Stay Free - Russel Brand - February 26, 2024


Serviceman Sets Himself on FIRE! What This EXPOSES About Global War - Stay Free #312


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 10 minutes

Words per Minute

177.99289

Word Count

12,504

Sentence Count

743

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

25


Summary

Russell Brand talks about Aaron Bushnell's self-immolation, Google Gemini, and the censorship industrial complex, and why good sex is the key to a long-lasting marriage. Plus, what happens when two political populist figures collide? Because Xavier Millet met Donald Trump backstage, that s pretty interesting. And what's up with Javier Millet and Donald Trump? And why he doesn t want to join our Awakened Wonder community. This episode is brought to you by AwakenEDWonders, a community of likeminded thinkers and journalists dedicated to challenging the dominant narratives we're told we need to believe in order to make sense of the world and the people we live in it. If you like what you hear here, please consider becoming a supporter of AWakenedWonder by becoming an AWAKENEDWonder member. You'll get access to all of our latest shows, shows and events, as well as access to special bonus episodes, and access to our most up-to-date news and information. Subscribe to AWakenEDUCATION WEEKLY, where you'll be the first to know when a new episode is available. Stay free, stay green, stay free! and stay woke! - edible, thank you, and stay free, and thank you for being a free thinker and free human being. - The Best Fiends - Ebb and Flow by Ebb & Flow, Ebb and Flow, and Ebb, and Flow's new podcast, Stay Free, and all things you need to know about the future of the future. by Good Sex, Good Relationships, and what it means, and how to be a free thing by being free in the future, and much more. . Stay Free With Us, and Stay Free with Us! by The Good Life, and Good Sex by The Besties by the Good Life by the Bad Boys of Good Sex and Good Things by Javier Millets, and What It's Like That by Xavier Millets. , and so on, and so much more! Stay Safe, and Much More by The Bad Boys by The Real Good Thing, and So Much More! . . . and much, Much More, by the Besties, and More by Good Things, and How to be Free, by The White House by the White House, and more by The New York Times, and by The People, and The Good Guys.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 So, uh, I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to get a shot of it. I'm going to have to do a little bit of a search.
00:00:07.000 I'm going to have to do a little bit of a search.
00:00:35.000 So, uh, I'm going to have to do a little bit of a search.
00:02:07.000 Brought to you by Pfizer.
00:02:22.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:02:34.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
00:02:35.000 Thanks so much for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:02:38.000 We've got a fantastic show for you today and much to discuss.
00:02:43.000 Of course, the self-immolation of service person Aaron Bushnell, God rest his eternal soul.
00:02:48.000 We'll be talking about how that relates to the pervasive, immersive and progressing forever wars across the world.
00:02:54.000 We'll be talking about Google Gemini and its extraordinary Misinterpretation of American history and what that might indicate about the lack of objectivity and the difference between artificial intelligence and artificial consciousness and the impossibility, in fact, of artificial consciousness.
00:03:11.000 Let me know if you can hear me in the chat.
00:03:13.000 I want to say hello to all of you guys that are watching right now in the Rumble stream.
00:03:18.000 If you're watching this on YouTube, we'll be available for the first 15 minutes, but then will we flee into the stream where we feel free?
00:03:26.000 The stream that is Rumble.
00:03:27.000 Who we appreciate for supporting our free speech and being such fine advocates for our free speech.
00:03:33.000 You might want to consider becoming an Awaken Wonder and joining our friends over in Locals where you get additional content every week.
00:03:40.000 Last week, for example, we did a piece of content about Amy Winehouse and the new movie and the kind of Jungian archetype of the sacrificed woman.
00:03:47.000 You'll love that stuff and I have some personal insights having been friends with Amy Winehouse when she was alive.
00:03:53.000 MsDivine66 is in the rumble chat.
00:03:55.000 I'm sorry to hear that you are dealing with breast cancer and I wish you a speedy recovery from that and recovering wanker, I have to say the word because that is your name, and Redook, you both want to see Gareth.
00:04:06.000 Well, if you want to see Gareth, you are going to have to join our AwakendWonder Locals community.
00:04:11.000 Gareth is now Kept in a cube and only revealed to people that are willing to subscribe.
00:04:18.000 Before we get into the rather sad story of Aaron Bushnell's death, we will be looking at a few lighter matters and later in the show we'll be looking at the federal censorship industrial complex as described and demonstrated by the brilliant Mike Benz, who says that what people mean by democracy these days are institutions rather than elections, whether that's on a global or national level.
00:04:40.000 I think that's such a good diagnostic.
00:04:43.000 StillToad1, I want to see Bear.
00:04:45.000 You are not going to see Bear, or Gareth, or any of this community of people until you cough up hard cash on a monthly basis by becoming an Awakened Wonder.
00:04:53.000 You'll have to simply put up with our brilliant analyses of global events derived much from Gareth's work and other members of our team, like young Putin.
00:05:02.000 It's just because he looks like him.
00:05:03.000 He certainly doesn't share his expansionist agenda.
00:05:05.000 And if the term expansionist agenda Worries you?
00:05:09.000 Consider this.
00:05:10.000 Joe Biden says that good sex is the key to a long-lasting marriage.
00:05:14.000 Here's the headline.
00:05:15.000 There's an expansionist agenda that I do not want to envisage.
00:05:20.000 E178 asks who's Aaron Bushnell?
00:05:21.000 Aaron Bushnell is the service person who sadly set himself on fire as an act of protest against escalating Middle Eastern war or what he described as the genocide in Gaza.
00:05:31.000 Here's a slightly lighter story.
00:05:35.000 What happens when two political populist figures collide?
00:05:40.000 Because Xavier Millet met Donald Trump backstage.
00:05:44.000 Now, it's pretty interesting to see this, if you ask me.
00:05:48.000 Show us your tits, says someone in the chat.
00:05:49.000 I simply will not do that anymore.
00:05:52.000 I think, given recent events, these guys are staying under wraps.
00:05:56.000 Unless you're willing to join our awakened... No, no, no, under no circumstances.
00:06:00.000 Now listen, what's interesting about watching Javier Millet meet Donald Trump is that I feel like Donald Trump is usually accustomed to being the charisma tornado in any room that he's in, you know?
00:06:12.000 Like, I mean, when Donald Trump met Kanye, that was interesting.
00:06:15.000 When Kanye was there, all sort of full of vibration and his Kanye-ness in a chair, in the White House as it was then.
00:06:23.000 And Trump sort of holds it back.
00:06:25.000 Watch what it's like when Trump meets Javier Millet.
00:06:28.000 It's, uh, Millet wants the Falcons back, says which ego.
00:06:31.000 We can have them, as far as I'm concerned.
00:06:33.000 I mean, they are pretty near to Argentina.
00:06:35.000 We probably shouldn't have got involved in that war.
00:06:37.000 It's probably a bit mad.
00:06:39.000 Uh, so, have you renounced the Freemasons, Brad?
00:06:42.000 I have.
00:06:43.000 I don't know if it'll mean much to them, given that I'm not in the Freemasons, because, you know, look at me.
00:06:50.000 Here, let's have a look at Javier Mille meeting Donald Trump for the first time backstage.
00:06:54.000 And if you want to be part of our conversation, get into Rumble!
00:06:57.000 That's where the chat is happening, baby!
00:07:00.000 Or you can become like Primal Colin and AwakendWonder there and get access to all our additional content.
00:07:05.000 Come on, let's have a look at Javier Mille meeting Trump.
00:07:08.000 Just sort of examine the social dynamics of this moment and tell me what it makes you feel.
00:07:14.000 Oh no, sorry, wrong one.
00:07:14.000 Let me have a look.
00:07:15.000 Here it is.
00:07:15.000 President!
00:07:18.000 Is that the shout of President?
00:07:19.000 Is that Trump?
00:07:20.000 That's Millet, so that's how he behaves.
00:07:22.000 President!
00:07:23.000 Because what I feel like, say if you did a magic spell on a hedgehog to bring it into person form, that's what Javier Millet is, you know?
00:07:31.000 Like a hedgehog, you do even have those in America.
00:07:35.000 Hedgehogs?
00:07:36.000 What the hell is this limey bullshit?
00:07:39.000 It's too intense.
00:07:43.000 Donald Trump's recoiling, isn't he?
00:07:45.000 He's recoiling.
00:07:46.000 He's leaning back.
00:07:46.000 Like, you can hear him.
00:07:47.000 He's using his thorax, I think, to create distance.
00:07:51.000 Like, that's very, like, that's, I think that's like a Thomas Hearns, Marvin Hagler dynamic.
00:07:56.000 Like he's using his height to get distance.
00:07:59.000 No, you're hurting me!
00:08:01.000 I said that out of honour for me!
00:08:03.000 I'm hurting you!
00:08:05.000 It's definitely affection, isn't it? What Javier Mille is expressing.
00:08:07.000 He really likes him.
00:08:08.000 But the arm slaps.
00:08:09.000 Trump's not going to like those arm slaps.
00:08:10.000 Can I ask, why is YMCA playing there?
00:08:16.000 Why is that the choice?
00:08:18.000 I know that plays a lot of Trump events, doesn't it?
00:08:21.000 Like, is it because he does that to it?
00:08:23.000 He does his dance.
00:08:24.000 But why not this?
00:08:25.000 Why not the original dance to it?
00:08:27.000 And obviously it's all of its connotations in gay culture.
00:08:30.000 It's an extraordinary moment.
00:08:31.000 These two, like, first face it, they're not young.
00:08:34.000 They are men and this is a very sort of... there's eroticism in the encounter, certainly on the
00:08:40.000 follicular level.
00:08:41.000 Triple 07 says the service man looks very twitchy.
00:08:50.000 Yeah, like Trump security's like, oh, I don't know, like he's going to get, he's going to be having words with him.
00:08:54.000 If that happens again, just five seconds, move him on, move him on.
00:08:58.000 Thank you.
00:08:59.000 No problem.
00:09:00.000 Make Argentina great again.
00:09:02.000 Come on, let's have a photo.
00:09:05.000 He's moving it onto the photo.
00:09:07.000 That's, that's the jog on, isn't it?
00:09:08.000 That's in Britain, we would call that the jog on.
00:09:10.000 That's like, that's enough now!
00:09:13.000 Let's do the photos, because the photos is the summit of the event.
00:09:16.000 Once you've asked for the photo, you're basically saying, this needs to end.
00:09:20.000 But, some say Javier Millet is doing magnificent work over there in Argentina.
00:09:24.000 Some people say he's collapsing the infrastructure.
00:09:26.000 I'd love to know what you guys think about it.
00:09:29.000 It's extraordinary, it's extraordinary stuff.
00:09:30.000 See if there's anything else in this exchange.
00:09:32.000 It's a bit too much.
00:09:34.000 Yeah.
00:09:40.000 Make Argentina...
00:09:42.000 Colorado Watch says in the Rumble Chat the same people who like Bojo also like
00:09:46.000 Millet. Both puppets of US hegemony.
00:09:48.000 Harsh analysis there in the rumble chat but that's the kind of analysis you get here.
00:09:55.000 707 says simply I am a woman.
00:09:56.000 I don't know if I did I say anything that denied that I if I did I apologize and
00:10:00.000 madam That was a good deal of fun analyzing that
00:10:14.000 Now we have to move to the tragic and difficult story of Aaron Bushnell's self-immolation and protest burning.
00:10:23.000 Now anyone who's seen these images will know how disturbing they are.
00:10:26.000 We're just putting up a series of stills because having watched it myself it's not the kind of thing that I would want to promote or put in front of you.
00:10:34.000 If you guys want to see it you can certainly find it for yourself.
00:10:37.000 Maybe we can even post it in the chat to stop people Leaving us, but I found it very very disturbing.
00:10:43.000 On the way to the event Aaron Bushnell, in fact, can you go back a little bit guys where you were on the prompter because I was happy where we were.
00:10:49.000 That's cool.
00:10:49.000 Stay there.
00:10:50.000 Thanks very much.
00:10:50.000 Cheers.
00:10:51.000 Well earlier on in the video Aaron Bushnell describes his reasons for doing it.
00:10:56.000 It's a protest about US involvement in Israel's occupation in Gaza and what he described as the ongoing massacre there.
00:11:04.000 Once he's there he covers himself in a highly flammable liquid and then sets himself on fire.
00:11:10.000 Now what's extraordinary is the response of the first responders and the subsequent activity.
00:11:16.000 Think of the other times you've seen acts of martyrdom like this.
00:11:22.000 I think Tibetan Buddhists did it, or excuse me, Vietnamese I suppose, Buddhists did it in
00:11:26.000 Vietnam, yeah, cruising bun said Vietnam.
00:11:29.000 But if you consider that, those were people that were devout spiritualists, specifically Buddhists,
00:11:35.000 he called it a genocide, Russell says, Blue Nose Bob, fair enough. And think also of the image of
00:11:42.000 the child running away from the napalm attacks or the Tiananmen Square image.
00:11:47.000 There's certain sort of images that you will never forget once you've seen them.
00:11:52.000 Now, I don't know how much of this you've seen in legacy media, or indeed if you lot even business with the legacy media anymore.
00:12:00.000 One of the things that I think is worth noting is if this event could be used to promote an authoritarian agenda, it would be.
00:12:09.000 But this is an extraordinary indictment of current US foreign policy when a service personnel member Ends their own life as a protest while Congress are advocating for further military expenditure.
00:12:28.000 Let's have a... Do we have anything else?
00:12:30.000 Have we got the Caitlin Johnston post?
00:12:32.000 We're not going to do that.
00:12:33.000 We're just going to move to like a still headline, huh?
00:12:36.000 Let's have a look on button four.
00:12:38.000 I'm pressing button four.
00:12:39.000 That's not coming up.
00:12:40.000 It's button four, still headline.
00:12:42.000 This is that.
00:12:43.000 Americans overwhelmingly don't want US to risk war with Russia in aiding Ukraine, a poll finds.
00:12:51.000 So war is not popular at the moment.
00:12:53.000 Look, 17% of Americans support the ongoing war in Ukraine.
00:12:58.000 A majority of Americans would not be willing to serve in the military were the US to enter a major war.
00:13:04.000 Quinnipiac polls show 84% of America worry about getting pulled into war in the Middle East.
00:13:10.000 Some 65% want a ceasefire in Israel's war on Gaza, not US action.
00:13:16.000 President Joe Biden will convene the top four congressional leaders at the White House this week to press lawmakers on passing the $95 billion national security package that bolsters aid for Ukraine and Israel, as well as the Indo-Pacific.
00:13:29.000 So, What I think we have here is a pivotal moment in the trajectory of this ongoing set of wars that are being funded together, so perhaps have to be scrutinised and analysed collectively.
00:13:45.000 It's not that long ago where it was impossible to criticize US military activity without being seen as unsympathetic to the sacrifice that service personnel make on behalf of national security, on behalf of patriotism, maybe it could even be said on behalf of community, but what's happened now is it's become unignorable that it's the agenda of the military-industrial complex that's being served in this set of wars, it's become unignorable The powers behind your nation have an agenda towards a unipolar globe where the ascent of Russia or even the relatively contained domestic power of Russia is regarded as a problem and the regional power of China is regarded as a problem.
00:14:31.000 Let me have a look at this.
00:14:33.000 The Pentagon spent in its total over 14 trillion dollars since the start of the war in Afghanistan with one half of the total going to military contractors.
00:14:40.000 A large portion of these contracts, one quarter to one third of all Pentagon contracts in recent years have gone to just five major corporations.
00:14:47.000 Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman.
00:14:51.000 Imagine the power of those organizations.
00:14:54.000 I'm minded of Mike Benz's recent statement.
00:14:58.000 In fact, post, I think he might have posted this just today, Mike Benz said that when we talk about democracy now, we don't mean an electoral process and therefore the will of the people.
00:15:08.000 What we mean are A set of institutions.
00:15:11.000 He said that in relation to Ukraine, who haven't had an election in three years now, and that's somewhat understandable.
00:15:17.000 They are engaged in a pretty serious war.
00:15:21.000 Here is that post from Mike Benz.
00:15:23.000 They just cancelled elections again in Ukraine, third year now, and the place they're telling you is the democracy we need to defend.
00:15:29.000 Remember, and burn this into your brain, democracy means institutions now, not elections.
00:15:33.000 Institution just means the organizations and outlets of the blob, a new emergent phrase to describe the So in this new martyr Aaron Bushnell what we have is a reminder that the military personnel themselves don't believe in these wars.
00:15:55.000 The American public don't believe in these wars.
00:15:58.000 Who believes in these wars?
00:16:00.000 We asked a little question Earlier in a poll.
00:16:02.000 Can we have a look at those results now?
00:16:05.000 Thank you.
00:16:06.000 Uh, let me show you.
00:16:07.000 Uh, serviceman Aarish Bushnell cast himself on fire.
00:16:10.000 We should stop funding wars to support the troops.
00:16:10.000 What does it tell you?
00:16:13.000 Uh, in our piece of content tomorrow on Here's the News, we'll be talking in some depth about the conditions that American service personnel find themselves in more broadly.
00:16:22.000 Even serving members often find it hard to feed their families and keep a roof above their heads.
00:16:29.000 Now, This is an interesting piece of footage, given where we find ourselves now, where Vladimir Putin, to an audience that I'd love to know, is explaining how Ukraine during NATO and attempting to bring Crimea back by military means will escalate to war.
00:16:46.000 This is in March 2022.
00:16:48.000 So, What I think is interesting about this is we've, all of us, shouldn't all of us have had the opportunity to determine whether or not we want to contribute to the escalation of a conflict that is always being clear has the potential to go nuclear?
00:17:06.000 Let's have a brief look at Vladimir Putin making it pretty clear what this would lead to.
00:17:11.000 If you're watching us on YouTube We'll stay with you for a couple more minutes, but then we've got so much more content.
00:17:17.000 Indeed, Mike Benz, whose post I just showed you, we're going to be analysing that in some detail.
00:17:22.000 Not just that post, we're going to be analysing his conversation with Tucker and how much it revealed about the censorship industrial complex.
00:17:28.000 Indeed, not since Edward Snowden's revelations have we had a better understanding of how the government is using proxies to shut down free speech and control narrative.
00:17:37.000 If any of you think that the legacy media is anything other than an amplification device for the establishment, or as we now call it, the blob, then I want to know what you're watching or reading on there.
00:17:48.000 What have they done for you lately?
00:17:49.000 Let's have a look at Vladimir Putin talking about Ukraine during NATO back in 2022.
00:17:53.000 I want to emphasize this again.
00:17:58.000 I said it, but I would like you to hear me after all, and to convey it to your readers, viewers and users on the Internet.
00:18:08.000 But do you understand or not that if Ukraine joins NATO and returns Crimea by military means, European countries will automatically be drawn into a military conflict with Russia?
00:18:23.000 Of course, the potential of the United Nations and Russia is insurmountable.
00:18:29.000 We understand, but we also understand that Russia is one of the leading nuclear powers, and on some components, even today, it is ahead of many.
00:18:35.000 and in retrospect pretty accurate in terms of how things have played out for
00:18:50.000 Former Secretary General of NATO Anders Fogh Rasmussen has now demolished the narrative of the unprovoked war in Ukraine.
00:18:59.000 This is an extraordinary bit of footage where you get the sense That we've been kind of walked into this conflict when people knew what the likely consequences would be.
00:19:11.000 Let's have a look.
00:19:12.000 I have read references to the US guarantees that it gives Israel for its security.
00:19:19.000 Is that very much like what we're talking about here with Keefe?
00:19:23.000 Yes, it is.
00:19:24.000 Obviously, there are differences between Ukraine and Israel.
00:19:28.000 But basically, we have modeled the Kiev Security Pact over the security arrangement between the US and Israel.
00:19:39.000 We should not just repeat the language we decided already back in 2008.
00:19:44.000 So in 2008, a decision was made that Ukraine would be joining in NATO.
00:19:49.000 In 2022, Vladimir Putin said, if you attempt to allow Ukraine in NATO or retain Crimea, we're going to get in some serious trouble.
00:20:00.000 That Ukraine will become a member of NATO.
00:20:03.000 We decided that back in 2008.
00:20:06.000 It isn't sufficient just to repeat that.
00:20:09.000 We should do something more.
00:20:11.000 And I think NATO should decide to say, OK, we outline a roadmap towards Ukrainian membership of NATO.
00:20:22.000 Step two, in the run-up to the NATO Summit in Vilnius, some countries led by the US should sign a document giving security guarantees to Ukraine until Ukraine can
00:20:37.000 join NATO.
00:20:38.000 We'll need some time to figure out exactly how could Article 5 cover a country that is maybe still at war.
00:20:49.000 How do you think Russia is going to react to this?
00:20:52.000 I don't care.
00:20:54.000 Okay, nuclear war then.
00:20:56.000 That'll be great.
00:20:58.000 Here's Victoria Nuland discussing Ukraine's democracy and America's self-interest.
00:21:02.000 Those of you that are familiar will know that Victoria Nuland has worked for successive administrations on both sides of the Irrelevant aisle in perpetuating wars and globalism.
00:21:14.000 Again, consider what is meant by democracy now.
00:21:16.000 Does it mean the interests of us, the people, or does it mean the interests of certain institutions, sometimes on a national level, sometimes on an international level, which is to say globalist interests.
00:21:28.000 Let's have a look at Victoria Newland on this.
00:21:31.000 They've been out in their districts hearing from the American people after they have heard from Ukraine, they have heard from Europe, which by the way just passed 54 billion in additional aid itself, that we will do what we have always done, which is defend democracy and freedom around the world, not just for victims of tyrants like Putin, but in our own interest in preserving a free and open international order.
00:21:59.000 That's what we need to do.
00:22:00.000 We've done it before.
00:22:01.000 And by the way, we have to remember that the bulk of this money is going right back into the U.S.
00:22:08.000 economy to make those weapons, including good-paying jobs in some 40 states across the United States.
00:22:16.000 Good paying jobs for ordinary Americans.
00:22:18.000 Can you really believe that, having seen Aaron Bushnell set himself on fire while still in active service, that these wars benefit anyone than military, industrial, complex interests?
00:22:31.000 Isn't that astonishing to see that perspective conveyed, as always, by an unquestioning and compliant legacy media?
00:22:40.000 You know who they work for.
00:22:41.000 Let's see what Glenn Greenwald had to say.
00:22:44.000 Imagine how dumb Victoria Nuland thinks everyone is that she feels comfortable with saying with a straight face, we will do what we have always done, which is defend democracy and freedom around the world.
00:22:52.000 As fraudulent as the Iraq war was, more lies were told in February 2022.
00:22:55.000 Now we're going to leave you if you're watching us on YouTube, but by God do we have some fantastic stuff coming up.
00:23:01.000 We're talking about the Google Gemini AI images and what that shows you about the difference between intelligence and consciousness and how it reveals a kind of agenda at the heart of the globalist AI revolution.
00:23:13.000 In our deep dive item, we're looking at Mike Benz's conversation with Tucker.
00:23:18.000 In some detail with additional information about how the censorship industrial complex is managing and controlling reality and of course we're gonna cover Trump's victory in South Carolina.
00:23:29.000 Is Nikki Haley viable anymore or have people lost interest in her?
00:23:34.000 Also, become a member of our Awaken Wonder community to get additional content!
00:23:37.000 Right, you guys, the first thing that we're looking at is Google have issued an apology for Gemini for overcompensating, leading to inaccurate historical images.
00:23:48.000 Let's look at how that's covered on Legacy Media.
00:23:51.000 We're all familiar with this.
00:23:52.000 George Washington as a person of colour, Vikings with hues of pigmentation unlikely to occur in that region at that time.
00:24:01.000 Is that what's important or is it more interesting that it's the revelation of a lack of objectivity in a piece of technology that's likely to become more and more central when it comes to building a future around social credit scores, facial recognition technology and presenting Versions of reality that are deemed absolute when plainly they are highly subjective and, in some cases, just damn wrong.
00:24:25.000 ...artificial intelligence tool Gemini because of inaccurate depictions of race.
00:24:31.000 The chatbot was incorrectly generating images of historical figures including America's founding fathers and Nazi soldiers as people of color.
00:24:39.000 People were blasting the snafu on social media saying AI models are struggling with the concept of race.
00:24:45.000 Google says it's working to fix the issue and plans to release an improved version of the tool soon.
00:24:51.000 I'm actually not that interested in this story.
00:24:54.000 I can't even believe I'm having to deal with this.
00:24:56.000 Let's have a look at some of those images.
00:24:58.000 There they are, of course.
00:24:59.000 I'm actually quite fond of the black Nazi.
00:25:02.000 I think that's something I could really be into.
00:25:06.000 Elon Musk posted this.
00:25:08.000 What's that?
00:25:11.000 Don't take that out of context!
00:25:13.000 Elon Musk posted this.
00:25:15.000 Gemini AI will be at the heart of every Google product and YouTube.
00:25:18.000 This is extremely alarming.
00:25:19.000 The senior Google exec called me again yesterday and said it would take a few months to fix it.
00:25:23.000 Previously he thought it would be faster.
00:25:24.000 My response to him was that I doubt that Google's woke bureaucratic blob would allow him to fix it.
00:25:28.000 Unless those who caused this are exited from Google, nothing will change except to make the bias less obvious and more pernicious.
00:25:34.000 By the way, kudos to Caitlyn, he means Johnston, for posting that she would definitely prefer Oh, Caitlyn?
00:25:40.000 You mean Caitlyn Jenner?
00:25:41.000 I would definitely prefer misgendering to nuclear apocalypse.
00:25:44.000 Because of that post, is it okay to misgender Caitlyn Jenner to stop a nuclear apocalypse?
00:25:49.000 Now, that's sort of trolling this piece of tech, I suppose, but in so doing, revealing that there's a total lack of clarity, intelligence, and objectivity at the heart of AI, and it's ultimately a tool of the global establishment that one day may be utilized to identify who, not what races, ought be represented in what way, but What people might be deemed terrorists or people of interest as it facilitates a minority report reality where all of us are presumed criminals based on our previous posting history or the preferences of a machine that as I say is not objective but is rendering reality
00:26:27.000 On the basis of the ideology of a small group of people who, again, do not really care about democracy, they care about power, profit, the management of reality.
00:26:39.000 And indeed, when we look at the Shane Gillis SNL, did you see Shane Gillis on SNL?
00:26:43.000 We have another opportunity to note how the culture cannot accommodate even good-humoured communication between people.
00:26:51.000 The assumption of cruelty in place of comedy and conviviality.
00:26:57.000 We'll be talking about that and looking at that in more.
00:26:59.000 DL later in the week.
00:27:01.000 Hey!
00:27:02.000 I've got to ask you something.
00:27:03.000 Are you getting enough magnesium?
00:27:04.000 I'm really suspicious that you ain't.
00:27:06.000 Have you heard of bioptimizers?
00:27:08.000 This is an advert by the way, right?
00:27:09.000 And I'm advertising magnesium because four out of five Americans ain't getting enough magnesium.
00:27:14.000 It's a big problem because it's involved in more than 300 biochemical reactions in your body.
00:27:19.000 Are you magnesium deficient?
00:27:20.000 Do you suffer from anxiety?
00:27:21.000 Insomnia?
00:27:21.000 Yes.
00:27:22.000 I'm so tired.
00:27:23.000 Look at me baby!
00:27:23.000 Muscle cramps?
00:27:24.000 Or twitches?
00:27:25.000 High blood pressure?
00:27:26.000 Constipation?
00:27:27.000 I'm not willing to discuss the last one.
00:27:29.000 If you do, you need magnesium because you're deficient.
00:27:33.000 Most supplements, the problem is, can't be absorbed into your body due to chemical reasons that I can't even begin to understand.
00:27:40.000 That's why I exclusively recommend Magnesium Breakthrough.
00:27:43.000 It's the only full-spectrum magnesium supplement with seven unique forms of magnesium that your body can actually use and absorb.
00:27:49.000 All Bioptimizer supplements are fantastic and you will get a full guarantee within a year if you are not satisfied.
00:27:58.000 So just go to bioptimizers.com forward slash brand and you'll get 10% by using our promo code.
00:28:03.000 You can get gifts with this purchase up to two travel-sized bottles of magnesium breakthrough.
00:28:07.000 Be careful how you travel through customs with that.
00:28:10.000 These are difficult times.
00:28:12.000 Act fast!
00:28:12.000 Go to bioptimizers.com forward slash brand.
00:28:16.000 Now, What's going on in the South Carolina primary?
00:28:19.000 Does this mean that the Nikki Haley experiment has totally failed?
00:28:23.000 It says Cat 2901.
00:28:23.000 Can you snort?
00:28:25.000 You actually can, I suppose, but it is at your own risk.
00:28:30.000 I should do that in that bit where I speak quickly.
00:28:32.000 If you ingest it nasally, it's at your own risk.
00:28:35.000 You can put it in your ears, put it in your butt, do whatever the hell you want to do with it.
00:28:39.000 Any artist says Bill Hicks.
00:28:40.000 I do Do you remember that?
00:28:40.000 I feel the world has had to alter with the radical invention and advent of independent media.
00:28:46.000 In Bill Hicks' time, you did not have global corporations turning on individual comedians.
00:28:53.000 In fact, we're going to discuss that more in the Shane Gillis piece tomorrow, which I know you guys are gonna absolutely love.
00:29:00.000 Let's have a look at what went on in the South Carolina primary.
00:29:04.000 CNN literally immediately called it for Donald Trump.
00:29:07.000 It was just that fast.
00:29:08.000 Let's have a look.
00:29:09.000 Trump will win the South Carolina Republican primary, defeating former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley in her home state and securing his fourth major early victory in the GOP primary season.
00:29:21.000 The former president taking another critical step toward winning his third Republican presidential nomination and continuing his dominance over the race.
00:29:30.000 Wow incredible.
00:29:31.000 So I suppose it's inevitable that we will get Trump v Biden unless Trump is incarcerated and Biden, well I mean sort of there are some health issues that could catch up and lead to who?
00:29:43.000 Gavin Newsom or Michelle Obama?
00:29:47.000 Certainly that's what Vivek thought when he was on here.
00:29:49.000 Let's have a look at Nikki Haley.
00:29:51.000 She is undimmed and confident.
00:29:53.000 I heard this week that no matter what happens in South Carolina I would continue to run for president.
00:30:01.000 It's interesting, isn't it?
00:30:02.000 Because this even looks like an infomercial now.
00:30:04.000 I say that Nikki Haley is a failed experiment, and this is because of independent media.
00:30:09.000 All of us now know that Nikki Haley is a military-industrial complex candidate.
00:30:12.000 You wouldn't have known that in the old days.
00:30:14.000 In the old legacy media days, they would have been able to sort of make her, frame her as an innovative new face of republicanism.
00:30:22.000 But now it's just straight away you think Nikki Haley. She's funded by arms companies
00:30:27.000 I'm a woman of my word You
00:30:38.000 You you
00:30:42.000 Thank you.
00:30:46.000 Here's the production.
00:30:47.000 It's not real.
00:30:48.000 Here's Gavin Newsom talking about it.
00:30:50.000 Billy or Trump would be easier to beat for him.
00:30:52.000 First of all, I think she's one of our better surrogates.
00:30:54.000 So I hope she stays in. I hope she does well tomorrow.
00:30:56.000 All the nasty stuff she says about Trump.
00:30:58.000 She's spot on. 99% of it.
00:31:00.000 So I'm enjoying this primary and I hope it continues.
00:31:04.000 So I wish her luck.
00:31:06.000 I've never seen Gavin Newsom talk before.
00:31:07.000 He's got a sort of helium feature to him.
00:31:13.000 He looks like he's sort of held up by gas, is what I would say about Newsom.
00:31:18.000 All I know about him is he had that dinner party during COVID-19, but all of our politicians in Britain were literally partying their way through that pandemic like it was 1999, when it was about the time that many of the medications for that period were patented, curiously enough.
00:31:34.000 Hey, we got a feeling about 20 years from now, you're gonna be needing a little vaccine, but I don't want a vaccine!
00:31:39.000 You know what else is gonna be popular?
00:31:41.000 Mandates, baby!
00:31:42.000 You're gonna take it!
00:31:44.000 Hope you've seen our piece of content, of which I'm very proud, created in-house here at Stay Free Media, on the new French laws, and our comments on that very funny bit of news media, where I think they were local news in Florida, where they go, like the two news people, like the woman that's doing the news, the news anchor's going, Wait a minute, I took all those jabs and I got myocarditis last week!
00:32:06.000 It's really, really, well it's not funny, it's not funny that she got myocarditis, it's just funny the way this stuff's playing out.
00:32:12.000 Hey, listen, you're going to love this.
00:32:14.000 We're talking about the Federal Censorship Industrial Complex.
00:32:16.000 Tucker Carlson's interview with Mike Benz detailed the emergence of what Benz calls military rule.
00:32:20.000 Now Mike Benz, we've got to get him on this show, we've got to find him, we've got to track him down, we've got to bring him on.
00:32:24.000 He talks about an online censorship industry and how powerful it's become, how corrupt and tyrannical the U.S.
00:32:30.000 defense and foreign policy establishment is now.
00:32:33.000 So, after the 2020 election and COVID-19 pandemic, the two most censored events in human history, can you believe that?
00:32:40.000 More censored than the Army, uh, the Library of Alexandria.
00:32:44.000 More censorial than the Nazi Party and their book burnings.
00:32:47.000 Now what's burned is American service personnel protesting wars that they themselves are supposed to be fighting in.
00:32:54.000 What does this new censorship industrial complex, backed in the way that it is by the military, mean for future elections and terrifyingly, pandemics?
00:33:02.000 Here's the news.
00:33:03.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:33:04.000 See you after.
00:33:07.000 No, here's the fucking news!
00:33:11.000 The 2020 election and the 2019 pandemic were the most censored events in human history Mike Benz has revealed on Tucker.
00:33:19.000 So has the US foreign policy and defense industry become the most tyrannical instrument in the history of the world?
00:33:28.000 We now know as a result of the fascinating interview between Mike Benz and Tucker Carlson that there's a new emergent political force operating on a global stage that you may have heard referred to before by authors like Martin Goury but will now understand in great depth as this censorship industrial complex truly emerges which means that the 2020 election and the 2019 pandemic were the most censored events in human history that now the US foreign policy and defense industry have unprecedented power And with 2024 being the year of elections, it's likely that we will be experiencing more censorship than ever before.
00:34:06.000 Nick Clegg, a former British politician and now head of Aspect of Meta, has 40,000 employees over there dedicated to censoring free speech in order to preserve what he bizarrely refers to as election integrity.
00:34:20.000 And the word integrity does not belong in this conversation.
00:34:23.000 We are in a war for freedom of information right now.
00:34:26.000 We are in a war to control the perception of reality.
00:34:30.000 Independent news sources such as this one, the ability to communicate immediately and with as little friction between us, the way that we currently can, is under threat.
00:34:39.000 Democracy itself is under threat.
00:34:41.000 International relationships are under threat.
00:34:42.000 The ability to challenge the legitimacy of wars and measures taken by our government, often under the guidance of global organisations, is under threat.
00:34:51.000 We have to wake up immediately. Several people have sent me this interview
00:34:55.000 saying it's hypocal and given that Tucker Carlson's done two very important interviews
00:34:59.000 recently, he did that one with Putin, then he had a little chat with another guy who gets
00:35:03.000 a little bit of heat from the mainstream media. Yes, old Russ himself, but this is the
00:35:07.000 one. This is the one to watch because Mike Bent explains how information and therefore
00:35:12.000 reality is controlled by some very powerful interests. We're going to look at some of it
00:35:16.000 together, then we're going to analyse it further and then we're going to organise against
00:35:20.000 this machine together.
00:35:21.000 They explicitly said on tape that they were set up to do what the government was banned
00:35:27.000 from doing itself.
00:35:28.000 And then they articulated a multi-step framework in order to coerce all the tech companies to take censorship actions.
00:35:35.000 They said on tape the tech companies would not have done but for their pressure.
00:35:39.000 Which involved using threats of government force because they were the deputized arm of the government.
00:35:44.000 They had a formal partnership with the DHS.
00:35:46.000 They were able to use DHS's proprietary domestic disinformation switchboard to immediately talk to top brass at all the tech companies for takedowns.
00:35:55.000 So what we thought of as big tech censorship was always government censorship.
00:36:00.000 Governments have proxy organizations within social media, and actually social media itself, operating to control the information that is accessible.
00:36:09.000 Generally speaking, this is just my personal opinion, it's information that would arm you with sufficient facts to become a dissident, for you to become suspicious and cynical of your own government's actions.
00:36:19.000 In short, Apparatus that was designed, and this is explicit and becomes more explicit over the course of this conversation we're having now, that was designed to control what was referred to as terrorism, foreign terror threats, has now been turned inward onto domestic populations.
00:36:33.000 This happens in my country, the United Kingdom, where you have the 77th Brigade, which has peculiar ties to Caroline Dynage, who was specifically the politician who demanded that I be demonetised.
00:36:43.000 And when I say peculiar connections, it's her husband ran it.
00:36:46.000 Psy-ops that were utilized to control foreign dissidents when it was convenient and necessary are now being used to control domestic populations.
00:36:53.000 And for a moment, pause just here on the semantics of this situation.
00:36:57.000 They were regarded, weren't they, groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda, they say quite rightly, as terrorists.
00:37:02.000 But we regarded the key feature of terrorism to be sort of violence, and maybe because of the way that we were generally coached, perhaps some of the religious and cultural paraphernalia That doesn't belong to the idea of the terrorist.
00:37:14.000 But now we know that what terrorism truly means is a desire and potentially the ability to disrupt the agenda of the powerful.
00:37:23.000 Because guess who's a terrorist now?
00:37:26.000 You and me.
00:37:27.000 And anyone that's interested in opposing their narrative.
00:37:30.000 Even if that means simply having a conversation on reasonable matters like personal medical pursuits.
00:37:36.000 Or having a perspective that might be contrary to the popular or mainstream view regarding a war.
00:37:42.000 You are terrorists now.
00:37:44.000 And they bragged on tape about how they got the tech companies to all systematically adopt a new terms of service speech violation ban called delegitimization, which meant any tweet, any YouTube video, any Facebook post, any TikTok video, any Discord post, any Twitch video, anything on the internet that undermined public faith and confidence in the use of mail-in ballots or early voting drop boxes Excellent.
00:38:11.000 People are in prison as a result of that, by the way, now.
00:38:13.000 And remember that France has just introduced laws to prevent you criticizing Pfizer.
00:38:17.000 under this new delegitimization policy.
00:38:20.000 Excellent. People are in prison as a result of that, by the way, now.
00:38:23.000 And remember that France has just introduced laws to prevent you criticizing Pfizer.
00:38:27.000 This is happening right now.
00:38:28.000 And look, to Ireland, too, the new hate speech laws that are peculiarly diffuse and oddly draconian.
00:38:33.000 And our country, the online safety bill, championed by someone who has connections to psy-ops that were previously deployed against terrorism.
00:38:40.000 I don't want to sound like a hysterical, ranting conspiracy theorist.
00:38:44.000 I'm simply pointing out that global organisations with global reach have a singular policy that they are deploying against vast populations.
00:38:53.000 And someone like Mike Benz here on Tucker's platform, gracefully delivered by Elon Musk, That they only adopted because of pass-through government pressure from the Election Integrity Partnership, which they bragged about on tape, including the grid that they used to do this and simultaneously invoking threats of government breaking them up or government stopping doing favors for the tech companies unless they did this.
00:39:19.000 That's brilliant, because do you remember all the demonopolisation conversations?
00:39:22.000 I remember being broadly supportive of that.
00:39:23.000 Yeah, you should break up Facebook.
00:39:25.000 You should break up Big Tech.
00:39:26.000 You should have that communally run, democratically by the people.
00:39:29.000 No, no, no, not the last bit, but we should break them up.
00:39:31.000 All that was was a threat to get Big Tech platforms to be obedient and start acting as proxies for the government.
00:39:38.000 Now, these are things that we're all experiencing.
00:39:40.000 If you've had a single post disappear, let alone if you've been subject to massive psyops yourself, this is this policy in action.
00:39:47.000 As well as inducing crisis PR by working with their media allies.
00:39:51.000 And they said the government, DHS, could not do that themselves.
00:39:53.000 And so they set up this basically constellation of State Department, Pentagon, and IC networks to run this pre-censorship campaign, which by their own math had 22 million tweets on Twitter alone.
00:40:08.000 And mind you, they did this on 15 platforms.
00:40:10.000 This is hundreds of millions of posts.
00:40:12.000 Which were all scanned and banned or throttled so that they could not be amplified or they existed in a sort of limited state purgatory or had these frictions affixed to them in the form of fact-checking labels where you couldn't actually click through to the thing or you had to, it was an inconvenience to be able to share it.
00:40:28.000 I've always been cynical about online activism, but now simply by sharing posts like this, you are becoming a dissident.
00:40:34.000 You can contradict the intentions of the state powers that Mike Benz is describing.
00:40:39.000 Now they did this seven months before the election.
00:40:41.000 This took out... Wait, wait, may I ask you to pause right there?
00:40:45.000 So what you're saying is, what you're suggesting is, they knew the outcome of the election seven months before it was held.
00:40:52.000 It looks very bad.
00:40:54.000 What an extraordinary suggestion.
00:40:56.000 But even something as apocal as election rigging, which in a way is just a technological evolution of ideas like gerrymandering and manipulation and uniparty policies and comparable politics within both of the major parties in most democratic nations, it's Shocking, astonishing, to a degree, but also, God, if you're living in this space, hardly surprising.
00:41:17.000 Let's look in more detail now about this age of censorship that we've entered into, and how censorship's not just like what it used to mean in the old days, a sticker across explicit images in a potentially erotic magazine.
00:41:30.000 No, what it means now is the control of reality itself, the control of elections, the control of global policies around health, the control of your mind, your reality, the control of everyone you love, everyone you care for, being filtered for and dominated by systems that you didn't vote for.
00:41:47.000 And if you do vote for them, that vote may not count, it seems.
00:41:50.000 Let's get into it.
00:41:51.000 Mike Benz, the executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, explained to Tucker how a constellation of federal agencies and publicly funded institutions under the pretext of countering misinformation rigged the 2020 election and are right now smothering the First Amendment and rigging the 2024 election through massive state-sponsored censorship online.
00:42:10.000 The 2020 election and the COVID-19 pandemic, says Benz, were the two most censored events in human history.
00:42:16.000 And 2024 is shaping up to be the same, thanks to the emergence of a federal censorship industrial complex.
00:42:23.000 In a sense, this is the pinnacle of stories we've been covering for a good while now.
00:42:27.000 The censorship industrial complex is a term that we learned from Michael Schellenberger and Matt Taibbi.
00:42:32.000 Recently, because of Lee Fang's reporting, we were able to understand that Moderna had been spying on our channel.
00:42:37.000 We know that the government spent money ensuring that our content got curtailed and shut down.
00:42:42.000 The stories were being planted in the media.
00:42:44.000 It's astonishing what's taking place here and it's astonishing that it's continuing.
00:42:48.000 Think for a moment that Julian Assange is having those hearings.
00:42:51.000 Think for a moment about the revelations of Edward Snowden some time ago that had comparable
00:42:54.000 revelations but now looks like some old timey hacking like where the five eyes nations all
00:42:59.000 exchanged information on one another's populations in order to get round pesky freedom of information
00:43:06.000 and privacy laws in those domestic territories themselves.
00:43:09.000 Now what's happening is this is metastasized into a vast unstoppable cyborg of censorship
00:43:14.000 and control.
00:43:15.000 The problem here is profound with deep historical roots that go back to the aftermath of World
00:43:20.000 War II and the creation of the CIA along with a host of US funded international institutions.
00:43:25.000 But for our purposes it suffices to understand the problem in its two most recent stages
00:43:29.000 the period from 1991 to 2014 and from 2014 to the present.
00:43:33.000 What's being referred to are the establishment of the legacy news media and its implicit connections to the state from their inception, Operation Mockingbird and various other ways that the CIA and deep state organisations have always infiltrated media.
00:43:47.000 And the problem occurred when legacy media's power base became diminished with the rise of social media and the internet.
00:43:54.000 At the outset of internet privatisation in 1991, free speech online was seen as an instrument of statecraft.
00:44:01.000 At that time, says Benz, internet free speech was championed by the US foreign policy and defence establishments as a way to support dissident groups around the world in their efforts to overthrow authoritarian or disfavoured regimes.
00:44:12.000 That's why freedom of speech used to be a neoliberal issue.
00:44:15.000 That's why, as you might say, as people say, the left used to care about free speech.
00:44:20.000 At that point, free speech could be used to destabilize foreign governments.
00:44:24.000 Hey, these dissident groups, they should have free speech because that free speech means that we'll be able
00:44:28.000 to corrupt their democratic processes and install a puppet government.
00:44:32.000 Now free speech means that you might start challenging your establishment, the United States government,
00:44:37.000 the UK government, the Australian, Canadian government.
00:44:40.000 Now you are the dissident and free speech is not so popular.
00:44:43.000 That's how and why that change took place.
00:44:46.000 I've always been curious about it.
00:44:47.000 Didn't the left use to talk about free speech?
00:44:49.000 Didn't I grow up thinking free speech because of women's rights, because of civil rights, because of rights of gay folk, because it's important that we can all speak to one another?
00:44:56.000 No, no, no, no, no.
00:44:57.000 It was a convenient tool to support it then and it's convenient to shut it down now.
00:45:01.000 Astonishing.
00:45:02.000 It allowed the U.S.
00:45:03.000 to conduct what Benz calls insta-regime change operations in service of the State Department's foreign policy agenda.
00:45:10.000 The plan worked really well.
00:45:12.000 Among other things, free speech on the internet allowed U.S.-backed groups to assert control over state-run media in foreign countries, making it much easier to overthrow government.
00:45:22.000 Every time you hear someone say, in Tehran, oh, they're sexist over there, don't care about women's rights, Now we can learn to tune in to what's actually happening.
00:45:29.000 Hold on a minute.
00:45:29.000 We know they don't care about women's rights.
00:45:30.000 They're obviously trying to institute a regime change in that country.
00:45:34.000 So just watch out for it now, because the legacy media will do it again and again, because that's what they do.
00:45:38.000 The high watermark of this way of deploying free speech online, Benz explains, was the Arab Spring in 2011 and 2012, when governments the Obama administration considered problematic.
00:45:48.000 Egypt, Tunisia, Libya all began falling in the so-called Facebook and Twitter revolutions.
00:45:53.000 During that time, the State Department worked closely with these social media companies to keep them up and running in those countries to be used as tools for protesters and dissident groups that were trying to circumvent state censorship.
00:46:03.000 So if your agenda is in alignment with their agenda, they will support you.
00:46:07.000 If it isn't, they won't.
00:46:08.000 Say, a figure like Zelensky, who just becomes a hero overnight and he's turning up the Golden Globes and billions of dollars are going his way, do you really think that that's because they care about Ukrainian people?
00:46:19.000 Or do you think, just temporarily, Zelensky becomes, oh look, use this guy quick, baggage him up like a mule with funding just strapped on him like dynamite and sent in to explode conveniently for their narrative.
00:46:31.000 And if Zelensky at some point becomes inconvenient, just ask Colonel Gaddafi what happens when you're no longer useful to the establishment.
00:46:38.000 Oh, you can't cause, you know, dead now because they facilitate his death.
00:46:41.000 We came, we saw, he died.
00:46:45.000 So this is a significant moment when you look at the Ukraine-Russia conflict, the ongoing vilification of Vladimir Putin, who I acknowledge is a tyrannical figure, war criminal, all of that.
00:46:52.000 It's a serious thing.
00:46:53.000 But look at it through the lens of utility and exploitation.
00:46:57.000 And again, the 2014 coup, which we talk about all the time, comes up.
00:47:01.000 This is fascinating.
00:47:02.000 All that changed in 2014 after the US-backed coup in Ukraine toppled the government of Viktor Yanukovych, and there was an unexpected pro-Russia counter-coup in Crimea and parts of eastern Ukraine.
00:47:13.000 That's literally the advent of the war we're involved in now.
00:47:17.000 Last same year, says Benz, when the people of Crimea voted to be annexed into the Russian Federation.
00:47:22.000 That was the last straw for the concept of free speech on the internet in the eyes of NATO.
00:47:27.000 For a moment we can question what NATO does and what NATO's for.
00:47:31.000 Do you think NATO is for you?
00:47:34.000 We care about free speech.
00:47:35.000 Free speech, everyone.
00:47:36.000 And now, let's hear from the people of Crimea using their free speech.
00:47:40.000 We would like to belong to Russia.
00:47:42.000 Yeah, I don't like this free speech.
00:47:43.000 That's bad.
00:47:44.000 Free speech.
00:47:44.000 That's a hate crime.
00:47:46.000 I heard some hate crime right there, did you?
00:47:47.000 It sounded like hate to me, boss.
00:47:49.000 Let's get Victoria Nuland.
00:47:50.000 Let's get all of our state marionettes in to say that hate speech is on the rise.
00:47:55.000 Oh my god, all of this hate speech.
00:47:56.000 Thereafter, NATO, the CIA and the State Department, together with the intelligence agencies of our European allies, did an about-face on internet free speech.
00:48:04.000 Oh, you don't like free speech all of a sudden?
00:48:06.000 They began instead to engage in what amounted to hybrid or information warfare to censor what they saw as Russian propaganda online.
00:48:13.000 These efforts quickly spread beyond Ukraine and Eastern Europe to include the censorship of populist groups on the right that were emerging across the EU as a response to the Syrian migrant crisis.
00:48:22.000 We all saw this take place as well. We remember the vilification of far-right groups. Now
00:48:26.000 whatever your politics are, you're actually in a democracy entitled to them. Personally,
00:48:30.000 I would suggest hating individuals or groups of people on the basis of their culture is
00:48:34.000 not acceptable, but I can understand people having national identities because for a long
00:48:38.000 time we were told that we were meant to be protecting our nations and going to war to
00:48:41.000 protect our nations and sacrificing our lives to protect our nations and actually fighting
00:48:45.000 wars in some of these territories. In fact, that's what's caused the migrant crisis is
00:48:48.000 these are the same bloody countries that are being bombed by the exact same interests that
00:48:52.000 are telling you that you're racist for having concerns about your countries.
00:48:55.000 So, wow, a lot to learn.
00:48:56.000 By the time Brexit emerged in the summer of 2016, explains Benz, NATO and the foreign policy establishment felt there was a real crisis afoot.
00:49:04.000 The problem was spreading west from Central and Eastern Europe, and it had to be stopped.
00:49:08.000 If it wasn't, then Brexit might trigger the collapse of the entire EU, along with NATO, and the entire constellation of supranational institutions that relied on NATO.
00:49:17.000 Looking back at it as an inhabitant of this nation, what do you think their real connection to the EU and NATO and all that stuff is?
00:49:24.000 Hey!
00:49:25.000 We love the EU!
00:49:26.000 It's obvious in retrospect that what they don't want is the disruption of their ability through these agencies to evade democracy and the process of democracy.
00:49:35.000 Referendums and referenda like Brecht Brexit or the mad giddy election of Donald Trump is obviously an anomaly and a disruption to a global trajectory wherever you stand on either of those issues and whatever you think they're about because I notice that they're generally rendered as being about hate but since then I've learned that hate is one of the ways and hate speech and racism and the persecution of minorities which I'm pretty convinced the global establishment don't actually care about is one of the ways that they legitimize censorship and control and through that lens I look at Brexit a little differently.
00:50:07.000 The entire post-war architecture of institutions might come crashing down, all because the hearts and minds of the people were being swayed.
00:50:14.000 We're told that that architecture is to maintain peace, but even that's something that I might want to interrogate a little.
00:50:19.000 So went the thinking anyway.
00:50:21.000 As far as the National Security Establishment was concerned, citizens were being swayed by Russian and far-right propaganda, and we can't have that.
00:50:27.000 We can't continue to bring you this potentially paradigm-shattering information without the support of our sponsors.
00:50:33.000 We've got one for you right now.
00:50:34.000 Stay to the end, please.
00:50:35.000 Is it me or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?
00:50:39.000 Pandemics?
00:50:39.000 Wars?
00:50:40.000 Lies?
00:50:40.000 Trickery?
00:50:41.000 For those of you that are in the United States, there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
00:50:46.000 American Heart for Gold makes it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver. With one phone call they can have physical
00:50:53.000 gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside a qualifying
00:50:56.000 retirement account like your IRA or 401k. American Heart for Gold is the highest-rate
00:51:01.000 firm in the United States with an A-plus rating from the BBB, that's the
00:51:04.000 Better Business Bureau, and thousands of satisfied clients right now. They'll give
00:51:08.000 you up to $10,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order. This offer, I'm
00:51:12.000 sorry to tell you, is only for customers from the United States of America.
00:51:17.000 Call 866 505 8315.
00:51:20.000 That's 866-505-8315.
00:51:22.000 Or simply text BRAND to 99-88-99.
00:51:24.000 Then they'll know we sent you.
00:51:27.000 Get up to $5,000 in silver and protect your future in this crazy, crazy world with some solid, precious metals literally made in stars.
00:51:35.000 Now let's get back to the content.
00:51:37.000 Under these circumstances, free speech was the last thing that could be allowed to flourish online.
00:51:41.000 Censorship became the order of the day.
00:51:43.000 As Carlson put it, these NATO and EU leaders identified their new enemy as democracy within their own countries.
00:51:49.000 Their own voters, in other words.
00:51:50.000 They feared that their people, the citizens of their own countries, would get their way.
00:51:54.000 And they went to war against that.
00:51:56.000 And doesn't it make sense, really, that you, if you become awakened, enlightened, and in tune, and demand real power in your own life, and that means the ability to disrupt the interests of the institutions and groups that are currently powerful, because at the moment there is a wealth transfer, it seems that more and more we're living within a fuel and energy crisis, inflation, explosion of grocery prices.
00:52:17.000 If you want to influence that, or interact even with that, You would be impacting their current strategy and their current structures.
00:52:24.000 And so therefore you are the problem.
00:52:26.000 And then Trump was elected.
00:52:28.000 From that moment, and indeed as we know from the Russia collusion hoax, even before Trump was elected in November 2016, the US foreign policy and defense establishment, which has done so much to censor and weaponize the internet overseas, turned their attention to American citizens.
00:52:43.000 This is a theme you hear again and again.
00:52:45.000 Infrastructure that was deployed overseas to create regime change, to control dissidents, to arm, to inspire, to utilize dissidents has been deployed in domestic populations.
00:52:53.000 You've experienced it.
00:52:54.000 I've experienced it.
00:52:55.000 We've all experienced it.
00:52:56.000 Sometimes I think it's as simple as they've got the technology and they sort of can't help but use it.
00:53:00.000 But other times I think it's about absolute and total control.
00:53:03.000 Initially, their predicate for domestic surveillance was Crossfire Hurricane, the fatuous notion that Russia had infiltrated the Trump campaign and that Trump was a Russian asset.
00:53:11.000 That's still going on.
00:53:12.000 Nancy Pelosi is still making claims along those lines.
00:53:15.000 Literally, like right now probably somewhere.
00:53:18.000 Once that collapsed, they needed another excuse to spy on and censor Americans who held disfavored opinions or who spread misinformation, to put it in the parlance of the censorship industrial complex.
00:53:27.000 To do that, they had to get around the prohibition against the CIA operating on American soil.
00:53:32.000 Since they couldn't very well get away with openly spying on and censoring American citizens, they decided to house the bulk of their censorship operations inside the Department of Homeland Security, specifically in a part of DHS tasked with reducing and eliminating threats to US critical physical and cyber infrastructure. Hence,
00:53:49.000 domestic misinformation, which is really just a term for opinions and information that the national
00:53:53.000 security state doesn't like or that run counter to State Department policy, was classified
00:53:59.000 as an attack on critical cognitive infrastructure and could therefore be censored. What it
00:54:04.000 amounted to was an end run around the First Amendment.
00:54:07.000 We're told that the internet creates these silos, these bubbles of opinion, these worlds
00:54:11.000 of escalating extremism. But on a personal and interpersonal level, did you not notice
00:54:16.000 that in your own family, you used to have people that had different political views
00:54:19.000 and at Thanksgiving or Christmas or whatever, you'd just go, oh, he's a bit Republican or
00:54:22.000 they're a bit of a hippie or a lefty.
00:54:24.000 Then you got on with your life rather than it being a frontier for a new war.
00:54:28.000 Where is this new atmosphere actually coming from?
00:54:30.000 Well, we've just had it explained to us.
00:54:32.000 It's to legitimize regarding ordinary citizens as terrorism and differences of opinions as an existential threat.
00:54:39.000 But even DHS couldn't do this directly, so it outsourced online censorship operations to third parties like the Election Integrity Partnership, or EIP, which consisted of four separate organizations.
00:54:50.000 The Stanford Internet Observatory, the University of Washington's Center for an Informed Public, Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, and a firm called Grafica.
00:54:58.000 These private sector partners did the nitty gritty work of mapping out entire online networks of people who helped spread certain disfavored opinions or what the censors called false narratives.
00:55:09.000 Essentially they were deputized to censor Americans on behalf of the government.
00:55:12.000 Do you remember when you first saw like maybe a graph about the dark web and Joel Rogan is a gateway to being a racist he's a right-wing Portal Gateway.
00:55:21.000 That was the result of these organisations, many of which are government funded or privately funded by vested interests.
00:55:27.000 Certainly that Atlantic Council needs a bloody good looking at.
00:55:29.000 And what they did is just created the idea that you can't trust powerful online sources whose opinions run counter to establishment narratives.
00:55:37.000 Once they determined that that was the desired outcome, they set about finding ways.
00:55:41.000 Well, you shouldn't listen to this person because they're a racist.
00:55:43.000 You shouldn't listen to this person because they're a sex offender.
00:55:45.000 You shouldn't listen to this, but they just filled in the blanks.
00:55:47.000 These managers and their partners inside the US government went about their task with gusto, including a seven-month pre-censorship campaign ahead of the 2020 election.
00:55:56.000 Any content challenging public faith in mail-in ballots, early voting, and ballot drop boxes was flagged for violating new rules about delegitimizing elections.
00:56:04.000 The censors, along with their governments, had strong-armed the social media companies into adopting these rules as documented in great detail last year with the release of the Twitter files.
00:56:13.000 You'll remember when Schellenberg has come on our show, you can watch these interviews, they're up now, he talked about pre-bunking, how journalists are often invited to conferences and told, hey, there's going to be all this disinformation about Hunter Biden's laptop, so when that does come out, will you go ahead and pre-bunk that for us?
00:56:26.000 We know that now.
00:56:27.000 Indeed, the Twitter files exposed a massive effort by the federal government to deputize Twitter and other social media companies to do what it could not, at least not legally.
00:56:35.000 But in some ways, the Twitter files just revealed the tip of the censorship iceberg.
00:56:39.000 One of the problems I have with the liberal left, even though I really admire some brilliant online broadcasters and comics, for example, is their unwillingness to address that figures like Trump or Elon Musk, who might be out of alignment with some of their cultural views, are serving this vital function by disrupting exactly this narrative.
00:56:54.000 Elon Musk's The acquisition of X is a problem for them because they lost a compliant partner in a space that they needed to control.
00:57:02.000 And subsequently Elon Musk is dealing with a lot of stuff and a lot of flack and all of that.
00:57:06.000 And you can have your own views about what his overall function is.
00:57:09.000 But when it comes to this particular problem, and I believe that this is THE problem, the control of information and therefore the control of reality, Elon Musk is disrupting that trend and tendency, as did Brexit, as did Trump, wherever you stand on the cultural purview around each of those issues.
00:57:24.000 And I would Also start to be open to the possibility that I personally may have misunderstood the cultural purview because where did I get it from?
00:57:32.000 Who gave me that context?
00:57:34.000 The State Department, through grants and product development assistance to private entities
00:57:38.000 like the Global Disinformation Index, GDI, and NewsGuard, was actively intervening in
00:57:43.000 the news media market to render disfavored press outlets unprofitable by funding the
00:57:47.000 infrastructure development and marketing and promotion of censorship technology and private
00:57:51.000 censorship enterprises to covertly suppress speech of a segment of the American press.
00:57:56.000 One of the moments in that interview that I enjoyed was when he said, what are you going
00:57:59.000 to do when the New York Times is reduced to the power and capacity of an average or at
00:58:04.000 least somewhat large Facebook page?
00:58:06.000 This is what's taken place in the last few years.
00:58:08.000 The legacy media's control of the minds of the population has been significantly challenged, reduced, castrated, annihilated perhaps even, and what we are experiencing now is an attempt to reassert centralised power.
00:58:19.000 The State Department then gave these tools to companies like Facebook and LinkedIn to target disfavoured media outlets.
00:58:25.000 Through these and other methods during the 2020 election cycle and the COVID pandemic, the government-backed censorship industrial complex throttled millions of online posts, suppressing news traffic to news sites and undermined revenue streams for a host of outlets and influencers with disfavored or dissident views.
00:58:41.000 Both the GDI and State Department's Global Engagement Center, GEC, developed censorship tools that included supposed fact-checking technologies, media literacy tools, media intelligence platforms, Social network mapping and machine learning, artificial intelligence technology, all these tools are being deployed now to control information.
00:58:58.000 But this isn't a thing of the past.
00:58:59.000 All the censorship infrastructure described above is still intact, still functioning, and is firing on all cylinders right now ahead of the 2024 election.
00:59:09.000 Is there one politician that is right now saying, I will dismantle this?
00:59:12.000 Bobby Kennedy is.
00:59:13.000 He's saying on day one, I'll dismantle this.
00:59:14.000 Is Trump saying it?
00:59:15.000 I don't know.
00:59:16.000 You let me know in the comments and chat.
00:59:17.000 This is a global problem that should be addressed.
00:59:19.000 If anything, the censorship industrial complex is more robust than it was four years ago.
00:59:23.000 Just last week, META's President of Global Affairs, Nick Clegg, boasted on CNBC that he currently has some 40,000 employees, which is nearly 60% of META's entire workforce tasked with censoring speech on Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.
00:59:37.000 Clegg also claimed META has spent about $20 billion, including $5 billion in the last year, on censorship efforts.
00:59:43.000 Or what he euphemistically called election integrity.
00:59:46.000 Sometimes you wonder where power is now situated and a paragraph like that tells you where power has gone.
00:59:52.000 If politicians seem replaceable and interchangeable, if democracy seems intransigent, turgid and static, where is power?
01:00:00.000 Well, it's there when you've got billions being spent on controlling information that directs the outcome of elections and even beyond that, global policies.
01:00:08.000 What does that mean in practice?
01:00:09.000 We don't have to guess.
01:00:10.000 Remember that Facebook infamously censored the Hunter Biden laptop story in October 2020 at the behest of the FBI.
01:00:15.000 With 40,000 employees now charged with censoring hate speech and ensuring election integrity, we can be fairly certain that if another Hunter Biden laptop story comes along this election cycle, it too will be quashed by the censors.
01:00:28.000 Difficult to dispute.
01:00:28.000 Why exactly is our government doing this?
01:00:31.000 It's not merely a partisan preference for ensuring Democrats stay in power, but something deeper and more insidious.
01:00:36.000 To circle back to Carlson's interview with Benz, it's because the national security state has come to regard democracy not as the will of the people expressed for elections, but as the constellation of government agencies, government-backed institutions, corporations, media outlets and non-profit groups.
01:00:50.000 Protecting democracy in this view means protecting these institutions from the people they were putatively meant to serve.
01:00:56.000 It's almost like over a broader time frame, there's been a return to something like an aristocracy or even a monarchy or oligarchy.
01:01:03.000 There was a sort of a brief blip where you had, oh, this is representative democracy.
01:01:07.000 Here are these separate states and cities that might all interdependently be run by elected councils and officials and true democracy could be achieved.
01:01:15.000 That idea has been crushed by a broader trend towards, let's centralise power, let's tell people they've got democracy, but what we've got is total control.
01:01:23.000 What's being described there is total control.
01:01:25.000 As Benz at one point says in the interview, the relationship between the managers of the American empire and the citizens of the American homeland has broken down.
01:01:32.000 And that's played itself out in the story of the censorship industry.
01:01:36.000 I think what we have there between that interview and this article is a good understanding, as we are likely to achieve, of what's happening in the world right now.
01:01:45.000 The potential for information, for dissent, for diverse opinions, for conversation, for discourse, discussion, contradiction, democracy, power, as local as the individual, as diverse as the planet, has exploded into a set of systems that were simply not ready for it.
01:01:59.000 And we're now witnessing those systems try to regain control, introducing new laws to regain control, exerting new influence over the companies that have access to all of us, i.e.
01:02:09.000 the big tech and social media platforms that we all now use as part of everyday life.
01:02:13.000 We are nothing less than a war for the control of our minds and our reality is taking place and all of us are somehow confined to very narrow bandwidths of conversation.
01:02:23.000 Little issues here or there, local or topical, or what about this and should that have happened and what about this?
01:02:28.000 When in fact what we all need to collectively do is take a broader perspective together and say the people I disagree with on the local and individual level have so much more in common with me than these vast institutions that are attempting to assert
01:02:41.000 and exert mass control.
01:02:43.000 And unless we find ways together of forming a collective manifesto,
01:02:46.000 of demanding a decentralised but unified opposition to the problem of globalism
01:02:51.000 and the global censorship required to achieve it, as outlined in these two pieces,
01:02:55.000 then we're going to be in real serious trouble.
01:02:57.000 So get ready to make some new alliances right now.
01:03:00.000 Get ready to, as they used to say, hold your nose and form friendships and alliances with cultural groups, ideas even, that you might not agree with because the alternative is plainly in sight now.
01:03:11.000 It's a centralised technocracy where a cadre of experts, powerful institutions, have near total control, executed through technology in forms of social credit scores, digital currencies, absolute control of media, that is absolutely unprecedented.
01:03:25.000 And while we're all distracted Oh no, are these people like new Nazis or populists or is that hate speech?
01:03:30.000 They are quietly but very deftly like a sliding saber slicing right through the heart of everything that we're supposed to hold dear.
01:03:39.000 Freedom of speech, representative systems of government.
01:03:42.000 We're going to lose all of it unless we wake up now.
01:03:44.000 But that's just what I think.
01:03:45.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.
01:03:46.000 See you in a second!
01:03:47.000 Thank you for choosing Fox News.
01:03:49.000 The news.
01:03:50.000 No.
01:03:50.000 Here's the fucking news!
01:03:52.000 Abats, do you speak in metronome, Russell?
01:03:56.000 Just wondering if it's rhythmically consistent.
01:03:58.000 No, I don't think so.
01:03:59.000 I think I use a lot of cadences and rhythms, I thought.
01:04:03.000 So, just fuck off, alright?
01:04:05.000 And what about this from Xander86?
01:04:07.000 No shit, Russell.
01:04:08.000 Welcome to 3.6 years ago.
01:04:10.000 Do you have any idea how hard we are working?
01:04:14.000 Extreme Steve says the intelligence community are the real terrorists.
01:04:18.000 Censorship isn't just convenient, it's advantageous to absolute tyranny.
01:04:18.000 Ooga booga!
01:04:23.000 Ruby C. Kinglet, welcome to the loving community of domestic terrorists.
01:04:27.000 Yeah?
01:04:28.000 Yeah?
01:04:29.000 You hear me?
01:04:30.000 You hear me now?
01:04:31.000 There are some demons being triggered, said CP Vexin.
01:04:34.000 Yeah, what do you think about that, those demons?
01:04:35.000 Do you think there are real demons in real life?
01:04:37.000 A lot of the Christian, uh, yeah, that's right, YouTube videos I watch, they say, look at these demons in real life.
01:04:43.000 And it's like people sort of going, rah, rah, rah!
01:04:45.000 And you're like, oh my God, are we going to be OK?
01:04:48.000 So listen, you'll like this.
01:04:50.000 The legacy media insists, despite all evidence to the contrary, that Ukraine is winning that war they're in with nuclear power, And well-led country by an old-school tyrant who's very, very confident in himself.
01:05:08.000 He's fit as a fiddle, that Putin.
01:05:10.000 I mean, I'm not advocating for him, but he's as fit as a fiddle.
01:05:14.000 Let's have a look at this mad thing.
01:05:17.000 This is made by Matt Taibbi.
01:05:18.000 He's alive to me.
01:05:19.000 His company, Racket, make these compilations that show how legacy media all sing from the same hymn sheet.
01:05:29.000 Can I have one?
01:05:29.000 Thanks, mate.
01:05:30.000 Those are the headlines tonight.
01:05:32.000 But are they behind?
01:05:34.000 Like, yesterday's news is the real truth.
01:05:36.000 The Ukrainians are winning.
01:05:38.000 We know that Ukraine will win.
01:05:39.000 This is inevitable that Ukraine is going to defeat Russia.
01:05:42.000 Ukraine is winning this war.
01:05:43.000 Ukraine is winning this war.
01:05:44.000 Ukraine will win this war.
01:05:45.000 Ukraine is winning this war.
01:05:47.000 Ukraine will win this war.
01:05:48.000 Ukraine will win it.
01:05:49.000 Because I have been there, I have worked there, I know.
01:05:51.000 He said Ukraine will win.
01:05:52.000 Winning the war is now nothing.
01:05:54.000 Someone says, legacy media will just cover today's episode as Russell Bryant says Putin is as fit as a fiddle.
01:06:01.000 Question.
01:06:01.000 Ukraine will win and it will happen very soon.
01:06:04.000 We can finish everything in weeks.
01:06:06.000 Victory will be in very short period.
01:06:09.000 They say Ukraine will win.
01:06:10.000 Ukrainians will win.
01:06:11.000 And I haven't met a single person yet who doesn't say Ukraine will win.
01:06:14.000 Russia's bad, Ukraine is good.
01:06:16.000 What else do you need to know?
01:06:17.000 That's amazing news.
01:06:19.000 A stalemate which only brings death and suffering.
01:06:21.000 A true solution can only be found at the negotiating table.
01:06:25.000 YouTube bans RT.
01:06:26.000 There's no way the Ukrainian army would be able to win.
01:06:29.000 Fox fires Tucker.
01:06:30.000 This war cannot be won.
01:06:31.000 Banned.
01:06:32.000 Ultimately unwinnable.
01:06:33.000 Ukraine is not winning.
01:06:33.000 Defunded.
01:06:34.000 Banned.
01:06:35.000 But everyone you meet without exception still insists that Ukraine will win.
01:06:42.000 We know that Ukraine will win.
01:06:45.000 Ukraine will win.
01:06:46.000 Putin's already lost the war.
01:06:47.000 I've never been more certain.
01:06:49.000 There is no possibility of him winning the war in Ukraine.
01:06:52.000 He's already lost that war.
01:06:53.000 He's already lost that war.
01:06:54.000 I know that Ukraine will win.
01:06:55.000 Ukraine will win.
01:06:57.000 No amount of propaganda can hide the fact that Ukraine is winning this war.
01:07:01.000 That's good.
01:07:02.000 We could do that again, couldn't we?
01:07:02.000 We should do that.
01:07:03.000 It's really good.
01:07:04.000 Which one was Albert Mueller?
01:07:06.000 Wasn't he?
01:07:07.000 He was one of them.
01:07:10.000 Also, I know about this.
01:07:11.000 There's another thing I've got an opinion on.
01:07:13.000 You're not even a scientist or a war expert.
01:07:16.000 Hey, guess who's coming on later in the week?
01:07:17.000 Rand Paul.
01:07:19.000 So, click the red button, join our Awaken Wonders, and then you can join that conversation live and put your questions to Rand Paul.
01:07:27.000 And I'll tell you what I'll do to make sure I do it, because sometimes I forget.
01:07:29.000 Once I'm actually with Rand Paul, I'm like, I can't glance down at this bit of paper.
01:07:32.000 I've really got him on the ropes now.
01:07:33.000 Not even I've got him on the ropes.
01:07:34.000 I've got him I've established a rapport, more likely than it.
01:07:37.000 It's not like, ooh, I'm winning.
01:07:39.000 It's more like, I'm doing well here with Rand Paul.
01:07:41.000 I won't say this.
01:07:43.000 This is what I won't do.
01:07:43.000 It'll go, Randy, you came and you gave.
01:07:47.000 No, don't do that.
01:07:48.000 Don't do that.
01:07:50.000 Uh, alright, well listen, it's gonna be a proper good interview.
01:07:53.000 Anyway, you can join it and improve it, perhaps, with a little thing called Research.
01:07:57.000 As well as that, if you're an Awakened Wonder, you get access to the additional content we make each week, like my, uh, Amy Winehouse thing.
01:08:02.000 Let me have a quick look at this.
01:08:03.000 You'll like this.
01:08:04.000 There's a new movie about Amy Winehouse that's being celebrated in the mainstream media.
01:08:08.000 I wonder if they will remember to point out that they contributed to her death by vilifying her continually and treating her like shit while she was alive.
01:08:16.000 That's good.
01:08:17.000 That's a very good bit of promo post.
01:08:17.000 That's a good one.
01:08:19.000 Well done, whoever selected that.
01:08:21.000 Uh, new members of our community include Scopurgy, Jackiect, Trifena, Puddingtown, Kjira2004.
01:08:28.000 Look, see your names go along there.
01:08:30.000 Feel loved.
01:08:31.000 It's a cult, I tell you, saying someone in the Awake and Wonder chat.
01:08:34.000 Guess what I've started doing in the Awake and Wonder chat?
01:08:35.000 Telling people to send us properties, like, to start a... what we're calling a community!
01:08:41.000 Send us, we've got a nice one in Oregon, Gal.
01:08:44.000 My wife, I showed it to my wife, goes, what do you think?
01:08:45.000 And she goes, it looks like a disused Quentin Tarantino set.
01:08:49.000 And I think what she means is, you know, when they did that Charles Manson bit in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.
01:08:53.000 I'll tell you one thing, Inglourious Basterds is better than you remember it.
01:08:57.000 How do you remember it as being?
01:09:00.000 It's better than that.
01:09:01.000 It's better than that.
01:09:02.000 You wanted Gareth, I gave you Gareth.
01:09:04.000 That, I assure you, like a poltergeist on the other side of a dimension into another sort of a wall in time, that was Gareth.
01:09:12.000 You keep the old dollars coming, we're gonna have old Gareth!
01:09:15.000 We'll get him in a whole strip, we'll get him stuck in a lollipop, we'll get him with a little widow's peak like a vampire.
01:09:19.000 Whatever you want, we can do it if you're willing to cough up the cash.
01:09:23.000 All right, guys, listen, this is a revolution that we're participating in here, so stay awake.
01:09:27.000 It's gonna be a great show tomorrow.
01:09:28.000 We'll probably talk about Shane Gillis more.
01:09:30.000 We'll talk about, well, it's up to you, you tell us.
01:09:33.000 We'll talk about all that stuff.
01:09:34.000 Negligent Banana, amazing movie, yeah.
01:09:36.000 Inglourious Bars is brilliant, I'll watch it again.
01:09:38.000 We need a photo of Gareth with today's newspaper, says Kyle Rino.
01:09:41.000 No chance!
01:09:43.000 There he is, holding a, A newspaper from 2019!
01:09:46.000 And a Pfizer vaccine!
01:09:49.000 Whoa yeah!
01:09:50.000 Satire, baby!
01:09:51.000 Join us tomorrow.
01:09:52.000 Remember, join our local community to join my conversation with Randy Paul and ask him questions.
01:09:57.000 Randy, you came and you gave without taking!
01:10:00.000 I'm actually going to be very respectful because he's a good guest for us.
01:10:03.000 All right, thanks very much for joining us.
01:10:06.000 Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
01:10:07.000 Until then, if you can, stay free!
01:10:10.000 Switch on.
01:10:11.000 Switch off.
01:10:12.000 Many switches.
01:10:12.000 Switch on.
01:10:13.000 Switch off.
01:10:14.000 Many switches.
01:10:14.000 Switch on.