Stay Free - Russel Brand - April 20, 2023


IT’S HERE…Zelensky’s Dissent CRACKDOWN! - #112 - Stay Free With Russell Brand


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 4 minutes

Words per Minute

175.93294

Word Count

11,377

Sentence Count

724

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

16


Summary

Russell Brand is joined by Vadana Shiva and Branko Marticic to discuss how the media and the US military are lying to the public about the nature of the conflict in Ukraine, and why it's a good idea to have an erection in public places. Plus, the latest on the Trump vs. DeSantis super PAC spat, and how the mainstream media are doing their best to keep us in the dark about what's really going on in the world. Stay free, you lunatics. Stay free! To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers and use the promo code: "ELISSA" for 10% off "Hunt a Killer". Our ad-free version of the show is available on all good podcasting platforms, including Vimeo, iTunes and Podchaser, wherever you get your shows. If you like what you hear, please consider leaving us a five star rating and review on Apple Podcasts, wherever else you re listening to your favourite podcast, and we'll be giving you 5 star reviews on the next episode of Stay Free, Yes Yes Yes No! Stay Free! Subscribe to Stay Free with Russell Brand and Good Mythology here! We're streaming live on Rumble on all of the major podcast directories and social medias, including Podchronicity, to keep you up to date with the latest in the latest happenings in the culture and culture around the world of podcasting and culture. Stay Free - stay free and stay woke! - be sure to leave us a review on your favourite podchronicities! Be sure to tell us what you're listening to us what's trending on social media and what you think about it's up to in the past 24 hours and what s your favourite thing you're watching and what's up in your life you're up to this week's Stay Free With Us! in the coming week, and what are you looking forward to in your news and who's watching the most important thing you'll be listening to next? stay free, stay woke, be safe, be sure, be woke, stay free! xoxo, bye! XOXO. - EJoshes, Vicky, Vadansh, Vavos, Vazquez, John King, VANESSA, Vaynerchucks, Jack, Ayn Rand, Ben, and John King


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Yeah, enjoy your life.
00:00:12.000 Enjoy it.
00:00:13.000 This is your life you're living, you lunatics.
00:00:16.000 This is Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:00:18.000 We're streaming live.
00:00:19.000 Hello, Vandana Shiva.
00:00:23.000 Are you the new Snowden?
00:00:25.000 Hello, Vandana Shiva.
00:00:27.000 Are you the new Snowden? Are you?
00:00:31.000 Join us not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
00:00:40.000 Until then, stay free.
00:00:41.000 Yes!
00:00:43.000 Brought to you by, 5G In this video, you're going to see the future
00:01:03.000 Hello there you awakening wonders!
00:01:15.000 Wherever you're watching us, the whole show will be exclusively available on Rumble.
00:01:20.000 You can roam the internet as much as you want looking for this show, but exclusively on Rumble.
00:01:26.000 First 15 minutes will be on YouTube, but then an action as seemingly as innocuous as this contravenes WHO guidelines.
00:01:35.000 We'll be telling you why this It's a dangerous act of radicalism.
00:01:40.000 Oh, you saucy little citrus!
00:01:42.000 A little bit later, we'll also be talking to Branko Marticic about how the US government misled the public on the war in Ukraine and how the media, very much the Joe Biden to the Joe Biden of the state, support the government in their ongoing lies.
00:01:57.000 Then we're in our item, here's the news, no, here's the effing news.
00:02:00.000 We'll be looking at how military personnel are suffering poverty, suffering Indignity!
00:02:08.000 All the while the military-industrial complex is profiting massively.
00:02:12.000 Let me have another sniff of that.
00:02:13.000 Oh, I'm feeling a little bit better, but I won't tell you what condition it might be helping, according to... There's plenty of conditions it could be helping with you.
00:02:22.000 There's nothing wrong with me, mate!
00:02:23.000 There's nothing wrong with me!
00:02:24.000 The burping for a start.
00:02:25.000 What in the holy name of God's wrong with Putin's neck pipes?
00:02:30.000 There's something wrong with his neck, look.
00:02:32.000 There's strange marks on Vladimir Putin's neck.
00:02:35.000 Look at his neck.
00:02:37.000 That ain't right.
00:02:38.000 Here he is appearing at, I would call it, An orthodox ceremony for the festival of Easter in which our Lord Jesus comes back from death to show us that there are deeper tunes to be played when it comes to the Requiem of Consciousness.
00:02:55.000 Here is Putin.
00:02:56.000 Let's see if you think there's anything wrong with his neck.
00:02:58.000 And also, is that candle just a little bit too thin?
00:03:01.000 Have a look.
00:03:03.000 I like his neck and I like that ceremony and I like that crown that they have
00:03:21.000 orthodox version of a bishop or a Pope or whatever you have in Russia
00:03:25.000 Let us know in the comments, in the chat, what you have over there in Russia.
00:03:29.000 I don't think those are the bits that the news want you to focus on.
00:03:32.000 The point of this, Ross, is they want you to think, oh, Putin, he's so ill.
00:03:37.000 He's a deranged madman.
00:03:38.000 Right.
00:03:39.000 No, and also, he's that as well, of course, he's a deranged madman, but he's so ill that we're going to win this war.
00:03:45.000 Putin, Putin, he's so ill, he'll be really easy to kill in our not-proxy war that we're not having.
00:03:51.000 We're just supporting Ukraine in a huge monetary effort that's necessary and had nothing to do with NATO impeding on former Soviet Union territory and nothing to do with a coup in 2014.
00:03:59.000 No one can!
00:04:00.000 Nice.
00:04:01.000 I feel like it looked like aging to me.
00:04:04.000 That's just life having its way.
00:04:07.000 Trump versus DeSantis, the ongoing preliminary battle has reached propagandist levels.
00:04:14.000 The mainstream media, of course, enjoying this.
00:04:16.000 CNN and sort of, I suppose, the liberal half of the neoliberal corrupt establishment media are enjoying this super PAC spat.
00:04:25.000 First up, whose video are we going to see first?
00:04:28.000 I think it starts with, uh, Ron DeSantis is on Trump.
00:04:32.000 All right, let's see what Ron DeSantis is saying about Trump.
00:04:34.000 First of all, let's have a look.
00:04:39.000 It is April 2023.
00:04:40.000 Yes, April 2023, but an early... Excited about the date.
00:04:42.000 That's just the date.
00:04:43.000 What are we worried about that for?
00:04:44.000 Yep, that's right.
00:04:45.000 We know the date.
00:04:45.000 You can trust us on CNN.
00:04:47.000 I think his point is that these are coming early when the election is next year, but he is just a man reiterating the date.
00:04:52.000 And also, like, this is the thing.
00:04:54.000 With all of their bombast and banal pageantry, they're in no position to criticise the propaganda of anyone else.
00:05:02.000 Look at that, by the way, his name, John King, came thrusting onto the screen, an unwanted graphic priapic erection forced in from the side of the frame.
00:05:12.000 If his point is they're doing this too early, just make a decision to not show it then.
00:05:16.000 You're doing the thing.
00:05:17.000 You're reporting on them doing it too early.
00:05:19.000 Yeah, you're getting involved.
00:05:20.000 You love it.
00:05:21.000 And wait till it gets to the three-finger yogurt.
00:05:24.000 A proxy war is underway between the top two Republican 2024 contenders.
00:05:28.000 A super PAC aligned with the Florida governor Ron DeSantis in a new TV ad suggests Donald Trump has lost his way.
00:05:36.000 Trump's stealing pages from the Biden-Pelosi playbook.
00:05:39.000 Repeating lies about Social Security.
00:05:41.000 Trump should fight Democrats, not lie about Governor DeSantis.
00:05:44.000 What happened to Donald Trump?
00:05:46.000 I like that shot of Donald Trump looking sort of a bit destitute, wandering home from a nightclub with his bowtie undone.
00:05:53.000 That was good.
00:05:54.000 Let's see though, I think Trump's super PAC propaganda, not necessarily affiliated with the Trump campaign, which is a super PAC thing, is better.
00:06:02.000 Because what they've gone for Is a garish, galling, gory, and awful image involving pudding.
00:06:11.000 Also, like, they're picking up on a weird detail about Ron DeSantis.
00:06:15.000 I didn't know that Ron DeSantis ate puddings with his fingers.
00:06:20.000 You know, like, have you ever been to India?
00:06:20.000 But that's...
00:06:22.000 In India, people eat, like, surprising meals with their fingers, and I presume that's common across that region of the world.
00:06:29.000 Like, I was in India, and people ate, like, rice and curry with their fingers, and you just have to go, well, why not?
00:06:34.000 Maybe it's more weird to hold a little spoon or a fork.
00:06:36.000 What are we afraid of, man?
00:06:37.000 I still think even in India, they wouldn't do a chocolate They might, mate.
00:06:41.000 They might get their fingers right in there.
00:06:42.000 If you are watching this live from India now, eating a puddin' with your fingers, then text us.
00:06:48.000 But, I mean, it's up to you to use your phone.
00:06:49.000 Maybe wipe the pudding off your fingers.
00:06:52.000 Or, if you're on DeSantis, and you're watching this in Florida, with a great scoop of pud right there, cradled there in the nook of your third knuckle, suck that down.
00:07:04.000 Delicious, like Mother Nature surely intended when she granted us these crazy little hand wands.
00:07:10.000 And, uh, let's know what's going on.
00:07:12.000 Now, that ad from a pro-DeSantis pack is responding to scathing ads from a pro-Trump group, including this, yes, stomach-churning dig at the Florida governor after a report that he ate pudding with his fingers.
00:07:26.000 Ron DeSantis loves sticking his fingers where they don't belong.
00:07:30.000 The fact is that DeSantis has got a table and chair, and all that's on it is that pudding.
00:07:34.000 Just for pudding.
00:07:35.000 That's his pudding table.
00:07:37.000 I'm going to the pudding table now, Ma.
00:07:39.000 There's nothing else there.
00:07:40.000 It's not like a TV or a phone or any distractions, just a man and his pudding.
00:07:44.000 And also it's a non-branded sort of looks.
00:07:47.000 I don't feel like that's a good quality pudding.
00:07:49.000 Like you'd get lots of those for maybe a dollar.
00:07:52.000 You get in Walmart and you get 20 of them puddings for a very reasonable price.
00:07:57.000 And if you're fingering your way through them at a rate of knots, that's what you want.
00:08:02.000 When you're sat alone at your good little jack corner, sticking your fingers at the table, that's what you want.
00:08:09.000 Get another one in.
00:08:10.000 Like he holds up his muddy little digits.
00:08:14.000 And we're not just talking about pudding.
00:08:16.000 Yeah, we have a conveyor belt operated by dumper-dumper like on a bicycle. Okay, bring another pudding
00:08:22.000 He's like a self-fulfilling one case a one-man one case running his own chocolate factory. He's eating his own
00:08:28.000 product Hmm, that's the way to run a state if you ask me and we're
00:08:32.000 not just talking about putting DeSantis has his dirty fingers all over senior entitlements
00:08:40.000 Making the connection between the senior entitlements and that chocolate smeared. Let's face it. That's an erotic
00:08:46.000 image. Yeah Yeah, it is.
00:08:48.000 Well, I guess it's both, isn't it?
00:08:50.000 What?
00:08:51.000 We're doing both?
00:08:51.000 What else is it?
00:08:52.000 Disgusting and erotic.
00:08:53.000 Right, I see.
00:08:54.000 I mean, the erotic need not necessarily evoke a passionate or even erotic response in the recipient because the world of sexuality is a complex and wonderful smorgasbord.
00:09:09.000 Smorgasbord, perhaps.
00:09:09.000 Right.
00:09:12.000 A wonderful menagerie.
00:09:14.000 A menagerie of potential things.
00:09:16.000 And also, it's sexualising DeSantis' pudding eating.
00:09:21.000 Maybe it's just efficient.
00:09:23.000 Yeah.
00:09:23.000 He did it on a private jet, apparently.
00:09:26.000 I don't know if that makes a difference.
00:09:28.000 It was 2019, Ron DeSantis is in a private jet, flying around, and the story came out that he ate a pudding with his fingers.
00:09:34.000 Maybe there weren't spoons on the jet.
00:09:35.000 Could have been a one-off, couldn't it?
00:09:37.000 I actually myself have probably, I'd call it stooped so low as to eat a pudding with Digit.
00:09:43.000 But that's, it's not through choice.
00:09:45.000 I'm not getting off on it.
00:09:46.000 I've looked around for some sort of spoon or device.
00:09:50.000 If there isn't one, what are you going to do?
00:09:52.000 Make one?
00:09:53.000 No.
00:09:53.000 Or use what I call God's sweet spoons.
00:09:56.000 God's spoonsies.
00:09:58.000 Nature's Forks, these guys are.
00:10:00.000 That's what the saying says.
00:10:01.000 In a minute, we're going to have a little look at how the media are fetishizing the identity of whistleblower Buddy Boy Texera, instead of focusing on the content of his leak.
00:10:11.000 We'll be talking to Branko Marcicic about that in more detail.
00:10:14.000 Why are the media always the willing, compliant The tack dog of the state instead of its interrogator.
00:10:22.000 Let me know in the chat, in the comments, if you think that the era of mainstream media is over, that, like Elon Musk, we should label them Propaganda Unit, state-funded, funded by Big Pharma, bought to you by Pfizer.
00:10:35.000 I mean, they normally do that themselves, actually, to be honest, don't they, as part of one of the conditions that Pfizer imposes on them.
00:10:40.000 Here's another story about a lad, Josiah Garcia, he works for the military, I was thinking the Air Guard or something like that, and what he did was he applied to get a job as a hitman on what turned out to be a spoof hitman site.
00:10:56.000 Someone, for a laugh I suppose, set up a spoof, you know, wanted hitman to carry out assassinations.
00:11:02.000 this poor impoverished service person went, oh god I'll give it a go, I've got nothing
00:11:06.000 to lose and then the FBI always looking for someone to arrest, an easy arrest. Like this
00:11:11.000 is, you know, the FBI as you are aware have a long history of setting up crimes then solving
00:11:16.000 that crime. I mean it's a weird racket they're running over there with regard to that.
00:11:21.000 Terrorist organisations that they contribute to and kind of form and then shop them.
00:11:27.000 How do you know?
00:11:28.000 Well, we started it.
00:11:29.000 We gave them all the ideas, funded them, armed them, everything.
00:11:32.000 They're terrorists.
00:11:33.000 So, hold on a minute, but what if you hadn't done all of that?
00:11:35.000 Then they wouldn't have been terrorists.
00:11:36.000 They'd have been just carrying on with their jobs.
00:11:38.000 I mean, this whole spoof, parody, hitman website game is something that needs a little bit of investigation, if you ask me, as well.
00:11:45.000 Also, I mean, if you're going to set that up, don't be surprised when someone does respond to it.
00:11:45.000 Yeah.
00:11:50.000 Don't spit your drip.
00:11:51.000 How dare you, you murderer?
00:11:53.000 I was just filling in a form that you put out there.
00:11:56.000 Jesus.
00:11:56.000 21-year-old Tennessee Air National Guardsman is under arrest tonight, charged with applying to be a hitman.
00:12:02.000 Officials say that he applied on a spoof site called rentahitman.com and was taken into custody after allegedly taking money from an undercover agent for a fictitious hit.
00:12:12.000 Here's ABC's Mona Kosar-Abdi.
00:12:14.000 Tonight, a Tennessee Air National Guardsman is facing federal charges after allegedly using the website rentahitman.com to apply for a job as an assassin.
00:12:24.000 But it turns out the website was just a parody, and now he's been arrested.
00:12:29.000 According to the criminal complaint, Garcia explained that he was, quote, Unconsciously or otherwise, it presents stories that are soluble and focused on the errors and malevolence, say, of an individual.
00:12:45.000 What that does is it prevents us from realizing that what we're dealing with are institutional and systemic problems.
00:12:52.000 What's more significant?
00:12:54.000 Is it the actions of Jack Taxera revealing on that chatroom site that there was misleading information being propagated about the Ukraine-Russia conflict?
00:13:06.000 Or the fact that this type of information is widely disseminated, the propagandist information I mean, in order to support the military-industrial complex, a machine for profit that requires war?
00:13:17.000 I'd like to see a story focused on that.
00:13:21.000 You so seldom see the interests of the powerful attacked on mainstream media, so you have to ask yourself, who do the mainstream media work for?
00:13:29.000 Let us know in the chat.
00:13:29.000 Do you think that their primary function is to serve you, to give you information, to help you understand the nature of reality?
00:13:36.000 Or do you think that it's actually the opposite of that?
00:13:38.000 to distract you from reality, to prevent you with narratives that might be absorbing, compelling,
00:13:43.000 vaguely comic, like the poor plight of this guardsman who's obviously not earning enough
00:13:49.000 from his pay in the military, who's obviously to a degree desperate to fill in such a form,
00:13:55.000 and whose actions, while I suppose ill-advised and unwise, are not nearly so significant
00:14:04.000 as for example us being told that the war in Ukraine is going really, really well, when
00:14:12.000 in fact hundreds of thousands of people are potentially needlessly dying and no one's
00:14:16.000 seeking a peaceful solution.
00:14:18.000 That's just one alternative narrative to contemplate.
00:14:22.000 Looking for a job that pays well, related to my military experience, shooting and killing the marked target, so I can support my kit.
00:14:29.000 Well, exactly that.
00:14:30.000 So what?
00:14:32.000 A guy who wants to earn more money because potentially he's on food stamps, like one in six military personnel, wants to use the skill sets that he's acquired in the military, probably abroad, killing people that the government want him to kill, over in the United States, and suddenly everything changes at that point.
00:14:47.000 If you don't trust the government anymore, then why would you trust them to determine which people it's okay to kill?
00:14:53.000 While he's over there killing those people, he's a hero.
00:14:56.000 Then he comes over here and fills in a spoof form, he's a villain.
00:15:00.000 And the media will present him as such.
00:15:02.000 He's answering such a pipsqueak question, when there's like an encyclopedia of inquiry that remains untouched.
00:15:11.000 Authorities say Garcia then sent in his resume, which listed his nickname as Reaper, and a copy of his photo ID, adding, quote, what can I say?
00:15:19.000 I enjoy doing what I do, so if I can find a job that's similar to it, put me in, coach.
00:15:25.000 I mean, actually, I feel a bit sorry for him because of the earnest way that he's trying to fill in this resume.
00:15:30.000 I would like it if I say this, coach.
00:15:33.000 What am I supposed to say?
00:15:34.000 I actually would probably kill him at a price that's right.
00:15:37.000 I'm willing to undercut my competitor, assassins.
00:15:40.000 It's clearly not the primary problem when you have military personnel willing to carry out online assassinations as a sort of side hustle.
00:15:51.000 If you're working for the military, you should be financially looked after.
00:15:54.000 But the bleak truth is that many, many military personnel simply are not.
00:16:00.000 One in six on food stamps, many insecure about shelter.
00:16:04.000 This is not the kind of hero's welcome that the 19 song demanded. It's not the kind of celebration that
00:16:14.000 American patriotism and pageantry continually suggests when it's at the recruitment end of finding
00:16:20.000 military personnel suggest is available.
00:16:23.000 It seems just fodder and objects of ridicule. And again, with the Buddy Boy text era case,
00:16:31.000 why are we not focusing on the content of the leaks? Why are we focusing instead on
00:16:37.000 irrelevant details about the lad that made the leaks.
00:16:41.000 That's something we'll be talking to Branko Marcicic about in more detail.
00:16:46.000 As well as Ukrainian censorship and the inability to openly discuss the war in Ukraine.
00:16:53.000 Yeah, obviously if this goes any further you can imagine the discussions.
00:16:56.000 What a sad end to the career of this military personnel.
00:17:00.000 There's a sad end to a lot of people in the military in America.
00:17:02.000 Almost 40,000 veterans are without shelter in the US on any given night.
00:17:06.000 Veterans account for 11% of homeless adults in the US.
00:17:09.000 So whether it's the way that this has gone or just the way that it goes standard for a lot of American veterans, it's not a great end.
00:17:16.000 We're not having an adult conversation about the problem because if you want to have A real conversation about even this one story, you'd have to say, why is there so much desperation in an individual that has a job?
00:17:33.000 Does that track across the military more broadly?
00:17:35.000 Yeah, it does actually.
00:17:36.000 It's just like endemic.
00:17:39.000 They're endemically impoverished in the military, even though they've got jobs, are jobs, where they're working for their country.
00:17:45.000 It's extraordinary and it's at odds with what we're broadly told.
00:17:47.000 Complain details that an undercover agent began communicating with Garcia after the website's alarmed owner contacted the FBI.
00:17:55.000 The two later meeting up in person, where documents say the agent asked if Garcia was comfortable with taking fingers or ears as trophies.
00:18:03.000 Garcia allegedly responding, quote, Into that, a bit, hasn't he?
00:18:07.000 Like, with the saying that he was going to, what, make himself an ear necklace?
00:18:11.000 Well, also, if one of the questions to him is, are you willing to do this?
00:18:16.000 He's not going to say no, is he?
00:18:17.000 He'll say, well, actually, no, I refuse at that point.
00:18:19.000 He's not going to take the meatloaf defence.
00:18:21.000 I'll do anything for this Assassin's gig, but I won't do that.
00:18:25.000 I will not make a necklace of my trinkets.
00:18:27.000 No.
00:18:28.000 Will you make yourself a Buffalo Bill style skin suit out of your victims for sexual reasons?
00:18:35.000 Put me in, coach!
00:18:36.000 I'll do it!
00:18:37.000 I'll make myself a sex bodice made out of my victim's skin!
00:18:41.000 I'll make myself suspenders out of people's entrails if it gets me the job!
00:18:45.000 When I see that lad standing there, blithely staring into the mirror with these lovely brown eyes and an assortment of odd snacks...
00:18:53.000 Oddly behind his head.
00:18:54.000 I feel a little bit sorry for him.
00:18:56.000 Nothing like it's a terrible indictment of the American military in general and more broadly the way that it's funded when you know that 50% of all military expenditure ends up going via the Pentagon, the unauditable Pentagon, into the hands of the military-industrial complex.
00:19:11.000 Let's have a look at some of the profits being made by these organizations like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin and all of these guys.
00:19:17.000 Look at that!
00:19:18.000 That's just the BAE system, 17.5 billion.
00:19:21.000 Just have a little glance at that, the amount of profit made by some of the military-industrial complex.
00:19:24.000 Meanwhile, there's people willing to do spoof assassinations to turn a few quid.
00:19:29.000 Now, the FBI who were involved in that investigation have a long history of setting up stings and then solving the problem that doesn't seem seem to be what you'd want the FBI doing. Here's one of the
00:19:41.000 more comic ones. In 2020, the FBI and Justice Department announced the arrest of 14
00:19:46.000 Michigan militia members who called themselves the Wolverine Watchmen. Already, that's a
00:19:51.000 bit daft, isn't it? If you're naming yourself after Wolverine. Are they watching Wolverine
00:19:56.000 or are they watchmen that are like Wolverine themselves? We'll never know. We'll
00:20:00.000 never know because they're made up and they wouldn't have done it anyway if the FBI hadn't
00:20:03.000 got them all worked up about The FBI claimed that federal agents had thwarted an elaborate plot hatched by the men to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
00:20:13.000 Questions of entrapment quickly emerged in the case.
00:20:15.000 Yeah, it's entrapment of that poor lad, isn't it?
00:20:17.000 It's entrapment.
00:20:17.000 He filled in a form.
00:20:18.000 Would you kill someone?
00:20:19.000 God, yeah, I suppose so.
00:20:20.000 I mean, I'm killing people abroad anyway, on behalf of the state.
00:20:23.000 I'm desperate enough.
00:20:24.000 I've got a kid on the way.
00:20:25.000 He's got a kid on the way, the lad.
00:20:27.000 Oh, well, bloody hell, you're a mergerer, then.
00:20:29.000 The FBI has used a dozen informants and several undercover agents to build the case.
00:20:34.000 One of the group's key members, known as Big Dan, was an FBI informant.
00:20:37.000 You can imagine these things getting to trial, and eventually, every single person that's standing before the judge will go, are you FBI?
00:20:44.000 Yeah, I'm FBI.
00:20:44.000 Is anyone here?
00:20:46.000 Not FBI.
00:20:47.000 No, we're all FBI.
00:20:48.000 What about you, Judge?
00:20:48.000 I'm FBI.
00:20:49.000 The whole thing's ridiculous.
00:20:51.000 It's like a school play.
00:20:52.000 It's like a diorama.
00:20:54.000 It's a complete confection.
00:20:56.000 It's to justify their own existence.
00:20:58.000 They're justifying their own existence, because if the FBI doesn't do anything, then you don't need an FBI, and what you'll expose is that the infrastructure and architecture of the state primarily exists to subjugate the domestic population, distract and disempower them, rather than protect them.
00:21:14.000 So you have to create bizarre cases like the Wolverine Watchmen, who sound made up, and indeed are made up, to justify their own existence.
00:21:22.000 You watch now there's these robot Dogs in New York City.
00:21:26.000 They'll never revert to not having them, even though once before the people of New York demanded they be removed, they'll continue to justify them, won't they?
00:21:34.000 They'll say, oh look, these digi-dogs have been solved in all sorts of cases.
00:21:38.000 Look at all the crimes they've solved.
00:21:40.000 All these crimes, there was these Wolverine Watchmen.
00:21:43.000 Those about, the Wolverine Watchmen, they were going to kick people right up the ball bag.
00:21:47.000 There used to be a lot of homeless people in this area and magically they've disappeared.
00:21:51.000 Presumably they've all gone and got jobs now as online spoof assassins doing pretend murders.
00:21:57.000 Well, a ridiculous waste of everybody's time and money.
00:22:01.000 So there you go.
00:22:01.000 Absurd.
00:22:03.000 Another 21-year-old kid working for the military with a daft nickname.
00:22:07.000 What was the other one called?
00:22:08.000 GoPro?
00:22:09.000 OG?
00:22:10.000 There they are.
00:22:11.000 There's Jack Texera, 21.
00:22:13.000 Josh Garcia.
00:22:14.000 Silly childish nicknames because they're only kids, really.
00:22:17.000 Working for the government, getting attacked personally by the media.
00:22:20.000 Same job, same basic sort of slave wages.
00:22:24.000 Poor sods.
00:22:25.000 No wonder they're willing to Boost their kudos on chat rooms and fill in spoof murder forms for a bit of attention.
00:22:32.000 I would say what needs to be addressed is the way that the military is funded and run and the relationship that the American military has with the people that they all signed up to protect and serve.
00:22:43.000 Pay them properly.
00:22:44.000 Take care of them.
00:22:44.000 It's a disgrace that you can be a member of the military and personally poor.
00:22:49.000 End the Let me know in the chat and the comments if you agree with that.
00:22:54.000 Now if you're watching this on YouTube, you won't be for much longer because I'm going to be telling you just why I'm sniffing this sweet orange.
00:23:01.000 I'm not a Ron DeSantis scoop-it-with-a-finger style perv.
00:23:05.000 This is a magical new health kick according to the mainstream media.
00:23:11.000 But we can't mention it on YouTube.
00:23:13.000 It's just too controversial.
00:23:15.000 Dare you sniff this sweet citrus?
00:23:17.000 Give it a sniff, gal.
00:23:19.000 Of course you are.
00:23:19.000 I'm cured.
00:23:21.000 But what are you cured of?
00:23:22.000 We'll tell you exclusively on Rumble.
00:23:25.000 Click the link in the description right now.
00:23:28.000 Okay, thanks to Will Sudders' dad, Andy Sudders, who's the only person willing to subscribe to the Telegraph website that enables us to access these stories.
00:23:38.000 We can tell you that a study from University College London has found that people with long Covid and anosmia, anosmia, anosmia, that's a silly thing for when your nose stops working.
00:23:50.000 nose and nose mirror have suffered a viral rewiring of the brain but may be
00:23:55.000 able to get their sense of smell back through olfactory training. Sniff your
00:23:59.000 way to health. That's all I was doing. Ron DeSantis will be using that as his
00:24:03.000 defense. I was just trying to cure myself along Covid. I'm scooping up the
00:24:07.000 goodness. I'm scooping up the goodness. Get away from that cat litter tray Ron.
00:24:12.000 Them's not chocolate raisins in there, Ronald.
00:24:15.000 Them's cat's business.
00:24:16.000 Ronald, get away from that chemical toilet.
00:24:20.000 Ronald, get away from that compost.
00:24:23.000 Ronald, get away from that aperture between the cheeks.
00:24:28.000 Yeah?
00:24:29.000 We know it.
00:24:30.000 We know it well.
00:24:31.000 I call that God's yoghurt pot.
00:24:32.000 I know you do.
00:24:33.000 God's pudding bowl.
00:24:34.000 Yep.
00:24:35.000 Chalky-chalky?
00:24:36.000 No, no.
00:24:38.000 Sniff your way better, Ron.
00:24:40.000 Sniff your way better up the back pipe.
00:24:42.000 That's right.
00:24:44.000 Bit more of this?
00:24:45.000 A bit more of this.
00:24:46.000 Not this, though.
00:24:47.000 The article, I think.
00:24:47.000 Or this or this?
00:24:49.000 Ron!
00:24:50.000 Sniff it.
00:24:51.000 I'm feeling better already.
00:24:53.000 Sniffing your way to health...
00:24:55.000 Is science now, claim scientists.
00:24:57.000 Olfactory training is a method where a person with smell issues, you dirty pigs, work to enhance their recognition of senses.
00:25:03.000 The scientists suggest taking a 10-second sniff of a common household scent.
00:25:08.000 Lemons, oranges, nutmeg, mint, or Ron DeSantis' fingers, at least twice a day.
00:25:13.000 I'd get Ron by his wrist.
00:25:15.000 I'd say, Ron, let me just...
00:25:16.000 Ron, what have you been doing?
00:25:18.000 I've only been out of the house half an hour.
00:25:20.000 Ron, why is the dog barking?
00:25:22.000 What's been going on, Ron?
00:25:24.000 Hang on, after all this time and all the debate around vaccines and all these things, are we honestly getting to the point where the answer to long COVID is sniffing stuff around the house?
00:25:35.000 All of this trouble, all of them funerals you went to on YouTube, all of those people you couldn't visit, all you needed to do was sniff yourself better!
00:25:44.000 I mean, of course I'm being reductive, and ultimately what he's saying is that you can reignite your senses and rewire them through olfactory...
00:25:52.000 Training, fair enough.
00:25:53.000 But when you add that to the great litany of formerly dismissed cures, steroids, vitamin D, exercise, being outside, breath work, general health, not eating processed foods, not bothering getting numerous booster shots that, according to clinical trials, I'm talking specifically about the Moderna one, don't do F all.
00:26:16.000 What's the bloody point?
00:26:17.000 The problem is that during the pandemic, no one actually had any oranges, because people were having all those burgers that they were told to eat.
00:26:23.000 They should have been giving out, come and get a vaccine, and we'll give you an orange to sniff on the way home.
00:26:28.000 Or if you're on Desantis, come get a vaccine, you can dip up to three fingers in my pudding bowl, Ron, and then get home and govern like you bloody well mean it.
00:26:38.000 All right, we're going to be talking to Branco Marchetic, Yeah.
00:26:40.000 Yeah.
00:26:41.000 I think there's a shutting down of journalists in Ukraine.
00:26:44.000 Yeah.
00:26:44.000 Again, not to say that that, obviously, the same goes on in Russia, but again, that's not the narrative that we're told.
00:26:50.000 That's already in the news.
00:26:51.000 That's in the news already.
00:26:52.000 Shutting down of journalists.
00:26:54.000 Shutting them down? Why's he doing that for?
00:26:56.000 He's meant to be a friendly guy and a jumper?
00:26:58.000 Yeah, again not to say that, obviously the same goes on in Russia, but again that's
00:27:02.000 not the narrative that we're told.
00:27:04.000 We've already done that. He's got cancer up his neck.
00:27:06.000 You've seen that guy's neck, it's too wrinkly.
00:27:08.000 If we're going to start judging leaders by their necks,
00:27:12.000 I mean Biden's necks, I wouldn't want to eat my pudding off of his clavicle, would you?
00:27:17.000 No, I wouldn't.
00:27:18.000 Would you want to fill Biden's clavicle with some sort of tapioca?
00:27:23.000 Right.
00:27:24.000 And then you've got no spoon, you're on a private jet.
00:27:26.000 Okay.
00:27:26.000 Biden, give us that deep clavicle.
00:27:28.000 Give us that deep well that's like chicken skin.
00:27:33.000 It's hanging deep there like an inverted ball bag.
00:27:36.000 Got it.
00:27:36.000 Like an inside ball bag.
00:27:38.000 Put your hand all the way in to scoop out the tapioca.
00:27:42.000 While Joe Biden goes, he's never been better.
00:27:45.000 He's never been healthier than this.
00:27:46.000 Dig right down into the clavicle.
00:27:48.000 Keep going.
00:27:49.000 You missed a bit!
00:27:52.000 If you want, if you need a little sauce... Uh oh, where are we going now?
00:27:57.000 If you squeeze Joe's nipplets, they've got a saline sauce in them, a clear saline fluid.
00:28:05.000 Hunter!
00:28:06.000 And if you like a little chili spice, Hunter's always ready to provide.
00:28:11.000 That's right.
00:28:12.000 Anyway, it's time now to look at some more news.
00:28:15.000 If that wasn't, excuse me, I've got to stay well.
00:28:18.000 I have to stay well, not just for me, but for the news.
00:28:21.000 If you want to know if there is anyone willing to confront a Deputy Defence Secretary with the hard facts of military expenditure and potential corruption in a Pentagon that's failed its last five audits and can't account for literally billions of dollars of expenditure, then look for Jon Stewart.
00:28:37.000 And across the aisle, Ally, if you're one of the people that declares themselves Libertarian, or right-wing that watches our show, me, as you know, and we don't know where Gareth is anymore, it's difficult to tell.
00:28:47.000 I think that you shouldn't trust any political party.
00:28:49.000 I think we need to start again.
00:28:50.000 Decentralise power wherever possible.
00:28:52.000 Have as much democracy as possible.
00:28:54.000 You know me.
00:28:55.000 And when you listen to this story, when you watch this story, you are going to be inclined to agree because the military-industrial complex is perhaps the greatest example of institutional corruption there is.
00:29:05.000 They are getting 50% of your federal tax dollars and they're not willing to tell you what they're doing with it.
00:29:12.000 All this while, as we've explained and described to you today, Did you see Jon Stewart talking to that horrible Defence Secretary?
00:29:33.000 Do you know that the Pentagon has never passed an audit?
00:29:36.000 Who should really be on trial?
00:29:38.000 The Pentagon spending a bunch of money on a war they're lying about?
00:29:42.000 Or that little boy?
00:29:45.000 Jon Stewart's doing a good job, isn't he?
00:29:47.000 Talking to people, having confrontations with that Defence Secretary lady where he brought up the fact that the Pentagon's never passed an audit.
00:29:54.000 What's the point in doing these audits then?
00:29:55.000 This is taking place, of course, while the Pentagon papers of that lad called something like Buster Teixeira, I'll get his actual name in a minute at some point, Has revealed that we're being told lies about the Ukraine war, the efficacy of the campaign so far, whether or not Ukraine will ever reclaim those territories, all the while money, your money by the way, is being pumped into keeping the conflict going because we've also been informed there's no chance of peace for at least a year.
00:30:20.000 So I'm asking you and I want you to answer in the comments in the chat Who should really be on trial?
00:30:25.000 That little boy or the military-industrial complex itself?
00:30:29.000 Okay, so you need to explain to me.
00:30:30.000 Do you understand what an audit does and the degree to which it is linked to the question that you're asking?
00:30:36.000 I believe so.
00:30:37.000 Okay, go ahead.
00:30:37.000 Give me your explanation.
00:30:39.000 No, I don't mind learning.
00:30:42.000 Has she ever watched Jon Stewart?
00:30:44.000 She's been rude, isn't she, to someone who most of us are aware is pretty sharp and knows how to behave on camera, knows how to conduct an investigation, knows how to interrogate people.
00:30:53.000 The narrative we're interested in here is why are we focusing on that little boy, buddy boy Texiera, when plainly people in positions of considerable power are literally contributing to the deaths of military personnel.
00:31:07.000 Let alone the fact that people that have given their lives in service or have suffered in service aren't being properly looked after.
00:31:14.000 You know there's a bunch of people in the military that are living on food stamps whose actions and decisions are actually leading to the death of soldiers and military personnel.
00:31:23.000 Is it Buddy Texiera or is it high up people in the defense industry who are masking the facts about the war and facilitating ongoing contracts?
00:31:34.000 Let me know in the chat.
00:31:35.000 What I would suggest is that the audit that they have in the military doesn't really look at whether or not there's efficacy.
00:31:45.000 It's just whether they got delivered the thing that they ordered.
00:31:49.000 That is any audit.
00:31:51.000 That is any audit.
00:31:52.000 That is true.
00:31:53.000 But generally those audits aren't $400 billion for Raytheon and $1.7 trillion for a plane that doesn't seem to be doing it.
00:32:00.000 There is a lot of waste, fraud and abuse within a system.
00:32:03.000 Audits and waste, fraud and abuse are not the same thing.
00:32:06.000 She really thinks she's going to be able to get through this conversation simply through analysing the etymology of the word audit.
00:32:12.000 You don't seem to know what the word audit means.
00:32:14.000 That's not the way out of this conversation.
00:32:16.000 Because obviously the question underneath the question is, is the reason that these audits being failed because there's like loads of corruption and money's getting skimmed off the top and creamed off the top.
00:32:25.000 I don't want it to be this, do you?
00:32:27.000 I want it to be that Jon Stewart sits down and talks to a defence secretary and she goes, Now honestly, what it is, is this is how the money's being spent and we're really doing our best.
00:32:34.000 I know it looks on the surface like Raytheon and Norfolk Grumman and BAE system and all of this.
00:32:39.000 Looks like what they're doing is they're presenting us with a bill and then they're taking a load of profit then these weapons aren't making it to Ukraine and actually we're prolonging that war so we can keep these deals going.
00:32:47.000 I know it looks like that but it isn't that.
00:32:50.000 The problem is actually this little boy.
00:32:52.000 This bloody little boy!
00:32:53.000 Oi!
00:32:54.000 I say put that lad in prison for at least a couple of thousand years till he's learned his bloody lesson.
00:32:59.000 It's a lesson.
00:33:00.000 Also, you can't be all confident and haughty if the Pentagon's failed five consecutive audits.
00:33:03.000 At that point, I don't know, man.
00:33:04.000 I mean, have you ever failed an audit?
00:33:05.000 which is do I know what was delivered to which place?
00:33:08.000 Right. Also you can't be all confident and haughty if the Pentagon's failed
00:33:13.000 five consecutive audits. At that point, I don't know man, I mean have you ever
00:33:18.000 failed an audit? Like right, what you've been doing with the money?
00:33:21.000 Spent it, I suppose.
00:33:21.000 Oh, I don't know.
00:33:23.000 Just asked me Nan.
00:33:23.000 My uncle had some of it.
00:33:25.000 Alright, well, we'll see in a year.
00:33:26.000 If that happened, like, four or five times, you'd feel like you'd be in prison by about the third one, wouldn't you?
00:33:30.000 The ability to pass an audit, or the fact that the DoD has not passed an audit, is not suggestive of waste, fraud, and abuse.
00:33:38.000 That is completely false right there.
00:33:39.000 Lately we're being granted conversations and confrontations that are emblematic of what we suspect is the dynamic between us and the powerful.
00:33:48.000 Whether it's Elon Musk and that BBC report, I mean you see like that he doesn't want to answer questions and he thinks that the BBC are beyond reproach or this conversation between Jon Stewart and this lady or some of Matt Taibbi's confrontations.
00:33:59.000 What we're getting confronted with is the pose of authority and power.
00:34:03.000 A kind of superciliousness.
00:34:05.000 A self-entitled authority.
00:34:07.000 A kind of because I said so mentality.
00:34:10.000 I'm not here to talk about that.
00:34:11.000 We're not here to answer those questions.
00:34:13.000 Well, guess what?
00:34:14.000 Those questions are coming.
00:34:15.000 There's a deluge of those questions because people don't trust the media.
00:34:18.000 People don't trust the government.
00:34:20.000 People don't trust corporations anymore.
00:34:21.000 And you're right not to trust them.
00:34:23.000 You're right!
00:34:24.000 We don't have to indulge in conspiracies.
00:34:26.000 What we can plainly see though, on the basis of these five failed audits and the media furore surrounding Buddy Boy Texas lad, is that people want us to look over here at a lad revealing information in chat rooms that doesn't put anyone at risk.
00:34:41.000 That espionage act should be called the don't say stuff we don't want you to say act.
00:34:45.000 So what is it suggestive of?
00:34:47.000 It's suggestive that we don't have an accurate inventory that we can pull up of what we have where.
00:34:56.000 That is not the same as saying we can't do that because waste, fraud and abuse has occurred.
00:35:00.000 Just because we can't, when ordered, tell you where the money's gone, that doesn't mean fraud or cheating or abuse.
00:35:07.000 Yeah, it don't look good though.
00:35:09.000 So, in my world, that's waste.
00:35:13.000 How is that waste?
00:35:15.000 If I give you a billion dollars and you can't tell me what happened to it, that to me is wasteful.
00:35:20.000 That means you are not responsible.
00:35:23.000 But if you can't tell me where it went... I don't know where a billion dollars got!
00:35:28.000 I'm very busy!
00:35:29.000 Do you know how long it takes to get my hair to look like this?
00:35:32.000 Ages!
00:35:33.000 Well, I can't tell you exactly how long.
00:35:34.000 Between ten minutes and a month.
00:35:36.000 Then what am I supposed to think?
00:35:38.000 And when there has been reporting... I mean, this is not... Look, I'm not saying this is on you.
00:35:43.000 Also, why is she laughing?
00:35:45.000 This isn't funny.
00:35:46.000 It's not a funny situation, is it?
00:35:48.000 It's not like, oh god, this is hilarious.
00:35:50.000 Do you remember when the guinea pig got out?
00:35:51.000 This is like, where's the fucking money we've give you?
00:35:54.000 And that you caused this.
00:35:56.000 But I think it's a tough argument to make that an $850 billion budget to an organization that can't pass an audit and tell you where that money went Like, I think most people would consider that somewhere in the realm of waste, fraud, or abuse because they would wonder why that money isn't well accounted for.
00:36:19.000 I mean, I'm trying to understand where you're trying to go other than the dollars, which really bother you.
00:36:27.000 Yeah, where are those dollars?
00:36:28.000 Oh, you're really worried about that.
00:36:30.000 Whether or not the war is legal or illegitimate, or whether we're telling the truth, or whether or not the Pentagon fundamentally funnels money towards the military-industrial complex, and it's impossible to record that accurately without revealing that military personnel are not benefiting from your tax dollars, but the various military-industrial complex companies are benefiting.
00:36:30.000 What else are you worried about?
00:36:49.000 Yeah, that's it.
00:36:50.000 That's exactly what the problem is.
00:36:52.000 I think it doesn't really bother me.
00:36:53.000 I think it's all connected.
00:36:54.000 Okay.
00:36:55.000 Tell me that story.
00:36:56.000 Bloody hell, she's awful!
00:36:58.000 How many times have we got to put up with these people in Congress sneering condescending people?
00:37:02.000 Do you know what your job is?
00:37:03.000 Your job is you work for the people.
00:37:05.000 It should be like, hi, how's it going?
00:37:07.000 Yeah, sorry, we've done this.
00:37:08.000 I'm sorry about that.
00:37:09.000 That is a bit confusing.
00:37:10.000 We're going to improve that.
00:37:11.000 It is a bit mental.
00:37:12.000 We've had five audits and failed them.
00:37:13.000 That's terrible that there are American military personnel living on food stamps right now.
00:37:17.000 It's terrible that there's a homeless crisis among veterans.
00:37:20.000 We're going to address all this.
00:37:21.000 You're quite right.
00:37:22.000 You should be like, this is funny.
00:37:24.000 Oh, this is brilliant.
00:37:25.000 It's not hijinks.
00:37:27.000 It's hijacking public money.
00:37:29.000 I mean, we got out of 20 years of war and the Pentagon got a $50 billion raise.
00:37:33.000 Like to me, that's fucking corruption.
00:37:36.000 I'm sorry.
00:37:38.000 And if like, if that blows your mind, And if you think, like, that's like a crazy agenda for me to have, I really think that that's institutional thinking.
00:37:50.000 Jon Stewart there, staying relaxed and spelling it out to a giggling, shrieking, awful government apparatchik.
00:37:57.000 Let's have a look at it in more detail.
00:37:58.000 Last year, the Department of Defense revealed that it had failed its fifth consecutive audit.
00:38:02.000 The Biden administration provided details this month on its $886.3 billion budget proposal for national defence in fiscal year 2024.
00:38:10.000 The Pentagon's spending path would put the military's annual budget over the $1 trillion threshold in just a matter of years, its chief financial officer said recently.
00:38:19.000 When an institution receives that much revenue, they have to be accountable and responsible.
00:38:26.000 The problem with the defence minister there, the deputy defence minister, is not just that her haughtiness is socially unpleasant, it's that it aligns very neatly and beautifully with the attitude we can assume is institutional based on these facts.
00:38:44.000 Oh it seems like they don't care and they think they can do whatever they want and they don't even have to answer questions or indeed pass audits because their power supersedes the power of government and indeed democracy and no matter what party's in they're going to ensure that the military-industrial complex continues to thrive even if that means sponsoring and prolonging foreign conflicts that lead to the death of American military personnel whose image they're willing to use as propaganda to mask their corruption.
00:39:13.000 And who they're willing to put to the forefront when conducting a trial against poor old buddy Texiera in order to say, hey, we're doing this because we want to protect American personnel.
00:39:22.000 If you do want to protect American personnel, then use the resources that the American taxpayers are giving you to give American service people a decent, fair wage and a respectable way of life.
00:39:34.000 Instead of, of course, funneling it seemingly unaccountably towards the military-industrial complex.
00:39:38.000 Jack Teixeira, suspect in the Pentagon leaks, has been charged under the Espionage Act, which criminalizes the unauthorized retention and disclosure of national security secrets.
00:39:48.000 It carries a sentence of up to 10 years per count, and each leaked document could be its own count.
00:39:52.000 The Washington Post says it has about 300 documents.
00:39:54.000 That means that Jack Teixeira will be 3,021 years old by the time he gets out.
00:40:01.000 I think if he's not learned his lesson in the first 2,000 years, the penal system also needs an audit.
00:40:06.000 The releases of classified information by Edward Snowden, a contractor at the National Security Agency, and Chelsea Manning, an army intelligence analyst, were treated by the government as catastrophes that jeopardized human lives.
00:40:18.000 This did not turn out to be true.
00:40:20.000 Documents released by Snowden revealed that the government was engaged in unconstitutional spying on Americans, while information that Manning provided to WikiLeaks showed that US forces killed journalists and civilians in Iraq and lied about it afterwards.
00:40:33.000 Despite the government's dire warning, subsequent reviews showed that no deaths could be linked to the disclosures by Manning and WikiLeaks.
00:40:41.000 None.
00:40:42.000 Not one.
00:40:42.000 Zero.
00:40:43.000 So they said it was endangering the lives of military personnel, but in fact what it revealed was they're spying on you and killing civilians and journalists.
00:40:51.000 How dare you say that we are killing civilians and journalists in Iraq and spying on American people?
00:40:57.000 That put American personnel's lives at risk.
00:41:00.000 How?
00:41:01.000 OK, give me a minute.
00:41:02.000 Well, we're going to audit you on this in a moment.
00:41:04.000 Oh, no, I can't be expected to pass audits.
00:41:06.000 Audits are complicated.
00:41:07.000 Don't even mention those to me.
00:41:08.000 I'm going to need a couple of billion dollars worth of missiles even to get through this audit.
00:41:13.000 One of the leaked documents revealed the U.S.
00:41:14.000 doesn't expect Russia-Ukraine peace talks in 2023.
00:41:17.000 Another leak that was also reported by The Washington Post says the U.S.
00:41:20.000 thinks it's unlikely the Ukraine will regain any significant territory in its expected counteroffensive, a stark difference from what the Biden administration has been saying publicly.
00:41:30.000 So the key thing here is these revelations have made it plain that in private, the Biden administration say they're not going to get any territory back.
00:41:38.000 In public, though, the Ukrainians are brave, strong people.
00:41:41.000 This counteroffensive will be a success.
00:41:43.000 It's worth pumping your taxpayer dollars into it.
00:41:46.000 If they don't believe what they're saying, what is it they believe?
00:41:50.000 And I'll offer you this.
00:41:51.000 Is it possible they believe it's profitable to continue the war?
00:41:55.000 Is it possible they consider it necessary to engage Russia in an ongoing conflict?
00:42:00.000 Once we know that they don't even believe it as a result of these leaks, by the way, no one's ever covering that, no one's covering the content of the leaks, then we have to ask, we have a duty to ask, what Is it, they believe?
00:42:12.000 Why are we talking about the criminality of young Jack Texera, who it seems isn't a plucky little idealist, but just a kid on a chat room revealing stuff for casual kudos in those chat room encounters.
00:42:23.000 Why are we talking about him?
00:42:25.000 He's not the story.
00:42:26.000 He's inadvertent.
00:42:28.000 Look at how the media partner the government in distracting us from the facts.
00:42:33.000 In November 2022, there was legislation pending in Congress that indicates that the US government believes the Ukraine war may continue for years.
00:42:41.000 On October the 11th, the Senate Armed Services Committee submitted its amended draft of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2023.
00:42:49.000 Nestled within the draft is a provision that would establish an emergency multi-year plan
00:42:53.000 to award massive defence contracts to Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, BAE Systems and other war
00:42:59.000 corporations to produce weapons for Ukraine and to replenish US stockpiles as well as
00:43:04.000 those of foreign allies and partners.
00:43:06.000 An amendment spearheaded by New Hampshire Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen and co-sponsored
00:43:11.000 by Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn would allow the Pentagon to award non-competitive
00:43:16.000 no-bid contracts to arms manufacturers under the plan.
00:43:19.000 Those kind of pieces of legislation sponsored by both parties as usual suggest that actually
00:43:26.000 what's happening is that there is an agenda to continue funnelling public money into private
00:43:32.000 Let me know in the chat and the comments if you agree.
00:43:34.000 And the reason the Pentagon keeps failing audits is because these relationships are kind of messy and potentially corrupt.
00:43:41.000 Congress is supportive of this.
00:43:42.000 They're going to give us multi-year authority and they're going to give us funding to really put into the industrial base.
00:43:48.000 And I'm talking billions of dollars into the industrial base to fund these production lines, said the Pentagon's chief weapons buyer, Bill LaPlante.
00:43:55.000 What you really want is these people on trial.
00:43:58.000 Jack tax area, if he goes away for a thousand, five hundred, ten years, a million years, it's not gonna make any difference to you, it's not gonna make any difference to the military.
00:44:05.000 What we should be analysing, auditing, scrutinising, adjudicating, is this expenditure.
00:44:11.000 If this doesn't change, the world cannot change.
00:44:14.000 This is a key component of systemic corruption and ultra-democratic power, power that is beyond democracy.
00:44:22.000 If we don't address this, nothing can change.
00:44:24.000 Past and current military spending equals 48% of all spent federal tax dollars.
00:44:30.000 So these are not insignificant sums.
00:44:33.000 Half of all federal tax dollars, federal tax dollars, so I guess you've got state taxes as well, but half of all federal tax dollars is going in this direction.
00:44:42.000 This is a significant industry.
00:44:43.000 I mean, it's almost inconceivably large.
00:44:46.000 So the blasé, insouciant, haughty attitude of that politician, who you also pay, so you can add that to the eventual figure that won't ever get audited, it's not an insignificant sum.
00:44:57.000 And it's certainly not funny.
00:44:58.000 Before the war ends, many Ukrainians and Russians will die while Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and Norfolk Grumman make fortunes.
00:45:05.000 So this is the key point of the video we're making.
00:45:08.000 Who's causing more deaths?
00:45:10.000 Little buddy boy Texera or Norfolk Grumman, Raytheon and the military-industrial complex partnership between your government that you pay for and those organisations?
00:45:21.000 If you were to audit it, good luck, and scrutinise it, good luck!
00:45:25.000 What would result?
00:45:25.000 Like, hold on a minute.
00:45:26.000 That meant that we made that decision, and that meant we prolonged it, and that meant we didn't debate this, and that meant a peace deal was taken off the table, and that meant we inspired that coup.
00:45:34.000 Oh, and that means that that money never made it to that particular organisation, and that meant that those service people ended up homeless.
00:45:40.000 That means these service people are on food stamps.
00:45:43.000 That meant these people committed suicide.
00:45:43.000 Look at all the deaths.
00:45:45.000 Count it all up!
00:45:47.000 Because I've had a good look at Chelsea Manning and Snowden and Assange, and the total is zero!
00:45:47.000 Count it all up!
00:45:53.000 Zero!
00:45:53.000 Like the number of successful Pentagon audits!
00:45:57.000 Zero!
00:45:59.000 At the same time, networks and cable news is replete with pundits and experts, or more accurately, military officials turned consultants whose current jobs and clients are not disclosed to viewers, for obvious reasons.
00:46:10.000 This while military families are reporting housing, health and financial challenges according to a survey released by the Military Family Advisory Network which found that nearly a quarter of enlisted families are experiencing food insecurity and more than 60% of respondents pay more than they can comfortably afford for housing.
00:46:27.000 So if you're in the military, which was one of those jobs that used to mean, well at least you're taken care of, You're gonna eat and have hours.
00:46:35.000 60% of them can't comfortably afford housing and quarter of them can't eat.
00:46:39.000 One-fifth of active service families and nearly 40% of veteran families surveyed reported less than $500 of emergency savings or no emergency savings fund.
00:46:48.000 And over three quarters of military families indicated that they carry debt.
00:46:52.000 Almost 40,000 veterans are without shelter in the US on any given night.
00:46:57.000 The leading causes of homelessness among vets are PTSD, social isolation, unemployment and substance abuse.
00:47:02.000 Veterans account for 11% of homeless adults in the US.
00:47:06.000 Sounds to me like a system that could be radically improved.
00:47:10.000 With a few key decisions and a few audits.
00:47:13.000 Although sometimes I read stuff like that and I feel despair, sometimes I see people like that defence minister and I feel hopeless.
00:47:19.000 Actually, it shows that the room for improvement is so vast that we would have to be stupid not to demand it.
00:47:26.000 We'd have to be stupid not to put aside cultural differences and come together in order to prioritise what are plainly the defining problems of our time.
00:47:36.000 Corruption.
00:47:37.000 Systemic abuse of power that takes place beyond the reach of democracy, i.e.
00:47:43.000 whether you vote Republican or Democrat, you're gonna get some version of this.
00:47:47.000 So we have to form new alliances, we have to form a new agenda, we have to create a new manifesto.
00:47:53.000 Because it's disgusting to me that people that give their lives in service, whether they actually die for it or not, are Ending up homeless or unable to afford food and shelter while the Pentagon are unable to pass a bloody audit and while the representatives of the defense industry just haughtily dismissed the inquiries of an on-screen journalist.
00:48:13.000 We have to demand better.
00:48:14.000 We have to put aside all other arguments until these problems are addressed.
00:48:19.000 But that's just what I think.
00:48:20.000 Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
00:48:22.000 I'll see you in a second.
00:48:26.000 Here's the fucking news!
00:48:29.000 Joining us on the free internet here on Rumble.
00:48:32.000 You won't get this on YouTube.
00:48:34.000 Sniff me some citrus, baby.
00:48:36.000 My snout's getting stronger by the second.
00:48:38.000 I'm being joined now by friend of the show, Branko Marcicic, an investigative journalist for Jacobin, the author of Yesterday's Man, the case against Joe Biden.
00:48:48.000 Uh, this is a really cool quote from Branko to get you in the mood.
00:48:53.000 So sit yourself down in your chair, wherever you are, and listen to this.
00:48:56.000 It's gonna get you hot and wet for Branko.
00:49:00.000 This is a Branko quote.
00:49:03.000 What's more corrosive to US democracy, that the president secretly put US booties on the ground in an escalating war zone in Ukraine, breaking a promise and going against the wishes of the voting public, or that the public was finally told about it?
00:49:19.000 That's a bit of the brilliant journalism of Branko Marticic, except for I made the word... I said booties instead of boots.
00:49:26.000 I don't know why I did that now.
00:49:28.000 I don't know why I did it.
00:49:29.000 It was silly.
00:49:30.000 Branko, thanks for joining us.
00:49:32.000 Hey, thanks for correcting the record there.
00:49:34.000 That's important.
00:49:35.000 We are, like you, independent journalists, and we have a duty to take truth pretty bloody seriously.
00:49:41.000 I'll congratulate you, firstly, on your hair today, and secondly, we'll move on to my first question.
00:49:47.000 Gareth Roy is very excited to have you here.
00:49:49.000 He believes you to be a rising star of the independent journalism scene, and he wants to frame you as one of our key voices on Stay Free Media.
00:49:58.000 So just know that, Branko, before you even begin your answer, that you are loved and believed in and adored.
00:50:04.000 Now, the US government misled the public on the war.
00:50:07.000 Why are the mainstream corporate media more interested in going on about that lad's nickname being OG?
00:50:14.000 Why are the New York Times involved in his capture and arrest like Scooby-Doo and the Gang or Lovejoy, if you're British?
00:50:22.000 Instead of focusing on the content of the leaks, please, Branko.
00:50:27.000 I mean, this is basically a pattern that happens every time there's a major leak that exposes something politically convenient or embarrassing or even scandalous.
00:50:36.000 Particularly from the U.S.
00:50:37.000 government, I can give you a number of examples.
00:50:39.000 I mean, basically, you know, some of the biggest leaks in U.S.
00:50:43.000 history, you think about Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers, you think about the various leaks that WikiLeaks put out under Julian Assange, the Snowden leaks, Chelsea Manning's contributions to the Assange WikiLeaks stuff.
00:50:58.000 All of these people were, rather than, well, alongside, you know, writing about the genuinely kind of scandalous and revelatory stuff that they revealed, at the same time there was this obsession among certain segments of the press on You know, were these people, are they heroes or traitors?
00:51:20.000 Are they good people?
00:51:22.000 Let's talk about some of their misdeeds.
00:51:25.000 Sometimes misdeeds are completely imagined, in the case of Snowden, who's been accused of being A Russian and a Chinese spy and all this kind of stuff.
00:51:35.000 But, and then also sometimes, you know, very real misdeeds.
00:51:38.000 You know, I think Assange, the sexual assault allegations against Assange were credible.
00:51:43.000 Obviously, this guy, this latest leaker has, you know, this record of making, you know, offensive and racist comments and so on and so forth.
00:51:52.000 But, you know, the entire time that we're talking about whether these people are good or bad and whether they, you know, are deserving of our respect or our valorization, We're not talking about the actual stuff that they revealed.
00:52:03.000 In the case of Wikileaks, it was evidence of war crimes by US and coalition forces in Iraq and other places.
00:52:11.000 In this case, there's so much important that's come out of this leak.
00:52:14.000 I would say number one, The fact that the Biden administration apparently does have boots on the ground, despite saying it would not deploy troops, that has, you know, dozens of special forces personnel in Ukraine, as does the whole of NATO.
00:52:31.000 I think it's saying like 97 people.
00:52:33.000 And on top of that, I mean, there's this major revelation about how easily this war could have already spiraled
00:52:42.000 into all out, you know, World War III or nuclear catastrophe.
00:52:45.000 There was this incident last year where Russian and British pilots kind of got into a scrape
00:52:51.000 of the Black Sea.
00:52:53.000 We heard about it.
00:52:54.000 There was a bit of alarm over it, but we didn't quite know the full details.
00:52:57.000 Now it turns out that actually the Russian jet, the Russian pilot misunderstanding instructions
00:53:04.000 from, you know, radar operators fired the missile at the British jet, and the missile malfunctioned,
00:53:11.000 and nothing happened.
00:53:12.000 But I mean, if that had, if that malfunction hadn't happened in the nick of time, this could have been a very different thing.
00:53:19.000 I mean, this could have been absolutely disastrous.
00:53:22.000 I mean, that's two things.
00:53:24.000 Out of the many things that have come out but you know these are very important topics to discuss in the context of this ever escalating war and we don't talk about them because we're focused on is this person good or bad.
00:53:35.000 Why can't the US be honest about the extent of their involvement in this conflict, plainly admitting that there are American personnel within Ukraine?
00:53:48.000 And why can't the mainstream media hold them to account when these leaks are made?
00:53:54.000 Why does this consensus to maintain one narrative exist, Branko?
00:54:00.000 I mean, unfortunately, in the US especially, the press has long been kind of more eager for escalation and kind of a more aggressive military posture from the Biden administration.
00:54:13.000 I mean, if you, you know, whatever you think about the Biden administration's policy to Ukraine, They have been relatively restrained compared to what the press has been asking.
00:54:23.000 I mean, you know, from the earliest days of the war, there were White House press corps people who were saying, you know, basically, why won't you set up a no-fly zone?
00:54:32.000 Which, you know, would have basically been the declaration of World War III.
00:54:37.000 Or, you know, saying, why aren't you constantly pushing the administration to send more advanced, more escalatory weaponry to Ukraine, and so on and so forth.
00:54:47.000 So I think for that segment of the media that kind of wants a more aggressive, confrontational posture from the United States government, it doesn't pay to talk about the risks.
00:55:00.000 It doesn't pay to talk about the way that the US government has actually misled the public.
00:55:05.000 around it's already fairly deep involvement in this war.
00:55:09.000 And I mean for the Biden administration, of course, it wants to maintain this idea that, oh, you
00:55:14.000 know, we're having a hands-off approach, this is not a proxy war, this is the
00:55:19.000 This is not a conflict between the U.S.
00:55:21.000 and Russia or between NATO and Russia.
00:55:23.000 We're merely providing support to Ukraine at once.
00:55:26.000 We're not ourselves actively, you know, belligerents in this war.
00:55:31.000 Because I think for domestic consumption, it convinces people that, hey, the U.S.
00:55:36.000 elite, you know, the U.S.
00:55:38.000 officials have not sort of blundered the country into yet another potentially catastrophic war.
00:55:44.000 And I think on the You know, it has this benefit of making the United States seem like a kind of honest broker in this war rather than, you know, what Lula, the president of Brazil, recently said, which is, you know, it's been sort of encouraging the prolonging of the war that's been going on.
00:56:02.000 Why is Zelensky declaring war on dissent, centralising nearly all of Ukraine's national TV networks?
00:56:10.000 Why, if the leadership of Ukraine are on the side of righteousness, why can they not accommodate dissent Debate and conversation and obviously I would apply that to the ongoing march towards censorship in our countries, you know, Australia, England, America, all that.
00:56:33.000 Why is there an unwillingness to accommodate dissent and debate?
00:56:38.000 What does that indicate?
00:56:39.000 But start off by telling us what's going on specifically with Zelensky in Ukraine.
00:56:44.000 Sure.
00:56:45.000 I mean, to put it briefly, the sort of authoritarianism that existed in Ukrainian politics, which, you know, long predates the invasion.
00:56:56.000 Unfortunately, ever since the breaking of the Soviet Union, Ukraine has been several different struggles over the decades to kind of try and make it a more democratic, less corrupt country.
00:57:05.000 You know, grassroots This has been a problem for a long time, and that was a problem under Zelensky before the war, but things really ramped up.
00:57:15.000 You know, there's been both anecdotal and also if you look at the data, the prosecution data, there's just been an explosion of prosecutions, detainments, all this stuff against anti-war dissidents, or really just any dissidents of all kinds.
00:57:34.000 What does that mean?
00:57:36.000 It might mean that, you know, you are someone who criticized the Zelensky government within Ukraine for, you know, helping to making decisions that helped sort of lead to war.
00:57:49.000 It might mean that you even support Russia.
00:57:53.000 There are definitely people in Ukraine who, you know, it's a small number, a small minority, but there are definitely people who support the war effort.
00:58:01.000 It might mean criticizing the Solicitor General for some of its anti-democratic overreaches.
00:58:07.000 It can also mean, you know, things like just basically putting forward kind of left-wing ideology.
00:58:14.000 A lot of leftists have been kind of caught up in the repression over there.
00:58:20.000 The sum total of it is that, you know, basically there's been a crackdown on anything that kind of deviates from the official Ukrainian line, whether it's about the course of the war, the causes of the war, the fitness of the Ukrainian government, all this stuff.
00:58:34.000 Whatever it is, if you're saying it and it's, you know, politically inconvenient to the government, you might get a knock on the door from the SBU.
00:58:44.000 Now, in terms of why this is happening, I mean, there's two explanations.
00:58:50.000 Number one, obviously Ukraine's been invaded by a larger neighboring power.
00:58:56.000 Any country that comes under foreign attack and outside attack in wartime, you see a typically a centralization of government power.
00:59:07.000 You see Things like censorship policies being put into place.
00:59:11.000 You know, it happened under Lincoln during the Civil War.
00:59:14.000 I mean, it happened just thinking about what happened with the United States after September 11 and how that kind of led to a centralization of a bunch of repressive powers.
00:59:24.000 And so it's not surprising that Ukraine being under attack has kind of resorted to this A classic method of sort of control and unity during wartime.
00:59:35.000 However, that's not the full story, because this was happening, like I said, long before, under multiple presidents, but, you know, ramped up under Zelensky too, who, well before the war, when his approval ratings had plummeted, and, you know, he had actually faced some pretty bad outcomes in municipal elections around the country, started to go after his opposition.
00:59:59.000 You know, he sanctioned the kind of leading opposition bloc and basically through that got rid of a bunch of opposition media.
01:00:09.000 He started to look at banning parties and so on and so forth.
01:00:15.000 And then there were the mayor of Kiev, obviously now everyone's very much united, But before the war, the mayor of Kiev got a knock on the door from the SBU as well, the sort of, you know, security service of Ukraine, who, you know, went in and I think searched his apartment and it was, at the time, ran as a form of political intimidation against someone who might be a future Zelensky rival.
01:00:39.000 So, it's those two things combining that there was already a trend towards authoritarianism under Zelensky's rule, but the war has, for multiple reasons, kind of made that just go to a far more extreme level than it was before.
01:00:54.000 Good analysis, Branko.
01:00:56.000 Thanks very much.
01:00:57.000 Some of it is legitimate and understandable.
01:00:59.000 When a nation is under attack, there is a requirement for authoritarianism, centralized control, and a clear agenda that can be pursued without one might query or quibble about the idea of necessary dissent or necessary opposition.
01:01:13.000 But certainly that makes sense and is understandable.
01:01:15.000 But there is some politics, as usual, wiping out of opposition.
01:01:19.000 Furthermore, I wonder how it relates to the post-war plan to rebuild Ukraine in partnership with Black Rock, eliminating the potential for a Ukrainian trade union movement to be able to meaningfully oppose the kind of restrictions and conditions that Any centralised and financially underwritten project of that nature would likely impose.
01:01:41.000 Branko, thank you so much for joining us.
01:01:43.000 I'm glad you're a regular contributor to our show.
01:01:46.000 You're certainly a valued addition.
01:01:48.000 You can follow Branko's work on Jacobin and his book Yesterday's Man, The Case Against Joe Biden is available to buy using money right now.
01:01:55.000 Thank you, Branko.
01:01:57.000 Cheers, I appreciate it.
01:01:58.000 See you soon.
01:01:58.000 Cheers, man.
01:01:59.000 We've got a great show coming up for you tomorrow.
01:02:01.000 We'll be asking and then answering this question.
01:02:04.000 Is Taiwan the new Ukraine?
01:02:07.000 You want a new, tell us in the comments and chat if you're up to speed, because we're going to tell you some interesting things.
01:02:12.000 Hey, why don't we have a look in the gallery, Dan, at all of the people that are doing their work?
01:02:15.000 I love seeing those.
01:02:16.000 Nice guys.
01:02:17.000 I enjoy seeing it.
01:02:18.000 Have a look at the whole team now doing their work in there.
01:02:20.000 And then would you put it up on the screen so as I can see them as well?
01:02:22.000 It gives me some joy.
01:02:24.000 We've also got some damning off YouTube information about vaccines and vaccine injury to tell you about.
01:02:30.000 We've got Beate Simkin.
01:02:31.000 There you go.
01:02:32.000 She's doing social media.
01:02:32.000 There's Lara.
01:02:34.000 There's Joe doing audio.
01:02:36.000 Look at this fantastic team of people toiling right now to bring you necessary truths.
01:02:41.000 Young Al, they had a birthday.
01:02:43.000 Only recently.
01:02:44.000 Sometimes Al doesn't post the entire show up when they're pre-recorded shows.
01:02:47.000 Do you, Al?
01:02:48.000 Do you?
01:02:49.000 Don't do you?
01:02:49.000 Can't be relied on to do that.
01:02:52.000 Remember that face?
01:02:53.000 He's the sort of fool who'd fill in a spoof assassination form without even knowing it was a parody.
01:03:01.000 We've also got some fantastic guests coming on the show tomorrow.
01:03:05.000 We've got Beate Simkin, my friend and breathwork teacher.
01:03:08.000 You can sign up to Locals for more exclusive content.
01:03:12.000 You can watch live podcast recordings, you can come here to Stay Free HQ and join us.
01:03:17.000 I do weekly meditations, bespoke and tailored to your needs.
01:03:20.000 Gareth, do you need a guided meditation?
01:03:22.000 I need an orange, that's all I need.
01:03:24.000 My friend, take that and sniff it.
01:03:28.000 Sniff yourself well.
01:03:29.000 And should you need a puddin', I got one I want in.
01:03:34.000 No, I'm fine.
01:03:34.000 I'm fine.
01:03:35.000 If you need some puddin', no spoon required.
01:03:39.000 No spoons here, baby!
01:03:40.000 I understand.
01:03:41.000 Take that puddin' straight from the sauce!
01:03:44.000 Hey puddin'!
01:03:46.000 I get it.
01:03:47.000 Hey!
01:03:48.000 We'll be doing some exclusive Q&As for our community, so press that red button that's somewhere on your screen now to join us deeper, deeper down the rabbit hole before we ultimately start communities.
01:03:58.000 See that join button?
01:03:59.000 You can press that.
01:04:00.000 We'll be starting physical communities before you know it.
01:04:03.000 Remember, we do the Community Festival every year for three days.
01:04:05.000 We're going to be travelling around the world, building communities, building resistance, opposing this machine.
01:04:09.000 Trying to break out of the prison planet on a daily basis, bringing you the best possible contributors and alternative narratives that you simply will not get anywhere else.
01:04:19.000 Happy birthday, Leon.
01:04:20.000 Happy birthday, Al.
01:04:21.000 That's a full happy birthday to you, not just 60% of one.
01:04:24.000 See you tomorrow, not for more of the same.
01:04:27.000 We wouldn't serve you that dross, but for more of the different.
01:04:29.000 Until then, stay free.
01:04:40.000 Switch on.