Stay Free - Russel Brand - August 30, 2024


“HE WASN’T ACTING ALONE!” - Dan Bongino DESTROYS SECRET SERVICE At Trump J13 Hearing - SF 441


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 10 minutes

Words per Minute

140.90222

Word Count

9,943

Sentence Count

645

Misogynist Sentences

12

Hate Speech Sentences

6


Summary

Russell Brand is joined by Carl Reiner and Frederick Reiner to discuss Mark Zuckerberg's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Bobby Kennedy's comments about the FDA, and a new piece by Chris Hedges on why the pet food brand Pawsitive is a bad idea. Plus, a look at the cross-party endorsements from both sides of the Democratic Party. Stay tuned to the end for a discount promo code BRAND15 to get 15% off your first pack! Logo by Courtney DeKorte. Theme by Mavus White. Music by PSOVOD and tyops. All rights reserved. Used by permission. This episode was produced and edited by Riley Bray. We do not own the rights to any music used in this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please leave us a five star rating and review on Apple Podcasts. It helps us to keep bringing you high quality, diverse and inspirational music. Thank you so much to everyone who has helped make this podcast possible. Stay free, stay tuned, and tweet us if you like it! Timestamps: 5:00 - What are you looking for the future? 6:30 - What's next? 7:15 - What do you want? 8:40 - What s next for me? 9:20 - Is it possible? 11:00s - What would you like to see in 2020? 12:30s - Who do you think is better? 13:40s 14:20s 15:00 16: What s your favourite pet food? 17:00 szn 18:00 + 17:40 19:00 is it better than mine? 21:10s - How do you like a dog? 22:00 | Is it a good idea? 23:00 Is there a dog that s better than yours? 25:00 Does it make you think it s a good thing? 26:00+ 27: Is it good enough? 35:00 & 27:00 / 26: Is your dog better than my dog a better than that sipping it? 36:00/16: Is that a good deal? 29:00 // 27:40 + + +c? & 35:15 35 + 36 + 35 & 35 + +36?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 (birds chirping)
00:10:40.000 , ,
00:10:42.000 You You
00:11:02.000 Brought to you by So I'm looking for the steel
00:11:22.000 Looking for the steel In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:11:27.000 Hello, this is Frederick. Hi.
00:11:31.000 We're going to be working in. We've got a live shot there.
00:11:33.000 Hello there, you awakening wonders.
00:11:39.000 Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:11:43.000 How great it is to be joined by you on another extraordinary day in the approach to the election.
00:11:53.000 How are you getting on in the Rumble Chat, Carl Rhino and Liquor Giant?
00:11:58.000 We've got some good stuff to cover from Bongino's testimony that I think you're going to be pretty interested in, as well as looking at some more revelations from Bobby Kennedy.
00:12:08.000 Some interesting I'll call them, I suppose, reflections on what the Zuckerberg position indicates.
00:12:17.000 The sound's low, guys, on the mic, if you wouldn't mind addressing that.
00:12:21.000 Thank you.
00:12:21.000 Have you got that note, please?
00:12:22.000 Got it.
00:12:23.000 Thank you, mate.
00:12:23.000 Thank you.
00:12:25.000 And it'll be fantastic for us to discover together... That's my dog in the background, man.
00:12:31.000 Let's discover together what we can take from the cross-party endorsements about which the Democrats are so proud.
00:12:42.000 Okay, guys, let's, uh, let's, uh, let's fix my collar.
00:12:45.000 What's wrong with my collar?
00:12:48.000 Thank you.
00:12:49.000 Yeah, good point.
00:12:51.000 Very good point.
00:12:52.000 Thank you.
00:12:52.000 Okay, let's get into it.
00:12:55.000 Firstly, this is what Callie Means has sort of posted What do you want?
00:13:00.000 These are actually snacks that are available from Rumble.
00:13:04.000 Actually, come on, let's do this now.
00:13:05.000 It's a great opportunity to do it.
00:13:07.000 Rumble make these snacks, you see, and they are available for your pets.
00:13:13.000 Let's see how this goes over with him.
00:13:15.000 He's sniffing it.
00:13:17.000 He's examining it.
00:13:18.000 He's taken it!
00:13:20.000 What an extraordinary moment that is.
00:13:23.000 This is a brand called Positive.
00:13:24.000 It's a pet food brand that Rumble have.
00:13:27.000 But also they have a pet insurance that is an affiliate to it.
00:13:31.000 You know, like dogs can go from very high energy to just being sick in an instant.
00:13:36.000 And you know it's like if you have to call a vet like when they're out of hours.
00:13:39.000 It's a terrible way to manage your dog's health, not to mention it can be very stressful for you.
00:13:43.000 So there's this emergency pet kit that you can get from Pawsitive Health, which contains critical medications and supplies that can keep you out of vets and maybe even save your dog's life.
00:13:52.000 So if you want to use it, go to Pawsitive, that's spelled like P-A-W, Pawsitive.com slash brand.
00:13:59.000 That's pawsitive, P-A-W-S-itive.com slash brand.
00:14:04.000 And get your pet emergency kit that's got critical meds in it, like activated charcoal and styptic powder.
00:14:10.000 And you can get 15% off using the code brand today.
00:14:14.000 Go to pawsitive.com slash brand and use the code brand to get 15% off.
00:14:18.000 I like these Rumble connected organizations because they've been so supportive.
00:14:23.000 Good boy.
00:14:23.000 So supportive to our channel.
00:14:25.000 It's great to give a little bit back.
00:14:28.000 There it is.
00:14:30.000 That's that.
00:14:30.000 Now here, check this out.
00:14:32.000 This is a CaliMeans post.
00:14:34.000 You know, like Bobby Kennedy said, I think just conversationally, that 50% of the US FDA's budget comes from pharma.
00:14:41.000 And then the agency released an official statement saying it's only 47%.
00:14:44.000 But of course, when it comes to The department within the FDA that controls drugs.
00:14:50.000 It's actually 75% of their funding, so it's actually even worse.
00:14:55.000 And how ridiculous of the FDA to complain that they're being misrepresented when it's, you know, when someone says, oh, 50% of their funding comes from Big Pharma, when it's in fact 47%.
00:15:04.000 It's just, it's just not a big enough difference, is it?
00:15:09.000 Okay.
00:15:10.000 Now, listen, this is a pretty significant story if you ask me.
00:15:15.000 We are in the very midst of a tidal wave of propaganda inviting us to perceive Kamala Harris as Barack Obama part two for us to celebrate the growth of America as a nation and as a republic because now people of color have gone from Jim Crow and the indignity and horror and evil of slavery to being in positions of political power but it's been remarked before that Barack Obama did not exactly Make America a better place for low-income Americans or Americans of colour.
00:15:51.000 But he in fact was, in a sense, a perfect product.
00:15:54.000 A magnificent product.
00:15:55.000 And the very people that might say, how could you promote this delicious pet food, will promote political ideologies that are deeply insidious and nefarious.
00:16:05.000 This take by Chris Hedges, the Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, He's excellent in his takedown of Barack Obama and how Obama voted every single time.
00:16:18.000 Because when we're looking at the election in November, I'm sure some of us, you know, me, I find it very difficult not to get deluged by the overstimulating campaigns and propaganda.
00:16:29.000 I tend towards anti-establishment thinking.
00:16:32.000 I always have.
00:16:32.000 I'm very cynical when the media tell me to do something.
00:16:36.000 I'm very cynical when the media tell me to hate someone.
00:16:38.000 I'm very cynical when there's a global campaign telling you to get in your house and take medicine and stuff like that.
00:16:45.000 I have an advantage there.
00:16:47.000 I guess I've just been coached that way by life and by circumstance.
00:16:52.000 I've been trained to be cynical.
00:16:54.000 Maybe you have as well.
00:16:55.000 Maybe that's why, even if you're watching this on YouTube now, maybe that's why you'll click the link in the description and join us over on Rumble because Rumble's made a commitment to free speech and not to censor, except for when what you say is a transgression of already existing laws, which to me seems like a pretty sensible way to go about things.
00:17:14.000 Anyway, the Kamala campaign are super excited that they've got what you might call legacy Republicans like Bush or Romney, Staffers or McCain.
00:17:23.000 Staffers, John McCain, God rest his soul, of course he's dead.
00:17:26.000 But they're excited by the idea that centrist Republicans are in support of their movement.
00:17:31.000 But what is their movement about?
00:17:34.000 What does it stand for?
00:17:36.000 What does it mean?
00:17:37.000 You know that my position is that the greater threat to America, and therefore the world, is not the idea of the populist strongman who many, many liberals, many, many members of the metropolitan professional classes that are so influential in media are coaching us to fear.
00:17:55.000 No, it's a far greater threat.
00:17:57.000 The threat of technological feudalism.
00:18:00.000 Where you're being told that you will be protected.
00:18:02.000 That in order to protect you, we have to censor this information.
00:18:06.000 In order to protect you, you have to go inside your homes.
00:18:08.000 In order to protect you, you have to trust their propaganda.
00:18:11.000 That this billionaire is good and this billionaire is bad.
00:18:14.000 And in this instance, it's necessary to take someone off the ballot.
00:18:17.000 And in this instance, it's impossible to take someone off the ballot.
00:18:20.000 We are beginning to see in real, livid, lurid time the nature of their hypocrisy.
00:18:26.000 It cannot be concealed forever.
00:18:27.000 That's why it's important to remember that Barack Obama was a candidate that I was excited by.
00:18:33.000 A brilliant orator.
00:18:34.000 A charismatic leader.
00:18:36.000 But how did he behave?
00:18:37.000 How did he vote?
00:18:38.000 What did he stand for?
00:18:40.000 Was he, as some have said, truly the representative of financial elites?
00:18:46.000 Who used many of his God-given abilities to serve those interests.
00:18:51.000 Let's look at Chris Hedges' analysis before looking at how the Democratic Party movement is using the endorsement of legacy Republicans and legacy Republican staffers to bolster their appeal.
00:19:06.000 Perhaps precisely because they are losing the propaganda war.
00:19:11.000 Let's look at what Chris, first of all, what Chris Hedges says.
00:19:14.000 It's pretty, pretty Damning and forthright.
00:19:18.000 Why are so many progressives and leftists going for Kamala?
00:19:23.000 You know, a fear of Trump because they're swayed by the bombardment of propaganda.
00:19:28.000 A lot of it's woke politics because she's a woman of color.
00:19:31.000 Although, you know, we should have gotten over that with Obama, who, as Cornel West said, was just a black mascot for Wall Street.
00:19:37.000 She was a cop, basically, and served the interests of law enforcement when she was attorney general in California.
00:19:43.000 When Obama ran, Dennis Kucinich printed out and gave me a copy of Obama's voting record.
00:19:49.000 And he said, you got to read this, because it's every corporate giveaway that's possible.
00:19:55.000 And Dennis said that when he went to go to baseball games at Cleveland, the ushers would go up and down and say, get the scorecard, get the scorecard.
00:20:03.000 So that's the scorecard.
00:20:04.000 This is the scorecard.
00:20:04.000 It's all that matters.
00:20:05.000 All the hundreds of millions of dollars they invest in propaganda is essentially an effort to divert you from looking at the scorecard.
00:20:14.000 And her scorecard's abysmal.
00:20:15.000 That's, of course, why she's done a noise.
00:20:18.000 A extraordinary scorecard.
00:20:21.000 How have they been governing?
00:20:23.000 What does it make you feel when Biden, remember that guy, says we beat Big Pharma this year and what he's actually referring to is limited price controls on a particular set of medicines.
00:20:33.000 How do you feel that the pandemic era has already been ushered off into the deep annals of barely accessible Memory.
00:20:42.000 Don't you think in a sane and sensible society this would be seen as a referendum, this forthcoming election, on the pandemic?
00:20:50.000 Don't you think that we should be able to hold on to the memory of the propaganda, the censorship, the deception, the lies, the authoritarianism, the plainly global hue of the top-down authority?
00:21:03.000 And if it was just a one-off example that would make sense In the context of a pandemic, you know, a pandemic is a global issue and requires a global response, then what do you imagine is happening in censorship, which similarly appears to be being manoeuvred and manipulated at the global level?
00:21:16.000 What's happening in agriculture when it seems that the control of our food is also happening at a global level?
00:21:21.000 When farmers are being impoverished and broken down?
00:21:25.000 When farmland is being acquired?
00:21:27.000 When it seems to me, although it'd be difficult and it'd take me a little while to demonstrate entirely, that our food sources Seeds, nature herself, are being colonized and plundered and controlled.
00:21:42.000 It's important to listen to significant voices like Vandana Shiva, an important voice in that topic, as surely as Kali means, has become a great influence when it comes to openness and transparency in the food industry.
00:21:54.000 Let's have a look now at how certain legacy Republicans' endorsements is being used as if it's a powerful boost to the Democratic Party campaign, to the Kamala campaign.
00:22:06.000 As if we should somehow forget that the names Bush, Cheney, et al.
00:22:12.000 were once redolent with blood.
00:22:14.000 With blood and the deceptions of weapons of mass destruction that were never found.
00:22:19.000 Here's a post by David Sachs on X.
00:22:23.000 George W. Bush, McCain and Romney lied us into Iraq and pointlessly killed five million in those wars.
00:22:30.000 It could be the most disgusting thing the U.S.
00:22:32.000 has ever done.
00:22:33.000 The fact these warmongers support Harris should tell you everything.
00:22:36.000 Democrats are the party of unjust government power.
00:22:41.000 Let me know what you think about that in the rumble chat.
00:22:42.000 Let me know what you think about that, Awaken Wonders, like Jim Earpsey and Miss Molly.
00:22:47.000 And let's have a look at a legacy media piece of reporting on these endorsements.
00:22:53.000 OK, more than 200 Republicans who worked for three of the most recent GOP nominees prior to former President Trump are now endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris.
00:23:03.000 Yes, the Democrat.
00:23:04.000 In a letter, the 238 Republicans, which includes staffers from former President George W. Bush's White House and Senators John McCain and Mitt Romney's presidential campaigns, urge more moderate Republicans and independents to, quote, take a brave stand once more.
00:23:20.000 The group builds on a smaller set of about 150 Republicans who pledged to support then-candidate Biden back in 2020.
00:23:28.000 And it comes after a Democratic convention that included conservatives like former Congressman Adam Kinzinger speaking to common values that transcend party.
00:23:38.000 The letter further states, quote, of course, we have plenty of honest ideological disagreements with Vice President Harris and Governor Walz.
00:23:45.000 That's to be expected.
00:23:47.000 The alternative, however, is simply untenable.
00:23:50.000 At home, another four years of Donald Trump's chaotic leadership, this time focused on advancing the dangerous goals of Project 2025, will hurt real everyday people and waken our sacred institutions.
00:24:04.000 Project 2025 and our sacred institutions.
00:24:10.000 Why don't you forget that you're alive and consume all of their ablutions, washing away your intelligence with the soap of their propagandist lies?
00:24:21.000 So odd, isn't it, that they continue to amplify hysteria, which is the only state in which you would consider imbibing this Kool-Aid Kamala campaign, which seems built not on substance, not on policy, only the relentless advancement of authoritarianism.
00:24:39.000 and a materialistic and godless attempt to defibrillate further the idea that superficial
00:24:46.000 indicators of equality ought being enough for you.
00:24:50.000 And for many people it seems like it is enough to say that this is a woman of colour.
00:24:54.000 And like I've said to you before, all things being equal, that would be a kind of indication
00:25:00.000 of a certain type of progress.
00:25:02.000 That would be great.
00:25:03.000 But surely we can all now see that what we are being invited to perpetuate are institutions that use a very, very powerful word like sacred In order to mask its insidious opposite, total corruption, total control.
00:25:22.000 Look at how the media are being used.
00:25:24.000 Look at how extraordinarily compliant they are.
00:25:27.000 Look how compliant they've been since the disaster of the Biden-Trump debate.
00:25:31.000 How exciting the next debates will be.
00:25:34.000 How extraordinary it will be to watch how that Unfold.
00:25:39.000 Note how the judiciary has been exploited and deployed.
00:25:42.000 Note how even an issue like who can be on ballots and who can't be on ballots.
00:25:48.000 You'll note that they're saying, oh it's impossible to get Bobby Kennedy off them ballots.
00:25:52.000 You know he's gonna probably take some votes off of Trump but that's the price of living in a free society.
00:25:59.000 Cornel West though, an independent, who might take votes from them, they're scrambling and scrabbling to get that dude off the ballot.
00:26:08.000 As we often observe here, there are no principles, there is only utility.
00:26:14.000 There is no heartfelt, forthright, strident belief to which you can have constant recourse.
00:26:20.000 What is it we believe in?
00:26:21.000 Is it service?
00:26:22.000 Is it kindness?
00:26:22.000 Is it compassion?
00:26:23.000 Is it that the word minister, like administer or prime minister, Or, government minister means to serve?
00:26:33.000 Has the very idea of service been lost?
00:26:35.000 Are we facing something far more ontologically profound as to whether or not we invoke a Republican MAGA candidate, albeit one that now is beginning to assemble an Avengers-like cast around him?
00:26:49.000 Of decent Democrats and fine, fiery independents like Bobby Kennedy.
00:26:54.000 And it's ridiculous to say that the Kennedy name has no association with the Democrat Party, particularly when you think of what the Democratic Party used to mean and what it used to represent.
00:27:03.000 So what I would invite you to do is consider very carefully about who you vote for, what you watch and what you believe in.
00:27:09.000 But that's just what I think.
00:27:09.000 Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
00:27:12.000 If you're watching this on YouTube, click the link in the description, because we are going to be talking about Dan Bongino's recent appearance.
00:27:20.000 If you don't know who... Start the timer, please.
00:27:22.000 If you don't know who Dan Bongino is, then you should learn all about Dan, because it is a pretty...
00:27:28.000 Fascinating pundit and commentator.
00:27:33.000 And his perspective on the Secret Service is particularly valuable given that he is a veteran of the Secret Service himself and a former cop.
00:27:40.000 And his testimony in a recent hearing has given us some incredible new insights on the Trump assassination attempt and the problems within the Secret Service that might mean a comparable event could occur again.
00:27:51.000 If you're on YouTube, click the link in the description.
00:27:53.000 Get on over to Rumble so we can continue freely together.
00:27:58.000 Before we get into that, of course, you know we cannot make this content without the contributions from our partners.
00:28:03.000 We've got very good partners here, and we're going to bring you a message from one of them right now.
00:28:12.000 Yeah, you'll love this.
00:28:13.000 In fact, I'll be back to you.
00:28:14.000 I'll give you that message in a moment, as a matter of fact.
00:28:19.000 What I'd like to talk to you about now.
00:28:20.000 Oh yeah, this is good.
00:28:22.000 Like Mark Zuckerberg's recent admission.
00:28:25.000 Mark Zuckerberg's recent admission.
00:28:28.000 That he censored information that he should not have censored.
00:28:32.000 That he took the lead of the FBI, which many of us were talking about at the time.
00:28:37.000 Many people were saying that the Hunter Biden laptop story was being repressed, that it amounted to election interference because it would have made a significant difference in significant states.
00:28:46.000 Many people were deeply concerned, more concerned even than the outcomes and impact of the Hunter Biden laptop story, about what took place during the pandemic.
00:28:55.000 How legitimate scientific voices were censored and controlled.
00:28:59.000 How ordinary people's testimony of adverse events as a result of taking those extraordinary medications was shut down.
00:29:07.000 Well now Mark Zuckerberg is himself on board with the misinformation because he has acknowledged that deep state interests were guiding his decision or at least those that work for him at Facebook when it came to censorship and shutting down posts.
00:29:24.000 Now I wonder What this admission means?
00:29:27.000 Does it mean, as Charlie Kirk said, that perhaps he's had a look at the way that the wind is blowing, the way that the data is flowing, and realised that he's likely to have to deal with a Republican Trump candidate in just a matter of months and he might need to get his house in order?
00:29:43.000 Or is it a deeper spiritual transformation?
00:29:46.000 Why don't you guys let me know in the chat What you think.
00:29:51.000 Let's have a look at the uh let's have a look at this morning joke clip just to remind us of how furiously and how passionately the legacy media went out to bat for censorship and control and how they denied that the Hunter Biden lapstop story was true and god you know how they behaved during the pandemic.
00:30:13.000 And talk about Facebook having problems and Twitter having problems with a story that even the New York Post knew was a lie.
00:30:28.000 They published a series of lies, penned them by Rudy Giuliani, who admitted that nobody else would take it but Rupert Murdoch's New York Post, because they might look into it and tell the truth.
00:30:41.000 Here we are in 2020.
00:30:43.000 This is what it's come down to, America.
00:30:46.000 Giuliani is feeding Russian misinformation to Donald Trump and feeding Russian disinformation to the New York Post.
00:30:58.000 They know it's a lie.
00:31:02.000 Yeah, that's where we are in 2020.
00:31:05.000 Just to let you know that they're still talking to Russians.
00:31:08.000 And by the way, Russian hoax?
00:31:11.000 Come on.
00:31:13.000 History will expose you all as fools and useful idiots for the Russians.
00:31:20.000 For four years now, for four years now, there has been a line from Russian agents into the campaign.
00:31:29.000 It's unbelievable how stupid you think Americans are, how stupid you think Americans are, for you can just say, Russian hoax.
00:31:39.000 Seriously?
00:31:39.000 The idiocy, the sheer idiocy.
00:31:44.000 You are revealed right now, but you will be revealed throughout history for basically running cover for Russians.
00:31:53.000 And you've got this computer repair shop owner in Delaware who is a staunch Trump supporter and who peddles in conspiracy theories and whose shop is thousands of miles away from where Hunter Biden lives.
00:32:07.000 So you've got a lot of questions here.
00:32:10.000 This whole thing smells bad, Joe.
00:32:12.000 I don't think there's a lot of credence.
00:32:14.000 That's why the FBI is questioning not the Bidens, but Rudy Giuliani.
00:32:19.000 And I think the message here, the lesson here, is that if you're going to plan an October surprise, you may want to choose a planner who is not parading around the world with a known Russian secret agent for the last year.
00:32:32.000 Maybe choose a planner that has better peer reviews next time.
00:32:35.000 So this looks like Russian intelligence, this walks like Russian intelligence, this sounds like Russian intelligence.
00:32:42.000 Every intelligence professional I've been talking to, Mika, says this is a Russian intelligence disinformation campaign.
00:32:47.000 Rudy Giuliani was not fed passively Russian disinformation.
00:32:52.000 He ordered it off the menu.
00:32:54.000 So do they look into how two weeks, two and a half weeks before an election, someone decided to use a tabloid to In all probability, know that they were smearing a major candidate against a president that this tabloid was supporting, and whether or not that would fall under a criminal investigation, leading to some kind of criminal charges.
00:33:19.000 I wonder why this admission is taking place now.
00:33:21.000 There's a post from Charlie Kirk on the amount of access that Zuckerberg has to data.
00:33:27.000 And this is not likely to be a mea culpa, but just a, oh no, me in a lot of trouble if the Republicans win the election in a couple of months.
00:33:37.000 What does Musk have to say?
00:33:38.000 He's simply concerned by the entire affair, and indeed it is concerning.
00:33:43.000 Michael Schellenberger knows all about this, being one of the first Twitter Files journalists to get access to what was going on when it came to the revelations that took place after Musk's own acquisition of the platform, then Twitter, now X, when stories about deep state engagement, meddling and censorship Well, Novel, before we'd had the time to absorb them and accept it as just part of life, before we'd come to terms with the fact that the Supreme Court would back the government as they continue to censor and control true information, do you imagine for a moment that they're not doing it right now when it comes to stories that might be beneficial to the Kamala campaign or stories that might be detrimental to Trump and this growing alliance with interesting political figures?
00:34:29.000 What does it make you feel when you know that you're consuming a great deal of contemnatory, negative propaganda continually?
00:34:38.000 How do these big tech, and in particular social media platforms, align with government interests?
00:34:44.000 It seems like a total alignment.
00:34:47.000 Yeah, and people in the Awaken Wonder chat, I'm talking to you, see Stevens5, are pointing out That Pavel Durov has just been arrested in France.
00:34:56.000 So it seems in the world of big tech, there's good big tech and there's bad big tech.
00:35:01.000 There's good billionaires and there's bad billionaires.
00:35:03.000 And the continual theme is compliance.
00:35:06.000 If you are willing to amplify the message of the powerful, if you are willing to contribute to their maintenance of their systems of control, you'll be okay.
00:35:14.000 But if you oppose them, wherever you sit in the spectrum, You will experience their ire and likely experience what happens when they turn their various institutions against you.
00:35:26.000 But that's just what I think.
00:35:27.000 Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
00:35:32.000 Zuckerberg's letter went further than what he told Joe Rogan in 2022, because he specifically mentioned Burisma, the Ukrainian natural gas company that Hunter Biden worked for.
00:35:44.000 Zuckerberg wrote, The FBI warned us about a potential Russian disinformation operation about the Biden family and Burisma in the lead-up to the 2020 election.
00:35:54.000 Nobody at the FBI has gone to prison or even been properly investigated for their crimes.
00:36:00.000 And yet the evidence shows that the CIA and FBI broke the Wiretap Act and the Hatch Act of 1939, which... Do you know what we need?
00:36:08.000 We need someone else in charge of the CIA.
00:36:12.000 RFK, a man whose uncle and father were potentially murdered as a result of deep state plots.
00:36:19.000 Could it happen?
00:36:19.000 We'll be having a look at that in a moment.
00:36:21.000 But here, first of all, is a message from one of our partners.
00:36:26.000 Now, the war against free speech is in full swing.
00:36:30.000 We are the Vanguard, bravely fighting back.
00:36:33.000 Rumble's the home of this channel, Stay Free, and a leader in defending the fundamental human right of free speech.
00:36:39.000 They've joined You might be aware that Dunkin Donuts, little old Dunkin Donuts didn't want to advertise on Rumble because of what they called right-wing culture.
00:36:55.000 Well let me tell you this, I don't believe in any wing.
00:36:58.000 You know what I believe in?
00:36:59.000 I believe in total freedom, I believe in decentralization and I believe in radical spiritual change.
00:37:04.000 Now Rumble have rallied around these issues.
00:37:06.000 Recently they've launched Rumble Premium.
00:37:09.000 This, I think, is going to be a game changer for all of us.
00:37:12.000 It's an ad-free viewing experience with great perks for viewers and creators.
00:37:17.000 Now, you all know there's some fantastic and extraordinary advertisements on Rumble, right?
00:37:22.000 But Rumble Premium will give you the ability to dive into your favourite content on your mobile or desktop or smart TV.
00:37:30.000 And savor every uninterrupted second of my content.
00:37:34.000 Why don't you upgrade to Rumble Premium today?
00:37:38.000 Support my free speech and the free speech of other content creators on this platform.
00:37:43.000 Please go to Rumble now.
00:37:44.000 Rumble.com forward slash premium.
00:37:46.000 And if you use the code brand, you'll save $10 and Rumble will be aware that our stream is creating great converts.
00:37:53.000 So that's Rumble.com forward slash premium.
00:37:56.000 And do use the code BRAND to save $10.
00:37:59.000 We're going to do it now.
00:38:00.000 I'm going to get Rumble Premium.
00:38:02.000 I'm going to do it on my own.
00:38:03.000 I'm not great with tech.
00:38:04.000 Anyway, there's a link there at the bottom of the screen now.
00:38:05.000 We're posting it in the chat.
00:38:07.000 Join up.
00:38:07.000 It's the way to handle it.
00:38:09.000 Oh, listen.
00:38:09.000 I'm going to have to do this on my own.
00:38:10.000 I can't.
00:38:11.000 I'm not a great multitasker.
00:38:13.000 I'll level with you.
00:38:14.000 I mean, even this single task is a challenge.
00:38:17.000 Now, we've been speaking for a while about corruption within the deep state, censorship, extraordinary theatrical constructed events, false flag events, FBI or CIA agents inserted into crowds to cause, participate, maybe cause, insurrections.
00:38:34.000 Is it time for the CIA to face a reckoning?
00:38:37.000 Is it time that the deep state is confronted?
00:38:40.000 We know.
00:38:41.000 Do you remember that brilliant bit of New York Times propaganda?
00:38:44.000 I'm a member of the deep state and I'm a nice person.
00:38:46.000 Again, they showed sort of like the humble pen pushers and poindexters of the deep state.
00:38:52.000 They're just men and women like you and I. And of course, human beings are everywhere and all human beings are sinners and all human beings are forgiven and all human beings are redeemed.
00:39:00.000 But when it comes to systems and institutions that exert incredible and unwarranted control over your life and my life, And over our collective freedom, the CIA's gotta be right up there.
00:39:11.000 What could be better, then, than the idea of RFK?
00:39:15.000 A man who's gotta have skin in the game because it's likely that his uncle, John F. Kennedy, and his own father, Robert Kennedy Sr.
00:39:24.000 were murdered as a result of CIA plots.
00:39:26.000 Certainly that's what he believes.
00:39:29.000 So, would you like to see Bobby Kennedy as the head of the CIA?
00:39:33.000 Is such a thing even possible?
00:39:36.000 Is this the type of reckoning these desacralized institutions within American political power, and therefore global political power, require?
00:39:46.000 I believe it could be the solution that we are looking for.
00:39:50.000 So, Let's have a look at Bobby Kennedy saying that he doesn't think it's likely, but I'd like it.
00:39:57.000 Would you like it?
00:39:58.000 I'd like it.
00:39:59.000 Would you like it?
00:40:00.000 The CIA, I mean, a lot of roads lead back, unfortunately, to our most powerful intelligence agency.
00:40:07.000 If you were asked, would you run it?
00:40:09.000 Would you become CIA director if you were asked?
00:40:11.000 I would never get.
00:40:13.000 Yes, I would, but I would never get.
00:40:16.000 Senate confirmation.
00:40:17.000 As you know, the intelligence agency are protected by very, very powerful committees in the Senate and in the House that are already into the project.
00:40:30.000 And the people who serve on those committees are people who would, you know, they would not, they would, they're just safeguarding that directorship.
00:40:40.000 And I would be very, very dangerous for those And yet, in your joint appearance on Friday, President Trump introduced you by saying that he plans to, if elected, establish a commission to declassify the remaining documents surrounding your uncle's murder in 1963.
00:41:01.000 Yeah.
00:41:02.000 And I think everyone at this point knows the truth, which is the CIA is implicated in that.
00:41:06.000 Those documents protect CIA, maybe among others.
00:41:09.000 Well, whether they do or not, it's odd that they've not allowed him to be released.
00:41:14.000 What could possibly be the explanation?
00:41:16.000 More than 60 years after my uncle's death.
00:41:18.000 Almost 65 years.
00:41:19.000 Oh, 62 years after his death.
00:41:23.000 And none of the people who were Implicated in that crime are alive now.
00:41:29.000 The last ones have died off in the last year or two.
00:41:33.000 And so it clearly is to protect the institution.
00:41:38.000 Yes.
00:41:39.000 And that's wrong.
00:41:40.000 This is wrong.
00:41:41.000 And it's wrong for a Democrat, and it's wrong for a Republican.
00:41:44.000 It's just interesting, though, that a bipartisan list of presidents below these six decades have kept those files classified.
00:41:52.000 Well, you and I have both.
00:41:54.000 I was astonished that Trump Uh, didn't declassify him because he promised to during the campaign.
00:41:59.000 Yeah, it was Mike Pompeo who did that.
00:42:00.000 Yeah, and that, and that, I talked to President Trump for the first time about that this week.
00:42:05.000 What'd he say?
00:42:06.000 He said that, um, he said that Mike Pompeo begged him I don't think I'm telling tales out of school here.
00:42:17.000 No, I think he told the same thing to you.
00:42:19.000 That's true.
00:42:20.000 But he said Mike Pompeo called him and said this wouldn't be a catastrophe to release these.
00:42:26.000 You need to not do it.
00:42:29.000 I want to say again, I think Mike Pompeo is a criminal, so that's my view.
00:42:32.000 He's threatened to sue me for saying that, but I hope he will, because it's true.
00:42:36.000 But that kind of tells the whole story right there, right?
00:42:40.000 That the CIA is... Why would the CIA be trying to keep these files classified if they had nothing to do with the murder?
00:42:47.000 I don't really get that.
00:42:49.000 It's an extraordinary point, and it's an extraordinary moment.
00:42:52.000 Honestly, I would be so fascinated to communicate directly with Democratic party advocates.
00:42:59.000 I guess that's what I've got to start having on the show.
00:43:01.000 We've got to start talking to people that believe that Kamala Harris represents change.
00:43:08.000 The people that belong to elite institutions.
00:43:11.000 People who are financially dependent on the maintenance of the professional metropolitan class that appear to benefit from, you know, the new conservatism.
00:43:19.000 I don't mean conservatism as in cultural conservatism or traditionalism.
00:43:24.000 I mean, the sense that we want things to stay the same.
00:43:27.000 Conservatism, for me now, means progressivism, individualism, materialism, the idea that technology will solve our problems, that we're here to consume, a kind of nihilistic belief that there is no afterlife, no for life, no reason for living, no God, no true beauty, Other than the symmetry that occurs arbitrarily, apparently through some fractal tumble of deracinated mathematics.
00:43:52.000 That there is no glory, that there is no God, that there is no reason to have principles.
00:43:58.000 I have so many friends That still advocate for, say, Keir Starmer and the Centrist Labour Party or Kamala Harris.
00:44:07.000 But usually this advocacy is born in my country of a hatred of the previous government, the Tory Party, the Conservatives.
00:44:12.000 That's our sort of version of the Republicans.
00:44:14.000 And I've got to tell you, they were pretty appalling.
00:44:17.000 They did have literal parties during Covid.
00:44:19.000 They are dreadfully corrupt.
00:44:20.000 They do deeply loathe ordinary people.
00:44:24.000 And in your country, the United States of America, it seems that the ongoing hysteria and hatred of Donald Trump, everything he touches, and the MAGA movement, and I would say that perhaps the ulterior thread that undergirds that is a suspicion and loathing of, I'm going to have to say, ordinary Americans of All colours.
00:44:46.000 The kind of loathing that is encapsulated in a phrase like basket of deplorables.
00:44:52.000 That kind of reflexed disdain for those of you that might happily wear a Make America Great Again hat.
00:45:01.000 Do send your picture wearing your MAGA hat in the rumble chat if you have one.
00:45:06.000 I know that one of the people that works here proudly wears one.
00:45:10.000 I'm looking for the birth of a political movement that can include Tulsi Gabbard, RFK, that does recognise that when it comes to cultural life, religious life, ideological life, spiritual life, individual freedom, the function of the government is to protect And to serve that the role of people in positions of government is a subordinate position of service.
00:45:35.000 Now Donald Trump's face is not the first one that comes to mind when you think of a subservient leader.
00:45:42.000 And indeed, for me, this is not the perfect election but it couldn't be more perfect in so much as I don't vote in American elections because I'm not an American citizen.
00:45:53.000 What I see vividly and clearly and what I'd like to invite people Who still vehemently oppose Trump to see is that we have in new corporatism, new globalism, new technology, new nihilism, new loathing of nature, of humankind and of the family and many of our sacred institutions that claims to be built upon compassion but is built instead on a kind of dark nihilism.
00:46:19.000 We have a real threat.
00:46:21.000 And not the threat that is easily identifiable and as vivid as the bold black, white and red of 20th century despotism.
00:46:30.000 Not the vivid and clear tyranny of the Stalins and the Hitlers.
00:46:35.000 Something that is not so easily personified.
00:46:38.000 Something that is like a fugue of tyranny passing through institutional and bureaucratic classes like a toxic fart of propaganda and lies and requires therefore A great aesthetic and fantastic fireworks and distraction and total media support and the ability to use the judiciary as a weapon.
00:47:00.000 I'm saying that what we face from these institutions that are corralled together under the Democratic Party and seem so vividly present At that recent convention are a far greater threat to your freedom and to world peace and to free speech and to child health than anything that could happen as a result of an alliance between Bobby Kennedy and Donald Trump and the increasing number of affiliates that appear to be joining that
00:47:29.000 Clearly imperfect movement, but it's not a movement that needs to compete with perfection.
00:47:35.000 It's a movement that needs to compete with propaganda, hyperbole, and some kind of dreadful, dreadful technological feudalism that, in my view, has to be stopped.
00:47:45.000 But that's just what I think.
00:47:46.000 Why don't you lot let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
00:47:50.000 Hey!
00:47:51.000 You!
00:47:52.000 You there!
00:47:52.000 Yes, you!
00:47:53.000 Are you an awakened wonder yet?
00:47:55.000 Are you an awakened wonder yet?
00:47:56.000 You know that I do a lot of my content for you awakened wonders down this secret camera.
00:48:00.000 We answer your questions directly.
00:48:02.000 Did you see that when we did that yesterday?
00:48:04.000 We do Russell's stand-up breakdown.
00:48:06.000 We give you early access to guests here.
00:48:10.000 We Let you join our live stream.
00:48:12.000 I'm going to do a live stand-up show in a minute.
00:48:14.000 If you're on Awake and Wonder, straight after this, I'm going to be going over there, doing a stand-up comedy show.
00:48:19.000 Totally live, totally spontaneous, total audience interaction.
00:48:23.000 And if you are on Awake and Wonder, you can write in and get a ticket.
00:48:26.000 You can come and see me live anywhere in the world.
00:48:29.000 You know I'm going to be in Phoenix appearing with Tucker.
00:48:31.000 On the 4th of September, and I will be doing some more live shows over that period.
00:48:36.000 And as an Awakened Wonder, you can get access whenever you want.
00:48:39.000 We're also planning many more specials.
00:48:42.000 We're gonna bring together Oracles, a consortium of wise minds, to offer us the true insights that we require.
00:48:50.000 I'm talking about your Callie Meanses, your Mike Benzes, your Jay Bhattacharyas, people that you can rely on, on trust, that have stood the test of time.
00:48:57.000 So, consider becoming an Awakened Wonder now for a small subscription fee.
00:49:02.000 You get additional access to the content we make and you get direct access to me, whether that's live, online, or live in person.
00:49:10.000 Here's a moment from my recent chat with Jay Bhattacharya, one of the heroes that emerged from the pandemic period.
00:49:16.000 In this conversation, What did I like about it?
00:49:20.000 I like this moment here where he talks about the government being like a mob.
00:49:23.000 I just had a chat right now with Michael Francis.
00:49:25.000 You'll be able to see that conversation first on Locals.
00:49:28.000 That'll be up on there in a couple of days.
00:49:29.000 And Michael Francis talked about how democracy now is so reminiscent and plainly referencing the crime syndicates in which he, to use their phrase, made his bones.
00:49:42.000 Well, Jay Bhattacharya made a comparable point that What we have now is what amounts to racketeering.
00:49:49.000 It's a lovely little operation you've got there.
00:49:52.000 Be ashamed of someone to destroy it.
00:49:54.000 If you're not an awakened wonder yet, you may not have seen this.
00:49:56.000 Become an awakened wonder.
00:49:58.000 There's so much more to it than wondering or even awakening.
00:50:01.000 Have a look at this moment between me and Jay Bhattacharya.
00:50:04.000 Al Capone, the gangster.
00:50:07.000 I mean, Al Capone will go to Chicago businesses and say, well, that's a nice business.
00:50:11.000 It would be a shame if something were to happen to it, and then gain protection money from them, right?
00:50:16.000 That's essentially what the government did with social media companies.
00:50:18.000 They essentially said, look, you know, Russell's saying terrible things.
00:50:21.000 Jay's saying terrible things.
00:50:23.000 You really need to censor them.
00:50:25.000 And the social media companies, if they were to say, you know, or else, or else, the or else would be, you know, we have regulatory power over you.
00:50:31.000 We can do nasty things to you.
00:50:33.000 You better listen.
00:50:38.000 ...legitimate scientist, outspoken man, brilliant speaker, communicator and academic who was censored, condemned and smeared during the pandemic period simply for telling the truth.
00:50:51.000 It's become clear The idea that we're living in a maelstrom of mad and maddening propaganda.
00:50:57.000 Did you see Bill Maher and Quentin Tarantino chatting together?
00:51:00.000 It's interesting to hear Quentin Tarantino's take on almost anything.
00:51:04.000 He's a brilliant communicator and as a devout Democratic Party member and Kamala supporter, he endorsed the idea that she never give interviews.
00:51:13.000 He sees it as a zero-sum game.
00:51:16.000 Nothing to gain from her appearing anywhere.
00:51:20.000 Now, what we've got, it seems to me, ...is a Democratic Party movement almost voided of principles.
00:51:25.000 I mentioned it a couple of times over the course of this conversation.
00:51:29.000 When it's convenient to extract someone from a ballot, they'll extract them from a ballot.
00:51:34.000 When it's convenient to leave them on a ballot, they'll remove them.
00:51:36.000 This is a post that sort of illustrates this.
00:51:38.000 Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson isn't allowing Bobby Kennedy to remove his name from the ballot, which could hurt Trump.
00:51:45.000 Meanwhile, her party is trying to remove Cornel West because he may hurt Kamala.
00:51:50.000 Never let these people talk about democracy again.
00:51:53.000 They're just corrupt thugs.
00:51:55.000 Well, that is a pretty fascinating take on that subject.
00:51:59.000 Now, I don't know if you saw, Our man Quentin Tarantino, brilliant filmmaker, and Bill Maher.
00:52:05.000 I've been on that show before.
00:52:06.000 I like Bill as a human being a great deal.
00:52:09.000 Talking about whether or not Kamala should give interviews.
00:52:13.000 You've doubtless been subjected to many of the peculiar moments of her behaving spontaneously and questioned whether or not there are influences other than the deep state blob manipulating her neurological pathways.
00:52:28.000 Could there be some secondary agents?
00:52:30.000 So, Many questions when it comes to that.
00:52:34.000 But one thing it appears to have been agreed on is they want to minimize her contact with the electorate.
00:52:41.000 They don't want Kamala Harris popping up on TV spontaneously, appearing in front of the likes of you and me, shooting the breeze so free and easily.
00:52:50.000 They want that controlled and they want that curtailed.
00:52:53.000 Well, Let's have a look at Quentin Tarantino and Bill Maher talking about the strategy.
00:53:00.000 Because strategy is everything now.
00:53:02.000 This is not a movement that believes in free speech or children's health or ending war or any of those things.
00:53:07.000 Those are free policies that you can take to the bank with Bobby Kennedy's announcement that he'll be joining Trump's presidential campaign and eventually, one hopes, government.
00:53:18.000 Let's have a look at Tarantino and Ma discussing this before we get to our main story tonight, Bongino's testimony and the potential for yet another Trump assassination attempt if the Secret Service doesn't radically change.
00:53:31.000 First though, here's Tarantino and Ma.
00:53:34.000 The bigger issue is the left and their ability or their desire to engage with anyone who's not already in the bubble.
00:53:46.000 And they get a big fat D minus on that.
00:53:50.000 I couldn't agree more.
00:53:51.000 Right.
00:53:51.000 I mean, you see Kamala.
00:53:53.000 I mean, I'm glad she's doing well.
00:53:55.000 I'm glad we have a real fight now for president.
00:53:58.000 But doesn't talk to the press, you know, would never go near me.
00:54:04.000 And I'm, you know, when you won't go near the people who are going to vote for you.
00:54:09.000 Yeah.
00:54:09.000 I'm going to vote for you.
00:54:10.000 Do I have to love everything?
00:54:12.000 No, I don't.
00:54:13.000 It just shows they're afraid.
00:54:15.000 And you're right, I see it so much more... Well, hold on, I don't... Okay, you know what?
00:54:19.000 I don't see her...
00:54:20.000 Well, there's no reason for her to go on your show before the election.
00:54:24.000 But I can actually see her.
00:54:25.000 Yes, there is.
00:54:27.000 Because I speak to the exact voter she needs.
00:54:30.000 The person who is in the middle.
00:54:32.000 The person who is not ideologically captured by either side.
00:54:35.000 Now, there are some who are that, and everyone is welcome.
00:54:41.000 Bigger audience all the time.
00:54:42.000 I'm greedy that way.
00:54:43.000 But basically, that's exactly the audience she needs.
00:54:47.000 The MSNBC crowd is already voting for her.
00:54:51.000 People who watch me, who will decide this election will probably be decided in like four states by...
00:54:58.000 Something like 80,000 votes in each.
00:55:00.000 That's how these elections, how close they are these days, and that's where we're back to.
00:55:05.000 We're at least back to normal, which sucked, but it is normal that it's 50-50 going into the election.
00:55:11.000 With Biden, it wouldn't have been.
00:55:13.000 Let me ask you about this, though.
00:55:14.000 Okay, look, look.
00:55:16.000 There's nothing you said that isn't right.
00:55:20.000 And there's definitely nothing you said that isn't right in a normal election cycle.
00:55:26.000 I mean, it's irrefutably right in a normal election cycle where you have a year to set your case.
00:55:37.000 I think it's just all about winning the fucking election, alright?
00:55:40.000 And then the easiest path to winning the election... Look, you can talk about maybe she should have had more guts about this or that and the other, but we're the fucking president.
00:55:48.000 Right.
00:55:50.000 And Trump's not the president, and we're the fucking president, and now it's gonna be about this.
00:55:54.000 But this is about fucking winning.
00:55:56.000 What most people don't give the Democrats enough credit for, alright, but we give the Republicans credit for, it's like, no, sometimes it's just about fucking winning.
00:56:07.000 And it doesn't matter how we look at this moment.
00:56:09.000 It's about fucking winning.
00:56:11.000 This is about fucking winning.
00:56:14.000 Yep.
00:56:15.000 Now it is.
00:56:16.000 It's a mad fucking dash and she is running and she's not stopping to stumble.
00:56:22.000 And you know what?
00:56:23.000 And there's nothing wrong with stopping this.
00:56:25.000 I'm gonna vote for her fucking anyway no matter what she says in a stupid fucking interview.
00:56:29.000 Exactly.
00:56:29.000 So don't fuck shit up!
00:56:31.000 Whoa!
00:56:32.000 So it's kind of strategic according to Tarantino who just wants to win.
00:56:37.000 I feel like looking at it as if it's a sport is the kind of voiding of nuance that's helped to get us in this terrible mess along with the incessant unending blizzard of data that we're all supposed to contend with.
00:56:56.000 The havoc of online news, the inability to focus on true fidelity, something that actually
00:57:03.000 means something, something that's drawn from and derived from simple universal principles.
00:57:09.000 You know me, I don't want to bang on about it, but I tell you, it's easier living in
00:57:13.000 this world as a Christian.
00:57:15.000 It's easier to recognize this is what I believe in.
00:57:18.000 This is what I'm here for.
00:57:20.000 This, this is a distraction.
00:57:23.000 This is nonsense.
00:57:24.000 I don't mean I'm not interested in talking to you if you're an atheist or a materialist or a Muslim or a Jew or Buddhist or New Ageist or whatever.
00:57:31.000 It doesn't, you know, of course I respect your freedom.
00:57:35.000 In fact, that's what this channel is about.
00:57:37.000 But when I hear that kind of excitement about worldliness, just like we're going to win, where is that drawn from?
00:57:45.000 Think about the last few years.
00:57:46.000 Think about what happened in the pandemic.
00:57:47.000 Think about this Ukraine-Russia war.
00:57:48.000 Think about what's happening in the Middle East right now.
00:57:51.000 There's just endless brutality and chaos and mindlessness and corruption and the idea that Kamala Harris, a person who's already in office...
00:58:01.000 Represents a kind of change or evolution or advance?
00:58:06.000 I don't understand it because I know Quentin Tarantino must- I've only met him once, briefly.
00:58:10.000 Morrissey gig.
00:58:11.000 Staples Center.
00:58:13.000 Los Angeles.
00:58:14.000 I was being ushered in.
00:58:15.000 I had Morrissey's favor back then.
00:58:18.000 And, uh, Tarantino, they wouldn't let him in.
00:58:20.000 I remember, like, as he was going, oh my- and I heard him go, oh my god, what, Russell Brand?
00:58:24.000 Oh my god, Russell Brand?
00:58:26.000 Like that.
00:58:27.000 I was like, you should let Quentin Tarantino in, I said.
00:58:29.000 You know, Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, let the guy in.
00:58:31.000 But Morris' security were pretty clear.
00:58:35.000 My point though...
00:58:37.000 Is this... How can you get so excited about any of this stuff?
00:58:41.000 This is all so berserk and so bizarre and so ludicrous.
00:58:45.000 What we have to think, I suppose, is if you really want change, how can you achieve change by voting for someone who's like the Vice President right now, whose alignment with Biden is so consistent that they haven't even bothered to cross his name out in their pre-convention documentation?
00:59:02.000 So, if it's change you believe in, if it's new alliances and a kind of new type of politics, which I guess I was slow to realise Trump to a degree represented.
00:59:12.000 People are very keen to frame it as a throwback to ethnocentric nationalism and militarism.
00:59:19.000 As espoused at the end of the 20th century, but it's kind of new emergent post-globalist populism.
00:59:24.000 And if you fold into that figures like Tulsi Gabbard and Bobby Kennedy, you might have something really, really interesting.
00:59:30.000 But that's just what I think.
00:59:31.000 Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
00:59:35.000 The news cycle moves so fast these days, it seems like millennia ago.
00:59:41.000 that we heard the crack of a gunshot the turn of a head a blood-soaked man arises from behind a pulpit to clench his fist and say fight fight fight moments before appearing in a photograph that Indifferent times would have defined the rest of the election cycle, but this is 2024, and time ain't like that anymore.
01:00:05.000 Time passes fast.
01:00:07.000 Well, Dan Bongino, fellow Rumble creator and former Secret Service member, has appeared at a hearing to unpack and understand those events of J13, and he believes it could happen again.
01:00:23.000 There could be another assassination attempt before the election.
01:00:27.000 Now let me know in the comments in the chat, while you give me a like and subscribe if you'll be so kind, if you believe that's possible or plausible.
01:00:34.000 And let's have a look at a compilation of Dan Bongino's moments as we promised you in the title of this Live show.
01:00:41.000 Let me know what you think about this, and let me know, do you believe that the Secret Service, like the CIA, like all government institutions, requires a reckoning and a deeper understanding?
01:00:52.000 And let me know, do you think it's possible that this could happen again?
01:00:58.000 Let's have a look at it.
01:01:00.000 With that, I'll turn it over to our subject matter experts, beginning with Mr. Bongino for opening remarks.
01:01:07.000 Listen, let's just get right to the point.
01:01:08.000 This was an apocalyptic security failure.
01:01:11.000 A man was murdered in front of his family.
01:01:12.000 Three people were shot on live television, including President Trump and the head who came within two millimeters of having his head explode on national television in front of millions of people.
01:01:22.000 There's no sugarcoating it.
01:01:23.000 There's no time for BS.
01:01:25.000 Unfortunately, as Congressman Crain and Mills both indicated, the story seems to have been vanquished to the phantom zone of media coverage.
01:01:34.000 It's amazing how we're still talking about JFK's assassination, but nobody seems to want to talk about President Trump being shot in the head on national television, despite the fact that we have no answers.
01:01:43.000 So I have five minutes, so I want to keep it quick, and I want to make three points.
01:01:48.000 in the Secret Service for 12 years.
01:01:49.000 I loved it.
01:01:50.000 I worked with some really amazing men and women.
01:01:52.000 But they have three institutional problems, I believe, in the macro will help us get to the bottom of how this Secret Service apocalyptic failure won't happen again.
01:02:01.000 First, they have a technology problem.
01:02:04.000 The joke in the Secret Service, which is sadly no longer funny when I was there, and it wasn't funny then either, is they rely on yesterday's technology tomorrow.
01:02:14.000 Think about that.
01:02:15.000 Yesterday's technology, tomorrow.
01:02:17.000 Everything from computer systems at waste agents' times, filling out time and attendance records they were doing, to Congressman Crane and I discussing the fact that they only implemented slings, a technology as old as the wheel, about, I don't know, five or six years into my time in the Secret Service, which is embarrassing.
01:02:36.000 The weaponry was old.
01:02:38.000 Everything was old.
01:02:38.000 These are things I would have talked about sooner if they didn't create a security crisis, and I obviously didn't want to air them publicly.
01:02:44.000 Now you're seeing what happens when you don't have a drone up at a site you could have bought for $39.99 on Amazon Second.
01:02:51.000 Another adage in the Secret Service you've heard even the new acting director discuss is the more with less approach.
01:02:57.000 There is no more with less.
01:02:58.000 There's less with less, okay?
01:03:00.000 The Secret Service more with less approach only works if you produce more.
01:03:04.000 That's how capitalism works.
01:03:06.000 You produce a flat screen TV that was probably 20 years ago, $10,000.
01:03:09.000 It's $200 at Walmart now.
01:03:12.000 They produce a better TV with less.
01:03:14.000 That's not what the Secret Service did.
01:03:16.000 They produced less with more.
01:03:18.000 They were given more money and produced less.
01:03:21.000 Mr. Bongino, in your opinion, is the Secret Service in a better spot today with Director Rowe in charge?
01:03:27.000 No, it's worse.
01:03:29.000 And sadly, I'm glad this is all being recorded because when something else happens, and I hope it doesn't, I pray to my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ that I'm wrong.
01:03:38.000 That you play this and go, look, that guy was crazy.
01:03:40.000 You think this is the last incident and you're out of your mind.
01:03:43.000 We have seen these incidents over and over.
01:03:45.000 We saw the Georgia grenade incident with President Bush.
01:03:48.000 They overtook the magnetometers.
01:03:50.000 The Secret Service leadership in charge now with the exact same people.
01:03:55.000 Exactly.
01:03:56.000 Can you imagine a C-suite at a company that makes widgets?
01:03:59.000 We find out that there's a design defect.
01:04:02.000 The widget explodes and kills 10 people, and the CTO gets a promotion to CEO.
01:04:07.000 You understand that's what happened here, correct?
01:04:09.000 These are the same people.
01:04:10.000 Kim Cheadle, the director, wasn't even fired.
01:04:13.000 She was allowed to resign.
01:04:14.000 She'll go get some cushy job somewhere, and her deputy, who is one of the guys behind these stupid, waste-of-time things like agents wearing red ties on the detail... This actually happened, by the way.
01:04:29.000 These people will tell you this on the road if you get the right people.
01:04:33.000 He was concerned about the tie color of the agents on the detail because it seemed to imply he supported President Trump.
01:04:40.000 Congressman Biggs wearing a red tie.
01:04:42.000 You're wearing a semi-red tie.
01:04:43.000 There's nothing to do with anything.
01:04:44.000 This is the kind of stuff the Secret Service Whether it's the ineptitude or something more insidious that led to that assassination attempt is something for us, I suppose, to all consider.
01:04:54.000 and counter-sniper assets from probably the most threatened man on earth.
01:04:57.000 If you can explain it, then good luck, because that's not the agency I work for.
01:05:01.000 Whether it's the ineptitude or something more insidious that led to that assassination attempt
01:05:08.000 is something for us, I suppose, to all consider. I found it fascinating that Trump himself
01:05:15.000 recently said, "Well, they don't seem to like me very much."
01:05:20.000 The Kamala Harris-Biden campaign.
01:05:22.000 You know, they don't seem to have a lot of time for me.
01:05:24.000 They don't seem to wish me well.
01:05:27.000 And even that was reported by legacy media as Trump supporting conspiracy theories that the Deep state tried to have him killed.
01:05:35.000 The fact is we now know, in part because of stories we've already looked at today, that deep state agencies do indeed, it appears, although it is difficult to corroborate for reasons that are obvious, i.e.
01:05:47.000 they control information, they control media, they control the judiciary, they have incredible control, participate in the assassination of their enemies.
01:05:57.000 In fact, part of Trump's assent was fueled by his ability to call out and say in public things that many of us have long suspected but you just don't see politicians say publicly.
01:06:12.000 I was struck of course as I've said before by Chappelle's SNL monologue where he said the reason that Trump has such popular appeal is because he's like someone who's showing you inside these institutions.
01:06:26.000 The legacy media are obsessed with the failings and shortcomings of Donald Trump.
01:06:32.000 They're obsessed, in fact, with the maintenance of the kind of power upon which their model is built.
01:06:39.000 A model that cannot withstand challenges from independent media, that cannot withstand the challenges of new Alliances that come out of independent political space.
01:06:49.000 I know a lot of you watching this will say, it's not independent enough.
01:06:53.000 Tulsi Gabbard, she's an institutional figure.
01:06:55.000 Bobby Kennedy's an institutional figure.
01:06:57.000 But man, if you read the real Anthony Fauci by Bobby Kennedy, you will have to recognize this is a man who's not only vigorous when it comes to research, but pretty outspoken on some complex issues.
01:07:08.000 And even though you might perhaps not agree with him on everything, maybe there are Military and geopolitical issues about which you have doubts.
01:07:17.000 If what you're interested in is progress, you would have to consider that perspective.
01:07:22.000 Let me know whether or not you have a strong counter-argument to that, and particularly if you're someone who supports the Kamala Harris campaign, what the point of difference and distinction is Now, now that we've all learned as much as we have.
01:07:37.000 So whilst this is a fascinating hearing, it looks like undertaken in some part by the Heritage Foundation.
01:07:45.000 Many will point out the connections between the Heritage Foundation and that great bugbear of the Democratic Party Project 2025, which appears to be radioactive to their way of life.
01:07:58.000 I'm pretty grateful to see Dan Bongino assessing a subject about which he knows a great deal, and a subject about which he's proselytised with great...
01:08:11.000 He's been very articulate on this subject.
01:08:13.000 He's helped me to understand that something unusual happened and he's really understood, I think, the necessary nuance when it comes to criticizing members of the Secret Service.
01:08:22.000 Some of you may have seen he's reporting at the RNC where he said, hey listen, I don't want to condemn the individuals because those are men and women that are willing to give their lives and that are dedicated professionals and devoted and I thought that was pretty admirable that he took that position.
01:08:37.000 But to hear him say that Trump's life May yet be threatened again prior to November the 5th.
01:08:45.000 Well, could it happen?
01:08:46.000 In this insane world, driven by insane people with insane motives, you'd have to say it is a possibility.
01:08:54.000 But that's just what I think.
01:08:55.000 Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
01:08:59.000 Now, listen, if you're not on Awake and Wonder yet, you should consider becoming one because we are going to be doing a live-streamed stand-up show exclusively for our Locals members in just over 30 minutes.
01:09:11.000 Go over to Locals.
01:09:12.000 There's a holding page up right now.
01:09:15.000 And you'll see me just live having fun.
01:09:18.000 Another of the advantages, if you consider it that, of being a local member is you get to see my stand-up breakdowns where I look at some of my favourite comics, comedians and comedy heroes doing their best work and having a look at why I think it functions so well.
01:09:32.000 So, if you have more time in your day for yet more media, consider becoming an Awaken Wonder.
01:09:38.000 And if you fancy coming to one of my live shows, one of the advantages is that you can claim a ticket for free and come see me anywhere in the world, as long as it's my shows.
01:09:46.000 Although I bet I could get a handful for that Tucker gig.
01:09:49.000 I bet I could get that for Locus members.
01:09:51.000 Let me look into that.
01:09:52.000 So yeah, consider becoming an Awaken Wonder.
01:09:54.000 If you're watching on Rumble, we'll post it in the chat.
01:09:56.000 We'll be back Tomorrow, which is Friday, I'm going to be chatting to Tony Robbins about a new film that he's involved with that could be the new Sound of Freedom.
01:10:05.000 So you're going to want to join us for that.
01:10:07.000 I think you might like it.
01:10:08.000 I'm talking to you, Sayyihub and Carl Reiner.
01:10:11.000 There he is, every other comment.
01:10:13.000 And CanadianMom1997.
01:10:15.000 All you guys, come join us tomorrow.
01:10:18.000 Underdog82, come to Florida.
01:10:19.000 Yeah, surely only a matter of time before I'm performing there.
01:10:22.000 Get your membership.
01:10:24.000 Sign up now.
01:10:25.000 Alright guys, we've got some great stuff coming up for the remainder of the week.
01:10:30.000 It's just one more day this week, right?
01:10:31.000 This is Thursday.
01:10:32.000 We'll be back tomorrow, not with more of the same, but with more of the different.