Stay Free - Russel Brand - Moscow Concert Hall Attack – Were ISIS REALLY Behind It? - Stay Free #332

00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and get the camera.

00:02:06.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.

00:02:17.000 Hey, hello there you Awakening Wanderers.

00:02:19.000 Thanks for joining us today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.

00:02:22.000 It's a really exciting show today and if anything goes wrong, I'll tell you what, we're trying our absolute hardest.

00:02:30.000 If you're watching us on YouTube, Eventually, you're going to want to click the link in the description because as this show goes on, we're talking not only about new, sly Instagram censorship and what might be behind it, could it be the burgeoning conflict and the escalation of tensions in Gaza?

00:02:46.000 We're not only going to discuss the unique and extraordinary origins of the recent terrorist attack in Russia and the odd idea that there are condolences being offered at the same time as a new type of munition Let me know in the chat if you think you can guess what type of munition the United States are sending to Ukraine while simultaneously offering condolences for a terror attack and the kind of absurdity of that.

00:03:15.000 I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry those people were killed in a terrorist attack.

00:03:19.000 Okay, now, feel free to use these bombs that will, for generations yet to come, be blowing the limbs off innocent children.

00:03:27.000 The extraordinariness of a collapsing system that will not and cannot make sense because we are being deceived on a global scale.

00:03:35.000 That doesn't mean you should believe every single conspiracy theory that comes your way, but I would always suggest asking yourself these questions.

00:03:43.000 Could they do it?

00:03:44.000 Would they do it?

00:03:45.000 Would you know if they were doing it?

00:03:48.000 These are just some of the questions for you Awakening Wonders in that Rumble chat.

00:03:52.000 I'm talking to you.

00:03:53.000 Yes, you're right.

00:03:54.000 The one that was above negligent, Banana Carl Rhino.

00:03:56.000 That's frankly racist.

00:03:58.000 And Grammy Yannon.

00:03:59.000 Oh, Crowfarch, my bad. 0.99

00:04:01.000 Yeah, you're right.

00:04:02.000 Rasbender.

00:04:03.000 It's Cluster, Cluster F-bombs.

00:04:06.000 Rasbender, this is coming your way.

00:04:08.000 Boobiebomb, Matchpoke. 0.90

00:04:09.000 No, it's not Boobiebomb.

00:04:11.000 That's not a real thing.

00:04:12.000 You do not get a mug.

00:04:13.000 And you certainly ain't going to be getting your hands on one of these little gemstones.

00:04:17.000 What would you call that?

00:04:18.000 Is it pink?

00:04:19.000 There's 25% off these babies this week and every single penny we get from it, or the profits of it at least, we will use to help vulnerable people.

00:04:19.000 Is it salmon?

00:04:26.000 And who ain't vulnerable in a crazy world that's perpetuating continuous war in every single direction?

00:04:32.000 Who ain't vulnerable when it seems like it's the priority of your current administration to spend time...

00:04:39.000 You know they don't like Donald Trump, so why is Joe Biden even on Truth Social?

00:04:44.000 Why would you be on Truth Social if you don't like Donald Trump?

00:04:49.000 This is Donald Trump's post about how he's won some awards at a golf night.

00:04:53.000 What I like about this post is how he capitalises the points of victory.

00:04:56.000 Awards night, club championship, senior club champion, I won both!

00:05:02.000 Joe Biden looks gone out of his way to go congratulations Donald, quite the accomplishment,

00:05:07.000 but that's in a sense not acknowledging that this entire presidential campaign is being conducted 0.67

00:05:13.000 on a slightly ridiculous level. Digital Hippie says a war is when two armies are fighting.

00:05:19.000 Fantastic quote from one of your greatest comedians. Let me know in the chat who you

00:05:23.000 think's the greatest ever American comedian while watching your beloved president doing golf.

00:05:30.000 Okay, you can challenge me. All right, there we go.

00:05:38.000 Oh! 0.60

00:05:39.000 Got a fresher there.

00:05:42.000 Got a fresher lefty.

00:05:44.000 Oh my god, look at that.

00:05:47.000 Well done. 0.91

00:05:54.000 Someone's gonna get their head sniffed!

00:05:54.000 Well done!

00:05:57.000 If you're in the Awakened Wonder chat right now, let me know if you're into these little guys and I'm going to think of a competition so that you can win this thing.

00:06:04.000 I'm going to sign it.

00:06:05.000 I'm going to think of a way for you to win it.

00:06:07.000 This is lovely.

00:06:08.000 You'll enjoy this.

00:06:09.000 Kamala Harris, your VP, has been over there in Puerto Rico, like sort of dancing along to a song.

00:06:17.000 We're getting into it and everything, which is sort of adorable.

00:06:20.000 She's a human being, let's open our hearts to each other.

00:06:22.000 But what's really amazing and funny is that the song that was being sung was a vindictive critique of globalism and in particular the American agenda in Puerto Rico.

00:06:33.000 These are the words of the song that she was driving along to.

00:06:35.000 We want to know Kamala, what did you come here for? 0.92

00:06:38.000 We want to know We want to know.

00:06:40.000 We want to know what you think of our colony, Long Live Free Palestine and Haiti too.

00:06:46.000 Let's have a look at that moment.

00:06:49.000 Let's have a look at it.

00:06:50.000 Let's have a look.

00:06:50.000 Nothing on, uh... Oh, I see.

00:06:52.000 It's the moment, like, the ladies explaining to her.

00:06:52.000 It's number four.

00:07:01.000 Oh, they're saying, what are you doing here?

00:07:03.000 on free Palestine, free Haiti. 0.84

00:07:03.000 What's going on? 0.84

00:07:10.000 No, no, I'm not clapping.

00:07:12.000 I'm not clapping for that.

00:07:13.000 I do not like that.

00:07:14.000 Now, you guys, we asked you earlier, what story do you want us to cover in this increasingly curious world?

00:07:20.000 Do you want us to cover the Russia terror attack and its extraordinary origins and the peculiar way in which the New York Times immediately knew, immediately knew which group it was carried out by and how it definitely could only be them?

00:07:35.000 Do you want that covered?

00:07:36.000 Or we asked whether or not you were interested in Alex Jones referring to events in Gaza as a genocide, or Candace Owens leaving Daily Wire there.

00:07:46.000 We asked you guys what you wanted, and there it is.

00:07:50.000 65% of you wanted to talk about the Russia-ISIS attack.

00:07:53.000 So once we leave YouTube, that's what we'll be discussing.

00:07:56.000 Of course, there's some pretty brutal content included in that, in addition to some extraordinary complexity when it comes to the Extraordinary complexity when it comes to the origins of ISIS that you are gonna love.

00:08:10.000 It's pretty fantastic.

00:08:12.000 Now, what I'm interested in is the measures and manner of increasing censorship.

00:08:18.000 Instagram have just introduced new ways of censoring our content and what's peculiar is it's being done So, almost by cover of darkness, those of you that are Instagram users, I don't go on that platform myself, but we do publish content on there, will have discovered that overnight a new setting has been established.

00:08:39.000 That is, political content has to be selected for.

00:08:43.000 We've all been automatically opted in.

00:08:45.000 They've found a way to make it kind of fiddly to get political content.

00:08:48.000 And as is always the case when it comes to these matters, no one will tell you directly what political content means.

00:08:55.000 It will include social and cultural content.

00:08:57.000 So you could be up on the gram chatting about any old thing and find yourself on the wrong side of political censorship.

00:09:04.000 Meta, the company that owns Facebook and Instagram, changed your settings overnight without you knowing it.

00:09:09.000 It's now limiting what you see that it considers political content.

00:09:13.000 CBS 8's Anna Laurel explains how Meta defines political content and how you can change your new settings.

00:09:19.000 When I first tried to change my own Instagram settings, it was actually shutting my Instagram app down.

00:09:25.000 So I updated the app and then I was able to update the settings.

00:09:29.000 So you might have to do that first.

00:09:31.000 This political content that Meta says it's now limiting includes laws, elections, and social topics.

00:09:39.000 A worldwide farmer's protest.

00:09:41.000 You can bet that will be included.

00:09:42.000 Flowerpower678 in the rumble chat.

00:09:45.000 That means they can essentially select any content at all and say it's political and select against it.

00:09:51.000 They may even decide that certain users are political commentators.

00:09:56.000 I mean, I think I would fall fail of such a critique.

00:09:58.000 Do you imagine that that is possible?

00:10:00.000 If you're watching us on YouTube, we'll be available for another couple of minutes.

00:10:04.000 Then we're going to stride freely to the stream of freedom that we call Rumble.

00:10:08.000 And you might want to consider becoming an awakened wonder because you get an additional exclusive video every week and you're going to love the chemtrails one this week.

00:10:15.000 I saw someone in the chat before saying, we've not had the chemtrails video yet.

00:10:18.000 That's because I wanted to make it just right for you.

00:10:20.000 And I use this video not only to talk about chemtrails, the plausibility of the theory, but also conspiracy theories in general.

00:10:27.000 And we look at the idea of Could they do it?

00:10:30.000 Would they do it?

00:10:31.000 Would you know if they did?

00:10:32.000 That means that new theories will emerge all the time, but we don't need to necessarily jump right into them until they're corroborated.

00:10:40.000 At the moment, if you use the code GODISGREAT, we will give you one month free on Locals, where you'll get all of our content, all of our chats, Full access to our movement and let's face it, our agenda now is to create real independence away from a corrupt political class.

00:10:58.000 That's why I think Candice Owen is making her primary home local. 1.00

00:11:02.000 She's becoming Awake and Wonder.

00:11:04.000 You can join Becca D and Davros200 and many of our friends like USA Now chatting away beautifully in that chat right away.

00:11:12.000 It's a very, very, very good platform.

00:11:14.000 You'll love it.

00:11:16.000 Now Instagram may be censoring what it calls political content and this is a curious time when it comes to conspiracy theories.

00:11:23.000 Many people found the Kate Middleton story cause for fascination and indeed latest revelations and this is directly from Kate Middleton that she very sadly That's obviously extraordinarily sad.

00:11:38.000 All of us at some point will be affected by that disease, if not directly, then tangentially.

00:11:43.000 What's extraordinary though is how the legacy media are all corroborating the idea that China, Russia and Iran somehow were behind propagating these ideas and theories.

00:11:55.000 And it's happened With extraordinary speed.

00:11:59.000 Now, obviously, this being Rumble, of course, there are still theories and ideas that you are free to discuss on a free speech platform.

00:12:07.000 You discuss away, you beautiful people.

00:12:11.000 Let's have a look, though, at how Legacy Media reported on this story.

00:12:16.000 Here's a headline on the subject.

00:12:18.000 China and Russia spreading slurs against the Princess of Wales.

00:12:22.000 In order to, it says here, destabilise the nation.

00:12:24.000 Now you'll be fascinated to see how quickly these ideas gained traction.

00:12:29.000 Almost as if there is disinformation and malinformation and propaganda that is utilised by our governments and media conglomerates.

00:12:40.000 Also, look at this from a morning show in our country.

00:12:43.000 Good morning Britain.

00:12:44.000 Claims this morning that conspiracy theories surrounding the health of the Princess of Wales are being spread by China, Russia and Iran to destabilise the nation.

00:12:56.000 How dare you! 0.99

00:12:56.000 How dare you destabilise our nation! 0.99

00:12:58.000 Gosh, can you think of all the ways that a nation might get destabilised?

00:13:02.000 Whether it's through the economic mishandling, cack-handedness of our own governments, the propaganda and lies that we're continually told, the inability to control our nations, forces of ordinary people used to police and control our populations.

00:13:19.000 Wow, the least of our problems is China making some stuff up. 0.98

00:13:23.000 It reached even, some might argue, certainly newer and perhaps more reliable news stations like GB News.

00:13:30.000 Let me know what you think of that channel.

00:13:32.000 It's not just the MPs and security and energy that the Russians and the Chinese are allegedly interfering with.

00:13:39.000 According to reports out today, the Royal Family have also been victim to this.

00:13:44.000 China and Iran are fuelling online conspiracy theories and disinformation about the Princess of Wales, according to a report today on the front of the Daily Telegraph.

00:13:52.000 This information is across all media.

00:13:55.000 We're very interested when legacy media organizations all appear to align with one another.

00:14:01.000 Throughout the pandemic period, we noted the similarity of their funding models, where they accepted advertising from, indeed who they chiefly get their advertising revenue from, and how that might have influenced, for example, their reporting when it came to certain medications that were offered during that period.

00:14:16.000 And on that subject, you will be fascinated to see our conversation with Dr. Ladipo, Who is the Surgeon General in Florida and may yet rise to an even more reified position should things go your way in the U.S.

00:14:31.000 of A, because he's got some extraordinary views and many of our AwakendWonder community members got the opportunity to ask him questions.

00:14:39.000 It was a brilliant conversation.

00:14:40.000 You'll love it.

00:14:40.000 You'll see that in the coming days.

00:14:43.000 But if you were an AwakendWonder, you could have joined and asked questions during it. 0.92

00:14:46.000 Let's have a look at a little more Legacy News reporting on this subject before moving on to the extraordinary motions, notions, and movements in what we call, I suppose, right-wing media space.

00:14:58.000 For example, you know, Candace Owens has left Daily Wire. 1.00

00:15:02.000 She's joined Locals now.

00:15:04.000 Alex Jones has expressed some extraordinarily, what do I want to say, interesting views When it comes to events in the Middle East, and we're going to be looking at that in a minute.

00:15:15.000 Mazenarabi1, love your work, matey.

00:15:17.000 Thanks, mate.

00:15:18.000 I hope I said your tag correctly.

00:15:18.000 I appreciate that.

00:15:20.000 Let's have a look at one more piece of propagandist coverage of this story, and then we'll move on.

00:15:26.000 Well, we know that in the past countries have tried to interfere and influence elections.

00:15:30.000 It now seems that the royal family, and in particular the Princess of Wales, have been targeted as well.

00:15:36.000 Now, there's been a huge amount of support since that announcement, you're saying, on Friday.

00:15:40.000 The vast majority of people in the country, the vast majority of people watching.

00:15:43.000 Very sympathetic.

00:15:44.000 A lot of us haven't forgotten Russiagate where we were fed false narratives by the legacy media almost continually.

00:15:50.000 Many of us will still recall the vilification of Joe Rogan when he had the audacity to mention how he personally responded to a personal medical condition.

00:16:00.000 In short, he got COVID and treated it himself.

00:16:02.000 You will remember the amount of propaganda and how hard they leant into Ivermectin is a horse paste! 0.99

00:16:08.000 Just one uniform global voice parroting the same message.

00:16:12.000 Well, guess what?

00:16:13.000 The FDA now are unable to describe Ivermectin as an animal medication by law because it is fake news and misinformation.

00:16:24.000 So if you wait around in these spaces long enough, you will be proved right eventually because the legacy media and their establishment overlords, should we call them overlords?

00:16:34.000 Someone said bloodbath in the chat.

00:16:35.000 You do not use the phrase bloodbath, okay?

00:16:38.000 way your food food prices have doubled says William B Taylor let's have a

00:16:42.000 little look at this British propaganda for a few more seconds. I'm very

00:16:45.000 supportive to her but in the last few weeks we haven't just had conspiracy

00:16:48.000 theories have we there have been very cruel and sometimes very ins...

00:16:52.000 Someone said bloodbath in the chat you do not use the phrase bloodbath okay that hurts people

00:16:57.000 humane comments Now some of these it is being suggested the worst of it may well have been originated from fake accounts, from bots, originated from propaganda machines in countries such as Russia, China and also Iran as well.

00:17:12.000 You should probably have wars with those countries then and would you additionally please censor all of our content and control our conversation just to help us you know we can't have anything like this happen again!

00:17:21.000 Now, what are the countries going to do about it?

00:17:24.000 The government, of course, and our agencies are well aware of this.

00:17:27.000 They are going to take sanctions today against China for separate issues for hacking MPs' accounts.

00:17:34.000 But will all of this put more pressure on social media companies?

00:17:37.000 You know that at the moment the US government are lobbying to ensure they still have the right to purchase private data of US citizens as long as it's garnered by private companies to bypass laws around data capture.

00:17:51.000 You know that's happening right now.

00:17:53.000 You know that their intentions around TikTok and possibly even Instagram are more about censorship when it comes to issues relating to war rather than any threats from the Chinese Communist Party when it comes to TikTok.

00:18:05.000 You know that Julian Assange is still in prison without trial in the United Kingdom, awaiting results to see if he's even able to appeal against extradition.

00:18:14.000 So while that fella stands there in front of that castle, we have to acknowledge that propaganda is at least a two-way street.

00:18:22.000 To intervene as well.

00:18:25.000 We hope that you'll understand that as a family an individual suffering in that way is sad.

00:18:30.000 Of course it is.

00:18:31.000 Now let's talk about the important subject of Israel and the remarkable impact it's having on right-wing spaces but culture more broadly.

00:18:41.000 Is it being used to legitimize censorship?

00:18:43.000 And when I say Israel I don't mean the nation of Israel, I mean current events in Gaza.

00:18:48.000 Let's have a look at Caitlin Johnston's recent post to kick us off. 0.97

00:18:52.000 She says Ben Shapiro cancelled cultured Candace Owens out of a job and Alex Jones has condemned Israel's genocidal atrocities before most Democrats on Capitol Hill.

00:19:01.000 American right-wing punditry is a trip, man.

00:19:04.000 And that's an interesting perspective, isn't it?

00:19:06.000 To consider that Alex Jones and Candace Owens are to the left of the Biden administration, particularly as we speculate in a video coming later this week.

00:19:17.000 There are ongoing arms deals, we know there are ongoing arms deals, that Biden's administration continues to arm Israel, keeping the arms sales at a certain level so they don't have to be sanctioned by Congress.

00:19:29.000 And what if it is because of reporting on Palestine that TikTok are facing sanctions?

00:19:35.000 What if that is the case?

00:19:37.000 Is it possible that that's the case? 0.97

00:19:39.000 Candace is of course leaving Daily Wire, many assume, although I don't know if Candice has bigger balls than Ryan. 1.00

00:19:47.000 That woman has got balls. 1.00

00:19:49.000 There's no question about that. 1.00

00:19:50.000 She got balls as still. 1.00

00:19:51.000 She's a powerful individual. 0.95

00:19:52.000 There's a lot of people that are detractors of Candice Owens, but she's not a person who's afraid to speak her mind, and I think that's an admirable quality.

00:20:01.000 Let's have a look at what she said, Russell Fonzie Brand.

00:20:05.000 Hey! 0.99

00:20:05.000 Slim Feezy. 0.99

00:20:06.000 Guys, I'm going to be honest with you because everybody's noticing it.

00:20:09.000 Every single political commentator in America, every single one of them knows this, that if you do not step out and say things that are radically pro-Israel, or if you are too quiet on certain narratives and they want you to be radically pro-Israel, you can lose everything.

00:20:27.000 That's the truth.

00:20:28.000 That is a fact.

00:20:28.000 I'm not feeling like I need to hide from that anymore, or be afraid to say it, rather, is a better way to say it, because I've endured this for years.

00:20:38.000 I'm just at the end of my rope.

00:20:39.000 I have given so much rope here, and I am just done with it.

00:20:44.000 This is her, that was her last episode actually.

00:20:47.000 She never did any further reporting on Daily Wire.

00:20:51.000 Let's have a look at what she said on her new platform.

00:20:54.000 This is the AwakendWonder platform, Locals, where our members get additional content, extra videos every single week and the opportunity to participate in our burgeoning revolutionary force.

00:21:06.000 Hey guys, it's Candice.

00:21:07.000 The rumors are true. 0.99

00:21:08.000 I am free.

00:21:09.000 Welcome to my locals page.

00:21:11.000 So much to talk about.

00:21:12.000 Obviously, I'm going to take a couple of weeks here just to rebuild and to refocus and to create something that is actually mine and something that Can't be threatened or taken because it belongs to me.

00:21:24.000 I can't tell you enough how much your support has meant to me over the years.

00:21:27.000 We're just getting started.

00:21:29.000 Join the Locals page, obviously, here.

00:21:30.000 You can support me and my work as an independent journalist, as an independent podcaster.

00:21:36.000 We're still going to be doing five days a week.

00:21:38.000 There'll be tons of announcements coming in the next couple of weeks.

00:21:41.000 And I guess the last thing I want to say is thank you.

00:21:43.000 For those of you that don't want to be on Locals and just want to support in any capacity, you can head to GoCandice.com.

00:21:50.000 Thank you guys.

00:21:51.000 There she goes.

00:21:53.000 Let's have a look now on this potentially pivotal moment where Alex Jones has posted this on Israel.

00:22:00.000 I'm going to read this out.

00:22:02.000 Israel has lost the high ground. 0.89

00:22:04.000 This is not war.

00:22:05.000 It is robotic mass genocide.

00:22:08.000 Section 1091 of Title 18 United States Code prohibits genocide whether committed in time of peace or time of war.

00:22:15.000 Genocide is defined in 1091 and includes violent attacks with the specific intent to destroy,

00:22:21.000 in whole or in part, a national ethnic, racial or religious group.

00:22:26.000 So plainly, these spaces are radically altering fast.

00:22:31.000 New alliances that were starting to coalesce are being challenged.

00:22:36.000 One of the issues that we can all agree on, I'm sure, can we agree on this?

00:22:40.000 Is free speech, the ability to disagree, the right for us to dispute and to have our voices aired, the right to choose for ourselves what our perspectives are, the maximum amount of democracy possible, and if you want my personal take, no more war.

00:22:56.000 No more war.

00:22:57.000 No more meddling in other people's nations or other people's disputes unless it is to advocate for peace.

00:23:05.000 No more colonialist imperialist projects in various forms that destabilize other nations and likely contribute to mass migration.

00:23:14.000 A return to first principles.

00:23:17.000 Maximum freedom of the individual.

00:23:19.000 Maximum freedom of the family and the community, however you define family and The ability for us all to live harmoniously in fully autonomous independent communities with representation where possible because it seems that if you had representation and democracy when it comes to the issue of continuing to fund both the Ukraine-Russia war by proxy and the Israel-Gaza massacre by proxy, American people and in particular it seems, if statistics is to be believed, Biden voters are not

00:23:52.000 Fans, but that's just what I think on that issue.

00:23:53.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.

00:23:56.000 Now, I'm very, very excited.

00:23:58.000 So excited that I almost lost myself to tell you that today's episode is brought to you by Sticker Mule.

00:24:03.000 Who don't love Sticker Mule? 0.99

00:24:05.000 Because with Sticker Mule, you get your own stickers in any shape that you like, any colour.

00:24:10.000 People just don't care what shape or colour they are.

00:24:12.000 These stickers are this shape and colour, right?

00:24:15.000 Check it out!

00:24:16.000 You can make your own for just a dollar and get free shipping.

00:24:19.000 Upload a design, a photo or a JPEG and Sticker Mule will make it beautiful.

00:24:22.000 You can make anything.

00:24:23.000 Express yourself.

00:24:24.000 Use your imagination.

00:24:25.000 The stickers will come to you in four days after you've seen online proof showing you exactly what the stickers will look like.

00:24:31.000 This can go to get to you wherever you are in the world.

00:24:34.000 Wherever you are in the world, four days, you can get 10 custom stickers now for a dollar.

00:24:39.000 The shipping's free.

00:24:40.000 Go to stickermule.com forward slash Russell Brand to get this deal.

00:24:43.000 If you use my code, it'll make it look like adverts on our channel work.

00:24:47.000 And that's pretty cool for us.

00:24:49.000 OK, start the countdown.

00:24:50.000 We are leaving.

00:24:52.000 YouTube right now, not forever.

00:24:54.000 If you're an awakened wonder there, we will continue to post fantastic videos and you should watch them all.

00:24:59.000 We need your support.

00:25:00.000 But we need you to click the link in the description right now because we are going to talk about this terrorist attack in Russia, its origins, the bizarre hypocrisy of America offering condolences.

00:25:10.000 You will love this piece of reporting.

00:25:12.000 Consider becoming an Awakened 1-2 where you get an extra video every week, including the chemtrail one that everyone's been talking about and waiting for.

00:25:19.000 And you can join us live with guests.

00:25:21.000 Click the link.

00:25:21.000 See you in a second.

00:25:23.000 Now, when it comes to global war, we know already we are dealing with a complex subject.

00:25:30.000 We know that nations like mine, the United Kingdom, and nations like yours, the United States, went to war with Iraq, Based on a lie. 0.98

00:25:37.000 The lie of course being weapons of mass destruction as well as a tangential and curious connection that was made.

00:25:45.000 That tangential and curious connection that was made was let's attack Iraq on the basis of these horrendous 9-11 attacks On New York City. 0.64

00:25:55.000 But what if those actions have led to the peculiar creation of terrorist entities that are right now potentially conducting atrocities in Moscow?

00:26:07.000 How can we have a time where this happens?

00:26:11.000 Where the United States say, we stand with Russia. 0.51

00:26:14.000 The United States condemn heinous Moscow attacks and stand with Russia, Blinken says.

00:26:19.000 We condemn terrorism in all of its forms and stand in solidarity with the people of Russia grieving of life from this horrific event.

00:26:26.000 Right, standard diplomacy, sensible opinion.

00:26:29.000 Or what about this?

00:26:30.000 U.S.

00:26:31.000 strongly condemn deadly terrorist attacks in Russia.

00:26:34.000 Send deepest condolences that we strongly condemn them.

00:26:37.000 We condemn terrorism in all of its forms and then try to wrap your mind around this fractal reality because similarly The US are sending Ukraine more cluster bombs as part of a new $300 million arms package. 0.98

00:26:53.000 If you don't know what cluster bombs are, they're sometimes known in the rumble chat as cluster fuck bombs, because these bombs lie around for ages and potentially could explode generations later, killing, destroying, maiming innocent children. 0.98

00:27:09.000 I hope not in a concert hall. 0.99

00:27:10.000 As long as in years to come a concert hall isn't built on one of these clusterfuck sites, then you won't have the ludicrous hypocrisy of cluster bombs blowing up people that are innocently attending a festival and the potential problems that that would cause when it comes to hypocrisy. 0.97

00:27:28.000 What an extraordinary story. 0.97

00:27:30.000 At bare minimum, the CIA participated in the genesis and creation of ISIS, and ISIS are a group that grew out of the Iraq conflict.

00:27:40.000 At minimum, the United States created this problem.

00:27:44.000 How extraordinary to see all of these botched wars aligning and coalescing into one crazy clusterfuck of a perpetual war, where wars from the past and wars Yet to happen are starting to combine.

00:27:59.000 Let's have a look at this from Annie Wall.

00:28:01.000 Well, this is just about the 300 million dollar arms package, which you are familiar with.

00:28:07.000 Let's have a look at a little bit of news from the legacy media.

00:28:10.000 Video news, I mean.

00:28:12.000 Where is that, mate?

00:28:13.000 I can't see that number.

00:28:14.000 Let's have a look at... Thank you.

00:28:14.000 Thank you very much.

00:28:16.000 Today was a day of national mourning in Russia for the victims of the terror attack in a concert hall on the outskirts of Moscow.

00:28:24.000 At least 137 people were killed.

00:28:27.000 A branch of ISIS did claim responsibility for the attack.

00:28:31.000 And today, the suspected gunmen were formally charged.

00:28:34.000 CBS's Debra Pata has the latest.

00:28:38.000 Investigators surveying the smouldering wreckage of the aftermath of the weekend massacre near Moscow.

00:28:45.000 On Friday night, armed men in combat fatigues burst into the Krokor City Hall, a popular concert venue, and methodically began shooting the audience before setting the place ablaze.

00:28:57.000 Videos posted on social media showed people screaming and ducking for cover ...as the gunmen fired round after round... ...terrifying and awful as war and violence always are.

00:29:10.000 Isn't it extraordinary to see our nation standing in solidarity with Russia while continuing to arm Ukraine for an adjacent conflict?

00:29:21.000 Now of course I understand that commonly Russia are seen as the aggressors and perpetrators of that conflict but To fully embrace that rather reductive perspective, you have to ignore the actions of NATO countries, NATO itself, US involvement in the 2014 coup, and CIA bases in Ukraine for the last 10 years engaging in what has been described as provocative activity that was likely to lead to war.

00:29:50.000 Here's some extraordinary reporting now.

00:29:54.000 Let's have a look.

00:29:55.000 No, that's not it.

00:29:56.000 It's this.

00:29:58.000 This is what's incredible, that as soon as this story was told, immediately, that's it, leave it there, thank you, as soon as this story broke, the New York Times were able to immediately say that Ukrainian intelligence involvement was not a credible theory.

00:30:17.000 Let's have a look at this and break it down together because What is the evidence that the New York Times and Washington Post had access to that enabled them to immediately make that claim?

00:30:28.000 The New York Times and Washington Post have promptly initiated a campaign to deny the involvement of the U.S.

00:30:34.000 and Ukraine in this attack.

00:30:36.000 Both outlets immediately dismissed Putin's statement about a connection to Ukraine, citing unnamed U.S.

00:30:42.000 security officials.

00:30:43.000 Okay, could you be a bit more specific?

00:30:45.000 Without providing any evidence, they simply echoed the claims of the White House and Kiev, made almost as soon as the attack occurred, that neither the US nor Ukraine were involved.

00:30:56.000 Now, many of you will have noticed that, I believe it was two weeks ago, the US issued a warning that there will be a terror attack.

00:31:04.000 Now what we need to know is, where did the perpetrators of this terrorist attack come from?

00:31:10.000 And is it possible that they could have any relationship at all with either Ukrainian special forces or US forces?

00:31:18.000 Not to just outlandishly make the claim that there's a conspiracy or potential involvement with the CIA or any other deep state agency, but simply to reflect on the possibility and to note how quickly the legacy media said that it was impossible.

00:31:34.000 How is it possible for the major U.S.

00:31:36.000 media outlets to immediately exclude any connection between this attack and a war raging between Russia and Ukraine with significant U.S.

00:31:44.000 involvement?

00:31:45.000 In fact, their claims have no more credibility than their earlier denial of U.S.

00:31:49.000 and Ukrainian involvement in the bombing of the German-Russian Nord Stream gas pipeline, Oh yeah, do you remember that?

00:31:55.000 That straight away, as soon as that pipeline blew up, they said, well, this is Russia.

00:32:00.000 Self-sabotage.

00:32:01.000 They're doing this for attention.

00:32:03.000 Of course, many of us were cynical and were perplexed, as we are, by this extraordinary, anomalous, and oddly out-of-context terror attack.

00:32:12.000 Even though it seems that Russia do have, I think, a 10% foreign population, that there are disputes between Russia and former Soviet territories.

00:32:21.000 Notably, I think I'm saying it right, Tajistan, a former Soviet nation that does have insurrectionists and insurgents within them.

00:32:29.000 No doubt Russia has its own version of imperialism and its own version of atrocities. 0.81

00:32:34.000 I suppose the question that comes to the forefront is, is there any history of American deep state sources inspiring, funding rebel insurgents if it was convenient to their own agenda?

00:32:47.000 And indeed, once these claims have Once these attacks have been claimed by ISIS, and that's already happened, you have to ask yourself, where did ISIS come from?

00:32:56.000 What were the events that led to the formation of ISIS?

00:33:01.000 This places the burden of proof on them to prove their innocence.

00:33:04.000 The attack has the mark of the CIA and its proxies in Kiev all over it.

00:33:08.000 Let's break that down a little further.

00:33:12.000 Central to the imperialist propaganda about the supposed non-involvement of the U.S.

00:33:16.000 and Ukraine is the fact that ISIS-K has claimed responsibility for the attack.

00:33:21.000 But the involvement of ISIS-K would not disprove Ukrainian and U.S.

00:33:25.000 involvement.

00:33:26.000 On the contrary, ISIS-K is largely a creation of U.S. 0.99

00:33:30.000 imperialism and its decades-long wars in the Middle East and Central Asia.

00:33:35.000 In 2021, the Wall Street Journal reported that US-trained intelligence agents and elite counterinsurgency troops were joining ISIS-K in Afghanistan.

00:33:44.000 Tajikistan, from where the suspect terrorists hail, has long been entangled in the armed conflicts in Afghanistan, going back to the 1980s when the US trained and funded Islamist fundamentalists in its war against the Soviet Union.

00:33:59.000 What a tangled and baffling web.

00:34:02.000 There is evidence that the CIA, we all know this in fact, that the Mujahideen received funding from the CIA, that Osama bin Laden at points in his history, due to his group's opposition to the then Soviet Union, received CIA funding.

00:34:15.000 It shows you that when you have a complex, interventionist, globalist policy when it comes to foreign events and foreign affairs, that you're going to create phantoms for the future and extraordinary problems like this.

00:34:29.000 And by the way, here's the kicker, all of it's funded by the American taxpayer.

00:34:35.000 All of these agencies, all of these insurgencies, all of these events, all of this deep cover craziness is coming from your endeavor.

00:34:44.000 That you can somehow trace your toil and graft and the way that you are treated in your nation and the way you are spoken about by your government and its media to events taking place overseas like this.

00:34:57.000 And you better believe that causing this amount of instability in various regions across the world creates the conditions for mass migration.

00:35:05.000 And if your country is unable to manage its borders, well, perhaps because funding via the Pentagon is all being souvered up, vacuumed up, into various projects abroad and ending up in the corporate private hands of Raytheon, Boeing, Lockheed Martin instead of being spent on actual American service personnel who as we know are setting themselves on fire in protest against these conflicts then what you've got yourself is an intergenerational long-term cluster bomb narrative right there and I changed the word to bomb at the last minute.

00:35:44.000 In this context, the March 7th warning by the U.S.

00:35:47.000 Embassy in Moscow of an impending major terrorist attack in Russia can only be interpreted as an attempt to create an alibi for the U.S.

00:35:54.000 in the lead-up to the operation of its proxies.

00:35:58.000 What a fascinating perspective that is!

00:36:03.000 In spite of the fact that on Rumble we can speak freely and we can say whatever we want, we believe in responsible reporting and, above all else, truth.

00:36:12.000 This is not to say that this is definitely a false flag event but, you know, Vladimir Putin, he had his suspicions indeed.

00:36:20.000 Which is the link?

00:36:22.000 Putin says this.

00:36:23.000 Let's have a look.

00:36:25.000 Putin links Ukraine to Moscow massacre without evidence, but this is from Politico.

00:36:29.000 And Politico, except funding, I believe, from the military-industrial complex.

00:36:33.000 We'll check that out.

00:36:34.000 President Vladimir Putin on Saturday suggested that terrorists who killed at least 133 people, and may God rest their eternal souls, in Friday night's attack at a Moscow concert hall were helped by someone based in Ukraine without providing any evidence.

00:36:46.000 In the same way that the New York Times didn't provide any evidence that these attacks had no Ukraine involvement.

00:36:54.000 Ukrainian officials have denied any involvement in the massacre for which Islamic State has claimed responsibility.

00:36:59.000 But when you look at the history of Islamic State, you're involved anyway. 0.93

00:37:03.000 And I don't mean you, I mean your tax dollars and your deep state.

00:37:07.000 Which, by the way, the New York Times are creating propagandist content to tell you is a cuddly, friendly old bunch of Star Trek fans and adorable people with squeaky voices.

00:37:15.000 And there's no need to believe for a second that that's not true.

00:37:18.000 Of course, it's people by human beings with souls.

00:37:22.000 But also they are part of a network that seems to have a pretty specific agenda and it is not the service of the American people or the people of the world.

00:37:31.000 Ukraine, which has been defending itself from Russia's full-scale invasion for two years and okay, what happened immediately prior to that, has repeatedly denied any links to the attackers.

00:37:39.000 There's some evidence too that Organizations and groups connected to the nations that have their own grievances against Russian imperialism are working out of Ukraine and receive their funding in ways that requires further investigation and analysis and hopefully over the coming week we'll be able to bring you that.

00:37:56.000 Remember, this is not the same saying, oh there's something...

00:37:59.000 This is simply saying would the New York Times tell you the truth or would the New York Times amplify the agenda of the powerful?

00:38:06.000 Would the CIA be involved in an operation such as this?

00:38:09.000 Is there any precedent for it even within this conflict?

00:38:12.000 Are we not in some kind of Avengers endgame scenario where various characters from various movies like, oh here's Black Panther, here's Spider-Man, Here's ISIS, here's the Mujahideen, here's neo-Nazis being funded by the American taxpayer fighting in Ukraine.

00:38:29.000 Who knows where this extraordinary mess is going to lead unless we stop intervening in foreign conflicts other than to advocate for peace.

00:38:39.000 It's a, I don't know, it's a novel idea but maybe it'll get some traction.

00:38:43.000 It has repeatedly denied any links to the attackers, that's the Ukrainian deep state.

00:38:47.000 Ukrainian foreign ministry labeling Moscow's accusations as a Kremlin attempt to mobilize Russian citizens against Ukraine and to try to distance the international community from Kiev.

00:38:56.000 You wonder what would be the motive of the deep state in enacting such an event?

00:39:01.000 Well, it would destabilize Russia, it would undermine Putin's position as a defender of national security, and it would create chaos and diversion in the territory.

00:39:11.000 So, obviously I'm not saying that it did happen.

00:39:13.000 I'm saying it could happen.

00:39:14.000 I'm saying that they would do it, and if they did do it, you wouldn't know yet.

00:39:17.000 So that's simply an open-minded analytical perspective on a complex situation.

00:39:23.000 Let me know what you think about this story in the chat right now, as Godo777 is.

00:39:28.000 Same as Putin when he blew up his own pipeline.

00:39:31.000 It's a bloodbath, I tell ya. 1.00

00:39:33.000 Another goddamn bloodbath. 0.99

00:39:35.000 If you want a reminder, Of how you're reported to, how you're regarded by the state, and how the legacy media will carry their agenda. 0.99

00:39:42.000 I've got one word for you.

00:39:43.000 It's Ivermectin.

00:39:45.000 Now, while it's still not been proven that Ivermectin is effective in the treatment of COVID, no one can make that claim on the basis of clinical trials yet.

00:39:55.000 Certainly those trials are now taking place.

00:39:57.000 What is for certain is that the FDA are no longer able to call it horse paste.

00:40:03.000 So what would CNN, Don Lemon, Brian Stelzer and basically everyone in the legacy media right the way up to like SNL and regular talk shows do with that piece of information.

00:40:16.000 It's misinformation now to call ivermectin an animal medication.

00:40:20.000 Let's have a look at that story.

00:40:22.000 So the FDA has agreed to delete and never publish several social media posts suggesting that ivermectin, a drug that some doctors use to treat COVID-19, is for animals and not humans.

00:40:33.000 While the FDA still does not approve of using ivermectin to treat COVID, it settled Thursday a lawsuit brought by three doctors who sued it As well as the Department of Health and Human Services and its Secretary Xavier Bequerra and FDA Secretary Robert Califf.

00:40:49.000 All parties have settled.

00:40:50.000 The lawsuit filed on June 2nd, 2022 was brought by Drs.

00:40:54.000 Mary Talley-Bowden, Paul Marek and Robert Apter, each of whom claimed the FDA was interfering with their ability to practice medicine.

00:41:00.000 The case was initially dismissed on the grounds that the FDA had sovereign immunity, which is weird.

00:41:05.000 Like, where's my sovereign immunity?

00:41:07.000 Where's your sovereign immunity?

00:41:10.000 Though a U.S. 0.55

00:41:11.000 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision saying that the FDA is not a physician.

00:41:17.000 Indeed, how could it be one?

00:41:19.000 Receiving, as it does, its funding in such an extraordinary way.

00:41:23.000 Elsewhere, it's been understood now that toddlers may be at risk of seizures if they take the vaccines.

00:41:30.000 That's another story I could have done with being published at the time.

00:41:33.000 Although, blessedly, common sense prevailed when it came to me and my family.

00:41:37.000 Let's have a look.

00:41:38.000 FDA admits Covid vaccinations lead to significantly elevated risks of seizures among toddlers.

00:41:44.000 Elon Musk there over on X, it should never have been given to little kids.

00:41:50.000 Interesting perspective there.

00:41:52.000 In fact, it makes you cry out for a drug that you can simply enjoy on the forecourt of a gas station, doesn't it?

00:41:59.000 Simpler times where you could just lean back in your truck or maybe drape yourself across the dash of your Tesla and ingest just a little bit of good old-fashioned gas station heroin.

00:42:13.000 And I wonder if those guys will be interested in some sponsorship deals.

00:42:16.000 They're drinks and pills promising to boost energy but experts call them gas station heroin.

00:42:22.000 It's sold as happiness in a bottle.

00:42:24.000 You can find it online.

00:42:25.000 Bold claim, isn't it?

00:42:26.000 Like, happiness in a bottle.

00:42:29.000 Already, it's an abstract concept.

00:42:31.000 Happiness perhaps isn't even what we should be looking for.

00:42:34.000 Perhaps purpose would be a better aim for all of us rather than happiness, which seems, I don't know what, a pleasure-derived distraction.

00:42:41.000 At convenience stores, even gas stations.

00:42:44.000 But experts are sounding the alarm, calling what's in these bottles and pills gas station heroin.

00:42:50.000 It's scary how available it is, because when you go into the gas stations, it's right up front.

00:42:56.000 Morgan Eccles says she thought the active ingredient in it, tineptine, was a safe dietary supplement that might help with her anxiety.

00:43:03.000 I would never.

00:43:04.000 Tineptine, that guy hung itself in its cell somehow.

00:43:09.000 Never have bought this had I known at the time what it was.

00:43:12.000 She says it only took a couple pills for her to get hooked.

00:43:15.000 It has the potential to destroy anybody.

00:43:19.000 And that's exactly what this mom says happened to her son.

00:43:23.000 It's a bit sad and awful if someone dies as a result of it.

00:43:23.000 It's horrible.

00:43:26.000 There's a reason they call it gas station heroin.

00:43:29.000 Christy Terry says her life was shattered when her 19-year-old son, Jonathan, died after taking these pills he bought at a gas station.

00:43:37.000 It's sold under names like Neptune's Fix and Tiana Red.

00:43:41.000 Neptune's Fix?

00:43:42.000 What does that mean?

00:43:43.000 Like, Neptune, he's the god of the sea, isn't he?

00:43:47.000 Like, what, with his trident?

00:43:49.000 What's he gonna do?

00:43:50.000 Like, why is he being evoked?

00:43:52.000 Poseidon, Neptune, the king of the deep.

00:43:54.000 What's he got to do with heroin?

00:43:56.000 I don't understand it.

00:43:56.000 I don't...

00:43:58.000 But the main ingredient in it, TNF-teen, has recently been linked by doctors to serious side effects, including seizures and death.

00:44:06.000 That's not... Death is not a side effect, is it?

00:44:10.000 Because... Death is... That's... Once you're dead, that's no longer on the side.

00:44:14.000 That's not a tangent.

00:44:16.000 What are the side effects?

00:44:17.000 Well, you know, being... Hmm, being, yes.

00:44:20.000 The very center, the crucible of all reality, the quality of God itself.

00:44:23.000 Yeah, that.

00:44:24.000 Well, it does cause that.

00:44:26.000 And also seizures.

00:44:27.000 Does anything else... Does anything else cause seizures?

00:44:31.000 In fact, it's time for your booster, baby!

00:44:31.000 Oh, yeah!

00:44:33.000 This can be very dangerous, because you just don't really know what's in that bottle.

00:44:38.000 Dr. Dank01 in the chat may cause some death.

00:44:41.000 Does cause a little bit of death.

00:44:43.000 You know, it was worth it though, because that was some pretty nice gas station heroin stroke booster shot.

00:44:49.000 Diane Colello, who runs the New Jersey Poison Center at Rutgers Medical School, says cases of t-ineptine poisoning are surging.

00:44:57.000 It worries me a lot.

00:44:59.000 It's going up across the nation.

00:45:01.000 Experts say the so-called gas station heroin works like a power... I'm beat on this show.

00:45:07.000 Gas station heroin!

00:45:09.000 ...opioid and can be very addictive.

00:45:13.000 We went shopping at several convenience stores around New Jersey and found Tiana Red and Neptune's Fix readily available.

00:45:21.000 The cost?

00:45:22.000 Around $30 a bottle.

00:45:24.000 Now she and this.

00:45:25.000 Is it an indication that I'm not entirely over my addiction?

00:45:28.000 That I'm like, hmm, reasonable?

00:45:30.000 Grieving.

00:45:31.000 Of course it's death!

00:45:32.000 Mothers say they want to see it taken off the shelves.

00:45:35.000 My son was a healthy 19-year-old that had his whole life ahead of him.

00:45:41.000 your supplement killed my son. Products with T and neptune have been banned in nine states.

00:45:47.000 Makers of Neptune's Fix and Tiana Red did not return our calls. Okay well I do hope that the

00:45:53.000 scrutiny that's been applied to Neptune's Fix and those other peculiar products that tragically

00:45:59.000 brought about the death of that young man, at least it seems contributed to it, that that

00:46:04.000 scrutiny is applied elsewhere to other similarly troubling medications.

00:46:11.000 Now, you might be aware that the legacy media speak on behalf of an establishment class that don't suffer from the same problems As ordinary people don't live in the same world as ordinary people and appear to be preparing us for some kind of black swan significant event.

00:46:29.000 But when you hear Vladimir Putin saying that World War 3 is a real possibility if NATO do employ, excuse me, do indeed deploy troops to Ukraine, which is, it seems increasingly likely, you will note that the legacy media seem to be advocating, excuse me, Put the new members up, guys, so I can see them.

00:46:52.000 ...seem to be advocating for what appears to be an actual nuclear war.

00:46:58.000 Is it possible that the legacy media and the globalist elites are preparing us for... Put them back, put them back, put them back.

00:47:06.000 For World War 3.

00:47:08.000 Now, we're going to put that on.

00:47:09.000 I want to welcome some of our new awakened wonders like Lardog1, Clark24, Lavadoo, Ade and RandomSourdough.

00:47:16.000 I want to welcome all you guys to our community and I want you to settle down and enjoy an incredible dive into the extraordinary and various ways that Armageddon may yet approach us.

00:47:29.000 Will it be a pandemic?

00:47:30.000 Will it be climate crisis?

00:47:31.000 Or will it simply be A nuclear war.

00:47:34.000 Let me know what you think about this in the chat.

00:47:36.000 Which one's gonna get us first?

00:47:39.000 Here's the news.

00:47:39.000 No, here's the effing news.

00:47:41.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.

00:47:43.000 No, here's the effing news. 0.82

00:47:43.000 I want to die. 0.82

00:47:46.000 Just because there hasn't been a nuclear war before, it doesn't mean there can't be a nuclear war now. 0.60

00:47:51.000 Especially if NATO keep doing things that Vladimir Putin says will cause him to start a nuclear war.

00:47:56.000 Is it possible the legacy media are trying to acclimate us to a nuclear war as if it's some normal thing that might just happen?

00:48:03.000 They are!

00:48:04.000 We're gonna prove it!

00:48:07.000 It's been admitted now that there is a kind of policy that includes the possibility of nuclear war, i.e.

00:48:14.000 we're not behaving how we would have done 34 years ago when it was good old Khrushchev, that great big eyebrow-faced lunatic or JFK, and his Massachusetts drool, acknowledging that missiles being sent to Cuba was a moment that we perhaps ought to step back and reflect a little.

00:48:29.000 Now people are just talking about nuclear exchanges like it's some sort of just something that has to be considered and accepted.

00:48:35.000 Let's have a look at Vladimir Putin talking about what NATO troops in Ukraine actually means because it seems that we're just trying to edge this and rationalize Because if you can use rationalism in the same way that rationalism has been used in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, like, oh, we can just use language to make it seem like this is not colonial and exploitative and awful and dreadful, or rationalism the way that it's used in Israel's current actions in Gaza, just like, oh, it's necessary and there are reasons for it.

00:49:03.000 Yeah, we're actually sort of going mad as a planet.

00:49:05.000 And that madness now seems to include inviting, accepting the potential of nuclear war.

00:49:11.000 Let's have a look at that and radically reprioritize on that basis.

00:49:15.000 Vladimir Putin also warns the presence of Western troops in Ukraine could trigger a third world war.

00:49:22.000 Putin's remarks come as Europe, particularly France, deliberates on proposal to send boots on the ground to reinforce Ukrainian troops.

00:49:31.000 The Russian president says Moscow's troops were advancing in Ukraine each day.

00:49:35.000 Putin also urges French President Emmanuel Macron to instead seek ways to peaceful solutions.

00:49:42.000 Maybe it's because, like, everything seems to move so quickly now, there's such an abundance of media, you might not even be bothered about this story in 10, 15 minutes, you might be watching something about Kate Middleton, or you might be watching something about Elon Musk, all things which have fascinating connotations and can be analysed and deconstructed to within an inch of your life.

00:49:59.000 But if you, like, think of the last hundred years, which isn't that long in the history of a planet, countries like France and countries like Russia and countries like America and Germany have been involved in wars.

00:50:10.000 And it's been because of disputes that are comparable to the disputes that are happening now.

00:50:14.000 Small regionalised wars in which allies support the smaller of the fighting forces have the potential to escalate.

00:50:21.000 We're literally hiding behind bureaucratic terms in institutions like NATO, pretending that what's happening isn't an escalation of tensions with a major nuclear superpower.

00:50:30.000 So what you would have first thought, using common sense, when all of these conversations began a few years back, when you hear Joe Biden actually then say, oh, of course, we can never put boots on the ground, because that would mean World War III, for Christ's sake.

00:50:40.000 I think that's a literal quote.

00:50:42.000 We will not fight a war against Russia in Ukraine.

00:50:46.000 The direct confrontation between NATO and Russia is World War III.

00:50:51.000 Something we must strive to prevent.

00:50:54.000 Or when you've heard that NATO have been involved in Ukrainian politics for quite a while, that there are CIA bases there, that we're sending hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars of weapons there and sort of pretending that it's like aid rather than the arming of a military in favour of seeking a diplomatic solution, which Vladimir Putin, we all know, is up for under certain conditions, which will obviously be favourable conditions to Russia.

00:51:17.000 To deny Russia the right to those favourable conditions is to essentially invite the possibility of war.

00:51:23.000 And you and I are not being told the truth about that.

00:51:26.000 In fact, the Legacy Media seem to be normalising the possibility of this endless escalation rather than pointing out just how terrifying this situation is.

00:51:34.000 Russia's European neighbors to the West swiftly criticizing Putin's election victory.

00:51:39.000 Germany's foreign ministry called the polls a pseudo-election that is neither free nor fair.

00:51:44.000 It also said the election in the occupied territories of Ukraine are null and void and a breach of international law.

00:51:52.000 For Britain's Foreign Secretary David Cameron, the illegal elections in Ukrainian territory, the lack of choice for voters, and no independent monitoring is not what free and fair elections look like.

00:52:04.000 Now might be a good time to tell you that there have been no elections in Ukraine for a little while.

00:52:08.000 While now and that all of their media has been centralized and Zelensky's done a bunch of deals with like Blackrock and JP Morgan for the rebuilding of the country and you have to choose your tyranny I'm like not saying why would I say that Russia isn't a tyrannical place and isn't using veiled bureaucratic trickery to pretend that there is democracy happening but actually even as I hear myself saying those words I think Oh my God, the same thing's happening in your country and my country.

00:52:32.000 We're doing it everywhere.

00:52:33.000 The same sets of institutions that hold power will remain unaffected by the outcome of any election.

00:52:39.000 That's how it works, isn't it?

00:52:41.000 Macron keeps saying about possible...

00:52:45.000 The possibility of sending French European troops to Ukraine and that's a matter of concern for the European nations.

00:52:53.000 How do you think the full-fledged conflict between Russia and NATO, is it possible?

00:52:58.000 And how probable is it?

00:53:00.000 At this point, I just would pause to invite you to consider, do you think that you, if you are French or if you are American or if you're Finnish or Swedish or whatever, should be involved in whether or not your country uses your money to escalate tensions with Russia?

00:53:15.000 Or do you think there should be some kind of referendum where they go, hey, listen, Putin's actions in Ukraine are continuing.

00:53:20.000 He does say that there is a peace deal available, but it will, of course, involve territorial secessions along the lines that Russia would have sort of offered at the beginning.

00:53:29.000 Do you I don't really care about that more than you care about, for example, having a house and having children and pets.

00:53:35.000 Oh, no, I care about democracy in Ukraine.

00:53:37.000 I think they should have it there.

00:53:39.000 And I think they should have democracy in Russia.

00:53:40.000 But what I really, really, really care about is having a house and a cat and streets and like breath and trees and everything. 0.94

00:53:46.000 So I'm going to vote for stop having wars and provoking the shit out of someone with nuclear weapons. 1.00

00:53:51.000 And every time they go, he's a madman, he's a tyrant. 1.00

00:53:53.000 I'm like, yeah, Leave him alone!

00:53:55.000 Well, I think everything is possible in the modern world, and as I said before, and it is clear to everyone, that this will be one step away from a full-fledged World War III.

00:54:09.000 I do not think anyone is interested in this.

00:54:12.000 Their only answer to that kind of rhetoric is, oh he wouldn't do that, he's only bluffing. 0.88

00:54:17.000 And elsewhere they provide a context of Putin as a madman. 1.00

00:54:21.000 In the same way that they say Trump is a madman. 0.94

00:54:23.000 In the same way that they say Tucker Carlson is a madman or Elon Musk is a madman or anyone who's a threat to the institutional globalist powers that truly dominate countries like yours and mine. 0.97

00:54:32.000 They have no answer or any suggestion that they could improve or change the way that they govern the world.

00:54:38.000 That's not up for discussion.

00:54:39.000 The only thing they can do is double down on that That guy's mad, these guys are mad and racist, and we're having these wars.

00:54:45.000 Why?

00:54:46.000 Because of protecting the vulnerable.

00:54:47.000 It just doesn't actually make any sense.

00:54:50.000 It is up to them.

00:54:51.000 Ultimately, if someone wants to cover their internal political problems with this kind of rhetoric, well, that's a well-known trick that is being used quite often.

00:55:05.000 Sometimes I extract the critiques of Putin from what Putin is saying, i.e.

00:55:11.000 do people use war to paliate and distract domestic populations?

00:55:15.000 Yes, that's been acknowledged.

00:55:16.000 We know that that's what the Gulf War and Falklands War are about, in particular I'm talking about in UK politics, Vietnam War, Korean War.

00:55:22.000 Of course they do.

00:55:23.000 War is a good distraction. 0.99

00:55:25.000 So whether you think Putin is crazy and a warmonger or not, let's just say yeah he is, but that doesn't mean that that's not true.

00:55:30.000 It doesn't mean that we shouldn't be involved in our nation's policies when it comes to the provocation of Russia and escalation of conflict with them.

00:55:38.000 I wouldn't want to see France playing this role of exacerbating, escalating, provoking the conflict.

00:55:48.000 I would like to see it more discussing possible peaceful solutions, something that the other Thank you.

00:55:54.000 been speaking about so they can play their role. Not everything is lost. But I would

00:55:59.000 like to end with the words of gratitude to the Russian people, to the Russian voters.

00:56:04.000 Once again I would like to emphasize we will do everything in our power to accomplish the

00:56:10.000 goals of the national development in all areas. Thank you.

00:56:15.000 Goodbye.

00:56:17.000 He's like the opposite of Joe Biden.

00:56:19.000 It's like he's still talking.

00:56:20.000 He's like, whoa, whoa, Vladimir, where are you going?

00:56:22.000 Joe Biden will be wandering around for another couple of minutes there.

00:56:24.000 So there you go, a clear threat of potential nuclear war in countries like France and the UK, which are sort of easier, I imagine, to hit with nuclear missiles than Missouri or Memphis or Massachusetts.

00:56:36.000 So, you know, if you are English watching this, You might want to think about what your position is.

00:56:40.000 So how do the legacy media make the prospect of nuclear war appealing as if it's, I don't know, air fryers?

00:56:47.000 Yeah, it's a new thing, nuclear war now.

00:56:49.000 You can cook your chicken in this.

00:56:50.000 Oh, my teeth!

00:56:51.000 On Sunday, the New York Times published an article by David Sanger titled, Biden's Armageddon Moment When Nuclear Detonation Seemed Possible in Ukraine.

00:56:59.000 The article documents extensive and far-reaching discussions within the Biden administration in late 2022 regarding the possibility of the war with Russia turning into a nuclear conflict.

00:57:10.000 Sanger reports that the Central Intelligence Agency told Biden that under a singular scenario in which Ukrainian forces decimated Russian defensive lines and looked as if they might try to retake Crimea, a possibility that seemed imaginable that fall, the likelihood of nuclear use might rise to 50% or even higher.

00:57:29.000 When you think about the language around climate change and the environment and measures that may or may not be deployed for the preservation of the planet, which I'll note here always seem to involve the persecution of ordinary people rather than institutional changes in massive corporations and elites not using the privileged means of transport that they often use, it's climate change and the environment spoken about sort of in almost hysterical terms.

00:57:55.000 here, the potential for the chance of there being a nuclear war raising by 50% was just

00:57:59.000 sort of like people like chewing pencils like I suppose that is a lot more likely. Seems like

00:58:04.000 the threat of Armageddon should be discussed in the same sort of way regardless of what's

00:58:09.000 causing it. He reported that the Biden administration was making urgent preparations for a US

00:58:13.000 reaction to a Russian nuclear detonation.

00:58:16.000 So in private conversations, top secret, to which we are not privy, they go, so what if there is a nuclear war?

00:58:22.000 Well, obviously we'll be OK because we've got bunkers in Hawaii.

00:58:25.000 But, you know, we'll win it.

00:58:26.000 We'll win it.

00:58:27.000 And in the post-nuclear war environment, by God, we'll thrive.

00:58:30.000 I mean, how long does that guy want to live?

00:58:31.000 An article written by Sanger, a long-time mouthpiece for the US military and intelligence agencies, is less a news article than the controlled release of information by the US intelligence agencies.

00:58:42.000 The purpose of this article is to acclimate the public to the possibility of the war becoming nuclear.

00:58:47.000 It is also an attempt to place the onus on Russia.

00:58:50.000 You started it.

00:58:51.000 It's your fault there's a nuclear war. 0.98

00:58:52.000 It's not children anymore, like someone's pulled someone else's hair and then they've been kicked in the shins or whatever. 0.96

00:58:57.000 This is... But you've ruined everything.

00:58:59.000 Everything.

00:58:59.000 I mean, unless there is an Atlantis, and unless there have been previous civilizations lost and long forgotten, this has been an uninterrupted ascent from the Garden of Eden, and you've spoiled it.

00:59:08.000 Proud of yourself.

00:59:09.000 Yeah, sorry.

00:59:10.000 It is also an attempt to place the onus on Russia when it is in fact the US and NATO powers that are engaged in a massive escalation of the war potentially involving the direct deployment of NATO troops to Ukraine.

00:59:21.000 We can't make this content without your love and support and without the support of our sponsors who we always select on the basis of effective product.

00:59:30.000 Have you noticed that recently clusters of respiratory illnesses in northern China and what's been referred to as white lung syndrome in the United States are scattered across the headlines?

00:59:30.000 Like today's.

00:59:40.000 There's hashtag white lung.

00:59:41.000 They're drawing attention, I believe, to the importance of being prepared for medical emergencies.

00:59:46.000 With close to 90% of pharmaceuticals in the US being produced outside of the country, what will happen when the inevitable next global crisis strikes?

00:59:54.000 Countries will clamp down on exports, they'll stockpile, the price of drugs will rise, and the pharmacy shelves in America, they say, will empty.

01:00:02.000 Is it already starting to happen?

01:00:03.000 Well, the wellness company's medical emergency kit has got you covered for times like this.

01:00:07.000 The wellness company is home to Dr. Peter McCulloch and Dr. Drew Pinsky.

01:00:11.000 They've both been guests on our show.

01:00:12.000 They're truth-telling doctors who are empowering you to take control of your health.

01:00:16.000 40% of Americans say they would avoid a doctor or hospital unless it was a catastrophic situation.

01:00:22.000 The Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit provides a solution.

01:00:25.000 This handy little kit includes eight potentially life-saving medications for you, along with a guidebook for safe use.

01:00:31.000 Emergency antibiotics, antivirals, and anti-parasitics to keep you and your family safe in the face of natural disasters, supply chain shortages, or medical emergencies like white lung or COVID.

01:00:41.000 Go to twc.health forward slash brand and grab your Medical Emergency Kit right now.

01:00:47.000 That's twc.health forward slash brand, code brand, Thank you.

01:00:51.000 you 10% at checkout. So if you use the code brand, you'll get 10% off. Don't wait until

01:00:56.000 it's too late. Take control of your health with the Wellness Company's Medical Emergency

01:01:01.000 Kit. Thank you. Now, let's get into this. Over the past two weeks, four NATO countries

01:01:06.000 – France, Canada, Lithuania and the Netherlands – have stated their openness to sending

01:01:11.000 NATO troops to fight Russia in Ukraine. On Saturday, they were joined by Poland, whose

01:01:16.000 Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski declared that sending troops to Ukraine was not unthinkable.

01:01:21.000 Hmm.

01:01:22.000 It sort of is though.

01:01:23.000 It sort of is unthinkable.

01:01:25.000 I mean if what they were saying is true, that Putin's war with Ukraine is not a regional dispute provoked by the 2014 coup and impingement by NATO on former Soviet territories but it's the beginning of a campaign to sort of go west and take over the world then and only then would you say oh well we can't yield to this madman and i suppose that's why they're trying to portray him in that way but anything other than an inevitable russian plan for total domination of the globe means that peace and diplomacy would be favorable and i've not seen anything from our side actually or theirs that suggests that russia are planning to take over there's no evidence for that there's no evidence for that

01:02:04.000 It's the same as, like, there might be interdimensional beings that are dominating.

01:02:08.000 It's difficult to corroborate.

01:02:09.000 You've got to corroborate that.

01:02:11.000 Is Putin trying to take over the world or is it more likely that he's being used as a bogeyman to legitimize authoritarianism in our own nations as Putin actually suggested in his own speech?

01:02:19.000 Statements were accompanied by the release of a recording of a discussion by members of the German military of the prospect of using German long-range weapons to carry out strikes on Russian territory, as well as leaks from Germany that Britain were deploying troops in Ukraine already, which amounts to another escalation of these tensions.

01:02:37.000 And in fact, because Ukraine couldn't continue this war without NATO support and without US financial support, ultimately that is the determining and deciding factor.

01:02:44.000 So already there is a war between NATO and the US, because if you took the US and NATO out of it, the war would be over.

01:02:50.000 So that's just logic, isn't it?

01:02:52.000 And reason.

01:02:53.000 So we're already in this war, and what we're witnessing now is the slow incremental inculcation of normalising it, so that we just go, oh, well, we're just in this nuclear war now.

01:03:03.000 Bloody Putin.

01:03:03.000 The immediate context for these actions is a series of disastrous setbacks for the Ukrainian war effort, raising the prospect of a total collapse of the Ukrainian army without direct NATO intervention.

01:03:14.000 So there's no longer support for Ukraine.

01:03:16.000 Ukraine, of course, can't win a war against Russia in the same way that Mexico couldn't win a war against America, even if you were to legitimise some conflict of that nature by saying, well, you know, the way that California and Texas were taken, that's not really fair, is it?

01:03:29.000 And the way that migrants are treated and maybe, you know, you could Come up with some reason to have wars and to support it, and what if people started to support Mexico?

01:03:36.000 I mean, how would that go?

01:03:37.000 As a recent article in Foreign Affairs warns, without a surge in Western military aid and major changes to Kiev's strategy, Ukraine's battlefield position will continue to worsen until it reaches a tipping point, possibly by this summer.

01:03:48.000 In other words, NATO has a window of just a few months to avoid a precipitous collapse of the Ukrainian military.

01:03:54.000 Sanger's article admits that in 2022, under conditions where the Russian military was facing a series of setbacks, the US evaluated that it was entirely possible for Russia to use nuclear weapons to improve its military position.

01:04:06.000 But it is NATO and the United States that now find themselves on the back foot, suffering serious defeats.

01:04:11.000 If the Biden administration believed that Russia would use nuclear weapons in order to forestall military defeat, is that any less true for the US and NATO?

01:04:20.000 In a critical passage, Sanger writes, The war gaming at the Pentagon and think tanks around

01:04:25.000 Washington imagined that Mr Putin's use of a tactical weapon

01:04:28.000 involved a demand from Moscow that the West halt all military support for the Ukrainians.

01:04:33.000 No more tanks, no more missiles, no more ammunition.

01:04:36.000 But this is precisely the position that NATO is driving Russia to take

01:04:39.000 by planning to deploy NATO troops to Ukraine.

01:04:42.000 Every escalation by NATO raises the pressure for the Russian government to set an explicit red line to be enforced by the threat to strike NATO territory or use nuclear weapons.

01:04:52.000 The NATO powers recognise the very real danger that the conflict in Ukraine could develop into a nuclear war, but they are taking no measures to avoid escalation.

01:05:00.000 Instead of discussing negotiations that could avert this catastrophe, they are continuing to pursue a policy that could well result in a nuclear conflict with Russia.

01:05:07.000 Having feared that a nuclear apocalypse could break out in 2022, the Biden administration and its NATO allies are now escalating the war to the point where that scenario becomes more likely than ever.

01:05:18.000 So for some time it seemed possible that a conflict that even involves Russia has the potential to escalate to the point where it could be deleterious, decimating for the entire planet. 0.79

01:05:27.000 That seems to remain likely and rather than acknowledge that likelihood explicitly through legacy media, it seems that the chosen path is to normalise that prospect And even suggest that it would be possible for NATO and the US to strike first in an escalating conflict that now plainly could be said to be between NATO, using the vassal of Ukraine, and Russia, who have their own territorial and potentially even imperialist intentions towards Ukraine, to whom I could not be more sympathetic.

01:05:55.000 And even my glibness should be couched that I personally am putting the country that I live in and my own interests ahead of Ukraine's, particularly given that In a nuclear war all Ukrainians would also die so surely what all reasonable people ought be demanding is actual independent referenda in our own nation so we can decide whether we want the funding of this war to continue or whether we want our nation's persuasive nurse, particularly that of the United States of America, to be deployed in pursuit of peace.

01:06:22.000 A peace that was apparently available two or three years ago but that the United States and the UK in the figure of Boris Johnson scuppered for reasons that I still don't Fully understand because things haven't been great for Ukraine since then.

01:06:34.000 They've suffered more annihilation, more death at the decimation of their army, the desecration of their towns and provinces and culture and standing in the world.

01:06:43.000 So I don't know who is benefiting.

01:06:45.000 But this in a context where we start to get the sense that authoritarianism is using crisis to legitimize more centralized power, to legitimize more censorship, to legitimize more control, makes a kind of Vague overall sense in terms of the more there is crisis, the more there is fear, the more there is the reason to bend towards authority, to be subdued, to lose your own sort of personal sense of sovereignty and freedom.

01:07:09.000 And it's only using sort of intuition as well as common sense when it comes to the matter of Russia's nuclear capacity that I can even understand this because from the legacy media what we're given is something like a sort of haku of misinformation and propaganda that's leading us increasingly it seems towards nuclear war.

01:07:25.000 But that's just what I think.

01:07:26.000 Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and chat.

01:07:28.000 Remember, click the link in the description, support our movement if you can.

01:07:30.000 But more important than that, please stay free.

01:07:32.000 Many switching, switch on, switch off.

Stay Free - Russel Brand - March 26, 2024

Moscow Concert Hall Attack – Were ISIS REALLY Behind It? - Stay Free #332

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript