Stay Free - Russel Brand - Media ATTACKS Musk, Alex Jones, Tate & Vivek On X Spaces! - Stay Free #267

00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and get the other one.

00:01:56.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.

00:02:04.000 We've got a live shot there.

00:02:11.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.

00:02:12.000 Thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand today.

00:02:15.000 It's a fantastic conversation with Neil Oliver coming up.

00:02:18.000 We're going to be talking about, well, you know, Neil Oliver from GB News, you know him.

00:02:22.000 He's a beautiful, poetic, sage-like commentator who will elevate your consciousness and give you some beautiful perspectives on a variety of complex issues.

00:02:31.000 Plus, we've got a fantastic investigation into the role of the media and the government in the pandemic.

00:02:37.000 Could it be possibly true that the government We've paid the media to favorably report on certain medications.

00:02:45.000 We can't get into that in too much depth while we're on YouTube.

00:02:48.000 If you're watching us there, we'll be there for about 15 minutes.

00:02:52.000 Then you'll have to click the link in the description and join us over on Rumble.

00:02:55.000 Download the app so you're informed when free speech is coming your way.

00:03:00.000 Plus, merchandise is back!

00:03:02.000 We've got hats and hoodies, this mug, t-shirts and so much more.

00:03:05.000 And for you, for a limited time, we've got an exclusive Discount code for 20% off the whole basket, go to RussellBrandStore.com, use the code RUMBLEMERCH at the checkout.

00:03:16.000 Okay, now get ready for a fantastic conversation with Neil Oliver, a valuable contributor, an open-hearted man, and in particular, note how he brings gentle spirit to complex conversations.

00:03:27.000 How are we going to progress to one another if our hearts are closed?

00:03:31.000 We must wake up together.

00:03:32.000 I know you're going to enjoy this conversation.

00:03:34.000 Hello, Neil.

00:03:34.000 Thanks so much for joining us.

00:03:37.000 My pleasure.

00:03:38.000 Yes, I very much enjoyed our last chat.

00:03:42.000 I was, I make no, I'm sure, I don't make any preparations for these things.

00:03:47.000 I just, I'm always excited by the possibility of where the conversation, any conversation might go.

00:03:52.000 I think that's the joy of these exchanges.

00:03:56.000 Well, Neil, I've prepared enough for both of us, so you don't need to worry.

00:04:00.000 I've got a carefully... You've done some homework.

00:04:04.000 It's almost intrusive, actually.

00:04:06.000 It's almost a violation of any privacy acts that may yet remain.

00:04:12.000 I've been in that fireplace for the last couple of days observing you, and you have not been found wanting.

00:04:19.000 You are a brilliant and wry Gaelic poet.

00:04:23.000 I enjoyed our conversation last time and I'm interested to talk, as you might imagine, more about globalism and more about freedom and more about, you know, like what might have happened here.

00:04:35.000 Let me tell you this because I sort of ask you this because I trust you.

00:04:39.000 Now, over the time that I've been broadcasting in these kind of spaces, I've developed an affinity for what might be called populism that previously I might have been sceptical about.

00:04:53.000 I have a deep understanding, for example, why people in Ireland are so frustrated and why they may be considering Yeah, voting for Conor McGregor.

00:05:03.000 I'm sympathetic to nations like the Netherlands where you're seeing the rise of figures like Geert Wilders, particularly while Dutch farmers are under such incredible pressure and they're exerting, I say they, and by that I mean corporate globalist forces appear to be trying to control agriculture.

00:05:23.000 In order that people do not have direct access to their own food.

00:05:27.000 That last bit is an assumption.

00:05:29.000 But it's very difficult to deny that centralist, globalist forces appear to be trying to regulate and control agriculture, usually under the auspices of helping the climate.

00:05:38.000 But it just seems that whenever we're helping the climate, we also penalise ordinary people and people's ability to run their own lives.

00:05:45.000 These were just illustrative examples, Neil, to point out how You know once I would have been considered a person that was of the left who would automatically be in opposition to the kind of populist movements that I've already referred to and in some cases listed.

00:06:01.000 Have you always been someone that's affiliated with the right or conservatism?

00:06:06.000 Are you an old-school liberal lefty?

00:06:08.000 And how do you feel when you find yourself sort of navigating a new political landscape that seems to be much more about People versus the establishment, periphery versus the center, rather than left and right as we used to understand it.

00:06:25.000 I've never been overtly political before.

00:06:30.000 I never was.

00:06:31.000 I've never been a carrying member of any political party.

00:06:35.000 I was never somebody who marched or protested.

00:06:40.000 I can't honestly say why that was.

00:06:41.000 I think it was probably ultimately down to a certain kind of laziness, really.

00:06:46.000 I think I was letting other people get on with things political.

00:06:49.000 And I do reproach myself for having been apathetic or disengaged for as long as I was.

00:06:58.000 But that said, I would never have characterised myself as being of the left or of the right or of the centre.

00:07:06.000 I didn't really think of myself in those terms.

00:07:10.000 I'm very interested, that said, in the way in which populist has become a pejorative term.

00:07:18.000 You know, it's bandied about in the same way as, you know, Hillary Clinton's basket of deplorables and whatever, white van man.

00:07:27.000 You know, there's a whole slew of terms that are used to make people feel bad, isolated one from another, as if their points of view are somehow crude or crass or base.

00:07:42.000 And I find that fascinating, to put it mildly.

00:07:48.000 Populist just means, as you know, of the people.

00:07:53.000 And the way in which that's been maligned is, well, I think it's unforgivable, actually.

00:08:00.000 And like you, I do feel a great deal of sympathy for populations all over the place.

00:08:09.000 who in a very short space of time in the scheme of things have been left with no alternative but to accept major change, major demographic and cultural change that they didn't ask for and weren't necessarily ready for.

00:08:28.000 You know, weren't bought so much as a gin and tonic and a bunch of filling station chrysanths before Certain couplings were forced upon neighbourhoods. 0.78

00:08:38.000 And why wouldn't people be alarmed by sudden change?

00:08:43.000 People generally are alarmed by sudden, unasked for change.

00:08:48.000 And I do get very frustrated at the way in which people are set against one another.

00:08:54.000 People have been, you know, whole civilizations all over the world have been deliberately displaced, damaged, carpet bombed, flattened, messed with.

00:09:05.000 People have been unseated and unsettled and are on the move as they would be for all sorts of, for as many different reasons as there are people.

00:09:15.000 And we are all the time invited to get angry with each other rather than where we should be angry, which is with the people up above us who punch down all the time.

00:09:28.000 And then encourage us to punch each other.

00:09:30.000 So I find I have a great deal of sympathy for everyone because I think we have been collectively messed with en masse for decades.

00:09:40.000 Yeah, decades.

00:09:41.000 And I feel like that.

00:09:43.000 A point in your answer there, you touched on the idea of migration and the cultural and social impact of migration.

00:09:50.000 Interestingly, mate, and we've got a lot of topics to cover over the course of our conversation, we'll talk about how the pandemic uniquely shifted cultural values, social attitudes, created an acceptance of regulation that didn't previously

00:10:03.000 exist. It was a time of unprecedented international deception, I feel, and international shaming,

00:10:11.000 and those two things obviously correlate. But before we get into the pandemic and the

00:10:18.000 unique revelations of that recent period, I'd like to sort of touch upon Ireland.

00:10:24.000 When we made some content about what happened in Ireland and how the rhetoric that was being used to condemn Irish people protesting about migration in the aftermath of several violent acts involving children and, as reported, Migrants, or members of the migrant population.

00:10:45.000 When we put that content up on various sites, YouTube, and of course our home here, Rumble, I was struck by the number of, I noticed Brazilian people that were resident in Ireland, Polish people that were resident in Ireland, saying, migration has gotten out of control in this country.

00:11:03.000 Irish people feel disturbed. 1.00

00:11:04.000 There was some brilliant reporting at the time that made it clear that Ireland doesn't have the same kind of trajectory in history as a country like England or the Netherlands or any country that has a colonial past.

00:11:18.000 Ireland, of course, is historically oppressed and their ethno-nationalism is a necessary part of their identity as they confronted and opposed external oppressors.

00:11:31.000 I felt two things I'd like to point out.

00:11:33.000 It's plain that you can have concerns about migration and not be a racist.

00:11:39.000 It's plain that people do not feel like, as you said, like they are being consulted about the direction of their nation.

00:11:47.000 And it was just something about what happened in Ireland because of the inability to sort of evoke guilt and shame in the same way you might be able to in a country like France or England or the United States, obviously.

00:11:59.000 That meant something was revealed to me.

00:12:01.000 And what I feel is, is that globalist rhetoric, it's shallow, it's manipulative, and it's dishonest.

00:12:12.000 And then when I started to sort of unpick that, I thought about a lot of the rhetoric around Brexit and a lot of the rhetoric around Trump.

00:12:17.000 And this is something you referred to in your first conversation as well.

00:12:20.000 There's a large appetite to condemn people just for having an opinion.

00:12:25.000 And the solution for this can only be democracy, because all of this anti-populist rhetoric is predicated on the idea that there should be authoritative institutions that dictate to people the direction of a country.

00:12:37.000 You could call that leadership if you want, but when there's been as much deception as we've experienced lately, when there's so much contempt for the population, when there's so much mistrust for the media that are now essentially part of the establishment, It's difficult not to argue that perhaps people should be able to make decisions for themselves, that they shouldn't have information that's kept from them, that they shouldn't be condemned and judged in the sort of way that we've kind of circled around even in the first 10 minutes of our chat.

00:13:04.000 I wonder what you feel about Ireland in particular and how that's relevant when it comes to this issue of globalism versus, I won't just say nationalism because nationalism is a pretty freighted term, but perhaps even localism.

00:13:18.000 Well, you're so right about Ireland being a very different case than, say, England, Britain, the Long Island of Britain, you know, a completely different experience and a completely different means of operating in the world historically.

00:13:37.000 There is, there's definitely something very pernicious about the way in which everyone is discouraged from daring to hold multiple thoughts in their head at the same time.

00:13:48.000 You know, as you said, you can be simultaneously worried about rapid and mass immigration to your neighbourhood without being, while at the same time being a human-loving, life-affirming, welcoming person.

00:14:07.000 You can hold those two thoughts simultaneously.

00:14:11.000 We're constantly invited only to pick a side.

00:14:15.000 Yeah, just take a line, a single line on every issue.

00:14:20.000 And if you don't, if you haven't got the time to think up one yourself, here's a laminated card with all of the pre-prepared lines that you that you might just help yourself to take.

00:14:31.000 And the people in Ireland who are concerned about the speed at which large arrivals are coming, They're instantly just if they if they raise a voice about that, they're instantly xenophobic.

00:14:46.000 They're instantly racist.

00:14:48.000 They're instantly small minded, close minded people. 0.98

00:14:52.000 And it's so unfair.

00:14:53.000 And so people knowing that that's going to that's how they're going to be dealt with.

00:14:58.000 That's the way they'll be responded to.

00:14:59.000 They just keep their heads down and intend and prefer to keep their mouths shut.

00:15:06.000 And it's I find that a terrible calumny that's been that's been inflicted.

00:15:10.000 But it's not just true of Ireland.

00:15:11.000 It's true of all sorts of there's there's no denying that all over the north of England, you know, communities have been radically altered by the demographically radically altered.

00:15:24.000 And people are just discouraged from so much as voicing an opinion about that.

00:15:30.000 without being dismissed as some kind of racist xenophobe.

00:15:35.000 I feel it's part of a direction of travel.

00:15:39.000 It's all about the way in which there's not to be any nuance in discourse.

00:15:43.000 There's not to be people having the time to air multiple coexisting points of view without instantly being shouted down for the first thing that you let out of your mouth.

00:15:56.000 I think a lot of us liked the Long Island of Britain as a phrase.

00:16:00.000 Ian Drummo just said that in the chat.

00:16:02.000 I liked that as well.

00:16:04.000 I wonder if you're familiar with the writing of Martin Goury, and in particular his famous book, The Revolt of the Public, in which he talks about how the availability of information that the communications age has brought about, particularly in the last 10 years, or he notes in 2001, there was as much information published as in all history up to that point, and it's doubled every year since then.

00:16:26.000 That it's such an enormous transformation that it in itself demands a change of all of our systems of governance.

00:16:37.000 I suppose it's kind of obvious, isn't it, that whether it's Congress or Parliament or whatever system of government, if it's a democracy in whatever country you're living in, That is in a way based on a kind of pragmatism.

00:16:52.000 We send a representative to a central point to convey the perspectives of that community that selected him.

00:17:01.000 That in itself, like the horse, was the technology they were using.

00:17:04.000 The building was the technology they were using.

00:17:07.000 Language was the technology they're using.

00:17:10.000 He said, Martin Goury, that now the terms left and right are redundant now, or use establishment versus periphery, has come about because it's a taxonomy-busting technology.

00:17:24.000 In the last few days, Neil, we've seen Elon Musk host Spaces on X, where figures that

00:17:31.000 are complete pariahs like Alex Jones, Andrew Tate, and talking with a candidate for the

00:17:39.000 Republican Party, Vivek Ramaswamy, and the world's richest man, you know, there or thereabouts.

00:17:48.000 Those are all figures that sort of, you know, in the New York Times or on MSNBC or CNN,

00:17:54.000 perhaps with the exception of Musk, just because of this sheer cargo that he wields, are persona

00:18:01.000 non grata.

00:18:03.000 That means now that not only do we have two cultures, beyond two cultures, numerous cultures,

00:18:10.000 and the teleology is that they're moving, the bifurcation has happened, and they're

00:18:13.000 splitting and moving further and further apart.

00:18:16.000 If you can have, you know, 2.3 million people watching that, if you have spaces like Rumble

00:18:21.000 You know, you can have uncensored speech and then, you know, even places like YouTube have been co-opted and are now ultimately sort of legacy media spaces when it comes down to it.

00:18:32.000 Certainly, you know, take the example of the pandemic, the WHO's laws or regulations are applied there in the form of the community guidelines of YouTube.

00:18:41.000 What we're experiencing is the inability of centralized authority to control a population, the inability to control information, and their obvious prognosis that that is going to lead to either disintegration or decentralization.

00:18:56.000 It's going to lead to dissent.

00:18:58.000 It's already happened.

00:18:59.000 Whether it's Napster, the Arab Spring, Brexit, Podemos, Trump.

00:19:05.000 There's a long list of success.

00:19:07.000 The Five Star Movement and Beppe Grillo in Italy.

00:19:09.000 There's a long list of dissenters.

00:19:11.000 And I think what we're experiencing is They are trying to use the leverage of crisis to reassert control and people are resisting it and I think my fear is that crises will continue to escalate until they have the means to impose that control.

00:19:28.000 Do you think therefore, Neil, that we're at a pivotal moment and do you think that it's a battle that can be won by those of us that are interested in free speech and democracy?

00:19:38.000 Very much so.

00:19:39.000 I believe, you know, Christmas is, we're in the season of Advent, you know, the coming, the imminent arrival of.

00:19:48.000 And people, I've heard people more and more than I ever have before using, you know, the word apocalypse seems to be coming into people's conversation quite a lot.

00:19:58.000 And apocalypse is a Greek verb that means to take the cover off, to expose.

00:20:05.000 And I think that, as you're quoting there, this mass access to information has had unintended consequences.

00:20:16.000 I don't know what was the objective, necessarily, or all the objectives, when DARPA put together the fledgling internet back in the 50s and 60s and so on.

00:20:25.000 Maybe they genuinely didn't foresee What would be the consequences of so many people having so much, well, hitherto unfettered access to so much stuff and being and being able to draw their own conclusions?

00:20:39.000 And I think that collectively what has happened, I think it's happening faster and faster.

00:20:44.000 You know, there's a kind of a there's some kind of it's moving quicker and quicker.

00:20:53.000 I do wonder at the extent to which we have lived under an illusion for a long time, even an illusion of democracy, and the reality with which we were presented.

00:21:04.000 It seems to be falling apart as more and more people are able to access and read more and more otherwise esoteric information.

00:21:17.000 You know, the old edifices like left and right and the way in which democracy was portrayed and offered up to us, it's starting to look thinner and thinner, worn out, And I just think there's no doubting that we are at a pivotal point, because whatever you want to call them, the globalists or the cabal, I think are exposed.

00:21:46.000 I think we can see them.

00:21:48.000 I don't know the extent to which they mean to be seen or whether they are simply being revealed for what they are, but the mask has come away and next year I think is going to be a very interesting year going into obviously the US elections and by the end of the year we won't be far away from our own elections in Britain and all of the rest of it and I am Fascinated by the potential of the globalists having to finally take the mask off and say democracy's gone.

00:22:23.000 You're not having democracy anymore.

00:22:25.000 You're going to have authoritarianism.

00:22:27.000 That's just the way it's going to be.

00:22:29.000 It almost feels as if they're going to have to fish or cut bait.

00:22:33.000 I tell you what, sorry to interrupt you, forgive me, but it feels like that is what's happening, because have you noticed how much in American media in particular they are talking about dictatorships and tyrants?

00:22:50.000 We made a joke the other day, it's almost like Shark Week in the United States, but it's Dictator Month.

00:22:54.000 Because they're continually saying, if Trump wins in 2024, he will turn America into a dictatorship.

00:22:59.000 He will exile.

00:23:00.000 He will execute. 0.51

00:23:01.000 He will ban elections going forward.

00:23:03.000 And like you say, I feel that authoritarianism has a different hue than we'd ever anticipated.

00:23:10.000 It's not a progression of the militaristic despotism of the last century.

00:23:16.000 It's, of course, technological dictatorships in the form that is the vision of Bill Gates that we should be fearful of.

00:23:23.000 Not the visions of the military leaders of Europe and Russia in the last century.

00:23:32.000 And I think you're right that 2024 is going to be significant.

00:23:35.000 Guys, if you're watching us on YouTube, we are going to exclusively broadcast now on Rumble.

00:23:41.000 We're going to exclusively stream on Rumble.

00:23:44.000 You'll have to click the link in the description to join me and Neil over there because I'm about to ask him about dictatorship.

00:23:50.000 Is it Trump that's a dictator or is it the current American administration that is trying to create a dictatorship?

00:23:56.000 A dictatorship on behalf of globalism?

00:23:58.000 I'm also going to be asking Neil about what was revealed to us during the coronavirus period.

00:24:03.000 We'll be talking specifically about the AstraZeneca jab being labelled defective, Pfizer being sued by Texas, the lack of authority in the Covid inquiry and new information that that the US government paid the media to promote vaccines.

00:24:19.000 All of this, Neil, just because you said then that access to hitherto esoteric information

00:24:24.000 means that you can't hold together one consensual public sphere. The public sphere keeps

00:24:31.000 seemingly infinitely splitting.

00:24:34.000 I am another thing that has taken shape.

00:24:41.000 Well, I've become aware of that.

00:24:42.000 You know, I'm I'm open about the fact that, you know, I was I was in a state of slumber for who knows how long before I properly started paying attention to all the things I'm paying attention to.

00:24:52.000 But increasingly, it feels that we're being discouraged from being seen in the same space as certain people.

00:25:01.000 Which is something that, it feels like something from another, it's medieval, you know, it's where people were, you know, beyond the pale, people were cast out into outer darkness, into perdition.

00:25:11.000 Do not be seen, or in the communist era, you know, where people, if you were seen in the same room as someone, it was as though you picked up their contagion of inappropriateness, whether you were interacting with them directly or not.

00:25:23.000 And for me, I've always anyway wanted at times, The company of and to talk to people with what might be described as outlandish ideas.

00:25:37.000 You describe that that X space, that Twitter space with what a disparate, unlikely fellowship that was.

00:25:47.000 That lineup that you described.

00:25:49.000 You wouldn't have expected to see them in the same space.

00:25:49.000 Yeah.

00:25:52.000 And there they were!

00:25:54.000 All these people, some of whom would, a lot of people would think, oh God, I can't be seen in a photograph with that person because that might, that might affect my career prospects.

00:26:01.000 Or, you know, it might see me being, you know, debanked or whatever, whatever.

00:26:06.000 That, and that, that inducement to stay away from people has the reverse effect on me.

00:26:12.000 That makes me even more determined.

00:26:14.000 And if I'm being told by the state and the establishment not to be seen with that person, not to talk to that person, that only makes me 10 times more desperate to fight.

00:26:26.000 Why?

00:26:27.000 What is it that you think is going to happen to me if I talk to them, if I listen to them, if I breathe the same air as them?

00:26:33.000 And I think that is part of what you're talking about that's going to fall apart.

00:26:40.000 It didn't hold together for very long, that idea that some people could be exiled, cast into perdition.

00:26:47.000 I think like me, people are thinking, well, if I'm not supposed to talk to him or her, I'm jolly well going to, because clearly the state thinks I might learn something that they would rather I didn't know.

00:26:58.000 Or that's the way it affects my psyche.

00:27:02.000 So many, I think so many things are becoming harder and harder to hold together.

00:27:05.000 And I think that's what's so difficult for so many people, because we are, we are having to re-evaluate everything, re-evaluate everything.

00:27:15.000 An old picture has just ceased to serve us anymore.

00:27:21.000 It's worn through, you know, a bright light's been shone on.

00:27:25.000 It's like one of those old masters where it turns out that there's another painting behind it because the artist reused the same canvas.

00:27:31.000 It's as if too many people can see that there's something else there that might even be much more interesting.

00:27:38.000 And that, I think, in the year ahead and certainly in the short to medium term future, I think the authoritarians or the would-be authoritarians have no other option than to try and censure and silence and label as misinformation and keep people away from information that they don't want them to read, because the knowledge, the resources, The different points of view, the alternative perspectives that people can readily and easily access and share means that that whole edifice just starts to fall away like confetti to reveal something else behind it.

00:28:18.000 Yes, even if you take a contemporary and contentious example like Andrew Tate, you have to genuinely believe that the moral outrage generated by the establishment is, as they say, motivated by his alleged misogyny and indeed the crimes that he is alleged to have committed.

00:28:45.000 Where that begins to break down is in my near certainty that there is no moral authority in the establishment anymore.

00:28:56.000 Indeed, the example of Trump's rise being amplified indictment by indictment is a further indication that even if you put aside your own moral judgment of the whatever figures in question, me, Tate, Trump, Tucker, Rogan, you, whoever they eventually determine they don't like today, you have to say, up until now, what is it about their modality that has led you to believe that they care about feminism, that they care about public health, even without tying it to a condemned or exiled individual?

00:29:36.000 At the advent of the coronavirus pandemic.

00:29:38.000 It was my own, um, now deeply inculcated cynicism, scepticism and fear of the establishment that guided me, put into a simple, uh, understanding or, um, sort of, what do I want to say, framing like this.

00:29:55.000 Hold on a minute.

00:29:56.000 If this is all about the sanctity of life, like we've got to be locked down in our homes, take these medications, social distance, because of the sanctity of life, Is this idea that life is sacred playing out generally across our culture?

00:30:14.000 Let's look at it in terms of economics and finance and social regulation and poverty and our moral standards.

00:30:22.000 Just take the issue of homelessness.

00:30:24.000 If life is sacred, what would be one's attitude to vagrancy?

00:30:31.000 What would be one's attitude to a whole host of subjects?

00:30:34.000 So, like you said, you get a kind of intuitive and visceral sense of a kind of glitch that you're being given one set of data and another set of data is deeply felt.

00:30:47.000 Hang on, these people don't care about me.

00:30:49.000 And then time passes.

00:30:51.000 And you learn, ah, the AstraZeneca jab, they're suing them.

00:30:53.000 Pfizer's getting sued.

00:30:54.000 The lockdowns were based on modelling, not empirical science.

00:30:58.000 Pfizer never clinically trialled for transmission.

00:31:01.000 They granted indemnity at the beginning.

00:31:03.000 They're not reporting accurately on adverse events.

00:31:07.000 They're reporting people have died of COVID when they died.

00:31:10.000 They're not talking about sudden death.

00:31:12.000 They're not talking about my... Like, eventually, your one's intuition is verified.

00:31:17.000 They don't care about the sanctity of life.

00:31:19.000 They care about control.

00:31:20.000 Let's go back and look at Trump again.

00:31:21.000 Let's go back and look at Tate again.

00:31:23.000 Let's go back and look at me again.

00:31:24.000 Aha! 0.94

00:31:25.000 Control.

00:31:26.000 Are any of these figures virulently anti-establishment in some way?

00:31:30.000 Now, like, you know, people who watch our channel a lot, No, I enjoy Donald Trump's rhetoric and I enjoy his anti-establishment positions, but I don't think that without significant systemic change and decentralization and I would say the dissolution of several significant deep state agencies that America can meaningfully change.

00:31:51.000 But I recognize now that these operations care about control, not about the sanctity of life.

00:31:58.000 I'm sorry that I saw you wanted to come in Neil, I'm sorry I kept talking.

00:32:00.000 Yes.

00:32:01.000 No, it's... I don't believe that there's any... The people that have the temerity to pontificate and to lecture to us about, you know, the sanctity of life, they are in no moral position so to do.

00:32:16.000 As you pointed out there, it's hollow.

00:32:20.000 The people that we are having to listen to are sock puppet hollow.

00:32:24.000 There's nothing there.

00:32:26.000 They don't emanate any credible, any believable belief in anything.

00:32:33.000 You know, they just have all of the appearance and all of the sound of people who are just working from today's, from the contents of today's inbox, from whatever script they're working to.

00:32:45.000 None of it's coming from a place of belief.

00:32:48.000 And, of course, what happened during the course of the pandemic?

00:32:53.000 It's now apparent that there was plenty of advice to the authority figures who laid down the diktats that locking people in their homes was going to be catastrophic.

00:33:03.000 I mean, like, you needed the wisdom of Solomon to see that anyway.

00:33:06.000 But there was plenty of strident advice being given behind the scenes saying, don't do this.

00:33:13.000 You don't lock people down like this.

00:33:15.000 Don't separate families.

00:33:16.000 Don't keep children out of school.

00:33:18.000 Don't do those things.

00:33:18.000 Don't do those.

00:33:19.000 Because all of the constant, well, and so it came to pass.

00:33:24.000 That the consequences have been desperate.

00:33:26.000 Likewise, there was plenty of information out there in advance that they knew that whatever, that the injectables hadn't been tested to see if they would stop transmission person to person.

00:33:36.000 There was plenty of suggestion that there were going to be adverse side effects and all of the rest of it.

00:33:41.000 And the things were rolled out anyway.

00:33:43.000 So with three years worth of hindsight or two years worth of hindsight, it's plain that there was no real heartfelt concern for people.

00:33:50.000 And I mean, I feel so, so desperate at the moment about what's happening in Israel, Palestine, Gaza.

00:34:00.000 The fact that whatever horror unfolded on the 7th of October, it then means that other babies have to die, not just by the hundreds, but by the thousands.

00:34:16.000 I can't countenance that.

00:34:18.000 I certainly can't condone it.

00:34:21.000 Anything where someone says other people's babies have to die because... I don't feel ready to hear the second half of that equation.

00:34:32.000 If it involves killing kids, I just can't accept it.

00:34:37.000 You can't do that. 0.96

00:34:39.000 I don't care.

00:34:40.000 Don't take me any further into that.

00:34:41.000 If that is what it means, the deaths of thousands, and that we're coming into the time of Christmas, where we're very focused on our kids and our family.

00:34:52.000 And we're supposed to, you know, the dissonance of that, that we celebrate our own children and our own families while simultaneously knowing what's happening to thousands upon thousands of people in Gaza.

00:35:04.000 I find it makes it makes me feel physically ill.

00:35:09.000 The thought of it and that there is an there's an anti-human agenda.

00:35:14.000 Elon Musk in that space that you talked about, you know, he talked about how he wants to see more people born, you know, that he is pro procreation, that he thinks that the populations of the world are in steep decline and that depopulation, not overpopulation, is going to be the existential crisis that we'll face in the decades and centuries ahead if we don't get out of this tailspin.

00:35:37.000 And I don't feel that the authority figures have any love of life, that they have any love of our species at all, such that I think that so much of what is being done and will be done in the future will come from that place of thinking, people aren't worth it anyway.

00:35:57.000 We have voided God from the heart of our systems.

00:36:01.000 I think that we coasted on materialism and rationalism undergirded by clear progress in areas such as technology and medicine.

00:36:11.000 We forgot perhaps that we had neglected and allowed to atrophy that aspect of the spirit that makes all other progress notable, valuable and worthwhile anyway.

00:36:24.000 What you said before about October the 7th and subsequent action is, I suppose, what it would sound like if you had Irrefutable principles and values at the core of your system.

00:36:41.000 Now of course I think we know what the arguments are that are continually made by people advocating for Israel's right to defend herself and those kind of arguments I'm sure have a great deal of validity if you're personally affected or ideologically or religiously affected.

00:37:00.000 And I've tried throughout this to maintain a position where I can continue to be useful and I try to simultaneously hold in my mind the people that have been affected from a variety of perspectives when it comes to that issue and I try my best with all issues but what is...

00:37:17.000 Irrefutable is that if we don't have anywhere in our institutions the kind of simple principles like actually the sanctity of human life, like the reason that we have to preserve our society is because we are, for us, the killing of children is unconscionable.

00:37:36.000 If that, I suppose, if we don't have that within the values that we're purporting to protect or espouse then In a sense, all that's left, and I think we've touched on this before, is a kind of escalating tribalism and, you know, let the devil take the hindmost, because there is no... And so the reason that I try on this channel to continually talk about, you know, like, to talk about the presence of God, like, there is a highest principle.

00:38:04.000 There are values that are transcendent.

00:38:06.000 There are things that are worth sacrificing our life for.

00:38:09.000 There are things that are worth sacrificing revenge for.

00:38:12.000 And it can't be enough to say that, well, if you found yourself in this position, then you would.

00:38:17.000 You know, if there was an intruder in your home, if you were similarly aggrieved, I sense that for our culture, and in far less incendiary issues than the conflict in the Middle East, we're being invited to pursue our lowest values.

00:38:31.000 We're being invited to engage with our lower selves.

00:38:35.000 As an addict in recovery, I cannot help but note how often the media and professions connected to commerce, marketing, advertising, continue to solicit Fear, desire, objectification of the body, or many sacred aspects of life, humor, sexuality, continually are objectified and mobilized in order to, in a sense, desacralize us and promote our animal nature.

00:39:06.000 Both fear and desire, I would say, being almost atavistic aspects of our our pre-civilized or pre-evolved or pre-awakened nature.

00:39:17.000 We need all of that.

00:39:24.000 We've had whatever it is, 300, 400 years of science, and like a new shiny bobble, our species has been transfixed by science.

00:39:34.000 All it can do, and I'm not denigrating that or running it down for a moment, it's astonishing what science and then technology have delivered unto us in the recent centuries.

00:39:44.000 But it has also provided an incomplete picture, you know, the thirst that from the soul doth rise, doth ask a drink divine and all that.

00:39:54.000 There are other questions which science cannot and does not address itself to, and therefore there are answers that science will not give us.

00:40:04.000 And with the dark side of great works like Darwin's Origin of Species was that once and for all, the people of the West were invited to think that, well, we're nothing special.

00:40:18.000 We're not, you know, we're not the work of a creator god.

00:40:22.000 We're part of a mindless process of evolution and we've just kind of happened because some of our ancestors had characteristics that gave them an advantage in an ecological niche and so on and so on.

00:40:37.000 And the dark travelling companion of that undermining of that kind of sanctifying of the human species was eugenics and all that that led to, you know, if humans are nothing but other animals, the accidents of evolution, the accidents of a process, then might we not experiment on them the same way we experiment on any other animals? 0.79

00:40:59.000 So science Takes as well as gives, unless and until people are simultaneously invited to eat from another menu at the same time, you know, to draw upon other flavours.

00:41:16.000 Which are different and separate from what science and technology delivers, but we still need them.

00:41:21.000 You know, man cannot live by bread alone, as it says in Deuteronomy.

00:41:25.000 You know, we need more.

00:41:27.000 And my experience over the last two or three years is I've been receiving thousands of letters.

00:41:33.000 People started sending letters to me without an address on them.

00:41:37.000 People send letters to, you know, the hairy guy in Stirling and they come to me, and so on and so on.

00:41:45.000 And the envelopes are funny, but inside the content is heartfelt and sometimes, many times, has brought me to tears.

00:41:54.000 And a lot of it's about faith.

00:41:57.000 At least three quarters of the people writing to me have declared themselves as being people of faith, that it was the faith that enabled them to, say, resist the vaccine products, enabled them to stand up to employers that were threatening them with this, that and the other.

00:42:12.000 They quote scripture to me.

00:42:14.000 They talk about the battle between light and dark, good and evil.

00:42:18.000 and the sheer weight of the car.

00:42:20.000 you you

00:43:34.000 you to go and record some

00:43:59.000 other content and okay yes and having those conversations I had muted almost and asked for it and we will function far more happily if that other aspect of our natural thinking, if room is made for it once more.

00:44:25.000 Neil, it's so beautiful talking to you, and I could talk to you for hours that we're threatening them with this, that and the other.

00:44:32.000 They quote scripture to me.

00:44:34.000 They talk about the battle between light and dark, good and evil.

00:44:38.000 And the sheer weight of it, the deluge of that kind of thinking from so many people from all over the world has meant that I have kind of renewed my comfort in having those conversations.

00:44:52.000 I had muted almost a conversation that I instinctively wanted to have.

00:44:59.000 And to be a part of, and I know that you talk on here about spirituality in all its many forms, everything that that means, and I feel the need of that.

00:45:11.000 And I think if you don't have that, if that component of life is not welcomed into the daily consciousness, then we are the less.

00:45:22.000 We are made the less for it, and we will function far more happily if that other aspect of our natural thinking is, if room is made for it once more.

00:45:37.000 Neil, it's so beautiful talking to you, and I could talk to you for another couple of hours if I wanted to make people on my team have a mental breakdown, because we've got to go and record some other content immediately.

00:45:47.000 Loads of you joining us on lockdown, I'm sorry I didn't get to pass on your questions, I really am, but I'm just, There's so many good ones from Judy Denmark, Kay Cotswold, Seakeasy, Jobstog, Viv & Carlo, Sunpatch, Patriots.

00:45:59.000 So many good questions, but our day got a little bit out of control.

00:46:02.000 I do apologize.

00:46:03.000 Neil, I do stay on because I've got something to ask you, but that was beautiful as always.

00:46:08.000 Thank you so much for bringing both poetry, reflection, gentleness, kindness to the political to a political conversation that sometimes can feel

00:46:18.000 extremely bombastic and I think that from bombast we won't get resolution, we won't get progress, we won't

00:46:25.000 get the kind of synthesis that's required for us to move forward.

00:46:29.000 Thank you for being a gentle contributor to a complex debate, Neil, and thank you for coming on Stay Free today.

00:46:34.000 Thank you for making space for me.

00:46:37.000 me I look forward to talking to you again Russell.

00:46:55.000 Is this the world you want to live in?

00:46:57.000 going to be looking at the extraordinary claim that your government spent money to ensure

00:47:02.000 that the legacy media promoted Covid-19 vaccines. This is astonishing. You have Pfizer funding,

00:47:09.000 I think, 75% of all cable news and now you have the government pushing to promote vaccines.

00:47:16.000 Is this democracy? Is this the world you want to live in?

00:47:19.000 Is this a world that you can afford to remain slumbering in for a single second further? Here's

00:47:25.000 the news.

00:47:25.000 No, here's the effing news.

00:47:27.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.

00:47:29.000 Good news. 0.99

00:47:30.000 No, here's the fucking news. 0.99

00:47:32.000 You already know how much money the legacy media receives from Big Pharma, don't you? 0.99

00:47:39.000 Well, how would you feel if you found out that the federal government also paid the media to promote vaccines during the pandemic?

00:47:46.000 Well, I feel like something very suspicious was going on.

00:47:48.000 Well, get ready!

00:47:51.000 We know now that authoritarianism is on the rise.

00:47:53.000 It's not in the form of militant dictatorships, but technological dictatorships, always seemingly in order to advance your safety and your convenience.

00:48:01.000 As in today's story, the federal government paid media organizations to promote vaccines during the pandemic.

00:48:06.000 It's as simple as that.

00:48:08.000 During the time where people that were hesitant, suspicious about new, untrialled medications were shamed and told that they shouldn't be allowed admission into hospitals amidst the plethora, almost to numerous, to count of untruths around whether or not they prevented transmissions or even were trialled, where it came from, whether or not certain information was repressed or suppressed, whether young people needed to take it, how effective booster shots were, whether or not deaths were being recorded properly, whether or not adverse injuries, all of that stuff.

00:48:35.000 Additionally, your government, that means your money, because remember, your government's money is your money.

00:48:40.000 They don't have any independent money and when they get it, they invest it pretty quickly in the stock market, let me tell you.

00:48:45.000 Curiously, into big pharma companies.

00:48:47.000 They were spending taxpayer dollars promoting vaccines through the media.

00:48:51.000 This is an extraordinary story and revelation.

00:48:53.000 It's not been widely reported.

00:48:55.000 I wonder why that would be.

00:48:57.000 Perhaps because it shows that the government and the legacy media are cooperating to bring about conditions where ordinary people have limited access to information and are exposed to information that is subsequently proven to not be true.

00:49:07.000 Let's get into this story.

00:49:08.000 Remember, we stream every day at these times.

00:49:11.000 We'd love you to join us there because this movement needs to move fast.

00:49:15.000 So this first commercial was paid for by the Department of Health and Human Services.

00:49:19.000 Or another way of saying that is you, you paid for this.

00:49:21.000 Louise and Roberta think they got COVID at dance class.

00:49:25.000 Mike thinks he got it at his family reunion.

00:49:28.000 Nancy blames the carpool. 1.00

00:49:31.000 One thing they have in common?

00:49:33.000 Their natural immunity is worn off.

00:49:35.000 Natural immunity is worn off.

00:49:37.000 Natural immunity will do that to you.

00:49:39.000 Just wears off.

00:49:40.000 Unlike this vaccine that we're paying for, you're paying for, and this advert that we're paying for, you're paying for, it never wears off.

00:49:46.000 It's 98% effective.

00:49:48.000 Sorry.

00:49:49.000 Look, don't ask questions about percentiles.

00:49:51.000 What do you want, us to start passing audits like the Pentagon?

00:49:53.000 The Pentagon never pass audits.

00:49:55.000 And they're not involved in the funding.

00:49:56.000 But they can restore their protection with an updated vaccine because getting COVID again means risking long COVID or even hospitalisation.

00:49:56.000 Oh.

00:50:05.000 Let me know in the comments if you can think of any other situations that might lead to hospitalisation or worse.

00:50:10.000 Get your updated vaccine because COVID can be anywhere.

00:50:17.000 We can do this.

00:50:18.000 That's their slogan.

00:50:19.000 That, at least, I agree with.

00:50:20.000 We can do this.

00:50:21.000 We can do whatever the hell we want.

00:50:22.000 And you'll pay for it.

00:50:23.000 What an extraordinary world.

00:50:25.000 What an extraordinary story.

00:50:26.000 Let's look at the details now and see if it can help us adapt our worldview, awaken, and oppose the kind of corruption that seems all too present continually.

00:50:35.000 Mainstream media's nearly monolithic coverage of mRNA vaccines and other COVID measures can be at least partially explained by a clear financial interest.

00:50:43.000 Yes, Recently, a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the conservative media company, The Blaze, found a number of major media outlets were paid to promote the Covid vaccine.

00:50:55.000 Such venues included, and get ready for a list of the usual suspects, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, NBC, CNN, Fox News and several others.

00:51:04.000 Oh! 0.60

00:51:05.000 The whole of the legacy media.

00:51:07.000 The Blaze's report received little coverage, even in conservative media, perhaps because some of those outlets were also paid by HHS, the Department of Health and Human Services, ideologically predisposed to criticize government-fueled narratives on the pandemic.

00:51:21.000 As the Blaze reports, hundreds of news organizations were paid by the federal government to advertise for the vaccine as part of a comprehensive media campaign.

00:51:28.000 This is a media campaign.

00:51:30.000 It's comprehensive.

00:51:31.000 Well, I can't comprehend it.

00:51:32.000 It seems corrupt and incomprehensible.

00:51:35.000 According to the documents the blaze obtained from the Department of Health and Human Services, they have to use Freedom of Information Act rights and legislation to get it.

00:51:43.000 This information is not freely available.

00:51:44.000 You have to go...

00:51:45.000 Give us the information.

00:51:46.000 Come on, give it his freedom.

00:51:47.000 You don't need this information.

00:51:49.000 Can't we tell you in 75 years when you're all dead?

00:51:51.000 The Biden administration purchased ads on TV, radio, in print and on social media to build vaccine confidence, timing this effort with the increasing availability of the vaccines.

00:52:02.000 Vaccine confidence should be related to vaccine efficacy and transparency.

00:52:06.000 Wouldn't you agree that your confidence in any government project ought to be based on transparency, authenticity, integrity?

00:52:13.000 Or do you just want to be told stuff, denied access to all of the information, and shamed if you don't participate?

00:52:19.000 The latter would be more effective and work more quickly.

00:52:22.000 Well, just do that then.

00:52:23.000 During the vaccine rollout, the Biden administration made a number of efforts to bolster vaccination rates.

00:52:27.000 They certainly did.

00:52:29.000 My God, do you remember all the dancing about, the musicals, the singing, the shaming?

00:52:33.000 It was extraordinary.

00:52:34.000 You've probably forgotten it's happened because you're traumatised and you've parked it somewhere.

00:52:37.000 But believe me, it happened.

00:52:39.000 The US Department of Health and Human Services COVID-19 public education campaign states they employed both paid advertising and media interviews, presentations, radio, TV tours and other public events to educate people about the importance of vaccination.

00:52:53.000 The word educate there.

00:52:55.000 I'm just going to educate you about the importance of vaccinations.

00:52:58.000 And now we're going to educate you about the importance of prison.

00:53:02.000 Here is the legacy media literally presenting information as if it was news when in fact it was propaganda.

00:53:08.000 If by propaganda you You mean information that was paid for by the state and was not revealed to be state-sponsored information in order to exert mind control?

00:53:19.000 Is that a good definition?

00:53:20.000 Well, I don't know if this is a good definition.

00:53:21.000 Column.

00:53:22.000 Mocking anti-vaxxers.

00:53:23.000 Covid deaths is ghoulish, yes, but maybe necessary?

00:53:27.000 That was it.

00:53:28.000 They went in hard.

00:53:29.000 Yes, it's ghoulish.

00:53:30.000 Once you acknowledge something's ghoulish, you can't continue with it.

00:53:33.000 It is ghoulish, isn't it?

00:53:35.000 Yes, sir, but necessary.

00:53:37.000 It's something that a ghoul would do.

00:53:37.000 Why?

00:53:40.000 That's the risen dead.

00:53:41.000 We've got to deal with the actual dead.

00:53:43.000 Some of whom died very suddenly for some reason.

00:53:45.000 The HHS website contains public access to all vaccine campaign advertisements for media outlets and beyond.

00:53:51.000 One past advertisement promotes COVID vaccination in children featuring a montage of selected medical doctors stating in unison, we can all agree on this.

00:53:59.000 You can trust the COVID vaccine for yourself or your kids or your grandkids.

00:54:03.000 I mean it from the heart.

00:54:05.000 Yeah, We're gonna need a rewrite on that because, well, it's not necessary for kids, the grandparents might not be in a position to say this, and the heart is in particular jeopardy.

00:54:17.000 Could we say we mean it from the gut?

00:54:18.000 In another ad directed to parents, That's what we want you to know.

00:54:21.000 Well, God, jeez, let me know in the chat.

00:54:23.000 What would you rather have at this point?

00:54:24.000 vaccines are safe and effective. That's what we want you to know. My grandkids are vaccinated.

00:54:29.000 What's not safe is getting COVID. Well, God, geez, let me know in the chat. What would

00:54:33.000 you rather have at this point, COVID or a vaccination?

00:54:37.000 Is it ethical for the government to dubiously claim COVID vaccines are uniformly beneficial for kids and contracting COVID is far less safe than getting your child double vaccinated?

00:54:46.000 No such randomised clinical evidence exists suggesting the benefits of the COVID vaccine outweigh the harms in young cohorts with a nearly zero risk of serious outcomes.

00:54:56.000 Moreover, is it ethical for either party for the federal government to advertise such medical misinformation on platforms allegedly committed to investigating the truth and holding the powerful accountable?

00:55:06.000 The answer is no, it isn't.

00:55:07.000 Particularly not during that misinformation, malinformation, tirade, that time of censorship of true information, the closing down of debate.

00:55:14.000 This is astonishing that this is happening.

00:55:16.000 Isn't it?

00:55:17.000 A new government ad on the HHS website now promotes the updated COVID vaccine.

00:55:22.000 It falsely claims the new booster shot prevents long COVID and hospitalisation when the only available evidence from Pfizer and Moderna are rat studies and a 50-person trial with an unexplained 2% rate of serious adverse events.

00:55:36.000 They've got some rats and 50 people.

00:55:38.000 You know if you see like a poll on the news where it says 50% say the Joe Biden. 0.62

00:55:42.000 You look at the bottom, it's like 1500 people.

00:55:43.000 You think that's not enough to take seriously in the country of 200 million.

00:55:47.000 50 people and some rats.

00:55:48.000 Okay, we're gonna need 50 people.

00:55:50.000 You'll do.

00:55:51.000 And some rats.

00:55:52.000 Sir, 2% of these rats and people are inexplicably dead. 0.97

00:55:56.000 Well, nevertheless, it's a damn fine product. 0.96

00:55:58.000 I'm not recommending for my kids and grandkids. 0.97

00:56:00.000 That's from the heart.

00:56:02.000 Sorry, the heart.

00:56:03.000 Oh God, I'm not feeling too good.

00:56:03.000 Wait, give me.

00:56:05.000 Get me another rat! 1.00

00:56:06.000 Rather than critically covering such propagandistic attempts to promote a longitudinally ineffective therapeutic with a 1 in 800 serious adverse event rate, major media outlets allowed the federal government to freely spread its misinformation on their platform.

00:56:19.000 We can't continue to bring you this revelatory content without your consciousness and your continuing awakening.

00:56:25.000 About these guys.

00:56:26.000 A little gang that we know as Sticker Mule.

00:56:29.000 Sticker Mule provides satisfaction, yes in the form of stickers and also in the form of the unleashing of the stickers themselves.

00:56:35.000 We've teamed up with them again to create 10,000 of these limited edition packs.

00:56:40.000 There are six Stunning designs.

00:56:42.000 Look, you might get the crow.

00:56:44.000 You might get this one that's sort of kind of 80s.

00:56:47.000 I love these things.

00:56:48.000 They're all made with Sticker Mule's magic touch.

00:56:50.000 There are 10,000 of them.

00:56:51.000 That's right, 10,000 ready to deliver to your home absolutely free.

00:56:54.000 How do I do this?

00:56:55.000 Do I have to go in some sort of quest?

00:56:56.000 Do I have to overcome my inner demons?

00:56:58.000 Do I have to become awakened and enlightened?

00:57:00.000 All of those things are true.

00:57:01.000 You do have to do them.

00:57:02.000 But to get these stickers, just go to Stickermule.com forward slash Russell and fill in the form.

00:57:06.000 The stickers will come.

00:57:07.000 Let me know in the chat when you've got your stickers.

00:57:09.000 Let me know where you're going to stick them.

00:57:10.000 Stickermule.com forward slash Russell.

00:57:12.000 Fill out the form.

00:57:13.000 Come on, let's get back into this content.

00:57:14.000 The New York Times reporting on vaccine induced myocarditis, for example, downplayed the side effects at every site and compared it to misleadingly higher rates of covid induced myocarditis.

00:57:24.000 A study finds that myocarditis is more common after covid than vaccination.

00:57:29.000 Second vaccine doses raise the risk of myocarditis in young men, but the condition remains very rare.

00:57:35.000 Researchers find a higher than expected risk of myocarditis in young men after full vaccination.

00:57:40.000 Do you remember that period where we felt like, are they saying that COVID causes side effects that are caused by the vaccine?

00:57:46.000 Do you remember that bit of the pandemic cycle?

00:57:48.000 For over two years, the media and government officials have been peddling dangerous misinformation.

00:57:53.000 For very sin, they accuse the conspiracy web of committing about COVID-19 posing a higher risk to young people than the vaccine.

00:58:00.000 Instead of examining age, gender and health stratified risk benefit ratios, they elementarily look at aggregate data and cherry pick seemingly beneficial outcomes to justify their everyone should get vaccinated campaign.

00:58:12.000 A few of the umpteen examples.

00:58:15.000 CNBC.

00:58:16.000 Myocarditis risk higher after COVID infection than Pfizer or Moderna vaccination, CDC finds.

00:58:22.000 Reuters.

00:58:23.000 Higher risk of heart complications from COVID-19 than vaccine study.

00:58:26.000 CNN.

00:58:27.000 Pediatric cardiologists explain myocarditis and why your teen should still get a COVID-19 vaccine.

00:58:33.000 Every time I think we've reached a new depth of reporting and propaganda and misinformation in this issue, some more information comes out and I sincerely believe that's why independent media is being censored because they can't keep up with the rate of revelation anymore.

00:58:53.000 Even though we all have this collective amnesia, which is probably a side effect, and aren't willing to really countenance what's happened in the last three years because it's sort of almost too terrible to take on board.

00:59:03.000 One of the most discrediting media assault campaigns grew in opposition to Joe Rogan's claim in a June 2021 podcast that healthy 21 year olds didn't need the vaccine.

00:59:12.000 Over two years later, Rogan's judgment has been vindicated, as it was at the time, given the 0.003% mortality risk among 20-year-olds and unusually high rates of myocardial and menstrual-related vaccine adverse events.

00:59:27.000 However, the mainstream media ecosystem conducted a fierce reputational decapitation in response to Rogan's impermissible dissent from the CDC and Pfizer edicts.

00:59:37.000 Let's for a moment just hold in our minds the reality that the government paid the legacy media to report favourable information, they suppressed information that was true but not favourable, and they smeared and attacked dissenters for telling the truth.

00:59:51.000 Is there anything they won't do?

00:59:53.000 Let me know in the chat and the comments.

00:59:54.000 Let me know if you think that it's possible that even I have been subject to these kind of attacks because of the reporting that we have done on this channel, because we have connected to an independent audience, because we have participated in helping to construct a narrative that's given people the ability to at least choose whether or not they want to be obedient and compliant or a little more circumspect when it comes to their own bodily autonomy.

01:00:17.000 Think too about Novak Djokovic, how he was continually vilified and attacked and harangued.

01:00:22.000 The people said that it was about public opinion.

01:00:23.000 It's not public opinion, it's media opinion.

01:00:26.000 And we now know that the media is paid for by Pfizer, is paid for by the government, and it's about controlling the public sphere.

01:00:32.000 Not safety.

01:00:33.000 Not health.

01:00:34.000 Not wellness.

01:00:35.000 They're promoting information that is dangerous.

01:00:38.000 They are censoring information that is sensible.

01:00:41.000 What is going on?

01:00:42.000 What's just happened in the last three years?

01:00:44.000 It's almost too big for me to comprehend.

01:00:45.000 Like the perhaps apocryphal galleons sighted by the native people of what is now Central and Latin America.

01:00:53.000 They see the ships on the horizon.

01:00:54.000 It's too much.

01:00:55.000 is too much to take on board.

01:01:09.000 Even if what we're talking about, even if what it should have been is, look, we think these medications might be useful for this part of the population, you should probably be careful if you're part of this.

01:01:16.000 It's extraordinary what's taken place.

01:01:18.000 It's extraordinary.

01:01:19.000 And I don't think that this mentality has been purged.

01:01:22.000 I don't think we could by any means say, oh, that'll never happen again, because there's been no reckoning.

01:01:26.000 There's been no acknowledgement of culpability.

01:01:28.000 No one said, sorry about all of that.

01:01:30.000 Joe Rogan was correct. 0.91

01:01:30.000 That was ridiculous. 0.91

01:01:32.000 Jay Bhattacharya was correct. 0.90

01:01:33.000 All those people were correct.

01:01:35.000 We're now just going to get on with the business of holding muted inquiries and having little lawsuits here and there that will prevent the true story getting out.

01:01:43.000 Meanwhile, a whole raft of censorship laws and smear campaigns have been launched against dissenters across the world.

01:01:48.000 Is this a coincidence?

01:01:49.000 Let me know in the chat.

01:01:50.000 Here's an example of one of the headlines from the time that Joe Rogan was attacked.

01:01:53.000 And here are some others.

01:01:54.000 Joe Rogan is using his wildly popular podcast to question vaccines.

01:01:54.000 The Washington Post.

01:01:58.000 Experts are fighting back.

01:01:59.000 Do you remember there was that petition, apparently from 300 doctors, and then they looked into that and those people weren't even doctors.

01:02:03.000 It's crazy. 0.98

01:02:04.000 Joe Rogan's show may be dumb, but is it actually deadly? 0.99

01:02:04.000 The Atlantic. 0.99

01:02:07.000 Oh my God, they were telling the truth.

01:02:08.000 This is propaganda.

01:02:09.000 This is coordinated.

01:02:10.000 How does this happen to people?

01:02:12.000 Today, Dr. Fauci says Joe Rogan is incorrect to tell young people not to get vaccinated.

01:02:16.000 I think Fauci was incorrect to go round to various government agencies disparaging the lab leak theory when it increasingly seems like that's exactly how this whole process began and they indeed participated in the funding of that very lab.

01:02:27.000 This is astonishing.

01:02:28.000 NBC.

01:02:29.000 Joe Rogan's Covid vaccine misinfo matters.

01:02:32.000 This is important actually.

01:02:33.000 This is why we've all got to really care about this.

01:02:34.000 Well they failed, didn't they?

01:02:36.000 But believe me, that mentality has not gone away.

01:02:38.000 If you are a dissenting voice, you will be attacked.

01:02:41.000 If you're an individual communicating online, you'll likely be censored.

01:02:44.000 Let us know in the chat if you've had your free speech impaired.

01:02:46.000 And if you're a public figure, the attacks could be unprecedented, immersive, coordinated, and terrifying.

01:02:52.000 The United States wasn't alone in spending large sums of taxpayer dollars to promote its agenda.

01:02:57.000 The Trudeau government invested over $600,000 in hiring social media influencers to advance federal directives, including the push for Canadians to get vaccinated and boosted.

01:03:05.000 Here's a headline.

01:03:06.000 Fed spent more than $600,000 hiring influencers in 2021.

01:03:09.000 As CTV reports, Health Canada spent the most on hiring influencers to promote government information.

01:03:16.000 $130,600 was spent towards an influencer campaign in support of the COVID-19 vaccination marketing and advertising campaign.

01:03:22.000 None of this is to mention Pfizer's vaccine campaigns, paying celebrities to rhapsodise about marvelously safe and effective mRNA inoculation.

01:03:30.000 Travis Kelsey, a professional football player watched and revered by many young American men in particular, promoted getting the updated booster shot and flu vaccine in the same visit.

01:03:39.000 Here's a story about that.

01:03:41.000 The Washington Post, NBC and the New York Times should have held the Biden administration's feet to the fire for

01:03:46.000 promoting experimental vaccines in all Americans, irrespective of risk and continued revelations regarding

01:03:52.000 concerning side effects.

01:03:53.000 They miserably failed to do so.

01:03:55.000 The last standing bulwark against government propaganda and censorship is crumbling before our eyes, losing relevance

01:04:02.000 Perhaps a solution for media institutions to earn back credibility is to critically cover federal agencies misinforming the public rather than take funds to promote their agendas.

01:04:02.000 by the month.

01:04:11.000 We have no reliable legacy, state or corporate media anymore.

01:04:16.000 The only media that will question the type of narratives that benefit the establishment elite are independent media outlets.

01:04:24.000 And I can tell you from personal experience, you will eventually be subject to attacks.

01:04:28.000 They will find something, metastasize it, alter it.

01:04:31.000 Amplify it.

01:04:32.000 Exaggerate it.

01:04:33.000 Do coordinated campaigns to present information in the least favourable light.

01:04:37.000 Exaggerate in lying.

01:04:38.000 Combining.

01:04:39.000 They'll use any technique they can to attack and destroy.

01:04:42.000 This is a time that is, as this article says, unprecedented.

01:04:46.000 It used to be the function of the media to hold the powerful to account.

01:04:50.000 Now they work in absolute integration with one another.

01:04:53.000 With new legislation being passed around the world to censor true information, to shut down hate speech, To grant the police in Ireland the ability to invade your home.

01:05:02.000 To shut down speech in the UK, Canada, coming soon to the USA, across the EU.

01:05:07.000 It is vital that a resistance movement form.

01:05:11.000 That we individually and collectively find ways to overcome our cynicism and scepticism about culturally different groups and bind together against centralised authority.

01:05:21.000 We know it by these signs.

01:05:23.000 Do they try to shut down dissent?

01:05:24.000 Do they smear?

01:05:25.000 Do they want to censor?

01:05:26.000 Do they want to control?

01:05:28.000 Are they always promoting regulation that grants them the ability to shut down your freedom while never really affecting the ability of the globalist corporatist establishment to maraud around the planet and profiteering under the auspices of safety and security usually veiled by the edicts of The WHO?

01:05:46.000 Look at their treaty coming soon that will mean that their laws will apply in your nation.

01:05:50.000 This is exacerbating fast.

01:05:52.000 I think it is an important time in world history and I think every single one of us needs to be actively engaged in opposing these measures wherever we can.

01:06:00.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.

01:06:00.000 But that's just what I think.

01:06:01.000 See you in a second.

01:06:10.000 Thanks for being a member of our community.

01:06:12.000 Remember, you can click the red button to join a conversation that's elegant and elevated that I know you will love.

01:06:17.000 On the show tomorrow, Norman Finkelstein will be talking about Israel and Palestine and he has some strong views.

01:06:24.000 I'm sure many of you will be aware of them.

01:06:27.000 Join us there, get involved in the chat and have your say in the wild and free Rumble Chat or the rather more gentle, supportive, community-oriented Locals Community.

01:06:38.000 Become an Awakened Wonder there by pressing the red button where you'll get early access to interviews.

01:06:43.000 You can join them live and ask questions of our guests where possible.

01:06:46.000 As well as talking about solutions that we will pursue together.

01:06:50.000 It helps us to grow.

01:06:51.000 Why not make someone you love an awakened wonder this Christmas?

01:06:54.000 Like African Child 024. 0.88

01:06:56.000 I see you there, African Child.

01:06:58.000 E-boy 17, Loomy Loomy, Raven Telematcha, Desana 15.

01:07:03.000 All recipients of a wonderful awakening together.

01:07:06.000 Thanks for being part of our community.

01:07:08.000 Thanks for staying awake.

01:07:09.000 Thank you for being discerning.

01:07:11.000 Thank you for being a firewalker.

01:07:12.000 Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.

01:07:15.000 Until then.

Stay Free - Russel Brand - December 14, 2023

Media ATTACKS Musk, Alex Jones, Tate & Vivek On X Spaces! - Stay Free #267

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript