Stay Free - Russel Brand - February 13, 2023


More Balloons or UFOs? Is It All A Distraction?! - #079 - Stay Free With Russell Brand


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per Minute

184.12518

Word Count

12,453

Sentence Count

785

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

Russell Brand is joined by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh to discuss the Nord Stream Pipeline conspiracy theory and whether or not the White House has a hand in it. Plus, we meet political organiser James Schneider, whose sworn intention is to disrupt the establishment and create new democratic models and methods to challenge centralised power. Stay tuned to the end of the show for a special interview with a man who claims to have a button that says It was America that blew that up . Allegedly! As Jocko Willink on this show said, it will be his first interview, and it s coming up on the show. Stay tuned for an interview with the man who may or may not have a key piece of evidence to back up his claims. Stay free, and spread the word to your friends about what's going on around the world and in your world. Stay free! - The Dark Side Of - Stay Free, and Don't Tell Mom and Dad about it. Stay Free! Stay woke, and Remember to Share, Retweet, and Share, and Tell a Friend about what you think of it! and how they can help us spread it around the word of the truth. Thanks to our sponsor, Amazon Prime and wherever else you get a chance to help support the podcast. . If you like the show, please consider becoming a supporter! Subscribe, Like, Share, Share and subscribe to Stay Free on Apple Podcasts and subscribe on your favourite streaming platform! Thank you for listening and sharing the podcast! You can also become a supporter of Stay Free with Us on iTunes, Podchaser, and Subscribe to stay Free on PODCAST! And thank you're supporting us on Podchords! Thanks for listening, and we'll be giving us a shoutout on Anchor.fm and a shout out on the podchords, and a review on iTunes and PODS on the podcast on your favorite podcast, too, and all of your reviews on the PodChords and on Instapod, and much more! Love you're listening to us on it's a big Thank you, and thanks for listening out and a big thanks to you're not being invited to stay free, Thank you and we're listening out! , and we really appreciate it, and so much more. - Thank you so much, and thank you, bye, and good night, bye.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 So, I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm
00:00:07.000 going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to
00:00:14.000 go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that.
00:00:21.000 And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm
00:00:28.000 going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going
00:00:35.000 to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go
00:00:42.000 ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do
00:00:48.000 that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm
00:00:54.000 going to go ahead and do that.
00:00:56.000 And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm
00:01:02.000 going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to
00:01:09.000 go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that.
00:01:16.000 And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm going to go ahead and do that. And I'm
00:01:21.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:01:21.000 going to go ahead and do that.
00:01:29.000 Hello, you awakening wonders.
00:01:31.000 Thanks for joining us today on Stay Free with Russell Brand, bringing you the truth behind mainstream media narratives and giving you a different, hopefully illuminating and encouraging perspective on global events.
00:01:42.000 Wherever you're watching this right now, we do the whole show.
00:01:46.000 Exclusively on Rumble because we are granted the ability to speak freely so we can bring people together from across the spectrum in and from the peripheries to confront centralised power.
00:01:57.000 And what does centralised power want you thinking about today?
00:01:59.000 Is it balloons?
00:02:01.000 Is it UFOs?
00:02:03.000 Later in the show we'll be talking about that and we'll be meeting James Schneider, who's a political organiser whose sworn intention is to disrupt the establishment.
00:02:11.000 We'll be talking to him about new democratic models and methods and ways we can disrupt the aforementioned power.
00:02:17.000 Then, once we click over just onto Rumble, we'll be having the first interview that Seymour Hersh, the Pulitzer Prize winning conspiracy theorist, journalist, you know, conspiracy theorist, whatever they are now, About his story about the Nord Stream Pipeline.
00:02:30.000 He revealed that it was allegedly, allegedly, I've got a button that says that.
00:02:34.000 It was America that blew that up.
00:02:34.000 Allegedly!
00:02:36.000 As Jocko Willink on this show said, it will be his first interview.
00:02:40.000 Seymour is with us.
00:02:41.000 He's coming up on the show.
00:02:42.000 The White House has already denied this story.
00:02:44.000 So does that make it more or less likely to be true?
00:02:47.000 Let me know in the chat.
00:02:48.000 Let me know in the comments whether or not you trust the White House or your own lying eyes.
00:02:52.000 But... What do you think that says about us that he's come to us first?
00:02:55.000 I think, is it good?
00:02:57.000 Because we're also Pulitzer Prize winning conspiracy theorists ourselves.
00:03:00.000 That's how you're taking this, are you?
00:03:01.000 I see this as us Pulitzer Prize winning journalists have got to stick together in our task of bringing the mainstream media down, of presenting people with the opportunity to confront power.
00:03:13.000 What we're talking about actually in this episode is where your attention is being directed and what you actually should be looking at.
00:03:20.000 The world wants you looking up into the skies at balloons or potentially UFOs.
00:03:25.000 We'll have Jeremy Corbell on the show talking about recent deep state disclosures around UFOs so we can get some sort of handle on that stuff.
00:03:32.000 Let us know if that's an interview you're interested in.
00:03:34.000 But what fascinates me is the way that we're being invited to observe particular narratives.
00:03:39.000 I reckon we're at the point we were at maybe five, ten years ago with the ...conflict between Ukraine and Russia, that we're seeing the incremental movement towards hostilities with China, and they're giving us almost childlike, identifiable images of infringement and attack.
00:03:56.000 There's a balloon over our country.
00:03:58.000 Apparently this is common practice.
00:04:00.000 It's been going on for ages, and certainly we're not including in the narrative the ongoing encroachment of Chinese territories by U.S.
00:04:07.000 military bases getting into their waters, and this is extraordinary stuff.
00:04:12.000 What you're being invited to look at are potential external threats at a time where there's a lot of domestic dissatisfaction in the United States, when Biden's approval ratings are falling, as may his bowels be, tumbling, his tumbling viscera.
00:04:26.000 And what you're not being invited to consider is the normalisation of AIs and potential lethal robot dogs.
00:04:34.000 Klip Klop, friend of the show, the Klip Klop dog, you know him?
00:04:38.000 Scary dog robot who scares himself, who's already being, I believe, It's not actually called Clip Clop, is it?
00:04:43.000 Is his actual name Clip Clop?
00:04:44.000 Let me know in the chat.
00:04:46.000 Is he called Clip Clop in his home life?
00:04:49.000 Clip Clop's at the Super Bowl.
00:04:50.000 It's the Super Bowl if you're into that sort of thing.
00:04:52.000 And I don't disrespect you if you're a sports-loving American person.
00:04:55.000 We love sport over here, just the ones that are from...
00:04:57.000 Our little old country, and across the world in the case of football.
00:05:01.000 But that's not the point.
00:05:02.000 No, it isn't the point.
00:05:03.000 The point is, Klip Klop's at the Superbowl.
00:05:05.000 Klip Klop's starring at the Superbowl with this lad.
00:05:05.000 Yeah.
00:05:08.000 He's dancing around all over the gaff.
00:05:09.000 They're normalising Klip Klop.
00:05:11.000 They're making Klip Klop a celebrity.
00:05:12.000 So when you see him marching down the precinct or pinning you to a wall, shooting guns at you, taking your temperature, forbidden!
00:05:19.000 You are not allowed to leave the house!
00:05:21.000 You think, oh, it's that dude from the Superbowl.
00:05:23.000 I like him.
00:05:24.000 I don't need all of your time. Let's go!
00:05:24.000 Have a look.
00:05:29.000 My super queen, eight days a week. Make sure you come, never leave. Wake up in my t-shirt.
00:05:40.000 Clip club, he's doing some nice moves.
00:05:42.000 I think they're a bit embarrassed.
00:05:43.000 They know that they're meant to be used for military purposes.
00:05:46.000 Yeah, like that's, this is not my function, this is not my purpose, Clip Club wants to oppress domestic population.
00:05:52.000 Yeah, because when they're doing stuff like that, it's undignified, isn't it?
00:05:57.000 Like French maid looking dances.
00:06:00.000 Freddy's sexualizing Clip Clop.
00:06:03.000 Sexy now.
00:06:04.000 They've only had Clip Clop ten minutes, they're sexualizing Clip Clop.
00:06:07.000 Poor Clip Clop.
00:06:08.000 There's no way that robot is sexy.
00:06:10.000 No.
00:06:10.000 There's a point of dance.
00:06:11.000 Dance in a sense is about fertility, expression of human potency, confluence, grace, movement, semiotic and semantic power that ain't issued verbally.
00:06:23.000 But Clip Clop don't know none of that.
00:06:25.000 That's old Clip Clop.
00:06:26.000 Let's not forget as well that Clip Clop and his half-arse don't want to be dancing at the Super Bowl.
00:06:31.000 Clip Clop have got another agenda.
00:06:33.000 Have a look.
00:06:37.000 So that's when you see Clip Clop marching down your street, scaring himself with his own bullet-y carooming, you'll go, I like that guy, I see him at the Superbowl, he's a friend of mine.
00:06:48.000 So we're being invited not to look at the robotisation, the militarisation of the police force, the normalisation of robots, you're being invited to look at what?
00:06:57.000 Balloons.
00:06:58.000 You know that film, Don't Look Up?
00:06:59.000 You remember it, that film, Don't Look Up.
00:07:02.000 We're in a situation that's similar to that, because that was obviously a film about where people were not looking at an impending disaster.
00:07:07.000 It was written by David Sirota, a friend of the show, and it's sort of a metaphor for climate change and perhaps other looming catastrophes.
00:07:12.000 Well, now what you're being invited to do is do look up.
00:07:15.000 That's why we've made that asset.
00:07:16.000 Do look up.
00:07:17.000 Look up into the sky.
00:07:19.000 Don't look down and around you at what's happening.
00:07:22.000 Don't look down.
00:07:23.000 There's the Nord Stream pipeline down there.
00:07:24.000 Don't look down there!
00:07:25.000 Don't start looking sub-aquatically about what them Navy Seals are doing to that pipeline.
00:07:29.000 That's what we'll be talking to Seymour Hersh about a little later.
00:07:32.000 Don't be looking down there in the depths, down in the fathomy places.
00:07:37.000 Don't look at the Pentagon and the government of your country, United States of America, campaigning to maintain their budgets at a time where interest in the Ukraine war is starting to wane, where new narratives are starting to emerge.
00:07:49.000 People are starting to see that a lot of economic interests are being met, i.e.
00:07:52.000 the Black Rock reconstruction, digitalisation of Ukraine stuff, the military industrial
00:07:56.000 complex and their endless profiteering, the $100 billion package that's already been issued.
00:08:02.000 Don't start looking at the increasing tensions between the US and China and the US's role
00:08:07.000 in that and don't look at Biden's constantly tumbling popularity and evident ineptitude.
00:08:15.000 Just look at this nice balloon.
00:08:17.000 Have a look at how the mainstream media are covering this story.
00:08:20.000 And while you're watching it, I don't want you to think that the newscaster looks like a sexy lady Michael Jackson.
00:08:26.000 Unidentified flying object shot down by the U.S.
00:08:29.000 over Alaska.
00:08:31.000 This, of course, follows the downing of that Chinese spy balloon last weekend.
00:08:37.000 CBS2's Bradley Blackburn live in our newsroom with the latest on this.
00:08:41.000 Bradley?
00:08:41.000 Andrea, before it was shot down, pilots were able to get close enough to that unknown object to see that it was unmanned and drifting in the wind.
00:08:50.000 But there is still a lot of Why is he talking so poetically about that?
00:08:54.000 It was drifting in the wind.
00:08:55.000 It was lost.
00:08:56.000 It was a mystery.
00:08:58.000 Why is he poeticising that balloon so much?
00:09:00.000 Also, the way that they're already tying the balloon and these UFOs, if that's what they are, together is amazing because it's basically a way of kind of saying UFOs are scary.
00:09:10.000 China's scary, isn't it?
00:09:11.000 We better do something about it.
00:09:12.000 God, have you got any ideas what we could do?
00:09:14.000 Yeah, start spending some money.
00:09:17.000 Certainly don't start discussing cutting Pentagon funding.
00:09:20.000 You know, like it's an attempt to control and manage narratives.
00:09:23.000 As long as there are external threats, domestic disruption and dissent is less likely.
00:09:29.000 You escalate the fear and the doubt.
00:09:32.000 So this news report concentrates on, this is a sort of mysterious thing, As we all know, these are common practices to have various weather balloons and even spying balloons.
00:09:42.000 And it's not been proven.
00:09:43.000 There's not a shred of evidence that it's a spying balloon yet.
00:09:45.000 Not a shred.
00:09:47.000 But even if it is, that is normal.
00:09:49.000 It happens all the time.
00:09:50.000 It's not a cause for escalation of tensions.
00:09:52.000 Unless, of course, you want to escalate tensions because people are getting a bit sick and tired of the lethal aid packages that go, curiously, via the Pentagon.
00:10:01.000 You might think, oh, if you want to help Ukrainian people, why don't you give that money in humanitarian aid directly to the Ukraine?
00:10:06.000 Why don't you broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine rather than disrupting them?
00:10:10.000 No, it's curious that that aid passes via the military-industrial complex.
00:10:15.000 I think up to 70% of weapons don't even reach their destination.
00:10:18.000 It's not confusing and complex, it's...
00:10:20.000 It's a racket, is what it is.
00:10:22.000 Also, let's not rule this out, Biden gets to posture on temporary AstroTurf rouge carpets as a commander-in-chief leader with Washingtonian prestige, as someone with some military clout shooting a balloon out of the sky.
00:10:39.000 Wow!
00:10:40.000 Rather than what many of us have come to see him as, a sort of doddering, financially corrupt sort of fella.
00:10:46.000 Allegedly.
00:10:47.000 I think.
00:10:48.000 It's cool.
00:10:49.000 Success.
00:10:49.000 down over Alaska, Mr. President.
00:10:53.000 Success.
00:10:54.000 There he is, just wearing the aviators, saying the word success.
00:10:58.000 We haven't been able to say success very often since he's been president.
00:11:02.000 No, take those opportunities.
00:11:04.000 Yeah, exactly.
00:11:04.000 When you can actually blow a balloon up the sky, it's nice to be able to say the word success.
00:11:08.000 Is that success?
00:11:10.000 Akin to popping a balloon in the sky.
00:11:12.000 I don't want to drill down into it.
00:11:14.000 What about that cannabis package where ultimately no one got released from prison?
00:11:18.000 Was that a success?
00:11:18.000 What about leaving Afghanistan?
00:11:20.000 Was that a success?
00:11:21.000 What about the response to the pandemic?
00:11:23.000 Was that a success?
00:11:24.000 What about your pledge to stand up for union workers?
00:11:28.000 Was that a success?
00:11:29.000 Look at the way that the mainstream media presents you with information.
00:11:32.000 You'll all be familiar with Corrine Jean-Pierre.
00:11:34.000 She's the White House Press Secretary.
00:11:37.000 Look at how she goes on mainstream media for a softball interview where, you know, this is an inviting mainstream environment where people are going to facilitate that kind of narrative.
00:11:48.000 You feel like, how does she mess this up so badly?
00:11:51.000 If I was briefing her, I'd say, right, okay, you're going on mainstream news.
00:11:54.000 It's going to be an easy interview.
00:11:56.000 Just don't use your hands in a weird way because it'll make you look like you don't know what you're doing.
00:12:03.000 And don't forget the vital word that's very important in the world of diplomacy.
00:12:08.000 PACT!
00:12:08.000 OK?
00:12:09.000 The LORAD is part of like a, part of a, it's a, it's a, what do you call it, a coalition,
00:12:15.000 a core solution.
00:12:16.000 A consortium of pacted nations.
00:12:17.000 A pact, exactly.
00:12:18.000 Also, don't shut your eyes too much during the interview, and whatever you do, do not
00:12:23.000 forget the name of the country that are our chief allies in this endeavour, OK?
00:12:29.000 We didn't do it on our own, we did it clearly in step with Canada.
00:12:36.000 Yeah, Canadia.
00:12:37.000 Even the news anchor there is like, look at her like, come on, what are you doing?
00:12:40.000 I'm here to help you, for God's sakes!
00:12:42.000 She's nosing it right up.
00:12:45.000 It's alright though, she doesn't go on a job like press secretary or anything.
00:12:48.000 So your job doesn't involve being the interface between the public and the media and the government, does it?
00:12:52.000 Yeah, that's actually all my job is.
00:12:55.000 Now, talking about the media's intervention and role in presenting news stories, we're fascinated by the Project Veritas James O'Keefe story.
00:13:05.000 Now, obviously, remember, we are, broadly speaking, a transcendent news organisation interested in true democracy and moving beyond the old labels of left and right so that we can create a different type of populism.
00:13:18.000 New coalitions, whether you have a traditional identity or a progressive identity, if you have democratic control over your own community, then you don't need to worry about other people's lifestyles and traditions and orthodoxies or lack thereof.
00:13:31.000 It's none of your business.
00:13:32.000 As long as we're all locked together in a cultural war, how can we form the alliances that are necessary to displace and disrupt centralised power?
00:13:39.000 Something we were talking to James Snyder, our guest, about in a minute.
00:13:43.000 If you're watching this on YouTube, we're going to have to click off in a second because we're bringing another Pulitzer Prize winning conspiracy theorist onto the show a little bit later, Seymour Hersh.
00:13:52.000 But I just wanted to touch on this James O'Keefe story.
00:13:57.000 James O'Keefe is in a lot of trouble there at Project Veritas.
00:14:00.000 And even though it's an anti-establishment organisation, Gary, I suppose it still sits within conventional, would you call it libertarian, right-wing politics in terms of its funding?
00:14:09.000 Ultimately, I guess they are still there to make profits, you would imagine, and when profits are put at risk by people getting a bit angry about the kind of stuff, it just shows the power.
00:14:18.000 I mean, look, if this is linked, it just seems odd that at a time when people are coming out and saying that he's a bully at work, which obviously no one likes a bully at work, but why is this happening now?
00:14:27.000 He's literally just revealed these things about Pfizer, which we don't know whether they're true or not.
00:14:31.000 Fascinating stories about Pfizer, if they are true.
00:14:34.000 And of course, while we're still on YouTube, we have to be careful.
00:14:37.000 Shall we come off YouTube now and then get right into this?
00:14:39.000 Because I can't believe the way that Rolling Stone, who used to be regarded as an anti-establishment, radical magazine, I seem to remember that I adorned the cover once.
00:14:47.000 Is that the last version of the radical?
00:14:49.000 The last time they were relevant!
00:14:50.000 Because when I was there with my top off, I think I was going a bit like, oh yeah, come on baby, take a dance with us!
00:14:55.000 I don't want to be able to do my Jim Morrison shtick back then.
00:14:58.000 We're going to leave you on YouTube.
00:14:59.000 All you've got to do is click on the link, join us on Rumble, because I'm, baby, I'm flexing.
00:15:03.000 I'm getting ready to bust some truth, to drop some bloody old truth bombs, or bring people together against the establishment, and here they come.
00:15:03.000 I can tell.
00:15:09.000 YouTube, click over.
00:15:11.000 This thing like uh of course right so now we're on we're just on rumble now so we can say that like they exposed that they were involved in that.
00:15:17.000 Directed evolution.
00:15:19.000 Which is so close to mRNA.
00:15:21.000 Directed evolution could with a couple of tweaks become mRNA which is the sort of thing they're involved in.
00:15:26.000 It's one little bat microbe away from becoming mRNA.
00:15:30.000 Basically what he was saying is that Pfizer are involved in a business of creating new versions of the virus in order to then create the solutions.
00:15:38.000 Just so happens that those solutions are extremely profitable to Pfizer.
00:15:41.000 And that's such a massive story and that's so much more significant.
00:15:44.000 Of course being a bully in the workplace is horrible.
00:15:47.000 I sometimes think, Gareth, Simple human values ought to be enough for most of us without getting into particular ideologies.
00:15:53.000 Sesame Street values, as some would call them.
00:15:55.000 If you are kind, that means you'll be kind to people regardless of what their beliefs are.
00:16:00.000 Like the basic principle of be kind, be kind, are you being kind, are you being kind?
00:16:03.000 These are some things I have to have in my own mad head.
00:16:06.000 But some of the things that old James O'Keefe was doing at work were quite funny.
00:16:10.000 According to one complaint, he took a sandwich from a pregnant woman because he was hungry.
00:16:15.000 Hey, that's my sandwich!
00:16:16.000 But I am hungry!
00:16:17.000 I just think it's funny that they're the things that they're trying to tuck him on anyway.
00:16:21.000 So obviously there has been pressure applied from somewhere, hasn't there?
00:16:25.000 That he's ruffling the feathers of people that you shouldn't ruffle the feathers of.
00:16:30.000 Albert Boyle being one of them.
00:16:30.000 Albert Boyle.
00:16:32.000 But what they're obviously trying to get him on is, what can we get him on?
00:16:34.000 And one of the main things is that he took a sandwich from a pregnant woman.
00:16:38.000 Yeah, it's a bit like, of course that's not a very nice thing to do.
00:16:41.000 No.
00:16:41.000 We all know that if you see a pregnant woman, with or without a sandwich, be nice to her.
00:16:46.000 Be nice to her.
00:17:08.000 Allegedly.
00:17:09.000 Even on Rumble.
00:17:10.000 See how responsible we are?
00:17:11.000 That's how you get Pulitzer Prizes.
00:17:13.000 Like our man coming on in a minute, Seymour Hersh.
00:17:15.000 Before that we'll have James Snyder talking to us about, who's this guy?
00:17:19.000 Oh yeah, but now we're disrupting some systems.
00:17:21.000 I regret that.
00:17:23.000 As soon as I see it, I regret it.
00:17:23.000 I regret that.
00:17:24.000 It was how low the jeans were.
00:17:26.000 That's the bit I regret.
00:17:27.000 Do you know what I regret most of all?
00:17:28.000 The lower thumb.
00:17:29.000 Yes.
00:17:30.000 That's what, like, when I see that guy, I think there's no need for that, Russ.
00:17:33.000 You shouldn't even let yourself down there.
00:17:34.000 I remember that shoot.
00:17:35.000 But then were the days, gal.
00:17:36.000 That's what I was doing back then.
00:17:37.000 Were you there?
00:17:38.000 I was there.
00:17:39.000 You poor sod.
00:17:40.000 Part of some absolute crap, haven't you, over the years?
00:17:40.000 I know.
00:17:42.000 Let's go back to the last... Yeah, because the funniest thing is, like, when you're trying to bring down James O'Keefe, who sounds like, you know, who knows, because these are, at the moment, simply claims, you know, nothing's been proven, but, like, What he was saying is that Pfizer have exhibited a level of profiteering and potentially corruption that means they should be subject to a lot of investigation.
00:18:03.000 What they're saying is he put on a production of Oklahoma in Virginia and spent 20 grand on company expenses for the staff to come.
00:18:12.000 Yeah, to take the staff to see him in Oklahoma.
00:18:16.000 What's this?
00:18:18.000 $5,000 for a cowboy costume?
00:18:19.000 You son of a... You dare to say that Pfizer are corrupt?
00:18:23.000 How dare you!
00:18:24.000 It's not like he said everyone's got to stay in their house for two years while he's in Oklahoma.
00:18:28.000 It's not like everyone's got to take some medicine while he's in Oklahoma, is it?
00:18:33.000 It's certainly not that.
00:18:34.000 It's not as bad?
00:18:35.000 I would say.
00:18:35.000 No.
00:18:36.000 I'd like to go.
00:18:37.000 No one's even asked the staff also, did you enjoy going to see it?
00:18:40.000 It's brilliant.
00:18:41.000 Oh my God, I've never seen anything like it.
00:18:42.000 The atmosphere!
00:18:43.000 Oh, to be alive at all was fantastic, but to be young and to go to that, that was very heaven.
00:18:49.000 It was bliss to be there.
00:18:50.000 I'd love to go.
00:18:51.000 Do you know any songs from Oklahoma?
00:18:53.000 No.
00:18:54.000 How does it go?
00:18:55.000 Oh, what a beautiful morning.
00:18:57.000 Is that in there?
00:18:57.000 Is that in there?
00:18:58.000 I think so.
00:18:58.000 Do you know what we need to do?
00:19:01.000 Go and see a performance of Oklahoma!
00:19:03.000 And I'll fund it!
00:19:05.000 It's not taxpayer money!
00:19:08.000 Ordinary taxpayers didn't have to pay for that, and then he made a profit of billions from it.
00:19:12.000 That's not what happened.
00:19:13.000 Absolutely right.
00:19:13.000 So even if this dude ain't great, and certainly it seems if they're a right-wing organisation, their politics are different from our politics, but we believe left, right, We should unite.
00:19:22.000 There's not left and right no more.
00:19:24.000 It's right and wrong.
00:19:25.000 Truth!
00:19:26.000 Justice!
00:19:27.000 And that's what we're interested in talking to our next guest, James Schneider, about.
00:19:30.000 James is a political organiser who wants to instigate radical change within the system.
00:19:35.000 He's a supporter for Make Amazon Pay, the author of Our Block, How We Win.
00:19:39.000 And he's an international chess player.
00:19:42.000 James, thank you so much for joining us on the show.
00:19:44.000 Thank you for having me.
00:19:45.000 It's a pleasure to have you.
00:19:46.000 Your hair looks fantastic.
00:19:47.000 Thanks very much.
00:19:48.000 That's a bloody good start.
00:19:49.000 We've been speaking to Christian Smalls, the leader of the union in the United States for Amazon, and what struck me about him is the way that his perspective was transcendent of the ordinary left-right divides that sometimes prohibit, I think, advancement in a political landscape that seems to be increasingly defined by centralism versus the periphery.
00:20:11.000 How do you think we can order democracy to make it more meaningful so that people have more How can dissent be incorporated into this process when you have now mostly central political parties that broadly speaking agree with one another and are not representing the interests of ordinary people whether that's in our country the UK or America or wherever else mate?
00:20:33.000 So I think the point that you're making, which is right, is that ordinary people have basically the same interests and want, broadly speaking, the same things.
00:20:41.000 Some people have some differences this way and the other way, and they don't have power in their lives to do that.
00:20:47.000 So take, if you're an Amazon worker at work, you're monitored by an algorithm which knows everything about what breaks you're taking, how much you're lifting, how far you're walking, all of that stuff.
00:20:58.000 You don't have any control over your life.
00:21:00.000 So what is, I think, important, what most people want, what people feel is missing, is that control and is that democracy in their lives.
00:21:09.000 So that goes for, you know, if you're a striking nurse now, if you're an Amazon worker, if you're worried about climate change or whatever that might be, because you don't have control in your life, you can't do anything about it.
00:21:21.000 So the thing to do It's for people who are in the same type of situation to get together to work with each other against whatever power they're confronted with.
00:21:29.000 So that means if you're a worker with other people that you work with because you've got the same boss you can deal with them.
00:21:35.000 If you're a tenant to work with other tenants so you can deal with landlords.
00:21:39.000 Yes.
00:21:39.000 If you're paying rip-off energy bills to work with other people who are paying or can't pay their rip-off energy bills and together bit by bit and Yeah, we can build our own power.
00:21:52.000 And we, you know, that's not going to be there's no simple solution.
00:21:55.000 You can't just elect one party, and everything will be better.
00:21:58.000 And also has to happen on a global scale, not just in our own countries, because there's huge systems of power and control, which keeps some people rich, and particularly hurt most of the countries on Earth.
00:22:11.000 And it's clear that those powers now are globalist.
00:22:14.000 They are ultimately transcendent of national sovereignty.
00:22:19.000 We talk a lot about how organisations like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation exert incredible control over another unelected organisation like the WHO, how WEF policies keep finding their way into national governments and how the pandemic period Broadly speaking, exacerbated that trend.
00:22:37.000 Now, we're talking about the way that Amazon treats its workers generally.
00:22:40.000 Now that Amazon are, I think, the ninth... If Amazon were a nation, they'd be the ninth most powerful nation in the world, as I understand it.
00:22:46.000 In the post-war Ukraine environment, there's an assumption that the digitalization of Ukraine is utmost among their goals.
00:22:52.000 We get this sense that people are piloting these modalities, piloting new ways of surveillance, digital ID scores, tracking people, new methods for asserting control.
00:23:02.000 And I liked the way you described the necessity for forming new alliances placed perhaps on community where you live or unions around the way that you work and indeed the way that various unions can come together in common cause.
00:23:15.000 What we essentially need, it sounds like you're saying to me, James, is new ways of forming alliances.
00:23:19.000 I know there are groups like Don't Pay UK in our country that are trying to confront the energy crisis at a time where Shell and BP are experiencing record profits at a time where the Nord Stream pipeline has been blown up.
00:23:31.000 Seemingly in accordance with an agenda that the United States of America have to control the natural gas market, which they've explicitly talked about, though I have made no claims about access to information that nobody else has.
00:23:43.000 How do you see the role of unions around big tech companies like Amazon and even some of the movements around health workers that are happening in our country, the UK?
00:23:54.000 Being influential for global solidarity movements for ordinary people, mate?
00:23:58.000 I mean, these are new things, but they're also old things.
00:24:01.000 The ways in which people have stood up and resisted power and oppression throughout history are basically the same kinds of ways.
00:24:08.000 They're people who have the same interests coming together to fight back and then forming alliances with other groups of people who are doing the same thing.
00:24:16.000 And I think You know, if we're going to get substantial change in this country, in Britain, that's going to be in large part due to the trade unions and the workers who right now are saying, I don't want a pay cut.
00:24:29.000 I don't want to have lower living standards.
00:24:31.000 I don't deserve it.
00:24:32.000 I work hard.
00:24:33.000 And the reason why they've got so much popular support is because almost everyone is in the same position.
00:24:39.000 So that is a really big basis for a democratic moment for Do you want your water to be owned by the public and owned democratically?
00:24:46.000 you know, how, what all their voting history is and all of that because when
00:24:50.000 you poll people on all of these issues like do you want your water to be owned
00:24:54.000 by the public and owned democratically or do you want you know shit pumped into
00:25:00.000 your rivers, almost everyone like three-quarters of people say yeah yeah we
00:25:04.000 want that publicly owned.
00:25:06.000 If you say, should Amazon workers be paid?
00:25:09.000 Should they get the £15 an hour minimum that they're going on strike for in the UK?
00:25:14.000 Very few people go, oh, no, I don't think they should be paid decently.
00:25:17.000 People don't think nurses should be getting a pay cut.
00:25:20.000 So that is the basis that you can start to bring people together.
00:25:24.000 And that doesn't make it easy.
00:25:25.000 Obviously, if it were easy, it would have already happened.
00:25:28.000 But the interests of the many, as it were, are so much more aligned.
00:25:34.000 It's interesting how much work goes into keeping these divisions entrenched.
00:25:48.000 It's also fascinating working in the media space, James, to see how a figure like Bernie Sanders, who's strongly, of course, connected to the Left wing, one might say, of the Democrat Party is now right in on Fox News, how it's conventional to see a traditional or conventional right wing space like Fox News talking about demonopolisation, establishment corruption.
00:26:10.000 And we've had guests on this show from Adam Curtis to Martin Goury talk about how these labels are becoming increasingly redundant as establishment power of the in the United States of the Democrat left comes alloyed to the kind of financial interests that You know, at the time of the Iraq war would have been, we all knew what Dick Cheney, Bush, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, we all understood, oh what it is, is they're agitating for conflict, then they profit from that conflict, then they profit from the reconstruction.
00:26:40.000 Similarly, and much more anecdotal and on a more parochial scale, like I live in an area that is conventional, what you might call conservative, that's I guess Republican in your language, And we went to a sort of an anti-water protest because the water facilities where I live are owned by QA and China and various foreign investors and they are indeed pumping raw sewage into the rivers
00:27:06.000 Because it's too expensive or not profitable enough to spend money on filtration systems that exist that would mean that it's not necessary to pump shit into the rivers.
00:27:16.000 And it's so interesting that when you have that mentality, when you have that modality, that is where you end up.
00:27:21.000 And to agitate for change at that level, at some point you do require a political movement, don't you?
00:27:28.000 And America don't have that in the Democrat Party, we've seen that, it's evident.
00:27:32.000 We don't have it in a Labour Party led by Keir Starmer, I wouldn't imagine.
00:27:37.000 So do you think this is a time for the organisation of new political movements and how ought they be framed, James?
00:27:44.000 The leader of Tanzania's independence, Julius Nyeri, said the US is also a one party state, but just with traditional American exuberance, they have two of them.
00:27:55.000 And we've got, you know, not exactly the same, but we've got some problems like that here.
00:28:01.000 And I think We do need big political movements and they need to be movements of movements.
00:28:06.000 They need to bring together your people from, you know, they might they might vote Conservative, but they're worried about the river.
00:28:12.000 They want that in to be managed properly.
00:28:15.000 They want proper water.
00:28:16.000 They don't want to be ripped off.
00:28:17.000 They don't want shit pumped into the internet.
00:28:21.000 So I think it's going to come about through bringing together Those actions that people are doing.
00:28:26.000 I think verbs are better than nouns.
00:28:28.000 If you say, I'm about this thing, then we'll sit here and we'll argue about that thing.
00:28:34.000 If we say, no, we're going to do something, we are going to stand up against our boss.
00:28:39.000 We're going to stand up against the privatized company.
00:28:41.000 We're going to stand up against health privatization.
00:28:43.000 We're going to do something together.
00:28:45.000 Then you build trust.
00:28:46.000 Then you build alliances, then you build solidarity.
00:28:48.000 And I think once we've done some more of that, then we'll be able to have a political movement that can transform the country and go much further.
00:28:56.000 Do you think that independent media is going to become increasingly necessary as it seems there's quite deep collaboration between most media spaces and conventional establishment-oriented politics in the manner that you described?
00:29:10.000 Two parties in a one-party state, ultimately.
00:29:13.000 What is the role and the significance of the media in disrupting these systems of governance that are becoming increasingly adept at nullifying dissent?
00:29:23.000 The I mean, the media has got a long standing role in shaping public opinion.
00:29:28.000 It's not perfect.
00:29:29.000 It's not it's not like it's completely planned by a small group of people.
00:29:33.000 But they have a role in shaping public opinion and generally to the interest of the establishment.
00:29:38.000 So places that give you a way in whether that is independent media or the Openings that do open up on the mainstream corporate media, although they're not very many of them, are extremely important to take.
00:29:50.000 And also people doing things with each other.
00:29:54.000 One thing is watching something, and that's good, because you learn.
00:29:57.000 But when you learn by doing, you learn through the experience of being part of something.
00:30:04.000 People will get way more education, for example, about what's going on with the water system by going down to the, you know, protests at a river or on a beach and talking to people.
00:30:14.000 They'll feel it.
00:30:15.000 They'll know it much more deeply.
00:30:17.000 Then, of course, it's good to watch videos and read, you know, read books and all the rest of it.
00:30:22.000 That's great.
00:30:23.000 But I think if you can move people from passively finding out how the world works, and how the world is generally not speaking, not set up in their interest, and move towards action, then you get from just knowledge to actual power.
00:30:38.000 That's good.
00:30:39.000 Yes.
00:30:40.000 And also, as you say, finding new ways to formulate alliances, not being trapped in the conveniently placed silos that prevent us from finding new ways to work together.
00:30:51.000 We got Christian Smalls, leader of the American Amazon I feel like I will check this when he comes, maybe vote for Trump at some point.
00:30:59.000 So it shows you that populism in the United States is an anti-establishment ideology that now appears to be coming from a surprising direction.
00:31:10.000 I know a lot of you will disagree with that.
00:31:12.000 Let me know what you think in the stream and the chat.
00:31:14.000 Now I can sense, Gareth, because I know you well, because I hear your breathing patterns change, that you want to say something.
00:31:20.000 Just as I was warming up.
00:31:21.000 A chess question with James about strategy and stuff.
00:31:25.000 No, I was just going to jump in.
00:31:26.000 I think what he said, I remember when Christian was on, and he was saying that a lot of the people that he had kind of convinced to come along with him on, you know, the unionization around Amazon were Republicans, were Trump voters, were people from all backgrounds.
00:31:38.000 He was saying that there were, you know, lots of kind of poor people they had to bring together.
00:31:42.000 Different gender identity, he was saying.
00:31:45.000 And he was saying that that was what worked in the end.
00:31:48.000 He said it didn't matter, didn't he?
00:31:49.000 Because everyone was getting fucked over by Amazon.
00:31:52.000 But do you think that there's obviously this issue at the moment when you're talking about coming together and actually doing something, tackling some of these issues, there's obviously these protest laws that are coming in at the moment worldwide.
00:32:03.000 Is that as a kind of reaction to the kind of things that you're talking about?
00:32:07.000 Yeah, so I want to say one other thing, but just to come to the protest thing.
00:32:11.000 When a system of control starts to break down, and that's what we're seeing, that's what we've been living through since 2008, the system is struggling to reproduce itself.
00:32:24.000 In the economy, with debt and with consent.
00:32:27.000 People don't trust the system in the way that they used to 20-25 years ago.
00:32:32.000 And either you can make people's, from the perspective of the system, you can make enough people's lives better that you gain consent.
00:32:41.000 Or you have to police it much more aggressively.
00:32:43.000 And obviously, they don't have any plans to make people's lives better.
00:32:46.000 So policing is going to get going to get, you know, stricter, more aggressive, shut down dissent, shut down protest.
00:32:53.000 But one thing I want to say about this, you know, left, right populist point that you're making.
00:32:58.000 There is a difference.
00:33:00.000 And the thing you have to focus on is ultimately, is something about giving people power and making them more powerful in their lives?
00:33:08.000 Is it genuinely about the many versus the few?
00:33:11.000 Or is it a kind of phony version of it?
00:33:14.000 Which says yes, no, we're on the side of the people.
00:33:16.000 But ultimately, let's take Trump, it gives the biggest, you know, handout to corporations in the history of the US.
00:33:24.000 He says I'm standing with the people.
00:33:26.000 But then he stands basically with his billionaire mates and his actual policies.
00:33:30.000 I think that's the thing that you have to look at.
00:33:33.000 I think the thing that in the in the sorry, carry on.
00:33:35.000 Ultimately these things will become measurable in policy and economics.
00:33:39.000 How did these, the measures of the Trump regime, not regime, era, how did they affect your life?
00:33:45.000 Did things improve for you personally or was it more of an emotional catharsis?
00:33:49.000 I'm so fascinated in what it must have been like to live in that country during that period.
00:33:53.000 Certainly I would agree with you that the establishment are not offering solutions to the problems in your life because they don't care, because it's not a bug or an error, it's a feature.
00:34:03.000 You're going to find and follow James on Twitter at Schneider Home.
00:34:06.000 Thank you, James, for joining us.
00:34:07.000 We'll get to talk about chess on another occasion.
00:34:07.000 Thanks for having me.
00:34:10.000 Now, we've got a fantastic Pulitzer Prize winning conspiracy theorist joining, sorry, journalist joining us in a matter of seconds.
00:34:17.000 But before we talk about the Nord Stream pipeline and how that narrative shifted, the ludicrous tricks and skullduggery that was at play during that narrative, Joe Biden's announcement, believe me, we will stop them.
00:34:28.000 We will stop them.
00:34:29.000 My chat with Jocko Willink in which he revealed Navy SEALs will be a piece of cake.
00:34:32.000 I don't think he used that phrase for them to disrupt that pipeline.
00:34:35.000 Let's get up to speed with the Nord Stream story before I bring yet another Pulitzer Prize winning journalist into your life.
00:34:44.000 Here's the news.
00:34:45.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:34:45.000 Have a look at this.
00:34:47.000 You know what they'll tell you on the mainstream media?
00:34:49.000 Russia blew up their own pipeline in an act of inconceivable, senseless, unprofitable self-destruction.
00:34:57.000 Certainly wasn't America doing it.
00:34:58.000 There are no clues or evidence to suggest that America did it.
00:35:02.000 Today's story is fantastic.
00:35:03.000 The evolution on the Nord Stream Pipeline story is a piece of reporting from a very credible Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who Who, get ready, is about to be called a conspiracy theorist, a whack job and condemned for whatever they can find.
00:35:17.000 Is he old?
00:35:18.000 Yeah, he's old.
00:35:19.000 That's bad though, is it?
00:35:20.000 Well, is it?
00:35:21.000 Yes, because he said something that's inconvenient.
00:35:23.000 Yeah, old is bad.
00:35:25.000 The bombing of the Nord Stream underwater gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea was a covert operation ordered by the White House and carried out by the CIA, a report by a veteran investigative journalist claims.
00:35:36.000 And we all knew that anyway, because it was bloody obvious.
00:35:40.000 Seymour Hersh, a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter, has claimed that US deep sea divers using a NATO military exercise as a cover planted mines along the pipelines that were later detonated remotely, as Jocko Willink said when he was on our show about three months ago.
00:35:55.000 Once hailed the greatest American investigative reporter, Hirsch, 85, who broke stories such as the mass murder of 500 civilians at My Lai in Vietnam and the torture of prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, said that the black op was ordered by President Biden and that the attack was carried out by the CIA in cooperation with Norway.
00:36:15.000 Many of us were discussing this possibility just because it seemed plausible, just because it had been explicitly stated that the US had an agenda to take over trade of natural gas between Russia and Europe, that they saw that as a market that they should own, because Joe Biden in Well, I tell you, we'll blow up that pipeline.
00:36:33.000 Just because Condoleezza Rice about 20 years ago explicitly said
00:36:36.000 You simply want to change the structure of energy dependence.
00:36:40.000 You want to depend more on the North American energy platform,
00:36:44.000 the tremendous bounty of oil and gas that we're finding in North America.
00:36:49.000 You want to have pipelines that don't go through Ukraine and Russia.
00:36:54.000 For years we've tried to get the Europeans to be interested in different pipeline routes.
00:36:58.000 It's time to do that.
00:37:00.000 I suppose it wouldn't be a big deal were it not for the fact that the whole thing is framed by a war
00:37:05.000 that we're continually told is humanitarian.
00:37:07.000 When every day new evidence emerges that it is financially motivated,
00:37:11.000 that Zelensky and his government have unusual financial relationships,
00:37:15.000 that Ukraine is corrupt, that it was okay to say Ukraine was corrupt before the start of this war.
00:37:20.000 Peace deals have been suggested and then sabotaged until it's convenient
00:37:23.000 and enough profit's been extracted.
00:37:25.000 It just goes on and on and on Until in the end you think, well, what is it we're being told right now that's not true?
00:37:31.000 Because we could start just adjusting a bit more quickly.
00:37:33.000 Here's a few guesses for me.
00:37:34.000 We're going to find out more stuff about the pandemic.
00:37:36.000 They're going to use new ways of introducing lockdowns and digital IDs and surveillance, and they're going to agitate for a war with China.
00:37:43.000 Those are just some of my guesses.
00:37:44.000 Let me know your own conspiracy theorists that will just be normal news in a few months in the comments and chat below.
00:37:50.000 And as for this Seymour Hersh, that Conspiracy theorist with his crackpot stories about the mass murder of 500 civilians in My Lai.
00:37:59.000 Oh yeah, the Vietnam War!
00:38:00.000 Of course now we all know that was an ethical, necessary war that wasn't a mad, giddy proxy war carried out by lunatic corrupt presidents and unnecessarily draining American lives and resources and wasting the life of the good People of Vietnam and what about this Abu Ghraib prison?
00:38:17.000 Oh what a lot of hocus pocus that turned out.
00:38:20.000 It's all well and good complaining about conditions in Abu Ghraib but may I ask how are we to reform these Iraqis if we don't attach electrodes to their genitals?
00:38:28.000 So Seymour Hersh with his crazy stories about Vietnam and Abu Ghraib is just some sort of nutcase.
00:38:34.000 He should have his own channel on Rumble.
00:38:39.000 We are joined now by Seymour Hersh who's a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who already would have seen the ineptitude of that link and probably been astonished by the standards and how they've fallen in media in the last 10 or 20 years.
00:38:58.000 We're speaking to Seymour Hersh because of his recent Substack article on the US involvement in the Nord Stream pipeline, which of course suggests that the US involvement was contrary to their very public denial, and even why the denial itself was significant in avoiding congressional permission.
00:39:16.000 It's a fantastic piece of writing from a prize-winning journalist.
00:39:19.000 It's an honour to have you, Seymour.
00:39:21.000 Thanks for joining us.
00:39:22.000 I'm glad to be here, I think.
00:39:24.000 Let me ask you a question.
00:39:25.000 Yes.
00:39:26.000 What's your hat?
00:39:28.000 It's probably attention-seeking on some level, Seymour.
00:39:31.000 I've come from the world of entertainment, probably haven't entirely let go of the idea that I'm a sort of a physical representation of the radical stance that I take in my own journalism.
00:39:41.000 One journalist to another.
00:39:44.000 I don't know if the word radical is the right one, but we'll let that one stand.
00:39:48.000 You want me to take the hat off because I'll do it out of respect for you and your prize.
00:39:53.000 I don't want to see what's there, but I will tell you something.
00:39:54.000 I was fascinated, as I told one of your aides just a minute ago, by the Condoleezza Rice quote.
00:40:02.000 My pay for this performance here will be Somebody send me a link to that.
00:40:09.000 We will send that to you.
00:40:11.000 It's not, it's, it's, it's, you're ahead of the curve with that idea.
00:40:16.000 But that's, that's been a prominent theme in the American conversations about oil.
00:40:24.000 And it is a fact that Norway, which did help us, has more than doubled the amount of oil, natural gas rather, is shipping now to Western Europe.
00:40:33.000 It had about nine or ten percent, it's way up.
00:40:36.000 And so you can't work, you can never cut out mercantile interests, but there were probably much more immediate interests of war in Ukraine, etc, etc.
00:40:45.000 But that's a fascinating point that you were making.
00:40:48.000 Anyway, so I got something out of this.
00:40:50.000 I'm happy.
00:40:51.000 Look, can you stop being so generally cynical about my hat and the entire experience of this interview?
00:40:57.000 I get something out of it.
00:40:58.000 You don't need to overplay the, I'm a well-worn journalist, I was around during war, gay, I've got a Pulitzer Prize.
00:41:05.000 I get it.
00:41:06.000 You're senior, you're world-weary, you've become cynical about establishment power.
00:41:12.000 It's much more ephemeral than that.
00:41:14.000 It's just, you know, it's amusing.
00:41:16.000 The hat is amusing.
00:41:17.000 I don't think there's anything profound in me talking about it.
00:41:20.000 It's what I see.
00:41:22.000 Sir, firstly I will credit Gareth, who makes the show with me, for his research that led to our use of the Condoleezza
00:41:29.000 Rice clip.
00:41:31.000 And our general approach is to challenge the dominant narrative that we are given through mainstream media,
00:41:38.000 which all and once was the domain of ordinary investigative media,
00:41:44.000 which seems to have become deeply sanitized in the last 20, 30 years.
00:41:49.000 Increasingly we are seeing, whether it is Chris Hedges or Glenn Greenwald or yourself,
00:41:55.000 journalists that have been prized for their investigative work being, if not demonized,
00:42:01.000 certainly subject to something amounting to smears.
00:42:05.000 The White House has already denied your story and I'd like to ask you what you think has happened to journalism in the last 20 or 30 years and why we're not presented with complex narratives that undergird reporting with the kind of economic, financial, military and geopolitical
00:42:22.000 interests that usually lead to events like the Ukraine-Russia conflict or indeed an event,
00:42:28.000 broadly speaking, within the remit of that narrative like the Nord Stream Pipeline
00:42:33.000 sabotage?
00:42:34.000 Well, I think one of the problems, look, you're asking, you're throwing the ball to me.
00:42:40.000 This is all I brood about a lot because I worked at the New York Times in the 70s
00:42:46.000 and had a great time.
00:42:48.000 Was never sort of blocked from writing stuff.
00:42:51.000 And it's a different world now.
00:42:52.000 You know, oh come on, stop it.
00:42:56.000 The bottom line is that I think what a secret source now is for the people, many of the people who write for the major newspapers, is a press secretary who, you know, says, come over here, I'll tell you something a little different than I've told the other guys.
00:43:13.000 I just don't understand why they're not jumping on certain stories.
00:43:16.000 Certainly this story is, I could just tell you a friend of mine, I have a wonderful old friend who escaped from the Middle East, became an oil man, became very rich and very happy.
00:43:25.000 uh living in france now he wrote me after this after the story and he said he said oh oh sigh he said that my nickname he said you've become a master in the deconstruction of the obvious i mean what was so hard about this story we know russia didn't do it because if they wanted to they could turn a valve And so I guess, is Macedonia a member of the NATO?
00:43:50.000 Maybe they did it.
00:43:51.000 You know, where do you go for the next possible suspect?
00:43:55.000 Who is it?
00:43:55.000 It's purely us, since the president basically said it.
00:43:59.000 But the bigger question is, what's going on with journalism?
00:44:01.000 I don't know.
00:44:03.000 My old newspaper, the New York Times, to which I probably went, I did all sorts of stuff on the CIA and Watergate and Vietnam for them.
00:44:12.000 Hasn't touched the story.
00:44:14.000 Neither has the Washington Post, which is another two great main sheets.
00:44:19.000 I don't think the Wall Street Journal has.
00:44:21.000 The rest of the country, some people have.
00:44:23.000 It's just like a blank.
00:44:25.000 It's like, it could be as simple as simple as we're coming off the Trump years, and we make big divisions in the media.
00:44:32.000 We're either going to be for or against Trump.
00:44:35.000 It could be the same sort of dichotomy plays out.
00:44:37.000 We're now in the Trump corner.
00:44:39.000 And if we write something critical of—we're now in the Biden corner, rather—if we publish something critical of Biden, we might be leading ourselves open to more Republicans, the guy in Florida, et cetera, DeSantis.
00:44:53.000 I don't know what the fear is.
00:44:54.000 But it can't just be about the fact that I don't name sources.
00:44:59.000 I spent, you know, nine years at the New York Times writing about the CIA going after Allende and going, you know, and all that stuff, killing people abroad without naming sources.
00:45:08.000 I mean, you know, either trust what I do or you don't.
00:45:10.000 Yes, I know that you also wrote about Abu Ghraib, significant revelations there, and about the mass murders in Vietnam of civilians.
00:45:19.000 And the banalisation of the media space is a theme that we touch upon frequently, the infantilisation of us as the audience class.
00:45:30.000 Even with the current escalation of tensions between the USA and China through the sanctions around semiconductors and of course the rather more visually stimulating and sensational story that accompanies the balloon and indeed the shooting down of the balloon.
00:45:48.000 Can I tell you about the balloons?
00:45:49.000 Can I tell you a little bit about the balloons?
00:45:51.000 Yeah!
00:45:54.000 I asked somebody about it, my friends, and I said, what's going on with the balloons?
00:45:57.000 Of course, they've been there forever.
00:46:01.000 Maybe you could argue they could take photographs of what a satellite can see much better.
00:46:05.000 But basically, the last wave, the unnamed car-like with the American press so full of it, It turns out the federal government has a contract with the meteorology department or whatever it is, weather department at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks, and that is one cold place.
00:46:22.000 It's way up there.
00:46:24.000 Most of the classes are underground.
00:46:25.000 You go underground to classes.
00:46:27.000 I've spoken there.
00:46:28.000 I know about this firsthand.
00:46:30.000 And over the Arctic Circle, the Arctic Circle is a Everybody flies the polar route from Asia to America, and there's no weather station there.
00:46:41.000 So the university has these little vehicles that goes and reports.
00:46:47.000 Pilots want to know if there's any unusual weather going on.
00:46:50.000 That's what you have to do.
00:46:51.000 And they are reporters of that information.
00:46:55.000 And that's what was shot down.
00:46:56.000 One of those things was shot down was one of those units that is sent up by a university paid by the government.
00:47:02.000 to go over the arctic circle and report on you know in case there's an extreme wind uh wind uh wind i don't know what the cliche is when the wind goes down in a in a down a downdraft and you know and and since there's no official station there who wants to be there to run a weather station and so they they're basically a remote weather station that's what they shot down whether they're going to talk about it in the next couple of weeks and uh uh the the we've we put about what Honestly, I don't know how many hundreds of billions of dollars into a new fighter, the F-22, that's coming online.
00:47:37.000 We had one called the F-1.
00:47:38.000 We put $203 billion in to make about a hundred of them.
00:47:42.000 But in the 80s, so far, seven exist.
00:47:46.000 It's just, money just floats.
00:47:48.000 But we paid a lot of money for the F-22, and its first kill was the first balloon, that one came over, was discovered over Montana.
00:47:57.000 And the pilot, and I'd like to think, That he knows exactly what he's doing.
00:48:02.000 When he landed, you know, in World War II, your guys and your Spitfires and us and our P-51s, you took care of every mission.
00:48:09.000 You put a little, you painted on the side a decal for the kills.
00:48:13.000 We did the same in Asia when our P-51s.
00:48:17.000 So the pilot of this F-22, getting the first kill of this plane, painted a balloon On the side of a specialized.
00:48:26.000 I'd love to think he was joking.
00:48:27.000 I don't know that.
00:48:28.000 I don't know whether what was in the state of mind, but that's what we're reduced.
00:48:28.000 I know it did it.
00:48:32.000 Now.
00:48:32.000 We've got to kill.
00:48:33.000 We kill the balloon and that's worth a couple couple, you know, 200 billion dollars for a plane.
00:48:39.000 Yeah, a small price to pay for dispatching some hydrogen and some helium.
00:48:44.000 It's over-the-top.
00:48:45.000 It's over-the-top crazy.
00:48:47.000 That's all I can tell you.
00:48:47.000 How do you feel then about the context that has to be said frames the Nord Stream Pipeline story, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the years of infringement upon former Soviet territories, the 2014... I'm not allowed to say that!
00:49:05.000 How dare you say that?
00:49:06.000 That there might have been reason Behind, you know, the language used, the language, it was done in 1990, the first agreement not to go east, but when East Germany joined West Germany, that was in NATO.
00:49:20.000 We wanted to make the combined country, and don't forget, The Germans had a real problem, because after World War II, when they wanted to get back into civilization and be accepted by other countries, get in the international groups like NATO, they spent a long time murdering people in Western Europe and bombing it and destroying it.
00:49:39.000 And so, Willy Brandt was the guy that said, we're going to be a money bank for you guys.
00:49:46.000 We're going to, auspolitik, we're going to be great neighbors.
00:49:48.000 We're going to trade with you.
00:49:49.000 We're going to be, we're going to show you we belong.
00:49:52.000 Willy Brandt did do that.
00:49:54.000 He got that started for all of his faults.
00:49:56.000 And so in 1990, when they joined, Gorbachev agreed To let this unified Germany into NATO.
00:50:05.000 And the price was a commitment by us in writing that I have a, um, I live in Washington, so I know people.
00:50:12.000 I have a friend that has access to the classified part of the embassy and our embassy in Bonn, and he ran him.
00:50:18.000 He went and read the cables for me.
00:50:19.000 There's nothing fantastic about it.
00:50:21.000 The language used by our Secretary of State James Baker was the equivalent of the equivalent in the in the documents agreement we made with the Gorbachev.
00:50:29.000 It wasn't a treaty, but it was an understanding, not one inch.
00:50:32.000 We will not go one inch east.
00:50:34.000 And then we've now, NATO was initially was 19 when it was set up in 69, 49 rather.
00:50:40.000 It's now what?
00:50:41.000 About 170 countries, Macedonia, you know, stuff like that.
00:50:44.000 I'm exaggerating.
00:50:45.000 But you know, NATO is a far cry from what we hate.
00:50:48.000 It's not Europe anymore.
00:50:49.000 It's all over.
00:50:50.000 I don't know.
00:50:50.000 I don't know.
00:50:51.000 Maybe one of the tropical islands in the South Pacific will become a member of NATO next.
00:50:55.000 And so, and so here's the Russians eating this.
00:50:58.000 Here's Putin eating this.
00:51:00.000 And then we start putting missiles in the border in Poland that we claim are defensive, but in a half a day, they can be turned into offensive weapons.
00:51:09.000 There's no question about that.
00:51:10.000 It's a fact that can be just diverted.
00:51:11.000 It'll take some time, a half a day, but you can fire your seven minutes of Moscow.
00:51:16.000 And that's another reality.
00:51:18.000 So it's what I hate to see in the paper, in Mildew's paper, for example, they keep on describing the Russian attack as being without provocation.
00:51:28.000 Unprovoked.
00:51:29.000 Well, it was really provoked.
00:51:32.000 I'm very troubled by my president and his immediate foreign national security team, Tony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, and Victoria Nuland, whose husband is one of the leading neocons who helped convince Dick Cheney that the solution to 9-11 and al-Qaeda was to attack Iraq, one of the great None.
00:51:58.000 Non-existence relation.
00:52:00.000 I mean, just so crazy.
00:52:01.000 But anyway, those three, I call them Winkum, Blinkum, and Nod.
00:52:05.000 Nod, I don't know if you have that child story there, but we have it in our country.
00:52:09.000 The first thing they do is they meet the Secretary of State in Alaska with the Chinese and start telling the Chinese what to do about their own domestic problems.
00:52:23.000 And now, we push the war.
00:52:29.000 You know, I don't know things, but I know things.
00:52:34.000 The initial agreement, the initial decision to plan for the pipeline was an option for leverage for the president against Putin.
00:52:45.000 It was started a year ago, 13 months ago, in December.
00:52:53.000 And it bled over to early this year.
00:52:56.000 And the idea was to ask the community for ideas.
00:52:59.000 I wrote about this, whether kinetic or non-kinetic.
00:53:01.000 And the word was kinetic.
00:53:02.000 That means we're going to hurt somebody.
00:53:04.000 And so, of course, it emerged.
00:53:05.000 We're going to take out the pipelines.
00:53:06.000 We've been complaining about the pipelines for a dozen years.
00:53:10.000 The first one, Nord Stream 1, and the new one.
00:53:13.000 The new pipeline is interesting because the first one was cut off by Russia.
00:53:17.000 The second one was cut off by the Germans.
00:53:20.000 They put a sanction on it.
00:53:22.000 So Germany always had the chance option of opening up the pipeline anytime they wanted.
00:53:27.000 And who cares about the pipeline in summer?
00:53:30.000 But comes fall, comes winter, and that's when you're going to need it.
00:53:35.000 The Russian natural gas has been supplying Germany and Western Europe with cheap gas for, what, a dozen years, and the economy's boomed based on cheap gas.
00:53:47.000 Now, Europe suffering.
00:53:52.000 It's getting cold.
00:53:52.000 They had a mild winter, but it's getting very cold now.
00:53:55.000 The leading companies are all getting the price of gases going up enormously.
00:54:00.000 Companies like BASF, which is the largest chemical company in Germany in the world, has been talking to China about maybe moving some assets there.
00:54:08.000 The consequences of knocking out the pipeline economically are disastrous.
00:54:13.000 As again, as you said, Norway is getting more gas and Norway was a big player in us with the project.
00:54:19.000 But the key The key thing is, when the president told the intelligence community, I want this, I want this, I want to see if I have an option, I think the thought of, in my understanding was, the thought of the community was, we're going to do what the, we do what the president wants.
00:54:37.000 That's what, that's the whole idea of having a CIA.
00:54:40.000 I mean, if you're the President of the United States right now, this guy can't get a thing to Congress.
00:54:45.000 But tomorrow, if he wants to, he can take a walk in the Rose Garden with the CIA director and somebody can get hurt the next day.
00:54:50.000 That makes you feel pretty good, particularly if you can't have your way anywhere else.
00:54:54.000 And so, I mean, that's one of the reasons I think the CIA is a very dangerous community, but full of a lot of smart people.
00:55:02.000 Anyway, it was always to be an option.
00:55:05.000 And what happened is, he didn't exercise it.
00:55:09.000 They were going to do it at one point when they had cover in the summer.
00:55:12.000 They had cover because of a, there was a big, the Baltic Sea is not a, there's no oil there.
00:55:19.000 And the idea of having a bunch of deep sea divers start digging around would have been exposed any problem, any thought of getting away with taking out the pipelines.
00:55:29.000 It just would have been too obvious, too seen.
00:55:31.000 But there was an exercise, NATO exercise last summer.
00:55:34.000 There's been one every summer.
00:55:36.000 For 22 years now in the Baltic.
00:55:38.000 And then maybe you could slide it in then.
00:55:40.000 That was the idea.
00:55:41.000 But the president didn't pull the whistle then.
00:55:44.000 In late September, he did it.
00:55:47.000 And by that time, the community itself had thought there was no reason to do it anymore.
00:55:53.000 You know, it was there as a potential threat, but he'd already started the war.
00:55:58.000 And by September, the one thing that was interesting, I've always been among a group of journalists and people in the community have been very skeptical about the chances of Ukraine to win a war against Russia.
00:56:12.000 And you know, if you know the history, when in this when in Stalingrad, when the Germans got their great defeat, the Russians are losing 2400 dead and wounded every four hours in the final days of the battle, and one just kept on going.
00:56:28.000 I mean, they are tough.
00:56:30.000 So far, in the war against Ukraine, I'm sure in the beginning it's correct that Putin or his generals underestimated the willingness of the Ukrainians to commit Harry Caray, as they have been.
00:56:41.000 But by September, it was clear there was real trouble.
00:56:44.000 Among other things, the corruption was so wild among the top, even including Zelensky.
00:56:49.000 They were all fighting for what percentage of the money they're going to steal.
00:56:52.000 There's a lot of fighting and brooding about that, even today.
00:56:55.000 And so as a corrupt regime, it never was going to be accepted in the NATO.
00:57:00.000 And it wasn't going to win the war.
00:57:01.000 And so Joe, then in late September, wants the hit.
00:57:05.000 And he gets it.
00:57:07.000 And at that point, I think that there were people in the intelligence community who thought it was, at that point, that didn't make sense.
00:57:13.000 That was just crazy.
00:57:15.000 And what's he doing?
00:57:16.000 He's throwing in, for whatever he can, the fear he had was that since Germany controlled the new pipeline, Nord Stream 2, the one that was just built and was just stopped.
00:57:29.000 They just finished it in 2020 and it was full of gas even then.
00:57:34.000 The gas that came up was, it's a 750 mile pipeline from Germany all the way to near St.
00:57:41.000 Petersburg and right up near Estonia, the border with Russia and Estonia.
00:57:46.000 So the long pipeline was full of methane gas.
00:57:49.000 That's what the gas is, methane.
00:57:51.000 And anyway, that's what bubbled up.
00:57:52.000 It wasn't pumping any, it was just stored there.
00:57:56.000 It would have been perfectly safe.
00:57:58.000 And so I guess Biden's thought was, I want to keep any possibility that the Germans and the rest of the Western Union, which is going to start getting cold, he did it in late September, will open up the pipeline and then be at the mercy of Russia.
00:58:18.000 In other words, the way they put it, That pipeline, the gas, the Russian gas, was a weapon for the Russians.
00:58:28.000 A weapon.
00:58:28.000 And once you took away that weapon, West Germany, if West Germany cannot open up the pipeline anymore, and Germany rather, and the European allies of NATO, well then they'll keep on supporting us in the war.
00:58:42.000 They won't have the option of saying, we quit.
00:58:44.000 We'd rather have Russian gas than join you in a war that you can't win.
00:58:48.000 And that's what I think the dominant thinking was.
00:58:51.000 Yes, I think you're right.
00:58:52.000 The US were incentivized by the suggestion that it created the opportunity and necessity, in fact, for harmony between Russia and Europe.
00:59:04.000 It gave the created conditions that were not advantageous, that meant the solutions became
00:59:10.000 evident and suggestible.
00:59:11.000 It was interesting that you touched upon Ukraine in corruption and the current clear out that
00:59:16.000 Zelensky enacted, even though in reporting from the Guardian prior to this conflict,
00:59:21.000 of course, when the Guardian's perspective on Ukraine was radically different and much
00:59:26.000 less simplistic and reductive, they talked about Zelensky's ownership or previous ownership
00:59:32.000 of offshore assets.
00:59:34.000 We know that the oligarch who's recently been ousted, who funded Zelensky's entire career,
00:59:40.000 I understand it, did have a relationship with Hunter Biden, you know, through his corporation
00:59:45.000 Burisma that was paying Hunter Biden.
00:59:48.000 It's just, it's fascinating, Seymour, to speak with you with your evident experience and cruel sarcasm when it comes to sartorial matters and Hats in particular to learn that these patterns appear to be increasing and exacerbating over time that a short time ago you could rely on an organization like the New York Times for anti-establishment radical reporting and now they are a mouthpiece of the establishment.
01:00:18.000 It's interesting that the Ukrainian conflict, much of the aid that's being offered to Ukraine
01:00:23.000 passes from the Pentagon through the military industrial complex.
01:00:27.000 Many of those weapons and assets appear to be quite difficult to track.
01:00:32.000 And in the subsequent post-war reconstruction of Ukraine, BlackRock are handling that and
01:00:37.000 there is an aim for 100% digitalization of Ukraine.
01:00:42.000 So it certainly seems to be a nexus of a great many stories that coalesce around corruption
01:00:48.000 and globalism.
01:00:49.000 A lot of people, by the way, I will tell you Seymour, on our online chat.
01:00:54.000 Adore you and your casual radicalism, although I'm getting there's a lot of people saying you should not have said that about my hat.
01:01:01.000 So it's I think you've had a bit of a better time than you thought you would have.
01:01:06.000 I think you've enjoyed this a little bit, haven't you?
01:01:08.000 You've been you started off a little bit curmudgeonly in your favourite chair that only you're allowed to sit in.
01:01:13.000 But over time, you've warmed to us as if being warmed by beautiful Nord Stream gas.
01:01:19.000 The only gas you can trust.
01:01:22.000 Your gas is a lot more expensive than my gas.
01:01:24.000 But you also create gas.
01:01:26.000 You're good at creating gas yourself.
01:01:28.000 You're a good gas machine.
01:01:29.000 That's great.
01:01:29.000 All I need to do is fit a pipeline to my face and we could have world peace.
01:01:34.000 Well, I'll tell you one thing about you.
01:01:35.000 You know what you're talking about.
01:01:37.000 So that's right.
01:01:37.000 It makes it much easier for me because you do understand what the world's what's going on.
01:01:42.000 My only shock is really, to be honest, it was is the Including the press in London.
01:01:47.000 I must say the London Times was one of the few people that figured out the story I was writing had some relevance.
01:01:53.000 But most of the cheerleading for Ukraine was madness all the way in the war.
01:02:01.000 I'm sorry, it doesn't mean I love Russia.
01:02:05.000 I certainly don't want to admit to any fondness for anything in Russia.
01:02:08.000 That would make me out to be really in trouble.
01:02:10.000 I'd have to have my wife start the car for the next year.
01:02:13.000 You know, there's so much hostility to Russia that it overrides common sense.
01:02:19.000 That's what it's done.
01:02:20.000 It's just overridden the notion that the Russian army is going to lose to Ukraine.
01:02:25.000 It's just not going to happen.
01:02:27.000 And when Biden wanted to whistleblown, blew it up, the people who, in the community, we're talking about really the creme de creme, were really appalled by it.
01:02:38.000 They saw it as him making a political Him deciding I'm going to keep Germany and Western Europe cold and broke because I want to try and win this war in Ukraine, a war that he cannot win.
01:02:52.000 The trick that you must, that I will tell you that I've learned in my long, as you said, many, many years, is presidents love wars because they're good for ratings.
01:03:03.000 All right, I got to go.
01:03:05.000 You got to go.
01:03:06.000 Put your headphones down.
01:03:08.000 Put it back on so I feel better.
01:03:09.000 Listen, I'm getting a bit sick of the level to which you're directing my outfit.
01:03:13.000 Do you want to pull it as a prize for wardrobe next?
01:03:18.000 I'll see you guys.
01:03:19.000 Hey, thanks for joining us.
01:03:20.000 By the way, one thing I didn't know.
01:03:22.000 A lot of people asked me why Substack.
01:03:25.000 Substack is a... I'm my own producer there.
01:03:29.000 It's an amazing place.
01:03:31.000 In other words, I'm...
01:03:34.000 There was more than a million hits on that story within less than a day.
01:03:39.000 And I get all these emails from people saying, wow, here comes somebody really telling a story now.
01:03:46.000 And they're on to the media.
01:03:49.000 They are onto the media.
01:03:50.000 They're onto the idea that there's either one side or the other, there's no middle.
01:03:54.000 And that means there's no good reporting.
01:03:57.000 And so it's fascinating.
01:03:59.000 I think the economics of the newspaper business are going to change enormously in the next decade.
01:04:05.000 My last one.
01:04:07.000 Goodbye.
01:04:07.000 I've got to go to work.
01:04:08.000 This isn't work.
01:04:10.000 You can't call this work coming on being vaguely offensive, making some gas jokes.
01:04:15.000 The only thing missing is the pub and the beer.
01:04:18.000 Goodbye.
01:04:19.000 Talk to you later.
01:04:20.000 God bless you, Seymour Hersh.
01:04:21.000 Thank you so much.
01:04:22.000 You can find Seymour's incredible work at seymourhersh.substack.com, where as well as providing investigative journalism, cruel barbs come for free.
01:04:34.000 What I thought was that had basically the dynamic of the film Up and we were talking about balloons you know there's that that curmudgeonly old man and that little boy's called Russell in the film Up who's sort of like a little bit optimistic and stuff.
01:04:46.000 I'm optimistic.
01:04:47.000 Well but like he's obviously so brilliant Seymour Hersh and like even in the times when he was talking about all the times because they were they were the only newspaper that kind of published it in mainstream newspaper in this country and even in that they were like the veteran reporter now aged 82 like really trying to do him for like being over he's so Brilliant!
01:05:04.000 I feel like we've lost the basic and positive aspects of tribe and hierarchy, i.e.
01:05:12.000 that person is an elder, so when you're talking to that person you think, oh well I'm dealing with someone I would speak respectfully to, like I would if it was in a family or community environment.
01:05:21.000 When everything becomes this sort of mindless damning of patriarchy, even though there are doubtless corrupt things that have come from authoritative and power-oriented structures, it doesn't mean that you lose regard for Wisdom.
01:05:33.000 That's how people move forward, is by like, alright, take on board what this dude's saying, then we'll apply it to what we've learned and what people younger than us are observing about the cultural trends and priorities of their generation.
01:05:46.000 Needs to be some cohesion.
01:05:48.000 Every direction we have, I think, a kind of deracination and separation, that we're not Connecting to one another in good faith and in love.
01:05:56.000 There's so much antipathy that in the end, to maintain their line, they have to start dismissing people that are clearly plausible, credible, and in the case of Seymour Hersh I would argue, quite brilliant.
01:06:11.000 And it's also like, that's the, yeah, like he was taking a piss of it, wasn't he?
01:06:14.000 Yeah.
01:06:14.000 But he was having a laugh.
01:06:16.000 Absolutely.
01:06:16.000 That's sounding you out when people do that, isn't it?
01:06:18.000 Yeah.
01:06:19.000 Yeah, what's with that?
01:06:20.000 Like, sort of, like, fuck with you a little bit, so you respond to it.
01:06:24.000 It's like, and also that's what Phil is, he's like kind of old and can't, fuck you, can't be bothered with it all, with the niceties.
01:06:31.000 Yeah, fantastic.
01:06:32.000 Yeah, it's pretty good stuff that.
01:06:33.000 Well, hey, tomorrow we've got Michael Tracy coming on the show.
01:06:36.000 He's an investigative journalist.
01:06:37.000 He'll be talking about the ongoing propaganda push for another world war, which I think if you live on the world, isn't necessarily a good thing.
01:06:44.000 If you want to join us for the show behind the show, Stay Connected, that we make every week, as well as getting access to my new standup special when it drops, Become a member of the Locals community.
01:06:54.000 They're on here right now.
01:06:55.000 All of our friends on Locals.
01:06:56.000 Look at what they're saying.
01:06:57.000 Look, they want us to talk about football.
01:07:00.000 Some people want me to be president.
01:07:01.000 Although some people like you as well, Gareth, as well.
01:07:03.000 Sensitive Hearts likes you.
01:07:04.000 I could be your press secretary.
01:07:05.000 Yeah, you'd be that.
01:07:06.000 I could do this a lot.
01:07:07.000 Yeah, do that.
01:07:08.000 Yeah, if you wiggle your fingers around, it'll be great for everybody.
01:07:11.000 People talking about, yeah, Zahex3133.
01:07:13.000 Why doesn't Russell get the Nobel Peace Prize?
01:07:15.000 I think you speak for millions when you say that.
01:07:18.000 Zahex31333.
01:07:19.000 All right, then.
01:07:21.000 Hey, why don't you sign up to our locals community?
01:07:24.000 We'll read your comments out during the show and you'll get access to all of this additional content.
01:07:29.000 Join us tomorrow.
01:07:30.000 Not for more of the same.
01:07:31.000 No.
01:07:31.000 Because it's another day.
01:07:32.000 We've moved forward.
01:07:33.000 We're constantly evolving.
01:07:34.000 It'll be for more of the different.
01:07:35.000 Until then, stay free.
01:07:37.000 Switch on.