Stay Free - Russel Brand - October 11, 2022


Stay Free with Russell Brand #010 - The REAL Reason Why Trump Didn’t Pardon Assange & Snowden


Episode Stats

Length

57 minutes

Words per Minute

148.44287

Word Count

8,580

Sentence Count

497

Misogynist Sentences

13

Hate Speech Sentences

9


Summary

Russell Brand and Yanis Vaynerchuk discuss the latest in the cost of living crisis, Julian Assange's acquittal and the deep state ploy to get Donald Trump to pardon Julian Assange. Plus, a new episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand. Stay Free is a podcast that aims to help people around the world get a good night s rest and get some rest so they can be their best, most restful day of the week. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/sponsorships/StayFree and use the promo code STAYFREE at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase when you enter the code StayFree at checkout. To support StayFree, visit stayfree.org/donations and make sure to leave us a five star rating and review on Apple Podcasts, too! StayFree is a non-profit organisation that helps people everywhere get a decent night's rest, a good nights rest, and a good start in their day to day life. Don t forget to give us a small donation to StayFree.org.uk and help us keep us out of your local shops! Stay Free. Thank you so much for all your support, stay free, stay safe, stay woke, stay happy, and stay free! xoxo, Caitie Caitie & Jodie xx - The Duke of Cambridge, PhD - The Daily Mail - The Thick & The Dark Lord - The Vagrant, The Good Lady - The Good Wife, The Badot, The New York Times Magazine - The Fucking Truth, The Fcking News, and The Good Fight, The Thickness, The Vagabond, The Ugly, The News, The Pizzazz, The Irishman, The Oldest, The Greatest, & The Good Morning, The Most Beautiful, The Cute, The Nonsense, The People s Guide to the Good Life, and So Much More! - And so much more! - Stay Free, Stay Awake. - This episode is sponsored by Stay Free! . . . and Stay Awakened. . , The Good Thing, Stay awake. , Stay awake, Stay free, Stay Woke, Stay woke, and Stay awake! , And so on and so on. (Thank you, Thank you, Stay w/ love you, Cheers, - Carolyn Joy


Transcript

00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and get my phone out of the way.
00:05:10.000 In this video, you're going to see the T-34.
00:05:21.000 You're watching Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:05:24.000 We are streaming all around the world.
00:05:27.000 If you're in Chile right now, on Easter Island in particular, it's 11am.
00:05:31.000 You know what time it is where you are.
00:05:33.000 We've got a fantastic show for you today.
00:05:36.000 In our item, here's the news now.
00:05:37.000 Here's the effing news.
00:05:38.000 We're going to be talking about Trump not pardoning Julian Assange due to the threat of impeachment.
00:05:44.000 Was it a deep state ploy?
00:05:47.000 Is it possible that politics takes place beyond the reach of ordinary democracy?
00:05:52.000 Let me know in the comments, let me know in the chat what you think.
00:05:55.000 Also I'll be talking to Yanis Varoufakis about the cost of living crisis.
00:05:59.000 How is it affecting you?
00:06:01.000 Is it Putin's price hikes, or is it energy conglomerates and powerful globalist interests that prevent us from being able to have access to the most simple resources, let alone the deep power within us all?
00:06:16.000 It's always worth remembering, isn't it, that reality passes through human psyche.
00:06:22.000 Every single social system ever designed at some point has to pass through human consciousness.
00:06:27.000 Hey, hit the rumble button.
00:06:29.000 Do you know that it helps us if you hit the rumble button?
00:06:31.000 Every single bit of content of ours that you watch, rumble like it's 1999.
00:06:36.000 If you're on a desktop, it's a simple plus.
00:06:38.000 It's a like if you're on a phone.
00:06:40.000 Rumble, if you're watching, sort that out.
00:06:41.000 It should just be one button.
00:06:44.000 Also, you can donate to us.
00:06:46.000 You can give us a little bit of money.
00:06:48.000 I know you've already got enough to worry about.
00:06:51.000 I mean, I'm talking about a cost of living crisis.
00:06:53.000 Can you afford your gas bill?
00:06:54.000 No, actually.
00:06:55.000 Well, give us ten quid.
00:06:57.000 The money that you donate, you know, you can do those little donations, we give that money to the Stay Free Foundation.
00:07:02.000 Now, this isn't like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, where you give us the money and we leave it in an account and then eventually take it in a few more years.
00:07:09.000 I'm not that... I'm saying that that's what...
00:07:11.000 That's not what they do, I'm sure.
00:07:13.000 I'm sure it goes to all sorts of good places.
00:07:14.000 But we give our money to addiction and mental health-related charities like Friendly House in Los Angeles, which is a treatment centre for women in recovery, or BAC O'Connor in Stoke, which is people of all genders in recovery.
00:07:26.000 And Treasures, another women's place that helps women with, you know, well, you can read about it on the internet.
00:07:31.000 Anyway, these women need help, and why shouldn't we give them that help?
00:07:35.000 Okay, you know, as well as our streams every single day, which you're watching today, by the way, it's a slightly different show.
00:07:40.000 Gareth's not with us.
00:07:42.000 Subhi's here.
00:07:43.000 Aren't you, Subhi?
00:07:44.000 Who's our head of social media.
00:07:46.000 It's so lovely to have you.
00:07:48.000 Often when you read comments, what kind of comments do you go for?
00:07:52.000 Because there's often ones that say things like, I'm a truth pervert, stuff like that.
00:07:57.000 What goes through your mind?
00:08:00.000 I'm trying to read really quickly.
00:08:02.000 You're just reading me.
00:08:03.000 It's purely a practical issue that we're dealing with.
00:08:07.000 Listen, you know, every single week we make a podcast for guided meditation.
00:08:12.000 Do you meditate yet?
00:08:13.000 If you don't meditate yet, you've got to learn to meditate.
00:08:16.000 You are simply not accessing a power deep within you that will bring you much serenity and peace, that will help you to get a different perspective on your life, that will help to free you from the constant intransigent nagging in your belly.
00:08:30.000 Meditate once a week.
00:08:32.000 With my new podcast, Stay Awake, I provide a guided meditation.
00:08:36.000 What could be more relaxing than me nattering on in your earhole while you try to access... I'd use a different voice.
00:08:42.000 I'm much more like this.
00:08:43.000 Have a look at it.
00:08:45.000 ♪♪ Last week, I did a meditation that seemed to have a lot of
00:08:56.000 impact on people's pets.
00:08:58.000 Carolyn Joy, you got in touch saying, thanks for all you bring to us, it's very much appreciated.
00:09:02.000 Here's some pictures of Ivy and Ruby, who prove canines and felines can be besties.
00:09:08.000 How can we not achieve peace between Ukraine and Russia when that dog and cat...
00:09:13.000 Against all odds, they're getting on so well.
00:09:16.000 Mazza1, I used to listen to Above the Noise, so pleased you're still guiding us.
00:09:19.000 My beautiful chocolate Burmese, Coco, often joins me for meditation.
00:09:24.000 When I heard beautiful chocolate Burmese, all sorts of images went through my mind, but that's the one that I want you to focus on, that one, of a sort of Siamese-looking cat, but it's actual Burmese.
00:09:33.000 AmandaGrace777, you don't know how much I needed this today, speaking about my meditation.
00:09:37.000 Here's a picture of Carl, my foster dog, who I'm adopting tomorrow.
00:09:40.000 I didn't know that, that there's a sort of a process where you sort of foster a dog, and then ultimately it becomes your dog, as long as you get on with it, I suppose.
00:09:47.000 Okay then, so, um...
00:09:48.000 I want to welcome our new members, Colraine Kitty, Maughan Davis and David Brown.
00:09:52.000 You're joining us on Stay Free AF.
00:09:55.000 Now, Tucker Carlson called on Trump to pardon Julian Assange, stating he was in jail for telling the truth.
00:10:01.000 That's amazing, isn't it?
00:10:02.000 Fox News.
00:10:03.000 Who would have thought that we would have allies on Fox News when I used to be regularly goaded and ridiculed on that very channel?
00:10:10.000 But, some people say that Trump was intimidated by deep state agents into not going forward with that pardoning.
00:10:17.000 If you want to learn a little bit more about that story, and why wouldn't you, I want you to watch Here's the News.
00:10:22.000 Wait for it, because I want to make sure what people are saying on locals.
00:10:26.000 They're talking about growing their own food.
00:10:27.000 Amazing what people are talking about over there.
00:10:29.000 Here's the news.
00:10:30.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:10:34.000 Here's the news.
00:10:35.000 No, here's the fucking news!
00:10:39.000 Did the deep state establishment bully Trump into not pardoning Assange and Snowden?
00:10:45.000 They'd never do a thing like that, would they?
00:10:48.000 Now, let's get into this story.
00:10:51.000 One of the great guests we've had live on Rumble has been Stella Assange, wife of Julian Assange, currently in Belmarsh Prison, put there because of his revelations that damaged US reputation.
00:11:04.000 He told the truth about US foreign policies and some of the unnecessary deaths that were caused.
00:11:10.000 The CIA threatened to have him killed.
00:11:13.000 This is a matter of public record.
00:11:15.000 I asked Stella, did you ever think that Trump would pardon Assange?
00:11:19.000 The reason I asked it is because I know a lot of you like Donald Trump and think that Donald Trump was a genuine maverick and a genuine opponent of the establishment and, you know, they want you but they need to get me to get to you.
00:11:31.000 All of that stuff.
00:11:32.000 I read your comments.
00:11:33.000 I read the chat.
00:11:34.000 So I asked Stella, how come if Trump was a genuine outsider and a genuine maverick, how come he didn't pardon Assange and Snowden as part of his presidential pardoning campaign?
00:11:44.000 Here's what she said.
00:11:45.000 Did you ever think that Donald Trump might pardon Julian?
00:11:49.000 Well, I was certainly trying to convince him to pardon Julian.
00:11:54.000 I think, you know, he's... Donald Trump is such a...
00:11:58.000 uh...
00:12:00.000 um...
00:12:02.000 I don't know.
00:12:03.000 Unpredictable.
00:12:03.000 A lot of people will be filling that silence in for you.
00:12:06.000 Unpredictable person.
00:12:07.000 He is unpredictable.
00:12:08.000 So that's an opportunity which I thought, you know, it could work for Julian and, you know, he's my husband, he's the person I love the most, so I will try anything I can to get him free.
00:12:19.000 Let me know in the comments.
00:12:20.000 Let me know in the chat.
00:12:20.000 Did you think that Trump might pardon Snowden and Assange, genuine enemies of the establishment, patriots in their way?
00:12:28.000 I would say righteous people in their way.
00:12:30.000 Edward Snowden, I think, was motivated purely by a love of America and American values.
00:12:35.000 Julian Assange, I think, is a person that believes In telling the truth.
00:12:39.000 These people are human beings, I'm not suggesting they're anything other than flawed human beings, but why are they in the position that they're currently in?
00:12:45.000 Why is Snowden exiled in Russia, having sought solace in other nations first?
00:12:50.000 Why is Assange currently in a British prison?
00:12:53.000 What's going on?
00:12:54.000 Now I know there's a counter-argument that usually predicates on putting the lives of military personnel in danger and I think that would be unforgivable.
00:13:01.000 I'm very supportive of the military and I think the people that have the biggest obligation to look after American military personnel are the Pentagon or the British military.
00:13:09.000 Those are the people that should be looking after them by paying them properly, taking care of them when they're in service and certainly taking care of veterans and I think there's a lot of questions to be asked there.
00:13:18.000 Have a look at Glenn Greenwald on Breaking Points when asked about the same story.
00:13:21.000 He suggests that Trump was on the precipice of pardoning both Snowden and Assange, but was persuaded to do otherwise.
00:13:29.000 Who has the power to persuade Trump to do other things?
00:13:31.000 What does that suggest about democratic power?
00:13:33.000 If people are more powerful than the president, particularly if that president's like a crazy, ego-led person like Trump, rather than a sort of near-cadaver like the current White House occupant, who has sufficient power to manipulate these apparently potent marionettes?
00:13:48.000 There was real movement inside the Trump administration to give particularly Snowden a pardon.
00:13:53.000 It came much closer to Snowden than they did to Assange.
00:13:56.000 And if you think about it, why would they have initiated an impeachment proceeding against a president who within a couple of weeks was on his way out?
00:14:04.000 And the reason, Crystal, was that they were very afraid that on his way out, Trump was going to do a bunch of stuff Including not just giving pardons to Snowden and Assange, but also declassify all kinds of documents he had been threatening to declassify about the CIA, about the Kennedy assassination.
00:14:22.000 And the only leverage they had against Trump doing what they considered crazy stuff on his way out was the second impeachment trial.
00:14:30.000 And they explicitly communicated to Trump, multiple Republican kind of hawkish senators did,
00:14:35.000 that if you do what we know you're thinking about doing, what Rand Paul and Matt Gaetz and others were encouraging
00:14:40.000 him to do, which was pardon Snowden,
00:14:42.000 that will severely jeopardize your chances of getting out of this impeachment trial with an acquittal.
00:14:48.000 We're talking about the power that continues to exist regardless of which president or political party occupies
00:14:55.000 the White House.
00:14:56.000 We talk about this continually and Julian Assange is a great example of the consistency.
00:15:01.000 Obama's in power, Snowden and Assange are charged with the Espionage Act.
00:15:05.000 Trump's in power, he doesn't do anything about it.
00:15:07.000 In a sense, as Noam Chomsky says, in the subjects in which both parties agree, you have no choice at all.
00:15:14.000 Assange is an example of where both parties agree.
00:15:17.000 What information did he have?
00:15:18.000 What is the documentation that Trump was considering releasing?
00:15:22.000 What do you really believe about the Kennedy assassination?
00:15:25.000 Do you think we're told the truth right now when something like the Nord Stream 2 pipeline suddenly springs a leak?
00:15:31.000 Do you really think it's not possible, impossible, beyond the bounds of possibility that Navy SEALs were involved in that?
00:15:38.000 Do you think it's something that shouldn't even be discussed?
00:15:40.000 Shouldn't even be considered?
00:15:41.000 Does that not feel like an impingement not only on your free speech, but your free thought?
00:15:46.000 Whilst I'm not an advocate of Donald Trump, I can see that Trump was a figure That was a berserker, a disruptor.
00:15:52.000 Even though Trump gave tax breaks to the rich and did things that I recognize are not going to help ordinary Americans and therefore don't address the fundamental issues that democracy must address, I can see that he agitated establishment figures like the Clintons and evidently he had an impact on the figures that are more deeply buried whose names we don't even know.
00:16:12.000 Does that relate to the documents that he then takes to Mar-a-Lago?
00:16:16.000 Because there's some reporting that the documents that he took there were, you know, related to Russiagate.
00:16:22.000 What I know for sure is that Trump was threatening to declassify all of those documents relating to Russiagate because Trump believes, I think, with a lot of validity, That there were crimes committed or at least ethical transgressions committed during the 2016 election to create and manufacture Russiagate.
00:16:40.000 It came out of the CIA.
00:16:42.000 And I don't know exactly which documents he took.
00:16:44.000 Nobody really knows exactly which documents he took.
00:16:47.000 But it certainly seems to align with everything I knew at the time, which was that Trump wanted those documents public.
00:16:54.000 Had the power to declassify them and now his defense is that he did.
00:16:58.000 It's amazing to consider that a figure like Donald Trump rose to power.
00:17:02.000 Perhaps it's even more amazing to consider a figure like Joe Biden could occupy office.
00:17:06.000 Yet more significant to note the amount of censorship that took place on social media platforms to enable Biden's unimpeded ascendancy.
00:17:15.000 We are living at a time when we need to question power.
00:17:18.000 The invisible power that's evidently present While the artifice of power in the form of the Republican Party and the Democrat Party shift and interchange without, I would say, ever making a real impact on issues that are symbolically significant and meaningful also, like the imprisonment of Assange and the exiling of Edward Snowden.
00:17:36.000 This is an opportunity for us to observe how entrenched these power systems really are.
00:17:41.000 When you see the revolving door between Washington and Wall Street, when you see the significant comparisons that can be made between the policies of both parties, When you can see successive administrations entering and leaving office without real change for American people on the issues that matter, you have to bring this question to the forefront of your mind.
00:18:00.000 How are we going to change our lives?
00:18:02.000 How are we ever going to alter these systems without dismantling the institutions that maintain systemic corruption?
00:18:08.000 Without learning to operate outside of the confines of big media, big state, big business?
00:18:13.000 I'm not saying that those are the only documents he took.
00:18:16.000 He probably took a bunch, being Trump.
00:18:17.000 Just kind of did it all recklessly.
00:18:19.000 I'm taking these boxes.
00:18:20.000 I'm taking these boxes.
00:18:22.000 I'm having that box.
00:18:23.000 Keep that box.
00:18:24.000 I don't care.
00:18:25.000 But I would think there's certainly a relationship between his belief that documents were being hidden that should be seen and his decision to remove a lot of documents out of the White House tomorrow.
00:18:34.000 Can you imagine how you would have felt if Trump on leaving office had pardoned Julian Assange, pardoned Edward Snowden?
00:18:41.000 How that would change the political landscape.
00:18:43.000 Imagine if he had released files pertaining to the assassination of JFK and other issues that are the center of conspiracy.
00:18:51.000 Is it possible that Donald Trump was a genuine outsider?
00:18:55.000 that genuinely wanted to make revelations about the machinations of American power, but was stopped by a deep state system?
00:19:03.000 Let me know what you think about that.
00:19:05.000 Let me know in the comment.
00:19:06.000 Let me know in the chat if you think that Trump was on the brink of revealing things that would shake the state and the state system to their very foundations.
00:19:14.000 One thing I will offer you.
00:19:15.000 This is a further confirmation that there is classified information that exists, that if you knew about it, if I knew about it, if we knew about it, we would no longer be able to give our trust over to the state.
00:19:27.000 We would realise that there are levels of corruption, hypocrisy, assassinations, murders, Plots and lies that would mean, well how can we trust these people?
00:19:36.000 How can we trust them to run schools, hospitals, build roads, conduct international diplomacy, when evidently on the basis of this secrecy alone, we can see that ultimately they are self-interested politicians.
00:19:50.000 Self-interested power players.
00:19:52.000 Of course, the argument that's usually offered is, we're keeping this information to protect you from the baddies, from our enemies.
00:19:59.000 But who among us can legitimately believe now that there's a single enemy out there that's more powerful than these deep state interests?
00:20:06.000 Maybe I'm being naive.
00:20:07.000 Maybe the argument that I'd much rather live within American hegemony than Chinese hegemony or Russian hegemony holds true.
00:20:15.000 And I should thank my lucky stars for those lucky stars and stripes.
00:20:19.000 For me, if we're told that we live in a transparent democracy, if we're told it's us that elect our leaders, if we're told that America is the greatest and freest country in the world, why didn't Trump pardon Snowden?
00:20:30.000 Why didn't Trump pardon Assange?
00:20:32.000 And why shouldn't we know the truth about some of the greatest stories never told in American political history?
00:20:39.000 That's the question I'd like to leave you with.
00:20:41.000 Let me know your answers in the comments.
00:20:42.000 Let me know what you think in the chat.
00:20:43.000 See you in a minute.
00:20:44.000 Thank you for using Fox News.
00:20:46.000 The dude.
00:20:47.000 No.
00:20:48.000 He's the fucking loser.
00:20:50.000 Many of you will have seen our interview with Stella Assange.
00:20:55.000 You can watch that in full now.
00:20:58.000 If you are a Stay Free AF member, you can also watch it just on Rumble.
00:21:02.000 It's up there.
00:21:03.000 Press that rumble button on this.
00:21:03.000 Give it a rumble.
00:21:05.000 Go on, rumble right now.
00:21:06.000 Go on, rumble like you mean it, for God's sake.
00:21:08.000 And go over and watch that Stella Assange interview in full.
00:21:12.000 To give yourself a little more insight on that peculiar case.
00:21:15.000 Remember, any donations you give to us go to treatment centres where drug addicts and people with mental health issues are regularly helped.
00:21:22.000 I want to welcome our new Stay Free AF members, Liberty Veritas and Amanda Grace.
00:21:28.000 Now, there's a cost of living crisis devouring our planet.
00:21:33.000 Wherever you are in the world, it's likely that you are being impeded, that you're experiencing an energy crisis.
00:21:40.000 In our country, the UK, our energy bills are doubling in size.
00:21:44.000 Perhaps this is because we are seeing the neoliberal experiment Reaching its crescendo.
00:21:51.000 Julian Assange was of course famous for saying that the function of modern government was to extract public money and to place it in private hands.
00:21:59.000 Think simply of the example of the funding for the recent vaccines.
00:22:02.000 Do you know how those vaccines were funded in the experimental phase?
00:22:05.000 You funded them.
00:22:06.000 Taxpayer money funded that experimentation.
00:22:09.000 Do you know what happened when it came to paying for them?
00:22:12.000 You paid for them!
00:22:13.000 It was your tax money that paid for them.
00:22:15.000 Today, in our conversation with Yanis Varoufakis, we talk about how a financial elite has reached a state of total domination around the world.
00:22:23.000 How there isn't just one planet, there are several.
00:22:26.000 There are invisible barriers that prevent you accessing power and prevent these elites ever being made accountable.
00:22:33.000 We're going to talk about how the financial system has been managed by the US from a surplus of dollars in high exports to the financial crash of 2008.
00:22:40.000 This is going to make you a lot smarter.
00:22:43.000 Please now enjoy this 30-minute extract from Subcutaneous.
00:22:47.000 That's our deep conversation.
00:22:49.000 So deep it gets under the skin.
00:22:50.000 I wanted to call it something like cut to the bone, but people said that sounds disgusting.
00:22:54.000 Have a look at me and Yanis Varoufakis and let me know in the comments, let me know in the chat, what you think about it.
00:22:59.000 And remember, keep rumbling, bud.
00:23:01.000 Keep rumbling for God's sake.
00:23:06.000 Thanks for joining us today, Yanis.
00:23:09.000 Well, thank you very much, Aston.
00:23:10.000 Hello, everyone.
00:23:12.000 Because some people are watching us live and then later people will be listening to this as a podcast, Yanis, and watching it on a variety of platforms.
00:23:19.000 We will be disseminating this message in as many places as we possibly can.
00:23:23.000 That's good to know.
00:23:24.000 We have to put it out there, don't we?
00:23:27.000 Because we are losing at every other front, aren't we?
00:23:29.000 We leftists.
00:23:31.000 We libertarian leftists.
00:23:34.000 It's interesting that you open with that phrase, because a lot of people that consume our content are American, and they, I think, have a completely different perception of the left, and I imagine they envisage, based on my sort of casual observations and research, that the left is defined by identity politics, which, you know, any regular viewers of this channel will know I'm supportive of, but that I think a component of a political ideology that is about the empowerment of all people.
00:24:06.000 And I feel, Yanis, that there's a lot that you can teach us.
00:24:09.000 And I want to start, first of all, by talking about political and financial corruption in the United States of America.
00:24:18.000 For example, the New Stock Act has been introduced that has a loophole in it that means that one way or another, People in Congress in the United States will continue to be able to trade in stocks and shares that they regulate.
00:24:31.000 It's been recently revealed that 20% of American Congress people own stocks and shares in companies that they literally sit on boards to regulate.
00:24:41.000 We know that Barack Obama, who was the great hope of the center-left ...introduced a stock act and then nullified it and neutered it sort of a year after it had been much trumpeted.
00:24:53.000 So, in a sense, I would, first of all, I guess, could we talk a little about the revolving door between Washington and Wall Street and how it seems like that, for example, Trump's rhetoric around the swamp and draining the swamp was to a degree legitimate, although neither you or I would imagine that Donald Trump would be, or his sort of ideas would be the
00:25:15.000 solution to that particular problem.
00:25:17.000 So can we talk a little about financial corruption in Washington to get started, please?
00:25:22.000 What you described is the ubiquity of insider trading.
00:25:28.000 But when I'm talking about insider trading, I'm not simply talking about financial sector insiders,
00:25:34.000 but all inside.
00:25:35.000 Insiders are the people who, the way that it was described to me once by Larry Summers, the great of the greatest insiders in the United States, academic, political, financial, Establishment.
00:25:52.000 He said to me once, when we had just met, I was finance minister of Greece at the time, and he was actually helping me, because he was quite peeved with the way that the German government was throttling the people of Greece.
00:26:08.000 Not because he was a philanthropist and a humanitarian, and he gave a damn about the people of Greece, but because he thought that what Germany was doing to Greece was creating repercussions that were negative for American financial capital.
00:26:20.000 So it was a kind of wolves friendship for a very short period of time, during which we met in a Washington DC hotel.
00:26:30.000 And after a long discussion, when we agreed on a couple of things that we had in common regarding our common objectives, he turned around and said to me, Yanis, let me ask you, what kind of politician are you?
00:26:42.000 Are you an insider or an outsider?
00:26:45.000 I looked at him and said, define your terms.
00:26:48.000 He said, listen, inside this are people who enter the system and they accept the rules of the system in return they get information which is vital crucial information that the system shares with them and they can make minor marginal changes to the system and then there are outsiders people who prefer to speak their minds and
00:27:18.000 You know, who will be jettisoned by the system very, very, very soon.
00:27:21.000 And the key difference is that the insider never turns on other insiders.
00:27:28.000 It doesn't matter whether they're Republicans, Democrats, left-wing, right-wing, center-left, whatever.
00:27:33.000 And so you say, what are you?
00:27:35.000 So this is what I mean by insider.
00:27:37.000 Insider trading.
00:27:39.000 So you've got the revolving doors scheme.
00:27:42.000 So you have, typically, under George W. Bush, Under Bill Clinton before him.
00:27:48.000 Under Obama after George W. Bush.
00:27:51.000 Under Trump.
00:27:52.000 The only difference between Trump and the rest was that Trump was a better liar than the others.
00:27:56.000 When he was saying, I'm going to drain the swamp.
00:27:59.000 And I'm going to stop the revolving doors.
00:28:02.000 And I'm going to stop the revolving doors.
00:28:04.000 What revolving doors was he referring to?
00:28:07.000 He was referring to situations where, I remember, during 2008, the great financial collapse, you had Hunt Paulson, who was the Minister of Finance of the United States, the US Treasury Secretary, What was his job for decades before he was the CEO of Goldman Sachs, the vilest and most apoplectically disgusting financial firm on Wall Street.
00:28:39.000 So he was He was there as Goldman Sachs' representative in the US government.
00:28:47.000 And when Lehman Brothers went under, the only reason why he let Lehman Brothers go under, with all the repercussions that you know, is because he didn't actually like the head of Lehman Brothers, because they used to be competing CEOs.
00:28:58.000 So this is the idea.
00:29:00.000 You know, you are the CEO of Goldman Sachs, then you become the finance minister, and then after you become the finance minister, you return to JP Morgan.
00:29:08.000 These are the revolving doors.
00:29:09.000 What did Trump do?
00:29:11.000 This is to people who may have been taken in by Trump's lies.
00:29:15.000 He did exactly the same.
00:29:17.000 He took the next CEO of Goldman Sachs and made him finance minister in the United States.
00:29:22.000 So, you know, this is insider trading.
00:29:25.000 The government has been absolutely utterly co-opted by the nexus of the military industrial
00:29:32.000 complex, the Wall Street financial sector and big tech.
00:29:47.000 The consequences of that crash are perhaps being felt still, exacerbated by the pandemic.
00:29:54.000 Now, with this war in Ukraine, there is a genuine cost-of-living crisis, much of which is being blamed on the war between Russia and Ukraine.
00:30:08.000 But it seems to me, with energy companies continuing to profit in the way that they are, that this cannot be the only factor.
00:30:17.000 There are a few questions in this.
00:30:19.000 One is, what do you see as being the solidarity between all people of the world, not that I'm suggesting any kind of centralised government at any point, I believe in autonomy, I believe in localised authority, I believe in true democracy, that's one area of it, but a degree of global solidarity of ordinary working people, of all descriptions, persuasions and views.
00:30:41.000 Two, This exacerbating cost of living crisis that's been continuing, lurching from catastrophe to catastrophe in the last, you know, sort of 12, 13 years.
00:30:54.000 What can we do to arrest it?
00:30:56.000 And three, what about the role of the media in the way that these stories are presented in ways that keep people fractured, separate, disparate and unable to unify?
00:31:07.000 What do you have to say on this, dear Yanis?
00:31:10.000 I'll give you an example from little pipsqueak Greece here.
00:31:14.000 Because it's actually, it tells a story which is much broader in terms of its application.
00:31:20.000 Here in Greece we have six oligarchs and one hedge fund stationed in London called CVC.
00:31:28.000 They own the electricity producers and the electricity providers.
00:31:35.000 They also own the media.
00:31:37.000 Every single television channel and newspaper is owned by the same people.
00:31:42.000 During this tremendous cost of living and energy catastrophe, their profit rates have skyrocketed because they have managed to amplify their price-cost differentials during the electricity disaster and the oil crisis.
00:32:03.000 And they're using these funds in order to ensure that they are buying out every journalist that appears on their channels.
00:32:12.000 Channels that they own.
00:32:13.000 I'm a parliamentary leader in Greece now for three years.
00:32:15.000 My party is in parliament.
00:32:18.000 Do you know how many times I've appeared on standard television channels like the equivalent of the BBC and ITV and Channel 4?
00:32:27.000 It's a rhetorical question.
00:32:28.000 Because it's a radical number.
00:32:33.000 So, you know, this is a very small example of what's going on worldwide.
00:32:40.000 But Russell, allow me, because, you know, your question is so... I mean, it contains almost everything that happened after the Second World War.
00:32:50.000 So, if you allow me, I'll try in very broad, in the broadest brushstrokes, to tell a story that follows through your line of thinking and questioning.
00:33:03.000 After the Second World War, we had two decades, the so-called Bretton Woods system, if you remember, or if you ever read about it, I'm talking to our viewers now, it was a remarkable system because it was designed by the Americans, the American New Dealers, by the FDR administration, to reflect the American New Deal.
00:33:23.000 So for 20 years, The West had the common currency, the dollar.
00:33:27.000 We had fixed exchange rates.
00:33:29.000 The exchange rate between the pound and the dollar and the yen and so on didn't shift for 20 years, right?
00:33:37.000 It was a managed system.
00:33:39.000 And it was actually the only time when capitalism seemed to be working.
00:33:45.000 It was a time, you remember, between the 50s and 60s of the baby boomers, a period of high growth, very low inflation, Very low unemployment and shrinking inequality in the 50s and the 60s.
00:33:59.000 Now, why did that happen?
00:34:01.000 Because you had boring finance.
00:34:04.000 There were capital controls.
00:34:06.000 Rich people could not take billions from one country and speculate in another.
00:34:11.000 There were restrictions in the movement of money.
00:34:15.000 No restrictions in the movement of trade, which is not a bad thing.
00:34:20.000 And the most important thing was that the whole thing was predicated on America having surpluses.
00:34:25.000 America was selling more to the world than it was buying from the world, because after the Second World War the rest of the world was in smithereens, right?
00:34:32.000 So we were buying American cars, American washing machines, and so on and so forth.
00:34:36.000 And so America had a dollar surplus as a result of the net exports to Europe and Japan, and that net surplus was being recycled to Europe and to Japan in the form of investment, public and private, the Marshall 8 plan and so on.
00:34:53.000 It was very, it was always rational, the system.
00:34:57.000 But that system blew up in the late 60s for a very simple reason.
00:34:59.000 America stopped to be a surplus country.
00:35:02.000 It went into a deep deficit because of the Vietnam War, because of the Civil Liberties Rebellion, which caused the LBJ, while at the same time sending young men to be killed in Vietnam, to increase social security payments and so on.
00:35:19.000 And so that was the first period.
00:35:21.000 That collapses in 1971 under Richard Nixon.
00:35:24.000 And then we have the reversal of this.
00:35:27.000 What happens is this.
00:35:28.000 The United States goes deeply into the red.
00:35:31.000 It starts importing from the rest of the world almost everything.
00:35:35.000 From Germany, from Italy, from Japan, and of course later from China.
00:35:40.000 It was operating like a huge vacuum cleaner that was sucking into American territory the goods produced by these exporting countries.
00:35:48.000 Now the question is, who was paying for that?
00:35:51.000 Any other country doing that would have gone bust.
00:35:55.000 But because of the exorbitant value of the dollar, and the American military and all that, and Wall Street, 70% of the profits of non-American capitalists, German capitalists, Italian capitalists, Japanese capitalists, and then later in the 1990s and 2000s, Chinese capitalists, 70% of the profits they made, they sent back to the United States to be invested in Wall Street.
00:36:17.000 So that was a recycling.
00:36:20.000 It was not ecological recycling, but it was financial capitalist recycling.
00:36:24.000 And that was the period during which we had financialization, you had Thatcher, you had Reagan.
00:36:28.000 To do this they had to unshackle finance, to let the city of London, Wall Street, go haywire, do anything they wanted.
00:36:36.000 And that came to a crashing end in 2008, when this tsunami of financial capital, under the weight of its own hubris, collapsed.
00:36:47.000 And then we have the period between 2008 and the pandemic.
00:36:51.000 Which was, briefly put, socialism for the bankers and austerity for everybody else.
00:36:58.000 By that what I mean is this.
00:37:01.000 All the banks, every single bank in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, the European Union went bust.
00:37:11.000 Every single bank.
00:37:13.000 It was a gigantic implosion of financialized capitalism.
00:37:18.000 And the states, central banks primarily, but also governments, saved them.
00:37:22.000 They bailed them out.
00:37:24.000 Something that never happened in 1929, which was the other equivalent financial crash.
00:37:30.000 That's socialism for the bankers.
00:37:32.000 You have the state, Providing the dough that keeps the bankers alive.
00:37:38.000 Constant socialism, right?
00:37:40.000 Lavish socialism for the bankers.
00:37:44.000 And austerity for everybody else.
00:37:46.000 Remember George Osborne in your country, the Troika in my country.
00:37:50.000 Even Obama, who did a supposed stimulus in the United States.
00:37:54.000 If you look at the overall fiscal situation in the United States, it was austerity.
00:37:58.000 Because the states were retrenching.
00:38:02.000 Much, much faster than the federal government was stimulating.
00:38:06.000 So you have austerity for the many, globally, at least in the North Atlantic economies, Europe and America, and socialism for the bankers.
00:38:14.000 Now, what happens is this.
00:38:16.000 When you have austerity for the many, and you print money and you give it to the rich, to the financiers, the financiers then lend it to big business, big business gets all these trillions from the central banks.
00:38:31.000 They look out there, out of the window, and what they see is that multitudes, the masses, were impecunious because of austerity.
00:38:38.000 And they say, yeah, damn that.
00:38:40.000 I'm not going to invest.
00:38:41.000 I'm not going to create, you know, a Tesla competitor if you're in Germany.
00:38:46.000 I'm not going to create new, fancy, high-value products because, you know, the hoi polloi out there cannot afford it.
00:38:53.000 So what do you do with the dough that comes your way if you're a big business person and money that has been freshly minted by the Fed comes your way?
00:39:02.000 You go to the stock exchange and you buy back your own shares.
00:39:05.000 Because that pushes your share price up.
00:39:07.000 Your bonuses are connected and your dividends are connected to your share price.
00:39:12.000 And you're doing really very well.
00:39:13.000 Then you buy real estate.
00:39:15.000 Real estate prices go up.
00:39:17.000 But there's no investment.
00:39:19.000 There is no investment, not even in capital goods, in manufacturing, in green technologies, in energy.
00:39:27.000 That explains why Germany has been sitting on surpluses now for 20 years and they're still struggling to produce electricity after all those years.
00:39:36.000 No investment.
00:39:38.000 Profits?
00:39:39.000 Rents?
00:39:39.000 No investment.
00:39:41.000 That was the situation between 2008 and 2020 when we had the pandemic.
00:39:45.000 Then the pandemic hits.
00:39:47.000 So what do they do?
00:39:48.000 More of the same.
00:39:48.000 They bring more money to give to the big financiers, to give it to the big businessmen.
00:39:52.000 Okay?
00:39:53.000 During the lockdown, however, they had to do also something else.
00:39:56.000 They had to give some of the money, some of the money they were making, for the first time since 2008, give it to the poor people.
00:40:02.000 Because otherwise it would be a revolution.
00:40:05.000 You lock down people, you give them some fairly low wages in order to keep them fed and quiet.
00:40:12.000 So at the time when the lockdown was crushing supply, supply chains, the availability of goods was gone because of lockdowns, and 13 years of underinvestment.
00:40:25.000 At that time, the hoi polloi get a little bit of money printed by the central bank.
00:40:30.000 So you have an increase in demand because the many now have a little bit more money.
00:40:36.000 Reduction in supply, prices go up.
00:40:39.000 And that's why the inflation genie came back.
00:40:42.000 Right?
00:40:42.000 And now we're in a situation where central banks are completely... Am I allowed to say the word fact on your program?
00:40:52.000 They're completely fucked.
00:40:53.000 Because they're damned if they do, they're damned if they don't.
00:40:57.000 If they increase interest rates, then all the zombie corporations, financiers, banks, states that have been addicted to the free money over the last 13 years will go bust.
00:41:10.000 If they don't increase interest rates, inflation will go back to 1970s standards.
00:41:15.000 So this is the situation.
00:41:18.000 The media, in the meantime, I gave the little Greek example, is owned by the same people who've been practicing socialism for the very few, for the bankers and the big finance, and austerity for everybody else.
00:41:33.000 And, meanwhile, you've got working classes that have been completely divided.
00:41:40.000 Completely divided between people who still have a decent job, the precariat, who don't give a damn about the rest of the working class because they think the rest of the working class does not have their interests in mind at all if you are peddling around London for Deliveroo.
00:42:02.000 You don't feel that the trade union movement is on your side.
00:42:06.000 You don't feel that the rest of the working class gives a damn about you.
00:42:10.000 So, what Thatcher began in the 1970s and 80s, which is to divide and rule over the working class in Britain, has now become a worldwide phenomenon.
00:42:22.000 Working classes are being turned against working classes.
00:42:25.000 This is what the fascists, neo-fascists like Trump, Bolsonaro, Modi, Meloni in Italy, Orban, this is what they do.
00:42:33.000 They invest in, you know, my country is greater than your country.
00:42:37.000 My working class, I'm going to look after my working class against your working class with tariffs and all that.
00:42:44.000 So you've got effectively a postmodern version of the 1920s and 30s of the mid-war period during which the only serious Resistance against the liberal, so-called liberal, illiberal establishment comes from neo-fascists, who are stoking up the fires of nationalism, of racism, of dividing one working class from another working class.
00:43:13.000 Sorry, that was too long an answer, but your question was very packed, mate.
00:43:17.000 I liked that answer, and we will release that answer in its complete form to as many people as possible.
00:43:24.000 The only points that I would like to pick up on is to the final flourish, almost the denouement of your 20-minute beautiful response.
00:43:34.000 Was that it's the ethno-nationalism and retro-fascism and this sort of post-modern nationalism that you cited is enhancing and increasing social tensions through their policies, their ideals and their rhetoric.
00:43:51.000 I also feel that the centre-left, which I regard now as a subset of neoliberalism, distinct in ways that are only A superficial, an artificial, they do their part too in stoking those divisions.
00:44:05.000 For example, in Clinton's, Hillary Clinton's, condemnation of Trump supporters as, you know, invert commas, Nazis, because of like they did that America first, one finger salute, while simultaneously praising Georgia Maloney for being, you know, like a woman, glass ceiling, but also maybe a fascist as well, you know.
00:44:29.000 Also, because when someone like Maloney is able to say, I will stand as a woman, as a Catholic, as a supporter of families, those ideas taken at face value, I believe are valuable ideas and ideas that have been neglected.
00:44:47.000 Whether or not I'm setting you up for long, long answers here.
00:44:52.000 you're not a part of this group then fuck you. You know that's like yeah that's a longer conversation
00:44:57.000 and a relevant conversation but a conversation that wouldn't be necessary if there was a
00:45:01.000 meaningful party representing ordinary working people at the national and international level.
00:45:08.000 A few other things I just want to pick up on is like I'm setting you up for long long answers
00:45:13.000 here I recognize this Yanis and I'm very grateful for the opportunity to listen. In this country of
00:45:18.000 course like Liz Truss has just sort of exploded it seems like a not even an economic time bomb
00:45:25.000 an economic bomb because it sort of went off immediately.
00:45:28.000 I'd love you to explain that for me and our audience, like in sort of simple terms, what she did and why it's been so negative so immediately.
00:45:36.000 I'm curious as to why banker bonuses caps were simultaneously removed as part of this package.
00:45:42.000 And I wonder if you would like to comment too on the broad but helpful proposition from Julian Assange
00:45:51.000 that the function of modern government, I think he's talking in particular about America but I feel like it
00:45:56.000 applies elsewhere, is to extract, and it sort of seems like a post-Thatcherite
00:46:00.000 notion, extract public money and place it into private hands.
00:46:04.000 So I wonder if you could elaborate on that Assange maxim a little more.
00:46:09.000 But start with, if you don't mind sir, a little breakdown of trusts' budget.
00:46:15.000 I hope I'll be more succinct than that.
00:46:17.000 the role of neoliberalism from the left and their culpability in creating the conditions
00:46:22.000 that you just described and sort of attributed more it seemed to me to be a problem of the
00:46:27.000 right rather than the left and I just want to present the alternative view as well and
00:46:32.000 that's my question. See you in 20 minutes.
00:46:35.000 I hope I'll be more succinct than that. Rasta let me begin with Trash, with Lizzie.
00:46:46.000 Okay, apart from the fact that she's clearly incompetent, because she made such a spectacular mess of it within seconds of getting her hands on the steering wheel.
00:46:58.000 What we have here is a clear case of what Marx once said, that when history repeats itself, it is as farce.
00:47:06.000 And the history I'm referring here to is her attempt to distance herself from Rishi Sunak.
00:47:13.000 Her great opponent within the Tory party, whom she defeated in order to become Prime Minister, and Boris Johnson, whom she replaced.
00:47:23.000 She decided that she's going to, I don't know whether she believes in it or not, but at least this is the strategy, it's a clear strategy, to present herself as a revivalist Thatcherite.
00:47:34.000 A new Thatcherite.
00:47:37.000 A new Iron Lady, with all the tropes that Margaret Thatcher so successfully, from her perspective, introduced in 1979.
00:47:48.000 Except that she's no Thatcher.
00:47:51.000 She doesn't have the noose, she doesn't have the intelligence, and she doesn't have the levers and the means that Thatcher had.
00:47:58.000 Now, What do I mean by this?
00:48:02.000 Now, Thatcher, I lived through this, I remember, I was in England during every one of Thatcher's years, unfortunately.
00:48:14.000 absolutely a master strategist when it came to combining an intensified class war against the working class with brilliant communication.
00:48:26.000 So her line was, for instance, on the one hand, that the state has to wither, which by the way is an expression first used by Karl Marx, the state has to wither to make space for people to actually be creative and do stuff.
00:48:44.000 Who doesn't like this idea?
00:48:44.000 No?
00:48:47.000 And by that she meant reduce tax rates, reduce regulation, get the state out of people's way.
00:48:58.000 But secondly, the tax cuts that she introduced were always the kind of tax cuts which simultaneously keep the lid on The government budget deficit.
00:49:14.000 And how did she do this?
00:49:16.000 There were not real tax cuts.
00:49:18.000 There was a tax redistribution against the working class.
00:49:23.000 So, remember, she doubled VAT, I remember that, it was 7.5% VAT, and she made it 15%, while at the same time giving tax cuts to the rich.
00:49:32.000 So, she shifted the tax burden onto the shoulders of the working class, while keeping the lid on the deficit.
00:49:39.000 Trust didn't do that.
00:49:40.000 She just got rid of the 45p tax rate, that is the highest tax rate, the one that applied to people making more than 200,000 quid, right?
00:49:51.000 And nothing else.
00:49:52.000 So that extended the budget deficit.
00:49:56.000 Markets didn't like it.
00:49:58.000 So she got her comeuppance, not from the working class, but from capitalists.
00:50:02.000 That's point number one.
00:50:03.000 Point number two is, Thatcher understood that by reducing tax rates for the rich, there is not going to be a growth spurt in the economy.
00:50:11.000 Capitalism does not respond by growing when you give more money to the rich, because the rich are never going to invest more money.
00:50:20.000 They already have plenty of money to invest and they're not investing it.
00:50:23.000 Why would they invest more money when they don't invest the existing money that they have?
00:50:30.000 So Thatcher understood that.
00:50:31.000 She understood that in order to create the appearance of growth, short-term growth that she capitalized on politically, electorally.
00:50:41.000 She won every election, you know, I mean to the extent I had to leave Britain at some point and migrate to Australia because she was winning everything.
00:50:49.000 The way to do it was by Just as Julian Assange said.
00:50:53.000 I wrote an article in the Guardian a few days ago saying the same thing.
00:50:57.000 What she did was to liquidate public property and throw it into the cauldron of financial capital in the city.
00:51:06.000 To be precise.
00:51:08.000 You were probably too young to remember.
00:51:10.000 When she sold British Gas, right?
00:51:14.000 There was this amazing Saatchi and Saatchi advertising campaign.
00:51:18.000 Tell Sid.
00:51:20.000 Bus stops everywhere, tell seeds, television advertisements everywhere.
00:51:24.000 Tell seed, tell seed.
00:51:25.000 And what was this tell seed?
00:51:26.000 What was she actually telling Sid or, you know, Jill and Jack and Harriet?
00:51:32.000 What she was telling them was, you know what?
00:51:35.000 I've underpriced British gas.
00:51:38.000 I've chopped up the ownership of British gas to shares and every share I'm selling it at half price.
00:51:47.000 So buy, and then if you buy, borrow, borrow, go to the banker, to your banker and borrow money, you know, 1500 quid.
00:51:55.000 She also put a limit on, you couldn't buy more than, I think it was about 1500 quid worth of shares.
00:52:02.000 But you know, if you buy it, then within five seconds, you sell it for 3000.
00:52:08.000 So you've doubled your money.
00:52:10.000 So what she did was she cut down all the Bits and pieces of public properties.
00:52:18.000 Gas, electricity, everything.
00:52:22.000 People actually went and borrowed money to buy their council homes.
00:52:26.000 And she did the same thing with council homes.
00:52:28.000 She threw the value that decades of working class effort had Put into council houses, took this value and threw it into the City of London.
00:52:38.000 Because this is what happens when you go to the Barclays Bank or Royals Bank to borrow, you know, get a mortgage in order to buy a council house, you are financialising the house.
00:52:48.000 This house that the working class built over years for itself.
00:52:52.000 Now it's become part of the City of London.
00:52:54.000 Same thing with pensions.
00:52:55.000 Financialised pensions.
00:52:57.000 Turning them into private insurance contracts that are traded in the City of London.
00:53:02.000 Okay, now that's what Thatcher did.
00:53:04.000 Liz Truss did none of that.
00:53:05.000 She thought she could, you know, play the role of the new Thatcher simply by announcing tax cuts here and more expenditure there and, you know, adopting the language of Thatcher.
00:53:17.000 And the markets got her.
00:53:20.000 Okay, so that's Truss out of the way.
00:53:23.000 Let's go to the question of what I call the post-fascist, neo-fascist on the one hand, and the center-left.
00:53:34.000 Let me be abundantly clear.
00:53:39.000 If the neo-fascist, post-fascist, authoritarian right is rising all over the world, we must blame ourselves, the left.
00:53:50.000 Not just the centre-left, all of us.
00:53:53.000 I like the fact, for instance, that you are adopting the mantra of liberty, that you're saying, you know, stay free, that you're talking about freedom.
00:54:00.000 Because, Russell, you and I have talked about this before, the left, you know, when the left began in the 19th century, you know, trade unions, the Communist Manifesto, the whole paraphernalia of the left ideology, It was not about justice.
00:54:17.000 It was not about equality.
00:54:18.000 It was about freedom.
00:54:20.000 It was an emancipatory movement, the left.
00:54:23.000 The feminists.
00:54:24.000 The feminists, they were women's lib.
00:54:27.000 Women's liberation.
00:54:29.000 It was not about identity.
00:54:31.000 It was about bloody liberty.
00:54:34.000 The liberty of women to do stuff.
00:54:36.000 And not to be confined to their home.
00:54:38.000 Not to be confined within the conventions of male-induced patriarchy.
00:54:46.000 I like that.
00:54:47.000 And I'm mentioning this because we, the left, during the 20th century, all sorts of left, the communists, the socialists, the social democrats, the labour rights, we ended up Presenting ourselves as lovers of a state that will come from, you know, a cradle to our coffin to look after us once we give up some of our liberties.
00:55:17.000 This is precisely the opposite.
00:55:19.000 I mean, Karl Marx would have, you know, would be rotating at 10,000 revs a minute in his coffin if he had heard that.
00:55:26.000 Why am I saying that?
00:55:28.000 The reason why Trump succeeded was one word, Obama.
00:55:36.000 It was Obama's failure, not failure, design to use a left-wing language in order to reinstate Larry Summers, the gentleman I mentioned at the beginning of our program, to the Treasury Minister.
00:55:55.000 To take Tim Geithner, all those people who had unshackled Wall Street in the 1990s under Clinton, and who had caused the massive pain of blue-collar workers in the United States.
00:56:08.000 Obama, who was voted by those blue-collar workers to give them a chance at having life prospects again.
00:56:18.000 took the architects of Wall Street's emancipation, put them back through the revolving doors that you mentioned, in power, to bail out the bankers and create socialism for the very, very few.
00:56:35.000 Well, Yanis Varoufakis, remember, that dude was running Greece during the time of the 2008 crash.
00:56:41.000 So he's got real experience of the EU, real experience of government.
00:56:45.000 If you want to listen to the rest of that conversation, it's available to our Stay Free AF members.
00:56:50.000 At the moment we're doing an offer of $33 for a year of membership.
00:56:53.000 Later in the year, my stand-up special, $33, will be dropping and you'll get that additionally.
00:56:59.000 That's all we've got time for today.
00:57:01.000 Thank you very much for joining me.
00:57:02.000 Tomorrow we're doing a fantastic story on billionaire bunkers.
00:57:05.000 Are they already preparing for Armageddon?
00:57:08.000 Was the first crisis financial?
00:57:10.000 Was the second crisis the pandemic?
00:57:12.000 Is the third crisis nuclear Armageddon?
00:57:14.000 Are they already preparing for it?
00:57:16.000 We're going to be joined by philosopher Brad Evans, who can always give us unique insights on complex issues.
00:57:22.000 Please sign up to Stay Free AF for exclusive live sessions.
00:57:25.000 Coming up, we've got Eckhart Tolle and Jordan Peterson.
00:57:28.000 Let me know as well in the chat, let me know in the comments who you want to see as guests and we will respond to you.
00:57:32.000 You can also listen to this show as a podcast every day, wherever you listen to your podcasts.
00:57:37.000 See you tomorrow for another episode of Stay Free.
00:57:39.000 We're not doing a Stay Free AF session today because today's the day where I don't do that.
00:57:45.000 But I'll see you tomorrow for another show.
00:57:47.000 See you in the chat.
00:57:48.000 I love you.