Stay Free - Russel Brand - February 19, 2024


Here's the News: Ireland Just SHOCKED The World And Elon Is FIGHTING BACK!


Episode Stats

Length

18 minutes

Words per Minute

199.55116

Word Count

3,705

Sentence Count

200

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

2


Summary

In this episode of Stay Free With Russell Brand's new podcast, "No, Here's the Fucking News," Russell Brand takes a deep dive into the current state of public opinion in Ireland, and asks the question, why the fuck did the government bother to hold a public consultation on hate speech? And why did they ignore the results of the polling on the matter? And what's the point of holding a poll if the result is just going to be disregarded on the basis of the fact that it's not representative of the public's point of view? Is that even a thing? And if it is, who's to blame? And how can we stop it from happening in the first place? - Russell Brand Stay Free with Russell Brand is a stand-up comedian, writer, podcaster, and podcaster. He is a regular contributor to the New York Times, The Huffington Post, and the New Republic, and is one of the most influential people in the alt-right in the world. He's also a frequent contributor to The Daily Beast, The Rebel, and The Daily Caller. , and has been featured in The Guardian, The New Statesman, The Daily Mail, and many other publications. He's a frequent guest on the BBC, and hosts a podcast called "Keep Calm and Carry On" on Radio Free, where he also hosts a show called "The Dark Side Of" where he gives us the inside scoop on current events and exposes the latest happenings in American culture. . You can expect weekly episodes every single day, delivered straight to your ears, wherever you get your chancell, every chance you get a chance to listen to it. - stay free with the latest in the latest episode of "Stay Free With RUSS BRADDY! and much more! Stay free with RUSSUAL, stay free, RUSS FREE with RUSSEAN BRAND! - RUSS FREEDOM. RUSS + RUSSY MACHINERY, RASHLEY MCCARTO, R.J. BONUS CONTENT: R.S. BRADDITIONAL PODCAST - R.E. R.K. MACHIEVAGE, RICHARD MADELLAUSSIVA, VAN VENGE, VANDAN SPEAKER, GABRIKE, JOSH MILLER, JORDAN WELCOME, SAM MAYLEK, JAMES KLEIN, VADAN SHELLENBERG, GREECE, AND MORE!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello there you Awakening Wonders on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you download your podcasts.
00:00:05.000 We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content.
00:00:08.000 We will be delivering a podcast every day, seven days a week, every single day.
00:00:13.000 You'll get a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they are covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth.
00:00:23.000 Once a week we bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate and many more.
00:00:31.000 Now enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:34.000 Remember, there's an episode every single day to educate and elevate our consciousness together.
00:00:40.000 Stay free and enjoy the episode.
00:00:42.000 No, here's the fucking news!
00:00:51.000 Hello there you Awakening Wanderers, thanks for joining us on our voyage to truth and freedom.
00:00:55.000 Remember, if you become a supporter of our content, you get access to conversations we have with Vandana Shiva, Glenn Greenwald, Michael Schellenberger, proper journalists and thought leaders, and you can ask them your own questions so we can participate in a conversation together, as well as get an exclusive access to our conversation with Tucker Carlson, which was pretty bloody great and you all loved.
00:01:13.000 And we do need to create a movement, because let's face it, whether it's Canada with weird assisted suicide laws or Australia with their pandemic internment camps or now Ireland proposing hate speech laws that will turn just controversial language or rudeness into hate speech and therefore make it a criminal offence with very vague definitions around what constitutes hate speech.
00:01:33.000 It seems to me that globalism is becoming Yet more potent, yet more priapic, yet more certain in their ideological right to control your thought, the information you'll have access to, the things you can freely say, the type of relationships you might have, the sort of information that you can consume online.
00:01:49.000 All of this is under threat and it's pretty bloody serious.
00:01:52.000 And it's being presented as if it's sort of no big deal and we've done some polling and it's all going to be okay.
00:01:56.000 You should see this dude prevaricating on the point of polling.
00:01:59.000 We polled some people on hate speech and what did you discover?
00:02:02.000 They don't like hate speech.
00:02:03.000 So are you going to implement that?
00:02:04.000 No.
00:02:04.000 Well what's the point in holding the poll then?
00:02:06.000 Well, democracy innit?
00:02:07.000 But you're ignoring the democracy.
00:02:08.000 No.
00:02:09.000 You are though!
00:02:10.000 This is the kind of double speak that we're seeing more and more of as the world slides into an Orwellian hellscape.
00:02:10.000 Look at this!
00:02:16.000 Taoiseach, your government conducted a public consultation regarding hate speech laws where citizens were asked to give their thoughts on the issue, and out of the thousands of responses from private individuals, over 70% were not supportive of such laws.
00:02:28.000 All these leaders that look kind of nice, and seem kind of nice, and you can tell they'll be really reasonable, and like, oh hello, no you're most welcome.
00:02:35.000 Then you listen to them, they're passing mad weird laws.
00:02:38.000 They feel someone that spoke like this, WE ARE GOING TO DO WHAT IS NE- You go, mate, Jesus Christ!
00:02:43.000 Just everyone's being so reasonable, they're getting away with sometimes literal murder, and always nearly tyranny.
00:02:48.000 And yet you're proceeding with them anyway.
00:02:50.000 So my question is, why did your government bother to do a public consultation if you were just going to ignore the results?
00:02:55.000 Reasonable question.
00:02:56.000 Why do a public consultation if you're going to ignore the results?
00:03:00.000 Let's see the answer to that reasonable question.
00:03:03.000 Well, we do public consultations because we think they're good practice.
00:03:06.000 It's a way to find out what people's thoughts are.
00:03:10.000 And then ignore it!
00:03:11.000 On issues.
00:03:12.000 And it's also, you know, a way to flesh out and highlight some of the issues we may not have considered.
00:03:16.000 And then ignore them!
00:03:17.000 But we're also, you know, wise to the fact that the vast majority of people don't make submissions to public consultations.
00:03:23.000 We have to bear that in mind.
00:03:24.000 So it's only a small number of people so we can ignore it.
00:03:27.000 It's only a small portion of the population that participate in these things so it's not necessarily reflective of public opinion and also we're wise to the fact that very often submissions are organized and campaign groups will organize responses so we're clear with that too.
00:03:40.000 Even the bloke in the background whose job it is to agree like he's laden with doubt it's like that doesn't make sense hold on a minute like we're literally in real time watching someone who works for the system go Wait a minute.
00:03:52.000 Wait a minute.
00:03:53.000 Is that red pill in my mouth right now?
00:03:57.000 But why hold the consultation if the end result is just going to be disregarded on the basis that it's not representative of public opinion?
00:04:04.000 What's the point of it then?
00:04:05.000 Well, the point is that we're a democracy and in Ireland we have elections.
00:04:09.000 Well, the point.
00:04:10.000 Oh, I'm glad that you've asked me that because the point is we're a democracy and that's why we do elections and ask people's opinions.
00:04:16.000 But then you ignore their opinions.
00:04:18.000 Yeah, we don't have to do everything.
00:04:20.000 Listen, fuck off.
00:04:21.000 Look at him in the background going, hold on a minute, that poll was a complete waste of time!
00:04:32.000 He's realising, what I'd like to hear, instead of the leader there, is the inner monologue of that bloke who's listening.
00:04:38.000 As he slowly works out that the entire system is totally corrupt and what's being legitimised is the introduction of laws that people don't want because it's not about the people.
00:04:47.000 But if you just pull that one thread.
00:04:49.000 Right, you know people don't want this law.
00:04:50.000 That's right, people don't want it.
00:04:51.000 But you're doing it anyway.
00:04:52.000 Yeah.
00:04:53.000 Because it's not about the people.
00:04:53.000 Why is that?
00:04:55.000 Because it's about control.
00:04:55.000 Why is that?
00:04:56.000 Why is that?
00:04:57.000 Because the only way we're going to be able to abate and subjugate a population is by having the legal means to do it because people are waking up to the fact that governments That's not what they're about.
00:05:07.000 They're about testing the temperature.
00:05:09.000 So is it just for show then?
00:05:10.000 We're in a race against time to control the flow of information and be able to arrest people for dissent.
00:05:16.000 But you know, there's a nice scene of nature in the background, so it's not all bad.
00:05:19.000 Yeah, but it's synthesized nature.
00:05:21.000 I kind of have everything.
00:05:22.000 That's not what they're about.
00:05:23.000 They're about testing the temperature.
00:05:24.000 So is it just for show then?
00:05:26.000 No.
00:05:26.000 [Laughter]
00:05:27.000 Is it just for show then?
00:05:28.000 Because what you've just said is, is it's kind of a show.
00:05:31.000 It's also not that.
00:05:32.000 It's all of the things that I said it wasn't, and also that other thing, which is the thing it would have to be if it wasn't those things.
00:05:38.000 It's none of that.
00:05:39.000 If you try and think about this for long enough, you will become enlightened, because it just doesn't make sense.
00:05:39.000 It's Zen.
00:05:45.000 Anyway, now it's clear that this is something that the public want, or don't want, it doesn't matter.
00:05:49.000 Anyway, it's democratic.
00:05:50.000 Here is an Irish politician explaining what new power they're taking, even though you don't want to wear it.
00:05:57.000 The government is addressing the extremist content online.
00:06:00.000 Because, you know, there's a lot of extremist content online and it's actually getting on my nerves now.
00:06:00.000 Yeah, that's it.
00:06:06.000 Like hate speech and incitement to violence.
00:06:08.000 What?
00:06:08.000 There's Houthis and extremist content online?
00:06:11.000 Don't worry about a war against Russia that can't be won.
00:06:13.000 Don't worry about censorship everywhere we go.
00:06:15.000 It's Houthis now and extremist content online.
00:06:18.000 Oh, that's driving me nuts.
00:06:20.000 Cumann na mBan is Ireland's new online safety and media regulator.
00:06:23.000 Don't worry about the migration crisis and what the Irish people appear to feel about that, whether you agree with them or not.
00:06:29.000 It's not your country.
00:06:30.000 It's their country.
00:06:31.000 They're allowed to run their country however they want, having been oppressed for hundreds of years by a near neighbour.
00:06:36.000 Don't worry about any of those problems.
00:06:38.000 It's extremist content online.
00:06:40.000 And those bloody hoothies.
00:06:41.000 And we'll also be joint regulator along with the European Commission for the EU Digital Services Act.
00:06:46.000 Wow, so it's actually aligning with another bureaucracy for which you are probably taxed but not represented.
00:06:53.000 And when that happens, sensible countries have a revolution.
00:06:56.000 My department has ongoing engagement with Onkoma Shun and I, having met them two weeks ago, met with Onkoma Shun again yesterday.
00:07:03.000 I mean, that is globalism, isn't it?
00:07:04.000 Like, they've decided that they're doing it.
00:07:06.000 You lot don't want it.
00:07:08.000 We're doing it.
00:07:09.000 That's globalism in capsule.
00:07:11.000 We've asked you, do you want it?
00:07:12.000 No thanks.
00:07:13.000 Well, the EU want it.
00:07:14.000 Well, but, so we're doing it.
00:07:16.000 Oh, democracy though?
00:07:17.000 And why are we at war with Russia?
00:07:19.000 Well, to protect Ukraine and democracy.
00:07:20.000 But they don't allow elections and there's no opposing parties and there's a lot of dissent within Ukraine and they've started to shut down state media.
00:07:27.000 Stop doing so much hate speech.
00:07:30.000 They informed me that they had engaged immediately with the large platforms and with the Gardaí and the European Commission and that the platforms had activated their instant response plans and their engagement is continuing.
00:07:41.000 An Comisión is calling for those who see hate speech or other illegal content online to report it to the platforms or to An Gardaí Síochána.
00:07:49.000 And then we'll decide if it's hate speech that we can utilise to control the conversation, and we'll act on it if it's convenient hate speech, and we'll ignore it if it's hate speech that we can't really utilise to manage the flow of information.
00:08:01.000 So we'll keep this all nice and vague, but the end result will be we've got control of social media and therefore the public conversation, and we can then essentially facilitate globalism, which you know is the agenda, because we've asked you what you wanted, you told us no, they told us yes, we're doing what they want.
00:08:15.000 So there'll be a lot more of that coming down the line.
00:08:16.000 And I don't know if there's anything in Irish history about informing on your community in order to facilitate an external colonial imperialist oppressor, whether or not you have any taboos against that or anything, or the black and tans, but there's going to be a lot more of that also.
00:08:30.000 This is important, but even more so important next year, because once An Comission is fully operational next year, People will be able to report to them directly if they think a platform has ignored or wrongly rejected their complaint.
00:08:44.000 And these reports can then be used by Cumann na mBan to decide where to focus their oversight and investigations and ultimately their enforcement action.
00:08:53.000 A lot of this goes on in the world now, doesn't it?
00:08:54.000 We can use people to grass snitch, spy on one another.
00:08:59.000 Oh, people were going out during the lockdown.
00:09:01.000 Well, in retrospect, there was nothing wrong with them doing that, it turns out.
00:09:04.000 Turning us all into little agents of the state.
00:09:07.000 Finally, Uncomissioned's first online safety code, as provided for under the Online Safety and Media Regulation Act, will be adopted in early 2024.
00:09:16.000 A draft code will be published very shortly for stakeholder consultation and this will hold the video sharing platforms accountable for how they protect their users online and will deal with extremist content like hate speech and incitement to violence.
00:09:31.000 There's already laws about incitement, that's legal already, you don't need a new law for that.
00:09:35.000 This is a new era.
00:09:36.000 For a new age, a new era, a great reset perhaps.
00:09:40.000 In which the regulators and the people they serve will be empowered to make the online world... Empowered?
00:09:45.000 You dare to say that this is about empowerment?
00:09:48.000 Safer for all.
00:09:49.000 It's a brave new world, baby.
00:09:50.000 Let's get into it.
00:09:51.000 Elon Musk has said his social media company X, previously known as Twitter, will fund Irish legal challenges to forthcoming hate speech legislation.
00:09:58.000 Musk warned of risks associated with laws that aim to curb free speech and said there was a need to challenge them.
00:10:03.000 In an online interview with Gripped, Musk said X's default position is that it will challenge any laws it believes would infringe upon someone's ability to say what they want to say.
00:10:12.000 He was speaking in relation to Ireland's pending criminal justice incitement to violence or hatred and hate offences bill, which Minister for Justice Helen McEntree said would be progressed early this year.
00:10:23.000 And we will also fund the legal fees of Irish citizens that want to challenge the bill as well.
00:10:28.000 So Mr. Musk, whose ex-platform has its European headquarters in Dublin.
00:10:32.000 So we'll make sure that if there is an attempt to suppress the voice of the Irish people, that we do our absolute best to defend the people of Ireland and their ability to speak their mind.
00:10:40.000 He said there should be concern if the Irish Parliament defined hate speech in its own terms.
00:10:45.000 People should be extremely concerned about that.
00:10:47.000 We're just at the mercy of the ruling party and whatever bureaucrats they put in place and they can just define something that is really not hate speech as hate speech just because they don't like it.
00:10:57.000 That's the key issue.
00:10:58.000 It's a very diffuse term, hate speech.
00:11:01.000 What do you mean hate speech?
00:11:03.000 Let's absolutely define that just in case it became exploitable in order to impose undue regulation and control over public conversation.
00:11:13.000 The reason that it allows that is because that's what it's for.
00:11:16.000 It's not for for protecting people from hearing racist terms or rudeness
00:11:21.000 or whatever.
00:11:22.000 It's not for that.
00:11:23.000 And in fact, you could make an argument that's not even the business of the state.
00:11:25.000 The business of the state should be to run facilities and amenities for people correctly
00:11:29.000 and fairly and justly.
00:11:30.000 And even words like fairly, of course, would need some scrutiny.
00:11:33.000 But what this plainly is about, and we saw it because we witnessed the dynamic of it,
00:11:37.000 is create a citizenry of informants, impose laws that have been designed and determined
00:11:43.000 centrally globally elsewhere against the will of the people in order to legitimise control
00:11:50.000 that is currently unavailable because of free speech and is sort of creating a global uprising
00:11:55.000 really which at the moment is still somewhat atomised because our cultures are so atomised
00:12:00.000 but could become an anti-globalist movement.
00:12:03.000 Look at the farmers, look at the truckers, look at the rage in Ireland around what's been happening there lately.
00:12:09.000 Look at the possibility, indeed, for change when people are united and able to speak freely.
00:12:15.000 That's the threat.
00:12:16.000 You're the threat, not anything else.
00:12:18.000 In relation to misinformation and disinformation, he said unlike in newspapers, X had a community notes function which allowed its users to add responses and comments on people's tweets.
00:12:26.000 The biggest lie in the media is the choice of narrative because they can simply ignore anything they don't like and they can overly focus on things they do want to talk about, he said.
00:12:35.000 Yes, that is what the legacy media does.
00:12:37.000 It amplifies stories, it creates stories, it ignores information that's detrimental to the interests of the powerful.
00:12:43.000 for whatever failings there may be within any institutional organisation doesn't do that.
00:12:49.000 And it allows and facilitates potentially epochal events like the disruption of our trajectory to World War 3
00:12:56.000 because of the Tucker-Elon axes.
00:12:58.000 It's really the best shot we have currently of free speech and maybe even freedom.
00:13:03.000 Further critiques of the proposed law labelled as authoritarian point to the lack of a legal definition of
00:13:09.000 hate and the potential overreach of authority such as the
00:13:11.000 seizure of personal electronic devices and prison sentences for possession of supposed hateful
00:13:16.000 content.
00:13:17.000 Last year, Musk committed to covering legal charges for ex-users who unfairly faced employer retribution due to their activity on the platform.
00:13:24.000 Even corporations drawing his ire due to the unfair treatment of ex-users were not safe from potential legal consequences.
00:13:31.000 In a case involving X, the company's legal team defended an Illinois student threatened with disciplinary action by his university over posts made on the platform.
00:13:39.000 An advocate for freedom of speech writes, Musk posted, What we're told we live in are democracies.
00:13:49.000 What we're told we fight for are democracies.
00:13:52.000 Kind of a version of freedom, or the best way of achieving freedom, is through the consensus of an electorate.
00:13:56.000 We're told that all the time.
00:13:57.000 It's our myth, in a way, because it's not what we live in.
00:14:00.000 As you just saw in that example, the polling data suggests that people are opposed to that.
00:14:05.000 And even if they were in favour of it, you'd have to question how are these contexts and
00:14:09.000 these consensus arrived at when you have a compliant media?
00:14:13.000 Perhaps the reason 70% of people polled don't want hate speech laws is because they use
00:14:17.000 independent media now and they recognise, "Hold on a minute, how does this benefit
00:14:20.000 me?
00:14:21.000 I could just go, 'Oh, that was hateful, I'm not going to look at that platform anymore.'"
00:14:23.000 Like, that's always an option, isn't it?
00:14:24.000 So if we don't live in democracies, because democracies are about representation and the
00:14:28.000 right to govern your own life and control your own community through referenda and through
00:14:32.000 consent, what do we live in?
00:14:34.000 One theory is we now live in anarcho-tyrannies.
00:14:37.000 Let's look at what anarcho-tyranny is.
00:14:39.000 Anarcho-tyranny is a system of government that fails to protect its citizens from violence while simultaneously persecuting conduct that would typically be regarded as innocent.
00:14:48.000 The experience of living under such a system may be familiar to you, even if the term itself is not.
00:14:52.000 A state of anarcho-tyranny might, for instance, see career criminals walk the streets murdering women mere days after being released from prison on license, even while offensive limericks, online poetry, and dogs trained to perform comical Nazi salutes are treated with the utmost seriousness by our criminal justice system.
00:15:08.000 Hmm.
00:15:08.000 The result is a disorienting combination of two different kinds of fear.
00:15:12.000 Fear of rising violent crime combined with a fear of arbitrary criminalization, including the criminalization of citizens who complain about what is being done to them by their governments.
00:15:22.000 Hmm.
00:15:23.000 Systems of anarcho-tyranny rely especially on laws that criminalise speech that would ordinarily be regarded merely as rude or controversial.
00:15:30.000 In Ireland, the Verac government is currently fast-tracking just such a law.
00:15:34.000 The Criminal Justice Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences Bill, which will criminalise any person who prepares or possesses material that is likely to incite violence or hatred against a person or group of persons on account of their protected characteristics.
00:15:48.000 Note the flabbiness of this wording.
00:15:50.000 Violence, one might once have assumed, is pretty easy to objectively define.
00:15:54.000 But hatred?
00:15:55.000 Now that's a word that a vengeful prosecutor could really make hay with, particularly given the usefulness of that additional word, likely.
00:16:02.000 With the new law in place, the authorities could easily decree that all sorts of politically inconvenient speech is likely to incite hatred against particular groups.
00:16:10.000 We are restricting freedom, said Irish Senator Pauline O'Reilly of the Bill, but we're doing it for the common good.
00:16:15.000 Categories such as misinformation and disinformation have recently emerged.
00:16:20.000 And mal-information is, even by the definition of the tyrannical bureaucrats that impose it, information that's true but likely to create disobedience.
00:16:29.000 For example, during the pandemic period, if you said, hey, there are different ways of treating this other than the proposed and near mandated measures, that would be regarded as malinformation because it's true, but likely to generate dissent, further dissent, maybe even disobedience.
00:16:45.000 It would also be regarded as malinformation to say, hey, Vladimir Putin and the former Soviet Union said that if you encroached on former Soviet territory, it would lead to an escalation of hostility, particularly between them and Ukraine.
00:16:59.000 And the 2014 coup, where a legitimately elected government was replaced, has also escalated tensions in that region.
00:17:07.000 And Vladimir Putin might be interested in a peace deal were Ukraine not to join NATO.
00:17:13.000 Might be regarded as mal-information.
00:17:16.000 Hate speech, similarly, could be utilized and deployed according to the will of whoever is holding that law as a weapon.
00:17:23.000 I know now that the law can be used as a weapon.
00:17:27.000 In fact, the term lawfare is casually entering our discourse because so many dissenting voices are shut down using legal means.
00:17:36.000 Who does the law serve?
00:17:38.000 What is the law for?
00:17:40.000 Laws like this are being created to further empower centralised authority, often derived from globalist or at least continental organisations like the EU, which are ultimately a globalist organisation if you ask me, in order to further shut down dissent and impose control.
00:17:57.000 You'll see a lot more of this, particularly if bills like this one are allowed to pass.
00:18:01.000 It's the sort of thing that we should oppose, and it's pretty fascinating and exciting that Elon Musk is willing to put his money where his mouth is when it comes to backing free speech.
00:18:10.000 We'll be following this story in more detail, and I hope that you will continue to support our right for free speech.
00:18:15.000 Because in a sense, what you're saying is, if you don't agree with that, Yeah, we shouldn't be allowed to say what we want.
00:18:20.000 We're so silly, aren't we?
00:18:21.000 Well, I don't know what kind of hate speech I'll do next.
00:18:24.000 No, you don't, because you don't know what hate speech is, and they like it that way.
00:18:27.000 But that's just what I think.
00:18:28.000 Remember, you can become a supporter of our content, get additional content, join our conversations, and be part of our movement if it suits you to do so.