Dr. Pierre Khoury joins Russell Brand to discuss the Pandemic, the ongoing lawfare between New York City and Donald Trump, and the new laws in France that prevent you from criticising, not France itself, but certain medical interventions - and you'll be able to guess what they are. Plus, a look at the latest financial news for Trump, including the potential for him to go public, and why this could actually be good news for him. Stay tuned for a live shot of the show, featuring a live audience Q&A session with Russell Brand. Stay free, my loves. Stay free. You're not going to want to miss this! - Russell Brand - Stay Free, My Dear Wonders! - Logo by Courtney DeKorte. Theme by Mavus White. Music by PSOVOD and tyops. The Dark Lord's Theme Song by Suneaters. Download MP3" Subscribe? Subscribe? Leave Us a Review On Apple Podcasts. Subscribe on iTunes Learn more about your ad choices. If you like what you're listening to this podcast, please tell a friend about it and tell us what your thoughts are on it. We'll be listening to it on Anchor.fm and we'll get a shoutout on the next week's episode of the podcast. Thank you for supporting the podcast! if you leave a review, rating and reviewing it on iTunes and review it on your favourite podcasting platform! Subscribe, review it and subscribe to it's a review on your podcast. Thank you're a fellow podcaster! and a review is a review and review on iTunes. It's a big thank you for the podcast I'll hear about it's good enough, it's great, it'll help us spread the word around the world more of that's a good one. Good vibes everywhere else on the world of good vibes and it'll get the word out there more of it's better than that. - Thank you, bye, good day, good night all of that and good night out there, bye bye. Love, bye - your truly, your truly Truly Brilliant, Rory... - Rory Dorie, Rory, Amy, Rory and Jack, Rory - Jack, Jack, Kristian, Kristy, EJ & Jacklyn xx - Jacklyn, Eudes, Elese, Elyn, Jacklyn and Jacklyn.
00:02:26.000Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:02:28.000It's a pretty exciting show that we've got ahead.
00:02:31.000As well as talking about Trump's financial nightmares and the ongoing lawfare between New York City and Donald Trump, we're going to be talking to Dr. Pierre Khoury, who you might be familiar with from his Numerous appearances before Senate hearings talking about the handling of the pandemic and in particular the medical matters pertaining to it.
00:02:54.000He's a fantastic guest and it's a fantastic conversation.
00:02:57.000We're also talking about Article Pfizer, the new laws in France that prevent you from criticising, not France itself, but certain medical interventions and I reckon you'll be able to guess what they are.
00:03:11.000For the first 15 minutes or so we'll stay with you On YouTube, as you know, ultimately our home is that stream of freedom that we call Rumble, where we remain in order to report ultimately on subjects like the ongoing trials of Julian Assange.
00:03:27.000I'm glad you enjoyed our coverage from that hearing for the last couple of days.
00:03:34.000I want to say hello to you Awakened Wonders like Tolson718 and Jamie Jam and Beth in Wonderland and Land in Lizards and Kyle Rhino telling me to shut up and stop ruining the chat in Rumble because there's a vibe in there.
00:04:00.000We're going to be talking a lot about censorship and how censorship is becoming more finely tuned even as it becomes more immersive and in some ways more monolithic.
00:04:10.000The ways of legitimizing censorship are becoming ever more extraordinary and it's a sort of pertinent time to be talking about that.
00:04:17.000Firstly, let's just cover the fact that Letitia James, the Attorney General of New York, saying she's going to seize Donald Trump's assets.
00:04:25.000Including these buildings in New York if you can't pay the $355 million civil fraud case fine.
00:04:32.000But this has generated a kind of spontaneous activism movement that, you know when people say, oh why is there not any interest in democracy?
00:04:41.000People don't say They don't say that so much anymore do they?
00:04:44.000People just are not interested in politics.
00:04:47.000Well now people are interested in politics and we're seeing the rise of blue-collar movements and they are not behaving properly or appropriately or supporting their allocated parties because this is This blue-collar movement is obviously pro-Trump and that's an extraordinary phenomenon and worth examining.
00:05:05.000You're going to see a lot of legacy media focusing on the attempts to pecuniate Donald Trump and that's, you know, the merits of that and the benefits of that, you're free to discuss there in the chat.
00:05:19.000But what is interesting is the potential for him to generate extraordinary revenue through the sale of Truth Social.
00:05:27.000Look at how CNN are covering that, ultimately admitting that their infatuation with Donald Trump is so extreme and extraordinary that Donald Trump has his own financial news section.
00:05:38.000It's like Trump is a whole planet to them and has his own taxonomies within the subject of Trump.
00:07:18.000Is we can decide for ourselves what we believe to be true.
00:07:22.000I've lost count of the number of times that we've reported on content here, then you tell us
00:07:26.000in the chat that's not what we think, we disagree with you, that's a false flag, we believe this
00:07:30.000and then we go back and forth a You know we've got differing views on a variety of political subjects, but a consensus can be achieved between us.
00:07:38.000And indeed, what they claim of misinformation, that it's a problem even if you don't believe it, meaning that if your objection was, hey I'm a free citizen, I'm an adult, I'll decide for myself what I do with the information you give me.
00:07:50.000I don't need you to censor and control information.
00:07:52.000Precisely what they claim it's doing, muddying the water, creating distractions, even though it doesn't sort of really make total sense, is one of the tropes and tactics of the legacy media, i.e.
00:08:03.000Nancy Pelosi continually saying that Trump might be in the employ, of Vladimir Putin prevents us from appreciating the despair and decay at the heart of our systems of democracy and the way that they are leading to cynicism, outrage, oppositionism.
00:08:22.000To continue to propagate the idea that Putin is meddling in Trump's affairs and perhaps has him in his financial fraud perpetuates an idea that otherwise would have been long dismissed and we've got a brilliant piece of propaganda coming up for you later around excess deaths because now the excess deaths are accepted as an actual reality.
00:08:42.000The UK system for recording excess deaths has literally been amended.
00:08:47.000Because the maths didn't work, they changed maths itself or math in your accent.
00:08:53.000Let's have a look at Nancy Pelosi still banging on about Russiagate when most sensible people have come to the conclusion that the problem with democracy is actually Nancy Pelosi.
00:09:03.000Putin is probably the richest person in the world.
00:09:06.000Well, that's just... Is he... Do we know that?
00:09:08.000I mean, what, more than various Saudi Arabian monarchs and more than various... I mean, I don't know.
00:09:16.000Can you just go onto the news at a time when people are saying, we've got to be careful of misinformation and just say... Like, you know, in Julian Assange's case, The other day, when people said, like, the CIA were planning to kill Julian Assange, Mike Pompeo has admitted that, it's widely understood, people went, hey, you can't just say that!
00:09:36.000You can't just turn up on MSNBC in a delightful, rather Christmas-themed broach, and say that Vladimir Putin is the world's richest man, I've seen him with his top off, holding a rifle on horseback, he's got bum cancer, and he's the world's richest man.
00:10:22.000I've already told you I'm in politics to help children every half hour while getting extraordinarily rich on a 200 grand a year salary and massing a fortune while my husband Paul Pelosi, when he can keep the burglars out of the house and keep the booze out of his mouth, seems to be doing very well, thank you very much.
00:13:00.000Why don't you make up some more stuff?
00:13:02.000So many facts about what's going on over there.
00:13:04.000Do you know that the 2014 coup involved the CIA?
00:13:09.000Do you know that there are biolabs in that country?
00:13:12.000What about the extraordinary relationship between Burisma, a Ukrainian company, and members of Hunter Biden's family?
00:13:18.000There are indeed many things that need to be discussed about both Political organizations in your all-powerful country, the United States of America.
00:13:27.000And indeed, when you consider the case of Julian Assange and the fact that Trump is the one that finally pressed the button on that espionage charge and didn't pardon him, there are doubtless questions that have to be asked there.
00:13:38.000But you ain't gonna get them questions asked on MSNBC because they want to corral you into a tiny paddock of ignorance through censorship.
00:13:46.000Sure seems like something, as you've said a few times, given that he refuses to criticize him, that he seems to be a fanboy of him.
00:13:56.000Do you see how they all reacted when Jon Stewart, like, criticized Joe Biden?
00:13:59.000Everyone just, like, went to the toilet in their own trousers with dread that such a thing could happen.
00:14:05.000What we need, I suppose, is a degree of balance and utility and respect for one another's opinion, an ability to communicate openly, and none of these things are being granted to us.
00:14:13.000Those of you that saw Mike Benz's conversation with Tucker.
00:14:16.000Tucker's been having some important conversations lately.
00:14:18.000A lot of people say the Putin conversation was important.
00:14:20.000Some people say, no, no, when he spoke to Russell Brand, that's one of the defining moments of our generation.
00:14:25.000But for my two cents, his conversation with Mike Benz is truly significant in outlining how the censorship industrial complex truly works.
00:14:35.000And it helps us to Answer some questions that have been bothering me for a long time.
00:14:39.000For example, someone that's like my age, and I am my age by a sheer coincidence, maybe it's a conspiracy theory, the idea that the liberal left were interested in free speech was a kind of defining idea.
00:14:52.000When did the neoliberalist left, I suppose we'll have to call them, stop caring about free speech?
00:14:56.000Well, this is something we can Let's have a look at that together.
00:15:06.000This is an article from The Federalist, as you can see, and it's a line of inquiry we'll be exploring in more depth over the course of the week when we're looking at some of Mike Benzie's revelations.
00:15:16.000How global censorship is a phenomenon that's emerged in the internet age and is a tool that is being used to control us all.
00:15:24.000We're familiar with it because of the great work of Li Fang.
00:15:26.000We know how logically AI censored and controlled our work.
00:15:29.000We know how Madonna paid a lot of money to censor and control stuff.
00:15:33.000We'd said as well as others, I suppose I'm just focusing on myself because of, you know, I am me.
00:15:37.000Hey, just check out this from the Federalist.
00:15:56.000Among other things, free speech on the internet allowed US-backed groups to assert control over state-run media in foreign countries, making it much easier to overthrow governments.
00:16:05.000Also, I like free speech when it caused disruption in places like Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya.
00:16:10.000The high watermark of this way of deploying free speech online, Benz explains, was the Arab Spring in 2011 and 2012.
00:16:27.000There was, of course, you know, like there was, we were still living through the repercussions of the financial crash, but censorship changed radically around that time.
00:16:35.000The Obama administration considered these kind of regimes to be problematic in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya.
00:16:40.000They all began falling in the so-called Facebook and Twitter revolution.
00:16:44.000So it was convenient for them to support free speech at that point.
00:16:48.000During that time, the State Department worked closely with these social media companies to keep them up-to-date.
00:16:53.000And running in those countries to be used as tools for protesters and dissident groups that were trying to circumvent state censorship.
00:16:59.000This is why this ongoing war is pivotal.
00:17:01.000This is why the continuing condemnation of Vladimir Putin and the ongoing support of Ukraine's, let's face it, unwinnable war against Russia are significant and interesting and I say that with all respect for Ukrainian people and those directly affected in this conflict.
00:17:15.000All that changed in 2014 after the US-backed coup in Ukraine toppled the government of Viktor Yanukovych and there was an unexpected pro-Russia counter-coup in Crimea and parts of eastern Ukraine.
00:17:28.000And that could have similar support from Russia.
00:17:29.000You would have to include that if you were sensible and balanced and an analyst of these kind of events.
00:17:36.000Later that same year, says Benz, when the people of Crimea voted to be annexed into the Russian Federation, that was the last straw for the concept of free speech on the internet in the eyes of NATO.
00:18:37.000You've already kicked out Britain once.
00:18:39.000But check this, and then Trump was elected.
00:18:41.000From that moment, and indeed we know from the Russia collusion hoax, even before Trump was elected in 2016, the US foreign policy and defense establishments, which have done so much to censor and weaponize the internet overseas, turned their attention to American citizens.
00:18:55.000Initially, their predicate for domestic surveillance was Crossfire Hurricane, the fatuous notion that Russia had infiltrated the Trump campaign and that Trump was a Russian asset.
00:19:04.000Once that collapsed, they needed another excuse to spy on and censor Americans who held disfavored opinions or who spread misinformation, to put it in the parlance of the censorship industrial complex.
00:19:13.000To do that, they had to get around the prohibition Against the CIA operating on American soil and they have indeed done that and that's what is significant about this time and we're going to be looking at that in more detail over the coming week.
00:19:26.000We've got a really fantastic and amusing story about how the UK have literally meddled with the concept of arithmetic itself in order to, in my view, mask excess deaths.
00:19:39.000Excess deaths are high since 2019 for some reason.
00:19:46.000If only these numbers didn't add up the same way, maybe we could turn the calculator the other way around and look, it says boobless or shell.
00:20:00.000Listen, you guys, if you're watching us on YouTube, we're going to be available for a few seconds now, so I'm going to need you to click the link and join us over on Rumble.
00:20:07.000But before you go, stress might be the very reason that you cannot lose weight.
00:20:14.000If you have moderate to high stress, and Lord alone knows we do here reporting on these issues on a daily basis, this doctor formulated weight loss supplement called Lean could be your solution.
00:20:26.000Chronic stress wreaks havoc on blood sugar which can cause your body to store excess fat.
00:20:36.000The studied ingredients in lean have been shown to help maintain healthy blood sugar levels, help optimize metabolism and keep your appetite under control.
00:20:42.000If your life is stressful and whose life isn't stressful under this crazy regime and you want to lose weight, add lean To a healthy diet and exercise lifestyle.
00:21:06.000Now I've got to say this fast like you do on a commercial.
00:21:08.000Statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
00:21:10.000Why would you trust those guys anyway?
00:21:11.000This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease and is not a substitute or alternative care from your healthcare provider.
00:22:09.000More people are dying than we'd expect and they didn't die of Covid.
00:22:13.000Was there anything else that could have been causing people to die?
00:22:17.000They know this is a big story, that's the one.
00:22:19.000Have we got someone in the office that we can use that hasn't got too much flamboyance or charisma that can make the idea that people are dying at unprecedented levels seem like quite a boring fact and something that's to do with maths We call these deaths, above average, excess deaths.
00:22:36.000is not interesting and you shouldn't watch it or look at it.
00:22:38.000And I don't mean that in a mean way about Jane, who's a human being with a soul
00:25:01.000Let's have a little look at the funding.
00:25:03.000And why are they spending so much money censoring people that are going, I'm a bit worried that these vaccines are causing adverse events and even deaths.
00:25:37.000Is the intention to tell you, listen, Bloody hell!
00:25:40.000Loads of people that we didn't expect to die, died!
00:25:42.000Or is the intention, hello, there's nothing to worry about, why don't you carry on being obedient?
00:25:47.000Don't get disgusted with the system and start causing terrible trouble and demanding new systems of government because actually not nearly so many people died as you first imagined by using your eyes and old-fashioned numbers before we tweaked numbers and made them a bit more reliable.
00:26:52.000These are key factors in understanding how many deaths we'd expect to see and whether the number of deaths is below or above this estimate.
00:27:01.000Looking more closely at the last months of 2020, Can we look at this more closely?
00:27:04.000Because it's making it look like we may have nearly mandated a medicine that killed people.
00:27:09.000Can we keep looking at it till it gets smaller and smaller?
00:27:12.000If you squint at the 30,000, it looks like 3,000.
00:27:16.000But we can't really make everybody squint, can we?
00:27:19.000Well, a lot of people are having Bell's palsy and stuff.
00:27:22.000Some people are squinting through sheer lack of choice. Well that's good, so some of
00:27:25.000them they're not going to be able to see the numbers. And then there's those people who've got other
00:27:28.000brain diseases and a lot of people are going to have pericarditis. They're not going to have time
00:27:32.000to look at this. Yes, yes, and then there's the myocarditis people, there's the people that are
00:27:35.000collapsing all the time. Actually this is this is all good news. 23. There were actually negative
00:27:41.000excess deaths, meaning fewer deaths than average being registered. Further back across the
00:27:46.000pandemic, the trends and peaks in excess deaths are the same using the new method as they were under the
00:27:55.000Because the very fact that they've had to produce this video shows you, oh no, excess deficit is coming down the pipe, you better get it ready.
00:28:03.000Now you know from looking at the way that their censorship industrial complex operates in other areas that they do things like pre-bunking, debunking, say it's muddying the water.
00:28:12.000You're going to hear a story, a crazy story by the way, about Hunter Biden's laptop that appears to reveal that Joe Biden's business interests intersect In his son's business interests in ways that were a little, well, I don't know, illegal.
00:28:25.000When you hear that, that's Russian disinformation.
00:28:36.000Now this one is like, oh no, excess deficits coming down the line.
00:28:39.000We've just had the biggest COVID study in history.
00:28:43.000It's revealed myocarditis, pericarditis, all the things we've been talking about since the beginning of the pandemic don't Don't vaccinate during a pandemic.
00:28:52.000Don't vaccinate children when it's completely unknown.
00:28:54.000All that sort of information that's been in the ether that we've been discussing for a long while has now been verified by a study that they've participated in in project Mitigate This Information.
00:29:05.000Dampen down the outrage of a global population.
00:29:08.000Now what they're doing is excess deaths.
00:29:57.000The UK government has found a new way to report excess deaths in order to In order to keep you better informed, I've suppressed the number of people that have inexplicably died since 2020, or C was, I can't remember what was C, just to keep math fun.
00:30:12.000And I even called it math to appeal to you, you mad Americans.
00:30:16.000And of course, all of you worked out what that was about.
00:30:20.000But listen, you don't want to listen to me.
00:30:23.000Ranting and raving about my opinions on what went on in COVID.
00:30:27.000Not when we've got Pierre Corry, a medical doctor, MPA, President and Chief Medical Officer of the FLCCC Alliance.
00:30:34.000He's an author of the best-selling book, The War on Ivermectin.
00:30:37.000And if you want to follow him, you can follow him on X, using the tag, at Pierre Corry.
00:30:43.000This is a really helpful and brilliant conversation.
00:30:45.000And in addition to this conversation, which I know you're going to love, We've also got a brilliant investigation into France's new article Pfizer, i.e.
00:30:53.000if you criticize vaccines, it's illegal and you can go to jail.
00:30:58.000Sometimes I feel like I'm making it up, but the truth is I'm not making it up.
00:31:01.000It's just stuff that I've been informed.
00:31:03.000By a team of researchers and producers that actually does confirm a lot of my pre-existing biases around the way the global establishment works.
00:31:12.000So listen guys, if you're not a member of our AwakendWonder community yet, become a member now.
00:31:21.000I answer your questions, but perhaps more important than anything, We're building a movement together because I think you recognize, don't you?
00:31:55.000This conversation is going to make you smarter.
00:31:58.000It's going to equip you with the information you need to have the conversations you're going to have to have as we break away from the mainstream, as we challenge our national institutions and as we become disobedient, awakened and active together.
00:32:10.000Here's my conversation with the brilliant and rather beautiful Dr. Pierre Khoury.
00:32:21.000I first want to talk about excess deaths and the peculiar quirk that it is insurance companies that have contributed to the revelation of the extent of excess deaths because they needed to adjust their premiums to account for unexpected and unusual deaths.
00:32:38.000Why is this, first of all, significant, Pierre?
00:32:41.000Well, I think, you know, the actuarial industry, that's data that really there's no incentive to corrupt.
00:32:48.000I mean, that's how they make their money, right?
00:32:50.000So that's as accurate a data as it's possible.
00:32:53.000They have to know what the death rates are, right, in order to price their products.
00:32:57.000And they started talking about how they saw unprecedented rates of dying.
00:33:03.000In fact, they said historically unprecedented.
00:33:05.000They've never seen rates of death like this amongst young people, largely starting in 2021.
00:33:12.000And in particular, that third quarter, and I don't know if you were aware of what was going on in the U.S.
00:33:17.000in the third quarter of 21, but that's when all of the mandates proliferated.
00:33:25.000And the most telling data comes out of the group life health insurance industry, because in the United States, those who have group life health insurance policies, it's essentially Fortune 500 companies.
00:33:52.000It's also peculiar to me that a revelation would come out of an institution or industry such as the one you have described because one imagines that what we would loosely call establishment interests or the preservation of the interests of the system would prevail against those kind of revelations.
00:34:14.000But as you have explained previously in your many op-eds on this subject, often with incredible caution, That they haven't advertised or even sought to demonstrate what the cause of these excess deaths might be, simply that there are unprecedented excess deaths.
00:34:31.000Now what's striking to people that operate in our space, that's independent media space, that's anti-establishment space, is that these kind of ideas, that we would see unprecedented and unusual excess deaths as a result of these medications, That was regarded as an outlandish peripheral and it's still not yet empirically demonstrable.
00:34:53.000It's not demonstrably true that what's behind this is vaccine injury or vaccine related deaths or heart disease or a variety of other conditions.
00:35:02.000But isn't it extraordinary to see information moving from the periphery, from what you would loosely call conspiracy theory, becoming verified either in the field of medicine or in this case the field of finance.
00:35:14.000And if If something as significant and as obvious as the adjustment of insurance premiums to account for, oh we can't insure you because you might die in your 30s or 40s in a way that's completely unanticipated or at least couldn't be anticipated 10 years ago, why would the FDA or a comparable organisation not be conducting a serious investigation into the phenomena of excess deaths?
00:35:38.000I think that would open the door to admitting immense responsibility and liability for what we're talking about, Russell, which is that this is a humanitarian catastrophe.
00:35:48.000I mean, in my most recent op-ed, we have data show that in the first nine months of 2023, 158,000 Americans died more than predicted, more than would be expected by stable rates of death.
00:36:44.000And so I've not seen anyone with a credible alternative explanation
00:36:48.000for a sudden spike in the healthiest members of the society.
00:36:52.000And the other interesting thing about the data is, when you look at who is dying, it's essentially the white-collar workers died more than gray-collar that died than more than blue-collar.
00:37:03.000So you have to ask yourself, what happened in the workplace, in the American workplace, in the third quarter of 21?
00:37:09.000And that's the only answer I can come up with.
00:37:12.000So it prevails more among the class of people that will have been mandated or at least compelled to take those medications.
00:37:22.000At least that is a conclusion that could be drawn.
00:37:26.000One of the things that's fascinated me, Pierre, has been the number of times that an evident pre-bunking took place.
00:37:35.000The idea that it was conspiratorial to query The indemnity that the vaccine manufacturers were granted, that many people that operate again in these kind of spaces pointed out, was peculiar and cause for concern.
00:37:51.000The Pfizer and Moderna being granted indemnity.
00:37:53.000Now of course in the UK we're seeing now some legal actions against country, companies, excuse me, I sometimes get country and company mixed up.
00:38:00.000I can see why that error, Freudian though it may be, occurs.
00:38:05.000Like the AstraZeneca Um, you know, I've been found potential or at least being pursued legally because of blood clots and heart conditions.
00:38:13.000There's been acknowledgement of myocarditis, of course, but when you piece together, even from a position of punditry rather than expertise, which is of course the position that you're assessing this from, It seems that when you look at the indemnity that was granted, the significance of the propaganda, the astonishing trope that people take vaccinations in order to protect the vulnerable and elderly prior to the revelation that there were no clinical trials against transmission.
00:38:43.000So that was an entirely bogus argument from the beginning.
00:38:47.000One of the things that some people, sociologists, pundits, epidemiologists said, is that we could potentially, in order to, at least the argument was, preserve and protect older people, be exposing young people to incredible risk.
00:39:02.000And this data suggests that that's exactly what's happened.
00:39:06.000I mean, we know, even without the data on transmission, we already knew the severity of the illness, how young people fared, how really no young people were dying for COVID, yet we had experimental therapy rolled out in which exploded the VAERS database from day one.
00:39:25.000I mean, I was first made aware of problems with, not problems with VAERS, but signals from VAERS.
00:39:30.000The third week of January 2020, we already had several hundred deaths reported, which far exceeded the stopping point of any novel product.
00:39:37.000And what has been happening since then?
00:39:39.000Nothing but dismissal, distortion, and ignoring of all that data.
00:39:42.000And it continues, as we're talking about today with this life insurance data.
00:40:12.000And, you know, the last thing I want to say about this, Russell, is you mentioned kind of like some information coming from the world of conspiracy theorists and then more into kind of maybe mainstream.
00:40:22.000The way in which I've learned to articulate it is I think of it as my goal throughout COVID has been bringing the private knowledge that us experts have gained and bringing it into common knowledge.
00:40:33.000And that process without people like you and other independent media is nearly impossible because that dome of censorship around mass media, which is controlled by pharma, you can't bring When you put it in those terms, Pierre, it's sort of comparable to the kind of hold that institutions such as the Church held over the population in medieval times when esoteric information, in particular scriptural analysis, was kept from the general population.
00:41:05.000in order to prevent their enlightenment and their awakening.
00:41:12.000We were discussing that it's interesting that the media, who of course in certain areas are very vigorous in their investigation and pursuit of certain targets, often dissenting voices, not only are they not interested in amplifying this type of story or investigating this type of story, these sorts of stories are being actively censored.
00:41:31.000We know that Moderna spent a good deal of money, time and resources tracking our action.
00:41:35.000We know that the Department of Culture and Media in this country spent significant money supporting a group called Logically AI that de-amplify and censor information in particular Around the pandemic period, it's the social regulations around it and of course the medical mandates and suggestions, if not mandates, around that time.
00:41:58.000So not only are these stories not being covered, they're being actively controlled and censored That, I suppose, further suggests that there is something significant at play, something potentially epochal.
00:42:12.000And indeed, that's why the conversation can't take place, because if the conversation did take place, what that conversation would lead to is a considerable reckoning.
00:42:26.000And it's really been a war against propaganda.
00:42:29.000And, you know, I always have to remind myself and others, my favorite definition of propaganda, which comes from Professor Mark Crispin Miller, is he says propaganda is a story or a message.
00:42:41.000To get you to think or act in a certain way.
00:42:44.000And if you look at COVID, it's been nothing but these mass disseminated stories and messages that the vaccines are safe and effective, that you need to save grandma.
00:42:53.000So much of this behavioral psychology that's been practiced on us to get us to do things that have really been directly opposed to our interests.
00:43:00.000And that's why I'm here talking about it, because we're seeing death result.
00:43:05.000This war of information, being fed bad information, essentially lies to propel the vaccine campaign, the competing pricey pharmaceutical products, the immense profits that they've gained, has been on the backs of scientific lies.
00:43:20.000You know, to me, the thing that I think everyone needs to remind themselves is they, meaning the FDA, those in power, They disappeared natural immunity overnight.
00:43:50.000And I think people have to understand the corrupt control of our agencies, our medical journals, and the insane medical propaganda that was disseminated in order to support these campaigns and the immense profits that they realized.
00:44:06.000You're right, we are engaging in an information war.
00:44:08.000Because I recall, Pierre, that another of the tropes that I was aware of, again just because of outspoken experts who at that point perhaps weren't even aware of the risks they were taking, who pontificated, well beyond pontificated, that you do not vaccinate During a pandemic.
00:44:28.000Why can't we discuss natural immunity?
00:44:30.000Of course either Mectin will discuss in more detail.
00:44:33.000But what's extraordinary is that not only are the lessons of this period not being learned, the mistakes are being doubled down on.
00:44:40.000This country has just passed the UK online safety bill that facilitates unprecedented censorship, of course on the basis of protecting the vulnerable.
00:44:48.000That's always how new tyrannies legitimize their further centralization of authoritarianism.
00:44:53.000Canada has introduced comparable legislation, Ireland is trying to introduce unprecedented measures, and France has just made it illegal to criticise certain recommended medical measures.
00:45:08.000But it's clearly, and it has indeed been dubbed the article Pfizer, Designed to prevent people from discussing or criticizing vaccines under threat of imprisonment of up to three years.
00:45:21.000What does this tell us about the relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and the state and what appears to be taking place?
00:45:32.000I mean, I know that you are a doctor, a scientist and a medical expert, but sociologically and in terms of power dynamics, something unprecedented appears to be taking place.
00:45:43.000I'm not an expert in those areas, but I've sort of had to become one because after discovering certain scientific truths by looking at the totality of the evidence around numerous topics with COVID, I've had to be faced with regular lies being issued from medical journals, media, newspapers, and out of the mouths of health care agencies.
00:46:03.000And so you're left asking yourself, what is going on here?
00:46:06.000And like you said, it's a war of information.
00:46:09.000But I mean, these are just abject lies and we have to call them out.
00:46:13.000And you mentioned briefly the suspicion and sense that there were financial motivations
00:46:23.000behind some of the policies, discussions and amplified messaging.
00:46:28.000We have your book here, The War on Ivermectin.
00:46:31.000For a while, Ivermectin was censored as a term.
00:46:35.000Along with natural immunity, vitamin D, exercise, fresh air and good honest praise of nature and the Lord, Ivermectin became verboden in and of itself.
00:46:49.000It seems that whilst we were told that the orthodoxy that was under attack was science itself, Fauci of course famously said, I am science.
00:46:58.000And as is often the case, ordinary people were cast as idiots for their spirit of inquiry when precisely the opposite was true.
00:47:08.000It isn't science that's being questioned.
00:47:12.000It's science as a subset of other imperatives.
00:47:15.000Of course, true science would be an open analysis and examination of all of the data, including conflicting data, so that a proper conclusion might be reached.
00:47:24.000How is the story of Ivermectin a good metric for understanding the corporatization of science, the co-opting of science, and the corruption of science?
00:47:35.000Yeah and I think it's it is the example sort of like what I was just saying is that by becoming this expert I understood I had to look at what was wrong with society because I knew what the truth was around Ivermectin but you know I wrote the book The War on Ivermectin but one of my colleagues could have written the book The War on Hydroxychloroquine I mean that was the first war right and so there was a concerted effort to suppress and distort the evidence of efficacy For safe, available, repurposed drugs that are inexpensive and highly effective.
00:48:03.000So you saw this concerted campaign to attack it in order to preserve those corporate interests.
00:48:09.000Let me just tell you kind of the inspiration I had for the book.
00:48:15.000Actually, when I first had the inspiration, I didn't have a book in mind, I had a lecture in mind.
00:48:19.000But what happened to me is, you may know this, I gave a testimony in the U.S.
00:48:24.000Senate on the critical need for Ivermectin.
00:48:46.000Oh, I lost a job pretty immediately, my papers started getting retracted, that I'd passed peer review by expert scientists, four rounds of peer review, and just got retracted from the journal.
00:49:04.000And so I wasn't sure what was going on.
00:49:06.000But here's my story, is that in March of 21, about four months later, I got an email from a researcher, actually an expert on vitamin D. His name is Professor William B. Grant.
00:49:19.000It said, Dear Dr. Corey, what they're doing to ivermectin they've been doing to vitamin D for decades and included a link to an article called The Disinformation Playbook.
00:49:29.000I think if you haven't seen the article, it's a very quick read.
00:49:32.000I think your listeners and viewers would love to read that because I read it.
00:49:36.000Where would we find this disinformation playbook?
00:49:39.000Oddly, if you put that in Google, it gets you right to the article.
00:50:41.000And for instance, one of them is called The Blitz.
00:50:43.000It's where they go after researchers who are producing the inconvenient science.
00:50:48.000And for instance, one of the examples in that article about The Blitz, it's actually about the movie with Will Smith where he plays the pathologist who first described the disease that happened to retired American football players.
00:51:00.000It's called chronic traumatic encephalopathy.
00:51:03.000That pathologist wrote a paper, published the paper.
00:51:06.000His life went sideways because he threatened the industry of the NFL.
00:51:09.000By the way, the NFL industry is $9 billion.
00:51:16.000So basically myself and my colleagues, Professor Paul Merrick, who founded the organization that we run together, we've all lost our jobs, our careers.
00:51:56.000Because whether it's, say, the famous influence of the Sackler family over art institutions and their cultural influence and impact, For many years surely the world of art relished and reveled in the patronage, a long historic tradition of patronage between wealthy individuals and wealthy organizations and the arts and suddenly we are forced to recognize that oh the amount of investment that
00:52:25.000Big Pharma makes in academia, the buildings, the studies, the clinical trials that are funded and perhaps more significantly the clinical trials that are not funded has always suggested control.
00:53:01.000And like, no one's been doing studies into vitamin D. I remember, this is interesting because in a sense we saw that Joe Rogan exploded into a global figure even more than he had already during this period because I suppose just conversationally Like any autodidact with the forum he has.
00:53:20.000We're saying, well, shouldn't we all be going outside and exercising and eating healthy and like with the kind of enthusiasm that you've described with some of your own papers.
00:53:28.000I took ivermectin and anti-monoclonals or whatever that word was, you know, and it seems
00:53:34.000to have worked a treat and was, you know, experienced the blitz and then the slurs and
00:53:49.000And it's interesting that it's, you know, back to an earlier part of our conversation,
00:53:53.000it's the insurance industries who revelations that can't be ignored.
00:53:57.000They've got to the point where they go, listen, we can't keep insuring people at the same rate because they're dying at an unprecedented rate.
00:54:04.000So now what has to happen is somehow that has to be either nullified or ameliorated.
00:55:43.000And I call our country the United States of Pharma.
00:55:46.000The influence of the pharmaceutical industry in the United States is Unparalleled compared to any other industry at the level of legislation, media, like I said, science.
00:55:55.000I used to think corruption and I used to think pharmaceutical corruption was like the free pens and trips and like the attractive drug reps who come into the offices and buy lunch for the doctors.
00:56:05.000Like I thought it was a kind of marketing corruption.
00:56:14.000I mean, even my references to the Sackler family, of course, then, I'm a recovering drug addict myself, but the people that were dying because of the various ultra fentanyls and opioids were, oh, these are just sort of drug addicts.
00:56:29.000These are the kind of people we don't mind if they die.
00:56:31.000Those sort of people, they're supposed to die.
00:56:36.000And like you say, the kind of somewhat innocuous presence of an attractive rep or a free bit of merch and a tidy pen has actually been exposed now as a veneer that concealed or at least distracted us from extraordinary control over the media, extraordinary control over the state, extraordinary control over our health and lives, unignorable corruption that amounts to an
00:57:05.000inversion of the stated purpose of such an industry, the wellness and well-being and health of
00:57:11.000Americans or the citizens indeed of the world.
00:57:14.000I can't envisage a more pronounced corruption than making people sick in order to make money
00:57:21.000rather than getting people healthy in alignment with, I don't know, the Hippocratic Oath.
00:57:28.000That's the other realization, some of my awakening evolution is I now have to be – I now have
00:57:36.000to accept that there are literal sociopaths at the tops of many different industries and
00:57:41.000corporations who betray – show very little empathy for the common man.
00:57:46.000You can show this immense data and see the death and destruction wrought by these policies and products.
00:58:30.000Vitamin D, they have been doing studies for decades in numbers of disease models
00:58:35.000where pharmaceutical industry consistently gives the wrong form of vitamin D,
00:58:40.000too low a dose for vitamin D, too late in the disease model,
00:58:44.000and then they'll do it in patients who aren't vitamin D deficient.
00:58:47.000So they never really test the importance of vitamin D and then it gets as absurd as the normal reference levels for vitamin D is atrocious.
00:58:57.000I would never allow a patient of mine to have a vitamin D level of 35.
00:59:01.000Minimum would be 50 and preferably much higher but they have...
00:59:05.000Artificially reduced vitamin D levels, because I gotta tell you, vitamin D is the symphony of the orchestra of our immune system, as well as surveillance for cancer.
00:59:14.000You probably wouldn't get cancer if your vitamin D level was over 100.
00:59:18.000This is as threatening as knowledge as you can be, and actually, when you look to see, does vitamin D make a difference in rheumatoid arthritis, in cancer, in any disease, and you know what you'll conclude?
00:59:28.000Because you look at all the studies, they all cancel each other out.
00:59:47.000I suppose, in a way, if your business model and its success is entirely contingent on people being sick and, for example, regularly getting cancer, and there is a cheap and effective way to prevent people getting cancer, you do not want that getting out there.
01:00:03.000And something as sort of simple And as sort of almost flatly platitudinous as that is a kind of key that you can just unlock the corpus of this disgusting, cadaverous, parasitic, vampiric entity.
01:00:29.000Damage in science as a, excuse me, damage in the trust in science as a result of the behavior of bad actors using science as a kind of weapon has suffered.
01:00:42.000Do you think people don't trust science in a way that's sort of more broad now?
01:00:46.000100%, but I actually think that is a positive.
01:00:48.000I think there's a huge portion of society now who realize the capacity for these authorities and these institutions of science to lie to us.
01:00:58.000And I think that skepticism and that lack of trust is good, because it's going to protect people.
01:02:06.000I think that's a start of something new.
01:02:08.000The more people are awake and aware of that the system is rotten and has been captured, the more I think we have an ability to start building, you know, a new one or a parallel one.
01:02:17.000And I will say that's what my organization, the FLCC, is trying to do.
01:02:21.000We're trying to be a source for Objective, conflict of interest free guidance on any number of areas of health.
01:02:27.000We're not just, you know, addressing COVID.
01:02:30.000We're actually addressing treatments for cancer, repurposed drugs for cancer, depression, diabetes, health.
01:02:36.000And so we're hoping that that's going to start a movement towards people getting better information and taking better care of themselves.
01:02:46.000In a real free society, people would be able to appoint your board as the board that guides their medical well-being, as opposed to corrupt organisations that are proven to take money, whether in the form of royalties or donations or funding, like the FDA or NIH.
01:03:07.000We'd be able to say, oh, I don't, like as if it would be a football team or something, you just go, I'll go with these dudes because I trust them and I don't think that they are ultimately working for I'll tell you our organization has had incredible amount of support from all around the world.
01:03:21.000Our protocols... Remember that's what we came together as five pulmonary and critical care specialists.
01:03:26.000We saw the onset of a pulmonary and critical care disease enveloping the world and we built our first protocol in March of 2020 addressing the hospital phase.
01:03:35.000Is pulmonary a relationship between heart and lungs?
01:04:10.000It was centered around the use of methylprednisolone, which was a corticosteroid, which, by the way, I also testified in the Senate in May of 2020 about the critical need for corticosteroids.
01:04:20.000And I did that at a time when every national and international health care organization was saying not to use it.
01:04:26.000And after I gave that recommendation in a Senate hearing, I was harassed by my university.
01:04:31.000They did not want me to talk to the press anymore.
01:04:33.000I was accused of malpractice, of killing people.
01:04:35.000And just want to record reflect, two months later, it became the standard of care worldwide.
01:04:40.000So our early identification for the need of corticosteroids was correct, as was ivermectin.
01:04:46.000But at that time, we also had ascorbic acid, which is vitamin C. So we had high dose IV vitamin C.
01:04:52.000We had another important vitamin called thiamine, which we gave intravenously, and then heparin, which is a blood thinner.
01:04:57.000So we had the anti-inflammatory components and the anti-cladding components very early on, and we saw patients do very well if they were treated early enough.
01:05:05.000And we tried to put that out in media, but everywhere we went nobody wanted to talk about a protocol unless we did a randomized controlled trial first.
01:05:15.000The culture must have somehow been thirsty for the edicts that were so blindly accepted.
01:05:24.000There must have been some open wound for people to so willingly accept the mandates.
01:05:32.000I don't mean just in terms of vaccine mandates, but the sort of mandated ideology.
01:05:38.000It was extraordinary that people were so willing to foreclose on simple discourse and simple discussion to apply what would previously have been regarded as evangelical and religious mindsets to the antithetical subject of science, which is meant to be, this is not conjecture, this is not belief, This is empiricism.
01:06:03.000We have measured, we have trialled, we have reviewed and analysed.
01:06:13.000Of course, as you have described in your Vitamin D example, if there are financial interests or interests of dominion, control and power behind this process of empiricism, what will be established is a method for conducting trials that have predetermined outcomes.
01:07:23.000Death, hospitalization, time to recovery.
01:07:25.000And so this whole thing of ivermectin, it was a disinformation tactic using trials with predetermined results published in the highest impact journals in the world.
01:07:37.000The trials were so poorly conducted, there was so much fraud that was brazenly obvious from their methods, but yet they sailed to publication in those journals.
01:07:45.000And that's really where I'm not the same physician anymore.
01:07:48.000I'm completely estranged from medicine because now I'm aware of the deep level of corruption in what I used to venerate as the institutions of science.
01:08:00.000We have been cast into a kind of desert, those of us that have experienced this, and you do not come out of that desert the same man.
01:08:09.000After you've experienced these tactics, after you have been the subject of these powers, after you have awakened to the righteousness in not trusting corporatized science, not trusting legacy media, Not trusting the co-opted state, judiciary or any of its tools of power and control.
01:08:30.000In a sense, you have to call upon something else to support you.
01:09:02.000I've landed with just the best group of people.
01:09:06.000Awake, critical thinkers who are trying to do the right thing.
01:09:09.000We're trying to help those that We've left behind.
01:09:12.000I don't know about left behind is the right one, but those who are still, I think, a little too trusting of a lot of institutions that are lying to them.
01:09:26.000I'm trying to do the same, but now I'm doing it in sort of in society rather than in the bowels of a hospital or in a lecture hall in a medical school.
01:09:35.000Yeah, because this is what's necessary.
01:09:36.000Perhaps we will see that amidst the obvious corruption of this pandemic period, there was a kind of avatar at work, a force that needed various agents to act on its behalf, ensuring that precisely what you're describing takes place.
01:09:52.000That which was esoteric becomes exoteric.
01:09:54.000That which was inaccessible becomes plainly understood.
01:09:57.000That which was concealed becomes revealed.
01:10:03.000I really think our numbers are growing and, you know, like my friend Del Bigtree says, we are winning.
01:10:08.000He's been in this fight to bring out truth on various aspects of medicines and vaccines for many years and he's never seen a time like this.
01:10:16.000I mean, the amount of people who've come into the fold who are aware and are continuing to fight to get these truths out is truly remarkable and I get to tell you, it's inspiring.
01:11:05.000I remember you and our collective power.
01:11:09.000Now, France's article Pfizer is a controversial shift in health policy and free speech.
01:11:16.000Those of you that have recently watched Tucker's conversation with Mike Benz will be aware that we are in an information crisis where censorship is becoming legislated in Favourably, in order to control information in spaces exactly like this one.
01:11:30.000In order to control precisely the type of connection that you and I are creating right now.
01:11:34.000France has just passed a law penalising critics of mRNA treatments, even though this huge study has just demonstrated how Right we are, to investigate the impact, in particular of the vaccines.
01:11:47.000Will the law, dubbed Article Pfizer, set a precedent in the global health policy landscape and raise further questions about individual rights and state control, or will those questions be crushed?
01:12:06.000Country of revolution, freedom, wine and pure sexiness.
01:12:10.000Although now they're banning, criticizing medications that are recommended by the state, imposing potential prison sentences and 45,000 euro fines.
01:12:25.000Now, if you're watching this in France, don't for a second think it's possible and plausible to criticize or speak out against medications.
01:12:31.000And let's face it, it means particularly and specifically recent gene therapies or vaccines or whatever you want to call them in that country.
01:12:39.000Although you probably won't be able to call them anything soon.
01:12:41.000You certainly will not be able to criticize them.
01:12:44.000So what does it mean for the world and for France when laws are passed that seem just designed literally to prevent Pfizer's profit margin being negatively impacted.
01:12:53.000It's being called Article Pfizer because it sort of seems to literally mean don't criticise Pfizer, even though it's written in sort of vague language.
01:13:00.000Don't anyone criticise any medical measures recommended by the state?
01:13:04.000What, like, people are going to say, oh, don't take your chemotherapy, love.
01:13:07.000Or people are going to say, don't get a pacemaker fitted.
01:13:09.000Although, ironically, heart disease and cancer are on the rise since around 2019, 2020 type time.
01:13:15.000I wonder why these laws are being passed.
01:14:06.000Can the current Prime Minister think of anything he has promoted?
01:14:09.000This is Andrew Bridgen, who's been talking a lot about excess deaths and complex subjects.
01:14:13.000You can see him on our show Stay Free, link in the description.
01:14:17.000Here he is, as usual, in Parliament, advocating for more stringency and analysis around the pandemic period.
01:14:23.000That's all he's asking for, and he's treated as a kind of lunatic as a result.
01:14:27.000Can the current Prime Minister think of anything he has promoted in partnership with huge businesses as safe and effective, which has ultimately harmed the British people?
01:14:35.000You can hear the murmur of globalism in the background, whether it's in France, whether it's in Canada, whether it's in the UK.
01:14:40.000There is an institutional opposition to open conversation around this subject and now legislation to prevent open conversation around this subject.
01:14:48.000That's without even recourse to the censorship laws in Ireland, Canada, the UK.
01:15:21.000And here is Rishi Sunak on GB News being questioned by a man who says he suffered from vaccine injury, which he wouldn't be able to say in France.
01:15:29.000My name is John Watt, and I'm one of the COVID vaccine injured in this country.
01:15:36.000I want you to look into my eyes, Rishi Sunak, and I want you to look at the pain, the trauma, and the regret I have in my eyes.
01:15:43.000That person, in case you're not in the British Isles, is a Scottish person behaving in a very Scottish fashion, which is to say, emotional and aggressive, full-on, and in this instance, correct.
01:15:53.000We have been left with no help at all.
01:15:56.000Not only am I in here that's vaccine injured, there's another man over there whose life's been ruined by that COVID-19 vaccine.
01:16:03.000I know people who have lost legs, amputations.
01:16:06.000I know people with heart conditions like myself, Rishi Sunak.
01:16:10.000He's so Scottish that this may not remain a verbal altercation for much longer.
01:16:14.000And I say this as a man who is married to a Scottish person.
01:16:17.000Why have I had to set up a support group in Scotland to look after the people that have been affected by that Covid-19 vaccine?
01:16:26.000Why are the people who are in charge, who told us all to do the right thing, have left
01:18:36.000I'm used to having difficult conversations.
01:18:37.000Like sometimes me and the wife talk about how much tax we should pay in this country and how much money Infosys should get from government contracts.
01:18:44.000And it can get quite heated sometimes because sometimes she thinks I should give a bit more.
01:18:48.000So there is a vaccine compensation scheme that's in place, as you alluded to, in the NHS.
01:18:53.000Obviously, everyone individually will work through their cases.
01:18:56.000It's difficult for me to comment on anyone's individual case.
01:19:12.000God, I'm saddened to hear that you've been silenced.
01:19:14.000It's almost as if we've been using proxy organisations like Logically AI to shut down any dissenting voices to anyone that's critical of vaccines.
01:19:21.000It's like we've spent loads of money cleansing social media of criticism.
01:19:24.000I don't know how the hell this keeps happening.
01:19:26.000Why are all these people getting silenced?
01:19:27.000It's almost as if we're funding it from your tax money and then pretending to apologise to you on the television.
01:19:34.000So please do get your details to Stephen and the team and I will happily take that away.
01:19:38.000Get to Stephen and the team and we'll deal with that, sort of, never.
01:19:42.000Of course you should be able to speak about your experience, what's happened to you, and as I said we have a compensation scheme in place for that and I'll make sure that we're working through that.
01:19:51.000We've got a compensation scheme for these 100% safe vaccines.
01:19:53.000Doesn't make sense, really, because 100% safe would mean you wouldn't need any compensation.
01:20:41.000About how best to roll out the vaccine, what was in the public health interest, the priority order, how that should be done, who should be eligible.
01:20:48.000And we got it basically wrong in every single one of those categories.
01:20:52.000That was something that the doctors recommended on.
01:20:54.000A lot of doctors were silenced and lobbied into silence and sometimes even struck off.
01:20:59.000And that's something that we followed.
01:21:01.000Now, obviously, if there are individual circumstances which haven't worked out... The phrase, haven't worked out, covers a multitude of sins there.
01:21:07.000In particular, people who took that amputation stuff.
01:21:40.000Gents, both of you, do give us your details.
01:21:43.000We will get that to the Prime Minister.
01:21:45.000And as he said, he will, I'm sure, look at that for you.
01:21:48.000In the meantime, let's move on to another question, sir.
01:21:50.000Okay, so having watched that, would you say there is room for some conversation or no conversation?
01:21:55.000Because in France, you are getting no conversation.
01:21:58.000And given that this is a globalist issue, no conversation is a problem that could be coming to a country that you live in too.
01:22:05.000So here's Brett Weinstein on the topic of France's new legislation.
01:22:08.000France has now criminalized objections to the MRNA platform, exposing those targeted to ruinous fines and imprisonment.
01:22:15.000It's obvious lunacy, and that it's happening in a Western nation should alarm us all.
01:22:19.000This madness must be defeated in France, at the WHO, everywhere it arises.
01:22:23.000So what exactly is going on in France?
01:22:26.000And given there's an obvious requirement for conversation around vaccines, excess deaths, vaccine injuries, social policies during the pandemic, why are laws being passed that would prevent anybody from criticizing a government-mandated In an unprecedented move that has sparked widespread debate across France and beyond, the French Parliament has recently passed a law that introduces severe penalties for those opposing mRNA LNP injections or other treatments recommended by the state based on current medical knowledge.
01:22:54.000I have to say current medical knowledge, that's in case, oh well it was the current medical knowledge then!
01:22:59.000Yeah, well guess what the current medical knowledge is?
01:23:01.000Current medical knowledge is this guy's got one less leg than he had this morning.
01:23:06.000As of today, criticism of such therapeutic treatments, when deemed obligatory or recommended by the state, could result in up to three years of imprisonment or a fine of 45,000 euros.
01:23:15.000This bold legislative step, quickly dubbed Article Pfizer by critics, represents a significant shift in the balance between public health policy and individual freedom of expression.
01:23:24.000There's a lot of it about, isn't there?
01:23:25.000How often are we seeing government policies leading to repression or suppression of free speech?
01:23:33.000In particular, censorship specifically of content we've been making.
01:23:37.000The core of the controversy lies in the creation of a new criminal offence targeting individuals who encourage others to withhold from medical treatments that are considered appropriate according to the prevailing medical standards.
01:23:46.000They have to always have, like, an adjective or a caveat, because they know that medicine evolves and changes.
01:23:51.000That is the nature of science, even if there is nothing malfeasant at play.
01:23:55.000The law specifically targets the resistance to mRNA treatment, positioning it as a cornerstone in the fight against future pandemics.
01:24:02.000This move has been interpreted by many as an anti-democratic manoeuvre, stifling any opposition or critique of the state-endorsed medical treatments under the heavy hand of legal penalties.
01:24:10.000Remember, the WHO treaty would mean that your country would have to provide 5% of your health
01:24:15.000budget, that your nation would have to abide by WHO regulations, which just essentially
01:24:19.000makes it legislation, whether that's mandated medicines or lockdowns.
01:24:23.000And it's not even just pandemics, it could be climate related or terrorism, extraordinary
01:24:53.000Should there be a law that prevents those concerns being communicated?
01:24:56.000Is that what you've learned in the pandemic period?
01:24:58.000Do you know what I've learned in the pandemic period?
01:24:59.000Dissent should continue to be shut down.
01:25:02.000Expert opinion should continue to be censored.
01:25:05.000Authority should be further centralised in the favour of governments and corporations.
01:25:09.000Is that the message of the pandemic period?
01:25:11.000Because that ain't the message that I received.
01:25:13.000Labelled Article Pfizer, the law is seen as emblematic of a broader trend towards increasing state control over public health narratives and personal health choices.
01:25:22.000The nickname itself, referencing one of the major pharmaceutical companies behind the development of mRNA vaccine technology, hints at the perceived alignment between government policy and the interests of Big Pharma.
01:25:34.000Raising questions about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on health policy.
01:25:38.000Furthermore, the timing and urgency of the law's enactment, with warnings of an imminent next pandemic and the positioning of mRNA technology as the sole solution, adds layers of complexity to the debate.
01:25:48.000We can't bring you this paradigm-shattering content without your love and the support of our partners.
01:25:59.000If you do, lightheadedness from elevation changes to gut issues due to water quality.
01:26:04.000If you ever had that happen, you never think about these things until they do.
01:26:07.000And when they do, all you want is something to make it better.
01:26:09.000That's where the Wellness Company's Travel Emergency Kit comes in.
01:26:13.000Whether you're backpacking through exotic locations or jet-setting for work, this kit ensures that you will be prepared for any health situation.
01:26:20.000How is it different from other travel kits?
01:27:26.000The law raises critical questions about where the lines will be drawn between preventing harmful misinformation and preserving the right to free speech and open debate on medical treatments.
01:27:35.000As France steps into uncharted territory with the enactment of this law, the international community watches closely.
01:27:42.000The implications of such a legal framework extend beyond the borders of France, potentially setting a precedent for how governments around the world might seek to regulate public discourse on health and medical treatments in the future.
01:27:53.000In conclusion, the recent enactment of the law penalising opposition to state-recommended mRNA treatments in France Marks a significant moment in the ongoing discussion about the role of government in regulating health policy and preserving public safety.
01:28:05.000While intended to combat misinformation and protect public health, the law's critics see it as a concerning move towards limiting free speech and privileging certain medical treatments over others.
01:28:15.000As the world continues to navigate the complexities of public health in an ever-evolving landscape, the debate over Article Pfizer Serves as a point and reminder of the tensions between collective safety and individual rights.
01:28:26.000It also demonstrates that there can be no financial ties between political figures and organisations and corporations of that size and scale that you don't want when laws like this are being passed.
01:28:34.000Any sense that it could be advantageous to Pfizer's bottom line or Pfizer's agenda.
01:28:40.000We also don't want to feel the sense that there's a globalist agenda in which individual nations pilot particular pieces of legislation before they become immersive, ubiquitous and total, as seems to be the case with various censorship laws around the world, and now in this one, the further oppression of free speech, in order to achieve what goal?
01:28:57.000There's so much misinformation about chemotherapy or heart tablets or asthma inhalers that people just start abandoning them.
01:29:04.000Has there ever been a medical emergency of this variety ever before?
01:29:07.000Do you ever recall like a huge movement opposing successful medical treatment?
01:29:12.000Of course there have always been people that are critical, cynical, sceptical and inquiring around vaccines, and if you look at some of the information available in those quarters, it certainly is interesting to review, shall we say.
01:29:24.000But the idea that the state, given their relationship with global corporations, has only your interests in mind In order to protect you, we're going to fine you and imprison you.
01:29:37.000And having seen that bit of footage of dear globalist Rishi Sunak pilloried by members of the British public, how do you imagine the globalists regard open conversation about these subjects?
01:29:48.000If there are indeed 30,000 adverse events to discuss in the UK, is an open conversation what the establishment wants, or do they want total control of the narrative?
01:29:57.000Why don't you look at the last couple of years and decide for yourself?
01:30:00.000What do groups that censor online social media discourse really care about and to whose benefit is that being directed?
01:30:06.000The censorship of important and significant voices like Jay Bhattacharya.
01:30:12.000Or is it about controlling a narrative?
01:30:13.000What we've learned in particular in the ongoing discourse between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci about measures and suggestions and steps that were taken in the early pandemic period that might have been avoided and that were potentially not legitimate and certainly not successful.
01:30:27.000Do you feel that what should happen now is a raft of law should be passed around the world to make it illegal for people to question and criticize?
01:30:33.000Or do you think that we should be heading in almost exactly the opposite direction?
01:30:37.000Certainly there's a need for discussion, even as the possibility for discussion is being foreclosed.
01:30:50.000We've taken you to a fever pitch of excitement.
01:30:52.000I'm- I can't imagine that things could get any better other than by telling you that tomorrow Andrew Bridgen, renegade British MP cast out of his own party for raising vital questions about excess deaths and Meryl Nass, American doctor struck off for refusing to follow government edicts and protocols will be in the studio with me discussing the WHO treaty which will impose further globalist draconianism on your nation.
01:31:26.000You're going to want to join us for it.
01:31:27.000If you want to watch it immediately, click the red button and join Locals where you get early access to our interviews and content.
01:31:34.000Sometimes you can join us for the interviews live and pose your own questions as well as regular readings from the Holy books!
01:31:41.000And an ongoing discussion to solutions.
01:31:44.000We also do an additional Here's the News every week.
01:31:47.000This week, for example, I talk about the Amy Winehouse film and the impact of figures like Amy Winehouse on culture and how the culture uses and, in a way, kind of sacrifices figures like Winehouse, Princess Diana, Marilyn Monroe.
01:32:12.000You can become one monthly or you can become one annually.
01:32:14.000It's about the cost it would be for killing some ants in your home with a can of insect repellent and for that price you could be elevating your consciousness.
01:32:23.000Like, Ironically, and Texaco51, and Al Brittani, and BuddyRo64, and Oodbuffalo.