
00:39:24.000 We should never use fear and panic in medicine.
00:39:26.000 It's unethical.
00:39:28.000 And I apologize if my participation that harmed people, but we really had a, you know, that was a deadly illness with a 100% fatality rate.
00:39:38.000 Not a 1% fatality rate, a 100% fatality rate.
00:39:42.000 And it was a bleak, dark period.
00:39:45.000 I was telling, as a fourth year medical student, I was telling young men regularly they had six months to live.
00:39:50.000 So there was a degree of panic.
00:39:52.000 I was never wrong, by the way.
00:39:54.000 So there's that.
00:39:56.000 Now, when this thing hit, You know the things that I got criticized for were obviously you know when you when things go viral you know I'm sure you've noticed it's never what you say it's always what somebody says you said it's never what you say and of course never and no one ever comes back go would you clarify that what did you mean never ever ever and if you try oh no you said no they keep saying something else about other than what you've said which then that goes viral it's just it's just insidious it's disgusting but there we are that's how things go viral
00:40:25.000 And when things are viral on me, the one thing they always cut out of my comments was the thing I actually got wrong.
00:40:32.000 Because the thing I actually got wrong was at the end of every comment, I would say, please just listen to Dr. Fauci, listen to the CDC.
00:40:38.000 They've been guiding my career there.
00:40:39.000 You can rely on these people to get us through it.
00:40:42.000 And I believe that until Dr. Fauci was in front of our government and they asked him whether we should, whether, you know, Dr. Fauci, you've closed down church practices out of doors.
00:40:52.000 Is it okay to go to a political demonstration?
00:40:55.000 And he looked and he went, I don't know what you're talking about.
00:40:57.000 And I thought, Oh, he's been adulterated.
00:41:00.000 Something's wrong.
00:41:01.000 Something is something.
00:41:02.000 This is not the same man.
00:41:03.000 So what is going on here?
00:41:04.000 And it just went from on and on and on from there.
00:41:07.000 So I kept expecting him to go back to his baseline reversion to the mean, but it just, it kind of never happened.
00:41:15.000 And it sort of was a misapplication of some of the same strategies we use back in the AIDS days.
00:41:19.000 It's a different time.
00:41:19.000 And that thing did those strategies are not useful, not good.
00:41:24.000 We probably weren't good then.
00:41:25.000 It's quite extraordinary and frightening, I would think, to be in a position where, necessarily, if you're a medical profession, you have to operate within institutions because institutions, when they're good, are the housing of expertise and accumulative knowledge.
00:41:41.000 But institutions, when they are bad, are the vessels for corruption.
00:41:45.000 And it seems like you've almost experienced that metastasis.
00:41:53.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:41:55.000 It's been sort of an evolution.
00:41:56.000 And like I said, it went from stay well to stay free.
00:42:00.000 That's what my, that's my evolution.
00:42:03.000 And part of that is looking, then I started looking at a lot of things.
00:42:08.000 Look, medical literature.
00:42:09.000 I, during COVID, Journals, I read the journals religiously and carefully and all of a sudden during COVID, all the science went one direction.
00:42:19.000 That is not science then.
00:42:21.000 Science is a back and forth and it kind of moves as you come to understand the landscape of literature.
00:42:26.000 It moves in a certain direction.
00:42:27.000 You kind of develop a consensus.
00:42:29.000 It doesn't just go one way.
00:42:31.000 And I thought, there's something wrong with the editorial process too.
00:42:34.000 And it was actually, I saved one journal.
00:42:36.000 It's not here on my desk right now.
00:42:38.000 But Annals of Internal Medicine, about two years into COVID, finally started writing some articles that were About budesonide, and about fuvoxamine, and about, you know, alternative treatments for early COVID.
00:42:48.000 I thought, oh, my annals of original medicine has returned.
00:42:51.000 They're back.
00:42:51.000 They're showing the full spectrum of what's out there.
00:42:55.000 But, you know, remember that Danish study that showed that a small percentage of the initial rollout of the vaccine was responsible for 90% of the adverse reactions?
00:43:03.000 I don't know if you know that study.
00:43:05.000 It was a great study done by a Danish researcher and physician.
00:43:07.000 It took her two years to get that published.
00:43:10.000 Two years!
00:43:11.000 Two years to publish something that should have been just out and before us and top of mind.
00:43:20.000 Yes, yes, yes, because in a sense there were opportunities to intervene with what led to incidents of catastrophic incidents.
00:43:33.000 Yes, that's astonishing that there were so many examples of the narrative being controlled and directed.
00:43:40.000 Still now it's very difficult to talk about batches because that indicates that the process was not reliable, that there was variation.
00:43:47.000 There are so Many lines of inquiry that are just impossible.
00:43:51.000 I have a few questions, if it's okay, from people in our chat.
00:43:55.000 Primal Colin says, what are your opinions, Doctor, on, well, it's quite a lot of questions.
00:44:01.000 Disease X, mRNA slippage, SV40, and the New Zealand whistleblower data.
00:44:06.000 Maybe the whistleblower data.
00:44:07.000 What do you think about that?
00:44:08.000 Because I suppose, I'm sure you're familiar, and potentially there could be 17 million excess deaths based on that.
00:44:14.000 I've heard that figure elsewhere also.
00:44:17.000 I pulled that study recently.
00:44:20.000 I don't know what to make of anything right now.
00:44:23.000 I just know we need to continue to look and examine and try to figure things out, not get hysterical on any front.
00:44:30.000 Ascending to the truth takes time.
00:44:32.000 It's hard.
00:44:33.000 It's not about being right.
00:44:34.000 It's about trying to get to a clear understanding of what's going on here.
00:44:38.000 I don't know if you saw the Austrian study that came out also that Vinay Prasad put out I want to read you that one.
00:44:47.000 I actually pulled it up because that will really interest your audience, it seems to me.
00:44:51.000 Here it is.
00:44:53.000 This is an excellent study, well done, peer-reviewed.
00:44:57.000 We did not observe a significant vaccine effect from the fourth vaccine dose, COVID-19 deaths, during a time with already very low absolute risk for outcome, meaning the vaccine had no effect.
00:45:08.000 And they observe no individuals younger than 40 years died of COVID-19.
00:45:12.000 So why are we getting vaccinated at all?
00:45:15.000 This is the thing.
00:45:16.000 Let's say the risk of myocarditis is one in 50,000.
00:45:19.000 It may be 1 in 800, but let's say it's just for the sake of argument, it's 1 in 50,000.
00:45:25.000 The risk of dying of COVID is zero under 40.
00:45:28.000 Why are we putting anybody at any risk of cardiac injury?
00:45:31.000 Why are we doing that?
00:45:32.000 And why pushing?
00:45:34.000 Why pushing so hard?
00:45:35.000 Especially we know the spike protein is the pathogen.
00:45:38.000 By the way, we have other vaccine alternatives.
00:45:40.000 What about Covaxin?
00:45:41.000 What about whole viral alternatives?
00:45:42.000 Why don't we, why don't we, if you want to push vaccine, how about those?
00:45:46.000 Why this one?
00:45:47.000 And why only this one?
00:45:49.000 Weird, right?
00:45:51.000 And then how do I give informed consent to a 22-year-old?
00:45:55.000 How do I do that?
00:45:57.000 When all of it is obscured and obfuscated, except to say, look, the recently published data suggests your risk of death is zero.
00:46:07.000 Do we want to talk about the potential adverse effects of the vaccine, given that your risk of death is zero from this illness?
00:46:12.000 I don't know.
00:46:13.000 I don't know.
00:46:16.000 For me, it seems like it was an extremely revealing period that I obviously come from a different world in many regards, though there were crossovers in our experience and some of our perspectives.
00:46:29.000 But for me, the confirmation that you cannot trust authority, That various arms of the establishment work in conjunction in order to achieve favoured outcomes, that crises are utilised to impose power, that if there's an opportunity to introduce authoritarianism and generate profit, it will be taken.
00:46:47.000 All of these sort of pre-existing biases, I would have to call them,
00:46:51.000 appear to get like pretty significant ticks next to them over that couple of years.
00:46:57.000 But isn't it astonishing?
00:46:59.000 I mean, you and I grew up in similar eras when at least, you know, question authority was our presumed position.
00:47:08.000 And then we expected our press to speak to the people in power and to question the people in power.
00:47:15.000 That is flipped on its head.
00:47:17.000 Where people are signing on to authoritarianism and are becoming a part of the elites and reinforcing their excesses.
00:47:25.000 That, okay, now we need to become a student of history because that is not something that I would expect in your country or mine.
00:47:34.000 And yet here we are.
00:47:35.000 By the way, the French, back to the French Revolution, the French youth have been pushing back on this.
00:47:40.000 They have been bristling about it since they were getting a vaccine mandate.
00:47:43.000 They were in the streets on Friday and Saturday night Demonstrating against that.
00:47:47.000 They're saying, how's that liberty?
00:47:49.000 It's a founding principle of this country.
00:47:50.000 How is that liberty?
00:47:52.000 Yeah, in every protest movement you can rely on the French to take it to extremes.
00:47:57.000 It's agricultural, we're dumping stuff in the street.
00:48:00.000 Yeah, thank God for the French, you have to say once in a while, even as an English person.
00:48:05.000 Yeah, it's become clear that the function of the media is to normalize and amplify the agenda of the establishment.
00:48:11.000 That's a sort of a paradigm that, you know, whether that's to introduce a new piece of technology, a new piece of legislation, to shut down a piece of dissent, it's become something that's become prevalent and You can candidly state in this space now.
00:48:26.000 Doc, we've got to wrap up now.
00:48:27.000 Thank you so much for your contribution and your participation.
00:48:30.000 And on a personal note, it's just lovely to see you again.
00:48:34.000 Really lovely and heartwarming.
00:48:35.000 It is lovely to see you too.
00:48:36.000 I don't know if you remember, but every time you and I talk together, we go, we've got to do more.
00:48:39.000 We need to spend more time together.
00:48:42.000 I'm feeling that now!
00:48:44.000 Yeah.
00:48:46.000 We should do this again.
00:48:47.000 We could have talked for another hour easily.
00:48:48.000 We could do a variety of things.
00:48:50.000 We could do things where we do questions and answers.
00:48:52.000 We talk about mental health, addiction, corruption, the duty of the physicians.
00:48:56.000 There's so many things.
00:48:57.000 Let's do it.
00:48:58.000 Let's just do it.
00:48:59.000 We'll figure out a way to do it.
00:49:00.000 Dr. Drew, thank you.
00:49:01.000 I would love to come visit you too.
00:49:02.000 That'd be fun.
00:49:03.000 You're always welcome here.
00:49:04.000 Lots of love to you, Doc.
00:49:06.000 Thank you so much.
00:49:08.000 Thank you, Doctor.
00:49:09.000 It's always a great pleasure to speak with you.
00:49:10.000 I'm going to be doing more.
00:49:11.000 Let's do a stream together.
00:49:12.000 I'd love to do that.
00:49:13.000 Let me know how you'd like to see me and Doctor Drew collaborate.
00:49:16.000 It could be the new Brangino.
00:49:17.000 It could be the new Browder or Crand.
00:49:20.000 I don't know how to do these things.
00:49:21.000 Hey, the Portmanteaus, those things are called, aren't they?
00:49:23.000 So you can see Dr. Drew's work at drdrew.com or you can watch Ask Dr. Drew streaming on Rumble.
00:49:29.000 There's a link in the description for all that.
00:49:31.000 Now you are aware that a mutant coronavirus strain is being worked on.
00:49:36.000 Chinese scientists have created it.
00:49:38.000 It's extraordinary.
00:49:38.000 It attacks the brain.
00:49:39.000 And if you were a mouse right now, or rather mouses, if there's more than one of you, It has a 100% kill rate and of course there's a risk it might spill over into humans.
00:49:48.000 So do whatever it takes to stop disease X or madness that must be stopped before it's too late.
00:49:55.000 Here's the news.
00:49:55.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:49:57.000 Stay with us.
00:50:01.000 No.
00:50:01.000 Here's the fucking news!
00:50:03.000 Good news everyone!
00:50:05.000 Chinese scientists, you know those guys, have created a new strain of coronavirus that has a 100% cure rate on mouses that they're testing it on.
00:50:13.000 So what do you think?
00:50:14.000 Gain-of-function research should continue at a pace to create a vaccine in case there is a new disease X?
00:50:20.000 Or do you think they should stop doing these experiments because it has the potential to cause another pandemic?
00:50:27.000 We are working now feverishly in laboratories on humanized mouses to ensure that we have a vaccine against you being corrupted and corralled by legacy media.
00:50:35.000 We're not doing anything like that, but Chinese scientists are right now, apparently, working on new forms of coronavirus that have a 100% kill rate on little, tiny, potentially innocent, mouses.
00:50:45.000 Do you think that after events over the last few years, we should look at whether or not gain-of-function research is as effective as is claimed?
00:50:51.000 Do you want dual-purpose research continuing where they work on chemical weapons and vaccines simultaneously?
00:50:57.000 Are you beginning to wonder if the cure might be worse than the disease and might even cause the disease?
00:51:01.000 Are these legitimate questions to ask?
00:51:03.000 And if not, why not?
00:51:06.000 Chinese scientists are experimenting with a mutant COVID-19 strain that reportedly has a 100% kill streak in mice.
00:51:15.000 The new strain is called GXP2V, and it attacks the brains of mice engineered to reflect similar genetic makeup to humans.
00:51:24.000 Humanized mouses.
00:51:25.000 Now, when you listen to the list of symptoms that these mouses are showing, do you think, I think Joe Biden's got this disease?
00:51:32.000 With most mice living just eight days, He's got about that long, maybe.
00:51:36.000 After being infected with this virus, researchers report the mice lost weight, became sluggish, adopted a hunched posture.
00:51:43.000 Uh-huh.
00:51:44.000 With their eyes turning completely white the day before they died.
00:51:48.000 Well, that election's not going to happen then.
00:51:49.000 And this experiment, of course, brings back haunting memories from the 2020 pandemic.
00:51:53.000 Let's bring in senior national correspondent Brian Endin, who is following this story, joins us live.
00:51:58.000 Brian, the obvious question here, could this affect humans in the same way?
00:52:02.000 Uh, well, we have to wait to find out that part of this.
00:52:05.000 We're gonna wait and see.
00:52:07.000 Ooh, surprise!
00:52:08.000 Please God, it doesn't.
00:52:09.000 We're just gonna make sure that they keep the windows shut at that level.
00:52:12.000 Oh, you bloody idiots!
00:52:13.000 Not again!
00:52:14.000 We've been looking over this research all day, Nicole, and obviously, like you said, any time you hear about China doing some kind of COVID research, it does send off alarm bells.
00:52:25.000 Well, a little bit.
00:52:26.000 What they should have is alarm bells in those laboratories that tell you when coronavirus is getting out the window.
00:52:31.000 That, I wouldn't mind paid taxis for.
00:52:33.000 We're going to need a few more taxis, not for bonuses for Aunty Fauci.
00:52:36.000 This one's actually for a bit of sealant around the windows.
00:52:38.000 No, that's money well spent.
00:52:39.000 But we won't be able to go to war with Yemen.
00:52:41.000 Oh, no, no.
00:52:41.000 We've got to have a war with Yemen.
00:52:42.000 I've got to have that war.
00:52:44.000 You know, when you think back to the way the whole pandemic may have started.
00:52:47.000 What's going on in the back?
00:52:48.000 Is kids collapsing all over the place?
00:52:49.000 What's causing all these children to collapse?
00:52:52.000 There is some reason to be concerned about this, and you mentioned some of the symptoms that these mice in this lab in China have after they were tested with this new strain of COVID.
00:53:03.000 Lost weight, sluggish, eyes turned white.
00:53:06.000 Again though, for us, I think the biggest concern is What kind of research are they doing, and is there the possibility of another lab leak?
00:53:15.000 Another.
00:53:16.000 Could that be a problem here?
00:53:18.000 Dr. Marty, who you heard from there, from Florida International University, she says she was actually on a special team with United Nations that would go into laboratories around the world and make sure that they're following protocols and not doing anything dangerous.
00:53:30.000 And she said based on what she knows with the situation in China, which we don't know a ton about, but Based on the little information that we do have, she says she hopes that one of these teams will go in there and make sure that everything is being done safely.
00:53:43.000 That would be nice, wouldn't it?
00:53:44.000 If you just have a little mooch about, see if it's safe.
00:53:46.000 Because, you know, we did just have a little bit of a pandemic.
00:53:48.000 And although the pandemic was pretty beneficial to the most powerful interests in the world, both financially and authoritarian structures that benefit from people being terrified and being out of luck.
00:53:56.000 It would be good if we didn't have a disease that kills, what was the percentage again?
00:54:00.000 Oh yeah, 100%.
00:54:01.000 That's everyone, except for people that have bunkers and live on high mountaintops.
00:54:05.000 So, you know, it's not all bad news.
00:54:07.000 Not if you're a Davos.
00:54:08.000 Because again, when you hear China and you hear COVID and you hear mice and you hear new testing, it obviously gets a lot of people worried, Nicole.
00:54:16.000 Yes, it does.
00:54:17.000 All right, Brian Inton.
00:54:18.000 Thank you.
00:54:18.000 So there you go.
00:54:19.000 That's the Legacy Media reporting on what sounds like a unnecessary experiment with very few beneficial outcomes.
00:54:26.000 Let's get into it.
00:54:27.000 Chinese scientists have been experimenting with a mutant coronavirus strain that is 100% lethal in mice, despite concerns that such research could spark another pandemic.
00:54:35.000 Scientists in Beijing, who are linked to the Chinese military, why are we seeing these connections between the military and research into vaccines?
00:54:42.000 I remember when I first heard that stuff, I think from Bobby Kennedy, I was like, come on, mate, this can't be right.
00:54:47.000 But just another one of those conspiracy theories that proves to be true.
00:54:51.000 Just another piece of true information that will be regarded as misinformation that reminds you that when people are talking about misinformation, what they're talking about is information that's going to make you not be compliant.
00:55:01.000 Scientists in Beijing who I mean, at this point, what is the upside?
00:55:11.000 I mean, I know China's not a democracy, so they shouldn't hold elections on whether or not that should continue, but in your country, in our country, when we're spending $145 million on a basically aborted COVID inquiry, don't you think we should publicly and collectively decide whether or not we want this type of research to take place?
00:55:27.000 Isn't that the very essence of participatory democracy?
00:55:30.000 The mice had been humanized, meaning they were engineered to express a protein found in people with the goal being to assess how the virus might react in humans.
00:55:37.000 Every rodent that was infected with the pathogen died within eight days, which the researchers described as surprisingly quick.
00:55:43.000 We were quite surprised by that.
00:55:44.000 Oh look, those mouses are dead!
00:55:46.000 It's not, like, supposed to be, like, a bit of a laugh that they're surprised by it.
00:55:50.000 I expected them to die in a few weeks or eventually just escape into the streets of Wuhan, but to see them dead on the cage floor like that, I must say, it made us all chuckle.
00:55:58.000 You couldn't see because I was wearing a mask.
00:55:59.000 Actually, I don't know why I bother with this thing.
00:56:00.000 The team were also surprised to find high levels of viral load in the mice's brains and eyes, suggesting the virus, despite being related to COVID, multiplies and spreads through the body in a unique way.
00:56:10.000 It's not like a sequel, is it, where you want it to be, ooh, this one's a little bit better.
00:56:13.000 He's got that jeweled glove on this time, Thanos.
00:56:16.000 No, this is actual life.
00:56:17.000 Writing in a scientific paper that's not yet been published, they warned the finding underscores a spillover risk of GXP2V in humans.
00:56:24.000 If you get a virus from a pangolin and put in a humanized mouse, and then that mouse dies, like, yeah, of course there's a bloody risk.
00:56:31.000 I mean, I'd say the risk is so serious that it perhaps means don't even do the experiment in the first place.
00:56:36.000 Professor François Ballou, an infectious disease expert based at University College London, wrote on Twitter,
00:56:41.000 It's a terrible study, scientifically totally pointless.
00:56:44.000 I can see nothing of vague interest that could be learned from force-infecting a weird breed of humanized mice with a
00:56:49.000 random virus.
00:56:50.000 Conversely, I could see how such stuff might go wrong.
00:56:53.000 So there you go, there's a professor and a scientist verifying what you would intuitively think when you hear,
00:56:57.000 Oh, they're injecting deadly diseases much worse than COVID, but a bit like COVID, into mice in a lab over in China.
00:57:05.000 What the hell are they doing that for?
00:57:06.000 Haven't they learned anything?
00:57:07.000 And the answer is, well, maybe they have learned something.
00:57:08.000 That's even more terrifying, isn't it?
00:57:10.000 Professor Richard E. Bright, a chemist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, told DailyMail.com he wholeheartedly agreed with Professor Ballou's assessment.
00:57:17.000 He added, the preprint does not specify the biosafety level and the biosafety precautions used for the research.
00:57:23.000 I'll tell you now that every time I'm saying Ballou, I'm thinking bear necessities.
00:57:26.000 And if I don't say it to you, I'm going to just keep thinking it.
00:57:29.000 So I've said it.
00:57:29.000 There.
00:57:32.000 When he's doing his own scientific research, he only looks for the bare necessities.
00:57:36.000 You can hardly say injecting pangolin in a humanised mouse's is bare necessities, is it?
00:57:41.000 It's like much more prickly pawpaw territory, I'd say.
00:57:47.000 The absence of this information raises the concerning possibility that part or all of this research, like the research in Wuhan in 2016 and 2019, that likely caused the COVID-19 pandemic, recklessly was performed without the minimal biosafety containment and practices essential for research with a potential pandemic pathogens.
00:58:03.000 Of course, to bring you this fantastic content, we need your support and love, and the love and support of our partners.
00:58:09.000 That's why we ensure that we work with partners that have your wellness and the improvement of your well-being and life in mind.
00:58:17.000 Recently, clusters of respiratory illnesses in Northern China and what has been referred to as White Lung Syndrome in the United States are scattered across the headlines, drawing attention, of course, to the importance of being prepared for medical emergencies, with close to 90% of pharmaceuticals in the US being produced Outside of the US, what happens when the next global crisis strikes?
00:58:37.000 Seems inevitable, doesn't it?
00:58:39.000 Countries, of course, will clamp down on exports.
00:58:41.000 They'll stockpile.
00:58:42.000 The price of drugs rise and pharmacy shelves in America could be empty.
00:58:46.000 In fact, some say that it's already starting to happen.
00:58:48.000 The wellness company's medical emergency kit has you covered for times like this.
00:58:53.000 The wellness company is home to Dr. Peter McCullough.
00:58:55.000 Who's been on this show numerous times.
00:58:57.000 Dr. Drew Pinsky, who's been on the show.
00:58:59.000 You saw that, right?
00:59:00.000 And other truth-telling doctors have come together to empower you to take control of your own health.
00:59:06.000 40% of Americans say they would avoid a doctor or hospital unless it was a catastrophic situation.
00:59:11.000 The Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit provides a solution.
00:59:14.000 It's a handy little kit, and it includes eight potentially life-saving medications for you, along with a guidebook for safe use, obviously.
00:59:21.000 Emergency antibiotics, antivirals, and antiparasitics to keep you and your family safe in the face of natural disasters, supply chain shortages, or medical emergencies like white lung or COVID.
00:59:31.000 So go to twc.health forward slash brand and grab your medical emergency kit right now.
00:59:37.000 That's twchealth forward stroke brand code brand.
00:59:41.000 That will save you 10% at checkout, by the way.
00:59:43.000 So don't wait till it's too late.
00:59:44.000 Take control of your health with a wellness company's medical emergency kit.
00:59:48.000 Okay, let's get back to the content.
00:59:50.000 According to the study carried out by the Beijing University of Chemical Technology, the virus was discovered in 2017 prior to the COVID outbreak.
00:59:57.000 It was discovered in Malaysia in pangolins, scaly mammals that are known harbourers of coronaviruses and were heavily speculated to be the intermediate hosts that passed COVID from bats to humans.
01:00:08.000 I also, when I see them, think they should be in that bar in Star Wars, threatening and solo.
01:00:15.000 The researchers cloned the virus and stored multiple copes in the Beijing lab, where it continued to evolve.
01:00:20.000 It's unclear when the newly surfaced study was conducted, but the researchers said it was possible the virus had undergone a virulence-enhancing mutation in storage, which made it more deadly.
01:00:30.000 For the new research, 8 mice were infected with the virus, 8 were infected with an inactivated virus, and 8 were used as a control group.
01:00:36.000 All mice infected with the virus died.
01:00:38.000 They succumbed to the infection between 7 and 8 days after being infected.
01:00:42.000 What is their fascination with eight mouses?
01:00:44.000 Like, eight mouses, that's how many I think Moderna tested their new boosters on.
01:00:48.000 They seem to think that's enough.
01:00:49.000 What's a responsible number of mouses?
01:00:51.000 I like eight.
01:00:52.000 Eight mouses.
01:00:52.000 Whee!
01:00:53.000 Like a racetrack.
01:00:54.000 Eight lovely mouses.
01:00:55.000 The infinity sign.
01:00:56.000 Oh no, they're all dead.
01:00:57.000 What should we do?
01:00:57.000 I don't know, make a vaccine?
01:00:59.000 Oh no, it's too late!
01:01:00.000 Ah!
01:01:01.000 Once more, here's those awful Biden-like symptoms.
01:01:04.000 Poor little things, really.
01:01:05.000 turning completely white, rapid weight loss and fatigue.
01:01:08.000 Researchers found significant amounts of the virus in the rodents' brains, lungs, noses, eyes and windpipes.
01:01:13.000 Poor little things, really.
01:01:14.000 By day six, the viral load had significantly decreased in the lungs, but the animals' brains had shrunk
01:01:18.000 and there were exceptionally high virus levels in their brains.
01:01:21.000 Do check Joe Biden.
01:01:22.000 The results suggest the virus infects via the respiratory system and then migrates to the brain,
01:01:26.000 unlike COVID, which causes lower lung infections and pneumonia in severe cases.
01:01:30.000 However, there have been examples of COVID being found in brain tissue of severely sick patients.
01:01:35.000 Severe brain infections during the later stages of infection may be the key cause of death in these mice, the researchers said.
01:01:41.000 They concluded, this is the first report showing that a SARS-CoV-2 related pangolin coronavirus can cause 100% mortality in HACE2 mice, suggesting a risk for GXP2V to spill over into humans.
01:01:52.000 I'm saying that, as if they've just won a decathlon.
01:01:54.000 And this is the first time we've successfully killed every single one of the mouses in this lab.
01:01:59.000 Except there was one occasion, wasn't there, where you knocked over the whole damn cage and killed a lot of them.
01:02:04.000 Yes, that was a crazy day in the lab.
01:02:06.000 Thankfully the windows were shut that day.
01:02:08.000 However, the original strain of COVID also killed 100% in mice in some studies, meaning the new results may not be directly applicable to humans.
01:02:15.000 Oh, carry on then, guys.
01:02:16.000 Have fun, go at it.
01:02:19.000 This madness must be stopped before it's too late.
01:02:24.000 Mm, misinformation.
01:02:25.000 But don't know, there's another person to shut down, ruining potential chance of profits and fun, let's face it, over at those labs in Beijing.
01:02:32.000 It was revealed in 2022 how similar research virus manipulation research was being carried out by Boston University.
01:02:38.000 Researchers were found to have created a new COVID strain that had an 80% death rate among mice.
01:02:42.000 It sparked nationwide debate about whether the experiments were an illegal form of research, known as gain-of-function, which involves purposefully making viruses more deadly or infectious to study their evolution.
01:02:51.000 Well, I think that debate can be concluded now.
01:02:54.000 It was, wasn't it?
01:02:55.000 That's exactly, literally, what it did.
01:02:57.000 The Biden administration tightened the rules around such research in October 2022, but the definition of gain-of-function remains contested.
01:03:03.000 Did you just do gain-of-function?
01:03:05.000 No.
01:03:05.000 What do you mean by gain-of-function?
01:03:06.000 You know what I mean by gain-of-function.
01:03:07.000 Did you get a pangolin, get a disease out of it, make it worse, give it to a humanized mouse?
01:03:11.000 We did do that a little bit, but it was she's birthday.
01:03:14.000 Oh, carry on then.
01:03:15.000 Dr. Christina Park, a molecular biologist from the University of Michigan, said, the Chinese study was classic gain-of-function, whether they tell you it's or not.
01:03:21.000 It's not classic, it's not even some variation, it's not some sort of riff.
01:03:24.000 It's not some avant-garde new interpretation of it.
01:03:27.000 It's classic, it's actual gain-of-function, like your mama used to make.
01:03:30.000 Cornpot-style gain-of-function research, the proudest tradition.
01:03:33.000 And every single one, have you noticed, of the scientists that's commented on this is like, well I don't think that's a good idea.
01:03:38.000 None of them are going, oh, use edgy radicals.
01:03:40.000 Stop doing it!
01:03:41.000 One of the Chinese researchers was Dr. Yigang Tong, who trained at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, a Chinese military medical research institute run by the People's Liberation Army.
01:03:51.000 He also co-authored a paper in 2023 with Batwoman.
01:03:54.000 Don't get excited.
01:03:55.000 She hasn't got a motorbike shaped like a bat.
01:03:57.000 She just experiments on bats in ways that are probably unhelpful.
01:04:00.000 Zhengli Shi, who helps run the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
01:04:04.000 Wait, so hang on a minute.
01:04:05.000 So these people doing this research worked with the people at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but you're worried that maybe the research here could escape like it did possibly at the Wuhan Institute of Virology?
01:04:14.000 No, no, no, no, no.
01:04:15.000 The only thing I will suggest is do make sure there are no wet markets anywhere near that lab in Beijing, because those bastards sell avia.
01:04:22.000 Although if Dr. Tong needs a grant, I know Anthony Fauci's got a few quid that he's looking to spend these days.
01:04:28.000 No questions asked.
01:04:29.000 Or, more accurately, no questions answered.
01:04:31.000 The WIV has been designated the most likely source of the COVID pandemic by the FBI and U.S.
01:04:35.000 Department of Energy in what has been dubbed the Lab League Theory.
01:04:38.000 Because it probably came out of a lab, that's why it's called that.
01:04:40.000 Researchers there, with U.S.
01:04:42.000 government grants, were performing gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses in the months leading up to the COVID outbreak.
01:04:47.000 So there you go.
01:04:48.000 If 100% of mouses are dying of this new COVID-like virus, and there's connections between the labs where they're doing it and the Wuhan Institute of Virology that was likely the source and cause of the COVID-19 pandemic, doesn't it suggest that there should be a little bit of public discussion, even some public engagement, as to whether or not gain-of-function research regard?
01:05:06.000 Hey, well you say gain-of-function research, we say potato.
01:05:09.000 Do as however you want.
01:05:10.000 It's clear that what you're doing is creating dangerous viruses in laboratories and they're not being entirely cautious as to whether or not they escape.
01:05:16.000 And I'm frankly not in the mood for another pandemic just yet.
01:05:19.000 But that's just what I think.
01:05:19.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.
01:05:21.000 See you in a second.
01:05:24.000 No.
01:05:25.000 Here's the fucking news!
01:05:27.000 Thank you very much for your comments.
01:05:28.000 Thank you very much for your loyalty.
01:05:31.000 Guess who's on the show tomorrow?
01:05:32.000 Glenn Greenwald.
01:05:33.000 It's a fantastic show.
01:05:34.000 Remember to come on AwakendWonder to get early access to these interviews, to participate in the conversation.
01:05:40.000 We'll be talking with Glenn Greenwald about Gonzalo Lira, 2024 elections and Trump, war in the Middle East and free speech.
01:05:47.000 Plus, click the red Awaken button right now to get early access to our interviews, extra stuff from Glenn Greenwald, brilliant things from Whitney Webb.
01:05:54.000 We did extra stuff there.
01:05:55.000 We do readings of great books to evolve ourselves together and we talk about how we're going to solve our problems.
01:06:01.000 Exclusive content, early access, guest interviews.
01:06:03.000 It's really worth it.
01:06:05.000 Become an Awakened Wonder.
01:06:06.000 Join this movement.
01:06:07.000 Stoke the fire within you.
01:06:09.000 Continue to walk this line together, you fire walkers, you awakened wonders.
01:06:13.000 Join us tomorrow with Glenn Greenwald.
01:06:14.000 Not for more of the same, but for more of the different.