Stay Free - Russel Brand - November 16, 2022


Poland Missile Strike | Who REALLY Did It?! - #036 - Stay Free with Russell Brand


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 5 minutes

Words per Minute

171.86803

Word Count

11,286

Sentence Count

700

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

10


Summary

In this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand, we discuss Donald Trump's announcement that he's running for president in the 2024 election, Joe Biden's pledge to cancel student debt, the G20, and much, much more! Stay Free, and Don't Let Them Drag You Down. - Russell Brand is a satirical comedy podcast produced and hosted by Russell Brand and features a rotating cast of characters from the world of comedy, stand-up comedy, sketch comedy and sketch comedy. This episode was brought to you by The F in News, and edited by Annie-Rose Strasser and Sarah Abdurrahman. Our theme music is by my main amigo, Evan Handyside, and our ad music is from Fugue Records, courtesy of Epitaph Records. If you like what you hear, please leave us a five star rating and a review on Apple Podcasts! Subscribe to stay free with Russell's Stay Free! and don't forget to leave a review and a rating and review! You can also become a patron of the podcast by becoming a patron by becoming patron@StayFree with RussellBrand.org.uk and we'll give you a discount on our next ad-free version of our new book, Stay Free: The Future Is Nowhere, coming out next week! Thank you! We'll be looking out for your reviews and questions and comments on the book recommendations, too! Stay free, you'll get 10% off the purchase of the book "The Future is Nowhere" and 5% off of the paperback edition of the new issue of The Future is Real, Outlawyer's new edition of The New York Times bestselling edition of Keep Calm & Simple, out on Amazon Prime, The Best of The Oldest in the new edition, The Newest, Thank You! by the New York Reviewed, out soon! Come check us out! we'll be giving you the chance to win a free copy of the next issue of StayFree with a signed by The New Yorker, Too Free With Russell Brand? stay free, no matter where you're listening to this book, too free, we'll have a discount code: Stay Free With It? and other great reviews of the latest in the world, no longer have a chance to buy a copy of this book or review it on the next episode, too FREE AND FREE, it'll have it all, and so much more.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 you you
00:01:27.000 brought to you by this video going on right now.
00:01:36.000 You're going to see the future.
00:01:38.000 Hello there you awakening wonders.
00:01:54.000 Thanks for joining me on Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:01:58.000 You are watching me live right now.
00:02:01.000 I thought you were going to say Stay Free, Russell Brand, but you were talking to yourself.
00:02:05.000 Yeah, do stay free.
00:02:06.000 Don't let them drag you down.
00:02:08.000 You've got to stay awake, you've got to stay free in this crazy world.
00:02:11.000 We've got so much to talk to you about today.
00:02:13.000 Of course, Donald Trump has announced his candidacy for the 2024 presidential election.
00:02:18.000 There's a G20, B20 Klaus Schwab attended by summit taking place right now.
00:02:24.000 Poland are being struck by missiles of mysterious origin.
00:02:28.000 We've got so many things to tell you about.
00:02:31.000 And of course, in our item, here's the news.
00:02:33.000 No, here's the F in news.
00:02:34.000 We're going to talk about Joe Biden's pledge to cancel student debt which mobilized thousands of young voters who still haven't seen their student debt cancelled.
00:02:46.000 Let's have a look.
00:02:47.000 First of all, I want to have a little look at Donald Trump pledging to make America great again, again, He's going to make America great again, again!
00:02:58.000 How many times can you make America great?
00:03:02.000 Which bit do you want to see?
00:03:03.000 Do you want to see him talking about drug dealers or do you want to see him talking about just general stuff?
00:03:07.000 I suppose the first bit, I love this bit, like if you haven't watched the whole speech you won't know that there's one bit where he declares that one of the new policies will be The out-and-out execution of anyone caught and convicted of drug dealing.
00:03:24.000 It's weird though because it seems to indicate that the way that they'll be executed is by their personal consent.
00:03:30.000 Are we going to ask them to be executed?
00:03:32.000 It seems to me to be a bit severe and fraught and potentially something that'll be very difficult to enact but here is Trump saying it.
00:03:41.000 But before we get into this, I want to invite you To look at the major point that we're making here.
00:03:48.000 Whether you're virulently anti-Trump, as all of the late-night talk shows and the mainstream news will be, or like excited by Trump and now pumped and febrile at the possibility of his return, Remember, we have already had Donald Trump.
00:04:04.000 We've had pre-Trump, then we've had Trump, now we're having post-Trump, now we're about to have Trump again.
00:04:09.000 How can we retain this sense of exhausting excitement?
00:04:13.000 And do you ever wonder whether or not you're being stimulated into a state of delirium about these potential vicissitudes that amount to the shifting of a couple of colours?
00:04:24.000 Meanwhile, the deep state agenda continues uninterrupted.
00:04:28.000 That's why We'll be looking in particular at Trump's policy around Russia and Ukraine and his actions while in office.
00:04:35.000 But I want you to focus in the immediate future, I mean right now, on what he's going to do to drug dealers.
00:04:41.000 And when you think of some of the drug dealers that you've known over the years, some of them are quite sweet people.
00:04:45.000 I mean, I wouldn't like to think of Dear Gritty, for example.
00:04:48.000 Of course, we're on YouTube.
00:04:50.000 It is wrong, obviously.
00:04:52.000 Absolutely, I would like to... While we're broadcasting on YouTube, I'd like to point out that drugs are obviously bad.
00:05:00.000 Bad.
00:05:01.000 Only an idiot... I mean, you wouldn't change that opinion on Rumble, even.
00:05:04.000 On Rumble?
00:05:05.000 Wait till you get me over there on Rumble.
00:05:07.000 In ten minutes, when we stop... I think in five minutes, actually, when we're not on YouTube anymore.
00:05:11.000 I become unfettered.
00:05:13.000 I become free.
00:05:14.000 I become liberated.
00:05:15.000 I might even take my top off and tell you what I really think about some deep establishment issues.
00:05:19.000 While we're on YouTube, though, for God's sake, don't do drugs.
00:05:22.000 I mean, actually, don't do drugs in general, and we'll tell you about the sort of qualifications of that in a minute.
00:05:27.000 For now, I'll tell you a person who is unequivocal on drug dealers.
00:05:31.000 That's Donald Trump.
00:05:32.000 He's gonna kill them.
00:05:33.000 He's gonna ask them, then he's gonna kill them.
00:05:35.000 Let's have a look.
00:05:36.000 responsible for death, carnage and crime all over our country
00:05:40.000 I'd like that a little louder Every drug dealer, during his or her life on average, will
00:05:46.000 kill 500 people I like the idea firstly of an average drug dealer
00:05:52.000 and 500 people to be able to quantify the death toll of a drug dealer
00:05:56.000 If we're going to start looking at the impact of drugs on mortality, let's have another glance at the opioid crisis and how much blood there is on the Sackler family's hands.
00:06:06.000 Maybe he means them.
00:06:07.000 They should!
00:06:08.000 I'm going to ask them, do they want to be executed?
00:06:11.000 Yeah, it's interesting because what he's undoubtedly the master of is emotive rhetoric.
00:06:18.000 He gives you the ability to... he has an epitomising oratory ability.
00:06:22.000 Gives you clear symbols.
00:06:24.000 Drug dealer.
00:06:25.000 Could be a lady drug dealer or a male drug dealer.
00:06:28.000 500 people they kill on average.
00:06:30.000 That's such an extraordinary statistic.
00:06:32.000 How did we arrive at that fact?
00:06:35.000 And why would you not, similarly, those of you that hate Trump, those of you that love Trump, why would you not offer us the impact of food that is detrimental for us and the pharmaceutical industry's irresponsibility, like some of those Johnson & Johnson cases which we can't go into detail of until we flip over a rumble when we get Gideon carefree about those kind of facts.
00:06:57.000 Let's have a look.
00:06:58.000 The drugs they sell, not to mention the destruction of families.
00:07:04.000 But we're going to be asking everyone who sells drugs, gets caught selling drugs, to receive the death penalty for their heinous acts, because it's the only way.
00:07:18.000 It's sort of mad, isn't it, that that's happening at Mar-a-Lago, this sort of sunny, light-hearted holiday resort, where you're applauding the death of potentially innocent people, certainly people that have had a compromised and confusing life.
00:07:34.000 It's amazing, isn't it, that he says asks.
00:07:36.000 We're going to be asking them.
00:07:38.000 So, do you want to be executed?
00:07:41.000 I'd actually prefer to carry on living for decades more, experiencing sunsets and such.
00:07:46.000 There are like stratas to drug dealers as well, aren't there?
00:07:49.000 Again, all drugs are bad and selling drugs is bad, but surely there's got to be a difference between kids in schools dealing bits of... A little ten pound drawer, a little bag of weed here or there, magic mushrooms, all terrible, terrible drugs.
00:08:06.000 I just picked these up for Steve and Karen and kept a little bit for myself.
00:08:10.000 Death!
00:08:10.000 Death!
00:08:11.000 Yeah, it does seem like that.
00:08:13.000 Is there not a subset of drug dealers?
00:08:16.000 It's one of the things I'd ask.
00:08:19.000 We don't need... I don't like to say this, and I don't even know if the American public is ready for it, and a lot of my people... Oh my God, what is it going to be?
00:08:19.000 Committees.
00:08:27.000 We don't need committees.
00:08:29.000 Who's that, need committees?
00:08:31.000 That's the next thing to go after drug dealers.
00:08:33.000 Firstly drug committee, then committees!
00:08:35.000 We're executing all... We're going to ask them, then we're going to execute them.
00:08:39.000 That's not nice.
00:08:40.000 They kill five.
00:08:43.000 It's not nice to kill 500 people.
00:08:43.000 It's not nice.
00:08:45.000 You can't call it... It's not a nice thing.
00:08:47.000 Did you think it was nice?
00:08:48.000 Yeah, I thought it was quite nice.
00:08:49.000 It's not nice.
00:08:50.000 It's not.
00:08:50.000 Fair enough.
00:08:51.000 Thanks for putting it straight.
00:08:52.000 Jeffrey Dahmer did merely a handful.
00:08:54.000 Look at what we did to that guy.
00:08:56.000 For each on average... Yeah, so we had to qualify the difference between each and on average.
00:09:03.000 Like, each drug dealer has to hit a target of 500 kills.
00:09:08.000 If you don't do this, In China, when I was with President Xi, I said, President, do you have a drug problem?
00:09:15.000 No, no, no, no, we don't.
00:09:16.000 He looked at me like I didn't know what I was doing.
00:09:21.000 There could be a number of reasons for that.
00:09:22.000 That's so fascinating that he's reporting on geopolitics in such a conversational and disposable way.
00:09:29.000 And again, this is part of the mastery of Trump, the simultaneous simplification and grandiosity.
00:09:35.000 Suddenly everything becomes vivid and clear.
00:09:37.000 And if you think that Trump ain't the answer, you're going to have to look at the current incumbent before suggesting that Trump would be an improvement.
00:09:46.000 Listen, we're only on YouTube for a couple more seconds now, so switch over.
00:09:50.000 Watch us on Rumble where we're going to unpack this story a little more.
00:09:53.000 We're going to talk about what's going on at the B20 Summit.
00:09:56.000 This is a little business-oriented brother of the G20 Summit.
00:09:59.000 We're going to be talking about those missiles and how it was misreported and potentially why.
00:10:04.000 And I'm going to really let my hair down and release some very unusual opinions.
00:10:08.000 See you over on Rumble in, it seems to me, about five seconds.
00:10:14.000 Have a little look at this.
00:10:15.000 Can we look at Joe Biden?
00:10:17.000 No, let's look at Trump the way he wraps up first.
00:10:20.000 This is how, like, so again, when people are dismissive of Trump, and you know that I'm, like, I'm not a pro-Trump person, because our belief is transcendent of these systems.
00:10:32.000 We believe that we need to look for genuine alternatives.
00:10:34.000 But I can still see how this, look at this, greatest hits, a beautiful medley that he uses as the denouement for his speech.
00:10:46.000 Check it out.
00:10:47.000 And together we will make America powerful again.
00:10:53.000 Ooh, powerful again.
00:10:54.000 That's good.
00:10:54.000 He says powerful quickly, like people are expecting him to say great.
00:10:57.000 He's like, no!
00:10:59.000 Powerful.
00:10:59.000 Because that's where he's got to introduce the device.
00:11:04.000 We will make America wealthy again.
00:11:09.000 Ah, I see what you're doing.
00:11:10.000 People are getting excited now.
00:11:11.000 The phones are going up in the crowd.
00:11:15.000 We will make America strong again.
00:11:19.000 Oh, more phones going up!
00:11:20.000 He's doing good gestures!
00:11:21.000 I love it when he does his gestures.
00:11:23.000 Strong, strong.
00:11:25.000 Where are these gestures going?
00:11:27.000 He's getting better and better!
00:11:29.000 We will make America proud again.
00:11:34.000 Proud.
00:11:34.000 It's like a sort of a YMCA of positive emotions.
00:11:40.000 We will make America safe again.
00:11:44.000 Oh safe!
00:11:45.000 You chop down to get the safety.
00:11:48.000 We will make America glorious again.
00:11:53.000 Glorious of all the gestures I think is the most dubious because glorious appears to be... I think that was his idea though.
00:11:59.000 Glorious, glorious, how about this?
00:12:02.000 That does seem glorious.
00:12:06.000 And we will make America great again.
00:12:11.000 Thank you very much.
00:12:12.000 God bless you all.
00:12:13.000 Thank you.
00:12:16.000 Why would anybody be impressed by Donald Trump?
00:12:19.000 It's not as if the current incumbent of the White House can't string a sentence together.
00:12:24.000 It's not like... Get ready.
00:12:26.000 That's a cute baby.
00:12:27.000 It's not like the current incumbent of the White House is lacking in any particular skills when it comes to oratory.
00:12:33.000 Let's check him out.
00:12:42.000 Reuters, the tangent about both.
00:12:46.000 Oh dear, a literal sepulchral figure issuing a stumbling speech from a crypt.
00:12:54.000 And again, it's not like I'm super excited by the prospect of Donald Trump.
00:12:58.000 I think that in a way, what it's going to do is create hysteria, it's going to create distraction, it's going to create the illusion of choice.
00:13:05.000 And it is an illusion as well.
00:13:07.000 It's going to make America confusing again.
00:13:09.000 It's going to make America baffled again.
00:13:11.000 It's going to make America delirious again.
00:13:15.000 So when he was talking about drug dealers in China, there was a bit we didn't quite get to the end of it, but when he was talking about...
00:13:23.000 In China, this reaction to Trump talking about drug dealers was they were baffled that they thought he didn't know what he was talking about.
00:13:30.000 So the Chinese government itself reported that there were 1.49 million registered drug users nationwide, as of the end of 2021.
00:13:37.000 In the past, officials in China have acknowledged that the number of registered drug users are a significant undercount of actual drug use there.
00:13:44.000 So I think they did know what he meant.
00:13:46.000 But you know, It was a nice story.
00:13:48.000 Certainly easier to control addiction if you have a totalitarian state.
00:13:53.000 There's no question about that.
00:13:58.000 Also, of course, we've been shaken by the news that Poland has been struck twice by missiles.
00:14:08.000 One of my favourite reports is when it says Missile or missiles.
00:14:12.000 That's like they're being so accurate and attentive to detail they want to get the number exactly right while being pretty incorrect when it comes to the origin of those missiles.
00:14:23.000 The news broke during the B-20 summit which sort of amounts to a collection of world leaders coming together to collude against an extraordinary Indonesian backdrop.
00:14:37.000 Have a look at this Extraordinary scene.
00:14:40.000 Check it out.
00:14:43.000 Mr. President, can you tell us what we know so far about the explosion at Colon, sir?
00:14:57.000 I think that Trudeau looks like he's recently removed makeup.
00:15:00.000 Rishi Sunak is drifting into his cyborg mode.
00:15:03.000 Joe Biden gets to sit in the middle between two tilted parasols.
00:15:08.000 I said parasols!
00:15:09.000 And that bizarre flower arrangement in the front.
00:15:12.000 I suppose you can learn a lot about global power dynamics right there.
00:15:17.000 And the influence and power of the WEF and Davos affiliates, which is largely regarded as a kind of conspiracy theory.
00:15:25.000 However, Klaus Schwab was attending that event.
00:15:29.000 He's present there.
00:15:30.000 He gave a speech where he talked about the problems of a multipolar world.
00:15:36.000 Now, I'll tell you one thing about the world.
00:15:37.000 It's got two poles.
00:15:39.000 And it requires them in order to spin on its axis.
00:15:42.000 But of course, what Schwalbe is talking about is the nature of different and diffuse power.
00:15:47.000 For a long time, there's been a clash of civilisations where the other side has been painted as negative, smeared, whether you're talking about the Cold War, where there's a narrative of the Free West and, you know, the Soviet Union, or Orientalism, the sort of idea that there are others, whether it's within what we regard as the Orient, like Eastern countries or Islamic power.
00:16:13.000 But the idea that you have one world, one order, one central dominating force from which all government flows is, I suppose, central To the project of the WEF and I suppose many of us fear that even national sovereignty, which is already hugely compromised, is being further diluted by unelected officials and bodies such as WHO or, you know, even summits like this.
00:16:38.000 Do they mean anything?
00:16:39.000 Do they mean nothing at all?
00:16:40.000 Are they things like The COP27, things that sort of appear like empty gestures where greenwashing is available, or are they opportunities for powerful people to come together and ultimately make decisions that do not affect their own interests and instead dilute and dissolve responsibility into the hands of ordinary people?
00:17:03.000 Ultimately, you know, you do your recycling, we'll carry on flying around in our private jets.
00:17:07.000 Let's have a look at what Klaus Schwab has to offer at the B20.
00:17:13.000 Of course, if we look at all the challenges, we can speak about a multi-crisis, an economic, a political, a social, an ecological, an institutional crisis.
00:17:27.000 But actually, what we have to confront is a deep systemic and structural restructuring of a Sounds like sort of restructuring is a rebranding of the reset.
00:17:44.000 Yeah.
00:17:45.000 It's not as catchy, but at least it doesn't sound like reset anymore.
00:17:48.000 We need a great reset.
00:17:49.000 Stop saying great reset.
00:17:51.000 People think that you're trying to create a new world order.
00:17:53.000 Restructuring?
00:17:54.000 A fantastic restructuring?
00:17:56.000 Yeah, that's less offensive.
00:17:58.000 So, you know, like when people say that Klaus Schwab doesn't have any real power and don't be such a tinfoil hat wearing lunatic.
00:18:07.000 Yeah, well, he's got himself to the B20, hasn't he?
00:18:09.000 There he is.
00:18:10.000 That is meant to be for global leaders.
00:18:12.000 So what's he doing there?
00:18:13.000 Well, you could argue he's got as much power as global leaders or potentially more.
00:18:17.000 Certainly appears to have some influence.
00:18:19.000 Oh, God.
00:18:21.000 And this will take some time.
00:18:24.000 As the world will look differently after we have gone through this transition process.
00:18:33.000 Politically, it's the driving forces.
00:18:36.000 What does need restructuring is the amount of spit that he's holding in his mouth.
00:18:40.000 Would you swallow before doing speech?
00:18:42.000 I'd be more willing to comply with your, I'll have nothing and I'll be happy, if you'd just swallow down that little bit of gargley fluid.
00:18:50.000 Everything's gonna be a lot better.
00:18:54.000 It's very unnerving to hear someone's larynx so lubricated at a time like that.
00:18:59.000 It's his political transformation.
00:19:04.000 Of course, is the transition into a multipolar world, which has a tendency to make our world much more fragmented.
00:19:18.000 It's interesting because of course we talk about diversity all the time, the importance of diversity, the significance of diversity, but when it comes to power there's only one option, a unipolar world.
00:19:28.000 Suddenly a multipolar world is dangerous, that you can't achieve a balance, that is going to be necessarily unstable.
00:19:35.000 Critics of the current conflict, regarded by many as a proxy war between America and Russia, argue that the intention is to hollow out Russia as a potential military force in the pursuit of the ultimate conflict.
00:19:49.000 And this is a sort of terrifying story that we'll have to do in more depth.
00:19:55.000 It's not on here no more.
00:19:58.000 Gal, tell me what that was, the story that...
00:20:02.000 Well, yeah, the one about that basically Ukraine was being used as a beta test for how we're actually going to approach warfare in the future.
00:20:11.000 I mean, that's pretty terrifying.
00:20:12.000 It was in the New York Times, an article that was written a couple of days ago.
00:20:15.000 But this was, yeah, military leaders have been talking about how Ukraine is kind of just the start in terms of where we're going.
00:20:23.000 Military-wise.
00:20:23.000 And why is it that they were so keen to report this as the missiles landing in Poland?
00:20:31.000 Why were they so hasty to attribute that?
00:20:35.000 We can look at the headlines that came out based upon, here we go, so we've got Russian bombs hit Poland, Russian missiles hit Poland, Putin's war escalates, even telegraphed Russian missile strikes Poland.
00:20:49.000 We've also got a little bit of a few clips that we put together of this as well.
00:20:54.000 Well, of the various, like, mainstream media news outlets reporting on it.
00:20:58.000 Reports of at least two dead tonight in Poland from a missile not far from the Ukrainian border.
00:21:04.000 Ukraine tonight saying it was Russia.
00:21:06.000 Russian missiles crossed into NATO member Poland, killing two people.
00:21:10.000 Russian missiles obstruct Poland this morning.
00:21:13.000 Russian missile or missiles.
00:21:16.000 Crossed into?
00:21:17.000 Could be missile, could be missiles.
00:21:18.000 What it definitely is, is Russian.
00:21:21.000 There's no way that it could have come from anywhere else.
00:21:24.000 Now apparently even when Zelensky announced that this act of aggression had taken place, it was already known by NATO who had been tracking those missiles that it It couldn't have come from Russia.
00:21:36.000 Yeah, in fact, even Biden himself at one point does say that it's unlikely that it could have come from Russia, which is amazing.
00:21:42.000 But at the same time, President Biden is asking Congress to provide more than $37 billion in emergency aid to Ukraine, a massive infusion of cash that would help support the nation as Russia forces suffer battlefield losses in the nine month old invasion.
00:21:57.000 So we had Max Blumenthal on the other day, didn't we?
00:22:00.000 And we were talking about A report that came out last week about America apparently starting to nudge Ukraine towards peace talks.
00:22:09.000 And we asked Max about whether it was true and how much had been reported about Boris Johnson going to Ukraine, to tell him to basically cut off peace talks with Russia back in April.
00:22:19.000 And what he was saying is, this was interesting, because this was happening at a time when Congress was trying to pass a $40 billion deal.
00:22:26.000 relief, you know, fund to Ukraine. And so what these things are basically doing is kind of facilitating these
00:22:33.000 deals into happening and it's interesting that this is coming at a time when they're trying to pass another
00:22:38.000 37 billion dollars in emergency aid to Ukraine of which you would imagine a lot of that will go to the military-industrial
00:22:44.000 complex. Let me know in the comments, let me know in the chat, if you think it's as simple as military-industrial
00:22:48.000 complex managing congressional and White House strings in order to
00:22:53.000 sustain a war that will increase profitability while potentially bringing the planet to the brink of Armageddon.
00:22:59.000 Doesn't that seem like a Terrifying prospect to you.
00:23:02.000 So terrifying, in fact, that it's difficult to regard it as feasible.
00:23:06.000 It seems absurd that such a catastrophic risk would be undertaken in pursuit of profit.
00:23:11.000 But remember some of the things you've seen during this conflict, like Sean Penn delivering an Oscar to Zelensky, the idea that peace talks have been disrupted in order to allow time for yet another lethal aid package to be offered.
00:23:28.000 And again, I remind you, as I continually feel that I have to, that my sympathy for people in Ukraine who are, like, caught in the middle of a terrifying conflict, like, remains undimmed.
00:23:40.000 It's just, it seems that, in all doubt, like, you immediately, when questioning these narratives, your integrity is called into question.
00:23:47.000 It's demanded of you that you simply imbibe the information that's spewed at you from various screens, and if you query it at all, It seems like you're the issue.
00:23:58.000 I know a lot of you feel like that.
00:24:01.000 Do you want to see anything else?
00:24:02.000 We've got another little clip from the B20 if you'd like to see it.
00:24:05.000 What happened?
00:24:06.000 Well, basically, we read an article today about how the B20 is calling on the G20 to adopt vaccine passports using WHO standards and to promote digital identity schemes.
00:24:16.000 So like the B20 and the G20, they have conversations with each other.
00:24:18.000 The G20, we all know what that is, that's sort of powerful heads of state coming together to talk about like a global agenda, and that's not a conspiracy theory, that's sort of literally the explicit function of it.
00:24:27.000 The B20 is like it's little brother, it's like a spin-off show that's more oriented towards business.
00:24:32.000 But the G20 is pretty economically and financially undergirded anyway, so to have a B20, that's a bit of a hat On a hat.
00:24:38.000 That's like having a pornography conference and then having a masturbation wing.
00:24:42.000 And it seems pretty odd that they're talking about vaccine passports after Pfizer said that they never tested for transmission.
00:24:51.000 So the point of having a passport is diminished.
00:24:53.000 Also, you would say, what's it got to do with business?
00:24:56.000 I mean, that is what the... Make a lot of money from them?
00:24:59.000 So, I mean, I guess that's where this is going, is the B in B20 stands for business.
00:25:04.000 The G in G20 is like, this is the collection of the world's economies, but it is about economics, ultimately.
00:25:11.000 But this is the business arm of the G20.
00:25:13.000 So if you've got a situation where they are literally talking about digital ID, you've got to wonder, how is that affecting business?
00:25:20.000 And as you say, Ross, like, we can make quite a lot of money out of this.
00:25:25.000 Let's have a look at them saying that then.
00:25:26.000 So let's have a digital health certificate acknowledged by WHO.
00:25:33.000 If you have been vaccinated or tested properly, then you can move around.
00:25:39.000 So for the next pandemic, instead of stopping the movement of the people 100%, which clogs the economy globally, you know, you can... Also, I don't like the easy way that they're saying the next pandemic.
00:25:52.000 Yeah, they're already planning.
00:25:54.000 We'll get this next pandemic going, this one.
00:25:56.000 You can continue to move around as long as you comply.
00:25:59.000 I suppose it seems so explicit that it's difficult to call it a conspiracy theory.
00:26:06.000 It's just an obvious and observable convergence of interests that would benefit from social credit score systems and the ability to use big tech to surveil, monitor and accredit us as individuals and whole populations.
00:26:20.000 They're just literally Talking about it in, at least in that guy's case, some traditional dress.
00:26:27.000 Yes, at least there's that.
00:26:29.000 At least they're observing some Indonesian customs over there, which I think is what, is there more stuff in there?
00:26:35.000 We'll see.
00:26:35.000 What more do you like?
00:26:36.000 Still provide some movement of the people.
00:26:39.000 Indonesia has achieved, G20 country has agreed to have this digital certificate using WHO standard and we will submit into the next The World Health Assembly in Geneva adds the revision to international health regulations.
00:26:56.000 So hopefully, for the next pandemic, we can still see some movement of the people, some movement of the goods, and movement of the economy.
00:27:05.000 Whether or not but it's all tracked is like a global conspiracy, the idea that you wouldn't query it when seeing something that's as overt as that, but that you shouldn't even talk about it.
00:27:17.000 Yeah, this is tracked movement, isn't it though?
00:27:20.000 We saw some of that with this pandemic with the CDC admitted tracking people through their mobile phones.
00:27:25.000 Now we're getting to a case with Digital IDs.
00:27:27.000 And of course, the reason for digital IDs was all to do with stop the spread in the first place, wasn't it?
00:27:31.000 That was literally the whole point of it.
00:27:33.000 It was that we can track you and if you have got coronavirus, you can't access these things so you can spread the virus.
00:27:40.000 And now we're at a stage where we know more about the stop the spread and the fact that it wasn't true anyway.
00:27:46.000 And yet digital IDs are still important and are still being discussed at a business event, a global business event for the next pandemic.
00:27:54.000 It's a little worrying.
00:27:55.000 Yeah I suppose so because it shows that it's profitable it shows it's in the interest of the powerful and all that leads me to conclude that it's pretty likely that it will happen.
00:28:04.000 Still coming up on the show, we've got, here's the news, no, here's the effing news,
00:28:07.000 where we're talking about Joe Biden's pledge to cancel student debt,
00:28:11.000 which evidently mobilized a lot of young voters, and how that effort is going now.
00:28:17.000 Has student debt been relieved?
00:28:20.000 And also, did they take the necessary measures to ensure that the policy would ever see the light of day,
00:28:26.000 or did they introduce it in a crazy little way that gave all sorts of opportunities
00:28:30.000 for it to be rescinded and interrupted?
00:28:32.000 You might enjoy having a little look at this image if you're curious about the nature of global power.
00:28:38.000 This is Klaus Schwab, Rishi Sunak and Justin Trudeau hanging out in, I would say, clashing garments there.
00:28:47.000 Klaus Schwab, he's such a chameleon-like individual, his skin is turning into a part of his shirt.
00:28:55.000 Again, look, it's just an innocuous photo opportunity really.
00:28:59.000 Just some politicians with limited policies and great hair hanging out with a man who says that we will own nothing and that we will be happy.
00:29:10.000 All of them have previous affiliations with Davos, the WEF.
00:29:15.000 In the case of dear old Rishi Sunak, he worked for Goldman Sachs.
00:29:18.000 He's not willing to admit whether the hedge fund that he set up profited from the Moderna vaccines.
00:29:26.000 He's married to a person whose dad owns, what's it called?
00:29:30.000 Infosys.
00:29:32.000 Infosys, which is a digital tracking agency that has a partnership with the WEF.
00:29:37.000 Like at this point, I don't know man, Like how we're still talking about whether or not something suspicious is going on.
00:29:44.000 It's like it's sort of surrounding you from every potential direction.
00:29:47.000 But look at the shirts!
00:29:49.000 Look at that!
00:29:50.000 How could you not trust some guys who are plainly wearing traditional Indonesian dress?
00:29:56.000 True though, he's undone two buttons, hasn't he?
00:29:58.000 He's done more of a brand.
00:30:00.000 I think Trudeau had to be restrained from unbuttoning that shirt to the waist and not wearing any trousers with it.
00:30:06.000 Klaus Schwab, he's switched off there.
00:30:08.000 What should be a glorious and triumphant moment for him is sort of, I suppose, like Alexander on realising that he'd conquered the known world.
00:30:16.000 He sort of thought, well, what was it all for?
00:30:18.000 Here I am, all my protégés are in government, but I've still got so much Qatar on the back of my throat.
00:30:24.000 I can't really enjoy it.
00:30:25.000 I don't see him as, like, part of the jokes.
00:30:27.000 I think he's not a humorous man, Klaus, I don't think.
00:30:30.000 I think he's leaving the jokes to, evidently, Rishi and Trudeau.
00:30:34.000 Yeah, Trudeau there surely just asking Rishi Sunak if he minds if he uses any kind of skin darkening material so that he can relax.
00:30:44.000 Trudeau there probably the longest amount of time he's gone without doing an ethnically inappropriate facial costume.
00:30:50.000 All right, well, listen, we've all had a lot of fun looking at the way that global elites manipulate narratives and control what passes for democracy.
00:30:59.000 But on a more micro level, we can see now how particularly popular policies like the cancellation of student debt may have mobilized young voters in the midterms in America.
00:31:11.000 But are the promises made Gonna be delivered.
00:31:15.000 Certainly we've seen the promises about controlling Big Pharma haven't been meaningfully delivered on.
00:31:19.000 Releasing people from federal prisons that had cannabis convictions.
00:31:22.000 Well, they were all released, but that's mostly because there was nobody in there.
00:31:27.000 Saudi Arabia are not really that much of a pariah.
00:31:31.000 Dealings are carrying on as usual.
00:31:34.000 So will this student debt ever be cancelled?
00:31:38.000 It's time now for Here's the News.
00:31:39.000 No.
00:31:40.000 No.
00:31:41.000 Here's the effing news.
00:31:47.000 Here's the fucking news!
00:31:48.000 Did Biden and the Dems stop a midterm rout by lying that they were going to cancel student debt when in fact they might not do that at all?
00:32:01.000 It is of course commonly understood now that an expected red wave did not materialise.
00:32:06.000 Is this because Trump is no longer an effective politician?
00:32:11.000 Or could another explanation be that young people turned out in record numbers, in part because of student debt cancellation, a pledge made by Biden that a little like his cannabis laws, may not amount to very much at all.
00:32:26.000 This is a fascinating story that shows that the pledge to cancel student debt may not be as straightforward
00:32:33.000 as we'd first thought.
00:32:34.000 That there were numerous ways that this legislation could have been passed and the route that's been chosen
00:32:39.000 actually means that student debt may not be meaningfully canceled at all.
00:32:43.000 Have a look.
00:32:44.000 Hey folks, I wanted you to hear it right from me.
00:32:46.000 Ha ha ha ha ha.
00:32:47.000 Who else would it be from?
00:32:49.000 Who else is going to tell you?
00:32:50.000 Would you wait to read it on your son's laptop?
00:32:52.000 Here's what you should know.
00:32:53.000 We're going to forgive $10,000 of federal student loan debt, keeping my campaign promise.
00:32:58.000 For the people who need the help the most, the folks who went to school on Pell Grants, we're going to forgive a total of $20,000.
00:33:05.000 This seems like a good pledge to me.
00:33:07.000 Now, I know many of you will think, why should a particular class of people, the educated class, get relief that's not being afforded to, for example, tradespeople?
00:33:15.000 And that's an interesting argument and an argument I'm sympathetic to.
00:33:18.000 Broadly speaking, though, I think that education, whether it's in trades or in academia, should be granted for as close to free as possible.
00:33:26.000 Educate your population, awaken and enlighten them.
00:33:30.000 But this information that Biden is conveying here is not true in the manner that he's explaining.
00:33:34.000 Let's get into it a little more deeply.
00:33:36.000 In the midterms, voters under the age of 29 broke for the Democrats in overwhelming numbers, helping turn the much feared red wave into a red trickle.
00:33:43.000 In a speech on Wednesday night, President Biden acknowledged that student debt relief played a big role in motivating the historic turnout of young people.
00:33:51.000 Debt relief almost certainly played a decisive role in key races, including Senate races.
00:33:56.000 Consider Pennsylvania, where cancellation champion John Fetterman beat Dr. Oz.
00:34:00.000 In Arizona, Mark Kelly, another proponent of cancellation, exceeded expectations.
00:34:05.000 Not so for Ohio Democrat and Senate hopeful Tim Ryan, who strongly opposed Biden's cancellation plan and lost to J.D.
00:34:11.000 Vance.
00:34:12.000 On Twitter, the White House Chief of Staff, Ron Klain, made a similar point, saying that President Biden kept his promises to younger Americans and they responded with energy and enthusiasm.
00:34:22.000 Not like when he sniffs their heads.
00:34:25.000 The problem is that Klain's comment isn't totally accurate.
00:34:28.000 Young people did indeed respond with energy and enthusiasm to at least one promise that is to date unfulfilled.
00:34:34.000 Almost three months after Biden's cancellation program was announced, not a single person has seen a penny of relief.
00:34:41.000 OK, well that could be because bureaucratic processes take a while and we wouldn't expect those promises to have been delivered on yet.
00:34:49.000 But let's look at some of the administrative details in the way that this measure has been taken, some of which certainly raise questions.
00:34:57.000 And now they may not ever see relief.
00:34:58.000 On Thursday night, a Trump-appointed judge in Texas struck down the student loan cancellation program.
00:35:04.000 Now, of course, many people who dislike Donald Trump will say, well, of course, a Trump-appointed judge has struck this down.
00:35:10.000 However, what's curious is it needn't have gone that route at all.
00:35:14.000 Listen carefully.
00:35:15.000 While the President has blasted the Republicans behind these lawsuits, the real story is more complicated.
00:35:20.000 Biden could have directed the Education Secretary to cancel people's debts using the Compromise and Settlement Authority granted in the Higher Education Act of 1965.
00:35:29.000 But instead, his administration invoked a different and more limited legal authority.
00:35:35.000 It was this limited authority that the Texas judge formally took issue with.
00:35:39.000 Had he wanted to, a measure could have been immediately taken to instantly cancel that debt bypassing the Trump judge.
00:35:47.000 So one hypothesis could be that they took this route knowing it would get struck down by a Trump appointed judge.
00:35:55.000 Now, if we had proper access and proper investigative journalism, we would of course ask someone close to Biden, why didn't you use the Compromise and Settlement Act if it was always your intention?
00:36:08.000 Note how the cannabis laws were only enacted at a federal level, meaning nobody was released from prison, rather than some people were released from prison.
00:36:18.000 They also chose to make borrowers apply for the program instead of automatically issuing cancellation, a slow-moving process that bought their billionaire-backed opponents valuable time to cook up legal arguments, find plaintiffs, and line their cases up with sympathetic judges.
00:36:34.000 So again, the manner in which this was undertaken was not the only one, but it was the least efficient one.
00:36:40.000 It granted valuable time to opponents of the measures so they could line their ducks up and prevent the bill being passed if they wanted to.
00:36:47.000 Also, it provides a convenient get-out course because a Trump-appointed judge acts the idea.
00:36:53.000 The simple truth is, is whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, your party is significantly backed by billionaires.
00:36:59.000 Now, things get even more interesting here because Biden has publicly said that this law has already been passed, which is an absolute lie!
00:37:07.000 Now, Biden does get confused pretty regular, so let's give him the benefit of the doubt.
00:37:11.000 President Joe Biden falsely claimed last week that he got his student debt forgiveness initiative passed by Congress.
00:37:16.000 During an on-camera discussion conducted by progressive organization NowThis News, Biden told young activists that they are probably aware I just signed a law that is being challenged by Republicans.
00:37:25.000 Biden then said it's passed, I've got it passed by a vote or two and it's in effect.
00:37:30.000 That's one of those lies where you provide too much detail.
00:37:32.000 Yeah, I don't know why these earrings are by my bed.
00:37:35.000 I guess it's because I've become an earring salesman in my spare time?
00:37:39.000 What Biden's done there is he's provided too much detail on top of a lie.
00:37:43.000 It hasn't been passed.
00:37:44.000 It hasn't been subject to a vote.
00:37:45.000 So what on earth was he saying?
00:37:47.000 Facts First said Biden's claims are incorrect.
00:37:49.000 Biden created his student debt forgiveness initiative for executive action, not through
00:37:53.000 legislation, so he did not sign a law and he didn't get the initiatives passed by any number
00:37:57.000 of votes. The Biden administration has now stopped accepting applications for federal student loan
00:38:01.000 forgiveness. So what's interesting about this story is that whether or not you think that
00:38:05.000 student debt should be cancelled, and I personally think that it should be and that people ought be
00:38:11.000 I think that everybody should have access to education, whether that's in academia or in trades.
00:38:16.000 I think that's an important function of the state to provide that kind of education, especially when you look at how much is spent elsewhere.
00:38:23.000 But if you do deliver those kind of pledges and galvanize and mobilize voters in that way, then you certainly have to deliver, and I would say deliver efficiently, And not lie about it.
00:38:35.000 Perhaps the reason they feel free to make these kind of pledges and claims is because the way they regard young people, voters more generally, but young people in particular, is as kind of little more than children.
00:38:47.000 Perhaps as idiots.
00:38:48.000 And if you think that's extreme, have a look at this.
00:38:50.000 What's the other thing we know about this population?
00:38:53.000 And it's a specific phase of life.
00:38:54.000 Remember, age is more than a chronological fact.
00:38:57.000 It isn't, actually.
00:38:58.000 What else do we know about this population 18 through 24?
00:38:59.000 18 through 24. They are stupid. That is why we put them in dormitories and they
00:39:09.000 have a resident assistant.
00:39:12.000 They make really bad decisions.
00:39:15.000 Now perhaps Kamala Harris, given the benefit of the doubt, was joking in that situation.
00:39:20.000 But that does chime with my general assessment that we are regarded by people in power as little more than idiots and, at best, as children that have to be coordinated and guided, who it's okay to lie to.
00:39:35.000 I would not identify as a Republican or a Democrat and I would say that whoever had come out on top in those midterms, ordinary people's lives, generally speaking, would not have significantly improved, certainly not in the way that they would if we were to radically change our systems of government so they were representative of the interests of ordinary people and not a reflection of the requirements of corporate elites, globalist agenda, Mainstream media.
00:40:01.000 You know the list by now, surely.
00:40:02.000 It's interesting to see another apparent political victory boiling down to a bit of tactical ingenuity.
00:40:09.000 A pledge made that will only be delivered upon in a limited way, perhaps affording opponents of that legislation or regulation, however you regard it, whether it's the correct term, the opportunity to prevent it being meaningfully passed.
00:40:22.000 Why was it not passed in the most effective way?
00:40:25.000 Why was the debt not cancelled immediately?
00:40:27.000 Why are similar measures not afforded to people that trained in trades as well as just in academia?
00:40:32.000 Is it that it was simply a tactic to mobilize a certain demographic while alienating another portion of the population?
00:40:40.000 So, even in instances where it seems like something's being given back to ordinary people, there are often invisible administrative veils being drawn and levers being pulled to prevent real change happening.
00:40:52.000 We're gonna forgive $10,000 of federal student loan debt, keeping my campaign promise.
00:40:57.000 This is politics in microcosm.
00:40:59.000 Like many of Joe Biden's pre-election pledges, it's not being meaningfully fulfilled.
00:41:04.000 Saudi Arabia are not being made a pariah.
00:41:06.000 People are not being What does it tell you that people will enthusiastically respond to being offered just a meagre amount of hope?
00:41:11.000 What kind of state are we in as a people where piecemeal measures are seen as cause for celebration?
00:41:15.000 done in the most efficient way? What does it tell you that people will enthusiastically
00:41:20.000 respond to being offered just a meagre amount of hope? What kind of state are we in as a
00:41:25.000 people where piecemeal measures are seen as cause for celebration? This is how politics
00:41:31.000 operates now. So much deception, so much despondency, so much despair that small pledges inefficiently
00:41:39.000 delivered are seen as major victories when in fact probably what they are is just tactical
00:41:45.000 maneuvering in order to motivate voters while doing the minimum possible in order to continue
00:41:51.000 to not inconvenience your billionaire backers.
00:41:54.000 Whether it's this pledge that doesn't look like it's going to be delivered in anything like the degree that was promised or perhaps more significantly the pledge not to exacerbate tensions on a global scale that could lead to nuclear war.
00:42:07.000 It seems between the discourse of politics and the delivery of politics is a vast gap and in that gap there is continuing despondency, continuing despair and in my mind Reason to continue to be cynical and sceptical about the game of politics, the spectacle of modern democracy.
00:42:25.000 But that's just what I think.
00:42:26.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.
00:42:27.000 Let me know what you think in the comments.
00:42:28.000 I'll see you in a minute.
00:42:29.000 Thanks for choosing Fox News.
00:42:31.000 Here's the news.
00:42:32.000 No, here's the fucking news.
00:42:35.000 So, we're following you, not literally, we're responding to what you're saying here.
00:42:45.000 We're not the CDC.
00:42:46.000 No, you can pretty much do what you want when it comes to what medicine you take and for what reason, but we're certainly observing what you're saying in the chat.
00:42:55.000 Salty Shrimp says, the elite crushing the monetary system as fast as possible.
00:42:59.000 Save your silver and gold, which is very convenient because we've got a sponsor for the show.
00:43:02.000 I'll try in a minute, and I've not watched the advert yet, although I did make the advert, so you'll be seeing an advert in a minute, mate.
00:43:08.000 Salty Shrimp, we're giving you a golden opportunity.
00:43:11.000 Medicus, forgive that, I didn't mean that.
00:43:14.000 Medicus, what about those who didn't go into further education due to fear of debt?
00:43:18.000 Yeah, that's a really good point.
00:43:18.000 Yeah, what about that?
00:43:20.000 Brad Wildman, a politician issuing false promises.
00:43:22.000 Chuck?
00:43:24.000 Come on, this is debt relief, not voting.
00:43:26.000 You must register.
00:43:27.000 Across the show, we've had some interesting comments.
00:43:30.000 We're talking about what we're beginning to frame as a false dichotomy between Trump and Biden.
00:43:35.000 What meow?
00:43:35.000 Make America literate again.
00:43:37.000 Jack's trees.
00:43:38.000 Yes, the Trump train is back.
00:43:39.000 Jump on board, people.
00:43:41.000 It's fun.
00:43:41.000 A lot of you still very excited by Donald Trump.
00:43:44.000 Voltaire 27, when a president's handlers rush out reporters when they try and ask questions, it's already a totalitarian government.
00:43:51.000 Yeah, that B20 clip, it was sort of macabre, wasn't it?
00:43:54.000 With it glitching in and out of vision, people sort of staring off listless and baffled.
00:44:00.000 I mean, not Biden, that's his general resting face.
00:44:03.000 But Trudeau and Rishi Sunak, to see them sort of transfixed in that way, maybe they are already AI.
00:44:09.000 Maybe if we are so conditioned and captured, whether or not we're literal cyborgs is less relevant.
00:44:17.000 Gabby Rios, 59.
00:44:18.000 The WF is running things right now, that's why they took out Trump.
00:44:21.000 Again, yous lot love Trump, I'm watching you now.
00:44:23.000 You love Trump, don't you?
00:44:27.000 He's ahead in the polls, just so you know.
00:44:29.000 In the polls between... A Politico poll taken the days before the poll closed, 33% of Republicans said they'd support DeSantis, 47% said they'd support Trump.
00:44:40.000 So all this kind of Trumpty Dumpty and he's the biggest loser and all of that, I mean, it still looks like if there was to be an election now between those two, it looks like he'd still get it.
00:44:52.000 So there's still power in that man.
00:44:55.000 I suppose what concerns me most of all is whether or not this is the generation of more hysteria.
00:45:04.000 That's all I'm questioning, is whether or not any of the alternatives you're being offered will meaningfully alter your life.
00:45:12.000 Now when we speak to people like Michael Singer, who was our guest on the show yesterday, he says that your primary function is to alter your inner life, to recognise that you're maintaining a state of stimulus,
00:45:25.000 obsessing with external things.
00:45:27.000 I mean, like, what he's essentially suggesting to us is a spiritual pathway
00:45:31.000 where we relinquish our attachments, not like, like, give up our money and give up our stuff.
00:45:36.000 Or gold.
00:45:37.000 Keep, for God's sake, you're gonna need gold more than ever.
00:45:40.000 But don't obsess about the gold.
00:45:42.000 No, just keep it safe.
00:45:44.000 Keep that gold safe for God's sake.
00:45:45.000 Shall we have a look at this?
00:45:47.000 We're going to talk to Brad Evans in a minute for our item Books with Brad, where we talk about a classic book and in particular its relevance to contemporary sociological and political issues.
00:45:47.000 I'd like to.
00:45:57.000 We already did 1984, George Orwell.
00:46:00.000 We're doing Alice in Wonderland now, a book that's about perspective, perception,
00:46:06.000 imagination, wonder, levels of being, consciousness itself.
00:46:10.000 We'll be talking about that with Brad.
00:46:12.000 But before that, should we see how my advert for gold worked out?
00:46:17.000 I'd love to.
00:46:18.000 You've created our own wonderland, haven't you?
00:46:20.000 I'd say it's a wonderland.
00:46:21.000 It's a sort of a kind of kingdom of Midas that we're about to enter into.
00:46:25.000 Shall we have a look at it?
00:46:26.000 Because I've not watched it before.
00:46:27.000 Have a look at this.
00:46:28.000 A word from our sponsors, which is also me.
00:46:31.000 Is it me, or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?
00:46:35.000 Wars, pandemics, lies, trickery.
00:46:38.000 My cats keep having kittens.
00:46:39.000 The last one's personal.
00:46:40.000 For those who are in the United States, there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
00:46:45.000 American Heart for Gold make it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.
00:46:51.000 With one phone call, they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.
00:47:01.000 American Hartford Gold is the highest-rated firm in the U.S.
00:47:03.000 with an A-plus rating from the BBB and thousands of satisfied clients.
00:47:08.000 Right now, they will give you up to $5,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.
00:47:14.000 This offer is only for U.S.
00:47:15.000 customers.
00:47:16.000 That's 866-505-8315.
00:47:16.000 Call 866-505-8315.
00:47:16.000 866 505 831 5 that's 866 505 831 5 or simply text brand to 99 88 99
00:47:26.000 Get up to five thousand dollars of silver and protect your future in this crazy crazy world with some solid precious
00:47:33.000 metals literally made in stars
00:47:36.000 Thank you.
00:47:38.000 There you go.
00:47:38.000 That's me doing that thing.
00:47:39.000 That's very good.
00:47:40.000 Did you think so, Gail?
00:47:41.000 Yeah.
00:47:41.000 I wasn't sure about that shot where I was looking off into the middle distance.
00:47:45.000 Oh, you do that quite a lot.
00:47:46.000 That's fine.
00:47:48.000 I could be at that B20 summit.
00:47:49.000 That was great.
00:47:51.000 Yeah?
00:47:51.000 Well, I like the bit where you talked about the IRA 401k, because I know you know a lot about that, don't you?
00:47:56.000 That's what motivated me to do the ad.
00:47:57.000 We've got to do something about the IRA 401k while we still bloody well can.
00:48:02.000 That's what I would advocate for.
00:48:04.000 It's time now for us to pivot dramatically and radically to the world of literature, for us to contemplate together the relevance of the great works of literature that define our culture and our language.
00:48:17.000 It's time, of course, for Books with Brad.
00:48:22.000 Suddenly, a white rabbit with pink eyes ran close by her.
00:48:28.000 Burning with curiosity, she ran across the field after it, and was just in time to see it pop down a large rabbit hole under the hedge.
00:48:37.000 In another moment, down went Alice after it, never once considering how in the world she was to get out again.
00:48:46.000 Hello, and thank you for joining me for our item, Books with Brad, or Books with Brand.
00:48:52.000 That's sort of one of the puns we're playing with.
00:48:53.000 Thanks for joining us, Brad Evans.
00:48:55.000 Always a pleasure.
00:48:57.000 Brad, why do you want to talk about Alice in Wonderland?
00:48:59.000 Why did you choose it for our next book?
00:49:02.000 At a time where we're spellbound by spectacle, what is the relevance of this book?
00:49:09.000 In a sense, regarded really as a children's book, isn't it?
00:49:13.000 Well, I think that's the misconception, right?
00:49:15.000 I think it's a really great question.
00:49:16.000 Why would we read a 19th century children's book to try to make sense of the world today?
00:49:21.000 No, I think, first of all, people forget how much of a radical and revolutionary book Wonderland was when it was first published.
00:49:28.000 It was the first book ever written, so children weren't just simply taught how to misbehave themselves.
00:49:33.000 Children were taught to question, to understand power, and I think that in itself is an important historical moment.
00:49:39.000 Now, to me, the importance of Wonderland, I always ask myself, you know, what is the singularity of a book?
00:49:45.000 And what I mean by that is, what is the guiding question which is at the centre of any book?
00:49:51.000 Wonderland, to me, has the most brilliant question of all.
00:49:54.000 Who am I?
00:49:55.000 And I think that is a question which I think all of us are deeply concerned with every single day.
00:50:01.000 Whether we're talking about our individual selves or we're talking about our collective selves.
00:50:05.000 And how do we actually deal then with what Carroll would call the adventure of life?
00:50:11.000 And how do we deal with understandings of power?
00:50:13.000 How do we deal with hierarchies of power?
00:50:17.000 All of this is completely within this book.
00:50:19.000 Now, you know, I'm reminded, I think it was C.S.
00:50:20.000 Lewis who said, there are no great just children's books.
00:50:25.000 The book has to reach to an adult audience for it also to appeal to us.
00:50:29.000 And I think he's absolutely right.
00:50:30.000 And Virginia Woolf also said, you know, Wonderland was not a book where children learn to become themselves.
00:50:35.000 It's a book where also adults can see the world through the innocent beauty of children's eyes.
00:50:40.000 And I think there is so much to unpack in that book that it's tremendous.
00:50:43.000 Part of its mythic potency, I suppose, is that it's a book about shifting levels and constantly fluctuating perceptions.
00:50:52.000 I feel that when we were talking today about the re-emergence of Trump on the political scene, though in some ways his spectre has been ever-present, kept continually alive by a media that's obsessed with him, even as they hold him in disdain.
00:51:09.000 That as he becomes again, once more, part of the dominant narrative, it seems that he operates as a kind of pole that invites either side of, in my mind, a false dichotomy, to operate at a suspended state of near hysteria, condemning Trump Not acknowledging his ability even as an orator or placing a degree of faith in him as an anti-establishment figure that in my view is not justified by his record in office.
00:51:42.000 So I see more and more That we are living in a fabricated reality, that we are puppeted continually by sets of interests that converge and ultimately require all of us to be sort of suspended in slightly unreal states.
00:52:02.000 So are you saying that Alice, the protagonist, is being subject to these forces as she, I suppose, leaves childhood enters into a solitary world and is confronted by figures
00:52:16.000 all of whom appear to be framed by different types of madness. Is it a book
00:52:22.000 that is somewhat about madness and is it a book that is about dealing with
00:52:27.000 reality stroke realities? Well the reality you know the book begins with
00:52:31.000 Alice kind of She asks this question, what is the purpose of a book without conversation and pictures, right?
00:52:38.000 And that's the history of the book as well.
00:52:39.000 Now, you talk about the illusion.
00:52:42.000 Dialectics is always an illusion, this idea of a dichotomy.
00:52:46.000 It constructs narratives of the world which bear no resemblance to the actual truth of the world.
00:52:51.000 It's just kind of a false illusion.
00:52:53.000 And that's the history of, you know, dialectical thinking more generally, to be kind of technical on this.
00:52:58.000 Now, the brilliance, I think, of Wonderland in terms of it's a real journey this girl takes.
00:53:04.000 She goes through constant existential crises, but the brilliance is she's encountering all these figures who look remarkably different to her.
00:53:13.000 Some of them she can tolerate.
00:53:15.000 Others she'll speak to and get upset by.
00:53:18.000 Others she'll respond to and say, you know what, I'm going to walk away from you.
00:53:22.000 But she needs to have that conversation.
00:53:24.000 You talked about earlier about a unipolar world.
00:53:27.000 Wonderland is the opposite of a unipolar world.
00:53:30.000 It's a world in which difference is allowed to happen.
00:53:33.000 And of course, we might write of this as madness, right?
00:53:37.000 But why is it that a world that's not unipolar seems so mad to us?
00:53:42.000 Now you're right in terms of the constant running theme throughout the book is, and I think it's a question as well, where is the madness located?
00:53:50.000 Now we might often think of course of the Mad Hatter as being this kind of quintessential figure of madness.
00:53:56.000 But he's actually quite a likeable, harmless character in this.
00:53:59.000 And we know, as I was talking to you earlier about, you know, the work of Michel Foucault.
00:54:03.000 Foucault talks about the importance of any narrative of civilization, we always need to identify these mad characters to kind of make us feel more comfortable in our claims of civility.
00:54:15.000 And I think what Alice reveals in this story is the absolute nonsense of those claims as well.
00:54:20.000 You know, the nonsense actually becomes quite liberating because it reveals how mad sometimes the reason and the rationality is of any given society as well.
00:54:29.000 And what passes for normal understanding can also be mad if we just step back and look at the craziness of the world.
00:54:36.000 Yeah, I feel like it's appealing to collapse into subjectivity, to fully believe in my own experience as reality and to deny the reality of others.
00:54:48.000 It's interesting how much the claim of other people's insanity is made in contemporary political life.
00:54:56.000 Trump is a lunatic, that Biden has dementia, that Putin is like Hitler, that we kind of other them socio-psychologically, that we have to see them as operating in an entirely different reality and a reality that is pejorative also.
00:55:18.000 So I suppose that in this book, are you saying that we're invited to look at the the world of Alice in less damning terms?
00:55:26.000 That she meets like, I don't know, the Red Queen, the Hatter, the Cheshire Cat, all sorts of characters that seem sort of mental and that Alice's attitude is one of like Broad acceptance and curiosity, I suppose.
00:55:39.000 She's driven by curiosity rather than certainty.
00:55:42.000 And materialism... One of the things we say a lot on this show is that whether you think you're on the left or the right, you're part of a neoliberal, tyrannical conspiracy that will not allow you any kind of political freedom.
00:55:56.000 You'll be hedged into a framework.
00:55:58.000 And are you saying that Alice's curiosity is a sort of an openness, like in Christianity it says, become as little children, moment to moment, react with wonder to reality?
00:56:11.000 Well, what is ethics if it's not an openness?
00:56:13.000 An openness to unknown characters, to unknown ways of living, and unknown ways of understanding one another.
00:56:19.000 And I think there is something deeply ethical about that book in terms of the journey this girl takes.
00:56:24.000 And she doesn't like all the people.
00:56:26.000 I think that's an important point.
00:56:27.000 Who don't she like?
00:56:28.000 Well, she doesn't like the Mad Hatter by the end of it.
00:56:30.000 She thinks, you know, this guy is a bit too much.
00:56:32.000 I need to walk away from it.
00:56:33.000 It's too intense.
00:56:34.000 It's too overwhelming.
00:56:35.000 And we can often feel like... What, just because of the tea party?
00:56:38.000 Well, I think that the chaos of the Tea Party becomes kind of crazy.
00:56:41.000 And I think there's, there is something I think really important to recognize in all of us.
00:56:46.000 I think that we all are not perfect characters.
00:56:49.000 We all have, you know, difficulties we bring to the world.
00:56:52.000 And I think if that's the, you know, the brilliance I think about this book is we all face existential challenges to our life because of what the world throws at us.
00:56:59.000 But it's how we respond to them and don't get overwhelmed by it.
00:57:02.000 As you say, reach to a more transcendental plane.
00:57:05.000 Now the, you talk about then the transcendental plane.
00:57:08.000 We're living in this world of illusion, but the one thing we can say is it's absolutely bereft of imagination.
00:57:14.000 I mean, imagination of what a better world might look like.
00:57:18.000 And I think that's one of the calling cards of this book, about how can we imagine a different world?
00:57:23.000 Now, there's a real dark side to this when you think about, you know, there's a kind of a subtle gesture in the follow-on book through the looking glass.
00:57:30.000 Well, you're not quite so sure at the beginning whether Alice herself is actually in a mental asylum.
00:57:34.000 Oh my God!
00:57:35.000 So she has this remarkable journey of imagination and society's response is to lock her up, right?
00:57:42.000 And I think that is another lesson.
00:57:44.000 How many imaginative people do we know in history who society believes are too transgressive?
00:57:50.000 So we'd rather lock them away.
00:57:52.000 And I think what we need today is precisely people who might think we're on the side of madness because they actually see the world differently from the accepted norm.
00:58:00.000 The role of the shaman is to transition between levels, levels of reality, to flirt with insanity.
00:58:06.000 There are cultures where madness is treated as semi-divine.
00:58:09.000 I'm not talking about sort of slavering actual madness, people that are a risk to others and themselves, but a lack of certainty.
00:58:16.000 Materialism and rationalism demand a kind of certainty of us.
00:58:19.000 I've had guests on our show before that have said, you know, astrophysicist, famous one, if it cannot be measured, then it isn't there.
00:58:26.000 Well, in a sense, the imagination is about the immeasurable because it has not yet become manifest.
00:58:31.000 It exists in a state of potentiality as most things must before realised.
00:58:35.000 Sometimes what I ponder, Brad, is the fact that we live in such a liminal space of certainty, i.e.
00:58:43.000 that which is known, our epistemological realm, is such a small component of all potential realities that it's negligible.
00:58:52.000 That which we know, compared to that which might be known, is a fraction of all potential realities.
00:58:59.000 So you have to have some sort of interface, or some space for an interface, with that which is unknowable.
00:59:05.000 Particularly if you want to change the world.
00:59:06.000 I suppose like the The dearth of imagination empowers those that are already dominant.
00:59:14.000 If you can't imagine new worlds, if you can't flirt with chaos, if you don't have a relationship with chaos, then order will prevail.
00:59:21.000 The existing order will prevail.
00:59:22.000 Or there will be a sort of a linear progression to more centralized powers.
00:59:26.000 When you see them talk about like, we've got to introduce vaccine passports, even though you can't rationally justify that anymore once it's been admitted that there were no tests on transmission.
00:59:36.000 Well then the power becomes the goal in itself.
00:59:40.000 We are, I believe, seeing a globalist project unfold, a unipolar one, mostly realised through the sort of American manifest destiny ideals.
00:59:50.000 So these In a sense, imagination is a very, very great tool.
00:59:55.000 It's not just the realm of harmless art or art as commodity.
00:59:59.000 It's potentially a weapon against order and a potential for the creation of new orders.
01:00:07.000 And I mean decentralised and democratic ones, before you panic.
01:00:11.000 I think there's a good example of this in terms of, you know, you think about, so first of all, you know, Lewis Carroll was actually a mathematician.
01:00:18.000 Was he?
01:00:19.000 So he's living in a world of kind of certainty, truth, but then he comes up with this, you know, fabulous tale of imagination.
01:00:25.000 And then when you think about, you know, I think the point that you're right in terms of, you know, we need imagination and we need imagination to trump this certainty.
01:00:32.000 But we also from time to time need certainty too, you know, and that's what the important function of the Cheshire Cat is in the story.
01:00:38.000 He's the one who kind of guides Alice and says, look, you can't dwell in this imaginative madness all the time.
01:00:44.000 You need to come back and kind of steer yourself through history.
01:00:48.000 So we need a bit of both.
01:00:49.000 We need the imagination, but we also need guidance from time to time to guide our history.
01:00:54.000 But also, a good example of the craziness of this, you might recall the Hydron Collider experiment.
01:01:01.000 In CERN, of course I do.
01:01:04.000 CERN, baby CERN.
01:01:05.000 Of course I know about it.
01:01:07.000 The attempt to kind of recreate the Big Bang.
01:01:09.000 Now Stephen Hawking came out and said, this is absolutely fucking insane.
01:01:13.000 Right?
01:01:14.000 He says that we've got no idea of the consequences of this.
01:01:17.000 That project was called the Alice Experiment.
01:01:20.000 Right?
01:01:20.000 So, the idea that we could enter this wonderland.
01:01:23.000 Now, Stephen Hawking said this was insane.
01:01:26.000 The scientists involved in this said, well, we're pretty certain there's not going to be any catastrophic event.
01:01:31.000 So that was their response.
01:01:33.000 And that is the power of the technology, the science, which could actually bring the world to its knees.
01:01:38.000 Now that's madness.
01:01:39.000 Yeah, where does rationalism lead us?
01:01:42.000 Even Dadaism as a response to the horrors of the First World War.
01:01:47.000 Is an acknowledgement that we need to invite imagination in, in times of crisis.
01:01:51.000 Rationalism is leading us deeper into the current conflict, the proxy war, as some are calling it, between America and Russia.
01:01:58.000 It's a rational, if you consider the rational economic proposition that governs the actions of the military-industrial complex, that this is merely a rational event.
01:02:11.000 And even something like the initial reporting on those missiles as being like, oh, they're Russian, and then it's revealed, oh no, they're clearly Ukrainian, but there's been enough time for yet more lethal aid to be released.
01:02:23.000 It seems like there is a rational trail that can be pursued there.
01:02:26.000 We're going to be talking more with Brad in a minute on Stay Free AF.
01:02:29.000 That's our membership community that's available on Locals.
01:02:33.000 You can click over to that.
01:02:35.000 In a minute, there's a link in the description and a small fee for participating in that.
01:02:38.000 Before you go anywhere at all though, I want to let you know that we are doing a live event on December the 5th in Gray's, my hometown.
01:02:46.000 Why, the Thameside Theatre, the very first place that I performed and once notably followed through on a fart in, is going to be closed down.
01:02:54.000 Those two incidents are unrelated.
01:02:56.000 It's not because it was ages ago.
01:02:57.000 They've cleaned that up by now and even I have emotionally overcome the shame that I experienced during that.
01:03:02.000 We're going to do a one day event there.
01:03:04.000 We're supporting the campaign to keep that theatre open.
01:03:06.000 Because do you know what?
01:03:07.000 When they were investigating why the Thameside Theatre was being closed down, the activists that are trying to take it over and run it as a community trust, decentralised power, communities running their own assets, literature, art, accessible to ordinary working class people, discovered that the council were...
01:03:22.000 Like a billion quid in debt for extraordinary reasons.
01:03:26.000 This is a chance to join me for a day of activism.
01:03:29.000 Brad's gonna be there, aren't you, Brad?
01:03:30.000 Absolutely, yes.
01:03:31.000 You'll be reading something.
01:03:32.000 You'll read one of your own books.
01:03:33.000 There's a library bit.
01:03:34.000 I'll show you the place where I've done that.
01:03:35.000 I can't show Brad the place I've done that.
01:03:37.000 So, Brad, this is where I've done that, near the... There's a museum in there as well, and there's a Neanderthal, and that's where I did that fart, as a matter of fact.
01:03:44.000 In homage!
01:03:46.000 In homage to an earlier incarnation!
01:03:49.000 That's what I've done.
01:03:50.000 So you can come there.
01:03:51.000 There's a link in the description.
01:03:52.000 It's on the 5th of December, which is a Monday.
01:03:55.000 Come there.
01:03:55.000 It's 22 quid.
01:03:56.000 All the money goes to the Stay Free Foundation, which is an organisation that we run here to make grants and donations to who?
01:04:03.000 None other than junkies and nutters.
01:04:05.000 Where Donald Trump would execute them, we keep them going.
01:04:09.000 Where Lewis Carroll celebrates the fissure that exists between sanity and insanity.
01:04:14.000 We keep them going.
01:04:16.000 We're going to wrap the show up now.
01:04:18.000 Tomorrow we've got Will Harris, who's a brilliant, what would you call him, a farmer?
01:04:23.000 Yeah, I mean, yeah.
01:04:25.000 He might be a brilliant farmer.
01:04:27.000 He's a bloody good farmer.
01:04:28.000 Oh, you should see him farm.
01:04:29.000 I've never seen farming like it.
01:04:30.000 The produce, oh, it's delicious.
01:04:32.000 But also, he's an anti-Bill Gates farmer who's able to articulate why Bill Gates' imperialist project must fail, should fail, and how it lines up with the narratives that we discuss on this show.
01:04:43.000 Also, we're talking to Adam Wagner, who's going to talk about, oh, uh-oh, he's going to be talking about what happened during the pandemic, Gal, and how it was actually It was an atrocity against our human rights and human freedoms, and you know we care about freedom on this show.
01:04:58.000 So, alright, we're going to wrap up now.
01:05:00.000 We're going to carry on on Stay Free AF, where we'll continue with our book club, where we're going to invite you to read Alice in Wonderland.
01:05:05.000 We're going to give you an opportunity to win a piece of art.
01:05:09.000 And also, we'll tell you a little bit more about, I don't know, probably just what I'm feeling.
01:05:12.000 We'll respond to your questions.
01:05:13.000 We've had some wonderful stuff over here.
01:05:14.000 People are talking about the rabbit hole.
01:05:16.000 That's you, Warday.
01:05:17.000 Farmer John talking about, just sort of a general message of support.
01:05:21.000 We're going to wrap up now.
01:05:22.000 We'll see you in a couple of minutes if you're a member of the Stay Free AF community on Locals.
01:05:26.000 Otherwise, see you tomorrow with a farmer.
01:05:28.000 With a farmer?
01:05:29.000 Absolutely.
01:05:30.000 Brilliant farmer.
01:05:31.000 Bloody good farmer!
01:05:32.000 He's been on Joe Rogan, that farmer.
01:05:33.000 He has, yeah.
01:05:34.000 But we knew about him before that, didn't we?
01:05:35.000 We did.
01:05:36.000 We knew about this farmer first.
01:05:37.000 See you tomorrow, or see you in a minute, on Stay Free AF.