Stay Free - Russel Brand - February 05, 2024


Here's the News: Another War In Middle East Has Started?!


Episode Stats

Length

24 minutes

Words per Minute

196.04926

Word Count

4,764

Sentence Count

247

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

26


Summary

Russell Brand's thoughts on the drone strike that killed 3 US service members in the Middle East, and why we should be worried about Iran's involvement in it, and who might be to blame for the deaths of the service members, and how to deal with the consequences of it, in this episode of his new podcast, Stay Free With Russell Brand . Remember, there s an episode every single day, 7 days, to educate and elevate our consciousness together. Stay Free, and enjoy the episode. No, here s the Fucking News! - Russell Brand. Join us on our voyage to truth and freedom. We bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr, Sam Harris, Veena Shiva, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate, and many more. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers. Use the promo code: "ELISSAFEED" to receive 10% off your first purchase when you enter the invite code: AWAKeningWonders at checkout. Our theme song is Come Alone by The Good Fight by Suneaters, courtesy of Lotuspool Records. This episode was produced and edited by Tall Tales and our ad music is by Haley Shaw, and our tagline is I'm Too Stupid to Die . We hope you enjoy it! - Thank you so much for listening to this episode, we really appreciate it. - Your support is so much more than we can't help us spread the word about it everywhere else. We really appreciate you, and we're looking forward to help you spread it everywhere. Thank you! - The Good News Network. Thank you, There's a little bit more than you can spread it around the word around the world. Love you, Big Love, Thank you. XOXOXOXO - The Best of Good News, Big Talk, Thank You, Your Support is Big Love & Blessings, - Alyssa & Good Morning - P. by by Rachel Maddows . - Vicky - Sarah McCartanon - , Sam Harris - JUICY PODCASTING & Gaborates - SONGS - BONUS EPISODES - GABE - DADDY


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello there you Awakening Wonders on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you download your podcasts.
00:00:05.000 We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content.
00:00:08.000 We will be delivering a podcast every day, seven days a week, every single day.
00:00:13.000 You'll get a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they are covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth.
00:00:23.000 Once a week we bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate and many more.
00:00:31.000 Now enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:34.000 Remember, there's an episode every single day to educate and elevate our consciousness together.
00:00:40.000 Stay free and enjoy the episode.
00:00:42.000 No, here's the fucking news!
00:00:51.000 Hello there you Awakening Wanderers, thanks for joining us on our voyage to truth and freedom.
00:00:54.000 You've got Republican politicians telling you, we've got to have a war with Iran.
00:00:58.000 You've got the President saying, we've got to respond to these three deaths.
00:01:01.000 You're being told from every conceivable angle that there's an inevitability of war with Iran.
00:01:07.000 Yet when people are directly asked, should there be a war with Iran, they seem to deny it.
00:01:12.000 This morning, the Biden administration vowing to take all necessary action.
00:01:16.000 It's necessary.
00:01:18.000 After an unmanned drone strike sent, it said, by Iran-backed militant groups.
00:01:23.000 President Biden yesterday leading a moment of silence and promising an American response.
00:01:29.000 We had a tough day last night in the Middle East.
00:01:34.000 Even that sentence isn't good.
00:01:35.000 We had a tough day last night in the Middle East and may I say that I find it rather appalling when politicians hold public silences when it's their actions and decisions that have led to their tragic deaths of those service personnel and that his subsequent actions will likely lead to the deaths of more service personnel. If you're going to have a moment of
00:01:52.000 silence, this should be a moment of reflection where we look at our aims and our objectives
00:01:56.000 and our politics and the decisions that we make and the consequences of escalating war and
00:02:00.000 tension. Not just, "Here's a minute of silence. Now let's carry on ensuring that loads of
00:02:04.000 people don't necessarily die."
00:02:05.000 "We lost three brave soldiers in an attack on our base. And we shall not smile."
00:02:12.000 Some people might question why there are 45,000 American service personnel stationed in the
00:02:18.000 Some people might be curious as to why 1 million people in that region have died in the last decade or so as a result of US interventionism in that region.
00:02:26.000 And who might be responsible for that?
00:02:28.000 Let me say this again.
00:02:29.000 It's Not in America.
00:02:30.000 It's over somewhere else, the Middle East.
00:02:32.000 There's 45,000, a small town's worth of service personnel.
00:02:36.000 And sometimes, occasionally, those people die, which I think is wrong and appalling.
00:02:41.000 I also would like to make clear that I think the people who serve in the military are extremely brave and ought be honoured.
00:02:46.000 And I also think they ought be led better and decisions ought be made that don't escalate the likelihood of their unnecessary deaths.
00:02:53.000 With America already locked in an escalating confrontation with the Houthis in Yemen over the group's continued attacks on global shipping.
00:03:00.000 Ah, those Houthis there at it again.
00:03:02.000 Yes, it's the Houthis that you'd never heard of before, all over your news cycle, getting Lindsey Graham into a frenzy, saying something like, we have to kill all Houthis, otherwise we can't look ourselves in the mirror and say, there is Lindsey Graham.
00:03:14.000 Now Republicans demanding a more forceful response from the US.
00:03:19.000 Senator Lindsey Graham writing, I am calling on the Biden administration to strike targets of significance inside Iran.
00:03:26.000 Hit Iran now.
00:03:28.000 Hit them hard.
00:03:29.000 I find it kind of personally appalling that people that operate in institutions of bureaucracy are willing to use the language of war so casually when so seldom are they directly affected by the consequences of that language.
00:03:42.000 But at least we're 100% certain that Iran are definitely involved and it's not essentially a guess, a hunch, a suspicion, a whiff, a convenient assumption that Iran are involved.
00:03:53.000 This is the press secretary of the Pentagon publicly admitting they don't even know if it's anything to do with Iran.
00:03:59.000 Just to follow up, you said Iran was behind the attack.
00:04:01.000 What does that mean?
00:04:02.000 Have you seen evidence of...
00:04:04.000 Good bit of journalism there.
00:04:06.000 the world.
00:04:23.000 that Iran funds these groups like Qatar Hezbollah and other groups that have
00:04:27.000 attacked our forces but I don't have more to share on as a general matter
00:04:31.000 yes in general it's the sort of thing that Iran might do if that kind of
00:04:35.000 general assumption were made in cultural life it would be referred to as racism
00:04:39.000 you can't just generalize like that Well, when it comes to wars, we can.
00:04:43.000 Not saying stuff, though.
00:04:44.000 Don't you dare generalise with stuff you say.
00:04:46.000 What about people you bomb?
00:04:47.000 Oh yeah, yeah, generalise with that.
00:04:48.000 Just generalise away, really.
00:04:50.000 Now, many progressive folk might condemn Marjorie Taylor Greene as a harpy, a hysteric, a lunatic, an extremist.
00:04:58.000 Here is Marjorie Taylor Greene saying, you shouldn't have wars, which seems to me to be a sensible thing to say.
00:05:04.000 What I have to say to Lindsey Graham and others that are just madly calling for war is they sound psychotic.
00:05:11.000 Absolutely psychotic.
00:05:12.000 War is very serious and if the President is planning to go to war with Iran, he needs to come to Congress and ask permission and this is something that Congress has to give approval for.
00:05:23.000 Lunatic Marjorie Taylor Greene there saying that Congress should be consulted before embarking on war.
00:05:29.000 I mean, I think it's part of the Constitution.
00:05:31.000 Now, that rational, sensible, heroic politician Nancy Pelosi claiming that anyone protesting against war is a Putin-apologist.
00:05:40.000 See how it works?
00:05:41.000 Marjorie Taylor Greene, she's crazy.
00:05:43.000 Nancy Pelosi, she's a hero.
00:05:45.000 Glass ceiling smashing, yeah!
00:05:47.000 First female speaker of the house!
00:05:48.000 What have you got to say, first female speaker of the house?
00:05:50.000 Well, anyone protesting against war, yeah, yeah, is a hero, is part of the civil rights movement that led to even the opportunities that you're enjoying.
00:05:57.000 Oh no, I'm saying they're liars and that they're funded by Putin.
00:06:00.000 Oh.
00:06:01.000 For them to call for a ceasefire is Mr. Putin's message.
00:06:06.000 Mr. Putin's message.
00:06:07.000 Make no mistake, this is directly connected to what he would like to see.
00:06:12.000 Same thing with Ukraine.
00:06:14.000 It's about Putin's message.
00:06:17.000 I think some of these protesters are spontaneous and organic and sincere.
00:06:22.000 Some I think are connected to Russia.
00:06:25.000 She may have the delicate features of a cartoon mouse, but she has the cruel heart of a tyrant.
00:06:30.000 And I say that having looked at this for a long time now.
00:06:35.000 Do you think some of these protests are Russian plants?
00:06:37.000 Do you see how the legacy media participates in the construction of myths while simultaneously saying you've got to watch independent media?
00:06:43.000 They're always purveying conspiracy theories.
00:06:45.000 So you're saying that these protests are made up of Russian plants?
00:06:48.000 How about asking, have you got any evidence for this?
00:06:50.000 Wait a second, you're making some pretty outrageous claims there, Nancy Pelosi.
00:06:54.000 Also, where the hell have you got these hundreds of millions from when you earn a couple of hundred grand a year?
00:06:58.000 Instead of that, just tee up an opportunity for Nancy Pelosi to convey propaganda.
00:07:02.000 These are plants I think some financing should be investigated.
00:07:06.000 And I want to ask the FBI to investigate that.
00:07:10.000 If anyone's finances should be investigated, it's Nancy Pelosi's.
00:07:13.000 And Paul Pelosi's.
00:07:14.000 Although, no, they're entirely separate, aren't they?
00:07:15.000 Nancy Pelosi's over here, earning 200 grand a year, and then there's Paul Pelosi, curiously and coincidentally, investing in big tech companies.
00:07:21.000 And Nancy Pelosi, though, they've got something to talk about at home, but not in an unprofessional way, because she actually regulates big tech companies.
00:07:26.000 So it's good, it's good for the small talk, but they don't let it get involved in the business strategy.
00:07:30.000 Or their love life.
00:07:31.000 Tucker Carlson, who's consistently anti-war, posted this on X, quite a succinct response to the dogs of war and their hawkish proclamations.
00:07:41.000 Now though, because we don't want to associate too heavily, right kids, with a right-wing extremist like Tucker Carlson and his right-wing advocacy for peace and harmony, so let's get some perspectives from those other right-wing fascists at World Socialist Organization.
00:07:58.000 And you'll note how frequently you agree with everything they're saying, almost as if there's this weird new movement at the center of global politics that's not really right or left in the conventional sense, but I don't know, totalitarian?
00:08:11.000 Calls for President Joe Biden to take direct military action against Iran are ratcheting up following this weekend's drone attack in Jordan that killed three U.S.
00:08:19.000 service members and wounded over 30 others.
00:08:21.000 The United States can and must respond to this brazen attack, said Democrat Senator Mark Warner in a post on X. This attack on U.S.
00:08:28.000 and coalition troops in Jordan, our steadfast regional partner...
00:08:32.000 Colonised it!
00:08:34.000 You bloody how dare you!
00:08:38.000 It's extraordinary really the normalisation of colonisation.
00:08:41.000 Again, my support for individuals that are brave enough to serve in the army.
00:08:44.000 Boundless.
00:08:45.000 But the exploitation and rhetoric around this and the obvious attempt to exploit an opportunity to go to war, which I would say probably is part of a broader project that includes profiteering and projects of dominion, are considered to be an insult to the bravery of those people who have lost their lives.
00:08:58.000 I support President Biden in a deliberate and proportionate response, added Senator Ben Cardin, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
00:09:07.000 Go democracy, guys.
00:09:08.000 Some Republican hawks, many of whom are longtime advocates of regime change, who have been calling for an aggressive response against Iran since October 7th, went a step further, calling for a direct confrontation with Iran.
00:09:18.000 The only answer to these attacks Must be devastating military retaliation against Iran's terrorist forces, both in Iran and across the Middle East, added Senator Tom Cotton.
00:09:28.000 This is a really peculiar moment, actually, because they're saying terrorist forces in Iran, but like almost the definition of terrorism previously was that it was separate from a sovereign state, i.e.
00:09:38.000 oh, ISIS, they're terrorists, Al-Qaeda.
00:09:40.000 They're terrorists.
00:09:41.000 IRA, even.
00:09:42.000 They're terrorists.
00:09:43.000 If it's directly connected to Iran, then you can't have both.
00:09:47.000 Either they're terrorists or they're Iranian forces.
00:09:49.000 Not Iranian terrorist forces.
00:09:51.000 You can't have all of it.
00:09:52.000 Iranian terrorist COVID Kanye Wests are attacking our troops!
00:09:57.000 The Biden administration claimed the attacks were carried out by Kataib Hezbollah, a militia group the US asserts is backed by Iran.
00:10:03.000 Iran has denied any links to the attacks.
00:10:06.000 Now we get into some interesting, bigger picture geopolitical facts.
00:10:10.000 More than 45,000 troops are deployed in the Middle East associated with decades of US wars throughout the region that have collectively killed over 1 million people.
00:10:18.000 Would it be sensible to divorce this attack and this escalation, even the current war in Gaza and all events in the Middle East, from this fact?
00:10:26.000 There are 45,000 troops stationed there and a million people have been killed in that region.
00:10:31.000 Would you say that's relevant or irrelevant?
00:10:33.000 The legacy media will tell you that's irrelevant.
00:10:35.000 They won't report on it, they won't responsibly explain it, they won't investigate it.
00:10:39.000 They'll just sort of go, oh, you know, Houthis now is the problem and let's escalate tensions.
00:10:44.000 To me, these are relevant details.
00:10:45.000 The attack on US troops deployed on the other side of the world is being used to justify long-planned military escalations.
00:10:51.000 Long-planned.
00:10:52.000 Over the past two months, US imperialism has provoked regional war in the Middle East, having already launched multiple attacks on Iraq, Syria, And Yemen.
00:10:59.000 And Yemen, that actually sounds like a real country.
00:11:01.000 Now the US military is threatening to directly attack Iran, which would engulf the entire region in a bloodbath.
00:11:07.000 Nice.
00:11:07.000 The Biden administration is playing with fire, creating the conditions for a catastrophe.
00:11:12.000 It has systematically provided funding, logistical support and political cover for Israel's war in Gaza.
00:11:18.000 Knowing full well that this would provoke retaliation against US forces deployed throughout the region whose deaths would be used as a pretense for further military escalation.
00:11:26.000 Many people at the beginning of this conflict said it is a volatile situation and would likely lead to further conflict and those people are now looking like they were accurate in their appraisal as events appear to be becoming More conflagratory and more intense, I would say.
00:11:41.000 In response to all criticism of its provocative actions, the Biden administration has responded
00:11:46.000 by declaring that it has no intention of waging war against the countries it is militarily
00:11:51.000 encircling.
00:11:52.000 Stop militarily encircling them then?
00:11:55.000 Oh no no, we militarily encircle people as part of a dance of love, and it's one of
00:12:00.000 our proudest traditions.
00:12:02.000 Asked repeatedly at Monday's press briefing whether the US government is actively considering potential attacks inside Iran, White House National Security Spokesman John Kirby repeatedly replied, we are not looking for a war with Iran.
00:12:14.000 Huh, but this is sort of a war, isn't it?
00:12:17.000 Notably on January 12th, Kirby used the exact same language with regard to Yemen, declaring, We're not interested in a war with Yemen.
00:12:24.000 And yet the United States has carried out dozens of missile strikes inside Yemen over the past three weeks, on over half a dozen separate days.
00:12:31.000 Funny way of showing you're not interested in a war, And as a further declaration of our peaceful intentions, here's some missiles!
00:12:37.000 Here's some attacks!
00:12:38.000 Here's a wedding ruined!
00:12:39.000 Bloody hell.
00:12:39.000 I'm glad they don't want a war if this is what they do to achieve peace.
00:12:42.000 It seems the best predictor of what country the US military will illegally bomb next is the one the US government declares it has absolutely no intention to wage war against.
00:12:50.000 The most ridiculous version of this argument was presented in a White House press briefing on January the 16th.
00:12:55.000 Let's have a listen to that now.
00:12:56.000 And then just going back to something you said about the Houthis, how we're not looking to expand this conflict, How do you square that with the mission of degrading their capabilities?
00:13:06.000 I mean, how is that not expanding this conflict?
00:13:08.000 Yeah, how is bombing someone not sort of a war?
00:13:12.000 Oh, this is friendly bombing, kindly bombing, love bombs, bath bombs!
00:13:16.000 So on the second question, I mean, by It's a very simple equation.
00:13:23.000 It can't be that simple because I think bombing is an act of war.
00:13:26.000 It's at best going to be Orwellian doublespeak and potentially absolute nonsense.
00:13:29.000 And I can only assume that these people either think we're stupid or don't think very much at all about anything.
00:13:36.000 By removing military capability from the hookies, We are making it harder for them to conduct these attacks.
00:13:42.000 These attacks have been escalatory.
00:13:44.000 These attacks have been dangerous.
00:13:46.000 These attacks have affected merchant shipping in the Red Sea, one of the most important international waterways around the world.
00:13:52.000 We're just doing this to help the international waterways, in a sense.
00:13:55.000 Consider us to be like...
00:13:56.000 Coast guards, in a way, just ensuring that the waterways are protected.
00:14:00.000 Oh no, look, there's a heron, an ibis.
00:14:03.000 We must look after the precious marshland.
00:14:05.000 It's extraordinary that we're invited to accept that an escalation of military action is the best way to get to peace.
00:14:10.000 This is the curious logic of the tyrant, and it's more obvious when you see something like Stalin adorned with medals and a mad mustache say out loud and outright, if you knew what I know, then you'd do what I tell you.
00:14:22.000 But I haven't got time to explain all this to you.
00:14:24.000 But let me tell you this.
00:14:25.000 If we didn't kill all these people, more people would die down the line.
00:14:29.000 So it's off to the gulags for them.
00:14:31.000 That's essentially what's being said here by John Kirby with none of Joe Stalin's panache or Georgian chutzpah, is that if the hoofies are not killed, things are going to get worse.
00:14:40.000 They're going to escalate their attacks on these vital shipping lanes and marshlands and precious little reed warblers.
00:14:46.000 They simply have to step in.
00:14:47.000 But it seems to me that what's more likely is there's an agenda in the Middle East, that there's long been an agenda in the Middle East, that's why there's 45,000 troops stationed there, that's why a million people have been killed there, that's why your legacy media is advocating for war, that's why Nancy Pelosi's not being asked any difficult questions, that's why dear old lazy old sloppy old Well, sopiorific, dozy Joe Biden is having a minute's silence and saying there must be retaliation and reaction because it's part of a broader plan.
00:15:11.000 Now, I know geopolitics is complicated, but what is plain and simple and obvious is that there are imperialist projects that relate to the military-industrial complex, American expansionism, and a general agenda of total global control.
00:15:22.000 So you, I suppose, have to ask yourself, what is this?
00:15:24.000 Is the military-industrial complex just responding to random stimuli and arbitrary events, or is this part of a concerted effort?
00:15:31.000 Just, you know, cast your mind back.
00:15:33.000 Have you ever heard anywhere people saying there's a long-term project to go to war with Iran?
00:15:36.000 Has that ever come up as part of the new American century?
00:15:39.000 Was it one of the things that was supposed to be in the boxes that Trump took out of the White House?
00:15:42.000 Just use your memory!
00:15:47.000 Well, that's literally the plot of Minority Report.
00:15:49.000 they could use it. That is by definition taking the tensions down, you're taking the ability
00:15:54.000 for them to conduct these attacks off the table. Well that's literally the plot of Minority Report.
00:15:59.000 In this Orwellian language any US attack on military forces of any country is an act of
00:16:03.000 de-escalation and if the United States military were to attempt to destroy China and Russia's
00:16:08.000 military capacity by attacking all of their bases with nuclear weapons that would be the
00:16:12.000 most de-escalatory act of all.
00:16:14.000 Seems like an extreme statement, but based on the logic that we've just heard, that's actually what is being proposed.
00:16:20.000 By destroying them, we're making things better down the line.
00:16:23.000 In fact, actually, people do literally use that argument about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, don't they?
00:16:27.000 Whole Japan would never have surrendered The kindest thing we could have done was to bomb them into oblivion.
00:16:34.000 And in fact, you know, Japan built back better.
00:16:36.000 I like that phrase, built back better.
00:16:37.000 The absurd verbal gymnastics are an attempt to cover up the White House's far-reaching plans for military escalation from the American population, which overwhelmingly opposes further US military intervention in the Middle East.
00:16:51.000 Yeah, like increasingly I think people don't want to be in a war in some far away place.
00:16:55.000 Say if your family are in the services or you yourself are in the services, don't you think, well, shouldn't we be doing stuff that's really connected to our purpose as a nation and as a people and as a tribe?
00:17:05.000 Like, you know, we could be domestically dealing with stuff, we could be preventing threats.
00:17:09.000 All of these assumptions that also lead to imperial goals and financial goals being met Oh, probably they're going to do this and then they'll do that, so your sons and daughters should get out there and die.
00:17:19.000 That doesn't seem like something that's very popular anymore, so they have to keep presenting it to us as somehow necessary, inevitable, beyond our choice.
00:17:26.000 We cannot allow this to happen.
00:17:27.000 Look at all the rhetoric at the beginning of this article.
00:17:29.000 Democrats and Republicans united together against your children's lives.
00:17:33.000 Asked on Tuesday why the White House has not informed the American people about its war plans or sought consent from Congress, Which you'd think are two pretty important ideas.
00:17:41.000 We're just going to, firstly, before we do anything, tell the American people and then have the due process of Congress.
00:17:46.000 They didn't bother with any of that.
00:17:47.000 Kirby bristled at the suggestion, declaring the Commander-in-Chief is not looking at polling or considering the electoral calendar.
00:17:53.000 The United States seized upon Hamas's October 7th attack on Israel to immediately surge troops, warships and aircraft into the Middle East in what the U.S.
00:18:01.000 Navy's news publication called the largest mass of U.S.
00:18:04.000 ships in the region in decades.
00:18:06.000 This massive military build-up was intended to be used In exactly the way it has been, to carry out a widening series of military attacks throughout the region, aimed at reorganising the Middle East and the US domination.
00:18:17.000 So once that fleet of ships is out there, it seems that it's possible, and they know that the legacy media will support this, that you just subsequently look, for instance, and go, Aha!
00:18:26.000 See?
00:18:26.000 All these incidents in the region?
00:18:28.000 We'll probably have to go to war with them.
00:18:30.000 But it is, in fact, perhaps, an act of provocation, even to take all of those warships into that region.
00:18:36.000 Could it be argued?
00:18:37.000 Use that simple philosophical trick of imagining it reversed.
00:18:40.000 If Iran had a bunch of ships in the Gulf of Mexico, do you imagine that people would be opening ice cream stands up on the beach for them?
00:18:46.000 Or do you think that there could be some conflict in the region?
00:18:49.000 In less than 10 days after the October 7th attacks, the WSWS warned, the dispatch of an armada of over a dozen warships to the Middle East is not simply to threaten Hamas, which has no navy.
00:19:00.000 The United States is preparing for a much broader conflict in the Middle East, including war with Iran.
00:19:05.000 Since then, the United States has bombed Iraq, Syria and Yemen.
00:19:09.000 Yeah, but just because they've bombed Iraq, Syria and Yemen and Hamas doesn't have a navy, don't see that as a strategic move.
00:19:18.000 I mean, don't imagine that there must have been a conversation somewhere within the admiralty, military-industrial complex and pentagons and the conglomeration of those organisations where people said, right, look, we're taking all those warships, it's obviously going to be seen as an act of provocation, but given that we've got this plan to escalate tensions with Iran anyway, There hasn't been no conversations, have there?
00:19:36.000 And we already know that the American people haven't been consulted, you know because you are them, and Congress hasn't been approached because it's listed there.
00:19:42.000 So by this reckoning, and even by Marjorie Taylor Greene's analysis, this is not a legal escalation.
00:19:47.000 What they have to do is go, oh shit, we've got all these Ship's here, thank God, because these provocative oofy bastards are lunatics.
00:19:54.000 Look at what they're doing now!
00:19:55.000 Oh my God, I could barely finish my propaganda without a hoofy catapulting me in the side of the head.
00:19:59.000 They have to now provide the justification.
00:20:02.000 You know how this works.
00:20:03.000 Problem-crisis-solution.
00:20:04.000 That's the phrase that we've become familiar with.
00:20:06.000 They exploit these crises continually to fulfill an agenda that was already desired.
00:20:11.000 The US sees the conflict that has now erupted in the Middle East as a critical component of its existential struggle with Russia and China.
00:20:18.000 Significantly, the United States, in the words of a recent article in Foreign Affairs, has taken note of China's expanding relationship with Middle Eastern states.
00:20:25.000 In particular, Beijing's effort to broker a rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
00:20:30.000 So China of China, the monsters that they are, bring about peace between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
00:20:36.000 What the hell are you doing over there bringing about peace in that region?
00:20:39.000 We've got a lot of money tied up in that region.
00:20:41.000 Shut your bloody mouths and let there be escalating tensions, which we can exploit for profit.
00:20:45.000 On Tuesday, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, a man who has publicly admitted that he's
00:20:50.000 been provoking Putin into war with Ukraine, in a meeting with Secretary of State Antony
00:20:54.000 Blinken obliterated any dividing line between NATO's war against Russia and the US conflict
00:21:00.000 with Iran and China, declaring "a Russian victory would embolden Iran, North Korea and
00:21:04.000 China.
00:21:05.000 That matters for Europe's security and it matters for America's security."
00:21:08.000 It's interesting how these facts are narrativised.
00:21:11.000 I suppose the complexity of modern politics and perhaps God, even the life of an individual,
00:21:14.000 mean that to a degree we're all narrativising reality, making sets of assumptions, certainly
00:21:18.000 the Pentagon are making assumptions.
00:21:20.000 But the idea that the war between Ukraine and Russia has to be perpetuated, otherwise
00:21:24.000 China are like "Oh, hello there, what's going on here?"
00:21:26.000 By that reckoning, the defeat by Vietnam of the United States during the 1970s would have caused more problems than it inevitably did.
00:21:33.000 The lesson of that conflict was not, we always have to win wars.
00:21:36.000 It was, stop starting wars in countries that are none of your business.
00:21:40.000 That's a lesson, at least, that we could investigate.
00:21:42.000 The global war that has now been provoked by US imperialism and its allies in London, Berlin and Paris is part of a global counter-revolution in which the imperialist powers are seeking to re-establish direct control over their former colonies.
00:21:53.000 At the same time, US imperialism, beset by massive internal social contradictions, is attempting to channel these internal tensions towards an external enemy.
00:22:01.000 These wars also create the framework for continuous attacks on democratic rights and an effort to delegitimize domestic political opposition.
00:22:08.000 In fact, war does do a lot of jobs, doesn't it?
00:22:10.000 It creates opportunities for revenue and it generates the opportunities to crush dissent at home, plainly.
00:22:17.000 I would imagine that over the coming years, if indeed these conflicts do escalate, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, if it sees the conscription of UK troops, as has been suggested through our legacy media in our country, if we see escalating tensions in the Middle East and even hostility between the US and China, Think of what reality is like. Well, I'll give you an idea
00:22:36.000 Taken literally from George Orwell. We're in this state of perpetual war and perpetual fear
00:22:41.000 Authoritarianism seems more and more necessary and understandable
00:22:45.000 We've already seen in the last couple of years that a significant number of people will just stay indoors if told
00:22:50.000 to do so Not necessarily because they're docile and compliant. I'm
00:22:53.000 not suggesting that actually I'm saying that a lot of people if we're told there's a
00:22:56.000 social project that we should all be participating in from a position of like love and general
00:23:00.000 goodwill will comply and there's nothing like constantly Escalating fear and threats of death and apocalypse and Armageddon
00:23:06.000 to make people more obedient In fact, that's obviously part of the general dynamic. We're
00:23:11.000 being encouraged to participate in we've got no choice.
00:23:13.000 They're doing this They're doing that
00:23:14.000 but when you look just briefly some of the strategic decisions that are being made when you just use your memory
00:23:19.000 to To recollect, hold on, haven't they been talking about war with Iran for ages and ages now?
00:23:24.000 Haven't I heard that?
00:23:25.000 New American Century, the boxes that Trump took out.
00:23:27.000 Then you start to get a different picture.
00:23:29.000 Who benefits from this situation?
00:23:32.000 What interests want this war to happen?
00:23:34.000 Who will likely suffer, both financially, emotionally, and most significantly, of course, will experience loss of life of themselves and their loved ones.
00:23:42.000 It won't be bloody senators.
00:23:44.000 Lindsey Graham ain't gonna go there.
00:23:45.000 Let's go, is he?
00:23:46.000 He'll use the hawkish rhetoric of war, but he will not use an M16.
00:23:50.000 So what I would suggest is that we remain united in our opposition to escalating conflict and demand that diplomatic solutions are sought.
00:23:58.000 And it's a ridiculous demand, really, because we don't have the institutions or personnel in place to seek those kind of conclusions, because this is not an aberration within the system, this is the system doing what it's supposed to do.
00:24:08.000 Generate conflicts that generate profit and solicit compliance at home.
00:24:11.000 But that's just what I think.
00:24:12.000 More important than any of that, if you can, please, stay free.
00:24:18.000 No.