This week on the show, we have an interview with Richard Dawkins, an FBI whistleblower, and we ask whether or not the mainstream media are funded by the military-industrial complex. Plus, a story about a Chinese warship being shot down in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean by an American drone, and a look at how much money the media makes from selling weapons to the government. All that and much more on this week s episode of The Dark Side Of. Awakening Wonders. Produced by Alex Blumberg and Patrick Muldowney. Our theme song is Come Alone by Suneaters, courtesy of Lotuspool Records. This episode was produced by Tall Tales and edited by Annie-Rose Strasser. It was mixed by Matthew Boll and Matthew Boll. Special thanks to our sponsor, Pfizer, for supporting the show. We are working on transcribing this episode of the show and putting it on SoundCloud. If you like what you hear, please leave us a rating and review in the comments section below. Thank you so much for your support, it really means a lot to us and we'll make sure we keep bringing you the best quality and quality content. Peace, Love, Blessings, Cheers, EJ & Rory. - The EJ and Rory. -Your Hosts, Ej & Rory -The Ej and Rory, AKA The Ej Crew Copyright 2019 Copyright 2019 by Dee McDonnell and Rory Campbell. All rights reserved. All Rights reserved. Ej.co.nz. Used by Dee and Rory is a copyright of the Ej is a registered under a Creative Commons Attribution license. Used w/ permission. .org. Used to create this content is copyright of this work. All credit given to charcter.org.org by the EJ Crew.org .co.mnr.nz/ We do not own the rights to use this work unless otherwise credited to any other person else's use of this material is owned by third-party owners. or any other third-third-party use is doing so. Thank you, unless otherwise stated in this work, unless stated in any other credit is credit given). This work is not claimed by copyright notice, credit given, other such credit, etc., etc., unless otherwise indicated, etc. by third party permission is said to be used in this material.
00:02:32.000Garrett O'Boyle, he'll be here, and Steve Friend.
00:02:35.000They're sick of the FBI, they've been working there, they've had enough of it.
00:02:38.000They're gonna be telling us all about it.
00:02:39.000We've got a brilliant presentation on Rachel Maddow doing that military-industrial-complex conference funded by Lockheed Martin, and we asked some questions about the mainstream media and their relationship with the military-industrial-complex, and whether or not it means that wars get reported on favorably, peculiarly, Especially by the left, who used to be all double Desna Avawar, as I recall.
00:03:02.000Let me know in the chat, in the comments, if you think that the way that the media is funded, particularly through companies like Raytheon, Lockheed, Martin, and of course General Electric, who own MSNBC?
00:03:37.000Uh, we're, like, we're gonna be talking about, like, yeah, we're gonna talk to them FBI whistleblowers, and we're gonna be analyzing the news and stuff, right?
00:03:45.000This is an ABC News report about a near-miss for these warships, and it's really good how they report this, because they're like, uh, this Chinese warship got in the way of an American warship!
00:04:19.000Right, so you're sending drones up above Russia.
00:04:22.000Yeah, we've been trying to annoy them.
00:04:24.000And all this is, of course, because of the changing economic tides that China is set to become the most economically powerful nation in the world in the next... Yeah, by 2035.
00:04:33.0002035, or as we say in England, 25 to 9.
00:04:34.0002035 or as we say in England 25 to 9. So first of all, sorry, so
00:04:39.000Well, I'm gonna do stuff like that sometimes I mean, come to work in a dressing gown, what do you expect?
00:04:45.000Let's have a look at this warship thing.
00:04:47.000Firstly, from a perspective that makes it look really bad, and then from another perspective that makes it not look that bad at all.
00:04:52.000Let's have a look first at the bad one.
00:04:54.000Tonight, tensions flaring after that Chinese warship nearly collided with a US military destroyer.
00:05:01.000Did you say, like, that Chinese warship?
00:05:10.000If you're watching us on YouTube, we'll be exclusively on Rumble in a minute, talking to a couple of whistleblowers, Garrett O'Boyle and Stevie Friend.
00:05:19.000We'll be talking to them about, they're going to talk about January the 6th.
00:05:22.000They're going to reveal stuff that you're going to love, so you're going to want to join us over on Rumble for that.
00:05:26.000I suppose you'd freak out if you were on it.
00:05:36.000out if you were on it. Right. Oh my god. This is not good, a collision. Well that
00:05:41.000makes it look like literally they were about to crash. It'll be mental. Yeah.
00:05:45.000Also, do you know that people always use that analogy don't they?
00:05:49.000That, you know, if you set off on a thousand mile journey on a battleship and you're just one degree off, by the time you reach your destination, you'll be thousands of miles off or whatever.
00:06:30.000Joe Biden, we're talking about this a bit later as well, Joe Biden banging on about semiconductors, making their own bombing factories, all sorts of sort of ludicrous semi threats.
00:07:30.000The near collision, the latest episode straining an already tense US-China relationship.
00:07:37.000Just like- We're showing you this because it's the amplification of
00:07:39.000tensions between China and the US and you simply wouldn't be seeing things like this on the news
00:07:44.000unless there was an appetite for there to be some kind of conflict.
00:07:47.000If they didn't want a conflict, they wouldn't put this on the news.
00:07:49.000So it's another example of how the media supports favorable narratives that support outcomes
00:07:56.000that the military-industrial complex will benefit from.
00:07:58.000And the mainstream media still somehow presents itself as the sort of arbiters of peace and morality.
00:08:04.000And a figure like Rachel Maddow, who I've told you before I like, like she's on MSNBC, sort of like, in 2011 she said like that Congress are in the pockets of the military-industrial complex.
00:08:15.000Well, now she seems to have joined them in that pocket because she appeared at an event for Lockheed Martin.
00:08:20.000We're looking at that in more depth, Bob.
00:08:21.000Gal, I wanted to see, let's have a look guys at Caitlyn Johnson's tweet about that and then we'll look at the alternative angle.
00:08:28.000She goes, that sounds incredibly aggressive of China.
00:09:38.000One of the interesting ideas that's floated out there for deterrence is just making it very clear to the Chinese that if you invade Taiwan, we're going to blow up TSMC.
00:09:48.000If you do that, you have a $2 trillion economic impact on the global economy.
00:11:38.000Bear thinks I'm going to produce a dog bisque and get it out of my pocket.
00:11:40.000What kind of lives do you think I'm living?
00:11:42.000Jack Dorsey has endorsed RFK, or it's his endorsement.
00:11:46.000I'm sorry that I said that, but it's been done now.
00:11:49.000Um I think that what's going to be great with like Cornel West announcing his candidacy here on this very show for the People's Party with RFK running that the conversation is going to be extraordinary because somehow RFK when he came on here oh the military were behind the whole vaccine he said some extraordinary stuff you've got to see that interview it's going to change the conversation It's like, obviously my assumption would be that the Democratic Party aren't going to allow RFK's candidacy to flourish, let alone be successful.
00:12:22.000They'll be trying to shut that down, close that down at every opportunity.
00:12:25.000Biden's refused to debate him or Marianne Williamson.
00:12:28.000The mainstream media won't platform any of these people.
00:13:43.000Rachel Maddow, Goat of Preach, Whistleblowers.
00:13:47.000In a minute, right, I think we've got the FBI on the line, the whistleblowers, but before that, we respect, while the world may not respect your free speech, While the WHO may still be offering up the guidelines that are followed on YouTube, they've renewed their deal with Google, we respect your free speech.
00:14:05.000And where freedom and speech meet, you get freech.
00:14:28.000Others of you thought, oh no, he's talking too much about egalitarianism and wealth redistribution, I think, without giving due attention to the fact that we already have massive wealth redistribution, like the five trillion wealth transfer that took place during the pandemic, creating a billionaire a day.
00:14:43.000But we have it in what I would regard as the wrong direction.
00:18:21.000All right, listen, why don't we talk to these FBI whistleblowers?
00:18:23.000If you're watching this on YouTube now, we can't broadcast these FBI whistleblowers, these brave men who are willing to testify against the FBI, who many people feel should be disbanded, because they're going to say stuff about January the 6th that would get us struck off.
00:18:46.000You've been suspecting for a little while now, haven't you, that January the 6th has been reported on inaccurately and utilized to introduce anti-protest laws, legitimize surveillance, spend additional revenue on the Capitol Police Force.
00:20:03.000First of all, Garrett, let's talk about the January 6th revelations.
00:20:08.000What in particular do you feel has caused you to get so much blowback?
00:20:12.000What is it that you have said that's caused so much consternation?
00:20:16.000What in particular did you observe about January the 6th and the FBI handling of it and FBI instigation and involvement in those protests?
00:20:25.000So my January 6th example that I whistleblew about was I received a lead from the Washington field office And it was based on an anonymous tip.
00:20:40.000So in the U.S., in law enforcement, anonymous tips don't hold a whole lot of weight, especially when there's limited information.
00:20:47.000You can't recontact the person who made the claim, things of that nature.
00:20:51.000And there's Supreme Court case law that helps dictate that.
00:20:54.000And so in mine, it was very limited info.
00:20:58.000And so I thought, OK, I'll do my best, my due diligence to run this down.
00:21:03.000And as I'm working on that for a day or two, I get some additional information from the same special agent in Washington who sent me the original lead and they were asking me to request a federal grand jury subpoena on the person that the original lead was on as well as a separate website where they made an illogical leap linking a username that we had no information about and with the person that I was supposed to be investigating.
00:21:36.000As I'm trying to figure all that out I then get a facial recognition match and by this point I had already had the most current driver's license photo of my subject and the quote-unquote facial recognition match was someone who was about 150 pounds lighter and had a full head of hair whereas the person I was investigating was bald.
00:21:58.000So I was really confused at this point and As I dug deeper, it turned out that someone in my field office had submitted a driver's license photo that was approximately 25 years old to the people in the lab who do the facial recognition stuff.
00:22:16.000And so at that point, I was like, okay, this is really out of bounds.
00:22:22.000being had here for the person that they want me to investigate and eventually I was able to make contact with that person and they told me they didn't want to talk to me without a lawyer and they told me that they weren't breaking any law no matter where they were on January 6th so at that point it was clear to me that there was No further information to to keep going with this investigation and then I contacted the person who made that facial recognition submission and they were adamant that regardless of the of the age of the driver's license photo that I had a match and
00:22:59.000I was just completely flabbergasted at that point because it's completely outside any constitutional norms that I had ever dealt with inside law enforcement, which I had been working in it for eight years total.
00:24:03.000We call ourselves the Suspendables, which we kind of did on a lark just to think of future Employment opportunities, maybe we could be mercenaries somewhere and rip off Sylvester Stallone.
00:24:14.000But apparently the New York Times found it very nefarious sounding and put it in the newspaper of record.
00:24:20.000So we have taken that mantle and you can see Garrett wearing some Suspendables gear right now.
00:24:32.000I mean, you have to laugh or you'd cry.
00:24:35.000It's been sort of an out-of-control bureau in the way that they've gone after Garrett and myself and many others who, you know, we came forward with the best of intentions.
00:24:45.000We didn't want to be talking to you, Russell.
00:24:47.000We just wanted to, you know, alert the people that were in a position of authority to make corrections and thought things were kind of out of whack.
00:24:55.000We wanted to go back to just doing the Joe Friday, just the facts, let's put bad guys in jail.
00:25:00.000But unfortunately, the FBI has just become out of control at this point.
00:25:05.000I suppose your detractors will say that you have a particular political persuasion and that you are agitators on behalf of the same movement that they would say are behind January the 6th but actually some of your revelations indicate that there were a considerable number of FBI operatives in that crowd who were perhaps doing more than monitoring and observing Allegedly.
00:25:33.000but in fact possibly instigating and exacerbating the conditions and there is some precedent for that
00:25:39.000allegedly within the FBI. Numerous cases where their investigations have gone beyond investigation
00:25:47.000and have become instigation. Furthermore as I heard you in your testimony say Steve,
00:25:53.000that the surveillance has gone beyond the observance of certain criminal acts to an
00:26:00.000ongoing cycle of surveillance that is unending and limitless.
00:26:07.000So back to you now, Gareth, because it is your turn and I'm determined to do this fairly and justly even though it has to be said your flag is not as big as Steve's and that makes you seem a bit A bit unpatriotic, I'd have to say.
00:26:20.000So, tell me, mate, have you got any more information on FBI instigation on January the 6th and elsewhere?
00:26:30.000Regarding January the 6th, there was another whistleblower whose testimony was played at our hearing.
00:26:35.000His name is George Hill, and he had some information regarding Washington Field Office not wanting to release a video to the Boston Field Office where he was working because they were concerned about revealing identities of FBI informants and or undercover employees.
00:26:52.000So I think once that revelation came to light, it became clear to everyone who already wasn't paying attention that there was Most likely a heavy law enforcement presence involved with the events of that day, but it certainly is something that the FBI takes under consideration in many, many different types of cases.
00:27:12.000So, in the FBI, a confidential informant is known as a confidential human source, or CHS, and it's FBI policy that FBI agents have at least one CHS on the books.
00:27:27.000Many have more than one, and it's the purview of the agency to push agents to implement CHS use as often as they can.
00:27:36.000So they will never release the amount of CHSs that the agency has as a whole, but it is a considerable number, and they try to put those CHSs and undercover employees into a wide range of different type of investigations.
00:27:51.000There's a recent story about Biden and bribery, as well as a new report, or poll at least, that suggests that the majority of Americans want the FBI to be reformed or shut down.
00:28:05.000Steve, given your recent experience, do you think reform is possible, or do you think that the entire organisation needs to be disbanded and started again?
00:28:14.000I think it's a six-on-one, half-dozen-or-the-other situation.
00:28:17.000I think the amount of reforms that are going to be necessary to make the FBI function properly in federal law enforcement are going to be so enormous that maybe starting all over again might just be the simpler task at this point.
00:28:29.000But I think that the elected officials are very scared of being labeled as Defund the police candidate for office.
00:28:38.000So there's all this reticence that surrounds that, but those guys just need to talk to the people that are boots on the ground, the Gerardo Boyles, the Steve Friends who actually worked in the FBI and can tell you that it's really all about empowering local law enforcement.
00:28:54.000That should be what the FBI prioritizes above anything else.
00:28:59.000This whole thought where you have a central hub in Washington, D.C., and they send out cases around the country to be worked is just farcical.
00:29:08.000All the good cases that the FBI works Thank you.
00:29:10.000Gareth, do you have a question for Steve or Gareth?
00:29:11.000and the sheriff's offices, where we have our small offices around the country. And we just
00:29:16.000really have to be there to support those guys because they don't have the finances and the
00:29:21.000cool gadgets that the FBI has. And maybe thinking about it in that way might make it more palatable
00:29:57.000Gentlemen, I just wanted to talk briefly about the Congressional hearing and the Democrats and The way in which you've been treated by, I guess, both the FBI and the Democrats.
00:30:08.000Obviously we know recently about the Durham report and the findings there, and also about the 278,000 illegal searches that were done by the FBI that's been reported on as well.
00:30:19.000And a sentence written by Michael Schellenberger, and I just wondered your opinions on it.
00:30:23.000He said, so why did the FBI and Democrats attack the FBI whistleblowers?
00:30:27.000Perhaps because they are revealing at a minimum the FBI's failure to stop the riot, And more maximally, its role in instigating it.
00:30:35.000And I wondered if it was going too far to suggest the FBI had a role in instigating Jan 6th, and what your thoughts were on that.
00:30:51.000Yeah, I think that the demand for domestic terrorism in this country by our elected officials and by leaders in the FBI vastly outstrips the supply of it.
00:30:59.000And unfortunately, the FBI essentially has a quota system that bosses get bonuses for if they open a certain number of cases.
00:31:07.000So domestic terrorism is popular and they want to open up a lot of cases.
00:31:11.000So they've contrived ways to work smarter and not harder.
00:31:15.000And as a result of that, the FBI has evolved into this intelligence-driven agency, and it deploys its informants, its confidential human sources, and its undercovers, and oftentimes infiltrates these groups that they label as possibly domestic terrorists or could become domestic terrorists.
00:31:33.000And as a result of that, you have an incident that happens at January 6th, or even on a smaller scale, like the plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer, where it was sort of revealed in the trial for those individuals that they were essentially entrapped, that they were not predisposed to commit that.
00:31:49.000That offense, but because of the infiltration on behalf of the government, not that the government set up the group, but they infiltrated so heavily that they encouraged these guys to do things that they were not predisposed to do.
00:32:01.000And I think that you saw that on its worst example on January 6, where there are a lot of organizations that were there just to support Donald Trump or to protest and redress their grievances in front of the Congress, which is their First Amendment protected activity.
00:32:13.000But because there were infiltrators afoot, they encouraged them to do something that was illegal.
00:32:18.000You are getting a lot of love here in the chat, as well as some inquiries.
00:32:22.000Georgie Gal says, presumably AI will replace the FBI.
00:32:26.000If you want to join us on Locals, just press the red button on your screen now and I can see your questions.
00:32:31.000Jim Earth C137, they both seem like good men who are just trying to do the Some people are talking about the bribe of Biden and then true chimera.
00:33:37.000I would say I align more as a libertarian than anything else.
00:33:41.000In 2016, I voted libertarian across the ballot.
00:33:47.000But especially as an FBI employee, and furthermore, as an investigator, Your job is to be as unpartisan as possible or nonpartisan as possible.
00:33:58.000And that's something any police academy, the FBI Academy, any constitutional law course you might take, they try to teach you that and drill that into your head.
00:34:08.000But as we've seen with something like the Durham Report and the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation and things of that nature, it's the top echelon, especially of the FBI, that are the ones that Our partisan and are seemingly having an agenda to skew the law enforcement activities one way or the other in this nation.
00:34:29.000And it's incumbent on every investigator to have it at the forefront of their mind that they come from a certain background and certain experiences that have helped.
00:34:47.000And that's why it's on us to always remember, okay, am I looking at this investigation or the facts that I'm discovering in this investigation as impartially as possible and following the rule of law as best as I can without my own agenda?
00:35:01.000And I think for both of us, The answer was that the FBI as a whole was the institution that was not partisan, or that was partisan rather, and that in part is what led us to come forward.
00:35:15.000When I was deposed in February, I told both Democrat lawyers and Republican lawyers that these issues are not partisan in nature, or they shouldn't be.
00:35:25.000And then, lo and behold, a few weeks later, it was the Democrat side who leaked small snippets of that testimony and tried to paint me as some deep mega-operative.
00:35:35.000And that couldn't be further from the truth.
00:35:37.000And when something like that happens, it was clear to me that they are the ones with an agenda.
00:35:41.000They don't really care about the facts or substance of our protected disclosures.
00:35:46.000They care only about protecting the party, only about protecting the FBI.
00:35:50.000And that couldn't be more clear to me at this point.
00:36:39.000No, I think my default setting is similar to Garrett, where I'm a libertarian by nature.
00:36:43.000I like to look at each individual candidate for a particular office.
00:36:46.000I kind of view politicians as being plumbers.
00:36:48.000I just want them to solve the problem and then, you know, not really get personally attached to any one of them.
00:36:53.000I think the one thing that gets lost in the attacks that came after me on the Democrat side during the hearing, where they tried to attribute some sort of sympathy towards a political side, I brought my whistleblower concerns forward, not because I had sympathy for the subject, but because I thought we might be putting our cases in jeopardy.
00:37:15.000If it was a righteous prosecution and we were not buttoned up in what we were doing and the FBI is not following the rules, I thought we could lose a trial.
00:37:23.000And then I was also concerned that there was a public safety risk in using a SWAT team to arrest somebody who had already pledged to be cooperative with law enforcement.
00:37:32.000A simple phone call to an attorney and ask to surrender is more than adequate in that situation.
00:37:38.000It was not because I was trying to get my fellow MAGA guy out of jail for free.
00:37:41.000I just wanted, I would think of myself more as a system idealist.
00:37:45.000And I think of criminals as system disruptors that we have to push back on.
00:37:50.000And now at this point, the FBI is really the system disruptor.
00:38:04.000The FBI denied me the ability to seek outside employment, which I requested, and they denied in one calendar day.
00:38:11.000My wife lost her job under very suspicious circumstances very shortly after I was put in unpaid indefinite suspension.
00:38:19.000The FBI leaked my private medical information to the New York Times and told them that I was accused of shooting a firearm in my backyard.
00:38:26.000And then the inspection division within the FBI also said that they tried to put a gag order on me to prevent me from speaking to an attorney or even my family about the situation.
00:38:35.000So it was a long train of abuses and eventually ended with my resignation in order to—I had a job offer on the table and had been unpaid for long enough that I had to provide for my family.
00:38:48.000Again and again in the chat here on Locals, press the red button if you want to join.
00:38:55.000A lot of people are in awe of the personal sacrifices you have made as a result of your belief in liberty and Just this and it's very very impressive that you have taken this risk and you've put yourself in a position where you can evoke so much ire and receive so much negative attention and of course I suppose the way that you're treated will indicate what kind of biases are present because all of us regardless of our political affiliations
00:39:24.000ought be interested in justice and telling the truth and the transparency and reliability of an organization like the FBI.
00:39:31.000Steve, I liked your remark that politicians should just be like plumbers solving problems and a lot of people picked up on that in the chat as well.
00:39:38.000I'd like to thank both of you very much for joining us today on Stay Free and also to thank you once again for putting yourself in such a vulnerable position where you've been the subject of persecution because Of your values and your personal sacrifices.
00:40:21.000Shall we show you a presentation that we've made where we talk about Rachel Maddow headlining a conference that was funded by Lockheed Martin, and we talk about the influence that the military-industrial complex are able to exert on political processes and media reporting through their expenditure, or do you just want us to Muckabout and just be stupid and just make stuff up off the top of our heads.
00:40:44.000So you can just say Rachel Maddow or top of head, muckabed.
00:43:07.000You normally, you are a bit awkward in those situations.
00:43:09.000Like say if I'm at an award ceremony, like it's been a while, let's face it, but like either hosting it or as the potential recipient, I always look a bit sort of weird.
00:43:17.000No, I think you've done a lot of work, interpersonal work.
00:43:21.000Like how to be... I've improved, haven't I?
00:43:22.000Yeah, you've got... I've come across as like normal... Techniques now, haven't you?
00:43:57.000The news has been going for as long as there are people, but never forget that the news is a TV show with a perspective.
00:44:02.000That the news always presents you with a version of events that's favourable, in our opinion here on Stay Free, with the interests of the powerful.
00:44:10.000Let's have a look at On This Week in History.
00:45:07.000Imagine I'd done that with a lot of emotional gravitas if I'd gone and now the moving spectacle of the power one person can have when they're willing to stand up to tyranny in a time where authoritarianism is becoming more and more pervasive.
00:45:21.000We need to take inspiration from Tankman is my Great Scott, Marty!
00:45:27.000Marty, we've got to do something about your kid!
00:45:30.000Marty, you've got to go back to the past!
00:45:38.000Oh, I don't know about this, Doc, for God's sake.
00:45:40.000Let's have a look at Tank Man in Tiananmen Square.
00:45:44.000It was noontime today in the centre of Beijing when a man walked to the middle of the Avenue of Eternal Peace, which as it happened was already occupied.
00:45:52.000He walked to the middle and stood there.
00:45:57.000It's very powerful as an image isn't it and earlier when we watched it in our meeting where we were sort of preparing the show, yes we do prepare it, I was quite touched and almost tearful at the stand that man had made and as Jamie observes he's got his shop in and that it's not like he was even out to protest he just popped out and thought hang on this ain't right.
00:46:14.000The avenue of eternal peace with all them tanks on it.
00:46:46.000He got himself quite jazzed up and went from stopping it to getting on the tank.
00:46:49.000he stopped there were 18 tanks and armored carriers in this convoy and while he talked
00:46:54.000to the crew and ignored the gunfire he stopped all of them one man alone of course can't stop an army
00:47:02.000except for a moment that's exactly what happened here for three got himself quite jazzed up and
00:47:08.000went from stopping it to getting on the tank exactly yeah pretty good
00:47:12.000A lot of people, someone said here, you should probably give Jackson positive enforcement, it might improve his work, but what can we positively enforce?
00:47:22.000Um, that he's come at all, he's here, he's turned up.
00:47:26.000In the middle of the day, an army was stopped by a man who stood still.
00:47:31.000A man who'd made up his mind, it seems, though why, we just don't know.
00:47:35.000But when bystanders rushed in to save this stubborn soul, it wasn't easily done.
00:47:41.000He was pushed away at last, faceless in the crowd.
00:47:44.000Safe, we think, but in a city verging on calamity.
00:48:07.000Obviously, you know, we've been talking about China and US aggression and what's going on there at the moment and the kind of two-sided stories that there are with that.
00:48:17.000And then we just had FBI whistleblowers of like a scene in the capital That's maybe being reported differently to the reality of it.
00:48:26.000And then you watch a news report like this and you think, God, these things are, you know, the way that this is reported compared to events in America would be extremely different.
00:48:35.000But there's things going on everywhere.
00:48:37.000Tiananmen Square was not a false flag event.
00:52:14.000Think about when David Bowie died, the outpouring of grief, the reverence, how he's become now a cultural icon that almost you can't criticise.
00:52:37.000It is a sign of our times that a man with a painted face and carefully adjusted lipstick should inspire adoration from an audience of girls aged between 14 and 20.
00:53:50.000You think, oh, this guy's pretty shady, dodgy.
00:53:52.000Don't want him in charge of an entire country.
00:53:55.000Leading us to the brink of a global world war, particularly with the incentive to legitimize military action that NATO's actions and the military-industrial complex requirements have set in motion a chain of events that could lead to the apocalypse.
00:54:11.000Well, at least we don't have Boris Yeltsin in charge, because that guy was edgy as hell.
00:54:16.000He's like sort of a polar bear Father Christmas mad drunk uncle tyrant.
00:57:39.000Join us tomorrow, but if you're on Locals, get over there, press the red button on your screen, join us on Locals, we're going to have a right laugh, we'll carry on.
00:57:45.000But this is vodka in here, I'm going to be dancing like Boris Yeltsin in a minute.
00:57:48.000Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.