Stay Free - Russel Brand - February 16, 2024


Here's the News: My Reaction To BOMBSHELL Tucker & Putin Interview


Episode Stats

Length

21 minutes

Words per Minute

196.17188

Word Count

4,185

Sentence Count

242

Misogynist Sentences

2

Hate Speech Sentences

14


Summary

In this episode, Russell Brand talks about his recent interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin, and why he thinks the United States should stop arming and funding the pro-Kremlin rebels in Ukraine. Russell Brand is a comedian, writer, and podcaster. His work has been featured in the New York Times, CNN, CBS, CBS Radio, NPR, and many other media outlets. He is a regular contributor to the Huffington Post, and is a frequent contributor to The Huffington Post and other publications. He is also the author of the book, and hosts the popular podcast, . Russell Brand's new book is out now and is available for pre-order on Amazon Prime, Blu-ray, and also rental on Vimeo. If you haven't yet, please take a few minutes to fill out this brief survey and tag us in the comments section below. We'd love your support, and we'd love to have the chance to sponsor a new show called on the airwaves starting next week! in which we'll be delivering a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they're not covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth. We'll get to the nitty gritty of current events and give you the inside scoop on what's going on in the world, so you can make informed decisions about what s going on around the world. Stay free, and help us elevate our consciousness. . . . Stay Free, Stay Free! - Stay Woke! and Free, and Let's all of us know that we're waking up to the truth, not just the good stuff! . , Thank You Awakening Wonders Stay Waking Us Up! , - The Best Woke, Thank You, - Russell Brand - Thank You! - - (featuring Jordan Peterson, Veena Shiva, Sam Harris, Gabor Mate, and Vinnie Paul, R.K. Jr., and V Vandana Shiva, and so much more. - This episode was produced and edited by: - Vinnie Mate and Vadim Chayesha, Jr., , and Vaneesh, and Gaborig, and Rachit, and the rest of the Crew, and his amazing team, and more! - Thank you for listening to this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello there you Awakening Wonders on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you download your podcasts.
00:00:05.000 We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content.
00:00:08.000 We will be delivering a podcast every day, seven days a week, every single day.
00:00:13.000 You'll get a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they are covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth.
00:00:23.000 Once a week we bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate and many more.
00:00:31.000 Now enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:34.000 Remember, there's an episode every single day to educate and elevate our consciousness together.
00:00:40.000 Stay free and enjoy the episode.
00:00:52.000 Thanks for joining us on our voyage to truth and freedom.
00:00:54.000 Remember to support our organisation, and we need your support, because you know how the establishment works now.
00:00:59.000 They find dissidents, they attack them, they shut them down.
00:01:01.000 We need you to fight back.
00:01:03.000 That's what we require, and if it's within your means, help us.
00:01:07.000 We do exclusive interviews with people like Tucker Carlson.
00:01:09.000 It's up there right now.
00:01:10.000 You can watch it whenever you want to, when you're a member.
00:01:12.000 And you get to join us for conversations with Tucker Carlson or Glenn Greenwald or Vandana Shiva.
00:01:17.000 Brilliant guests that want to change the world.
00:01:19.000 We'd love your support if you have the time.
00:01:21.000 Now, obviously, this fantastic conversation has taken place.
00:01:25.000 We're not naïve, or maybe we are naïve, but not so naïve as not to imagine that Vladimir Putin has an agenda and knows how to communicate.
00:01:31.000 What a fascinating conversation it was.
00:01:34.000 There are many things to consider.
00:01:36.000 The right of any nation to have their own history.
00:01:39.000 The complexity of the concept of a nation.
00:01:42.000 For example, look at the relationship between the United Kingdom and Ireland, and the times in history where people in the United Kingdom would have said, but Ireland is part of our country!
00:01:51.000 Or the relationship between the United States and Mexico, which once included Los Angeles and Texas.
00:01:57.000 Or indeed the relationship between the United States and the people that lived there before the arrival of European settlers, many of whom were from my country.
00:02:03.000 History is complicated.
00:02:06.000 The relationships between nations are complicated.
00:02:09.000 A nation is in itself, of course, a construct.
00:02:12.000 So, of course, there are going to be different inflections and impressions of something that is willed out of the imagination.
00:02:20.000 One thing's for sure, Vladimir Putin regards this as a regional dispute, essentially a civil war.
00:02:27.000 And he regards the support by America of Ukraine As comparable to if Texas seceded from the United States, which is a possibility.
00:02:36.000 Texas might one day say, do you know what?
00:02:37.000 We've had enough of you lot.
00:02:39.000 We're going to run Texas independently.
00:02:41.000 And then imagine if Russia started to arm Texas.
00:02:43.000 No, I'm not saying that's the only perspective available to us.
00:02:46.000 There are countless perspectives.
00:02:48.000 And certainly, as we've always said on this channel, the rights of Ukrainian people to live and not be bombed must surely be paramount.
00:02:55.000 The complexity from their perspective, from a Ukrainian perspective, obviously has to be considered.
00:02:59.000 But what is the obligation of the wider world?
00:03:02.000 Is it to continue to pump money into this conflict, a conflict that surely cannot be won without major loss of life and maybe even nuclear war?
00:03:11.000 Or is it paramount that at this point we consider peace?
00:03:15.000 The threat that the legacy media face from this interview even taking place Is that you and me, people that they like to control the information we gain access to, are able to look at Vladimir Putin ourselves and go, hmm, I don't think this guy does want to invade NATO countries.
00:03:29.000 Of course, I'm not unsympathetic to people of Ukraine, not that, you know, an online commentator's views of any particular importance, but all of us should be looking at this from the perspective of what's the best resolution.
00:03:40.000 And bear in mind, whenever you've seen Joe Biden, Lobbying for more money that ends up primarily in the hands of the weapons industry.
00:03:47.000 Have you ever heard him say, because this is how this will resolve.
00:03:50.000 This will be the solution.
00:03:51.000 Vladimir Putin is offering a solution.
00:03:54.000 Vladimir Putin is saying, if you stop arming Ukraine, this could be over in a couple of weeks.
00:03:58.000 Now, of course, the response to that, understandably, from Ukrainian people would be, you're going to abandon us to this monster?
00:04:03.000 But obviously, this is not a perfect situation.
00:04:06.000 Essentially, the question we're asking is, is this any of our business or is our business business?
00:04:11.000 The business of making money.
00:04:13.000 Let's have a look at some key moments from that conversation and decide for ourselves what we believe.
00:04:18.000 What a novel concept.
00:04:19.000 Tell us why you believe the United States might strike Russia out of the blue.
00:04:24.000 I think what a lot of people loved is that when Vladimir Putin started to answer the first question, it was a half hour response that explained the history of that region.
00:04:33.000 Are we having a talk show or a serious conversation?
00:04:38.000 Here's the quote.
00:04:40.000 Thank you.
00:04:41.000 It's a formidable series.
00:04:42.000 Because your basic education is in history as far as I understand.
00:04:50.000 Yes.
00:04:53.000 So if you don't mind, I will take only 30 seconds or one minute to give you a short reference to history for giving you a little historical background.
00:05:02.000 Please.
00:05:02.000 There was a man called Genghis Khan.
00:05:04.000 Oh, there was a massive explosion.
00:05:06.000 The universe began to expand.
00:05:08.000 But in a way, that shows you the complexity of history.
00:05:11.000 That's why there are so many available perspectives, because history is complicated.
00:05:15.000 Now let's get into the nitty gritty of Tucker Carlson's tie and why he's such a Putin apologist.
00:05:20.000 We're willing to negotiate.
00:05:23.000 It is the Western side, and Ukraine is obviously a satellite state of the US.
00:05:28.000 It is evident.
00:05:29.000 I do not want you to take it as if I'm looking for a strong word or an insult, but we both understand what is happening.
00:05:37.000 The financial support, 72 billion US dollars, was provided.
00:05:43.000 Germany ranks second, then other European countries come.
00:05:48.000 Dozens of billions of US dollars are going to Ukraine.
00:05:52.000 There's a huge influx of weapons.
00:05:55.000 In this case, you should tell the current Ukrainian leadership to stop and come to negotiating table, rescind this absurd decree.
00:06:04.000 We did not refuse.
00:06:05.000 I think sort of straight away just seeing Vladimir Putin as a human being and hearing that there is a Russian perspective is interesting.
00:06:10.000 You immediately get the impression that Russia feels beleaguered and beset by surrounding superpower nations like Germany and the United States who are funding a neighbour's war against them, a war that they regard as a civil war.
00:06:21.000 Again, it's not like we all want to get all giddy as if Vladimir Putin is Harry Styles or The Beatles.
00:06:26.000 This is a political leader.
00:06:27.000 This is a political leader with imperialist objectives of his own.
00:06:31.000 A man that would doubtless have people killed if he disagreed with them.
00:06:34.000 All those things are true.
00:06:35.000 Those are things that we have to consider from an awakened perspective.
00:06:39.000 The very fact that the legacy media have been so quick to attack Tucker Carlson.
00:06:43.000 In Russia, you don't interview the President.
00:06:45.000 The President interviews you.
00:06:46.000 Carlson could barely get a word in.
00:06:48.000 I mean, I think if you get an interview with Vladimir Putin, it'll be somewhat impolite and perhaps not sensible to go, no, shut up, excuse me, but I think this, I've been on holiday.
00:06:56.000 You're going to listen, aren't you?
00:06:57.000 It's Vladimir Putin.
00:06:58.000 It's important.
00:06:59.000 He did push on the important issue of Evan Gershkovich.
00:07:02.000 You know, this is a person of considerable power.
00:07:05.000 I believe that the very fact the interview took place is what's important.
00:07:08.000 The very fact that we have the opportunity for ourselves to go, Hold on a minute, he doesn't seem like what he's saying is, first of all, I'll invade Ukraine, which used to be part of the Soviet Union until about 40 years ago anyway, and then what I'm going to do is invade this country, Sweden's next, then Finland, then Poland.
00:07:23.000 You get the idea that what this is is a person with nativist control.
00:07:27.000 Sure, but you already said it.
00:07:28.000 I didn't think you meant it as an insult because you already said correctly, it's been reported that Ukraine was prevented from negotiating a peace settlement by the former British Prime Minister acting on behalf of the Biden administration.
00:07:39.000 So, of course, they're a satellite.
00:07:40.000 Big countries control small countries.
00:07:42.000 That's not new.
00:07:43.000 And that's why I asked about dealing directly with the Biden administration, which is making these decisions, not President Zelensky of Ukraine.
00:07:50.000 That's a good dig for those of us that are British.
00:07:52.000 We knew that went down, right?
00:07:54.000 Notice how often what Vladimir Putin is saying chimes with what you've heard in independent media.
00:07:59.000 Notice that the 2014 coup comes up, the regional disputes in 2008, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the tacit agreement between Gorbachev and Reagan not to impede on former Soviet territories.
00:08:10.000 All these things are coming up because they're bloody true.
00:08:12.000 I'm not saying that Vladimir Putin doesn't have his own agenda.
00:08:14.000 I'm not 12 years old.
00:08:15.000 Of course he does.
00:08:16.000 But all of the things that you've heard from independent media, like, hang on a minute, haven't we provoked them to some degree?
00:08:22.000 And whether or not their invasion is criminal and whether or not Ukrainian people are dying, which is appalling and terrible, we have to think, what is the role of America?
00:08:30.000 Because America and Western countries more generally, as their affiliates, could be playing the role of bringing about peace by saying, look, we're going to suspend arms now, which would have the added benefit of meaning that $60 billion will be available
00:08:41.000 for US infrastructure for you to democratically determine how it's spent, for example, on
00:08:44.000 your border. If that's what you vote for, if that's what you care about, then that's what would
00:08:49.000 happen in a democracy. And then peace would be forced. Peaceful negotiations will be forced. It's
00:08:55.000 not as simple as "Isn't Zelensky nice?"
00:08:57.000 He's a type of a heartthrob.
00:08:58.000 Aren't Russia bad invading Ukraine?
00:09:01.000 It's clear there are other components.
00:09:03.000 It's clear that diplomacy and peace ought be what we're aspiring to.
00:09:07.000 And it's pretty clear as well that the West, and Western media in particular, have tried from the beginning to reduce this conflict to some echo from the past.
00:09:15.000 He's a bit like Hitler, and if we were to appease him, it's a bit like Neville Chamberlain appeasing Hitler.
00:09:20.000 I don't think it's like that at all.
00:09:22.000 We have the Legitimate right to query what's happening in this conflict.
00:09:26.000 We have the legitimate right to hear a variety of perspectives.
00:09:29.000 In a way, it's very similar to the pandemic.
00:09:32.000 Right from the beginning, legitimate experts were shut down and censored.
00:09:36.000 And it's only a couple of years later that you start to realise, hey, I might have benefited from hearing from some of those experts.
00:09:42.000 Who benefited from me not hearing from those experts?
00:09:46.000 Let us go back to 1991, when we were promised that NATO would not expand.
00:09:52.000 To 2008, when the doors to NATO opened to the declaration of state sovereignty of Ukraine, declaring Ukraine a neutral state.
00:10:01.000 Let us go back to the fact that NATO and US military bases started to appear on the territory of Ukraine, creating threat zones.
00:10:10.000 Let us go back to coup d'état in Ukraine in 2014.
00:10:14.000 In a way, the interview is like the greatest hits of things you've heard on independent media, isn't it?
00:10:19.000 NATO expansionism, ignoring an agreement between Gorbachev and Reagan, 2014 coup, all things you would have heard if you'd listened to Jeffrey Sachs on our show.
00:10:27.000 Or, what you might have to call these days, alternative historians.
00:10:31.000 There are broader philosophical conclusions that could be reached, i.e.
00:10:34.000 the right of a nation for self-determination, what is a nation, how is a nation established, how small and decentralized could a nation become in a truly democratic space, who has the right to determine the history and the future of different ethnic ethnic groups that might have all sorts of alliances and
00:10:49.000 all sorts of spats.
00:10:50.000 And most of all, what I feel is emerging from this is we cannot trust the legacy
00:10:54.000 media. We cannot trust the people that want to perpetuate this war.
00:10:57.000 Perhaps you might conclude also you cannot trust Vladimir Putin.
00:11:00.000 But one thing that seems really clear to me, and perhaps this is the key point.
00:11:03.000 I don't get the sense that were the West to push for a peace deal
00:11:07.000 instead of a perpetuation of war in a couple of months, we'll be hearing like,
00:11:10.000 Oh, guess what? Russia's invaded Sweden. Oh, guess what?
00:11:14.000 Russia have turned up in Sri Lanka.
00:11:16.000 I was in the Seychelles the other day.
00:11:17.000 You know what happened?
00:11:18.000 It's right.
00:11:19.000 Russia.
00:11:20.000 Russia with a bunch of bloody Houthis.
00:11:22.000 Never heard of them until a couple of years ago, but now they're right bastards.
00:11:25.000 Do you see also how we're invited not to trust our own assessment of reality?
00:11:29.000 Even the idea that this would be censored or controlled or immediately pre-framed as propaganda shows you that we're not trusted to make assessments for ourselves, that you're not capable of watching this and saying, Well, even though it's clear that this is a person with their own agenda, their own intentions, their own understanding of history, I still am going to listen because I might be able to make my own judgment.
00:11:46.000 Increasingly, from the pandemic period onward in particular, we're invited to believe that we're somehow not capable of making decisions for ourselves.
00:11:53.000 We're regarded as idiots.
00:11:55.000 or children. And when an outlier like Tucker Carlson, facilitated by Elon Musk, it grants
00:12:00.000 us the opportunity to watch for ourselves a conversation like this. They're terrified
00:12:05.000 because they're terrified that you might become disobedient, that you might not regard this
00:12:09.000 as a simple matter of Ukraine are goodies, Putin is a baddie.
00:12:13.000 We have to keep funding this.
00:12:15.000 Russia will be invading Ghana next or they'll be marching on Paris.
00:12:19.000 They want you to have that perspective.
00:12:21.000 The same as during the pandemic.
00:12:22.000 This is a template that I believe you'll see again and again.
00:12:26.000 Crisis situation, authoritarian measures in response, people generally having to fund it.
00:12:31.000 What we're at is a tipping point in public trust in significant institutions.
00:12:36.000 Can you imagine a scenario where you sent Russian troops to Poland?
00:12:40.000 Only in one case, if Poland attacks Russia.
00:12:43.000 Why?
00:12:45.000 Because we have no interest in Poland, Latvia or anywhere else.
00:12:49.000 Why would we do that?
00:12:51.000 We simply don't have any interest.
00:12:53.000 That's a key moment.
00:12:54.000 There you have to decide, is Putin a Hitler-like loony who has expansionist dreams?
00:13:00.000 What I'm saying is, when you see him say, we've got no interest in invading Latvia, do you think that he's lying Or do you think that there's a grind going on when it comes to perpetuating this war?
00:13:12.000 And I'm not saying these things just because I'm deeply cynical about NATO or globalism just because of some feeling in the pit of my stomach.
00:13:20.000 I just remember the Iraq war.
00:13:21.000 and the Afghanistan war and how these things always play out and what you find out then oh
00:13:25.000 there were no weapons of mass destruction Afghanistan was a waste of time and two trillion
00:13:29.000 dollars and American service personnel lives. We have a quite a significant wealth of experience
00:13:35.000 on which to evaluate the intentions of our own nations and for us to keep believing out of some
00:13:39.000 sort of warped patriotism, terror and infantilism in the agenda that is advanced by our own
00:13:45.000 government that is more propagandist and ridiculous.
00:13:48.000 I'm going to listen to Vladimir Putin and go, well, whilst I wouldn't exactly trust him with my own life, it's pretty plain that what he is is a Russian nativist and just doesn't want people messing with former Soviet Union territories.
00:14:01.000 And that's going to have to be solved in a sensible way.
00:14:05.000 Ukraine have their own agenda.
00:14:06.000 Suddenly, a regional dispute in which they would typically have no chance, they've got 60 billion dollars coming down the pipeline, not the Nord Stream pipeline like which Russia blew up, right?
00:14:15.000 Remember?
00:14:16.000 That could help them in a conflict that they would never otherwise be able to win.
00:14:19.000 So of course I understand that Ukrainian people would have a completely different perspective and I'm obviously very very respectful of that and surely we all ought be.
00:14:27.000 But the agenda for any sensible person should be peace.
00:14:30.000 And the only way to get peace is through diplomacy.
00:14:32.000 Well, the argument, I know you know this, is that, well, he invaded Ukraine, he has territorial aims across the continent, and you're saying, unequivocally, you don't.
00:14:42.000 It is absolutely out of the question.
00:14:45.000 You just don't have to be any kind of analyst.
00:14:48.000 It goes against common sense to get involved in some kind of a global war.
00:14:52.000 Tell that to Joe Biden!
00:14:54.000 He loves them!
00:14:54.000 He's doing one against Iran, one against the Houthis, one against Russia, looking for one against China, but Putin's the mad warmonger!
00:15:01.000 And a global war will bring all humanity to the brink of destruction.
00:15:06.000 That's another one of those things that we intuitively understand.
00:15:08.000 Hold on a minute, but won't a global war kill all of us?
00:15:10.000 That's why we feel dislocated from our leaders and from our media, because they're not saying things like, a global war is going to kill us all.
00:15:16.000 So even though this is terrible for Ukrainian people, let's end this right now.
00:15:19.000 It could have ended a year and a half ago if Boris Johnson, another globalist, hadn't trotted out there to extend it for a couple of years just because they've named a cake after him in Kiev.
00:15:27.000 I remember that detail.
00:15:28.000 It's called the Boris Johnsonuk, and here it's their bestseller.
00:15:31.000 There are certainly means of deterrence.
00:15:34.000 They have been scaring everyone with us all along.
00:15:38.000 What?
00:15:38.000 Our media?
00:15:39.000 Scaring us to make us compliant?
00:15:40.000 They would... Oh.
00:15:42.000 Tomorrow Russia will use tactical nuclear weapons.
00:15:45.000 Tomorrow Russia will use that.
00:15:48.000 No, the day after tomorrow.
00:15:50.000 So what?
00:15:54.000 In order to extort additional money from US taxpayers and European taxpayers.
00:15:59.000 Uh oh, getting pretty near the bullseye. He's above the target now. Not literally, because
00:16:03.000 he said he won't use nuclear weapons. Phew.
00:16:05.000 The goal is to weaken Russia as much as possible.
00:16:09.000 That's one of the geopolitical arguments that you'll be well familiar with if you watch
00:16:13.000 Weaken Russia.
00:16:13.000 Weaken China.
00:16:15.000 Iran have got oil.
00:16:16.000 Gag them out.
00:16:17.000 We know all this stuff because we watch independent media instead of the BBC, CNN, New York Times, all them lies that won't get done and complain.
00:16:22.000 One of our senior United States senators from the state of New York, Chuck Schumer, said yesterday, I believe, that we have to continue to fund the Ukrainian effort.
00:16:36.000 This is a provocation and a cheap provocation at that.
00:16:44.000 I do not understand why American soldiers should fight in Ukraine.
00:16:48.000 There are mercenaries from the United States there.
00:16:51.000 The bigger number of mercenaries comes from Poland, with mercenaries from the United States in second place and mercenaries from Georgia in third place.
00:17:02.000 Well, if somebody has the desire to send regular troops, that would certainly bring humanity to the brink of very serious global conflict.
00:17:11.000 This is obvious.
00:17:14.000 Do the United States need this?
00:17:16.000 What for?
00:17:17.000 America used to be like that, by the way.
00:17:19.000 It was really hard to get America to participate in the World Wars that Britain were in in the last century.
00:17:24.000 Now there's this new sort of agenda, I suppose, because America have replaced Britain as an expansionist colonial power, but she's using a corporate globalist aspect rather than the old school monarchistic one that we used.
00:17:34.000 Thousands of miles away from your national territory, Don't you have anything better to do?
00:17:41.000 Yeah, actually, I'd like to play swing ball.
00:17:43.000 You have issues on the border, issues with migration, issues with the national debt, more than 33 trillion dollars.
00:17:51.000 You have nothing better to do, so you should fight in Ukraine?
00:17:55.000 If this is one of his lookalikes, he's bloody good.
00:17:57.000 Wouldn't it be better to negotiate with Russia, make an agreement, already understanding the situation that is developing today, This is it.
00:18:05.000 This is what, in a sense, the fissure that's opened is that our interests are more in alignment with Russia's agenda than our own government's.
00:18:13.000 That's the problem.
00:18:14.000 That's what this exposes.
00:18:16.000 We have nothing in common with the institutions that lead us.
00:18:19.000 You need to take Take back control and power over your own lives.
00:18:21.000 It's been exposed by this.
00:18:23.000 Not that I believe Vladimir Putin, but the assessment of the global situation is pretty accurate.
00:18:28.000 Do you trust anyone to advocate for you?
00:18:31.000 Do you want this to carry on?
00:18:33.000 Wouldn't you rather just have a little more democracy in your own community and tolerate people that are culturally different in your own nation as long as they leave you alone?
00:18:40.000 Isn't it clear that a different vision is required and that no one's offering it to you?
00:18:44.000 Because we're living in their vision right now.
00:18:47.000 Realizing that Russia will fight for its interests to the end?
00:18:50.000 Do you know what frightens me?
00:18:51.000 That is what I thought at the beginning.
00:18:53.000 Russia just will fight for their interests till the very end, isn't it?
00:18:56.000 Like, didn't they do that against, like, France and the Austro-Hungarian Hapsburg Empire?
00:19:02.000 And didn't they do that against the Germans?
00:19:03.000 And isn't this, like, just part of what Russia is?
00:19:06.000 So aren't we gonna have to just come up with some sort of solutions to this?
00:19:08.000 And that's not a profitable mindset!
00:19:11.000 And realizing this, actually return to common sense, start respecting our country and its interests, and look for certain solutions.
00:19:19.000 They're not terrified that Vladimir Putin will lie.
00:19:22.000 They're terrified that Vladimir Putin will tell the truth, which is what he's done.
00:19:26.000 And there are some uncomfortable truths in there, but it's the truth.
00:19:29.000 It wouldn't even matter if I said Vladimir Putin is the worst person in the world, he's a propagandist, he's the new Hitler.
00:19:33.000 Fact is, he's got nuclear weapons.
00:19:35.000 You can't win a war against Russia anyway without it just going on for ages and ages and annihilating potentially billions of lives.
00:19:42.000 So, that's the only option.
00:19:44.000 And the people that are perpetuating this war know that as well, much better than I do, of course.
00:19:48.000 They've just realised...
00:19:49.000 We keep these wheels turning, we can control the domestic population, we can keep running these tax bills, funding this that gets funneled towards military industrial complex companies that people in Congress own shares in.
00:19:58.000 Like, in a world where none of that was true, like the military industrial complex was not-for-profit, people in Congress didn't own stocks and shares in those companies, people in our nations had true democratic control over policies of war, then everything would be different, wouldn't it?
00:20:11.000 Have a better understanding, a better appreciation, and we would know it was not about hypocrisy and corruption.
00:20:16.000 Particularly if there wasn't a long list of failed wars in the last 50 years that all, one way or another, amounted either to policies of dominion or policies of profit.
00:20:25.000 So you've got to decide for yourself, whose propaganda do you fundamentally accept?
00:20:30.000 Do you want to keep funding this conflict or not?
00:20:32.000 And that's what's important here, is Tucker Carlson has given the opportunity to make that decision for ourselves, and the legacy media hate it, and the establishment hate it, and what they'll do is they'll attack Tucker, they'll attack anyone who's interested in peace, because they're supporting and sustaining this machine, because actually the machine works just fine for them, but does the machine work well for you?
00:20:52.000 How's your life?
00:20:53.000 How's your grocery bills?
00:20:54.000 How's your energy bills?
00:20:55.000 How's your mental health?
00:20:56.000 How are your kids?
00:20:58.000 How are your families?
00:20:59.000 How are you getting on?
00:21:00.000 So whose agenda, whose propaganda do you want to believe in?
00:21:03.000 I'd say, for a moment, think about your own God, your own sense of yourself, your own communities, and your own values, and make a decision based on that.
00:21:10.000 But that's just what I think.
00:21:12.000 Remember, you can become a member of our community and support us because we are, believe me, pretty committed to this now.
00:21:16.000 We make extra content every week.
00:21:18.000 Click the link in the description and join us there.