In this episode of Awakening Wonders, Russell Brand discusses the recent laws passed in France, Canada, Canada and the UK that ban opposition to gene therapy and vaccines, and the role played by the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Tony Blair, in promoting them as "safe" and "effective" in order to protect the profits of pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline. Also, a man who says he suffered from a vaccine injury, which he claims was caused by a single dose of one of the controversial vaccines, is being questioned by the French authorities about whether they are safe or not, and why they should be allowed to speak out on the matter at all. Remember, you can become a supporter of our content, get additional videos every week, and join us for conversations with journalists every week. Once a week, we bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr, Sam Harris, Veena Shiva, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate, and many more. Stay Free, and enjoy the episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand! Remember, there s an episode every single day, 7 days, to educate and elevate our consciousness together. Remember: there s more than one episode a day to elevate and elevate consciousness, so make sure to check out the full range of shows on our social medias, wherever you get your favourite streaming platform. - Stay Free! - Russell Brand and other greats! - . Subscribe to Stay Free - Subscribe to our new show, Stay Free: to get notified when a new episode is available. . . . to stay free and get exclusive access to all new episodes of the show that's coming to you! , stay free! . , , , and much more! Stay Free - stay free, stay free in the future! ! Stay free, and thank you, Thank you, my friends! :) - Rishi Sunak, Rishi, R.S. , R.J., R.K. and R.W. & R.Briggs R. ...and R.R.Sons, -R.B., Rishi says: ... - and so on... - I want to look into the trauma in my eyes, and look into my eyes...
00:00:00.000Hello there you Awakening Wonders on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you download your podcasts.
00:00:05.000We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content.
00:00:08.000We will be delivering a podcast every day, seven days a week, every single day.
00:00:13.000You'll get a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they are covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth.
00:00:23.000Once a week we bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate and many more.
00:00:31.000Now enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:34.000Remember, there's an episode every single day to educate and elevate our consciousness together.
00:00:55.000Remember you can become a supporter of our content, get additional videos every week and join us for conversations with journalists and put your own questions to them in case you don't think I ask the right questions, which I know for a fact I do.
00:01:04.000Now if it's in France, don't for a second think it's possible and plausible to criticise or speak out against medications and let's face it, it means particularly and specifically recent Gene therapies or vaccines or whatever you want to call them in that country, although you probably won't be able to call them anything soon, you certainly will not be able to criticize them.
00:01:23.000So what does it mean for the world and for France when laws are passed that seem just designed literally to prevent Pfizer's profit margin being negatively impacted?
00:01:32.000It's being called article Pfizer, because it sort of seems to literally mean
00:01:36.000don't criticize Pfizer, even though it's written in sort of vague language.
00:01:39.000Don't anyone criticize any medical measures recommended by the state?
00:01:43.000What, like there's people are gonna say, "Oh, don't take your chemotherapy, love." Or people are gonna say, "Don't
00:01:48.000Although ironically, heart disease and cancer are on the rise since around 2019, 2020 type time.
00:01:54.000I wonder why these laws are being passed. Let's get into it.
00:01:57.000So firstly, this is a post by Dr Kat Lindley on X. Today a law was passed in France qualifying any opposition to mRNA LNP injections as a sectarian aberration.
00:02:07.000It carries a penalty of up to three years imprisonment and 45,000 euros.
00:02:12.000It will not tolerate any criticism of the therapeutic treatments which will be recommended or made obligatory by the state.
00:02:17.000Any person who dares to openly criticize these therapies will be liable to fines and imprisonment.
00:02:22.000Seems like an astonishing piece of legislature.
00:02:25.000So that's what's happening in France, but over in the UK, like Macron in France, we have a globalist leader in Rishi Sunak.
00:02:32.000And even if in the next election we change leaders, guess what we're getting?
00:02:56.000Here he is, as usual, in Parliament, advocating for more stringency and analysis around the pandemic period.
00:03:02.000That's all he's asking for, and he's treated as a kind of lunatic as a result.
00:03:06.000Can the current Prime Minister think of anything he has promoted in partnership with huge businesses as safe and effective, which has ultimately harmed the British economy?
00:03:14.000You hear the murmur of globalism in the background whether it's in France, whether it's in Canada, whether it's in the UK.
00:03:19.000There is an institutional opposition to open conversation around this subject and now legislation to prevent open conversation around this subject.
00:03:27.000That's without even recourse to the censorship laws in Ireland, Canada, the UK.
00:03:48.000Mr Speaker, to what he was more broadly insinuating, let me be unequivocal from this dispatch box that Covid vaccines are safe.
00:03:56.000And in France, you can't say anything other than that.
00:04:00.000And here is Rishi Sunak on GB News being questioned by a man who says he suffered from vaccine injury, which he wouldn't be able to say in France.
00:04:09.000My name is John Watt and I'm one of the Covid vaccine injured in this country.
00:04:15.000I want you to look into my eyes real soon, okay?
00:04:17.000I want you to look at the pain, the trauma, and the regret I have in my eyes.
00:04:22.000That person, in case you're not in the British Isles, is a Scottish person behaving in a very Scottish fashion.
00:04:27.000Which is to say, emotional and aggressive, full-on, and in this instance, correct.
00:04:32.000We have been left with no help at all.
00:04:35.000Not only am I in here that's vaccine injured, there's another man over there whose life's been ruined by that COVID-19 vaccine.
00:04:42.000I know people who have lost legs, amputations.
00:04:46.000I know people with heart conditions like myself, Rishi Sunak.
00:04:49.000He's so Scottish that this may not remain a verbal altercation for much longer.
00:04:53.000And I say this as a man who is married to a Scottish person.
00:04:56.000Why have I had to set up a support group in Scotland to look after the people that have been affected by that Covid-19 vaccine?
00:05:05.000Why are the people who are in charge, who told us all to do the right thing, have left us all tear up?
00:05:12.000And left me and the thousands and the tens of thousands in this country to rot.
00:05:18.000We're actually going to extradite you to France right now.
00:05:21.000We were thinking Rwanda, but I think you'd be happier in France.
00:05:24.000In Scotland right now, according to the yellow card system, there are over 30,000 people that have had an adverse reaction to that vaccine and 200 deaths.
00:05:33.000OK, John, thank you very much indeed for your question.
00:06:43.000In a way, that's what democracy in conversation looks like.
00:06:46.000People being able to express themselves, being able to express their emotions, being able to confront leaders with difficult truths, and look at what it's like.
00:07:15.000I'm used to having difficult conversations.
00:07:17.000Like sometimes me and the wife talk about how much tax we should pay in this country and how much money Infosys should get from government contracts.
00:07:23.000And it can get quite heated sometimes because sometimes she thinks I should give a bit more.
00:07:27.000So there is a vaccine compensation scheme that's in place, as you alluded to, in the NHS.
00:07:32.000Obviously, everyone individually will work through their cases.
00:07:35.000It's difficult for me to comment on anyone's individual case.
00:07:50.000If you do, lightheadedness from elevation changes to gut issues due to water quality.
00:07:55.000If you ever had that happen, you never think about these things until they do.
00:07:58.000And when they do, all you want is something to make it better.
00:08:00.000That's where the Wellness Company's Travel Emergency Kit comes in.
00:08:04.000Whether you're backpacking through exotic locations or jet-setting for work, this kit ensures that you will be We prepared for any health situation.
00:08:11.000How is it different from other travel kits?
00:09:29.000God I'm saddened to hear that you've been silenced.
00:09:31.000It's almost as if we've been using proxy organisations like Logically AI to shut down any dissenting voices that anyone that's critical of vaccines.
00:09:38.000Like we spent loads of money cleansing social media of Chris.
00:09:42.000I don't know, how the hell this keeps happening?
00:09:43.000Why are all these people getting signs?
00:09:45.000It's almost as if we're funding it from your tax money and then pretending to apologise to you on the television!
00:09:51.000So please do get your details to Stephen and the team and I will happily take that away.
00:09:56.000Get to Stephen and the team and we'll deal with that sort of, well, never.
00:10:00.000Of course you should be able to speak about your experience, what's happened to you, and as I said we have a compensation scheme in place for that and I'll make sure that we're working through that.
00:10:08.000We've got a compensation scheme for these 100% safe vaccines.
00:10:12.000Doesn't make sense really because 100% safe would mean you wouldn't need any compensation.
00:10:58.000About how best to roll out the vaccine, what was in the public health interest, the priority order, how that should be done, who should be eligible.
00:11:05.000And we got it basically wrong in every single one of those categories.
00:11:09.000That was something that the doctors recommended on.
00:11:11.000A lot of doctors were silenced and lobbied into silence and sometimes even struck off.
00:11:16.000And that's something that we followed.
00:11:18.000Now, obviously, if there are individual circumstances which haven't worked out... The phrase, haven't worked out, covers a multitude of sins there.
00:11:24.000In particular, people who took that amputation stuff.
00:11:57.000Gents, both of you, do give us your details.
00:12:00.000We will get that to the Prime Minister.
00:12:02.000And as he said, he will, I'm sure, look at that for you.
00:12:05.000In the meantime, let's move on to another question, sir.
00:12:08.000Okay, so having watched that, would you say there is room for some conversation or no conversation?
00:12:13.000Because in France you are getting no conversation and given that this is a globalist issue, no conversation is a problem that could be coming to a country that you live in too.
00:12:22.000So here's Brett Weinstein on the topic of France's new legislation.
00:12:26.000France has now criminalised objections to the MRNA platform, exposing those targeted to ruinous fines and imprisonment.
00:12:32.000It's obvious lunacy and that it's happening in a Western nation should alarm us all.
00:12:36.000This madness must be defeated in France, at the WHO, everywhere it arises.
00:12:40.000So what exactly is going on in France?
00:12:43.000And given there's an obvious requirement for conversation around vaccines, excess deaths, vaccine injuries, social policies during the pandemic, why are laws being passed that would prevent anybody from criticising a government-mandated In an unprecedented move that has sparked widespread debate across France and beyond, the French Parliament has recently passed a law that introduces severe penalties for those opposing mRNA LNP injections or other treatments recommended by the state based on current medical knowledge.
00:13:12.000They have to say current medical knowledge, that's in case, oh well it was the current medical knowledge then!
00:13:16.000Yeah, well guess what the current medical knowledge is?
00:13:18.000Current medical knowledge is this guy's got one less leg than he had this morning.
00:13:23.000As of today, criticism of such therapeutic treatments, when deemed obligatory or recommended by the state, could result in up to three years of imprisonment or a fine of 45,000 euros.
00:13:32.000This bold legislative step, quickly dubbed Article Pfizer by critics, represents a significant shift in the balance between public health policy and individual freedom of expression.
00:13:41.000There's a lot of it about, isn't there?
00:13:42.000How often are we seeing government policies leading to repression or suppression of free speech?
00:13:50.000In particular, censorship specifically of content we've been making.
00:13:54.000The core of the controversy lies in the creation of a new criminal offence targeting individuals who encourage others to withhold from medical treatments that are considered appropriate according to the prevailing medical standards.
00:14:04.000They have to always have, like, an adjective or a caveat because they know that medicine evolves and changes.
00:14:09.000That is the nature of science, even if there is nothing malfeasant at play.
00:14:12.000The law specifically targets the resistance to mRNA treatment, positioning it as a cornerstone in the fight against future pandemics.
00:14:19.000This move has been interpreted by many as an anti-democratic manoeuvre stifling any
00:14:23.000opposition or critique of the state-endorsed medical treatments under the heavy hand of
00:14:26.000legal penalties. Remember, the WHO treaty would mean that your country would have to
00:14:31.000provide 5% of your health budget, that your nation would have to abide by WHO regulations,
00:14:35.000which just essentially makes it legislation, whether that's mandated medicines or lockdowns.
00:14:40.000And it's not even just pandemics, it could be climate-related or terrorism. It's an
00:14:44.000extraordinary bill that should be opposed.
00:14:45.000The passing of the law came with minimal debate within the parliament, a fact that has only
00:14:49.000fuelled the outrage among its detractors. Critics argue that the law not only undermines
00:14:53.000the democratic process by limiting the scope of public discourse on health policy, but
00:14:57.000also prejudges alternative medicine and potential whistleblowers who may have valid concerns
00:15:02.000about mRNA technology or other treatments.
00:15:05.000I mean, certainly it seems, doesn't it?
00:15:07.000But there are at least some valid concerns.
00:15:10.000Should there be a law that prevents those concerns being communicated?
00:15:13.000Is that what you've learned in the pandemic period?
00:15:15.000Do you know what I've learned in the pandemic period?
00:15:17.000Dissent should continue to be shut down.
00:15:19.000Expert opinion should continue to be censored.
00:15:22.000Authorities should be further centralised in the favour of governments and corporations.
00:15:26.000Is that the message of the pandemic period?
00:15:28.000Because that ain't the message that I received.
00:15:30.000Labelled Article Pfizer, the law is seen as emblematic of a broader trend towards increasing state control over public health narratives and personal health choices.
00:15:39.000The nickname itself, referencing one of the major pharmaceutical companies behind the development of mRNA vaccine technology, hints at the perceived alignment between government policy and the interests of Big Pharma.
00:15:52.000Raising questions about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on health policy.
00:15:55.000Furthermore, the timing and urgency of the law's enactment, with warnings of an imminent next pandemic and the positioning of mRNA technology as the sole solution, adds layers of complexity to the debate.
00:16:05.000The law raises critical questions about where the line should be drawn between preventing harmful misinformation and preserving the right to free speech and open debate on medical treatments.
00:16:15.000As France steps into uncharted territory with the enactment of this law, the international community watches closely.
00:16:21.000The implications of such a legal framework extend beyond the borders of France, potentially setting a precedent for how governments around the world might seek to regulate public discourse on health and medical treatments in the future.
00:16:32.000In conclusion, the recent enactment of the law penalising opposition to state-recommended mRNA treatment in France Marks a significant moment in the ongoing discussion about the role of government in regulating health policy and preserving public safety.
00:16:44.000While intended to combat misinformation and protect public health, the law's critics see it as a concerning move towards limiting free speech and privileging certain medical treatments over others.
00:16:54.000As the world continues to navigate the complexities of public health in an ever-evolving landscape, the debate over Article Pfizer Serves as a point and reminder of the tensions between collective safety and individual rights.
00:17:05.000It also demonstrates that there can be no financial ties between political figures and organisations and corporations of that size and scale that you don't want when laws like this are being passed.
00:17:13.000Any sense that it could be advantageous to Pfizer's bottom line or Pfizer's agenda.
00:17:19.000We also don't want to feel the sense that there's a globalist agenda in which individual nations pilot particular pieces of legislation before they become immersive, ubiquitous and total, as seems to be the case with various censorship laws around the world, and now in this one, the further oppression of free speech, in order to achieve what goal?
00:17:36.000There's so much misinformation about chemotherapy or heart tablets or asthma inhalers that people just start abandoning them.
00:17:43.000Has there ever been a medical emergency of this variety ever before?
00:17:46.000Do you ever recall like a huge movement opposing successful medical treatments?
00:17:51.000Of course there have always been people that are critical, cynical, sceptical and enquiring around vaccines, and if you look at some of the information available in those quarters, it certainly is interesting to review, shall we say.
00:18:03.000But the idea that the state, given their relationship with global corporations, has only your interests in mind, In order to protect you, we're going to fine you and imprison you.
00:18:16.000And having seen that bit of footage of dear globalist Rishi Sunak pilloried by members of the British public, how do you imagine the globalists regard open conversation about these subjects?
00:18:27.000If there are indeed 30,000 adverse events to discuss in the UK,
00:18:31.000is an open conversation what the establishment wants, or do they want total control of the narrative?
00:18:36.000Why don't you look at the last couple of years and decide for yourself?
00:18:39.000What do groups that censor online social media discourse really care about?
00:18:43.000And to whose benefit is that being directed?
00:18:45.000The censorship of important and significant voices like Jay Bhattacharya.
00:18:51.000Or is it about controlling a narrative?
00:18:52.000What we've learned in particular in the ongoing discourse between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci about measures and suggestions and steps that were taken in the early pandemic period that might have been avoided and that were potentially not legitimate and certainly not successful.
00:19:06.000Do you feel that what should happen now is a raft of law should be passed around the world to make it legal for people to question and criticise?
00:19:12.000Or do you think that we should be heading in almost exactly the opposite direction?
00:19:16.000Certainly there's a need for discussion, even as the possibility for discussion is being foreclosed.