One of the most extraordinary phenomena of the entire Pandemic period was watching how conspiracy theories became conspiracy facts, and how respected elected political officials ultimately came to reveal and openly discuss, often with evidence and receipts, information that was being discussed online years before. Today, we re talking to a range of outsiders and insiders, radical political figures and outspoken commentators, who are now willing to speak out about the events of the last few years. All in all, you re left asking this question: They knew, and it s worse than we could ever have imagined, how did this happen? Let s get into it with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) and Dr. Dave Martin (D-VA), and Rep. Jim Jordan (R, OH), and Sen. Ron Johnson (D, J.D.J.C.) on today s episode of Stay Free With Russell Brand: A Call to Action. In this episode, we talk to Dr. Martin about his new book, Deception: The Truth about the Pandemic and the Cover-up, and the Conspiracy Theories about the Global Pandemic, written by Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Rand Paul about the role of the pharmaceutical giant, Big Pharma, in covering up the truth about the spread of the S.I.V.E.S. Pandemic. and the cover-up of the truth behind it. What does it mean for the soul of the country? and what does it do to the spirit and morale of a nation that s been beset by distrust in the government and corporate greed and corruption? What is it really doing to the country s soul? and why it s time to wake up to the truth? And who s to blame for it ? And what s responsible for it? All that and more on Stay Free with Russell Brand! Stay Free, Stay Free! and See The Future? - Russell Brand Subscribe to Stay Free on Podchaser Radio and Subscribe and Share the Podcast on Apple Podcasts! Subscribe on iTunes Learn more about your ad choices and become a supporter of the show on Audible and Podcharts. Subscribe at Podcharter.co/Become a Friend of The Dark Side of the Dark Side Media Subscribe to our new podcast, Like, Share, Share and Retweet our podcast on social media and more! Subscribe on Insta-Friend us on your favorite podcasting platform?
00:00:00.000I'm going to go ahead and run through the area and see what happens.
00:02:17.000In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:02:30.000Hello there you Awakening Wanderers, thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:02:35.000One of the most extraordinary phenomena of the entire pandemic period was watching how conspiracy theories became conspiracy facts, how respected elected political officials ultimately Came to reveal and openly discuss, often with evidence and receipts, information that was being discussed online years before.
00:02:58.000Well, I keep harping on about it because it shows you exactly how institutional power, whether it's government or corporate, intercedes with the truth.
00:03:08.000Today we're specifically talking about Big Pharma, Vaccines and lockdowns.
00:03:13.000But what's unique about it is we're talking to a range of guests.
00:03:18.000Dave Martin, who's always been ahead of the curve on Big Pharma, its corruption, and even more esoteric and occultist components of that.
00:03:26.000And Congressman Jim Jordan, who of course is over many of the house congressional hearings, as well as Senator Ron Johnson who's always been outspoken on this subject.
00:03:36.000So between them you've got a good number of outsiders and insiders, radical political figures and outspoken commentators, As well as institutional political figures who are there by popular mandate, who nevertheless are now willing to speak out about the events of the last few years.
00:03:55.000All in all, you're left asking this question.
00:03:58.000They knew, and it's worse than we could ever have imagined, how did this happen?
00:04:30.000In over 500 pages you have articulated what many people have felt, in fact due in no small part to your own investigations since the outset of the pandemic, that we have been subject to an unprecedented global deceit and that Anthony Fauci plays a central and key role in orchestrating this deceit.
00:04:49.000What primarily is it that you want us to understand from this book about Anthony Fauci's role in the pandemic and its cover-up?
00:04:57.000You know, I think we've never had a cover-up where the proof of the cover-up and the proof of the deceit, the proof of the lying, is so obvious in the words of the people committing the cover-up.
00:05:09.000So we had Anthony Fauci and all these virologists publicly saying, you're crazy if you think this came from the lab.
00:05:17.000But you have them in private explicitly saying the opposite.
00:05:21.000Not just hedging their bet, but absolutely saying, Wow, this is no conspiracy theory.
00:05:26.000This looks like the most likely thing.
00:05:29.000Some of these scientists were saying, ah, I'm 60-40, it came from the lab, or I'm 80-20, or I'm 50-50.
00:05:35.000But in public they were saying, absolutely no way it came from the lab.
00:05:39.000So it was a dishonesty on a level that we've never ever been able to prove by actually seeing in their own words how diabolically dishonest they were.
00:05:50.000In fact, not only were they giving us deception through omission, but also deception through commission, and deception through direct contradiction, and the management of information demonstrated a level of duplicity that we've seldom seen in public life.
00:06:06.000I'm speaking in particular of Antony Fauci's intervention at various agencies, including the CIA, the management in particular of what was known as the lab leak theory, but increasingly seems like an undeniable Truth.
00:06:18.000I wonder, for a moment, if we may take this broader, Senator, what do you think it does to the soul of a nation, to the spirit and morale of a nation, when a deception of this scale is practiced, when we almost see in real time ideas that were dismissed as conspiracy theories, i.e.
00:06:33.000that gain-of-function research was dangerous, that dual-purpose research was taking place, That potentially America was involved in the funding of the research in Wuhan through groups like EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA and perhaps the figure of Peter Daszak is an interesting one to comment on here.
00:06:51.000What do you think it does to America's spirit at a time where your country appears to be undergoing a great reckoning?
00:06:58.000What does an event like this do to the country's soul?
00:07:02.000What we saw for about three years as these public health officials came before committees was that they kept blaming the right wing and saying, you're responsible for vaccine hesitancy.
00:07:12.000You're responsible for people distrusting their government.
00:07:15.000And I pointed right back at them and said, absolutely not.
00:07:18.000You're responsible because you've lied to the public.
00:07:22.000And I don't think they ever truly grasped that.
00:07:25.000But in the end, it's amazing to me how smart people actually are.
00:07:30.000Because the elitist point of view is that the common man is too stupid to take care of himself, too stupid to make his health care decisions.
00:07:37.000But interestingly with this, if you ask a poll of how many moms are vaccinating their six months old in the United States, it's like a handful.
00:07:46.000You know, they're from the Act Blue Coalition or something, but they're not normal people.
00:07:52.000But very few people are vaccinating their kids because they see no reason, it's not a deadly disease for kids, and they have read about that there's a possibility that my kid could have a side effect from the vaccine, but there's not much possibility that my kid could get very sick from the disease.
00:08:06.000So I think the people have gotten smarter on this, but vaccine distrust and distrust of government has grown exponentially because of their dishonesty.
00:08:16.000Indeed, we are seeing now on what we commonly refer to as mainstream or legacy media, it seems to me at least, an attempt to mitigate the unavoidable deluge of truth that they are now being confronted with.
00:08:29.000I know that now Pfizer and the CDC have participated in the funding of a broad study that at least begins to acknowledge pericarditis, myocarditis, as well as other conditions and just how many yellow card and adverse injuries there have been as a result of this extraordinary product.
00:08:45.000The politicization of this issue was, it seems, used to undergird a new orthodoxy that apparently
00:08:52.000always had as its aim the kind of authoritarianism that doesn't think twice about censoring and
00:08:59.000controlling information that is not advantageous to its previously concealed agenda.
00:09:05.000Within the figure of Anthony Fauci, who lived through a kind of live hagiography during
00:09:11.000this extraordinary period, we were able to see another curious aspect of American public
00:09:17.000life, the unelected bureaucrat consuming and demonstrating power at a level that is difficult
00:09:46.000I wonder what you feel is the role of the what has come to be termed the legacy media in creating this somewhat unaccountable hero Annie Fauci who's now just admitted that the figure of a six-foot separation we just pulled out of the air that masks weren't effective while previously having made the ludicrous claim that he, you know, I am science.
00:10:07.000How did the media contribute to the creation of this figure?
00:10:11.000So, just for fun, we will occasionally write op-eds that we submit to either the New York Times or the Washington Post, because they always reject them.
00:10:31.000They both were in power about the same period of time, 40 some odd years.
00:10:35.000They both accumulated power over that time and the power went to their head and they had their own personal fiefdoms.
00:10:41.000This can happen whether you're FBI director or head of infectious disease.
00:10:45.000Now you would have never thought the head of infectious disease would become so powerful.
00:10:49.000But, you know, Bobby Kennedy's been pretty good at writing about this.
00:10:53.000He writes, and I think has drawn more attention to this than many people, is that a lot of this happened after 9-11.
00:10:59.000So after 9-11, there was a great deal of fear.
00:11:02.000We passed the Patriot Act, taking away civil liberties in our country, but we also ramp up our arms trade.
00:11:08.000And in our arms, armamentarian is bioweapons.
00:11:13.000And we say, well, gosh, the enemy is making this and the enemy is trying to take Ebola and spread it through the air.
00:11:19.000Well, we should do so we can learn how to counteract it.
00:11:22.000And so everything is, you know, an escalation, the same as there's a nuclear arms race.
00:11:26.000There's also a biological arms race that goes on.
00:11:29.000But what happened is Anthony Fauci was head of like one twenty seventh of all of NIH.
00:11:35.000His fiefdom grew in dollars to come to dominate all of NIH, and it's one of the reasons why in the end nobody knew Francis Collins' name and still don't, but they all knew Anthony Fauci's name.
00:11:49.000But two, his budget dwarfed all the other budgets.
00:11:52.000And he also became somebody who routinely was visiting with the spooks.
00:11:57.000And this is one of the things that I learned in the book is almost all these people granting scientific grants, you would think they're these just ivory-towered scientists who are like trying to cure disease for mankind.
00:12:09.000They're meeting with the CIA and the MI5 and the MI6.
00:12:14.000In England, Welcome Trust that was headed by Jeremy Farrar, who's a big player in all of this.
00:12:21.000He's talking to his boss at Welcome Trust.
00:12:23.000And oh, by the way, she's the former head of MI5.
00:12:27.000So it's like all these people who are involved with science are also involved with intelligence, which really tells you there's a lot more going on here than they're letting us see.
00:12:36.000Yes, but it was Bobby Kennedy's analysis that first helped me to understand that there'd been a historic teleology from declared international wars which were identifiable, like the Second World War, to the subsequent Cold War, to the War on Terror, To the war on germs and the war on ideas, all used to, I suppose, through a kind of diffuse subterfuge, legitimize more and more authoritarian measures, even though the enemy is becoming harder and harder to quantify.
00:13:11.000Bobby Kennedy also, just on a side note, says that you should succeed Mitch McConnell.
00:13:49.000A million, a couple billion at a time.
00:13:51.000And then this money goes to support candidates that vote for him within the caucus.
00:13:56.000And many of them are unable to raise money very well for themselves, they're not very well known in their communities, and they're deathly afraid of the voters.
00:14:04.000This is something people don't quite understand or isn't reported as much as it should be.
00:14:09.000Most of these incumbent senators are deathly afraid of their voters, including their own party.
00:14:14.000They go home to their own conventions and they're booed at their conventions.
00:14:18.000So the hardcore people who work in the political world, in the conventions of their state, they know these people aren't representing them.
00:14:27.000So I routinely will put forward things that I know that no good person in this state supports, and then we'll try to let people know how their senator voted because they have no idea.
00:14:37.000This disjunct between the electorate and the institutions that nominally serve them has become increasingly exposed.
00:14:45.000One of the clear themes of the pandemic period was deep state intervention when it came to matters of media and the control of information.
00:14:53.000It was Mike Benz that recently coined the term, which I think is interesting when people say democracy now, as in we must go to war in order to defend democracy.
00:15:02.000They mean a set of institutions that are owned by elite interests as opposed to the process of elections via which the will of the people might have been expressed.
00:15:11.000Do you feel that fissures have opened up during the pandemic period that are going to be very difficult to close?
00:15:17.000You've already mentioned That trust in science and trust in vaccines has fallen radically, and it seems to me that there's an attempt to try to address and redress that, or create systems of authority that don't require public complicity.
00:15:29.000Do you feel that there is a great mistrust in American public officials, in some part brought about by Anthony Fauci?
00:15:37.000And I like your comparison to Hoover because, you know, Anthony Fauci liked dressing up in that mask that apparently did very little, and we know that Hoover had some interesting clandestine habits in that area also.
00:15:49.000Yeah, I think that the thing I worry most about coming out of this is the idea that there's different standards of justice.
00:15:58.000You know, one of the things that almost tore America apart back in the 50s and 60s was the idea that if your skin were black, you wouldn't be treated with equal protection under the law, that you were going to be treated differently according to your skin color.
00:16:11.000We have gotten past that to a great degree over many decades, but now my fear is that people are being treated differently based on the shade of their ideology, whether what your beliefs are on vaccine or who you follow politically or whose podcast you listen to.
00:16:27.000Because Anthony Fauci is clearly guilty of lying to Congress about the gain of function, about funding gain of function research.
00:16:35.000He's guilty of lying in his own words, because we now have slack emails from February 1st, 2020, when he says explicitly they're doing gain-of-function research.
00:16:44.000He lists the research, which is the research he had funded, and he says he knew they were doing it from the very beginning.
00:16:51.000From the first email, this is the amazing thing of this cover-up.
00:16:55.000The first email we have a record of is January 27th, 2020.
00:16:59.000Fauci gets an email from his assistant, he says, wanted you to see this paper, this Gain of Function paper in Wuhan that we funded.
00:17:08.000That's the first email, January 27th, and then the rest of the time is Fauci publicly saying, nothing to see here, we never funded Gain of Function.
00:17:17.000But he never is prosecuted and won't be prosecuted.
00:17:20.000But people from the previous administration who either were accused of lying or may have lied to Congress are still being prosecuted.
00:17:28.000We'll be on YouTube for just a couple more seconds then you're gonna have to click the link in the description to join us exclusively on Rumble because this issue has taught us a great deal about censorship and the control of information.
00:17:42.000People who came to the Capitol on January 6th but never entered, that were milling around looking like this and didn't do anything, are still being pursued for jail.
00:17:52.000But if you came here to protest Kavanaugh's, you know, about a hundred women lay on the floor and wouldn't leave.
00:17:58.000They were trespassing in the Senate buildings and they were moved, but they were taken.
00:18:03.000I don't know if any of them ever got a ticket, but none of them went to jail.
00:18:06.000If they were booked, they were let go.
00:18:08.000That's what typically happened to protesters in our country if you didn't hurt somebody.
00:18:12.000But that's not what's happening with January 6th.
00:18:15.000So people are worried that there's two standards of justice now, and that will lead to further problems.
00:18:33.000Look, it's actually Airstek, the world's only scientifically proven electromagnetic field protection chip trusted by experts.
00:18:41.000Airstek is now, can you believe this, an official partner of the Ultimate Fighting Championship, the UFC, giving support for world-class athletes who want to safeguard themselves from excessive electromagnetic radiation.
00:18:52.000We're all going to want that protection soon.
00:18:53.000Elite athletes within the UFC are unique In their need to optimize their performance in 25 minute bursts.
00:19:00.000Airstek understand the importance of optimal recovery and peak performance.
00:19:04.000Trusted and used by pro athletes all around the world to elevate their game.
00:19:08.000EMF modulation technology solutions help them train harder, recover faster and perform at their best.
00:19:14.000And wouldn't we all benefit from that?
00:19:44.000The question is, from atkarina14, as more and more evidence emerges that health agencies on a global scale misled and most likely harmed many people, what kind of actual accountability can there be given the scale of the offence?
00:19:57.000Are you talking about harm from the vaccine?
00:20:04.000This has been a discussion for a long period of time, and we discussed this in the book.
00:20:08.000Congress gave liability protection so there is no harm to be held to these people.
00:20:13.000They can serve up whatever you want, and it'd be bad enough if it were voluntary, but it's being pushed on you.
00:20:19.000Many people lose their jobs if they're not vaccinated, but if they're harmed by the vaccine, they have no recourse.
00:20:24.000Now they set up some big vaccine database and then an ability to get some money from the government, but it's not the same because it doesn't chasten at all the companies.
00:20:34.000And really the insidious part of this is that it's mandatory.
00:20:39.000And then, you know, you got the former FDA commissioner, Scott Gottlieb is on the board of Pfizer, who is then calling Twitter to say, take down this article saying you might be harmed by vaccinating your children.
00:20:53.000That's how bad it is that the former FDA commissioner is now on the board of Pfizer, is now telling Twitter to take down information on this.
00:21:01.000So it's disturbing, but it's been going on since the 1970s.
00:21:05.000My dad fought against it, was one of the few people to vote against giving liability protection to the vaccine manufacturers.
00:21:14.000On the other side of it, they would argue, well, the government mandates these things.
00:21:20.000So the government should be responsible for it.
00:21:23.000But if they're not responsible for their own products, I don't think they're going to work as hard to try to do no harm.
00:21:29.000You know, to make sure that there's not a harmful aspect.
00:21:32.000And these things were pushed out so fast, if they had been voluntary in every aspect, you could at least say people who were frightened could take them, people at high risk could take them, but they were pushed out and then pushed on healthy people who didn't need the vaccines.
00:21:47.000And that really is a crime and somebody should be punished, particularly in the government, The Anthony Fauci's of this world who pushed nonsense and bad science on us that now he just throws up his hands and says, oh, well, we didn't really know.
00:22:00.000We liked six feet, but we didn't really know why we said six feet of distance.
00:22:24.000There are exceptions to every rule, but no healthy child with no significant disease is going to the hospital and dying from COVID.
00:22:30.000It is not a deadly disease for healthy children.
00:22:33.000If your child has an illness, you talk to your doctor and you can make your own decision.
00:22:38.000The vaccine isn't doing anything for healthy children.
00:22:41.000And it's all it's doing is doing to the bottom line of Big Pharma.
00:22:44.000So Anthony Fauci and his ilk have basically become salesmen for Big Pharma.
00:22:48.000And this is sort of the tragedy of crony capitalism.
00:22:52.000And I think we have to keep fighting it.
00:22:56.000That was Senator Rand Paul, who's done more than probably anyone in the Senate, maybe Thomas Massey as well, you could argue, let me know in the comments and chat, to bring these issues to a wider audience and to give them the credibility that they warrant.
00:23:08.000But when you want insight that borders on prophecy, you have to listen to Dave Martin.
00:23:17.000Was it that many previously covert interests became temporarily visible, like the recent Aurora Borealis in Northern Europe?
00:23:28.000Suddenly, something that is always there became visible to a new population.
00:23:33.000Hang on a minute, the pharmaceutical industry and the state are operating in conjunction with these unelected bureaucratic bodies in order to centralise authority and generate profit?
00:23:44.000Well, so I think there's two things that make the COVID situation somewhat dramatic, at least.
00:23:50.000I wouldn't say unprecedented, but certainly dramatic, because we can actually make the argument that certainly the establishment of the Commonwealth was the legitimization of the British East India Company, and that company's 86% of its trade was opium.
00:24:04.000Unambiguously, this is not a new phenomenon.
00:24:07.000The difference probably is the degree to which the audacity of the direct suppression of civil and human rights was part and parcel of this exercise.
00:24:19.000And I've seen it, as I've said many times, as a marketing exercise to see exactly how far the complicit population will go before they start pushing back.
00:24:29.000Because I think that's really what it was.
00:24:30.000I think this was a market test more than it was a substantive act.
00:24:34.000And the fact is that the market test was to see how far humans are willing to allow themselves to be caged, curtailed, limited, delimited, everything else.
00:24:46.000And I think that what we really did was we had a market test on humanity and humanity came with a, let's just say, not a passing grade.
00:24:54.000Have you got any corroborating evidence to suggest that indicates or even proves that it was that?
00:25:04.000I mean, listen, you only have to go to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board Look at the decade of vaccines that they published in 2011.
00:25:12.000They actually said that they were going to do this.
00:25:14.000They said by 2020, we were going to have a universal acceptance, a universal vaccine mandate across the world on a universal platform.
00:25:23.000And then in September 18th of 2019, they specifically said that there would be an accidental or deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
00:25:31.000This comes right out of their document, Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, September 18th, 2019.
00:25:36.000And in that document, they said the purpose of it was so that by September 2020, the world would have a universal vaccine plan.
00:26:01.000And if you actually, God forbid, read the words on the page, you actually see that this was nothing but a market test, which is the reason why we have Answer Corporation, ATI, Forsmarsh, and the companies that were involved in the rollout of this pandemic, we have them all setting up the marketing program, which was the launch of Event 201 and other things, where they actually told us exactly what was going to happen.
00:26:24.000They told us what the media was going to sound like.
00:26:27.000They told us what the marketing was going to sound like.
00:26:29.000They told us all of these things in advance of this bullshit story of patient one in Wuhan.
00:26:36.000All of this was theater to get the public to accept the next round of the drug trade.
00:26:43.000And the next round of the drug trade is genetically modified humans.
00:26:48.000I wonder if I might ask you the somewhat taxing favour that by the time we are doing this now for our community and locals, so if you come and awaken one day, you can join us for these conversations and put your questions to our treasured guests like Dave.
00:27:02.000I wonder if by the time we stream this on Friday, if you could send us some links that we can post in the chat.
00:27:08.000For example, in particular, the various documents that you've referred to that permit you to make those accusations, just so that we can learn together from the brilliant work that you've done in compiling these narratives.
00:27:23.000So really what you're saying is that many of them, what seems to be the most outlandish
00:27:30.000statements that could be located online at the commencement of the pandemic are closer
00:27:36.000to the truth than what you would see on the BBC or NBC or the New York Times.
00:27:41.000The people that are saying this is a staged event, this is a pandemic, this is a mass
00:27:47.000marketed attempt to see if you can assert civilization control.
00:27:51.000Now how do you tally that with something like the discovery that in Ukraine, through DIA, They are now monitoring and observing Ukrainian transactions and have tied digital identity to the ability to shut down bank accounts, causing some Ukrainian civilians that refuse the conscript to have their assets frozen.
00:28:13.000Do you think that the control of finance, social credit scores, digital ID are part of this, you know, launch, as you very explicitly said, next phase of the drug phase, genetically engineered or altered humans?
00:28:25.000Do you think part of that is civilian management through technological dictatorship?
00:28:32.000Dustin Moskowitz, the name I love to mention that nobody seems to ever bother to keep reciting, and I encourage people to do it.
00:28:39.000But Dustin Moskowitz, the co-founder of Facebook and the guy behind paying for Event 201 and the guy behind paying for a number of other things, including his joint venture with the Wellcome Trust through Syncoven.
00:28:51.000And a number of funding sources this program is about once again making sure that there is an ability to access a control mechanism on human beings and by genetically modifying people with mrna by doing all sorts of those kinds of manipulations and then by encouraging things like central bank digital currencies.
00:29:13.000And all of the kinds of things we're supposed to track on our phones, the vaccine passport or the personal identity transactions, all of these things are meant to control and limit the ability for the free association and the free movement of thoughts and ideas and people.
00:29:32.000If you're going to actually control and manipulate a population, what you have to do is effectively create house arrest for the non-compliant.
00:29:41.000And it turns out that house arrest for the non-compliant is what I said in my interview in April of 2020.
00:29:49.000I said this entire program was the launch of the universal house arrest program.
00:29:57.000What I mean is that by creating, using, by the way, the only tool that can subvert constitutional rights, which is public health.
00:30:05.000Public health was written into the law.
00:30:07.000As the way of subverting constitutional rights and using public health as the means to do it, we have been placed under a virtual house arrest and the technologies that are enabling that are going to be increasingly rolled out, whether it's your 5G, 6G personal identity chips, whether it's the things that you wear, it's the personal devices that monitor your behavior, the personal devices that monitor your health status.
00:30:34.000These are all meant to effectively Be the anklet on your leg for the criminal that you are if you think you are entitled to liberty.
00:30:45.000We need to understand that the structure at its core, and this by the way goes back to something as simple as the criminal conspiracy that took over the United Kingdom Health Services in the 1920s and the 1930s, very specifically the Wellcome Trust.
00:31:01.000Because the Wellcome Trust, which was the modern expression of the opium trade of the British East India Company, in 1941 set up what was called the Therapeutic Research Corporation in the UK, and that formed the basis for what would ultimately become the modern criminal organizations, the World Health Organization, And all of the stuff that the UN, League of Nations, and everything else did, as well as informing what became the FDA in the United States.
00:31:29.000But go back and ask the question, where did all this come from?
00:31:33.000And the answer is it actually came from the opium trade.
00:31:37.000It's the modern expression of the British East India Company, which happened to be unified under the Wellcome Trust.
00:31:48.000All of that money, all of it, Came out of criminal drug trade.
00:31:53.000I'm not going to sit here and let you blame Her Majesty the Queen, God rest her eternal soul, and Great Britain, after all of our endeavours, our incredible flag, the great things we've done, William Wilberforce, Shakespeare, some very, very fine people, and you, unavowedly, a member of one of our colonies, criticising us in this manner.
00:32:22.000It's disgusting when you actually have something as simple as, I don't know, the charter that actually puts it all in motion.
00:32:29.000So you're saying that these, it's interesting because when you speak to people that have perhaps previously made an income in criminal ways, you know, organised crime, you have a version of that in North America, you have versions of
00:32:42.000that around the world, and in Britain the sort of 19, post-1960s style gangster culture has an
00:32:48.000incredible glamour to it, and in part what you always feel is this, aside from the, you know, violence
00:32:56.000and the criminality, that it's difficult to avoid the conclusion that really these are people that
00:33:02.000have bypassed systems that are supposed to repress and control them.
00:33:07.000In a way when you describe the enterprises that have grown out of by your reckoning and you say you have the receipts
00:33:13.000and we Totally want to see him and I completely love this stuff
00:33:17.000There are just criminal enterprises that are taking place on a much larger scale that kind of
00:33:22.000legislate in their wake to mask the criminal nature creating whatever
00:33:27.000institutions or global entity is required to frame badge and provide
00:33:33.000sigils and insignia that Legitimize well, we did this for the Queen of England. We
00:33:39.000did this for a listen. I mean, it's hilarious You go to 1941, the Therapeutic Research Corporation, which was the Therapeutic Substances Act in the UK, and you go back and say, well, hold on a second.
00:33:53.000You mean that the biggest drug company in the UK set up the regulator for the drugs in the UK?
00:34:24.000And so this is actually one step further.
00:34:27.000Remember, and I've said this many, many times, in the World Health Organization's founding charter, they wrote an absolute, absolute amnesty for all criminal acts conducted by themselves.
00:34:42.000Russell, I don't know how you would feel, but if by fiat you and I just come to an agreement right now, wave our royal scepter and say, from now on, everything that Russell and Dave do are exempt from any prosecution of any kind in perpetuity, thank you very much.
00:34:59.000A few people might raise their hand and go, I wonder if Russell and Dave are up to something?
00:35:06.000Because it turns out that if you give yourself amnesty from all forms of criminal prosecution, including murder, by the way, let's get clear, it cannot be By law, no member of the World Health Organization, in the execution of anything they said they were doing in their own capacity as a World Health Organization, not a single one of them can not only be tried and prosecuted, they can't even be investigated.
00:35:36.000Have you any... okay, of course... A statute!
00:35:38.000I take your premise that even the implementation of such a piece of regulation or legislation, global regulation, and it's extraordinary to see how often global regulation is being proposed these days.
00:35:53.000Of course we've discussed the WHO treaty, of course we've not touched on Australia attempting to implement a piece of censorship legislation that would by virtue Of their attempts, they say, to bypass the capacities of VPN, be international and global.
00:36:11.000So what you're saying, Dave, is that at the inception of the WHO, they granted themselves somehow amnesty.
00:36:18.000Now, I wonder if there are examples in the history of the WHO of where that amnesty has been implemented or effective or where its boundaries might likely be tested.
00:36:27.000Do you think in the pandemic period, Let's keep it really current.
00:36:30.000At what points are there likely to have been actions generated by people protected by that
00:36:39.000statuette that were they not offered those protections, they would have been prosecuted
00:36:47.000Remember that in 2018, during the Ebola clinical trials run by the World Health Organization
00:36:53.000in Africa, it was very clear that Remdesivir, the drug that was promoted by Dr. Deborah
00:37:00.000Birx and Dr. Anthony Fauci as a drug for the treatment of COVID, remember,
00:37:06.000That in 2018, the World Health Organization, in its infinite wisdom and high morality, decided that remdesivir was actually too lethal to inject into Africans.
00:37:16.000And that is because the fatality rate of people exposed to remdesivir in the Ebola trials was 53%.
00:37:23.000And the bad news about that number is that Ebola doesn't kill 53%.
00:37:58.000When you're telling me that the World Health Organization's morality meter got pegged And they said in 2018 remdesivir was too deadly to use on Africans.
00:38:09.000That's a whole new level of that feels like a line that probably shouldn't be crossed which is the reason why every physician who injected a patient with remdesivir anywhere in the world was at least committing negligent homicide if not willful murder.
00:38:27.000And because it was a standard of care during an emergency You could kill people.
00:38:37.000And by the way, that's not, once again, it's not an allegation I'm making, it's an accusation I'm making, because the facts were all available.
00:38:45.000Every physician could have read the exact same documents I read.
00:38:48.000Everyone could have read the World Health Organization's interim report, which said that regardless of viral load, people that got remdesivir were killed.
00:38:57.000That means, Russell, the World Health Organization murdered people without Ebola In the clinical trial, murdered them.
00:39:08.000Do you see that particular set of staggering crimes that is difficult to comprehend because of their scale?
00:39:19.000As forms of genocide and mass corruption often are, as somehow pertaining to the type of themes you refer to in much of your discourse elsewhere.
00:39:32.000Do you see that as being an outlier event, an anomaly, an aberration?
00:39:37.000Or do you see that as being part of a broader scheme that the WHO is participating in?
00:39:45.000There's no question that like any other theater of social engineering, the more egregious the crime to steal a page from Plato.
00:39:57.000Remember, he talks about the fact that, you know, if a simple thief steals a loaf of bread, we call him a thief.
00:40:04.000If an organized group of young people steal a bunch of loaves of bread, we call it Oliver Twist.
00:40:12.000But there's a certain level at which a crime becomes so egregious that the sum of our emotional and spiritual awakening to the egregious nature of the crime is seared in its consciousness and we actually start marveling at its audacity.
00:40:29.000We go from seeing a crime to pondering how somebody could have pulled it off.
00:40:36.000Right, think of a serial killer, right?
00:40:39.000One person kills one person, it's a murder.
00:40:41.000One person kills ten people, we go, well that was effort.
00:40:44.000One person kills a hundred people and we start going, let's do a discovery series on the mind of a serial killer.
00:40:51.000But when one person kills a million people, we don't have a million moments of consternation.
00:41:00.000We actually As Plato observed, we flip the crime on its head and we start marveling at its audacity.
00:41:10.000And this is exactly the intent of what happened with COVID, because by marveling at the audacity of the fullness of the complicity of the horrific crimes that were done, We actually don't have a conscience to say every single person in a nursing home who was able to have a glass wall put between them so that they couldn't die in the arms of a loved one, every single person that was put into an ambulance and put on a respirator, which we knew was going to kill them,
00:41:45.000Every single person who was put into a hospital and injected with remdesivir, every single one of them was a willful act of something that started in 1913 with the Carnegie Foundation, which was the eugenics program that is still absolutely alive and well at Cold Spring Harbor Labs.
00:42:04.000And by the way, go back and look at it.
00:42:06.000It was in the 1920s and the 1930s that Hitler was inspired by the work of the United States Eugenics Office.
00:42:15.000So let's not sit here and pretend that this is some sort of shock.
00:42:19.000Our willingness in the name of what we call public health and in the name of what we call science, our willingness to murder people, and I don't mean, oh it was an accident kind of thing.
00:42:31.000I mean stuff like in 1920 when we went to orphanages and we poisoned children with radioactive oatmeal so that we could watch how they die.
00:43:09.000In the 1960s, in the United States and in the UK, we had debates on whether it was ethical to use the incarcerated population for lethal drug studies because they were doing their time for society anyhow, so let's go ahead and kill them.
00:43:30.000I was also fortunate to talk to Jim Jordan, Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, who is an extraordinary contributor to this debate because he approaches it plainly, clerically, patiently and openly and even he's disgusted with the level of construction and corruption that's been exposed in these arguments.
00:43:52.000I wonder when you went from thinking that what we knew about the pandemic did not warrant inquiry, that we should continue to follow the science, accept the narrative, accept the findings of the various regulatory bodies, whom are sort of epitomized really in the figure of Anthony Fauci, and perhaps the whole idea of government bureaucracy And bureaucratic power has come to be epitomized in the figure of Anthony Fauci.
00:44:19.000At what point did you think, oh, this is not an honest actor upon whose expertise we can rely, but potentially the kind of face of the very kind of corruption the Republicans are notably interested in reducing?
00:44:31.000I don't know if there's one exact point, but I would think it was probably when they were downplaying Natural immunity.
00:44:41.000Like suddenly we've got the first virus in history where there's no natural immunity.
00:46:01.000When you describe it like that, Jim, it sounds almost like a coup took place, because how would power migrate away from the autonomy and sovereignty of individuals to these institutions that are unelected and yet publicly funded, having the power to make those type of decisions?
00:46:15.000Is it because... I'll just answer my own question, but I'll do it quickly.
00:46:19.000It's your podcast, you're allowed to do that.
00:46:22.000Well Jim, was it the exploitation of a crisis to legitimise authority that would have otherwise been immediately rejected by a discerning population?
00:47:16.000Publicity, the prestige of it, the power of it, and I do think there were people in elected positions who tried to exploit it for political gain, particularly when it came to the election.
00:47:29.000I think all that was a problem, but you're making the fundamental argument for why it's better to have smaller government, because smaller government typically means greater freedom for we, the people.
00:47:39.000Jim, I believe in non-interventionism, and I believe in independence, and I believe in freedom.
00:47:43.000Well, what I also believe is that the regulatory bodies that we do have ought to be functionally fit for purpose and the kind of hypocrisy and exploitation that is afforded when the FDA is primarily, not primarily, but significantly funded by the organizations and corporations that it is supposed to be regulated.
00:48:02.000In a sense, isn't that Not just an over-preening and over-funded bureaucracy, but a far deeper problem.
00:48:10.000Corporatization and commerce embedded into state institutions, Jim.
00:48:16.000And what's the... political scientists have an agency capture?
00:48:23.000Where it's, you know, the very entities that agencies are supposed to regulate and oversee become captured by those entities.
00:48:33.000And you get this, what some people call it, this Stockholm Syndrome, where it's like, well, we're all working together here, but that may not be in the best interest of the consumer, the best interest of the citizen.
00:48:45.000So that is, I think, a valid concern, and something I think many of us Many of us kind of suspected.
00:48:58.000I'm not from your country and I'm not from Capitol Hill, as you can plainly observe.
00:49:03.000But the layman's perspective... You dress just like a congressman.
00:49:08.000The layman's perspective on political corruption is that the overlap between commerce and corporatism and state has become so immersive and embedded that it's ultimately operating as one corrupt sort of tumor, almost.
00:49:23.000Because it was big government, big media, big tech working together to censor people who spoke out against what was going on in the government.
00:49:35.000And it's like, that is a scary alliance.
00:49:38.000And we saw that largely with people speaking out against COVID.
00:49:41.000You said anything against the orthodoxy of the administration, you were censored.
00:49:48.000And the example I always point to is the third day of the Biden administration, Third day, January 23rd, 2021.
00:49:54.000There's an email from the executive office of the presidency of the White House to Twitter.
00:49:58.000And it says, take down this tweet ASAP.
00:50:20.000Take down a true statement, a true tweet, government pressuring big tech to do so, and the person they're trying to do this to is their opponent.
00:50:29.000RFK was getting ready to run for president.
00:50:31.000That is not supposed to happen in the United States of America, but it did, and that's the scary part.
00:50:37.000And we saw, whether it was COVID or whether it's related to the election or other issues, that big government, big media, big tech, and I always say there's a formula.
00:51:12.000And it's something we got to stay on top of.
00:51:16.000Ron Johnson, Senator of Wisconsin, was one of the first people to publicly raise questions from within the Senate when it came to how the pandemic was being managed.
00:51:26.000It was very interesting to catch up with him at the RNC.
00:51:29.000He said a few things that really surprised me.
00:51:34.000One of the reasons, Ron, that I was very excited and keen to speak to you is because you took a very particular and deliberate and almost extraordinarily outspoken stance during the pandemic period.
00:51:44.000I believe that you even went so far as to suggest that the pandemic was augured, perhaps deliberately, in order to legitimise authoritarianism.
00:51:54.000Would you explain that, if that is indeed your position, sir?
00:52:13.000I'm the guy who said that, you know, we tragically lose tens of thousands of people on American highways every year, but we don't shut them down.
00:52:21.000And Anthony Fauci from the podium in the White House said, oh, that was way out there.
00:52:45.000Then I held a hearing in early May with John Ioannidis, who did the analysis on the Princess Cruz, showing that, yeah, COVID can be deadly, but primarily if you're Elderly, or if you're certain comorbidities.
00:52:56.000For the rest of us, we'll probably survive.
00:52:58.000So that provided me a fair amount of comfort, also being a person of faith.
00:53:16.000We saw about a four trillion dollar transfer of wealth from The little people, from the working men and women of this country to the massive corporations, to the big tech social media giants.
00:53:31.000When they sabotage early treatment, and they did, they sabotage early treatment, whether it's hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, bunesonide, there were a host of molecules that existed, corticosteroids.
00:53:42.000Pierre Corrie, in my Mayme hearing, we had him come in.
00:54:01.000People lost their lives because they administered remdesivir where there was no evidence whatsoever.
00:54:07.000There was evidence that would knock out kidneys.
00:54:09.000It was withdrawn from an Ebola trial because it was more harmful.
00:54:12.000So, again, I knew this because I was already connected to a large group.
00:54:17.000I wish it was larger, but a group of eminently qualified doctors and medical researchers that had a completely different view On COVID, and in particular, I got connected with Michael Yeadon, Senior Vice President of Pfizer in the UK, toxicologist, who was beside himself when he heard what his former colleagues were going to do.
00:54:39.000He said, Ron, there's a long list of ingredients we do not put in injectables because they are toxic to the body.
00:54:45.000When I heard my colleagues, who educated with me, know what I know, they were going to produce an injectable shot It was going to turn the body into its own manufacturer of toxins.
00:55:22.000And yet they were so hell-bent on this vaccine, this universal vaccine program, which by evidence, with Rick Bright and Anthony Fauci in late October, I think, of 2019, they were bemoaning the fact that we don't have a universal vaccine program.
00:55:55.000In fact, nothing has been rolled out that effortlessly since the vaccine itself.
00:55:59.000Then, your ability to relay that narrative so plainly and eloquently reminds me that there are many incredible facets, not least as you touched upon near the beginning of your rather lovely soliloquy, the wealth transfer from ordinary middle-class people to extraordinarily powerful business interests.
00:56:19.000Now, I began by incorrectly implying or stating, in fact, that you had Suggested that the entire exercise had been malignly conducted and whether or not it was an engineered event is difficult to corroborate, but what does seem significant is that it granted powerful institutions the legitimacy to further centralize authority at a point where the inertia seems to be towards decentralization and maximal
00:56:50.000individual sovereignty, maximum community electoral representation.
00:56:56.000It seems like it functioned in a way of, forgive me Ron, I won't be, I won't be long.
00:57:03.000No, I'm gonna be, I reckon I'll do, it'll be a 10% as long as, as it should be, because I'm here to inquire of you and your wisdom.
00:57:10.000I would like to say that when you look at the various institutions and interests that benefited, is it not possible to calculate how this event may have come about?
00:57:20.000I think what we know almost for sure now, and I believe this very early on as soon as Tom Cotton talked about the Wuhan lab, and I was talking to computational biologists and other experts, this thing did not spring from nature.
00:57:45.000Fauci financed EcoHealth Alliance to tune about $14 million.
00:57:50.000The Defense Department financed EcoHealth Alliance to the tune of about $42 million, and USAID, who Bobby Kennedy says is a CIA cutout, $53 million.
00:58:01.000So Fauci's role in this was almost minor compared to our Defense Department and potentially CIA.
00:58:07.000So again, this was obviously man-made.
00:58:11.000Exactly how it was released, I don't know.
00:58:35.000So, that's why Fauci, very early on, end of January, early February, went overboard to cover his tracks and make sure that any talk of a man-made chimeric virus was...
00:58:59.000Let me know in the chat, you beautiful lunatics, you.
00:59:02.000And what was fascinating, or at least interesting to me, was that the idea that there are all these hearings that are conducted, but It seems to me unlikely that the reckoning that's required for an event of this magnitude and corruption of this degree is unlikely to be conducted.
00:59:19.000And do you think that it calcifies the idea in the minds of many Americans and people around the world that corrupt elites are able to produce and conduct their hypocrisy without justice?
00:59:32.000In short, Senator, Is the level of justice that is required ever likely to be enacted upon those who, if they did not perpetrate this event, and I'm certainly not suggesting they did, benefited from it, mishandled it, exploited it, covered it up, and in so doing created almost the perfect lens for us to understand the degree to which many of these regulatory agencies and institutions are corrupt and not fit for purpose?
00:59:59.000It is my personal intent to make sure that happens.
01:00:03.000All I can do right now is write oversight letters.
01:00:05.000I've written over 60 about hot lots, about their standard operating procedure in terms of analysis of their veyor system.
01:00:12.000So I've laid the foundation for my investigation should we gain the majority and I become chairman of the permanent subcommittee on investigations.
01:00:20.000I have stronger power than I had as chairman of the full committee.
01:00:24.000Part of the problem, I don't want to throw people under the bus, but problem with the house subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic, Got a lot of doctors from the mainstream medical community.
01:00:34.000I mean, they're all singing the praises of the vaccine still, that has saved millions of lives.
01:00:38.000There's no study, there's really no science, true science, that shows the vaccine saved lives.
01:00:43.000Now, I think maybe early on, when it was targeted toward the variant that was out there, it might have been somewhat effective, but these people are coming up with, they'll save 14 million lives, so let's give these people a Nobel Prize.
01:00:56.000There's no hard science to back that up.
01:00:59.000From my standpoint, to cover their tracks, I think there's some pretty good indications that because they sabotaged early treatment, hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people died.
01:01:07.000Because they used remdesivir, people died in hospitals.
01:01:11.000And it's indisputable that the vaccine causes death, permanent disability.
01:01:18.000I mean, on the VAERS system today, we're over 37,000 deaths worldwide.
01:01:23.00024% of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within two days.
01:01:26.000Now, I know VAERS doesn't prove causations.
01:01:29.000That's a correlation our regulators should have been aware of and concerned about in February, March of 2020.
01:01:36.000And by the way, when I brought that up to Francis Collins in April of 2021, okay, Three or four months after the vaccine was granted emergency use authorization, I think at that point it was like 40 some percent of people were dying the day of vaccination or within one or two days.
01:01:53.000Again, we were administering to elderly people that couldn't handle the assault on their body.
01:01:58.000Francis Collins said, Senator Johnson, we have identified six people have died because of the J&J, because of clotting.
01:02:07.000That's how cavalier he was and how unserious they were.
01:02:10.000And now, by the way, last week in testimony before our committee on the origin and the dangerous gain-of-function research, I had the opportunity to question Dr. Redfield, and he admitted that they purposely downplayed and ignored the vaccine injuries because they didn't want to create vaccine hesitancy.
01:02:29.000Well, you can't tell the public the truth.
01:02:31.000You can't let them have true, conformed incent.
01:02:35.000And he said that there are a lot more injuries than what they're being reported right now.
01:02:39.000So it's staggeringly corrupt, particularly hot off the heels of the opioid crisis, that one wonders if many of the large pharmaceutical companies should not just be regulated more efficiently, but actually demonopolized and broken down and bought into new systems of ownership that would perhaps steward these powerful organizations with a little more responsibility.
01:03:02.000There's a report out today about Merck corruptly covering up the inefficacy of its mumps vaccine.
01:03:10.000The mumps are, instead of actually fixing it, they spent all kinds of time and research
01:03:17.000trying to justify the fact, no, this really is more efficacious than we thought it was.
01:03:22.000So no, listen, our pharmaceutical companies have completely captured our federal health agencies.
01:03:39.000They're the one that sabotaged early treatment. They're the one that wanted and pushed the vaccine,
01:03:43.000led by people like Bill Gates, who for some reason wants to vaccinate the world and every living thing on it.
01:03:50.000He's very keen, isn't he, Bill Gates, to vaccinate people.
01:03:52.000I think he should take more of these vaccines himself, to see if he can withstand them, and pipe down a little bit.
01:04:00.000One of the things that perhaps we don't focus on enough is that the whole undergirding of the endeavor was that human life is sacred and if any of us individually or collectively can do things to protect one another, we will do it.
01:04:12.000Whether that's take a particular medication or lock ourselves in our home or yield to authority in ways that would usually be inconceivable.
01:04:20.000Are you heartened to any degree to learn that people still regard life with such a sanctity or do you think that was simply something that was exploited to further legitimize authority?
01:04:32.000And on this idea of the sanctity of human life which underwrites the measures to protect human life and indeed much of the compassion underwritten authoritarianism of the neoliberal democratic movement, do you feel that what you and I talked about in the bathroom. I keep
01:04:49.000mentioning situations that we talked in that sound really illegitimate. We were chatting in the
01:04:53.000hotel, we were chatting in the bathroom, but in the bathroom you talked about some of them projects
01:04:57.000you do to help people with addiction issues. I'm in recovery from addiction. Do you think that
01:05:01.000this kind of genuine compassion, this idea of serving in the manner of our Lord and Savior
01:05:06.000Jesus Christ, ought to be at the forefront of systems of government and authority in a way
01:05:09.000that seems impossible when you're discussing this level of corruption? First, I believe most
01:05:15.000people are good. Okay, America is a great country because Americans are good people.
01:05:19.000The UK has been a great country because...
01:05:23.000Britain's, you know, Anglo-Saxons are by and large good people.
01:05:27.000Now, we've been led by some very bad people, by corrupt people, by stupid people.
01:06:56.000By the way, Marjorie is definitely one of the few people in the house Who has advocated for the vaccine injured, held unauthorized hearings.
01:07:06.000Probably not to the, you know, the joy of the chairman of the committee, but she's shown some real courage as well.
01:07:13.000We were talking about like the VARS events, the number of excess deaths.
01:07:16.000We're talking about a good many things.
01:07:17.000What type of reckoning is required and how likely is it that when it comes to criminal proceedings and genuine consequences, For people like Fauci, that that will be pursued.
01:07:27.000And how far are you willing to pursue it?
01:07:29.000Because Ron's actually prepared to pursue it quite aggressively, it seems.
01:07:32.000Well, we've worked together, the Senator and I, because, well, you know, I'm one of those un-vaxxed people.
01:07:37.000I just didn't buy into the whole lie that was, I felt, sold to us from the medical-industrial complex.
01:07:45.000But really to break that system, we have to look deeper into why so many members of Congress
01:07:51.000and elected officials are basically beholden to the different big pharma companies.
01:07:58.000And that's because they're funded by them.
01:08:00.000And that shouldn't hold elected officials in place.
01:08:05.000But when you have many people receiving their donations that fill their campaign coffers from big companies
01:08:14.000like Pfizer and Moderna and so forth, then it muzzles them in ways it shouldn't, right?
01:08:20.000And luckily, um, gosh, approximately over 95% of my donations are small dollar donations.
01:08:28.000So the only people I work for are the people that voted for me in my district and the American people.
01:08:33.000And so that's very freeing for someone like me.
01:08:36.000I don't have to worry about having money in my campaign to get reelected because I've had to depend on the lobbyists in Washington or the big industries that rely on government contracts or rely on government officials and unelected bureaucrats making decisions in order to empower them.
01:08:56.000And I think that's extremely important, and that's a good conversation.
01:08:59.000Let me quick add, because there's no doubt about there's a financial component of this, but I think even more at play here is the fact that whether it's doctors, whether it's members of Congress who have always pushed, for example, childhood vaccines, and they did videos on the, you know, get vax.
01:09:14.000Listen, I support Operation Warp Speed.
01:09:22.000So the fact that people have recommended this or pushed it or mandated it, they don't want to admit that what they recommended, pushed or mandated could have killed somebody, might have permanently disabled them.
01:09:34.000So they will never admit they're wrong.
01:09:38.000And from my standpoint, and now the American public, quite honestly, anybody who got vaccinated, They don't want to face the reality that maybe they've got a ticking time bomb.