In this episode, Russell Brand takes a look at the new laws passed in France and Canada, and why they seem to be designed to stifle freedom of speech and freedom of the press. He also asks the question: Is the current Prime Minister, Tony Blair, a conspiracy theorist, or is he actually a 'safe and effective' politician? And if so, will he use his position as Prime Minister to push through legislation that could have a negative impact on our health care, or will he just sit back and let the misery pile up? Stay free, and enjoy the episode! Remember, you can become a supporter of our content, get additional videos every week, and join us for conversations with journalists and put your own questions to them. Once a week, we bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr, Sam Harris, Veena Shiva, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate and many more. You'll get a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they are covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth. We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content! We'll be delivering a podcast every single day, 7 days, seven days a week. Stay Free! - The Awakening Wonderings - Bringing you in depth conversations with experts, experts, thinkers, journalists, and thinkers from all walks of life to elevate your consciousness and elevate you to the highest level of consciousness. . Thank you for listening. - Awakening Wonders. You can find us on all of the social medias, wherever you get your best listening to the things you care about you can get the most about the most important things in the most authentic, the most influential things you can find out about the world. ...and we'll get more information about what's going on in your day to help elevate your day-to-day life, your most authentic version of the world, everywhere you can access the most powerful and most influential place on the most of the best of your most influential podcast on the internet, your guide to the most effective way to your most of your social media experiences. , , your host, your daily dose of truth and information, your favourite podcast, your truth, and so on and so you can be your best chance to understand the most profound and most authentic experience and so much more!
00:00:00.000Hello there you Awakening Wonders on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you download your podcasts.
00:00:05.000We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content.
00:00:08.000We will be delivering a podcast every day, seven days a week, every single day.
00:00:13.000You'll get a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they are covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth.
00:00:23.000Once a week we bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate and many more.
00:00:31.000Now enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:34.000Remember, there's an episode every single day to educate and elevate our consciousness together.
00:00:54.000Remember you can become a supporter of our content, get additional videos every week and join us for conversations with journalists and put your own questions to them in case you don't think I ask the right questions, which I know for a fact I do.
00:01:04.000Now if you're watching this in France, don't for a second think it's possible and plausible to criticise or speak out against medications, and let's face it, it It means particularly and specifically recent gene
00:01:14.000therapies or vaccines or whatever you want to call them in that country, although you probably
00:01:19.000won't be able to call them anything soon, you certainly will not be able to criticise them.
00:01:23.000So what does it mean for the world and for France when laws are passed that seem just
00:01:27.000designed literally to prevent Pfizer's profit margin being negatively impacted?
00:01:32.000It's being called Article Pfizer because it sort of seems to literally mean, Don't Criticise Pfizer.
00:01:37.000Even though it's written in sort of vague language.
00:01:39.000Don't anyone criticise any medical measures recommended by the state?
00:01:43.000What, like people are going to say, Oh, don't take your chemotherapy, love.
00:01:46.000Or people are going to say, don't get a pacemaker fitted.
00:01:48.000Although ironically, heart disease and cancer are on the rise since around 2019, 2020 type time.
00:01:54.000I wonder why these laws are being passed.
00:01:57.000So firstly, this is a post by Dr. Kat Lindley on X. Today, a law was passed in France qualifying any opposition to mRNA LNP injections as a sectarian aberration.
00:02:07.000It carries a penalty of up to three years imprisonment and €45,000.
00:02:12.000It will not tolerate any criticism of the therapeutic treatments which will be recommended or made obligatory by the state.
00:02:17.000Any person who dares to openly criticize these therapies will be liable to fines and imprisonment.
00:02:22.000Seems like an astonishing piece of legislature.
00:02:25.000So that's what's happening in France, but over in the UK, like Macron in France, we have a globalist leader in Rishi Sunak.
00:02:32.000And even if in the next election we change leaders, guess what we're getting?
00:02:56.000Here he is, as usual, in Parliament, advocating for more stringency and analysis around the pandemic period.
00:03:02.000That's all he's asking for, and he's treated as a kind of lunatic as a result.
00:03:06.000Can the current Prime Minister think of anything he has promoted in partnership with huge businesses as safe and effective, which has ultimately harmed the British economy?
00:03:15.000You hear the murmur of globalism in the background whether it's in France, whether it's in Canada, whether it's in the UK.
00:03:20.000There is an institutional opposition to open conversation around this subject and now legislation to prevent open conversation around this subject.
00:03:27.000That's without even recourse to the censorship laws in Ireland, Canada, the UK.
00:03:48.000Mr Speaker, to what he was more broadly insinuating, let me be unequivocal from this dispatch box that Covid vaccines are safe.
00:03:56.000And in France, you can't say anything other than that.
00:04:00.000And here is Rishi Sunak on GB News being questioned by a man who says he suffered from vaccine injury, which he wouldn't be able to say in France.
00:04:09.000My name is John Watt and I'm one of the Covid vaccine injured in this country.
00:04:15.000I want you to look into my eyes whilst you're sitting back and I want you to look at the pain, the trauma, and the regret I have in my eyes.
00:04:23.000That person, in case you're not in the British Isles, is a Scottish person behaving in a very Scottish fashion.
00:04:28.000Which is to say, emotional and aggressive, full on, and in this instance, correct.
00:04:32.000We have been left with no help at all.
00:04:35.000Not only am I in here that's vaccine injured, there's another man over there whose life's been ruined by that COVID-19 vaccine.
00:04:42.000I know people who have lost legs, amputations.
00:04:46.000I know people with heart conditions like myself, Rishi Sunak.
00:04:49.000He's so Scottish that this may not remain a verbal altercation for much longer.
00:04:54.000And I say this as a man who is married to a Scottish person.
00:04:57.000Why have I had to set up a support group in Scotland to look after the people that have been affected by that Covid-19 vaccine?
00:05:05.000Why are the people who are in charge, who told us all to do the right thing, have left us all tear up?
00:05:12.000And left me and the thousands and the tens of thousands in this country to rot.
00:05:18.000We're actually going to extradite you to France right now.
00:05:21.000We were thinking Rwanda, but I think you'd be happier in France.
00:05:24.000In Scotland right now, according to the yellow card system, there are over 30,000 people that have had an adverse reaction to that vaccine and 200 deaths.
00:05:34.000John, thank you very much indeed for your question.
00:05:48.000John, I'm very sorry to hear about your personal circumstances and you said someone over here also seems to have suffered by a similar thing.
00:05:57.000Now, obviously I don't know about the individual's situation.
00:07:15.000I'm used to having difficult conversations.
00:07:17.000Like sometimes me and the wife talk about how much tax we should pay in this country and how much money Infosys should get from government contracts.
00:07:24.000And it can get quite heated sometimes because sometimes she thinks I should give a bit more.
00:07:27.000So there is a vaccine compensation scheme that's in place as you alluded to in the NHS.
00:07:32.000Obviously everyone individually will work through their cases.
00:07:35.000It's difficult for me to comment on anyone's individual case.
00:07:51.000God, I'm saddened to hear that you've been silenced.
00:07:53.000It's almost as if we've been using proxy organisations like Logically AI to shut down any dissenting voices to anyone that's critical of vaccines.
00:08:00.000It's like we've spent loads of money cleansing social media of criticism.
00:08:04.000I don't know how the hell this keeps happening.
00:08:06.000Why are all these people getting silenced?
00:08:07.000It's almost as if we're funding it from your tax money and then pretending to apologise to you on the television.
00:08:13.000So please do get your details to Stephen and the team and I will happily take that away.
00:08:18.000Get to Stephen and the team and we'll deal with that sort of, we'll never.
00:08:22.000Of course you should be able to speak about your experience, what's happened to you and as I said we have a compensation scheme in place for that and I'll make sure that we're working through that.
00:08:30.000We've got a compensation scheme for these 100% safe vaccines.
00:08:34.000Doesn't make sense really because 100% safe would mean you wouldn't need any compensation.
00:09:20.000About how best to roll out the vaccine, what was in the public health interest, the priority order, how that should be done, who should be eligible.
00:09:27.000And we got it basically wrong in every single one of those categories.
00:09:31.000That was something that the doctors recommended on.
00:09:34.000A lot of doctors were silenced and lobbied into silence and sometimes even struck off.
00:09:38.000And that's something that we followed.
00:09:40.000Now, obviously, if there are individual circumstances which haven't worked out... The phrase, haven't worked out, covers a multitude of sins there.
00:09:47.000In particular, people who took that amputation stuff.
00:10:19.000Gents, both of you, do give us your details.
00:10:22.000We will get that to the Prime Minister.
00:10:25.000And as he said, he will, I'm sure, look at that for you.
00:10:27.000In the meantime, let's move on to another question, sir.
00:10:30.000Okay, so having watched that, would you say there is room for some conversation or no conversation?
00:10:35.000Because in France, you are getting no conversation.
00:10:37.000And given that this is a globalist issue, no conversation is a problem that could be coming to a country that you live in too.
00:10:44.000So here's Brett Weinstein on the topic of France's new legislation.
00:10:48.000France has now criminalised objections to the MRNA platform, exposing those targeted to ruinous fines and imprisonment.
00:10:54.000It's obvious lunacy and that it's happening in a Western nation should alarm us all.
00:10:58.000This madness must be defeated in France, at the WHO, everywhere it arises.
00:11:03.000So what exactly is going on in France?
00:11:05.000And given there's an obvious requirement for conversation around vaccines, excess deaths, vaccine injuries, social policies during the pandemic, why are laws being passed that would prevent anybody from criticising a government-mandated In an unprecedented move that has sparked widespread debate across France and beyond, the French Parliament has recently passed a law that introduces severe penalties for those opposing mRNA LNP injections or other treatments recommended by the state based on current medical knowledge.
00:11:34.000I have to say current medical knowledge, that's in case, oh well it was the current medical knowledge then!
00:11:39.000Yeah, well guess what the current medical knowledge is?
00:11:40.000Current medical knowledge is this guy's got one less leg than he had this morning.
00:11:45.000As of today, criticism of such therapeutic treatments, when deemed obligatory or recommended by the state, could result in up to three years of imprisonment or a fine of €45,000.
00:11:54.000This bold legislative step, quickly dubbed Article Pfizer by critics, represents a significant shift in the balance between public health policy and individual freedom of expression.
00:12:03.000There's a lot of it about, isn't there?
00:12:04.000How often are we seeing government policies leading to repression or suppression of free speech?
00:12:12.000In particular, censorship specifically of content we've been making.
00:12:16.000The core of the controversy lies in the creation of a new criminal offence targeting individuals who encourage others to withhold from medical treatments that are considered appropriate according to the prevailing medical standards.
00:12:26.000They have to always have like an adjective or a caveat because they know that medicine evolves and changes.
00:12:31.000That is the nature of science, even if there is nothing malfeasant at play.
00:12:34.000The law specifically targets the resistance to mRNA treatment, positioning it as a cornerstone in the fight against future pandemics.
00:12:41.000This move has been interpreted by many as an anti-democratic maneuver stifling any opposition or critique of the state-endorsed medical treatments under the heavy hand of legal penalties.
00:12:49.000Remember, the WHO treaty would mean that your country would have to provide 5% of your health budget, that your nation would have to abide by WHO regulations, which just essentially makes it legislation, whether that's mandated medicines or lockdowns.
00:13:04.000It could be climate related or terrorism.
00:13:06.000Extraordinary bill that should be opposed.
00:13:07.000The passing of the law came with minimal debate within the parliament, a fact that has only fuelled the outrage among its detractors.
00:13:13.000Critics argue that the law not only undermines the democratic process by limiting the scope of public discourse on health policy, but also prejudges alternative medicine and potential whistleblowers who may have valid concerns about mRNA technology or other treatments.
00:13:27.000I mean, certainly it seems, doesn't it?
00:13:29.000But there are at least some valid concerns.
00:13:32.000Should there be a law that prevents those concerns being communicated?
00:13:36.000Is that what you've learned in the pandemic period?
00:13:37.000Do you know what I've learned in the pandemic period?
00:13:39.000Dissent should continue to be shut down.
00:13:41.000Expert opinion should continue to be censored.
00:13:44.000Authority should be further centralised in the favour of governments and corporations.
00:13:48.000Is that the message of the pandemic period?
00:13:50.000Because that ain't the message that I received.
00:13:52.000Labelled Article Pfizer, the law is seen as emblematic of a broader trend towards increasing state control over public health narratives and personal health choices.
00:14:01.000The nickname itself, referencing one of the major pharmaceutical companies behind the development of mRNA vaccine technology, hints at the perceived alignment between government policy and the interests of Big Pharma.
00:14:14.000Raising questions about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on health policy.
00:14:18.000Furthermore, the timing and urgency of the law's enactment, with warnings of an imminent next pandemic and the positioning of mRNA technology as the sole solution, adds layers of complexity to the debate.
00:14:28.000The law raises critical questions about where the line should be drawn between preventing harmful misinformation and preserving the right to free speech and open debate on medical treatments.
00:14:37.000As France steps into uncharted territory with the enactment of this law, the international community watches closely.
00:14:43.000The implications of such a legal framework extend beyond the borders of France, potentially setting a precedent for how governments around the world might seek to regulate public discourse on health and medical treatments in the future.
00:14:54.000In conclusion, the recent enactment of the law penalising opposition to state-recommended mRNA treatment in France Marks a significant moment in the ongoing discussion about the role of government in regulating health policy and preserving public safety.
00:15:06.000While intended to combat misinformation and protect public health, the law's critics see it as a concerning move towards limiting free speech and privileging certain medical treatments over others.
00:15:16.000As the world continues to navigate the complexities of public health in an ever-evolving landscape, the debate over Article Pfizer Serves as a point and reminder of the tensions between collective safety and individual rights.
00:15:27.000It also demonstrates that there can be no financial ties between political figures and organisations and corporations of that size and scale that you don't want when laws like this are being passed.
00:15:35.000Any sense that it could be advantageous to Pfizer's bottom line or Pfizer's agenda You also don't want to feel the sense that there's a globalist agenda in which individual nations pilot particular pieces of legislation before they become immersive, ubiquitous and total, as seems to be the case with various censorship laws around the world, and now in this one, the further oppression of free speech.
00:15:58.000There's so much misinformation about chemotherapy or heart tablets or asthma inhalers that people just start abandoning them.
00:16:05.000Has there ever been a medical emergency of this variety ever before?
00:16:08.000Do you ever recall like a huge movement opposing successful medical treatments?
00:16:14.000Of course there have always been people that are critical, cynical, sceptical and enquiring around vaccines, and if you look at some of the information available in those quarters, it certainly is interesting to review, shall we say.
00:16:25.000But the idea that the state, given their relationship with global corporations, has only your interests in mind, In order to protect you, we're going to fine you and imprison you.
00:16:38.000And having seen that bit of footage of dear globalist Rishi Sunak pilloried by members of the British public, how do you imagine the globalists regard open conversation about these subjects?
00:16:49.000If there are indeed 30,000 adverse events to discuss in the UK, is an open conversation what the establishment wants?
00:16:56.000Or do they want total control of the narrative?
00:16:58.000Why don't you look at the last couple of years and decide for yourself?
00:17:01.000What do groups that censor online social media discourse really care about?
00:17:05.000And to whose benefit is that being directed?
00:17:07.000The censorship of important and significant voices like Jay Bhattacharya.
00:17:13.000Or is it about controlling a narrative?
00:17:15.000What we've learned in particular in the ongoing discourse between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci about measures and suggestions and steps that were taken in the early pandemic period that might have been avoided and that were potentially not legitimate and certainly not successful.
00:17:28.000Do you feel that what should happen now is a raft of law should be passed around the world to make it legal for people to question and criticise?
00:17:34.000Or do you think that we should be heading in almost exactly the opposite direction?
00:17:38.000Certainly there's a need for discussion, even as the possibility for discussion is being foreclosed.
00:17:44.000Remember, you can support our content where we make additional videos that are a bit more near the knuckle because they're just for you, as well as interviews with journalists where you can pose your questions to them.
00:17:53.000Also, you'll be supporting a movement that faces incredible opposition from establishment powers.
00:17:58.000And I know that's what we ultimately need.