Stay Free - Russel Brand - EXPOSED: It Goes DEEPER Than We Imagined! | DISTURBING New Vaccine Info - SF 424

00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and run through the area and see what happens.

00:02:17.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.

00:02:30.000 Hello there you Awakening Wanderers, thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.

00:02:35.000 One of the most extraordinary phenomena of the entire pandemic period was watching how conspiracy theories became conspiracy facts, how respected elected political officials ultimately Came to reveal and openly discuss, often with evidence and receipts, information that was being discussed online years before.

00:02:57.000 Why do you keep harping on about it?

00:02:58.000 Well, I keep harping on about it because it shows you exactly how institutional power, whether it's government or corporate, intercedes with the truth.

00:03:08.000 Today we're specifically talking about Big Pharma, Vaccines and lockdowns.

00:03:13.000 But what's unique about it is we're talking to a range of guests.

00:03:17.000 Rand Paul, the Senator.

00:03:18.000 Dave Martin, who's always been ahead of the curve on Big Pharma, its corruption, and even more esoteric and occultist components of that.

00:03:26.000 And Congressman Jim Jordan, who of course is over many of the house congressional hearings, as well as Senator Ron Johnson who's always been outspoken on this subject.

00:03:36.000 So between them you've got a good number of outsiders and insiders, radical political figures and outspoken commentators, As well as institutional political figures who are there by popular mandate, who nevertheless are now willing to speak out about the events of the last few years.

00:03:55.000 All in all, you're left asking this question.

00:03:58.000 They knew, and it's worse than we could ever have imagined, how did this happen?

00:04:03.000 Let's get into it.

00:04:06.000 Senator Rand Paul, thank you so much for joining me today on Stay Free with Russell Brand.

00:04:11.000 Glad to be with you.

00:04:12.000 I hear it's a really big program to be on.

00:04:14.000 So, you know, everybody wants to get on your show.

00:04:16.000 It is a significant cultural artifact.

00:04:19.000 We regularly have outspoken members of a worldwide resistance movement of which you have become a significant voice.

00:04:28.000 And now with your Book Deception.

00:04:30.000 In over 500 pages you have articulated what many people have felt, in fact due in no small part to your own investigations since the outset of the pandemic, that we have been subject to an unprecedented global deceit and that Anthony Fauci plays a central and key role in orchestrating this deceit.

00:04:49.000 What primarily is it that you want us to understand from this book about Anthony Fauci's role in the pandemic and its cover-up?

00:04:57.000 You know, I think we've never had a cover-up where the proof of the cover-up and the proof of the deceit, the proof of the lying, is so obvious in the words of the people committing the cover-up.

00:05:09.000 So we had Anthony Fauci and all these virologists publicly saying, you're crazy if you think this came from the lab.

00:05:15.000 It absolutely came from animals.

00:05:17.000 But you have them in private explicitly saying the opposite.

00:05:21.000 Not just hedging their bet, but absolutely saying, Wow, this is no conspiracy theory.

00:05:26.000 This looks like the most likely thing.

00:05:29.000 Some of these scientists were saying, ah, I'm 60-40, it came from the lab, or I'm 80-20, or I'm 50-50.

00:05:35.000 But in public they were saying, absolutely no way it came from the lab.

00:05:39.000 So it was a dishonesty on a level that we've never ever been able to prove by actually seeing in their own words how diabolically dishonest they were.

00:05:49.000 Yes, indeed.

00:05:50.000 In fact, not only were they giving us deception through omission, but also deception through commission, and deception through direct contradiction, and the management of information demonstrated a level of duplicity that we've seldom seen in public life.

00:06:06.000 I'm speaking in particular of Antony Fauci's intervention at various agencies, including the CIA, the management in particular of what was known as the lab leak theory, but increasingly seems like an undeniable Truth.

00:06:18.000 I wonder, for a moment, if we may take this broader, Senator, what do you think it does to the soul of a nation, to the spirit and morale of a nation, when a deception of this scale is practiced, when we almost see in real time ideas that were dismissed as conspiracy theories, i.e.

00:06:33.000 that gain-of-function research was dangerous, that dual-purpose research was taking place, That potentially America was involved in the funding of the research in Wuhan through groups like EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA and perhaps the figure of Peter Daszak is an interesting one to comment on here.

00:06:51.000 What do you think it does to America's spirit at a time where your country appears to be undergoing a great reckoning?

00:06:58.000 What does an event like this do to the country's soul?

00:07:02.000 What we saw for about three years as these public health officials came before committees was that they kept blaming the right wing and saying, you're responsible for vaccine hesitancy.

00:07:12.000 You're responsible for people distrusting their government.

00:07:15.000 And I pointed right back at them and said, absolutely not.

00:07:18.000 You're responsible because you've lied to the public.

00:07:21.000 You've lost your credibility.

00:07:22.000 And I don't think they ever truly grasped that.

00:07:25.000 But in the end, it's amazing to me how smart people actually are. 1.00

00:07:30.000 Because the elitist point of view is that the common man is too stupid to take care of himself, too stupid to make his health care decisions. 1.00

00:07:37.000 But interestingly with this, if you ask a poll of how many moms are vaccinating their six months old in the United States, it's like a handful. 1.00

00:07:46.000 You know, they're from the Act Blue Coalition or something, but they're not normal people. 0.83

00:07:52.000 But very few people are vaccinating their kids because they see no reason, it's not a deadly disease for kids, and they have read about that there's a possibility that my kid could have a side effect from the vaccine, but there's not much possibility that my kid could get very sick from the disease.

00:08:06.000 So I think the people have gotten smarter on this, but vaccine distrust and distrust of government has grown exponentially because of their dishonesty.

00:08:16.000 Indeed, we are seeing now on what we commonly refer to as mainstream or legacy media, it seems to me at least, an attempt to mitigate the unavoidable deluge of truth that they are now being confronted with.

00:08:29.000 I know that now Pfizer and the CDC have participated in the funding of a broad study that at least begins to acknowledge pericarditis, myocarditis, as well as other conditions and just how many yellow card and adverse injuries there have been as a result of this extraordinary product.

00:08:45.000 The politicization of this issue was, it seems, used to undergird a new orthodoxy that apparently

00:08:52.000 always had as its aim the kind of authoritarianism that doesn't think twice about censoring and

00:08:59.000 controlling information that is not advantageous to its previously concealed agenda.

00:09:05.000 Within the figure of Anthony Fauci, who lived through a kind of live hagiography during

00:09:11.000 this extraordinary period, we were able to see another curious aspect of American public

00:09:17.000 life, the unelected bureaucrat consuming and demonstrating power at a level that is difficult

00:09:24.000 to find a comparison for.

00:09:26.000 He was given an extraordinary ride in the media, Anthony Fauci.

00:09:29.000 I feel like I saw live song and dance numbers take place.

00:09:33.000 People even, in fact, sexualizing Anthony Fauci at points, taking him to... Please, please, stop.

00:09:39.000 We've got to stop there.

00:09:41.000 Stop! 1.00

00:09:42.000 I have the footage!

00:09:43.000 I have the footage!

00:09:46.000 I wonder what you feel is the role of the what has come to be termed the legacy media in creating this somewhat unaccountable hero Annie Fauci who's now just admitted that the figure of a six-foot separation we just pulled out of the air that masks weren't effective while previously having made the ludicrous claim that he, you know, I am science.

00:10:07.000 How did the media contribute to the creation of this figure?

00:10:11.000 So, just for fun, we will occasionally write op-eds that we submit to either the New York Times or the Washington Post, because they always reject them.

00:10:20.000 Every time they reject them.

00:10:22.000 We can't get anything published.

00:10:23.000 So we sent over to them a comparison between J. Edgar Hoover and Anthony Fauci.

00:10:29.000 Because there are similarities.

00:10:31.000 They both were in power about the same period of time, 40 some odd years.

00:10:35.000 They both accumulated power over that time and the power went to their head and they had their own personal fiefdoms.

00:10:41.000 This can happen whether you're FBI director or head of infectious disease.

00:10:45.000 Now you would have never thought the head of infectious disease would become so powerful.

00:10:49.000 But, you know, Bobby Kennedy's been pretty good at writing about this.

00:10:53.000 He writes, and I think has drawn more attention to this than many people, is that a lot of this happened after 9-11.

00:10:59.000 So after 9-11, there was a great deal of fear.

00:11:02.000 We passed the Patriot Act, taking away civil liberties in our country, but we also ramp up our arms trade.

00:11:08.000 And in our arms, armamentarian is bioweapons. 0.92

00:11:13.000 And we say, well, gosh, the enemy is making this and the enemy is trying to take Ebola and spread it through the air.

00:11:19.000 Well, we should do so we can learn how to counteract it.

00:11:22.000 And so everything is, you know, an escalation, the same as there's a nuclear arms race.

00:11:26.000 There's also a biological arms race that goes on.

00:11:29.000 But what happened is Anthony Fauci was head of like one twenty seventh of all of NIH.

00:11:35.000 His fiefdom grew in dollars to come to dominate all of NIH, and it's one of the reasons why in the end nobody knew Francis Collins' name and still don't, but they all knew Anthony Fauci's name.

00:11:47.000 One, he was a TV hog.

00:11:48.000 He loved the camera.

00:11:49.000 But two, his budget dwarfed all the other budgets.

00:11:52.000 And he also became somebody who routinely was visiting with the spooks.

00:11:57.000 And this is one of the things that I learned in the book is almost all these people granting scientific grants, you would think they're these just ivory-towered scientists who are like trying to cure disease for mankind.

00:12:09.000 They're meeting with the CIA and the MI5 and the MI6.

00:12:14.000 In England, Welcome Trust that was headed by Jeremy Farrar, who's a big player in all of this.

00:12:21.000 He's talking to his boss at Welcome Trust.

00:12:23.000 And oh, by the way, she's the former head of MI5.

00:12:27.000 So it's like all these people who are involved with science are also involved with intelligence, which really tells you there's a lot more going on here than they're letting us see.

00:12:36.000 Yes, but it was Bobby Kennedy's analysis that first helped me to understand that there'd been a historic teleology from declared international wars which were identifiable, like the Second World War, to the subsequent Cold War, to the War on Terror, To the war on germs and the war on ideas, all used to, I suppose, through a kind of diffuse subterfuge, legitimize more and more authoritarian measures, even though the enemy is becoming harder and harder to quantify.

00:13:11.000 Bobby Kennedy also, just on a side note, says that you should succeed Mitch McConnell.

00:13:16.000 He posted about that today.

00:13:18.000 Is that something that you would consider?

00:13:21.000 Uh, well, all I need is 25 votes.

00:13:23.000 If someone can find me 25 reasonable Republicans.

00:13:26.000 No, it's difficult.

00:13:27.000 It's a, it's a club.

00:13:28.000 You know, it's a very small club.

00:13:31.000 And if we have about 50, you got to have about 25.

00:13:35.000 The reason McConnell has been able to stay in power is that he goes to the corporate heads, the CEO heads of all the big business.

00:13:43.000 He gathers money, more money than you can put in a bag.

00:13:45.000 It's like $300 million he gathers.

00:13:49.000 A million, a couple billion at a time.

00:13:51.000 And then this money goes to support candidates that vote for him within the caucus.

00:13:56.000 And many of them are unable to raise money very well for themselves, they're not very well known in their communities, and they're deathly afraid of the voters.

00:14:04.000 This is something people don't quite understand or isn't reported as much as it should be.

00:14:09.000 Most of these incumbent senators are deathly afraid of their voters, including their own party.

00:14:14.000 They go home to their own conventions and they're booed at their conventions.

00:14:18.000 So the hardcore people who work in the political world, in the conventions of their state, they know these people aren't representing them.

00:14:27.000 So I routinely will put forward things that I know that no good person in this state supports, and then we'll try to let people know how their senator voted because they have no idea.

00:14:37.000 This disjunct between the electorate and the institutions that nominally serve them has become increasingly exposed.

00:14:45.000 One of the clear themes of the pandemic period was deep state intervention when it came to matters of media and the control of information.

00:14:53.000 It was Mike Benz that recently coined the term, which I think is interesting when people say democracy now, as in we must go to war in order to defend democracy.

00:15:02.000 They mean a set of institutions that are owned by elite interests as opposed to the process of elections via which the will of the people might have been expressed.

00:15:11.000 Do you feel that fissures have opened up during the pandemic period that are going to be very difficult to close?

00:15:17.000 You've already mentioned That trust in science and trust in vaccines has fallen radically, and it seems to me that there's an attempt to try to address and redress that, or create systems of authority that don't require public complicity.

00:15:29.000 Do you feel that there is a great mistrust in American public officials, in some part brought about by Anthony Fauci?

00:15:37.000 And I like your comparison to Hoover because, you know, Anthony Fauci liked dressing up in that mask that apparently did very little, and we know that Hoover had some interesting clandestine habits in that area also.

00:15:49.000 Yeah, I think that the thing I worry most about coming out of this is the idea that there's different standards of justice.

00:15:58.000 You know, one of the things that almost tore America apart back in the 50s and 60s was the idea that if your skin were black, you wouldn't be treated with equal protection under the law, that you were going to be treated differently according to your skin color.

00:16:11.000 We have gotten past that to a great degree over many decades, but now my fear is that people are being treated differently based on the shade of their ideology, whether what your beliefs are on vaccine or who you follow politically or whose podcast you listen to.

00:16:27.000 Because Anthony Fauci is clearly guilty of lying to Congress about the gain of function, about funding gain of function research.

00:16:35.000 He's guilty of lying in his own words, because we now have slack emails from February 1st, 2020, when he says explicitly they're doing gain-of-function research.

00:16:44.000 He lists the research, which is the research he had funded, and he says he knew they were doing it from the very beginning.

00:16:51.000 From the first email, this is the amazing thing of this cover-up.

00:16:55.000 The first email we have a record of is January 27th, 2020.

00:16:59.000 Fauci gets an email from his assistant, he says, wanted you to see this paper, this Gain of Function paper in Wuhan that we funded.

00:17:08.000 That's the first email, January 27th, and then the rest of the time is Fauci publicly saying, nothing to see here, we never funded Gain of Function.

00:17:17.000 But he never is prosecuted and won't be prosecuted.

00:17:20.000 But people from the previous administration who either were accused of lying or may have lied to Congress are still being prosecuted.

00:17:28.000 We'll be on YouTube for just a couple more seconds then you're gonna have to click the link in the description to join us exclusively on Rumble because this issue has taught us a great deal about censorship and the control of information.

00:17:38.000 Click the link, join us over there.

00:17:42.000 People who came to the Capitol on January 6th but never entered, that were milling around looking like this and didn't do anything, are still being pursued for jail.

00:17:52.000 But if you came here to protest Kavanaugh's, you know, about a hundred women lay on the floor and wouldn't leave. 0.99

00:17:58.000 They were trespassing in the Senate buildings and they were moved, but they were taken.

00:18:03.000 I don't know if any of them ever got a ticket, but none of them went to jail.

00:18:06.000 If they were booked, they were let go.

00:18:08.000 That's what typically happened to protesters in our country if you didn't hurt somebody.

00:18:12.000 But that's not what's happening with January 6th.

00:18:15.000 So people are worried that there's two standards of justice now, and that will lead to further problems.

00:18:20.000 It may lead to strife in our country.

00:18:23.000 We can't make this content without our partners.

00:18:25.000 Here's a quick message from them now.

00:18:26.000 Stay with us.

00:18:28.000 And now a word from our partners, Coca-Cola.

00:18:31.000 No, Pepsi.

00:18:32.000 No, it's not both.

00:18:33.000 Look, it's actually Airstek, the world's only scientifically proven electromagnetic field protection chip trusted by experts.

00:18:41.000 Airstek is now, can you believe this, an official partner of the Ultimate Fighting Championship, the UFC, giving support for world-class athletes who want to safeguard themselves from excessive electromagnetic radiation.

00:18:52.000 We're all going to want that protection soon.

00:18:53.000 Elite athletes within the UFC are unique In their need to optimize their performance in 25 minute bursts.

00:19:00.000 Airstek understand the importance of optimal recovery and peak performance.

00:19:04.000 Trusted and used by pro athletes all around the world to elevate their game.

00:19:08.000 EMF modulation technology solutions help them train harder, recover faster and perform at their best.

00:19:14.000 And wouldn't we all benefit from that?

00:19:15.000 I know that I would.

00:19:16.000 I keep this one device here.

00:19:18.000 It's protecting me from that.

00:19:19.000 It's protecting me from a whole lot of things.

00:19:21.000 Get out Russian hackers! 1.00

00:19:23.000 Go to airstech.com forward slash pages forward slash russell dash brand there's a link and use the code RUSSELL30 for 30% off.

00:19:32.000 So click the link under this and use the code RUSSELL30 two s's two l's for 30% off this device.

00:19:38.000 Protect yourself from invisible fields of detrimental vibration.

00:19:43.000 Back to the content!

00:19:44.000 The question is, from atkarina14, as more and more evidence emerges that health agencies on a global scale misled and most likely harmed many people, what kind of actual accountability can there be given the scale of the offence?

00:19:57.000 Are you talking about harm from the vaccine?

00:20:00.000 Yes sir.

00:20:04.000 This has been a discussion for a long period of time, and we discussed this in the book.

00:20:08.000 Congress gave liability protection so there is no harm to be held to these people.

00:20:13.000 They can serve up whatever you want, and it'd be bad enough if it were voluntary, but it's being pushed on you.

00:20:19.000 Many people lose their jobs if they're not vaccinated, but if they're harmed by the vaccine, they have no recourse.

00:20:24.000 Now they set up some big vaccine database and then an ability to get some money from the government, but it's not the same because it doesn't chasten at all the companies.

00:20:34.000 And really the insidious part of this is that it's mandatory.

00:20:39.000 And then, you know, you got the former FDA commissioner, Scott Gottlieb is on the board of Pfizer, who is then calling Twitter to say, take down this article saying you might be harmed by vaccinating your children.

00:20:53.000 That's how bad it is that the former FDA commissioner is now on the board of Pfizer, is now telling Twitter to take down information on this.

00:21:01.000 So it's disturbing, but it's been going on since the 1970s.

00:21:05.000 My dad fought against it, was one of the few people to vote against giving liability protection to the vaccine manufacturers.

00:21:14.000 On the other side of it, they would argue, well, the government mandates these things.

00:21:17.000 Why should people sue us?

00:21:18.000 We're not mandating them.

00:21:19.000 The government's mandating them.

00:21:20.000 So the government should be responsible for it.

00:21:23.000 But if they're not responsible for their own products, I don't think they're going to work as hard to try to do no harm.

00:21:29.000 You know, to make sure that there's not a harmful aspect.

00:21:32.000 And these things were pushed out so fast, if they had been voluntary in every aspect, you could at least say people who were frightened could take them, people at high risk could take them, but they were pushed out and then pushed on healthy people who didn't need the vaccines.

00:21:47.000 And that really is a crime and somebody should be punished, particularly in the government, The Anthony Fauci's of this world who pushed nonsense and bad science on us that now he just throws up his hands and says, oh, well, we didn't really know.

00:22:00.000 We liked six feet, but we didn't really know why we said six feet of distance.

00:22:03.000 It was no science.

00:22:05.000 But on the children, I have gone directly at Anthony Fauci on the vaccine for children and said, does it reduce transmission?

00:22:12.000 No.

00:22:13.000 Does it reduce hospitalization or death?

00:22:16.000 And he says, well, we don't know.

00:22:18.000 And I say, well, the reason you don't know is that no child is going to the hospital or dying right now.

00:22:22.000 No healthy child.

00:22:24.000 There are exceptions to every rule, but no healthy child with no significant disease is going to the hospital and dying from COVID.

00:22:30.000 It is not a deadly disease for healthy children.

00:22:33.000 If your child has an illness, you talk to your doctor and you can make your own decision.

00:22:38.000 The vaccine isn't doing anything for healthy children.

00:22:41.000 And it's all it's doing is doing to the bottom line of Big Pharma.

00:22:44.000 So Anthony Fauci and his ilk have basically become salesmen for Big Pharma.

00:22:48.000 And this is sort of the tragedy of crony capitalism.

00:22:52.000 And I think we have to keep fighting it.

00:22:56.000 That was Senator Rand Paul, who's done more than probably anyone in the Senate, maybe Thomas Massey as well, you could argue, let me know in the comments and chat, to bring these issues to a wider audience and to give them the credibility that they warrant.

00:23:08.000 But when you want insight that borders on prophecy, you have to listen to Dave Martin.

00:23:13.000 Here he is.

00:23:15.000 What was unique about the pandemic?

00:23:17.000 Was it that many previously covert interests became temporarily visible, like the recent Aurora Borealis in Northern Europe?

00:23:28.000 Suddenly, something that is always there became visible to a new population.

00:23:33.000 Hang on a minute, the pharmaceutical industry and the state are operating in conjunction with these unelected bureaucratic bodies in order to centralise authority and generate profit?

00:23:42.000 Is that what it was?

00:23:44.000 Well, so I think there's two things that make the COVID situation somewhat dramatic, at least.

00:23:50.000 I wouldn't say unprecedented, but certainly dramatic, because we can actually make the argument that certainly the establishment of the Commonwealth was the legitimization of the British East India Company, and that company's 86% of its trade was opium.

00:24:04.000 Unambiguously, this is not a new phenomenon.

00:24:07.000 The difference probably is the degree to which the audacity of the direct suppression of civil and human rights was part and parcel of this exercise.

00:24:19.000 And I've seen it, as I've said many times, as a marketing exercise to see exactly how far the complicit population will go before they start pushing back.

00:24:29.000 Because I think that's really what it was.

00:24:30.000 I think this was a market test more than it was a substantive act.

00:24:34.000 And the fact is that the market test was to see how far humans are willing to allow themselves to be caged, curtailed, limited, delimited, everything else.

00:24:46.000 And I think that what we really did was we had a market test on humanity and humanity came with a, let's just say, not a passing grade.

00:24:54.000 Have you got any corroborating evidence to suggest that indicates or even proves that it was that?

00:25:02.000 Yeah, absolutely.

00:25:04.000 I mean, listen, you only have to go to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board Look at the decade of vaccines that they published in 2011.

00:25:12.000 They actually said that they were going to do this.

00:25:14.000 They said by 2020, we were going to have a universal acceptance, a universal vaccine mandate across the world on a universal platform.

00:25:23.000 And then in September 18th of 2019, they specifically said that there would be an accidental or deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.

00:25:31.000 This comes right out of their document, Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, September 18th, 2019.

00:25:36.000 And in that document, they said the purpose of it was so that by September 2020, the world would have a universal vaccine plan.

00:25:45.000 Period.

00:25:46.000 That's not an allegation.

00:25:48.000 That's an accusation because it's reading right out of their script.

00:25:51.000 So this is not putting the pieces together.

00:25:54.000 This is something basic.

00:25:56.000 I know it challenges a lot of people, but it's called literacy.

00:25:59.000 You just have to read their plan.

00:26:01.000 And if you actually, God forbid, read the words on the page, you actually see that this was nothing but a market test, which is the reason why we have Answer Corporation, ATI, Forsmarsh, and the companies that were involved in the rollout of this pandemic, we have them all setting up the marketing program, which was the launch of Event 201 and other things, where they actually told us exactly what was going to happen.

00:26:24.000 They told us what the media was going to sound like.

00:26:27.000 They told us what the marketing was going to sound like. 0.95

00:26:29.000 They told us all of these things in advance of this bullshit story of patient one in Wuhan. 0.85

00:26:36.000 All of this was theater to get the public to accept the next round of the drug trade. 0.97

00:26:43.000 And the next round of the drug trade is genetically modified humans.

00:26:47.000 Extraordinary.

00:26:48.000 I wonder if I might ask you the somewhat taxing favour that by the time we are doing this now for our community and locals, so if you come and awaken one day, you can join us for these conversations and put your questions to our treasured guests like Dave.

00:27:02.000 I wonder if by the time we stream this on Friday, if you could send us some links that we can post in the chat.

00:27:07.000 Absolutely!

00:27:08.000 For example, in particular, the various documents that you've referred to that permit you to make those accusations, just so that we can learn together from the brilliant work that you've done in compiling these narratives.

00:27:21.000 I mean, it's extraordinarily significant.

00:27:23.000 So really what you're saying is that many of them, what seems to be the most outlandish

00:27:30.000 statements that could be located online at the commencement of the pandemic are closer

00:27:36.000 to the truth than what you would see on the BBC or NBC or the New York Times.

00:27:41.000 The people that are saying this is a staged event, this is a pandemic, this is a mass

00:27:47.000 marketed attempt to see if you can assert civilization control.

00:27:51.000 Now how do you tally that with something like the discovery that in Ukraine, through DIA, They are now monitoring and observing Ukrainian transactions and have tied digital identity to the ability to shut down bank accounts, causing some Ukrainian civilians that refuse the conscript to have their assets frozen.

00:28:13.000 Do you think that the control of finance, social credit scores, digital ID are part of this, you know, launch, as you very explicitly said, next phase of the drug phase, genetically engineered or altered humans?

00:28:25.000 Do you think part of that is civilian management through technological dictatorship?

00:28:30.000 Well, no question.

00:28:31.000 It's not by accident.

00:28:32.000 Dustin Moskowitz, the name I love to mention that nobody seems to ever bother to keep reciting, and I encourage people to do it.

00:28:39.000 But Dustin Moskowitz, the co-founder of Facebook and the guy behind paying for Event 201 and the guy behind paying for a number of other things, including his joint venture with the Wellcome Trust through Syncoven.

00:28:51.000 And a number of funding sources this program is about once again making sure that there is an ability to access a control mechanism on human beings and by genetically modifying people with mrna by doing all sorts of those kinds of manipulations and then by encouraging things like central bank digital currencies.

00:29:13.000 And all of the kinds of things we're supposed to track on our phones, the vaccine passport or the personal identity transactions, all of these things are meant to control and limit the ability for the free association and the free movement of thoughts and ideas and people.

00:29:32.000 If you're going to actually control and manipulate a population, what you have to do is effectively create house arrest for the non-compliant. 0.98

00:29:41.000 And it turns out that house arrest for the non-compliant is what I said in my interview in April of 2020.

00:29:49.000 I said this entire program was the launch of the universal house arrest program.

00:29:55.000 And what do I mean by that?

00:29:57.000 What I mean is that by creating, using, by the way, the only tool that can subvert constitutional rights, which is public health.

00:30:05.000 Public health was written into the law.

00:30:07.000 As the way of subverting constitutional rights and using public health as the means to do it, we have been placed under a virtual house arrest and the technologies that are enabling that are going to be increasingly rolled out, whether it's your 5G, 6G personal identity chips, whether it's the things that you wear, it's the personal devices that monitor your behavior, the personal devices that monitor your health status.

00:30:34.000 These are all meant to effectively Be the anklet on your leg for the criminal that you are if you think you are entitled to liberty.

00:30:45.000 We need to understand that the structure at its core, and this by the way goes back to something as simple as the criminal conspiracy that took over the United Kingdom Health Services in the 1920s and the 1930s, very specifically the Wellcome Trust.

00:31:01.000 Because the Wellcome Trust, which was the modern expression of the opium trade of the British East India Company, in 1941 set up what was called the Therapeutic Research Corporation in the UK, and that formed the basis for what would ultimately become the modern criminal organizations, the World Health Organization, And all of the stuff that the UN, League of Nations, and everything else did, as well as informing what became the FDA in the United States.

00:31:29.000 But go back and ask the question, where did all this come from?

00:31:33.000 And the answer is it actually came from the opium trade.

00:31:37.000 It's the modern expression of the British East India Company, which happened to be unified under the Wellcome Trust.

00:31:44.000 Nothing giant surprising about it.

00:31:48.000 All of that money, all of it, Came out of criminal drug trade.

00:31:53.000 I'm not going to sit here and let you blame Her Majesty the Queen, God rest her eternal soul, and Great Britain, after all of our endeavours, our incredible flag, the great things we've done, William Wilberforce, Shakespeare, some very, very fine people, and you, unavowedly, a member of one of our colonies, criticising us in this manner.

00:32:20.000 I know, it's disgusting.

00:32:22.000 It's disgusting when you actually have something as simple as, I don't know, the charter that actually puts it all in motion.

00:32:29.000 So you're saying that these, it's interesting because when you speak to people that have perhaps previously made an income in criminal ways, you know, organised crime, you have a version of that in North America, you have versions of

00:32:42.000 that around the world, and in Britain the sort of 19, post-1960s style gangster culture has an

00:32:48.000 incredible glamour to it, and in part what you always feel is this, aside from the, you know, violence

00:32:56.000 and the criminality, that it's difficult to avoid the conclusion that really these are people that

00:33:02.000 have bypassed systems that are supposed to repress and control them.

00:33:07.000 In a way when you describe the enterprises that have grown out of by your reckoning and you say you have the receipts

00:33:13.000 and we Totally want to see him and I completely love this stuff

00:33:17.000 There are just criminal enterprises that are taking place on a much larger scale that kind of

00:33:22.000 legislate in their wake to mask the criminal nature creating whatever

00:33:27.000 institutions or global entity is required to frame badge and provide

00:33:33.000 sigils and insignia that Legitimize well, we did this for the Queen of England. We

00:33:39.000 did this for a listen. I mean, it's hilarious You go to 1941, the Therapeutic Research Corporation, which was the Therapeutic Substances Act in the UK, and you go back and say, well, hold on a second.

00:33:53.000 You mean that the biggest drug company in the UK set up the regulator for the drugs in the UK?

00:34:02.000 So the company set up the regulator?

00:34:06.000 And continues to this day to fund the regulator.

00:34:09.000 It's brilliant.

00:34:10.000 It's so good because this is more creative than the mob could ever be.

00:34:14.000 Because this is not, we get a couple corrupt cops to look the other way.

00:34:18.000 This is, we hire the police force.

00:34:22.000 The police force are us.

00:34:24.000 And so this is actually one step further.

00:34:27.000 Remember, and I've said this many, many times, in the World Health Organization's founding charter, they wrote an absolute, absolute amnesty for all criminal acts conducted by themselves.

00:34:42.000 Russell, I don't know how you would feel, but if by fiat you and I just come to an agreement right now, wave our royal scepter and say, from now on, everything that Russell and Dave do are exempt from any prosecution of any kind in perpetuity, thank you very much.

00:34:59.000 A few people might raise their hand and go, I wonder if Russell and Dave are up to something?

00:35:06.000 Because it turns out that if you give yourself amnesty from all forms of criminal prosecution, including murder, by the way, let's get clear, it cannot be By law, no member of the World Health Organization, in the execution of anything they said they were doing in their own capacity as a World Health Organization, not a single one of them can not only be tried and prosecuted, they can't even be investigated.

00:35:36.000 Have you any... okay, of course... A statute!

00:35:38.000 I take your premise that even the implementation of such a piece of regulation or legislation, global regulation, and it's extraordinary to see how often global regulation is being proposed these days.

00:35:53.000 Of course we've discussed the WHO treaty, of course we've not touched on Australia attempting to implement a piece of censorship legislation that would by virtue Of their attempts, they say, to bypass the capacities of VPN, be international and global.

00:36:10.000 It's extraordinary.

00:36:11.000 So what you're saying, Dave, is that at the inception of the WHO, they granted themselves somehow amnesty.

00:36:18.000 Now, I wonder if there are examples in the history of the WHO of where that amnesty has been implemented or effective or where its boundaries might likely be tested.

00:36:27.000 Do you think in the pandemic period, Let's keep it really current.

00:36:30.000 At what points are there likely to have been actions generated by people protected by that

00:36:39.000 statuette that were they not offered those protections, they would have been prosecuted

00:36:43.000 for the type of crimes?

00:36:46.000 Let's keep it really current.

00:36:47.000 Remember that in 2018, during the Ebola clinical trials run by the World Health Organization

00:36:53.000 in Africa, it was very clear that Remdesivir, the drug that was promoted by Dr. Deborah

00:37:00.000 Birx and Dr. Anthony Fauci as a drug for the treatment of COVID, remember,

00:37:06.000 That in 2018, the World Health Organization, in its infinite wisdom and high morality, decided that remdesivir was actually too lethal to inject into Africans.

00:37:16.000 And that is because the fatality rate of people exposed to remdesivir in the Ebola trials was 53%.

00:37:23.000 And the bad news about that number is that Ebola doesn't kill 53%.

00:37:28.000 You get over Ebola.

00:37:29.000 You don't get over remdesivir.

00:37:31.000 53% of the people given that drug died.

00:37:35.000 They were murdered.

00:37:38.000 And it was so egregious that the drug was pulled from the clinical trials because it was unethical by World Health Organization standards.

00:37:45.000 That's like saying that something's too hot by the devil's standards in hell.

00:37:50.000 Right?

00:37:51.000 That's what that is.

00:37:52.000 So let's just really be clear.

00:37:53.000 We're not talking about a high moral compass there. 0.99

00:37:55.000 We're talking about a holy shit. 0.99

00:37:58.000 When you're telling me that the World Health Organization's morality meter got pegged And they said in 2018 remdesivir was too deadly to use on Africans. 0.99

00:38:09.000 That's a whole new level of that feels like a line that probably shouldn't be crossed which is the reason why every physician who injected a patient with remdesivir anywhere in the world was at least committing negligent homicide if not willful murder.

00:38:27.000 And because it was a standard of care during an emergency You could kill people.

00:38:37.000 And by the way, that's not, once again, it's not an allegation I'm making, it's an accusation I'm making, because the facts were all available.

00:38:45.000 Every physician could have read the exact same documents I read.

00:38:48.000 Everyone could have read the World Health Organization's interim report, which said that regardless of viral load, people that got remdesivir were killed.

00:38:57.000 That means, Russell, the World Health Organization murdered people without Ebola In the clinical trial, murdered them.

00:39:08.000 Do you see that particular set of staggering crimes that is difficult to comprehend because of their scale?

00:39:19.000 As forms of genocide and mass corruption often are, as somehow pertaining to the type of themes you refer to in much of your discourse elsewhere.

00:39:32.000 Do you see that as being an outlier event, an anomaly, an aberration?

00:39:37.000 Or do you see that as being part of a broader scheme that the WHO is participating in?

00:39:45.000 There's no question that like any other theater of social engineering, the more egregious the crime to steal a page from Plato.

00:39:57.000 Remember, he talks about the fact that, you know, if a simple thief steals a loaf of bread, we call him a thief.

00:40:04.000 If an organized group of young people steal a bunch of loaves of bread, we call it Oliver Twist.

00:40:12.000 But there's a certain level at which a crime becomes so egregious that the sum of our emotional and spiritual awakening to the egregious nature of the crime is seared in its consciousness and we actually start marveling at its audacity.

00:40:29.000 We go from seeing a crime to pondering how somebody could have pulled it off.

00:40:36.000 Right, think of a serial killer, right?

00:40:39.000 One person kills one person, it's a murder.

00:40:41.000 One person kills ten people, we go, well that was effort.

00:40:44.000 One person kills a hundred people and we start going, let's do a discovery series on the mind of a serial killer.

00:40:51.000 But when one person kills a million people, we don't have a million moments of consternation.

00:41:00.000 We actually As Plato observed, we flip the crime on its head and we start marveling at its audacity.

00:41:10.000 And this is exactly the intent of what happened with COVID, because by marveling at the audacity of the fullness of the complicity of the horrific crimes that were done, We actually don't have a conscience to say every single person in a nursing home who was able to have a glass wall put between them so that they couldn't die in the arms of a loved one, every single person that was put into an ambulance and put on a respirator, which we knew was going to kill them,

00:41:45.000 Every single person who was put into a hospital and injected with remdesivir, every single one of them was a willful act of something that started in 1913 with the Carnegie Foundation, which was the eugenics program that is still absolutely alive and well at Cold Spring Harbor Labs. 0.72

00:42:04.000 And by the way, go back and look at it.

00:42:06.000 It was in the 1920s and the 1930s that Hitler was inspired by the work of the United States Eugenics Office. 0.50

00:42:15.000 So let's not sit here and pretend that this is some sort of shock.

00:42:19.000 Our willingness in the name of what we call public health and in the name of what we call science, our willingness to murder people, and I don't mean, oh it was an accident kind of thing.

00:42:31.000 I mean stuff like in 1920 when we went to orphanages and we poisoned children with radioactive oatmeal so that we could watch how they die.

00:42:45.000 In the United States.

00:42:46.000 That was not a, you know, concentration camp exercise.

00:42:50.000 That was funded by and supported by the Eugenics Research Office here in the United States.

00:42:56.000 That was injected digoxins.

00:42:58.000 That was injected all kinds of other toxins.

00:43:01.000 That was radiation exposure.

00:43:03.000 And we did that with impunity on, are you ready for this?

00:43:06.000 Orphans.

00:43:09.000 Yes. 0.99

00:43:09.000 In the 1960s, in the United States and in the UK, we had debates on whether it was ethical to use the incarcerated population for lethal drug studies because they were doing their time for society anyhow, so let's go ahead and kill them. 0.99

00:43:30.000 I was also fortunate to talk to Jim Jordan, Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, who is an extraordinary contributor to this debate because he approaches it plainly, clerically, patiently and openly and even he's disgusted with the level of construction and corruption that's been exposed in these arguments.

00:43:50.000 Have a look.

00:43:52.000 I wonder when you went from thinking that what we knew about the pandemic did not warrant inquiry, that we should continue to follow the science, accept the narrative, accept the findings of the various regulatory bodies, whom are sort of epitomized really in the figure of Anthony Fauci, and perhaps the whole idea of government bureaucracy And bureaucratic power has come to be epitomized in the figure of Anthony Fauci.

00:44:19.000 At what point did you think, oh, this is not an honest actor upon whose expertise we can rely, but potentially the kind of face of the very kind of corruption the Republicans are notably interested in reducing?

00:44:31.000 I don't know if there's one exact point, but I would think it was probably when they were downplaying Natural immunity.

00:44:41.000 Like suddenly we've got the first virus in history where there's no natural immunity.

00:44:44.000 Really?

00:44:45.000 And then they just told us so many things that over time just turned out not to be true.

00:44:50.000 I remember we had Dr. Birx in front of a committee probably two years ago.

00:44:55.000 And I remember asking her simple question.

00:44:59.000 My turn to ask her and I asked her a question.

00:45:00.000 I said, Dr. Birx, when the Biden administration told us that the vaccinated couldn't get the virus, were they guessing or lying?

00:45:07.000 Because it's got to be, you know, did you not know, you're kind of guessing, or were you actually lying to us, which is even worse.

00:45:15.000 Because the truth is, what they told us turned out not to be true.

00:45:17.000 And you can go down, and I know you've covered all this before, but almost everything they told us turned out not to be true.

00:45:25.000 Didn't come from a lab.

00:45:26.000 Wasn't gain-of-function research.

00:45:27.000 Wasn't our tax money used in the Wuhan lab.

00:45:30.000 All those seem to me not be true.

00:45:32.000 Vaccinated can't get it. 1.00

00:45:33.000 Vaccinated can't transmit it.

00:45:34.000 Mask works.

00:45:35.000 Six-foot social distancing was based on science.

00:45:38.000 There's no such thing as natural... There's like eight lies right there.

00:45:40.000 So at some point, we're just like, why should we believe anything you tell us about this virus, right?

00:45:44.000 And the worst was, though, when they said to men and women in our military, you don't get the shot.

00:45:51.000 We're going to kick you out.

00:45:53.000 And they tried to say it to businesses.

00:45:55.000 If you don't have people get to get the vaccine, they can't work.

00:45:58.000 This is America, for goodness sake.

00:46:00.000 You can't do that.

00:46:01.000 When you describe it like that, Jim, it sounds almost like a coup took place, because how would power migrate away from the autonomy and sovereignty of individuals to these institutions that are unelected and yet publicly funded, having the power to make those type of decisions?

00:46:15.000 How did that happen?

00:46:15.000 Is it because... I'll just answer my own question, but I'll do it quickly.

00:46:19.000 It's your podcast, you're allowed to do that.

00:46:22.000 Well Jim, was it the exploitation of a crisis to legitimise authority that would have otherwise been immediately rejected by a discerning population?

00:46:28.000 Well said.

00:46:30.000 And do you not think that what's revealed during the period of the pandemic is a degree of corruption that's actually institutional?

00:46:37.000 You're making the argument for basic conservatism.

00:46:39.000 It's why you want a smaller government.

00:46:40.000 the regulatory bodies? And do you not think that they can never inspire the hearings that

00:46:44.000 you've already conducted? And as I said to you, I love your style. I like that you get

00:46:47.000 into people, wrestle that you are, but isn't the kind of reckoning that would truly be

00:46:52.000 required? Doesn't that kind of amount to the disbanding of some of those agencies and maybe

00:46:58.000 even the incrimination of some of those figures?

00:47:02.000 You're making the argument for basic conservatism. It's why you want a smaller government, bigger

00:47:05.000 the government, the more potential for abuse. I think a lot of this is driven by just raw

00:47:11.000 power at the end. I think Fauci sort of liked it all, liked all the...

00:47:15.000 .

00:47:16.000 Publicity, the prestige of it, the power of it, and I do think there were people in elected positions who tried to exploit it for political gain, particularly when it came to the election.

00:47:29.000 I think all that was a problem, but you're making the fundamental argument for why it's better to have smaller government, because smaller government typically means greater freedom for we, the people.

00:47:39.000 Jim, I believe in non-interventionism, and I believe in independence, and I believe in freedom.

00:47:43.000 Well, what I also believe is that the regulatory bodies that we do have ought to be functionally fit for purpose and the kind of hypocrisy and exploitation that is afforded when the FDA is primarily, not primarily, but significantly funded by the organizations and corporations that it is supposed to be regulated.

00:48:02.000 In a sense, isn't that Not just an over-preening and over-funded bureaucracy, but a far deeper problem.

00:48:10.000 Corporatization and commerce embedded into state institutions, Jim.

00:48:15.000 Fair question.

00:48:16.000 And what's the... political scientists have an agency capture?

00:48:23.000 Where it's, you know, the very entities that agencies are supposed to regulate and oversee become captured by those entities.

00:48:33.000 And you get this, what some people call it, this Stockholm Syndrome, where it's like, well, we're all working together here, but that may not be in the best interest of the consumer, the best interest of the citizen.

00:48:45.000 So that is, I think, a valid concern, and something I think many of us Many of us kind of suspected.

00:48:56.000 During the pandemic.

00:48:57.000 Yeah, because I'm an outsider.

00:48:58.000 I'm not from your country and I'm not from Capitol Hill, as you can plainly observe.

00:49:03.000 But the layman's perspective... You dress just like a congressman.

00:49:08.000 The layman's perspective on political corruption is that the overlap between commerce and corporatism and state has become so immersive and embedded that it's ultimately operating as one corrupt sort of tumor, almost.

00:49:21.000 I mean, we saw it in this area.

00:49:23.000 Because it was big government, big media, big tech working together to censor people who spoke out against what was going on in the government.

00:49:35.000 And it's like, that is a scary alliance.

00:49:38.000 And we saw that largely with people speaking out against COVID.

00:49:41.000 You said anything against the orthodoxy of the administration, you were censored.

00:49:48.000 And the example I always point to is the third day of the Biden administration, Third day, January 23rd, 2021.

00:49:54.000 There's an email from the executive office of the presidency of the White House to Twitter.

00:49:58.000 And it says, take down this tweet ASAP.

00:50:01.000 And the tweet was from RFK Jr.

00:50:03.000 And he said two sentences.

00:50:05.000 He said, Hank Aaron passed away after taking the vaccine.

00:50:08.000 He took the vaccine as an effort to encourage more black Americans to get vaccinated.

00:50:12.000 So he had maybe three sentences in there.

00:50:13.000 Every sentence is accurate.

00:50:15.000 Every sentence is true.

00:50:16.000 And the Biden administration was telling the third now.

00:50:18.000 Now think about this.

00:50:20.000 Take down a true statement, a true tweet, government pressuring big tech to do so, and the person they're trying to do this to is their opponent.

00:50:29.000 RFK was getting ready to run for president.

00:50:31.000 That is not supposed to happen in the United States of America, but it did, and that's the scary part.

00:50:37.000 And we saw, whether it was COVID or whether it's related to the election or other issues, that big government, big media, big tech, and I always say there's a formula.

00:50:48.000 I attribute this to the left.

00:50:50.000 The left will tell a lie.

00:50:52.000 Big media will report the lie.

00:50:54.000 Big tech will amplify and assist the lie.

00:50:56.000 And then when you tell the truth, they call you a racist or they call you something else.

00:51:00.000 And then by the time you're proven right, they've already moved on to the next lie.

00:51:03.000 So now we've been proven right, like the vaccinated can get it.

00:51:06.000 The vaccinated can transmit it.

00:51:07.000 The masks don't work.

00:51:08.000 We've been proven right on this, but they're already on to the next issue.

00:51:11.000 And that's a problem.

00:51:12.000 And it's something we got to stay on top of.

00:51:16.000 Ron Johnson, Senator of Wisconsin, was one of the first people to publicly raise questions from within the Senate when it came to how the pandemic was being managed.

00:51:26.000 It was very interesting to catch up with him at the RNC.

00:51:29.000 He said a few things that really surprised me.

00:51:31.000 See if you can spot what they are.

00:51:34.000 One of the reasons, Ron, that I was very excited and keen to speak to you is because you took a very particular and deliberate and almost extraordinarily outspoken stance during the pandemic period.

00:51:44.000 I believe that you even went so far as to suggest that the pandemic was augured, perhaps deliberately, in order to legitimise authoritarianism.

00:51:54.000 Would you explain that, if that is indeed your position, sir?

00:51:58.000 I don't think I ever went that far.

00:51:59.000 I know there are people that do believe that.

00:52:01.000 I just don't know.

00:52:03.000 I don't, you know, I have a very open mind.

00:52:05.000 None of this makes sense.

00:52:07.000 And that's, I think, really how I went down the path I went.

00:52:10.000 Very early on, none of it made sense.

00:52:12.000 The shutdowns made no sense.

00:52:13.000 I'm the guy who said that, you know, we tragically lose tens of thousands of people on American highways every year, but we don't shut them down.

00:52:21.000 And Anthony Fauci from the podium in the White House said, oh, that was way out there.

00:52:23.000 No, it's a very good analogy.

00:52:25.000 I held hearings as chairman of Homeland Security.

00:52:28.000 First and foremost, early in May, well, first in February, where I realized we don't make the precursor chemicals for drugs.

00:52:36.000 That's a vulnerability.

00:52:38.000 As soon as I heard about hydroxychloroquine, my first concern was, can we produce enough of them?

00:52:43.000 That was in March.

00:52:45.000 Then I held a hearing in early May with John Ioannidis, who did the analysis on the Princess Cruz, showing that, yeah, COVID can be deadly, but primarily if you're Elderly, or if you're certain comorbidities.

00:52:56.000 For the rest of us, we'll probably survive.

00:52:58.000 So that provided me a fair amount of comfort, also being a person of faith.

00:53:04.000 So none of this made sense.

00:53:05.000 These lockdowns were so destructive.

00:53:07.000 We were shutting down churches.

00:53:08.000 We were shutting down, you know, small stores.

00:53:11.000 People who invested life savings, but the big box stores got to stay open.

00:53:15.000 You know, none of this made sense.

00:53:16.000 We saw about a four trillion dollar transfer of wealth from The little people, from the working men and women of this country to the massive corporations, to the big tech social media giants.

00:53:29.000 It was all in their benefit.

00:53:31.000 When they sabotage early treatment, and they did, they sabotage early treatment, whether it's hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, bunesonide, there were a host of molecules that existed, corticosteroids.

00:53:42.000 Pierre Corrie, in my Mayme hearing, we had him come in.

00:53:45.000 He talked about corticosteroids.

00:53:47.000 He was vilified until a few weeks later, dexamethasone, actually, there was a study that showed it.

00:53:53.000 Of course, they always under-prescribed it.

00:53:55.000 The treatment of COVID patients in hospitals was abysmal.

00:54:00.000 People lost their freedom.

00:54:01.000 People lost their lives because they administered remdesivir where there was no evidence whatsoever.

00:54:07.000 There was evidence that would knock out kidneys.

00:54:09.000 It was withdrawn from an Ebola trial because it was more harmful.

00:54:12.000 So, again, I knew this because I was already connected to a large group.

00:54:17.000 I wish it was larger, but a group of eminently qualified doctors and medical researchers that had a completely different view On COVID, and in particular, I got connected with Michael Yeadon, Senior Vice President of Pfizer in the UK, toxicologist, who was beside himself when he heard what his former colleagues were going to do.

00:54:39.000 He said, Ron, there's a long list of ingredients we do not put in injectables because they are toxic to the body.

00:54:45.000 When I heard my colleagues, who educated with me, know what I know, they were going to produce an injectable shot It was going to turn the body into its own manufacturer of toxins.

00:54:57.000 He was beside himself.

00:54:59.000 He couldn't believe they would do that.

00:55:01.000 And now they've been denying it.

00:55:02.000 So I knew early on that this was a potentially dangerous shot.

00:55:07.000 And quite honestly, now we know they did not do the type of safety testing on this.

00:55:12.000 They knew that it would body distribute all over the body.

00:55:14.000 They knew the impact if this were to, for example, attach the heart, go through the blood-brain barrier, attach the ovaries.

00:55:21.000 They had to know that.

00:55:22.000 And yet they were so hell-bent on this vaccine, this universal vaccine program, which by evidence, with Rick Bright and Anthony Fauci in late October, I think, of 2019, they were bemoaning the fact that we don't have a universal vaccine program.

00:55:38.000 Flu season just doesn't do it.

00:55:40.000 We probably need a pandemic. 0.93

00:55:42.000 Well, they got their pandemic.

00:55:44.000 I know that's a mouthful, but... No, I want to congratulate you on your pronunciation of hydroxychloroquine.

00:55:50.000 That took me a while.

00:55:51.000 Elegant.

00:55:52.000 Handled almost effortlessly.

00:55:54.000 Rolled off of the tongue.

00:55:55.000 In fact, nothing has been rolled out that effortlessly since the vaccine itself.

00:55:59.000 Then, your ability to relay that narrative so plainly and eloquently reminds me that there are many incredible facets, not least as you touched upon near the beginning of your rather lovely soliloquy, the wealth transfer from ordinary middle-class people to extraordinarily powerful business interests.

00:56:19.000 Now, I began by incorrectly implying or stating, in fact, that you had Suggested that the entire exercise had been malignly conducted and whether or not it was an engineered event is difficult to corroborate, but what does seem significant is that it granted powerful institutions the legitimacy to further centralize authority at a point where the inertia seems to be towards decentralization and maximal

00:56:50.000 individual sovereignty, maximum community electoral representation.

00:56:56.000 It seems like it functioned in a way of, forgive me Ron, I won't be, I won't be long.

00:57:02.000 Like me!

00:57:03.000 No, I'm gonna be, I reckon I'll do, it'll be a 10% as long as, as it should be, because I'm here to inquire of you and your wisdom.

00:57:10.000 I would like to say that when you look at the various institutions and interests that benefited, is it not possible to calculate how this event may have come about?

00:57:20.000 I think what we know almost for sure now, and I believe this very early on as soon as Tom Cotton talked about the Wuhan lab, and I was talking to computational biologists and other experts, this thing did not spring from nature.

00:57:32.000 This was man-made.

00:57:33.000 We know of our bioweapons research. 0.93

00:57:37.000 We understand how much we have funded.

00:57:39.000 By the way, Fauci, and this is according to Bobby Kennedy's book.

00:57:43.000 I love Bobby Kennedy.

00:57:44.000 I love him.

00:57:45.000 Fauci financed EcoHealth Alliance to tune about $14 million.

00:57:50.000 The Defense Department financed EcoHealth Alliance to the tune of about $42 million, and USAID, who Bobby Kennedy says is a CIA cutout, $53 million.

00:58:01.000 So Fauci's role in this was almost minor compared to our Defense Department and potentially CIA.

00:58:07.000 So again, this was obviously man-made.

00:58:11.000 Exactly how it was released, I don't know.

00:58:13.000 My guess is probably an accident.

00:58:16.000 But we have accidents in these biolabs all the time. 1.00

00:58:19.000 The minimum we should have done if we were financing this bioweapons research is we shouldn't have shared it with the Chinese. 0.99

00:58:26.000 We should have made sure it stayed in unbelievably safe and secure biolabs, and we didn't do that.

00:58:31.000 We were cavalier with it.

00:58:32.000 We were dangerous with it.

00:58:35.000 So, that's why Fauci, very early on, end of January, early February, went overboard to cover his tracks and make sure that any talk of a man-made chimeric virus was...

00:58:49.000 Crazy conspiracy theory.

00:58:51.000 He got away with it for quite some time, but the truth is coming out.

00:58:54.000 Ron, yesterday we spoke to Jim Jordan on this show.

00:58:57.000 It was a brilliant conversation.

00:58:58.000 Did you see it?

00:58:59.000 Did you like it? 1.00

00:58:59.000 Let me know in the chat, you beautiful lunatics, you. 1.00

00:59:02.000 And what was fascinating, or at least interesting to me, was that the idea that there are all these hearings that are conducted, but It seems to me unlikely that the reckoning that's required for an event of this magnitude and corruption of this degree is unlikely to be conducted. 0.95

00:59:19.000 And do you think that it calcifies the idea in the minds of many Americans and people around the world that corrupt elites are able to produce and conduct their hypocrisy without justice?

00:59:32.000 In short, Senator, Is the level of justice that is required ever likely to be enacted upon those who, if they did not perpetrate this event, and I'm certainly not suggesting they did, benefited from it, mishandled it, exploited it, covered it up, and in so doing created almost the perfect lens for us to understand the degree to which many of these regulatory agencies and institutions are corrupt and not fit for purpose?

00:59:59.000 It is my personal intent to make sure that happens.

01:00:02.000 Again, I'm in the minority.

01:00:03.000 All I can do right now is write oversight letters.

01:00:05.000 I've written over 60 about hot lots, about their standard operating procedure in terms of analysis of their veyor system.

01:00:12.000 So I've laid the foundation for my investigation should we gain the majority and I become chairman of the permanent subcommittee on investigations.

01:00:20.000 I have stronger power than I had as chairman of the full committee.

01:00:24.000 Part of the problem, I don't want to throw people under the bus, but problem with the house subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic, Got a lot of doctors from the mainstream medical community.

01:00:34.000 I mean, they're all singing the praises of the vaccine still, that has saved millions of lives.

01:00:38.000 There's no study, there's really no science, true science, that shows the vaccine saved lives.

01:00:43.000 Now, I think maybe early on, when it was targeted toward the variant that was out there, it might have been somewhat effective, but these people are coming up with, they'll save 14 million lives, so let's give these people a Nobel Prize.

01:00:56.000 There's no hard science to back that up.

01:00:58.000 They're just saying it.

01:00:59.000 From my standpoint, to cover their tracks, I think there's some pretty good indications that because they sabotaged early treatment, hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people died.

01:01:07.000 Because they used remdesivir, people died in hospitals.

01:01:11.000 And it's indisputable that the vaccine causes death, permanent disability.

01:01:16.000 And it's not just thousands.

01:01:18.000 I mean, on the VAERS system today, we're over 37,000 deaths worldwide.

01:01:23.000 24% of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within two days.

01:01:26.000 Now, I know VAERS doesn't prove causations.

01:01:29.000 That's a correlation our regulators should have been aware of and concerned about in February, March of 2020.

01:01:36.000 And by the way, when I brought that up to Francis Collins in April of 2021, okay, Three or four months after the vaccine was granted emergency use authorization, I think at that point it was like 40 some percent of people were dying the day of vaccination or within one or two days.

01:01:53.000 Again, we were administering to elderly people that couldn't handle the assault on their body. 0.98

01:01:58.000 Francis Collins said, Senator Johnson, we have identified six people have died because of the J&J, because of clotting.

01:02:05.000 Senator, people die.

01:02:07.000 That's how cavalier he was and how unserious they were.

01:02:10.000 And now, by the way, last week in testimony before our committee on the origin and the dangerous gain-of-function research, I had the opportunity to question Dr. Redfield, and he admitted that they purposely downplayed and ignored the vaccine injuries because they didn't want to create vaccine hesitancy.

01:02:29.000 Well, you can't tell the public the truth.

01:02:31.000 You can't let them have true, conformed incent.

01:02:35.000 And he said that there are a lot more injuries than what they're being reported right now.

01:02:39.000 So it's staggeringly corrupt, particularly hot off the heels of the opioid crisis, that one wonders if many of the large pharmaceutical companies should not just be regulated more efficiently, but actually demonopolized and broken down and bought into new systems of ownership that would perhaps steward these powerful organizations with a little more responsibility.

01:03:02.000 There's a report out today about Merck corruptly covering up the inefficacy of its mumps vaccine.

01:03:10.000 The mumps are, instead of actually fixing it, they spent all kinds of time and research

01:03:17.000 trying to justify the fact, no, this really is more efficacious than we thought it was.

01:03:22.000 So no, listen, our pharmaceutical companies have completely captured our federal health agencies.

01:03:28.000 They've also captured the media.

01:03:30.000 So that's why I call it the COVID cartel. The Biden administration, our federal health agencies captured by Big

01:03:35.000 Pharma, together with the media and social media giants. That is

01:03:38.000 the COVID cartel.

01:03:39.000 They're the one that sabotaged early treatment. They're the one that wanted and pushed the vaccine,

01:03:43.000 led by people like Bill Gates, who for some reason wants to vaccinate the world and every living thing on it.

01:03:50.000 He's very keen, isn't he, Bill Gates, to vaccinate people.

01:03:52.000 I think he should take more of these vaccines himself, to see if he can withstand them, and pipe down a little bit.

01:04:00.000 One of the things that perhaps we don't focus on enough is that the whole undergirding of the endeavor was that human life is sacred and if any of us individually or collectively can do things to protect one another, we will do it.

01:04:12.000 Whether that's take a particular medication or lock ourselves in our home or yield to authority in ways that would usually be inconceivable.

01:04:20.000 Are you heartened to any degree to learn that people still regard life with such a sanctity or do you think that was simply something that was exploited to further legitimize authority?

01:04:32.000 And on this idea of the sanctity of human life which underwrites the measures to protect human life and indeed much of the compassion underwritten authoritarianism of the neoliberal democratic movement, do you feel that what you and I talked about in the bathroom. I keep

01:04:49.000 mentioning situations that we talked in that sound really illegitimate. We were chatting in the

01:04:53.000 hotel, we were chatting in the bathroom, but in the bathroom you talked about some of them projects

01:04:57.000 you do to help people with addiction issues. I'm in recovery from addiction. Do you think that

01:05:01.000 this kind of genuine compassion, this idea of serving in the manner of our Lord and Savior

01:05:06.000 Jesus Christ, ought to be at the forefront of systems of government and authority in a way

01:05:09.000 that seems impossible when you're discussing this level of corruption? First, I believe most

01:05:15.000 people are good. Okay, America is a great country because Americans are good people.

01:05:19.000 The UK has been a great country because...

01:05:23.000 Britain's, you know, Anglo-Saxons are by and large good people. 1.00

01:05:27.000 Now, we've been led by some very bad people, by corrupt people, by stupid people. 1.00

01:05:33.000 Who like? 1.00

01:05:34.000 There's a bunch.

01:05:37.000 I think most Chinese people are good.

01:05:39.000 I think most Russians are good.

01:05:40.000 I think most Iranians are good.

01:05:42.000 I think most people trapped in North Korea are good people.

01:05:45.000 And the British?

01:05:46.000 It is British.

01:05:47.000 I love the British.

01:05:48.000 I work for a company.

01:05:49.000 They're run by the British. 0.96

01:05:50.000 I spend a lot of time over.

01:05:51.000 I love you, okay?

01:05:53.000 Thank you.

01:05:53.000 You're hard partying, like Wisconsinites.

01:05:55.000 You might drink it every now and again.

01:05:57.000 Yeah, too much.

01:05:57.000 But sometimes, I know.

01:05:58.000 Stock and roll.

01:05:59.000 I got that.

01:06:00.000 But no, again, people are good.

01:06:03.000 We need to elect better leaders.

01:06:05.000 We need to embrace the essential ingredients of what allows government to protect us, and that is called freedom.

01:06:12.000 I would say it's the essential ingredient.

01:06:14.000 It's allowed people to dream and aspire and build and create lives for themselves, better communities, better nations.

01:06:20.000 But the more essential, the higher value is truth.

01:06:24.000 And what I appreciate are those doctors who risked and lost their careers.

01:06:30.000 They were vilified.

01:06:31.000 And I appreciate people like you who've also used this format to tell people the truth.

01:06:37.000 I mean, you have been the light.

01:06:39.000 I did quite well, didn't I?

01:06:40.000 You absolutely have.

01:06:42.000 Oh, hey, you lot.

01:06:43.000 Didn't I do very well? 0.93

01:06:44.000 Excuse me, show me where's my bloody single?

01:06:46.000 Thank you very much.

01:06:47.000 Hey, listen, will you stay with us, Ron?

01:06:49.000 Because Marjorie Taylor Greene is here and will be joining us live.

01:06:52.000 We are going to have a real COVID showdown.

01:06:54.000 Would you like to join us?

01:06:55.000 You look exceptional today.

01:06:56.000 By the way, Marjorie is definitely one of the few people in the house Who has advocated for the vaccine injured, held unauthorized hearings.

01:07:06.000 Probably not to the, you know, the joy of the chairman of the committee, but she's shown some real courage as well.

01:07:11.000 She's one of those individuals.

01:07:13.000 We were talking about like the VARS events, the number of excess deaths.

01:07:16.000 We're talking about a good many things.

01:07:17.000 What type of reckoning is required and how likely is it that when it comes to criminal proceedings and genuine consequences, For people like Fauci, that that will be pursued.

01:07:27.000 And how far are you willing to pursue it?

01:07:29.000 Because Ron's actually prepared to pursue it quite aggressively, it seems.

01:07:32.000 Well, we've worked together, the Senator and I, because, well, you know, I'm one of those un-vaxxed people.

01:07:37.000 I just didn't buy into the whole lie that was, I felt, sold to us from the medical-industrial complex.

01:07:45.000 But really to break that system, we have to look deeper into why so many members of Congress

01:07:51.000 and elected officials are basically beholden to the different big pharma companies.

01:07:58.000 And that's because they're funded by them.

01:08:00.000 And that shouldn't hold elected officials in place.

01:08:05.000 But when you have many people receiving their donations that fill their campaign coffers from big companies

01:08:14.000 like Pfizer and Moderna and so forth, then it muzzles them in ways it shouldn't, right? 0.85

01:08:20.000 And luckily, um, gosh, approximately over 95% of my donations are small dollar donations.

01:08:28.000 So the only people I work for are the people that voted for me in my district and the American people.

01:08:33.000 And so that's very freeing for someone like me.

01:08:36.000 I don't have to worry about having money in my campaign to get reelected because I've had to depend on the lobbyists in Washington or the big industries that rely on government contracts or rely on government officials and unelected bureaucrats making decisions in order to empower them.

01:08:56.000 And I think that's extremely important, and that's a good conversation.

01:08:59.000 Let me quick add, because there's no doubt about there's a financial component of this, but I think even more at play here is the fact that whether it's doctors, whether it's members of Congress who have always pushed, for example, childhood vaccines, and they did videos on the, you know, get vax.

01:09:14.000 Listen, I support Operation Warp Speed.

01:09:15.000 I want to end this pandemic.

01:09:17.000 If there would have been a vaccine that would have worked, I'd have been happy to have it and support it.

01:09:21.000 But again, I talked to Michael Eden.

01:09:22.000 So the fact that people have recommended this or pushed it or mandated it, they don't want to admit that what they recommended, pushed or mandated could have killed somebody, might have permanently disabled them.

01:09:34.000 So they will never admit they're wrong.

01:09:37.000 The body count is way too high.

01:09:38.000 And from my standpoint, and now the American public, quite honestly, anybody who got vaccinated, They don't want to face the reality that maybe they've got a ticking time bomb.

01:09:47.000 I hate to say that, okay?

01:09:49.000 Everybody wants to just forget it and move on, but we can't because they want to use this mRNA platform for other things.

01:09:57.000 And in the end, you have to expose the truth to prevent further harm.

01:10:04.000 Thank you very much for joining us for this special.

01:10:06.000 We will be back tomorrow with a World War special.

01:10:10.000 How many fronts can this battle be fought on simultaneously?

01:10:13.000 Escalating tensions in Venezuela, Iran, throughout the Middle East.

01:10:18.000 In fact, of course, Ukraine and Russia continues. 0.94

01:10:20.000 But the greatest foe of all, the nation that causes most consternation and terror is China. 1.00

01:10:26.000 We'll be back tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.

01:10:28.000 Until then, if you can, stay free.

Stay Free - Russel Brand - August 07, 2024

EXPOSED: It Goes DEEPER Than We Imagined! | DISTURBING New Vaccine Info - SF 424

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript