Stay Free - Russel Brand - January 23, 2024


Musk Just REVEALED Why The Legacy Media Want To DESTROY HIM - Stay Free #290


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 9 minutes

Words per Minute

179.59981

Word Count

12,566

Sentence Count

872

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

20


Summary

In this episode of Stay Free With Russell Brand, Russell talks about how the legacy media and centralised state have been designed to keep us in check and secure their grip on power, and why we need to wake up to the fact that we are the only ones with the power to change the status quo. He also talks about the dangers of the globalist agenda, and how we can empower ourselves through our individual awakening. Stay Free with Russell Brand is produced by Awake and Wonder and edited by Riley Bray. Visit awakenandwonder.co.nz/StayFree with RussellBrand to join in on the fun, the free, and the conversation. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers and use the promo code: "WAKEUP" to receive 10% off your first pack! We'll be giving you access to the Glenn Greenwald show, The Glenn Greenwald Show, The Daily Beast's Glenn Greenwald's The Intercept, and The New York Times' Opinions on all things Globalism, Globalism and Globalism in Davos, as well as much more! If you like what you hear, please HIT SUBSCRIBE and leave us a review on Apple Podcasts! Subscribe to our new podcast, and tell a friend about what you're listening to! and we'll send you a review of the latest episode! Thank you for listening and sharing it on your favourite podcast, wherever you get your thoughts on social media! Love & Peace, Brett Baumeister - Brett Caen and Ben Shapiro, Ben Kuchar, Ben Bergman and Ben Kerts, the founder of The Root & Ben Kamb, and much more... Thanks for listening to this episode, Ben Karmen, Ben, Ben Berg, . Ben and Ben Berenbaum, - Ben Karpf, ? Ben & Ben, Brian, and Ben Gell, , and Ben Mee, etc. - Ben, Beren, ...and Ben Koppel , Ben Korte ... and Ben, and so much more. . . And so much so much love, Ben Borte, Ben Jeezy, Ben Mertz, Ben S., Ben, & Ben Jell & Ben Shapiro


Transcript

00:00:00.000 so so
00:01:56.000 so In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:02:16.000 We are getting to Birkini, we've got a lot of stuff there.
00:02:19.000 Hey you Awakening Wanderers, thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:02:26.000 While many in this world of legacy media corruption and centralised state distraction may want you to be like larvae, wasting away, atrophying in their hive of corruption and control, we pray for your freedom.
00:02:40.000 Whoever you are, wherever you're from, whatever your beliefs, we believe that we are the opposition.
00:02:45.000 We believe that the solution lies within your consciousness.
00:02:49.000 We believe that no matter if you are pro-Israel, pro-Palestine, Republican, Democrat, Labour, Conservative, no matter what divisive tag may have been placed around your neck, there is a stream, a unitary stream, Running through all of us and we can oppose their globalist agenda through our individual awakening.
00:03:07.000 This is the time where we must awaken.
00:03:09.000 This is the moment.
00:03:10.000 They are becoming fiercer.
00:03:11.000 They are becoming more dangerous.
00:03:13.000 They are trying to intoxicate you with corruption and lies all the more ferociously and yet we become more powerful By the day.
00:03:20.000 Why, you only need glance at their ludicrous automated measures and their evident failure to see.
00:03:27.000 In a minute I'm going to show you one of the robots that we ultimately use to serve the globalist agenda struggling in the snow and human beings innocently helping it.
00:03:35.000 We've got so many stories to cover today.
00:03:37.000 If you're watching us on YouTube, you glorious awakening wonder you, there's a link in the description.
00:03:41.000 You'll have to come over and join us in that stream of freedom where we can speak freely.
00:03:46.000 Not hate speech, but the very speech they fear the most.
00:03:49.000 Speech to bring about unity.
00:03:51.000 Speech to empower you.
00:03:52.000 Where we will be discussing Elon Musk and Shapiro.
00:03:55.000 That's going to be a good conversation.
00:03:56.000 My favorite bit is when Elon Musk says the reason the legacy media attack X is because X is an opponent.
00:04:03.000 And I must say, when I myself was personally subject to numerous ongoing attacks,
00:04:07.000 it was never correctly covered that they've got skin in the game.
00:04:11.000 They are opponents. They want independent media to fail.
00:04:15.000 They want independent thought to fail.
00:04:17.000 They do not want your awakening. They fear your awakening.
00:04:20.000 You've always known there was something wrong.
00:04:23.000 And now we're finally beginning to understand it.
00:04:25.000 We've got some fantastic stories for you.
00:04:27.000 Things that will blow your socks off and melt your mind.
00:04:30.000 Who would have imagined that one day, in plain sight, openly, we'd be saying they were developing bioweapons.
00:04:39.000 They were developing bioweapons with government money and potentially that's what caused recent events.
00:04:46.000 I cannot believe it.
00:04:48.000 The people on the outer peripheries, the vanguard, were closer to the truth than people now on state or corporate funded media.
00:04:55.000 I'm talking about media that's either funded by big pharma advertising or funded by you.
00:05:00.000 Those organizations, Those are the misinformation peddlers.
00:05:03.000 Those are the people that are dangerous.
00:05:05.000 Those are the institutions that you cannot trust.
00:05:07.000 Now, we'll be on YouTube for about 15 minutes, then over on Rumble.
00:05:11.000 If you download the app, that'll be better for us, because then we can tell you whenever we're broadcasting.
00:05:15.000 We'll be telling you... Well, God, we've got so much stuff coming up.
00:05:18.000 We've got a Glenn Greenwald show that we'll give early access to you for, plus exclusive content will remain on Locals if you're on Awake and Wonder.
00:05:26.000 Remember there's an exclusive video for our locals community that's up right now talking about the mysterious increase of 8% in child fatalities, child deaths in the last couple of years.
00:05:36.000 I wonder if the legacy media will be investigating thoroughly what caused that with the same vigour that they investigate dissenting voices that could affect their bottom line.
00:05:46.000 We're going to be talking about Why the legacy media require Trump, why they continue to loathe him, and how when Trump fails, they fail.
00:05:54.000 We'll also, as I've told you, be talking about globalism.
00:05:57.000 We'll be talking about George Soros' lad.
00:05:59.000 We'll be seeing him stammering in Davos.
00:06:03.000 But first of all, Like, if ever you doubt human beings and our capacity for grace and love, for great service, the power that's in us all, have a look at this.
00:06:13.000 This robot has probably been designed to ultimately change the page thing on the stream deck.
00:06:18.000 Thanks guys.
00:06:20.000 This is a robot that's probably ultimately going to be used to corral us into various institutions of compliance.
00:06:27.000 But look what happens when it gets stuck in the snow.
00:06:30.000 Everyone comes along to help this little robot.
00:06:33.000 Humans come to help the robot.
00:06:35.000 It's like a pixel film.
00:06:37.000 I've lost my mommy!
00:06:50.000 Come on, little guy.
00:06:51.000 You'll be okay.
00:06:52.000 Just come through here.
00:06:53.000 Adorable.
00:06:54.000 Humanity, our kindness, our compassion, and our vulnerability are our greatest assets.
00:06:59.000 If we can access that, there is a limitless power.
00:07:01.000 They know that power is there, and by God, do they fear it.
00:07:05.000 You'll be familiar by now with the fact that Elon Musk and Ben Shapiro have met in Auschwitz to talk about the legacy media and how the legacy media are threatened by X. This is an interesting conversation from our perspective because of course we're interested in the legacy media and their agenda of destruction.
00:07:21.000 Did you see our recent content on the new revelations that Moderna have been tracking and surveilling many dissenting voices.
00:07:29.000 I am included in the peculiar group of government-funded agencies that are hell-bent on shutting down dissent.
00:07:37.000 They've been tracking Jay Bhattacharya, Alex Berenson, Michael Schellenberger, Anyone that's critical of the big pharma agenda.
00:07:44.000 Extraordinary.
00:07:45.000 Have a look at that.
00:07:46.000 It's up on Rumble right now.
00:07:48.000 You do not want to miss that.
00:07:49.000 You will be better informed.
00:07:50.000 You also see how the legacy media report on important stories like excess death.
00:07:55.000 This is how they report excess death.
00:07:57.000 Something mysterious is happening.
00:07:58.000 We don't know what's causing it.
00:08:00.000 What is causing more people... It's almost like a couple of years ago, something happened that caused more people than ever before to die.
00:08:07.000 But we don't know what it is and we simply don't have the time to investigate it.
00:08:11.000 Let's have a look at Elon Musk talking about Legacy Media with Ben Shapiro in Auschwitz.
00:08:16.000 Legacy Media has spent an awful lot of ink on you.
00:08:19.000 There's been a lot of attempts to paint you as anti-semitic or paint X as anti-semitic.
00:08:25.000 Where do you think that's coming from?
00:08:27.000 Why does the Legacy Media seem to have you, particularly in the last year and a half, in the crosshairs so much?
00:08:34.000 Well, I mean, the reality is that X is competition for the Legacy Media.
00:08:39.000 So, You know, X is where people go to get the most current news and learn about the world.
00:08:47.000 So the legacy media is our direct competitors.
00:08:51.000 So they're really going to find every angle to try to cancel X.
00:08:55.000 So, in a sense, what Elon Musk is saying, and let me know if you think this is true, the legacy media cannot be trusted, probably at all, on any subject, particularly after how they behaved during the pandemic.
00:09:06.000 They were the people that were advocating for certain measures.
00:09:09.000 They were the people that were amplifying the cries for lockdown.
00:09:11.000 They were the people that were inaccurate in their reporting on the origins of this virus.
00:09:15.000 They are the people that refuse to look into excess deaths, adverse events.
00:09:19.000 They are essentially the mouthpiece of the powerful, amplifying and normalising their narratives, ensuring that we remain at least dependent, but potentially enslaved.
00:09:28.000 So of course, whenever legacy media talk about independent media, you have to be deeply cynical and sceptical about what they're saying.
00:09:37.000 In short, you cannot trust them.
00:09:39.000 You cannot trust them at all.
00:09:42.000 I mean, if you want to know why things are happening, look at the incentives.
00:09:49.000 And legacy media has had a tough time with respect to usage.
00:09:55.000 The numbers I saw was that the sort of traditional print cable television viewership went down something like 20-30% last year.
00:10:05.000 On the other hand, X went up roughly the same, roughly 20-30%.
00:10:11.000 So it's a direct competition for people's attention.
00:10:14.000 So if there's some attack they can levy against me.
00:10:18.000 Okay, well that's a pretty interesting aspect of the conversation.
00:10:22.000 Obviously many of you have very strong views about events in the Middle East and I must say it's difficult to blame you for it is a unique and complex and agonizing conflict.
00:10:33.000 Part, it seems to me, of a geopolitical nexus that is designed or at least delivers forever wars and it seems to me that after the two trillion dollars squandered in Afghanistan, although I'm Not sure who in particular benefited from it, so maybe it wasn't entirely squandered.
00:10:49.000 I'm sure Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Boeing benefited, but it doesn't seem to me to have been a useful expenditure of your resources.
00:10:56.000 But, you know, who's asking you?
00:10:58.000 Who's asking you where your money should be spent?
00:11:01.000 One of the things I like that Elon Musk said during that conversation was that world leaders should do their own posts.
00:11:08.000 We asked you earlier whether or not, who you'd most like to see posts from.
00:11:14.000 Can we put that up now?
00:11:15.000 Is it on my screen?
00:11:16.000 Let's have a look.
00:11:17.000 And you guys said that you would like to see Rishi Sunak, 2% of you, he's our Prime Minister, affiliated with the WF.
00:11:25.000 Joe Biden, he's your President, receives a lot of funding from the financial industry.
00:11:29.000 Kim Jong-Un.
00:11:30.000 That dude, he's very much furrowing his own plow, or plowing his own furrow.
00:11:36.000 In any event, there's a trench and he's in it alone.
00:11:38.000 And Justin Trudeau, 40%.
00:11:40.000 But most of you want to see Joe Biden's unexpurgated posting and Yeah, I think it will be interesting.
00:11:46.000 If what happens when he types is what happens when he speaks, we'd be in for some accidental poetry, I tell you.
00:11:51.000 Let's have a look at Elon Musk talking about leaders posting for himself.
00:11:58.000 But it's only me doing these posts, ever.
00:12:01.000 I don't have a team or anything.
00:12:05.000 In fact, I generally would recommend for leaders of the world to just literally post your own stuff.
00:12:13.000 Although, Elon Musk, let's face it, has got into some trouble.
00:12:17.000 He's about to say he's got into some trouble.
00:12:18.000 While you make a mistake, don't worry about it.
00:12:24.000 It's a very forgiving culture we live in, no doubt about that.
00:12:27.000 Hey, let us know in the rumble chat, eat my chode, maybe a bot, maybe a human being, certainly posting the word fart a lot.
00:12:33.000 Why don't you vote 1 if you want us to mute him or 2 if you are free speech absolutists.
00:12:39.000 We'll do whatever you say because, you know, free speech is free speech.
00:12:43.000 Or do you want to control your community?
00:12:44.000 It's up to you.
00:12:45.000 Or do you want a sort of a kind of ever-mutating ongoing discourse about the nature of censorship and free speech?
00:12:53.000 I can't remember which numbers I said so you'll have to tell me.
00:12:55.000 Some of you are saying mute him.
00:12:57.000 1 is mute.
00:12:58.000 Was 1 mute?
00:12:59.000 I think he's going to get a little muting.
00:12:59.000 Some of you are saying mute.
00:13:02.000 You're going to get muted.
00:13:03.000 He's muted.
00:13:04.000 Hey, that's how democracy works, guys.
00:13:06.000 Seems pretty simple to me.
00:13:07.000 So yeah, if you're watching this on YouTube, we're just going to do a little more here.
00:13:11.000 We're talking briefly about the primaries, but I recognize that a lot of you feel that internal domestic politics are all contained within a paradigm that is ultimately controlled by the same interests.
00:13:20.000 Although I similarly recognize that Vivek and Trump Our two figures much admired in the libertarian anti-establishment world.
00:13:31.000 Let's have a look at a little bit of Trump and Vivek.
00:13:34.000 They're campaigning together and there's a sense that Trump is getting some of his policies from Vivek.
00:13:40.000 Like it's like Trump's young person.
00:13:42.000 That's what it sounds like.
00:13:44.000 Vivek's been telling me about CBDCs and meth.
00:13:47.000 I mean, I don't know what else they've been discussing, but have a look at that.
00:13:50.000 I say that old Choate dude's getting muted for a little while now, based on democracy.
00:13:55.000 Baroque, for example, says mute the c-word.
00:13:57.000 Very strong views on democracy right there.
00:13:59.000 Let's have a look how that plays out, and let's have a look at Trump with his consultant young person, Vivek Ramaswamy.
00:14:05.000 He's not with him.
00:14:06.000 I think he's sort of citing him.
00:14:07.000 And this I do for Vivek, because he's very big into it.
00:14:11.000 I happen to agree with him, but he said, could you mention this?
00:14:14.000 I will never.
00:14:14.000 He said, I love Vivek.
00:14:17.000 I love him too now.
00:14:18.000 I didn't love him when he was running, but I like him now.
00:14:20.000 It's amazing the way you can like somebody when you win, right?
00:14:25.000 Donald Trump there, he understands comedy, he understands the button.
00:14:29.000 Hey, so we've been talking about globalism, we've been talking about when people say, oh, what do you mean global establishment?
00:14:35.000 What is this power that NATO, the WHO, the WEF, what is this power that the financial industry through the World Bank or the IMF, how is it that it works?
00:14:43.000 How does the politics of debt operate?
00:14:46.000 How do you go into a nation, get them heavily into debt?
00:14:50.000 Exercise and leverage control using these, what we might term, globalist methods.
00:14:55.000 Well, one evident observable facet of globalism is this WHO treaty.
00:15:01.000 This is a post from a really good journalist, I figure, James Melville.
00:15:05.000 The UK government has just confirmed its commitment to the WHO pandemic treaty.
00:15:10.000 This is an affront to democracy and risks handing over significant components of public health policy to the World Health Organization.
00:15:18.000 So, I think there is a petition you can sign.
00:15:22.000 Although, someone else is posting fart now.
00:15:25.000 I like the way it works.
00:15:26.000 Machine health.
00:15:27.000 That's pretty funny.
00:15:27.000 Funny.
00:15:28.000 Why no RFK on XRussell?
00:15:30.000 What about, oh, why don't we vote for him?
00:15:33.000 Yeah, no, I like that dude.
00:15:36.000 So, hey, listen, so let's post in the chat, why don't we post the petition against the WHO treaty in the UK and the petition in the US, if there is one, in the Rumble chat and the Locals chat, because if you are an Awakened Wonder over there in Locals, we make additional content for you Every single week we're doing a farming, agricultural, global revolution story tomorrow, which is pretty damn fantastic.
00:16:00.000 Mute for annoyance is not a free speech issue.
00:16:02.000 Interesting.
00:16:03.000 Interesting.
00:16:03.000 Nice.
00:16:04.000 Nice.
00:16:05.000 And we've got the 8% excess deaths of children in the UK story to cover.
00:16:11.000 Um, so yeah, let's post that, and you should probably sign that, because that WHO treaty, if you don't know, means 5% of your country's health budget will go to the WHO, and in the event of another pandemic, the seemingly inevitable event, I'm just using their language, they're saying disease X is likely and inevitable, I'm not saying it's inevitable, it's them that's saying it's inevitable.
00:16:28.000 In that inevitable event, then 5% of your nation's budget, and any measures that they propose, that could include things like mandated vaccines, perhaps, or lockdowns, your nation will have no democratic Purchase, control, or even conversation over.
00:16:44.000 Hey and on that subject, let's have a look at Fauci and how he truly feels about medical measures.
00:16:52.000 We've got a story later this week about DARPA that you're gonna Like, you know, DARPA.
00:16:56.000 You remember DARPA?
00:16:57.000 They were involved in the beginning of the pandemic.
00:17:00.000 They were connected to the Wuhan Institute of Virology through the EcoHealth Alliance.
00:17:05.000 They were funding research that seems, now at this point, to likely have been dual-purpose research, i.e.
00:17:11.000 bioweapon research potentially was connected to events in Wuhan.
00:17:15.000 While we're still on YouTube, I'll be careful about how I term that, but a man who uses language very confidently and deftly is Anthony Fauci.
00:17:23.000 Spitting truths, y'all!
00:17:25.000 Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you are going to have schools, universities, and colleges are going to say, you want to come to this college, buddy?
00:17:36.000 You're going to get vaccinated.
00:17:37.000 It's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bull**** and they get vaccinated.
00:17:47.000 You will lose your ideological bull****.
00:17:51.000 I mean, I won't swear while we're on YouTube.
00:17:53.000 And you will get vaccinated.
00:17:55.000 Do you notice how directive a lot of this language is?
00:17:57.000 How instructive it is?
00:17:58.000 You will know nothing and you will be happy.
00:18:00.000 You will get vaccinated.
00:18:01.000 You will drop... The term ideological BS in this instance means freedom, personal autonomy, liberty, things that are enshrined in documents such as the Magna Carta, the US Constitution, the Holy Bible, the idea of your personal freedom.
00:18:18.000 Is, according to Anthony Fauci, BS.
00:18:21.000 So, tell me, who should be indicted?
00:18:24.000 Donald Trump or Anthony Fauci?
00:18:26.000 One for Trump, two for Fauci.
00:18:28.000 Is that a person you would like to see answer some difficult questions?
00:18:30.000 Let me know.
00:18:31.000 If you're watching us on YouTube right now, we'll be there for another couple of minutes before exclusively available on Rumble, speaking freely.
00:18:39.000 And if you want to support our work and get additional content, here's a link in the description now showing you how you can do that.
00:18:44.000 Sometimes We run a little bit over.
00:18:46.000 It's twos.
00:18:47.000 It's all twos.
00:18:47.000 I've never seen so many number twos since I went down the sewage works.
00:18:51.000 I was only there asking questions for a friend.
00:18:54.000 If you want to support our work, you might want to go over to locals, where we do a lot of additional content.
00:18:59.000 For example, our entire Whitney Webb conversation is up there.
00:19:02.000 And why I love Whitney Webb is she talks about the financial component of global corruption so that you can understand it and corroborate it in ways that aren't dependent just on your strong emotional sense that corruption is taking place.
00:19:16.000 She legitimizes it through what you might call journalistic integrity and research.
00:19:21.000 So, meanwhile, over at Davos, which has come to an end and we've learned some pretty powerful messages from that, Alex Soros, son of George, has been participating.
00:19:31.000 I don't know if you're fans of the show Succession, but it's difficult to keep the image of the Succession children out of your mind while watching Alex Soros talking at Davos.
00:19:41.000 How did you get that job, Alex?
00:19:44.000 Is any nepotism involved in this stuff?
00:19:47.000 Or did you climb to the top of your papi's socks and just roll into Davos like these lyrics roll off of your tongue?
00:19:55.000 Let's have a look.
00:19:56.000 You know, so, you know, so, you know, but when I see this, you know, when I look at this, you know, you know, more globally regarding, regarding, you know, regarding democracy, I also say to myself, when was this great time?
00:20:12.000 Everybody got along so well and, you know, things were going so... This is the kind of sort of miserabilist condemnation of the history of humanity that's common in rational and materialist circles.
00:20:12.000 Good.
00:20:25.000 Things aren't getting any worse.
00:20:27.000 Things have always been bad.
00:20:28.000 There's always been war.
00:20:30.000 As a matter of fact, things are improving.
00:20:31.000 There are more people that are not affected by poverty than any ever before.
00:20:36.000 Do you know the Life expectancy in some countries, not America actually, but in some countries is actually going up and things are better than ever before.
00:20:43.000 You may feel like you're in a state of existential despair, but actually things are great.
00:20:48.000 There's something wrong with you.
00:20:49.000 Maybe you didn't go to university.
00:20:51.000 Maybe that's the problem.
00:20:53.000 Maybe you're not part of our globalist elite.
00:20:55.000 Maybe that's the problem.
00:20:56.000 You just don't see things correctly.
00:20:59.000 This kind of discourse is becoming all too common in the rational circles exemplified by the WEF, and I know you guys are spotting that 666 in the World Economic Forum logo like an unconscious message being transmitted and transmuted from some deep unitary force.
00:21:16.000 But, hey, Listen, it seems to me that that guy got where he is today through evident loquacious abilities and in a great capacity for truth-telling.
00:21:28.000 Did you ask Russell about Fort Detrick, says Paul the Strings, like you said you would?
00:21:33.000 Actually, I didn't, but we did get a lot of stuff on sort of like biolabs and that.
00:21:36.000 You'll love it.
00:21:37.000 You'll love it, man.
00:21:38.000 You'll love it.
00:21:39.000 Have a look at Alex Soros's ankles and listen to what he's saying, for heaven's sake.
00:21:44.000 I mean, I think, you know, I think that we really have to be careful here in this nostalgia
00:21:44.000 Oh, great.
00:21:55.000 for a time past, because a lot of the reactions we're seeing in society are actually reactions
00:22:02.000 to positive things, like equality for women, and greater diversity.
00:22:13.000 Yes, yes, yes.
00:22:14.000 The cultural agenda being used once again to legitimise further enhancing the agenda of the powerful, the most brilliant distraction they've ever yet come up with.
00:22:25.000 The CIA using logos for the LGBTQ plus communities that they evidently and purportedly support.
00:22:33.000 You're fine to be whatever you want to be as long as you ain't free.
00:22:37.000 You can have whatever faith or religion or ideology or sexuality you want to have as long as you ain't free.
00:22:43.000 You can say in your own mind that you are whoever you want to say you are in your mind as long as you're not free.
00:22:48.000 As long as you stay corralled within the parameters that we've lain out for you and that we openly discuss here at the World Economic Forum, where they're even coming for your coffee now!
00:22:59.000 Can you believe?
00:23:00.000 Because if they come for my... Listen.
00:23:00.000 Are you ready for this?
00:23:03.000 If you want me to take medicine or stay in my house all year long, I'll do it.
00:23:07.000 If you want us to go engaging forever wars with poor people around the world of a variety of colours and sexualities and tell us you're doing it for diversity, sure, take my taxes.
00:23:18.000 But when you come for my caffeine, you cross a line that I ain't ready to have crossed, baby.
00:23:24.000 We'll be having our coffee before the session, and you raised the coffee example.
00:23:27.000 I'd love just to give you the chance to expand on that.
00:23:31.000 Basically, the coffee that we all drink emits between 15 and 20 tonnes of CO2 per tonne of coffee.
00:23:39.000 So, we should all know that.
00:23:41.000 This is every time we drink coffee, we are basically putting CO2 into the atmosphere.
00:23:47.000 And one of the reasons is because most of the coffee plantations, or most of the coffee is produced through monoculture.
00:23:54.000 Even when they say the word plantation, it gives you an indication of where their morality and their ethos ultimately lies.
00:24:01.000 Who do you think the global elites were during the time of slavery?
00:24:05.000 Who do you think they were?
00:24:07.000 What do you think they said then?
00:24:08.000 What do you think they say when they have to repackage their working model?
00:24:12.000 How do they Effortlessly moved from a situation of slavery to a situation of dependency.
00:24:18.000 Why would we trust these elites now?
00:24:22.000 Especially if they want me... You will pride the coffee from my cold dead fingers, is what they're saying in the Awaken Wonder chat over there on locals.
00:24:30.000 Shaman711, coming for the coffee, revolution time.
00:24:33.000 Yep.
00:24:34.000 When they came for our phones, we said nothing.
00:24:38.000 When they came for our free speech, we said nothing.
00:24:40.000 When they came for our coffee, it's like, actually we're not having that.
00:24:42.000 We're gonna rise up against it.
00:24:44.000 Hey, so listen, you know Marianne Williamson?
00:24:47.000 She's a spiritualist, would you call her, and now politician.
00:24:51.000 She's running for the candidacy in the Democrat Party, but she ain't getting a lot of support from the DNC, the regulatory body and I suppose steering committee of the Democrat Party.
00:25:02.000 In fact, The Democrats seem pretty certain that there's only one man that can reliably run that thing.
00:25:09.000 It's, oh right, 666 for Google Chrome logo.
00:25:12.000 That's very good, well done.
00:25:13.000 I like it when you spot all that stuff.
00:25:14.000 There's some really good logo analysis going on in the Awake and Wonder chat.
00:25:18.000 Let's have a look at Marianne Williamson grappling with the corruption within the Democratic Party.
00:25:23.000 Hey, you know me.
00:25:25.000 I don't trust either of them.
00:25:26.000 I say that we need entirely new systems, representative democracy, decentralization, unified but decentralized, individual freedom, community freedom, the maximum amount of democracy possible.
00:25:38.000 But let's have a look at what Marianne Williamson is saying.
00:25:41.000 Marianne, if you were able to speak with Joe Biden for, let's say, 60 seconds, what would you want to say to the President?
00:25:49.000 I would tell him that with all due respect that you should be ashamed of yourself, sir, because this the way that you and your administration and the DNC has suppressed other candidates opposing candidates in this in this primary season has been undemocratic and should not happen.
00:26:06.000 And Dean Phillips, myself and others, when you have Democratic voters, 70 percent of whom have said they'd like to hear.
00:26:12.000 from other candidates, we should have had the right.
00:26:15.000 And hopefully the Democratic voters and other independent voters, it's an open primary here.
00:26:20.000 We'll see through that and we'll- For all of their hysteria around Donald Trump and how
00:26:24.000 Donald Trump, in a second term of Trump, will turn America into a
00:26:28.000 dictatorship, it's going to be worse than Pol Pot.
00:26:30.000 It's going to be worse than Hitler.
00:26:32.000 The fact is that what we have in lieu of democracy right now under this establishment is already a threat to freedom.
00:26:41.000 You've just got to decide what you think is worse, I suppose, and that's Marianne Williamson from within the party, the party that RFK had to leave in order to be heard.
00:26:51.000 Hey, have you seen our friend Tucker Carlson's going to Canada and he's Got some ominous warnings for Justin Trudeau.
00:27:00.000 We're going to be talking in a minute about Nikki Haley's ties to the military.
00:27:03.000 We've got a fantastic story about legacy media hysteria when it comes to the subject of Trump, a man that they need for their economic model to work.
00:27:12.000 Which way will they go?
00:27:15.000 So much content to come.
00:27:16.000 Let's have a look at Tucker talking about the Canadians.
00:27:19.000 Thank you for your call, you have reached the media line.
00:27:23.000 For all urgent requests, please send your request by email.
00:27:26.000 Merci pour votre appel, vous avez attendu la ligne médiatique.
00:27:30.000 Merci beaucoup.
00:27:32.000 Yes, hi, I couldn't understand the French part, but it's Tucker Carlson calling from the United States.
00:27:38.000 And I'd be grateful if you pass a message on to the Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau.
00:27:42.000 We are coming to liberate Canada.
00:27:45.000 We are coming to liberate Canada.
00:27:49.000 And we'll be there soon.
00:27:50.000 Merci!
00:27:53.000 Mercy.
00:27:54.000 God love him.
00:27:55.000 Extraordinary there.
00:27:57.000 Doubtless will be some interesting stuff there.
00:28:01.000 I like the mercy ending.
00:28:02.000 Pretty good.
00:28:04.000 Hey, keep watching Tucker.
00:28:06.000 What are Nikki Haley's military ties to the industrial complex?
00:28:10.000 Are you interested about that?
00:28:12.000 It's pretty extraordinary.
00:28:13.000 Let's have a look.
00:28:17.000 I would like coffee right now.
00:28:19.000 No, I don't think I should have some, it's too late in the day.
00:28:21.000 Allied defence LLC. If the mainstream press were doing their decisions, Allied defence...
00:28:25.000 I would like coffee right now. No, I don't think I should have some, it's too late in the day.
00:28:29.000 But I would like coffee right now. And can you imagine the WEF would stand in the way
00:28:35.000 of our beloved coffee? Will they do, will they allow decentralised agriculture?
00:28:39.000 Will they allow more freedom for farmers?
00:28:41.000 Will they allow us to control our own food sources?
00:28:44.000 Fence should have to disclose who their clients are.
00:28:48.000 I did something that normal business people don't do.
00:28:49.000 I've put up 20 years of my tax records.
00:28:51.000 Personal tax filings.
00:28:53.000 She should put up 20 years of her personal tax filings and put up the clients of Allied Defense LLC.
00:28:58.000 If you're running for U.S.
00:28:59.000 President, tell us who the damn clients are of the military contractor that you started, presumably using your connections from the U.N.
00:29:07.000 Starts the military contracting firm.
00:29:08.000 Starts, again, then serving on the board of Boeing.
00:29:10.000 Ends up giving secretive speaking fees from foreign actors while also running Extraordinary stuff there.
00:29:16.000 Nikki Haley, who seems to be the establishment choice for the candidacy of the Republican Party, of course, is in New Hampshire tonight.
00:29:22.000 Well, let's see how that all goes.
00:29:23.000 Is she doing all right so far?
00:29:26.000 How's it looking?
00:29:26.000 Interesting.
00:29:27.000 Or is it a foregone conclusion for your fella?
00:29:27.000 Is it going to go?
00:29:31.000 Interesting stuff.
00:29:32.000 Listen, if you watch this on YouTube, we are going to leave right now.
00:29:35.000 We've got some extraordinary stuff coming up.
00:29:38.000 Firstly, we're talking about the legacy media's infatuation with Donald Trump and their dual-purpose requirement to bring down Trump and yet elevate Trump, to continually amplify the threat of Trump while they acknowledge that they need Trump.
00:29:51.000 It's astonishing.
00:29:52.000 We're going to be talking to you a little bit about the revelation that we're doing in more depth later this week that Bioweapon research likely took place in Wuhan, that there is literally scientific microbial evidence that that is the case, that bioweapon research potentially contributed to the lab leak, and that this research is continuing.
00:30:13.000 We've got a fantastic story for you.
00:30:15.000 Join us in a few seconds over on Rumble, you awakened wonders.
00:30:21.000 Thank you for being in this stream of sweet freedom with us.
00:30:24.000 Remember, If you join us over on Locals, let's post the link to Locals right now.
00:30:29.000 We'll probably do another 10 minutes at the end of the show tonight.
00:30:31.000 We do meditations, we do biblical readings, we give you one exclusive video a week.
00:30:36.000 The 8% rise, for example, in child deaths in the UK, which I'm now free to say.
00:30:42.000 Russell, did you get permission from Tricky and Run DMC to use that song?
00:30:45.000 Yeah, we did, but we messed up somehow in a way that meant we could only use it exclusively on one platform.
00:30:50.000 It really Bugs me as a matter of fact that we can only play it silently.
00:30:53.000 So we'll do a bit extra on locals but we've still got plenty more time as well as a fantastic deep dive exploration into the legacy media and their complex relationship with Donald Trump.
00:31:06.000 Let's have a look.
00:31:07.000 Welcome one another in the stream you awakened wonders, you glorious individuals.
00:31:12.000 Would the elites controlling this go to the video if that's alright?
00:31:16.000 Okay, so it's the New Hampshire primary later today.
00:31:19.000 Are the legacy media the defenders of democracy that they cast themselves as or the participants in a circus that leads to the Trump bump and a return to the skyrocketing corporate media profits that they had during the years of the first Trump campaign and presidency?
00:31:32.000 Here's the news.
00:31:33.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:31:35.000 See you in a minute.
00:31:35.000 We'll be back in a second.
00:31:36.000 Thanks for watching Fox News.
00:31:37.000 Here's the news.
00:31:38.000 No, here's the fucking news.
00:31:42.000 With Trump rinsing it in the primaries and expected to win New Hampshire tonight, are
00:31:47.000 even Trump's worst enemies in the legacy media secretly rooting for him because what they
00:31:52.000 really care about is ratings and money?
00:31:57.000 Hello there you Awakening Wonders, thanks for joining us on this voyage to truth and freedom.
00:32:01.000 Remember, every week we make an exclusive video that's available to our supporters by clicking the link in the description.
00:32:08.000 This week's was about excess deaths and the surprising, and let's face it, mortifying,
00:32:13.000 8% rise in child deaths in the UK and possibly beyond that.
00:32:17.000 We did an exclusive video covering John Campbell's content and look at what could be causing
00:32:22.000 these excess deaths across the world.
00:32:24.000 Certainly the legacy media are never going to tell you about it, so support our content
00:32:28.000 so we can grow this movement together.
00:32:30.000 Because out there in the legacy media space is a complicated world, even those that claim
00:32:34.000 to hate Donald Trump more than Satan.
00:32:37.000 More than Beelzebub.
00:32:39.000 More than the darkest imaginable realms seem to be secretly rooting for him because when Trump's out of office and out of the picture, they have to lay off legacy media workers.
00:32:49.000 Their advertising revenue slumps.
00:32:52.000 So, is it possible that the reason the hysteria and amplification of the anti-Trump narrative continues to abide and even increases because the legacy media need Trump Now Trump is expected to win New Hampshire tonight and of course he rinsed it in Iowa.
00:33:06.000 But there was a rush to announce his victory, perhaps preemptively, because legacy media outlets wanted to be the first to unveil the information.
00:33:15.000 Let's have a look at some legacy media reporting around Trump and see if we can see where the hypocrisy emerges.
00:33:20.000 Well, we don't know the number yet, Julie Fine.
00:33:22.000 Thank you so much.
00:33:23.000 But the Associated Press has officially called it, Donald Trump wins the Iowa Republican Caucuses.
00:33:30.000 That is 32 minutes after they began.
00:33:33.000 We have this race called, at least in terms Of number one?
00:33:36.000 There's a reason the news looks how it does.
00:33:39.000 There's a reason it's often a male and a female in suits in front of important institutional buildings.
00:33:44.000 It's in order to suggest that the news is something other than a television program.
00:33:49.000 But it is editorialized.
00:33:50.000 That means they select information to amplify, they select information to ignore, and significantly they are funded by their partners in marketing.
00:33:57.000 In this case, in talking about cable news, overwhelmingly by Big Pharma.
00:34:02.000 Have you noticed any news stories in the last couple of years that were biased towards outcomes that might be favourable to Big Pharma?
00:34:07.000 Let me know in the chat and the comments.
00:34:09.000 So when it comes to covering Donald Trump, they are massively compromised because clearly, ideologically, they do not like Donald Trump.
00:34:15.000 He is a populist.
00:34:16.000 He is a candidate that that blue collar workers tend to flock towards.
00:34:20.000 He is anti-elite, anti-establishment.
00:34:22.000 Those are just a few of the things about Trump they loathe and despise.
00:34:25.000 And yet Trump for them is ratings gold.
00:34:28.000 So how do legacy media organizations that are dependent on advertising revenue
00:34:32.000 support in an unbiased way on Donald Trump?
00:34:35.000 The simple truth is they are unable to.
00:34:37.000 We have to get the, we'll get to the Hitler stuff in a second.
00:34:41.000 I mean, I think that story's been covered.
00:34:43.000 He was a really bad, genocidal lunatic that used folk myth, the music of Wagner, even Hindu symbolism and Roman pageantry to revivify a dormant German nation that had been crushed by the First World War.
00:34:55.000 We don't need to get back into, oh, you're going to say that Trump's here.
00:34:58.000 No, that is news.
00:34:59.000 But let's start, though, with I'll make a chart.
00:35:03.000 The fact that Donald Trump... Mike is making a chart.
00:35:06.000 They're making the news up.
00:35:08.000 Is this chart going to be reasons that Donald Trump is like Hitler?
00:35:08.000 I'll do a chart.
00:35:11.000 Firstly, haircuts.
00:35:13.000 They both had unusual haircuts.
00:35:15.000 It's not well.
00:35:16.000 We know this.
00:35:17.000 But this guy, he's looking so old, he's shuffling around.
00:35:22.000 They act as if it's ethically incorrect as well to condemn Biden on the basis of his physical appearance and his age, but they do it for Trump because they've got no principles at all, have they?
00:35:31.000 All the while they're talking about this, they're thinking, we need Donald Trump.
00:35:34.000 Without Donald Trump, pretty soon it's going to be, Micah, oh, sorry, you don't have Micah.
00:35:38.000 We had to make her redundant because Biden is doing another term, basically at this point, like an ash cloud from a crypt, and we can't afford to pay Micah's wages.
00:35:47.000 He's going through this thing and then about why he should have total immunity, total immunity even when he crosses the line.
00:35:57.000 It is pure, sheer authoritarianism and tyranny.
00:36:03.000 If that is your depiction and understanding of authoritarianism and tyranny, I'd love to see how they're handling the numerous stories around Hunter Biden, his business interests and their potential connection to Joe Biden, whether that's the Burisma stuff in Ukraine, these potential Chinese deals, of course the report in that was censored during the time of the election, because it If something is corrupt and tyrannical then it has to be corrupt and tyrannical whichever side does it.
00:36:24.000 Otherwise you're simply advocating for a particular ideology while simultaneously amplifying the threat of Trump in order to have a powerful demon and opponent in their preferred media space so they can continually agitate for advertising.
00:36:36.000 So we have that part of it.
00:36:39.000 Trump at his most dangerous, but also Trump at his most detached from reality.
00:36:45.000 He's really losing it.
00:36:47.000 We've been getting glimpses now of him shuffling around and looking lost.
00:36:55.000 Have they covered Joe Biden in that bike shop?
00:36:58.000 Look at this.
00:36:59.000 So there you go.
00:37:04.000 There's a good degree of hysteria there and agitation.
00:37:08.000 So it would be surprising to learn, wouldn't it, that during the periods where Trump was not in office and not in the news cycle, their figures and revenue suffered.
00:37:16.000 We'll get into that in a moment.
00:37:18.000 Let's have a look at some more MSNBC hysteria.
00:37:21.000 Donald Trump supporters are right there with him.
00:37:24.000 Even as his rhetoric has become more blatantly fascist, they want what he wants.
00:37:29.000 Like, if you're going to scrutinise rhetoric right down to the sort of colloquial idiosyncrasies, what about the moment where Joe Biden says, no, the bombing of the Yemen isn't working in so much that it isn't impacting the Houthis, but we're going to continue with it?
00:37:43.000 That actually goes beyond fascism.
00:37:45.000 That's into the kind of Orwellian dystopianism of the reversal of the meaning of language.
00:37:50.000 And of course, many of you will be saying right now, and perhaps even typing in the comments, the goal is not to end wars.
00:37:55.000 The goal is forever wars.
00:37:56.000 Don't you think that these kind of deeply cynical globalist issues are more significant than the tribal polemicism and fanfare that surrounds either of these two candidates?
00:38:06.000 Frankly, in short, if they are indeed legitimately concerned about Donald Trump, Why are they not analysing and scrutinising corruption, hypocrisy and authoritarianism within the party that they support?
00:38:17.000 In the past year, Trump has called for the termination of the Constitution, said he wants to be dictator for a day.
00:38:22.000 That was a joke.
00:38:23.000 I watched that.
00:38:24.000 He said that on, I think, Glenn Beck or Sean Hannity, wasn't it?
00:38:27.000 And he said, for a day I'll be dictator, build the wall.
00:38:30.000 I know about these legacy media tactics because I know how I personally have been victim to it.
00:38:34.000 it as if it's serious shows you that they are kind of tweaking the dials.
00:38:38.000 Well what if that wasn't a joke? What if we portray that in its worst possible light?
00:38:42.000 I know about these legacy media tactics because I know how I personally have been victim to it.
00:38:47.000 They take something that was out in the open and clear and explicit, for example my promiscuity,
00:38:51.000 dial it up, amplify it, make it look as awful as possible and then present it to you as news.
00:38:57.000 What do the legacy media report on and what do they ignore?
00:39:00.000 They ignore things that could be detrimental to the interests of the powerful and they celebrate and amplify stories that are antithetical to your personal and particular interests.
00:39:09.000 Trump has fundamentally transformed the Republican Party to the point that the party itself has taken on his grievances and the agenda of vengeance that he's openly planning if he wins a second term.
00:39:22.000 Aside from agenda of vengeance sounding like a bit of a Sith sequel from an overly franchised Star Wars movie, Doesn't it seem to you that there is a bit of an agenda of vengeance against Trump himself as he deals with indictment after indictment after they continually pursue him through various courts?
00:39:39.000 It seems to me somewhat politically motivated rather than, we must have justice for all of these various diffuse frauds.
00:39:46.000 As Tom Nichols wrote in The Atlantic this week, quote, these voters now want to get even with their fellow citizens, not for what's been done to Trump, but for what they feel has been done to them.
00:39:57.000 They were certain that 2016 would finally bring them the recognition and respect they craved.
00:40:01.000 Instead, Trump set them up for a steady diet of ego-bruising rebukes from other voters.
00:40:08.000 Ego bruising, rebukes from other voters.
00:40:10.000 It's an interesting piece of analysis and you would think, given the nature of that invective, that these news organisations would legitimately be opposed to Trump.
00:40:18.000 But are they?
00:40:19.000 Here we go again.
00:40:20.000 About 30 minutes into counting the first votes of the Iowa caucus, the Associated Press, CNN, NBC and various other news networks called it for Donald Trump.
00:40:28.000 Donald Trump wins the Iowa Republican caucuses.
00:40:32.000 That is 32 minutes after they began.
00:40:35.000 There was little doubt that the former president would easily dominate the rural state, but the rush to declare him the victor in violation of policies that prohibit such calls before the polls close was a blatant attempt to soak up the election night audience.
00:40:47.000 It is difficult because of course they have an agenda beyond conveying information.
00:40:51.000 This followed another departure from traditional editorial practices when MSNBC and CNN refused to screen Trump's victory speech MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, casting herself and her network as defenders of the Republic, justified the unusual decision with typical exaggerated commentary.
00:41:06.000 Maddow said her network would suffer by knowingly broadcasting untrue things, which is an extraordinary claim to present themselves as gatekeepers.
00:41:14.000 And that is why you cannot trust the legacy media.
00:41:16.000 That's why you should consider supporting our channel, where right now you can watch an exclusive video for our supporters on The Iowa primary heralded democracy falling to an authoritarian and potentially fascist form of government.
00:41:33.000 For his part, Jake Tapper of CNN suggested his network had to shield viewers from anti-immigrant rhetoric.
00:41:40.000 I suppose there has to be a continual amplification of the hysteria simply to provide a sense of narrative.
00:41:45.000 It's pretty clear they don't like Donald Trump.
00:41:47.000 It's pretty clear that what they want is neoliberal authoritarianism with strong globalist ties.
00:41:52.000 An America that is run by the agenda of NATO, the WHO, the WEF.
00:41:57.000 Defined and confined by cultural war issues.
00:42:00.000 It's pretty clear that that is the agenda.
00:42:02.000 You don't need to every single day keep bloody well telling everybody that.
00:42:05.000 Trump responded in kind.
00:42:07.000 NBC and CNN refused to air my victory speech he said at a rally in New Hampshire the following day.
00:42:12.000 Think of it because they are crooked, they're dishonest and frankly they should have their
00:42:16.000 licenses or whatever they have taken away.
00:42:18.000 Ha ha ha, their licenses or whatever they have.
00:42:22.000 Typically dismissive.
00:42:23.000 If you watched Trump's victory speech in Iowa, it was full of just sort of politeness.
00:42:27.000 And I think that one of the mistakes they're making is by portraying Trump as this incredibly
00:42:32.000 intoxicating and charismatic leader who they can't even broadcast.
00:42:37.000 Makes him somewhat more appealing, particularly when understandably trust in the media is
00:42:41.000 at an all-time high.
00:42:42.000 time deserved an understandable low. Their refusal to even platform Donald Trump, I think,
00:42:47.000 and let me know if you agree with this in the chat and the comments, makes Trump seem
00:42:50.000 more legitimate. And with that, election season has started, along with the outrage cycle
00:42:56.000 from which both Trump and legacy media reap mutual benefit.
00:43:01.000 The more media outlets lean into partisan anti-Trump coverage, the more gleefully he
00:43:05.000 campaigns against the media as a biased institution. You know how much we value your
00:43:09.000 dedication, your time, your attention, and we similarly value our partners that help to keep the
00:43:14.000 lights on and help to keep us Now a word from our sponsors at Brickhouse.
00:43:19.000 Read their product, Lean.
00:43:21.000 Now, stress may be why you can't lose weight.
00:43:23.000 There could be other reasons.
00:43:24.000 Could be stress.
00:43:25.000 Do you have moderate to high stress?
00:43:27.000 We got this new doctor formulated weight loss supplement called Lean.
00:43:31.000 It could be your solution.
00:43:33.000 These are fantastic medics.
00:43:35.000 Now, as you know, over the course of my life, I've had difficulties with food and eating, and you've got to be careful and healthy when it comes to diet.
00:43:43.000 But if you think your problems with diet are to do with stress, this could be a very useful product for you as part of a healthy, conscientious and focused approach to your own wellness.
00:43:55.000 Chronic stress wreaks havoc on blood sugar, which can cause your body to store excess fat.
00:44:00.000 Stress can also slow your metabolism, which of course, as you know already, fuels weight gain.
00:44:04.000 And you all know about stress eating and sugar cravings.
00:44:07.000 This is the good news.
00:44:07.000 I get that stuff.
00:44:08.000 The studied ingredients in lean have been shown to help maintain healthy blood sugar levels, help optimize metabolism, and help keep your appetite under control.
00:44:18.000 Could be a very useful product.
00:44:19.000 If your life is a bit stressful and you want to lose weight, add lean to a healthy diet and exercise lifestyle.
00:44:24.000 Remember, you gotta eat healthy and exercise well.
00:44:26.000 It's not a miracle, but it could be the difference.
00:44:30.000 Plus, we can get you 15% off and free shipping at TakeLean.com if you enter brand15.
00:44:36.000 That's the promo code, brand15.
00:44:38.000 Enter that at TakeLean.com.
00:44:39.000 And that's promo code brand15 at TakeLean.com.
00:44:42.000 TakeLean.com.
00:44:43.000 Statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
00:44:46.000 This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease, and is not a substitute or alternative for care from a healthcare provider.
00:44:53.000 Okay, let's get back to our content.
00:44:55.000 Thanks for staying with us.
00:44:56.000 It's a pattern that first took shape nine years ago when Trump launched his campaign with a series of inflammatory statements.
00:45:02.000 Mexican migrants are rapists, ban all Muslim immigration, why can't I call women fat pigs,
00:45:07.000 slobs and disgusting animals?
00:45:08.000 The extreme remarks rolled on.
00:45:10.000 In response, the media abandoned objectivity.
00:45:13.000 Journalists inserted themselves into the story, often challenging Trump directly and darkly
00:45:17.000 warning readers to oppose him.
00:45:19.000 The New York Times and Washington Post broke tradition and used the words lie and liar on their splash to describe a presidential candidate.
00:45:26.000 The media used any opportunity to present Trump in a negative light.
00:45:29.000 MSNBC, despite its supposed rule against broadcasting falsehoods, reported salacious stories casting
00:45:34.000 Trump as a Russian intelligence asset, of course referring to Russiagate, which Rachel
00:45:38.000 Maddow and MSNBC et al all enthusiastically reported, even though it's been proven to
00:45:43.000 be untrue since then.
00:45:45.000 The press pitted itself against the candidate.
00:45:47.000 While popular on cable television, this approach is very much divorced from journalism that seeks to understand why voters were attracted to his message on trade, his unorthodox opposition to foreign military interventions, or the anger he mobilised against establishment elites.
00:46:00.000 For his part, Trump I think the political press is among the most dishonest people that I've ever met, Trump would say, to be met with uproarious applause.
00:46:12.000 Undoubtedly, Trump's instincts around elitism, the establishment, neoliberal, globalist politics are Pretty acute, astute and well observed.
00:46:22.000 The fact is Trump cannot rise to prominence and ongoing success unless there is an appetite for Trump.
00:46:28.000 And a big part of that appetite, I believe, is the antipathy that the government, legacy media, corporatism, globalism are all collectively held in.
00:46:36.000 Whether or not you believe Trump has delivered on the promises and rhetoric that he's delivered in his previous presidential campaign and whether or not he will deliver on the rhetoric during this one, there is no question that the more the legacy media says that they hate Donald Trump, the more other people regard him as a populist icon and an anti-establishment figure.
00:46:54.000 What's baffling about all of this is there's never a time of atonement or a reckoning.
00:46:59.000 You never see Morning Joe and all them others sat around the table and going, you know what, we should probably talk about the corruption within the Biden family.
00:47:04.000 We should probably talk about the lack of infrastructure in American life.
00:47:07.000 We should probably talk about why all of these people feel so unheard and angry.
00:47:11.000 Unless you're willing to campaign along the lines of, listen, we don't think Donald Trump's a very good political figure for these reasons.
00:47:18.000 But we recognise that what he's tapped into in you is a kind of rage and anger and despair and a desire for a different type of America.
00:47:26.000 All they've ever really offered is, you slot must be racist.
00:47:29.000 And so much of it doesn't make sense when you find out that the Democrat Party has already lost the white working class vote of its own former supporters and is well on the way to losing non-white, black, Hispanic voters.
00:47:41.000 One of the things he was most condemned for was the cages.
00:47:43.000 The children at the border in cages.
00:47:45.000 Then you learn Barack Obama built those cages.
00:47:48.000 Or the wall.
00:47:49.000 The typical Donald Trump policy.
00:47:51.000 thing I know where to do is build. All of that stuff and then you discover that
00:47:53.000 Joe Biden is continuing to build the wall. Similarly the campaign pledges
00:47:57.000 offered by Joe Biden. I will make Saudi Arabia a pariah.
00:48:00.000 Make them in fact the pariah that they are. Then he does a series of arms deals
00:48:05.000 and energy deals with Saudi Arabia. Their inability to address the problem
00:48:09.000 leaves us open to the rhetoric charisma and phenomena of Donald Trump. They
00:48:14.000 can never directly address it because to directly address it you would have to
00:48:17.000 acknowledge the culpability of the system itself.
00:48:20.000 You'd have to say, this system doesn't work.
00:48:21.000 It's probably at an end now.
00:48:23.000 We're resisting that change because we won't let someone like Robert F. Kennedy even debate our current candidate.
00:48:29.000 We won't send Biden into the debate, Marianne Williamson.
00:48:32.000 And because of that, because Joe Biden is a symbol of the establishment, he is a symbol of that party, elderly, perhaps once efficient, but certainly not anymore.
00:48:41.000 Because of these failings, All they can do is sort of marvel at and fetishise Donald Trump, and even that's not working.
00:48:47.000 Unless their agenda is simply to increase news and advertising revenue, then it's working pretty well, actually.
00:48:52.000 All decorum gone, the clashes drove record viewership and unprecedented profits for media corporations.
00:48:58.000 Meanwhile, the endless anti-Trump headlines in the liberal media only made his point about bias while also keeping him right at the heart of every story.
00:49:06.000 The profit dynamic was significant.
00:49:09.000 In 2015, Les Moonves, then chief of CBS News, was giddy with the Trump-driven audience.
00:49:14.000 Looking ahead, he told investors, the presidential election is right around the corner and thank God the rancor has already begun.
00:49:21.000 So there's an obvious compromise there.
00:49:22.000 They're ultimately, like all for-profit organizations, the bottom line is the line that matters most.
00:49:25.000 At the moment, they can appeal to their audience by continually condemning Trump.
00:49:29.000 out there he chuckled, according to a recording.
00:49:32.000 So there's an obvious compromise there.
00:49:34.000 There, ultimately, like all for-profit organisations, the bottom line is the line that matters most.
00:49:40.000 At the moment, they can appeal to their audience by continually condemning Trump.
00:49:43.000 It seems to work.
00:49:44.000 But if it gets proven at some point that by amplifying Trump,
00:49:47.000 by showing Trump, by finding the right line, oh, what we'll do is we'll talk about Trump,
00:49:53.000 If they can't continue this delicate dance around the issue of Trump, their model is doomed.
00:49:57.000 And perhaps with the rise of independent media anyway, their model is no longer effective.
00:50:02.000 What we're watching, I think, is a bunch of institutions falling apart, doubling down on hysteria and authoritarianism in order to resist what seems to me to be the inevitable decentralization of many of their models.
00:50:14.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.
00:50:15.000 The Washington Post and New Yorker enjoyed record circulation.
00:50:19.000 MSNBC and CNN also claimed unprecedented viewership, finally outflanking Fox News as each network competed for an audience hungry for Trump controversies, some of which, like the Steele dossier, were outright fabrications.
00:50:31.000 A story we've covered, the Clinton campaign funded lies that made it all the way onto legacy media shows, and they've never really acknowledged that.
00:50:39.000 They certainly don't ever acknowledge it when they talk about lack of trust in the media or the rise in Trump's popularity.
00:50:43.000 Another one of the things they just don't cover.
00:50:45.000 The heightened political climate continues to benefit CNN, John Martin, head of Turner, told the Financial Times.
00:50:51.000 Even the New York Times boasted about its Trump bump.
00:50:54.000 Mark Thompson, then the Times' chief executive, celebrated a continued revenue spike well after the campaign ended, as coverage of exceptional news events, including the firing of James Comey, helped add 109,000 new digital customers.
00:51:07.000 Ultimately it's a business model that needs to alter and amend and it needs to exist in these type of spaces.
00:51:12.000 I believe that's why these kind of spaces are under significant attack because they represent the emergence of entirely new perspectives or old perspectives re-heard and it's an enormous threat to the media unless they can start penetrating these spaces.
00:51:25.000 But with Biden came the Trump slump.
00:51:27.000 The Washington Post lost nearly a third of its digital audience and last October announced large cutbacks to its workforce.
00:51:33.000 Viewership rates are down at all the major cable and television networks with NBC and MSNBC just earlier this month reporting yet another round of layoffs.
00:51:41.000 When do you consider that the Democrat Party essentially exiled RFK rather than have a candidate that could stand up against Trump?
00:51:48.000 And wouldn't even let Bernie Sanders run as a candidate, preferring Hillary Clinton inexplicably.
00:51:54.000 How do you imagine the legacy media, the propagandist arm of the same establishment interests, feels when it comes to a decision between we're going to have to cut our own workforce and make less money with Biden in office, Or we can continue to contribute to this hysteria around Trump, even knowing that potentially we increase his chances of being elected, but also keep our advertising revenue and subsidies nice and high.
00:52:17.000 How do you think they might respond to that internally, knowing what we know about their ethics?
00:52:21.000 No wonder then that the anti-Trump narrative is rearing its head again.
00:52:24.000 The Iowa coverage already points to what lies ahead, as Trump is described as a psychopathic criminal.
00:52:30.000 That's extreme, isn't it?
00:52:31.000 Like, not just a criminal.
00:52:33.000 Not just a psychopath, but a psychopathic criminal.
00:52:36.000 The worst thing anyone can be.
00:52:40.000 And his entire base built on a cult of personality.
00:52:43.000 The media will again do battle in an attempt to prevent the former president from returning to the White House.
00:52:48.000 Paradoxically though, this is bound to help not hinder Trump's campaign.
00:52:52.000 In 2016, journalists were so distracted by the latest Trump tweet that they paid no heed to the electorate.
00:52:57.000 It's deep frustration at the establishment and it's longing for a change agent.
00:53:01.000 But such are the incentives and outlets are bound to overplay their hand again.
00:53:04.000 The professional and financial advantages are such that non-partisan journalism is forgotten.
00:53:09.000 The media will cast themselves as defenders of democracy and joust with Trump and his campaign,
00:53:13.000 little realising that their crusade may well lead him straight back into office.
00:53:18.000 I suppose the question we're left with is, is that exactly where they want him?
00:53:22.000 What an extraordinary time we live in where our trust in media is so low,
00:53:26.000 we can't even trust them in their own evident passion and enthusiasm
00:53:30.000 when it comes to ultimately what matters most to them, ongoing profits.
00:53:35.000 When we know how their model is funded, when we know what their affiliations are when it comes to corporatism, when we saw during the pandemic period how they advocate and align in particular with the interests of the pharmaceutical industry, which is why we want you to subscribe and watch our 8% excess death in children video if you can because I believe
00:53:51.000 strongly the legacy media model is finished.
00:53:54.000 They have no authenticity, they have no vitality, they have no real connection to the issues they
00:53:59.000 talk about. When you see Micah and Morning Joe and those various other pundits pontificating,
00:54:04.000 what I believe you're watching is the No.
00:54:05.000 end of a particular type of institution that has no ideas left except the ongoing vilification
00:54:11.000 of someone in the figure of Donald Trump who has harnessed a tide of anti-establishment
00:54:16.000 zeal and they are completely at a loss as to how to oppose it because to oppose it would
00:54:20.000 mean radically altering their entire model and everything that they advocate for.
00:54:24.000 But that's just what I think, let me know what you think in the chat.
00:54:26.000 See you in a second.
00:54:27.000 No, here's the fucking news.
00:54:32.000 You beautiful, glorious, awakening individuals.
00:54:35.000 What fantastic comments you've sent in.
00:54:37.000 There was Pete1844 asking about a Christian theocracy.
00:54:41.000 I think any centralised authoritarian government would be a problem for us.
00:54:45.000 You know what I believe in.
00:54:47.000 Decentralised but unified.
00:54:48.000 It's inevitable that we're all going to have cultural beliefs that differ and any centralised form of government is ultimately going to end up oppressing, either visibly and invisibly and implicitly, Marginalized groups or explicitly.
00:55:02.000 Thank you very much.
00:55:03.000 I appreciate that.
00:55:04.000 Who the hell watches MSM still?
00:55:08.000 Wake up!
00:55:09.000 Wake up your parents and your children and your neighbours and your churches.
00:55:12.000 Please, Orange Tosh, there cannot be many people left who actually take the legacy media seriously.
00:55:17.000 Matkan.
00:55:17.000 Legacy media is just a psyop these days.
00:55:20.000 Sabramovic.
00:55:21.000 And vaccine mandates aren't tyrannical.
00:55:23.000 Jbeb99.
00:55:24.000 The campaign trail is difficult.
00:55:26.000 Not that Biden would know that.
00:55:27.000 WNPLM.
00:55:29.000 Oh yeah, Russell, are you going to cover that clip of that British piano player in public having a group of Chinese people demanding he stop filming?
00:55:34.000 They tried to send the cops after him and it almost worked.
00:55:37.000 Yeah, yeah, I did see that.
00:55:38.000 That was pretty interesting.
00:55:40.000 Let's have a look at that, in fact.
00:55:41.000 Let's have a look at that British guy who's a YouTuber, actually.
00:55:44.000 We should give him a little shout out.
00:55:46.000 Who's playing the piano in public, and then some Chinese folk who are making TV there, let's say, you've got to stop filming.
00:55:53.000 Russell, what do you think of the King Charles and the WEF, says Kristen 1974?
00:55:57.000 I think the WEF are soft PR for globalist power, and I think that the monarchy at this point And perhaps at any point is a visible living demonstration of hierarchical systems that need to be abandoned and abolished and replaced.
00:56:14.000 Replaced immediately.
00:56:16.000 So, you know, that's my view.
00:56:17.000 Hey, let's have a look at this bloke playing the piano in public and these Chinese TV journalists trying to shut him down.
00:56:26.000 It's pretty interesting.
00:56:28.000 I think you'll like it.
00:56:33.000 Pretty inoffensive so far, pretty jaunty.
00:56:36.000 Can the Chinese Jeffries have a go?
00:56:39.000 Oh yeah, of course, of course.
00:56:42.000 And they ask, they're asking do they want to have a go.
00:56:44.000 Do you want to have a go?
00:56:45.000 We can let these Chinese folks have a go.
00:56:47.000 This is what British people are ultimately like.
00:56:49.000 Friendly, open-hearted.
00:56:52.000 Don't lose your optimism.
00:56:54.000 Don't lose your belief that people are fundamentally beautiful.
00:56:57.000 It's the systems, I believe.
00:56:58.000 It's the systems that drag us down.
00:57:00.000 You know when they say, oh, there's public interest in these stories?
00:57:03.000 No, there isn't.
00:57:04.000 No, there isn't.
00:57:06.000 Most people want to be left alone.
00:57:07.000 Most people want to be free.
00:57:09.000 There are a few, it seems, that there are some people that somehow get off on being governed by peculiar authority.
00:57:16.000 We can't let that be the flow of life, can we?
00:57:19.000 Of course we've got the Chinese here!
00:57:20.000 Is that guy filming him though, right then?
00:57:23.000 They're saying you can't film us, you can't film us.
00:57:26.000 But this dude, luckily he knows the law.
00:57:28.000 I don't know, are we allowed?
00:57:30.000 We're not allowed.
00:57:32.000 Is that guy filming him though?
00:57:34.000 They're saying you can't film us, you can't film us.
00:57:36.000 But this dude, luckily he knows the law.
00:57:38.000 We're not allowed?
00:57:40.000 You're not allowed because we're for Chinese TV.
00:57:42.000 This is very for Chinese TV.
00:57:45.000 This is non-disco.
00:57:45.000 Oh, OK.
00:57:47.000 It's not disco?
00:57:48.000 There's no reason.
00:57:49.000 That's our choice.
00:57:50.000 That's our rights.
00:57:51.000 Oh, so it's not a legal thing?
00:57:52.000 It is a legal thing because... Yes, you can.
00:57:56.000 Anyone can film because in the UK it's a free country and anyone can film.
00:58:00.000 But we have images, right?
00:58:02.000 Not in public.
00:58:03.000 In China?
00:58:04.000 But we're not in China.
00:58:05.000 No, no, no.
00:58:05.000 I have my choice.
00:58:07.000 No, but we are in Britain.
00:58:09.000 Great Britain.
00:58:10.000 We're not in China.
00:58:10.000 I say I'm also British.
00:58:12.000 I'm also British, okay?
00:58:13.000 She's Great Britain.
00:58:15.000 I'm also British.
00:58:16.000 I'm also British.
00:58:16.000 But I don't want to use my image.
00:58:18.000 You've got a Chinese flag there.
00:58:19.000 It doesn't matter.
00:58:20.000 Show me the Chinese flag.
00:58:21.000 Why are you touching her?
00:58:23.000 Stop touching her!
00:58:24.000 Don't touch her!
00:58:25.000 Please!
00:58:25.000 That was an escalation.
00:58:27.000 Do not touch her!
00:58:28.000 Please!
00:58:29.000 You are not the same age!
00:58:30.000 Please do not touch her!
00:58:32.000 Please don't touch her. Please don't touch her.
00:58:32.000 Don't touch her!
00:58:34.000 I told you to carry out the camera.
00:58:36.000 I told you.
00:58:38.000 This is not to go on your channel.
00:58:40.000 Alright, so the police arrive and you wonder how this will go.
00:58:45.000 Now, I'm not in particular interested in the nationality of the participants.
00:58:49.000 I'm interested in freedom.
00:58:50.000 That dude's just filming some stuff in public, which I don't think is against the law.
00:58:54.000 I remember the beginning of it.
00:58:57.000 John E. Piano playing.
00:58:58.000 Listen, Kelly, we're in a public space.
00:59:00.000 I'll just have a conversation with this dude in my place.
00:59:04.000 Listen, this is going on your YouTube channel.
00:59:09.000 I need to speak to you without this being on your YouTube channel.
00:59:13.000 Well, what about what?
00:59:13.000 Is this proper in a public space?
00:59:15.000 Listen, can I just have a conversation with you please?
00:59:17.000 Sure.
00:59:17.000 Without your friend video.
00:59:19.000 No, because the camera never lies.
00:59:20.000 Listen, I've got my camera on and we're just having a conversation.
00:59:23.000 OK, so I've got my camera on.
00:59:24.000 Let's have a conversation then.
00:59:26.000 This is going on your YouTube channel and I don't want it to go on your YouTube channel.
00:59:29.000 Well, don't talk to me then, Kerry.
00:59:31.000 Listen, listen.
00:59:33.000 She said, Kerry, we're in Britain.
00:59:34.000 We're in a public space.
00:59:36.000 We've got free country.
00:59:40.000 Someone makes the point, private shopping mall.
00:59:43.000 Yeah, that's what happens with the privatisation of previous public space.
00:59:46.000 There was some, like in our country, there was a bill, I think in Georgian Georgian Britain where like common land was taken in a private ownership and from that point on the kind of dynamics of what public life consisted of starts to irrevocably alter and you see this escalated now like the only reason they could move on people that were participating in the Occupy movement was because many of those squares where the protest took place were ultimately privately owned even though you would think as part of your country or our country that they would be publicly owned because they're funded by
01:00:21.000 Taxpayers etc.
01:00:22.000 But it's extraordinarily easily to legislatively curtail and dominate and I suppose ultimately colonize public space.
01:00:31.000 So yeah, you're right.
01:00:32.000 Even though it looks to me like that's a train station would be my guess.
01:00:35.000 I bet that ultimately through a sort of set of private-public partnerships, which is extraordinary.
01:00:40.000 It's one of the things we're looking at at the moment is the curious cartilage between state and corporation.
01:00:45.000 And there are groups like, there's a group called Logically, in the UK that we're looking into, because they've been
01:00:50.000 looking into me, surveilling me, we've got a, like, we have to go to them and ask for, like,
01:00:53.000 for them to hand over all the information, for all the spying they've been doing. It's sort of
01:00:57.000 fascinating the way it all rocks along.
01:00:59.000 But these kind of think tanks and these NGOs and these public groups, you know, the obvious
01:01:04.000 examples are things like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. We're a philanthropic organisation!
01:01:10.000 Okay, well, can we see some philanthropy, please?
01:01:12.000 No, I said you're waving a communist flag. That's all I said.
01:01:18.000 And the hands were meant to be going towards her?
01:01:20.000 Were you trying to touch her in that moment?
01:01:23.000 I was not trying to touch her.
01:01:24.000 That's why I have a camera.
01:01:26.000 Right.
01:01:26.000 That's why I have a camera.
01:01:26.000 OK.
01:01:28.000 They've requested that the video where they've approached gets deleted and not used on your channel.
01:01:32.000 Because there's money being made and their works are accompanied and their faces can't be shown on your channel.
01:01:32.000 No.
01:01:36.000 Well, they shouldn't be.
01:01:38.000 You're not their private security agent.
01:01:40.000 I'm not their private security agent.
01:01:41.000 And we're in a free country.
01:01:43.000 We're in a free space.
01:01:44.000 We're not causing any trouble.
01:01:45.000 The problem is not from us, Kerry.
01:01:46.000 The problem is they are coming over, telling us what to do, and playing the piano.
01:01:50.000 Now, fair is fair, but you are not their private security guards.
01:01:53.000 I never said I was, and I'm having a conversation with you.
01:01:56.000 And we're in a free space, in a free country.
01:01:58.000 I'm not causing any trouble.
01:02:00.000 There's an allegation being made and that's why... What's the allegation?
01:02:03.000 Now you told me to stop filming and now you say there's an allegation.
01:02:06.000 The camera never lies.
01:02:07.000 That's why I film... You've told me to turn off my camera and now you're saying I've got an allegation.
01:02:11.000 What's the allegation?
01:02:12.000 The reason why I'm asking you not to... It's weird, isn't it?
01:02:15.000 And baffling and confusing.
01:02:16.000 It seems like the people that are charged with enforcing the law are not even sure what laws they're enforcing.
01:02:21.000 ION7, Cops Work for Globalists.
01:02:23.000 I know a lot of people that work within police forces that are really good people.
01:02:27.000 public servants that got into the police force because they want to serve the public, not because they want to enforce the agenda of the powerful.
01:02:36.000 It's a very curious line they've got to walk.
01:02:38.000 I'm sure many of you know people that are in service, whether it's people that are firefighters or health professionals or even police officers that are publicly minded.
01:02:45.000 This of course comes from the channel of Brendan Cavanagh, who's a British YouTuber.
01:02:50.000 You should check out his stuff because he's clearly up for it, but most of the time he's just Playing the old Joanna, tickling the old Ivories without, I'm assuming and I hope, intervention from the police.
01:03:00.000 Because I know that you are putting this on your YouTube.
01:03:02.000 It doesn't matter where it goes, we're in a free country.
01:03:04.000 Sorry?
01:03:05.000 We're in a democracy.
01:03:07.000 We're not in China.
01:03:08.000 And that's not racist, that's the truth.
01:03:09.000 That's what our forefathers thought.
01:03:10.000 Exactly, but you can't say things like that, can you?
01:03:13.000 You can't just say things like that.
01:03:14.000 Say what?
01:03:15.000 That we're in a free country?
01:03:16.000 No, that we're not in China.
01:03:17.000 We're Chinese people, exactly.
01:03:19.000 Well, they came... Listen, Kerry, if I was over in China and I started laying the law down to Chinese people at the piano, telling them what they cannot do, do you think that's appropriate?
01:03:29.000 They came over here, the guy started shouting at me, and he said, you're not allowed to film, you're not allowed... And I said, sorry, we're in Britain and I'm allowed to play.
01:03:36.000 And I said, you're waving a communist flag.
01:03:38.000 And then he said, you're racist.
01:03:40.000 So, if I've done anything wrong, tell me.
01:03:42.000 Right?
01:03:45.000 This is a free speech issue.
01:03:46.000 I'm sorry.
01:03:47.000 This is a free speech issue.
01:03:49.000 I'm not causing any trouble.
01:03:50.000 They are the ones making a fuss.
01:03:52.000 He's doing a good job there because he's staying double calm.
01:03:54.000 That's fascinating.
01:03:55.000 We'll watch the end of this in a second.
01:03:58.000 In a way, you have to be able to see the interface between issues like this and other globalist issues that are going to be affecting us, I think, increasingly.
01:04:07.000 We're going to be talking more about this later in the week.
01:04:10.000 The revelation that indeed the Wuhan Institute of Virology, in conjunction with DARPA, funded by the EcoHealth Alliance, were working on dual-purpose research.
01:04:20.000 Dual-purpose research is a long euphemism that ultimately means bioweapons.
01:04:25.000 This is a fantastic story, we'll be looking at it in more detail later this week, but I just want to give you a heads up on it because it's pretty important.
01:04:33.000 Last year, multiple U.S.
01:04:34.000 government officials stated that sources in the U.S.
01:04:36.000 government were 100% confident that COVID-19's patient zero worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and conducted risky gain-of-function experiments there.
01:04:45.000 Okay, we're getting somewhere.
01:04:47.000 This lab received funding from the National Institutes of Health, you've heard of them, through EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based non-profit.
01:04:53.000 Remember, these agencies are significant.
01:04:56.000 In 2018, EcoHealth Alliance applied for a grant from the Defence Advanced Research Project Agency, DARPA.
01:05:02.000 Let me know in the chat.
01:05:03.000 You're going to show the rest of the video?
01:05:04.000 Yeah, I'll show the rest of the video.
01:05:05.000 You want to know how it ends?
01:05:06.000 You want to know if he gets away free?
01:05:08.000 We'll check it out.
01:05:09.000 We'll check it out.
01:05:10.000 The DARPA for a project called Diffuse that would involve Shi Zhengli's lab group at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Ralph Baric's lab at the University of North Carolina.
01:05:20.000 So there's a connection between DARPA, EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
01:05:26.000 Now U.S.
01:05:27.000 Right-to-Know has obtained a full cache of notes and drafts from the DEFUSE grant proposal for a Freedom of Information Act request.
01:05:34.000 These documents reveal that the features of SARS-CoV-2 closely resemble the work described in EcoHealth Alliance's proposal.
01:05:42.000 That means that they can, at a microscopic level, observe that the proposals that they were looking for grant funding for, DARPA and EcoHealth Alliance, looks a lot like SARS-CoV-2, i.e.
01:05:57.000 the research they were applying to be able to do looks like the disease that causes the pandemic.
01:06:04.000 Looks like.
01:06:05.000 I'm only following the science now, so don't leap to any conclusions.
01:06:10.000 SARS-CoV-2's furin cleavage site primed the virus for easy transmissibility among humans and is absent from the closest known relatives of SARS-CoV-2.
01:06:20.000 What comes up in this is extraordinary, like literal individuals over in Russia researching biolabs that then subsequently crop up in Wuhan.
01:06:30.000 It's a fantastic, fascinating and interesting story.
01:06:33.000 We'll be covering it in more depth Over the coming days.
01:06:38.000 Did Brangino ever happen?
01:06:39.000 We are still working on Brangino, but we're more likely to get Browder at this point with Steve and Crowder.
01:06:47.000 Hey, let's watch the end of this video and then we'll go over to Locals.
01:06:50.000 Let's post a link.
01:06:50.000 You can watch us on Locals for free.
01:06:52.000 It's where we have our supporter community, but we'll post a free link for you guys so you can check out what we do on there now.
01:06:59.000 Let's have a look at the rest of our man.
01:07:01.000 They shouldn't get the police as their private security.
01:07:04.000 I think it's a disgrace.
01:07:05.000 Nobody said that, have they?
01:07:06.000 Who said that?
01:07:06.000 And on top of that, Kerry, you told me to stop filming.
01:07:08.000 It's good that he's staying calm.
01:07:10.000 It's good that he's using her Christian name.
01:07:12.000 And then you said there's an allegation.
01:07:13.000 Now, if I didn't have my camera, how would I prove my innocence?
01:07:17.000 You know what?
01:07:17.000 I know they are causing the fuss.
01:07:19.000 I am not causing the fuss.
01:07:21.000 I'm just standing up for myself, right?
01:07:22.000 There's a fuss being caused and I have nothing to do with it.
01:07:24.000 I know!
01:07:24.000 No, listen!
01:07:25.000 Kevin, they're from China.
01:07:27.000 Listen, we can't say that.
01:07:29.000 What, they're from China?
01:07:31.000 They're waiting for you from China.
01:07:33.000 I can't say that.
01:07:34.000 This has become an interesting and astonishing conversation.
01:07:39.000 You can't say that.
01:07:41.000 You can't say they've come from China.
01:07:43.000 You can see, I suppose, in this exchange how the charge of bigotry is used to shut down communication because I don't think That guy's saying they're from China and are therefore inferior, or they're from China and therefore don't have any rights.
01:07:59.000 I think he's saying they're from China.
01:08:03.000 Why are they telling us what to do when they're just on holiday making a TV show?
01:08:07.000 Isn't that what you're saying?
01:08:09.000 They've got a communist... Well, can I just say they're from China?
01:08:13.000 Without the F?
01:08:15.000 I'm sorry for the F, but they've got... Listen, they are waving a communist flag, and I said you're waving a communist flag.
01:08:22.000 Is that racist?
01:08:24.000 to say they've got a common use of language.
01:08:26.000 They're not listening.
01:08:28.000 Look, I've got nothing...
01:08:30.000 What TV station are you in?
01:08:32.000 I've got nothing to do with it.
01:08:34.000 Listen, I'm just playing at the piano.
01:08:36.000 They stood by the piano.
01:08:38.000 I was filming and then they started laying down the law.
01:08:40.000 He says you're from Japan.
01:08:42.000 I'm not doing anything.
01:08:44.000 That's why the police are getting angry.
01:08:46.000 Because it's not your job.
01:08:48.000 Listen, you should tell them.
01:08:50.000 I'm not telling them anything that you're telling me to tell them.
01:08:52.000 OK, get on and play your piano.
01:08:54.000 I'll have a discussion with them.
01:08:56.000 Tell them we're in a free country.
01:08:58.000 That's pretty interesting.
01:08:59.000 Are we in a free country anymore though?
01:09:03.000 And what will that freedom look like if the WHO treaty comes to pass?
01:09:08.000 What will it look like if there's just an ongoing increase of ever more frightening global crises that are used to leverage and legitimise further authoritarianism. Fascinating and extraordinary. We're
01:09:21.000 going to cover a few more stories now. If you guys are watching us over there on
01:09:25.000 Rumble, let's post a link in the description. We'll do another 10 minutes over on
01:09:30.000 locals and I'll tell you a little bit more about what goes on over there. Meditation, scriptural
01:09:34.000 reading, access to more Whitney Webb, more Glenn Greenwood, more fantastic content.
01:09:38.000 Dr. Drew's coming up on Thursday, Glenn Greenwald on Friday.
01:09:41.000 Click the red button to join our Locals community to get early access to all sorts of things.
01:09:45.000 I want to welcome JS Katz, Rev0635, Juno4, Chainpup, KMS Brown.
01:09:51.000 Join me on Locals now for a little bit more chat and join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
01:09:56.000 Until then, if you can, stay free.