Stay Free - Russel Brand - December 15, 2022


How The US Plans To Keep The War Going For YEARS TO COME - #047 - Stay Free with Russell Brand


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per Minute

171.30089

Word Count

11,500

Sentence Count

746

Misogynist Sentences

18

Hate Speech Sentences

11


Summary

Pepsi have introduced a carbonated drink called Pilk, and it's a bit naughty, but not in the way that you might expect. Also, the Pentagon has failed yet another audit, which is a good thing, because they're looking to make billions of dollars out of the Ukraine conflict. And why Lindsay Lohan represents sexy danger and naughtiness. Stay Free With Russell Brand is out now, and you won't want to miss it! Logo by Courtney DeKorte. Theme by Mavus White. Music by PSOVOD and tyops. All rights reserved. Used by permission. This episode was produced and edited by Riley Bray. We do not own the rights to any music used in this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please leave us a five star rating and review on Apple Podcasts. Have a wonderful rest of the week, and we'll see you next Tuesday for another episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand, Stay Free. Thank you. Stay free, Love, Brand xoxo, EJ. - The Oasis - Russell Brand - Stay Free, - This episode is sponsored by Pepsi and is a tribute to the late, great singer-songwriter, singer, songwriter, poet, actor, and all-round greatness, Jonathan Goldstein. . and we'd love to hear your thoughts and musings about it on social media if you'd like to send us a review of the song you sent us a screenshot of it. if it's good enough, we'd like us to send it in the next one, we'll get it on the next time we post it on Insta-postponing it to us and we're listening to it on insta-tweet it :) - Thank you! - thank you, Russell Brand - Thankyou, - EJ & Steve O'Donnell - - Jeebus - Gav & Gav - P.J. - Gave it out to the Oasis - Sarah - Gorms - Sarah - is a lovely, Sarah - is a beautiful, lovely, sweet, beautiful, smart, sweet and funny, lovely and sexy, beautiful and lovely, beautiful - and we love you, thank you so much, thanks so much - and I'll be back next week! XOXO -


Transcript

00:00:00.000 You You
00:00:38.000 Brought to you by Pfizer Brought to you by Pfizer
00:00:58.000 Brought to you by Pfizer Brought to you by Pfizer
00:01:02.000 In this video, you're going to see the student circle.
00:01:15.000 Hello there, you awakening wonders.
00:01:17.000 Thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:01:20.000 Today we've got some fantastic stuff to talk about, like how the war industry is looking to make billions out of the Ukraine conflict for years to come.
00:01:28.000 Also, the Pentagon has failed another audit.
00:01:31.000 I think they've failed five in the last five years.
00:01:34.000 That's right.
00:01:35.000 I should do the audit.
00:01:36.000 Did you see my math test?
00:01:37.000 Very good.
00:01:38.000 Joe Biden though, he's a man who could do that all day also because he does know how old he is, which is good news.
00:01:44.000 That's a good platform to build upon Joe.
00:01:46.000 In our presentation, here's the news, no here's the effing news, we're going to be showing you how your health data is captured and used against you.
00:01:54.000 Let me know in the chat right now, did you know that was happening?
00:01:57.000 Do you know to which degree?
00:01:58.000 Do you know the new mercurial measures they're introducing to make them more adept at that?
00:02:03.000 Joining us later in the show, if we didn't have enough wonder to present you with, Steve-O is joining us to talk about addiction, activism, censorship and his new plan to become the Archbishop of Canterbury.
00:02:14.000 Oh yeah!
00:02:15.000 He hasn't got that plan.
00:02:16.000 We need you to hit rumble right now because it helps us in a way that I can never understand.
00:02:21.000 Before we get into that heavy news about the military-industrial complex and how they're willing to take us to the brink of Armageddon in order to turn a profit, which I don't know how they're going to spend in a post-apocalyptic wasteland, because in the post-apocalyptic wasteland all there is is ash, and you'd just be swapping that.
00:02:36.000 What about the bunkers though?
00:02:37.000 Down in the bunkers.
00:02:38.000 They love bunkers.
00:02:40.000 I forgot about the bunkers.
00:02:40.000 Of course.
00:02:41.000 I always forget about the bunkers.
00:02:43.000 Now though, it's time for our new item.
00:02:45.000 The system is fine.
00:02:46.000 Don't collapse into existential despair.
00:02:52.000 The first example of things being fine and there being no need to collapse into existential despair is Pilk.
00:02:58.000 Pepsi have introduced this thing called Pilk.
00:03:02.000 Have a look at Pilk.
00:03:06.000 Nice.
00:03:07.000 Ooh, naughty.
00:03:11.000 Hep C and milk.
00:03:13.000 There's a lot of things to unpack, Gareth, and I'm going to start unpacking them now, if you don't mind, mate.
00:03:17.000 Firstly, right, they're using Lindsay Lohan's cultural cachet as a person.
00:03:21.000 I'm guessing as a sort of a bad girl, girl gone wild, addiction, etc.
00:03:26.000 And she is mixing a drink.
00:03:28.000 The milk is what's described as naughty.
00:03:30.000 The milk would be the nice, wouldn't it?
00:03:32.000 Because that's the nourishment.
00:03:33.000 That's the nourishment, isn't it?
00:03:34.000 That's the mother's milk.
00:03:35.000 That's the milk of the Marjorie right there.
00:03:37.000 So that should be the nice, not the naughty.
00:03:40.000 It probably isn't mother's milk.
00:03:42.000 I mean, if you're going to start putting milk in Pepsi, why not put human milk in it?
00:03:42.000 Why not?
00:03:46.000 Why not sperm?
00:03:47.000 I mean, if you're watching this on YouTube, then remember, after 10 minutes, we go into an ascensorial wonderland where we talk about whatever the hell we like.
00:03:56.000 And I communicate to you deep, deep truths about the deep, deep state.
00:04:00.000 For the first 10 minutes, we have a little bit of a laugh about putting lactation into carbonated drinks.
00:04:07.000 Also, why is the whole thing so sexy?
00:04:09.000 There's a lot of things happening here.
00:04:10.000 Because that's the other element to Lindsay Lohan, isn't it?
00:04:12.000 That's what she represents.
00:04:13.000 She's sexy.
00:04:14.000 Lindsay Lohan represents sexy danger.
00:04:15.000 And naughtiness.
00:04:16.000 And it's interesting, again, in post-modernity and in a sort of a state of ongoing irony, the culture devouring itself, it's like things that were sort of serious once, wasn't she getting in trouble for converting to Islam?
00:04:30.000 Drug references.
00:04:31.000 Drug related, everything was sort of all very serious.
00:04:33.000 And now though, the whole self-cannibalizing culture.
00:04:36.000 What is so dangerous or naughty about putting milk into a cup?
00:04:40.000 I don't understand that.
00:04:41.000 It's not dangerous or naughty, it's just not going to taste very nice.
00:04:44.000 Because I once put milk into a soda stream and it just turned into bubbly foam and it was awful.
00:04:44.000 Exactly, yeah.
00:04:49.000 I was a pioneer, I didn't know even then.
00:04:51.000 Pilk.
00:04:54.000 That is one dirty soda.
00:05:00.000 And dirty as well.
00:05:01.000 I mean, like, what is this?
00:05:01.000 This is a children's drink at best.
00:05:03.000 But anyway, like, if you're going to get into portmanteaus, here's some other products.
00:05:06.000 You could mix vinegar and chocolate.
00:05:08.000 You can have chinega if you do that.
00:05:10.000 You could mix fish and yogurt.
00:05:11.000 That's simply foggot.
00:05:13.000 And you could also mix eagle drones and Ukraine.
00:05:16.000 And what you might do there is start a nuclear war.
00:05:18.000 So there's all sorts of other potential.
00:05:20.000 Did you ever do coke floats, though, when you were young?
00:05:22.000 Because that's not a million miles off, is it?
00:05:24.000 My brother Gareth, my dear friend.
00:05:26.000 Okay.
00:05:27.000 In the Coke float, you have found the one possible argument for this working.
00:05:33.000 And that's, when I thought about a Coke float, that's when I thought, that pilk might be alright.
00:05:38.000 It's gonna be nice, isn't it?
00:05:39.000 Creamy, lovely pilk.
00:05:40.000 That's right.
00:05:41.000 But like, a Coke float, it did go flat, didn't it?
00:05:43.000 It did.
00:05:44.000 You had to drink it very quickly.
00:05:45.000 Get that Coke float down, yeah.
00:05:47.000 Get that Coke float down, yeah.
00:05:49.000 What is everyone doing?
00:05:49.000 Why?
00:05:51.000 I think, in a sense, that's the pathway that started me on to crack and heroin, the brown and the white.
00:05:55.000 The coke float is baby smack and crack, I say.
00:05:59.000 Don't do drugs.
00:06:00.000 Drugs are very bad, particularly if you're watching this on YouTube, where it's a bit more sensorial and a little bit less able to tolerant nuance and complexity, as we've learned over the years.
00:06:10.000 Biden, though, does know how old he is.
00:06:13.000 Have a look.
00:06:14.000 I'm not happy with questions on whether he is too old to run for president again.
00:06:18.000 The 80-year-old venting to aides about the media's fixation, quote, you think I don't know how bleeping old I am.
00:06:25.000 He's been pushed too far there.
00:06:27.000 I know how old I am.
00:06:27.000 Yeah.
00:06:29.000 He's actually just finally said it.
00:06:31.000 That's good, though, because numbers is one of the areas where he displays most delirium.
00:06:35.000 As you know, on this show, Stay Free with Russell Brand, on every day, we believe that this is a sort of a repeat of the madness of King George III.
00:06:43.000 Where the descent into senility of a monarch represented the end of the old empire, giving birth, as it did, to both French democracy and the American Revolution, which could have been a mistake.
00:06:54.000 Let me know in the chat and the comments where you think that you shouldn't have had that revolution.
00:06:57.000 You should have stayed with mad old King George.
00:06:59.000 Probably not because, you know, you've got back on the cycle of senility anyway.
00:07:04.000 Putin news.
00:07:05.000 He's had to withdraw from an ice hockey game because of yet more health rumours.
00:07:11.000 As you know, Putin... Not because he's just a bit busy.
00:07:13.000 Also, like, that's a high level of fitness, isn't it?
00:07:16.000 Yeah.
00:07:16.000 Like, you're in the middle of a war with Ukraine.
00:07:19.000 Just Ukraine?
00:07:21.000 Well, just Ukraine.
00:07:22.000 There's no evidence there's a proxy war.
00:07:24.000 Although, of course, what are these Eagle drones that are being recommended?
00:07:28.000 Yeah, you can't... I don't think he should be playing ice hockey.
00:07:31.000 His excuse shouldn't be, oh, I feel a bit ill.
00:07:31.000 No.
00:07:34.000 It should be, I'm busy.
00:07:35.000 And also, it doesn't have to be something extreme like Parkinson's or liver cancer.
00:07:39.000 Ice hockeys really are.
00:07:41.000 I mean, even standing up on ice skates is very difficult.
00:07:44.000 Then to sort of enter into combat under those circumstances, I think is outrageous.
00:07:50.000 These are the kinds of stories that are, of course, used to distract you from significant and important news that we would like to draw your attention to now.
00:07:56.000 Remember, if you're watching this on YouTube, we continue for one hour on Rumble. We'll be talking about how the healthcare
00:08:02.000 industry is mining your health data and you know also in conjunction with big
00:08:06.000 tech. Let's have a look at that story now about the war industry looking
00:08:11.000 forward to multi-year authority in Ukraine. Let's have a look at that. So okay
00:08:18.000 there is legislation pending in Congress that indicates that the US government
00:08:21.000 government believes that the Ukraine war may continue for years.
00:08:24.000 On October the 11th, the Senate Armed Service Committee submitted its amended draft of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2023.
00:08:30.000 Nestled within the draft, Gareth, nestled, they've got a draft and then they've found a little enclave where you put a bird's egg or a baby bird or a little viper.
00:08:41.000 Nestled within the draft is a provision that would establish an emergency.
00:08:44.000 Whenever you hear that word, you know they're up to something.
00:08:46.000 Whether it's shutting down trucker protests or endorsing profitable endeavours for Lockheed Martin, etc.
00:08:53.000 There's a multi-year plan to award massive defense contracts to Lockheed Martin, Raytheon,
00:08:57.000 BAE Systems and other war corporations to produce weapons for Ukraine and to replenish
00:09:01.000 U.S. stockpiles, as well as those of foreign allies and partners.
00:09:05.000 An amendment spearheaded by New Hampshire Democrat Senator Gene Shaheen and co-sponsored
00:09:09.000 by Texas Republican Senator John Cormian would allow the Pentagon to award non-competitive,
00:09:14.000 no-bid contracts to arms manufacturers under the plan.
00:09:17.000 Now that's the kind of complexity that I want to see covered by the mainstream media.
00:09:22.000 Why are they not including that story in their reporting on the Ukraine war?
00:09:30.000 These are vital defining facts.
00:09:32.000 I noticed that was a Democrat and a Republican.
00:09:34.000 This is bipartisan.
00:09:35.000 No, no, no, hold on.
00:09:36.000 They can't be the same.
00:09:37.000 Both those parties can't have ultimately the same interests.
00:09:39.000 It must mean something when you go down to that booth and you pick one of them, maybe
00:09:44.000 nibbling on a nail or sucking on a thumb, you're making a valuable decision.
00:09:49.000 Now that's the complex reporting there in the intercept, or at least the transparent
00:09:52.000 reporting, but have a look at the mainstream media have reported the emergence of a new
00:09:57.000 superplane.
00:09:58.000 It's like something from Top Gun.
00:10:00.000 Like, Gareth, what exactly is this superplane?
00:10:02.000 It's just fast and can ignore radars.
00:10:05.000 This is Northrop Grumman who have unveiled their new B-21 nuclear bomber.
00:10:10.000 They spent $200 billion on this.
00:10:13.000 The thing is with Northrop Grumman... I don't like saying it.
00:10:16.000 I don't like it because what they make is very very high tech but Northrop Grumman sounds like a Yorkshire farmer.
00:10:22.000 It does.
00:10:23.000 I hope I've invented new super jets that'll be able to evade detection and drop missiles on Val from Grade 8.
00:10:33.000 Look at how they're reporting it on the news.
00:10:35.000 This woman makes it seem so amenable and sexy that I actually start to think, I'm glad we've got these broadcasters.
00:10:40.000 This is the news.
00:10:41.000 It sounds like promo.
00:10:42.000 Look at it.
00:10:42.000 This is the news.
00:10:44.000 An Air Force project long under wraps is a secret no more.
00:10:50.000 She's thrilled about it.
00:10:50.000 Excited.
00:10:51.000 There's a secret note.
00:10:52.000 Finally we know all about it.
00:10:54.000 This is a bomber.
00:10:55.000 This has got to bomb children.
00:10:57.000 This is a machine of death that you're paying for if you're an American taxpayer.
00:11:01.000 And we're probably paying in some sort of crazy old roundabout way.
00:11:04.000 Display fit for Hollywood.
00:11:05.000 The Pentagon showed off the new long-range V-21 Raider in Palmdale, California last night.
00:11:12.000 It is fit for Hollywood.
00:11:13.000 It does look like Hollywood production.
00:11:15.000 It does look like Top Gun Maverick, in particular the bit at the beginning when he's test pilot in that plane, you know, and you see him in that lab.
00:11:21.000 Maverick, you fool!
00:11:22.000 Don't try and fly it that fast!
00:11:24.000 But of course we know Maverick.
00:11:25.000 He does try and fly it that fast.
00:11:26.000 Well, he's a Maverick after all.
00:11:28.000 If Maverick starts behaving within the lines, they're going to have to change his name to a conventional figure within the Air Force.
00:11:34.000 It's also like a Steve Jobs iPhone launch.
00:11:37.000 The commodification of war, the normalisation of war, the reductive vilification of a figure like Putin, who doubtlessly requires no additional vilification because he's a former KGB head who's engaged in military action overseas.
00:11:51.000 You know, the vilification stands for itself.
00:11:53.000 You don't need to turn these figures into cartoons.
00:11:55.000 Unless you're doing that to strip the conversation of nuance in order for this crazy, profitable crap to go down unquestioned.
00:12:03.000 How can the Pentagon fail five audits?
00:12:05.000 Let me know what corruption you envisage that masks.
00:12:09.000 Now, we're going to have to drop out on YouTube now, not just because... Not because we don't love you.
00:12:15.000 I love all six million of you awakening wonders.
00:12:17.000 I feel connected to you in the limitless, but it's... Gareth, I'm feeling the censorship.
00:12:22.000 I'm feeling the censorship on me.
00:12:24.000 I've got to let myself loose.
00:12:25.000 I've got to unveil some truth.
00:12:26.000 Steve-O's coming on here later.
00:12:27.000 Me and Steve-O, we've got to be untethered.
00:12:29.000 That's right.
00:12:30.000 Haven't we?
00:12:31.000 Yeah.
00:12:31.000 And also, we've got hero videos coming at you.
00:12:33.000 Deep, deep, dark presentations on truths that simply cannot be unveiled on YouTube.
00:12:38.000 We're just too dangerous and naughty.
00:12:39.000 We're a lot like that... Pilk!
00:12:41.000 I'm like a delicious glass of stinking pilk.
00:12:41.000 Yeah.
00:12:45.000 Why don't you just tip a yoghurt and sperm, whatever you want, into a can of cola and drink it down.
00:12:53.000 It could be any type of sperm, I don't think it's necessarily egregious to say that.
00:12:56.000 I wouldn't keep going down the sperm line.
00:13:00.000 I'm not sure we're off earth.
00:13:01.000 That's what she said.
00:13:02.000 I mean, I never use that joke, but there you go.
00:13:04.000 All right, listen, YouTube, join us over on Rumble.
00:13:07.000 Got to say goodbye to you now, but get over there now.
00:13:09.000 There's a link in the description.
00:13:11.000 Okay, let's have a look at this relentless commodification of war a little more.
00:13:16.000 Let's see how the rest of the advert goes.
00:13:18.000 It's not an advert, is it?
00:13:18.000 I mean, news.
00:13:19.000 it.
00:13:42.000 Big for their boots.
00:13:42.000 Yeah.
00:13:45.000 When you get to a point where the, you know, trust in media is like, you know, falling dramatically over the last few years, is it kind of any wonder?
00:13:53.000 You know, there was obviously all the issues around the pandemic and blame, the blaming of the unvaccinated and all those kind of narratives that the news was regularly, you know, CNN, Brian Stelt, we saw it all.
00:14:02.000 And then you've got, and you go, no, no, we're fair and balanced.
00:14:05.000 How dare you not trust us?
00:14:06.000 Horsepace, things like that.
00:14:08.000 And then they go and advertise this.
00:14:09.000 What do you think in the comments?
00:14:10.000 Do you think the mainstream media see you as absolute morons and idiots?
00:14:14.000 Do they talk down to you?
00:14:15.000 Do they give you narratives fit only for mainstream media?
00:14:19.000 And also, by the way, those big movies, you know that they're made in alliance and compliance with military ideals and goals, and this is certainly not an attack on The brave service people around the world who sacrifices, we regularly and rightly honour.
00:14:32.000 It's to simply say that the military-industrial complex, who take 50% of most Pentagon budgets, do not care about service personnel either.
00:14:40.000 No, they don't.
00:14:41.000 Nearly a quarter of enlisted families are experiencing, this is within the military, are experiencing food insecurity, and more than 60% of respondents pay more than they can comfortably afford for housing.
00:14:50.000 So this is like people who literally serve in the military are experiencing problems with food insecurity.
00:14:55.000 How dare they propagandise and ally those two ideas, pretend that if you don't support the troops you're somehow unpatriotic, when in fact, as you've always known, as you've always known, they simply use that narrative to fatten already wealthy organisations like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin.
00:15:11.000 Is it later in this same news report that you see like a general come out that used to work for Raytheon?
00:15:16.000 Oh man, this is going to blow your mind.
00:15:17.000 You won't believe this.
00:15:18.000 They could bring this person out like it's part of the news.
00:15:19.000 He works for Raytheon, check it out.
00:15:23.000 The B-21 Raider is the first strategic bomber in more than three decades.
00:15:28.000 One of the best strategic bombers I've ever known.
00:15:30.000 Even when I was working at Raytheon, it was one of the best ones we had there.
00:15:34.000 So he now is working for the government.
00:15:36.000 He's Biden's pick from Raytheon.
00:15:36.000 He's the defence secretary.
00:15:39.000 If I'm looking for anyone as the new defence secretary, who shall I pick?
00:15:42.000 Someone from...
00:15:44.000 The defence industry?
00:15:45.000 No!
00:15:45.000 They'll be wanting to have wars unnecessarily!
00:15:45.000 No!
00:15:47.000 Oh no!
00:15:48.000 God!
00:15:48.000 Hold on a minute!
00:15:48.000 I've just seen something!
00:15:49.000 If you pick someone that's both Raytheon or Lockheed Martin, they'll, because of their relationships and because of their systemic ties, they'll be looking for ways to create war.
00:15:57.000 It'll be bad for world peace!
00:15:59.000 Joe!
00:15:59.000 No!
00:15:59.000 Oh, he's already done it!
00:16:00.000 I know how fucking old I am!
00:16:02.000 We're big, big farmer this year!
00:16:06.000 That's what we say.
00:16:07.000 Let's have a look at this dear old darling.
00:16:10.000 It is a testament to America's enduring advantages in ingenuity and innovation.
00:16:17.000 Corruption and complexity and reductiveness.
00:16:20.000 Also, ingenuity and innovation could be used in ways that don't lead to, you know, annihilation.
00:16:25.000 For example, why not tip a delicious glass of milk?
00:16:30.000 Like you did.
00:16:31.000 That's what I've done.
00:16:32.000 That was enough for me.
00:16:33.000 Lovely old milk or chinica.
00:16:36.000 Chomp down on a lovely bar of vinegary chocolate for your ingenuity.
00:16:39.000 Is this still the news?
00:16:40.000 This is still the news.
00:16:41.000 This is still the news.
00:16:42.000 It actually looks like the Top Gun trailer.
00:16:44.000 Still the news.
00:16:44.000 It does.
00:16:45.000 This shouldn't be the news.
00:16:46.000 Do you think that the news should be a trailer for war?
00:16:48.000 Do you think that the news should be a mouthpiece for commerce and further commodification of your culture?
00:16:54.000 Do you know by now that mainstream media news is just another TV show that they put on at a regular time and wrap up in graphics and grammar that distract you from the fact that it's propaganda?
00:17:03.000 Let's check out a little bit of it.
00:17:05.000 The V21 Raider represents a view into the future and brings it to the here and now.
00:17:13.000 nuclear armageddon if you keep agitating china and russia can't keep doing that gareth it's going to annoy them in tomorrow's high-end threat environment the b21 looks imposed we are opening and imposing That's what it's come down to.
00:17:29.000 Oh my God, look at that thing!
00:17:31.000 Let's just drop it.
00:17:32.000 People aren't going to make decisions based on the aesthetics of the aircraft, truly, when it comes to geopolitics and the complex global arguments and the ultimate showdown between the USA and the globalist forces that want a unipolar world and can't handle the complexity of a necessary Multi-polar geopolitical space where China aren't going to just give up and go home.
00:17:53.000 Obviously, this war is about bankrupting Russia.
00:17:55.000 Many people have explicitly said that.
00:17:57.000 That's the point of it.
00:17:59.000 It's not to protect the Ukrainian people, which would be a worthy goal.
00:18:02.000 That's why they say it.
00:18:03.000 It's not to bring down a tyrant in Putin, which would be a worthy goal.
00:18:07.000 That's why they say it.
00:18:08.000 It's to further line the pockets of corrupt organizations like... Well, I don't know if they're corrupt.
00:18:12.000 The whole system is corrupt.
00:18:13.000 They're not corrupt, but the fact that they're not just shows you the space they operate in.
00:18:17.000 The biggest lobbying group in Washington is the defense lobbying group.
00:18:21.000 So when you talk about corrupt, I mean, lobbying basically is corrupt.
00:18:24.000 That's by power.
00:18:25.000 Do you think that that's corrupt?
00:18:26.000 Do you think that lobbying should be banned?
00:18:27.000 You know when Tulsi Gabbard left the Democrat Party and just said that it's a war machine, didn't she?
00:18:32.000 She said that when she came on our show.
00:18:34.000 You can see that show on Rumble.
00:18:38.000 I guess it's difficult to contest that she's right when the defense industry is the most powerful lobbying interest.
00:18:44.000 Yeah, you can.
00:18:45.000 And also, you know, when you get a stat like this from Global Living, which according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, it would cost $20 billion to end homelessness in the United States.
00:18:54.000 Let's have a look at some of that stuff, Gareth.
00:18:55.000 I know you've done some tireless work there with your team.
00:18:58.000 Well, I guess, you know, when Tulsi Gabbard talks about leaving the Democrats and that it's, you know, a party of warmongers, and you see statistics like, you know, the new Pentagon budget, which is record amounts that Biden's asked for, And 200 billion going on this new B-21 bomber.
00:19:14.000 And then you get a statistic like it would cost 20 billion to end homelessness.
00:19:17.000 I mean, I'm sure that's slightly reductive in its own way, because all sorts of systems will also need to be altered.
00:19:22.000 But it does seem like their priority is on defence, doesn't it?
00:19:26.000 Could you bring that full screen for me, guys, so I can see that in its entirety?
00:19:29.000 Thank you.
00:19:29.000 Last week, the Department of Defence revealed that it had failed its fifth consecutive audit.
00:19:33.000 I would not say we flunked it, so we don't even know what they're doing.
00:19:35.000 When they have audits, like when they go into bed and go, right, let's see what's going on with all this money.
00:19:40.000 Isn't it something like 70% of the weapons that have been sent to Ukraine can't be tracked?
00:19:45.000 That's right.
00:19:46.000 I would not... So listen to this.
00:19:47.000 This is going to blow your mind.
00:19:48.000 You're not going to believe this.
00:19:49.000 Let me know what you think in the comments of the chat about this story.
00:19:51.000 I would not say that we flunked, said DOD controller Mike McCord, although his office did note that the Pentagon only managed to account for 39% of its 3.5 trillion in assets.
00:20:02.000 Only 39%!
00:20:02.000 Imagine you could only... Imagine you could only account for 39% of your fingers.
00:20:08.000 Where are the rest of your fingers?
00:20:10.000 I'm not telling you I don't need to tell you that!
00:20:12.000 Why don't you look at these ones?
00:20:13.000 I'm going to have to smell those ones because I don't trust where you've been putting them on the basis of your inability to accurately audit.
00:20:20.000 The process is important for us to do and it's making us get better.
00:20:23.000 It's not making us get better as fast as we want.
00:20:27.000 We want to get better faster, but possibly because most of your fingers are up inside your bumholes, you crazy crowd.
00:20:33.000 The US military has the distinction of being the only US government agency to have never passed a comprehensive audit.
00:20:39.000 Stop auditing them!
00:20:40.000 They never pass one.
00:20:41.000 No, it's pointless.
00:20:44.000 Because normally if you fail an audit, there are consequences to failing an audit.
00:20:49.000 With them it's just record amounts of additional funding.
00:20:53.000 Well, I've got some very bad news.
00:20:56.000 Oh, what is it?
00:20:57.000 You have failed the audit.
00:20:59.000 Oh, is this going to affect our funding?
00:21:00.000 Let me check.
00:21:01.000 No, you're getting record funding.
00:21:03.000 So what's the relevance of the audit?
00:21:05.000 Oh wow, when you put it like that, no relevance.
00:21:07.000 How about I stick my fingers up my own ass?
00:21:09.000 Why not?
00:21:10.000 That's what we're here doing.
00:21:11.000 39% of my fingers are the ones that you can see.
00:21:14.000 The rest of them, they've got to be somewhere, baby.
00:21:16.000 They've got to be somewhere.
00:21:18.000 What does it say here?
00:21:19.000 In the Hill, the House on Thursday passed the annual defence authorisation bill for a record $847 billion, 50% of which it's estimated will end up in the hands of organisations like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon, which by some weird coincidence, the Defence Secretary used to work at.
00:21:35.000 Oh, you think because he used to work at Raytheon, now he's his defence secretary, they set up favourable contracts and would even go so far as perpetuating needless wars in order to fatten the pockets of those organisations.
00:21:47.000 That war in Ukraine was a surprise for your birthday and you've spoiled it.
00:21:53.000 You're just like Big Pharma.
00:21:55.000 No?
00:21:55.000 Maybe?
00:21:56.000 Could work, could work, could work.
00:21:58.000 And as you say, Gareth, 40 million people nationwide are living in poverty.
00:22:03.000 Yeah, I mean, I guess at a time where you're talking about the cost of living crisis all the time, you've got politicians going on the telly talking about how difficult it is and how, you know, it's because of Putin that we can't, that we have to, you know, you're paying high gas prices because what we're doing is fighting Putin.
00:22:19.000 Well, it seems like there's plenty of money around.
00:22:21.000 It's money, isn't it?
00:22:22.000 They're getting some money from somewhere, aren't they?
00:22:23.000 They're getting it from somewhere.
00:22:24.000 The military industrial complex giant, Northrop Grumman.
00:22:27.000 Hurry up, Northrop Grumman here!
00:22:30.000 I was out lambing this morning, up to shoulder!
00:22:33.000 Not many people, I imagine, are going to appreciate this rather good impression of a Yorkshire farmer from All Creatures Great and Small in the 1980s on British television because you're most likely in America, aren't you, in all reality?
00:22:47.000 Military industrial complex giant Norfolk Grumman introduced its B21 radar on Friday.
00:22:52.000 The B21, whose development was 30 years in the making and whose total cost is expected to exceed $200 billion, is tapped to replace the B2 Spirit.
00:22:59.000 According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, it would cost $20 billion to end homelessness.
00:23:03.000 I mean, I recognise that you can make those kinds of financial connections almost arbitrarily, but it does show what our priorities are.
00:23:09.000 as a culture and in particular when you see that that money is not going to
00:23:15.000 support in troops who we've just heard are living in various degrees of
00:23:19.000 deprivation in spite of the amount of resources available and the bloody
00:23:23.000 Pentagon can't even complete an audit. Yeah. It leaves a lot of questions.
00:23:27.000 I think we're in a situation now with this war and with some of the things that we're discovering about this war that people, the public, are now starting to ask questions about where does this money go?
00:23:37.000 Let me know in the chat, is this war just a pandemic sort of again?
00:23:42.000 Is the war the new pandemic?
00:23:44.000 in 18 months will we be going, I'm fucking ill, we were saying at the time That this is a result of NATO infringement.
00:23:44.000 I.e.
00:23:51.000 Again, this is not.
00:23:52.000 Please, this is a sensitive matter.
00:23:53.000 People's lives are at stake.
00:23:54.000 That's why it's important that you tell the truth.
00:23:56.000 People are dying in Ukraine.
00:23:58.000 This is a terrible, terrible war.
00:24:00.000 We're not saying that, you know, the censorship that prevents people having an ordinary conversation and a necessary conversation about this isn't out of respect for Ukrainian people.
00:24:09.000 It's out of respect for Rafian and Lockheed Martin and their agenda.
00:24:13.000 So do you think in 18 months there'll be more facts available?
00:24:16.000 Let me know in the chat.
00:24:17.000 Let me know in the comments.
00:24:18.000 Right now.
00:24:19.000 Now, are you curious, even a little bit, about how your health data is captured and used against you and the methods and the measures that they use to capture yet more information in even more interesting ways?
00:24:31.000 Have you noticed the ubiquity of cameras?
00:24:33.000 Have you noticed how everything now, it requires a little glance of your face that they're reading the contours of your, in your case, Gareth, beautiful face.
00:24:42.000 Thank you.
00:24:42.000 Well, why not?
00:24:43.000 Why not do a compliment in the middle of the link?
00:24:45.000 Do a compliment in the middle of the link.
00:24:46.000 That's what I learned at school for old media.
00:24:49.000 Now that we're in new media, now that we're truth tellers, now that we're on the side of truth and justice, I can still use some of those techniques.
00:24:56.000 When they're reading the contours of your face, where is that information going and how could it be co-opted and misused?
00:25:02.000 Time now for Here's the News.
00:25:03.000 No, no, oh no, here's the effing news.
00:25:07.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.
00:25:09.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:25:13.000 In spite of Ron DeSantis calling for a statewide jury on the efficacy and practices around vaccines,
00:25:20.000 narratives are still being created saying that anti-vaxxers are bad drivers, for one thing.
00:25:26.000 Thankfully, people aren't simultaneously advancing new ways to capture and weaponize your health data.
00:25:33.000 Are they?
00:25:34.000 They are.
00:25:37.000 In this fantastic story, hot off of Ron DeSantis announcing that there will be a statewide investigation into the efficacy and practices, potential misrepresentation around mRNA vaccines, we want to talk to you about some of the phony narratives that are being constructed, for example, People that didn't get vaccinated are probably really bad drivers.
00:25:56.000 If you can make such tangential leaps, isn't this a time to be especially vigilant around data capture?
00:26:02.000 Because it seems that they don't use that data in ways that are entirely linear, and I would say that they are weaponising health data and trying to create social credit score conditions already.
00:26:14.000 Let me tell you a little bit more about this crazy idea that people that aren't vaccinated are bad drivers.
00:26:19.000 I'm not taking that medicine, it's not been correctly trialled.
00:26:22.000 Also, woo-hee!
00:26:23.000 I don't care about trees or white lines!
00:26:26.000 People who refuse to get the COVID vaccine are far more likely to get into traffic crash requiring hospitalisation, a recently published study found, adding evidence to the theory that anti-vaxxers often demonstrate other kind of dangerous anti-social behaviour.
00:26:39.000 Now that is obviously a narrativisation to suggest that a personal choice not to take a particular medication, particularly as more and more information is revealed, and Ron DeSantis calls for a state-wide jury to analyse evidence that they could have been misleading and misrepresenting the efficacy of those vaccines.
00:26:57.000 You can't say, well, as we know for a fact, anti-vaxxers are anti-social.
00:27:01.000 This is like extraordinary propagandising techniques.
00:27:04.000 Have you noticed that Almost all media now is propagandising, potentially from both directions, this is not just a liberal establishment modality, possibly the right are doing it, possibly even I'm doing it, maybe none of us are free from this tendency but perhaps the only chance we have is by inviting discourse and conversation around issues, not leaping to conclusions and certainly not giving the ability to garner more data to corrupt
00:27:28.000 Centralised forces.
00:27:30.000 And as usual when they take your data, you know, like during the pandemic, hey, just so we can help you.
00:27:34.000 Have you taken that medication?
00:27:36.000 Just so we can help you.
00:27:37.000 We're not letting you in that venue.
00:27:38.000 Just so we can help you.
00:27:39.000 You're a bad driver and you shouldn't be allowed a car and we're not going to insure you.
00:27:42.000 Do you see how this edges us towards a social credit score dystopia?
00:27:46.000 Do you see?
00:27:47.000 Let me know in the comments.
00:27:47.000 Let me know in the chat.
00:27:48.000 We theorise that individual adults who tend to resist public health recommendations might also neglect basic road safety guidelines, the authors stated.
00:27:56.000 Non-compliance isn't automatically negative.
00:27:59.000 There might come a time where non-compliance is necessary.
00:28:01.000 Haven't we seen the mainstream media already shift from, boo, anti-vax protesters, what's wrong with them, those idiots, they should be denied health care, all the way to, look at these brave Chinese protesters protesting against lockdown.
00:28:13.000 Why are these people ignoring lockdown?
00:28:15.000 Boo!
00:28:15.000 Hey, these people are ignoring lockdown.
00:28:17.000 Hooray!
00:28:17.000 The only difference is the passing of time.
00:28:20.000 You can't trust them.
00:28:21.000 They have no moral authority.
00:28:23.000 They are simply peddling whatever ideas maximize the ability of the powerful to enhance their power.
00:28:28.000 Even if they don't know it yet, they know not what they do.
00:28:32.000 I hope that's the answer.
00:28:33.000 The study published in the American Journal of Medicine looked at data from more than 11.2 million people in Ontario, Canada, and data from 178 medical centres in the province.
00:28:41.000 Of the 11.2 million people, 84% had received Covid vaccines, and 16% had not as of July 31st, 2021.
00:28:47.000 Of that same group, 6,682 people needed emergency care for a serious vehicle crash, During the one month period researchers looked at, or 200 per day, of those traffic crash victims, 75% had gotten the jab and 25% had not, or an increased risk of 72% for the unvaccinated relative to the jab.
00:29:05.000 Now that might seem like some pretty contrived mathematics, but it's essentially a pirouette around the algebra to come to the conclusion that unvaccinated people ought be persecuted And when you note that in January, Quebec had a plan to put significant health tax on unvaccinated people, you can see how this data is being mobilised in unique and unusual ways.
00:29:25.000 So I think it's really important to spot when they say A is potentially true and therefore B, because A is probably a lie and B is probably tyranny.
00:29:33.000 The conclusion around Quebec is drawn from a tweet from Quebec Health Minister Christian Dube who announced, What do you want?
00:29:39.000 Taxing or vaxing?
00:29:40.000 Neither?
00:29:40.000 Well one of them's inevitable.
00:29:41.000 People thought that they were going to be heavily taxed if they didn't immediately get vaxxed.
00:29:45.000 What do you want? Taxing or vaxxing?
00:29:46.000 Neither. Well, one of them's inevitable.
00:29:48.000 In fact, both of them are inevitable.
00:29:49.000 Traffic deaths surged in the United States during the pandemic,
00:29:52.000 but Canada, like nearly all comparable countries, saw the opposite,
00:29:54.000 the extension of a long-term trend of fewer road fatalities.
00:29:57.000 There could be loads of reasons for that.
00:29:59.000 That could be because across the US people's businesses were closing down, they were experiencing despair, they knew lockdowns were being imposed on them that were ultimately unfair, that they couldn't trust Big Pharma, that they couldn't trust the government.
00:30:08.000 The researchers are careful to note the studies show no causal link between vaccine hesitancy and risky driving.
00:30:13.000 That means there is no link.
00:30:14.000 That means it's being made up.
00:30:15.000 That's an arbitrary link.
00:30:16.000 That's a narrativised link.
00:30:17.000 That's another way of saying propaganda.
00:30:19.000 But the results may relate to a distrust of government or belief in freedom that contributes to both vaccine preferences and increased traffic risk.
00:30:27.000 Man, I love me some freedom.
00:30:29.000 No vaccines.
00:30:30.000 Also, I'm going up on the sidewalk.
00:30:32.000 Also, that old lady's getting what's coming to her.
00:30:35.000 Other explanations, the researchers said, might be misconceptions of everyday risks, faith in natural protection, antipathy towards regulation, chronic poverty, exposure to misinformation, insufficient resources, or other personal beliefs.
00:30:47.000 so many variables that the entire study is absolutely redundant Other than its potential utility in creating erroneous, facetious narratives to damn and condemn people that it's safe to damn.
00:30:47.000 I.e.
00:31:01.000 It's almost like in the wake of the woke, where they've realized that you oughtn't condemn people on the basis of identity, there's a craving, a longing.
00:31:08.000 Ah!
00:31:08.000 We've got to still find a way of hating poor people.
00:31:11.000 These people!
00:31:11.000 We've got to find a way of demonizing some group.
00:31:14.000 Is there a group that we can legitimately condemn?
00:31:16.000 Not really, not really.
00:31:17.000 But could we sort of cobble together some data?
00:31:19.000 Well, I suppose you would.
00:31:20.000 It'd be unethical.
00:31:20.000 Doesn't matter about ethics.
00:31:21.000 We don't have any.
00:31:22.000 This is why it's all the more concerning that we are seeing again, through the process of commerce and convenience, new technology introduced that will give centralised big tech resources, which, as you know, are deeply interpolated with political and government agencies, the ability to garner more of your data.
00:31:41.000 New software from Radiant, a San Francisco-based software company that plans to roll out its AI-driven kiosk by the end of this year, will create a personalized experience for customers while helping boost restaurant sales.
00:31:51.000 Well, that's good news.
00:31:52.000 Or customers.
00:31:53.000 I might be a customer.
00:31:54.000 Restaurant sales?
00:31:55.000 Well, that's got to be good for the economy.
00:31:56.000 This isn't going to lead to you stealing our data and using lots of facial recognition tech to make all sorts of assumptions and prevent people getting insured, is it?
00:32:03.000 According to Radium, you'll walk up to a kiosk in a quick-service restaurant, and a tiny camera will scan your features, registering your height, age, gender, and mood.
00:32:11.000 Depressed, sad, stuck in a dystopia.
00:32:13.000 Pronouns?
00:32:14.000 Pissed off and angry!
00:32:15.000 Instantly, it will adjust its display, selecting meal options picked just for you.
00:32:19.000 How dare it!
00:32:21.000 You look depressed.
00:32:21.000 Here, here's a milkshake.
00:32:23.000 Now fuck off.
00:32:23.000 Let's have a look at how this technology is being presented to potential vendors.
00:32:27.000 Window displays have always been an effective way to catch the eye of passers-by.
00:32:31.000 Yeah, I love window displays.
00:32:33.000 Keep talking.
00:32:34.000 Using anonymous AI facial technology, cameras attached to radiant screens capture and count the number of passers-by with the opportunity to see the content.
00:32:43.000 Do you see that what that's actually suggesting is there's going to be posters that are reading your gender, your age, your preferences.
00:32:50.000 This is at the point that it's being offered to vendors as a way to sort of target customers.
00:32:54.000 Apparently with bananas.
00:32:56.000 But do you see that in the wrong hand, for example, in the kind of hands that might make a connection between you not taking a certain kind of medication and being an irresponsible driver, that could be used to make all sorts of decisions and choices about not only what you might buy, but where you might go and what you might be allowed to do and not do.
00:33:12.000 And also health information of yours that ought remain private.
00:33:15.000 And measure engagement behavior through the number of people that pass the screens Oh my God, look at those bananas!
00:33:21.000 The performance of each ad is measured using the data captured and visualized in SightCorp by Radiant Analytics.
00:33:28.000 Data plus capitalism will lead, ultimately, to a sharp spike of evil.
00:33:34.000 Because in the end, there's an obligation to use all of the data accrued to generate profit.
00:33:39.000 This same data could be used to create a better, fairer, more just society.
00:33:43.000 To create better diets, better conditions.
00:33:45.000 but in an irresponsible culture where the- Chayna.
00:33:47.000 ...
00:34:02.000 In spite of Ron DeSantis calling for a statewide jury on the efficacy and practices around vaccines-
00:34:10.000 On a per-screen and per-campaign level.
00:34:12.000 Isn't the music like sort of semi-tribal?
00:34:14.000 Like, hey, we're in nature.
00:34:16.000 We're not in nature, we're in an open prison and it's increasingly less open.
00:34:20.000 Psycorp by Radiant Analytics provides unique, anonymous audience measurement.
00:34:25.000 Why does he keep saying anonymous?
00:34:26.000 How come the only people that get to be anonymous are these powerful interests?
00:34:29.000 Every little bit of privacy is being extracted from your life, from your masturbation habits, to your personal acquisition choices, your consumer habits, your health biometrics, the shape of your face, your mood, your gender, your preferred type of weather, what kind of hat you like to wear.
00:34:43.000 I like these ones.
00:34:44.000 But for them, absolute anonymity.
00:34:45.000 Does that seem like yet another power imbalance?
00:34:47.000 Optimize your storefront today.
00:34:50.000 Contact us to schedule a demo.
00:34:52.000 What are some of the ways though that the data accrued through this charming tribal tech could ultimately be utilized?
00:34:58.000 With little public scrutiny, the health insurance industry has joined forces with data brokers to vacuum up personal details about hundreds of millions of Americans.
00:35:06.000 The companies are tracking your race, education level, TV habits, marital status, net worth.
00:35:10.000 They're collecting what you post on social media, whether you're behind on your bills, whether you order online.
00:35:15.000 They feed this information into complicated computer algorithms that spit out predictions about how much your healthcare could cost them.
00:35:21.000 Are you a woman who recently changed your name?
00:35:23.000 You could be newly married and have a pricey pregnancy pending.
00:35:25.000 Or maybe you're stressed and anxious from a recent divorce.
00:35:28.000 That too, the computer's models predict, may run up your medical bills.
00:35:31.000 Once you know that data accrued under one pretense, often within very prescriptive and
00:35:37.000 explicit conditions, can be used elsewhere, you know that this data will end up being
00:35:43.000 used to the convenience of the highest bidder or the most powerful.
00:35:47.000 Once you know that the state has agents deeply embedded in social media organizations and is controlling the narratives of just public discourse, you know that these relationships and conditions already exist.
00:35:58.000 You know that the real tyrant that you need to be concerned about is not Vladimir Putin and whether or not he's shat himself lately, but the new tyranny afforded by this kind of technological dictatorship.
00:36:08.000 Are you a woman who's purchased plus-size clothing?
00:36:11.000 You're considered at risk of depression.
00:36:13.000 Mental health care can be expensive.
00:36:14.000 I don't think so.
00:36:15.000 You've just bought those leggings.
00:36:17.000 Hopefully they'll keep you cheerful, because you ain't going into no clinic.
00:36:21.000 Cuddle up to your giant leggings, tubby!
00:36:23.000 We sit on oceans of data, said Eric McCulley, Director of Strategic Solutions for LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which sounds like a Superman baddie.
00:36:32.000 Insurers contend that they use information to spot health issues in their clients and flag them so they get the services they need.
00:36:38.000 Yeah, because that's how insurance companies behave, isn't it?
00:36:40.000 Oh, oh, we've just noticed you're an insurance risk.
00:36:43.000 Would you like us to insure you so we can help you down the line?
00:36:45.000 Do you not know that whenever you get insured, this is my experience, Oh yeah, we'll insure you, we'll help you, your car, your house.
00:36:51.000 Oh, I need you.
00:36:52.000 Oh, let me just check your policy.
00:36:53.000 Now, how to say this, it's a very complicated thing.
00:36:56.000 We've looked at your data and I've created a graph for you that helps explain the complexities of your situation.
00:37:02.000 So, if you could just follow the advice.
00:37:04.000 See you in a week!
00:37:05.000 And companies like LexisNexis say the data shouldn't be used to set prices.
00:37:09.000 But, as a research scientist from one company told me, I can't say it hasn't happened.
00:37:12.000 Because it has, and that would be lying.
00:37:14.000 At a time when every week brings a new privacy scandal and worries about the misuse of personal information, patient advocates and privacy scholars say the insurance industry's data gathering runs counter to its touted and federally required allegiance to patients' medical privacy.
00:37:27.000 Patient advocates warn that using unverified, error-prone, lifestyle data to make medical assumptions could lead insurers to improperly priced plans, for instance raising rates based on false information or discriminate against anyone tagged as high cost.
00:37:41.000 So in a sense you can see how A story saying that people that didn't get vaccinated are causing car crashes, while there are new investigations into the efficacy of those vaccines that were, as I recall, quite aggressively pushed, means that we oughtn't be marching open-hearted with our trousers down into the arms of data capture organizations, even if they're saying that they're ultimately going to offer us better services.
00:38:04.000 There's enough evidence to suggest that these big tech platforms and data capture giants operate in coordination with the government to push An agenda that is not beneficial to anybody but themselves.
00:38:15.000 But that's just what I think.
00:38:16.000 Let me know what you think in the comments.
00:38:17.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.
00:38:19.000 See you in a moment.
00:38:20.000 All right, look at that.
00:38:24.000 We're back on the all of a sudden just like that.
00:38:26.000 We're back in the stream and joined by Jackass legend, Steve-O.
00:38:31.000 Hello Steve-O.
00:38:32.000 You all right, mate?
00:38:33.000 Yeah, dude.
00:38:34.000 I'm doing great, Russell.
00:38:36.000 Fascinating conversation right here.
00:38:39.000 Yeah, thank you so much for participating.
00:38:41.000 Thanks for being on our show.
00:38:42.000 I just want to mention straight away Steve-O's new book, A Hard Kick In The Nuts, What I Learned From A Lifetime Of Terrible Decisions.
00:38:48.000 Brilliant title.
00:38:50.000 It's out now and also Steve-O's on tour at the moment with his bucket list tour.
00:38:54.000 If you can get tickets, we'll put a link in the description.
00:38:57.000 Stevo, I've always loved you, mate.
00:38:59.000 Firstly, I loved you in the Jackass days because I thought there was something piratical and mad about what you all were doing.
00:39:05.000 And now I know, I think it's okay for me to say, we're both in recovery and stuff and I know you have a very different side To your nature.
00:39:15.000 Now that you're like a sober person, how is your perspective altered?
00:39:20.000 Not only to your past, but to the aspect of you that still craves that kind of attention and still craves that kind of craziness.
00:39:28.000 How do you adapt to that as a man in recovery?
00:39:32.000 It occurs to me there's a saying, what happens when you take a drunken horse thief and take away his alcohol?
00:39:45.000 You've got a sober horse thief.
00:39:48.000 You know, I'm an attention whore, so I'm just a sober attention whore.
00:39:54.000 I do want you to know that in my book, I mention you in here, Russell.
00:40:00.000 There's a mention of you.
00:40:01.000 It says, this all helps explain how I let Russell Brand talk me into taking a course in Transcendental Meditation.
00:40:13.000 Though, truth be told, I think Russell Brand could have talked me into sticking my dick in a blender.
00:40:23.000 Perhaps your greatest stunt was allowing me to talk you into Transcendental Meditation.
00:40:31.000 Now, let me tell you this.
00:40:34.000 I'm a very all-or-nothing type of personality.
00:40:38.000 And as it relates to meditation, you got me into the course.
00:40:44.000 And by the way, thank you for that.
00:40:46.000 It was 2013.
00:40:48.000 When I took the course in Transcendental Meditation, and kind of like any good habit, if it's working out, if it's eating properly, all you have to do is miss one day, and then it just becomes this slippery slope of inactivity.
00:41:05.000 And, you know, that was my experience.
00:41:09.000 I dabbled in it, and then I just fell off and it went away.
00:41:12.000 But the years that went by, I felt that I was really missed.
00:41:19.000 I thought, you know, I should be meditating.
00:41:21.000 I would be really benefiting if I meditated.
00:41:23.000 And I got myself a new teacher in 2019.
00:41:28.000 And knowing that I'm all or nothing, I started recording my meditation, keeping track of it on an app.
00:41:37.000 And so I've got this streak going.
00:41:41.000 I'm 1,000, how many days do I have?
00:41:49.000 1,084 days, averaging over 40 minutes every single day.
00:41:54.000 I've not missed a single day since December 27th, 2019.
00:41:58.000 And I really believe that it's transformed me.
00:42:05.000 I genuinely believe that my meditation practice Causes the universe to conspire in my favor.
00:42:16.000 When you say that, can you think of examples or times that you felt that you've accessed another power or that your life has been different as a result of meditation?
00:42:27.000 It's very, very hard to put your finger on it.
00:42:31.000 You know, there are experiences that, you know, in our world of recovery, we refer to as God shots, things where we just think that something's just too magical to be chalked up to coincidence.
00:42:48.000 There's, you know, just the general, I would, I would call it momentum.
00:42:59.000 You know, I've got momentum.
00:43:01.000 I would call it, you know, rather than say, wow, I've been fortunate.
00:43:07.000 I have good luck.
00:43:08.000 I like to say the force is with me.
00:43:12.000 Because much of your public persona is derived from a very unique time where like you and the crew
00:43:19.000 that you moved with engaged in dangerous, chaotic acts that were beautifully presented and brilliantly delivered
00:43:27.000 that would have been required in my opinion, a kind of, as well as craziness,
00:43:32.000 a kind of a valor and bravery.
00:43:35.000 It makes me think that perhaps people don't appreciate the complexity of you.
00:43:40.000 When you look back at it now, mate, and I know that part of it is looking for attention,
00:43:44.000 but what else do you think you're striving for?
00:43:46.000 I once heard you describe it as a kind of pursuit of glory.
00:43:50.000 And given the way that those, much of that stuff is presented on MTV,
00:43:53.000 there was sometimes a kind of nihilism.
00:43:55.000 Aside from the camaraderie and friendship between you and the rest of the crew, there was something that indicated to me that we were coming to a time where the world was changing.
00:44:04.000 But now, in this new spirit, in this place of new spirit where you are becoming more awake, where you're in recovery, where you have more self-awareness, what aspect of yourself do you think was being expressed?
00:44:15.000 beyond requiring attention.
00:44:16.000 Do you think there's any self-hatred or self-masochism in that stuff?
00:44:19.000 Am I overthinking it or is it simply about glory?
00:44:22.000 And how do you pursue that glory now?
00:44:24.000 It's funny that you would point to a possible self-destructiveness and self-hatred
00:44:45.000 where I think my view on it, and going back to before I was in recovery,
00:44:52.000 my position has been that most people have really a very strong sense of self-worth.
00:45:05.000 Fairly serious problems, whether it's health problems, whether it's financial problems.
00:45:11.000 Maybe they're not happy in their marriage, but people have great stressors in their life.
00:45:18.000 And I genuinely believe that by performing the most outrageous, ridiculous, shocking acts, That when people are consuming my art, that I have effectively distracted them from their stressors.
00:45:37.000 And I would not purport to having solved anybody's problems, but by distracting people from their problems, I have made their problems go away, albeit temporarily.
00:45:48.000 And as such, I have given myself the title of Distraction Therapist.
00:45:56.000 And I believe that it's a noble title.
00:46:00.000 I feel like almost, I was just thinking then, that in certain yogic practices, the endurance of pain is regarded as a kind of a noble mastery over people's addiction to comfort, addiction to conformity, and normalness, and being willing to do those things.
00:46:00.000 Absolutely.
00:46:19.000 There's a reason.
00:46:20.000 I think things don't become that successful and that exciting without there being something at their heart that is magnetizing people.
00:46:28.000 Another aspect of your nature that interests me, mate, is your evident love of animals.
00:46:34.000 I know that you've... I got a dog where I've got an emotional support card for my dog, Bear, you know?
00:46:40.000 And I did that because I saw you talking about it on your YouTube channel.
00:46:45.000 And also, I wanted to ask you about your protest and arrest at SeaWorld there.
00:46:51.000 Tell us a bit more about that and how that went down.
00:46:54.000 Well, I absolutely love animals, and thank you for mentioning my YouTube channel.
00:47:00.000 How about that?
00:47:01.000 You and I, we are of the new school, Russell.
00:47:05.000 We're of the new school.
00:47:07.000 We used to be of the old school, where every job that we God, we needed permission for.
00:47:15.000 We needed some asshole in a boardroom to give us permission to work and now we don't need that anymore because we're of the new school of the digital world and we work when we want to work and we deliver our content straight to the audience.
00:47:35.000 God is that refreshing.
00:47:36.000 What kind of freedom do you feel as a result of that?
00:47:38.000 And were you aware at the time that when working within mainstream media and an organization like MTV, that there are certain agendas strapped onto your work?
00:47:47.000 Commercial, but perhaps agendas even beyond that.
00:47:50.000 What do you think is the significance of operating in this space, as well as the artistic freedom?
00:47:54.000 Do you think that there are other ideals that you can tag onto that, mate?
00:47:59.000 I don't know that the That the agenda of MTV or Paramount Pictures was anything particularly nefarious outside the confines of standard issue capitalism.
00:48:20.000 I don't know that there was much political behind it, but I feel that at a point, the mainstream media, the entertainment industry, just kind of lost interest in me.
00:48:35.000 You know, I had expired for their purposes, and they no longer believed in me, and they no longer wanted to give me permission to work, as they had in the past.
00:48:45.000 And I was the only one who believed in myself, and I had to take control and give myself permission to work.
00:48:53.000 And since then, I've built an audience, and I'm thrilled.
00:48:59.000 And with regards to my love for animals, It's just pretty shocking how much callous disregard there is for animals.
00:49:14.000 The sea world seems like the most, you know, low-hanging fruit.
00:49:22.000 I think.
00:49:23.000 I mean, I think that if there's a fight that most people can get behind, it's the plight of orcas in captivity in SeaWorld.
00:49:36.000 And at the time when I got arrested for protesting It was pretty silly what brought about the idea.
00:49:49.000 I had just purchased my first drone, and my team and I, we were figuring out how to fly this thing, how to use it to film, and now I wanted to come up with an idea to use our new toy.
00:50:09.000 And I felt pretty strongly that for drone footage to be compelling, I needed to place myself extremely high up in the air.
00:50:19.000 And so I looked up in the air and what I saw was construction cranes.
00:50:26.000 And I thought, okay, well, if I climb to the top of a construction crane and we're flying the drone up there, that might look pretty cool.
00:50:35.000 But it didn't feel like a complete idea.
00:50:38.000 It felt like kind of a part of an idea.
00:50:41.000 So I thought, Well, I'll take an inflatable killer whale and go up to the top of a crane, inflate, I'll write SeaWorld sucks on the inflatable killer whale, and I'll blow up some fireworks, and then that's it.
00:51:01.000 The crane that I climbed up was nowhere near SeaWorld.
00:51:09.000 There were people who saw just a figure up 150 feet in the air with a backpack.
00:51:17.000 Who knew if I was some kind of a terrorist?
00:51:20.000 And the response, I mean, God, there were like 80 firefighters and who knows how many police officers, a SWAT team.
00:51:33.000 And, you know, at the end of the day, I was quite And not in a good way for wasting the city resources the way that I did.
00:51:49.000 Now, with that said, there was a change in legislation regarding orcas in captivity, which followed fairly shortly thereafter.
00:51:59.000 I'm not taking credit for that change in legislation, but I may have helped.
00:52:07.000 It was just a big attention grab and I slapped a, you know, a worthy cause onto it to try to get, you know, I don't know, like, it was pretty dumb.
00:52:22.000 You know that free climber Alex Halland, like, when they tested his amygdala and all that stuff, they found that he didn't have a normal relationship with fear and adrenaline, etc.
00:52:33.000 Have you ever had tests like that done?
00:52:38.000 No, but I'm reasonably sure that I wouldn't have to have those tests done.
00:52:44.000 I experience fear, I experience pain, you know, all of these things.
00:52:48.000 I don't think I'm particularly unusual in that regard.
00:52:52.000 I think it's simply that my desire for attention outweighs my desire for comfort.
00:53:01.000 It's just a simple equation.
00:53:03.000 How do you contrast the kind of fear and pain that you feel in anticipation and execution of your stunts with the kind of emotional fear and pain that a lot of us associate with addiction?
00:53:14.000 Fear of rejection, fear of being alone, the pain of not being loved, the pain of trauma from your childhood.
00:53:20.000 How do they compare on a scale?
00:53:24.000 You know, it's interesting that In preparation for stunts, there's really two things that I equate, and one of them is
00:53:42.000 There have been times when drawing attention to something that I've done to harm another person represents genuine risk, especially in cases where the person may not know that this harm has been done.
00:54:05.000 addressing that by by calling attention to it by revealing this uh this harm that's been done there there are potential consequences uh much the same way there are potential consequences with uh with dangerous stunts like jumping off of a building and in both cases preparing to do that uh it looks like um you know an objective assessment of what the Logistics are, you know, like an assessment of the risks, you know, an assessment of how it's going with the men's, you know, to sit down with the sponsor and sort of read a script of what's going to be said.
00:54:51.000 Not that you would ever read the script, but just to prepare.
00:54:55.000 And, you know, with this stunt, a little bit of a blueprint, maybe a stick figure drawing of what it looks like.
00:55:01.000 Once it's been assessed, then It's quite literally an exercise in counting 1, 2, 3, go.
00:55:11.000 And I've done that with every dangerous stunt and, you know, with all of those, you know, really scary amends.
00:55:21.000 And I've never backed out after counting 1, 2, 3, go.
00:55:25.000 Wow.
00:55:26.000 It's the most useful tool for me.
00:55:28.000 I've never backed out of anything.
00:55:29.000 That's pretty amazing mechanism that you've set up in yourself.
00:55:33.000 I bet all things like cold therapy and all that.
00:55:36.000 I saw you swimming in the Arctic that time.
00:55:37.000 I bet those kind of things, you're just so schooled in it.
00:55:40.000 You must just be a kind of master of those kind of things now.
00:55:43.000 Stevo, how does it apply to stand-up?
00:55:46.000 And also, you know, and the fear that most people that do stand-up comedy associate even when experienced with standing up in front of an audience and also having experienced whether or not it was a cultural cancellation, you know, the cancellation of Jackass in 2000 when in your words it no longer became a sort of an appropriate commodity.
00:56:05.000 How do you feel about the risks associated with content now as a stand-up comedian and the risk cancellation even when masters like Chappelle are like, you know, and Rogan, you know, super experienced
00:56:16.000 guys are like, you know, within the sights of a particularly difficult cultural moment.
00:56:22.000 I mean, there's a couple of things there.
00:56:30.000 Um, and.
00:56:31.000 Initially, the idea of performing stand-up was, like, absolutely terrifying at the level of any kind of, you know, really risky behavior.
00:56:45.000 You know, I've since found my voice.
00:56:49.000 I've been touring doing stand-up for more than 12 years now.
00:56:56.000 You know, I've just kind of become accustomed to it.
00:56:59.000 I've found my stride, my voice.
00:57:03.000 With respect to the cancel culture, I'm not as concerned with that because, much like with Jackass, you know, I really only target myself.
00:57:18.000 You know, I'm not... I view Jackass, again, you know, you know suggested maybe that there's an underlying self-hatred and uh you know and i see nobility i see something very wholesome in it because with jackass you know we we only ever target ourselves and each other and we're all such willing participants it's permissible to enjoy our uh
00:57:49.000 Our misfortune and outside of that intimate targeting of ourselves and each other.
00:57:58.000 We're so universally respectful of third parties.
00:58:03.000 You know, there's just really nothing.
00:58:05.000 There's never been anything.
00:58:08.000 There's never been anything hateful and as such I really view Jackass and the spirit of the comedy that I perform as something that's genuinely wholesome and I wouldn't want to go so far as to say You know, immune from the woke cancel army.
00:58:33.000 But I think, you know, I don't really particularly consider myself, for the most part, anybody who is a target of that type of stuff with the comedy that I perform.
00:58:47.000 Yeah, I think you're right as well thinking about it with the Jackass, that the spirit of that always came through, that it was inclusive and joyous.
00:58:55.000 And again, even with a little bit of analysis and research, emerging as it does out of skater culture and punk, both of those ideals and genres afford the pushing of boundaries and breaking rules.
00:59:12.000 And it's kind of like, and also risk with skating in particular, I suppose.
00:59:17.000 So like um yeah it makes sense and I guess what I was saying with the I suppose if you weren't a person in recovery I wouldn't have thought about the potential for because I know I've done things in my life where there's because I did self-harm like as a kid not in a kind of a joyous celebratory just in a kind of angry like breaking glass and all that kind of crazy stuff so I guess yeah I was looking at it from that angle but you've made it very clear that that's not a motivation thanks for it thanks for explaining.
00:59:41.000 I mean, nothing is ever purely black or purely white, so you're not wrong to perceive that, and certainly I think there's a tinge of all of this, and that's what makes it a little bit dangerous, and so you're not entirely off-base.
01:00:04.000 I think that there's room for that as well.
01:00:08.000 And when we think about, you know, having been destroyed, you know, as men in recovery, you know, man, are there other ways that we can be self-destructive for the love of God?
01:00:22.000 I've made my way into, I want to say, five different 12-step fellowships at this point.
01:00:29.000 I'm balls deep in four of them, and I think barrelling towards a fifth.
01:00:35.000 God, the fifth.
01:00:36.000 I can't even imagine what the fifth one is.
01:00:37.000 I'd love to continue that conversation with you, possibly offline, because I think I could probably benefit from some of your experience in some of the only four, because I keep it sort of substance-oriented, even though plainly I've got behavioural addictions in all sorts of areas where I could really do with support.
01:00:51.000 Stevo, it's amazing to speak to you and see you.
01:00:54.000 I'm always struck by your spiritual rigor, your bravery and your connection to very vivid principles like joy, the evidence of clowning and things that I think are right, important and beautiful.
01:01:05.000 I always get it emanates from you very clearly.
01:01:08.000 So thanks for sharing that.
01:01:09.000 I'm going to check out your book, A Hard Kick in the Nuts, what I learned from a lifetime of terrible addiction.
01:01:14.000 And I will make this one request of you, as well as the potential learning that I could get from some of that 12 step stuff you just outlined.
01:01:20.000 I was thinking, I would like to come on your channel one day and like see this like I was thinking what I would do steve-o is like say like if you had to get a child to do a stunt like how because I'm I always say I always said from jackass from the beginning if I did any of that
01:01:37.000 I would die.
01:01:38.000 I would die.
01:01:39.000 It wouldn't be, oh, look, he's got a bump on his elbow.
01:01:44.000 It would just be mortuary, on a slab, autopsy.
01:01:49.000 So perhaps we could find a stunt that I could undertake that I don't die from.
01:01:55.000 That would be my dream.
01:01:58.000 You know, it's wonderful to speak with you, Russell.
01:02:01.000 It's been a long time since we've seen each other.
01:02:03.000 I've been remarking as I was watching you have your conversation with Gareth, I thought, man, he really is a beautiful creature to look at, this Russell Brand.
01:02:15.000 He's just...
01:02:16.000 A shockingly good-looking man.
01:02:19.000 And I'm also fascinated by this Rumble thing.
01:02:22.000 Is Rumble really a platform where you can just show whatever you want?
01:02:27.000 Because I run into a lot of problems with community guidelines.
01:02:31.000 I mean, they censor, like, all of my exciting stuff.
01:02:35.000 So do I need to get on Rumble and how much can I really show on there?
01:02:38.000 Stevo, this is the non-censorship platform.
01:02:41.000 I will be happy to broker your arrival on this platform and use it as leverage for my own advancing interests.
01:02:48.000 Yeah, there's nothing that they won't let you show.
01:02:50.000 Within, like, the law of the land and common, you know, what is understood to be a consensual decency, you know, like in the spirit that you've already described, I don't think you'd have any problem.
01:03:00.000 The community guidelines here is a community of maniacs that are self-supporting.
01:03:05.000 I love it.
01:03:06.000 I love it, man.
01:03:07.000 Do you have the same cell number that we last communicated on?
01:03:11.000 Yeah, I think I do.
01:03:12.000 I think I do.
01:03:12.000 But I'll get, I'll send, I'll have them send that cell number to you as well.
01:03:17.000 I love it.
01:03:17.000 I love it.
01:03:18.000 And presumably you are in the UK.
01:03:20.000 That's right.
01:03:21.000 I'm coming over there soon.
01:03:22.000 I'm coming over there to sort of, in fact, to promote Rumble and evidently now to do a baby stunt and I assume some work around S-fellowships and food fellowships, gambling, debt.
01:03:35.000 I don't know which other ones there are.
01:03:37.000 I mean, yeah, we'll talk, Russell.
01:03:41.000 Do you still have that same home that we had all those meditations in?
01:03:45.000 I don't have that home.
01:03:46.000 I think that was the 50 cent house, like I briefly lived in in LA.
01:03:51.000 For a while, I lived in the 50 cent house.
01:03:52.000 That was, I think, just after my marriage ended.
01:03:57.000 I think that's where we did that stuff.
01:03:59.000 And no, I don't have that.
01:04:00.000 That was a rental property, but I've got a place over there, so I'll catch you there.
01:04:05.000 Well, hey, I look forward to catching up further.
01:04:09.000 Thank you for having me on.
01:04:10.000 It's been fascinating.
01:04:14.000 Please don't take offense to this, but I thought, man, this is like a much more attractive, a much more articulate, and a much more expedited and British InfoWars.
01:04:32.000 I look forward to serving my custodial sentence and paying out billions to the innocent people who my words have harmed.
01:04:40.000 Yeah, I didn't even think of it in those terms, but it's interesting and everything that you said makes sense.
01:04:51.000 You know, it's fascinating.
01:04:53.000 I really enjoyed listening to you speak.
01:04:55.000 And, yeah, like, you know, I remember all of our times together so fondly, and it's really great to reconnect.
01:05:03.000 Stevo, thanks, man.
01:05:04.000 So lovely to see you.
01:05:05.000 You take care.
01:05:06.000 Nice one, mate.
01:05:07.000 I'll catch up with you soon.
01:05:07.000 We'll get in touch offline.
01:05:09.000 Loads of love, mate.
01:05:09.000 Loads of love.
01:05:11.000 Oh, yeah.
01:05:12.000 Right on.
01:05:12.000 Take it easy.
01:05:14.000 We'll catch up with... Well, that was lovely to see, Stevo.
01:05:16.000 Oh, my words.
01:05:17.000 How lovely was that?
01:05:18.000 Wasn't he so sweet and so lovely?
01:05:20.000 So nice.
01:05:21.000 So warm.
01:05:22.000 What a lovely man Steve-O is.
01:05:23.000 He also carried on the conversation there.
01:05:25.000 We went into sort of personal territory.
01:05:26.000 I nearly ended up giving up a phone number and an address in the conversation, but we'll pass that.
01:05:31.000 I mean, he's such a beautiful bloke.
01:05:34.000 Hey, listen, we're going to round up the week in a fantastic way.
01:05:37.000 Tomorrow, we are talking to, I mean, an Oscar winning actor on this show, Gareth.
01:05:43.000 Can you believe it?
01:05:43.000 Tim Robbins in our conversation, The COVID Redemption.
01:05:47.000 have a look.
01:05:49.000 It was a very different political environment in the United States.
01:05:57.000 Very divisive.
01:05:58.000 At first, if you were a Democrat when Trump was president.
01:06:03.000 Well, you weren't going to take that vaccine because it was Trump's vaccine.
01:06:06.000 And then that seemed to somehow change.
01:06:08.000 It was kind of Orwellian.
01:06:09.000 It was like we are no longer at war with East Asia.
01:06:13.000 It was it was now we were thinking about a different way.
01:06:16.000 And if you didn't take the vaccine, you were a Republican.
01:06:19.000 And it wasn't that way here in England.
01:06:21.000 It was a much more tolerant attitude.
01:06:27.000 British Info Wars, that's what we are now.
01:06:30.000 That would be like the Info Skirmish or something.
01:06:33.000 It wouldn't be a war with the British.
01:06:35.000 No, we don't believe in them.
01:06:36.000 We don't believe in war.
01:06:37.000 We can have someone else have that war on our behalf.
01:06:40.000 Twisted Cuffs.
01:06:42.000 Info fisticuffs is what we have.
01:06:44.000 All right, listen, we are carrying on.
01:06:47.000 Me and Gareth have got so much more to discuss.
01:06:48.000 There'll be a bit where Gareth points out something I did or didn't say.
01:06:51.000 Stevo, for example, has already probably got that as a little nest egg of nastiness that he's nourishing by his nut bag.
01:06:57.000 So join us on Locals in our Stay Free AF community.
01:07:00.000 Straight away, we'll be carrying on there.
01:07:02.000 If not, we're back tomorrow with Tim Robbins, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
01:07:07.000 Until then, stay free.