Stay Free - Russel Brand - February 16, 2023


Heart Attacks - Why Is This Happening Now? - #082 - Stay Free With Russell Brand


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour

Words per Minute

175.32317

Word Count

10,534

Sentence Count

690

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

5


Summary

Russell Brand is joined by Stacey Malkin to discuss the dangers of corporate greed and corruption in food and health care, the rise in heart attacks among young people, and the new presidential candidate, Nikki Haley. Plus, a look at who's funding Nikki Haley's campaign and why she's running against Donald Trump in 2020. Stay Free with Russell Brand is available on all good podcasting platforms, if you search for Stay Free, you'll find us. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers and use the promo code: "WAKEUPWondering" to receive 10% off your first pack! All you have to pay is just $5 and you get 10% OFF your entire purchase when you sign up to our newsletter! We're giving away a free copy of our new book, Waking Up Wonderings, which is available for pre-order now! If you like what you hear here, please HIT SUBSCRIBE and leave us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts! It helps us spread the word about what we're doing it! We'll be looking out there, and we're looking out for the best ones too! Thank you! Stay free, you're amazing! - stay free, love you, always, always. - Yours Truly, Eternally grateful, - EJ & EJ, Amy, - Pravya, Eds, P.S. & P.B. - Tom, Tim, R. . . . - Sajesco, . , P.E. , R.S., P.A. & K. . . , - R.C. , S.J. , , SONGS, , K. M. & S. BONUS EPISODES, P. B. C. & JUICY, M. - P. R. & C. , M. C., R. A. D. , E. E. & R. S. , A. ( ) - O. J. ( ) - E. ( ), & D. (A. BORROS, ) AND SO MUCH MORE! , B. SORRY FOR THE PODCAST SUPPORTED BY:


Transcript

00:00:00.000 so so
00:01:08.000 you you
00:01:11.000 Hello, you Awakening Wonders!
00:01:13.000 Thanks for joining me on Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:01:16.000 Wherever you're watching this right now, the whole show is only available on Rumble.
00:01:20.000 Join us there for the unexpurgated, uncensored version of this show where we use freedom of speech to unite people, to bring people together.
00:01:28.000 God knows it's needed now more than ever.
00:01:31.000 Press the red join button to join us on Locals.
00:01:33.000 That's where I always respond to the comments and speak to my Little community on there.
00:01:39.000 God love them.
00:01:40.000 Watch here.
00:01:41.000 Hold on a second.
00:01:41.000 There's a stream session happening right now.
00:01:43.000 There you are.
00:01:43.000 One second.
00:01:45.000 Can someone come in and sort that out for me, please, if you don't mind?
00:01:47.000 It's actually quite complicated.
00:01:49.000 Thank you.
00:01:50.000 Hey, we've got a lot to tell you.
00:01:52.000 You happen to be joining us on the very day that surveillance reached ironic levels.
00:01:58.000 Yep, look at this.
00:01:59.000 Commemorative plaque to George Orwell is also the site of a surveillance camera.
00:02:04.000 The creator of words like big brother, wrong think, surveillance state, forever war.
00:02:12.000 There's almost a surveilling, Residual vapour, his spirit now observed as he spins in his grave.
00:02:19.000 We've got loads of globalist stories for you.
00:02:21.000 The WHO are pushing for world surveillance powers, wouldn't you know?
00:02:24.000 There are other globalist scams, digital wallets, biometrics, stuff like that we'll be discussing.
00:02:29.000 We've got a great guest on the show today, Stacey Malkin.
00:02:32.000 She's going to talk to us about the exposure of corporate corruption in food and health.
00:02:37.000 We've had a few guests around this subject and it's fascinating because fact is, we all need food like the same way that 10% of the United States gets its water from a little river running through Ohio.
00:02:50.000 Hopefully nothing toxic's been spilled there lately.
00:02:52.000 If you're joining us on YouTube now, you're going to want to click over onto Rumble because we're going to be talking about this extraordinary thing.
00:02:59.000 I don't know if you've heard about it, There's been this massive spike, and I use the word spike deliberately, to demonstrate that heart attacks in young people has gone up by 30% since the pandemic.
00:03:13.000 It's almost like something happened during the pandemic that caused young people to start having heart attacks.
00:03:18.000 Obviously we won't be discussing that on YouTube, but we'll be discussing it in a moment.
00:03:22.000 But!
00:03:23.000 In other news, democracy is functioning fine.
00:03:27.000 We've got a new presidential candidate, the first one, the first rival to Trump, I suppose she is, Nikki Haley.
00:03:33.000 Let's have a little look at her speech and see if you spot any veiled digs at any current power players.
00:03:40.000 Just see, watch this very carefully, see if you can spot who she might be having a dig at.
00:03:44.000 We'll have term limits for Congress.
00:03:47.000 And mandatory mental competency tests for politicians over 75 years old.
00:04:01.000 Why would anyone need a mandated competence test?
00:04:05.000 I can't think of anybody that would benefit from having their mental state tested.
00:04:08.000 Can you?
00:04:09.000 America is a nation that can be defined in a single word.
00:04:17.000 I think we all enjoy that kind of rhetoric, you know, that in the post-Trump era, populist rhetoric has returned, talking about curbing the amount of time that people are in Congress, making sure that incompetent folk, our legacy and connections can't just rise to the top.
00:04:33.000 But here's a list of some of the billionaires that are funding Nikki Haley's campaign.
00:04:37.000 16 of them.
00:04:38.000 16 billionaires.
00:04:39.000 And what do you get?
00:04:40.000 Have a look at a piece of her promotional material.
00:04:43.000 Pretty good bit of promo.
00:04:44.000 Check it out.
00:04:46.000 Some people look at America and see vulnerability.
00:04:50.000 The socialist left sees an opportunity to rewrite history.
00:04:55.000 When you call these people like the socialist left I know like in your country you've been really coached to not like socialism and quite rightly after the failure of the Soviet Union Maoism and the concentration of power that traditional conventional socialism awards government which we are totally against we believe in decentralized models and your ability to democratically Well done.
00:05:15.000 Nicely done.
00:05:16.000 but calling these people socialists, look at that, $140 million between them.
00:05:16.000 Very good.
00:05:20.000 Nancy Pelosi there.
00:05:22.000 I don't think you can call yourself a socialist if you're $120 million,
00:05:25.000 much of which may have been accrued from your partner's stock market trading.
00:05:30.000 And he may have picked up a few tips from, you know, given that she heavily regulates or doesn't heavily
00:05:35.000 regulate, but he's involved in the regulation of some of the
00:05:37.000 industries he owns stocks in.
00:05:39.000 Well done. Nicely done.
00:05:40.000 Do you see that? I'm a pro, man.
00:05:41.000 That's what we have to do.
00:05:42.000 Half of Congress are millionaires.
00:05:44.000 12 times richer than the typical American.
00:05:47.000 So those socialists and, you know, obviously when she's talking about term limits, I can see the benefits of that and that's something I can wholly get behind.
00:05:56.000 But when you hear that she's backed by 16 billionaires and she's not mentioning things like, I will end lobbying in politics.
00:06:02.000 I will end people owning stocks and shares in the companies that they regulate.
00:06:06.000 No one's going to say that.
00:06:07.000 When she says end the professional class of politicians, why not go further and start having government by assembly?
00:06:13.000 Everyone recognises the world needs to change.
00:06:15.000 Change means doing things differently.
00:06:17.000 The idea that you'd have people's assemblies, assemblies of people like you.
00:06:20.000 Oh no, we couldn't have that.
00:06:21.000 You need professional people with ties to corporations receiving lobbying money, owning stocks and shares in the corporations that they're supposed to be regulating.
00:06:28.000 Without that, everything would fall apart.
00:06:29.000 You're damn right it'd fall apart.
00:06:31.000 And what you might get are different systems, more just, fair systems.
00:06:34.000 Because let's face it, what we are living in now is not democracy.
00:06:38.000 We are living in a globalist, corporatist state where many of the laws and regulations that affect your life are determined by bodies that are unelected.
00:06:47.000 Gareth, had you even heard of, until very recently, of a thing called, like we've all heard of the IMF, we've all heard of WHO, WEF, but have you heard of the World Government Summit?
00:06:57.000 I have not, no.
00:06:57.000 There's a thing now called the World Government In plain sight.
00:07:01.000 Just out there the world's going, what are, all these sort of, oh what you think they're trying to achieve a new world order?
00:07:06.000 You think there's an aim to have a world government?
00:07:09.000 Where do you come up with these crackpot conspiracies?
00:07:13.000 Next you'll be saying that they cut money and expenditure on trains and that led to a train crash that's polluting American rivers and killing American fish.
00:07:20.000 Well, this crazy talk of there being a world government seems like little more than the rantings of a conspiracy theorist.
00:07:29.000 Over now to the World Government Summit with Elon Musk addressing them beautifully.
00:07:36.000 I should say, I know this is called the World Government Summit, but I think we should be maybe a little bit concerned about actually becoming too much of a single world government.
00:07:48.000 If I may say that we... Who booked this guy?
00:07:51.000 It's ruining, this is our first World Government Summit.
00:07:53.000 You put someone on who says that world governments are not a good idea.
00:07:56.000 Might as well just have the sound of...
00:08:00.000 No.
00:08:01.000 Klaus Schwab's at this Government Summit.
00:08:02.000 He is.
00:08:03.000 They all show up at these places.
00:08:04.000 Yeah, that's it.
00:08:05.000 I was looking at it.
00:08:06.000 It's a bunch of 250 ministers, 20 presidents, dozens of CEOs and Klaus Schwab.
00:08:12.000 But the idea that there's a plan to create a world government at the World Government Summit is a conspiracy theory.
00:08:18.000 They must love these events.
00:08:19.000 There's so many of them.
00:08:20.000 There's so many.
00:08:21.000 G20, B20, World Economic Forum, you know, whatever this is now, World Government Summit.
00:08:27.000 It's like a golf tour.
00:08:28.000 It's like every country's got its own globalist little adventure.
00:08:33.000 And it's not like it's meaningless.
00:08:35.000 It's not like it's a simple corporate jamboree.
00:08:38.000 The WHO now are lobbying for a treaty to be passed that would implement the greater ability for global surveillance biometric data to be captured.
00:08:49.000 We'll be talking about this in our presentation a little later.
00:08:53.000 They've released an international pandemic treaty which will give them new sweeping surveillance powers.
00:08:57.000 The treaty requires the WHO's 194 member states to strengthen the one health surveillance system.
00:09:03.000 It's only 98% of all countries in the world though, Ross.
00:09:06.000 That belong to it?
00:09:06.000 I think you're getting a little overly worried.
00:09:08.000 Oh, it's only 98% and what about that 2%?
00:09:10.000 Countries that have not got even proper flags?
00:09:13.000 Hopefully those guys are going to rally pretty hard.
00:09:16.000 They obviously are using COVID-19 to legitimise the necessity for global surveillance, but many of us believe that the pandemic shows why you need more democracy, why you need more open discourse, why you need more openness, why you need science to be open and empirical rather than ideologically led.
00:09:34.000 And I think you'll agree with us that more and more evidence is being revealed and released that suggests that that isn't the template that's being followed.
00:09:43.000 Later, of course, we're going to be talking about the rise of 30% in death by heart attack in young people, which we cannot talk about on YouTube because by some weird coincidence, by some weird conspiracy theory, Google are regulated by the WHO nominally and electively.
00:10:00.000 They use the WHO's guidelines to regulate their community.
00:10:03.000 You can check that for yourself.
00:10:04.000 So on Rumble, we'll be talking about that in more depth.
00:10:06.000 There's a link in the description.
00:10:08.000 Click over.
00:10:09.000 Here we list Some of the globalist main players and some of their latest crazy little schemes.
00:10:16.000 Now, you might not have heard of Ursula von der Leyen.
00:10:19.000 She came to prominence on our show.
00:10:22.000 I think we brought her to the forefront.
00:10:23.000 We did, yeah.
00:10:24.000 Her and Albert Baller, CEO of Pfizer, were texting to do massive orders worth billions of euros without it being passed.
00:10:32.000 There's a council and a committee that were meant to sanction that.
00:10:34.000 When the EU was spending a bunch of money on buying more jabs or whatever, it's meant to be Signed off at the level of government, but they were just sorting that stuff out on text.
00:10:43.000 Ursula von der Leyen with her name that could be in an episode of Seinfeld.
00:10:46.000 You know they have that.
00:10:47.000 They use names like that in Seinfeld.
00:10:50.000 She's refusing to disclose those texts.
00:10:52.000 Why?
00:10:53.000 Again, unelected, uncooperative.
00:10:55.000 What's going on there?
00:10:56.000 Check out these new DNA smart cards.
00:10:59.000 Another little globalist adventure that's on the way that you're fascinated by, Gareth.
00:11:04.000 Because it coagulates a whole bunch of data into one convenient place.
00:11:08.000 Convenience!
00:11:09.000 Just to come back to Ursula von der Leyen.
00:11:11.000 So there was an investigation by Investigate Europe who found deals for doses happened behind closed doors between the EU and pharmaceutical companies.
00:11:19.000 New variants, international competition and darkness around manufacturing costs have allowed Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna to increase the bill for European taxpayers.
00:11:27.000 So this all came about when she was meant to, obviously she's meant to disclose these texts and hasn't done.
00:11:32.000 Albert Borla, do you remember when Janine Small from Pfizer revealed something that we can't talk about on YouTube until later, but revealed something fairly important?
00:11:42.000 At that same committee, Albert Borla was meant to testify and pulled out of the appointment himself.
00:11:47.000 So no one's really saying anything about something which involves 10 billion euros of public money being spent on these vaccines.
00:11:56.000 Click here on the red button to join us on Locals.
00:12:01.000 OK, we're going to have to... Oh God, I feel like something's wrong with me.
00:12:04.000 Sorry.
00:12:05.000 I don't know why.
00:12:08.000 Something must have happened.
00:12:09.000 You're going to be blown away by the reporting on this story.
00:12:13.000 Young people dying from heart attacks has risen by 30% since the pandemic.
00:12:18.000 The mainstream media are reporting on this story, but the way they tiptoe around what What the potential causes for this could be is going to blow your mind.
00:12:26.000 We're only going to be able to talk about this on Rumble.
00:12:29.000 That's the reason we're on Rumble.
00:12:30.000 Our commitment to free speech.
00:12:32.000 Free speech gives us the opportunity to attack establishment interests.
00:12:35.000 That's simply not possible on platforms that are governed by the WHO, or at least use them to formulate their guidelines.
00:12:40.000 Join us over there now.
00:12:42.000 We'll see you there.
00:12:44.000 Now, it's now understood.
00:12:46.000 Let's have a look at that headline.
00:12:47.000 Young people are Dying from heart attacks has risen by 30%.
00:12:51.000 Let's have a look at that.
00:12:53.000 Thank you.
00:12:54.000 Right, and now let's have a look at how that was reported on the mainstream media.
00:13:00.000 Let's have a look.
00:13:01.000 Heart attack deaths have become more common across all age groups since the start of the coronavirus pandemic.
00:13:07.000 But a recent study found that young people are actually most at risk in this case.
00:13:12.000 According to Cedars-Sinai Hospital, the number of heart attack deaths among... Data that's coming from a hospital.
00:13:19.000 They're noticing there's been a 30% rise in heart attacks among young people.
00:13:24.000 It's a national review though.
00:13:24.000 Fair enough.
00:13:26.000 It's not just of one hospital.
00:13:28.000 25 to 44 year olds in the U.S.
00:13:30.000 over the first two years of the pandemic was 30% higher than predicted.
00:13:36.000 Okay, fantastic.
00:13:37.000 A lot.
00:13:38.000 Let's have a look at the next clip.
00:13:40.000 And do we know why younger people might be more at risk?
00:13:44.000 Could the reason be and what could it not be?
00:13:46.000 Now this is where you see editorializing happening live.
00:13:49.000 I want you to watch this very carefully because it's fascinating because what they're obviously not saying is could this be caused by the vaccine given that there are now Studies that suggest that it causes myocarditis that the injection doesn't stay in the site in the arm but migrates to cardio material.
00:14:09.000 This is stuff that people are looking at experimenting with and like the way they grope around for potential causes.
00:14:16.000 It's like you know like when you go on a game show or something it's like you can't say the word vaccine.
00:14:20.000 Yeah.
00:14:21.000 OK, you've got to talk about this story.
00:14:22.000 You're not allowed to say the word vaccine.
00:14:25.000 OK, could it be that people aren't exercising enough?
00:14:27.000 I mean, COVID itself could be causing heart attacks.
00:14:29.000 Could it be that?
00:14:30.000 Maybe there's some sort of heart attack ghost that's getting into people's arms somehow.
00:14:30.000 Could it be that?
00:14:35.000 We don't know for sure.
00:14:36.000 And in fact, these death certificates are probably not even capturing the fact that they might have had COVID.
00:14:41.000 Could have been COVID.
00:14:42.000 That's one of the many things that it could have been.
00:14:44.000 Is there anything else that's been happening since the pandemic that could be causing an unprecedented 30% rise in death by heart attacks in young people?
00:14:53.000 They're really just saying, did you die from a heart attack or not?
00:14:56.000 Did you die from a heart attack?
00:14:59.000 Could be difficult to answer that question if the answer is yes.
00:15:02.000 What we do know, however, is that younger people were less likely to protect themselves against COVID than older people.
00:15:08.000 Less likely to mask, less likely to take other mitigation measures.
00:15:11.000 It's because they've not masked.
00:15:12.000 It's because they've not taken medication.
00:15:14.000 Look, the thing is, who knows?
00:15:16.000 The problem I have with this is that she starts this by saying, we don't know.
00:15:16.000 It could be.
00:15:20.000 So at this point, this is conjecture.
00:15:22.000 So on the mainstream media, you're getting a circled expert coming on with conjecture about this and only giving one possible cause for this, one possible reason.
00:15:31.000 And exactly what you're saying, the reason, the one thing that they don't want to say is anything to do with vaccines.
00:15:36.000 And I suppose when you start to look at some of the things that people had concerns about at the beginning of the pandemic, For example, vaccine manufacturers were granted legal indemnity.
00:15:46.000 Many people thought, that ain't good.
00:15:48.000 When Pfizer booted them files 75 years into the future, when it became impossible to talk about, when all of the campaigns to shame unvaccinated people, look.
00:15:58.000 This pandemic no longer is intriguing to me in its own merit.
00:16:04.000 It intrigues me because it is a window into how power functions.
00:16:08.000 And given that what we are seeing now is a trend to further centralise power, beyond the level of national democracy.
00:16:17.000 Organizations like the WHO, WEF having the power to suggest, and in the case of the WHO, the power to introduce legislation that will affect you and your whole country that you won't at any point be able to intervene with.
00:16:30.000 It's funded by like Bill Gates to an extraordinary degree who has invested.
00:16:34.000 I mean all of these things, sometimes when I'm saying them out loud it sounds like a conspiracy theory because so much information has been simultaneously revealed that it's It's difficult not to start feeling almost scared, I think, by the scope and power of what's happening.
00:16:50.000 It's not one time, we're not going to show the whole of this interview, the whole of this piece, but there's not one moment in this whole thing where, as was reported in Politico, data has shown an elevated risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle and membrane, respectively, after the second mRNA vaccine dose among males aged 12 to 39, which you would think classifies as young people, with those in their late teens and 20s more affected. It's
00:17:15.000 not mentioned once, it's literally, they don't mention this once. The idea that
00:17:20.000 omission is a form of propaganda and manipulation is one that we have to consider.
00:17:26.000 Throughout the pandemic we saw certain stories escalated, elevated, certain ideas, notions, even ideals
00:17:32.000 escalated and elevated. When it comes to the theories of the of the virus's origin, certain theories
00:17:38.000 and ideas were pushed and some were excluded from discourse, even though we know that privately
00:17:43.000 now the experts charged with the pandemic response were...
00:17:46.000 Seriously discussing the possibility that for example bioengineering and lab leak were viable theories.
00:17:53.000 And what I think we're going to see over the next couple of years is more and more of these ideas becoming verified and validated and seeing yet more ideas migrate from conspiracy theory to cast iron incontrovertible fact.
00:18:07.000 At the moment we're in a period of debate and negotiation but all of the voices of people are Robert Malone and Brett Weinstein and Joe Rogan, people that were openly having those conversations that faced extreme censor now seem more legitimate.
00:18:20.000 One side effect or one adverse event that's a problem, I believe, and you guys let me know what you think in the chat, is that we start to become more open to radical and ludicrous ideas and I think they like that.
00:18:34.000 I think they like it when we start to Discuss openly and passionately ideas that are a little bit kooky.
00:18:42.000 There ain't no need for that.
00:18:44.000 We can remain sanguine, deliberate, factual, and present a pretty powerful case that some extraordinary things have taken place.
00:18:53.000 We needn't assume malfeasance when ineptitude will do, but it does appear that there is an agenda to, where possible, bypass democratic power.
00:19:02.000 We had a guest on the show recently, Martin Goury.
00:19:04.000 He said, democracy is the only game in town.
00:19:07.000 With all of its flaws, democracy is the best it's going to get when you look at the alternatives.
00:19:11.000 We don't have democracy.
00:19:13.000 You don't have a democracy in America.
00:19:14.000 We don't have one here.
00:19:15.000 You have parties that are so similar to one another, whose ideals and agenda converge so neatly with the interests of transnational entities and corporations, that you are not given any real choice about any real issues.
00:19:31.000 So these stories we're talking about now, digital passes, High-ranking officials of corporations and unelected bodies exchanging texts and remaining unaccountable.
00:19:41.000 This is the fingerprints on the gun of how power operates.
00:19:46.000 At the old world government summit, I weren't invited.
00:19:51.000 You weren't invited.
00:19:52.000 Guess who was there?
00:19:53.000 Guess who was there with his little baby bum face?
00:19:56.000 He gets about, doesn't he?
00:19:57.000 You've got to say.
00:19:58.000 He's got such good skin.
00:19:59.000 I hope he doesn't take a private jet.
00:19:59.000 He looks so soft.
00:20:02.000 Of course he does.
00:20:04.000 He's very particular about his travel, Klaus Schwab.
00:20:06.000 Let's have a look at what he's saying at the World Summit.
00:20:09.000 I think he's saying something like we're going to be mastered by robots.
00:20:12.000 Let's have a look at him.
00:20:14.000 Our life in 10 years from now will be completely different, very much affected, and who masters those technologies in some way will be the master of the world.
00:20:31.000 I suppose that's the chatbot stuff.
00:20:34.000 And he's right.
00:20:35.000 He's right.
00:20:36.000 But it's just, it's a shame that the people he's addressing are a bunch of CEOs and world leaders, isn't it?
00:20:41.000 The very people who will take charge of all of that.
00:20:43.000 You've got Microsoft investing billions into this chatbot stuff.
00:20:48.000 You know, the chatbots that are now controlling jets and all sorts.
00:20:52.000 So it's, yeah, he's right.
00:20:54.000 Let us know in the chat bot how you feel about that.
00:20:58.000 Or if you are a chat bot, simply tell us what we think and what we should do about that.
00:21:03.000 Looking at some of your comments now.
00:21:05.000 Art by Wendy Klein, awaken or die.
00:21:08.000 Seriously, what's wrong with Klaus Schwab?
00:21:10.000 Oop, spike proteins, that's from blessed old bird, If you want to be a member of this community, there's a red button there.
00:21:18.000 You can join us.
00:21:19.000 Be part of this community.
00:21:20.000 You'll be the first to learn about stuff.
00:21:21.000 You'll get my live stand-up special in a few days.
00:21:24.000 There's all sorts of advantages to being a member of this community.
00:21:27.000 And by God, if they're all ganging up at World Government Summits, we've certainly got to do everything we can to unite.
00:21:32.000 We've got a fantastic story now.
00:21:34.000 The WHO, as I told you earlier, are pushing a treaty that will give them the power to implement legal control in your country in the event of another pandemic.
00:21:45.000 And let's face it, there's another one coming.
00:21:47.000 Do you think, let me know this in the chat, are these measures about your health or controlling your future freedom?
00:21:53.000 Let me know in the chat.
00:21:54.000 I'll be reading your comments when we come back.
00:21:57.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:21:57.000 Here's the news.
00:21:59.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.
00:22:01.000 The news.
00:22:02.000 No, here's the fucking news.
00:22:04.000 The WHO, or World Health Organization, What is it you like most about it?
00:22:11.000 That you fund it out of your taxes?
00:22:13.000 That Bill Gates is its second biggest funder?
00:22:15.000 Or that nobody elected it?
00:22:17.000 They've got a brilliant new draft pandemic treaty that's going to surveil you into so much better health and definitely not negatively impact your freedom.
00:22:28.000 We've got a fantastic story for you today about the World Health Organization.
00:22:33.000 A new draft pandemic treaty which they propose will give them more powers to surveil and control you.
00:22:40.000 Obviously for your benefit.
00:22:42.000 You don't need to take my word for it.
00:22:43.000 Here are the WHO explaining how they're going to help you from the terror and horror of your sweet beautiful freedom.
00:22:50.000 We want to end this emergency in every country.
00:22:54.000 On the planet, in 2023, and we can do this.
00:22:57.000 And even if that emergency provides opportunities, you know, a wealth transfer of five trillion, some of the most powerful organizations in the world becoming more powerful, more ability to regulate, even though it's an emergency in your life, if you can't get treatment for your cancer, if you can't see a doctor, if your small business is closing, some of the most powerful interests in the world benefited heavily.
00:23:15.000 Let's see what the suggestions they've got for us now to advance us on our course towards more freedom.
00:23:19.000 So what we are asking all member states, all countries around the world to do is to reassess their situation have a fresh look at what you're doing and look at what needs to be adjusted so we need to strengthen the systems in countries around surveillance oh surveillance well that's interesting you're going to help us by watching us we need to strengthen the clinical care pathway so that any individual if they are infected
00:23:42.000 With whatever they have.
00:23:43.000 With anything.
00:23:44.000 Oh, not just COVID now.
00:23:45.000 Anything at all.
00:23:46.000 Headache, life itself.
00:23:48.000 All things can become a disease to the machine.
00:23:51.000 Flu, RSV, COVID.
00:23:53.000 All things are a disease and therefore all things should be surveilled.
00:23:56.000 Flu now.
00:23:57.000 To help you, to help you.
00:23:58.000 The problem is that like AI, there's usually an ideology behind it.
00:24:03.000 When we see globalist measures like this, we're going to track you, basically.
00:24:08.000 We're going to surveil you.
00:24:09.000 We're going to observe you.
00:24:10.000 For you, incidentally, you have to ask, Right at the beginning, right at this point, is this for us or is this for those centralized systems?
00:24:17.000 We prioritize and focus our vaccination campaigns to ensure that we reach 100% of the at-risk groups.
00:24:27.000 Notice that in their promotional material, the WHO very deliberately show vaccination
00:24:31.000 programs being successfully completed in what look like nations where the majority of people
00:24:36.000 are of colour.
00:24:37.000 One might assume that that was one of the African nations where that man is being inoculated.
00:24:42.000 Curiously, the WHO's biggest single funder refused to rescind the patents enabling the
00:24:47.000 vaccines to be manufactured in those nations.
00:24:50.000 Which, if what you were doing this for was philanthropy, because the Bill and Melinda
00:24:54.000 Gates Foundation is a philanthropic organisation, then presumably you would waive those patents
00:24:58.000 to facilitate those medicines get into as many people as possible.
00:25:01.000 If though you apply a different metric, like they were doing it for profit, then it would make sense not to give over the patents because you wouldn't profit from it.
00:25:08.000 So you tell me, what analysis makes more sense to you?
00:25:11.000 Profit and power, humanitarianism and kindness.
00:25:14.000 Always the humanitarianism and the kind of dialed out, amped up so you can't hear or think anything.
00:25:18.000 We've got to help people through war.
00:25:20.000 We've got to help people through medicine.
00:25:21.000 Then all of the information and data stacks up.
00:25:23.000 Hey, hey, this isn't helping people.
00:25:25.000 This isn't helping people.
00:25:26.000 Oh, but I noticed that it gave you a great deal of ability to surveil us, profit, impose regulation at a time where people are becoming more awakened and have more ability to communicate and organise.
00:25:35.000 That's just an inadvertent side effect.
00:25:37.000 Yeah, there are a lot of inadvertent side effects.
00:25:39.000 I've seen the yellow card reactions.
00:25:42.000 100% of individuals need to be boosted who are over 60.
00:25:45.000 We need new and updated vaccines that focus on preventing infection and transmission.
00:25:50.000 We need to understand more about the different types of public health and social measures and we really need to build trust.
00:25:58.000 You certainly do need to build trust after that last fiasco we've all just been through, after we've seen the way that Bill Gates acquired shares, sold shares, the timing of those events, that whole piece of propaganda underscored by beautiful strings, an attempt to present information as philanthropic and altruistic that ultimately might be about power and control.
00:26:18.000 Let's get into it.
00:26:19.000 The World Health Organization, WHO, has released the latest Zero Draft of its International Pandemic Treaty, which will give the unelected global health agency new sweeping surveillance powers if passed.
00:26:32.000 The treaty requires the WHO's 194 member states, which represents 98% of all the countries in the world, to strengthen the WHO's One Health surveillance systems.
00:26:42.000 That's what people mean by globalism.
00:26:44.000 It's centrally determined policies implemented without democracy, funded by, yes, your taxes, countries like the United States, my country, the UK, all sorts of countries, Germany, the biggest donor.
00:26:54.000 But the second biggest donor, as I'm sure you know by now, is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
00:26:58.000 And that's not their only means for getting funding into the WHO.
00:27:02.000 Do you think, have you seen over the course of your life, that giving money to something gives you some power and influence?
00:27:09.000 Do you think that if you donate money to an organisation that Passes global regulations around vaccines, for example, and elsewhere you invest in shares for vaccine companies.
00:27:18.000 Is that a conflict of interest?
00:27:19.000 No, it's not a conflict of interest.
00:27:20.000 It's commensurate interest working brilliantly like a missile made of money.
00:27:24.000 One Health is a WHO system that aims to optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems.
00:27:30.000 Bloody hell, they're not even stopping at people now.
00:27:31.000 They want your pets and your entire ecosystem.
00:27:34.000 What's next?
00:27:34.000 Your thoughts?
00:27:35.000 We want your thoughts to be more healthy.
00:27:37.000 Do you mind if we stick this chopstick down in your ear and wiggle around in your brain?
00:27:41.000 It's for your benefit.
00:27:43.000 It hurts.
00:27:44.000 Sometimes pain is good.
00:27:45.000 And uses the close interdependent links among these fields to create new surveillance and disease control methods.
00:27:51.000 Bloody hell, that sounds like an immersive web of observation, which after the revelations of, say, Edward Snowden, seems like something I don't want to grant to an unelected transnational body.
00:28:01.000 The WHO's One Health fact sheet points to COVID-19 as one of the main reasons for expanding its One Health approach and states that it puts spotlight on the need for a global framework for improved surveillance.
00:28:11.000 That's weird, because I'd say that the COVID-19 pandemic shows you exactly why we should improve individual freedom, community democracy, democracy more generally, the right of people to participate in a conversation.
00:28:22.000 To hear all sides of the conversation around science.
00:28:24.000 To extract profit from the pharmaceutical and healthcare industry so that they are responsive to their taxpayer funders and that any money that they raise subsequent to an emergency is returned to the nations and people that funded it in the first place.
00:28:36.000 So, seems like we learned very different lessons.
00:28:38.000 The draft treaty also orders WHO member states to strengthen surveillance functions for outbreak investigation and control through interoperable early warning and alert systems.
00:28:50.000 Orders them.
00:28:50.000 You won't be able to decide and neither will your country be able to decide if you want more or less surveillance.
00:28:57.000 Additionally, it requires member states to recognise the WHO as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work in pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems and in convening and generating scientific evidence and more generally fostering multilateral cooperation in global health governance.
00:29:16.000 They use words like cooperation Directing and coordinating authority.
00:29:21.000 Essentially what that's saying is that they will become an unelected, all-powerful system of governance when it comes to crises.
00:29:29.000 The WHO isn't God.
00:29:31.000 It isn't some unquestionable, mystical entity.
00:29:35.000 It's the interests of human beings coalescing around a set of ideas, many of which lead to profit, some of which lead to greater ability to assert control.
00:29:45.000 What I'm suggesting is that you should decide if it's right for you.
00:29:49.000 You should vote for whether or not you want it to happen in your community, your country.
00:29:53.000 More democracy, not less.
00:29:54.000 This is exactly the opposite direction to the direction we should be heading in.
00:29:59.000 Because the truth is that all this technology that we're being granted affords us the opportunity for more democracy.
00:30:04.000 The WHO has previously confirmed that it's a big supporter of vaccine passports.
00:30:08.000 No shit!
00:30:09.000 This draft treaty has been in the works since December 2021.
00:30:12.000 A final report on the treaty is expected to be presented to the WHO's decision-making body, the World Health Assembly, WHA, in May 2024.
00:30:20.000 If passed, this treaty will be adopted under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution, an article that allows the WHO to impose legally binding convention on the WHO's 194 member states if two-thirds of the member states' representatives vote in favour of the conventions.
00:30:37.000 Unless you believe that Bill Gates' huge donations to the WHO do not amount to influence, then you have to accept that what the WHO means is that Bill Gates has the ability to create international laws that affect everybody.
00:30:52.000 I mean, notice he was all over your TV set throughout the pandemic.
00:30:55.000 I think you should do this.
00:30:55.000 I think you should do that.
00:30:56.000 Have a corn cob.
00:30:57.000 Like, that dude is funding organisations that can vote for laws getting into your country.
00:31:03.000 Now, I don't know if that's what you want.
00:31:05.000 I don't think it's what I want.
00:31:06.000 Listen, I'm tired of thinking.
00:31:08.000 Life's too hard.
00:31:08.000 Just get Bill Gates to tell me what to do.
00:31:10.000 Unlike the law-making process in most democratic nations, where elected officials implement national law, this WHO process allows a small number of global representatives, often unelected diplomats, to impose international laws on all of the WHO's member states.
00:31:24.000 The WHO has the support of many powerful nations, including the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the European Council, which represents 27 European member states.
00:31:34.000 This treaty is just one of the global surveillance proposals with ties to the WHO that is being pushed by influential global figures.
00:31:41.000 At Business B20 2022, a summit of business leaders from Group of 20, G20 countries, numerous countries agreed on a digital health passport that used WHO standards.
00:31:52.000 The digital health certificate will track whether people have been vaccinated or tested.
00:31:57.000 You don't want unelected officials deciding the basic facts of your life.
00:32:01.000 That's feudalism.
00:32:02.000 We've been through that.
00:32:03.000 Centralised systems of control where you're ultimately a serf.
00:32:06.000 What you are now is a serf with an iPhone.
00:32:09.000 Oh, I got an iPhone!
00:32:10.000 You're a peasant.
00:32:11.000 So let's have a digital health certificate acknowledged by WHO If you have been vaccinated or tested properly, then you can move around.
00:32:23.000 Fuck off!
00:32:24.000 So for the next pandemic... What?
00:32:26.000 Sorry?
00:32:26.000 Next pandemic?
00:32:27.000 Instead of stopping the movement of the people 100%, which clogged the economy globally, you know, you can still provide some movement of the people.
00:32:37.000 So hopefully for the next pandemic, we can still see some movement of the people, some movement of the goods, and movement of the economy.
00:32:45.000 But it will ultimately be what they decide is what's being suggested.
00:32:49.000 Do you remember in the early days of the pandemic when it was suggested there should be more surveillance, digital IDs to stop the spread, all that kind of stuff, even though stopping the spread now seems like a dubious goal, particularly in connection with the administration of medicine.
00:33:02.000 It was suggested that it was up to us and to our benefit to hand over our data and that they would never be misused.
00:33:07.000 It would never be given to spy agencies.
00:33:09.000 It would never be used to track us.
00:33:11.000 It would never be used to immobilize us.
00:33:12.000 It would never be used to create prejudicial conditions against people who yielded.
00:33:17.000 Some people were suspicious and said, no, no, no, no, no.
00:33:19.000 I don't want a digital ID.
00:33:20.000 I'm not sure about these medicines.
00:33:21.000 How have they been tested?
00:33:22.000 Some people were skeptical and doubtful.
00:33:24.000 Let's see how that all went down.
00:33:25.000 In the pandemic's bewildering early days, millions worldwide believed government officials who said they needed confidential data for new tech tools that could help stop coronavirus spread.
00:33:35.000 In return, governments got a firehose of individuals' private health details, photographs that captured their facial measurements and their home addresses.
00:33:42.000 Now from Beijing to Jerusalem to Hyderabad, India and Perth, Australia, the Associated Press has found that authorities used these technologies and data to halt travel for activists and ordinary people, harass marginalised communities and link people's health information to other surveillance and law enforcement tools.
00:34:00.000 In some cases, data was shared with spy agencies.
00:34:03.000 Oh, okay then.
00:34:04.000 For more than a year, AP journalists interviewed sources and pored over thousands of documents to trace how technologies marketed to flatten the curve were put to other uses.
00:34:14.000 Just as the balance between privacy and national security shifted after the September 11th terrorist attacks, COVID-19 has given officials justification to embed tracking tools in society that have lasted long after lockdowns.
00:34:26.000 Just exactly like we said.
00:34:28.000 During the pandemic, the CDC tracked millions of phones to see if Americans followed COVID lockdown orders.
00:34:34.000 Just exactly like we said, and they promised they wouldn't.
00:34:37.000 How many things now have you seen make the pilgrimage from conspiracy theory to incontrovertible fact?
00:34:42.000 Adverse events!
00:34:43.000 Excess death!
00:34:44.000 They're spying on us!
00:34:45.000 Facts!
00:34:46.000 Employees of the New York City Department of Education who refused to get vaccinated against COVID-19 had their fingerprints and files sent to the New York Criminal Justice Services and the FBI, illegal filing alleges.
00:34:57.000 That means that they criminalized not getting the vaccination.
00:35:00.000 They treated not being vaccinated as a crime.
00:35:03.000 Think of the information that's come out subsequently that makes that an appalling and untenable position.
00:35:09.000 It's simply a personal choice.
00:35:11.000 So what that tells you is the prevailing mentality and the preferred ideology is that your personal freedom is a crime.
00:35:18.000 That's where it's heading.
00:35:19.000 This is the taste.
00:35:20.000 This is the amuse-bouche.
00:35:22.000 This is the little hors d'oeuvre of the banquet of tyranny that is coming.
00:35:26.000 Your freedom is a crime.
00:35:27.000 Your ability to decide where you go, what you do, what medicines you take, what food you eat, what you believe in, what entertainment you watch, what your opinions and views are, is ultimately an inconvenience to these centralizing authorities.
00:35:39.000 But it's for your health.
00:35:40.000 It's for your safety.
00:35:41.000 If you care, as any parent knows, about someone else's safety, it's an ongoing bloody negotiation between, look, I don't think you should do that.
00:35:49.000 Oh, God.
00:35:50.000 And that's with actual children.
00:35:51.000 We're not children.
00:35:52.000 We're adults.
00:35:53.000 We literally have as much right as they do.
00:35:55.000 What claims have they made?
00:35:56.000 It's follow the science.
00:35:58.000 Is that science conforming to a bunch of corporate incentives?
00:35:58.000 Oh, OK.
00:36:01.000 Turns out it was.
00:36:02.000 Oh, yeah, well, we're sort of experts.
00:36:04.000 OK.
00:36:05.000 Are you the only experts?
00:36:06.000 And are you definitely right?
00:36:07.000 Or did you exclude a load of other expert voices?
00:36:09.000 Are you using this technology in ways that you said you wouldn't?
00:36:12.000 Their authority is over.
00:36:13.000 New York City had a vaccine mandate for employees of the Department of Education that required them to be fully vaccinated by September 2, 2022.
00:36:21.000 By mid-September, about 1,950 employees had been fired for refusing to get the vaccine.
00:36:26.000 Oh, I'm not sure about taking this vaccine.
00:36:28.000 Has it been properly tested?
00:36:29.000 Get out!
00:36:30.000 And before you go, give us your fingerprints.
00:36:32.000 Oh, this is weird.
00:36:32.000 You're not going to misuse those, are you?
00:36:35.000 Hello, is that the FBI?
00:36:35.000 No.
00:36:36.000 We were already listening to the call before you rang us.
00:36:38.000 Oh, you can put the phone down.
00:36:40.000 Oh, see, we're still here.
00:36:41.000 Oh, we've got those fingerprints.
00:36:42.000 Yeah, we know that.
00:36:43.000 Those who refused to get vaccinated also had a problem code added to their personnel file.
00:36:48.000 Ooh, problem code.
00:36:50.000 That is where we're heading.
00:36:52.000 If you do not obey, you are a problem.
00:36:55.000 If you do not conform, you are a problem.
00:36:57.000 If you do not comply, you are a problem.
00:37:00.000 But only to them.
00:37:01.000 Only to the unelected, centralised, bureaucratic bodies that don't want you to have any individual freedom.
00:37:07.000 To us, you are a solution if you don't comply.
00:37:10.000 To us, you are a solution if you don't conform.
00:37:13.000 Plus, you are a solution if you do not obey.
00:37:16.000 You must ignore their imperatives.
00:37:18.000 You must bind together.
00:37:19.000 You must overcome the adversity and conflict you've had with your fellow human beings.
00:37:23.000 You must demand individual freedom.
00:37:25.000 You must demand community freedom.
00:37:26.000 You must listen to the light within yourself and continue to nurture it.
00:37:30.000 Stay with us on this ride to freedom.
00:37:33.000 We can only do this together.
00:37:34.000 But that's just what I think.
00:37:35.000 Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
00:37:37.000 I'll be reading them in a second.
00:37:42.000 Hello there you awakening wonders.
00:37:46.000 Today's show is brought to you by Manscaped, who are the best in men's below the waist and below the snout and within the ear grooming.
00:37:54.000 Their products are precision engineered tools like our analysis for your family jewels.
00:38:00.000 Manscaped's performance package is the ultimate men's hygiene bundle.
00:38:05.000 You get the lawnmower, this trimmer is the future of grooming, and some say the greatest ball trimmer ever.
00:38:10.000 You get the weed whacker, crop preserver ball deodorant, although if there is an odour, there just shouldn't be an odour on your balls.
00:38:18.000 But if there is, this will rid you of it.
00:38:20.000 The crop reviver toner, performance boxer briefs, and a travel bag to hold your goodies.
00:38:26.000 In this case, the goodies are the products, not your reproductive organs.
00:38:29.000 Join over 7 million men worldwide, not literally, that would be unhygienic, you'd be ankle deep in pubic hair, who trust MANSCAPED with this exclusive offer for you.
00:38:39.000 Get 20% off and free shipping with the code BRAND at MANSCAPED.COM.
00:38:43.000 That's 20% off with free shipping at MANSCAPED.COM and use the code BRAND.
00:38:47.000 Oh, it's really actually quite satisfying because you can hear it.
00:38:49.000 Can you hear that?
00:38:51.000 That's the sound of youth returning.
00:38:56.000 Bill Gates is simply playing the best game of the Sims he has ever played.
00:39:00.000 Like we're his simulation.
00:39:01.000 That's what Wimmsdale is saying.
00:39:04.000 Ellen Sophia says, if you don't control your mind, someone else will.
00:39:08.000 Rogue Nation says, I don't understand the mind of these individuals getting off on controlling the world.
00:39:14.000 And once again, blessed El Bird, I wonder how much these medical experts get paid.
00:39:19.000 Yeah, and then someone says, Juanita952 says, congratulations on being the seventh most spiritual living person.
00:39:27.000 Thank you.
00:39:28.000 I am quite proud of that.
00:39:28.000 Thank you very much.
00:39:29.000 We've got a really important and exciting guest coming on now.
00:39:34.000 Stacey Balkan is the co-founder of US Right to Know, which Gareth will tell you a little more about later.
00:39:39.000 We have to find reliable sources for our content so that we don't end up using the witterings of hysterical lunatics.
00:39:47.000 Instead, we find truth-tellers in the case of Right to Know expose corporate corruption and government failures
00:39:53.000 that threaten our health and in particular, our food systems.
00:39:56.000 Stacey, thanks for joining us today.
00:39:59.000 Thank you so much for having me, Russell.
00:40:01.000 And thank you for taking a stand on these issues and providing a platform for truth.
00:40:06.000 You know, the things we're going to talk about today really matter to the health of all of us.
00:40:10.000 So thank you.
00:40:11.000 Thanks so much, May.
00:40:12.000 The first thing we wanted to talk about is the power of big agriculture and how technology And in particular, the use of pesticides is creating huge health risks for the planet and disrupting our food systems.
00:40:25.000 Can you give us an overview of what's happening, please, Stacey?
00:40:30.000 Sure.
00:40:31.000 So, our food system is really in the hands of a handful of corporations that have a long history of corruption.
00:40:37.000 Pesticides and seeds, most of them in the world, the majority are sold by four corporations that have consolidated in recent years.
00:40:48.000 And it's sort of a consolidation of corruption, a survival of the most brutal business tactics.
00:40:54.000 So, all of these companies, as I said, have histories of hiding and denying the harm of their products.
00:41:00.000 And we just came out with a report at U.S. Right to Know called Merchants of Poison
00:41:06.000 that is based on a years-long investigation into Monsanto's own documents.
00:41:11.000 And we have a huge trove of documents, and I hope we can talk a little bit later
00:41:15.000 about how we do our research at U.S. Right to Know.
00:41:18.000 But we report through these documents to lay out and explain what they show
00:41:23.000 about how the company runs its science denial and disinformation campaigns.
00:41:28.000 It likes the tobacco industry, like the fossil fuel industry,
00:41:32.000 although I think in some ways more effectively because they have the power of.
00:41:37.000 Mainstream academia on their side with many professors and universities who seem to be independent, but they're not as our research has shown.
00:41:46.000 Many of them are actually getting paid by Monsanto and working directly with pesticide companies to do their public relations and lobbying for them.
00:41:55.000 So we lay out the key tactics that they use.
00:41:59.000 I'm very aggressive.
00:42:00.000 It's sort of an astonishing array of tactics.
00:42:03.000 It's really a lot of desperate tactics, in my view, I think is the bottom line finding of our report that it takes to support this business model that the pesticide companies have.
00:42:18.000 So we can talk about the tactics.
00:42:20.000 I'd love to.
00:42:21.000 I mean, Merchants of Poison sounds like a very good paper and a bloody good thrash metal band name.
00:42:26.000 I know Gareth in particular uses Right to Know a lot.
00:42:31.000 Gareth, what in particular do you want to follow up on that Stacey was asking you No, I just think it's really interesting the way that your organisation, as Russell says, we use you a lot and you do some fantastic investigations, but you've also been smeared and discredited by some of the mainstream media now, and you were just talking about the ways in which universities are funded by Monsanto and things.
00:42:52.000 What do you feel about censorship at the moment and the way that you've been kind of discredited yourselves and what direction is that going and is it becoming harder to tell the truth like you are doing?
00:43:06.000 Well, it's very intense and we were attacked right out of the gate when we started our organization in 2015.
00:43:13.000 And the reason was because we were looking where Monsanto and the pesticide companies didn't want us looking.
00:43:19.000 And we first came up against Monsanto about 10 years ago when we tried to label genetically engineered foods in California.
00:43:26.000 I was part of that effort.
00:43:28.000 And it was a question put to voters.
00:43:31.000 And as you can imagine, there was overwhelming public support for Right to Know and labeling,
00:43:37.000 about 65 to 70 percent.
00:43:39.000 But then Monsanto led campaign in the span of about 30 days.
00:43:44.000 They were spending about a million dollars a day on just a blizzard of lies and confusion
00:43:51.000 that tanked the ballot initiative.
00:43:53.000 But what was interesting about that was so many seemingly independent, reputable sources
00:44:00.000 were singing the lyrics of Monsanto.
00:44:03.000 So we wanted to get under the cover of that and figure out how did that happen?
00:44:07.000 How did they do it?
00:44:08.000 So my colleague at that time, Gary Ruskin, and I started U.S.
00:44:12.000 Right to Know, and he filed many public records requests for the emails of academics
00:44:18.000 that we suspected were working with Monsanto.
00:44:22.000 Over the years, we've dug up tens of thousands of pages of documents from agrochemical industry,
00:44:28.000 now also the ultra processed food industry.
00:44:31.000 We also investigate the origins of COVID-19.
00:44:36.000 And we found many news-breaking documents that have led to our own investigations, front-page investigations in the New York Times and many other media outlets.
00:44:47.000 They have tried to discredit us.
00:44:48.000 We at one point revealed that Monsanto had an entire PR campaign to try to discredit our group.
00:44:57.000 There's a 31-page Monsanto document, a PR plan involving 11 Monsanto employees, several PR firms, and we were three people.
00:45:10.000 So this is how threatened they are by transparency, by their own documents.
00:45:17.000 And what they show about how they run their business.
00:45:20.000 So astonishing that they will go to so much trouble to repress the truth rather than behaving ethically.
00:45:27.000 Clearly what is often pointed to as science, continually this term is used, as if it's a new orthodoxy, a new unequivocal monolith of truth, when in fact it's often been funded, paid for.
00:45:43.000 Food monopolies preventing information entering the mainstream, Even about recognized, popularly eaten and ordinarily recognized brands like Pepsi, Kellogg's, Coca-Cola.
00:45:57.000 As I understand, many of these processed food brands spend a lot of money publishing, like on influencing studies and repressing information about the damage that their products do.
00:46:07.000 Is that true, Stacey?
00:46:09.000 Yes, absolutely.
00:46:10.000 And the Monsanto documents, again as an example, show many ways that the company was manipulating the scientific record over decades.
00:46:17.000 So, like ghostwriting studies, choosing friendly scientists to write particular narratives, strong-arming regulatory agencies, shoddy science.
00:46:29.000 There was a recent study looking at the corporate science that was provided to regulatory agencies for glyphosate approval.
00:46:36.000 and many of the studies were based on old outdated scientific methods. They didn't include
00:46:42.000 research that would identify cancer risk. So it's just really bad science, but they present
00:46:49.000 themselves as pro-science and their front groups present themselves as pro-science.
00:46:55.000 The genetic literacy project is an example, scientific literacy.
00:47:00.000 but those groups are at the forefront of attacking individual scientists
00:47:07.000 who raise concerns about pesticides.
00:47:11.000 And we talk a lot in the report about the very aggressive, unprecedented campaign
00:47:17.000 that they ran to try to discredit the World Health Organization's Cancer Research Agency,
00:47:22.000 which found in 2015 that glyphosate was a probable human carcinogen.
00:47:28.000 So they personally and viciously attack scientists, and it's just sort of a playbook 101.
00:47:36.000 Sense is the very essence of what's meant by systemic corruption,
00:47:40.000 the inability to tell truthful stories, to...
00:47:44.000 Convey information that's beneficial to people that gets in the way of profit.
00:47:48.000 Now, I don't want to give the impression that the man's gotten into my head too much because I did literally dream about Bill Gates recently, which I talked about on our show that's available for our locals community.
00:47:58.000 Click the red button if you want to join that and get access to our additional content.
00:48:03.000 Bill Gates is a lead investor in biotech companies that patent food.
00:48:09.000 Vandana Shiva is a great friend of our show and a great mentor of ours, and she talks continually about the negative impact that Bill Gates has had on her country, India, and on many countries in the continent of Africa.
00:48:23.000 Is there anything in your research around Monsanto and elsewhere in Big Agra, Big Food, and tech that has brought Bill Gates's name and his funding entities to the forefront?
00:48:34.000 Very much to the forefront.
00:48:35.000 I've done a lot of reporting on Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation, particularly focusing on their campaign to expand industrial, chemical-intensive agriculture in Africa.
00:48:46.000 So they spent about $6 million on that effort under the banner of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa.
00:48:54.000 And this is despite no evidence showing that it's achieved anywhere near the things they, you know, wildly and boldly promise about Feeding the world and helping the poor.
00:49:06.000 African groups across the continent have protested against the Gates Foundation, have tried to bring their views to the Gates Foundation.
00:49:13.000 They've been almost entirely ignored as they double down on these efforts to push corporate controlled agriculture, seed laws that actually can criminalize seed saving and seed exchanges.
00:49:26.000 In some cases, that's a huge fight happening in Africa right now.
00:49:30.000 And I've also written about, you know, what is Bill Gates' food agenda and plans to transform our food system, which he talks about all the time, under the guise of helping the climate and feeding the poor.
00:49:45.000 But really what it's about is monocultures, patented foods, and ultra-processed foods, and this push for techno-foods.
00:49:53.000 You know, basically the pesticide industry scheme is patented seeds, A handful of crops, getting farmers to grow huge monocultures that depend on pesticides and fertilizers that are harming the soil, that are harming people and our health, and these crops don't even feed people.
00:50:16.000 They're used mostly for cars, for cows, and for ultra-processed food factories.
00:50:24.000 Oh, Stacey, you're getting a lot of love from our community down here.
00:50:28.000 People like Feel The M and Susan, Maria Hall, all sending love and very grateful for the work that you're doing.
00:50:37.000 Gareth, have you got any more inquiries about your fellow journalists there at US Right To Know?
00:50:41.000 Yeah, I was just, it was so interesting about Bill Gates, you know, obviously the kind of hero-worship that he's had over the last couple of years, and yet at the same time we have discovered that he's the biggest farmland owner in the United States now.
00:50:53.000 How much of a connection do you see between that ownership of farmland now that he has, and these plans for ultra-processed food and changing the food systems?
00:51:04.000 Yeah, well, you know, he says he bought the farmland because his investment company told him to.
00:51:08.000 So that gives you a clue right there.
00:51:10.000 He's expecting, you know, maximum returns on his investment, which means the profit scheme of corn and soy monocultures.
00:51:18.000 And what are they going to do with all that corn and soy?
00:51:21.000 ultra-processed food factories.
00:51:23.000 You know, they're building more of these factories.
00:51:25.000 And if you look at what's actually in these food factories and companies like Ginkgo Bioworks,
00:51:32.000 which Bill Gates is a big investor in, I've written a lot about that company.
00:51:36.000 You know, it's energy intensive, plastic intensive, ultra, ultra processed foods that consumers
00:51:42.000 are not even saying they want, fake meats and so forth.
00:51:46.000 So, you know, is this the food system that we want?
00:51:51.000 And I think people don't want this food system and that we need to find ways to de-escalate, decentralize, bring food back to local communities and grow it in ways that are based on agroecological principles and that actually help farmers and communities.
00:52:11.000 He's pretty clear.
00:52:12.000 Yeah, the farmers in Africa are really mad at Bill Gates and he's not listening to them.
00:52:17.000 No, what he does, dear Bill Gates, is he claims he's helping people.
00:52:21.000 He turns up on the internet nibbling on a corncob, claiming that everything he does is for the benefit of mankind.
00:52:29.000 This week we've been speaking about big food and how diabetes, heart disease, cancer would
00:52:34.000 be considerably reduced and some have even suggested eliminated altogether were processed
00:52:39.000 foods to be removed from our diet.
00:52:41.000 It seems increasingly that we are encouraged not to look at and obviously to financially
00:52:46.000 support agricultural dietary measures that are bad for the planet, bad for us individually,
00:52:53.000 bad for our health, bad for our culture, bad for our society and then when someone like
00:52:57.000 you and your organisation questions it, you become the subject of smearing campaigns.
00:53:03.000 This is precisely in microcosm, and indeed globally, how we've come to imagine and assume these systems are working.
00:53:11.000 But it's always so valuable, Stacey, to get an opportunity to access the research that you have done that stops it being the wild conjecture of a madman and brings it into a place of journalistic integrity.
00:53:24.000 Thank you so much for joining us today, Stacey, for that fantastic interview.
00:53:27.000 I know that we'll be talking to you more, at least I hope so.
00:53:30.000 Thank you so much.
00:53:31.000 I hope so too and everyone you can follow our work at USRTK.org and please also sign up for our weekly free newsletter to find out about our investigations because we have lots more going on in the food industry, COVID-19 origins and lots more on the pesticide companies.
00:53:48.000 And Bill Gates.
00:53:49.000 They all love that.
00:53:50.000 Look, I mean, they're going mad here.
00:53:51.000 Bill Gates, these conspiracy theorists on the chat, on locals, they're going crazy for this information.
00:53:58.000 Stacey, thank you so much for your time.
00:53:59.000 It is wonderful to be in your company.
00:54:01.000 Thank you.
00:54:02.000 Thank you so much, Russell.
00:54:03.000 I really appreciate it.
00:54:05.000 Thank you so much, mate.
00:54:05.000 Take care.
00:54:06.000 Bye-bye.
00:54:08.000 Gareth, I think that interview went actually rather well.
00:54:10.000 Good.
00:54:10.000 Amazing.
00:54:11.000 She was an interesting person.
00:54:13.000 I've got so much respect for these people that dedicate their lives to finding out truth.
00:54:19.000 And when there's so much pushback against them, it's pretty amazing.
00:54:23.000 Right to know.
00:54:24.000 Open the books.
00:54:25.000 It was amazing.
00:54:25.000 That's right.
00:54:26.000 In a way, this, for me, helps to demonstrate that it increasingly is not important what your cultural or even political identity is, but that you are interested in freedom.
00:54:37.000 Freedom, which, by the way, is now subject to a campaign to turn it into a word that is divisive and even bigoted.
00:54:45.000 You know, when we talk about freedom, we mean your individual freedom to be who you are, obviously, without harming other people, freedom for your community.
00:54:52.000 We've got a fantastic story coming up about that soon.
00:54:55.000 And yeah, you're right, like groups like Right To Know are doing diligent, fastidious, necessary work to demonstrate and prove that what many of us feel, that something isn't right, that we're not being told the truth, that they're making decisions that are not for our benefit, claiming that it's for our safety, for our convenience, their kindness, all these Extraordinary tropes that we hear again and again and increasingly becoming suspicious of.
00:55:20.000 The work of people like Stacey demonstrates that it's true.
00:55:23.000 And then you get, you know, again, it's not always to paint Bill Gates as the biggest villain.
00:55:28.000 I mean, it's quite plainly, it's not just the realm of conspiracy that he's up to these things.
00:55:34.000 Like Stacey, we've just been talked through some of the things that he's up to.
00:55:37.000 But when he goes on the media and the most that he'll get is someone either talking about Jeffrey Epstein or saying, do you think it's bad that you take those private jets all the time?
00:55:46.000 And that's it.
00:55:47.000 That's the end of the question.
00:55:48.000 He says, oh, I think it's fine.
00:55:50.000 I think my carbon offsets deal with that.
00:55:52.000 End of.
00:55:52.000 What if we had him here?
00:55:54.000 Like in my dream.
00:55:56.000 We'd want to go, what's with all that farmland, mate?
00:55:59.000 What was with buying up those shares and then selling them?
00:56:03.000 What are you hoping to achieve with your investment in the WHO?
00:56:08.000 That sort of thing.
00:56:09.000 Why are you investing in all these media companies?
00:56:12.000 And then would we just plainly go, look, we think this bill, you're totally loaded and that.
00:56:17.000 You've gone a bit mad and you want to wind it in a little bit.
00:56:21.000 I think Bill Gates will just always have an answer of, this is designed for the good of humanity and the good of society.
00:56:28.000 You know, he'll always have, like with these food systems at the moment and the ultra-processed food, as with the stuff in Africa, it's always, they've got a problem in Africa, we need to go and help them, this is the only way it can be done.
00:56:39.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:56:39.000 when you then hear that people in Africa are like we don't want this and it's not
00:56:43.000 helping you know that's the side that you don't hear you just hear of the
00:56:46.000 philanthropy that you know even though as we have spoken about recently they
00:56:50.000 seem to have more money coming in than going out at that foundation.
00:56:54.000 That's right there's been billions in profit which seems like an extraordinary way to run a charity.
00:56:58.000 There's some really interesting lines of inquiry coming up on the chat.
00:57:02.000 You're full of shit, Bill.
00:57:03.000 Says Curiouser and Curiouser.
00:57:05.000 Let us know how you want us to approach these subjects.
00:57:09.000 Not that it's likely that Bill Gates will come on as a guest, but I'll tell you who did come on.
00:57:13.000 Tim Poole.
00:57:14.000 I had a fantastic conversation with him, which is the subject of tomorrow's episode of Stay Free.
00:57:20.000 free. Have a look at a little clip of that. In here. Okay, if I'm still live right now,
00:57:32.000 then let me tell you that I did speak to Tim Paul. I'm not lying. And possibly this is
00:57:37.000 one of those SWAT attacks that he's continually subject to.
00:57:41.000 Is it able to play now?
00:57:43.000 In the absence of shock, people will invent shock.
00:57:47.000 And we're seeing stories that make no sense all of a sudden are generating millions of views.
00:57:52.000 And it seems like this is destabilization.
00:57:55.000 And I'm wondering if we're at that point where people have no strong morals anymore.
00:58:00.000 The only thing that's driving the media ecosystem is to be as shocking as possible.
00:58:04.000 And then when there's literally nothing at the top, people invent things to be shocked by.
00:58:08.000 And then the system destabilizes.
00:58:12.000 Yeah that's a good that.
00:58:13.000 Do you know who, what he kept mentioning?
00:58:14.000 He kept mentioning this geezer called Yuri.
00:58:17.000 Hold on a second, let me find him because I've got a clip of him from my mate Tony Robbins sent me this.
00:58:22.000 Like this guy called, what's he called?
00:58:24.000 Like he's a Soviet defector.
00:58:26.000 Hold on when his name comes up.
00:58:27.000 Yeah, Yuri Bezmenov.
00:58:29.000 Have you lot heard about Yuri Bezmenov?
00:58:30.000 He was a Soviet defector who talks about the four stages of deterioration.
00:58:34.000 I think we're going to do a story on it.
00:58:36.000 We will.
00:58:37.000 It's pretty good.
00:58:38.000 You'll like this.
00:58:38.000 And he talks a lot in the show about instability, that we're living in a time of instability and how it may have been If you want to learn more and get more deeply involved with our stuff, and if you're interested in meditation, which I strongly suggest you do get involved in because you need to have access to peace.
00:58:56.000 It's an intense world and it's intense time.
00:58:58.000 On our Locals Community, I do a weekly meditation with someone from the community.
00:59:03.000 I did one earlier today with Farrah on the subject of self-love.
00:59:06.000 She's probably on the chat right now.
00:59:09.000 We did one last week with another friend of mine.
00:59:11.000 Meditations that address what you're feeling personally.
00:59:14.000 Also, you get a look at the show behind the show where I talk about crazy dreams.
00:59:17.000 And we go deep, don't we sometimes, Gareth?
00:59:19.000 It's a moment of relief and respite from the intensity of talking about these data-oriented, challenging stories.
00:59:19.000 Absolutely.
00:59:28.000 Sometimes there's strikes on YouTube, there's complex things for us to deal with here.
00:59:32.000 Death threats, lots of fascinating stories when it comes to the show behind the show, so join us on Locals, just click on that red button, you can join us there, and that's the chat I tend to look at when we're up live.
00:59:43.000 Okay, so hey, tomorrow, Tim Paul, another fantastic conversation, and we've got some wonderful conversations coming up next week, and I'll be letting you know about how you can come and see me live if you're in Florida or Los Angeles in about a week's time, because we're going over there to do Rogan and Bill Maher and Tucker and all of that kind of stuff.
01:00:01.000 We're going to be over there soon.
01:00:02.000 Anyway, join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.