Russell Brand is back with a brand new episode of Stay Free With Russell Brand, and this time he's joined by Lee Fang, who's breaking a story that could be the most important story of the 21st century: the rise of nepotism in American politics. Plus, a new ban on porn on trains, and a call from Tucker on the phone, and much, much more. Stay Free with Russell Brand is out now, and you won't want to miss it! Logo by Courtney DeKorte. Theme by Mavus White. Music by PSOVOD and tyops. All rights reserved. Used by permission. This episode was produced and edited by Riley Bray. We do not own the rights to any music used in this episode. If you or someone you know is enjoying it please leave us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts or wherever else you get your music. It helps us to keep pushing the boundaries of what's legal and ethical and respectful. Thank you for listening and supporting this podcast. Stay free with us. - Stay Free, Brandy and Friends. xoxo - The Wangerous Girl and the Wangercast is a production of Gimlet Media. and is available on all major podcast directories, including Audible, Podcoin, and Podcoin. , and is also available on the App Store and Google Play. And if you like it, please tell us what you think about it, we'd love to hear us out there about it. . And we'd be sure to let us know what you thought of it. Thank you and what you're listening to us in the comments section. Have a great day! and we'd like to hear your thoughts about it too! - Thank you, and we'll be listening to it in the podcast next week! in the next few days! Love you, please leave a review on the podcast? if you'd like us to send us a review! or your thoughts on it's a little bit more like that's a bit like that, and it's not a bit more polite than that's better than that, it's more polite, more polite? - thank you, more like a nice, more of a day in a nice day in the middle of the road? or a more polite day, a day like that?
00:00:56.000We will get you Tucker by the end of this show, so help me God.
00:01:01.000And also exclusively on Rumble, you know we're on YouTube right now, well we won't be in a minute because of the, you know, we love YouTube.
00:01:08.000YouTube's where our 6.4 million wonders live and we love every single one of a million.
00:01:12.000Every one of them million, six million, point four, we love them.
00:01:16.000But we got to go on to Rumble to talk to Lee, Fangs for the memory.
00:01:21.000Fang about, and he's breaking a story on our show.
00:01:25.000So this could be our most important show ever.
00:01:27.000He's breaking a story, new Pfizer revelations about some Pfizer funding stuff that is going to knock your pants down around your ankles or possibly if you're in a comical mood, put them on top of your head.
00:01:39.000No matter what the hygiene consequences of such an action should be.
00:01:43.000We're talking about institutional corruption.
00:01:49.000The kind of nepotism that leads a man, a certain little man called Joseph Jojo Biden, to possibly visit Ukraine to grease the wheels of his son's employment at Burisma Rhymes With Charisma Ukrainian gas company.
00:02:04.000And this kind of nepotism exists throughout Congress because there's evidence of significant insider trading.
00:02:41.000This is from the United Kingdom, which is where you get your language and where the Queen, God rest her soul, used to live until very recently.
00:02:48.000This is, uh, Northern Railway asked passengers to stop watching porn on trains.
00:02:52.000Now, you might think, perfectly reasonable request.
00:03:56.000They've advised customers to refrain from searching offensive topics and inappropriate jokes.
00:04:03.000Ah, and stop them from searching explicit material in bad language on their Wi-Fi.
00:04:08.000So what this will become about is censorship.
00:04:10.000Now I know this is a frivolous story, but sometimes you can see in a fragment the whole.
00:04:17.000You can see in a fractal the way that these patterns repeat themselves.
00:04:20.000Let's have a look at the kind of broader corruption that sits at the top of American politics power pyramids in the form Of lovely old Joe Biden, who's expected any second now to announce that he's going to be running again, even though mild perambulation for him seems like a challenge.
00:04:36.000Let's see how the mainstream media are reporting on Joe Biden right now.
00:04:43.000His re-election campaign as soon as tomorrow.
00:04:46.000So, if he wins, America's oldest president could stay in office until he's 86 years old, and that may not sit well for a lot of Americans.
00:04:55.000According to a new NBC News poll that shows 70% of Americans do not think Mr. Biden should run again, including 51% of Democrats.
00:05:04.000Now, half of those who say he should not enter the 2024 race cite his age as a major reason why.
00:05:54.000And the so-called political processes of fraud, our elected officials, like our bureaucratic functionaries, like even our judges, are largely the indentured servants of the commercial interest.
00:06:04.000Now, this is where one story about a potentially corrupt President, I mean would you, let us know in the chat right now, if Joe Biden strong-armed the CIA into delegitimizing the Hunter Biden laptop story, would you call that corruption?
00:06:22.000What about the stenographer that says that he heard Joe Biden and Hunter Biden chatting about the deal with Burisma and fracking and stuff?
00:06:31.000Like we're starting now to accumulate a story of If not extraordinary corruption, it's appalling that it's not extraordinary.
00:06:37.000It's the level of corruption that we accept within American politics, but politics in our country, the UK too.
00:06:43.000It's an acceptance that really our political leaders are, broadly speaking, serving commercial interests because their personal interests align more with financial, commercial and corporate interests than with the interests of the electorate.
00:06:57.000Let's have a look at the SVB story now and the number of Congress folk who sold shares around the time that that banking crisis took place.
00:07:09.000On March the 10th, Silicon Valley Bank collapses.
00:07:13.000Also on March the 10th, children of Democratic representative Jared Moskowitz sell shares of Seacoast Banking Corporation worth $65,000 to $150,000 After Mr Moskowitz attended a bipartisan congressional briefing on the bank in Tumult.
00:07:30.000Then the very next day... Three days later that is, yeah.
00:07:48.000Yeah so I mean this is the case so obviously what was going on at the time this example of Mr Moskowitz is after that congressional briefing obviously had insider knowledge I mean I guess it's allegedly but it seems pretty obvious.
00:07:59.000You think that during the bipartisan congressional briefing.
00:08:11.000But obviously it can work the other way as well.
00:08:13.000So March 17th, Republican Representative Nicole Malliotakis buys shares of New York Community Bank Corp after private discussions with New York State Bank regulators.
00:08:22.000Are you suggesting that that conversation with the New York State Bank regulators contained information that led Nicole Malliotakis to buy those shares?
00:09:30.000And that also furthermore, what's more, That he's getting his son little deals over there in the Ukraine.
00:09:38.000I mean, if it was Donald Trump, do you think the mainstream media, the NBCs, et cetera, will be reporting on this more?
00:09:43.000Do you think they'll be saying, hold on a minute, Donald Trump took Don Jr., our friend over at Rumble, over to Ukraine, got him a gig with Burisma, and he's using the CIA to repress information that could be negative?
00:09:55.000Trump right now being hauled through the courts of New York City on the basis of a hush payment that came from potentially legal fees or campaign funding.
00:10:04.000I know it's a sort of a complex legislative and bureaucratic case, but we all know that whatever they're saying really is to take Trump out of the race.
00:10:12.000And what I'm saying to you is that whether it's Biden or Trump, As long as the systems and institutions remain as corrupt
00:10:18.000as they are, and they sit on a bedrock of corruption, because look at that, it's normal.
00:10:22.000During a three year period, nearly a fifth of federal lawmakers or their immediate family
00:10:26.000bought or sold stocks or other securities that could have been affected by their legislative
00:10:52.000Things are coming out but there isn't transparency around it and this occurs at the same time as the Biden administration is poised to increase internet surveillance in response to those Pentagon papers that we have kind of talked about the last week or so and the restrict act that they're bringing.
00:11:06.000There's all fun ways of censoring and shutting down discussions, shutting down truth when we're not able to glean any truth from the things that have been going on with it.
00:11:15.000We're centralising authoritarianism at a time where we do not trust authority at all.
00:11:21.000We believe in democracy here at Stay Free.
00:11:23.000Freedom's what we believe in above all else.
00:11:32.000Lobbyists trading money for government favours?
00:11:34.000Members of Congress owning stocks and shares in the companies that they regulate and legislate?
00:11:38.000Four, or against, government censorship on free speech.
00:11:41.000Which of those three things, and I reckon in future we should put A, B, C, and make that look sort of nice and clear, you know, like sort of a clear thing, and look at the language a bit better.
00:12:39.000Recently independent journalists like Matt Taibbi, Shellenberger and Barry Weiss have all been exposed in a massive censorship operation by the US government to control content on social media and eliminate any dissenting voices.
00:12:50.000Have you read their reporting or are you listening to the embarrassed compromised hacks from the media that are covering their tracks?
00:13:25.000I think what's happening now is that there's a real movement for independence in American politics.
00:13:31.000Let me know in the chat right now if you agree with this.
00:13:33.000There's new emergent voices, even within mainstream politics.
00:13:36.000Someone like Rand Paul, like a little while ago, Bernie Sanders, people were saying, And people like, I don't know, Robert Kennedy stand for President.
00:13:43.000Do you think we should have him on the show, by the way?
00:13:45.000Because I think we could have him as a guest.
00:14:39.000Get ready for that, getting pinged off your little old body as quick as an ex-wife.
00:14:44.000I reckon that, yeah, you're going to love that story, but let's have a look at Rand Paul exposing, if that's the right word, some of the ludicrous expenditure that the pharmaceutical industry lays out on experiments that I don't think are worth undertaking.
00:15:58.000If I was down at the labs, living it up in Wuhan, where we're pretty lax in our lab in Wuhan, I'd go, pop a couple of G's on that beagle's body, because I got a hunch that some science is going to happen around here.
00:16:40.000We're running two polls simultaneously.
00:16:42.000What do you want to see more of with your taxpayer dollars?
00:16:45.000Mice getting drunk, drugs, drugged up beagles, even if they're being inefficiently administered intravenously when they could be administered nasally, which I think is how more people do cocaine.
00:17:30.000Hey, listen, we're going to flip over now to being exclusively on Rumble because we've got Lee Fang coming up.
00:17:37.000Now, Lee Fang is one of the Twitterphile legends that Tim Robbins vocally advocates for.
00:17:42.000Lee Fang has been doing actual journalism, revealing the relationship between the Deep State and social media organizations.
00:17:51.000Lee Fang, is investigating pharmaceutical companies.
00:17:54.000Li Fang is doing what journalists are supposed to do, convey difficult, challenging, truthful information
00:18:00.000to the rest of us so that we can make informed decisions for ourselves rather than being deluged in untruths,
00:18:07.000censored to within an inch of our lives and surveilled all the way to Belmarsh.
00:18:13.000So we're going to leave you now because there's a lot of stuff that Lee Fang's going to say and this is an exclusive conversation with Lee.
00:18:17.000I believe he's about to simultaneously release the article on Substack in an exciting moment.
00:18:22.000Very exciting on the day that Tucker resigns.
00:18:38.000It's Lee Fang independent journalist who worked on Twitter files He now writes an investigative newsletter on substack and he's the author of the machine a field guide to the resurgent riot Thanks for joining us Lee.
00:18:49.000It's great to see you, mate I'm humbled by the intro.
00:18:54.000Thank you for your humility and your grace.
00:18:57.000Mate, we want to start with the exclusive story.
00:19:00.000As I understand it, Pfizer are attempting to sort of set up grassroots organizations that are lobbying for COVID vaccine mandates.
00:19:08.000I'm sure I'm mangling that somewhat, but it sounds like Pfizer are spending money to create apparently authentic voices advocating for vaccine mandates.
00:19:19.000Well, look, this story basically takes a look in 2021, when in the United States, we had multifaceted mandates, you know, mandates enacted by I live in California and San Francisco, there were very restrictive mandates here.
00:19:33.000But you know, across the country, including the Biden administration, in September of 2021, enacted a very kind of strong mandate with no exemption for prior immunity, or, you know, kind of natural immunity or prior infection, natural immunity.
00:19:50.000And, you know, Pfizer was not playing a kind of visible role here.
00:19:54.000They didn't comment on any of the articles.
00:19:57.000They weren't really talking to the press.
00:19:59.000You saw consumer groups, civil rights groups, patient groups, doctor groups, you know, public health organizations all saying, you know, these mandates are necessary.
00:20:09.000even though there wasn't a lot of scientific evidence to support the basis that, you know,
00:20:14.000we needed these mandates, that, you know, they were sold to us with the claim
00:20:18.000that they would stop transmission of the virus, you had this coalition of community groups
00:20:25.000Well, I'm taking a look at new disclosures that show that many of those organizations, these third-party organizations with a lot more credibility than a pharmaceutical company with a lot of money to gain, were taking funds from Pfizer while lobbying for these controversial policies.
00:20:45.000Just a story I just published right before coming onto your show on my sub stack.
00:20:49.000We're very excited to receive this exclusivity from you, Lee, and at the risk of diminishing your contribution, you're getting a lot of love in the chat.
00:20:58.000Notably, Pride Folks, who says, simply, babe alert.
00:21:04.000That's an objectifying comment, I believe, about your physical appearance, but we'll probably we'll get some more on that.
00:21:34.000Pfizer CEO Albert Baller is the treasurer of the Pharmaceutical Lobbying Group, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.
00:21:40.000Pharma spent a total of $140 million over that, in fact, on lobbying between 2019 and 2022.
00:21:48.000As well as the pharmaceutical industry being the largest single advertiser on mainstream media, 75% of all their ad revenue comes from the pharmaceutical industry, Lee.
00:21:57.000So we're talking about an almost immersive omnipotence.
00:22:01.000They've got power in every direction, as well as it appears as a result of your exclusive there, to be investing in apparently organic and authentic voices that are, you know, pro-mandate or pro What chance do we have of real democracy?
00:22:18.000What chance do we have of legitimate open conversations when an organisation can exert that much power over that much of the machinery of the state whether it's media or government itself?
00:22:29.000Well, look, you know, the figures you just cited were the ones that have to be disclosed, you know, that's when they hire, you know, a former member of Congress or a staffer to go and wine and dine, you know, a policymaker or regulator, they have to disclose most of that funding, that spending, but So much they don't have to disclose.
00:22:47.000How much they're spending on television, how much they're spending on TikTok ads, how much they're giving to these front groups or these doctors groups or these public health groups that kind of set the nature of the debate.
00:22:58.000They kind of appear in the news media, they create events, and they create a discourse that looks authentic, that looks organic.
00:23:06.000but it benefits the bottom line of their benefactors of companies like Pfizer and you know, the
00:23:11.000vaccine debate is, um, you know, I think it's fraught.
00:23:14.000It's interesting because this has shaped our lives in the last three years of the pandemic.
00:23:18.000Um, but it's, you know, it's also not that unique in the sense that every major pharmaceutical
00:23:23.000company in the United States, uh, engages in these practices.
00:23:26.000They, they, uh, pressure regulators, they, um, spend so much money on direct to consumer
00:23:31.000advertising, uh, and really they kind of just dominate the entire public policy debate.
00:23:36.000So, you know, we can talk about a lot of other special interest groups, but pharma is unique
00:23:41.000in just the raw amounts of money they spend to control the entire public sector, uh, on
00:23:47.000regulatory on, on policy on, on really everything in terms of, of, of how it affects medicine
00:23:53.000and as it has, as it's practiced in the United States.
00:23:56.000Lee Fang, what specific groups did they fund, mate?
00:24:01.000Do any of them stand out as, does it seem particularly manipulative or deceptive?
00:24:07.000Any of the groups that have like legitimacy or authenticity that is surprising?
00:24:13.000You know, in Chicago, there was a very kind of controversial vaccine mandate.
00:24:18.000There were also discussions about vaccine passports.
00:24:22.000And, you know, a large percentage of the African-American, the Black community in that city was not vaccinated in 2021.
00:24:29.000And one of the oldest African-American civil rights groups, the Urban League, Chicago Urban League, went out into the media and was asked, you know, would this mandate hurt the African-American community?
00:24:42.000Would it kind of push them to the sidelines?
00:24:44.000And she was very clear in lobbying and pushing back against that, saying, no, the mandate's worth it.
00:24:52.000She never mentioned that just prior to that interview, a few months prior to the interview, she received a $100,000 check from Pfizer, not mentioned during the interview, not mentioned on the Urban League's website.
00:25:04.000It's not disclosed until this morning, until right before appearing on your show.
00:25:08.000The Consumers League of America, I mean, this is another consumer advocacy group that's kind of famous for standing up to corporate power, founded over 100 years ago, fighting against monopolies.
00:25:20.000They're a group that kind of mysteriously endorsed the mandates in 2021.
00:25:25.000Again, they received big money from Pfizer and even has a Pfizer lobbyist on its board.
00:25:31.000You know, these are intricate relationships that aren't disclosed to the people reading these press releases who are getting pressured by these groups, and it's affecting the entire debate.
00:25:39.000It's affecting how regulators see these issues, and it also affects how the public sees this.
00:25:44.000when they see these third party groups that have some credibility, you know,
00:25:48.000these are kind of famous organizations that are known for standing up for the
00:25:51.000public interest when they're saying, Hey, these mandates are a good idea for the American public. It
00:26:05.000Yeah. I think that should be at the beginning of the endorsement of as I,
00:26:10.000African American people should take these vaccines.
00:26:13.000Also, earlier, a minute ago actually, I just got $100,000 from Pfizer who I think they do sell vaccines and they would potentially financially benefit.
00:26:22.000If it can't be explicit, you can't have democracy.
00:26:26.000I think what the danger we have now, Lee, is we've reached the point where there's such mass distrust in government, mass distrust and mistrust of media, and there seems to be no attempt to rectify that through authenticity and morality and principled action, but through the increase of censorship, through the increase of control.
00:26:51.000With Matt Taibbi, your mate, your fellow Twitterphile journalist, he's being threatened with jail now, I understand, and I don't know how much traction that's got, and I pray that it isn't something that would happen.
00:27:05.000Matt Taibbi's a friend of ours, we love him, the croaky-voiced, drum-kit-perched, cap-wearing, so-called journalist sweetheart that he is.
00:27:15.000Do you worry yourself that we're reaching a point that free speech is actually something that you could be in prison for?
00:27:23.000If you're Julian Assange, you're already in prison for it.
00:27:27.000I mean, I've looked at, I've covered Congress for the last 15 years.
00:27:32.000And there are a lot of experts and people brought in to testify.
00:27:38.000Uh, who mislead, who get the facts wrong, who, you know, they engage in all kinds of kind of scurrilous behavior.
00:27:44.000And I've never seen behavior like this in terms of a member of Congress in response.
00:27:48.000And Matt Taibbi, for the record, I don't know if your audience has seen this letter.
00:27:53.000I exclusively obtained it and published it last week on my sub stack.
00:27:57.000But after testifying on March 9th, Matt Taibbi had a back and forth
00:28:02.000with one of the members of Congress, Democrat named Stacey Plaskett.
00:28:06.000She's the one who called her, Taibbi and Schellenberger, a so-called journal.
00:28:11.000You know, very aggressive kind of questioning.
00:28:15.000But, you know, that's par for the course in politics.
00:28:17.000You know, you can get aggressive with a witness.
00:28:19.000What's unusual is this letter afterwards that took a quote from Matt Tybee saying that an arm of the Department of Homeland Security had worked with one of these disinfo NGOs that's, you know, partially backed by Stanford University as they were pressuring Twitter on content moderation policies.
00:28:38.000Uh, that Twitter did not distinguish between the private sector and the public sector when they were receiving these censorship requests.
00:29:00.000All these government agencies that are exerting incredible levels of pressure on social media firms, including today, although we don't have the same kind of purview, the same kind of visibility that we had under the Twitter files.
00:29:12.000But it's certainly happening to other platforms as well, including Discord and Facebook and others.
00:29:17.000Um, but yeah, I've never seen this letter taking a true quote, an accurate quote from Matt Taibbi and saying this was an example of perjury that you could face up to five years of imprisonment for, for telling the truth.
00:29:31.000It's also true, I understand, that Facebook have been censoring Seymour Hershey's reporting on the Nord Stream pipeline.
00:29:38.000This value of free speech, according to our poll, let's have another look at that poll.
00:29:41.000I think a lot of our audience are deeply concerned about free speech and it seems that the free speech argument is increasingly being connected, I think, through centralised media narratives with, you know, right-wing extremism.
00:29:57.000And it seems that there's an attempt to, yeah here it is, like 60% of our audience that we're currently polling say that free speech is the issue that concerns the most out of a whole bunch of significant little issues there.
00:30:10.000Do you think that we're reaching some kind of tipping point where credible, lifelong Pulitzer Prize winning journalists like Seymour Hersh are being sort of shut down and censored?
00:30:21.000What do you think, how do you think, do you think there's like new alliances that we can make to ensure that we can continue to speak free Well, look, you know, I grew up in the Washington, D.C.
00:30:30.000area, in the suburbs, Prince Rudy's County, and the war in Iraq kind of radicalized me and motivated me to get involved in media and politics, just seeing kind of the entire mainstream media basically in lockstep repeating the Bush administration's drive to go to war and their claims about weapons of mass destruction and a war on terror.
00:30:51.000And I, you know, I had such Great hopes for the promise of the open internet as a corrective to government censorship, that with more voices, we'd have a better chance of getting to the truth, especially when it comes to these life and death foreign policy issues.
00:31:07.000And the war in Ukraine is kind of an example of how I was wrong.
00:31:12.000The internet is quickly becoming different.
00:31:16.000We're getting organized into little walled gardens.
00:31:18.000We're getting pushed into just a small number of platforms.
00:31:21.000Those platforms are coordinating with government, and they're attempting to squelch the truth.
00:31:26.000At the same time, we have Um, uh, you know, because of these big social media firms draining the advertising revenue from legacy newspapers, we just have less journalists too.
00:31:37.000Um, you know, I did a story last year looking at how, um, a whistleblower from the Department of Homeland Security basically told us that, um, the Department of Homeland Security, their next big agenda item is working with social media companies to correct quote unquote disinformation, uh, about the war in Ukraine, Russia.
00:31:59.000You know, we see a lot of war propaganda.
00:32:01.000We see a lot of claims about, you know, the readiness of Ukraine or, you know, what have you about Russia.
00:32:07.000But there's not a lot of independent reporting.
00:32:08.000There's not a lot of skeptical reporting.
00:32:12.000But how do you reach those voices if we're only on a few platforms and those platforms are coordinating with the government to squelch out voices of dissent?
00:32:22.000Yeah, we've been talking a lot about the restrict act that appears to be being sort of caressed into the public debate.
00:32:31.000What was that public news article we read, Gareth?
00:32:33.000I want to say Leighton Baines, but I know he's a former Everton left back.
00:32:46.000But Leighton Woodhouse was talking about how in order to legitimise censorship, you have to create the problem of misinformation, disinformation, malinformation.
00:32:56.000Because without it now, there are too many independent voices, too much capacity for investigation.
00:33:02.000It's for one narrative to dominate in the way that it could have done sort of, you know, before the advent of these technologies.
00:33:09.000So while there was sort of briefly this utopian possibility of free speech, open communication, thorough investigation, it's being, you can see now, it's being sort of legislated against.
00:33:21.000There's smear campaigns against independent voices.
00:33:24.000People are being threatened with prison.
00:33:29.000Do you think that this Restrict Act, which we had explained to us is like the Patriot Act after 9-11.
00:33:37.000It's like using, for example, the recent Pentagon Papers to underwrite this censorial legislation.
00:33:45.000Do you think this is the sort of thing that will go through, mate?
00:33:48.000Well, just again to compare to the War on Terror and Bush administration, they used the claim that, you know, you were in league with terrorists, you know, you were a jihadi or whatever, to polarize the debate, to, you know, stigmatize any voices of dissent.
00:34:04.000You know, we just have a different vocabulary, a different kind of cultural moment.
00:34:08.000You know, we say that someone is hateful, they're, you know, spreading hate speech, they're an extremist, or they're spreading disinformation or malinformation.
00:34:16.000You know, obviously no one supports intentional misinformation or intentional hate, but these attempts to stigmatize whistleblowers or journalists with these kind of classifications to marginalize them, it's emotionally arresting.
00:34:33.000You know, that's the kind of language you use to push someone to the side and say, don't listen to them and censor them.
00:34:44.000of organizations that are part of this. Even for me, I launched my Substack, I went independent
00:34:49.000for the first time in nine years, and with my first story out the gate, I had an MSNBC host
00:34:57.000saying that I was just writing about the Department of Homeland Security, accusing me of being a
00:35:01.000bigot or something. This is the strategy for marginalizing independent voices of dissent.
00:35:08.000Lee, I'm really glad that you've moved to Substack.
00:35:12.000We recommend that everyone who follows our work follows Lee Fang.
00:35:17.000He's a fantastic journalist and if you were willing to introduce perhaps photographs of yourself with your top off or just some Bermuda shorts.
00:35:25.000I think you might gain more followers.
00:35:27.000That's just advice based on what are some of the things I'm seeing in the chat here from our locals community that people can join to essentially objectify our guests.
00:35:36.000Lee, thank you for joining us and providing people that are sexually attracted to men with some free midday pornography.
00:35:44.000Even though we did a story today about people masturbating on public transport from the perspective of it wasn't a good thing.
00:35:51.000I wonder how they feel about masturbating to Lee's sub stack.
00:35:54.000Let's do a poll on do you think it's acceptable to masturbate over Lee Fang's sub-stack imagery of him in his vacation wear, or do you think that's wrong?
00:36:05.000We'll do a poll on that, Lee, and we'll send you the results, and perhaps you can do an article on that.
00:36:09.000Well, you've got to be the top-level tier for that, but like and subscribe, you know.