Stay Free - Russel Brand - January 18, 2024


Here's the News: Trump Wins Iowa & The Legacy Media Are FURIOUS!


Episode Stats

Length

25 minutes

Words per Minute

191.81937

Word Count

4,885

Sentence Count

280

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

5


Summary

On this episode of Stay Free With Russell Brand, Russell Brand reflects on the stunning victory by Donald Trump in the Iowa Caucuses, and reflects on how the legacy media are falling apart, assuming that a Trump victory in 2020 is an inevitability. He also reflects on why the mainstream media should be giving Donald Trump a more unfiltered platform, and why they should be worried that he might turn out to vote for someone other than Hillary Clinton in 2020. And, of course, he takes a look at how the establishment media are trying to delegitimize the Trump movement, and how they're doing it in order to keep us from voting for Donald Trump, who they know is going to win the 2020 election. Stay Free with Russell Brand wherever you get your podcasts, and remember there's an episode every single day to educate and elevate your consciousness together. Stay free, and enjoy the episode. Stay Free, and Stay Woke! Logo by Courtney DeKorte. Theme by Mavus Whitehead. Music by PSOVOD and tyops. Art by Ian Dorsch. We do not own the rights to either of these songs, but we do have a song written and performed by Skynet, which you can buy for free on SoundCloud, if you search for "Stay Free" on Soundcloud, we'll send you a free download of the song "Coming Soon" and it will be available on that too. . Thank you for listening to Stay Free! - Your Song of the Week: "A Good Day" by SONGS, "Coming Home" by The Good Vibes, "Let's Talk About It, "Good Vibed" by Shadydave, "Solo, Bad Vibez, "Gonna Goofy" by Ferg & Other Things (feat. & "I Don't Know What's Good? " by Squeep, "No One's Wrong, We'll Figure it Out How To Say It Out" by Mr. , "Thank You" by Gabor Mate, "Outro by Fade, "The Good Vaynerchuk, "Bennie & Gabor, " " by Gotta Have It Out, " by Vellum, " & "Let Me Say That?" by Sondor, "Alyssa & Gabbie, "Feat. " by Jeezy, " & "


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello there you Awakening Wonders on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you download your podcasts.
00:00:05.000 We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content.
00:00:08.000 We will be delivering a podcast every day, seven days a week, every single day.
00:00:13.000 You'll get a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they are covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth.
00:00:23.000 Once a week we bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate and many more.
00:00:31.000 Now enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:34.000 Remember, there's an episode every single day to educate and elevate our consciousness together.
00:00:40.000 Stay free and enjoy the episode.
00:00:55.000 And amidst the blizzards of Iowa, Trump stands triumphant.
00:01:00.000 Difficult to say that he is not popular in Iowa after an astounding victory like that.
00:01:06.000 I'm curious as well the nature of Trump's victory speech.
00:01:09.000 It is a definite modulation.
00:01:11.000 Gone is the bombast and casually attacking, dissing and cussing Donald Trump.
00:01:15.000 The more conciliatory, Nikki Haley did well, Vivek's a good guy, Donald Trump.
00:01:20.000 Extraordinary.
00:01:21.000 The legacy media are falling apart, assuming that Trump 2024 is an inevitability.
00:01:26.000 How can they maintain that Joe Biden, visibly waxing and cadaverous before our eyes, can oppose this force?
00:01:34.000 Iowa seems to be the beginning of the end for Biden.
00:01:37.000 Ten months to go yet but it seems like an insurmountable surge of popularity.
00:01:42.000 Is Trump the biggest threat American democracy faces or is he an inevitability of institutional corruption, banality and hypocrisy?
00:01:50.000 Interjector I'm sorry I just have to do a little bit of business just for a second.
00:01:53.000 Certainly one person who seems to be terrified of a Donald Trump victory and even Donald Trump verbiage is Rachel Maddow who says that Donald Trump's speeches cannot be broadcast presumably to protect us or just in case he does a misinformation or he slips out a malinformation or an untruth but of course anyone that knows anything about MSNBC knows that they regularly broadcast misinformation whether that's around the pandemic the medications that grow Throughout that era, the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop, it's just which flavour of misinformation and which flavour of authoritarianism you, or indeed they, prefer.
00:02:27.000 When you watch this, does this make Trump less appealing to you?
00:02:30.000 Or does it make him feel like some sexy elixir that can't even be shown on TV?
00:02:34.000 Particularly if you actually watch the speech where he's just like, Nikki Haley, nice lady, we understand this, well done.
00:02:40.000 I want to congratulate Ron and Nikki for having a good time together.
00:02:46.000 We're all having a good time together.
00:02:48.000 And I think they both actually did very well.
00:02:52.000 Very smart people, very capable people.
00:02:54.000 It's not like he's saying, smash the state, fight the power, blah, blah.
00:02:58.000 At this point in the evening, the projected winner of the Iowa caucuses has just started giving his victory speech.
00:03:05.000 He's not Voldemort.
00:03:06.000 We do not speak his name.
00:03:08.000 You can't name him.
00:03:10.000 The projected winner, he that must not be named, has got, oh my god, 51% of the entire vote!
00:03:16.000 Anyway, we can't broadcast his speech in case he's so damn charismatic, even dyed in the wool, liberal voters turn over.
00:03:24.000 The best thing that their liberal establishment could do right now if they wanted to damage Donald Trump is say, let me tell you something, I like Donald Trump.
00:03:30.000 You should vote for him.
00:03:32.000 You should get out there now and vote for Donald Trump.
00:03:34.000 Then it'd be like with UFOs.
00:03:36.000 What?
00:03:36.000 They're putting UFOs on the news now?
00:03:37.000 UFOs, they ain't real.
00:03:38.000 That's a hoax.
00:03:39.000 I don't know if you could make him sound any more sexy if you tried.
00:03:42.000 there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered live
00:03:47.000 platform to remarks by former president trump. I don't know if you could make him sound any more
00:03:52.000 sexy if you tried. He's somewhere between a bourbon, a new strain of cannabis and jimmy
00:03:58.000 hendrix. We cannot give you unfiltered Donald Trump. Better put some water with that Donald
00:04:03.000 Trump. He might come out and thank Vivek for a bravely fought campaign. And honestly, earnestly,
00:04:09.000 it is not an easy decision. But there is a cost to us as a news organization of knowingly
00:04:14.000 broadcasting untrue things.
00:04:17.000 Uh, Rachel?
00:04:19.000 It stops with you.
00:04:20.000 You take this thing, it stops.
00:04:21.000 Is it still on YouTube?
00:04:22.000 It's still on YouTube.
00:04:23.000 Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person.
00:04:30.000 A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else.
00:04:37.000 In a sense, we have the problem in microcosm right here.
00:04:47.000 It's not misinformation, it's misinformation that's inconvenient to the establishment.
00:04:51.000 It's not authoritarianism, it's authoritarianism that's inconvenient, if not to the establishment, their version of the establishment.
00:04:57.000 It's absurd that you show a speech by Ron DeSantis or Nikki Haley and not by Donald Trump, particularly if you've watched that speech.
00:05:03.000 It simply could have been done by Jimmy Stewart.
00:05:05.000 He's just sort of like, hey, thank you.
00:05:07.000 I'm trying my best.
00:05:08.000 It's Christmas.
00:05:09.000 We will monitor them and let you know about any news that he makes.
00:05:14.000 Also, you're giving him so much power, even if I was advising strategy.
00:05:18.000 Don't say he makes news.
00:05:19.000 Don't say he's so sexy and cool.
00:05:22.000 You're making him into an outlaw, you lunatics.
00:05:24.000 You're making him more appealing than ever.
00:05:25.000 Stop indicting him.
00:05:26.000 You're indicting him all the way to the White House.
00:05:29.000 It's because the basis of his candidacy is he's running against politics.
00:05:33.000 He's running against politicians.
00:05:35.000 He's running against policy.
00:05:36.000 He's running against the whole idea that a Congress does a thing.
00:05:39.000 In a way, I actually agree with that.
00:05:41.000 And I also feel that why would you not analyse, why would you not scrutinise, with the same degree of disdain, the activity within the Biden administration?
00:05:49.000 Why would you not say, possibly the reason that people are against politics, policy, the function of Congress, is because there has been so much corruption, so much deception.
00:05:58.000 How do we feel about the ongoing vilification of Donald Trump because, like, oh, those kids in cages?
00:06:03.000 Let's find out that Barack Obama built those cages.
00:06:05.000 How can we deal with the constant vilification of Trump because build a wall, build a wall, build a wall, when Joe Biden's gonna build that wall anyway?
00:06:12.000 The whole thing seems like hysteria, tribalism, favoritism, an inability to face the emergent id of the angry working American people.
00:06:21.000 And why are they angry?
00:06:23.000 Why are they angry?
00:06:24.000 It's because of this stuff.
00:06:26.000 In a country that has a strong man leader.
00:06:28.000 He's running for a situation in which he is the leader.
00:06:33.000 There is no government.
00:06:34.000 There isn't a policy process.
00:06:35.000 It's weird though, because Donald Trump has actually been president for four years.
00:06:39.000 So there's data available, some of which we'll share with you, about what actually happened while Donald Trump was in office.
00:06:44.000 He didn't go, right, you're all under arrest.
00:06:46.000 Okay, Don Lemon, you're out.
00:06:48.000 I mean, people weren't lined up against the wall.
00:06:50.000 What happened was is there was a rise in some jobs.
00:06:53.000 There was a fall in unemployment broadly comparable to the preceding Obama administration.
00:06:58.000 There was a lot of late night talk show riffs and gags.
00:07:01.000 it's very difficult if you ask me to make significant change within the turgid system
00:07:06.000 of conventional American politics. That's certainly my position, is you're not going
00:07:09.000 to change it that much because there's so many layers of infrastructure. Indeed, Maim
00:07:13.000 Gouri, who's a brilliant source on this and a liberal democrat, broadly speaking, he wrote
00:07:17.000 the amazing book The Revolt of the Public, said, "If you expect to become an authoritarian,
00:07:21.000 you have to wield absolute control over a key institution of government such as the
00:07:25.000 military, like Franco, Perón or Pinochet, from Spain, Argentina and Chile, of course,
00:07:29.000 a mass movement with a paramilitary wing like Lenin, Mussolini or Mao.
00:07:33.000 Neither condition applies to Donald Trump.
00:07:35.000 Every federal institution is ferociously set against him.
00:07:38.000 What would happen if Trump ordered the FBI or the 101st Airborne Division to start shooting Democrats?
00:07:43.000 It's ridiculous.
00:07:44.000 Donald Trump does not have a paramilitary wing at Mar-a-Lago.
00:07:47.000 The hysteria around Trump has reached a pitch where you have to ignore it.
00:07:51.000 From the same article, Martin Gurry, what kind of person becomes an authoritarian?
00:07:54.000 Well, it may look like fun, but authoritarianism is really hard work.
00:07:57.000 You need to be in the prime of life in your 30s or 40s like Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, Mao and Castro.
00:08:03.000 Very rarely an exceptional person such as Julius Caesar is granted literal dictatorship.
00:08:07.000 The Romans invented the entire idea in his early 50s.
00:08:11.000 So there you are.
00:08:11.000 And isn't it more likely Basically, the reason that Trump is so appealing is because of his vitality, vivacity, rhetorical skill, ability to reach the emotional heart of Americans everywhere, and because what the Democrats are telling you the solution is a waxen cadaverous near-zombie in the form of Joe Biden, who had this to say.
00:08:30.000 Looks like Donald Trump just won Iowa.
00:08:32.000 He's the clear frontrunner for the other side at this point.
00:08:34.000 But here's the thing.
00:08:35.000 This election was always going to be you and me against extreme MAGA Republicans.
00:08:39.000 It was true yesterday and it'll be true tomorrow.
00:08:41.000 In short, the legacy media and the establishment themselves are doubling down on the idea that this is an extremist movement rather than a populist one.
00:08:48.000 Populist is opposite to extremist.
00:08:50.000 It means it's spread out across a vast population.
00:08:54.000 If we are worried about the rise of authoritarianism in this country, we are worried about the potential rise of fascism in this country.
00:09:00.000 We're worried about our democracy falling to an authoritarian and potentially fascist form of government.
00:09:06.000 It's all black people that have worked within the Democrat Party, all people that are clearly affiliated with the Democrat Party, sort of pretending to be the sort of goodies, and this is the sober, sombre analysis.
00:09:17.000 But really, this is just more hysteria, more propaganda.
00:09:21.000 People have seen through that now.
00:09:22.000 What they are doing is making the situation much, much worse, continually.
00:09:27.000 And the American electorate is made up of two major parties.
00:09:31.000 One of those parties has been flirting with extremism on the ultra-right for a very long time.
00:09:37.000 They've brought them in in a way that they haven't been central to Republican electoral politics ever before, and I know because I've been studying this.
00:09:44.000 It's very interesting to make such sweeping statements about taxonomies and use terms like extreme right while simultaneously indulging post-structuralist ideas like there's no such thing as identity or masculinity or femininity, all ideas that I'm absolutely open to in the infinite morasses and molasses of space.
00:10:00.000 But if you say there is an absolute thing called extreme right rather than democracy, because what's just happened is a Republican candidate has gone up against a bunch of other Republican candidates in Iowa and every single district has gone, that guy!
00:10:12.000 That's, I think, democracy.
00:10:14.000 And yes, Trumpism is sometimes what we call it.
00:10:17.000 MAGA movement is probably a better way to do it.
00:10:19.000 But there is an authoritarian movement inside Republican politics that isn't being bamboozled by Trump.
00:10:25.000 They are pushing Trump to get more and more extreme, because the more extreme things he says, The more they adhere to it, yeah.
00:10:33.000 And that is coming from a very large proportion of the American right that adheres to the Republican Party.
00:10:39.000 And that's why this is a Republican Party problem more than it is the problem of one man and his leader.
00:10:43.000 Doesn't that tie together the— Prior to Trump, we had four years of Obama.
00:10:48.000 Since Trump, we've had four years of Biden.
00:10:51.000 If Trump is as extreme as the legacy media are saying, surely we will have seen extreme fluctuations and extreme changes.
00:11:00.000 Let's compare some of the data between these administrative periods and see if there's another reason why the Democrat Party might have gone into decline.
00:11:08.000 Looking at the three years before COVID-19 made a mess of things, the US economy under Trump performed about the same as it had during the last three years under President Obama.
00:11:16.000 The last three years of President Obama's administration saw an increase of 8.1 million jobs and a 2% point drop in the overall unemployment rate, decreasing from 6.2% in 2014 to 4.9% at the end of 2016.
00:11:28.000 Under Trump, the number of jobs increased by 6.5 million in his first three years and unemployment dropped from 4.4% to 3.7%.
00:11:35.000 Similar.
00:11:35.000 Comparable.
00:11:39.000 Not a massive swing in either direction.
00:11:42.000 So whether you're fervently pro-Donald Trump and you love him and his charisma and his easy style, or if you love Barack Obama and his classiness or whatever, you have to say that looking at these numbers, it's not that different, is it really?
00:11:55.000 After losing the 2016 presidential election to Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton variously blamed WikiLeaks, Bernie Sanders, misogynistic voters, white women, former FBI Director James Comey, and above all, the Russian government for her defeat.
00:12:08.000 And certainly the legacy media that won't show Donald Trump's victory speech in Iowa supported all of those stories pretty vociferously.
00:12:16.000 Many of her supporters, not least those in the media, leapt to embrace her excuses.
00:12:20.000 Just as many of Trump's supporters convinced themselves that the Biden campaign stole the 2020 election from their candidate, Democrats have found comfort in explanations for their failures that place the blame on others.
00:12:31.000 But Clinton's 2016 defeat, in fact, was the culmination of a slow decay that first took hold within the Democratic Party half a century ago.
00:12:40.000 So, none of these problems are being addressed.
00:12:42.000 None of the scrutiny that's being applied to Trump, and even if Trump goes, and is he authoritarian, and what will he do if he wins in 2024?
00:12:49.000 No one's saying, should we have a look at this party that we're unquestioningly supporting 24 hours a day?
00:12:54.000 What are they doing?
00:12:56.000 What have they done?
00:12:57.000 If this guy's so bad, why is it that we have to ban him in order to defeat him?
00:13:01.000 Surely you would just go, do you want this guy?
00:13:03.000 Or, you know, like, apparently he's so bloody charismatic, intoxicating and alluring, you can't even show him giving a polite appraisal of an Iowa caucus without all of us sort of losing our minds and following him into the forests.
00:13:15.000 The Democrats today are increasingly becoming a party of upwardly mobile professionals and creatives.
00:13:20.000 The party has shed much of its traditional working class base, which has started to show up in its legislative priorities.
00:13:26.000 When you look at that panel of people, do you think, oh, these are working class Americans, these speak to ordinary working class people.
00:13:34.000 You see Rachel Maddow or Jen Psyche, I don't know anything about their backgrounds.
00:13:36.000 They might be from blue collar backgrounds, they might.
00:13:38.000 But they don't appear to be talking about, I don't know, fuel costs or infrastructural failure
00:13:43.000 or the deterioration of American society or many of the issues that, from what I gather,
00:13:47.000 concern ordinary American people.
00:13:50.000 The white working class exodus from the party has been particularly severe,
00:13:53.000 putting states like Ohio, which former President Barack Obama won twice,
00:13:58.000 out of reach for the party.
00:13:59.000 In 2020, less than a third of white working men, the very backbone of the old New Deal coalition, voted for Biden.
00:14:06.000 And that was an improvement over the meagre 23% of white working men who backed Hillary in 2016.
00:14:10.000 In the 1990s, the Democrats were in free fall.
00:14:14.000 After losing the biggest landslide election in American history to Reagan, they had suffered 12 straight years of Republican control of the White House.
00:14:21.000 Much of their industrial white working class base had defected to the GOP, alienated both by the cultural radicalism of the new left professional activists who had commandeered the party's intellectual infrastructure, and by a democratic economic ideology that was increasingly indistinguishable from that of the Republicans.
00:14:38.000 I think we all remember that Bill Clinton primarily became out, look it's going to be basically the same steps, I've got a saxophone and there's going to be some crazy stuff going on in the Oval Office kids!
00:14:49.000 Desperate for a new strategy, Democratic operatives formed a centrist pro-business network called the Democratic Leadership Council to build the Democrats back into a nationally competitive political party again.
00:14:59.000 Similar things happened in our country under Tony Blair.
00:15:02.000 And similarly, it's created a kind of homogenized political space where no one feels that they really identify, I think, with either party.
00:15:09.000 I don't think there's anyone that's passionate about like, I really love them.
00:15:12.000 There is no British equivalent to Trump, even, where you'd go, oh, this guy really is speaking to ordinary British people.
00:15:18.000 It's just a banalised space of career politicians who you feel would prefer to be at Davos than in Parliament.
00:15:24.000 The DLC sought to co-opt the Republicans on economic growth and free trade while countering the New Left's radicalising influence on the party's social and cultural agenda.
00:15:33.000 The DLC found a perfect champion in Bill Clinton, when he wasn't on holiday.
00:15:38.000 Clinton was a free market true believer with enough affinity to the politics of the 60s to bring the new democratic intelligentsia under his wing.
00:15:45.000 As a candidate that corporate CEOs and former student revolutionaries alike could get behind, Clinton forged a new electoral majority and brought the Democrats back into the White House.
00:15:55.000 And from an outsider's perspective, it seemed like, oh, this guy is really charismatic and good in front of a camera and people seem to like him, rather than this person is invested in serving American people.
00:16:05.000 It was part of the show businessification of American and subsequently British politics.
00:16:11.000 Where, oh, as long as you've got someone who's good on camera and sounds alright, it doesn't really matter what they believe in.
00:16:16.000 And I think that Clinton was like that, Obama's like that in our country, Blair's like that.
00:16:20.000 They say a bunch of stuff and seem kind of lovely when you're looking at them and listening to them.
00:16:24.000 And then it comes to, like, the 2008 crash and they're like, Wall Street, we're on your side, baby.
00:16:29.000 And that has made ordinary people think...
00:16:31.000 I don't trust this lot.
00:16:32.000 Donald Trump, as Dave Chappelle is fond of saying, came out and goes, you know that stuff you think we're doing in there?
00:16:36.000 That is what we're doing.
00:16:37.000 I know all these tax loopholes because I use them.
00:16:39.000 He said, I know the system is rigged because I use it.
00:16:43.000 I said, God damn!
00:16:45.000 All of her donors is using me like oh my god this is amazing if you can't see
00:16:49.000 why that would be appealing after the preceding 20 or 30 years then that's a deep
00:16:54.000 strain of myopia that is a much more likely the problem than Donald Trump's evident charisma.
00:16:59.000 In office however Clinton bungled his careful balancing act.
00:17:03.000 In his campaign he had purported to speak for the forgotten middle class.
00:17:06.000 But as president, he seemed to speak more loudly for Wall Street.
00:17:08.000 He pushed for NAFTA, the founding of the World Trade Organization, financial deregulation, and permanent normal trade relations with China.
00:17:16.000 China.
00:17:17.000 In part, thanks to Republican overreach, Clinton persevered through two terms in the White House.
00:17:17.000 China.
00:17:22.000 But his new Democrat rebrand did nothing to bring white working class voters back to the party.
00:17:27.000 Eight years later, Barack Obama met and even surpassed Clinton's electoral success, but likewise failed to stem the blue-collar bleeding for the long term.
00:17:35.000 And again, in office, doubled down on the betrayal of ordinary people, legislated for and governed for elite and establishment interests.
00:17:43.000 The kind of perspective that you probably have and that I have is of like, you can't trust these people.
00:17:46.000 And when Rachel Maddow says they're anti-political candidates, that's why that's happened.
00:17:51.000 Because I made my bones publicly in my country, the UK, saying there's no point voting for anyone on a political TV show.
00:17:57.000 You can't trust any of them.
00:17:58.000 They're all the same.
00:17:59.000 I basically said that.
00:18:00.000 We know it's not going to make any difference.
00:18:00.000 Why vote?
00:18:02.000 We know that already.
00:18:03.000 I say when there is a genuine alternative, a genuine option, then vote for that.
00:18:07.000 But until then...
00:18:08.000 Don't bother.
00:18:09.000 There was a lot of outrage and controversy around it at the time, absurdly enough, but now I know we are the biggest constituency.
00:18:15.000 Elsewhere in there, Rachel Maddow says that America is made up of Republicans and Democrats.
00:18:19.000 No, it isn't.
00:18:20.000 People are just like, oh, is this what we've got to deal with?
00:18:22.000 That's why RFK is polling so spectacularly, because there's a significant number of people in your country, in my country, and I think across the world, that want something actually different.
00:18:31.000 Obama twice ran on an even more explicitly populist message than Clinton, but like Clinton, staffed his cabinet and administration with Wall Street ideologues.
00:18:40.000 We've seen that happen again and again.
00:18:42.000 We've seen people under Biden from Big Pharma getting jobs, from Wall Street getting jobs, from Big Tech getting jobs, and all these contracts being awarded.
00:18:48.000 We know what the game is now.
00:18:49.000 That's the real problem here.
00:18:50.000 This is why I think Rachel Maddow and the legacy media have to amplify their hysteria, because so many of us now go, Yeah, but it doesn't really make any difference.
00:18:57.000 You can't trust any of these people.
00:18:59.000 They're all in the clutches of establishment interests.
00:19:01.000 And now we have to go, no, no, the Democratic does mean something.
00:19:05.000 Congress does mean something.
00:19:06.000 Don't you dare invade the Capitol.
00:19:08.000 They have to sort of invest it with meaning because the meaning is drained out of it because of conduct, because of behavior, because of history, because of what we've all seen.
00:19:14.000 This betrayal was even starker than it was with his predecessor, coming as it did in the immediate wake of the global financial collapse.
00:19:21.000 Obama prosecuted no high-level financial executives for the crimes that led to the meltdown, and allowed his Wall Street advisors to mismanage his economic recovery plans.
00:19:29.000 Unlike Clinton, he succeeded in creating the Democrats' long-sought universal health insurance program, but the law was a barely coherent patchwork of regulations written by healthcare lobbyists, which provided inadequate subsidies and drove up premiums for millions of middle-class Americans who weren't covered by their employers.
00:19:45.000 Again and again you hear pledges and promises made.
00:19:47.000 We beat Big Pharma this year.
00:19:48.000 We beat Big Pharma this year.
00:19:50.000 WE BEAT PHARMA THIS YEAR!
00:19:51.000 And then you find out that what it means is a few drugs are going to be capped from 2025 or whatever.
00:19:57.000 Or that no one is prosecuted for Wall Street.
00:19:59.000 Or healthcare is actually quite sort of temperate really.
00:20:03.000 Since the meaning has drained out of the type of politics that Rachel Maddow is advocating for.
00:20:08.000 So anyone that is anti that is more appealing.
00:20:12.000 That's my analysis.
00:20:12.000 And that's why the results are in every single district in Iowa against Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley, Donald Trump all the way.
00:20:18.000 And based on that, he's going to be the candidate.
00:20:21.000 And I would say similarly, based on that and looking at the total lack of trust in Joe Biden, even among Democrat voters, 69% of them say that Biden does not have the mental sharpness to be president.
00:20:32.000 It's unlike It's likely that Biden can beat Trump fairly.
00:20:36.000 Hillary Clinton shared Obama's reverence for Wall Street, but none of his talent for pretending to be a populist.
00:20:41.000 Indeed, she didn't even try.
00:20:42.000 Instead, she ran a campaign that was explicitly scornful of white working-class voters, maligning them as racists and misogynists.
00:20:48.000 In sharp contrast to Obama's unifying message, Clinton directly appealed to the identity-based grievances of various constituency groups largely centered in the prosperous post-industrial metropolitan regions of the country.
00:21:00.000 While accusing her opponent Donald Trump of campaigning on hate, she ran the most polarizing campaign in living memory.
00:21:06.000 Clinton rallied the educated professionals of the new American knowledge economy to her side by leading their culture war against the denizens of the dying manufacturing towns and agricultural rural and ex-urban swathes of the country that had been emptied of jobs and stripped of community and social purpose by decades of
00:21:22.000 de-industrialisation championed by both parties. In that paragraph you get an
00:21:26.000 economic understanding of the social realities that have led to Donald Trump's rise and the
00:21:30.000 deterioration of the Democrat party.
00:21:33.000 And in a character like Clinton with her inability to reach people through charisma,
00:21:36.000 the problem becomes calcified because prior to her there was Obama and Clinton, Bill Clinton,
00:21:42.000 who knew how to perform on camera and Donald Trump knows how to do that.
00:21:46.000 And if you look at even his Iowa victory speech, it looks like he's adopting a more conciliatory tone, and I would suggest learning the lessons of the Robert F. Kennedy campaign, that there's a lot of anti-establishment people out there that aren't down with the high revs type of aggressive populist politics but open for a kind of convivial,
00:22:05.000 conciliatory, statesman-like return to anti-establishment populism that's somewhat more
00:22:11.000 inclusive. Certainly that seemed like a different side of Donald Trump in that speech. She couldn't
00:22:15.000 have been a more useful foil for Trump if she had tried. While frequently spilling over into
00:22:20.000 hyperbole or even outright bigotry, Trump merely played the other side of the culture war
00:22:24.000 Clinton was waging. He lambasted the professional class's moral crusades on immigration, race
00:22:29.000 and criminal justice as cynically as Clinton celebrated them. But he also excoriated the free market
00:22:35.000 orthodoxies of both parties, a critique that resonated with every working and middle-class
00:22:40.000 voter who had lived through the Great Recession. Trump embraced
00:22:43.000 protectionism.
00:22:44.000 and an industrial policy to restore American manufacturing.
00:22:47.000 He rallied against the cultural elites, especially their loudest spokespeople in the media,
00:22:52.000 and white working class voters, including ones who had voted twice for Obama, rewarded him for it.
00:22:58.000 This isn't the kind of analysis that you see on legacy media, is it?
00:23:01.000 Because it's inconvenient.
00:23:02.000 And one of the things I've had cause to reflect on lately is Albert Mays's famous claim that
00:23:07.000 tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance.
00:23:09.000 Well, the nuance is always stripped away in this new puritanical establishment legacy media
00:23:15.000 propagandist machine.
00:23:16.000 When they're talking about Trump, it's always He's dangerous, he's racist, he's awful.
00:23:20.000 They don't describe the circumstances of his rise, they don't describe his appeal, they don't describe their own culpability, they don't describe why they cannot amend and adjust because of their affiliations and funding and because of lobbying and because they're ultimately owned by financial interests comparable to the financial interests that have traditionally owned the Republican Party.
00:23:38.000 They can't have those conversations so there's nothing they can do except continually condemn Donald Trump, continually Lambast anyone who might be interested in Donald Trump's appeal without ever addressing the causes of this problem.
00:23:50.000 It was principally Trump's mishandling of the coronavirus pandemic that led to his loss to Joe Biden, who in his campaign distanced himself from the avant-garde professional class social justice politics that had come to dominate his party.
00:24:02.000 Democrats hoped that Biden's everyman appeal might win back some working class voters to the party.
00:24:07.000 That hasn't happened.
00:24:08.000 In fact, now the Democrats are losing non-white working class voters.
00:24:13.000 Every election cycle, Democrats lose more and more of this demographic.
00:24:16.000 Despite his virulently anti-immigrant rhetoric between 2016 and 2020, Trump gained support among Latino voters.
00:24:24.000 Joe Biden did 16 points worse among Latinos than Hillary Clinton had four years earlier.
00:24:28.000 The Democrats have an increasingly tenuous hold on the Asian vote, and their support even from black non-college educated voters has begun to slip.
00:24:36.000 As of last summer, Biden fell short of earning the support of a majority of non-white voters without a college degree.
00:24:42.000 A third of these voters prefer Trump.
00:24:44.000 Today, the Democrats and the Republicans are virtually tied in voters' perception of which party is best for the middle class.
00:24:51.000 Americans as a whole no longer take the Democrats for granted as the party that fights for ordinary people and are just as likely to regard the Republicans as such.
00:24:59.000 This is a historical sea change.
00:25:01.000 So you have a historical result in Iowa where Donald Trump, the most indicted president in history, is on the rise.
00:25:09.000 You have a Democrat party that is flailing.
00:25:11.000 You have a legacy media that is unwilling and unable to offer a mere culper.
00:25:16.000 You have a Democrat party that's unwilling To give a meaningful and viable candidate at this point.
00:25:21.000 So the way things look after the Iowa caucus is Trump victory 2024.
00:25:27.000 But that's just what I think!