The Wuhan lab leak was probably real. Deep state agencies helped to downplay it, and maybe cover it up. The COVID inquiry in the UK only asks questions that are basically irrelevant in an attempt to continue to control the narrative. Otherwise, why do they ask about the lab leak? Why don t they ask whether or not lockdowns were successful? Is it because they plan to use these techniques, lockdowns in particular, again? And if they ever get anywhere near the truth, people will go, that s not what we're discussing. What's needed is a true reckoning because as conspiracy theories become conspiracy facts, we're awakening to the role of independent media and independent politics. And the establishment can't allow that to happen. They can t allow the truth to be heard, and if they do, they'll amplify establishment messages and not tell you the truth about what's going on in the world and in their everyday lives. - This episode is brought to you by AWakening Wonders, a podcast that educates and elevates our consciousness to elevate our consciousness together. Stay free, and enjoy the ride. - Rachit Vaidyanathan. If you like what you hear, please leave us a five star review on Apple Podcasts and we'll be giving you a shoutout on the next episode of AWakened Wonders. We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content that's better than that! - Rachel Maddow, Jordan Peterson, Sam Harris, Veena Shiva, Gabor Mate, and many more. - R.K. Jr., Sam Harris. And many more! - Raffael Fauci Jr., Jr., etc. - The Dark Side of the Story? - The Truth is Out There? We bring you in depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson? - And a podcast delivering the truth that s better than the rest of the stuff you need to know about it? And so on and so on... - And so much more. R. is a podcast delivered by R. Is it possible to help you get a chance to know the truth and more? . So help us make it so that you can be more like that? , can you help us help us do it so it can be so that we can help you be better like that, can you be more of that, right in a place that helps us do that, more like it?
00:00:00.000Hello there you Awakening Wonders on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you download your podcasts.
00:00:05.000We really appreciate you, our listeners, and want to bring you more content.
00:00:08.000We will be delivering a podcast every day, seven days a week, every single day.
00:00:13.000You'll get a detailed breakdown of current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, but if they are covering, they're amplifying establishment messages and not telling you the truth.
00:00:23.000Once a week we bring you in-depth conversations with guests like Jordan Peterson, RFK Jr, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate and many more.
00:00:31.000Now enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:34.000Remember, there's an episode every single day to educate and elevate our consciousness together.
00:00:57.000Deep state agencies helped to downplay it and maybe even cover it up.
00:01:02.000The COVID inquiry in the UK only asks questions that are basically irrelevant in an attempt to continue to control the narrative.
00:01:09.000Otherwise, why don't they ask about the lab leak?
00:01:11.000Why don't they ask whether or not lockdowns were successful?
00:01:14.000Is it because they plan to use these techniques, lockdowns in particular, again?
00:01:21.000Hello there you Awakening Wonders, thanks for joining me on this voyage to truth and freedom.
00:01:25.000And it's a voyage where we have to avoid avalanches of deception, step over landmines of pure lies.
00:01:31.000In the UK they're conducting a Covid inquiry but it's a very managed affair.
00:01:35.000Also there are continuing revelations about Wuhan, the safety in that laboratory, the degree to which US health agencies are Let me know in the chat in the comments if you think that's what's happened and if you've noticed that when there's inquiries they deliberately only ask questions that lead down blind alleys.
00:02:01.000Of course the COVID inquiry in the UK wouldn't be happening without independent media voices and independent minds like yours.
00:02:07.000That's why the COVID inquiry will be a facade, a charade, Limited to just condemning one or two bad actors and one or two earnest mistakes.
00:02:15.000What's needed is a true reckoning because as conspiracy theories become conspiracy facts, we're awakening to the role of independent media and independent politics and the necessity for radical change.
00:02:28.000So let's have a look at the most recent revelations around Wuhan and the fact that it's been deliberately downplayed.
00:02:33.000And then we'll have a little look at some episodes from the UK COVID inquiry and you'll note how muted it is.
00:02:38.000And if they ever get anywhere near the truth, people go, that's not what we're discussing.
00:02:42.000Top US health official has admitted he and a team of other leading scientists deliberately chose to downplay suggestions the COVID-19 pandemic originated in a Chinese lab leak.
00:02:53.000You and Fauci in those discussions just wanted to turn the rhetoric down.
00:03:01.000The doco what really happened in Wuhan the next chapter also exposes extensive attempts to make the public think it was a natural virus.
00:03:09.000For a moment try to recall the passionate enthusiasm around Anthony Fauci at that time.
00:03:15.000The late night talk show parades, people dressed in vaccine costumes, the oh thank god for Fauci because you know Trump's such a lunatic.
00:03:23.000When you analyse that news coverage now, there are a lot more questions that emerge.
00:03:27.000If Fauci and the NIH deliberately intervened to suppress and control that information, why was it they were doing that?
00:03:34.000What are the financial ties between the NIH and the pharmaceutical industry?
00:03:37.000What other information is being concealed?
00:03:39.000What health measures at Wuhan were ignored?
00:03:41.000Where does Wuhan get its funding from?
00:03:43.000Why was it so important to control that narrative?
00:03:45.000Why are these questions still not able to be asked?
00:03:48.000That's before we get into the area of adverse injuries and excess deaths and the impact of lockdown and the efficacy of lockdown and how quickly it was understood that lockdown wouldn't work and the voices in science like Peter McCulloch and Jay Bhattacharya that said from the beginning that lockdown would not All these questions were being asked by some people at the beginning of the pandemic and that information and those questions were censored by the same interests that are right now saying you should be able to censor information because of hate speech in Ireland, you should be able to censor in the UK because of safety, you should be able to censor in the EU because of hate speech or whatever it is.
00:04:29.000They are desperate To prevent these kind of conversations and this kind of connection taking place because it is a threat to their control.
00:04:36.000So the COVID inquiry will be a kind of performance and information will be meted out, dribbled out as slowly as possible so that we as a population, we as people, don't have the chance to organize or properly respond because the information just comes out so slowly, discredited, slowed down, bogged down in controversy, like they did at the beginning of the pandemic, like they're still trying to do right now.
00:04:58.000So US Chief Medical Officer Anthony Fauci, at the time of course, what did he stand to gain by covering it up?
00:05:05.000Well his agency had been among several United States agencies that were funding the research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
00:05:14.000So Robert Kadlec, that health official, told us last night that Fauci would have been concerned for his own reputation and that of his institute.
00:05:22.000If you'd said that those agencies were involved in the funding of Wuhan and that it was likely that the virus had emerged from the laboratory in early 2020, or midway through 2020, you would have been kicked off the internet.
00:05:36.000You might even have been dragged out of your home.
00:05:38.000If you'd have said, I wonder if these lockdowns work, I wonder if these masks work, that was akin to saying, you might as well fly a confederate flag.
00:05:46.000That's the way that this was conveyed in the mainstream media.
00:05:49.000Now, what they're saying is, that was correct.
00:05:51.000If it eventuated that his agency had funded the very research that sparked this pandemic, and that is a live possibility.
00:05:59.000That was one of the worst conspiracy theories.
00:06:02.000Hey, what if Anthony Fauci is involved in the funding of the very research that led to the outbreak?
00:06:07.000Why on earth would someone go to incredible lengths to cover that up?
00:06:10.000And if we don't learn the lessons, if we don't start to regulate this very risky gain of function
00:06:15.000research in laboratories globally, we could have another pandemic happen again. And that's what
00:06:21.000the experts I speak to in this documentary warn. Now, the reason I think that this is connected
00:06:26.000to the COVID inquiry in the UK and the lack of significant inquiry within that inquiry is
00:06:32.000because they are still trying to keep their powder dry in a number of ways.
00:06:35.000One, they don't want to entirely discredit the government, which is basically what should happen.
00:06:38.000Not just, oh, this party or these few individuals.
00:06:40.000entire institution. They don't want to entirely discredit the legacy media, which is totally
00:06:45.000what should happen, and they don't want to prevent the opportunity of imposing those
00:06:49.000measures again for a variety of reasons, because remember right now the WHO are pushing for
00:06:54.000a treaty that would enable them to impose those measures on any member country in the
00:06:58.000event of another pandemic, and the description or criteria for what a pandemic could be is
00:07:02.000pretty loose, let me tell you. It would include giving them the ability to tax your country
00:07:06.000or take tax from your country and to impose medical measures like vaccines or what they
00:07:10.000call vaccines. This is not stuff I'm making up, this is simply stuff that in a few years
00:07:15.000you might be able to watch on the legacy media, if the legacy media have to report on this
00:07:19.000stuff because an independent media pushes them. If the censorship laws that are currently
00:07:22.000being pushed are all successful, then the legacy media will not report on this stuff.
00:07:26.000They only report on this stuff because independent media forces it.
00:07:30.000We've narrowed down two scientists in China whose actual research might have started COVID-19.
00:07:37.000We explain in this documentary how it could have been their work.
00:07:41.000One of them, a Chinese military scientist, was working on a vaccine for COVID-19 back in October 2019.
00:07:49.000And his research could have led to the pandemic.
00:07:51.000He was then believed to be killed by the Chinese People's Liberation Army.
00:08:05.000That it was actually a weapon, that it's actual biotechnology that was being used potentially to create weapons, like in RFK's book that was basically banned when it was the number one seller in the New York Times.
00:08:15.000They just went, there is no number one this week.
00:08:31.000Apparently, there have been concerns about safety in the Wuhan Institute of Virology for some time that was well reported and well understood, extraordinarily, and suspicions that this research is actually about bio-weaponry.
00:08:44.000Which, when I first heard it a couple of years ago, I was like, oh no, that's a little bit far-fetched.
00:08:51.000That UFOs are real and that the government killed JFK?
00:08:54.000What my article uncovers is a almost decade-long trail of warnings issued by the Department of Energy to the National Institutes of Health and other government agencies This is significant because it's a report from Vanity Fair.
00:09:11.000When this stuff was first reported on, it was like just passed around on the periphery of the internet.
00:09:15.000The sort of thing that you would get kicked off of social media for.
00:09:18.000These are the kind of arguments that the misinformation, disinformation bills are based on.
00:09:22.000We can't have all this misinformation around COVID.
00:09:25.000It's going to cost people their lives.
00:09:26.000The misinformation was the stuff that the legacy media was peddling.
00:09:30.000I don't want to be reductive, but I do want to draw your attention to the significance of the repression of the Wuhan lab leak.
00:09:38.000And remember, we're still not at the point where the legacy media are able to talk about excess deaths and adverse events as a result of certain medications.
00:09:46.000So imagine where we're going to get to.
00:09:48.000About the risks of what's called dual use research of concern.
00:09:53.000That biology research that was being funded by the National Institutes of Health overseas could be misappropriated and possibly used for harm.
00:10:07.000Even when we were reporting on UFOs, we noted that the CIA retrieve crashed UFOs and then give them to Lockheed Martin because Lockheed Martin don't have to keep as detailed records as government agencies.
00:10:20.000Look here at this curious relationship between the NIH and foreign research laboratories for dual use products.
00:10:27.000We are already so deep into conspiracy theory territory of 20 months ago that a COVID inquiry in the UK would have to be asking questions like, is this a bioweapon?
00:10:45.000This is to aid the transition of power from one political party to another political party and say, well, that's that all dealt with.
00:10:51.000Guess where we'll be in a couple of years.
00:10:53.000But those warnings got even more specific As close to the pandemic as mid-2019, when the Deputy Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette warned an associate and advisor to Dr. Anthony Fauci specifically about the coronavirus research that was being funded at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
00:11:20.000Is it me or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?
00:11:29.000For those who are in the United States, there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
00:11:34.000American Heart for Gold make it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.
00:11:40.000With one phone call, they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.
00:11:50.000American Hartford Gold is the highest-rated firm in the US with an A-plus rating from the BBB and thousands of satisfied clients.
00:11:57.000Right now, they will give you up to $5,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.
00:12:16.000Get up to $5,000 of silver and protect your future in this crazy,
00:12:20.000crazy world with some solid, precious metals, literally made in stars.
00:12:24.000You know, the concern was that there were basically tools and techniques being used in that research that could be
00:12:35.000potentially misappropriated for military use or for malign use by the Chinese government.
00:12:44.000So I think what's significant here is that, you know, that research as well as the kind of research being funded was really of contention for almost a decade before the pandemic even began.
00:12:58.000For ten years prior to the pandemic, people were going, you shouldn't be doing this, this is dangerous.
00:13:05.000At very best, this shows incredible ineptitude and a connection between the NIH and Anthony Fauci prior to the pandemic and the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
00:13:16.000We also know, it seems as a result of other whistleblowers, that Fauci went around various agencies saying, hey, listen, when you're reporting on this, don't talk about the lab leak theory.
00:13:31.000Look at where we are now and contrast that with the mealy mouth and limited questions that emerge in the inquiry.
00:13:37.000Could that be because ultimately the establishment is one mechanic and these legacy media interests, state interests, these government agency interests all align.
00:13:44.000And if people got the Actual information that they should be privy to.
00:13:50.000We would become non-compliant and disobedient and would demand real change.
00:13:55.000One of the scientists who stood alongside Boris Johnson in those Covid briefings night after night during the pandemic has questioned how much the then Prime Minister understood of what was actually going on.
00:14:07.000Chief Scientific Advisor at the time, Sir Patrick Vallance, wrote in his diaries back then that Mr Johnson was bamboozled by the graphs Oh, so it's Boris Johnson.
00:14:22.000Well, we've got rid of him now, so everything's OK.
00:14:24.000Currently, we've got a prime minister whose wife has strong connections to the WEF, who happens to have invested in a hedge fund that invested in Moderna.
00:14:32.000What they're presenting you is a paradigm where it's suggested you can solve this problem by shuffling the individuals within the very system that caused the problem.
00:14:42.000We were not as well prepared as we should have been.
00:14:46.000This is a British politician answering questions in the inquiry.
00:14:51.000There is a significant body of judgment that believes that the virus itself was man-made.
00:15:04.000Let's shut that down pretty swiftly because otherwise, hold on a minute, if it was man-made, it was made in a lab, can't trust the pharmaceutical industry, funded by Anthony Fauci, they did the lockdown anyway, we turned that guy into a hero, can't trust the state, can't trust the system, gonna need to dismantle the machinery of democracy and have to create new democratic communities that are decentralised but, you know, No, no, wait!
00:15:29.000Just answer these simple questions and we'll blame one or two bad apples and carry on with what we do best, tyrannizing people with lies and deception.
00:15:37.000So, let's look at how the system maintains control and maintains narratives even while conducting inquiries.
00:15:44.000And I would say that the point of the inquiry is to achieve the impression of inquiry rather than inquiry itself.
00:15:49.000Look at the information that's already available.
00:15:51.000Look at how that information was repressed and controlled.
00:15:53.000Oh yeah, we were trying to help, we were trying to help.
00:15:55.000Well, in trying to help, it seems that things were made a lot, lot worse.
00:15:59.000So why is there not a proper interrogation inquiry now?
00:16:01.000Is it because to have a proper inquiry you'd have to dismantle the machinery that created the problem in the first place?
00:16:07.000What on earth is the point of the COVID inquiry?
00:16:10.000Lockdown was arguably the most controversial policy to be implemented in British peacetime history.
00:16:15.000It had huge ramifications for the nation's health, its economy and for an entire generation of children.
00:16:20.000Let me know in the chat how quickly you were asking those questions and seeing those questions being asked online and being censored online.
00:16:27.000The impact is still being felt with nearly 7.8 million patients languishing on National Health Service waiting lists.
00:16:34.000Wednesday's autumn statement laid bare the stultifying effect it's had on the UK's growth rate and the eye-watering sums it has added to our national debt.
00:16:43.000We needed a thorough investigation into whether the coronavirus cure was worse than the disease.
00:16:48.000A forensic cost-benefit analysis of whether shutting down the country for months on end was the right policy.
00:16:55.000Instead, we've got an embarrassing merry-go-round of blame that is repeatedly failing to answer the central and most important question of all.
00:17:01.000How many lives were actually saved by lockdown, and was it really worth it?
00:17:05.000And you know, because you're informed, how obfuscated and confusing that data has always been.
00:17:10.000People that died in extraordinary circumstances, like literal accidents, being marked down as having COVID at the time that they died, and therefore another COVID statistic.
00:17:19.000Remember, we're not straying into conspiratorial territory, although I can't even envisage what that Might be anymore.
00:17:25.000What we're saying is, was the data managed in order to expedite certain decisions and outcomes that were favourable to what you might call establishment interests?
00:17:33.000And for clarity, I mean the state's ability to regulate, the corporate world's ability to profit, globalist interests, ability to assert power beyond the remit of sovereign nations.
00:17:42.000In June, researchers from Johns Hopkins University and Lund University examined almost 20,000 studies on measures taken to protect populations against COVID across the world.
00:17:51.000Their findings suggested that lockdown in spring 2020, when compared with less strict policies adopted by nations like Sweden, prevented as few as 1,700 deaths in England and Wales.
00:18:02.000To put that into context, in an average week there are around 11,000 deaths in England and Wales.
00:18:07.000Flu deaths hit a five-year high of 15,000 in England last winter.
00:18:11.000When you're dealing with death, it's obviously a very important subject.
00:18:15.000And remember that when the coronavirus pandemic first began, there was this idea that we're protecting the sanctity of life, which is an important spiritual humanitarian idea.
00:18:51.000Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments.
00:18:53.000The report's author said their study showed that the draconian measures had a negligible impact on COVID mortality and were a policy failure of gigantic proportions.
00:19:22.000This week, we've heard evidence from Sir Patrick Vallance, the government's former Chief Scientific Advisor, Professor Sir Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer for England, and his deputy, Jonathan Van Tam, taking some time off from his new job at Moderna to participate in the COVID inquiry.
00:19:38.000Even if you ask the question, where do you work now?
00:19:40.000That would be a more meaningful inquiry, wouldn't it?
00:19:48.000That shows you the level of corruption we're dealing with.
00:19:50.000An inquiry is designed to unveil no new information and to essentially create one or two, oh this person and this person.
00:19:57.000We were told the government was woefully ill-prepared for a pandemic.
00:20:00.000We will hear from the politicians next who will doubtlessly blame the scientists and on and on it will tirelessly go as the main protagonists desperately try to cover their backs.
00:20:09.000Tens of millions of pounds of taxpayer money have been spent on this exercise so far and the British people are none the wiser.
00:20:15.000Just the little the poorer notice that.
00:20:16.000Your taxpayer dollars and your taxpayer pounds pay for research that ends up in the hands of pharmaceutical companies, which is then sold back to you, or your taxpayer dollars or pounds again pay for those measures.
00:20:28.000It's an extraordinary, almost beautiful system, were it not for its cruelty.
00:20:32.000Rather than asking difficult questions, as did the researchers at Johns Hopkins, or exploring important issues like the origins of the virus, the inquiry appears to be operating on the foregone conclusion that if we'd locked down earlier, longer and harder, we would have been better off, despite mounting evidence to the contrary.
00:20:48.000The inquiry then is not only designed to not reveal new information, but to ensure that future lockdowns can be facilitated so it remains prominent In the minds of the British public and the global public that there will be more lockdowns if only we'd locked down earlier.
00:21:31.000The probe seems to be firmly set within the bounds of a centrist political consensus that the dysfunctional government and its former prime minister messed it all up and should be held responsible.
00:21:41.000Yet, even on this point, its exploration of the advice structure around Boris Johnson appears wholly inadequate.
00:21:46.000We have heard virtually nothing on why scientists with opposing views on lockdown were shut out of the decision process inside Number 10.
00:22:29.000The inquiry appears obsessed with the importance of following the science.
00:22:33.000It is unwilling to entertain the notion that some of that science may have been flawed or wrong altogether.
00:22:38.000There has similarly been scant scrutiny of supposedly science-led decisions which seem to have been made on the basis of little or no evidence at all.
00:22:45.000Is the inquiry going to examine the extent to which the modelling was wrong and unpick why it was so heavily relied upon?
00:22:51.000The modelling suggested, oh no, to stop the spread you have to isolate people from one another, so they went with that.
00:22:57.000If you look at the graphs of infection and hospitalisation and death, some have pointed out that to a large extent they seem to rise and fall in natural geometric curves.
00:23:06.000The inquiry should therefore surely be clarifying which interventions worked and which didn't.
00:23:11.000It should be sharing everything it knows about the efficacy of different measures, including social distancing, contact tracing and mask wearing.
00:23:18.000Social distancing, that places the responsibility on the individual and offers the opportunity to control.
00:23:22.000Contact tracing facilitates digital exploration and data harvesting and mask wearing.
00:23:28.000I would say, look, I don't want to be too conspiratorial, ironically, about this, but measures of social control are inherently beneficial.
00:23:37.000If you give people behavioral nudges, indeed, like they plainly did with young people.
00:23:41.000You know, you were allowed into nightclubs if you have the medication, even though we now know that it was not clinically trialled, or clinically trialled at all in some cases, for transmission.
00:23:51.000So what was the benefit of telling young people that they could go to nightclubs if they had been vaccinated?
00:23:56.000What was the legitimacy of saying, in order to protect older, more vulnerable people, you should take the medication?
00:24:00.000The answer to that rhetorical question is there was none.
00:24:03.000So that's where we uncover the malfeasance, and that's where the COVID inquiry will not take you, because it's a type of performance, a type of theatre, a part of a spectacle.
00:24:13.000Should be drawing lessons from the care home scandal and explaining how we should protect the elderly and vulnerable in future.
00:24:19.000That's indeed what Jay Bhattacharya said from the outset.
00:24:21.000He said there are vulnerable communities who probably should get vaccinated, who should certainly be protected and shielded.
00:24:27.000He said that, he was called a maniac, he was shut down.
00:24:29.000You can go back and look at it unless those things have been raised from the internet.
00:24:32.000It should be carrying out a comprehensive audit on how badly children were affected by lockdown, both educationally and psychologically, and drawing a conclusion on whether schools should ever be closed again.
00:24:44.000Any parent will be asking the same questions, I imagine.
00:24:47.000Let me know in the chat how you were affected by that.
00:24:49.000Fundamentally, it should be telling us whether lockdown worked and to an extent, rather than getting lost in a trivial maze of pointless tittle tattle and name calling, none of which proves anything about government efficiency or decision making, but does show you the function of government and its relationship with its own subsidiary agencies and inquiries and indeed the legacy media and global power more broadly.
00:25:09.000It was estimated in 2020 that the average age of a death from COVID was 82.4 years old.
00:25:15.000Any death is a tragedy and that means we should also be examining whether the young mums who succumbed to breast cancer because people were staying at home saving lives and protecting the NHS could have been avoided.
00:25:25.000The inquiry should look as closely at excess deaths as it has COVID deaths.
00:25:30.000And yet excess deaths is still a phrase that I feel nervous using.
00:25:34.000We necessarily impose lockdown on the basis of provisional or hypothetical evidence.
00:25:38.000Now that we have hard data, that should surely be the chief focus of the inquiry.
00:25:43.000Or follow the science, as people used to say.
00:25:45.000How accurate did the models turn out to be?
00:25:55.000How many did they cost through missed medical procedures?
00:25:58.000The deleterious impact of being cooped up inside and not least the lower life expectancy that tends to go with lower income.
00:26:04.000We can now look at the overall death rates in countries that apply different levels of intervention.
00:26:08.000Australia, where lockdowns were severe, seemed to have ended up with a higher excess mortality rate than Sweden, where restrictions were far lesser.
00:26:14.000Does that suggest that lockdowns killed more people than they saved?
00:26:19.000Surely a legitimate inquiry would ask those questions, particularly when you see what the lag is behind independent media reporting, then legacy media reporting, then government inquiries.
00:26:29.000It's almost as if they want power to ultimately be maintained and nothing to really change, and to be able to continue to deploy the same measures in the event of some other comparable crisis, rather than have a genuine inquiry which empowers people to make choices for themselves.
00:26:41.000And if this was happening simultaneously to dissenting voices being shut down and smeared, and new censorship laws being introduced, then you'd really have to start getting suspicious.
00:26:49.000More depressing is that the whole process teaches us about how Whitehall works.
00:26:54.000In a crisis, the bureaucracy's first instinct is to centralise, regulate and ban, and then defend its stance regardless of changed circumstances.
00:27:03.000Not just Whitehall, which is one of the power centres in the UK, but power across the world.
00:27:10.000It could have said any one of a number of very influential and powerful NGOs and the individuals that you know already fund those agencies.
00:27:17.000The question of how to avoid lockdown was never asked of us, and I find that extraordinary, said Professor Mark Woodhouse of Edinburgh, one of a handful of dissenting voices at the inquiry.
00:27:43.000the shaming and condemnation of people that were hesitant or suspicious about the medications
00:27:47.000that were being offered, the shutting down of dissenting voices. I'm not just talking
00:27:50.000about myself, although I am talking about myself. More importantly, I'm talking about
00:27:53.000the legitimate scientific voices of Bacharya, McCulloch, a whole host of others, Dave Mine,
00:27:58.000all voices that you can see on our channel every day.
00:28:01.000Because what's being ignored in the inquiry is being undertaken by us in independent media and our movement.
00:28:07.000And let me tell you, there is a high cost for it, but it's a cost worth paying because it's a cost that must be paid.
00:28:12.000If you're interested in truth, you have to ask difficult questions.
00:28:15.000You have to be willing to confront authority.
00:28:17.000Otherwise, what you'll be given is COVID inquiries where people go, well, I don't think we're interested in that.
00:28:21.000You'll have a legacy media that's like two years behind the curve only asking those questions in my humble opinion because independent media and you and your independent thought have already pondered the answers to those questions.
00:28:31.000When did you first hear of some of the names that I've said?
00:28:33.000When have you ever heard those voices on legacy media?
00:28:37.000When have you ever seen those voices in a Senate Inquiry or Congressional Inquiry or indeed in the UK Inquiry?
00:28:42.000So, the legacy media of course amplifies the message of the powerful.
00:28:46.000The Covid Inquiry is essentially a piece of theatre.
00:28:48.000The function of it is to ensure that these measures remain on the table for any future crisis where having authority, centralising authority, shutting down people's lives, controlling for, surveilling, censoring, social credit scoring all remain options for a power structure that is quaking, shaking and knows its days are numbered.
00:29:09.000You can join a chat that is bizarre, has a variety of views in it, some of them not to my taste, but all of them worth hearing in a world that values free speech.