Stay Free - Russel Brand


Jeffrey Sachs On Nord Stream & Wuhan Lab. You Won't Believe THIS - #026 Stay Free with Russell Brand


Summary

Jeffrey Sachs is an economist and professor at Columbia University who challenges the mainstream media narratives on subjects as varied as the pandemic, the ongoing war, and the outrageous claim that Joe Biden is communicating with dead people. In this episode of Stay Free With Russ and Brand, we talk to Jeffrey Sachs about his journey with addiction, and how he overcame his own addictions to become a better human being. He also discusses his work with the Strive Foundation, which is a non-profit organization that provides resources to help people who are struggling with addictions and mental health issues. Jeffrey also talks about how he became a drug addict, and what it was like growing up in a drug-addicted household, and why he decided to stop taking drugs in order to live a life of purpose and purposelessness. Stay Free with Brand is produced by Russ F. Brand and is brought to you by Gimlet Media and produced in partnership with the Stay Free Foundation, a New York-based organization dedicated to providing resources to people in need of help with their mental health, addiction and recovery. Stay free with Brand! Stay free, stay free, and stay free! Thank you for being a friend of the show, and thank you for supporting the show! . - Russ and Gareth and Stay Free! - Stay Free, Brand . . . Stay free! . . , , , and stay safe, and keep free, stay free. , stay free ! Thanks for listening, and rest in peace, love, and gratitude, and light, and good vibes, and love, your support, your continued support, and support, you are so much appreciated. - R.Says -R.S. R.A. . , R. . . -S.R. and R.P. & R.E. ~R.B. :P -A.S., R.V. ( ) - A.S, -P.A., & P. - (A. -B.M. -E. ( ) . (S. (s. ) (C. (P. ) , P. (M. (C) ) ( ) (C.) (V. (R. (J. (D. (A) ) )


Transcript

00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and get the camera.
00:00:25.000 I'm going to get the camera.
00:01:56.000 Cheers.
00:01:57.000 So I'm looking for the CEO Looking for the CEO
00:02:02.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:02:05.000 Let's let the future be my reference.
00:02:09.000 I'm gonna be breaking news.
00:02:10.000 There's got a life out there.
00:02:11.000 Hey, all right.
00:02:17.000 Thanks for watching Stay Free with Russ for Brand.
00:02:19.000 On this show we do a variety of things.
00:02:20.000 Sometimes we talk to guests, like Jordan Peterson or Eckhart Tolle, and generally we try to cover the news in a way that, whilst explains how, let's face it, Terrifying things are, doesn't strip you of the essential hope that's required to be a human being, that things could improve, that life could get better, that there is some joy, some glory to be had out there.
00:02:44.000 Today we're talking to Jeffrey Sachs, who's one such figure in my mind, not Solely because he's willing to challenge establishment narratives, not just because he's an economist and professor at Columbia University who's willing to talk out against the kind of mainstream media narratives that we're fed around subjects as varied as the pandemic or the ongoing war, but also because of this face that he does when he's under pressure.
00:03:11.000 That.
00:03:12.000 That's what I like about him.
00:03:13.000 Can we see that?
00:03:14.000 Thanks.
00:03:15.000 Yeah, that's one of the things that I like about him.
00:03:19.000 That face!
00:03:20.000 And in our interview today, which is going to be sort of coming up in about 10 minutes, I'm going to try and get him to do that face.
00:03:27.000 If you have any questions for Geoffrey, particularly those of you on locals, send them now because that's one of the things we're going to do.
00:03:35.000 If you're a member of our State Free AF community, we're going to frankly prioritise your questions because you support us in the work that we try to do.
00:03:43.000 You know it's Addiction Week and We have this foundation here, the Stay Free Foundation, where people that are drug addicts and mentally ill can apply for individual or group grants.
00:03:54.000 What I mean by that is, we might give a grant to people that are running a treatment centre, or we might give a grant to an individual drug addict.
00:04:01.000 But there's a real proviso, there's a sting in the towel, and that sting is simply stop taking drugs.
00:04:08.000 Let's see what's going on.
00:04:10.000 Why are you smiling at me for?
00:04:11.000 Well, it's just general smiling.
00:04:13.000 Just to lift the spirits?
00:04:15.000 I thought so.
00:04:16.000 Sometimes when you see a smiling face, actually, I did actually feel good, but then I'm cynical about my own emotions.
00:04:20.000 Well, that says more about you.
00:04:22.000 No, it doesn't!
00:04:23.000 It doesn't say more about me.
00:04:24.000 It's because I was thinking, what's he smiling about?
00:04:27.000 What's going on if we're in a televisual context?
00:04:30.000 Are you alright?
00:04:31.000 Very well, very well.
00:04:32.000 We've got some news, Gareth.
00:04:34.000 The first thing I wanted to talk to you about as producer of the show, as co-creator of the show, is Joe Biden.
00:04:44.000 Is there anything this man can't do, is what I'm saying, because, like, there's being forgetful, and then there's telling lies, and then there's the outrageous claim that you're communicating with dead people, that typically when people say that, I don't know, do you know anyone that said that?
00:05:00.000 Not personally, no.
00:05:02.000 I once saw a medium when I was a younger man.
00:05:05.000 Sounds like the kind of thing you'd do.
00:05:06.000 Of course I would.
00:05:07.000 I'd love anything like that.
00:05:08.000 Like, when I was a drug addict, I would take any drugs.
00:05:10.000 Now that I'm not a drug addict, or at least not taking drugs anymore, I will do any whack, crazy, spiritual thing To get myself, like, that's why, you know, and I'm not saying these things are all whack and crazy because I believe in a lot of these people.
00:05:22.000 The tapping with Nick Orner, love that, he's not whack and crazy, it's been proven scientifically.
00:05:27.000 The breathwork with Biette, Wim Hof's breathwork, Kundalini yoga, Transcendental Meditation.
00:05:34.000 Frankly, I'm desperate.
00:05:36.000 That's essentially the message that I'm conveying.
00:05:38.000 And when I was younger, actually when I was just commencing my journey as a drug addict, Is that how you see it?
00:05:43.000 Or just commencing?
00:05:44.000 Okay, let's see.
00:05:45.000 Let's get it all set out nicely.
00:05:48.000 Start with the easier drugs.
00:05:49.000 Right.
00:05:50.000 The simple... Chocolate?
00:05:52.000 Yeah, actually.
00:05:53.000 Chocolate, masturbation, if you want to call it a type of drug.
00:05:56.000 Certainly it can be addictive if you really lean into it.
00:06:00.000 And then like the rest of the marijuana, the cannabis, then the amphetamines.
00:06:04.000 Then you climb that drug ladder to you hit what I call the beggar man's gold.
00:06:09.000 That's the hero in itself, the sweet lady, the brown mistress, the naughty snake.
00:06:16.000 But like on that journey, one time I went to see a medium and I went there like in a sheepskin jacket with no top on and that, and essentially pressurised her into saying that Mark Bolan was my spirit guide.
00:06:28.000 Right.
00:06:28.000 Yeah, from T-Rex.
00:06:30.000 Like, she, I had every, I really had the look of a man who wasn't going to leave until I was given... Oh, you also had the look of Mark Bolan.
00:06:38.000 Essentially, I went in there, sort of in eye shadow, wearing a sheepskin jacket with no top on, and sort of jewels and stuff, and a look of desperation.
00:06:48.000 Anyway, so... Was this a bit like when you pressured your mum into saying you were the new Jesus?
00:06:51.000 I didn't pressure her into saying I was the new Jesus.
00:06:53.000 I just said... I was only seven.
00:06:56.000 I just said I was worried that I might be.
00:06:58.000 And that we should probably prepare.
00:07:00.000 We should probably... Batten down the hatches!
00:07:02.000 Could be the new Lord.
00:07:03.000 I'd never say that now.
00:07:05.000 Actual Jesus.
00:07:05.000 Love...
00:07:06.000 There he is.
00:07:07.000 And here he is as well.
00:07:07.000 Got a new tattoo.
00:07:08.000 There's new Jesus there.
00:07:09.000 Wow.
00:07:09.000 How's it feeling?
00:07:10.000 How's he doing?
00:07:11.000 So it's going into the scabby phase, I'm afraid.
00:07:13.000 Oh, I see.
00:07:13.000 Which is a bit of a... That'll be the bit where he's pushing that rock to one side.
00:07:17.000 You're putting the Vaseline on?
00:07:20.000 Well, I didn't use Vaseline because that's actually stopped breathing.
00:07:22.000 It was a cream that Anna had.
00:07:23.000 I don't know the name of it.
00:07:24.000 What kind of cream is it?
00:07:26.000 We don't even know the brand name.
00:07:27.000 Could be anything.
00:07:28.000 Because we could be endorsing this.
00:07:30.000 Bauman's.
00:07:31.000 You want a Christ tattoo on the forearm?
00:07:34.000 Well, you need some Bauman's, me old pal, me old bube.
00:07:36.000 God, we're controlled by the elites, aren't we?
00:07:40.000 Look at us.
00:07:41.000 Whether or not it's communing with the dead as, you know, me as a young man with Mark Bolan, God rest his eternal glittery soul, or Joe Biden, President of the United States, tottering around the stage, claiming to have had a face-to-face conversation with the inventor of insulin.
00:07:59.000 Let's watch him.
00:08:00.000 How many of you know somebody with diabetes and needs insulin?
00:08:03.000 Well, guess what?
00:08:08.000 When Debbie and I passed this law, it included everybody, not just seniors.
00:08:14.000 And so what happened was he had the corner of his cheek licked.
00:08:17.000 I'm not a fan of that.
00:08:17.000 Not really, no.
00:08:19.000 No, look, he was trying to get some out of the corner of his cheek with his tongue.
00:08:22.000 I'm not a fan of that.
00:08:23.000 No.
00:08:24.000 Not when you're president and you're sort of doing an insulin talk.
00:08:27.000 Also, as I understand it, the insulin is sometimes up to 600% I think it's risen in price 680% in terms of like the kind of profits that they've been making over time.
00:08:38.000 Yeah, and I feel like it's not a strong suit for Joe, the sort of availability of insulin in the United States right now.
00:08:44.000 Well, I think Americans pay still 10 times more than we pay elsewhere.
00:08:47.000 And this is before we've got to the bit where he claims to speak to the dead.
00:08:51.000 We said, okay, you know how much it costs to make that insulin drug for diabetes?
00:08:56.000 Of course.
00:08:57.000 It was invented by a man who did not patent it because he wanted it available for everyone.
00:09:01.000 Big Pharma still lives by that code, really.
00:09:04.000 You remember during the pandemic, that sort of profit-free, access to all, just want to help spirit.
00:09:10.000 Albert Ball, the CEO of Pfizer, said it would be morally reprehensible to profit from this drug.
00:09:16.000 But strangely, Pfizer uniquely profited during the pandemic.
00:09:22.000 I don't know if that's because of the pandemic.
00:09:22.000 Their best ever year.
00:09:24.000 I've I tried to read what it said about their prophets and it was just basically a black limitless expanse of nothingness, so it's difficult to understand.
00:09:34.000 That's what he says.
00:09:37.000 Yeah, he spoke to him.
00:09:38.000 He didn't, and to be honest, I'm beginning to think that that lady in Southend-on-Sea when I was a lad only said that Mark Bolan was my spirit guide because she wanted me to leave.
00:09:47.000 Are you sure there are no spirit guides coming through?
00:09:50.000 Are you sure there are no spirit guides coming through?
00:09:52.000 Do you want to know a bit about insulin?
00:09:53.000 Alright, yeah, a bit.
00:09:55.000 Insulin, a hormone produced in the body, was never invented at all, but was discovered, so that's the first lie, discovered by Frederick Banting, a physician and scientist who died at the age of 49 in 1941, and Biden was born in 1942.
00:10:09.000 So even if he'd done it, you know, just before, it would have been an early conversation in his life.
00:10:13.000 You know like how Dalai Lama's and that, there's sort of a moment where they sort of cross between spaces, and in fact this is the time of Halloween where the veneer between the realms is thinner than ordinary.
00:10:25.000 All saints' days are coming, or it's here already, I don't know, I've not really been following stuff like that.
00:10:30.000 Maybe young Joe Biden and the passing soul of who I'm going to call Freddie Insulin, like ships in the Meta Knight, crossed briefly.
00:10:40.000 At that point, I don't know, it seems it's a difficult story to sell.
00:10:45.000 You are starting to form the opinion that Biden is just enlightened, aren't you?
00:10:48.000 Is that where you're getting to?
00:10:50.000 What it is, is like, they say that as people sort of deteriorate and decay, the soul becomes more evident and prominent, and like, this cadaverous man is like, I think, now reaching the point where he's more dead than living, and is sort of gaining Tibetan Book of the Dead, Dead Sea Scroll-type knowledge.
00:11:09.000 Like, esoteric knowledge.
00:11:10.000 He's like a sort of a Jesuit master now, sort of conveying pure truths.
00:11:16.000 That's why he doesn't know which way to go, because he's not even sure what reality is in anymore.
00:11:16.000 Yeah.
00:11:20.000 It's like an augmented reality he's in.
00:11:22.000 It's like Pokemon Go.
00:11:24.000 He's in a Pokemon Go world, and in his Pokemon Go world, it's like, well, the staircase is over there, along with Pikachu or one of the other lads.
00:11:24.000 Sure.
00:11:31.000 That's right, Pikachu.
00:11:32.000 That's the vice president.
00:11:35.000 Okay, little buddy, let's go.
00:11:37.000 What's that on your laptop?
00:11:40.000 I don't know much about Pikachu's character well as my kids.
00:11:46.000 I forgot to buy some Pikachu stuff.
00:11:48.000 Cute little guy.
00:11:50.000 What angle is Pikachu?
00:11:51.000 What is he even?
00:11:52.000 A rabbit?
00:11:53.000 A rat?
00:11:53.000 What's his game?
00:11:53.000 A guinea pig?
00:11:55.000 It's an electric mouse.
00:11:56.000 How do you know that?
00:11:58.000 Oh, that's the generation gap.
00:12:00.000 Okay.
00:12:01.000 What generation are you?
00:12:04.000 Oh, that's that one.
00:12:05.000 29.
00:12:06.000 That's X, is it?
00:12:06.000 That's not X. That's Millennials.
00:12:08.000 Right.
00:12:09.000 Stars directing their faith, in the words of Dear Robbie.
00:12:12.000 OK, so, also though, while we're talking about decrepit leadership, according to potential propaganda or actual reality, Putin does have Parkinson's and pancreatic cancer.
00:12:26.000 Says a Kremlin spy.
00:12:30.000 Can we trust spies?
00:12:32.000 No.
00:12:32.000 By their very nature, they're lying for a living, aren't they?
00:12:35.000 They've got to go around the whole time acting like they're something... Not spies.
00:12:39.000 Like they're not spies.
00:12:40.000 What are you doing?
00:12:40.000 I wasn't spying.
00:12:41.000 I'll tell you that.
00:12:43.000 Also, if Putin does have that, then I feel sorry for him.
00:12:46.000 There's the evidence right there.
00:12:48.000 Apparently it's evidence of an IV drip.
00:12:51.000 But as we were talking about earlier, I guess an IV drip could be other things, couldn't it?
00:12:55.000 A man might take an IV drip for many reasons, for virility, for... to have a prehensile member.
00:13:03.000 Right.
00:13:04.000 Just one that could move around like a pig's tail.
00:13:06.000 Okay, yeah.
00:13:07.000 Take a special drip and then it could... who knows?
00:13:10.000 There could be many reasons.
00:13:12.000 Is that one of the pop-ups you've been looking at?
00:13:13.000 I don't look at pop-ups, thank you.
00:13:16.000 If something pops up on me, firstly I think, well, what are you popping up for?
00:13:19.000 You've no business here.
00:13:20.000 And prehensile ones, that's no business of mine.
00:13:24.000 So like, Putin, I suppose this is old school propaganda, like just, oh, he's weak.
00:13:29.000 He's weak.
00:13:30.000 He's in decline.
00:13:31.000 Are we doing that with Biden?
00:13:33.000 I'm actually not approaching him from a propagandist perspective.
00:13:35.000 I'm actually concerned.
00:13:36.000 And if someone charged me with looking after him, I'd do it.
00:13:39.000 Yeah.
00:13:40.000 But we're not trying to take down the U.S.
00:13:42.000 though, are we?
00:13:43.000 I mean, we're not in some kind of proxy war with the U.S.
00:13:45.000 Not in the immediate future.
00:13:46.000 Right.
00:13:46.000 I think that it should carry on, but just run by the people that live there in a more direct way.
00:13:51.000 Right.
00:13:52.000 That's in my agenda.
00:13:53.000 Yeah, that's your propaganda.
00:13:55.000 There it is.
00:13:56.000 Quite straightforward.
00:13:57.000 Told you outright.
00:13:57.000 Very good.
00:13:58.000 Don't have to make up lies about it.
00:14:00.000 But, like, is Putin really weak?
00:14:02.000 Because just remember this, which was admittedly, let's face it, Russian propaganda.
00:14:06.000 Nonetheless, it's quite good propaganda because you just know Putin's general demeanour in it.
00:14:11.000 I think he looks pretty hard.
00:14:12.000 Firstly, there's a rocket firing off into the sky.
00:14:14.000 guys have a look gal. Daring. Cut to Putin chilled.
00:14:39.000 Doesn't look very in decline, does he?
00:14:44.000 He's fine.
00:14:45.000 He's absolutely fine.
00:14:46.000 I think he could handle pancreatic cancer.
00:14:47.000 Unless that's one of the doubles, because apparently there's doubles.
00:14:50.000 He's got all of these doubles.
00:14:51.000 I mean, I suppose that's common practice.
00:14:52.000 I feel like Churchill had them.
00:14:54.000 You ever thought about it?
00:14:54.000 Right.
00:14:56.000 People have mistaken you for other people, haven't they?
00:14:58.000 Yeah, sort of over the years, Gal, but, like, I've never been invited to double for one.
00:15:02.000 Okay, right.
00:15:03.000 I've got my own waxwork, of course.
00:15:05.000 You have.
00:15:05.000 But, like, some people, like Putin, I don't know, yeah, having doubles is common practice, I think, isn't it?
00:15:11.000 Yeah.
00:15:12.000 For a leader, Churchill had them.
00:15:13.000 I don't know that Hitler would have had them.
00:15:15.000 I suppose he did, though, did he?
00:15:16.000 Might have done.
00:15:17.000 Of course he did.
00:15:18.000 He would have needed some doubles.
00:15:20.000 Okay, so, like, according to Russian propaganda, Putin pretty mighty, commanding a nuclear army, according to other propaganda, vulnerable and weak.
00:15:30.000 But I suppose to give it a slightly different perspective, if this is a time of decay in a more macro perspective, in a more cosmological perspective, it's interesting I think that the leaders that we're looking at Our leader's in decline.
00:15:44.000 It's interesting that there are doubles, that it's sort of a literal simulacrum, if you can have such a thing, that it's a sort of a baffling array of entropying, atrophying rather, figures just falling apart before our eyes.
00:15:57.000 I think it tells you something integral, that this is but the mask of power, this is but the veil.
00:16:06.000 You know, like, we're on Rumble right now.
00:16:07.000 You're watching this on Rumble, presumably.
00:16:09.000 Rumble has pulled its services from France, refusing to cave to demands to censor Russian news sources.
00:16:15.000 Now, I think YouTube did censor Russia Today, right?
00:16:19.000 Yeah, that's right, and I think that's what this is over as well, is that they've been told to take down Russia Today on Rumble, and they've refused.
00:16:26.000 And so, therefore, they've pulled their services from France.
00:16:28.000 That's a proper wartime move, and I suppose when we're talking to Jeffrey Sachs later, one of the things I'll be interested in asking him is about whether or not it is a proxy war, and indeed what constitutes a proxy war.
00:16:38.000 This funding, whether it's the explicit funding coming out of the Pentagon, what's been referred to as lethal aid, or the loans that are coming out of the World Bank and the IMF, that sort of is funding.
00:16:50.000 The NATO support, the NATO encroachment that led to this, the meddling in Ukrainian... I mean, to what point Is Ukraine an independent nation in a war with Russia?
00:17:03.000 By what terms, really?
00:17:06.000 I suppose the difficulty is that in the last century, we've gone from wars that went from real plain, even down to the costume, goodies versus baddies type wars, Wars against terror, wars against drugs, wars against germs, proxy wars, wars where the goodies have got Nazis in their team.
00:17:28.000 It's just become more and more difficult to get a cohesive angle.
00:17:32.000 When Aaron Maté came on the show, and you can look at that interview in full on Rumble, I said, like, all right, Aaron.
00:17:40.000 I tried to take him to task a bit, Gary.
00:17:42.000 Well, yeah, because I was saying, like, look, mate, you're coming across as someone who has just criticised America no matter what.
00:17:42.000 Oh, yeah?
00:17:48.000 What if you'd have been alive in the Second World War?
00:17:51.000 Would you still have been going, oh, America?
00:17:52.000 Like, oh, you'd go, no, I wouldn't.
00:17:55.000 I'd have joined up and fought against the Nazis.
00:17:58.000 Right, he said that, did he?
00:17:59.000 That's what he said.
00:18:00.000 And I mean, like, he said it.
00:18:00.000 Right.
00:18:02.000 I didn't take him at his word.
00:18:02.000 What about you?
00:18:03.000 I didn't push back on that.
00:18:04.000 What do you think you'd have done?
00:18:07.000 I can't see you in the army.
00:18:08.000 Well, it's a different time, innit?
00:18:09.000 I'm not gonna have this haircut in the 1940s.
00:18:10.000 No, you wouldn't be allowed it.
00:18:11.000 Of course not.
00:18:12.000 No one had this haircut in the 1940s.
00:18:12.000 No one did.
00:18:14.000 Like, literally, you wouldn't be allowed it.
00:18:14.000 No one.
00:18:16.000 I mean, my whole personality in the 1940s would have had to have just simply been put to one side.
00:18:20.000 And I'd have had to have got on with being a 1940s person.
00:18:22.000 Yeah.
00:18:23.000 Do you think you reclaimed the personality after the war?
00:18:26.000 Like you were going home to your wife or something?
00:18:29.000 Maybe.
00:18:29.000 Like me and her, she'd hopefully accept me for what I really was.
00:18:32.000 But I can't listen.
00:18:33.000 The fighting was awful.
00:18:36.000 Let me slip into something a little more comfortable.
00:18:40.000 Give me your kitten heels right now.
00:18:42.000 Because I've been being a completely different person.
00:18:44.000 All this got any gun chum crap.
00:18:47.000 Firing guns.
00:18:48.000 No man to handle that.
00:18:50.000 You'd have been terrible at the football match at Christmas Day.
00:18:53.000 Well, that was in the First World War, Gareth.
00:18:55.000 And I think in Treasure, I haven't gotten a goal, I suppose.
00:19:01.000 I think I would have found it difficult.
00:19:02.000 In the First World War, you know, like all those conscientious objectors, they've been forgiven now.
00:19:07.000 It's weird, isn't it?
00:19:08.000 Because now, if you go against the narrative of the war right now, you're like, oh, it's not very patriotic.
00:19:12.000 Everything has shifted.
00:19:13.000 I don't understand what happened from, like, you know, when somebody was 29, or young Putin there, who's, I think, 19 now.
00:19:23.000 You're dealing with, like, sort of like, when we were younger, it was like, the left is this, the left is for freedom of speech, for standing up, now it's, everything is sort of to anti-war, big anti-war marches against Iraq, now it's like, what, I'm not sure what we're supposed to do.
00:19:38.000 I understand that the world is complex, I understand that the truth is complex, but what I'm beginning to believe is that because there are no actual principles in politics, they sort of ghost and shift around according to what is convenient in order to meet their objectives.
00:19:53.000 In order to suit an agenda.
00:19:53.000 Yeah.
00:19:54.000 It's not as straightforward as, these are the goodies, these are the baddies, they seem to have gone.
00:19:58.000 No, I mean, it's amazing that with all the information that we have now, more information than ever, you would think, or certainly have access to, that the arguments seem to be more reductive than ever, in terms of the shutting down, and obviously we'll talk to this, talk to Jeffrey Sachs about this, but the kind of reductivism that goes around conversations about nuanced subjects such as this war, for example, seems to increasingly be shut down.
00:20:20.000 But perhaps it's because of the availability but perhaps the reductivism is the response because now you
00:20:26.000 literally can watch a channel like this, you can watch if you wanted Young Turks or you could watch
00:20:31.000 Tim Pool or you could watch Crowder or Shapiro or Redacted or Double Down News,
00:20:37.000 like across the sort of you know the political spectrum of left to right, we call it libertarianism to sort of old
00:20:42.000 school leftism, like there has to be a machine that dominates information
00:20:48.000 and like we were talking earlier about Musk and Twitter, and like my belief is that Musk is an individualist, he is
00:20:58.000 a libertarian and like as he said in his recent tweet and a free speech absolutist.
00:21:04.000 But clearly he has like a private agenda that relates to essentially, I think, a technological revolution, space travel.
00:21:13.000 And it's interesting, I was thinking as well about, like, because he was like, initially at least, the sort of Tesla person, like, and the affiliation between Tesla and ecological responsibility, which maybe doesn't hold up under scrutiny, let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments what you guys think.
00:21:30.000 It's interesting that he is now seen as someone that's almost beyond the arguments of climate and ecology and he's sort of talking about I think like transhumanism through the neural link like you know sort of a kind of technological human hybrids and of course he famously said we already are sort of cyborgs um and also the idea of interplanetary human beings
00:21:53.000 Because of this, his agenda, I was arguing, is somehow at odds with American hegemony.
00:21:58.000 The idea that America, through globalist affiliations with organisations like the WHO, IMF, which I believe they have undue influence over, along with private financial interests that are pretty well documented, that ultimately align with American corporatism and the American agenda.
00:22:17.000 Musk has found himself at odds with the agenda to create a unipolar world.
00:22:21.000 That Russia, obviously, believe in a kind of pluralism of power because they want their own Russian imperialism.
00:22:26.000 Similarly, China.
00:22:28.000 I'm wondering what the true tectonic plates of power are actually being moved by.
00:22:33.000 And that's one of the things I'm going to ask Jeffrey Sachs as well.
00:22:37.000 Yeah, it's complex.
00:22:37.000 I mean, you know, he's an interesting figure.
00:22:40.000 There's another side of it that is argued by a lot of people that he's as much a part of the system as anyone else and that what's happening with Twitter at the moment is all for show in a way.
00:22:49.000 A lot of those money that he's made has come through government contracts.
00:22:53.000 You know, he's kind of integrated into that system.
00:22:53.000 Yeah.
00:22:57.000 A lot of the ways in which Tesla makes money is selling carbon credits to people who, you know, because of the business that he operates in.
00:23:04.000 So it's like companies who like have big old carbon footprints now buy carbon credits to make sure that they're carbon neutral or whatever that is now in order for their businesses to carry on doing what they're doing.
00:23:15.000 That doesn't seem fair.
00:23:16.000 It doesn't seem fair.
00:23:17.000 That's when you're not living in reality.
00:23:18.000 No.
00:23:19.000 We did, it was a lot of carbon but...
00:23:21.000 Have you seen our carbon credits?
00:23:23.000 I think Bill Gates buys a lot of carbon credits.
00:23:26.000 So there's someone who goes around talking about emissions and who has bought a private jet company, takes private jets everywhere, offsets his carbon emissions.
00:23:34.000 So it's not a fair system.
00:23:35.000 And I think, you know, Tesla, as what I've heard, makes a lot of money through selling those carbon credits.
00:23:41.000 I think to say he's, like, outside of the system and an independent is not true, but obviously there's other complexities to it.
00:23:48.000 When we have him on, Gareth, will you carry that part of the conversation?
00:23:52.000 Because I'm actually, as you know, if you're a regular viewer of our show, Stay Free with Russell Brand, cultivating a friendship with him.
00:23:58.000 Most recently, when I text him, he was like, sorry, I've been so busy with Twitter, he said.
00:24:02.000 I go, well, I'm on there a couple of times a day myself, so... Yeah, I don't know.
00:24:07.000 And, like, also, I go, do you want me to come there?
00:24:11.000 Right.
00:24:11.000 To Twitter.
00:24:12.000 Come and help, if you want.
00:24:14.000 He didn't respond to that.
00:24:14.000 No.
00:24:15.000 Now, so, like, when, like, if we do get him on, it's like, you know, I do recognise this is still a billionaire, like, ultimately a billionaire.
00:24:21.000 Sort of an oligarch with a great deal of power.
00:24:23.000 And I'm really interested in putting those arguments forward.
00:24:25.000 But, do you know, that's something for the future.
00:24:28.000 Here's something for the present, baby.
00:24:30.000 A man that's become a recognised radical.
00:24:33.000 A man who's been confronting mainstream narratives all over this cultural space, using his adorable face, creating an iconic expression, the recoiling look of shock that only Jeffrey Sachs, economist and professor at Columbia University, can deliver.
00:24:50.000 Jeffrey, is this you?
00:24:52.000 Is it really you?
00:24:58.000 We're so happy to see you there, and it's nice to see a variation.
00:25:01.000 Although, in the original version of the face, the mouth actually remains closed and the head goes back.
00:25:06.000 Who's this?
00:25:09.000 Yes, that's it.
00:25:11.000 That's the one.
00:25:12.000 That's the one we know and love.
00:25:14.000 Yeah, that's good.
00:25:15.000 I mean, it's not for me to tell you how to do your signature face, of course.
00:25:22.000 Geoffrey, I've got loads of things I want to ask you, I'll jump into it.
00:25:25.000 Fantastic.
00:25:26.000 We're discussing now global narratives.
00:25:29.000 We're discussing now unipolarism.
00:25:32.000 We've been looking at the idea that... Let's start where we were when you joined us.
00:25:38.000 We were talking about how a figure like Elon Musk may be controversial even if he's ultimately pursuing self-interests
00:25:46.000 because his purchase of Twitter prevents the control of the public sphere in a
00:25:52.000 way that would be ultimately amenable to the establishment whose ultimate goal
00:25:56.000 and when I say the establishment I mean American corporate interests and how
00:25:59.000 they align with unelected globalist bodies like the IMF, WHO etc.
00:26:05.000 A shared objective to create a unipolar world, a kind of new world order, a one-world government one way or another, even if it's implicit and tacit rather than overt and explicit.
00:26:17.000 And obviously Russia have their own Weltanschauung.
00:26:20.000 Obviously China have their own agenda. Thank you. I'm glad I got the Welton Shong nod
00:26:24.000 there. Thanks from a Columbia professor. So what do you do you think that's true
00:26:30.000 of Elon Musk? Is he a disruptor in some way even if he is not ultimately unique
00:26:35.000 among billionaires?
00:26:37.000 Look, our big problem is the level of discussion we have in general is pretty
00:26:46.000 miserable.
00:26:47.000 I don't know if Twitter can really solve that because, you know, dealing with these problems in tweets is part of our problem, actually.
00:26:55.000 I have to say it's probably not the solution.
00:26:59.000 We're just not doing a very good job of understanding the complete mess that we're in.
00:27:07.000 The U.S.
00:27:08.000 lies for a living, as we know, but the mainstream media do nothing about it and just repeat the lies, amplify them, and it's getting pretty dangerous.
00:27:20.000 That's the real problem.
00:27:21.000 It's a very dangerous time right now because we seem not to be able to have an adult conversation about almost anything in the mainstream.
00:27:33.000 I don't hear you.
00:27:34.000 See?
00:27:35.000 Oh, there we go.
00:27:35.000 Okay.
00:27:36.000 What has changed, Jeffrey?
00:27:38.000 What in particular does your ascent into public consciousness demonstrate?
00:27:42.000 Why is it impossible to have these conversations?
00:27:45.000 Why is there a tightening?
00:27:47.000 Why is there more censorship?
00:27:48.000 It seems to be altering.
00:27:50.000 Forget the shifting perspectives of the left and right and this new Liberal authoritarianism that seems to be emerging.
00:27:58.000 Why is there now such a demented attempt to control the public space and the public narrative?
00:28:06.000 And your personal experience surely speaks to that, being shut down publicly when sort of talking about the Nord Stream pipeline, when talking about Wuhan.
00:28:16.000 Tell me what you think is driving this new extreme sensorialism.
00:28:23.000 It's a little bit hard to know.
00:28:25.000 In my youth, which was a very long time ago, newspapers like The Washington Post and New
00:28:31.000 York Times actually enjoyed dissing on political figures.
00:28:35.000 I grew up when we were getting rid of Richard Nixon because of all the lies.
00:28:42.000 But now, these papers don't do anything but repeat the lies.
00:28:48.000 And it's extremely strange for me.
00:28:50.000 You know, I know a lot of the reporters.
00:28:53.000 They tell me privately, yeah, what you're saying is right, but, you know, our editor's not so interested in it.
00:29:00.000 It is really A big question.
00:29:04.000 I don't think there's a simple answer.
00:29:06.000 Of course, corporate ownership, yes, it's definitely part of it.
00:29:10.000 But the complete collapse of professionalism in journalism in these mainstream media, not everywhere because there are some really brave people out there, but in what we call the mainstream, is pathetic and very dangerous because we're deep into a war that is escalating and we can't even have a decent Discussion about what the sources of this war are or how to end it and I had the experience I wrote for one Syndicate project syndicate for 20 years.
00:29:43.000 I was their most published writer, but they wouldn't print the pieces that I wrote that were contrary to the official line about this war and it was pretty amazing to me after 20 years I couldn't even post a piece and that that's not good in my view
00:30:03.000 No, I believe nowadays Woodward and Bernstein would be doing their work online.
00:30:09.000 Even in recent memory, a figure like Chris Hedges has gone from being a Pulitzer Prize winner within New York Times to having his content taken off YouTube because he was like interviewing Zizek or Edward Snowden on Russia Today.
00:30:25.000 So that's sort of like measurable increase in a sensorial mentality.
00:30:29.000 And when it comes to this war in particular, Jeffrey, when you have figures like Noam Chomsky and Donald Trump advocating for diplomacy and ultimately peace, what does it tell you about the sort of central space and how radically it's being controlled?
00:30:43.000 And what does this level of control suggest to you?
00:30:48.000 Well, you know, what I've seen, because I've really lived it and I've been involved with dozens of governments across the world for 40 years now, basically the neocons took over U.S.
00:31:01.000 foreign policy 30 years ago.
00:31:04.000 And it hasn't really mattered whether it's Democrats or Republicans.
00:31:08.000 It didn't really matter whether it was Bush Jr.
00:31:13.000 or Obama or Biden.
00:31:16.000 The weirdest thing is Trump, who's a nut, in my view, and a dangerous one, by the way.
00:31:22.000 I want to be clear about that.
00:31:23.000 He's the one that didn't make wars during his four years.
00:31:27.000 The others all were engaged in wars.
00:31:30.000 That's not a good sign.
00:31:31.000 The mainstream of our political system in both parties is militarized.
00:31:37.000 And our foreign policy is largely based on secrecy, also.
00:31:44.000 And so we don't even see what our government's doing.
00:31:47.000 Nothing is explained.
00:31:49.000 Nothing is debated anymore.
00:31:52.000 And that's been true for a long time.
00:31:54.000 But it's been true across the administration.
00:31:56.000 So it's not a partisan thing.
00:31:58.000 You know, we had Bush, who I thought was the worst imaginable president during his term.
00:32:04.000 Okay, then Obama came in and Obama made wars again the same way in Syria.
00:32:10.000 A presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Assad.
00:32:14.000 Not reported by the mainstream media at all.
00:32:17.000 This NATO operation to overthrow Qaddafi—never explained.
00:32:22.000 And it really goes on and on.
00:32:24.000 And now we're in a war in Ukraine, and we are in it.
00:32:29.000 This is absolutely a war between the United States and Russia.
00:32:33.000 It's extraordinarily dangerous.
00:32:35.000 We're told every day in the mainstream media an unprovoked war that started on February 24, 2022.
00:32:43.000 Which is false.
00:32:45.000 There's a history to this.
00:32:46.000 There was a way to avoid this war.
00:32:50.000 Biden didn't choose it.
00:32:52.000 But none of it is properly debated at all.
00:32:55.000 So that's really what we're facing.
00:32:58.000 By your reckoning then, Geoffrey, this is an agenda that began sort of broadly in the 90s with the new American century, with like the Wolfowitz, Cheney, and the think tank that sort of indicated for America to achieve true hegemony, there would be sort of military action in the Middle East around resources, and you see that broadly whilst it expands numerous administrations and bipartisan ones at that, This is ultimately a continuation of that.
00:33:27.000 And of course, it is shrouded in secrecy, and that's why Julian Assange is right now in Belmarsh and Snowden is, with some degree of irony, right now in Russia.
00:33:37.000 Now, I wonder if you would talk to us a little more about the... If the accepted mainstream narrative is that this war began on, as I think you said, January the 14th...
00:33:49.000 January 24th, absolutely.
00:33:50.000 That day, that's it.
00:33:52.000 No history before it.
00:33:54.000 So you're not talking about the 2014 elections, not talking about NATO infringement, not talking about the sort of sponsorships and coups that have taken place.
00:34:02.000 Could you give us a bit of insight into an alternative narrative and could you speak more particularly about the sort of peace deal that potentially could have taken place that Boris Johnson delayed, deferred in his sort of talks with Zelensky?
00:34:16.000 And yeah, can you give us an alternative narrative please?
00:34:19.000 Absolutely, because there is a real story behind all of this.
00:34:25.000 I happened to be there, actually, 32 years ago, 33 years ago, because I was an economic advisor to the economic team of Gorbachev, actually.
00:34:37.000 And in 1990, Gorbachev wanted to end the Cold War.
00:34:41.000 He wanted to and the Soviet military alliance, the so-called Warsaw Pact
00:34:46.000 Germany wanted to reunify, or Helmut Kohl wanted to reunify Germany,
00:34:46.000 alliance.
00:34:52.000 and they discussed this, and it was very clear.
00:34:54.000 The U.S. and Germany said to Gorbachev, if you dissolve the Warsaw Pact and the Cold War,
00:35:03.000 and Germany reunifies, NATO will not move one inch eastward.
00:35:10.000 And that was the basic premise that we're actually going to get beyond the Cold War.
00:35:15.000 And explicitly the language is, we're not going to take advantage of your actions.
00:35:21.000 So we're not going to substitute our military power in the places where you pull back.
00:35:27.000 Turned out to be a massive lie.
00:35:30.000 In the mid-1990s, the U.S.
00:35:32.000 started the NATO expansion.
00:35:34.000 Very wise people at that time, and I think the wisest of the era was George Kennan, a great historian, scholar, and diplomat of the time, said this is the beginning of the new Cold War.
00:35:49.000 The warnings went completely unheeded.
00:35:52.000 We got to the early 2000s.
00:35:55.000 By the way, Putin came into power pro-European.
00:36:00.000 Absolutely wanting normal relations.
00:36:02.000 George Bush expanded NATO to seven more countries, to the Black Sea, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Slovenia, to the three Baltic states.
00:36:14.000 All the time Putin was saying, stop!
00:36:16.000 You're right in our neighborhood, we have national security concerns.
00:36:19.000 Then in 2008 at the Bucharest NATO Summit, Bush, over the objections of the Europeans—and European leaders talked to me privately at the time—but they don't talk publicly.
00:36:33.000 And that's how Europe works.
00:36:34.000 The U.S.
00:36:35.000 says what it's going to do, and the European leaders may complain, they may squirm, but they don't explain to their own people what's at stake.
00:36:45.000 But what Bush pushed in 2008 was that NATO would now expand to Ukraine and to Georgia.
00:36:54.000 Now, if people take a map out and look at the country Georgia on the east end of the Black Sea, I don't think that's a North Atlantic country.
00:37:04.000 I don't think that's a NATO country, actually.
00:37:07.000 What you see at play there is this neocon idea of surrounding Russia in the Black Sea.
00:37:15.000 Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, Georgia.
00:37:19.000 And what our strategists have said for decades is that would basically corner Russia, and Putin said it, don't do this in our neighborhood.
00:37:32.000 And actually there was a NATO-Russia meeting the next day after Bush pushed through this enlargement commitment, and at that NATO-Russia meeting, Putin said to Bush, if you push NATO into Ukraine, we take back Crimea.
00:37:53.000 I tell you that now.
00:37:55.000 This was reported in Kommersant and the Russian press afterwards.
00:38:00.000 Fast forward, Russell, a few years.
00:38:03.000 First, there was a pro-Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych, who He very wisely said, I don't want Ukraine to be in the middle of a war between these two nuclear superpowers.
00:38:16.000 We stay neutral.
00:38:18.000 We don't want NATO here because I want us not to be in the midst of a war.
00:38:25.000 He was president up until early 2014.
00:38:30.000 When he pulled back from signing a partnership agreement with the EU under Russian pressure,
00:38:39.000 saying, don't sign, we have stakes here, too, he said, Yanukovych said, we need to delay
00:38:44.000 these negotiations with Europe, protests broke out, no doubt partly spontaneous.
00:38:52.000 But then the United States went to work, as it does, and turned those spontaneous protests
00:38:59.000 into an open insurrection.
00:39:02.000 Our politicians even went and spoke to the Maidan, as it's called, the space where the
00:39:09.000 protests took place, as if, you know, Chinese politicians, say, came to Trump's rally on
00:39:17.000 January 6, 2021.
00:39:18.000 It's pretty weird.
00:39:20.000 The United States just got way in there and said, go for it.
00:39:23.000 We're with you.
00:39:24.000 We're with you.
00:39:25.000 We know that the assistant secretary of state at the time, Victoria Nuland, was orchestrating
00:39:32.000 what would be the change of government.
00:39:34.000 She was caught on tape.
00:39:36.000 Fuck Europe!
00:39:37.000 Here's how we're going to do it.
00:39:39.000 Here is what the new government's going to look like.
00:39:42.000 It's interesting.
00:39:44.000 She was the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs.
00:39:50.000 Today, she is the Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs.
00:39:55.000 In other words, this is a long project.
00:39:59.000 The same people are engaged.
00:40:01.000 Yanukovych fled.
00:40:03.000 There were Violence, by the way, absolutely violence, in part, on the insurrectionist side.
00:40:13.000 There's no doubt about that, according to careful scholarship.
00:40:17.000 The United States immediately recognized the new government, extra-constitutional government.
00:40:24.000 There was regime change.
00:40:26.000 Putin said, you just made a coup against our pro-Russian president.
00:40:30.000 That was Russia's interpretation.
00:40:32.000 Whatever it is, it was complicated, but the U.S.
00:40:35.000 government doesn't explain anything.
00:40:38.000 But I saw, by the way, just kind of by coincidence, because I've been engaged in Ukraine all the way back since 1994.
00:40:50.000 I saw how U.S.
00:40:54.000 NGOs, quote-unquote, were directly engaged in financing part of the Maidan episode.
00:41:02.000 So I saw with my own eyes.
00:41:05.000 We were way in there.
00:41:07.000 Okay, from Russia's point of view, that's it.
00:41:10.000 Now there's a pro-U.S.
00:41:13.000 The pro-Russian president was overthrown in their interpretation.
00:41:13.000 government.
00:41:19.000 They followed up.
00:41:20.000 As they said, Putin seized Crimea.
00:41:24.000 The new government said, we're going for NATO.
00:41:27.000 The U.S.
00:41:28.000 started pouring in billions of dollars of armaments.
00:41:32.000 Between 2014 and 2021.
00:41:35.000 This war has actually been going on for eight years.
00:41:38.000 It didn't start even as a hot war in February of this year.
00:41:43.000 It started in 2014.
00:41:45.000 And the war has been going on.
00:41:47.000 The arming has been going on.
00:41:48.000 The idea of turning Ukraine into a NATO country has been going on.
00:41:54.000 Then comes Biden in.
00:41:57.000 Now, again, Trump for me was really psychologically unstable.
00:42:04.000 I never felt safe for a day.
00:42:06.000 I thought, okay, fine.
00:42:08.000 Now, something reasonable and rational.
00:42:11.000 But he brought the neocons exactly into the core again.
00:42:18.000 Pretty weird.
00:42:19.000 I think he's lost his political base at home for this because the costs and consequences of this are huge.
00:42:28.000 But the essence of it is that in 2021, Putin said to Biden as new president, stop NATO enlargement.
00:42:37.000 This is our backyard.
00:42:39.000 We will not tolerate NATO in Ukraine, a U.S.
00:42:44.000 military alliance on our 1,000 plus kilometer border.
00:42:49.000 No!
00:42:51.000 And I happen to call the White House late in 2021 just saying, please avoid a war.
00:42:59.000 We don't need NATO there.
00:43:00.000 It's no good to have NATO there.
00:43:02.000 It's no good for the United States to have NATO there.
00:43:04.000 We don't have to be on every piece of this board, like the game of Risk I often compare it to.
00:43:11.000 They want bases everywhere in the world, these neocons.
00:43:15.000 We already have them in 85 countries.
00:43:17.000 My God, it's more than enough.
00:43:19.000 We should not have wanted to go.
00:43:22.000 But Putin said, let's negotiate.
00:43:28.000 I said, you know, the terms are pretty reasonable.
00:43:30.000 Let's figure out how to do this.
00:43:32.000 The White House said, no, it's non-negotiable.
00:43:36.000 Putin invades on February 24th.
00:43:40.000 By mid-March, Zelensky is saying, you know, we could have neutrality.
00:43:47.000 We need guarantees.
00:43:49.000 We need security guarantees.
00:43:50.000 But we could have neutrality.
00:43:52.000 Actually, in mid-March, the Ukrainians put forward a number of terms, handed it to the Russians.
00:44:00.000 The Russian negotiators, I know, I had long discussion about this, sent it to Putin.
00:44:05.000 Putin said, yeah, these are grounds on which we can negotiate.
00:44:09.000 Turkey was the intermediary.
00:44:13.000 Incredibly skilled diplomats.
00:44:15.000 One day in the second half of March of this year, the Ukrainian spokesman, the Russian spokesman, and the Turkish spokesman said, we're very close to a deal.
00:44:29.000 It wasn't propaganda from one side or another.
00:44:29.000 They all said it.
00:44:32.000 They all agreed.
00:44:35.000 Then, Ukraine walked away from the negotiating table.
00:44:40.000 Pretty damn weird, actually.
00:44:43.000 I thought it was a devastating mistake.
00:44:47.000 It's never been explained.
00:44:48.000 It's never been acknowledged.
00:44:50.000 There are lots of stories that make a lot of sense about how Boris Johnson flew there, never accept neutrality, fight on, we arm you.
00:44:59.000 There are stories about the United States at that time telling them you don't have to accept any of this because those were the days when Biden came to the NATO meeting and said this is going to be a long war and then spoke in Warsaw and said that man cannot stay in power and his defense secretary Lloyd Austin said just after that that our aim is to weaken Russia so it can never do this again.
00:45:25.000 In other words, something really went haywire at the moment when negotiations could have been concluded.
00:45:36.000 And now we've been in this for months.
00:45:41.000 It has escalated.
00:45:44.000 At least tens of thousands, possibly hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians have died in the midst of this.
00:45:52.000 Russia has recently taken out half of the energy system of Ukraine.
00:45:59.000 They rebuilt it, but new missiles come raining down.
00:46:04.000 Biden has talked about that, oh my god, we're on a risk of Armageddon.
00:46:08.000 He's trying to think, he said even out loud.
00:46:11.000 What is Putin's off-ramp?
00:46:12.000 Well, Mr. President, I can tell you what the off-ramp is because it's been explained for 32 years.
00:46:17.000 Please.
00:46:20.000 Do not expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia, just like we would not like China and Mexico having a military alliance right now.
00:46:32.000 And when Cuba tried that in the Western Hemisphere back in the early 1960s, the United States invaded with a snap of a finger.
00:46:41.000 Please exercise some prudence.
00:46:43.000 So President Biden's wondering, hmm, what's the off-ramp?
00:46:46.000 Well, it's not so complicated.
00:46:49.000 But it is for the neocons because they've had this agenda for decades now.
00:46:54.000 They see it's fine.
00:46:56.000 We're almost there.
00:46:57.000 We're almost there.
00:46:58.000 We almost have Ukraine on our side.
00:47:00.000 That's the big prize.
00:47:01.000 That's the weakening of Russia.
00:47:03.000 That's their view as we take one step of escalation on each side.
00:47:09.000 And it's just absolutely mind-boggling.
00:47:12.000 But to come back to where we started, Russell, it's not explained in the mainstream media at all.
00:47:19.000 I mean, I'm beginning to see, Geoffrey, why people interrupt you so aggressively at this point.
00:47:24.000 Ha ha!
00:47:25.000 There was the face!
00:47:27.000 Geoffrey, there was obviously several things I'd like to follow up on.
00:47:33.000 the sort of hubris of American imperialism and the sort of various
00:47:38.000 marionette agencies and organizations that operate as their proxies, whether
00:47:43.000 it's these NGOs that you listed or NATO itself, starts to paint a picture where
00:47:48.000 if indeed this is a continuation of narratives that existed since 2014 and
00:47:53.000 even earlier than that with the New American Century project, that it
00:47:57.000 suggests to me that even the official American government is a type of proxy,
00:48:03.000 that there is an agenda that can be pursued regardless of apparent
00:48:08.000 fluctuation and vicissitude in American political life, American domestic
00:48:13.000 political life.
00:48:14.000 It seems that one agenda is continually being addressed and followed without that narrative ever being divulged or discussed or ever actually being within reach of due democratic process.
00:48:30.000 So, I wonder then, Geoffrey, what...
00:48:34.000 If it's, you know, to colonise or dominate or control Ukraine through the sort of involvement of NATO and I've heard things about NATO and their sponsorship and involvement with military-industrial complex and them sponsoring and organising arms deals.
00:48:49.000 I've heard stuff about NATO that's pretty damn dubious.
00:48:52.000 I wonder, how could a policy that is so reckless be pursued To the very, to the dawn of Armageddon.
00:49:02.000 Like, you know, now this is not a country like Iraq or, you know, other countries that were destabilised in what we call the Middle East.
00:49:09.000 This is a, this is a sort of a former superpower that has nuclear capacity.
00:49:14.000 So how is it that there is no contingency for the ability for Russia to respond?
00:49:23.000 Is that something, obviously that's something you must have pondered.
00:49:23.000 Why is that?
00:49:25.000 Tell me what you think.
00:49:27.000 Yeah, I mean, when President Biden let slip that maybe the world was going to be destroyed,
00:49:35.000 he was chastised.
00:49:36.000 Oh, the Wall Street Journal, why are you talking that way?
00:49:43.000 Lindsey Graham and the Republican senator, you know, shame them.
00:49:46.000 The President shouldn't talk that way.
00:49:49.000 We're told we'll never be blackmailed by nuclear blackmail.
00:49:54.000 Oh my God!
00:49:55.000 How about understanding that Russia has 1,600 deployed nuclear weapons?
00:49:59.000 We have 1,600 deployed nuclear weapons.
00:50:01.000 We have 1,600 deployed nuclear weapons.
00:50:06.000 How about just a little care?
00:50:08.000 You know, it's not a matter of nuclear blackmail.
00:50:12.000 It's a matter of us not getting the world blown to bits.
00:50:16.000 And one of the things I've spent my whole life studying as an adult, because I lived through it since second grade, was the Cuban Missile Crisis, which was exactly 60 years ago this year.
00:50:30.000 And we came—we came within one second of nuclear war, literally, because the nuclear-tipped torpedo was put in the bay, the firing bay of a disabled Soviet submarine, and the order to fire was countermanded at the last moment by a Communist Party official that happened to be on the submarine and could countermand the captain's order.
00:50:58.000 That's how close we came.
00:51:00.000 to the launch of a nuclear war.
00:51:02.000 So when you have studied these things, looked at them, know the kind of the tick tock, minute by minute of how that crisis 60 years ago almost ended the world.
00:51:16.000 And you know, today, how much irresponsibility there is.
00:51:21.000 And Frankly, you know, there are field commanders, there are accidents, there are planes that collide, there are misunderstandings, misreadings of everything that can happen right now.
00:51:32.000 Of course, we need to pull back from this path that we're on.
00:51:38.000 But one of the parts of the campaign is to tell us nothing to worry about.
00:51:44.000 No problem.
00:51:45.000 Everything's fine.
00:51:47.000 Zelensky says each day, we're going to push them out of every inch of Ukraine, including Crimea.
00:51:55.000 Well, yeah, but not before nuclear war you're not going to.
00:51:59.000 And we know that, but we don't say it.
00:52:02.000 And we just don't tell the truth.
00:52:06.000 And this is, This is imperial logic.
00:52:10.000 Imperial logic is you don't have to explain anything.
00:52:13.000 This isn't about democratic governance.
00:52:15.000 This is about imperial logic.
00:52:17.000 What happened in the U.S.
00:52:18.000 is we used to have two sides of our foreign policy, by the way, because going all the way back to the end of World War II, there was a hardline side, which we would call the neocons, which was looking for U.S.
00:52:34.000 basically control.
00:52:36.000 And there was a side that said we should negotiate peaceful coexistence, what we would now call multilateralism.
00:52:43.000 I would say, by and large, since 1992, it's been the neocons in charge.
00:52:52.000 And that's what is stunning to me.
00:52:55.000 But they don't feel any urge to explain any of these issues to us.
00:53:00.000 I know it.
00:53:02.000 I see it because I hear a lot.
00:53:05.000 I see it from different government side.
00:53:08.000 I see the perplexity.
00:53:09.000 I also know in Europe there's a lot of consternation in European leaders, but they don't say anything.
00:53:18.000 It's not only imperialistic, it's also imperious.
00:53:21.000 There's an incredible arrogance here, and I feel like a sort of psychological disassociation.
00:53:27.000 I wonder, Geoffrey, what role the pandemic played in creating these conditions.
00:53:34.000 Obviously, you've described a narrative that takes us back considerably earlier than the ordinarily agreed commencement date of this war.
00:53:44.000 I wonder how we can have a culture where ordinary people appear to have been groomed and coached into a state of dumb numbness and compliance where the kind of phatic and emblematic support of Ukraine through badges and flags and platitudes doesn't, cannot in fact, incorporate the Apocalyptic narrative that ought be at the forefront of all of our minds.
00:54:13.000 I wonder if we've somehow been groomed into compliance in 30 years of saccharine consumerism and the sort of sudden shock of two years of lockdowns.
00:54:27.000 Which in themselves seem to have been somewhat dubiously underwritten, whether it's about the inauguration of how this disease indeed began, the use of scientific narrative, the conveyance of information, the way that generally speaking the stories we were told supported centralised power And corporate objectives, whether that was medical policy, social policy.
00:54:56.000 I wonder how you see the pandemic as being part of a broader story of the induction of compliance and ignorance and the creation of a sort of a global state where there is a separate strata of geopolitical conflict or, you know, objectives that are kept entirely separate from our ordinary understanding.
00:55:20.000 You know, it actually, it really does go back a long way because I date it to 1947.
00:55:28.000 That was when the National Security Act was passed in the United States.
00:55:33.000 It created the CIA and it made just a profoundly dangerous blunder for a republic.
00:55:42.000 And that was that it made the CIA two things.
00:55:45.000 One, an intelligence agency, understandable.
00:55:49.000 And the other, a secret army, a covert operation for dirty operations that would never be divulged,
00:55:59.000 basically at the president's discretion.
00:56:02.000 Even Truman knew something's going to go very wrong with this.
00:56:07.000 So when the hardliners are in power, they think they can act with impunity
00:56:12.000 because they don't have to explain anything.
00:56:15.000 We learned it from the Brits, by the way.
00:56:17.000 You know, this is British Empire behavior for the...
00:56:22.000 We just needed to get tea at a reasonable price, and we weren't willing to take over a few continents to get it.
00:56:29.000 Well, that, and true, you know, you needed to open up the opium market in China, which was extremely important, so... But you're right, that was partly to get tea, so I think you've got the primary objective.
00:56:45.000 We don't even do it for tea or coffee, by the way.
00:56:49.000 We've been doing it since 1947.
00:56:53.000 When it's secret, it's just with impunity.
00:56:57.000 What happened in 1992 was that the Great Adversary disappeared.
00:57:02.000 So now you have the neocons, but you have this, BAM!
00:57:07.000 We're all alone!
00:57:08.000 We are the most powerful colossus in the history of the world!
00:57:12.000 We are the world's unipolar power!
00:57:16.000 For, by the way, 4.2% of the world population.
00:57:21.000 The hubris of it, the arrogance of it, the obnoxiousness of it is really stunning.
00:57:26.000 But that was the idea in 1992.
00:57:28.000 But you know what really...
00:57:31.000 put us into overdrive is that starting in the 2010s, really around 2015, China's rise freaked out the unipolarists, freaked out the neocons, because something was not on the script.
00:57:51.000 The script is We made it.
00:57:54.000 We're the superpower.
00:57:55.000 No one can rival us.
00:57:57.000 And then, step by step, here comes China with 1.4 billion people.
00:58:02.000 So the United States changed its policy.
00:58:07.000 Oh, no, no, no, sorry, not Geoffrey.
00:58:09.000 I mean, don't move the teleprompter.
00:58:10.000 So now, harder face again.
00:58:12.000 Carry on, sorry Geoffrey, that was for the teleprompter.
00:58:14.000 I was going to say that in 2015 the US changed its foreign policy.
00:58:19.000 It actually decided that China's continued economic progress was no longer in the interest of the United States.
00:58:28.000 It's a kind of stunning idea that, hmm, We don't want you to make more progress.
00:58:34.000 You're stepping on our toes.
00:58:36.000 And so the U.S.
00:58:37.000 began, also under Trump, unilateral actions.
00:58:42.000 Even Obama was playing this, we're going to write the rules for Asia without China, which is a little bit obnoxious, by the way, and a little bit naive. It was
00:58:52.000 called the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and it was explicitly put forward by Obama on the grounds
00:58:58.000 that the United States needs to write the rules, not China. But, you know, the U.S. is an Asian power.
00:59:05.000 China, I'm not so sure. But in any event, this is what has really also increased this sense of
00:59:13.000 anxiety, because we're told now all the time it's not just Russia that's the enemy it is China
00:59:22.000 And China's the big enemy, Russia's the regional enemy, China's the world threat.
00:59:27.000 And so we're in a two-front fear We're in a proxy war in Ukraine, and at the same time we're stoking incredibly dangerous tensions with China.
00:59:44.000 And we explicitly are saying, our government officials are saying, we must take actions, for instance, stop the export of high technology goods to stop China's continued progress.
01:00:01.000 When you hear it from the other side, that's a little bit provocative.
01:00:06.000 And then we have the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, flying to Taiwan.
01:00:12.000 The Chinese have said, please don't do this.
01:00:15.000 Please don't stir the water.
01:00:18.000 Please keep things down.
01:00:19.000 Like Putin was saying, please don't go to Ukraine with NATO.
01:00:24.000 No, we have the right to do it.
01:00:26.000 We will defend Taiwan.
01:00:28.000 Absolutely endangering Taiwan like nothing else by putting Taiwan exactly into this superpower confrontation the same way.
01:00:40.000 So where does the pandemic fit in?
01:00:43.000 Look, it's another piece of dislocation.
01:00:49.000 It's another hot button for me because I'm also in that debate about where this virus came from, and I lean towards that it came out of some super-duper U.S.
01:01:01.000 scientific technology.
01:01:05.000 In partnership with China, most likely, so that this is not even a natural virus.
01:01:12.000 But it raises another point, by the way.
01:01:14.000 I headed a commission on the pandemic for two years for the Lancet Journal.
01:01:21.000 It was a thoroughly fascinating, riveting assignment.
01:01:27.000 I came to understand how much the U.S.
01:01:30.000 government has lied about the origins of the pandemic it's wanted to paint this narrative just like the other narratives we talked about it wants to paint the narrative that it absolutely was natural it could not possibly have been anything else and it chose that false narrative right from the start of the pandemic way before they could have known
01:01:56.000 And at a time when the insiders were saying, that looks a lot like it came out of a lab, but they created the narrative.
01:02:06.000 And that is that narrative creation is what is the business of the US government.
01:02:14.000 It creates a narrative about China as the enemy.
01:02:18.000 It creates a narrative about Ukraine as an unprovoked war by an unhinged new Hitler Russian president.
01:02:30.000 It creates a narrative about the virus.
01:02:35.000 You know, once in a while some of this might actually be Correct or not, I'm not even going there, but what it is is the narrative is the essence of how politics is to be conducted right now.
01:02:51.000 And then the main method of reporting by the New York Times or the Washington Post or the Financial Times even, which I think is a much better newspaper, is senior unnamed U.S.
01:03:05.000 officials say the following.
01:03:08.000 And it's just repeated straight out, and it says they've requested anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the information.
01:03:17.000 Well, hell, it's so sensitive that maybe we should know about it also.
01:03:22.000 And if I could just jump in with one more example of this, you know, pretty interesting who blew up the Nord Stream pipeline.
01:03:32.000 One president I know said, if Russia invades, that's the end of the pipeline.
01:03:37.000 And then, when asked, well, what do you mean, Mr. President?
01:03:41.000 He says, we have our ways.
01:03:43.000 And then, after the pipeline's blown up, the Secretary of State says, this is a tremendous opportunity to wean Europe from Russia.
01:03:53.000 Well, what's the narrative?
01:03:55.000 The narrative is, well, Russia did it.
01:03:57.000 And the newspapers say, well, duh, yeah, the U.S.
01:04:00.000 officials say Russia did it.
01:04:02.000 Russia blew up its own pipeline, its own billions of dollars of infrastructure, the pipeline that carries Russian energy to European markets, which was a lot of the point of this, whereas the other side said they were going to do it.
01:04:20.000 So this is, this narrative business It's really pretty clear, obviously, when I said that thing on U.S.
01:04:30.000 television a couple of weeks ago.
01:04:32.000 That was that face, because they stopped me.
01:04:35.000 I was supposed to be on for, usually, typically a half an hour on that show, and after three minutes they said, well, that's enough, Mr. Sachs.
01:04:42.000 And then the moderator went on a kind of five-minute rant.
01:04:47.000 Which I got to hear because they cut me off of the show, but they left me on Zoom, so I got to hear the rest of it.
01:04:53.000 So watch what you say afterwards if you're—unless you cut me off.
01:04:57.000 But they went on a five-minute rant about me.
01:04:59.000 This guy doesn't know anything.
01:05:01.000 Why do we have an economist talking about this and so forth?
01:05:05.000 And the answer is, I've been involved in diplomacy in more than a hundred countries for decades, and so I watch these things and I have something to say about them.
01:05:14.000 It's extraordinary that even words like doves and hawks, common idioms that used to define the potential for polarity in these conversations have kind of drifted from the common lexicon.
01:05:27.000 There is nobody taking up that side of the argument, I suppose there is, there's Tucker Carlson, there's Noam Chomsky, there's Donald Trump, but it's in some cases I imagine it's just sort of anti-establishment motivated by the kind of dualistic nature of American politics rather than a genuine appetite For real peace.
01:05:44.000 What was it very interesting to hear there Jeffrey was like that with case after case we are seeing whether it's the war, NATO expansionism, meddling in foreign democracies, a sort of a kind of psychotic, vampiric recklessness Followed by maddening lies.
01:06:05.000 It feels like the sort of contemporary law that is delivered through sci-fi of, oh, the machines will one day become intelligent and they realize they don't need us.
01:06:16.000 It's sort of being acted out by machine-like minds.
01:06:20.000 Minds that are so disassociated from common humanity that they're acting Just in accordance with a sort of a binary rationality that excludes common humanity and the obvious fact that if you continue to provoke Russia, if you continue to provoke China, you're ultimately going to end up in conflict situations.
01:06:42.000 Now, I can't believe that they have failed to calculate The possible, even likely outcomes.
01:06:51.000 So I begin to think that they have a contingency that includes the annihilation of many, many people.
01:06:59.000 Like, if you think in a post-industrial world, the sort of former proletariat and working class becomes disposable and therefore available to sort of addiction, prison populations, just fodder for the machine.
01:07:13.000 I wonder sometimes, and I hope it doesn't sound fanciful, but there are only really two alternatives.
01:07:19.000 One, they haven't thought about the possibility that Russia could respond with apocalyptic weaponry.
01:07:27.000 Or they have thought about it, and they don't care.
01:07:32.000 What alternative is left other than that?
01:07:35.000 So, what do you think about that?
01:07:37.000 Completely obnoxious, I agree.
01:07:38.000 You know, I'm gonna completely reassure you.
01:07:39.000 I don't think they've thought about it.
01:07:40.000 Right, right, I mean, we'll talk as soon as you're gone.
01:07:43.000 Who does he think he is, a Columbia professor, coming on our internet show where we make
01:07:48.000 up stuff on the spot, telling us about years of experience and committees he's sat on?
01:07:55.000 Completely obnoxious, I agree.
01:07:57.000 You know, I'm going to completely reassure you, I don't think they've thought about it.
01:08:03.000 Honest to God, I don't think it is actually, I don't think, I may be wrong, but I don't
01:08:10.000 think it is so deeply nefarious and evil.
01:08:13.000 I think it is so thoughtless and ignorant and arrogant, and it's a hubris that comes when you never have to explain anything.
01:08:21.000 When every screw-up, you just go on.
01:08:25.000 And because we have so many screw-ups in American foreign policy, but because not one of them was told honestly.
01:08:35.000 They never have to explain.
01:08:37.000 So I think the arrogance is, all right, so we screw up.
01:08:40.000 So what?
01:08:42.000 Look, who explained the complete disaster?
01:08:49.000 of Afghanistan, which, by the way, wasn't just a disaster of pulling out, you know, in this chaotic way.
01:08:56.000 The U.S.
01:08:56.000 went into Afghanistan in 1979.
01:09:00.000 That's almost not even known, except that Zbigniew Brzezinski let us in on this fact a few years ago in an interview that it was a secret, covert operation.
01:09:13.000 To fund the Mujahideen, to incite or provoke the Soviet Union to invade.
01:09:21.000 How clever.
01:09:23.000 Forty years later, Afghanistan is a complete wasteland.
01:09:28.000 But there's no accountability.
01:09:30.000 On the way out, the United States grabbed the eight billion dollars, the measly eight billion dollars of their foreign exchange reserves to make sure that there would be no conceivable economy.
01:09:42.000 left behind.
01:09:43.000 Or who explained Syria?
01:09:46.000 You know, every day I read Putin is absolutely, you know, unhinged.
01:09:52.000 He went into Syria.
01:09:54.000 Yes, Russia went into Syria in 2015.
01:09:57.000 The United States went into Syria covertly in 2011.
01:10:01.000 In 2012, The U.S.
01:10:05.000 President, President Obama, signed an order for the CIA to overthrow Assad together with Saudi Arabia.
01:10:14.000 So who explained it?
01:10:16.000 It's not even discussed in American life.
01:10:20.000 So I think what we're seeing is they don't think ahead.
01:10:25.000 As soon as this policy started in February and March with the sanctions and this and that, I talked to my... I can't call them friends anymore.
01:10:38.000 They don't want to be known as my friend inside the U.S.
01:10:42.000 government, but people that I've known for a long time, I like them.
01:10:45.000 They don't necessarily like me.
01:10:48.000 But in any event, I said, this is not going to work.
01:10:52.000 This policy, this sanctions policy is not going to work.
01:10:55.000 The following is not going to work.
01:10:56.000 And the basic logic that you have, that you're going to defeat Putin on the battlefield, that's also not going to work.
01:11:04.000 In the end, This is core security interests for Russia, and they have 1,600 deployed nuclear weapons.
01:11:12.000 So think about it, how this could unfold.
01:11:15.000 But it's not going to unfold where Putin says, oh, sorry, we're going home.
01:11:19.000 It was just a terrible, terrible mistake.
01:11:22.000 And NATO, you're very welcome to come into our next door.
01:11:26.000 It's not going to happen that way.
01:11:28.000 So I don't think they think these things through, because the basic goal is incompatible with reality.
01:11:39.000 The goal of a unipolar US world, where 4.2% of the world population runs the show, is incompatible with 21st century reality.
01:11:53.000 So when you're fundamentally on this kind of inconsistent course, Naturally, it can't make sense.
01:12:05.000 It fundamentally cannot make sense.
01:12:08.000 And it doesn't.
01:12:09.000 But if you don't have to explain it, it doesn't bother you so much.
01:12:14.000 If we could break open just one or two of these stories, really understand Nord Stream, for example, which, again, I'm putting my chips on the U.S.
01:12:25.000 and the U.K.
01:12:26.000 They done it.
01:12:27.000 And that's where I think this is.
01:12:30.000 If we could understand where this virus came from.
01:12:34.000 If we could understand why the negotiations broke down in March.
01:12:39.000 What did Boris Johnson say to Zelensky?
01:12:41.000 Did he say don't negotiate?
01:12:42.000 What did the U.S.
01:12:43.000 say to Zelensky?
01:12:44.000 If we could just open up on one of these things.
01:12:48.000 It would really help people to understand that we're fed stories that don't make sense.
01:12:55.000 You know, let me give you another one, which is another pet peeve of mine right now.
01:13:02.000 We're talking about global pandemics, nuclear Armageddon, a co-opted, hollowed out, zombie democracy, marching us all to mutual nihilism and death, and you're peeved!
01:13:14.000 Yes, I'm a little peeved about the next one, alright?
01:13:17.000 So, here's my pet peeve.
01:13:21.000 Russia grabbed the Zaporizhia nuclear power plant early in the war.
01:13:28.000 And the Ukrainians have been trying to take it back.
01:13:31.000 So, this power plant has been shelled very dangerously most days.
01:13:39.000 Now, the Russians are inside and they control the plant.
01:13:43.000 The Ukrainians are outside.
01:13:44.000 They're trying to recapture the plant.
01:13:47.000 And the plant's being shelled every day.
01:13:50.000 And what do we read in our newspaper?
01:13:53.000 Well, each side accuses the other of shelling the plant.
01:13:58.000 Well, duh.
01:14:00.000 If one side is in the plant and the other side's trying to retake the plant, who's probably shelling the plant?
01:14:08.000 So even this one, and I've spoken to senior international officials, I can say I've spoken to very senior people.
01:14:18.000 On this issue, I have a supposition that Ukraine is actually shelling the plant, and that it's extremely dangerous, and that we should say to Ukrainians, even if they're our best friend, don't shell a nuclear power plant.
01:14:34.000 It's not a good idea.
01:14:37.000 That's not very supportive of Ukrainians, that.
01:14:42.000 I haven't seen... Where's your... Have you not got a flag that should be up somewhere in your screen?
01:14:47.000 Because they need some support.
01:14:50.000 This is a time to support Ukraine blindly into the jaws of death.
01:14:54.000 There you go!
01:14:55.000 You know, it's exactly.
01:14:58.000 How about supporting them by having this war end and stop having them be the fodder of a proxy war of neocons fighting the latest of their 30 years of disastrous wars.
01:15:10.000 How about that way of supporting Ukraine?
01:15:12.000 I think it would be really nice for the Ukrainian people not to have the missiles falling on their head because NATO wants to expand.
01:15:21.000 Thank you, Geoffrey.
01:15:21.000 So beautiful.
01:15:22.000 Just one more question.
01:15:24.000 In fact, two.
01:15:25.000 One is, like, with the midterms approaching... Yeah, but really, but why?
01:15:28.000 Really, but why?
01:15:29.000 Think about it.
01:15:31.000 Think about it for a moment, but why?
01:15:33.000 With the midterms approaching, the control over... And with some members of the Democratic Party revolting, you know, there was that letter signed by people that was kind of repressed.
01:15:44.000 Is this war being used as a political pawn, even on the domestic front?
01:15:49.000 That's one thing I'd like you to answer.
01:15:51.000 And also, when we talk to people that are more of a kind of, what I would say, orthodox liberal perspective, they say, like, no, Putin is a unique monster, he's deranged, he's going crazy, it's his agenda, he's a fan of this philosopher, he wants to reunify the Soviet Union, he'll not rest, as if he's the one with the imperial project.
01:16:13.000 What do you do when you're confronted with that argument, which sort of amounts to that it's kind of unpatriotic, and that Russia, particularly in the hands of Putin, may have their own imperialist agenda, and also that domestic midterm thing?
01:16:30.000 Look, on the midterm, it's just...
01:16:33.000 It's the weirdest and saddest mistake of Biden, who inherited a country that in many ways is, you know, in unbelievable social crisis.
01:16:45.000 Part of it building for decades, part of it the pandemic, part of it the Trump after Trump.
01:16:51.000 But the U.S.
01:16:52.000 is really in sad, Hard shake that and needs a lot of love and care to put back a society in order.
01:17:03.000 Why in that context would Biden go on a foreign policy adventurism?
01:17:11.000 to have two fronts of global disaster and tension that, in my view, are what actually
01:17:19.000 indirectly is undermining his own party in the upcoming elections.
01:17:25.000 Why?
01:17:26.000 Because this war and the sanctions and the tensions with China, everything else, is feeding
01:17:32.000 this stagflation that we're in right now, the high inflation and the economy dysfunctional
01:17:38.000 and the supply chain's not working.
01:17:40.000 In other words, Biden stirred things up on foreign policy.
01:17:44.000 The American people were not asking for foreign policy adventures right now.
01:17:47.000 They absolutely were not.
01:17:50.000 They were asking for, can you help repair our society, which is ripped apart?
01:17:56.000 And that's what Biden's promise could have been.
01:17:59.000 So the whole idea that he got us in and he did because this war could have been avoided had he negotiated over the NATO issue and talked to Putin and done something in 2021.
01:18:11.000 He got He made a choice.
01:18:17.000 And again, it comes to, you know, who makes these choices and why is this such a persistent line of 30 years of US foreign policy?
01:18:29.000 It is a bit of a mystery.
01:18:30.000 Why would why would Biden do this?
01:18:32.000 And are there, you know, permanent state forces that just press this?
01:18:37.000 But in any event, the job of the president of the United States is not to do this.
01:18:42.000 And so when the midterms come, Probably, you know, just according to the polls, I'm no prognosticator except that it looks like the Dems are going to lose one or both houses of Congress.
01:18:55.000 I would say, yeah, all the voters say we don't like the inflation.
01:18:58.000 Well, I can tell you as an economist, This foreign policy has stoked exactly the things that are driving the Democrats' prospects down.
01:19:09.000 So it's just a mistake.
01:19:11.000 It's not a political football.
01:19:13.000 It's just a political mistake.
01:19:15.000 And I learned 30 years ago, the main job of a U.S.
01:19:20.000 president is to put the brakes on the war machine.
01:19:25.000 It's really hard, because the war machine's always revving.
01:19:29.000 And a sound president we've had very few knows how to put the brakes on.
01:19:36.000 And very, very few have done that.
01:19:39.000 Actually, Eisenhower and Kennedy, in their distinctive ways, both did that.
01:19:45.000 They knew to stop wars from going on.
01:19:49.000 Kennedy may have paid with his life for it, because his peace initiatives were profoundly unpopular with the CIA and with others, and God knows what happened.
01:20:02.000 But he understood putting the brakes on.
01:20:06.000 And but most of our presidents don't.
01:20:09.000 And whether this was Biden's initiative or his naivete or this is our foreign policy, Mr. President, and you stick with it, whatever it is.
01:20:18.000 This, ironically, was the biggest weakness of his domestic policy, which is why he was elected, to do something about a society that's really, really wounded right now.
01:20:33.000 I mean, with our shootings, with the addictions, with the poverty, with the inequality, with the dislocations, with the divide, this was the time for some domestic healing.
01:20:45.000 What you've described to us, Geoffrey, is how power might really operate without recourse to conspiratorial chitter-chatter.
01:21:01.000 If an agenda can be pursued that spans various administrations but alters but barely and includes some identifiable protagonists and organisation, Organizations that are also transcendent of the acknowledged machinery of American democracy.
01:21:20.000 It tells you that there is an agenda that is able to endure the apparent fluctuations of vicissitudes of American democratic life.
01:21:29.000 So, in a sense, the conversation is this.
01:21:32.000 What do we do to interrupt this machine that currently is uninterrupted by the will of ordinary people?
01:21:40.000 It's rather heartfelt, I thought, when you described the actual domestic problems that the United States, and indeed the world, face right now, and how this agenda is being pursued regardless, that this is a time when people could be reaching out in peace.
01:21:54.000 We shouldn't be talking about wars in Europe or wars anywhere in 2022.
01:21:58.000 We learned enough in the last century.
01:22:01.000 There has to be an entirely new mentality and sometimes I feel that what's required is the introduction of entirely different psychological, and might I venture the word, spiritual approaches to politics.
01:22:14.000 No, look, I really think what we're doing right now, which is talking about it, helping people to understand what's going on, getting people to question again what they're being fed.
01:22:27.000 And by the way, people don't have trust, so it's not impossible to get them to think through, but they need the information.
01:22:35.000 They need to understand the story.
01:22:37.000 It's really important.
01:22:39.000 Because this machine is running with impunity right now.
01:22:43.000 It does run on secrecy.
01:22:45.000 Everything is, you know, is classified documents and that's how an imperial state operates.
01:22:53.000 And the more that it's opened up, This is not what the public wants.
01:22:58.000 This is not a war driven by public hate, you know, by the fervor for the war.
01:23:04.000 This is a war driven from the top.
01:23:06.000 NATO expansion wasn't a popular cause.
01:23:09.000 It's a political elite.
01:23:13.000 And even of that, just a pretty small part of the political elite.
01:23:17.000 But it is, I'd say, the dominant political direction of the U.S. government at the top, but not coming
01:23:29.000 from the American people.
01:23:31.000 So that's actually the hope.
01:23:33.000 It's actually the hope.
01:23:35.000 If these stories break open just a little bit and people say, hmm, this is not what
01:23:40.000 we were told, now, in this, every kind of crazy demagogue can come.
01:23:46.000 That's what is unsettling about highly charged times, because they can go from bad to worse.
01:23:54.000 But they can also go from bad to better.
01:23:56.000 And I think that that's what we really need to be pressing for.
01:24:01.000 That's the challenge when information is so tightly controlled.
01:24:04.000 That's the challenge when it is difficult to convey these stories that have a degree of complexity, when people rush towards simple conclusions, damned platitudes, and what amounts to pugnacious, bellicose jingoism, just sort of repackaged in a sort of a new multicolored flag.
01:24:25.000 It's fascinating.
01:24:27.000 And the government absolutely Classifying everything so that we absolutely don't know what they're doing in our, quote, democracy.
01:24:38.000 It's a lot of things getting redacted, Jeffrey.
01:24:40.000 You got it.
01:24:42.000 Now, will you please stop flirting with us and do that fucking face?
01:24:50.000 The many faces of Jeffrey Sachs. It's Facts and Faces with Jeffrey Sachs.
01:24:57.000 But the face we love most of all is the face of a man shocked by the inability of the mainstream media and their
01:25:03.000 favoured and cherished narratives to accommodate truth and complexity.
01:25:07.000 Jeffrey, thank you so much. When you're next looking for a friend in the White House and you are found wanting, know
01:25:13.000 that you have friends here on our show.
01:25:17.000 We'll go for it.
01:25:18.000 Thank you, man.
01:25:19.000 So lovely to hear you.
01:25:19.000 Thank you.
01:25:20.000 Thank you for your time and for your expertise and your dedication.
01:25:23.000 Thank you.
01:25:24.000 Bye-bye.
01:25:24.000 Thank you.
01:25:25.000 See you, mate.
01:25:26.000 Bye-bye.
01:25:26.000 Wow.
01:25:27.000 That was intense, wasn't it?
01:25:29.000 Because we were in there for a while, guys.
01:25:31.000 I'm quite hungry.
01:25:34.000 I stared at your banana for a bit, covetously.
01:25:36.000 It's interesting that whilst Jeffrey Sachs was talking about all that geopolitical madness, we were both focusing on a banana.
01:25:43.000 I was looking around at all of us, and I was thinking, he's actually sort of, you know, like, it's weird, isn't it?
01:25:47.000 Because even we are sort of talking about it, but with actual nuclear war, like, when you're sort of saying it, we are a bit detached, aren't we?
01:25:56.000 Isn't it like that even if I thought someone was going to cut off one of my fingers or like sort of throw sort of like some paint at one of my children I'd like stop everything I was doing that would be the sole focus of my life for like I'm not doing anything else forget all of this it doesn't matter.
01:26:11.000 Yeah the fact that it can still be a kind of concept to us the idea of Armageddon you know when it seems so real and possible at the moment.
01:26:19.000 You know well like in that that trope in sci-fi where sort of like extraterrestrials turn up or whatever and they're like What the fucking hell are you all doing?
01:26:27.000 Get your shit together.
01:26:29.000 We almost need to do that.
01:26:30.000 We need an extraterrestrial.
01:26:32.000 We need a terrestrial.
01:26:34.000 We need the Great Reset is what we need, isn't it?
01:26:36.000 I know this guy.
01:26:37.000 Little guy, plucky little fella over there in Germany.
01:26:39.000 He's got a lot of spit in his gob when he talks.
01:26:41.000 He's a bit jowly.
01:26:43.000 He's a bit jowly, but he wants what's best.
01:26:45.000 Now apparently what you've got is too much stuff.
01:26:47.000 He's willing to run it all.
01:26:49.000 It's Klaus Schwab, everyone.
01:26:51.000 He says if only we'll put him in charge of absolutely everything.
01:26:54.000 Or, you know, various other billionaires and stuff.
01:26:56.000 Everything will be okay.
01:26:57.000 Look, all I'm suggesting, Gal, is that we can do our best by...
01:27:01.000 Putting out the stories of people like Jeffrey Sachs, combining it with the spiritual insights of people like Eckhart Tolle, the practical activism of Vandana Shiva, but what we're going to need is a very charismatic attention seeker to stand somewhere near the front, sort of making it about them in some way.
01:27:19.000 Anyone come to?
01:27:20.000 I haven't, I can't think of anyone.
01:27:21.000 It's not... They'd have to be pretty good looking though and they'd need to know a lot about acting.
01:27:28.000 Who is there?
01:27:28.000 Chris Hemsworth?
01:27:31.000 Hemsworth?
01:27:31.000 Hemsworth, is it?
01:27:32.000 No, he's not right, is he?
01:27:33.000 He's busy, isn't he?
01:27:34.000 He's very busy, he's got a lot of films at the moment as well.
01:27:36.000 Too many, too many, because I could have been Thor.
01:27:37.000 I could have been Thor.
01:27:39.000 Oh, I don't know, he's got the big biceps though, hasn't he?
01:27:41.000 I could do some push-ups, couldn't I?
01:27:42.000 They're pretty big though.
01:27:43.000 Give me half a bucket banana!
01:27:44.000 That's my banana!
01:27:46.000 Share me that or what?
01:27:47.000 Because of the cost of living crisis, you won't even spare me half a banana.
01:27:50.000 Because of the cost of living, is it?
01:27:51.000 That's right, yeah.
01:27:52.000 For fuck's sake.
01:27:53.000 Alright, well, I suppose, look, let's try to wrap up this show.
01:27:57.000 Let's just see what people are saying on locals.
01:27:59.000 We really got a lot of faces out of him.
01:28:00.000 I would like to see a bunch of freeze-framed saxes.
01:28:04.000 What are people saying?
01:28:05.000 Let the banana in, says Claudia Christie.
01:28:07.000 Benedict Cumberbatch, don't you dare mention that name in here.
01:28:11.000 Self-realisation on a massive scale is what Illuminated Soul says.
01:28:16.000 You're right about that.
01:28:17.000 We've got to do that, guys.
01:28:18.000 Hey, thanks for joining us in the locals community.
01:28:20.000 What I've recognised and learned... Am I right in saying that what you want from us there in the locals community is more direct access?
01:28:27.000 Like, you know, joining us for lunches and stuff like that.
01:28:29.000 You tell me what you want and we'll get it.
01:28:31.000 Or do you simply want a man playing a trumpet?
01:28:33.000 You tell us what you want and we'll deliver.
01:28:36.000 Do you want us to create a council of experts?
01:28:39.000 A real council of experts will do it and create a global revolution where you... I nominate you, Russell Brand.
01:28:45.000 Thank you, Firegirl2020.
01:28:46.000 Finally, someone got those hints I was dropping, for God's sake.
01:28:50.000 Oh, that's what you were getting at, was it?
01:28:52.000 That's what I was getting at.
01:28:53.000 I was saying I could do it.
01:28:54.000 Because of my acting.
01:28:55.000 Remember?
01:28:56.000 I thought you really did want Chris Hemsworth.
01:28:59.000 Remember him?
01:28:59.000 Arthur.
01:29:00.000 Oh, hello, I'm Arthur.
01:29:02.000 He didn't talk like that, did he?
01:29:05.000 That's right.
01:29:06.000 Hello, hello, I'm Gediminator Greek.
01:29:08.000 Remember?
01:29:09.000 Hello, I'm the man in Despicable Me.
01:29:12.000 Hello, now we're talking.
01:29:13.000 All good acting from me there.
01:29:16.000 French horn, people are saying.
01:29:17.000 Simply French horn, baby.
01:29:19.000 Banana sandwiches, you're joking me, mate.
01:29:22.000 When is Elon coming?
01:29:23.000 Big Ben 92.
01:29:24.000 It's hard, I'm trying my best.
01:29:24.000 I don't know.
01:29:26.000 Russell, I love you.
01:29:27.000 I believe in you.
01:29:28.000 I love Gareth Roy.
01:29:29.000 I want more meditations to cope with grief.
01:29:30.000 Sensitive heart, 25.
01:29:32.000 Will do you agree for meditation?
01:29:33.000 Sensitive heart, 25.
01:29:34.000 Will do you agree for meditation?
01:29:36.000 And a next possible chance.
01:29:38.000 Puppies and French horn.
01:29:39.000 You've just been explained that there's gonna be a nuclear war.
01:29:43.000 unless we get our shit together and you want a French horn, some puppies and for Chris Hemsworth
01:29:50.000 to lead a global revolution. Actually he's in my phone, he's someone I could call. Oh don't text
01:29:56.000 another one. I've texted him, I'm texting Hemsworth. Right, is this, am I just leading to more heartbreak?
01:30:01.000 Yes. It's just gonna lead to me going tomorrow Chris Hemsworth didn't text back isn't he? Right.
01:30:05.000 Like when I was in Australia. He's still doing this. Yeah, Chris Hemsworth, Chris Hemsworth. I didn't even save it.
01:30:13.000 I'm so cool, man.
01:30:15.000 Um, like, uh, like, uh, it's just in there, but it's in, it's in there.
01:30:18.000 But I don't call him Chris Hemsworth.
01:30:18.000 Hold on.
01:30:18.000 Chris Hemsworth.
01:30:20.000 I'll have to look for an Australian number.
01:30:21.000 When I was in Australia, there was this bit where I went round his house for the whole of the show.
01:30:25.000 When I was around, like, there's a bit, like I was in Australia, there's a big killer spider out, and I go, I go, so what's this one, Chris Hemsworth?
01:30:31.000 Like, by phone or whatever.
01:30:32.000 He goes, oh, mate, that's a fucking serious one.
01:30:34.000 You ought to be careful of that one, mate.
01:30:36.000 And he said his name.
01:30:37.000 It was good, like, you know, how Australian things have got sort of stupid names.
01:30:40.000 No offence, Australians.
01:30:41.000 He goes, oh, you want to watch that?
01:30:42.000 That's a dodgewaza!
01:30:44.000 You wanna watch that?
01:30:45.000 It'll fucking lay its eggs in your ball bag, mate!
01:30:48.000 Well, they're always up to something, Spies, aren't they?
01:30:50.000 Trying to lay their eggs in a fucking ball bag, living in a trap door.
01:30:53.000 Yeah.
01:30:53.000 Aren't they?
01:30:54.000 They are, yeah, yeah.
01:30:55.000 Why don't they play by the rules?
01:30:57.000 Rules.
01:30:59.000 Fond memory of Chris Hemsworth, is it?
01:31:01.000 I went round his house.
01:31:01.000 I love him.
01:31:02.000 I like him.
01:31:03.000 He lent me that book, The Dog, the Horse, the Cat and the Carrot, or whatever it's called.
01:31:06.000 Do you know The Dog, the Horse, the Cat and the Carrot?
01:31:07.000 By Charlie Watts?
01:31:08.000 Something like that.
01:31:09.000 Do you know The Dog, the Horse, the Cat and the Carrot?
01:31:12.000 Bet you know it, James.
01:31:12.000 It's very sweet.
01:31:13.000 The Dog, the Pig, the Dog and the Monkey?
01:31:15.000 Something like that.
01:31:16.000 The dog, the pig, the horse and the carrot.
01:31:18.000 Everyone loved it for a while.
01:31:19.000 The dog, the horse, the pig and the carrot and it's like sort of water painting drawings.
01:31:22.000 I'm not sure there's a pig in that.
01:31:23.000 It's like Winnie the Pooh feeling.
01:31:24.000 The dog, the horse, the pig and the carrot.
01:31:26.000 No, there's no pig.
01:31:28.000 You know it, don't you?
01:31:29.000 Not the curious case with the dog in there.
01:31:31.000 It's got a nice watercolour drawing.
01:31:33.000 Isn't it a fox?
01:31:34.000 It's a fox, I'm sure.
01:31:36.000 The dog, the horse, the pig and the carrot.
01:31:38.000 The mole.
01:31:40.000 The fox, the boy, the mole, the dog, the horse, the carrot.
01:31:42.000 That was it.
01:31:44.000 The dog, the boy, the horse, the carrot, the mole.
01:31:46.000 There's a boy with a mole.
01:31:47.000 He's got a dog and a carrot and a horse.
01:31:49.000 How bad's that mole?
01:31:50.000 It's prominent.
01:31:51.000 That's the issue.
01:31:52.000 It's not bad.
01:31:52.000 It's not cancerous, but it's prominent and he's got to deal with it.
01:31:56.000 But sometimes that can be a booty spub, baby.
01:31:58.000 What's too high?
01:31:59.000 What's the too high price?
01:32:00.000 You're making this up.
01:32:01.000 No, I'm not making it up.
01:32:01.000 It's a dog, it's a pig, a horse and a carrot.
01:32:03.000 I recognise this energy.
01:32:04.000 This is the Russell's pent-up for an interview.
01:32:07.000 I've been concentrating on Armageddon.
01:32:09.000 It's my time.
01:32:10.000 But what am I going to do with it?
01:32:11.000 Now the show's over.
01:32:11.000 I don't know.
01:32:12.000 Now what do I do?
01:32:12.000 Go and fucking have a meeting about, like, accountancy?
01:32:15.000 No.
01:32:16.000 No, I don't.
01:32:16.000 I go out and I rampage.
01:32:18.000 That's it.
01:32:20.000 I rampage!
01:32:20.000 Put it all into a text to Chris Hemsworth.
01:32:22.000 Chris!
01:32:23.000 What about the dog, the horse, the pig and the cow and the boy?
01:32:26.000 Chris!
01:32:27.000 People want you as a world leader.
01:32:30.000 I should do it, Chris.
01:32:31.000 I've more experience in that area.
01:32:34.000 But I would like a little... I'd like to hang off... You do that and I'll hang off on your arms.
01:32:39.000 That's the only thing I can possibly think of getting off on.
01:32:41.000 All right.
01:32:42.000 Listen, we've got so much stuff for you.
01:32:43.000 On Thursday, we're talking about Canadian truckers and we're going to be in a new intimate environment.
01:32:47.000 We're going to do it in there, aren't we, Gal?
01:32:48.000 We are, yeah.
01:32:49.000 It's going to be nice, it's going to be new, it's going to be intimate, it's going to be an environment.
01:32:52.000 Friday we've got Books with Brad, when we're reviewing, in quite a lot of detail actually, 1984 by George Orwell.
01:32:58.000 I've got some insights there.
01:32:59.000 Got your favourite chapter, yeah?
01:33:01.000 I probably, the ninth?
01:33:02.000 Chapter nine.
01:33:03.000 It's probably my favourite one.
01:33:05.000 Chapter 8, boring!
01:33:06.000 Chapter 10, pretty good.
01:33:08.000 But chapter 9, now we're talking.
01:33:10.000 It gets juicy, does it?
01:33:12.000 I mean, I can't bloody well believe it!
01:33:15.000 What Big Brother was doing to, like, the main guy?
01:33:19.000 In chapter 9, I go, whoa, Big Brother!
01:33:21.000 Lay off, fucking, do you want to lay off main guy a bit?
01:33:25.000 Main guy, he's just trying to pursue his objective.
01:33:28.000 But there's these obstacles!
01:33:29.000 How's main guy gonna get what he wants?
01:33:31.000 This is Jeffrey Sachs-style analysis, this is.
01:33:33.000 That's right, that's right.
01:33:34.000 Well, when I was at Columbia University, I actually was on a board doing stuff to do with the pandemic and that.
01:33:39.000 They brought me in.
01:33:40.000 It's fascinating.
01:33:43.000 I formed a few opinions back then.
01:33:44.000 I said, that's this... I said, this fucker's come from Mulholland.
01:33:47.000 That was you, was it?
01:33:48.000 Is that who he was talking about?
01:33:49.000 I goes, Jeff!
01:33:50.000 Jeff!
01:33:52.000 Jeff, get ready for your shock face, because this fucker has come from Wuhan.
01:33:56.000 Yeah, you invented the shock face, didn't you?
01:33:58.000 Huh?
01:33:59.000 You invented it.
01:33:59.000 Well, I did it first.
01:34:00.000 Sure, at Columbia.
01:34:01.000 I mean, listen, I don't want to say that I invented it.
01:34:03.000 I'm just saying, you know, a lot of us were hanging around.
01:34:05.000 It was me, David Bowie.
01:34:07.000 Just the whole punk thing happened around then.
01:34:08.000 Smoking a doobie.
01:34:09.000 Yeah, I smoked a doobie, and Jeffrey's gone.
01:34:12.000 And he goes, I'll have that.
01:34:13.000 And I'm like, hang on, Jeff.
01:34:15.000 Wait up, mate, wait up.
01:34:16.000 I go, this thing's...
01:34:17.000 He's making a fortune out of it now.
01:34:19.000 He's rinsing it and he's all over the world.
01:34:21.000 He's all over the world, large and in charge.
01:34:23.000 Oh, the Nord Stream Pipeline, America done it.
01:34:25.000 Oh, the pandemic, it started in a lab.
01:34:27.000 Does a bit of your heart break every time you see him do it?
01:34:29.000 I'm pissed off.
01:34:30.000 Yeah.
01:34:31.000 I'm pissed off.
01:34:31.000 It's like Bill Hicks and Dennis Leary.
01:34:34.000 It's, you know, we've seen it.
01:34:35.000 It's Peter Cook and David Frost.
01:34:37.000 We've seen this play out time after time after time.
01:34:40.000 Bloody time!
01:34:41.000 Anyway, it's Elvis Presley and Shaken Stevens!
01:34:45.000 Good of you to not bring it up though, I thought.
01:34:46.000 Well, I didn't want to embarrass him.
01:34:47.000 Professional.
01:34:48.000 I didn't want to embarrass him, because I'm a pro like that.
01:34:51.000 OK, I'd better go, I'm beginning to lactate.
01:34:55.000 Anyway, if you want to join Stay Free AF, some of you already have joined Stay Free AF, and as you can see, I'm going to eat.
01:35:00.000 Someone said, go and eat.
01:35:02.000 I can see I'm having a mental breakdown.
01:35:03.000 Best advice today.
01:35:04.000 Go eat, go and eat.
01:35:05.000 He's fucking, he's gone mad.
01:35:07.000 He's on edge.
01:35:09.000 Listen, if you want to watch a whole bunch of interviews, we've got...
01:35:11.000 Hey, brother.
01:35:12.000 I know it's hard!
01:35:15.000 It is to live without drugs!
01:35:17.000 And remember, it's Addiction Week, and I've been an addict over the years, and we're going to talk to you a bit more about addiction over the course of the week, are we?
01:35:24.000 We are.
01:35:25.000 Will we have time, though, with Armageddon coming?
01:35:27.000 Does it seem worth worrying?
01:35:29.000 Might as well take drugs.
01:35:30.000 That's not the message.
01:35:31.000 So, nuclear war?
01:35:32.000 No.
01:35:35.000 If there's a nuclear war, I'm telling you now, I'm going to get some psilocybin and some heroin, and I'm going to fucking smash it.
01:35:42.000 Okay.
01:35:44.000 Don't do drugs though, kids.
01:35:45.000 Especially not my kids, because they're already in enough trouble.
01:35:48.000 Don't do drugs, that was a joke.
01:35:49.000 Do you know jokes?
01:35:50.000 Remember jokes?
01:35:51.000 Christ.
01:35:52.000 Alright, our book goes on Friday.
01:35:55.000 Is it Friday or Thursday, book day?
01:35:56.000 They're asking me questions.
01:35:57.000 Alright, I love you, listen, we better go.
01:35:58.000 Friday, it's Friday.
01:36:00.000 Stay free, love you, bye, bye.