Russell Brand is joined by Ron Paul on Tucker Carlson to discuss the possibility of a Black Swan Event happening in the near future. Plus, a look at the Biden impeachment hearing and the potential plea deal for Julian Assange, and a look into why some in the legacy media think Putin is afraid of war, and why Candace Owens thinks Donald Trump is a narcissist. And, of course, there's still time to catch up on Russell's latest podcast, Stay Free With Russell Brand. Stay Free with Russell Brand is on all of the social medias, if you search for Stay Free, you'll find us. Stay Free! Logo by Courtney DeKorte. Theme by Mavus White. Music by PSOVOD and tyops. All rights reserved. No remixes, unless otherwise specified. Used by permission. This episode was produced and edited by Riley Bray. The opinions expressed here are our own and do not necessarily those of our respective employers. We do not own any of the rights to any music used in this episode. If you have any objections, please contact us directly or indirectly through the proper channels. Thank you for any amount you can afford to support this podcast through Paypal or any other means, we do not claim any fees, we are working with a third-party provider. Thanks for supporting this podcasting platform. You can be reached at bit.ly/StayFree with any amount of your time and support is greatly appreciated. - we appreciate the support we can provide you with a good sound quality and access to this podcast. It helps us with the rest of our equipment and support us in any of our marketing opportunities. Thank you! We appreciate your support. , and we appreciate it greatly and your support is appreciated! - it helps us tremendously - thank you, and we really do appreciate it, too much, really really helps us get out there and we hope you can see this podcast out there too much out there in the world. Also, we really appreciate it's a lot of people out there, it really does help us out there. Love you, thank you so much. XOXOmically, Thank you, much appreciate you, really appreciates it, much more than you can do it, really, truly appreciates the support, really means it's not enough, really gets it, truly means it really helps them out.
00:04:31.000Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand and what a day it is for you seekers of truth amidst the deluge of lies.
00:04:41.000Whether you are looking at the periphery of these spaces that people have long said that there are interdimensional Beings dabbling in our power structures, or if you stay within the realms of that which is cosigned, consigned, accessible and sayable, people are beginning to believe that a black swan event is likely.
00:05:04.000Quoting of course, let me know if you know in the chat, AwakendWonders over on Locals.
00:05:14.000On Tucker Carlson, the man some say is the best president that the United States never had, saying that something is happening and I know you feel it too.
00:05:22.000I know you feel that there is something in the air, in the words of Phil Collins.
00:05:27.000So we're going to look at a few stories.
00:05:29.000We're going to look at the Hunter Biden stuff, that hearing, the impeachment hearing stuff.
00:05:34.000We're going to look at the potential that there may be a plea deal available for Julian Assange, although that's something his lawyers are not aware of.
00:05:43.000We're going to have a good look at the Supreme Court's handling of the Biden administration's pressure on social media sites.
00:05:52.000Now, on YouTube, we'll be there for about the first 15 minutes Or so, and then we will be wading into that sweet stream of freedom, where we will communicate openly and honestly about what we believe.
00:06:06.000So if you watch us on YouTube, we'll be there for about 15 minutes, then we're going to, um, we're going to migrate, as one day we will all have to, to spaces where free speech is possible.
00:06:17.000We've got a lot to talk about, like when it comes to Freedom of Information Act requests and how that's necessary for journalism these days, but even as a private citizen, an individual like me, albeit one that is, I pray that you see me this way, involved in the independent media and truth movement, a new movement that hopes to oppose this new tendency towards a phrase I heard recently, and let me know if you know where this phrase come from, techno-feudalism.
00:06:42.000That what's being created is a top-down system of global government where the rest of us are regarded as digital surface.
00:06:50.000Where our biometric data is corralled and controlled.
00:07:47.000It's good for you and every increasing volume of medical research is suggesting specific ways in which vitamin D can help protect against serious conditions.
00:08:39.000We asked you what story you wanted us to lead on and of course you said Ron Paul's one in a tucker of an upcoming black swan uh or we asked black sawn event but you deduced using your collective and individual intellect.
00:08:54.000I mean some people might have seen that and gone A black swan event?
00:09:00.000But nevertheless, we're going to cover that in a minute and in some detail too.
00:09:05.000Also, we're going to have another look at that, you know that New York Times story, they're saying like why the deep state are fantastic?
00:09:11.000This is brilliant because we're beginning to understand now that the New York Times are in a sense a portion of the establishment.
00:09:18.000I don't just mean as a legacy media amplifier, No, I mean in so much as they participated in the investigations that led to the arrest to buddy-boy Tashera, or Jack Tashera, as his actual name is, the whistleblower.
00:09:30.000And two, they collaborated with the CIA in bringing us the story about CIA bases being in Ukraine for the last 10 years, which is, it seems, another provocation of Putin.
00:09:40.000There were all sorts of operations going on that were absolutely fascinating and fantastic, so we've got some good stories.
00:09:46.000But first, Let's have a look at, you know, well, it's a story that won't astonish you.
00:09:53.000It's the world's most powerful man wandering about.
00:09:56.000Biden wanders off stage after spotting a baby in the crowd.
00:10:36.000He ought to be able to read body language, I'd say, a little better.
00:10:39.000That baby's body language My mind is telling me yes, but my body is telling me no!
00:10:45.000It didn't look good, did it, from a body language perspective.
00:10:48.000Let's have a look at his latest wanderings before getting into the Assange story, this Black Swan event, New York Times and legacy media in general, but specifically the New York Times, being a paid up member of the establishment, doing their bidding, crushing dissent, Normalizing their agenda on a daily basis but here's Biden's latest wonder.
00:11:09.000Look at the medical professional sort of like clocking it.
00:11:12.000We have made so much progress together but we know that there is still work to be done which is why we are going to... Excuse me!
00:11:23.000And you know that we've been, you've been hearing a lot about TikTok and what a threat TikTok is.
00:11:30.000Well that TikTok is, that TikTok threat is entirely Hypothetical!
00:11:35.000US intelligence has produced no evidence that the popular social media site has ever coordinated with Beijing.
00:11:40.000We have nothing to add the FBI said when asked for evidence of TikTok's actual threat.
00:11:45.000And based on what Elon Musk said yesterday, if there was FBI evidence it would have been deleted because they keep deleting all of their files that relate to significant issues.
00:11:54.000And remember that when we talk about A country like Russia being sort of anti-democratic and criminal.
00:12:01.000Criminal because of their illegal invasions that are eerily similar to state-sponsored invasions conducted by the partners of the United States of America under the flag of your nation but under the agenda of the deep state that the New York Times would tell you are super friendly.
00:12:16.000One of the things they always point to is the lack of free press.
00:12:19.000Well remember Julian Assange is still not Free!
00:12:23.000Lara Brand, check out anything that you see posted twice.
00:12:27.000Consider that spam and sort it out for me.
00:12:46.000This is, of course, reporting in the Guardian legacy media outlet that somewhat abandoned Julian Assange in spite of benefiting significantly from much of his reporting.
00:12:56.000government is reported to be considering a plea deal to offer Julian Assange, allowing him to admit to a misdemeanor, but his lawyers say they've yet been given no indication.
00:13:05.000Washington intends to change its approach.
00:13:07.000The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the U.S.
00:13:10.000Justice Department was looking at ways to cut short the long-caught battle of the WikiLeaks founder against extradition to the U.S.
00:13:18.000on espionage charges for the publication 14 years ago.
00:13:21.000documents related to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.
00:13:26.000Documents of course exposed a good deal of wrongdoing and remember the Pentagon cannot prove that it endangered a single US service personnel.
00:13:34.000We reported extensively on the hearing to be granted an appeal which we've not heard a result of and I don't know whether that's a positive thing or not.
00:13:44.000Presumably it means it's at least being considered.
00:13:48.000The report said a plan under consideration would be to drop the current 18 charges under the Espionage Act if Assange pleaded guilty to mishandling classified documents and misdemeanor offence.
00:13:58.000Assange would be able to enter the plea remotely from London, would likely to be free soon after the deal was agreed.
00:14:03.000He's already done five years in the UK.
00:14:05.000However, Assange's legal team said they're not aware of a change in the prosecution strategy.
00:14:09.000Assange's extradition would be politically difficult for the Biden administration, particularly in an election year.
00:14:14.000The previous Democratic administration under Barack Obama ultimately decided not to charge Assange because of fears that doing so would infringe First Amendment rights, guaranteeing freedom of the press.
00:14:31.000Remember, we have to do the video, the 30 seconds.
00:14:32.000Why don't we regulate the time that that happens?
00:14:34.000Let's always do it in the first 10 minutes.
00:14:36.000Okay, let's have a look at the legacy media in Australia reporting on that.
00:14:40.000Lawyers for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange say they've been given no indication US authorities are... Basically, I just like watching this guy because I think he talks in an unusual way.
00:14:49.000I like it that that news program's logo is a sort of spring, not a letter or a word.
00:14:54.000I wouldn't know what to call that show.
00:14:56.000And I sort of like the way that this guy talks.
00:14:58.000...considering a possible plea deal following a report in the Wall Street Journal.
00:15:03.000It says Julian Assange could plead guilty to a reduced charge of mishandling classified information...
00:15:11.000To Hunter Biden's congressional hearing relating to Joe Biden's impeachment.
00:15:17.000Well I suppose in this way, haven't we come to accept as normal total corruption?
00:15:24.000While we may be beginning to suspect that a Biden impeachment on the basis of granting favours to family members that are beyond the remit of his political position and yet Use that position as an advantage is a type of corruption.
00:15:38.000Isn't it the type of corruption that we're becoming inured to, inoculated from, as if there were a successful vaccine that did what it said on the tin and was not a kind of renegade aluminium cocktail doing God alone knows what.
00:15:54.000Isn't it extraordinary that we've come to accept that Nancy Pelosi's ability to profit, seeming ability to profit, from information that she surely must have access to while sitting on regulatory bodies within Congress that oversee what happens on big tech platforms and Paul Pelosi's eventual investments are That's a kind of corruption isn't it?
00:16:19.000I mean ideally wouldn't we take money out of politics altogether?
00:16:24.000I mean ideally wouldn't the business of politics in your country and mine and all nations be built upon the principle of freedom from hypocrisy and corruption with service as the highest principle?
00:16:37.000So the very fact But the Hunter Biden story, sort of, it seems fascinating but also there's a degree of fear to it because it's just another example of corruption in a corrupt system.
00:16:51.000I'm not down for a second that Joe Biden's position benefited Hunter Biden's business dealings.
00:16:56.000I can't imagine what the hell What he was doing at Burisma, essentially.
00:17:02.000What was going on at Burisma that legitimized his position?
00:17:09.000But what Glenn Greenwald's focusing on in particular was the career of AOC.
00:17:16.000Who, at the offset, was an individual that I suppose many people would have thought, wow, this is a person that's a waiter, an ordinary person, a person that's risen up to be a member of the political class that will represent ordinary people.
00:17:35.000How she's become a demonstrable acolyte and clear voice for the Pi establishment is astonishing and extraordinary to see.
00:17:44.000Look at their passion, look at their vim, look at their vigour.
00:17:47.000I believe the fact that he was sitting with me while I was putting together a business deal... Did you witness the president commit a crime?
00:19:45.000He wore the mask walking into the house over site impeachment hearing which centers on allegations Biden
00:19:50.000benefited from his son hunters business deal Mmm whole thing's pretty theatrical here is Tony Bob Alinsky
00:19:56.000Tony Bob Bob Alinsky gave his transcribed interview on February 28th and lied throughout his testimony
00:20:02.000Here's just one egregious example of hunters perjury He lied to the committee
00:20:08.000On important details concerning his money demands and threats to CFC in text messages on July 30th and 31st
00:20:16.0002017 He leveraged his father's presence next to him in that infamous text to strong-arm CFC to paying Hunter immediately.
00:20:26.000Jim Biden also lied extensively throughout his transcribed interview on February 21st and perjured himself.
00:20:32.000Now, I watch an event like this and it's fascinating and it's clear to me, at least, that whatever the result of these investigations, there are some dubious relationships going on.
00:20:40.000But does this seem to you, too, to be a kind of theatrical distraction from something much deeper, something much more potent and powerful?
00:20:51.000When Ron Paul says there will be a Black Swan event, doesn't there seem to be an almost Jungian resonance to that, something deeply understood, something you've been aware of for a long, long time, something we're being ushered towards, whether it's in your country, whether it's in my country, whether it's in those Nordic lands of Scandinavia where happiness is at an all-time high, Whether it's in the country of the United States of America, where little rascals gangs conduct real robberies in some nostalgic echo of that which was once pastiche, becoming real, becoming peculiar, that which was once light, becoming dark.
00:21:32.000What does Ron Paul mean when he says a black swan event?
00:21:39.000Because this is no longer the realm of conjecture and metaphysical conspiracy theory.
00:21:47.000We're aware that we're continually provoking a nuclear superpower into increasing conflict.
00:21:52.000We're aware that in the volatile region of the Middle East there are atrocities and abominations taking place all around.
00:22:00.000We know too of the looming threat of an antagonised China.
00:22:06.000Is it going to be a geopolitical military provocation that leads us towards this Black Swan event?
00:22:12.000Now that we've had our first taste of a pandemic, an event which was extraordinary, has exposed a good deal of systemic corruption, an event that appears to have in some ways been, if not planned, then certainly rehearsed, a medication that's been more controversial than Any medicine that I can remember, other than those that have rightly been subject to considerable and rigorous inquiry.
00:22:49.000What is it that slouches towards Bethlehem to be born now?
00:22:54.000Let's have a look at Ron Paul and then for the rest of the show we're going to look at the New York Times and their celebration of the deep state and the legacy media's relationship with the deep state.
00:23:06.000And the numerous, anonymous, anodyne-sounding agencies that crush dissent on behalf of the deep state.
00:23:14.000And the necessity that we not only remain informed and educated, but that we awaken on some profound level.
00:23:22.000That we are able to transcend the traps that are even now being laid.
00:23:27.000Let's have a look at this Black Swan event first of all, and we'll get into it.
00:23:30.000I think we're reaching this point where some sudden thing is going to happen.
00:23:35.000I believe in that theory of the black swan.
00:24:11.000You have to be able to tell them what they have to do.
00:24:16.000One is to protect the money, one is to protect your wealth.
00:24:19.000But when I go through this, when people really want to know some details
00:24:24.000and I get a little more in detail, I said, but really, really the most important thing you do
00:24:30.000is study and understand what's going on.
00:24:35.000Because if you come away from that and you're able to accumulate a lot and get by and you have your guns and you have stored food and all that, it's not going to work.
00:24:46.000You have to understand what's happening.
00:24:52.000A lot of you are saying that destabilizing the population through what you refer to as the migrant crisis.
00:24:59.000A lot of you are referring to potential escalating wars and pandemics.
00:25:04.000In a minute we'll be looking at the New York Times' celebration of the deep state where they attempt to normalise, and to be fair of course there are many people that work at new deep state type agencies, they're of course human beings, I'm not suggesting that it's a men in black scenario where they're pulled down from the stars and from the sky somewhere, but if you're normalising somebody who works at the FDA you better mention some of the Concerns of the last few years.
00:25:29.000You better mention the revolving door between the FDA and Moderna.
00:25:32.000You better mention many people's cynicism and outright scepticism and rage around events in the pandemic and the failure to report on subjects as diverse as adverse events and excess deaths.
00:25:42.000If you're watching us on YouTube we're going to be there for another couple of minutes and I'm going to need you to click the link in the description and join us in the stream of freedom where we can speak a little more clearly and a little more deeply about the matters that may come to define our lives In the coming years.
00:25:58.000Let Ron, dear Ron though, have his final words.
00:26:32.000Are you observing a decrease in your personal liberty that's apparently for your safety and security?
00:26:39.000And who sets the table for this increasing authoritarianism?
00:26:42.000Why it's the legacy media, of course, It's those blue chip brands like the New York Times that will call any dissenting voice a conspiracy theorist that will come down hard in favor of the CIA or the FDA or NATO, any of those organizations.
00:27:00.000The New York Times has gone so far in a new modern media landscape to mimic the former content of groups like Vice and make kind of folksy, homey, homespun, Accessible Casey Nasdaq style.
00:27:14.000Hey on the deep state great style video.
00:27:34.000It could have so much meaning, couldn't it?
00:27:36.000It could be just something to pop on top of your dome to show that you're awakened yet, or it could be, remember what those campaigners were wearing a few years ago in your nation.
00:27:45.000Remember, you get additional content if you become an Awakened Wonder.
00:27:48.000We make exclusive videos every week on a variety of subjects, often conspiracy theories, and you join us live with our fantastic guests.
00:27:56.000Neil Oliver, he's on Rumble tomorrow, but you could have joined him live yesterday.
00:28:02.000Now, Let's have a look at how the New York Times handle the tricky job of making people love, I don't know, the CIA and the FBI.
00:28:12.000I mean, remember, we're living at a time now where many people are deeply cynical about Big Pharma, deeply cynical about the...
00:28:19.000Intentions and agenda of the health industry, but they are happy to create and then leap upon a bandwagon of undeserved enthusiasm for the deep state.
00:28:32.000And before we begin, I want to remind you that when Jack Teixeira, the whistleblower, was arrested, the New York Times participated in the investigation and almost the arrest of a whistleblower.
00:28:43.000A man who's now, of course, in prison.
00:28:45.000When it came to reporting on CIA bases in the Ukraine, the New York Times admitted it was a story they'd known about for some time, but only reported on it with the complicity of the deep state.
00:28:55.000So let me know in the chat why you think they are shilling for the deep state, propagandizing the deep state, normalizing the deep state, and of course condemning anyone who has any questions about the deep state.
00:29:57.000This message of massive distrust of institutions is becoming immersive and powerful.
00:30:04.000Remember how you felt during the pandemic when you had your suspicions about the medications and the measures that were being taken and the peculiar three-letter organizations that were being granted unprecedented authority?
00:30:16.000Well, look at what's transpired in the intervening years.
00:31:08.000Just remember what's going on in the world right now, what the CIA's role has been in the escalation of the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, and how the New York Times has reported, or rather, not reported on that.
00:31:21.000Consider still the New York Times position on a journalist like Julian Assange, who as yet remains incarcerated.
00:31:28.000Consider that even Bobby Kennedy, I mean even Bobby Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy is an out there guy, is saying that the CIA, the FBI, they should be dismantled, that many of the figures that have arisen in spaces like this one, Vivek Ramaswamy, say that the CIA should be disbanded, you should get rid of the FBI, that these organizations no longer claim to work for the people.
00:31:48.000They work for the establishment, for the blob as many would call them, ensuring that you remain unawakened.
00:31:54.000And look at how the New York Times, and believe me, there are comparable organizations in our nation that cooperate with the government, that corroborate the government's lies.
00:32:04.000Organizations and agencies funded by your government that observe dissenting voices, that track information on dissenting voices, that Participate and even coordinate takedowns on dissenting voices.
00:32:17.000Personal experience and because of Freedom of Information Act requests that even now are dazzling and you're gonna have to wait and see those revelations as they come.
00:32:34.000In search of the people behind this threatening entity.
00:32:41.000I mean, of course there's human beings.
00:32:44.000Like, have you seen that film that's out at the moment, Zone of Interest, where it takes, like, Hermann Hesse, or I think it's Hermann Hesse, isn't it?
00:32:52.000Not Hermann Hesse, the writer of Siddhartha, a brilliant and kindly gentleman.
00:32:55.000Where it takes Rudolf Hesse, who is a senior Nazi working and at and overseeing Auschwitz, And shows how he was able to live a normal life in the shadow of death, destruction, and indeed genocide.
00:33:11.000If you were to focus on the normal, ordinary details of a Nazi or a genocidal lunatic, you would find Flavours of humanity amidst them.
00:33:22.000I'm certainly not comparing these, you know, essentially bureaucrats.
00:33:25.000There's a bureaucratic component to the CIA.
00:33:27.000Martin Goury worked for the CIA as an analyst and it's his brilliant book, The Revolt of the Public, that we continually turn to when understanding how they've got into such a mess because independent media and social media spaces mean they cannot control the narrative anymore because we're all connected.
00:33:43.000That's why they're working so hard to control these spaces.
00:34:05.000Hannah Arendt's masterpiece, The Banality of Evil, focuses precisely on this.
00:34:10.000I'm not suggesting that this lovely guy with all his wonks and lanyards and bits and bobs is anything other than a perfectly likeable bureaucrat.
00:34:20.000The fact is is that the CIA is an extraordinary and nebulous organization where there's probably no one individual that has any understanding or appreciation of exactly what's going on there.
00:34:29.000But I'll tell you what I believe is going on there.
00:34:32.000They're controlling the media, they're infiltrating social media, they're managing legacy media.
00:34:36.000They're ensuring that stories don't reach you that would make you non-compliant and disobedient.
00:34:41.000The very fact that there's people that... Look at this lady!
00:34:53.000Of course people are ultimately beautiful.
00:34:56.000That is the great promise that the spiritual life offers us.
00:34:59.000And even if you're just a humanitarian or a materialist, you know that everybody has beauty in them.
00:35:04.000If you don't believe that, then what hope is there for any of us?
00:35:06.000But the New York Times going out of its way to say, look at the... Donald Trump's out of his mind thinking that the deep state's a threat to democracy.
00:35:17.000Why are we in a war, or at least a proxy war now, Defending Ukrainian democracy when they don't have elections, when they jail dissenters, Gonzalo Lira, died in prison, American journalist, when they've centralised all of their media, when they're doing deals with BlackRock and JPMorgan.
00:35:33.000That's the democracy that your tax dollars are supporting?
00:35:36.000No wonder the New York Times is working so hard to ensure that you remain compliant.
00:35:41.000And all the chattering classes and Manhattan folks, did you see that piece about the deep state?
00:36:34.000I'm saying that what part of what propaganda does is it amplifies irrelevant detail to distract you from the fact that even that Environmental Protection Agency, let's look at what their role was in the East Palestine train crash.
00:36:54.000How does it ensure that the needs of ordinary people are met and not compromised by a globalist agenda to use climate change which, whether you believe it's a real threat or not, is doubtlessly being used by globalist elites to impose measures that will curtail the freedom of individuals.
00:37:09.000No one's suggesting that those 15-minute cities will affect people that live on their own private archipelagos
00:38:08.000What was the institutionalized corruption?
00:38:10.000What was the relationship between big pharma and family doctors who've been further impaired since the pandemic era?
00:38:17.000How was it that just one family and one organization, the Sacklers and Purdue, were demonized when this was a situation that should have told us once and for all, never trust the pharmaceutical industry.
00:38:52.000What's the 650 million deal that's been done in the UK with AstraZeneca while there are cases going on that suggest that maybe people died as a result of that product?
00:39:11.000But we should not be surprised that the New York Times participate in a project like that because you know how they participated in the arrest of Jack Teixeira.
00:39:26.000Was he really just a bit of a kid bragging in a chat room about sensitive information?
00:39:31.000Certainly the New York Times participated in the takedown that has led to his incarceration.
00:39:37.000In April, the New York Times publicly identified the individual who allegedly leaked Pentagon documents exposing U.S.
00:39:43.000government lies about the Ukraine war leading to his arrest.
00:39:47.000The Times, working with the state-funded propaganda clearinghouse Bellingcat, you guys all heard of that, right?
00:39:53.000Publicly revealed the identity of Jack Teixeira, or as we call him, Buddy Boy Teixeira, for no reason at all, because it certainly isn't his actual name.
00:40:01.000A 21 year old, if you've ever seen pictures of this guy, he looks like about 9.
00:40:05.00021 year old Air National Guard member.
00:40:07.000We won't find many stories on Aaron Bushnell, will you?
00:40:10.000Whose image and video has been scraped from the internet, and who do you think's facilitating that?
00:40:19.000Who do you think's doing the hard, expensive work?
00:40:22.000of cleaning up the internet of a story where a service person a member set fire to himself in protest of an American well if it does not call it an American conflict but a conflict that would not be taking place without American arms.
00:40:43.000NATO troops are on the ground in Ukraine.
00:40:45.000This takes the complicity of the US media in the crimes of US imperialism to an entirely new level.
00:40:51.000It has become an active co-partner with the government in preventing the development of an informed public opinion that could place restraints on the preparation, conduct and escalation of war.
00:41:01.000That's what the legacy media has to do.
00:41:04.000For the Times to publicly take actions that led directly to the arrest of a source of information vital to the public interest marks a milestone in the degeneration of the American press into an appendage of the state.
00:41:16.000Anyone with information exposing criminal wrongdoing by the government cannot go to the New York Times, Washington Post or other major U.S.
00:41:22.000media outlets for fear of simply being handed over to the police Or FBI.
00:41:27.000And remember, too, the story about the CIA bases inside Ukraine that have been there for 10 years, involved and engaging in acts of provocation against Russia.
00:41:39.000The history of that conflict is complicated.
00:41:42.000Certainly, though, the 2014 coup was a significant moment.
00:41:45.000Certainly the breach of pledges not to impede on former Soviet territories is significant, and no doubt Putin's own imperialist agenda is a factor worth considering, but the legacy media have got that angle covered.
00:41:59.000And if what you seek and what you desire is peace, don't you have an obligation to report on significant details like the fact that Boris Johnson, then Prime Minister of the UK, scuppered a provisional deal between Zelensky and Putin, was it two years ago now?
00:42:21.000So, on the weekend of the second anniversary of the war, the New York Times published a lengthy article revealing that the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24th, 2022 was instigated by a systematic and widespread campaign of military intelligence aggression on the part of the United States.
00:42:37.000The article details long-standing Central Intelligence Agency operations in Ukraine, in which the agency sponsored and built up the Ukrainian Military Intelligence Agency, HER, using it as a weapon of spying, assassination and provocation directed against Russia from on the decade.
00:42:50.000The Times article, check this out, this is the bit that's important.
00:42:54.000...is not so much an exposure as a controlled release of information.
00:42:58.000The US newspaper of record reports that the two authors of the piece, Adam Entis and Michael Schwarz, conducted more than 200 interviews with current and former officials in Ukraine, elsewhere in Europe, and in the States.
00:43:10.000This activity could hardly have taken place without the knowledge, permission, and even encouragement of the CIA.
00:43:16.000Oh, one wonder why they're so friendly and upbeat about the deep state.
00:43:19.000As well as the Zelensky regime and Ukrainian intelligence.
00:43:22.000By reporting the virtual control of the Ukrainian regime by the US military intelligence apparatus, The Times is seeking to pressure the Republicans to support the war funding.
00:43:31.000So even there, there's an agenda that's sort of slightly...
00:43:35.000Off-key, nefarious, insidious, I suppose is the correct word.
00:43:39.000In order to get Republican support for further funding for that war, they said, well look, you know, we're involved in this thing.
00:43:49.000It's arguing that this money is not going to a foreign government in a foreign war, thousands of miles from US borders, but to a subcontractor of American imperialism, waging an American war ...in which US personnel are deeply and directly engaged.
00:44:05.000That's the way that the legacy media operates.
00:44:07.000This is where the cartilage is of the interconnection between the state, private organizations crushing dissent online, you're aware of that, state intervention and intercession into our communications, and a globalist agenda that could lead to the very Black Swan event that Ron Paul is talking about.
00:44:28.000Okay, guys, we're gonna have a little look at... In fact, I want to let you know about something about our partners.
00:44:33.000Then I'm gonna show... Then we're gonna look at the Supreme Court thing that's going on at the moment.
00:44:38.000It's absolutely fantastic, fascinating, and you'll love it.
00:44:41.000Then we've got some really great stories about real-life little rascals.
00:44:45.000They're kids conducting bank robberies.
00:44:48.000You may have noticed that I get pretty passionate when it comes to what I'm reporting about.
00:44:54.000That's still in my blood because when I cleanse my skin, I use the products of Charlize.
00:44:59.000Charlize is run by a woman called Charlene, a good, damn fine Christian woman over in your country who's herself been subject to Biden administration intervention.
00:45:09.000By using her fantastic products that make you look younger, you are sticking one to the man.
00:45:15.000These products are fantastic and you know we need partners like Charlize because we are under constant attack.
00:45:21.000Now this cleanser is free from toxins in a way that other cosmetics are not.
00:45:26.000They've got stuff called phthalates in them.
00:45:27.000If you're a man and you care about reproduction, And the downstairs swimmers, this is the product you should be using because a lot of facial cleansers, especially cheap ones, are full of toxins and phthalates that can potentially reduce your testosterone, can potentially be introducing phthalates into your system, affecting your reproductive health.
00:46:25.000You can get 25% off this, so please go charlies.beauty forward slash brand Get yourself some of these products and let our partners know that our work here is reaching people and is effective as well as making yourself beautiful and potent because we are being censored, you are being censored and any attempts to prevent censorship are of course
00:46:47.000Being fought seriously and severely within the Supreme Court.
00:46:52.000It seems that they're likely to reject an effort to limit the federal government from pressuring social media companies.
00:46:57.000So how are government, big tech and big academia working so hard right now to silence you?
00:47:03.000Wouldn't you like someone just to do a deep dive into this and explain it to you?
00:47:09.000We're going to have some fun together.
00:47:11.000We're going to look at tumbling population levels.
00:47:12.000We're going to have a laugh about some bank robberies being done by kids.
00:47:15.000And we are going to give you an opportunity to get one month free in our movement as a member of our community opposing the forces that we talk about regularly.
00:47:33.000The Supreme Court are probably going to reject an attempt to limit how much the federal government
00:47:39.000can pressure social media when it comes to censorship.
00:47:42.000So how are big government, big tech, and big academia teaming up to silence you?
00:47:50.000For a minute it seemed like the conduct of the government during the pandemic period was to be scrutinized and ultimately condemned by the Supreme Court, but of course that's not going to happen.
00:48:00.000Sometimes you hear about the Supreme Court seeming to reject the use of the judiciary as a weapon, but ultimately Ultimately, I suppose, it's an institution that's within American government and therefore largely supportive of centralized powers.
00:48:12.000It's not ultimately a system that's going to empower people to start overthrowing stuff and creating new systems of government, is it?
00:48:20.000So let's have a look at this story together, how it's being reported on the legacy media, and then let's look at at least three components of the censorship industrial complex, notably the state and the government And even though this is a Republican-sponsored endeavour, look at how it's being quashed.
00:48:34.000Then let's look at big tech companies and how they've become more compliant and the manoeuvring they're having to do to remain in the favourable conditions that they need to be in, particularly in your country, America.
00:48:44.000And finally, let's look at how big academia functions in this space as well, to create an inescapable orb of constant censorship and control that we're all just trying to live within as if it's normal.
00:48:54.000The Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday on social media censorship claims against the government.
00:48:59.000The court seemed likely to reject a bid by two GOP-led states to restrict the federal government from urging social media companies to restrict misleading posts or disinformation on their platforms, unless there is a threat of retribution.
00:49:14.000At issue, Republican AGs of Missouri and Louisiana brought that case along with several individuals who claimed that platforms like Facebook suppressed their views against vaccines and lockdowns during the pandemic at the government's demand.
00:49:26.000The court voiced more sympathy with the administration's defense during yesterday's arguments across a broad spectrum of those justices.
00:49:34.000The justices questioned whether any plaintiffs suffered harms that gave them a right to sue and they expressed skepticism that the government's interactions with social media companies amounted to official restraint.
00:49:46.000So they are saying that the government will be able to continue to pressure social media companies.
00:49:51.000Companies, even though we know now that there was a lot of true information that was censored, even though we know now that we live in a curated reality where Google, for example, can amplify particular stories and news feeds, where you can be censored and shut down, where true information can be excluded.
00:50:06.000Essentially, we are in a continual 360 programming simulation that now seems less likely than ever to be penetrated by alternative sources of information.
00:50:17.000So that's pretty significant, particularly if you're aware of the recent story that the New York Times published saying, the Deep State are great, they're just people like you and me, which is a kind of inversion of that film Zone of Interest, sort of saying, well, he just lived next to the Auschwitz, he was alright really, rather than, this is a bizarre concoction, something that we shouldn't accommodate and put up with.
00:50:37.000It's treating Facebook and these other platforms like they're subordinates.
00:50:43.000Would you do that to the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal or the Associated Press or any other big newspaper or wire service?
00:50:53.000They are eagerly on board with the projects of the establishment and have functioned perhaps for their entire history as vassals of the establishment social media because of its chaotic expanse for a moment and perhaps still in some beautiful dream could be a place where truth Sometimes inadvertently can reach large numbers of people.
00:51:12.000It certainly makes us disobedient and less compliant when you can feel and sense immediate pushback on any propagandist endeavor.
00:51:20.000But what this Supreme Court ruling or likely ruling means is that the government will be able to continue to And that's in addition to all these additional measures that we're seeing around the world.
00:51:38.000Whatever Canada are passing this week, who knows?
00:51:40.000Our country, the UK, with their online safety bill.
00:51:43.000All of these tools are essentially the hands that mould our understanding of reality.
00:51:49.000And any attempts at getting hands off my version of reality is being strongly resisted.
00:51:53.000There's a problem if the government is engaged in coercion, but if it stays on the persuasion side of the line and all we're talking about is government speech.
00:52:00.000I was merely persuading you to censor this information.
00:52:03.000Would you mind awfully censoring all that information?
00:52:06.000Remember Elon Musk has revealed that the FBI had some device that after two weeks eliminates and deletes, obliterating all of their interactions with X. Like when he revealed all that, what was then known as the Twitter files, Justice Jackson?
00:52:19.000It was like, oh, the FBI have been getting involved and saying, hey, you should censor that, you should amplify
00:52:53.000My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in a significant way.
00:52:58.000As he says, that is quite literally the entire point of the First Amendment, the entire Bill of Rights.
00:53:03.000The point of the Bill of Rights is to ensure that big government doesn't encroach into the individual freedom of, in this case, Americans.
00:53:09.000But some brilliant principles are found there, that government is meant to be a unit and system of service, not a system of control.
00:53:15.000And even as I say that out loud, it's obviously bloody ridiculous, because otherwise none of this stuff will be happening.
00:53:20.000I mean, none of these things would be top secret.
00:53:22.000We wouldn't feel like we're in the middle of sort of an advanced agenda to centralise global power and prohibit us from accessing the information required to even argue against this increasingly, seemingly inevitable process.
00:53:34.000I mean, what would you have the government do?
00:53:37.000I've heard you say a couple of times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it, is not going to get it done.
00:53:48.000It's not like government's a victim in some way.
00:53:50.000Poor old government, just trying to get on and censor people and protect and serve.
00:53:56.000There's also some strange language around children there.
00:53:59.000I'm trying to work out what the dynamic is.
00:54:01.000And I suppose what the dynamic continually is, is to present the exploitation of powerful institutions as their kind of weary attempts to protect and help us.
00:54:11.000And Donald Trump and Elon Musk and Tucker Carlson or whoever it is this week are getting in the way of the government's attempt to just Help us to death!
00:54:19.000And so I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country and you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging... That's amazing.
00:54:36.000I don't want to hurt you but you're making me hurt you.
00:54:40.000They have a duty to sort of override our freedom.
00:54:42.000Some people would say that even if you're wrong about something, you should have the right to be wrong.
00:54:47.000There are certain rules and regulations that most of us appreciate and understand to the degree where they could almost be regarded as universal.
00:54:53.000Don't harm other people, don't take other people's property.
00:54:56.000The kind of things that we all have a sort of sense of as being moral and ethical values which could of course be limitlessly debated.
00:55:02.000But what we don't really need is a government usurping our own individual will, kind of colonizing our minds and controlling our realities and then sort of asking for a payment.
00:55:27.000Because I'm really worried about that.
00:55:30.000Because you've got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government's perspective, and you're saying that the government can't interact.
00:55:45.000All of this prevarication and entervisigating around the idea of how much pressure or whatever euphemism they want to use to imply pressure and control is extracting a very important piece of information.
00:55:56.000This pertains to the coronavirus period where they were censoring information in retrospect That was century stuff.
00:56:39.000No weird mad profits for Pfizer and Moderna.
00:56:42.000Definitely aren't legal cases now with Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca.
00:56:45.000So they're continuing, even though the body of evidence is, they were wrong to have done it.
00:56:50.000They've lost the argument and now they're trying to double down on the control.
00:56:53.000And of course that's not a coincidence, that's why.
00:56:56.000Because now they're worried, oh no look, what happened was is people were telling the truth at the time that we were incorrect and that will continue to happen.
00:57:05.000Whether it's wars or the next time we try to say everyone get in your house for, I don't know, is it a solar flare?
00:57:43.000Giving power to unelected officials who remain in power no matter what administration seizes the throne for a moment only to implement the exact same agenda is not a system of government that any of us should be accepting.
00:57:56.000And we know that now, so they're just going to censor the conversation that we're all having.
00:58:00.000The justices seem skeptical of the idea that by alerting social media companies to disinformation, the government was somehow coercing them.
00:58:09.000They didn't see the evidence for that, and they said there should be a place for government officials to go to platforms and talk about harmful content, as long as they weren't, again, using their powers to coerce these companies, because that would violate the First Amendment.
00:58:32.000Anyway, I was just wondering if you'd send us out all of this information that doesn't lead to vast profits for pharmaceutical companies and the ability to regulate.
00:58:43.000I want you to think about my idiosyncrasies and quirks as an individual. Not the fact that I'm an agent of
00:58:47.000the state that can control and shut you down and can demand taxes and can use
00:58:52.000law to control criminalize and kill you actually if it comes to it. They're
00:58:57.000not your friend. The system is not your friend. This is oppression and tyranny
00:59:01.000as always presented as normal and helpful. The repercussions of a
00:59:06.000ruling could be far reaching as the nation heads into a contentious election.
00:59:10.000We expect a ruling on the case sometime in June.
00:59:14.000That's significant as well because obviously they are anticipating the requirement to control and censor information in the build-up to the next election in the event that they can't put Donald Trump in jail.
00:59:24.000Now whether or not you believe Donald Trump is the solution to a nation's ills or not, the fact is the establishment seem Hell-bent on controlling and imprisoning Donald Trump, and even more significantly, in my view, the constituency that he represents of hugely dissatisfied people that are rejecting the neoliberal project and demanding freedom, be closer to home, and with that, at least, I agree with them entirely.
00:59:46.000Let's have a look at a legacy media take on this, just in case we start thinking that the government's out to oppress us, and we need that realisation somehow diluted by our friends in the legacy media.
00:59:57.000The Supreme Court seems prepared to reject a Republican-led effort to sharply limit the federal government from pressuring social media companies to remove harmful posts and misinformation from their platforms.
01:00:07.000A majority of justices from across the ideological spectrum, from here to here, As if Supreme Court judges are just a random cross-section of society.
01:00:17.000The ideological expressed concern about hamstringing White House officials and other federal employees from communicating with tech giants about posts the government deems problematic that are related to public health, national security, and elections, among other topics.
01:00:31.000You know, you're a person, aren't you?
01:00:33.000You love people, you're worried, you've got concerns and doubts and fears about, I don't know, getting older and the world and all that.
01:00:38.000So you sometimes just go, you know what's getting me down is that I'm worried that the White House are hamstrung in their ability to pressure social media when it comes to matters of public health.
01:00:48.000Why can't the government just get in there?
01:00:50.000What they're actually talking about there is the ability of the government to censor social media.
01:00:54.000Let's forget that their relationship with most social media platforms is so convivial.
01:00:59.000It amounts to propaganda, really, anyway.
01:01:01.000They're slowly working out, oh my God, this is a resource where things can somewhat organically take shape and present entirely new economic, media, and ideological spaces.
01:01:10.000We've seen it with Napster, Arab Spring, Trump.
01:01:14.000But now, what they're working out is, look, as long as we've got favourable relationships and a bunch of contracts with Amazon and Google and elsewhere, we can exert some control over these platforms.
01:01:25.000But they clearly want to be able to immediately have boots on the ground, as it were, agents in the offices of these places, just pretending to be their mates.
01:01:33.000Shouldn't reach for another one really, instead they're all just mates having a chat rather than the government censoring you.
01:01:38.000The first amendment prevents the government from censoring speech and punishing people for expressing different views.
01:01:45.000But the Biden administration says officials are entitled to share information, participate in public debate and urge action as long as their requests are not accompanied by threats.
01:01:53.000Well, to be fair, I didn't threaten people.
01:01:56.000I said, remove all of those posts from those doctors and Stanford scientists saying that there is no proof that this inhibits transmission.
01:02:05.000I just asked them to do that and we shamed them and stopped their fun.
01:02:25.000Social media and artificial intelligence, he said, created an accelerant for disinformation.
01:02:29.000Principal Deputy Solicitor General Brian Fletcher, representing the Biden administration, said government officials have long-standing authority to use the bully pulpit to inform and persuade.
01:02:39.000The lower court ruling, he said, would prevent thousands of government officials, including FBI agents and presidential aides, from addressing threats to national security and public health.
01:02:54.000The initial ruling in the lawsuit came from a conservative district court judge in Louisiana who said that the Biden administration appeared to have operated the most massive attack.
01:03:05.000In United States history, the court's order barred thousands of federal employees from improperly influencing tech companies to remove certain content.
01:03:13.000Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit narrowed the decision to a smaller set of government officials and agencies, including the Surgeon General's Office, the White House, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the FBI.
01:03:24.000A three-judge panel of the appeals court said the White House probably coerced the platforms to make their moderation decisions by way of intimidating messages and threats of adverse consequences.
01:03:34.000Doesn't seem right, does it, that that's how they operate?
01:03:36.000The panel also found that the White House significantly encouraged the platform's decisions by commandeering their decision-making process, both in violation of the First Amendment.
01:03:44.000So it's actually outrageous when you hear it described like that, and the sort of thing that should absolutely be stamped out.
01:03:49.000And the fact that, like, the Supreme Court judge is saying, I'm a bit worried that we're hamstrung by this First Amendment.
01:03:55.000It's a bit of a shame that we can't just, you know, condemn people without trial and throw them in jail and create gulags and put chips under people's skin.
01:04:04.000In October, the Supreme Court intervened and allowed the Biden administration to resume communications with social media companies while the litigation continued.
01:04:12.000So they're still literally doing it right now.
01:04:15.000That's how the world works now we know.
01:04:18.000One of the Republicans who's been leading the opposition to the Biden administration's ability to coerce and pressure in the way that's been described is the Congressman Jim Jordan.
01:04:28.000This is an article by him about how academia After Elon Musk bought Twitter, we began to see just how much the government had been using the company to censor speech online.
01:04:43.000Journalists such as Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger published internal Twitter documents showing that the government was deeply involved in Twitter's content moderation decisions.
01:04:52.000Musk even called Twitter a crime scene.
01:04:54.000Since then, the Select Subcommittee has obtained direct evidence showing how the government coerced and colluded with Facebook, YouTube, Amazon, universities and others to deliberately censor certain viewpoints.
01:05:04.000For example, we uncovered how the Biden White House directly pressured Facebook and YouTube to take down posts with which the White House disagreed, including True information, memes, and other content that did not violate the company's content moderation policies.
01:05:18.000Of those listed, I would say true information is the most troubling, because when you consider that Supreme Court justice saying, you know, we're hamstrung, we're hamstrung...
01:05:36.000And while this piece is of course by a Republican politician and therefore partisan, it's irrelevant really because Mark Zuckerberg himself admitted, I think with Lex Friedman, that they had censored true information on Facebook because the government Asked them to.
01:05:55.000So, I don't know how much more information we need on this subject.
01:06:02.000The censorship was so bad that Facebook's President of Global Affairs, Nick Clegg, the former Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, what a coincidence, ...protested to the Biden White House, to no avail, that the White House's demands represented a significant incursion into traditional boundaries of free expression in the US.
01:06:19.000Like, free expression is just like a tradition, like wearing a hat or pancake day, something that might be seen as a quaint custom rather than a pretty important value actually.
01:06:29.000Internal emails show that the social media giants caved and changed their policies to censor more Americans' free speech because Facebook and YouTube needed to maintain a good relationship with the White House for other important policy decisions like breaking up Facebook and Alphabet because they are monopolies and have the power to control information and censor.
01:06:48.000And the government said, you want to carry on doing that, you better bloody well censor what we ask you to.
01:07:01.000But the Biden administration's censorship campaign didn't end with social media.
01:07:04.000The White House even tried to censor books.
01:07:06.000The Select Subcommittee released internal Amazon emails in which company personnel, when preparing for an upcoming meeting with the Biden White House, asked Is the admin asking us to remove books?
01:07:15.000Or are they more concerned about search results, order, or both?
01:07:19.000Ultimately, Amazon appears to have changed its policies because of White House pressure censoring books, questioning vaccines by enabling a feature called Do Not Promote.
01:07:28.000What could be more un-American than the federal government telling a private company what
01:08:26.000Big government and big tech weren't alone in this censorship enterprise.
01:08:29.000Big academia was intricately involved too.
01:08:31.000The Select Subcommittee uncovered emails showing that Stanford University set up something called the Election Integrity Partnership in the summer of 2020.
01:08:38.000That name will tell you exactly what it's doing.
01:08:58.000As concerning as all this is, what comes next is even scarier.
01:09:01.000The government has now turned its attention to supercharging the censorship process by funding the development of AI-powered tools to do it at scale.
01:09:07.000We've been telling you about this for a while and we've been subject to it as well at the hands of government proxies, who I won't name anymore because I think they scan our videos to find their name and de-amplify them, but you can look for those videos and they're really worth watching.
01:09:20.000The Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government's latest report revealed how the National Science Foundation issued multi-million dollar grants to university and non-profit research teams to develop AI-powered censorship and propaganda tools to combat alleged misinformation.
01:09:34.000One NSF-funded research team said the quiet part out loud when it told NSF that its AI-powered tool could help social media platforms more comprehensively enforce their misinformation policies and thus Externalize the difficult responsibility of censorship.
01:09:49.000Non-public documents also reveal the condescending way the censors privately talk about Americans, particularly military families, the elderly, rural and indigenous communities, and Americans who hold the Bible and the Constitution as sacred.
01:10:01.000Oh my God, don't you suspect that as well on a person that they just don't like you?
01:10:04.000That's why that bill didn't pass in Ireland recently, because people are beginning to understand that the elites do not like them, not one bit, and people would rather reach back to a tradition that at least has some sort of value, like, I don't know, God and religion, than believe in these new made-up agendas that are entirely about disempowering people and pretending it's about kindness.
01:10:22.000We've made incredible progress fighting government-induced censorship over the past year.
01:10:27.000We owe tremendous gratitude to the many Democrats, progressive journalists, and other left-of-center witnesses who have bravely been willing to testify in front of the select subcommittee, even when facing baseless personal attacks from Democrats on the subcommittee.
01:10:39.000If we lose our freedom of speech, our other cherished First Amendment rights to practice our faith, to publish and report, to assemble peacefully, and to petition our government, are vulnerable too.
01:10:48.000And I would say that, actually, that it's not hysterical to imagine that next in line are precisely those rights.
01:10:54.000In fact, if you look at them, you know, the right to assemble peacefully, that's kind of under attack.
01:10:58.000There's lots of new protest laws, petition our government.
01:11:00.000Like, they don't care, do they, really, what you say?
01:11:03.000Democracy even explicitly is if you don't vote for this one person you are voting for tyranny.
01:11:09.000That is conversely obviously already tyranny because you've only got one option according to them.
01:11:14.000When that's coupled with the kind of authoritarianism that they're not acknowledging, the warmongering that they're not acknowledging, what exactly is this sacred thing that they are protecting?
01:11:41.000They think that your values are laughable.
01:11:42.000They think that your rights are laughable.
01:11:44.000And that's why What will happen in the Supreme Court is the government will be allowed to continue to censor people just on the off chance people start connecting with one another and rejecting their increasingly evident tyranny.
01:13:31.000Well, it's happening in real life now.
01:13:33.000It's really funny, because there's news reporting it.
01:13:35.000They keep trying to balance, like, making it like The Little Rascals, but they're going, it's not actually like The Little Rascals, because these kids robbed a bank, and The Little Rascals would never have done that.
01:13:45.000That's actually quite... Don't rob banks, kids.
01:14:11.000I mean, is there literally anyone in this chat who saw Little Rascals when it was happening?
01:14:15.000That's why they have to keep establishing context the whole time about Little Rascals.
01:14:20.000In a way they would never establish context if they were saying that Donald Trump used the phrase bloodbath to describe tariffs he might impose on the industry and what the lack of those tariffs might mean to the car industry were the tariffs not imposed because the Biden administration got a second term.
01:14:35.000They're not going to give you that context.
01:14:37.000When it comes to the little rascals, there's context up the wazoo.
01:14:41.000Children's television in the 50s and remains a pop culture phenomenon today.
01:14:46.000Now the name is actually being used by the FBI to It's funny because they're on the brink of sort of glamorizing it and also sort of suggesting that it's quite cute but also they did, they actually did rob a bank.
01:15:03.000They're being called the Little Rascals Bank Robbers.
01:15:07.000The FBI says these kids, ages 11, 12, and 16... There are those numbers, in case you don't know what numbers are.
01:15:15.000These adorable scams, they're like Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, but in real life, robbing a bank.
01:15:22.000What's the crime of robbing a bank to the crime of a new bank opening?
01:17:31.000I spoke to former FBI investigator Bill Daley.
01:17:34.000If police were to get into the bank, no matter how young a perpetrator might be, and if they pose a threat to them, something bad could happen.
01:17:42.000All three juveniles have been charged with robbery by threat.
01:17:47.000That's the news, these little bastards!
01:17:49.000Well guys, we're going to wrap it up right now.
01:17:51.000Now, we're going to do another 10 minutes over on Locals with our AwakendWonder community.
01:17:56.000On our AwakendWonder community, we provide additional content, a different exclusive video every single week, plus we do competitions.
01:18:03.000For example, all you have to tell us to win this t-shirt that I'm holding right now in front of my face is, can you name one, just one of the little rascals that Those adorable little darlings, and you will get a variety of fantastic products, including this and this.
01:18:21.000First one to answer in the Awaken Wonder chat, you get those things.
01:18:24.000Plus, we do interviews, like we've got some fantastic interviews coming up soon.
01:18:29.000Steve Bannon, we've got a variety of people coming on the show.
01:18:31.000Dinah White, they're all coming on the show.
01:19:07.000He's going to be on, it's going to be fantastic.
01:19:09.000I want to welcome our new members like Freedom Hunter 2022, Swindidge, Thomas Magic Words, see those names skating across the screen, Fearless Fred, TonyClark95.
01:19:18.000If you're on Awake and Wonder, we're going to do some more, so stay there, get over there, click the link in the, like we'll post the link in the chat right now, but get over to Locals and enjoy that little bastard and knob cheese, we're not little...