Stay Free - Russel Brand - September 28, 2022


Russell Brand #001 - Should We Be Laughing At Biden Or Is The Joke On Us?


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 23 minutes

Words per Minute

166.76625

Word Count

13,950

Sentence Count

987

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

6


Summary

The first episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand, where we talk about Joe Biden's apparent senility, and whether it's a symptom of a deep problem in American politics, or is it evidence of something deeper, like the rise of the Antichrist? Stay Free is streaming live everywhere in the world, wherever you get your news. Stay Free! Subscribe to Stay Free to get immediate access to all new episodes, and to receive notifications when new episodes are available. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/sponsorships and use the promo code: "UPLEVEL" to receive 10% off your first purchase when you enter the offer code: STAYFREE at checkout. This offer ends on December 31st, 2019. Stay free! Stay safe, and stay free. - Russell Brand and the crew at RUMBLE Thank you so much for joining us on Rumble, I'm a black man, and I could never be a better man on this land, the situations are real, The situations are REAL. - the are real. And wherever you are watching this in Togo, that's gotta be a fire risk, hasn't it, hasn t it, haven't it? - wherever you're watching this, that'd be a good deal, haven t you? You're in luck! - - and wherever you re watching this is where you are, you're going to be safe? And where you're listening to the realest and the most important thing you can be the most impactful news you can get the most of it's going to get you the most information you can find you can help you in the most effective way possible, no matter where you re listening to it, right there, right here in the next 24/7, right in the rest of the world? Love you, stay free, keep up to date with us? XOXO, Russell Brand and Good Luck, xoxo, Gav & Gav and Gav Gave it a shot at it's GAV & GABE Love ya'll! xo - EJ & GARRELL - P.J. & Boyanton - R. BONUS EPISODE: Stay Free, EJ and GRABS - PSYCHO


Transcript

00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and get the camera.
00:00:26.000 I'm going to get the camera.
00:11:10.000 I'm a black man and I could never be a better man On this land the situations are real, I brought our rules
00:11:18.000 here So I'm looking for this deal
00:11:21.000 Looking for this deal Hey!
00:11:40.000 You are watching Stay Free with Russell Brand, although the titles appear to be playing in again.
00:11:46.000 Hey, this is the first ever episode.
00:11:48.000 Thank you for joining us on Rumble.
00:11:50.000 I'm Russell Brand.
00:11:51.000 This is Stay Free.
00:11:53.000 We are streaming live everywhere in the world.
00:11:55.000 If you're watching this in New York City, it's noon.
00:11:58.000 Good afternoon to you, good people of New York.
00:12:01.000 If you're watching this in Los Angeles, it's 9am.
00:12:04.000 If you're watching it in the UK, it's 5pm.
00:12:06.000 If you're watching this in Togo, in Africa, it's 5pm.
00:12:10.000 And wherever you are, that's gotta be a fire risk, hasn't it?
00:12:14.000 With a dried flower.
00:12:15.000 Thank you so much for tuning in for our first ever episode, where we give you, well not, I don't, I would never want to call it the news behind the news.
00:12:26.000 We tell you the news that the mainstream media won't tell you.
00:12:30.000 We give you insights on the news that the mainstream media simply won't reveal.
00:12:36.000 And we, according to another platform, give you deadly misinformation that could put you at incredible risk.
00:12:45.000 On Rumble though, It appears we are safe to make errors and then amend them.
00:12:50.000 I'm referring, of course, to our video that we made yesterday.
00:12:53.000 Have a look at that.
00:12:54.000 You can look at that on Rumble.
00:12:55.000 You can look at it for... No, you won't, but can you look at that on YouTube?
00:12:57.000 Is that up on YouTube?
00:12:58.000 Nope.
00:12:59.000 No, you can't look at that.
00:13:00.000 Well, we made a new one on YouTube, yeah.
00:13:02.000 This is Gareth.
00:13:03.000 Gareth's the producer of the show.
00:13:06.000 Today, on our stream, we're asking, should we be laughing at Biden, or is the joke on us?
00:13:13.000 What I mean by that is, when we sort of like, Talking about Joe Biden and his evident fragility and senility and there's a tendency to be sort of mocking and cruel.
00:13:27.000 Is it actually a revelation into sort of a deep problem in politics, i.e.
00:13:34.000 this person can't possibly be the most powerful man in the world and yet There he is, occupying that position.
00:13:40.000 What does that tell you about the political class?
00:13:42.000 What does that tell you about political theatre?
00:13:45.000 Later, we're going to be taking an intricate and articulate, deep look at Congress and how Still, to this day, in spite of the Stock Act, 20% of current people in Congress own stocks and shares in the companies that they're expected to regulate.
00:14:03.000 Is this, along with Biden's bumbling senility, further evidence that we live in a kind of simulacrum, an appearance of the politically real, when in fact it's a kind of theatre?
00:14:15.000 When power has migrated elsewhere?
00:14:17.000 When power operates within inaccessible networks?
00:14:22.000 In short, there is no democracy anymore.
00:14:25.000 There is no accountable media.
00:14:27.000 There is no accessible government.
00:14:30.000 These are all the questions that we're going to be answering over the next hour, and of course we're going to be responding to your comments.
00:14:35.000 Let me have a look at those comments now.
00:14:38.000 You're with us now, coming in, of course.
00:14:40.000 Look at this.
00:14:41.000 This is from Boyanton.
00:14:42.000 Joe Biden is the Antichrist.
00:14:44.000 Oh, I don't know about that.
00:14:45.000 The actual Antichrist, because if you're going to oppose Christ, you've got to be very... because Jesus, he had access to a lot of powers, didn't he?
00:14:53.000 There's the walking on water.
00:14:54.000 There's the water into wine, which, of course, probably a remnant of the Dionysian power, like that Christ can Generate ecstatic power, the power that comes from beyond the limit itself.
00:15:07.000 If you're going to oppose that, mate, you're going to need to be harder than Biden.
00:15:11.000 He'd have a better memory, wouldn't he?
00:15:12.000 He'd probably be better on the stage as well, I think, the Antichrist.
00:15:15.000 The Antichrist is going to have to be very good on details, Gal.
00:15:19.000 He's going to have to recall things.
00:15:21.000 Biden is a puppet, says Cuddly Crow.
00:15:24.000 Someone is pulling the strings.
00:15:27.000 That's what Cuddly Crow says.
00:15:29.000 Jerusalem, don't have blind faith.
00:15:31.000 Please watch this if someone's sending videos and stuff.
00:15:33.000 Look, keep commenting, okay, over the course of this hour, because, yeah, we want to stay close to you.
00:15:38.000 That's part of the beauty of this.
00:15:40.000 Just so that you don't miss our normal news, because you might be using us as your main news source now.
00:15:45.000 You should be doing that.
00:15:46.000 So here is some normal news for you, as well as, you know, some of the more... the kind of relevant information that we're going to be giving you.
00:15:55.000 So here's some what I call normal news.
00:15:58.000 Elon Musk's deposition in Twitter Fight has been rescheduled for the first week of October.
00:16:04.000 Deposition means, like, he's going to have to do something under oath back at his house, isn't it?
00:16:08.000 It's not at his house, no.
00:16:09.000 That's something that we thought earlier, but that isn't the case.
00:16:12.000 Where is he going to be on the internet?
00:16:13.000 It's going to be a proper court.
00:16:14.000 He's going to go to court, is he?
00:16:15.000 Yeah.
00:16:16.000 So that's going to happen to Elon Musk?
00:16:17.000 Twitter lawyers, they're going to interrogate him.
00:16:19.000 He's going to be interrogated.
00:16:21.000 Bankers from New York and Edinburgh are set to flood into England after Kwasi Kwarteng, that's the Chancellor, scrapped caps on bonuses.
00:16:30.000 Yeah, I mean that's happened.
00:16:32.000 I don't really know why it's just New York and Edinburgh that are the bankers.
00:16:34.000 Why are bankers everywhere interested?
00:16:37.000 Yeah, they can come from wherever they want.
00:16:38.000 It's not limited to just them two cities.
00:16:41.000 What that is, is like for a while in this country, banker bonuses were capped because there was a little bit of an economic crash in 2008 that some people say that they caused, but then they were bailed out by the government, which means that your money was used to bail him out. But now, obviously because
00:16:57.000 we're on the precipice of an economic crisis emerging from the pandemic in the middle of a war in Europe
00:17:03.000 it seems to me the obvious way to nip this in the bud is to give some bankers some bonuses. Yeah, well apparently
00:17:09.000 it's hindering London's attractiveness as an investment destination.
00:17:13.000 That's what it's doing.
00:17:13.000 Is it?
00:17:14.000 It's hindering, according to the Chancellor, yeah, it's hindering our attractiveness.
00:17:18.000 So people are not coming here and investing.
00:17:20.000 Because you can't get a bonus.
00:17:21.000 They want a bonus.
00:17:21.000 Can't get a bonus.
00:17:22.000 So there's a lot of people that come, they want to be bankers, but they want bonuses.
00:17:26.000 That's it.
00:17:26.000 They don't even just want to be paid the regular banking money, they want a bonus.
00:17:30.000 So that's some normal news.
00:17:32.000 Floridians brace for Hurricane Ian's potentially devastating impact.
00:17:37.000 Yeah, it's hitting hard in Florida.
00:17:40.000 Do you want to know how they name hurricanes?
00:17:43.000 Alphabetically.
00:17:44.000 Well, it is alphabetically, but it's from a pool of 10,000 names that are submitted to the World Meteorological Organization.
00:17:50.000 I don't want to be devastated by anyone called Ian.
00:17:54.000 I know.
00:17:54.000 Ian.
00:17:55.000 No offence if you are called Ian.
00:17:57.000 I know people called Ian, and I love them.
00:17:59.000 But I don't see them as being a sort of cyclonic and devastating force.
00:18:02.000 I think they've done Isaac, and they've done Isaiah, or Isaias.
00:18:06.000 Isaiah has got prophetic power.
00:18:08.000 And Isaac, even, with that hard K at the end.
00:18:12.000 Ian, I think that's just going to mess with the net curtains a bit.
00:18:15.000 Sort of like that minor conflagration I caused in the dry flowers.
00:18:19.000 That's the meddling work of Hurricane Ian.
00:18:21.000 Has there been a Hurricane Russell yet?
00:18:24.000 I mean, I'd like to think that I occupy that space myself.
00:18:28.000 Also in mainstream news...
00:18:31.000 Haley Bieber addresses claims she stole Justin Bieber from Selena Gomez.
00:18:36.000 Now, what I'd say there is you can't own Bieber.
00:18:39.000 No.
00:18:40.000 Bieber is a free, sentient entity.
00:18:42.000 You can't just say, he was mine, you took him from me, can you?
00:18:45.000 Yeah.
00:18:45.000 No, he's not a little object, is he?
00:18:47.000 He's a free man.
00:18:48.000 Good name for an object.
00:18:48.000 Yeah.
00:18:50.000 Bieber.
00:18:51.000 Yeah.
00:18:51.000 And also for the act of stealing.
00:18:53.000 You Bieber'd that!
00:18:54.000 That was mine and you Bieber'd it!
00:18:56.000 Of course, the first person to ever try to nick Justin Bieber, to steal him, to take ownership of him, was me.
00:19:03.000 Here I am, when I was married to Katy Perry there, sort of literally trying to take Justin Bieber and own the wee lad.
00:19:11.000 He looks concerned, doesn't he?
00:19:13.000 He's got that look of, I should be smiling, but I'm a little bit scared.
00:19:13.000 He does.
00:19:16.000 He's gone for a smile, but the corners of his mouth are reaching out to the edges.
00:19:21.000 I'm actually glad that Katy Perry's in that image as well, because otherwise I think it would look even more dubious.
00:19:27.000 Yep, indeed.
00:19:28.000 You're smiling a bit too big there, aren't you?
00:19:31.000 I saw that Bieber!
00:19:33.000 I think it was the Grammys I was at, because I remember I was a movie star.
00:19:36.000 That's it.
00:19:37.000 The hats, the acting.
00:19:37.000 You remember it.
00:19:38.000 Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments if you thought that was very good acting I did once I was the Easter Bunny.
00:19:44.000 Other times, I was Arthur.
00:19:46.000 Other times, I was Lord of Snow.
00:19:48.000 I was also despicable me.
00:19:48.000 Despicable me.
00:19:50.000 I was at the Grammys, and I see that Bieber there, and, like, the thing was with him then, as you can see, he was only a little lad, and I couldn't sort of fathom the idea that he was just generating so much revenue, and I thought, he's young enough that I could probably adopt him.
00:20:04.000 If he sees me as a father figure, I'm never gonna have to concentrate again for the rest of my life.
00:20:09.000 I'll just go, go on, get out of here!
00:20:11.000 Get a song, show your hair.
00:20:13.000 The main thing people liked then was this hair, wasn't it?
00:20:15.000 You don't have to talk about the hair no more, he's moved on.
00:20:16.000 Yeah.
00:20:17.000 Like that, he's grown, he's grown from his hair.
00:20:20.000 But remember, none of these things, interesting and fascinating, sorry about burping, interesting and fascinating though they plainly are, because that's the content that you need to know, that's normal news.
00:20:30.000 We're asking, should we be laughing at Joe Biden or is the joke on us?
00:20:35.000 And the reason we're asking it is, does having a decrepit and imitative, performative figure in a presidential role indicate that the mechanisms of power themselves are failing, particularly as we're going to go deeper into congressional analysis and talk about the stock act
00:20:55.000 and the fact that the stock act that Obama put forth, he then, he didn't repeal it, but he sort of...
00:21:01.000 He modified it.
00:21:02.000 He modified it and nullified it. He didn't modify it to make it better, did he?
00:21:05.000 No.
00:21:06.000 Like, and you'll notice this, you'll notice this when we do this item, that when Obama signed the stock act, it was
00:21:12.000 very public, very ceremonial, we're going to stop people in Congress owning stocks and
00:21:16.000 shares in the companies they regulate. That's not what the American people want.
00:21:19.000 There's fanfare, there's people signing things. You'll notice a young...
00:21:22.000 Spunky Joe Biden standing there, swaggering.
00:21:25.000 Who's this young prodigy?
00:21:27.000 Who's this hot young thing?
00:21:29.000 And when they sort of not rescind it, but essentially introduce loopholes in it so that you can own stocks and shares essentially if they belong to like a spouse or a dependent child.
00:21:40.000 Yeah, and you don't have to declare it online anymore.
00:21:41.000 Don't have to declare it.
00:21:42.000 That was the point.
00:21:43.000 Don't make me declare every stock and share I own.
00:21:45.000 When they do that bit, they do that private.
00:21:48.000 So they're all out front when they're sort of signing things that they think look good, but when they're rescinding it or nullifying it, they do it out the back so you can't notice.
00:21:56.000 So let's have a look at some of the stuff that Joe Biden's been up to lately.
00:21:59.000 Many of you probably are concerned by this recent, I suppose it's sort of an unconscious Freudian announcement.
00:22:08.000 Let's have a look.
00:22:09.000 We go back a long way.
00:22:12.000 She was 12, I was 30, but anyway.
00:22:16.000 This woman helped me get an awful lot done, eh?
00:22:19.000 What does he mean, gal?
00:22:20.000 Do you suppose by that?
00:22:21.000 I don't know.
00:22:21.000 I mean, the most troubling part of it for me is she helped me get an awful lot done.
00:22:25.000 And I just don't know what that would mean to someone of that age without going to territories that I don't wish to.
00:22:32.000 What we think it is.
00:22:35.000 Right, there's a few options.
00:22:36.000 The most obvious one, that's the one you're thinking.
00:22:38.000 It can't be that.
00:22:39.000 It can't be that, can it?
00:22:41.000 Alright, so let's rule out that one.
00:22:43.000 So it's instead perhaps likely that he makes so many jokes about his Mephistopheles-like age, his old Monty Burns decrepitness.
00:22:51.000 That he's a fella from the crypt, and he's started to own it, hasn't he?
00:22:54.000 People have gone, advisors have gone, own this old thing, because people are laughing at it, but own it.
00:22:59.000 It can be like the N word.
00:23:01.000 You can own it back again.
00:23:02.000 Own your oldness.
00:23:04.000 So he's doing that, so he's making lots of jokes about age, but what he's done there is he's moved into a different context.
00:23:10.000 Oh, I'm so old that I was 30 when I was going out with 12 year olds.
00:23:14.000 No, no, the context changed now!
00:23:16.000 If you make that joke, the age has to be really high.
00:23:19.000 Because if you're going to deduct 15 years, make sure that's really high, that age.
00:23:23.000 He should say, I was 90, she was 12.
00:23:25.000 Oh no, I was 90, she was 75.
00:23:26.000 So if that's going to be the gap, that's even worse, Russ!
00:23:30.000 She should at least be older than the age of consent.
00:23:33.000 Exactly.
00:23:34.000 Just that's the only rule.
00:23:35.000 Have that as the threshold.
00:23:36.000 That's the rule.
00:23:37.000 Is there an age for consent?
00:23:38.000 Yep.
00:23:39.000 Let's say older than that.
00:23:39.000 That's it.
00:23:41.000 Not that we are, of course, suggesting that Joe Biden's done anything on the sly side of life.
00:23:45.000 Allegedly.
00:23:47.000 That's into the alleged territory right there.
00:23:50.000 But also, it's not like the last time he said it, because he's said a few other things in that territory, hasn't he?
00:23:55.000 Let's have a look.
00:23:59.000 Like, he must have said, someone must have told him, you know the other day, when you said that thing, she was 12, I was 30?
00:24:05.000 Yeah.
00:24:06.000 People didn't like that, Joe, because it came across a little bit Nazi.
00:24:11.000 So don't say anything like that.
00:24:12.000 Well, it's been a matter of days.
00:24:13.000 What is he at?
00:24:14.000 He says a baseball club.
00:24:16.000 Yeah, the Atlanta Broves World Series title.
00:24:19.000 Celebration.
00:24:19.000 He's there?
00:24:20.000 He's started rounding up 15-year-olds.
00:24:23.000 Sort of like R. Kelly.
00:24:25.000 Allegedly.
00:24:27.000 So, you'd think, watch your step for a little while.
00:24:30.000 For the next few days, don't say anything that can be misinterpreted in that manner.
00:24:34.000 Let's see what he gets up to.
00:24:36.000 He's really relaxed, that kid in grey.
00:24:45.000 The kid in grey is really relaxed about meeting the President of the United States.
00:24:48.000 Yeah, he's not bothered.
00:24:49.000 Right mate, yeah, how's it going?
00:24:50.000 Do you ever feel like...
00:24:53.000 Like Joe Biden, he's sort of probably alright and he's sort of quite nice, really.
00:24:57.000 Probably, yeah.
00:24:57.000 I mean, that just makes me think of like a lovely old grandad, but I don't know if that's the image you want for the President of the United States.
00:25:03.000 He's also endured quite a lot of personal tragedy, hasn't he?
00:25:05.000 He has, of course he has.
00:25:06.000 Like there's been those deaths in his life and all that kind of thing.
00:25:09.000 But I suppose if you're going to live to 150, you're going to experience that.
00:25:12.000 Yeah, exactly.
00:25:13.000 Also, like in Interview with a Vampire.
00:25:16.000 Like, everyone's dead with it.
00:25:16.000 Yeah.
00:25:17.000 Like, all the people they knew when they were little, they was like in Dick Turpin days.
00:25:22.000 Yeah.
00:25:22.000 Like Robin Hood times and stuff.
00:25:24.000 Yeah, and like vampires, I guess he has also done a lot of things that are pretty bad as well.
00:25:29.000 It doesn't look good, does it?
00:25:29.000 Yeah, I know.
00:25:30.000 What do you mean?
00:25:31.000 Some of the potential alleged deals, Ukrainian energy company links, Chinese energy company links.
00:25:38.000 Yeah, not to mention the actual political decisions over the course of his career.
00:25:41.000 Do you mean sort of like sanctioning droning?
00:25:44.000 All that kind of stuff, under Obama, all of those things.
00:25:46.000 I mean, there's a fair amount, isn't there?
00:25:48.000 We can dig deep into it another time, but...
00:25:50.000 Yeah.
00:25:51.000 This is a news stream.
00:25:51.000 Can we?
00:25:54.000 We can dig right into it if we want.
00:25:56.000 If we want, we're doing news.
00:25:57.000 We can dig into it.
00:25:58.000 We can dig in.
00:25:59.000 I guess what I'm saying is, yes, that is, I mean, that's what politicians are.
00:26:02.000 They are human beings, but they also commit some pretty dreadful things.
00:26:05.000 The fact is, if you're a participant in a system of that nature, you will necessarily have been involved in the murder of thousands of people.
00:26:15.000 That dude, Dan Carlin, who does Hardcore History, his brilliant podcast, let us know in the chat, let us know in the comments if you've checked that out.
00:26:21.000 He would say, even if you were like a lovely old, cuddly old president, like Jimmy Carter, who was like, so yeah, he was sort of like, nice sort of guy, he goes, that guy nutted off loads of people.
00:26:31.000 It's just the way it is if you're going to participate in those kinds of systems.
00:26:33.000 Look at Bush now.
00:26:34.000 If you look at Bush now, he's like, Oh, he's lovely, isn't he?
00:26:36.000 Oh, he's lovely.
00:26:37.000 He's just basically a painter.
00:26:38.000 He's a painter and decorator.
00:26:39.000 He's a very good one.
00:26:41.000 They're selling him like that sort of afro-hair Bob bloke, you know?
00:26:44.000 Yeah.
00:26:44.000 The guy that does those lovely gentle paintings.
00:26:47.000 What is he called, that bloke that does those gentle paintings?
00:26:47.000 That's it.
00:26:49.000 Let me know in the chat and the comments.
00:26:50.000 You know that guy, he's a Bob whatever.
00:26:51.000 Bob someone.
00:26:52.000 He Bob someone.
00:26:53.000 He's a cult figure now.
00:26:55.000 Let me have a look.
00:26:55.000 Let me have a look in the comments.
00:26:56.000 I bet people are telling me this stuff already, aren't they?
00:26:58.000 They're fast.
00:26:59.000 They're like lightning, these people.
00:27:01.000 Yeah.
00:27:02.000 Like, uh, even, like, so whatever kind of president... Dan Carlin, yeah, Dan Carlin.
00:27:06.000 Do you know who I mean?
00:27:07.000 You know, who's that Bob Gieser I mean, guys?
00:27:10.000 That is who I mean.
00:27:10.000 Bob Ross.
00:27:11.000 Thank you.
00:27:12.000 Well done.
00:27:12.000 Yeah, you can also do that if you work here.
00:27:13.000 That's really good.
00:27:14.000 Jimmy Carton was a moron.
00:27:16.000 That'd be cold!
00:27:18.000 Yeah, Bob Ross, well done.
00:27:19.000 Thank you, John the Savage.
00:27:20.000 Thank you, Jonger55.
00:27:23.000 Yeah, well done.
00:27:24.000 Yeah, you're right.
00:27:24.000 Yeah, you're right, you lot.
00:27:25.000 Stay with us.
00:27:26.000 Hey, listen, if it's investigative journalism you want, and you obviously do, and you deserve it, guess who's coming up later in the show?
00:27:32.000 We've got Glenn Greenwald, who's also going to be on Rumble in the... I think he's coming on in a couple of weeks.
00:27:38.000 He's going to start his own show.
00:27:40.000 We're going to be talking to him later in the show, so if you've got any questions for Glenn, you can, well, you can ask us them and we'll pass them on to him, won't we?
00:27:48.000 Yeah.
00:27:48.000 When he's here, Glenn Greenwald's going to be talking about Edward Snowden, for example, who's recently been granted Russian citizenship.
00:27:55.000 So will he have done a test for that, do you reckon, to become a Russian citizen?
00:27:58.000 I think he has to.
00:27:59.000 I think everyone has to.
00:28:01.000 Remember I had to become an American once?
00:28:05.000 That's right.
00:28:06.000 By God do they test you.
00:28:07.000 How did that go for you?
00:28:08.000 You're not great in those kind of things, are you?
00:28:10.000 I don't like being told what to do.
00:28:12.000 I don't like being told what to do.
00:28:14.000 I don't like being told what to be patriotic.
00:28:16.000 Although, you know, I love America.
00:28:17.000 I respect Americans.
00:28:18.000 I'm not attacking, you know, your country and your ancestors and all that kind of thing.
00:28:22.000 Also, though, my own country.
00:28:23.000 I believe in decentralised autonomy.
00:28:28.000 I believe we should be running our own communities.
00:28:30.000 I believe patriotism is only of value if it benefits the people who the flag claims to represent.
00:28:37.000 If patriotism and nationalism just becomes a kind of device for centralising fiduciary power and legislative power while ordinary people suffer, what's the bloody point of that?
00:28:48.000 We'll ask Glenn Greenwald.
00:28:49.000 Of course he will.
00:28:49.000 He'll have an answer, won't he?
00:28:50.000 Of course he will.
00:28:51.000 He's got a Pulitzer Prize.
00:28:52.000 Exactly.
00:28:53.000 They're not giving them out like candy.
00:28:55.000 No.
00:28:55.000 They want to take that back now, I bet.
00:28:57.000 Yeah, they'll regret that.
00:28:58.000 I mean, one thing you can say about the way that the mainstream media has changed is people like Glenn Greenwald, who have, like, sort of Pulitzer Prize-winning journalists who broke the Snowden story, or people like Chris Hedges, who also, like, won a Pulitzer and worked at the New York Times, now they have to sort of, like, just shake a tin can on the corner of the street, giving out news like Ann Jobs, and, like, would you like a Pulitzer Prize-winning piece of journalism?
00:29:24.000 Like, they're doing, like, backstreet journalism now, aren't they?
00:29:27.000 Real independent stuff.
00:29:28.000 It's the future, Ross.
00:29:29.000 Is it?
00:29:30.000 I hope so.
00:29:31.000 We've invested in it, haven't we?
00:29:32.000 Independent journalism.
00:29:33.000 OK, it's time now for us to... I mean, we've had a bit of a laugh now, haven't we?
00:29:38.000 We've said some frivolous things about Joe Biden.
00:29:41.000 We've retrospectively looked once more at dear little Justin Bieber.
00:29:46.000 Who, if you ask me, can't be owned by anybody except his own sweet self.
00:29:50.000 But now it's time to look at some meaningful news.
00:29:52.000 Did you know, if you're an American, 20% of the people in your Congress trade in industries that they regulate?
00:29:59.000 In spite of the fact that in 2012, Barack Obama, who many people, liberals, progressive folk thought was going to be fantastic for America and fantastic for the world, he passed the Stock Act and then he meddled with that Stock Act.
00:30:09.000 Nosed it right up and made it basically irrelevant.
00:30:12.000 Nosed it up, I suppose means... Translate that one.
00:30:15.000 Introduced mitigating legislation that reduced its impact.
00:30:20.000 Nice.
00:30:20.000 I suppose.
00:30:21.000 So, we're gonna have a look now at that more deeply in an item where I go off on my own, right?
00:30:27.000 So, I'm gonna go off somewhere else now.
00:30:29.000 We're gonna miss you.
00:30:30.000 Yeah, this item's called, here's the news.
00:30:33.000 No, here's the fucking news.
00:30:35.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.
00:30:37.000 The news.
00:30:38.000 No, here's the fucking news.
00:30:41.000 As Putin threatens Armageddon, we learned that 20% of Congress members own stocks in the industries they're
00:30:50.000 supposed to be regulating.
00:30:51.000 How can we trust them on the precipice of a crisis?
00:30:56.000 Now, this is an unusual time for the world.
00:30:59.000 Putin threatens Armageddon.
00:31:01.000 This is a time where you want to be able to rely on your leaders.
00:31:04.000 This is a time when you want to know that Congress is populated with people with one thing on their mind.
00:31:10.000 The preservation of civilization.
00:31:12.000 Whether you're on the left or the right, the preservation of the American way.
00:31:15.000 This is a time for a hero, a politician you can rely on.
00:31:18.000 Someone who means what they say and says what they mean.
00:31:21.000 Someone who represents a new, beautiful America of integrity.
00:31:24.000 Someone like Obama, who was the very politician that promised that these loopholes would forever be closed.
00:31:31.000 That insider trading would be a thing of the past.
00:31:33.000 Don't take my word for it though, here he is saying it.
00:31:36.000 Lately I've been talking a lot about the choices facing this country.
00:31:39.000 Straight away it's nice to be reminded that Barack Obama doubtless has a degree of charm, assuredness, charisma.
00:31:46.000 You can see why people were drawn to Barack Obama.
00:31:49.000 I remember why I was drawn to Barack Obama.
00:31:52.000 This is a president that represents new hope, new change.
00:31:56.000 Those were the buzzwords, if not the policies.
00:31:59.000 Here he is talking about something that we care about deeply on this channel.
00:32:02.000 Ensuring that politicians have one thing and one thing only on their minds.
00:32:05.000 The well-being of the people they represent.
00:32:08.000 That they're not distracted by corporate interests.
00:32:10.000 Isn't that the number one challenge they're going to face?
00:32:12.000 The titan of corporatism forever in their ear.
00:32:15.000 They're going to need to stout moral souls to resist temptation.
00:32:19.000 They certainly shouldn't own Stocks and shares in the companies they're supposed to regulate.
00:32:25.000 20% of people in Congress currently do own stocks and shares.
00:32:29.000 Do you think?
00:32:30.000 Let me know in the comments below.
00:32:31.000 Do you think that that biases the way they regulate those companies?
00:32:35.000 The fact that they're personally, literally, financially invested in those companies?
00:32:39.000 Let me know in the comments below.
00:32:40.000 Let me know.
00:32:41.000 Here, Barack Obama, and this is why so many people love him, introduced regulation to prevent that happening.
00:32:46.000 The idea that everybody plays by the same rules is one of our most cherished American values.
00:32:52.000 It goes hand in hand with our fundamental belief that hard work should pay off.
00:32:56.000 Joe Biden actually does look different.
00:32:57.000 He's actually deteriorated, isn't he?
00:32:59.000 Like there, he looks sort of more together, and he's under a lot less pressure.
00:33:02.000 There, he looks like he would be able to get off that stage if you went, leave the stage now, Joe.
00:33:07.000 He'd go, sure, off I go.
00:33:08.000 What, where, diddle, diddle, diddle, diddle.
00:33:14.000 Biden, are you OK?
00:33:15.000 Are you OK?
00:33:16.000 Are you OK, Biden?
00:33:17.000 It's the notion that the powerful shouldn't get to create one set of rules for themselves and another set of rules for everybody else.
00:33:24.000 That's Obama talking about the passing of the STOP Act, which is Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act.
00:33:31.000 In 2013, Obama quietly signed legislation that rolled back a provision of the Stock Act that required high-ranking federal employees to disclose their financial information online.
00:33:40.000 The emailed announcement was one sentence long.
00:33:42.000 There was no fanfare when the Senate and then the House passed the bill in largely empty chambers using a fast-track procedure known as unanimous consent.
00:33:50.000 That's how power works.
00:33:51.000 And if we expect that to apply to our biggest corporations, and to our most successful citizens, it certainly should apply to our elected officials.
00:34:01.000 Especially at a time when there's a deficit of trust between this city and the rest of the country.
00:34:07.000 Well, it's not got any better!
00:34:09.000 And that's why in my State of the Union, I asked members of the House and the Senate to send me a bill that bans insider trading by members of Congress, and I said that I would sign it right away.
00:34:18.000 Well, today I'm happy to say that legislators from both parties have come together to do just that.
00:34:26.000 The Stock Act makes it clear that if members of Congress use non-public information to gain an unfair advantage in the market, Yep, that was the basics.
00:34:36.000 the law. Nancy Pelosi. We were sent here to serve the American people and look out
00:34:41.000 for their interests. Yep, that's the basics. I mean this is what politics
00:34:46.000 should look like but the ceremony should have a relationship with reality.
00:34:52.000 Ceremony should be the performance of a set of values that are real, rather the
00:34:57.000 instantiation of an invisible idea.
00:35:00.000 We can't show you fairness, justice, but here's a ceremony.
00:35:04.000 We're going to sign a bit of paper, we're going to tell you what it is, and then we're going to do it.
00:35:08.000 But of course, it was repealed.
00:35:09.000 The same act was quietly repealed in 2013.
00:35:12.000 So when they're bringing it in, it's all can-can, legs kicking, lights flashing.
00:35:18.000 Fairness!
00:35:18.000 Justice!
00:35:19.000 When they repeal it, nothing to see here.
00:35:21.000 Out the front, look at me.
00:35:23.000 Round the back, where'd she go?
00:35:24.000 That's the nature of American politics.
00:35:26.000 It's a performance, and it remains a performance to this day.
00:35:29.000 That is why, in spite of this act being passed in 2012 and repealed in 2013, you have 20% of current Congress members owning stocks and shares in the companies they're supposed to be regulating at a time that we've just come out of that pandemic, we've got a weird president who looks tired and confused all the time and don't know where the exit is, and during this time it's acceptable for people in Congress to own stocks and shares in companies they regulate.
00:35:51.000 How can you oppose The might of Putin, if the might of Putin is what we oppose.
00:35:55.000 How can you oppose corporatism at all?
00:35:57.000 How can you represent ordinary American people?
00:36:00.000 The very things that are declared in that speech, how can that happen with these kind of stymie and inefficiencies?
00:36:06.000 What we want you to observe on this channel is the difference between the performance of politics and the reality of politics.
00:36:11.000 The fact that the things they say in public are the sort of things that should be happening kind of tells you that they know what they should be doing.
00:36:18.000 They know what they should be doing.
00:36:19.000 We were sent here to serve the American people.
00:36:22.000 And look out for their interests, not to look out for our own interests.
00:36:25.000 Don't bother.
00:36:26.000 What?
00:36:27.000 On my own interest?
00:36:27.000 Oh shit, I hope he doesn't know about Hunter.
00:36:29.000 We should make sure people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress can't lobby Congress, and vice versa.
00:36:37.000 That's that all dealt with.
00:36:38.000 Luckily lobbying's not a record height.
00:36:41.000 The lobbying industry had a record year in 2021, taking $3.7 billion in revenue.
00:36:41.000 It is.
00:36:46.000 Federal lobbyists are slated to spend in record numbers this year after lobbyists raked in $2 billion in the first two quarters of 2022 alone, an all-time high.
00:36:54.000 Top lobbyists, all of which spent millions of dollars in quarter two, included corporate behemoths like Meta, Amazon, Pfizer, and Pentagon contractor Lockheed Martin.
00:37:03.000 So there we go.
00:37:04.000 They say it because they know it's right, but they don't do it because they can't.
00:37:08.000 In the industry, with the top spending in quarter one, the health sector, nearly half of the 3,130 lobbyists that were active last year were former government employees.
00:37:16.000 If you've worked in government, you shouldn't be able to get a job in lobbying.
00:37:19.000 These are actual regulations, legislation that could be passed.
00:37:22.000 Why won't it be passed?
00:37:23.000 Let me know in the comments.
00:37:24.000 Let me know in the chat.
00:37:25.000 Thank you for using Foxy and I hope you enjoyed my video.
00:37:28.000 Now, here's the fucking news!
00:37:31.000 I'm back from where I was just then and we'll show you the rest of that, or I'll do the rest of that in a little
00:37:39.000 You've been sending us some comments, and very good comments they are too.
00:37:39.000 minute.
00:37:42.000 Chris Rumble, who's the bloke who started Rumble, Chris Pavlovsky, hi Chris, thanks for the gig and everything, says, Russell, thank you for trusting and switching to Rumble.
00:37:51.000 Independent creators without corporate media control is the future.
00:37:54.000 That's a hundred dollars as well.
00:37:55.000 I wonder how he decided a hundred.
00:37:57.000 Give us a bit more!
00:37:59.000 Give us October's payment!
00:38:01.000 That's what we want!
00:38:02.000 I'm bankrolling this operation!
00:38:05.000 That's what we want.
00:38:05.000 And then Jay Wolfgram, thank you for doing your life's purpose for our benefit.
00:38:10.000 Thanks, mate.
00:38:11.000 Actually, once in a while, when I become consumed with terrifying anxiety, I do recall that it is our function here to ...serve, that it is our function to convey truth, that it is our function to elevate consciousness, and the corruption that we see in the external world is also present within the individual.
00:38:28.000 As long as I can overcome my own inward corruption, I think we'll be okay, that we'll be able to generate new systems through the alliances that we will form through this new corporation.
00:38:37.000 That's a hundred dollars, if you want your comment brought to the forefront.
00:38:41.000 He gave more money than the head of Rumble.
00:38:44.000 Right, you're in charge now!
00:38:45.000 New guy, it's all about you!
00:38:47.000 And then someone only paid a dollar to say, are you in the Illuminati because of the 33 tattoo?
00:38:52.000 If I was in the Illuminati, and I'm not, I wouldn't put a tattoo on my wrist declaring... Oh, would you?
00:38:59.000 Aha, the double bluff!
00:39:00.000 The old famous double bluff.
00:39:02.000 Young Putin is over there.
00:39:03.000 He's the person that gives us the comments.
00:39:05.000 Are you alright there, Young Putin?
00:39:06.000 So cool, because if you look at an image of Young Putin, you'll see that his face and Young Putin's face are the same face.
00:39:12.000 Let's have a look at that.
00:39:13.000 There they are.
00:39:14.000 We're not, of course, saying that Putin's anything like a good guy, because he's a perilous... And he doesn't do our comments either.
00:39:20.000 We tried.
00:39:21.000 We said, Vladimir, would you consider coming over to Rumble?
00:39:24.000 Apparently he's very busy.
00:39:25.000 There's some sort of quite aggressive campaign going on somewhere in there, uh, in Europe.
00:39:29.000 Anyway, uh, further to our comments in, uh, here's the news.
00:39:32.000 No, here's the fucking news.
00:39:33.000 I'd like to do something I regularly do at home with my family, and that's quote Jean Baudrillard, or as you menace, Jean.
00:39:42.000 Power itself has for a long time produced nothing but the signs of its resemblance.
00:39:47.000 And at the same time, another figure of power comes into play, that of a collective demand for signs of power.
00:39:53.000 A holy union that is reconstructed around its disappearance.
00:39:56.000 When it's totally disappeared, we will logically be under the total hallucination of power.
00:40:01.000 A haunting memory that is already in evidence everywhere, expressing at once the compulsion to get rid of it.
00:40:06.000 No one wants it anymore.
00:40:07.000 Everyone unloads it on everyone else, and the panicked nostalgia over its loss.
00:40:12.000 Are we living in the simulacrum that Baudrillard describes?
00:40:16.000 Let us know in the comments.
00:40:17.000 Do they like that, the kids?
00:40:18.000 When you read it at home?
00:40:19.000 My children are quite into Baudrillard.
00:40:22.000 Yeah, we do.
00:40:23.000 A little bit of Little Prince, a bit of Smurfs, then it's hard into the postmodernists.
00:40:29.000 I tell them that all the stories I've just read them were meaningless.
00:40:31.000 But their mates don't come around anymore, do they?
00:40:33.000 No, they don't.
00:40:35.000 I tell them that Joe Biden comes over once in a while and that's normally enough to disincentivise them.
00:40:40.000 This rumble is going to blow up, says OXOX.
00:40:43.000 I hope they mean that in a hip-hop way.
00:40:46.000 Rather than in a, you know, terror way.
00:40:48.000 Hey, can I see more of those comments, please?
00:40:50.000 They're scooting out.
00:40:51.000 People are commenting at an alarming rate.
00:40:54.000 Politicians are not public servants.
00:40:55.000 They are out for their own profit, says AdMacRumble950.
00:40:59.000 Yeah, I think you're right.
00:41:01.000 DDoS attack again.
00:41:02.000 Canadian support, Russell, says Kenzie.
00:41:05.000 Keep chatting to us in that chat, because it really makes me feel good.
00:41:08.000 Yeah, it will get me too.
00:41:09.000 I just saw someone say, I'm rooting for a Putin.
00:41:13.000 Look, that may rhyme, but you can't root for Putin simply because it rhymes.
00:41:18.000 Otherwise, what, you're lying for Biden?
00:41:20.000 I mean, what are you going to do for Trump?
00:41:22.000 Zelensky's pretty difficult, though, isn't it?
00:41:24.000 Zelensky's pretty difficult to rhyme.
00:41:25.000 Zelensky, yeah, yeah.
00:41:28.000 Even you.
00:41:29.000 Master of the rhyme.
00:41:31.000 The original OG.
00:41:32.000 I don't know, Ospensky.
00:41:33.000 I can't relate to Russian literature with it.
00:41:36.000 All right, listen.
00:41:37.000 Why don't we Pause momentarily this hysteria and silliness to yield the floor, to cede, to our colleague at Rumble now whose show will soon start, a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist and fellow conspiracy theorist and right-wing fascist, it's Glenn Greenwald.
00:41:57.000 Hello Glenn, thanks for joining us.
00:41:59.000 Hey Russell, congratulations on your debut.
00:42:01.000 Super excited to join you in our fascist project as part of the far-right wing ideology we're now promoting.
00:42:08.000 It's good to be with you.
00:42:10.000 Yeah, it's good, isn't it, to get across all these conspiracy theories from the far-right, like that there's a kind of a corporatist movement across the globe to disempower ordinary people and to nullify democracy.
00:42:23.000 These kind of right-wing conspiracies should be marginalized.
00:42:27.000 Glenn, what do you reckon to that story about 20% of people in Congress owning stocks and shares in the companies that they're supposed to regulate?
00:42:38.000 How does that prevent ordinary democratic process from taking place?
00:42:42.000 How does it interrupt that?
00:42:45.000 I think it's interesting that people actually do realize that there's an image of Washington that they're shown, and then the reality of Washington that is hidden.
00:42:55.000 Because both President Obama and Donald Trump won by pointing out that Washington is a fraud, that it operates through lobbyists, through money.
00:43:03.000 Trump was saying all you have to do is write people a check in Washington in Congress, and they call you immediately and do what you want.
00:43:09.000 People understand that's the game.
00:43:11.000 The question is, what can be done to change it?
00:43:14.000 You know, people in Congress spend something like 80 to 90 percent of their time fundraising to keep themselves in office for the next term.
00:43:22.000 And all they're doing all the time is talking about little tiny regulations that affect a tiny sliver of people who donate to them.
00:43:28.000 People know this.
00:43:29.000 They know Washington is a fraud.
00:43:31.000 And I think this issue that you're raising of people in Congress owning stock in the very companies they're regulating is a very powerful way to illustrate that and to kind of raise anger, righteous anger over how this is functioning.
00:43:47.000 When we have the question that we've posed at the beginning of our show today, is Joe Biden a joke and is the joke on us?
00:43:57.000 When you have a figure like Joe Biden that becomes the subject of a great deal of ridicule, it's easy to kind of fall into nihilistic frivolity.
00:44:08.000 But Joe Biden does wield significant power.
00:44:13.000 And how has he been favourably reported on?
00:44:17.000 And how has his sort of persona as this sort of doddering and senile figure prevented us from seeing the true nature of his power and potentially of the corruption that that masks?
00:44:29.000 Yeah, I mean, it is, you know, I think we do have to confront the reality that he's clearly cognitively impaired.
00:44:35.000 I don't know if you saw today.
00:44:36.000 He was at a an event where he gave credit to a Republican congresswoman for helping pass a bill that he was praising and there to to sign and he said, hey, where's Congresswoman Jackie?
00:44:49.000 I don't see her.
00:44:49.000 And the reason he didn't see her is because she died in a car accident two months earlier.
00:44:54.000 And he actually issued a statement lamenting her death two months earlier, but obviously had no idea that she was dead, which is why he was asking where she was and why she wasn't at the ceremony.
00:45:03.000 And so you have, on the one hand, this person who's obviously, you know, doddering and senile in a sad way, right?
00:45:10.000 The thing we all see like in our grandparents and great-grandparents.
00:45:13.000 But on the other hand, he's the face of this, you know, kind of power center that continues to turn along regardless of what he does, just like it did with Trump and regardless of what he did, that is very sinister and nefarious and most of all consequential.
00:45:28.000 And it is important not to get distracted by the almost, as you say, frivolity of mocking Biden and lose sight of what the U.S.
00:45:35.000 government itself, not under Biden's control, only nominally so, continues to do to people around the world.
00:45:43.000 Perhaps he's sort of passed into a new transcendent state where he sees dead people, Sixth Sense style, I see dead people, dead Congress people.
00:45:53.000 Glenn, what do you think about Edward Snowden becoming a Russian citizen and what do you think has changed since the revelations that Edward Snowden made, of course, stewarded by your own Pulitzer Prize winning journalism?
00:46:06.000 Has the world changed for the better?
00:46:08.000 Have things got worse, broadly speaking, in that time?
00:46:12.000 Well one thing that's changed is that the West has become completely obsessed with Russia.
00:46:16.000 I would say at least as much as at the height of Cold War hysteria led by people like Joseph McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover.
00:46:22.000 Things that we had thought were kind of debunked and discredited and relics of the Cold War have now been completely rejuvenated where everything is attributed to Russia including long-standing social strife in the UK and the US.
00:46:35.000 And so obviously the fact that Snowden, who didn't choose to be in Russia but was forced to be in Russia, as Obama officials themselves boasted he was trying to get out and they blocked him from leaving by doing, among other things, threatening the Cubans and threatening of the other countries where he was obtaining asylum, is now being used to say, oh look, all along obviously this entire, you know, operation of disclosing NSA secrets, which won Pulitzers and Polks and every journalism award around the world, As it turns out, that, too, was just a Russian influence operation.
00:47:06.000 Snowden and me and Julian Assange were all Russian spies.
00:47:10.000 This kind of Cold War hysteria and paranoia has taken hold of not just the U.S., but the West.
00:47:16.000 They blame Brexit, Putin for Brexit.
00:47:19.000 And it's all a way of evading any attention or scrutiny on the elites, the neoliberal elites, who are causing all the suffering in this world by saying, oh, look, it's all Putin's fault.
00:47:30.000 In these kind of conspiracy adjacent spaces, where people are so suspicious of the system, so certain that democracy can't serve them, so certain that the media are inauthentic with them, there is this sense that there is deep state power, that there is a power that doesn't reveal itself, that we can't access.
00:47:50.000 When you've been involved with something as revelatory and epochal as the Edward Snowden story, do you feel the proximity of that kind of power?
00:48:02.000 Did you feel afraid for your life?
00:48:05.000 Did you feel that there were forces that are not evident or transparent that are present in forming global political narratives?
00:48:17.000 Yeah, you know, I spent, you know, two years or almost three years of my life doing nothing but reading through hundreds of thousands or millions of pages of top secret U.S.
00:48:26.000 government documents, not just about the NSA, but also British and Australian and Canadian agencies, but also the Pentagon and the CIA.
00:48:33.000 And not only did I get a firsthand glimpse of exactly what it is that they do, to the world, but also to those people like us who expose
00:48:41.000 it. I couldn't leave Brazil for more almost a year once I back out back from Hong Kong because
00:48:46.000 the US government was explicitly threatening privately and publicly that they would arrest
00:48:51.000 us if we step foot on US soil for the reporting we were doing. I was constantly warned that
00:48:55.000 in Brazil where I've lived for 17 years, the CIA has a massive presence due to its
00:49:00.000 relationship to the government that was a coup government that overthrew the Brazilian government in
00:49:06.000 1964 and continued through 1985 to prop up a tyranny. So the idea that, you know, this is
00:49:11.000 one of the things you were alluding to earlier that we're now right-wing conspiracists because we
00:49:16.000 say things like, hey, you know, the CIA and the NSA actually do sinister things.
00:49:22.000 In secret, outside of the forces of the democratic process, it used to be such a basic staple of knowledge.
00:49:31.000 You know, it was Dwight Eisenhower who chose to warn of that on his way out the door after serving as American president for eight years, after being a five-star general, and now it's discredited as something that only crazy conspiracy theorists believe, even though I spent, you know, three years reading the documents that prove it.
00:49:47.000 Yeah, in a sense, the charge of being a conspiracy theorist is just a way of undermining the information and discrediting that information.
00:49:58.000 Glenn, when your show starts in a couple of weeks, what sort of stuff are you going to do?
00:50:02.000 What's your show going to be like?
00:50:05.000 And will we be sort of like allies throwing to each other and stuff like on normal television?
00:50:12.000 Yeah, you know, I think we have a similar, though obviously not identical, approach to the world and view of the world.
00:50:19.000 And I think our incentives are very similar, which is the idea that corporate media allows an extremely narrow range of views and opinions to be expressed.
00:50:28.000 They promote and glorify the viewpoints and ideology of a very narrow range of people.
00:50:34.000 That's why you turn on television and all you see are ex-NSA and CIA and FBI and Pentagon agents delivering the quote unquote news to you.
00:50:43.000 We know that the corporate media is very subservient to The security state system, the security services in both Western Europe and and the U.S.
00:50:52.000 and so this is an opportunity not only to look at the news from a different perspective and to break through that propaganda but also reuse a platform that is intent on allowing free speech so we don't have to be in fear that if we say something that Anthony Fauci dislikes or the CIA director dislikes or the Biden White House dislikes we're going to be demonetized or lose our platform or censored or booted off and I think that's the most important thing at least to me Russell and what we're building is a space on the internet where you can go and speak freely without worrying that some corporate or government force is going to silence you.
00:51:29.000 So you know, like, we're going to do a story tomorrow on Bill Gates, Bill Gates' influence over the media, the donations he makes.
00:51:37.000 I was sort of surprised to learn that Bill Gates has donated like 300 million dollars to various media organisations.
00:51:43.000 And they're not charities either, it's things like CNN and MSNBC, why do they need donations?
00:51:49.000 And I suppose that as well as deep state power in the form of the kind of agencies that you've listed, the kind of notorious Five Eyes, not to be mistaken for Five Guys, which I think I think it's just a legitimate burger joint which you can reliably get good food at.
00:52:02.000 There's also these kind of Bill and Melinda Gates, Hillary Clinton, Clinton Foundation type sort of soft power organisations that have incredible influence and sway.
00:52:13.000 There's another form of, I don't know, circumventing the traditional conduits of democratic power.
00:52:18.000 We're going to talk about that.
00:52:19.000 It's another thing you know quite a lot about, isn't it, and you've written about, Glenn?
00:52:23.000 Yeah, you know, it's bizarre.
00:52:24.000 So the idea that, you know, billionaires and security agencies exert massive and oftentimes invisible unseen power to shape our politics and our society for their own interest used to be just a Very commonly accepted and widely acknowledged view, and it's one that I do believe most people continue to recognize, even though it's now dismissed and branded a conspiracy theory by the very same people
00:52:55.000 Who have spent the last five years telling Americans that Vladimir Putin has taken over not just the United States but the UK through sexual blackmail and all kinds of other leverage.
00:53:06.000 One of the most deranged conspiracy theories I've heard in my lifetime.
00:53:10.000 They're the ones who spread that and then at the same time trying to mean basic Ideas like billionaires and the government controls people through propaganda and money as though that's the wild conspiracy theory.
00:53:23.000 And that's what I think is needed more than anything, is a recalibration of what it is that's really fact and what it is that's really the disinformation.
00:53:31.000 Because to me, the disinformation comes most from exactly those agencies and entities claiming to be most dedicated to combating it.
00:53:40.000 With incredible auspiciousness and serendipity, it was just yesterday that we got a strike on YouTube for the sin of misinformation for talking about ivermectin, a word that we can say now.
00:53:53.000 Ivermectin, we talked about it and it was somewhat inaccurate.
00:53:56.000 We've pointed out a government website that said it was being clinically trialled and we said that it had been approved.
00:54:01.000 And actually, I don't normally do this, but it was young Putin who works for us.
00:54:04.000 He's one of the researchers and producers here.
00:54:07.000 I'm beginning to think that this guy is a conspiracy theorist.
00:54:09.000 He said, yeah, this is a good story, leave it in, and actually it's led to all sorts of complications.
00:54:15.000 Anyway... It's Russian involvement, that's what it is.
00:54:17.000 What was it?
00:54:17.000 It was Russian involvement.
00:54:18.000 Yeah, actually, Russian involvement.
00:54:19.000 Perhaps you are Russian-sponsored media.
00:54:22.000 That's what it's beginning to... Agent young Putin there has caused us all sorts of problems.
00:54:27.000 I wonder if what might emerge from free speech-oriented media are new political movements.
00:54:35.000 New means of organisation.
00:54:37.000 New ways, perhaps even, of transcending the bifurcations and divisions that are stoked by mainstream media.
00:54:44.000 Because, Glenn, if the window has shifted so much, if even the ideas that seemed central to the left and right just 10, 15 years ago are so sort of amorphous and mobile, doesn't it mean that there's a possibility for a different type of populism, different types of alliances that can get beyond the divisions of the culture war?
00:55:03.000 Have you seen anything that makes you think That's possible, mate.
00:55:07.000 I think people are craving...
00:55:10.000 Any kind of news or analysis or political space that allows them to understand that their enemies are not their neighbors, including their neighbors who have been led to think things with which they disagree, but are the power centers that are constantly trying to tell them and incite them to focus on their neighbors instead of on them.
00:55:31.000 I think there's a real craving for that.
00:55:33.000 I think that's one of the reasons why you've built a gigantic audience, why I've been able to build a large impact and influence through platforms like Substack,
00:55:42.000 where we are free to speak about those things and not have to be imprisoned by this
00:55:46.000 artificial Democrat versus Republican or left versus right framework that gets imposed on everything,
00:55:51.000 and that is sometimes applicable, but mostly not. And I think one of the things that we have
00:55:55.000 to be aware of is that anytime anything gets created that is a genuine threat to power
00:56:00.000 centers, the nature of power is that they will want to attack those things that are threats to them
00:56:05.000 by demeaning and discrediting, and then through brute force.
00:56:08.000 And we've already seen that with places like Substack and Rumble.
00:56:12.000 And we're going to be seeing it much, much more as we continue to grow, which I have no doubt we will for a variety of reasons.
00:56:19.000 There already are big attacks on places like Rumble for refusing not to de-platform RT when they're told to, for defending free speech instead of taking orders on censorship.
00:56:28.000 And the more we're able to break through and reach large audiences, They're not going to just say, oh well, good luck to them, good for them, glad to see that they're challenging and undermining and subverting our propaganda.
00:56:39.000 There are going to be attacks of all kinds and I think the ability to understand that's coming and to prepare for it and to fortify ourselves against it is crucial.
00:56:47.000 Glenn, thank you so much for joining us.
00:56:50.000 We couldn't have had a better guest for our inaugural show.
00:56:53.000 I'm sending so much love to you and to your family, and I'm so excited and thrilled, honoured even, that we're going to be working together.
00:57:00.000 Thanks for joining us, mate.
00:57:01.000 Yeah, me too.
00:57:01.000 I appreciate it.
00:57:02.000 Super excited.
00:57:03.000 Good luck with everything, Russell.
00:57:04.000 Talk soon.
00:57:04.000 Take care, Glenn Greenwald.
00:57:06.000 There he goes.
00:57:07.000 That's a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, a proper journalist, breaking real stories, talking about the news in a critical and awakened way.
00:57:16.000 You know what we do here on this channel?
00:57:19.000 In addition to the stuff we do here in the stream, in addition to the media that we We disseminate throughout the culture.
00:57:26.000 We do live events.
00:57:27.000 We have an event every year, a community event.
00:57:30.000 We've done it once.
00:57:31.000 We had Vandana Shiva and Wim Hof appear live.
00:57:34.000 If you want to learn more about that, there's a link in the chat.
00:57:37.000 And also, we have the Stay Free Foundation, where we make regular donations with your money that we raise from, you know, stuff you give us through the merchandise, primarily.
00:57:45.000 If you buy a little bit of merchandise, any money that we make goes to helping people with Addiction issues and mental health issues.
00:57:51.000 Not... I'm... I hasten to add people that are active drug addicts.
00:57:55.000 We don't just give them twenty or thirty dollars like dear old Chris from Rumble sending us a hundred pounds less than a normal person.
00:58:02.000 Like we give them if they're like trying to get off drugs.
00:58:04.000 We're very clear about that, innit?
00:58:07.000 Very clear, yeah.
00:58:08.000 If you're on drugs, we're not giving you any money.
00:58:10.000 If you're off the drugs, have a little bit of money.
00:58:12.000 It's incentive.
00:58:13.000 We incentivise you to get off the drugs.
00:58:15.000 You don't need to stay on the drugs.
00:58:16.000 No.
00:58:17.000 Get off them.
00:58:18.000 Have some money.
00:58:19.000 There's a bit of money to reward you.
00:58:21.000 Oh, I wish I'd had that when I was on drugs.
00:58:21.000 Easy, easy.
00:58:23.000 Ah, right.
00:58:23.000 That was a trick.
00:58:24.000 You've shown true colours there.
00:58:26.000 The colours of drugs.
00:58:27.000 The stinking colour of heroin.
00:58:27.000 Brown.
00:58:29.000 The naughtiest of all the drugs.
00:58:31.000 Okay, it's time now to hand over authority and control for this precious new emergent medium.
00:58:37.000 To you, the people watching this live stream, people with unchecked views, people with radical minds, free thinkers, lunatics, people out there in the outer regions of consciousness.
00:58:49.000 Let's see what you've got to say in our new item, Fake Comments.
00:58:56.000 They're real comments, some of them, but some of them are fake as well, that we've had to make up in order.
00:59:00.000 I mean, there's plenty of real comments, but like, let's have a look, just see, can I just quickly have a look at what people are saying in real comments, because I just want to see in case they're saying stuff that's interesting, young Putin.
00:59:11.000 Look at this, so look, someone's just given us 20 quid.
00:59:14.000 Amazing show.
00:59:15.000 Who are you planning for your future guests?
00:59:16.000 I love Glenn, by the way.
00:59:17.000 That's from Skippy83.
00:59:20.000 Skippy83, we're going to be talking to Vandana Shiva.
00:59:22.000 We're going to be talking to Elon Musk.
00:59:24.000 Elon Musk's coming on next week.
00:59:27.000 Who else we got coming on here?
00:59:29.000 No, I'm not actually sure.
00:59:30.000 I'm not actually sure.
00:59:31.000 We've got all sorts of people.
00:59:32.000 Get a list of that so I can answer that question easy.
00:59:34.000 Who?
00:59:35.000 I said that already.
00:59:35.000 Wim Hof.
00:59:37.000 That's Rasbomb.
00:59:38.000 Did USA bomb Nordstrom?
00:59:40.000 Oh Christ, so much pink.
00:59:42.000 Jesus Christ, don't say stuff like that, you're mental.
00:59:45.000 We love Space Cats, we love Rumble.
00:59:47.000 Right, listen you lot.
00:59:47.000 If you're going to be in that chat, don't say mad stuff.
00:59:50.000 It's not the dregs of humanity, like effing and blinding and using hate speech.
00:59:55.000 Do you know that the starting point is basic acceptance and love?
00:59:58.000 That's the starting point.
01:00:00.000 That's where we're going to come from.
01:00:01.000 I'm not saying we're not going to overthrow the government.
01:00:03.000 I'm not saying we're not going to bring down the system.
01:00:05.000 I'm not saying we're going to replace the corrupted and cancerous organs of a broken system with a new, enlightened, utopian set of ideals that will liberate us, that will allow progressive and traditional people to live side-by-side freely in fully autonomous communities, free from judgement.
01:00:21.000 I'm just saying, in a chat, say nice stuff.
01:00:24.000 This is from Leon Kennedy.
01:00:25.000 Buy XRP.
01:00:26.000 People say all sorts of stuff in here, eh?
01:00:28.000 Some of it might be, like, performance art or something.
01:00:30.000 Right, you're a performance artist.
01:00:31.000 Someone, for example, has just said fart.
01:00:33.000 Well, there you go.
01:00:34.000 That's Junkyard1976, who's just said fart.
01:00:37.000 Is that performance art?
01:00:38.000 I think it is.
01:00:39.000 And then, um... This is... Please tell us about Edward Snowden, says Marie Eugene.
01:00:45.000 And someone's saying, Wild and Sacred says, get Charles Eisenstein on here.
01:00:49.000 No, fair enough.
01:00:51.000 Yeah, well, actually, Charles Eisenstein, he's good.
01:00:53.000 We've had him on before, we'll try and get him on again.
01:00:56.000 Alright, so let's have a look at some of these fake comments that we've got.
01:01:00.000 Fake comments.
01:01:02.000 What's this one?
01:01:03.000 So, Mel Baker, she sent you a link, and she said, we should ask kids for their advice all the time.
01:01:10.000 And she must have a reason for this, and I believe it's skewed towards this clip.
01:01:14.000 Let's have a look.
01:01:19.000 What this is, I believe, is a clip of people talking about the royals.
01:01:23.000 It's some sort of Australian little kid saying, when asked, what would you like to see King Charles do?
01:01:28.000 In our country, we've got things called kings and queens.
01:01:30.000 We've got a new king at the moment.
01:01:31.000 He's got new insignia.
01:01:33.000 He's got new iconography.
01:01:35.000 The money's about to change forever.
01:01:37.000 Like, you know, because we've had the queen on it for a while, and it's been going quite well.
01:01:41.000 Listen, while you sort that stuff out, why don't you, Gareth?
01:01:43.000 Yeah?
01:01:44.000 If I wanted to become a Russian, what kind of work would I have to do?
01:01:47.000 If I wanted to become an American, what kind of work would I have to do?
01:01:50.000 What are the citizenship tests of these various nations?
01:01:54.000 We've got some slides for that, actually, so it is going to require slides.
01:01:57.000 Oh, really?
01:01:58.000 That's going to require also its own effort.
01:02:00.000 You'll have to bear with us, because this is our first ever streamed show.
01:02:02.000 We've not streamed a show before, so there are some sort of technical issues here, like pulling up these evident clips.
01:02:09.000 And if you lot in the chat are going to say sort of mad stuff, like the word fart, I won't be able to reliably use that as content.
01:02:16.000 So, I'd like you to cast your mind back a few minutes to when we were talking to Glenn Greenwald, or when I was reading out Baudrillard, and think, this is the tone, this is the established tone.
01:02:24.000 We can be frivolous, we can be silly, we can be downright sceptical and cynical if that's what's required, but we can't just type in the word fart.
01:02:31.000 So, Gal, what have you, has everything essentially crashed?
01:02:33.000 I'll tell you a bit more about Congress, following our video earlier, and actually, we're coming back to that video later.
01:02:38.000 Item.
01:02:39.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:02:40.000 That's a good idea.
01:02:41.000 OK, let's do that.
01:02:42.000 Now, so earlier on, we were talking about how 20% of people in Congress own stocks and shares in the companies that they've been elected to regulate.
01:02:50.000 And some of them specifically and particularly sit on committees that are supposed to regulate, for example, big tech or the financial industry.
01:02:58.000 No, no, no.
01:02:59.000 Don't just play it in.
01:03:01.000 Stop.
01:03:01.000 Don't just play it in.
01:03:02.000 Actually, you mustn't do that, darling.
01:03:05.000 That's the last thing that any of us need.
01:03:07.000 Kill that now, we'll never go back to that.
01:03:10.000 I want to talk about this actually, Gal.
01:03:14.000 Tell me exactly what it is, how we got ourselves into this situation, because Obama did pass an act in 2012, then they didn't repeal or rescind that act, but they sort of moderated it.
01:03:25.000 We're going to show you the rest of that item in a minute, but Gal, what did you want to pick up on?
01:03:30.000 Yeah, well, it's interesting because, you know, even within this ability that people in Congress have to declare stocks that they, you know, regulate and own, they have 45 days.
01:03:45.000 The law is they have 45 days to declare this.
01:03:48.000 That's the one law that's left.
01:03:50.000 You know, it's like, all right, you can have the stocks, we'll leave that in, you can do that, but you must declare it within 45 days.
01:03:55.000 Anyway, so inside of literally just That's it.
01:03:58.000 That's the law.
01:03:59.000 put an article together. Insider and several other news organisations have identified 72
01:04:04.000 members of Congress who have recently failed to properly report their financial trades
01:04:08.000 as mandated by the Stock Act. So they're not even doing it within 45 days.
01:04:12.000 What? So they've just been told, you can have whatever stocks and shares you want, but as
01:04:17.000 long as you let us know in what, 45 days?
01:04:19.000 That's it. That's the law. That's what they have to do.
01:04:21.000 But they won't do it?
01:04:22.000 They won't even do that. So a key provision of the law mandates that lawmakers publicly
01:04:26.000 and quickly, 45 days, disclose any stock trade made by themselves, a spouse or a dependent
01:04:31.000 child. Now we've talked about this before, like what that dependent child could be.
01:04:36.000 Like, you can just have a child who's ever so dependent and is in part of your house.
01:04:40.000 Like, if this child's so dependent, he's basically going to be quite malleable when it comes
01:04:43.000 to doing stock trades that you can conceal within your family, within your family unit.
01:04:48.000 What age range is a dependent child, do you think?
01:04:51.000 Well, you could say that Hunter Biden.
01:04:54.000 It depends what they're dependent on.
01:04:56.000 Good point.
01:04:58.000 Yeah, so many members of Congress have not fully complied with the law.
01:05:03.000 They offer excuses including ignorance of the law.
01:05:06.000 Cleric, which you'd think they would understand the law, being... Because they make it up.
01:05:11.000 They do make the law up.
01:05:12.000 If you make up a law, you've got to at least understand it, innit?
01:05:15.000 It's like you design Monopoly, and then you're sat there and you start chewing on the community chess cards, or that little Scotty Dog and the Top Hat, you start putting them together.
01:05:22.000 You'd have to say, hold on a minute, what was in your mind when you were conceiving of this system?
01:05:26.000 Yeah, also the word ignorance is like, I think that's extra Mickey, really.
01:05:30.000 Well, they're absolutely ignorant of it.
01:05:33.000 It's not that I forgot it for a while.
01:05:34.000 I've just never known what it was or where it was.
01:05:37.000 Yeah, so ignorance of the law, clerical errors, so they're blaming clerics, I guess.
01:05:42.000 You can't blame clerics.
01:05:43.000 No, you can't do that.
01:05:44.000 Oh, they typed it out wrong.
01:05:46.000 That's their fault.
01:05:47.000 And mistakes by an accountant, so now they're blaming accountants.
01:05:50.000 There's so many people, like, I suppose what you want is, like, the buck stops here type politics of JFK.
01:05:57.000 People that are willing to put their head above the parapet, knowing what might happen to that head, particularly if they go for a drive in Dallas.
01:06:03.000 There are penalties, though, Russ.
01:06:04.000 I don't mean that in a mean way, he was a great hero.
01:06:05.000 There are penalties.
01:06:07.000 Go on.
01:06:07.000 So when lawmakers who violate the stock-out face a fine, the penalty is usually small.
01:06:12.000 $200 is the standard amount, and that's sometimes waived by the House or Senate ethics officials.
01:06:17.000 $200?
01:06:17.000 Yeah, that's it.
01:06:17.000 Yeah.
01:06:19.000 Like, a fine is meant to be a form of penalty.
01:06:22.000 Like, a $200 penalty, that's insignificant.
01:06:25.000 To Nancy Pelosi.
01:06:26.000 To Nancy Pelosi.
01:06:27.000 Nancy Pelosi, who may be worth up to $100 million, is not... I think it's more now.
01:06:32.000 I think it's $172, I think.
01:06:34.000 If she's worth $172 million, she's not going to feel the pinch, is she, of a $200 fine.
01:06:39.000 With her lethal little sharp, jabby-jab elbows.
01:06:42.000 No, she'll be all right, I think, Nancy.
01:06:44.000 She'll be fine.
01:06:44.000 It's not going to touch the sides.
01:06:46.000 All right, so one of the things that you may have noticed during the item, here's the fucking news, is a young, plucky, strident, vibrant Joe Biden.
01:06:57.000 Now, the evidence of the deterioration that we were soon to experience was visible.
01:07:03.000 If you have a look, there are a few moments there where Joe Biden looked, I would say, If not suspicious, a little bit odd.
01:07:11.000 This is Biden, that young protege, standing with Barack Obama.
01:07:15.000 Let's have a look at some of these.
01:07:16.000 Let's look more closely at what he was doing while Obama was announcing the Stock Act.
01:07:20.000 It goes hand in hand with our fundamental belief that hard work should pay off.
01:07:24.000 A little bit of fiddling with the jacket there.
01:07:26.000 I suppose that's sort of a bit discomfort in this place.
01:07:29.000 But he looks much more cognizant and present than the man that we've come to know as the Earth's most powerful lover of teenagers.
01:07:36.000 Let's have a look.
01:07:37.000 About to start coming on stock.
01:07:38.000 I said that I would sign it right away.
01:07:41.000 Well, today, I'm happy to say... Oh, he's gone for the old snout!
01:07:44.000 What does that mean, the snout dab there?
01:07:47.000 Just concentrate, let the President talk, and then finally... We were sent here to serve the American people, and look out for their interests, not to look out for our own interests.
01:07:57.000 What?
01:07:57.000 I'm here for my own interests, and maybe a little bit for Hunter's.
01:08:00.000 Like, the thing that worries me when you see a brilliant orator and charismatic leader like Barack Obama say stuff like that is it makes me realize they know what's right.
01:08:10.000 And that's what worries me.
01:08:11.000 I suppose we have a lot of stuff around wokeness, that many of the values that are espoused are important values, but values that are exploited and misused.
01:08:21.000 These ideas are Used as tokens to distract us from the lack of moral rectitude rather than of emblems of a deeper set of values that are being pursued.
01:08:33.000 Or like this sort of like even perhaps with the environmental movement like you see big corporations that are Literally responsible for ecological decline, espousing sort of easy, phatic phrases about ecological responsibility.
01:08:48.000 So I suppose that what we're talking about today is politics as performance.
01:08:53.000 Joe Biden as a kind of, well some of you have said in the comments, as a kind of puppet figure, or a Congress where people are supposed to be regulating and legislating on behalf of American people, but where we ...deeply suspect they are essentially motivated by self-interest.
01:09:09.000 Perhaps the whole system is a type of performance.
01:09:12.000 The mainstream media, which is supposed to be a conduit of information, which is supposed to be defined by transparency and clarity, has become opaque and disingenuous.
01:09:22.000 So what we have are a set of interlocking systems that prevent ordinary people having access to truth and having access to power, and that's precisely what we're interested in changing and certainly initially addressing.
01:09:33.000 But I think, you know, changing over time is something we're well into as well, isn't it mate?
01:09:37.000 It certainly is.
01:09:37.000 Tomorrow we'll be talking about Bill Gates as well, so...
01:09:40.000 In tomorrow's show, we're going to be looking at Bill Gates.
01:09:43.000 Now, again, this is the territory, as Glenn Greenwald said, that sometimes is regarded as conspiratorial.
01:09:50.000 But there's no doubt that Bill Gates has considerable power and considerable influence throughout the pandemic.
01:09:57.000 His ideas were at the forefront and he had undue influence both Ideological and financial in some very surprising areas.
01:10:05.000 I suppose most of you watching this are well-educated, albeit autodidactically, enough to know that Bill Gates is the second largest donor to the WHO.
01:10:15.000 The biggest donor to the WHO?
01:10:17.000 America!
01:10:18.000 America!
01:10:19.000 300 million people!
01:10:20.000 World Wars!
01:10:21.000 Flags!
01:10:22.000 Eagles!
01:10:23.000 Mountains!
01:10:23.000 Now, those of you that are members of Stay Free AF, that's our little membership crew, can join us in a minute where we're going to be answering your questions and answers.
01:10:30.000 So that's what we're going to be talking about tomorrow.
01:10:34.000 Now, those of you that are members of Stay Free AF, that's our little membership crew,
01:10:39.000 can join us in a minute where we're going to be answering your questions and answers.
01:10:44.000 Keep them legible, keep them clean, keep them clear.
01:10:48.000 Before that, shall we have a look at the rest of this video?
01:10:50.000 I wondered if maybe we should look at some of that other stuff, though, before we go.
01:10:53.000 I mean, I'm kind of enjoying it here now.
01:10:55.000 I like it.
01:10:56.000 What are some of the other items that we had in the sort of back quarter of the show?
01:11:01.000 Was there anything in there?
01:11:02.000 Perhaps you'd like to see this moment from the mainstream media.
01:11:04.000 Forget the little Australian kid.
01:11:05.000 I've fallen out of love with her when she piped up when I was talking.
01:11:08.000 Now, this is a little British pop star named Lewis Capaldi.
01:11:12.000 You might not have heard of him if you're an American person, but he's making a mainstream media appearance here, and he uses some colloquialisms that perhaps don't belong in the realm of breakfast time.
01:11:22.000 This is an early morning show.
01:11:23.000 You can see in the corner of the screen it's 8.59 in the morning.
01:11:27.000 Lewis Capaldi, I don't know what kind of vibe he's on.
01:11:30.000 I get the idea he's quite a nice guy.
01:11:32.000 He's outspoken and jovial.
01:11:34.000 He's jovial!
01:11:35.000 He's being jovial.
01:11:36.000 He's got spirit.
01:11:37.000 That's what he's got.
01:11:38.000 First of all, he starts off talking about the geyser, the anchor's hair, and then you can sense discomfort at the level of joviality and spontaneity.
01:11:49.000 Can't you, Gal?
01:11:49.000 Let's have a look at this.
01:11:50.000 Let's see, you've got great hair.
01:11:53.000 We were talking about it outside, weren't we?
01:11:55.000 They don't like that he's referred even to a realm outside of the frame of the show.
01:12:02.000 You can see, look, that's the mainstream anchor.
01:12:04.000 He don't like that he's been referred to.
01:12:06.000 The female anchor adjacent to him there, she's getting ready to comment.
01:12:10.000 But you can sense, like this is an atmosphere that I've created on TV shows a lot, that you can create a little bit of chaos there with just a little bit of spirit.
01:12:19.000 Let's have a look at how it goes.
01:12:22.000 I didn't see that.
01:12:24.000 Looks great.
01:12:24.000 Well, you've got great hair, too.
01:12:26.000 Yeah, I see you.
01:12:27.000 Oh, look at that.
01:12:27.000 There you go.
01:12:28.000 Right, the high five.
01:12:29.000 It's getting a bit more anxious.
01:12:31.000 Many of us now that are attuned to subcutaneous detail will be sensing that the spirit of chaos is about to emerge.
01:12:38.000 Very rarely happens.
01:12:39.000 That very rarely happens.
01:12:41.000 Would you like a rim?
01:12:42.000 Would a what?
01:12:43.000 Would you like a rim?
01:12:44.000 I thought you said a rim.
01:12:46.000 She's gone for a, like a joke there, a sort of a dad joke.
01:12:49.000 Well, get a room, you two.
01:12:51.000 You know, like a safe little joke.
01:12:54.000 But Lewis Capaldi has taken it to the territory of rimming.
01:12:58.000 Which, at breakfast time... Why not?
01:13:01.000 Could be a worse time.
01:13:02.000 Start the day!
01:13:03.000 There you go.
01:13:04.000 Go in there, go in hard!
01:13:06.000 Wait for it to be fragrant and fresh.
01:13:09.000 Get it right in there with the yawning dawn.
01:13:13.000 Okay you guys, so like today we've been talking about the spectacle of power, haven't we?
01:13:16.000 The presentation of power and the reality of power.
01:13:19.000 Do you think you have systems that serve you?
01:13:21.000 Do you think, as Glenn Greenwald said, that what we really have are a set of deep state agencies that govern the true nature of power and Incredible, tyrannical financial interests that pull the strings of apparent global organisations such as WHO, IMF, WEF.
01:13:39.000 All of these things we'll be talking about in the future on Stay Free with Russell Brand because these are the things we're interested in.
01:13:45.000 military industrial complex, mainstream media corruption, the pandemic and big pharma,
01:13:50.000 and real values, human values, getting beyond the conflagration that we're continually confronted
01:13:57.000 with between apparently separate communities that I believe have more in common with one another
01:14:02.000 than we have that separates us, whether you're a traditional person or a progressive person,
01:14:06.000 whether you love Trump or loathe Trump, whatever you feel...
01:14:09.000 China.
01:14:10.000 You've got to laugh at that guy.
01:14:11.000 You've got to love him, haven't you?
01:14:13.000 Whatever you feel about mainstream media, mainstream politics, big business, and certainly whatever you feel about the cultural world, there is a place for you here to engage in honest, open discourse and to head towards something more truthful and more beautiful.
01:14:27.000 To recognise that your individual awakening can connect you to communal awakening.
01:14:31.000 That if we're going to change the world, we're going to have to change ourselves, we're going to have to do things differently, we're going to have to think a little bit differently, we're going to have to form new alliances.
01:14:40.000 These are the kind of things we're interested in talking about on Stay Free with Russell Brand.
01:14:45.000 Have a look now at the rest of our item.
01:14:47.000 Here's the news.
01:14:48.000 No, here's the fucking news.
01:14:49.000 And for those of you that are members of our Stay Free AF community that gives you all sorts of assets and advantages, there's a link in the description.
01:14:57.000 It'll tell you more about that.
01:14:58.000 We'll be doing a quick Q&A.
01:15:00.000 Thank you for joining us for this historic First broadcast.
01:15:04.000 Historic, I suppose.
01:15:05.000 I mean, will it be in a history book?
01:15:06.000 Yes.
01:15:07.000 Depends who writes them, doesn't it?
01:15:08.000 If we rise to a position of some authority... They're online now, anyway, I think.
01:15:12.000 History books, they're online these days.
01:15:14.000 Yeah, you could just probably... It's just like Wikipedia now.
01:15:16.000 We could type it ourselves.
01:15:17.000 We could just go and amend it.
01:15:19.000 Just saying, then our Rumble channel happened.
01:15:21.000 It was brilliant.
01:15:22.000 It was very good. $200.
01:15:24.000 It was seismic.
01:15:25.000 We got $100 from the bloke who owns the old platform, then a bit more money from someone who we may never yet meet.
01:15:31.000 But you are considered to be part of our community.
01:15:34.000 We adore you.
01:15:35.000 We love you.
01:15:36.000 Have a look at the rest of the item.
01:15:38.000 Here's the news.
01:15:39.000 No, here's the fucking news.
01:15:39.000 Then we'll do a quick Q&A if you're part of the Stay Free AF community.
01:15:43.000 See you soon.
01:15:43.000 stay free.
01:15:55.000 Between the 55 corporations that paid $0 in federal income taxes in 2020, for instance, the group spent a combined nearly $450 million in lobbying and campaign contributions since 2015, which translated into $12 billion in tax savings and rebates for the companies in 2020.
01:16:10.000 I think we're beginning to see the mechanics of how politics truly works.
01:16:15.000 I think we're Beginning to see what would actually happen if money was taken out of politics.
01:16:19.000 It would fall apart.
01:16:20.000 You wouldn't have politics.
01:16:22.000 It would be unrecognisable.
01:16:24.000 It's like has been said of Britain.
01:16:25.000 Without the monarchy, it's not Britain anymore.
01:16:27.000 That's what defines Britain.
01:16:29.000 You take dirty money out of politics in your country, in our country, probably in most places around the world, you wouldn't have a recognisable landscape.
01:16:36.000 You wouldn't get the same people in it.
01:16:37.000 You wouldn't get the same laws passed.
01:16:39.000 It would change the world overnight.
01:16:42.000 That's why they can never let it happen.
01:16:46.000 We actually got what he actually wrote here.
01:16:47.000 Change America forever.
01:16:49.000 Fingers were crossed behind my back.
01:16:51.000 Don't actually have to do anything.
01:16:52.000 Reverse it all in one year.
01:16:54.000 I love you very, very much.
01:16:55.000 See you at Martha's Vineyard having one hella party.
01:17:00.000 Little did we know we were 10 years away from a president that you'd applaud if he could actually hold a pen.
01:17:06.000 Nearly 20% of Congress members, 49 Democrats and 44 Republicans, well, they're almost as bad as each other.
01:17:12.000 They have been trading shares of companies in industries that they are supposed to be overseeing as part of their committee assignments, creating major conflicts of interest and new report fines.
01:17:21.000 Between 2019 and 2021, 97 US Senators and Congress members or their immediate family made financial transactions in which they may have had access to inside information.
01:17:32.000 Representative Bob Gibbs, Republican, Ohio, member of the House Oversight Committee, reported buying and trading shares of pharmaceutical giant AbbVie in 2020 and 2021.
01:17:41.000 At the same time, the committee was investigating the company and its rivals for unfair pricing practices.
01:17:48.000 I don't know so much about AbbVie.
01:17:50.000 I see it was a kind of a family firm.
01:17:52.000 Which family?
01:17:53.000 My family.
01:17:54.000 And meanwhile, a total of 13 lawmakers traded shares of companies that were under investigation by committees they served on.
01:18:00.000 What's the point of having a committee if the person investigating it has a vested interest in the outcome?
01:18:07.000 Okay, you're our best man.
01:18:09.000 Now, what the hell's going on at AbbVie?
01:18:11.000 I like him.
01:18:13.000 The wife of representative Alan Lowenthal, Democrat, California, sold Boeing shares in March 2020, just a day before a committee her husband sat on released a bombshell report that alleged Boeing leadership was partly to blame for two 737 MAX crashes.
01:18:31.000 Oh, and you thought I sold those Boeing shares because I had information that there was about to be a damning report revealing their culpability in some air crashes?
01:18:44.000 I sold those shares to fund a surprise birthday party and you've just spoiled it!
01:18:49.000 You're just like your father.
01:18:51.000 Although, what I will say about your father is he's very reliable when he sits on committees and he wouldn't be influenced by knowing that we own shares in Boeing.
01:18:58.000 Phew!
01:18:58.000 The most active traders were also those who may have had the... The most active traders were those who may have had the most insider information.
01:19:08.000 44 of the 50 most active traders in Congress had conflicts of interest.
01:19:13.000 So the ones who are doing it most are the ones that are most culpable, most likely to be guilty.
01:19:18.000 It's not someone in Congress.
01:19:19.000 Even though I don't know nothing about it, because I would never get an info.
01:19:22.000 I just love stocks and shares, man.
01:19:24.000 I trade stocks and shares for the love of it.
01:19:26.000 I love my stock trading down the streets, man.
01:19:28.000 I just do it like jazz.
01:19:30.000 Buy!
01:19:32.000 Sell!
01:19:33.000 What's that?
01:19:34.000 Boeing's planes keep crashing and it's their fault.
01:19:37.000 Sell!
01:19:37.000 Sell!
01:19:38.000 Shit!
01:19:38.000 Sell!
01:19:39.000 The analysis doesn't even capture all problematic trades.
01:19:42.000 For instance, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's husband is famous for purchasing shares of companies like Amazon and Meta, which Pelosi is responsible for regulating.
01:19:51.000 But since Pelosi doesn't sit on a committee, she was not included in the study.
01:19:55.000 Nancy Pelosi is a reliable member of Congress, not some evil witch who would elbow a child just to get a nice photograph.
01:20:01.000 Nancy Pelosi elbowed this little girl during a photo-op?
01:20:05.000 Despite ongoing concerns about lawmakers' financial transactions, there is minimal regulation on stock trade.
01:20:11.000 Because, like, it's not a bug, it's a feature.
01:20:14.000 It's not a bug, it's a feature.
01:20:16.000 You can't do that, otherwise there's no point in the whole system.
01:20:19.000 Hey guys, we can't trade stocks or shares anymore!
01:20:21.000 See you then, bye!
01:20:22.000 See you!
01:20:23.000 Just go!
01:20:23.000 There's no point doing it.
01:20:25.000 That's the reason.
01:20:25.000 Hey guys, you can't get jobs anymore in companies that you used to regulate.
01:20:30.000 Guess what would happen?
01:20:31.000 People would get involved in politics that genuinely cared about ordinary people.
01:20:36.000 People that had no other motivation.
01:20:38.000 You're a human.
01:20:38.000 I'm a human.
01:20:39.000 You know how difficult it is not to be like, oh god, my kid's in this football team.
01:20:43.000 I want them to win.
01:20:44.000 Oh shit, I'd make a few bucks here if I was like... We're human beings.
01:20:47.000 We're fallible.
01:20:48.000 The system has to change in order to elevate the best aspects of us and the best among us.
01:20:55.000 Not to create a cesspit where the scum of the earth rise to the top.
01:20:59.000 Under the Stock Act, which is the only legislation that reigns in lawmakers' trades.
01:21:04.000 Stop trading!
01:21:05.000 Get the fuck off me with your Stock Act!
01:21:07.000 I'm trying to trade!
01:21:09.000 Well, your men will be in Congress.
01:21:10.000 Piss off!
01:21:11.000 Most members of Congress are still free to make trades that could conflict with their legislative duty as long as they disclose the information within 45 days, which many do not do.
01:21:22.000 Okay.
01:21:23.000 Okay.
01:21:23.000 Well, listen, it is difficult.
01:21:24.000 I understand it.
01:21:25.000 I love trading myself.
01:21:26.000 So if you are going to trade, will you at least tell us within 45 days that you did trade?
01:21:33.000 No!
01:21:33.000 The 2012 law was passed with bipartisan support, it's almost as if they're the same, in the wake of a stock trading scandal.
01:21:39.000 Yet in the nearly 10 years since it was enacted, no one has been prosecuted after it, even as many members continue to conspicuously trade.
01:21:46.000 Pointless legislation.
01:21:48.000 Despite renewed chatter about the importance of cracking down on legislators' stock trades, Come on!
01:21:53.000 We're chattering about it!
01:21:55.000 high-ranking staffers say the likelihood Congress will actually regulate itself is so low, it's laughable.
01:22:00.000 How low is it?
01:22:05.000 It's all performative.
01:22:06.000 It's not going anywhere, one Senate staffer told the New York Post.
01:22:10.000 Proponents of legislation that would ban members of Congress from trading stocks say that Democratic Party leaders are stalling on the bill.
01:22:17.000 Though House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat California, claimed last week that lawmakers are finally ready to bring a bill to ban Congress from trading stocks to a vote by the end of this month, proponents of the ban are sceptical that that is the case, according to interviews with lawmakers.
01:22:30.000 Here's what I predict.
01:22:31.000 They might.
01:22:32.000 They'll do a big ceremony about it.
01:22:33.000 Joe Biden will sign something with a pen, probably quivering and shaking as he goes.
01:22:38.000 Then a couple of months or a year later, They'll repeal it and no one will hear about it because it'll be some other thing in the news that they tell you now.
01:22:45.000 Watch out for the monkey pox kids!
01:22:46.000 Some lawmakers think that the Democratic leaders could be delaying because they're personally against the plan.
01:22:51.000 Representative Abigail Spanberger has speculated that Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer are simply trying to put the bill off long enough until efforts to pass it fizzle out.
01:23:01.000 I think that they're trying to run out the clock, she said in May.
01:23:03.000 That's the kind of thing that goes on, isn't it?
01:23:05.000 Everyone will get bored of it in a minute, they'll get distracted, there'll be another war, there'll be something so terrible that happens you just grind you down into a dust, you can't keep caring anymore.
01:23:12.000 In the end you just crack.
01:23:14.000 It's hard to stay engaged.
01:23:15.000 That's part of the point.
01:23:16.000 To drain your will.
01:23:18.000 To drain you of the ability to even imagine a better future.
01:23:39.000 Let's go.