Joe Biden's escalatory speech at the United Nation's peacekeeping mission in the Middle East has sparked a firestorm of criticism, and the legacy media are quick to point the finger at Russia. Kevin McCarthy has been removed as Speaker of the House, which is a significant moment in American history, as it's the first time in our history that a Speaker has ever been removed from office for a significant breach of the party leadership. Meanwhile, a Florida Congressman has a plan to force a snap vote to remove him from office, which could spell trouble for the future of the entire Republican leadership in the House of Representatives. In the wake of all this, we have an amazing conversation with Scott Adams, the Dealbook creator who predicted Trump's wins, written a really brilliant book about Trump, actually, and a fascinating book about framing and persuasion that will help you understand consciousness. The full conversation is available on Locals. That's when you press the red button and become an Awakened Wonder and support our content, which, as you know, is important once the government and the media are against you, it becomes actually imperative. You are a discerning and awakening member of a new community that can change the world, from independent media, and I'm so happy to be here with you to have this opportunity to explore truth together. In this video, you'll get the whole conversation there, and it's brilliant. In this episode, you're going to see the future. You'll get a fantastic show where you'll be able to explore the past, the present, the past and the future, and everything in between. In short, you need to understand the present and the past. That's what's going on in order to become an awakened wonder! Today's show will be available wherever you're watching the show, so don't miss it! You can't ask for more than $10, $20, $30, $50, $60, $80, $100, $75, or $150, and $200, and so much more! We'll see you in the next episode! - RUMBLE! RUMBLING WEEEEEeee! Thank you so much for listening to this show. - Timestamps: 0:00:00 - What do you think of it? 5:30 - What are you waiting for? 6:40 - What would you like to see in the future?
00:01:24.000We've got a fantastic show for you today.
00:01:25.000You are discerning and awakening member of a new community that can change the world from independent media.
00:01:31.000We can create independent movements and I'm So happy to be here with you to have this opportunity to explore truth together.
00:01:37.000We're going to be talking unbelievably about Joe Biden's escalatory speech at the UN, where he suggests that Russia and Russia alone caused the current conflict.
00:01:47.000He denies historical facts just plainly and blatantly.
00:01:49.000It's astonishing to observe the legacy media, as you know, simply amplify the messages of the mainstream, never discerning, never investigative or interrogating unless it's To shut down dissent and dissidents.
00:02:04.000We have an amazing conversation with Scott Adams, the Dealbook creator who predicted Trump's wins, written a really brilliant book about Trump, actually, and a fascinating book about framing and persuasion that will help you understand consciousness.
00:02:16.000The full conversation will be available on Locals.
00:02:19.000That's when you press the red button and become an Awakened Wonder and support our content, which, as you know, is important once the government and the legacy media are against you.
00:03:40.000...16 to 210 to remove Kevin McCarthy from his position.
00:03:44.000Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz filed a motion last night which created a snap vote to remove fellow Republican Kevin McCarthy from the speaker job.
00:03:54.000This is the first time in American history that this has ever happened.
00:04:07.000And when it comes to how those raised money, I take no lecture on asking patriotic Americans to weigh in and contribute to this fight from those who would grovel and bend knee for the lobbyists and special interests who own our leadership, who have... Oh, boo all you want!
00:04:36.000We're not... We are own bio-lobbyists!
00:04:38.000who have hollowed out this town and have borrowed against the future of our future generations.
00:04:43.000I'll be happy to fund my political operation through the work of hardworking Americans, $10 and $20 and $30 at a time, and you all keep showing up at the lobbyist fundraisers and see how that goes for you.
00:05:07.000Now, sources telling me at this hour some House Republicans have been in contact with and have started an effort to draft former President Donald Trump to be the next Speaker.
00:05:19.000And I have been told that President Trump might be open to helping the Republican Party, at least in the short term if necessary, if it's needed.
00:05:30.000Seems weird to say this but I can't imagine Trump doing a job that requires that much admin.
00:05:33.000I know he's actually run massive businesses and...
00:05:38.000But I feel like he does it in a kind of a flair way.
00:05:40.000I can't imagine he's going to do a job that requires sort of muted, administrative and bureaucratic discipline because it just doesn't seem to be what he's about.
00:05:56.000Now, sadly, they are talking about a tragic and awful shooting, but the person they get on the line as a caller is plainly not there to contribute to their news story.
00:06:18.000It seems for a long while that he's actually about to contribute to the news agenda of Fox, but he just continues to promote Tucker Carlson.
00:06:27.000Well, first we were watching, we all get together every Tuesday night, and we watch Dr. Carlson's show on X. We used to watch him on Fox News, obviously he's out there no more, and still being the most credible guy in the media.
00:06:41.000We can't tell you why we fired him without compromising your trust in this whole operation.
00:06:46.000We always get together to watch Tucker Carlson, and I think he's doing probably better now that he's not with Fox News, because the corporate media- Wait a minute.
00:06:53.000This isn't- This guy's not talking about- Can you, sir, would you please start taking this massacre seriously?
00:06:59.000He always controls what the teleprompter readers are able to say.
00:07:12.000So there's the legacy media being trolled.
00:07:15.000Meanwhile, the cyber sphere that seeks to control your reality with dubious information in judicious reporting is stepping things up again.
00:07:25.000You remember when we told you a little while ago about, like, Meta will be introducing sunglasses so you can broadcast their version of reality directly into your consciousness and prevent, I don't know, nature or loved ones entering your field of vision?
00:07:41.000And the mainstream media, of course, does its job.
00:07:44.000Not critiquing, not examining, not investigating, simply normalizing the agenda of the powerful in what amounts to a sort of advertisement.
00:07:55.000They're saying that they can still afford propaganda even though they've probably cut human jobs.
00:07:59.000by ChatGPT. Mark Zuckerberg showed Meta's recent cost cutting has not stopped them keeping up with
00:08:05.000the integration of artificial intelligence into daily life.
00:08:08.000They're saying that they can steal a full propaganda even though they've probably cut human
00:08:20.000Well, how about an open internet that's not censored and surveilled?
00:08:23.000How about listening to the point of view of dissidents and people that dissent?
00:08:26.000How about a fairer, democratic world where communities are able to control their own resources, where we don't have information piped directly into our eyes by sponsors, where Facebook don't essentially act like a surveillance organization, giving information
00:08:40.000directly to the government and using an agenda set by the government and their deep state
00:08:45.000operatives to bludgeon people into submission.
00:11:29.000Okay, is it right that Facebook are able to be the only portal on phones in Malaysia and it allows them to control the news agenda?
00:11:37.000What about Facebook's relationship with, or particularly Zuckerberg's relationship with Fauci during the pandemic, especially the correspondence that took place between them and Zuckerberg's admission that they censored true information?
00:11:47.000How was Facebook funded in the first place?
00:11:50.000Is it like Google, initially funded with CIA and government money.
00:11:55.000What is their tax relationships with the United States?
00:12:47.000We can filter that for you now, and put commercials in it, and then tell people what you're looking at.
00:12:52.000And if one day ever, in the past or ever in the future, you look at something we don't want you looking at, like maybe some information about how Pfizer is funded, or the depth and length of their clinical trial prices, or how many mouses took that Moderna booster shot, that's eight, I can tell you that without the mouses, then you will be shut down, for no additional fee.
00:13:11.000We can insert a small explosive device here at your temple, and we can Literally, if you ask too many questions, blow your mind!
00:13:18.000Ray-Ban to make its model look less geeky and address pro- That's the issue, is it?
00:13:24.000It's a bit geeky to have your consciousness controlled by an unprecedentedly large, corrupted, big tech organization.
00:13:56.000It's not cool to give up your freedom, the freedom of your attention, the last remaining gift, the last private piece of your divinity and sacredness sold to Ray-Ban and Facebook.
00:14:08.000Privacy measures by including an LED light that appears when the glasses are recording.
00:14:13.000Because, you know, we wouldn't record what you think we would record without telling you.
00:14:17.000Oh, well, the old LED light, you know, that's how you'll know.
00:14:21.000I mean, it's not like we can turn on microphones of your iPhone, or it's not like we would use WhatsApp to spy on you.
00:14:27.000It's not like service providers use that data all the time already.
00:14:30.000It's not like Edward Snowden and Julian Assange never happened.
00:14:45.000They've got a plan to build this authoritarian dystopia where they say it's for convenience and safety and I guess they'll probably just, I don't know, make it look cool or something but you're going to have to be so careful because otherwise they're going to spy on you, they're going to surveil you, they're going to censor you, they're going to shut down dissent.
00:14:57.000they're going to transcend the sovereign nation with a global movement that presents itself
00:15:01.000to you as sort of like kind and friendly and yet is ultimately about centralised authoritarianism
00:15:05.000and I suppose what they'll probably do is come up with like health crises and war crises
00:15:09.000and energy and climate and water crises that legitimise their increasing authoritarianism.
00:15:50.000I was worried that maybe we couldn't trust them but the news there, the news that a minute ago was telling you the production was great, it's just told us that they won't do that without our consent so obviously unless you like don't trust the media and don't trust the government there's absolutely nothing to worry about.
00:16:07.000The $299 glasses would be an quote, ads free experience.
00:16:14.000What I was worried about is that when you stole my consciousness, you might sneak an advertisement in there.
00:16:18.000That is the very least of our worries.
00:16:23.000Now, at least while our consciousness is being invaded by these big tech colonial forces, we're not being marched into a hot war with Russia as Tucker Carlson predicted a year ago.
00:16:33.000Joe Biden gave a speech at the UN where he explicitly said that Russia and Russia alone have caused this conflict and the UK are getting ready to deploy boots on the ground.
00:16:44.000All this stuff, we're told it could never happen, but it's happening.
00:17:46.000Just the amplification of a state message that wants you dumb, distracted and incapable for discerning for yourself.
00:17:52.000Let's have a look at how the legacy media reports on this story and introduces the significant amplification of actual UK troops In Ukraine.
00:18:00.000Remember, when we're reporting on this, we're reporting in a nuanced way.
00:18:04.000We're not saying that Ukraine oughtn't be saved and served.
00:18:07.000We're not saying that the humanitarian issues and the unnecessary loss of life are not significant.
00:18:12.000We're not saying that Ukraine don't have the right to their own agenda and own historical sovereign trajectory.
00:18:17.000We're simply asking, are the legacy media telling you the truth?
00:19:20.000There's not another reason, like, oh, do you remember he did all that shoplifting?
00:19:23.000No, it was that he revealed a bunch of war crimes.
00:19:26.000In fact, as you know, because we've told you, the International Criminal Court cannot be utilised to prosecute Russia for their criminal invasion.
00:19:35.000Because the US would have to tacitly acknowledge that so many of their previous invasions have also been criminal wars, like the Iraq war, which Joe Biden lobbied for and supported.
00:19:45.000Without which we cannot achieve any of our goals.
00:20:56.000In a way, this rehearsed, revised and presumably scripted speech that he's, I imagine, reading from a teleprompter is just as mad as the stuff he spontaneously says to console victims of massive fires.
00:21:19.000Like, even his spontaneous sort of fever dream Joyce-ian prose makes as much sense as his carefully prepared remarks at the UN because none of it's true.
00:21:30.000Like every nation in the world, the United States wants this war to end.
00:22:18.000No nation wants this war to end more than Ukraine.
00:22:22.000And we strongly support Ukraine in its efforts to bring about a diplomatic resolution that delivers just and lasting peace.
00:22:29.000I don't know that the best way to get just and lasting peace is through, like, I don't know, bombing Crimea.
00:22:35.000I think there might at least be diplomatic solutions.
00:22:38.000I recognise that sometimes when you're dealing with a historic geopolitical conflict with deep roots, like the conflict that is regionalised between Ukraine and Russia, and the historic conflict between the United States of America and Russia, there is a degree of complexity that's unlikely to be perfectly disseminated, broken down and understood in an online video.
00:22:58.000But what we can say with some certainty is we're not being told the truth, the media aren't investigating it correctly, they are functioning as amplifying propagandists for a state message, that this is beneficial to certain state interests, there is a unipolar agenda that America have themselves explicitly spoken about.
00:23:14.000Numerous times you've heard people say stuff like This is actually a cheap war.
00:23:17.000For 3% of our budget, we're able to reduce the capacity of Russia to a significant extent.
00:23:22.000We've just seen Chrystia Freeland and Hillary Clinton say, we're sending a clear message to China, you're next.
00:24:32.000Maybe there could have been a better resolution to the First World War, and there are two imperialist forces, or numerous imperialist interests and all that.
00:24:39.000And so this, plainly, with the stuff that I've just listed a bunch of times, just because I've listened to Jeffrey Sachs and a variety of other people, journalists and academics worthy of the names, rather than systems of amplification for propaganda, and academic institutions that are funded in ways that simply mean they're going to support imperialist notions and mainstream narratives.
00:24:58.000To say that Russia and Russia alone, it's not that.
00:25:00.000Like didn't NATO, that Stoltenberg dude, the other day goes, oh well what happened was Putin said if you do this we're gonna do that and we just did it.
00:25:08.000President Putin sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement.
00:25:16.000That was a precondition for not invade Ukraine.
00:25:39.000The agenda of the government and the interests that they serve are so opposing to yours that the only way that this massive conflict can't be exposed that would lead to revolution is through a media that lies to you.
00:26:04.000Russia alone has the power to end this war immediately.
00:26:08.000And it's Russia alone that stands in the way of peace.
00:26:11.000This is astonishing when you actually look at it.
00:26:13.000This is propaganda live and we just carry on with our lives.
00:26:16.000I mean, I suppose because in some ways it seems irrelevant and abstract and in a way is abstract and irrelevant because you can't really do anything about it.
00:26:22.000Except, as I say, participate in a massive campaign of disobedience and join a movement that opposes this kind of thing.
00:27:42.000Does Hunter Biden have any qualifications to work for Burisma?
00:27:47.000If we abandon the core principles of the United States to appease an aggressor, can any member state in this body feel confident that they are protected?
00:27:59.000If we allow Ukraine to be carved up, is the independence of any nation secure?
00:28:06.000I'd respectfully suggest the answer is no.
00:28:38.000Or, if you enjoyed Star Wars, you're going to love The Return of the Semiconductor.
00:28:42.000That's why the United States, together with our allies and partners around the world, will continue to stand with the brave people of Ukraine as they defend their sovereignty and territorial integrity and their freedom.
00:28:54.000Couldn't even get to the end of the phrase territorial integrity because it was so lacking in integrity
00:28:59.000Okay, so there's some propaganda that was eagerly lapped up except for by old Baldy in front of Sierra Leone
00:29:10.000It was fact-checking what's happening Excuse me!
00:29:14.000Let's have a look at an alternative version of reality that might not be so valuable to the elites.
00:29:19.000The Biden administration used last week's meeting of the United Nations General Assembly as a platform to launch a full-throated tirade against Russia of the kind made by countries before they declare war.
00:29:29.000Oh, so Tucker Carlson might have been right when he said there will be a hot war within a year.
00:29:34.000In his speech to the UN Tuesday, Biden declared the United States, together with our allies and partners around the world, will continue to stand with the brave people of Ukraine as they defend their sovereignty and territorial integrity and their freedom.
00:29:45.000Of course, this is the kind of rhetoric that, when you say it, sounds good, sounds normal, sounds like what should be happening.
00:29:50.000But don't a lot of political speeches sound like when you sort of think, yeah, if that was actually what you were doing, everything would be OK.
00:29:57.000Biden asserted that Russia alone bears responsibility for the war in Ukraine.
00:30:01.000Russia alone has the power to end this war immediately, and it is Russia alone that stands in the way of peace, because Russia's price for peace is Ukraine's capitulation, Ukraine's territory, and Ukraine's children.
00:30:11.000I think when people say stuff like that, you kind of know that they're lying.
00:30:14.000Another indicator might be if, for example, they lobbied all big tech platforms to deny Russia Today the ability to broadcast.
00:30:21.000So, for example, YouTube won't broadcast Russia Today, because do you think that's because Russia Today's content is so brilliant If you saw it, you'd go, oh my god, let's go and support Russia and become Putin apologists.
00:30:32.000No, it's just simply because it will provide a different perspective.
00:30:34.000And if you had a different perspective, you wouldn't be so malleable.
00:30:37.000And that's why you are members of this community.
00:30:39.000That's why we exist in this community, because we care more about truth than this mad Gideon deception.
00:30:59.000The White House is demanding the unconditional surrender of Russia, accompanied by the overthrow of its government and its territorial breakup.
00:31:05.000So they want to do what they're saying Russia want to do.
00:31:09.000Have you noticed this inversion of values?
00:31:11.000Have you noticed the vilification of anyone that dissents?
00:31:14.000Have you noticed that they claim to be telling the truth while lying, standing for peace, while going to war?
00:31:19.000Literal Orwellian inversion of language.
00:31:22.000Achieving this goal is impossible without direct U.S.
00:31:24.000involvement, transforming a proxy war into a direct conflict between the United States and Russia.
00:31:29.000The conflict in Ukraine is already America's war, for which the U.S.
00:31:32.000and NATO are providing logistics, weapons, and intelligence.
00:31:35.000But the failure of Ukraine's counteroffensive has led the Biden administration to conclude that achieving its objectives is impossible without turning the current proxy war into a full-scale conflict involving the deployment of U.S.
00:32:04.000That's why there's this state of fear.
00:32:05.000That's why you're doing well staying with us.
00:32:07.000We're going, hold on a minute, I'm not going to just respond to fear, hysteria, propaganda and lies.
00:32:12.000I'm going to get deep, I'm going to stay true to myself, I'm going to discern.
00:32:15.000And then you'll be able to go, wait, hold on, didn't actually, who was that that said that there could never be a war because it would lead to Armageddon?
00:32:22.000Wait a minute, didn't NATO say they spoke to Putin and he said that that escalation would lead to further war?
00:32:26.000Wait a minute, wasn't there a story last week where they said that Elon Musk was talking to the Kremlin and actually we found out that all he was doing was not letting Ukraine use Starlink to bomb Crimea?
00:32:39.000It's been widely asserted in the American media that Russian President Vladimir Putin believes a change in the American government would lead to a shift in policy.
00:32:46.000Nevertheless, it is the aim of the Biden administration to preempt such a policy shift by escalating the conflict to a point where, well before the 2024 election, the war will have involved a commitment of US prestige and resources, including manpower, that makes a diplomatic and non-military solution impossible.
00:33:02.000This is from a socialist organisation, so before you decide who it is you hate in this world, consider that you might have allies in places that surprise you.
00:33:09.000Biden's remarks were followed by those of his attack dog, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, whose statements bordered on total insanity.
00:33:16.000And that guy should know a thing or two about borders by now.
00:33:18.000So let's be referred to Russia and Russians as evil and as terrorists and accuse them of carrying out genocide against Ukraine.
00:33:25.000Again, when you use language like that, you deny the possibility of a peaceful solution.
00:33:38.000Zelensky condemned the United Nations for being overly afraid of nuclear war.
00:33:42.000You can't be too scared of annihilation, can you?
00:33:44.000Unless you've reached some sort of spiritual nirvana, recognised that consciousness undergirds all material reality, and then recognised that from that you could derive a new reality based on spiritual principles, but I don't think that's the point they're making.
00:33:57.000Saying, in many cases, the fear of war, the final war, Oh, it's a good one though.
00:34:01.000the war after which no one would gather in the General Assembly Hall again.
00:34:05.000The effort to promote complete nuclear disarmament, he said, should not be the only strategy to protect the world from
00:34:37.000Once you understand that the function of the Afghanistan war is not to win it, but to prolong it, then you recognize that the role of government is to take public money and to put it into private hands.
00:34:46.000So it's another one of those paradigms.
00:34:47.000Is the media amplifying the agenda of the powerful and normalizing it?
00:34:52.000Is the government taking money from public hands and putting in private hands?
00:34:59.000The statements by leading US officials are accompanied by equally reckless and provocative assertions in major newspapers.
00:35:05.000In an editorial entitled, Biden has done a lot for Ukraine but not enough, the Washington Post wrote that Mr Biden should stop dawdling and provide Kiev with ATACMs, referring to the long-range missile system that would be used to strike deep within Russian territory.
00:35:21.000I wonder who funds that news organization?
00:35:23.000The US and NATO are already in an undeclared war, providing logistics, weapons and intelligence.
00:35:29.000The only thing Ukraine is supplying is the bodies.
00:35:32.000Have you ever considered that the United States of America might not march you into Armageddon and therefore you might need to live a little longer?
00:35:39.000That is why I'm proud that we are partnered by Field of Greens.
00:35:44.000Now the Mayo Clinic says if you want to help prevent heart disease, lower blood pressure and cholesterol, eat five servings of fruit and vegetables every day.
00:35:51.000But who's got time for that when you're being surveilled, when you're being censored, when you're being shut down?
00:35:56.000Each fruit and each vegetable in Field of Greens was medically selected by our Actual doctors, real doctors, not people in white coats that are trying to shut down free speech.
00:36:05.000I'm saying actual doctors and they've medically selected each vegetable to support your vital organs like your heart, your lungs, your kidney and immune system.
00:36:13.000Obviously flu season is upon us and you know what people will be suggesting?
00:36:17.000Wooden field of greens be a much better solution.
00:36:20.000It works fast, you'll feel better with more energy, who knows your skin, hair, nails all look healthier.
00:36:26.000If you don't always eat right and exercise, join me and take Phil the Greens.
00:36:30.000We can get you started with 15% off your first order.
00:37:15.000Army War College Quarterly included an article, A Call to Action, Lessons from Ukraine for the Future Force.
00:37:22.000It stated that The Russia-Ukraine war is exposing significant vulnerabilities in the Army's strategic personnel depth and ability to withstand and replace casualties.
00:37:30.000Army theatre medical planners may anticipate a sustained rate of roughly 3,600 casualties per day, with a 25% predicted replacement rate.
00:37:38.000The personnel system will require 800 new personnel each day.
00:37:42.000For context, the United States sustained about 50,000 casualties in two decades of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.
00:37:48.000In large-scale combat operations, the United States could experience the same number of casualties in two weeks.
00:37:53.000So you have advocacy for heavy recruitment of new personnel within defence and military circles.
00:38:01.000Curiously, over at Lockheed Martin, they're making some interesting profit predictions for the coming quarters and the coming decade, in fact, similarly based on Escalate intentions and indeed conflict between Russia and the United States.
00:38:13.000So it's not a matter of reading the runes and mystical predictions.
00:38:17.000When military industrial complex companies and defense operatives are making the same claims, testimonies, then you recognize that oh well the reason they need more personnel is because there's going to be a war.
00:38:28.000The reason Lockheed Martin and Raytheon are predicting more profits is Because there's going to be a war.
00:38:31.000The reason Tucker Carlson said there's going to be a hot war between Russia and the United States is because there's going to be a war between Russia and the United States.
00:38:37.000And to use a Kamala Harris-like anecdote, it's almost like slowly incrementally turning up the temperature, we the frogs in the boiling water will not notice that we're being boiled to death by the chefs of war.
00:38:48.000Sorry, I said it was a Kamala Harris one.
00:38:50.000According to several media reports, President Biden has agreed to arm Ukraine with Army Tactical Missile Systems, just like the Washington Post requested, honey!
00:38:58.000Which would mark a significant escalation since the missiles have a range of up to 190 miles.
00:39:03.000I just hope they've got the internet to back it up!
00:39:05.000Reports have said Biden plans to send a cluster bomb variant of ATACMs to Ukraine, making the escalation more significant.
00:39:12.000The potential weapons transfer would give Ukraine the ability to target Russian territory with cluster bombs, which leave behind unexploded submunitions that can be found by civilians years or decades later after their use.
00:39:24.000But I'm sure BlackRock will find a way to profit from that, so maybe it doesn't matter.
00:39:27.000Another of the pledges that we were made, if you just use your memory and your mind and your own lying eyes, is that there would never be boots on the ground because that would demonstrate an actual war and that would lead to Armageddon and guess what?
00:39:39.000Meanwhile, UK troops may deploy into Ukraine for the first time to train soldiers as on-the-ground training efforts ramp up between the war-torn country and its international allies.
00:39:48.000Grant Shapps, the UK's Secretary of State for Defence, said in an interview with The Telegraph he was discussing a plan to mobilise British troops with his military chiefs.
00:39:57.000The media normalises the agenda of the powerful.
00:39:59.000I was today talking about eventually getting the training brought closer and actually into Ukraine as well, Schaps
00:40:05.000told the outlet, particularly in the west of the country.
00:40:06.000I think the opportunity now is to bring more things in country.
00:40:22.000In addition to offering training on the ground in Ukraine, Schaap said British defence companies like BAE Systems are moving manufacturing into the country.
00:40:29.000It's something I hope to see more British companies do as well.
00:40:32.000It really astonishes me when I hear it sort of spoken of in these glib statistical and financial terms.
00:40:37.000This is a real opportunity for British businesses.
00:40:39.000All of this actually amounts to death and horror, needless amplification of ideas and conflicts that perhaps could be moved beyond, evolved beyond.
00:40:49.000That's why I suppose what we're suggesting is not that we consider politics to be which of these two bloody awful choices do we make between these two dreadful, despicable, privately funded facades that call themselves democratic parties.
00:41:02.000We say, God, is it possible that we could do things differently altogether?
00:41:05.000Is it possible that the world could be differently organised?
00:41:07.000And in spite of everything, I believe it's possible.
00:41:09.000I'm keen to see other British companies do their bit as well by doing the same thing, Schaps said per the Telegraph.
00:41:14.000So I think there'll be a move to get more training and production in the country.
00:41:17.000Escalation of a war just being described like it's a church fete or a country fair.
00:41:22.000Schaps also floated the idea of the British Navy aiding Ukraine in the Black Sea.
00:41:29.000So there you go, you've witnessed Joe Biden give a speech that was full of deception, half-truths, out-and-out lies that amounted to propaganda.
00:41:34.000The media continued to amplify a message that amounts to escalation of a war, which we've told you before, which you know already, you've told us in the chat, and continue to communicate in there, and remember followers, could lead to Armageddon.
00:41:44.000How are they not Armageddon-averse in the same way that they noted Ukrainian people are becoming casually averse?
00:42:28.000Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments in the chat and I'll see you in a second
00:42:32.000Right you lot if you're watching this anywhere but rumble we're gonna have to leave you now
00:42:42.000We've got a fantastic interview, an extended interview, in fact, with Scott Adams, who you might know from Dilbert, you might know from his recent controversy, you might know because of his excellent and interesting I'm going to be talking to him about all of that.
00:43:42.000Of course, I suppose leadership remains a fascinating subject, I suppose because leadership and persuasion are the ability to, through charisma perhaps, or through other means, and perhaps you'll explain them to me, create Realities that people will willingly or even unconsciously participate in.
00:44:07.000Tell me what you think specifically Trump exemplifies.
00:44:12.000In the book you talk about him being sort of some like indigenous or native or a natural genius when it comes to the art of persuasion.
00:44:22.000What do you mean by that and what are examples of that?
00:44:26.000Well, he seems to have the full toolbox of persuasion, which if you didn't study it as a field, as I do, I'm a trained hypnotist, you wouldn't recognize.
00:44:36.000So, for example, the number one tool of persuasion is fear.
00:44:41.000So he started out in 2015, the illegal people who may be criminals are streaming across the border and, you know, China's going to eat our lunch and basically scaring you.
00:45:27.000He also says it's going to have a door in it.
00:45:31.000Now, that's making you think past the sale, because you already have to accept there could be a wall for there also to be a door, and then he tops it off with, and Mexico's going to pay for it?
00:45:43.000Now, that's the funniest, make-you-think-best sale I've ever seen.
00:45:48.000Because if he can make you argue about how ridiculous it is that Mexico would pay for the wall, you've already uncritically accepted that there might be a wall.
00:46:17.000And he comes up with nicknames that are not only visual, like Low Energy Jeb, It's a concept, but when you see him, it changes how you see him.
00:46:28.000And I always say that when I first saw Jeb Bush, you know, come on the scene, I thought to myself, wow, he's got exactly that executive, calm, cool, you know, probably would be great in an emergency, because he wouldn't get too excited about it, you know?
00:46:44.000And then the moment that Trump says he's low energy, That's all I could see, because he made a comparison between his own energy and Jeb, and from that moment on you could only see it.
00:46:55.000But the other magic he does is he picks a nickname that will be almost certainly reinforced by future events.
00:47:05.000So when he says low-energy gem, you know there's going to be a video where somebody says, there he is, he's looking low-energy.
00:47:12.000You could probably find that for anybody.
00:47:14.000But then when he says Crooked Hillary, you think to yourself, ah, there's no way she won't be at least accused of something that would fit into that frame.
00:47:57.000So every time one of those stories gets a headline, I look at the headline and in my head goes, perfect call.
00:48:05.000Even though I don't believe it, you know, I mean, I'm not persuaded by just those words, that the words just pop up in your head.
00:48:12.000And that's the secret behind a reframe and behind hypnosis and a lot of AI as well.
00:48:17.000It seems like what you're saying, and I would say it's alluring and it's an attractive proposition, is that there are kind of universal principles in communication that don't alter Whether they're within the realm of hypnosis or neuro-linguistic programming, they are just certain indefatigable facts that if people use them, you know, I like to think, no, no, I'm very sophisticated.
00:48:46.000I'll know if someone's trying to dupe me or lead me up the garden path.
00:48:51.000But this is sort of, in a sense, an inability to acknowledge my own hardware and my own unconscious biases and the way that the part of me that's beyond me is likely to behave.
00:49:02.000Firstly, do you think that Trump is doing this instinctively, almost as a genius might, in the way a genius athlete, or like sort of the way that Marlon Brando might pick up a glove and on the waterfront and just sort of thumb it unconsciously, creating an organic naturalness, or the way that Willie Mays might strike a ball?
00:49:23.000And I know nothing of baseball, so I would use football if it was left to me, but I know who the audience are.
00:49:31.000Or do you think that this is something that he's learned through sales?
00:49:33.000Because in a sense, these are sales techniques.
00:49:36.000I often see how the culture has evolved, often around people that I admire, even mentors of mine, that at their point of origin would have been much more focused on the world of sales and pitching, that now have migrated into a more overtly spiritual space, I would say.
00:49:52.000That in a way, some of the principles hold true.
00:49:56.000Yeah, I know that thing of like two suggestions and then two verifiables and then a suggestion.
00:50:01.000I recognize what you're saying about that stuff and it seems, you know, I'm like making these notes and thinking, you know, man this is how I should be communicating, this is how we should all be communicating if our job, and God is it not, become our job now more than ever to present a version of reality that's more appealing than our opponents.
00:50:16.000And if Trump is a genius of it, say, if that is indeed what you believe and sort of become somehow a native genius of it, Is it stuff that everyone does badly, and like even his opponents do it badly?
00:50:27.000And can you talk us through a few examples of their crap versions of it as well?
00:50:32.000Well, the universals would include repetition.
00:50:36.000The more you repeat something, the more people think it's true.
00:50:38.000That's what he does with the perfect phone call.
00:50:41.000He just keeps saying it until you can't not think it when it's paired with the topic.
00:50:46.000So he's got that, but he has all the sales techniques of thinking past the sale, etc.
00:51:08.000I don't think you'd pick that up on your own.
00:51:12.000His minister of the church he went to every Sunday when he was a kid, his family, was the author of the book, The Power of Positive Thinking.
00:51:21.000whose name is escaping me for some reason.
00:51:35.000But imagine going to church and having somebody who was considered the most influential person in the country, so much so that the author was blamed Or accused of being a hypnotist, because he was so influential.
00:51:49.000So I think that Trump probably got it from his father, who was probably selling real estate projects as well.
00:51:55.000So some of it he picked up, and some of it I think he is a natural.
00:51:59.000But he goes for fear somewhat automatically.
00:52:03.000And association, he's good at associating something negative with something positive.
00:52:09.000One of the reframes in my book uses this technique, the same one he uses, and the reframe is, alcohol is poison.
00:52:17.000Now, that's not true, per se, because it's just a definition.
00:52:21.000Could be a beverage, could be a form of entertainment, could be a liquid.
00:52:25.000But if you just pair it with the word poison, it lets you more easily, you know, say no to a drink.
00:52:31.000Doesn't work for alcoholics, it does work for people who just want to cut down.
00:52:35.000So that reframe actually is the one that I hear the most from.
00:52:39.000Probably twice a week, I hear from somebody, a stranger who says, I stopped drinking entirely with one sentence.
00:52:46.000So that's how powerful this stuff can be, and Trump is a master of it.
00:52:50.000In actuality, I am in recovery and this idea of compounding concepts is significant even
00:53:01.000in the, I don't know if it's more sophisticated or simply different, but the idea of abstinence
00:53:07.000is predicated of course on the notion that it is the first drink that's the problem,
00:53:12.000not the ninth or the tenth or that you'll ever be able to drink safely.
00:53:15.000In this instance, the compound is to equate even drinking at all with an annihilation of your life.
00:53:21.000And in fact, any kind of behavioral adjunct pivot progression would have to be predicated upon a
00:53:30.000vision of some description. And in the case of like a 12 step person like me, it's I now equate
00:53:36.000the use of a recreational drug, even or, you know, street drugs, or even a sort of socially
00:53:42.000acceptable and legal drug like alcohol with personal destruction. And that is a form of
00:53:48.000conditioning has taken place and ultimately in this instance, a beneficial one.
00:53:54.000I wonder if, you know, obviously comment on anything you want to mate, but like I wonder if you think that part of what Trump has been able to do in addition to his evident and obvious rhetorical skill and I've always thought it's a failing of his opponents not to sort of acknowledge and register and enjoy that even when opposing him because it sometimes looks like they don't inhabit the same sort of universe as everyone else when they just sort of say he's stupid or whatever.
00:54:22.000I wonder if there's something, one, that he engages with people emotionally in a way that's sort of somehow, I want to say anomalous or at least rare in an age of sort of bureaucrats and managerial politicians that are somewhat visionless.
00:54:40.000and this idea of vision, this idea of being able to give a authentic vision to an audience.
00:54:48.000And given that we're living in a time of obvious conflict where the culture is, in a sense,
00:54:54.000it feels to me, and again, tell me what you feel, and I know I'm throwing a lot at you
00:54:57.000here, but I feel like you're tracking it, like the culture is trying to centralise and
00:55:02.000control perception, the culture is aggressively saying, this is what reality is.
00:55:10.000This is the information that you have to believe.
00:55:12.000If you don't believe this information, you are the worst kind of nefarious individual.
00:55:17.000Do you think, how do you believe we can penetrate, challenge, attack, control, overcome that?
00:55:24.000Well, the tough part is you never know who your enemies are.
00:55:28.000Because I feel like whoever's behind the shadow banning and maybe some cancellations that are more political than content related, you don't really ever know who's behind it.
00:55:41.000So if you look at my situation, the Washington Post was sort of the flagship that got the other newspapers to cancel me.
00:55:48.000But the Washington Post is well known as, let's say, well connected with the intelligence outfit in the United States.
00:55:57.000So the question I ask is, is the fact that the Washington Post is so associated with Democrats and also the intelligence group, which are also associated with the Democrats, is it a coincidence that no Republicans canceled me?
00:56:11.000So when we're talking about free speech and how do you penetrate the narrative, there's also some amount of dirty tricks and secret players that are really hard to know who your targets are.
00:56:25.000So it's hard to fight back when you don't know who you're fighting against.
00:56:30.000But to answer, the only way I can imagine there would be a difference is people like Trump who can break through because he's just too hard not to cover.
00:58:27.000Like, those are the kind of questions that I ask.
00:58:29.000It's like, do I have to go to another country just to get freedom of speech?
00:58:34.000And I saw today, you know, Mike Benz, he's another person on the Axe platform who talks about the intelligence agencies, you know, maneuverings behind the scenes, as if he's opening the hood so we can see.
00:58:46.000And I think it was today he was tweeting that he's expecting, you know, just a massive personal attack and probably some form of lawfare against him.
00:59:05.000It appears, too, that what was once regarded as the, I would say, liberal left and the assumption that built into that were ideals that grew out of the civil rights movement that are pretty righteous and laudable.
00:59:27.000set of interests has become curiously authoritarian in the name of liberty, safety, convenience.
00:59:36.000I'm seeing these odd pacts emerge between sort of big tech and the sort of neoliberalism
00:59:43.000that are creating curiously in a way that I could never have imagined.
00:59:49.000Alliances on what might once have been termed the other side of the aisle, but you've mentioned
00:59:54.000Glenn Greenwald, and let's mention him once more, he says that in a way, personally, and
01:00:02.000I wouldn't expect you to know this or even care, that I used to be regarded as a kind
01:00:06.000of conventional lefty sort of Hollywood type person, but I was always actually anti-authoritarian
01:00:14.000and sort of pro-individual freedom and pro-community freedom, also interested in community and
01:00:21.000and care about society and have values and principles.
01:00:24.000And then, like, as my content became more vocally anti-establishment, as I started to speak out against electoral democracy, its corruption, legacy media, how they simply amplify state and corporate state message at that, rather than interrogating it, how they spend no resources on investigating issues that really seriously affect people, and significant resources on bringing down dissent and controlling potential dissidents, I started to be called, like, right-wing and a right-wing conspiracy theorist, and, like, I've spoken to a bunch of people that Yes, conservative, and I find them absolutely delightful, I'd have to say.
01:00:59.000But I still feel that what's emerging, potentially now, is something new.
01:01:03.000And I cite often Martin Gurry's book, The Revolt of the Public, which is a sort of, in this way, a companion piece to that famous book, Here Comes Everyone.
01:01:12.000That simply explores how the way that communication technology has altered has meant that the establishment can no longer keep up with the diversification and dissemination of information and has necessarily become authoritarian in order to countenance these new threats, these new information threats.
01:01:30.000And in order to legitimise what they're doing, which is basically state censorship, they've
01:01:35.000had to invent new categories, misinformation, disinformation, and create enemies that would
01:01:41.000warrant this is why you see people being called Nazis and the most egregious and awful things
01:01:46.000that you can accuse anybody of, racist, and the list we can all add to that list of course,
01:01:51.000because they need to legitimise the end goal, shut down dissent, control dissent invoices,
01:01:57.000because any dissent invoice now, anyone with a phone is a potential threat.
01:02:01.000Martin Goury talked about that in the revolt of the public, that the old models are dying,
01:02:06.000so they have to find ways of controlling the emergent new model.
01:02:10.000And in a sense, Trump was, you know, one of the first people that effectively used these
01:02:16.000new forms of communication technology, famously through Twitter as it then was.
01:02:21.000And I wonder what you think about these likelihood of new alliances with people with a broad base of social philosophy and ideology.
01:02:29.000I wonder what you think about the possibility, and again I suppose to your point about who are these people that are controlling it.
01:02:36.000I guess I would say that it's the nexus of interests that exist between, like for example with this new online safety bill in the UK, demonstrates that the UK government and the EU and all of the Five Eyes countries are introducing legislation that enables their government in unprecedented ways to utilize big tech so that, and I guess it's like a deal they're doing really, of we're not going to shut you guys down and your ability to profit and advertise if you allow us to Yeah, you know, my take on this is that I see the world as a big old dopamine machine.
01:03:21.000I used to say, follow the money and it explains everything.
01:03:25.000But money is just a holding place for dopamine, right?
01:03:28.000You can keep it in your money until you're ready to buy the jazz ski, and then you get your dopamine.
01:03:33.000So when you're looking at why is it this weird connection of people who don't even seem to be on the side they used to be on?
01:03:40.000I think it's because the philosophical layer, the why we do things, has always been fake for the people in power.
01:03:48.000The people in power want to keep their job, keep their influence, keep their dopamine high, you know, have more babies than the other people, so basically win.
01:03:56.000So, whatever it takes to win is what they're going to promote, and it doesn't have to make sense, it doesn't have to be consistent with what they've ever done, it doesn't have to be ethical, it doesn't have to be moral, because they're just chasing dopamine.
01:04:08.000So, once you see the world as a dopamine chase, everything makes sense.
01:04:13.000It's just very unpleasant to think of it that way.
01:04:16.000Yeah, it does seem pretty, obviously literally endocrinal and sort of therefore animal and unconscious and beyond individual freedom and beyond any kind of freedom you might conceive of.
01:04:27.000Hey, you said that Trump would win in 2016, famously, when people were considering it to be a preposterous and implausible outcome.
01:04:43.000In 2024, almost anything could happen.
01:04:46.000We're in a weird situation where I do worry about his physical security.
01:04:51.000I do worry that 91, what look like to me, political charges, is not the end of it.
01:04:59.000And it looks like there's no level of obviousness that they're trying.
01:05:04.000Well, they're not trying to be less obvious anymore.
01:05:07.000The latest charges in New York, Look to me like they're not even trying to be legitimate.
01:05:15.000It looks to me like it's just purely political.
01:05:18.000And I don't know if most of the country will either understand banking and insurance issues to know how blatantly, obviously political it is or not.
01:05:28.000But they're not trying to hide anything.
01:05:30.000I think complexity is the friend of the The power mongers, because they can hide anything in complexity, say, well, you don't understand legal tax accounting things, bad, orange man bad.
01:05:44.000And then, you know, trust us, orange man bad accounting, you don't understand.
01:05:48.000And they can take anybody down with that.
01:05:51.000So I would expect that if Trump survives these charges, all the ones we know about, I think they'll just be new ones.
01:05:59.000I think they'll just invent new ones until they can find some way to take him out.
01:06:04.000They'll obviously go after all of his lawyers, anybody who would talk to him, anybody who would support him.
01:06:11.000If you say anything nice about him, even though I'm endorsing Vivek Ramaswamy, I like somebody younger for the next era.
01:06:22.000Even then, because I say positive things about Trump's skill set, they'll try to take me on as well.
01:06:29.000Now, the thing about free speech is the people trying to suppress it are, of course, the people in power, because people in power are the ones who are most, let's say, threatened by free speech.
01:06:40.000So they don't have to take everybody out.
01:06:42.000They only have to take out the notables.
01:06:44.000Because if they take out the people who are really good at communicating and have some chance of breaking through into their base that doesn't hear the other arguments, those are the dangerous ones.
01:06:55.000They don't need to take out everybody who has a social media account and complains online.
01:07:35.000What is it that you sort of, like I saw you say that white people should stay away from black people because there was so much tension being generated and it wasn't safe.
01:07:51.000What did you mean and how do you think it was misused especially?
01:07:59.000Well, everything that public figures say gets taken out of context, because there's always a bigger context.
01:08:05.000So the bigger context is that in the United States and other countries as well, we're suffering under these things called ESG and CRT and DEI.
01:08:15.000Now, they all have in common the idea that there's an oppressor group and an oppressed group.
01:08:22.000The oppressors are the rich old white guys, mostly, but white people in general.
01:08:28.000And the oppressed are black people and people of color, but black people in particular, because of the legacy of slavery and ongoing systemic racism.
01:08:39.000And so the idea is that if you're in the group that has been labeled the oppressor, and the other group has been told that you've oppressed them and you have their stuff, And they should get it back.
01:08:58.000It has nothing to do with anybody's DNA.
01:09:01.000It has nothing to do with anybody's culture.
01:09:03.000So it has nothing to do with even the color.
01:09:05.000It has to do with the fact that we've decided to organize our society in a way that we're trading people, not only in school, but all the way through their corporate life and through the media, that one group of people are the bad people, and they have your stuff.
01:09:24.000Now, it's hyperbole to say, get away, because we live in a big World in which getting away isn't really a practical thing, so I was hoping people would see that as hyperbole, but if you take it seriously, it sounds like a whole different thing.
01:09:39.000Yeah, I suppose in a sense it appears to me that elite interests have always been able to dominate.
01:09:48.000I mean, what is power other than the ability to dominate and control reality, whether that's the perception of reality or the economics of reality themselves?
01:09:58.000And yeah, there is a sort of a reductivism in many of the The dominant narratives around how we should sort of almost re-segregate society that don't seem to have a very, what do I want to say, congenial vision for our future, i.e.
01:10:18.000there is not a very optimistic appraisal of our ability to live together beyond our demographic distinctions.
01:10:27.000And that really, really worries me, because I think it is ultimately advantageous to the very same groups that benefit from prohibiting free speech.
01:10:38.000When you said that thing before, that ultimately it is dopamine, that's the sort of, you know, like beneath even the level of the individual, the kind of element, the element that we're moving on.
01:10:49.000I wonder if you feel that in using that type of framing and that type of analytic, we can look at What's happening when the more vilified Trump becomes, the more popular he becomes?
01:11:02.000Superficially it would seem that people are so mistrustful of the legacy media and detest the state so deeply.
01:11:12.000Glenn Greenwald and I spoke last week and he said that people hate the state and they actually hate the media now.
01:11:21.000It's like there is a hatred that's at almost a tipping point.
01:11:25.000And that, in a way, an anti-establishment figure, for whatever you think of Trump, whether you're pro-Trump or anti-Trump person, it's pretty plain the establishment don't want him there.
01:11:35.000It's pretty plain they're going to considerable lengths to prevent him becoming a sort of an incumbent political force, at least.
01:11:45.000I wonder, What type of ways might this undercurrent, this emotional undercurrent, be harnessed, corralled, motivated, activated for anti-establishment movements elsewhere?
01:12:03.000And if you agree with the basic analysis that he's become an anti-establishment icon?
01:12:18.000You'd have to find somebody who just, by luck, had similar characteristics and a billion dollars so they could weather the storms and didn't need to have a day job and all kinds of things.
01:12:32.000I mean, there's things I would say at my current age that I never would have said as a younger man, because right now I'm risking a few extra years of my remaining life.
01:12:43.000So that's a smaller risk than 40 years of life.
01:12:47.000So I'm in a lower risk situation, as is Trump, because he's a certain age.
01:12:54.000So he can simply do and say things that other people are not free to do.
01:12:59.000So that's the kind of freedom you could imagine other places would have, older people.
01:13:04.000But I don't recommend people over, I don't know, 75 being in office.
01:13:42.000We just didn't know it as well as we know it now.
01:13:45.000We didn't know that the news was as fake as Trump taught us.
01:13:49.000Once we started looking for it, you could see it everywhere.
01:13:52.000But until he alerted you to it, you thought, well, maybe a few stories are sketchy, but mostly they're playing it straight down the middle.
01:14:01.000Everything is rigged, everything is crooked, and we might be at a point where just breaking everything is the right move.
01:14:08.000So when I hear things like Matt Gaetz might cause chaos in the Congress with his latest moves about the Speaker, I think to myself, ah, chaos.
01:14:18.000That's exactly what you do before you build a house.
01:14:23.000You destroy the house that's there, because you can't really just fix the one that's there.
01:14:29.000The first step of building is destruction.
01:14:32.000So we may be entering a transparently beneficial destruction period.
01:14:38.000But we're also nimble enough in 2023, and there are enough smart people and hardworking people, that we can actually adjust to incredible shocks.
01:15:10.000So we're really good at seeing problems way ahead of time and then adjusting appropriately.
01:15:16.000So my most likely prediction for the United States is that there will be corrective forces because there always are.
01:15:23.000Things don't go in one direction forever.
01:15:25.000That's just not It's just not a feature of human experience.
01:15:29.000Things do reach a point that's too far.
01:15:32.000This week, for example, we're hearing it was a member of Congress who had a carjacking.
01:15:39.000There was a journalist who got murdered in his home in Philadelphia.
01:15:43.000So the stories of crime in the cities are certainly going to cause a change to the massive, you know, let's say, unmitigated immigration into the cities.
01:15:57.000So we're reaching a breaking point, but not for the wrong reason.
01:16:02.000We're probably reaching a breaking point because you have to use reality to fix people's brains if they're living in an illusion.
01:16:09.000If the illusion is we can be kind to everybody and it'll all work out, well, the massive immigration into New York City is the physical disproof of that.
01:16:19.000So you probably need a physical disproof to change people's minds.
01:16:23.000And the minds are what needs to be changed right now.
01:16:26.000So we might be heading toward a lot of destruction, but creative destruction.
01:16:32.000I feel often that the amount of effort, bureaucracy, corruption, legislation, militarisation of the police forces, anti-protest laws, new censorship bills, increasing surveillance, cultural machinery that appears to be utilised to divide people from one another, All collectively to be taken as a scale of endeavor that must be matched by a kind of latent and unexpressed belief that real change is possible and burgeoning and that there will come a point where people are willing to overlook cultural differences if the right messages can reach them stroke us.
01:17:14.000And recognize that ultimately we have more in common than one another than the small sets of institutions and interests that benefit from this ongoing state of crisis and decay that you describe.
01:17:26.000Also I agree with your necessity of destruction being a precedent or a precursor to real change
01:17:35.000in a kind of almost Vedic Shiva the destroyer creator way because I also feel sometimes
01:17:42.000that whilst it appears to be an archetype that most cultures lean into, the idea of
01:17:50.000a golden age, the idea of Eden, the idea of a time where we were more awake, it feels
01:17:58.000to me that there is a heaviness in our materialism.
01:18:02.000There is a heaviness in our individualism.
01:18:04.000The rationalism has voided the space between us, has robbed us of the potential charge that can exist between individuals and create the kind of charismatic healing that great individuals can bring about and perhaps great social movements can.
01:18:19.000So I sometimes take heart In how hard they work to prevent change from happening, that in a sense like, you know, I'm sure this is something that you're familiar with, it seems like your kind of wheelhouse, those miraculous moments where suddenly tulips are no longer prized, where sort of economic bubbles burst, where new realities just penetrate immediately and people sort of simultaneously awake as if there's some new perfume has reached something dormant within them.
01:18:48.000So That's how I keep myself cheerful, Scott.
01:18:53.000I wonder if you might tell us a little more.
01:18:55.000I know that your Alcohol Is Poison is part of your Reframe Your Brain, at least some of the ideas that you cover within your new book, Reframe Your Brain.