In a world of ever-shifting categories, you glorious awakening wonder, let us contemplate and consider together the state of contemporary affairs. In a world where power is operating in accordance with the media in ways that legitimise our ongoing distrust, we re going to be talking about this, and if you re watching us on YouTube now, we continue in 10 minutes, only on Rumble, you will know why when you hear what we re talking about. In our presentation, Here s the News, we go a little deeper and discuss Prince Harry s revelations, and how alongside the ongoing censorship of the JFK files, and the revelations about Twitter, that it shows that power is, in fact, operating according to the media s wishes. And later, we have Claire Daly, MEP, who s just been placed on Ukraine s Secret Service blacklist and how you get on it. But before any of that, we just want to assure you that the system is fine. Don t collapse into existential despair. We re here to tell you the truth, as best as we understand it, about contemporary events, in a way that hopefully doesn t make you want to end your own life in a state of despondency and despair. Stay free, and remember, we believe very deeply in the possibility of change. Stay Free! - Russell Brand . In this video, you re gonna see the future, and in this episode, we ve made for you, you're going to see the Future. brought to you by You re gonna See the Future! - you're gonna be the future. - In this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand? by In This Video, You're Going To See The Future, You re Gonna See The Real Thing? by , You're Gonna Be the Future? - This is the future? (featuring Russell Brand and Gareth Roy? , This is a show that we've made for You, You'll Have To Be The One? in this video you're Going to See the Real Thing, by . . . We are live online right now, and we are live, right here, right now! by RUMBLE on Rumble on YouTube, we've come here, we're making for you everywhere, we'll be making a podcast about the future! in 10 Minutes Only on Rumble! , we're live online now, so don't miss it!
00:01:32.000We've come here explicitly and directly to tell you the truth as best as we understand it about contemporary events in a way that hopefully doesn't make you want to end your own life in a state of despondency and despair because we believe very deeply in the possibility of change.
00:01:49.000With me is Gareth Roy who due to various reasons, I mean what is your job title now?
00:01:55.000I think it's online assistant or something like that.
00:02:10.000In a world of ever-shifting categories, you glorious awakening wonder, let us contemplate and consider together the state of contemporary affairs.
00:02:18.000We're going to be talking about this, and if you're watching us on YouTube now, we continue in 10 minutes time only on Rumble.
00:02:24.000You will know why when you hear what we're talking about.
00:02:27.000We're talking about Prince Harry in our presentation, Here's the News.
00:02:30.000That's where we go a little deeper and we'll be talking about Prince Harry's revelations and how alongside the ongoing censorship of the JFK files and the revelations about Twitter, that it shows that power is operating in accordance with the media in ways that In a sense, legitimise our ongoing distrust.
00:02:48.000Biden has got some classified documents now in his house.
00:02:52.000Now when Trump's got... They're not in his house.
00:03:16.000And also we're looking at Zelensky working with BlackRock.
00:03:20.000This is like Again, if you're interested in the narrativization of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, you have to stay with us for this, because it's now explicit that there are profit opportunities being generated by this conflict, not only by the military-industrial complex, who, as you know, have benefited hugely from this war, just like they did with the conflict in Afghanistan,
00:03:43.000But also now for BlackRock, who are causing all sorts of domestic chaos, by the way, buying up properties in the United States, and now they're overtly benefiting from what they're calling the restructuring of Ukraine.
00:03:57.000Anyway, and later, we've got Claire Daly, MEP, who's just been placed on Ukraine's Secret Service blacklist.
00:04:02.000We're going to talk about that and what is that blacklist and how you get on it.
00:04:06.000But before any of that, we just want to assure you that the system is fine.
00:04:09.000Don't collapse into existential despair.
00:04:16.000First reason not to collapse into despair is that surgeons are sorry for texting patients they had aggressive cancer instead of Happy New Year.
00:04:24.000I'm so sorry you've got aggressive cancer.
00:05:01.000No, it's too different from Happy Christmas, because what they wrote back was, please, because they sent a follow-up, luckily, saying otherwise Christmas would be ruined.
00:05:10.000How quickly did you get the follow-up?
00:05:16.000You tell me I've got aggressive cancer at 6pm on Christmas Eve.
00:05:19.000By 8pm I'm going to have made some pretty radical... I've been a crack house by the time... for reasons of evangelising that you should not take drugs.
00:05:28.000As you know, I'm 20 years in recovery.
00:05:30.000Drugs are bad for those of you on YouTube and for those of you everywhere.
00:05:33.000After, in 10 minutes time, man, we've got some stuff to tell you about that.
00:05:48.000Our message to you should have read, we wish you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, and then they add, in case of emergency, please contact NHS 111.
00:06:25.000I think the process of putting a backpack on a pigeon's wing, like that little bit there, that sinew in a pigeon's armpit, I don't think it would like having something looped over that.
00:06:39.000At the Pacific Institution in Abbotsford, the correctional facility staff says the bird was spotted with its bag of drugs in the yard The point is, at a correctional facility, you have to at least consider, are any of the people in that correctional facility for the misuse of controlled substances?
00:08:01.000In case you think that we've been lost in frivolity, ornithological crimes only covered here, have a look at, like, do you remember the climate around Pfizer and, like, when you, it was impossible to post on social media about Natural immunity.
00:08:19.000And remember, on YouTube, I'm saying that's no bad thing either.
00:08:23.000Until we click over only onto Rumble in a minute when I might be a little more candid with my views.
00:08:28.000Well, look, it has been revealed as a result of the excellent investigations of Alex Berenson, who's coming on the show, I think, next week.
00:08:35.000Is that right, Gareth, my online assistant?
00:08:41.000Alex Berenson's revelations from the Twitter files say that a Pfizer board member, Scott Gottlieb, secretly pressed Twitter to hide posts challenging his company's massively profitable Covid jabs.
00:08:52.000To funnel his demands, Gottlieb abused the same Twitter lobbyists the White House did.
00:08:57.000fresh evidence of overlap between the company selling mRNA shots and the government forcing
00:09:10.000I think the mad thing about this, Ross, was that the tweet that he basically wanted to censor, I mean this has come out of the Twitter files, this is about Twitter censorship, is that the tweet actually was from a former head of the FDA, who was like, Natural immunity, we won't say much more about it, is, you know, people should maybe not be, anyway, we won't go too far down that line.
00:09:33.000Right, because we're still on YouTube.
00:09:34.000It's still like, this is the degree, that's the degree of ongoing censorship, that even at this point we have to be incredibly cautious.
00:09:41.000But that would appear to be evidence that people within Pfizer, who made a lot of money during that pandemic, were controlling Presumably!
00:09:50.000I mean I can think of only one reason and that reason is they care about people so much over at Pfizer they just want to do the right thing the whole time.
00:09:56.000I think it's being, well Alex is basically saying that this would have affected the profits which Pfizer made 81 billion sales in 2021 and him himself Gottlieb was paid 365,000 Yeah, but that ain't how Scott Gottlieb rolls.
00:10:16.000The Pfizer director saw a tweet that explained what natural immunity was after COVID infection and how it's superior to vaccine protection.
00:11:22.000We're even going to look at apparently frivolous stories like the Prince Harry story and show how that Demonstrates further relationships between the media and powerful institutions.
00:11:31.000If you're watching this on YouTube now, click over onto Rumble.
00:11:35.000What do you think about all this, Gareth?
00:11:41.000Well, the thing about that is that, like, it was a tweet by a former FDA commissioner, and all he was saying is, you know, natural immunity should be considered as good as a vaccine for certain people.
00:11:53.000But then what he was saying is also if you're a certain age you should get vaccinated.
00:11:58.000So basically that's there's nothing... What's all these excess deaths?
00:12:03.000Nothing to do with... Why is everyone dying all of a sudden gal?
00:12:08.000One of the explanations about excess Covid deaths especially in the UK which has like risen massively is that the impact of Covid and lockdowns on for example our national health service Is having a massive effect.
00:12:19.000I've also noticed that a lot of pigeons are serving up crystal meth.
00:13:32.000This is the very centre of American political life.
00:13:36.000But the point, I guess the point is, yeah, if all this fuss was made about, I think the difference is like with Trump it was hundreds and they're saying in the case of Biden it's like 10 or 11 or something.
00:13:45.000It's not the amount of classified files.
00:16:17.000It's lovely, so lustrous and I get my fingers right down in there, getting in the scalp of Brosnan.
00:16:24.000Have a look, when we talk about this conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
00:16:29.000One of the things that we continually point out is that mainstream media coverage of the conflict highlights Putin's malevolence and Russia's criminal invasion without ever pointing out NATO's infringement on the agreed territories of the former Soviet Union and neither does it point out military industrial complex profit And now, Black Rock Prophet.
00:17:13.000Of course it's true and terrible that it's costing lives and livelihoods, but can you even hear in the tone an invitation into idiocy that you're just, that's how to understand this.
00:17:32.000Now, that $40 billion, where is it going to end up?
00:17:36.000It's like, you know, because what you've just been told is Putin's war and lives and livelihoods of Ukrainian people are being impacted.
00:17:41.000So in your mind, just thinking, oh, this aid, that's going to help Ukrainian people.
00:17:45.000The word aid is sort of Designed, I think, to evoke images of care and help.
00:17:51.000I wouldn't mind betting that this $40 billion will be carved up, ultimately, into what was called lethal aid, briefly, in a ludicrous port man 2, and it will end up with the military-industrial complex, as 50% of all Pentagon spending does, doesn't it mate?
00:18:25.000Other potential reasons include destabilizing Russia, 5% of the Earth's mineral resources there, and the military-industrial complex profits, as well as, of course, you know, I guess violence.
00:18:34.000the 5% of those mineral resources, organisations like BlackRock could benefit.
00:18:39.000But there's no evidence that there's any integral connection between BlackRock and the Biden
00:18:54.000BlackRock's managing director Eric Van Nostrand was hired straight into a senior advisory position in the Biden administration's Treasury Department in August, explicitly to shape US economic policy on Russia and Ukraine.
00:19:06.000So yeah, it's a pretty big deal, pretty big link.
00:19:08.000Someone from Blackrock, the managing director, has been brought into the Treasury to reshape US economic policy, and what do you know, a little while later Zelensky and Blackrock are doing a deal.
00:19:19.000Sometimes I want to know what the counter narrative to that will be.
00:19:23.000Someone say no look what well, of course, there's gonna need to be restructuring There's just been a war but it seems to me like colonization like Ukraine are being bought into that Now familiar position of taking on IMF loans that are highly conditional, you know They're borrowing money off like the IMF and the World Bank and you think well Oh, that's you know to help them restructure, but then loans come with conditions Absolutely.
00:19:44.000Like Mike Skinner used to say, a grand don't come for free.
00:19:47.000The IMF don't go doling out dollar and then say, spend it wisely, do as you will.
00:19:53.000Countries that refuse those loans, like Yemen and stuff, are getting all sorts of scrapes.
00:19:57.000The IMF leverages loans to push governments to adopt friendly positions to US investors or Western investors.
00:20:07.000This is not just giving out, just do what you want with that and pay it back when you want.
00:20:10.000We're absolutely fine, this is for you, it's aid really.
00:20:13.000colonization. What do you think? Tell me in the chat, are we conspiracy
00:20:17.000theorists? Have we gone mad? And in case you think that we have gone mad, say
00:20:20.000you're watching this just to like to criticize us, you've come here to
00:20:23.000criticize, we're trying our hardest on Stay Free. Look at Mitch McConnell
00:20:27.000literally just openly, because sometimes I think, oh these things are conspiracies, but
00:20:31.000they're not. Look, Mitch McConnell literally just says it on your TV set, check it out.
00:20:35.000And let's be clear, the reason that a big bipartisan majority of the American
00:20:41.000people and a big bipartisan majority in Congress support continuing to assist
00:20:45.000Ukraine is not primarily about inspiring speeches or desire to engage.
00:21:09.000In philanthropy, President Zelensky is an inspiring leader.
00:21:15.000But the most basic reasons for continuing to help Ukraine degrade And those American interests don't mean, like, folk in Connecticut and Iowa and ordinary Americans everywhere.
00:21:34.000American interests are American elite interests, military-industrial complex interests, interests of people that are heavily invested in Black Rock.
00:21:42.000And I'm astonished to see it outlined and espoused so plainly.
00:21:47.000They're certainly not in the interests of people.
00:21:50.000When you consider the Blackrock deal in place now, and you were talking about the property earlier on, when you hear that Blackrock is buying up, in some cases, when you mention places like Ottawa and Connecticut then, in some cases it's like three quarters of the housing in those cities and states, enabling people to never be able to afford to buy a house.
00:22:06.000So it's kind of crazy that now the same investment company is going, we'll stick you into Ukraine, you can buy up that part of Ukraine, you can privatise Ukraine now.
00:22:15.000It's driving foreign policy, it's driving domestic policy, it's affecting your life and I personally believe it's part of a globalist agenda.
00:22:23.000When you hear a phrase like, you will own nothing and you will be happy, it's because of policies like that and the financial clout and ability of organisations like BlackRock.
00:22:33.000They're literally biasing the housing market.
00:23:03.000Iraq has one of the largest customer bases in the entire Arab world.
00:23:09.000It has one of the world's largest supplies of oil.
00:23:12.000And it has one of the best educated workforces in the region.
00:23:17.000Some of them might be a bit traumatised by the bombing and the loss of their children, but they're pretty well educated.
00:23:23.000So when you hear Mitch McConnell speaking like that, Hillary Clinton talking like that, Zelensky and BlackRock doing a deal like that, it surely invites you to consider that there's more to this...
00:23:35.000...than humanitarian aid for Ukrainian people who are doubtlessly suffering, the criminality of Russia's invasion.
00:23:40.000You have to look at the context, and I don't think it should be considered a conspiracy theory, to investigate these ideas when you know that the people that are telling us these stories have been lying to us for as long as they've had access to this kind of media machinery.
00:23:54.000Yeah, and when you get kind of mainstream media telling stories, but again, we, you know, I have to keep caveat in it with, yeah, the war's awful.
00:24:01.000These are terrible things that happened to Ukraine.
00:24:02.000But when it just says things like it's crippling the lives of Ukrainian people, well, when these IMF loans get leveraged and they want their money back, that's going to pretty much cripple the people of Ukraine as well.
00:24:13.000You know, it's not just now that this stuff's happening.
00:24:17.000It's going to be later on when, when the loans have to be paid back.
00:24:20.000Ordinary Ukrainians will suffer as a result of these actions and continue to suffer.
00:24:24.000Ordinary Americans will suffer as a result of the same interests due to the housing and real estate activity of BlackRock.
00:24:31.000Ordinary people across the world suffer as a result of globalist elite corporate interests.
00:24:36.000And unless we are able to provide a cohesive counter-narrative and some inspiration for people to come together around a different set of beliefs, then I don't know how else we're going to prevent this.
00:24:47.000Should we watch a bit more of Hillary?
00:24:48.000Because I think she says some more crazy stuff, doesn't she?
00:24:52.000Today, Turkish, Chinese, French, Jordanian, Iranian companies are lining up to do business.
00:25:00.000But very honestly, we see too few American companies alongside our soldiers and our diplomats.
00:25:09.000Telling off American companies for not trying hard enough to profiteer.
00:25:59.000I think her point is exactly this, that Ukrainians are going to be suffering from some of the things that are going on at the moment, and that why is this proliferation of weapons and this money going to arms manufacturers not being in some way criticized or spoken about?
00:26:14.000I thought we were supposed to be able to criticise and converse and talk about stuff without getting censored and shut down the whole time.
00:26:32.000Hey, should we have a look at this Prince Harry thing now?
00:26:37.000Of course, all of you will have seen Prince Harry, someone said to me today, re-traumatising himself.
00:26:44.000Sort of like he's re-evoking the trauma of his rather tragic childhood.
00:26:49.000Um, and you know, and you will have a variety of opinions, I'm sure, on whether or not he's doing the right thing, but what we think's interesting about it is that explicit within his revelations is the fact that there are relationships between Powerful institutions, in this case the royal family and the mainstream media, that they literally will hold back information if it's convenient, inflate, amplify certain stories.
00:27:14.000Have a look at that and tell us what you think.
00:27:15.000Stay with us in the chat and comments.
00:27:27.000Prince Harry has got a new book out in which he talks about the challenges of being a royal person.
00:27:32.000But does this round of interviews reveal more about the relationship between powerful institutions and the deep state and media than they were intended to?
00:27:44.000Even with a story like this about Prince Harry and Meghan, which could initially be seen as senseless distraction and online frou-frou and froth, but I feel like in revealing the way that certain stories about the royals can be prevented from breaking, we can ascertain the way that power functions in media spaces.
00:28:01.000In particular, it could be argued that this story is an anomaly, like Elon Musk acquiring Twitter that reveals information that would typically be kept from us.
00:28:09.000Let's have a look at some of the interview and see if we can make any diagnosis from it about the way that media and power operate more generally.
00:28:16.000What was different here was this level of frustration.
00:28:20.000And I talk about the red mist that I had for so many years, and I saw this red mist in him.
00:28:27.000He wanted me to hit him back, but I chose not to.
00:28:39.000The royal family have always had marginal figures like Edward and Mrs. Simpson, and more laterally, and perhaps more pertinently, Princess Diana.
00:28:47.000Figures that can be regarded as external to the dominant culture of the family, and in this case, I suppose, with the media having involved in the way that it is, Prince Harry can operate as a kind of whistleblower, or at least an alternative perspective on the machinations and movements of that family.
00:29:03.000In the Oprah interview, you accuse members of your family of racism.
00:29:06.000You don't even... Well, the British press said that.
00:29:11.000After the Oprah interview, they said that they were going to bring in a diversity saw.
00:29:17.000Everything they said was going to happen hasn't happened.
00:29:19.000I suppose what this conversation shows you is that the royal family is an anachronistic and atavistic organisation.
00:29:27.000There is no rational reason to have a royal family.
00:29:31.000And beyond that, there is no reason to have such a deeply hierarchical and elitist society.
00:29:37.000In a way, it's peculiar to have an essentially former royal commenting on the hierarchical structures of the royal family and the obvious biases that are within it.
00:29:46.000The royal family has to be a propaganda machine to justify its ongoing existence.
00:29:52.000Because if we were to look, for a moment, in macro, at the problems of our planet, we would quickly deduce that having entrenched elitist structures is not necessary and not helpful for the ongoing survival of the planet and for the benefit of most ordinary people.
00:30:08.000So the Royal Family requires continual propping up, continual positive PR.
00:30:13.000The Royal Family have to be presented as enough like us for us to enjoy them and feel generally positive towards them, but distinct enough from us to warrant the elite treatment that they receive.
00:30:25.000Fact is, is that it provides a template for separating society into different categories.
00:30:30.000Even if you don't live in a monarchy, if you live in the United States, you accept that there are elite groups, but you have essentially an oligarch class of tycoons who are talking about space exploration while other people are talking about being able to eat or heat their homes.
00:30:45.000So having a conversation about the particularities of royalty is extraordinary.
00:30:49.000A few interesting things that are revealed by this press tour to promote this book are that there are intimate relationships between the royal family and the media, that classified information that's controlled exists here, that it's even possible to consider some of the more outlandish conspiracies that exist around the royal family because they have close relationships with the media and secret services.
00:31:08.000Two Protect an organisation like the Royal Family.
00:31:19.000Even a figure like Diana, who was anti-establishment, still operated ultimately within those spheres and fell out of favour because, to a degree, she was antithetical to the aims of the Royal Family.
00:31:31.000I suppose the challenge that Meghan and Harry have is that they want to start their own empire or industry or business, that they want to be able to exist outside of the royal family and the only collateral they have is the data that they possess on the royal family, that they can, like Diana, present a counter-narrative.
00:31:48.000But if you start to deconstruct royalty in an absolute way, what you're left with is, you shouldn't have royal families, you shouldn't have elitism of this degree.
00:31:55.000Ultimately all of these interests are antithetical to the interests and well-being of ordinary people.
00:32:02.000So while in the short term it could be beneficial for Harry and Meghan to present a counter-narrative to the royal family, Ultimately it's something that will unravel because if you scrutinise them through the same lens that you scrutinise the royal family, you have to ultimately deduce that these are unnecessary organisations.
00:32:20.000They're anachronistic residual leftovers from a time when we needed continual reminding that there was some benefit to having centralised sovereignty.
00:32:29.000That there was some advantage for ordinary people in being governed by out-of-touch leaders.
00:32:34.000And while you can say the power of the royal family is ultimately or largely ceremonial.
00:32:39.000The Guardian revealed in 2021 that a thousand laws were vetted by the Queen or Prince Charles.
00:32:43.000That, you know, some of their power is legislative as well as symbolic.
00:32:47.000When you consider that still in 2022 there are aspects of the JFK case that are still being booted into the future.
00:32:54.000There are still vetoed documents redacted.
00:32:57.000Well, if that kind of information can be controlled, it's very interesting to consider what other type of information may be constrained, restricted and redacted.
00:33:04.000files is information that goes beyond Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone nutter acting on
00:33:09.000his own intuition and instincts. Presumably there's information that shows a degree of
00:33:13.000conspiracy and collaboration. Well if that kind of information can be controlled it's
00:33:17.000very interesting to consider what other type of information may be constrained, restricted
00:33:24.000and redacted. It's possible to imagine that while Harry gives us some sort of personal
00:33:29.000insights into the dynamics of the royal family that there may similarly be information about
00:33:34.000the real power and the real reach and the real influence of, let's face it, an incredibly
00:33:39.000wealthy organisation that simply doesn't need to exist.
00:33:43.000It is possible, for example, to imagine those resources going elsewhere.
00:33:46.000In a way, it's comparable to the Twitter files, where Elon Musk's unique position at this moment means that he's willing to reveal that within that social media organisation there is deep state collaboration, that the FBI over a two year period paid three and a half million dollars in order to exert influence over the type of information that was published and the type of information that was restricted on an apparently neutral and private platform.
00:34:11.000Harry's revelations, I would say, are a brief anomaly that may ultimately be about kind of gossip and social and cultural issues that ultimately do not affect power, but from it I think you can infer that there are relationships between powerful institutions, The media and the state that control the flow of information and the control of data.
00:34:33.000Perhaps all the fibrility, all the heat that surrounds a subject like this is because on some level we know that if we knew the absolute truth about the royal family, if we knew the absolute truth about the government, If we knew the absolute truth about the degree of collaboration between social media, ordinary media, the corporate globalist state, and powerful elite organisations like the Royal Family, or other powerful families in America, the Bushes, the Clintons, etc, that we would be highly resistant to allowing those kind of undemocratic processes to continue indefinitely.
00:35:05.000When one of their number breaks ranks, whether it's Elon Musk or Donald Trump or Prince Harry, you get a kind of a shiver, a shudder of awareness that, hold on, all is not well within these institutions.
00:35:42.000All those things are interesting in a somewhat Personal, human, and maybe slightly frivolous way.
00:35:48.000But for me, what is interesting about these kind of conversations that I would rank alongside the ongoing censorship of JFK information and the revelations in the Twitter files is, as we have long suspected, there are relationships between powerful institutions that allow them to control the narrative of the way that most of us perceive reality.
00:36:07.000This kind of openness from a royal would have felt shocking a few years ago.
00:36:11.000We've heard so much, it's now less surprising.
00:36:15.000Despite it all, Harry keeps talking of reconciliation as his family, at least publicly, remain silent.
00:36:22.000At some level I feel then that it's quite a sad story about a person revealing the degree of suffering they went through when they lost their mother and feeling like an outsider in a family.
00:36:30.000I'm sure many of us can relate to that.
00:36:32.000But perhaps more importantly, and to me more interestingly, it reveals a degree of collaboration and relationship between the deep state, powerful institutions such as the royals, and the media.
00:36:42.000Particularly when taken in conjunction with the ongoing censorship of the JFK case, the revelations of the Twitter files, that demonstrates that the reality that you live in and that I live in is a highly curated one and one that is presented to us in order to continue to advance the interests of the powerful and to mask great tracts of reality, lest we should make very different decisions about how we'd like it organized.
00:37:13.000A lot of you saying in the chat that you feel broadly unsympathetic to Harry and Meghan is what I'm noticing and generally speaking you think that the royal family is an outdated, outmoded symbol of elitism that ought be evolved beyond.
00:37:33.000That seems to be the general You there, Gareth.
00:37:37.000I'm very excited because we have an actual politician.
00:38:17.000But to get you in the mood and to get us right in the mood, even though I've seen this already, let's have a look at Claire Daly in Parliament, giving it some.
00:38:48.000The country's future is being sold to finance a proxy war that's tearing it apart.
00:38:54.000And of course the loans have preconditions that Ukraine must uphold democracy and rule of law.
00:39:01.000But since the tap was turned on, Zelensky has banned most opposition parties, shuttered the media, attacked trade unions and workers' rights.
00:40:33.000And my second crime was by saying that the sanctions which the European Union was imposing was having an impact on the ordinary citizens of Europe.
00:40:41.000Now, I happen to think that actually both those things are true, demonstrably so.
00:40:50.000But I mean, look, can you imagine what would happen if China, for example, did up a blacklist of people who had a different opinion?
00:40:58.000And of international figures of various persuasions, we'd have an outcry from the so-called democratic world that this was an outrageous authoritarian assault.
00:41:09.000Yet that's what happened by the Ukrainians.
00:41:12.000And, you know, you'd have to say against the backdrop of open borders with Europe, And guns, which Interpol and Europol have said are freely being sold on the black market and widely handled out across Ukraine, that putting up a hit list or a hate list of people who are supposedly anti-Ukrainian is a pretty dangerous hit list for the Ukrainian authorities to do.
00:41:35.000But look, nothing has happened so far.
00:41:40.000It used to be an acceptable position to stand with people that were suffering, to be behind the rights of ordinary people, to broadly support humanitarianism.
00:41:49.000Who among us wouldn't without being regarded as somehow, I don't know, a conscientious objector or a traitor to the cause?
00:41:57.000We live in times where censorship has become normalized.
00:42:02.000If indeed this is a proxy war, if indeed this does afford opportunities to Black Rock,
00:42:08.000you know, what's more dangerous to us, Blacklists or Black Rock, I wonder?
00:42:12.000If indeed the military industrial complex in America are unduly benefiting from this conflict,
00:42:19.000what is the, why does it become necessary to tell that story?
00:42:23.000And why is it that we're being invited to believe such a reductive story, which of course has elements of truth in it?
00:42:33.000Why is it that we're being offered such a reductive narrative?
00:42:36.000And why is it accepted by ordinary people and by, I know, by all of our viewers, That people usually and ordinarily in political spaces don't engage in this kind of discourse.
00:43:24.000And in any war, ordinary people lose out.
00:43:27.000It's ordinary Russians who are losing their lives.
00:43:29.000It's ordinary Ukrainians and it's ordinary Europeans who are suffering and choosing between heating or eating this winter as the sanctions go on.
00:43:38.000And we have a media and a political establishment that is hell-bent on ensuring that our people, I suppose, trundle along with their narrative that this is somehow a battle between authoritarianism and democracy, which was exactly the same type of rubbish that we heard in the Iraq war.
00:43:57.000It's been driven by the military-industrial complex.
00:44:00.000Putin's illegal invasion gave NATO what it wanted, sadly, was the excuse now to engage in what could almost be endless war at the level it's going at now.
00:44:11.000We've seen the billions of dollars being collected in the US, supposedly for Ukraine.
00:44:16.000Actually, most of that money stays in the US.
00:44:19.000and goes to the arms companies and the military industrial complex.
00:44:23.000We've the same things in Europe. Loans being given, conditions attached.
00:44:27.000This is capitalism's free-for-all really, where they have a, I suppose, what would you call it?
00:44:33.000I don't know, a little study, an economic study where the Ukrainian people are cannon fodder
00:44:38.000and their country is an experiment really for global capitalism.
00:44:42.000I mean, the EU has been investing in Ukraine for years now.
00:44:47.000The corruption, the money has been sidelined by their leaders.
00:44:50.000Now the opposition is This is shock therapy like we've never seen it before.
00:44:54.000out of their rights. And as you were highlighting earlier, global capital has its eyes on the
00:44:59.000price of going into a deregulated economy, whereby environmental protections are being
00:45:05.000removed, archaeological protections, planning and regulation, labour rights gone. This is
00:45:11.000shock therapy like we've never seen it before. And the reason why I suppose there's no discussion
00:45:16.000allowed is that vested interests are at play globally and they don't want any dissent.
00:45:21.000What I will say is that the majority of people worldwide can see through this nonsense.
00:45:27.000And we find even though we are, I suppose, not lone voices, but minority voices on a political stage, The feedback that we get globally is huge on this and actually a majority of the people who live in the countries that are outside of the US and Europe have already seen through this nonsense.
00:45:48.000They've been the victims of war before, they know what's going on and so yeah it's just we're not, we don't have a vehicle either politically or in terms of the media for getting that message really out.
00:46:00.000When the machinery of power has to work so hard to control a narrative, to some degree I suppose I find it encouraging that there must be an appetite for truth elsewhere and a genuine concern about the consequences of that truth being proliferated.
00:46:18.000We can, I suppose, deduce from BlackRock's involvement with the post-war Ukrainian project that profits will be made.
00:46:28.000Do you find that in the European Parliament there is a reluctance to have the kind of discourse that you were promoting in the clip that we showed there?
00:46:39.000How much traction does that kind of dialogue get in there?
00:46:46.000Is the European Parliament as turgid as I assume most parliamentary buildings are?
00:46:53.000Is it a place where you think real change can be instantiated from?
00:46:58.000Well, God no, I'd say it's way worse than most parliaments.
00:47:02.000The European Parliament is completely disconnected from the hearts and minds of the citizens of Europe in a manner even worse than what we see elsewhere.
00:47:11.000I mean, we've had, when we get up to speak, we have people Screaming, Moscow calling, go back to Russia, seeing as I was never there in the first place, that would be a pretty difficult thing to do.
00:47:21.000But all of that type of absolute nonsense being thrown up, and some of that is from being led by the sort of real zealots, anti-Russian people from the Baltic states and so on, and maybe They have an element of, you know, understandable, seeing us looking at their history or whatever, but it doesn't really excuse it.
00:47:43.000We find that some of the countries of Europe, maybe the old Paris, Germany, France and so on, where the economic impact of this war is beginning.
00:47:54.000And to have a real pressure on those economies.
00:48:01.000It was gas before Christmas that their good like-minded partners in the U.S.
00:48:05.000were caught with their trousers down with the Inflation Reduction Act, where contrary to the Europeans' belief that we were great pals in this together, the U.S.
00:48:14.000brought in again its protectionist measures and it was revealed that the Europeans now are paying four times as much for energy As is being paid in the U.S.
00:48:25.000LNG and so on, which basically the war nearly forced us into taking on because they don't want to do business with authoritarian Russia.
00:48:33.000So I think the European establishment in terms of the politicians, a lot of them are shooting themselves in the foot, even from the point of view of capitalism.
00:48:42.000But I really think there's a yearning from citizens in a lot of countries for something different because people are feeling this.
00:49:34.000But we've abandoned any idea of neutrality and sort of played the role that the UK has played for years of sort of, you know, wagging the tail of the US dog.
00:49:44.000And I think that's really regrettable.
00:49:46.000And I think most people in Europe don't want that.
00:49:48.000And maybe as the economic conditions get worse, which sadly they are, in part as a consequence of the war, that people will begin to wake up for that.
00:49:56.000But isn't it a bit sickening that it takes that?
00:49:59.000It takes more pain inflicted on ordinary people for something to change.
00:50:05.000And it does expose the media that we have now.
00:50:08.000I mean, anybody who says anything different is a Russian agent.
00:50:12.000And we see this constantly, that anybody who points out About the economic impact of European decisions on European citizens who live in standards by imposing these ridiculous sanctions is accused of being a Russian agent.
00:50:26.000Everything is down to Russian propaganda.
00:50:28.000Not that people could actually make up their own minds and critique the system we live under for themselves.
00:50:34.000It's very You know, paternalistic and, you know, sickening really.
00:50:39.000Claire, you're a very exciting politician and a rare thing.
00:50:42.000You appear to be a politician that's pro-democracy, pro-open conversation, pro-inclusivity, respects the electorate as being capable to make up our own minds about complex issues.
00:50:57.000Thank you so much for coming on our show and participating in a conversation that we hope may one day lead to some opposition to the relentless march to a unipolar world.
00:51:07.000You can find out more about Clare by going to claredaily.ie.
00:51:12.000That's, I guess, because you are... Are you the MEP for Dublin?
00:52:17.000It was that things were going to get so bad that the hamster's going to go from a gift to then something that's going to power our electricity to then we're going to have to eat it in a soup.
00:52:26.000What I've always thought when I see Russians around the place is they're really, really hard.
00:52:32.000And I feel like that sort of slightly xenophobic generalisation is affirmed when I see the content they make for TV.
00:52:43.000Like, they made this beautiful advert Where it's like a little kid getting a hamster for Christmas to power the lights and the next year they eat it.
00:53:04.000Because there was things that we were talking about that we were talking about before she came on where I mentioned kind of Zelensky censoring media in that in that country and of course it's a difficult conversation to have because every time you say something that feels like it's a negative take on any kind of Ukrainian action or assistance to Ukraine it was like boo you can't say that yeah we have to Talk about all of the things.
00:53:29.000You've got to talk about all of it and understand it.
00:53:30.000Do you know what I think we should do?
00:53:32.000I say let's get a Ukrainian family to live here so we support the people that are suffering as a result of the Ukrainian war.
00:53:45.000Are you saying putting them in the theatre?
00:53:46.000They can work there, they can... Like, why don't we open our hearts and minds and homes to a Ukrainian family, have them live in here at our premises.
00:56:39.000And we have a situation where with the whole Nord Stream pipeline and now that conveniently that now we have to buy more gas from the United States.
00:57:16.000Loving Action says, at the authentic self level there exists only unconditional love, authenticity, joy, forgiveness, compassion, non-judgment, oneness and unified connectedness.
00:57:30.000Just saying you'd want to be in that place of great love!
00:57:33.000And then you can sort of see that nation is a concept, ideologies are a concept, and that mapped upon the limitless unitary oneness that we all participate in through our individual consciousness are systems of profiteering and power that don't benefit ordinary people.
00:57:49.000That's why it's nice to see people like Claire Daly Yeah, and one of the points that she made was that everyone's suffering.
00:57:55.000She was saying Russian people are suffering, Ukrainian people are suffering, Europeans are suffering, American citizens are suffering.
00:58:02.000It's not these countries and these wars that are happening and these institutions like BlackRock and IMF These are all just operating at the very top of all this, and everyone else is suffering in the middle of it.
00:58:12.000We're believing in crazy propaganda, whether it's Russian propaganda, US propaganda, British propaganda, buying into all this stuff.
00:58:18.000Meanwhile, there is a cartel of powerful corporate interests profiting from the whole shebang.
00:58:24.000Hey, listen, tomorrow on the show, we've got the latest on the Twitter files with Michael Schellenberger.
00:58:30.000I want to be talking about them Fauci files, don't I?
00:58:38.000If you are a member of the Stay Free AF community that you can join for the low, low price of, I think, around $30 a year, we give a few away free through our mailing list.