Stay Free - Russel Brand - July 07, 2023


LIVE: Tucker Carlson WORLD FIRST Interview Since Leaving Fox! - #163 - Stay Free With Russell Brand


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 56 minutes

Words per Minute

123.29

Word Count

14,390

Sentence Count

1,023

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

10


Summary

Tucker Carlson joins Russell Brand in studio for his first interview since leaving Fox News to pursue a new career as a reporter at the New York Times. Tucker talks about why he left Fox, why he decided to leave the network, and what he plans to do now that he s not working for a major media company. He also talks about his decision to leave Fox and why he thinks it s a good thing he left the network in the first place. And, of course, he talks about how he s dealing with the fallout from being fired from Fox and the new job he s found at the Times. And, as always, there s a little bit of politics at the end of the episode, so don t miss it! Stay free, and remember, free speech is the right to free speech to unify in the spirit of love, not freedom to speak hatefully of one another. And of course that s the free speech of our free speech, which is the freedom from hate, not free speech from speaking hatefully against one another, is the speech to speak in love. . Thank you for listening to Stay Free with Russell Brand and Stay Free, and Good Morning America. Stay Free! - Russell Brand - Stay Free With Russell Brand, and God Bless You, My Brother and Sister, Caitlin Durante in this episode of Stay Free: A Call Me Out! (featuring Tucker Carlson . . . Stay Free and See The Future! in the Stay Free Podcast on Stay Free. on YouTube, Stay Free Speech Rumble on the home of Free Speech Rumble on Free Speech Remedy on , and Free Speech Revolution to join us in studio to talk about the future of the future, and all things free speech and freedom, love, and freedom in the world, and so much more! , and much more. , in this video on the future! on his new podcast Stay Free in the future. - stay free, my brother and I hope you're listening to this, and I love you all! and I'm grateful for all the love and support you'll see the world in the good stuff, Tweet Me Out, I'm going to see the future in the next episode, I'll see you soon! :) - TAYLOR MCCARTANCHOR: for a world exclusive!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and get the camera out of the way.
00:38:42.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:38:55.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
00:38:56.000 Thanks for joining me on Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:39:00.000 At the moment, we're on YouTube, but that will only be for the first 15 minutes before we are exclusively on the home of Free Speech Rumble.
00:39:07.000 And of course, our free speech is the free speech to unify in the spirit of love, not free speech to speak hatefully of one another.
00:39:16.000 Of course, the reason we're so excited today is because we are being joined For a world exclusive, we have Tucker Carlson with us in studio.
00:39:23.000 His first interview since leaving Fox News.
00:39:26.000 Thanks for joining us, Tucker Carlson.
00:39:31.000 As your friend and as someone who watches a lot of your videos, I'm amazed that I'm here.
00:39:36.000 This is prettier even.
00:39:37.000 I'm not going to give away critical details and jeopardize your safety, but this is, if people could see where you're broadcasting from, You think it's a beautiful... I think it's beautiful.
00:39:46.000 And that's not an overstatement.
00:39:47.000 I think it's beautiful.
00:39:48.000 Thank you so much because I think we have a beautiful intention here.
00:39:51.000 We're recognising that independent media and independent politics are beginning to coalesce.
00:39:56.000 It's becoming increasingly unlikely that you can report truthfully, honestly and in good faith.
00:40:02.000 Putting forward anti-establishment narratives without being attacked.
00:40:06.000 Of course, we're going to talk about a lot of subjects here, but primarily we're going to want to talk about the reasons for you leaving Fox.
00:40:12.000 We're going to want to talk about some of the reporting around Jan 6.
00:40:14.000 We're going to want to talk about the attacks that you endured in your defense of the text messages around Trump.
00:40:21.000 First of all, I want to start off by asking you, Taka, how has it been in the six months Six months or so since you left Fox.
00:40:28.000 How have you been personally and how does it compare to the time when you left MSNBC in terms of its emotional impact on you?
00:40:34.000 Well, I've been fired.
00:40:35.000 You know, it's not the first time I've been fired.
00:40:37.000 And I think in our business, when you work for a big company in media and, you know, you say what you think, there's an expectation that you could get fired.
00:40:44.000 So I've always had that.
00:40:47.000 And I've always tried to take the long view, not just on media, but on life.
00:40:51.000 All graves go unvisited in the end.
00:40:53.000 I always think that.
00:40:55.000 So I was surprised.
00:40:57.000 I didn't expect to get fired that morning at all in April.
00:41:02.000 So I was shocked, but I wasn't really shocked.
00:41:06.000 And I wasn't mad.
00:41:08.000 It's not my company.
00:41:09.000 And when you work for someone else, that person reserves the right, and in fact has inherently the right, to decide whether you work there or not.
00:41:17.000 And I don't know why I was fired.
00:41:19.000 I really don't.
00:41:22.000 I'm not angry about it.
00:41:24.000 Uh, you can believe me or not, but I think you can feel that I'm not.
00:41:28.000 Um, and, you know, I wish Fox well.
00:41:32.000 Uh, there was, you know, ugly leaking, you know, I'm a racist or whatever they leaked or someone there leaked to the New York Times, but I, that's not true.
00:41:42.000 And I think the people who run the company know that's not true.
00:41:44.000 I actually don't think they did it.
00:41:46.000 Um, and I'm not mad about it and I've been, I've been happy.
00:41:51.000 I guess the only thing that bothers me, Is I'm 54, and when you get a little bit older, and my wife and I, you know, our children are grown and we live in rural settings, as you do, because we believe in nature and God and dogs.
00:42:07.000 You know, you can lose your drive.
00:42:10.000 I mean, it's just a little bit too nice, kind of.
00:42:13.000 And I do feel like we, you know, people who are healthy and aware and who can read, like, have an obligation to be engaged.
00:42:22.000 In the life of the community they live in, in the life of the country they live in, and in the life of the world to the extent that they can.
00:42:26.000 And so my only fear has been maybe being a little bit too happy.
00:42:34.000 You know I've spent a lot of time trout fishing, a lot of time we have four dogs, a lot of time with my dogs and my wife, and a lot of kind of like late breakfast outside stuff.
00:42:43.000 You know like you don't That's not, I mean that's great, but life has got to be more than that, so now I'm back to work and I'm grateful to be doing that.
00:42:52.000 The fact that you're broadcasting now on Twitter suggests that you still want to remain engaged in the international conversation, which is a conversation about ethics, it's a conversation If you're watching us on Rumble right now, remember to press the red button if you want to join us on Locals.
00:43:09.000 That's where I watch the conversation.
00:43:10.000 I can see Sensitive Hearts, Ashella, all of our beautiful, unified, diverse community that speak openly and freely there.
00:43:18.000 Please do join us because at the end of this conversation, Tucker's going to join us for an additional chat.
00:43:24.000 True or false with Tucker?
00:43:26.000 In a sense the whole conversation is true or false.
00:43:27.000 I mean what's the point in having a conversation if there isn't some line between authenticity and falsehood?
00:43:33.000 You touched briefly for a moment on the idea of racism and of course this is an idea that's talked about a lot or an accusation really that's been offered.
00:43:42.000 When I went on your show in America, mate, which I enormously enjoyed and the personal connection with you that we have since cultivated is the thing that I perhaps most enjoyed, I spoke to some of my friends that are Overtly liberal, even though many of them are beginning to recognize that the categories of left and right are shifting.
00:44:00.000 What they said is that Tucker Carlson, when he talks about demographic shifts in the United States of America, how the balance between different ethnicities is shifting over time, that that is codified racism.
00:44:16.000 And some of them, like some of my mates that are LA Democrats, like you know me, I don't believe in any political party anymore.
00:44:23.000 In this country.
00:44:24.000 Tell me about it.
00:44:25.000 Yeah, no, I agree.
00:44:26.000 But I do still feel that some of the principles that are more typically associated with the left, like recognizing that all voices have a value in the conversation and essentially that racism is bad.
00:44:41.000 So how do you feel about that?
00:44:43.000 And what are you talking about when you say there's a demographic shift?
00:44:47.000 What do you mean?
00:44:47.000 I would say a couple of things.
00:44:50.000 First, I always try.
00:44:53.000 I'm over 50, so why wouldn't I just say exactly what I think at all times?
00:44:58.000 And I do.
00:44:59.000 And so if I had...
00:45:02.000 Well, whatever my racial views are, I would just say them, and I'm just saying them now.
00:45:07.000 So my views about race begin with my religious faith, which is not very sophisticated, but is sincere.
00:45:15.000 And that begins with the belief, the knowledge, the certainty that God created people, that they're not objects, they're not machines.
00:45:23.000 They're not widgets in a bin waiting to be assembled by some company.
00:45:26.000 They are distinct individuals with distinct souls, and they have equal value in the eyes of God.
00:45:33.000 Doesn't mean they have equal ability.
00:45:35.000 Doesn't mean they all look the same.
00:45:38.000 But it means they have equal inherent value.
00:45:40.000 And my politics flow from that belief.
00:45:42.000 Yes.
00:45:44.000 And so the idea that You would reduce people to their race and say, you know, we're going to treat this person better or worse because of his skin color is repugnant to me.
00:45:55.000 And it's something that I've argued against every day that I was at Fox News, I think all of my life.
00:46:01.000 You can't punish or reward people based on their immutable characteristics.
00:46:07.000 Yes.
00:46:08.000 Because they didn't choose those characteristics.
00:46:11.000 So it's inherently unfair.
00:46:13.000 It's inherently immoral.
00:46:14.000 I'm totally opposed to it.
00:46:16.000 And so if that's a racist position, I guess You know, I'll just stand and take the punishment.
00:46:22.000 I don't think that is.
00:46:23.000 I think that's an argument against racism.
00:46:26.000 I think it's wrong to reduce people to qualities they were born with and they can't control.
00:46:32.000 Period.
00:46:33.000 My views on immigration are super simple and I think mainstream and sensible.
00:46:33.000 Yes.
00:46:40.000 The fact of who lives in a country more than any other fact determines what the country is like.
00:46:46.000 And so if you change it radically over a very short period of time, you're going to have a lot of social upheaval, a lot of churn.
00:46:55.000 It's going to rattle people.
00:46:56.000 People can't metabolize change.
00:46:59.000 Very well.
00:47:00.000 The Industrial Revolution led to Stalinism and then the Third Reich.
00:47:05.000 These are basic facts.
00:47:07.000 It's not an attack on anyone's color at all.
00:47:12.000 So those are my views.
00:47:16.000 I support a lot of, well, I don't know how I feel about immigration as a topic, There are a lot of immigrants I love, including my best friend, for whatever it's worth.
00:47:27.000 So I'm not, of course, I'm not against immigrants.
00:47:29.000 Like, that's insane.
00:47:31.000 But the way that the United States is doing immigration is designed to wreck the country and to make it unstable and to destroy any social cohesion whatsoever or social trust and make people hate each other and add to racial, yes, racial division, which I hate because it's not solvable.
00:47:50.000 In contrast to, say, class division.
00:47:51.000 If we're arguing about class, well, at least class theoretically can change.
00:47:55.000 I can ascend or descend classes, but race doesn't change because we're not responsible for it.
00:48:01.000 We're created that way.
00:48:02.000 So you don't want racial conflict.
00:48:04.000 That's the one thing you don't want.
00:48:06.000 And I feel that in the United States, our leaders not only want racial conflict, but are stoking it.
00:48:12.000 But as a practical matter, just in the context of US politics, and perhaps it's similar in the UK, the term racist or white supremacist or white nationalist, these are terms designed to stop people from talking.
00:48:28.000 I remember the first time I was called a white supremacist, and for whatever it's worth, I don't want to sound defensive, but I grew up in Southern California in the 70s.
00:48:35.000 uh living with a father who was by in modern terms very racially progressive or something you know he was always saying God created people like it didn't racism didn't make sense to me that was not a factor in my life at all um and we lived right next to Mexico whatever so but the first time I was called a white supremacist I was like jeez that's it hurt it stung And I thought, I'm not exactly sure what that is, but I know that I'm not one, but I know that that's like the worst thing you can be.
00:49:04.000 That's like calling someone a Nazi, or a monster, or Satan, or like, what is that?
00:49:10.000 And I was bothered by it.
00:49:11.000 It was right when I started my last Fox show, so it was in the fall of 2016.
00:49:14.000 And I did a kind of long, very sincere, I mean it too, sincere script about how, you know, this is what I believe and we're all created by God and you should never punish or reward people based on their skin color.
00:49:32.000 And it had no effect at all.
00:49:33.000 And then I realized the people using those terms are not sincere at all.
00:49:36.000 There's no sincerity.
00:49:37.000 The words have no meaning to them, except as they're useful as tools to acquire political power and to make anyone who stands in the way of that shut up or go away or go to prison.
00:49:49.000 And so once I realized they weren't sincere, then it's like, that's between me and God.
00:49:53.000 And not only am I not a racist, I'm not much of a hater.
00:49:57.000 I really try not to be.
00:49:59.000 And there are things that I hate, and there are people I feel like I'm on the verge of hating sometimes, or I feel myself obsessing.
00:50:04.000 You know, you're like in the truck, or you're walking the dogs, and you're pissed about something, and I can't be that fucking person, you know, whatever.
00:50:11.000 And I really try and catch myself and say to myself, that will eat you if you let it fester like that.
00:50:19.000 Don't be that way.
00:50:19.000 I'm a very flawed person, but I really try not to be a hater, because I think that's death.
00:50:26.000 I mean it, too.
00:50:28.000 One of the areas of your answer there that I imagine we could talk about further are the distinctions between having a position on immigration and its potential ability to destabilise an indigenous population.
00:50:39.000 How you, again, cross-reference that with colonial and imperial history.
00:50:46.000 How you cross-reference that with globalism and an attempt to create sort of like a centralist authoritarian model.
00:50:54.000 That's something we could talk about a lot longer, I'm sure, the distinction between racism and having a position on immigration.
00:51:01.000 You get in the way of their business plan and they call you a racist.
00:51:04.000 That's what's actually happening here?
00:51:08.000 I reckon we should come off YouTube now.
00:51:10.000 If you're watching us on YouTube, the next question I'm going to ask you, Tucker, there's a viewer question.
00:51:14.000 How new ways of censoring and shutting down conversation are?
00:51:19.000 Beginning to appear I reckon we should come off YouTube now if you're watching us on YouTube the next question
00:51:27.000 I'm gonna ask you Tucker. There's a viewer question what this is from at the bus
00:51:31.000 This is on locals if you want to watch this on locals press the red button and join our locals community
00:51:35.000 This is how we aim to have conversations like this all the time because my belief is
00:51:41.000 Actually an optimistic and hopeful one of humanity that we share more with one another than divides us and that there
00:51:47.000 are ways of reorganizing society
00:51:49.000 radically and that our categories and our lexicon has to alter significantly because
00:51:55.000 Left and right are starting to become redundant when there are so many similarities between the left and right
00:52:00.000 When both appear to be driving towards centralist authoritarian models where you are surveilled and censored at will, where free conversation is closed down on the basis that there is some other authority that knows better than you what you mean when you're speaking and that they have the right to shut you down.
00:52:17.000 Press that red button and join us over on local so you can ask questions to Tucker.
00:52:21.000 I'm assuming that your questions for Tucker are bloody I'll answer any question that you throw my way.
00:52:24.000 Let me tell you.
00:52:26.000 Deboss says, what is your relationship with Trump like now?
00:52:30.000 But before Tucker tells us what his relationship with Donald Trump is like right now, having said once, like, you know, those text messages, remember that stuff?
00:52:39.000 And then publicly saying that Donald Trump is significant.
00:52:41.000 Plus, we've got to talk about RFK.
00:52:43.000 Plus, we've got to talk about censorship.
00:52:44.000 Plus, we've got to talk about the military industrial complex.
00:52:47.000 Plus, we've got to talk about the Hunter Biden laptop.
00:52:49.000 And plus, we've got to talk about Big Pharma.
00:52:50.000 And in order to do that, we have to have free speech.
00:52:52.000 That's why you've got to click on the link in the description.
00:52:55.000 Join us over on Rumble right now.
00:52:57.000 And if you're with us on Rumble... Bye-bye, YouTube.
00:52:59.000 We love you, you 6.4 million Awakening Wonders.
00:53:02.000 If you're watching us on Rumble, press the red button and join us on Locals and post your questions there.
00:53:07.000 There's so much to ask you.
00:53:09.000 I'm so grateful to you for coming here.
00:53:11.000 I love this!
00:53:12.000 Are you happy?
00:53:12.000 Do you like it?
00:53:13.000 Have you got everything you need?
00:53:13.000 I love it.
00:53:14.000 Can I offer you any more snacks?
00:53:16.000 Nicotine?
00:53:17.000 Gum?
00:53:17.000 I've got my nicotine.
00:53:18.000 I've got my Pellegrino.
00:53:19.000 I had my coffee.
00:53:20.000 I'm in my happy place.
00:53:21.000 I'm so glad that you're comfortable here.
00:53:23.000 Thank you so much.
00:53:24.000 It means a lot that you've given us this interview.
00:53:26.000 Thank you very much, Tucker.
00:53:28.000 Right, so I suppose what we're asking there is that it seems that you said that Trump was no longer relevant in the political conversation, he was no longer the lightning rod, he was no longer the berserker of American politics.
00:53:40.000 Loads of people on our platform absolutely love Donald Trump.
00:53:44.000 They see him as the solution to America's problems.
00:53:46.000 They see him as the great swamp drainer.
00:53:49.000 It seems you have occupied varying positions on Trump at various times.
00:53:54.000 Where are you on Donald Trump now?
00:53:56.000 And particularly perhaps how that relates to the emergence of radical anti-establishment figures within the Democrat Party, notably RFK.
00:54:03.000 Uh, where am I on Trump now?
00:54:04.000 I love Trump, personally.
00:54:07.000 I mean, I made a huge mistake last November in getting involved in American politics, something I've never done before.
00:54:16.000 And making calls, you know, this guy's going to win.
00:54:19.000 I think this is going to happen in this state.
00:54:22.000 Meet your new governor, New York, stuff like, and I was wrong on almost every call.
00:54:27.000 I'm not a very astute political analyst.
00:54:31.000 I'm not interested in politics.
00:54:33.000 I never have been interested in politics.
00:54:34.000 I'm interested in ideas.
00:54:36.000 I'm interested in people.
00:54:38.000 And so there's a primary going on in the United States between Trump and a bunch of other people, primarily Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida, but others, Vivek Ramaswamy, for example.
00:54:49.000 And I haven't said word one about it, don't plan to.
00:54:55.000 I think looking back on this 10 years from now, assuming we're still around, I think we're going to see Trump's emergence as the most significant thing to happen in American politics in 100 years, because he reoriented the Republican Party against the wishes of Republican leaders.
00:55:13.000 But when I think about Trump right now, so it's July of 2023, you know, I'm struck by his foreign policy views.
00:55:21.000 You know, Trump is the only person with stature in the Republican Party, really, who's saying, wait a second, you know, why are we supporting an endless war in Ukraine?
00:55:35.000 And that, you know, leaving aside whether Trump's gonna get the nomination or get elected president or would be a good president, you know, I can't even assess that.
00:55:43.000 All I can say at this point is I'm so grateful that he has that position.
00:55:46.000 He's right.
00:55:48.000 And everyone in Washington's wrong.
00:55:49.000 Everyone.
00:55:51.000 And Trump is right on that question.
00:55:53.000 And it's a big question.
00:55:54.000 That war is reshaping the world.
00:55:56.000 It's reshaping the economy of the world.
00:55:57.000 It's reshaping populations.
00:55:59.000 I mean, I was just in Romania last week, which is, of course, shares a border with Ukraine.
00:56:05.000 The refugees in that region, the number of people killed in that war, I mean, Europe
00:56:10.000 will never be the same because of this war.
00:56:13.000 And it really matters.
00:56:15.000 And Trump alone among popular figures in both parties understands that, and I'm grateful
00:56:22.000 Whether he gets the nomination or gets elected, words really matter.
00:56:26.000 Saying something true out loud matters.
00:56:29.000 And he is saying true things about Ukraine, and God bless him.
00:56:31.000 That's how I feel.
00:56:32.000 So Trump generated, I suppose, a new type of populism.
00:56:37.000 He rebooted politics, he reordered the Republican Party.
00:56:42.000 But perhaps, is it fair to say that other than the significant fact that he was less
00:56:47.000 militaristic significantly than other comparable presidents, at least recent presidents I mean
00:56:53.000 by that, do you think that he delivered in office?
00:56:57.000 Why do you think he remains so fascinating?
00:56:59.000 Do you think that the Americans, broadly speaking, that are attracted to Donald Trump are attracted
00:57:04.000 by his foreign policy stance?
00:57:05.000 Or do you think that there's something else?
00:57:05.000 No.
00:57:07.000 And do you not think that RFK, who is, in my understanding, he's been on the show a couple of times, he's now on Rumble, and I find him to be a very admirable man, he similarly is vehemently anti-war, anti-this conflict, and seems to also have identified the unspoken intention to be the deracination and annihilation of Russia for globalist and economic reasons.
00:57:28.000 Yes.
00:57:29.000 The rather naive assumption that it's in any way a humanitarian conflict.
00:57:31.000 It's for democracy!
00:57:34.000 That's my favorite!
00:57:35.000 It's for democracy!
00:57:36.000 Okay, say the people who hate democracy.
00:57:39.000 Well, I love Bobby Kennedy, and I've had him on my show many times.
00:57:42.000 He announced a president on my show, which took a lot of stones on his part, given how despised I am by a lot of Democratic primary voters.
00:57:49.000 I think he's a wonderful person, I'll say that.
00:57:52.000 Just as a man, I admire him.
00:57:56.000 I admire, he said the greatest thing any politician or any public figures ever said to me at dinner a couple of years ago.
00:58:04.000 You know, they've gone after his family.
00:58:06.000 The pharma companies and their agents and the media have really gone after his family, his siblings.
00:58:10.000 They convinced a bunch of his siblings to denounce his views.
00:58:13.000 So painful.
00:58:14.000 And I'm so close to my family, I can't even imagine that.
00:58:16.000 And I said to him, um, what's that like?
00:58:20.000 I thought I took a lot of shit.
00:58:21.000 I can't even imagine what that would be like.
00:58:23.000 If my brother denounced me, I'd probably shoot myself.
00:58:25.000 I couldn't handle it.
00:58:27.000 So if it was Buck, he would be able to provide the weapon.
00:58:30.000 Well, yeah, my brother's not going to denounce me.
00:58:34.000 He's my best friend and wonderful man.
00:58:35.000 But anyway, so I said to him, what's that like?
00:58:37.000 And he said, and I'm quoting, probably shouldn't be quoting a private conversation, but he said this to me.
00:58:40.000 He said, I've got seven children and they all love me.
00:58:43.000 I don't care.
00:58:44.000 Wow.
00:58:44.000 And I thought, okay, you want us to distill my values into a sentence?
00:58:49.000 That's the sentence.
00:58:51.000 So I really admire him.
00:58:52.000 I don't agree with him on everything.
00:58:54.000 I do agree with him, I'll just be honest, on most things.
00:58:56.000 On the big things.
00:58:59.000 And so, no, I love what he's doing.
00:59:02.000 I love his bravery, which is just remarkable.
00:59:05.000 The amount that man has suffered for what he thinks is true.
00:59:09.000 The amount of money he's lost, the friends he's lost.
00:59:13.000 He's been ostracized in a way most people can't even understand because he ticked off a drug company?
00:59:18.000 Really?
00:59:20.000 And he's persevered and I really admire him.
00:59:24.000 If RFK and Trump have risen, as they plainly have, to capture the popular imagination, and yet both to a degree are stymied, shackled or reluctantly tolerated by their party, what does that tell us about the shifting sands of American political life?
00:59:42.000 I think the area where you and I most plainly and overtly align, perhaps other than the belief in God I suppose, is our Deep understanding that the military-industrial complex and Big Pharma are able to exert significant power over the Democratic Party, a democratic process that renders ordinary electoral politics basically meaningless.
01:00:05.000 These two figures are like populist anti-establishment figures in a sense.
01:00:11.000 What do you feel is the likelihood of either of them being able to pass through the internal mechanics of their parties, in the case of RFK, through the legal hurdles that are being placed in front of Trump at the moment?
01:00:24.000 And what is the role of independent media, in particular, say, a figure like Elon Musk, who seems, at the moment at least, to have the power to fight on that terrain?
01:00:34.000 I know there was a lot in that question, Tucker, but you've got a lot to say.
01:00:36.000 Well, I would say a couple of things.
01:00:38.000 The United States has had precisely in 250 years almost one populist president, and that was Teddy Roosevelt, also the most popular president in American history, who was president from 1901.
01:00:49.000 The president who he served as VP was shot to death.
01:00:55.000 Until 1908.
01:00:56.000 Most popular president the United States ever had and he was a populist.
01:00:59.000 The two biggest populist figures in the moment are Trump and Bobby Jr.
01:01:06.000 And then we had a guy called Ross Perot run about 30 years ago who roughly had the same politics.
01:01:12.000 All four of those figures had one thing in common.
01:01:15.000 They were all from the world they criticized.
01:01:18.000 So you think of populist, you know, the English Peasant Revolt.
01:01:22.000 Which is one of the most interesting things ever to happen, where they stormed the Tower of London and killed, I think they killed, the Archbishop.
01:01:22.000 Yes.
01:01:29.000 I'm from there.
01:01:30.000 That's died in Essex.
01:01:31.000 Yes.
01:01:32.000 Yeah, Watt Tyler, exactly.
01:01:32.000 Watt Tyler.
01:01:34.000 We're not even sure if that was his real name.
01:01:35.000 Watt Tyler.
01:01:37.000 Watt Tyler.
01:01:39.000 But he was a legit peasant.
01:01:41.000 Like, we don't even know when he was born.
01:01:43.000 And that was not an effective rebellion.
01:01:44.000 Of course, they did not free the serfs after that, as I recall.
01:01:47.000 But the effective populists are the ones who critique from the inside and say, I grew up in this world.
01:01:54.000 Teddy Roosevelt grew up rich, of course, in New York.
01:01:57.000 Trump, Perot, Bobby, I mean, Bobby Kennedy's family is one of the most famous families in the world in modern history, the Kennedys, and certainly the most famous family in democratic politics.
01:02:06.000 So these are people who know how the system works because they've benefited from the system.
01:02:10.000 And so their critique is much more meaningful and much more effective, I would say, because they can bear witness to what they have seen.
01:02:17.000 Um, I don't think Trump has changed politics in Washington.
01:02:22.000 I think the parties both have been very resistant to any kind of reform and that's very foolish.
01:02:27.000 That's a Ceausescu move.
01:02:29.000 You see things changing around you and you just, you can't metabolize it.
01:02:33.000 You can't sort of change with the moment and then you, you know, you meet a bad end when you become that rigid.
01:02:41.000 Um, I think that Bobby Kennedy and Trump will both have a very tough time getting the nomination.
01:02:49.000 I'm hoping that both of them will, of course, I guess.
01:02:54.000 I'm hoping that their message will be heard.
01:02:55.000 I don't even know what I hope for in the process itself, but I want them to be heard.
01:02:59.000 And they can now be heard because there are channels of information that people can tune into and listen.
01:03:06.000 I mean, I would just, I would just, I would amend one thing you said when you said that, you know, these huge multinationals control our politics.
01:03:13.000 Well, they also control our media.
01:03:15.000 Yeah.
01:03:16.000 I mean, Pharma, as you well know and often say on your show, is the biggest advertiser on American television.
01:03:16.000 They do.
01:03:21.000 Probably true in the UK as well.
01:03:23.000 And so, you know, there's no incentive whatsoever to question their products.
01:03:27.000 And now we have, because of the social media companies, Twitter and Rumble and probably others, we have less filtered sources of information with fewer gatekeepers and a higher probability you'll hear something true.
01:03:41.000 I think that's a huge change.
01:03:42.000 I mean, how can you... I mean, this is like Samus Dot.
01:03:45.000 This is like...
01:03:47.000 You know this is like information that the people in charge don't want you to see and now you can see it.
01:03:52.000 It really is the promise of the internet finally fulfilled.
01:03:55.000 That's my hope anyway.
01:03:57.000 Figures like RFK and Trump already demonstrably through his successful use of Twitter are going to require New models of media in order to build an audience whether
01:04:09.000 or not you align with the views of those individuals It's it's plain to see that the traditional media models
01:04:16.000 curtail and censor their rhetoric Why when you left Fox News?
01:04:23.000 I think like those of us that work in the independent media space or for our like Tucker's leaving like an I even if I
01:04:30.000 May say like when we met like are you gonna leave Fox?
01:04:33.000 Like, I felt like, just from the, just because of your awareness, and because of the stuff you were saying about the mainstream, the fact you're having Glenn Greenwald on there, and people every week!
01:04:43.000 From his bunker in Rio!
01:04:45.000 I love Glenn.
01:04:46.000 What a good man.
01:04:47.000 He's a beautiful human being.
01:04:48.000 He's no doubt a brilliant man.
01:04:50.000 So we were all amongst us thinking, where will Tucker go?
01:04:54.000 Will he be joining us on Rumble?
01:04:56.000 Will you set up your own thing?
01:04:59.000 What was it about your conversations with Elon Musk that led you to work there on Twitter?
01:05:05.000 Well, I don't work for Elon.
01:05:09.000 He's paid me zero money.
01:05:11.000 I don't think I ever want to work for anyone again.
01:05:13.000 I've done that.
01:05:15.000 I'd like to make money.
01:05:16.000 I mean, I've, you know, I think that's fair.
01:05:18.000 I've made zero money since I left, and that's fine.
01:05:22.000 But at some point I'd like to, but I'm not working for Elon Musk.
01:05:26.000 He hasn't offered to hire me, and if he did, I wouldn't accept.
01:05:29.000 Um, but what he's done is offered me that what he's offered every other user of Twitter, which is a you know a chance to broadcast Your views without a gatekeeper there.
01:05:41.000 But I do think, you know, I think the technology at Twitter is, my expectation is evolving.
01:05:46.000 And I think, you know, the subscription model, you know, might work or it might not.
01:05:50.000 You know, I don't know, but I think it might.
01:05:53.000 And I plan to stay there.
01:05:56.000 But what social media offer in the short term, at least for me, is an audience, but also a reason, this is personal, but a reason to write.
01:06:04.000 I can't think clearly without writing.
01:06:06.000 You know, I started in this business as a magazine writer and a book writer, newspaper writer, and I need to write things out.
01:06:13.000 I'm very dyslexic and I can't, you know, I have trouble processing information in certain ways.
01:06:17.000 And unless I'm forced to write a script, I can't really decide what I think about something.
01:06:22.000 And so the daily or regular discipline of writing a script Forces me and in some case it really is forced.
01:06:30.000 I don't want to do it I'd much rather go fishing or bird hunting you know I would but if I have to I will and there's something wonderful in that you know writing a script as you know Forces you to think through Everything about the issue it to have a much deeper understanding of at least for me.
01:06:48.000 That's true, so I couldn't go too long without writing or my IQ would drop dramatically.
01:06:54.000 I don't think I'd ever recover and We had Stephen Friend on here, and the other FBI whistleblower, and importantly, and perhaps this is the most important thing about that story, one of their brothers and sisters has tattooed stick figures of me on their genitals.
01:07:11.000 That's the defining issue.
01:07:12.000 How has that affected his dating life?
01:07:15.000 It's ruined it.
01:07:17.000 Well, I mean, I think it would kind of narrow the available population down a little bit.
01:07:24.000 It's just me now!
01:07:25.000 I'm the only person who sees that as an advantage!
01:07:27.000 Oh!
01:07:28.000 Well, I am honoured!
01:07:29.000 Do as you will!
01:07:31.000 But also, they said, of course, these FBI whistleblowers, that the FBI had a significant number of agents, that there were other law enforcement agencies there on January the 6th.
01:07:41.000 In fact, it was the whistleblowing on this subject that caused them all this grief.
01:07:44.000 In a sense, there are some discrepancies, shall we say, on how that event was initially reported on with regards to what
01:07:53.000 actually went down.
01:07:54.000 Now what you've been accused of in the mainstream after you received I think it was like 40,000
01:07:58.000 hours of footage from your man McCarthy there was that you sort of cherry-picked, is the
01:08:04.000 phrase that often comes up, footage to deliberately show that it was to a degree a peaceful event.
01:08:10.000 What is your sincere opinion of what went on on January the 6th and why do you feel
01:08:16.000 that there is yet an attempt to regard it as a deliberate insurrection?
01:08:24.000 And also within that I guess the possibility for presenting moments of peace within 40,000
01:08:30.000 hours of footage does exist.
01:08:31.000 So were you sincere in your presentation or do you have a particular perspective on how
01:08:36.000 it was?
01:08:37.000 I have well, let me just say one of my children was there working in the building and called me during it and And was right nearby when Ashley Babbitt was shot.
01:08:46.000 So I was interested in it from the moment it happened.
01:08:48.000 I was appalled by the vandalism outside, by fighting with police officers.
01:08:53.000 I hate violence.
01:08:55.000 From abortion to the war in Ukraine.
01:08:57.000 I mean, I am consistent on that.
01:08:58.000 I'm not a Catholic, but I definitely share those views.
01:09:02.000 I'm not for the death penalty.
01:09:02.000 I'm not for killing people.
01:09:03.000 I'm not for hurting people.
01:09:04.000 I'm not for violence.
01:09:06.000 And I've had those views for a long time.
01:09:08.000 So, you know, any violence on January 6th, I oppose.
01:09:13.000 I've said that many times.
01:09:15.000 I was kind of happy to leave it where it was, which is this got completely out of hand.
01:09:22.000 The only reason I ever got involved in commenting on it was, and we did a show that night saying, well, this is awful, right?
01:09:29.000 What happened?
01:09:30.000 Was the lying about it was immediate.
01:09:33.000 This was a racist, white supremacist insurrection.
01:09:36.000 Okay.
01:09:38.000 There was no indication to this day that race had anything to do with it at all.
01:09:41.000 Like nothing.
01:09:42.000 These are people who thought the election was stolen from them.
01:09:45.000 There's some evidence they were right.
01:09:46.000 We could debate that, but that's what they thought.
01:09:48.000 That's a meaningful thing.
01:09:49.000 If you've got a big population in your country that doesn't believe that your elections are on the level, you need to figure out a way to convince them that the elections are on the level or else you can't have democracy because it's a faith-based system.
01:10:00.000 So that was the first thing I noticed.
01:10:02.000 There was no effort at all to convince people, actually, electronic voting machines are secure.
01:10:06.000 Which they are not.
01:10:07.000 By the way, that's a lie.
01:10:09.000 In any country that has electronic voting machines is by definition at risk of having its elections stolen.
01:10:15.000 By definition.
01:10:16.000 No country that cared about democracy would have electronic voting machines, okay?
01:10:20.000 First thing.
01:10:20.000 But no one even, and by the way, many Democrats have made that point.
01:10:24.000 Not now, but ten years ago.
01:10:27.000 There was no effort to reassure anybody.
01:10:29.000 They immediately used it as a cudgel to make their political opponents shut up, and in a lot of cases, to send them to jail.
01:10:36.000 So I noticed this, and I'm like, wait a second.
01:10:38.000 Nobody here is operating in good faith at all.
01:10:40.000 They're just immediately lying with maximum aggression.
01:10:44.000 And anyone who asks questions about it, like me, and if you could go back and look at the tape, my first five shows on January 6th were like, well, yeah, it's bad, but I don't think you're telling the truth about what actually happened.
01:10:54.000 Shut up!
01:10:55.000 Racist!
01:10:56.000 What?
01:10:57.000 So that's always the key for me.
01:10:59.000 It's like an infection.
01:11:01.000 You know it's infected when it hurts.
01:11:03.000 You press it.
01:11:04.000 You recoil.
01:11:05.000 They immediately recoiled when you asked any questions about January 6th.
01:11:09.000 And that was a tip off to me.
01:11:10.000 I mean, I had no thought in my head as I watched this happen on television and in the subsequent weeks that U.S.
01:11:19.000 Law enforcement or military agencies had anything to do with it.
01:11:21.000 That never crossed my mind.
01:11:23.000 I never thought there was a false flag or anything like that.
01:11:25.000 I'm not a conspiracist by temperament.
01:11:27.000 I never thought that.
01:11:29.000 And then I interviewed the chief of the Capitol Police, Stephen Sund, in an interview that was never aired on Fox, by the way.
01:11:37.000 I was fired before it could air.
01:11:39.000 I'm going to interview him again.
01:11:40.000 But Stephen Sund was the totally non-political Worked for Nancy Pelosi.
01:11:45.000 I mean, this was not some right-wing activist.
01:11:47.000 He was the chief of the Capitol Police on January 6th.
01:11:49.000 And he said, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:11:51.000 That crowd was filled with federal agents.
01:11:54.000 What?
01:11:55.000 Yes.
01:11:55.000 Well, he would know, of course, because he was in charge of security at the site.
01:12:00.000 So the more time has passed, now it's been two and a half years, it becomes really obvious that core claims they made about January 6th were lies.
01:12:10.000 And my view about events and about people Is, if you catch someone telling a lie about one thing, the first question you have is, what else are you lying about?
01:12:20.000 If you say to your wife, where were you?
01:12:22.000 I was at the grocery store.
01:12:23.000 If you find out she was not at the grocery store, then it raises, okay, probably not just lying about being at the grocery store, were you?
01:12:30.000 Like, what is this exactly?
01:12:31.000 Why were you lying about that?
01:12:33.000 And that's kind of the way I feel about January.
01:12:35.000 Like, what is this?
01:12:36.000 This is, they're clearly lying.
01:12:39.000 That's provable.
01:12:41.000 Why?
01:12:42.000 And I'm the last person... I'm often accused of being a conspiracy, not on the opposite.
01:12:47.000 I grew up in a very stable country, the United States, in the 70s and 80s, where people didn't indulge in conspiracies because there weren't any obvious ones afoot, right?
01:12:56.000 I mean, we took things at face value.
01:12:58.000 We trusted our government, by and large.
01:13:01.000 But the amount of lying around January 6th, and it was obvious in the tapes that I showed, is really distressing.
01:13:11.000 And anyone who's covering for those lies should be ashamed of himself, and that would include almost the entire American media, including Fox News, people at Fox News.
01:13:20.000 Fox News, to its great credit, let me air that, and I'm grateful that they did.
01:13:23.000 But there are people there who were mad at me for airing that.
01:13:26.000 Really, why?
01:13:28.000 If you think I'm cherry picking it and taking it out of context, show me where.
01:13:32.000 And by the way, I didn't make the claim that it was entirely peaceful.
01:13:36.000 It wasn't.
01:13:37.000 Police officers were injured.
01:13:39.000 More police officers were injured at the riots in front of the White House the year before, but whatever.
01:13:44.000 All injuries to police officers or anyone else are bad.
01:13:47.000 I'm certainly not making excuses for it.
01:13:49.000 But I'm asking obvious questions.
01:13:51.000 You said this happened, for example.
01:13:53.000 There was a guy called the QAnon Shaman, Jacob Chansley.
01:13:56.000 They put the guy in prison for years!
01:13:59.000 There is surveillance tape that they hid, until I aired it, showing the Capitol Police trying lots of doors, trying to get into the Senate chamber, the sacrosanct chamber that he wasn't allowed to be in, and then escorting him in!
01:14:11.000 And he kind of wanders around like he's taking a hit of mescaline, just kind of, you know what I mean?
01:14:16.000 And like, he says a prayer, he thanks God for the Capitol Police, and then he wanders out.
01:14:21.000 Now, there are a lot of conclusions you could draw from that, but you cannot call that guy an insurrectionist.
01:14:25.000 That's a lie.
01:14:27.000 And by the way, an insurrection is a very specific meaning, and I'm pedantic about words because they're the currency that I trade in.
01:14:32.000 I mean, that's what I do.
01:14:33.000 I use words for a living, so I care about their specific meanings.
01:14:36.000 That was not an insurrection.
01:14:37.000 It was not armed, and its purpose was not to overthrow the government.
01:14:41.000 It was a spasm of rage that Trump definitely helped inspire, that's true, at the election results.
01:14:52.000 Okay, you know, I'm not actually for that.
01:14:56.000 I don't think leaders should be making people more pissed in general.
01:15:00.000 Um, but that's what it was.
01:15:01.000 It was not an insurrection.
01:15:02.000 And to put Jacob Chansley, an American citizen, a Navy veteran, in jail for years after he was let into the Senate chamber by uniformed Capitol Hill police officers, and then I play that, and I'm the bad guy?
01:15:17.000 Fuck you!
01:15:18.000 Like, what do you make of that?
01:15:20.000 I'm sorry, it makes me mad just thinking about it.
01:15:21.000 I said I wasn't going to be a hater.
01:15:23.000 That makes me mad.
01:15:24.000 And I see people on other channels, it's outrageous!
01:15:26.000 He's trying to minimize January 6th.
01:15:28.000 Well, but what?
01:15:28.000 This guy went to prison!
01:15:30.000 Went to prison!
01:15:31.000 You ever been to prison?
01:15:32.000 Only for visits.
01:15:33.000 Right, okay!
01:15:34.000 It's not very nice to clarify.
01:15:35.000 You don't want to go to prison to take a man's freedom away and call him all these names for something he didn't do and then show no remorse at all when you are exposed to have lied about it.
01:15:45.000 This is a human being who was locked away in a prison.
01:15:49.000 It's an outrage to me.
01:15:52.000 Do you mind if I spoke from time to time? Sorry, sorry, sorry. Well it's very hard to get in this position. Right.
01:16:00.000 See that Iraq war, like you know that was brilliant when you went on that podcast and went, like that you were
01:16:05.000 ashamed that you participated and that you rallied for that war.
01:16:08.000 Now to hear you talk about Jan 6, you're saying that at the beginning you had no axe to grind and broadly speaking you oppose violence of any kind.
01:16:17.000 I do!
01:16:19.000 I know, I believe you.
01:16:20.000 And you oppose violence against the police, perhaps in particular Now, though, it seems that you are inquiring, if not suggesting, that there was another aim.
01:16:31.000 Are you saying that it allowed the capital police to be funded differently and more extensively?
01:16:37.000 Are you saying that it facilitated further authoritarianism?
01:16:40.000 That it enabled people to smear the MAGA movement?
01:16:45.000 That it created more opportunity for surveillance laws and censorship?
01:16:49.000 Um, techniques or critiques that we use here on our channel when looking at news is, oh does this allow people to censor more?
01:16:57.000 Does this allow people to surveil more?
01:16:59.000 Does this allow, for example, like a sort of just to use a sort of something anecdotal and contemporaneous, that there's a just stop oil movement in this country at the moment and whenever you see footage of them sort of blocking roads and sort of road users dragging them out the road because it's annoying, I say this as a person who sort of loves nature, loves the environment, feels that profit shouldn't be put ahead of respect and love for the environment.
01:17:21.000 I can't help but feel that the media has an agenda in continually presenting us with these annoying images of Just Stop Oil getting in the way of ordinary commuters who are just trying to get to work.
01:17:31.000 I'm beginning to now critique media from that perspective.
01:17:34.000 Oh, they are using this event in order to elicit these emotions, whether it's war or the events of January 6th.
01:17:42.000 Do you believe that there is, as George Carlin would say, a convergence of interest between the state and its desire to regulate and corporations and their desire to profit, big tech and their desire to capture data, the state and their need to get data?
01:17:54.000 What is it you're observing?
01:17:55.000 Because when I'm listening to you, you don't sound like a regular TV anchor anymore.
01:18:01.000 And in fact, one of the things I'm offering is that that's not a role that's going to exist for much longer because the centralisation of authority is becoming so rapid and so radical that if you even work in this space, you know, with these new EU laws being passed that will mean that social media platforms will be heavily fined 6% of their annual revenue and that they can be censored.
01:18:22.000 The Five Eyes countries are all passing censorship laws.
01:18:24.000 In a sense, to become an independent media voice will be to become an activist.
01:18:29.000 So with regard to the January 6th, do you think these events are used to create particular outcomes?
01:18:34.000 Do you think it's just opportunistic?
01:18:36.000 And where do you feel your personal role is as an independent media broadcaster is now?
01:18:45.000 Well, I think my role is to tell the truth to the extent I can see it.
01:18:48.000 You know, to say what I think is true.
01:18:50.000 Always with the knowledge that we see everything You know, through a glass darkly, we don't see things clearly.
01:18:57.000 We don't have perspective on ourselves or the world around us.
01:19:00.000 We get a lot wrong.
01:19:00.000 I've gotten a lot wrong, that's for sure.
01:19:03.000 But you do your best.
01:19:04.000 And you cannot allow people to force you to lie.
01:19:08.000 Period.
01:19:09.000 So that's how I see my role.
01:19:11.000 I think you're asking the right question.
01:19:13.000 And I ask the same thing about the climate movement.
01:19:16.000 I mean, I'm bewildered by it.
01:19:18.000 Apart from my own family, there's nothing more important to me than nature.
01:19:22.000 I think I spend an above average time in nature amount of time.
01:19:25.000 I mean, I've organized my whole life to be in nature.
01:19:27.000 So I really, really care about it.
01:19:29.000 And I'm very upset about the many ways in which it's despoiled, at least in my country.
01:19:33.000 I mean, nature is not doing well.
01:19:34.000 The environmental movement is gone where I live.
01:19:37.000 And we pollute, we put up chain stores and strip malls and pave things we should not pave.
01:19:43.000 We are very tough on nature in the United States and the environmental movement does nothing to stop that.
01:19:49.000 And so my question for the climate people, and I have no doubt the climate is changing, it's always changed.
01:19:53.000 I live in a place That was completely sculpted by the glaciers, which only melted 10,000 years ago.
01:20:00.000 There were people, there were people living where I live in Northwestern Maine when the glaciers receded.
01:20:06.000 10,000, the Native Americans, 10,000 years ago.
01:20:08.000 So like, this is a feature of life on earth.
01:20:12.000 But, and so I have no doubt it's changing again.
01:20:14.000 And I would be completely open to the possibility that people's behavior is accelerating that change or driving it to some extent.
01:20:20.000 It doesn't sound crazy to me.
01:20:21.000 I don't think it's proven, but I'm open to it.
01:20:23.000 Of course I am.
01:20:25.000 My question is really simple.
01:20:27.000 Which of your solutions to climate change disempower you?
01:20:31.000 So when you act your father on behalf of your children, you are doing things because you love them.
01:20:37.000 They're not necessarily in your interest.
01:20:39.000 Like, you'd rather go take a sauna or do some yoga.
01:20:42.000 Or hop on your wife, but no, you have a child with needs, so you love that child, so you do something for that child.
01:20:49.000 That's what it looks like to serve and love someone, is to do something you don't want to do, doesn't help you in any way, but at least potentially helps that other person.
01:20:57.000 I see the climate movement not doing one thing that doesn't enrich or empower the climate movement and its corporate sponsors.
01:21:04.000 Not one.
01:21:05.000 So for example, not to be boorish here in lecture, but I'll stop with this.
01:21:09.000 Like, if I understand You know, the ecology correctly, trees are like helpful if you're worried about rising CO2, correct?
01:21:21.000 Because they consume it and then emit what?
01:21:23.000 Oxygen.
01:21:24.000 So if you're really worried about climate change caused by carbon dioxide, you'd probably be planting a lot of trees.
01:21:29.000 I don't see a ton of, and I would be very for that as someone who truly loves trees and spends a lot of time thinking about trees and have a lot of trees and maintain a lot of trees.
01:21:37.000 I love trees almost more than anything.
01:21:39.000 Like, where's the nationwide effort to reforest the United States?
01:21:44.000 I don't see it.
01:21:45.000 Instead, I see a lot of solar panels from China that don't work, that actually wreck the environment, industrial wind farms that wreck where I live.
01:21:54.000 Like, I live near them.
01:21:55.000 I know what they do.
01:21:56.000 They kill all these birds of prey.
01:21:58.000 It's like they're destroying the environment, but they're becoming richer.
01:22:01.000 So on January 6th, tell me one solution that doesn't make you more powerful.
01:22:06.000 Yeah.
01:22:07.000 There's not one.
01:22:08.000 So that's an indication of bad faith to me.
01:22:11.000 And of course, you know, I'm not going to be boorish and I'll stop, but anyone who's interested in the uses to which January 6th has been put by the people in charge of Washington can look it up.
01:22:18.000 I mean, the surveillance that was justified The total capture of our banks, for example, by the FBI in the wake of January 6th is completely shocking to any civil libertarian.
01:22:29.000 You can't call my bank and find out what I spent money on.
01:22:31.000 You don't have a warrant.
01:22:33.000 What?
01:22:33.000 That's not allowed under our Constitution.
01:22:35.000 But they did it because it was an insurrection.
01:22:37.000 Okay.
01:22:38.000 So, you know, I don't know.
01:22:40.000 I can't even guess as the mechanics of January 6th.
01:22:43.000 Did the many federal agents in the crowd do this?
01:22:46.000 Did they go along?
01:22:47.000 I don't know the answer and I'm not going to speculate.
01:22:49.000 But I know in the aftermath of January 6th, that event was used by predators in our political sphere to increase their power and to disempower the population they supposedly serve.
01:23:00.000 And I'm very offended by that.
01:23:01.000 Not because I'm some crazed populist.
01:23:03.000 I'm not.
01:23:04.000 I don't want to burn anything down.
01:23:05.000 I'm like very temperamentally conservative.
01:23:08.000 I like to build things, not break them.
01:23:10.000 But you can't look at me with a straight face and tell me you're defending democracy when you get JP Morgan to go through my credit card statements.
01:23:17.000 You're lying.
01:23:18.000 That's my only point.
01:23:19.000 You're lying.
01:23:20.000 Yes, it is a good point.
01:23:26.000 I suppose that both the pandemic era and the current war can have that critique equally well applied.
01:23:36.000 Who benefits from this ability to surveil and impose, for example, vaccine passports?
01:23:42.000 Who benefits from our inability to openly communicate on these subjects?
01:23:46.000 It always appears that there is a sort of an invisible hand Guiding these events.
01:23:52.000 Guiding the conversation.
01:23:54.000 Amplifying certain voices.
01:23:55.000 Diminishing others.
01:23:56.000 And it always appears to somehow benefit centralist, authoritarian institutions, be they governmental, corporate, or financial.
01:24:05.000 And war does it especially.
01:24:05.000 Anti-human!
01:24:07.000 And if you'll pardon me, and I don't mean this as criticism of your country, which I love, but I've spent the last week in England, and I've driven all around.
01:24:15.000 It's nice, isn't it?
01:24:17.000 It's beyond belief how pretty it is.
01:24:20.000 But one thing that just I can't get over is the stark change the stark change in architecture between 1939 when you all entered the war after the invasion of Poland in 1945 when you quote won, okay architecture changed completely and it went from designs that complemented the landscape around them to And local material, you know, used in ways to, I think, elevate the human spirit to a kind of architecture that clearly hates people, that is designed to oppress the human spirit and make people feel without value, worthless.
01:25:03.000 And that is ugly and disposable and made out of materials that are not worthy to be lived in, that are disgusting.
01:25:11.000 And you see that not just in England, but also in the United States.
01:25:13.000 Pre-war, as you well know, is a selling point for apartments in New York for a reason.
01:25:18.000 Everything changed with the war.
01:25:20.000 And there's something about war that changes people in a very, very deep way, down to the architecture, which is an expression of how we feel about each other.
01:25:27.000 The buildings that we build to house our fellow man say a lot about how we feel about our fellow man.
01:25:32.000 In my view.
01:25:33.000 And after the Second World War, I mean, it completely changed and it became very aggressively anti-people.
01:25:41.000 Like, what kind of person could come up with brutalist architecture or its many tributaries, and there are many.
01:25:48.000 Brutalism is just the most obvious one, but all architecture post-war is really kind of brutalist actually.
01:25:53.000 What are you saying when you build a building like that?
01:25:55.000 You're saying that the people who occupy the building are worth nothing.
01:25:58.000 That's what you're saying.
01:25:59.000 Whereas you drive to the Cotswolds and people in the pre-industrial age with no electricity and no machines built buildings that are still standing and true to this day using local limestone and thatch.
01:26:13.000 And the result was beautiful.
01:26:16.000 And by the way, I'm not just saying this as an Anglo whose ancestors lived in this country.
01:26:20.000 I'm saying this just as a human being.
01:26:21.000 I think if you brought someone from the streets of Tokyo to the Cotswolds and said, what do you think of that building?
01:26:25.000 He would say, that's beautiful.
01:26:26.000 Because beauty is inherent.
01:26:27.000 Every person recognizes beauty.
01:26:30.000 Okay?
01:26:30.000 It's not culturally specific, actually.
01:26:32.000 A Shinto temple in Kyoto, I recognize it immediately as beautiful because it is.
01:26:37.000 Because it's It's consistent with the symmetry of nature.
01:26:41.000 But the war changed.
01:26:43.000 The war always does that.
01:26:45.000 War makes people less human.
01:26:48.000 It hurts them in some deep way.
01:26:50.000 Even the survivors I'm talking about.
01:26:52.000 Even the ones whose legs weren't blown off.
01:26:55.000 It's interesting to me how often you appear to be referring to the ulterior energetic force, emotion or essence of a thing, i.e.
01:27:06.000 that beauty could perhaps be the manifestation of love.
01:27:11.000 I've obviously myself observed many times that municipal and state buildings were once plainly an expression of a contract between the people and their government of a good faith relationship.
01:27:23.000 I just thought that!
01:27:25.000 I walked up with my wife in the rain on a village hall in Eastlitch, in the town of the Cotswolds, and the village hall was so beautiful.
01:27:37.000 And I thought, whoever built that cared about the people, it was built by the people who live there for the people who live there, and they loved the people who lived there because they were related to them or knew them.
01:27:45.000 And that hall, I mean, it was built by peasants without machines!
01:27:49.000 Yes.
01:27:50.000 It's impossible to ignore, though, that beneath even these architectural changes that you refer to is an insidious economic ideology.
01:28:00.000 Of course there is a kind of a disdain for the population and the public, and this disdain is something we're continually talking about, whether it's the media, whether it's the state, whether it's private corporations.
01:28:08.000 you can kind of tell they don't like you, and they don't respect you.
01:28:12.000 So when populist figures emerge, i.e. most notably Trump, who somehow seems to give timbre to this idea
01:28:18.000 that hey, they don't like us very much, it's pretty plain that for a while, when you-
01:28:23.000 Right there, that's Trump's appeal right there.
01:28:24.000 When he was talking about Roosevelt a moment ago, that he came from the bourgeoisie or the intelligentsia,
01:28:29.000 it was sort of notable that there's a requirement for an alliance between people who understand,
01:28:35.000 experientially, systemic, the way that systems conduct themselves,
01:28:40.000 the way systems operate, the bourgeoisie, the intelligentsia, whatever word you wanna use
01:28:44.000 for that critique, and ordinary people.
01:28:46.000 This, I believe, is the communicative bridge that needs to be built.
01:28:51.000 I've long felt that it is disgusting that most people now feel voiceless,
01:28:57.000 and not most, many people feel that their electoral agencies are not worthy of trust,
01:29:03.000 media is not worthy of trust.
01:29:04.000 There will never be another election, I don't imagine, in your country, Tucker, where the other side goes, oh, well done, winning that election!
01:29:11.000 Whether it's the Democrats or the Republicans, the other side's just going to go, It was corrupt!
01:29:14.000 It was disgusting!
01:29:15.000 There were Russian agents involved!
01:29:15.000 Look at these machines!
01:29:17.000 You can't rely on this!
01:29:18.000 So there is much that needs to be healed and obviously what we continually offer here is that what's required is indeed beyond an investigation and interrogation of those agencies New systems of decentralisation to move democracy as close as possible to the people affected by it, which I suppose is a principle that's evident in federalism but something that we can discuss more in a moment.
01:29:41.000 Tucker Carlson has talked about the great beauty of this nation in some ways, and I mean this with all due love and respect to our cousins across the Atlantic, a country that in a way Invented your country a little bit.
01:29:52.000 You've just had Independence Day.
01:29:54.000 It was a mistake to throw all that tea into... What do you mean, in some ways?
01:29:57.000 It definitely invented our country.
01:29:59.000 I mean, we're an English country.
01:30:01.000 And what a lovely language we gave you and all.
01:30:04.000 So, it's a temporary celebration of what we do here in this country.
01:30:08.000 Here's a word from our sponsors.
01:30:10.000 Please stay with us, because afterwards, me and Tucker are going to talk a lot more about the military-industrial complex, how deeply embedded they are in the system.
01:30:16.000 I'm going to ask Tucker, even though there are probably contractual restrictions for what Tucker can and can't talk about, I'm going to say, Why do you reckon Fox Satcher?
01:30:22.000 Do you reckon it was Jan 6th?
01:30:23.000 Do you reckon he's speaking out too much?
01:30:25.000 A bit too much Glenn Greenwald on a Sunday afternoon?
01:30:27.000 What was it exactly that you reckon?
01:30:29.000 So stay with us.
01:30:30.000 Also consider joining me for Community and indeed my comedy special during the pandemic period, Brandemic.
01:30:37.000 We're going to be back and asking Tucker the kind of questions that he would ask people while laughing.
01:30:37.000 Have a look at these messages.
01:30:41.000 Oh I know!
01:30:42.000 I'm sure you believe it!
01:30:43.000 Ha!
01:30:44.000 That's fantastic!
01:30:45.000 See you in a second. Welcome to community.
01:31:09.000 Are we on the verge of an environmental apocalypse?
01:31:11.000 Is AI going to destroy all mankind?
01:31:13.000 Are we powerless to choose peace in the face of military-industrial complex objectives?
01:31:18.000 And where the heck are my khaki now?
01:31:20.000 Dealing with questions like those ones is enough to make you exhausted, but thanks to Genucel skincare, you can still look and feel amazing.
01:31:29.000 Like me.
01:31:29.000 You'd never know I care about anything.
01:31:31.000 Not with this eyelid treatment.
01:31:32.000 Straight look at that now.
01:31:34.000 The eyelids have never been better.
01:31:35.000 GenuCell skincare is a natural line of products for both men and women, whoever you are.
01:31:39.000 Nothing is tested on animals, so they're completely cruelty-free with natural, high-quality ingredients, and everything is made exclusively in the USA.
01:31:46.000 And I know exactly what I'm getting with their products, because everything is still formulated to this day from the same pharmacist.
01:31:53.000 His name's George.
01:31:54.000 All right, George.
01:31:55.000 He founded the company over 20 years ago.
01:31:57.000 You'd not know it, though, because he looked like a nine-year-old boy.
01:32:00.000 Because of these products.
01:32:02.000 So if you're invested in your health and personal wellness like I am, then start and end your day with GenuCell.
01:32:09.000 Their Summer Essentials Package is currently available at an incredible introductory price.
01:32:13.000 Just go to GenuCell.com forward slash brand and take an extra 10% off your entire order.
01:32:20.000 That's GenuCell.com forward slash brand.
01:32:24.000 The gift of eternal life!
01:32:26.000 larger reproductive organ, world peace,
01:32:30.000 Genu-cell.
01:32:31.000 Stay free with Russell Brand.
01:32:32.000 See it first on Rumble.
01:32:34.000 It's been a weird couple of years, let's face it.
01:32:36.000 This is the COVID-19 timeline.
01:32:45.000 January 2020, patients in Wuhan are infected with a new form of coronavirus.
01:32:50.000 I remember that bit.
01:32:51.000 I remember thinking, who gives a f***ing s***?
01:32:53.000 Tell me when it gets to a bit of China I'm f***ing heard of, then I might start caring.
01:32:58.000 Listen!
01:33:01.000 How much f***ing spunk!
01:33:04.000 On a f***ing bet!
01:33:06.000 Do you need?
01:33:08.000 Before you start understanding science!
01:33:13.000 Yeah, but... What?
01:33:15.000 But... What?
01:33:17.000 Well, it's just over here, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where they're doing gain-of-function research
01:33:24.000 on bat coronaviruses!
01:33:27.000 -♪ ♪ -♪ ♪ ♪♪
01:33:34.000 Is it me, or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?
01:33:38.000 Wars, pandemics, lies, trickery.
01:33:41.000 My cats keep having kittens.
01:33:42.000 The last one's personal.
01:33:43.000 For those who are in the United States, there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
01:33:49.000 American Heart for Gold make it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.
01:33:55.000 With one phone call, they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.
01:34:04.000 American Hartford Gold is the highest-rated firm in the U.S.
01:34:07.000 with an A-plus rating from the BBB and thousands of satisfied clients.
01:34:11.000 Right now, they will give you up to $5,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.
01:34:17.000 This offer is only for U.S.
01:34:19.000 customers.
01:34:21.000 866-505-8315.
01:34:23.000 That's 866-505-8315.
01:34:26.000 Or simply text BRAND to 99-88-99.
01:34:31.000 Get up to $5,000 of silver and protect your future in this crazy, crazy world with some solid, precious metals literally made in stars.
01:34:39.000 Stay free with Russell Brand.
01:34:41.000 See it first on Rumble.
01:34:44.000 Fantastic there, yeah, do join us if you can.
01:34:46.000 We've got some fantastic questions still to come, some of them sent in by you.
01:34:51.000 Press the red button, join us on Locals.
01:34:52.000 Right, now that we're deeply embedded in Rumble, why the hell did you leave Fox?
01:34:56.000 Tell us the truth, what are you not permitted to say?
01:34:58.000 Tell us, tell us!
01:35:00.000 So do you think they sacked you because of Jan 6?
01:35:02.000 Do you think they sacked you because you're too anti-establishment, too anti-war?
01:35:06.000 Tell us.
01:35:08.000 I honestly don't know.
01:35:09.000 I will say, you know, my views changed dramatically over the course of 20 years.
01:35:16.000 As I've said many times, I was a kind of half-hearted booster of the war in Iraq, which is hard to believe.
01:35:23.000 But, you know, that was in 2003.
01:35:26.000 And so my views for the last 20 years have been, and I realized, and I repented of that, I feel sick even thinking about it now.
01:35:34.000 But my views have remained pretty much the same for the last 20 years.
01:35:38.000 They've evolved, you know, as things have changed.
01:35:40.000 But in general, I've been skeptical of the storylines and all kinds of different things.
01:35:44.000 And I certainly was for the 14 years I was at Fox.
01:35:47.000 And they were always, they didn't agree with me, of course, I don't think, but they were always very nice to me and they always let me say what I wanted.
01:35:56.000 Not one time did they tell me not to say anything.
01:35:58.000 So I was always grateful to Fox and I am in retrospect grateful to Fox for that.
01:36:02.000 So that never changed up until the moment they called me and said, you know, we're taking the show off the air.
01:36:07.000 And so I can only speculate, I know.
01:36:09.000 But I do think as a general matter, not even about me, the war in Ukraine is a red line for For a lot of people in business and politics, and you see it in our politics in the U.S., where the leaders of the Republican Party in the Congress, who really are repulsive in my view, are now supporting sending cluster bombs to Ukraine.
01:36:30.000 Ukraine is losing the war, obviously.
01:36:33.000 The United States could, and Ukrainians are dying in huge numbers, and the country's being destroyed.
01:36:37.000 And so the U.S.
01:36:38.000 could force a peace like tonight.
01:36:40.000 They could.
01:36:41.000 Uniquely, they have that power.
01:36:43.000 And they won't.
01:36:44.000 And they're continuing to allow Ukrainians to be killed and the country to be devastated.
01:36:48.000 So I don't know their motive.
01:36:51.000 I can only guess.
01:36:52.000 But I know that if you criticize that, they really are intent on making you be quiet.
01:36:57.000 With the pandemic being reframed in such a short period of time and with this cultural amnesia always being... Has it been reframed?
01:37:05.000 In a sense it has.
01:37:06.000 Like we now know that there were no clinical trials for transmission and 96% of people... Oh, they were lying?
01:37:13.000 cannot spread the disease, that they were considerable, like their myocarditis, all
01:37:18.000 of that, that lockdowns didn't work. You're making me feel bad for getting all those shots.
01:37:22.000 That the 6 feet to 10 feet was arbitrary, and now we're looking, and now already we're
01:37:29.000 being invited to kind of forget that that sort of happened.
01:37:32.000 And with Biden inadvertently saying Iraq instead of Ukraine, do you feel that these kind
01:37:40.000 of Freudian errors are simply because in time we will regard this conflict in the way we
01:37:46.000 regarded Iraq.
01:37:47.000 This is not to say I'm not sympathetic towards Ukrainian people, but that it was a war primarily
01:37:50.000 motivated by the interests of the military-industrial complex, the stated plan for BlackRock to
01:37:55.000 rebuild Ukraine in a comparable way that Halliburton were able to exploit the conflict in Iraq,
01:38:00.000 and indeed a secondary agenda to diminish Russia's capacity to be a superpower on the
01:38:04.000 world stage.
01:38:05.000 Do you think these things will become explicit and broadly accepted, and in a similar way,
01:38:09.000 I mean, the key to joy and wisdom is admitting that you're not God.
01:38:11.000 That is the key.
01:38:12.000 That's the key to life, in my opinion.
01:38:14.000 and a lack of alliance. Do you think that those people will undergo some kind of
01:38:17.000 reckoning, Tucker? I hope so. I mean the key to joy and wisdom is admitting that
01:38:24.000 you're not God. That is the key. That's the key to life, in my opinion.
01:38:28.000 Admitting you're not God. And if you can't do that, you are doomed to
01:38:34.000 Because you're not God, by the way.
01:38:35.000 That's a fact that you can't change.
01:38:36.000 You are not God.
01:38:37.000 Okay?
01:38:38.000 Period.
01:38:38.000 Breaking news for me.
01:38:40.000 Hit me pretty hard, that one.
01:38:43.000 That's my take home.
01:38:43.000 That's the moment.
01:38:44.000 Oh, okay.
01:38:45.000 Well, that's it.
01:38:46.000 I'm out!
01:38:48.000 It's essential to happiness and to honesty to admit when you're wrong.
01:38:55.000 And it's so freeing.
01:38:56.000 I mean, it's the basis of the recovery movement.
01:38:58.000 I realized I was powerless.
01:39:00.000 And I just have lived that.
01:39:02.000 And I understand very well, personally, the human impulse to hide being wrong.
01:39:08.000 No one wants to admit being wrong because in so doing you admit you're wrong.
01:39:12.000 You lack the power that you pretended that you had.
01:39:15.000 But I just find it so liberating.
01:39:18.000 I was wrong.
01:39:20.000 I thought this, it turned out not to be true.
01:39:22.000 I was wrong.
01:39:23.000 I didn't know.
01:39:24.000 I am not God.
01:39:26.000 Once you say that, then you realize there's nothing to be afraid of.
01:39:29.000 By the way, everybody already knows what you're lying about.
01:39:32.000 People know who you are.
01:39:34.000 I tell my children this all the time.
01:39:35.000 You think you're getting away with it.
01:39:37.000 I'm secretly whatever it is Everybody knows and they love you anyway, or they hate you.
01:39:41.000 Anyway, it doesn't matter We know because we can smell we're like dogs.
01:39:45.000 We know who the other person is instantly All the pretense is pointless.
01:39:50.000 And so how beautiful is it to just say, nope, here's who I am.
01:39:55.000 Yeah.
01:39:56.000 And they can't, and I look at someone like Tony Blinken, who's our Secretary of State, who's obviously way over his head, not a genius, but probably above average in cleverness, but not, you know, he's not like a great statesman or a great person or whatever.
01:40:10.000 And he feels, you just watch him on television, he feels this burden to pretend, I'm Secretary of State, I got it all under control.
01:40:16.000 You have no freaking idea, Tony Blinken!
01:40:18.000 Like, you have no idea what's going to happen.
01:40:21.000 You've been wrong again and again and again, but you can't admit it.
01:40:25.000 So you're terrified of being exposed.
01:40:28.000 I'm not attacking Tony Blinken or singling him out.
01:40:30.000 I hope not unfairly.
01:40:31.000 This is where we all find ourselves.
01:40:33.000 God, I hope nobody knows!
01:40:35.000 You know, whatever it is.
01:40:36.000 I'm secretly gay, or I gained 20 pounds, or I'm actually very vain.
01:40:40.000 Everyone already knows.
01:40:41.000 Calm down.
01:40:42.000 Just admit it.
01:40:43.000 And I hope people who are wrong about COVID can take the life-affirming path of admitting.
01:40:50.000 The dignity preserving.
01:40:51.000 When you admit you're wrong, you actually preserve your dignity.
01:40:54.000 When you continue to lie, you lose your dignity.
01:40:57.000 They think it's the opposite.
01:40:57.000 People don't get that.
01:40:58.000 Oh, I have to... No, I was... Actually, I was kind of, you know... Stop the bullshit.
01:41:03.000 Admit it and become...
01:41:03.000 We all know.
01:41:06.000 Fully human?
01:41:07.000 Then you can respect yourself.
01:41:08.000 How can you respect yourself if you're lying?
01:41:10.000 You can't.
01:41:11.000 This is, I believe, the undergirding idea of perennialism by Aldous Huxley, where he contrasts various theologies and notes that the primary idea, whether it's in the Vedas or coming from Meister Eckhart, is this transcendence of self.
01:41:28.000 The acknowledgement that this vessel, this idea, this synaptic crash of self, this mess of memory and projection can be transcended through and via a connection to God.
01:41:42.000 And this, I was wrong.
01:41:44.000 Ultimately becomes, I was irrelevant.
01:41:47.000 The rustleness is irrelevant.
01:41:48.000 There is a way through this.
01:41:50.000 There is a pathway.
01:41:51.000 The denial of this transcendence, or even this imminent relationship with a higher power, a higher force, defines our age of materialism, rationalism.
01:42:00.000 All things can be measured in ways.
01:42:02.000 This is why you have lumpen and brutal block buildings, abundant, and an annihilation of elegant thatch.
01:42:10.000 Because there are challenges to our power.
01:42:10.000 Yes!
01:42:18.000 The idea that a flower is more beautiful than anything we could create, and that a white pine is more enduring than anything we will ever build, Like, that's such a challenge.
01:42:27.000 The idea that there are mysteries we can't explain?
01:42:29.000 Yes.
01:42:30.000 This is why they call you a conspiracy nut.
01:42:31.000 This is why they become hysterical when you raise questions that challenge their version of events.
01:42:37.000 Because what you're really doing, it's not even about January 6th or UFOs or the Kennedy assassination.
01:42:41.000 It's about revealing their limits.
01:42:44.000 Yes.
01:42:45.000 They don't have the answers and they can't admit it because admitting that they don't have the answers is the same as admitting they're not God.
01:42:52.000 And I'm only saying that's the most liberating thing you can do.
01:42:56.000 It's curious how, sort of, how it can be distilled to something so identifiably personal.
01:43:02.000 Like, I saw you once interview someone and you went, no, no, I do the same!
01:43:05.000 Like, I thought you were talking about gun laws or something.
01:43:05.000 I do the same!
01:43:08.000 But in a way, people want feudal power.
01:43:11.000 People want total power.
01:43:12.000 I want absolute dominion over my life.
01:43:15.000 But there now is, of course, a tendency to mask this intention.
01:43:19.000 The idea that this is for your security.
01:43:21.000 This is for your safety.
01:43:23.000 We are trying to help you.
01:43:24.000 What was that?
01:43:25.000 This is what sort of busted me up, Tucker, during that whole... Just goose-stepped for me!
01:43:28.000 Stop lying!
01:43:29.000 What's the big deal?
01:43:30.000 We just marched through Nuremberg!
01:43:32.000 Totally true, though!
01:43:33.000 I'm more comfortable with just put on a uniform and point a gun at me.
01:43:37.000 Stop telling me it's for my own good.
01:43:39.000 You're lying.
01:43:40.000 Like, I know that's not true.
01:43:41.000 Well, authoritarianism necessarily had to become veiled.
01:43:44.000 Those kind of optics of the rallies and the flags was identifiably a problem.
01:43:50.000 But the urge and the will to power has remained consistent.
01:43:54.000 Of course.
01:43:55.000 I suppose in a sense where we appear to align very strongly is we don't like being told what to do, that we're willing to surrender, willing to learn, willing to take on new ideas.
01:44:05.000 A few more just little personal questions.
01:44:07.000 They're not personal, they're about your career.
01:44:09.000 How do you feel about the FBI hacking your phone, mate, with the Putin thing and being called a Putin puppet?
01:44:16.000 A Putin puppet?
01:44:18.000 The Putin puppet thing I've never taken seriously.
01:44:20.000 I am a passionate Tolstoy fan.
01:44:24.000 No, he predates Putin, by the way.
01:44:27.000 I love Tolstoy.
01:44:28.000 And I mean that.
01:44:29.000 The Kreutzer Snotters.
01:44:30.000 I just read it.
01:44:30.000 It's an amazing book.
01:44:31.000 Is that that thing where you talk about Christianity?
01:44:34.000 Have you read them essays on Christianity by Tolstoy?
01:44:35.000 Of course I have.
01:44:36.000 And I'm not sure I quite agree.
01:44:37.000 The Kreutzer Snotters is all about how sex is bad, which I strongly disagree with.
01:44:41.000 But he's just an amazing writer.
01:44:42.000 But that's... I've never been to Russia.
01:44:44.000 I don't speak the language.
01:44:45.000 I have no special... I mean, the whole thing is insane.
01:44:48.000 And by the way, I've always... I mean, that never bothered me because I'm the most Amer... I'm so American it's like a joke.
01:44:57.000 Yeah, you are really American.
01:44:58.000 I'm the most American person I've ever met.
01:45:00.000 You're so American.
01:45:01.000 You've been here so... Ever since you've arrived on the premises, you've been so American.
01:45:04.000 You're shaking people out.
01:45:05.000 And then American just turned up, inadvertently, just by... Magnetized by you.
01:45:09.000 Asking people personal questions.
01:45:11.000 I'm from Sacramento!
01:45:12.000 Where do you live?
01:45:12.000 How are you?
01:45:13.000 You're being all American everywhere, spilling your Americana up everything.
01:45:17.000 No, but it's so true!
01:45:18.000 It's so... And it...
01:45:19.000 Exactly.
01:45:20.000 For good and bad.
01:45:21.000 Mostly bad.
01:45:22.000 I want to ask you an important question, I think.
01:45:25.000 There's nothing to suggest that the state of nation is a permanent one.
01:45:30.000 It's a relatively recent advent.
01:45:32.000 It's pretty plain that one of the ways that the cultural war can be continually Leveraged, even issues where I imagine you have strong views, and indeed these are arguments that define your country, certainly more than mine, although everyone's affected by them.
01:45:46.000 Pro-gun versus gun control.
01:45:49.000 Pro-choice versus pro-life.
01:45:51.000 The identity politics issues.
01:45:53.000 Are we ever, as a, you know, there's nothing in our evolution that would suggest we should live in countries of 300 million people all following a single credo.
01:46:02.000 Isn't it necessary, and indeed obvious, that this ulterior driving energy be that through technology or different forms of identification?
01:46:13.000 I mean, imagine if, like, 2,000 years ago, you'd grabbed someone from Iceland and someone from Sudan and someone from London and said, right, you lot, you're all the same, live together, according to one belief.
01:46:24.000 That's exactly right.
01:46:25.000 It'd be an absurd thing to do.
01:46:26.000 So, aren't we, isn't it obvious and necessary that what has to change is the nature of democracy itself?
01:46:32.000 And would you, and I guess, I imagine, I can guess, because you've said about, you know, shooting's a hobby of yours, you've already said that you are anti-abortion, would you be willing to, as it were, stand on an ideological if not political ticket with people that had opposite views on you when it came to like trans and raising kids trans and stuff like that?
01:46:53.000 If it meant that you and your community would be completely at liberty to raise your children and run your community how you wanted to.
01:47:01.000 Well, of course.
01:47:02.000 Yeah.
01:47:02.000 Yeah.
01:47:03.000 So, I mean, I've no plans to stand for office.
01:47:06.000 Is that the same as running for office?
01:47:08.000 Yeah, we stand.
01:47:08.000 You stand.
01:47:09.000 We're English.
01:47:09.000 We run.
01:47:10.000 I've come here.
01:47:11.000 Now, I'll be here for a while.
01:47:13.000 Simply elect me.
01:47:14.000 Hey!
01:47:14.000 Can I have some power?
01:47:17.000 America, we run as fast as we can.
01:47:18.000 Sprinting about, gathering up them donations.
01:47:20.000 But of course, and by the way, I mean, the real, like the Tower of Babel didn't work for a reason.
01:47:27.000 That is commentary on, you know, written by the ancient Hebrews 3,000 years ago, but still a sort of deep commentary on people and how to organize a society.
01:47:35.000 And like, human differences, I said at the outset, people are united in their value.
01:47:42.000 I think their value, each person's value is identical because they're all created by the
01:47:47.000 creator. But people are different. I mean, they are. I have four children. They're not all the
01:47:51.000 same, right? People are different. And they kind of live the way they want to live. And it's sort
01:47:57.000 of any effort to make them live in ways that you want them to live that they don't want to live,
01:48:02.000 like, is doomed to concentration camps, kind of, in the end.
01:48:05.000 Like you need to use a lot of force to make people change basic habits that they've decided they want.
01:48:12.000 So that suggests to me much smaller administrative zones or countries or whatever you want to call them.
01:48:20.000 The problem is technology makes it really easy to manipulate huge groups of people.
01:48:23.000 The drive out here from London, my driver's from Brazil.
01:48:27.000 A country I love.
01:48:28.000 It's very similar to the United States in a lot of ways.
01:48:30.000 And she's from southern Brazil.
01:48:32.000 And I said, are there Brazilians in London?
01:48:33.000 Yeah, but most are from the north.
01:48:35.000 No, I don't see them.
01:48:35.000 Do you see them?
01:48:37.000 I don't, I don't trust them.
01:48:38.000 I don't like them.
01:48:39.000 Oh, they're from southern, they're from northern Brazil.
01:48:41.000 Okay.
01:48:44.000 And I said, well, why don't you split into two countries?
01:48:46.000 And she said, everybody wants to, but we can't because we've got a central government and it's not in their interest.
01:48:52.000 And I thought that's the story of a lot of the world.
01:48:54.000 It really is that like, I have a lot in common with my neighbors.
01:48:59.000 I lived on a street in Washington for many years where I had, I think everyone on the street voted differently from the way I vote.
01:49:05.000 We had, there were a bunch of different races on the street, and I felt like we had a lot in common.
01:49:10.000 And I think everyone on the street felt that way about everyone else because it was our street!
01:49:12.000 Do you know what I mean?
01:49:14.000 So like, we would have been a pretty good self-governing country of, you know, 11 houses or whatever in Northwest DC because we had this fundamental thing in common, which is geography.
01:49:26.000 And I do think ultimately we'll get back to that, because I think it's a much more natural way.
01:49:33.000 Loose alliances of small places is a much more natural way to govern, in my opinion.
01:49:41.000 But we're a long way from that.
01:49:43.000 It seems that the homogeneity ultimately is driven by systems of dominion and the requirement for profit.
01:49:52.000 Exactly.
01:49:52.000 And that the ideology is secondary and its function is to create division.
01:49:58.000 That's its point.
01:49:59.000 Even when we as a team start talking about, how do we talk to Tucker about trans issues, cultural issues?
01:50:05.000 When we're talking about it, we start saying, oh, it's difficult, isn't it?
01:50:07.000 Like, you know, as soon as we start talking about trans athletes or Virtue signaling or positive affirmation it becomes in a sense it becomes divisive.
01:50:19.000 My personal position is like the way I want to raise my children how I want to raise my children of course you have to immediately caveat that with of course there are some areas where you think well what if people are mistreating their children in ways that are obvious you immediately have to asterisk that but that aside I want to raise my children how I want to raise my children I don't want anybody else telling me how to raise my children.
01:50:40.000 And I recognize that the price of that is other people are going to raise their children how they want to.
01:50:45.000 And the aesthetics of that and the descriptions of that are almost none of my business.
01:50:52.000 I couldn't agree more.
01:50:53.000 I couldn't agree more.
01:50:54.000 I mean, I, yeah, I mean, that's a whole separate, you know, the question of whether you should be told how to raise your children by people who don't have children.
01:51:03.000 Which is where we wind up now.
01:51:07.000 Yeah, no, I couldn't agree more.
01:51:10.000 Okay, so here we are.
01:51:13.000 Is it possible for anyone left in the mainstream media to say what they think?
01:51:16.000 That's from Atlauna, who's one of our followers on Locals.
01:51:21.000 I can answer that really clearly, no.
01:51:22.000 I mean, you can within certain boundaries.
01:51:25.000 You know, like, you can be against Bud Light or for Bud Light or whatever, but you can't say, Ukraine is not a democracy, so stop saying we're fighting for democracy.
01:51:34.000 You cannot say that.
01:51:35.000 No one does.
01:51:37.000 Hey, this is from at sunpatchpatriot.
01:51:39.000 With all these conspiracy theories coming out as true, is there anything that's still covered up that you think holds weight?
01:51:45.000 You know, now that they have more information about UFOs and stuff, do you think there's anything that's not been uncovered that you... Yeah!
01:51:52.000 Biden just reclassified the Kennedy documents 60 years after his assassination.
01:51:57.000 No one, even peripherally involved, is still alive.
01:52:01.000 So what could possibly be the sources and methods that were supposedly showing the world by declassifying these are so outdated, they're irrelevant.
01:52:10.000 They were using disappearing ink in 1963.
01:52:12.000 So why in the world would we be continuing to hide the truth about the Kennedy assassination 60 years later?
01:52:21.000 And of course, the answer is obvious, because it implicates not individuals, but institutions.
01:52:27.000 And reveals them as complicit in a murder and in the overthrow of the U.S.
01:52:32.000 government.
01:52:33.000 And the U.S.
01:52:34.000 government is complicit in the overthrow of the U.S.
01:52:36.000 government.
01:52:36.000 And that's the truth.
01:52:38.000 I know that for a fact because I interviewed someone who saw the documents.
01:52:43.000 And so, you know, we have a long way... Look, the bottom line is, unless there is a compelling reason that relates to imminent physical security of citizens, we should never hide the truth from the population in a democracy.
01:52:59.000 Period.
01:53:01.000 Because that is incompatible with democracy.
01:53:03.000 Secrecy is incompatible with democracy.
01:53:04.000 How can I... I'm running the government, but you can't tell me what the government's doing?
01:53:08.000 That's not democracy.
01:53:09.000 That's something else.
01:53:10.000 And don't insult me by calling it a democracy, because it's very much not.
01:53:14.000 And so, yes, there is much that remains secret.
01:53:17.000 I'm not going to speculate.
01:53:18.000 And you don't need to be conspiracy nut.
01:53:20.000 In the United States, we have over a billion federal documents that remain classified.
01:53:25.000 A billion!
01:53:26.000 Going back to the Second World War.
01:53:29.000 So that's a democracy?
01:53:30.000 That is not a democracy.
01:53:33.000 It's just not!
01:53:34.000 Tell me how it is!
01:53:35.000 Yes, in a sense, the very category of classified, except in matters of national security, obviously indicates a kind of parental relationship.
01:53:44.000 You used the metaphor... Yes, thank you.
01:53:46.000 That's exactly... I'm stealing that.
01:53:47.000 That's exactly... It indicates a parental relationship.
01:53:49.000 That's right.
01:53:50.000 We're locking the bedroom door.
01:53:51.000 You can't know what's happening in here.
01:53:53.000 Yeah.
01:53:54.000 I want to know what's going on in there.
01:53:56.000 When I did look once, it was disgusting.
01:53:58.000 Listen, we're going to do a little bit on Locals.
01:54:01.000 So if you're watching this on Locals right now, you're welcome.
01:54:04.000 We'll see you in a second.
01:54:04.000 Press the red button on the bottom of your screen and join us in Locals.
01:54:07.000 We're going to play true or false.
01:54:10.000 Not true and false.
01:54:11.000 That's complex.
01:54:14.000 Oh my God.
01:54:15.000 It's simultaneously true and false.
01:54:17.000 You're now enlightened.
01:54:18.000 Welcome.
01:54:18.000 Welcome to the limitless bliss that was always within you all along.
01:54:23.000 You can follow Tucker on Twitter, obviously, at Tucker Carlson, where you can see upcoming interviews with Ice Cube and the Tate brothers.
01:54:28.000 Yeah, maybe I'll ask you about that.
01:54:30.000 Great.
01:54:30.000 in them tape brothers. We're going to go over to locals now press the red button on your
01:54:33.000 screen. We'll just chat for about 10 minutes. Also, I'm in a pull up competition with RFK.
01:54:39.000 I've got I've got BRFK in a pull up competition to raise 100 grand. You can donate by going
01:54:43.000 to Kennedy 24.com forward slash pull up isn't it kill me.
01:54:46.000 Have you seen he's mad while looking his arms Tucker. He's arms are thicker than my torso nine
01:54:51.000 years old. Look at the bar he's It's like a murder weapon.
01:54:55.000 How can I compete with that?
01:54:57.000 I'm never going to get there.
01:54:57.000 We've already got up to 21 grand, 24 grand.
01:55:00.000 If you don't want me to have a competition with this man who will plainly win, donate to that campaign.
01:55:06.000 If you're watching us on Locals, we'll see you in a second for a little more chat.
01:55:10.000 Join us next week, though, not for more of the same.
01:55:12.000 We'd never insult you with that crap, but for more of the different.
01:55:15.000 Until then, stay free.
01:55:16.000 Thank you, Tucker Carlson.
01:55:18.000 See you in a second on Locals.
01:55:19.000 Stay free with Russell Brand.
01:55:21.000 See it first on Rumble.
01:55:23.000 I know you.
01:55:24.000 You'd like to drop those leftover pandemic pounds that you put on during the pandemic because you were sad inside because of the pandemic.
01:55:31.000 But how sick are you also of all the ads for weight loss pills and fad diets that probably don't even work anyway and might make your feet change colour?
01:55:39.000 I've been there.
01:55:39.000 I've done that.
01:55:40.000 They don't work.
01:55:41.000 They're a con.
01:55:41.000 They're a trick.
01:55:42.000 It's skullduggery.
01:55:43.000 Do you know what actually works?
01:55:44.000 Eating five healthy servings of fruit and vegetables every single day.
01:55:49.000 Who among us has time to prepare that every single day?
01:55:52.000 This brings us around to Field of Greens.
01:55:54.000 Field of Greens is a science-backed formula of specific fruits and vegetables you won't find in any other product.
01:56:01.000 Proper nutrition reboots your metabolism so you can burn calories faster and lose weight a healthier way, and Field of Greens is the only brand backed by a better health promise.
01:56:10.000 Yes, you'll look and feel healthier fast, but the greater proof comes at your next checkup when the doctor goes, whatever you're doing, Keep it up!
01:56:18.000 Okay, let's get you started with 15% off your first order.
01:56:22.000 Visit BrickHouseRussell.com, promo code BRAND.
01:56:26.000 That's BrickHouseRussell.com, promo code BRAND.
01:56:29.000 Stay free with Russell Brand.
01:56:31.000 See you at first on Rumble.
01:56:43.000 Switch on.