Stay Free - Russel Brand - February 08, 2023


The TRUTH About Biden’s State Of The Union Speech - #076 - Stay Free With Russell Brand


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per Minute

179.5231

Word Count

12,046

Sentence Count

910

Misogynist Sentences

19

Hate Speech Sentences

21


Summary

Joe Biden's State of the Union speech may not have addressed the truth of America, but Satish Kumar thinks it did, and he's here to tell us why. Plus, we've got a quiz to keep you warm in the winter months, and an apology from Joe Biden for the way he conducts his trivia quizzes. Thanks to our sponsor, Pfizer. In this video, you're going to see the future, and in this video you'll get to see The Awakening Wonders. The full show is available only on Rumble on the Wild West, wherever you're watching the show now. Thanks for joining us whereverver you re watching us now. The Wild West is a production of Native Creative Podcasts. New episodes drop every Tuesday, only on Native Creative. Native Creative is a podcast produced in partnership with Native Creative, and produced by Native Creative Productions. This episode was produced and edited by Rishi Sethi. Additional audio mixing and mastering by Matthew Boll. Our theme song is by Ian Dorsch and our ad music is by Haley Shaw. We'd like to learn more about you, the listeners, so please take a few minutes to leave us a rating and review our podcast by rating and reviewing our podcast on Apple Podcasts, and we'll be looking out for your feedback in the next episode. Thank you! If you like what you hear, please tell us what you think about it in the comments and what you're listening to us on social media! or share it with a friend about it on the wild west podcast and/tweet us about it! and/or share it on your thoughts on the podcast! if you're looking for more like this episode on Insta- or share us on your favourite podcasting platform, we'll get a shoutout! Timestamps: 5 stars and a review on the episode 7 stars is a review of the podcast? 8 stars is much more! 9 stars is more than enough! 10 stars is enough, right? 11 stars? 12 stars is appreciated! 13 stars is all you can do, please spread the word about this episode? 14 stars are much more than that? 15 stars is not enough? 16 stars is too much? 17 stars are enough, can I have it? 19 stars are a star rating? 21 stars are more than just a star?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 I'm going to go ahead and get the last one.
00:00:49.000 Brought to you by Pfizer.
00:01:10.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:01:12.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:01:23.000 You Awakening Wonders, thanks for joining us.
00:01:25.000 Wherever you're watching us now, the full show is available only on Rumble.
00:01:29.000 That means, Gareth, producer of the show, we've got to get as much into this first 10 minutes before community guidelines kick in, before free speech collapses, before we lose the ability to unite people from across the political spectrum and create new movements, new unity, new acceptance, a new vital political movement, which is surely what the world needs right now.
00:01:51.000 Biden's State of the Union speech maybe doesn't address the truth of America.
00:01:56.000 We'll be looking at that.
00:01:58.000 I've got a fantastic guest coming up, Satish Kumar, a genuine hero, an elder, a true, spiritual, potent voice that can provide the necessary sucker that we require at this time.
00:02:10.000 He's not a conspiracy theorist, is he?
00:02:13.000 That conspiracy theorist Satish Kumar when he was meeting those other conspiracy theorists like Martin Luther King Jr and Bertrand Russell, those crackpots in the SDE.
00:02:23.000 He fits the type.
00:02:24.000 You've got to watch out for them.
00:02:26.000 We're only going to be on Twitter and YouTube for a little while before we're on Rumble on the Wild West, so I want to make sure that we get as much across as possible.
00:02:36.000 Do you know what I want to give people the chance to do?
00:02:38.000 Everyone's worried about the energy crisis, aren't they?
00:02:40.000 The fuel, for some reason, has become very, very expensive and costly, even though the energy companies like Shell and BP are enjoying their most profitable years in history, even though they still receive government subsidies.
00:02:54.000 But we can't control that.
00:02:56.000 That system's beyond us.
00:02:57.000 It's beyond our reach.
00:02:58.000 But I have got a few little techniques to keep you warm during the winter months if you're experiencing any cold.
00:03:04.000 We've put together This compilation of shudder moments from Justin Trudeau that'll help you shudder yourself warm.
00:03:12.000 If you can't afford your energy bills, that don't matter none.
00:03:15.000 Just watch Justin Trudeau and shudder yourself warm as he embarrasses you into a glow of humiliating heat.
00:03:22.000 Check him.
00:03:23.000 Where we can be free and no man owns the fish.
00:03:27.000 Hello Vladimir, it's Rishi and Justin.
00:03:30.000 I need a singer because I'm easy come, easy go, little high, little low, anywhere the wind blows.
00:03:42.000 Ooh, that warms you up.
00:03:43.000 It warms you up to watch him!
00:03:46.000 When he goes... At least it can warm you.
00:03:52.000 We've got a fantastic quiz.
00:03:53.000 We're only going to give you the answer once we click over on to Rumble.
00:03:57.000 Which country poses as liberal but As a matter of fact, it's a totalitarian type of place.
00:04:04.000 A mass formation, you could say.
00:04:06.000 A mass formation, because we've been discussing mass psyche and mass hypnosis over the course of the week.
00:04:12.000 We get guests on here that can give us unique insights into the reality behind the systems of domination within which most of us toil and grind.
00:04:21.000 But now it's our take on the State of the Union Address, which is essentially just a propagandist piece, isn't it?
00:04:29.000 Absolutely.
00:04:30.000 But, like, a lot of people think that it was senseless faticus, that's imitative information, no real political value to it, just an oratory exercise with no real truth.
00:04:40.000 But I think it was pretty valuable, and there was some pretty powerful rhetoric in there.
00:04:45.000 And make no mistake, if you try to increase the price of Frisbee, I will veto it.
00:04:53.000 Make no mistake!
00:04:55.000 If you try anything to raise the cost of presenting themselves, I will veto it.
00:05:02.000 Yeah!
00:05:03.000 That's moving!
00:05:04.000 That's the world we're living in!
00:05:07.000 Also, Joe Biden, I think he owes us all an apology for the way that he conducts his trivia quizzes.
00:05:16.000 Name me a world leader who changed places with Xi Jinping.
00:05:20.000 Name me one!
00:05:22.000 Name me one!
00:05:24.000 All right, mate.
00:05:25.000 Do you want to calm down?
00:05:26.000 Justin Trudeau?
00:05:29.000 Yeah, that's one.
00:05:30.000 Justin Trudeau, Rishi Sunak, maybe, like, all of them, really.
00:05:34.000 Why is he... What is that mood?
00:05:36.000 It's aggressive.
00:05:38.000 That's aggressive?
00:05:39.000 Name me one!
00:05:40.000 I don't like it when he does that.
00:05:41.000 I worry for him, and I worry for us.
00:05:44.000 When he might turn himself into chalk, the poor old sod.
00:05:47.000 Yeah, because it was like it wasn't rhetorical.
00:05:49.000 It was like he actually wanted an answer.
00:05:51.000 Oh God, I can't think.
00:05:53.000 Jesus, Joe, please calm down.
00:05:54.000 Let me check Hunter's laptop.
00:05:56.000 Oh no, where is that damn thing?
00:05:58.000 And there's this crazy lady, Marjorie Taylor Greene.
00:06:00.000 I bet loads of you like her.
00:06:02.000 But what I would say is that she shouldn't wear her buttons as a necklace in the same outfit.
00:06:08.000 The one thing he did not talk about was the one thing he should have talked about.
00:06:13.000 He should have apologised to America for the Chinese spy balloon.
00:06:17.000 Everyone loves that balloon, don't they?
00:06:18.000 That balloon has really lit up the political scene because it's... The thing is with a balloon...
00:06:25.000 Power these days seems so diffuse, untenable.
00:06:28.000 Technocratic, governed by a cadre.
00:06:30.000 Technological, inaccessible to most of us who don't understand the complexity of the way that technology operates, manages demographics and data.
00:06:39.000 But like, when something, like, old school, like there's a balloon floating in the... You up there?
00:06:44.000 Like, Joe Budden, he could deal with that with one of his angry fish shakes.
00:06:46.000 Get down there, you varmint!
00:06:50.000 Shoot it straight out of the sky himself, couldn't he?
00:06:52.000 Yeah, he could.
00:06:53.000 One of the things that, of course, we are concerned about, and let me know what you think about this.
00:06:57.000 If you're watching this on Twitter, do a little tweet about it.
00:06:59.000 On YouTube, let me know in the comments.
00:07:00.000 On Rumble, let me know in the chat right now and we'll read it.
00:07:03.000 If you're a member of our locals community, that's the stream that I'm watching right there.
00:07:07.000 For example, hello there, Ashela.
00:07:08.000 Yeah, it's a new hat.
00:07:10.000 Listen, we're not trying to bring down the government here.
00:07:11.000 Don't worry about people's hats.
00:07:12.000 That's not the issue.
00:07:13.000 What we're looking at is how the left have fetishised conflict with Russia in order to pursue a unipolar agenda and how the right potentially is looking at exacerbating the conflict that is already an economic one.
00:07:28.000 I suppose Joe Biden has imposed the most aggressive sanctions yet because of semiconductors.
00:07:33.000 There's a thing you've never heard of that now you have to learn.
00:07:35.000 There's semiconductor wars now.
00:07:37.000 Semiconductor wars?
00:07:38.000 That's what's happening now, yeah.
00:07:39.000 Get your hands off my semiconductor!
00:07:42.000 Yeah, this is how we're going to beat China, apparently.
00:07:44.000 So I suppose this is what we're asking, is that even though the State of the Union Address, I'm sure, was full of the usual platitudinous patriotic claptrap, are we being groomed and prepped for yet more global wars?
00:07:57.000 I mean, the one thing that was good about the proxy war with Russia, I thought, is it's not China.
00:08:02.000 That's like the best thing about it.
00:08:05.000 And now it looks like we're heading that way.
00:08:07.000 We've already had that general say it's going to happen in two years.
00:08:09.000 Now you've got Biden saying we've got to beat China and that's the way to unite us.
00:08:13.000 Unite us in a war against an incredibly well organised and powerful global entity.
00:08:20.000 In his State of the Union address on Tuesday night, President Biden took aim at China It is.
00:08:26.000 Well, at the moment they're saying competition, aren't they?
00:08:31.000 But then you've got generals saying that there's a war coming.
00:08:33.000 And then you've got the thing with the semiconductor.
00:08:35.000 It is priming us towards aggression with China.
00:08:38.000 Is anybody in the financial industry saying that a war would be profitable?
00:08:44.000 That's something to watch out for.
00:08:45.000 Surely not.
00:08:46.000 White House linked venture capital fund boasts China war would be great for business.
00:08:50.000 Now we remember this, don't we?
00:08:52.000 Do you remember when like Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, all them dudes told their shareholders we can guarantee profits in the next quarter because this war is going to be dragging on?
00:09:01.000 Yeah, war with Ukraine is good for business.
00:09:03.000 I think, let me know if you agree with me in the chat and the comments, that at this point, because of our ability to curate information from a wide variety of sources, if we truly watch the narratives that are usually suppressed, ones that you won't see discussed on mainstream media, you might be able to...
00:09:19.000 Pre-empt where these conflicts are going and even when they might commence We're already into the sanctions at stage.
00:09:27.000 We're already into the condemnatory Bombastic language phase the economic opportunity of war China encircled by a war John Pilger called a noose.
00:09:40.000 Yeah missile bases now arc Yeah.
00:09:43.000 An arc.
00:09:44.000 Yeah, an arc and a noose.
00:09:45.000 Yeah, exactly.
00:09:46.000 I'd rather have an arc.
00:09:47.000 Because an arc, there's positive connotations, like through an arc you pass into spiritual bliss and awakening.
00:09:47.000 Sure.
00:09:52.000 Through a double arc, maybe even a little McDonald's, but a noose, nothing good comes out of that unless, I mean, I don't even want to get into that territory until we're in the Wild West that is Rumble.
00:10:02.000 But this is why we shouldn't be tricked by this whole balloon stuff.
00:10:05.000 It's silly.
00:10:05.000 I know Marjorie Taylor Greene's kind of using it in a political sense, but it's silly.
00:10:10.000 It's the kind of perfect little symbol for a government who's trying to start wars and whatever way it is they're going to war with China.
00:10:17.000 Because it's hollow, empty, full of hot air, but easy to identify.
00:10:21.000 Sure.
00:10:22.000 I sometimes feel that news narratives require symbols.
00:10:26.000 I'll handle this as carefully as I possibly can.
00:10:29.000 Part of the idea that coronavirus originated in a wet market, which still yet may be the truth because there are several theories being discussed and no conclusions have yet been offered, but the wet market was an evocative idea because it plays to the ordinary mistrust that Occidental people may have when contemplating Food sources, different cultural ideas and values.
00:10:55.000 When you start seeing the different... It's very basic and primal, the food people eat, the way people are, our atavistic suspicion of the other, of people that are from other communities.
00:11:06.000 These things transcend ethics and morality.
00:11:09.000 These are about anthropology.
00:11:11.000 Historically, the most likely way that an infectious disease arrives in your community is a stranger.
00:11:18.000 That's beyond morals and ethics.
00:11:20.000 That's not a reason to underwrite racism.
00:11:22.000 But when a narrative around, it came from a wet market, you know that the subtext is they're different than us.
00:11:28.000 Something like a balloon, it provides a convenient symbol.
00:11:31.000 It's territorial.
00:11:32.000 The balloon is literally above America.
00:11:34.000 Increasingly likely now that it was a weather balloon, at least that's what they're saying.
00:11:38.000 You'll still see people say, oh no, they could have got down into the air force bases and fired off something from a nuclear fission factory.
00:11:46.000 Yeah, but even if that is the case, I mean literally when we're talking about this noose and this arc of military bases, perhaps giving the US a front row seat to spy on China.
00:11:54.000 And then a point that Caitlin Johnson made in one of her brilliant articles as usual this week was, Talking about Edward Snowden, the revelations around spying with that, it's like we get all in this frenzy about this balloon because it eventually leads us towards this narrative about war with China, but when revelations like Edward Snowden come out that America is spying on its own citizens, oh we bang him up and or let him flee off to Russia.
00:12:17.000 What are you more worried about?
00:12:18.000 A balloon or your own government spying on you?
00:12:21.000 Right now, who are you more afraid of?
00:12:24.000 China or your own government?
00:12:26.000 Now, your own government, remember, we are interested in presenting you with transcendent narratives and diagnostic tools.
00:12:33.000 For example, our problem with the Democrat Party isn't, oh, we really like the Republican Party, and we don't care which party you like.
00:12:40.000 It's irrelevant to us.
00:12:41.000 We think there needs to be a new populist unifying movement transcendent of those ideals.
00:12:47.000 When the Democrat Party were campaigning, they didn't say we're going to be waging a new war on drugs.
00:12:53.000 They talked about the horror of the opioid crisis.
00:12:56.000 But guess what's happening now?
00:12:58.000 They are amping up the war on drugs, as you can see from this story.
00:13:03.000 Harsher penalties for fentanyl related substances.
00:13:06.000 Now if there's one aspect of the drug crisis and mental health crisis in America in the last few years, it was the disgusting way the pharmaceutical industry induced that crisis.
00:13:18.000 The profits that were gleaned, and this seldom happens, is an area where I'm something of an expert.
00:13:23.000 I understand addiction and I understand what psychologically underwrites addiction.
00:13:27.000 Despair.
00:13:28.000 Pain, loss, disconnection, loneliness, total lack of trust in the system.
00:13:34.000 So to hear that the war on drugs is back but under the new auspices of liberalism shows you precisely and exactly how hollow this administration is.
00:13:45.000 As hollow and as empty as a balloon.
00:13:48.000 Well yeah the thing is this is it's being talked about and I think it was in the State of the Union where Biden was talking about the trafficking element of this and that we're cracking down on the trafficking element and that's how we're going to solve the problem of the fentanyl issues.
00:13:59.000 But it's also that fentanyl any fentanyl related cases it's a schedule one drug now so it means that like people taking it You know, so you're going to end up with the same situation where prisons are going to get filled up with more people.
00:14:11.000 It's exacerbating the problem.
00:14:12.000 The prison industry?
00:14:13.000 Well, it could be, yeah.
00:14:14.000 Could fool those companies that use cheap prison labour.
00:14:17.000 Right, exactly, and the profits that are accrued in relation to that.
00:14:20.000 And, you know, it's essentially creating a system and a problem that exists already and exacerbating it.
00:14:25.000 Our great mentor and elder George Carlin used to say, you don't need a conspiracy where interests converge.
00:14:33.000 Let me know what you think about that quote in the chat.
00:14:35.000 Let me know what your favourite George Carlin quote is.
00:14:39.000 Or which other elder you turn to.
00:14:40.000 One of our elders we'll be talking to a little later in the show, Satish Kumar.
00:14:44.000 A man who went on a pilgrimage from India, met greats like Bertrand Russell, the English philosopher, and Martin Luther King, the unparalleled, peerless leader of the American civil rights movement.
00:14:57.000 More dark money flooding into politics in spite of the Democrat Party saying that they wouldn't sanction it.
00:15:02.000 And by the way, We're not saying that the Republican Party are the solution to these problems, are we?
00:15:10.000 Because we believe in transcendent ideals.
00:15:12.000 No, but you can point out hypocrisy when you see it.
00:15:14.000 I mean, for a party that once decried dark money and said, you know, it's just the Republicans using it and we wouldn't do it, and then winning an election using dark money, and now they're They won an election using the very dark money they said they would never use.
00:15:27.000 Here it is.
00:15:27.000 There's a promise from them.
00:15:28.000 Democrats deride dark money.
00:15:30.000 Then they use dark money.
00:15:34.000 Is there another broken promise from those Democrats?
00:15:36.000 The opioid crisis.
00:15:37.000 Joe Biden's new plan to end the opioid epidemic is really ambitious and bold.
00:15:43.000 Biden's speech comes with opioid epidemic having been a deadly public health crisis.
00:15:47.000 But, you know, listen, should we flip over now?
00:15:50.000 If you're watching us on Twitter, if you're watching us on YouTube, there's a link in the description so you can watch us on Rumble.
00:15:55.000 We broadcast every single day.
00:15:57.000 The reason we're on Rumble is we can freely say whatever we want and we believe in...
00:16:01.000 Unity, transcendence, freedom of the individual, freedom of the community, traditional values, progressive values, your right to democratically run your community, public discourse where all voices are heard, valued and respected and everybody is included and we unify where possible against centralised establishment power, that's our real threat, not one another, that we should find ways to unite, accept and love one another and if that That makes me a conspiracy theorist baby.
00:16:27.000 It does.
00:16:28.000 Well then I'm not then.
00:16:29.000 Get me my, take off my brown bobble hat and hand me my tinfoil one.
00:16:33.000 Okay, let's have a look at the Republicans.
00:16:35.000 If you think they're the solution, see you later other guys.
00:16:37.000 If you think the Republicans, look what the Republicans want to do.
00:16:39.000 They want to roll back child labour laws.
00:16:42.000 But surely gal, it'll just be jobs, you know, it's good for kids to have a little bit of work.
00:16:46.000 Yeah.
00:16:47.000 Maybe you could work at hairdresser, sweeping the floor.
00:16:49.000 Pet shop.
00:16:49.000 Right.
00:16:50.000 Yeah, with the pets, that's a good job.
00:16:52.000 If I'd had to, did you want to do jobs when you was a kid?
00:16:54.000 Oh, I didn't want to do a paper round.
00:16:55.000 Hey, did you have one?
00:16:57.000 I had to have one for a bit.
00:16:57.000 No, I didn't.
00:16:58.000 I was throwing papers down.
00:16:59.000 Of course you did.
00:17:00.000 I didn't like doing the paper round.
00:17:01.000 But like, what I would have done is worked in a pet shop.
00:17:04.000 And when you think about children doing jobs, look at what the, the, the reprehensible Iowa bill to expand child labour.
00:17:10.000 Look at the jobs.
00:17:11.000 Mining, Really odd.
00:17:13.000 That's like, that's a cliche bad job.
00:17:15.000 Yeah.
00:17:15.000 Backbreaking, that's not right for adults.
00:17:17.000 Adults shouldn't have to do binding.
00:17:17.000 No.
00:17:19.000 I think there's been some pretty bad health risks associated with it.
00:17:22.000 You can make you cough, you can hurt yourself down there.
00:17:24.000 Logging, that's got to be dangerous.
00:17:26.000 Surely.
00:17:27.000 Like dealing with great big trees and logs and stuff.
00:17:30.000 And I think worst of, the worst of the bunch I'd say is animal slaughtering.
00:17:35.000 That's not a weekend job, slaughtering an animal.
00:17:38.000 What process would you have to go through?
00:17:40.000 And again, even as a vegan person, I don't judge people for eating meat or even hunting.
00:17:44.000 People are going to be who they are.
00:17:45.000 We've all got different perspectives on reality.
00:17:47.000 But for me, I can't kill animals.
00:17:48.000 But if your weekend job is you've got to kill a cow... You'd really look forward to going back to school on Monday.
00:17:54.000 I've got to get school work.
00:17:55.000 It is hard.
00:17:56.000 Algebra.
00:17:57.000 But I didn't have to kill a cow.
00:17:59.000 I didn't have to look into the face of a sentient being and then pull the trigger on a bolt gun.
00:18:04.000 Like that.
00:18:05.000 And sort of see it go... And then sort of pass into a terrible death that I know I was personally responsible for.
00:18:11.000 I'd rather do games.
00:18:13.000 Games?
00:18:13.000 Sometimes maybe it's cold.
00:18:15.000 You've got to do a cross-country run.
00:18:17.000 Or you just run to the back.
00:18:19.000 Stay at the back maybe.
00:18:19.000 Better though.
00:18:21.000 Better than... What you're not doing is killing one of the creatures of the Lord as a temporary material expression of the limitless love that we surely all must be accessing.
00:18:31.000 One of the things I'll be talking to Satish Kumar about.
00:18:34.000 Now, we mentioned the quiz a little bit earlier.
00:18:36.000 Which country pretends to be liberal, but is actually a tricky little totalitarian country?
00:18:41.000 Let me just see what people are saying.
00:18:42.000 Who do you lot think it is?
00:18:44.000 Some people are feeling bad about Utrecht, but some people are saying USA, some people are saying Ukraine.
00:18:49.000 No, because they're, like, if you think who's got the nicest hair, New Zealand, not bad.
00:18:54.000 Someone said CSC, said Canada.
00:18:57.000 CSC, Raj, Canada.
00:18:58.000 Let's show the answer right now.
00:19:05.000 Oh Canada, our home and native land.
00:19:12.000 I got it.
00:19:14.000 That sting was too long.
00:19:15.000 Much too long.
00:19:16.000 Three seconds too long.
00:19:17.000 Christ, we're all going to be dead soon.
00:19:18.000 We're going to die during a bloody sting.
00:19:20.000 Made me feel, I'm actually feeling a bit chilly.
00:19:23.000 I think I need a warming shot of Trudeau.
00:19:26.000 Warm yourself up with the Trudeau shutters.
00:19:29.000 Let's have a look at him once more.
00:19:31.000 Oh, look at them.
00:19:32.000 Can you hear them in there, panicking?
00:19:34.000 They don't know how to ride that deck, do they?
00:19:36.000 I can't move at this pace, Gareth.
00:19:37.000 Do you need to throw me?
00:19:38.000 Shall I throw to it again?
00:19:40.000 I'm not cold anymore, but I will get cold later.
00:19:43.000 I'll tell you that.
00:19:44.000 Yeah.
00:19:45.000 Like, what I feel like this is Justin Trudeau, with his sincerity, has the ability to induce deep shudders.
00:19:51.000 Keep that thing, like, loaded on somewhere.
00:19:53.000 I'm going to pop back there.
00:19:55.000 Oh, I know you will.
00:19:55.000 You'll test them.
00:19:56.000 Or we'll test you.
00:19:58.000 Have a different laptop with things that are needed immediately.
00:20:00.000 Let's have a look at it.
00:20:04.000 And no man owns the fish.
00:20:06.000 Hello Vladimir, it's- Is that his take on teach a man to fish, isn't it?
00:20:11.000 Right, I didn't- He's doing, I think- That's not- What accent is that he's doing?
00:20:13.000 You shouldn't be doing that.
00:20:14.000 That's not good, what accent was he doing there, guys?
00:20:16.000 No, Trudeau and his accents.
00:20:18.000 Like, he's- He wants to be someone else, Trudeau, doesn't he?
00:20:23.000 And it's weird that the first syllable of his last name is True, because he's a particularly... He ain't True-doe.
00:20:29.000 That ain't True-doe!
00:20:30.000 And that's how he would say it, as well, because he'd be doing a street South London ethnic accent.
00:20:36.000 This is my favourite one, is this Vladimir.
00:20:36.000 There he is.
00:20:38.000 Richie and Justin.
00:20:43.000 I don't mind him doing that so much though.
00:20:46.000 You probably would really like him if you were like I guess he's at some stage school in London when he yeah I think it was just wasn't it the day before something really serious yeah they did some stuff with the truckers like around then they said those truckers Nazis, and we're going to shut down all the bank accounts.
00:21:01.000 It's this time where we just all need to be very careful about what we're doing.
00:21:05.000 Christina Freelander, like W.E.F.
00:21:08.000 Stooge, freezing up Canadian people's bank accounts.
00:21:11.000 Justin Trudeau, easy come, easy go.
00:21:14.000 We're free, I know.
00:21:15.000 They're doing like Wayne's World stuff.
00:21:18.000 You can't have people like that running.
00:21:19.000 That was the day before Her Majesty's funeral.
00:21:21.000 That was it.
00:21:22.000 That stays in your mind.
00:21:22.000 That was it.
00:21:23.000 He was in England, I think he was in England at this point.
00:21:25.000 Have you had the Queen's death yet?
00:21:26.000 I haven't accepted it.
00:21:26.000 No.
00:21:27.000 No, it's very difficult.
00:21:28.000 I've not fully, deep down, accepted it.
00:21:31.000 If I see King Charles on a pound note.
00:21:33.000 Well you will.
00:21:34.000 I won't accept it.
00:21:36.000 I'd only accept Her Majesty's tender.
00:21:37.000 You'll be lucky if you're using any kind of actual cash notes these days Ross.
00:21:41.000 You will earn nothing and you will be happy.
00:21:42.000 Certainly not in Canada anyway, that's not the way it's going.
00:21:45.000 Because they are, actually there are stories behind this, this isn't just frivolity and just an opportunity to show you Trudeau, God love him, being slightly absurd.
00:21:56.000 There's a new online censorship bill that's been passed in Canada, what does it mean Gal?
00:22:02.000 Currently the law for censorship only kind of pertains to like TV and radio and things like this, but this is designed to extend those powers for online media as well.
00:22:15.000 Just more censorship?
00:22:16.000 More censorship, but this time moving to the online space.
00:22:20.000 They say things like pedos, terrorists, all that.
00:22:23.000 Yeah, I guess it will.
00:22:24.000 I mean, they'll use whatever... You've got to watch out for pedos.
00:22:26.000 We're going to censor everyone.
00:22:28.000 Yeah, it'll be for your safety.
00:22:29.000 It'll be hate speech and all these... Again, all these things that are right in that people shouldn't say, you know...
00:22:37.000 Things about people that are... Be kind!
00:22:40.000 Right!
00:22:41.000 Be kind to each other!
00:22:42.000 If you're in that chat right now, you better be being kind to each other.
00:22:45.000 But at the same time, you know, freedom of speech is a right.
00:22:49.000 And once you get to the point where you're policing what people say, if they're not harming people, then you've got an issue.
00:22:55.000 Yeah, it's a problem.
00:22:56.000 Gal, are they doing some CBDC stuff and all?
00:22:59.000 Yeah, okay, so the Canada's... Smart cities.
00:23:01.000 Smart cities.
00:23:02.000 So these are like data-driven cities.
00:23:04.000 The guys, the way that they're introducing this is that it's about climate change, is that people will be able to kind of monitor their climate change and all help to, you know, What our job is now, I think, is to diagnose upcoming trends.
00:23:20.000 As well as doing our level best to inform you of reality as we understand it, I think we have to be alert to the geopolitical issues, such as the reality behind the proxy war between the USA and Russia and what the goals are of that.
00:23:36.000 We've spoken about that at some length.
00:23:38.000 There are Numerous goals to destabilize and drain Russia, to create a post-war Ukraine that generates opportunity for companies like BlackRock, to pilot ideas like digital ID and surveillance.
00:23:51.000 They've already said that Ukraine will be 100% digital.
00:23:54.000 So to report the stories that you don't get.
00:23:57.000 You tell us in the chat in the comments if this is what you want.
00:24:00.000 Then to be alert Excuse me, of emergent stories like the evolving conflict between the USA and China and how we're prepared and groomed for it.
00:24:10.000 Then to watch out for stories about digital IDs, censorship.
00:24:13.000 That's one of the things we're super interested in and what we do with our guests.
00:24:16.000 We bring on guests that are experts in those areas.
00:24:19.000 If you cannot control communication and information because of the technological revolutions of
00:24:24.000 the last 20 years in particular, what's obviously a requirement is the ability to
00:24:28.000 censor and to smear dissenters.
00:24:32.000 These things become, and you can see how that is increasing, more arguments for censorship
00:24:36.000 and more like radical condemnation of, I would say, players within the political sphere that
00:24:42.000 just 20 years ago were considered ordinary rivals.
00:24:47.000 take American politics.
00:24:48.000 The right of the Republican Party weren't regarded as, like, flat-out Nazis.
00:24:53.000 There's a rise of nationalism as a response to globalism, no doubt about it, but the ordinary political discourse within a country like America was, Republicans, Democrats, they really make no difference, so it wasn't, like, fueled by hatred.
00:25:06.000 And that's one of our main points, isn't it?
00:25:08.000 That if you were sort of fervidly pro-Joe Biden, Then what are you now doing with what's happened in that country since then?
00:25:16.000 With what's happening now with the opioid crisis story that we just talked about today, the escalating of tensions, the botched Afghanistan, all of this stuff.
00:25:25.000 What do you do with that?
00:25:26.000 You have to accept that ultimately these are establishment entities.
00:25:30.000 You also have to hope that, like, on the other side, that when Donald Trump comes on the telly and says stuff about, you know, ending the war and that there wouldn't be war if he was president, that it doesn't mean that if he does get to become president again, that then they ramp stuff up with China even more.
00:25:46.000 You know, you have to hope that on both sides.
00:25:48.000 I mean, Jimmy Dore was brilliant last week when he came on and he said, this is not about either party, this is about the military-industrial complex.
00:25:54.000 That is who's in control here.
00:25:56.000 And increasingly we're seeing, and if we put that out yet, that presentation about war is America's business, that's what they require.
00:26:02.000 Is that the video we put out yesterday?
00:26:04.000 Yeah, I think it was.
00:26:06.000 There's a requirement for ongoing war.
00:26:08.000 You can't stabilize American economics without it.
00:26:11.000 We've got a fantastic presentation for you now.
00:26:13.000 It's pretty funny and also, I've got to say, terrifying.
00:26:18.000 This is about the AI and automation revolution, replacing human beings with robots in order to, well, mostly kill us and take our jobs.
00:26:26.000 I'm not sure in what order.
00:26:29.000 That will become clearer over the course of the presentation.
00:26:31.000 Here's the news.
00:26:32.000 No, here's the effing news.
00:26:35.000 No, here's the effing news!
00:26:41.000 On the good news or the bad news?
00:26:43.000 Robots are coming for your job.
00:26:45.000 Also, they might kill you.
00:26:46.000 Wait, that's two bits of bad news.
00:26:50.000 If we're to unite against the threat of terrifying killer robots and AI taking all of our jobs, we better learn to communicate better, even if the systems of communication may end up being co-opted by those very robots.
00:27:02.000 Let's have a look at some of those terrifying robots now.
00:27:08.000 I don't like that their soundtrack is like Stomp or one of those Broadway shows where people are like dum-dum-dum-da-dum-dum.
00:27:16.000 I'd rather they river danced.
00:27:21.000 Yeah, well, at least no-one's strapped a gun to their back and just let them loose in society where they nervously spray bullets into a barren landscape.
00:27:31.000 Alright, well as long as it's just the military using these terrifying robot dogs against people from other countries who are nothing like us and don't have soul spirit stuff, we don't have to worry about that.
00:27:42.000 We don't want them filtering into domestic police forces and being used against the domestic population.
00:27:47.000 That'll be unforgivable!
00:27:49.000 There I draw the line.
00:27:51.000 In March, the Biden administration was criticized for encouraging local governments to use the American Rescue Plan Act, ARPA funds, a 1.9 trillion pandemic relief aid package on policing in the midst of an ongoing pandemic.
00:28:04.000 There are many confusing things that happened in that pandemic, but it just didn't make sense.
00:28:08.000 But perhaps the most confusing thing was when they went, OK, in order to help people that have suffered as a result of this pandemic, we are buying an army of robot dogs that can shoot people.
00:28:20.000 How's that going to help?
00:28:22.000 Wear a mask?
00:28:23.000 Some towns and cities approved police requests to spend pandemic relief funds on drones and armoured vehicles.
00:28:28.000 We brought you that story at the time.
00:28:30.000 This week, members of Los Angeles City Council's Public Safety Committee voted in favour of LAPD's acquisition of military robots.
00:28:38.000 Because LAPD have got such a great history when it comes to dealing with civil unrest, that what you want is for them to have autonomous clip-clop gun dogs unleashed throughout Compton!
00:28:49.000 The result of the committee's vote were not surprising.
00:28:52.000 Four of its five members are top recipients of campaign donations from political groups representing LAPD officers.
00:28:59.000 Of course, there are great people in the police force.
00:29:01.000 I happen to know some great people in the police force, so this is not an out-and-out attack on the police force.
00:29:06.000 This is an attack on militarizing the police force and the potential of the police force being used against the public that they're supposed to be protecting and serving.
00:29:12.000 It's not like there's any history or current news stories about the police attacking citizens.
00:29:17.000 In the past, these semi-autonomous quadrupedal bots have had only brief tours of duty with police forces across the U.S.
00:29:24.000 You know how they're introducing them to us by making them laugh, aren't they?
00:29:26.000 Like, hey, look at these funny little clip-clop dog.
00:29:30.000 How can we make American people like these evil killer robots?
00:29:34.000 Make them like dogs?
00:29:35.000 Yeah, make them like dogs.
00:29:36.000 They wouldn't fall for that, though, would they?
00:29:38.000 They'll see a dog with a gun on its back is still a sort of robot dog.
00:29:43.000 Oh look at this one!
00:29:44.000 It thinks it's people!
00:29:46.000 He thinks he's people!
00:29:50.000 In Honolulu, Hawaii, police deployed the bots at homeless encampments during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.
00:29:56.000 The NYPD was also seen using a bot named Digidog to patrol public housing projects.
00:30:01.000 Where should we start introducing these robot killer dogs to the public?
00:30:06.000 What about, like, homeless people?
00:30:08.000 Poor people who can't do anything about it?
00:30:10.000 Whose spirits have been broken by crushing inequality?
00:30:13.000 I mean, would that be wrong?
00:30:14.000 Would that be the wrong thing?
00:30:15.000 Surely what they need is identifiable aid.
00:30:17.000 In fact, this 1.9 trillion dollar package could be used to- Listen!
00:30:21.000 You know where this is heading!
00:30:22.000 We're sending those robot dogs to fuck with the homeless!
00:30:24.000 Sorry, sorry, I shouldn't have mentioned the package.
00:30:26.000 While robot maker Boston Dynamics has promised that it wouldn't allow its bots to harm human beings, that'll do then.
00:30:32.000 That's not the plot of Terminator.
00:30:34.000 We promise we will not go back into the past and kill John Connor.
00:30:38.000 Well, that's enough for me.
00:30:39.000 Carry on then.
00:30:40.000 The San Francisco City Council vowed last year that it's okay for police to use robots to kill.
00:30:45.000 Well, they've fucking already changed their mind.
00:30:47.000 Yeah, I suppose it would be okay for it to kill.
00:30:50.000 Yeah, but definitely not going back in time, though.
00:30:52.000 Oh, no, yeah, no.
00:30:53.000 Definitely, let's not change that.
00:30:54.000 We can't do that yet.
00:30:55.000 The LAPD dog-like military robot was bought at a cost of nearly $280,000.
00:30:59.000 If the past is precedent...
00:31:02.000 The goal here is to normalise and ingrain the technology so that taxpayers start footing the bill down the line.
00:31:08.000 No, they wouldn't do that, would they?
00:31:09.000 Get the taxpayers to pay for something that became profitable and ultimately led to less freedom for all of us?
00:31:13.000 No, that doesn't even sound remotely familiar.
00:31:15.000 This is what happened when LAPF, Los Angeles Police Foundation, funded a pilot of LAPD body camera surveillance, funded LAPD's implementation of Palantir data processing systems, funded the hiring of controversial academics But otherwise, have you done it?
00:31:30.000 No.
00:31:30.000 Other than that seemingly endless list, we've barely done it at all.
00:31:32.000 All those privately funded experiments have since become taxpayer liabilities.
00:31:36.000 Unity Safety Partnership Surveillance Program.
00:31:38.000 But otherwise, have you done it?
00:31:40.000 No.
00:31:40.000 Other than that seemingly endless list, we've barely done it at all.
00:31:43.000 All those privately funded experiments have since become taxpayer liabilities.
00:31:48.000 They're crafty, aren't they?
00:31:49.000 Residents have warned that the robots could be outfitted with lethal munitions,
00:31:53.000 following a pattern of mission creep that we saw with LAPD's use of drones, body cams,
00:31:58.000 and myriad other technologies.
00:32:00.000 But it's not just killer robots on the street we need to worry about, although that is quite a lot to worry about.
00:32:06.000 Because you know, most of us aren't homeless or so poor that we can be used to test robot dogs on.
00:32:12.000 Yet.
00:32:12.000 Major fast food chains are employing thousands of robots to flip burgers, brew espressos, and greet customers.
00:32:19.000 Would you like a coffee?
00:32:20.000 Oh, shit!
00:32:21.000 Oh, God!
00:32:22.000 Sorry, sir.
00:32:23.000 Sorry.
00:32:23.000 See you in court.
00:32:24.000 I am your new lawyer.
00:32:26.000 That guy's a good friend of mine.
00:32:27.000 And it is a fraction of the cost compared to paying human workers.
00:32:30.000 Phew!
00:32:31.000 A plan with no drawbacks.
00:32:32.000 White Castle is testing the flippy robot This is the Flippy Robot!
00:32:36.000 Oh wow, the Flippy Robot, well that sounds fun, what does it do?
00:32:39.000 Flip and flop, and slide around, play funny games?
00:32:41.000 It takes your job.
00:32:43.000 Oh, but look at Flippy!
00:32:46.000 That was your life.
00:32:47.000 Fuck you.
00:32:48.000 Is that what the Flip is?
00:32:49.000 Yes.
00:32:50.000 White Castle is testing the Flippy Robot at 100 locations, and Chipotle uses a one-armed robot to make tortilla chips at one site, and Starbucks has $18,000 AI-powered espresso machines in at least 1,200 locations.
00:33:03.000 When you watch this mainstream media news report on the Flippy Robot, please notice their perspective and their general tone towards the Flippy Robot.
00:33:11.000 That it's favourable, that it's fun, that it's innocuous.
00:33:13.000 Even when it's announced that it's going to have a human economic cost, they still see it as brilliant because their agenda is not interrupted by the Flippy Robot.
00:33:20.000 It is ultimately served, as is your espresso, piping hot by a robot that hates you.
00:33:24.000 Chipotle's testing an autonomous kitchen robot that can make its tortilla chips.
00:33:29.000 Yes.
00:33:29.000 Yes.
00:33:30.000 You idiot.
00:33:30.000 Officials with the chain restaurant said the mechanical assistants named Chippy.
00:33:34.000 Do you think people will accept these robots if we give them glib, stupid little nicknames?
00:33:39.000 No, they won't be that stupid.
00:33:40.000 Sorry sir, you've lost your job.
00:33:42.000 Oh, why?
00:33:42.000 I've been working my hardest.
00:33:44.000 I know, but look at Chippy.
00:33:46.000 Fuck you.
00:33:48.000 We'll allow the humans to focus on actual food related issues.
00:33:52.000 Yes, we need a little positive news.
00:33:54.000 That's not positive news if you're a minimum wage person.
00:33:54.000 That's not positive news.
00:33:57.000 That's not positive news if you're concerned about the automization of the workforce.
00:34:00.000 That's not positive news if you care about increasing inequality and the inability of ordinary people to organize against centralized power.
00:34:06.000 That's bad news.
00:34:07.000 That's bad news cheerfully delivered by the media arm of centralized authority.
00:34:10.000 A follow-up story on Chippy, of course, you know, also related to Flippy, which is the hamburger flipper that is stationed in some White Castle restaurant.
00:34:17.000 There's Flippy.
00:34:17.000 There's Chippy.
00:34:18.000 Hey, sir!
00:34:18.000 Come back here!
00:34:19.000 Grippy!
00:34:20.000 Come back here!
00:34:21.000 Drink your coffee!
00:34:23.000 Too hot!
00:34:23.000 Ah!
00:34:24.000 I can't drink it!
00:34:25.000 Chippy is essentially, as we saw in the photos there, a long robotic arm that cooks tortilla chips and dumps them into a bin.
00:34:25.000 Get drippy!
00:34:33.000 Dumps them into a bin!
00:34:35.000 Bon Appetit!
00:34:36.000 And ultimately removing the need for an employee to be there doing this.
00:34:40.000 I'm all for uh for chippy guys, chippy and flippy.
00:34:42.000 Chippy and flippy and lippy and grippy.
00:34:45.000 Like Teletubbies for future unemployment.
00:34:47.000 This might be good for for stocks like a Chipotle, eventually like a McDonald's because it is just going to
00:34:54.000 drive a lot more efficiency.
00:34:55.000 In a way even this innocuous seemingly story is a good example of how the mainstream media
00:35:01.000 facilitates the agenda of centralized authority.
00:35:03.000 I don't want to be conspiratorial, but the coalescence of financial interest is to the advantage of the kind of elites that hugely benefited, for example, during the pandemic and benefit during this war.
00:35:14.000 And the more that people become expendable, generally speaking, the more power they have.
00:35:19.000 If, like, the only power that we have is, hey, we're not going to do that, I'm not buying that, why don't we come together and organise our own city?
00:35:25.000 They've got chippy, flippy, lippy and grippy, all of Donald Duck's bastard robot nephews.
00:35:30.000 No leverage against them.
00:35:31.000 Actually, we've got a leverage robot.
00:35:34.000 As I mentioned, reduces labour costs in the restaurant.
00:35:37.000 Reduces labour costs means reduces your ability to negotiate a living wage for your time.
00:35:43.000 If you invest one time in this particular robot, that's one less employee.
00:35:48.000 One less employee!
00:35:49.000 They're literally describing how you've lost your job.
00:35:52.000 I mean, was there not enough suffering in the 2008 crash?
00:35:55.000 Was there not enough suffering during the pandemic?
00:35:56.000 Is there not enough global suffering as a result of these interests being pursued at every level of society?
00:36:02.000 Then this is presented as, like, good news.
00:36:04.000 Chipotle are going to be sacking people and dumping your food in a bin and expecting you to say thank you for it.
00:36:09.000 Look at this robot as an employee.
00:36:11.000 That employee is not going to be taking off days from work.
00:36:14.000 It's not going to be taking off any time, is it, Flippy or Chippy?
00:36:17.000 It's certainly not going to complain about its labor conditions or about growing inequality across America or the possibility of ordinary people having a life that's built around more than just working, endless shifts, and maybe looking out the window one day and seeing a butterfly or a leaf floating on a breeze.
00:36:32.000 Chippy don't care about nature.
00:36:34.000 Chippy don't care about you.
00:36:35.000 Chippy don't care about God.
00:36:36.000 Chippy don't care about nothing.
00:36:38.000 Bon Appetite!
00:36:39.000 Unless the arm falls off because the bolts fall off, and that is unlikely.
00:36:42.000 Bolts fall off.
00:36:43.000 We didn't like the bit where he said the bolts might fall off.
00:36:45.000 Sorry.
00:36:46.000 Sorry about that.
00:36:46.000 Your job could be done by Flippy.
00:36:48.000 If we put a tie on him, I'll do it.
00:36:49.000 Just tell me where to stand.
00:36:51.000 We gotta get that voice right.
00:36:52.000 He's based on Zelensky!
00:36:53.000 And lastly, improved food quality.
00:36:55.000 Again, I am all for the perfect chip.
00:36:57.000 Give it to me.
00:36:58.000 I'm willing to pay more for the perfect tortilla chip.
00:37:00.000 I'm gonna leave there happy, feeling good about myself.
00:37:02.000 How dare they include improved food quality on that list, like a faceless soulless robot can prepare food better than a human being, or your grandmother, or the relationship between ceremony, ritual, community, culture and food.
00:37:15.000 Every single bit of humanity extracted.
00:37:18.000 The thing that's true is reduces labour costs.
00:37:20.000 All the other things on that list are sort of mitigating.
00:37:22.000 In fact, I don't care about anything other than that, and I'm not blaming the individual news show, or even A massive organization like Chipotle.
00:37:28.000 It's systemic thinking.
00:37:29.000 We have already become automatized in the way we approach reality because of interests built around finance and domination.
00:37:36.000 They become a person, I think.
00:37:37.000 Who fixes Chippy?
00:37:38.000 I can have a great conversation with Chippy and Flippy.
00:37:40.000 They would struggle to match their humanity.
00:37:42.000 You know, this is essentially like a factory worker, a factory machine.
00:37:44.000 If you're a Ford, you operate robots right now.
00:37:46.000 This is very much something similar and maybe it won't wear out that much.
00:37:50.000 But where are all these ideas coming from?
00:37:50.000 All right.
00:37:52.000 A 2020 World Economic Forum report predicted that robotics and automation would displace 85 million jobs globally in the coming five years.
00:38:01.000 Experts have also claimed that AI bots will take 20% of all jobs within five years.
00:38:07.000 That's inequality in action.
00:38:08.000 That is, you will own nothing and you will be happy.
00:38:11.000 In action.
00:38:12.000 This is the concentration and consolidation of power.
00:38:15.000 And if you think that's conspiratorial, remember the technological revolution of the 50s.
00:38:18.000 Vacuum cleaners, white goods, you know, dishwashers and all that.
00:38:22.000 What is there now?
00:38:22.000 Have you got more time?
00:38:24.000 Or has it worked out that it's just built-in obsolescence and endless cycle of consuming?
00:38:27.000 And this is just another advance in the same mentality.
00:38:30.000 But according to the WF, more new roles will be created.
00:38:33.000 97 million.
00:38:34.000 As humans, machines and algorithms increasingly work together.
00:38:37.000 It's a bit sketchier on those particular details of its master plan.
00:38:40.000 But this will help everybody.
00:38:42.000 I don't know.
00:38:42.000 How?
00:38:43.000 Would you like some bugs?
00:38:44.000 No.
00:38:45.000 What if Flippy makes the bugs all delicious for you?
00:38:48.000 I am your grandmother!
00:38:49.000 Eat your bugs!
00:38:50.000 Do you not want to eat it?
00:38:52.000 I wouldn't like to pry.
00:38:53.000 Okay, so let's see how the research underwrites some of Klaus Schwab's theories.
00:38:57.000 New research shows the rise of robots may not be as beneficial for workers as some claim.
00:39:02.000 What?
00:39:02.000 What about trickle-down economics?
00:39:03.000 could have positive impacts on economic growth and productivity according to economists,
00:39:08.000 but workers might not reap the rewards.
00:39:10.000 What about trickle-down economics?
00:39:11.000 We can use Drippy to scoop up any trickles and give those back to the elites.
00:39:15.000 Exposure to robots had negative effects on employment, leading some workers to drop out of the labor force and
00:39:21.000 increasing unemployment.
00:39:22.000 The economists examined the effects of industrial robots on the Chinese labour market using data from over 15,000 families and found that the workforce struggled to adjust to the dramatic changes brought by robotics.
00:39:33.000 So what exactly was it that made working with robots so difficult?
00:39:37.000 Do you want an espresso?
00:39:39.000 Do you want an espresso?
00:39:41.000 Dump that in a bin.
00:39:42.000 What is the problem?
00:39:44.000 Are we not friendly enough?
00:39:45.000 Robot exposure led to a decline in labour force participation, minus 1%, employment, minus 7.5%, and hourly wages, minus 9% of Chinese workers, they wrote.
00:39:55.000 At the same time, among those who kept working, robot exposure increased the numbers of hours worked by 14%.
00:40:01.000 The implications of robotisation in emerging markets for jobs, growth and inequality could be profound, the economists wrote.
00:40:07.000 They went on to argue that developing nations may be faced with the decision between increased productivity and potential higher economic inequality and social unrest if they choose to continue automating away jobs with robots.
00:40:19.000 Hopefully then there are new protest laws being introduced all over the world and harsh new measures preventing people from forming unions and coming together.
00:40:27.000 Also, hopefully, there are massive censorship laws that prevent people from conducting conversations in public spaces that allow them to organise around alternative narratives and agenda that oppose centralised authority.
00:40:39.000 Keep watching the mainstream media everyone, you'll see the way this is heading.
00:40:43.000 That's why we need independent voices like this and independent conversations like this one, so that we can continue to present mainstream news and advancing technologies in a more balanced light.
00:40:52.000 That's not to say that technology isn't fascinating, that all of this couldn't be used to create some kind of utopian society where people didn't need to work and that we could spend all our time praying and exploring inner and outer space and creating Wonderful new systems of opportunity and care and love for one another, psychedelic ventures, but I don't imagine that's the way all this is heading.
00:41:10.000 But that's just what I think.
00:41:11.000 Let me know what you think in the comments in the chat.
00:41:12.000 I'll see you in a second.
00:41:13.000 Thanks for choosing Fox News.
00:41:15.000 Good day.
00:41:16.000 No.
00:41:17.000 Here's the fucking news!
00:41:19.000 Sensitive heart 25.
00:41:21.000 Well done on this video.
00:41:23.000 I feel almost like crying about these robots.
00:41:25.000 I'm unemployed anyway, so we can't take my job.
00:41:27.000 So it's all bad news.
00:41:29.000 It's not bad.
00:41:31.000 Excuse me.
00:41:32.000 BD Canu.
00:41:33.000 We're living in historical times.
00:41:34.000 Get your households in order.
00:41:36.000 Stay free, awake, self-sufficient and unified.
00:41:38.000 This is something Gareth and I were discussing earlier.
00:41:41.000 So many of us are prisoners of comfort, unable to cope in reality.
00:41:46.000 I feel an urge to train myself to be able to feed myself to survive if there is the solar flare or some event that brings civilization crumbling to rubble.
00:41:58.000 Hunter Biden, oh I'm not going to read that name out, Hunter Biden then one of his hobbies 2022, those robotic dogs won't need Oh God, that whole comment is disgusting.
00:42:07.000 Peace, love, light.
00:42:08.000 You can't adapt to insanity.
00:42:09.000 Just say no and go your own way.
00:42:11.000 Well, there's some lovely comments there from you, members of our community, you beautiful people.
00:42:16.000 Gareth, we've got our wonderful guest joining us now.
00:42:19.000 I'm very excited, honoured in fact, to introduce Satish Kumar.
00:42:25.000 Who, as well as being a former monk, I wonder how you get out of the monk game?
00:42:29.000 Is it like being a former gangster?
00:42:31.000 A lifelong activist, a significant figure, and I have argued consistently that were there to be a global council of elders, or even, you know, don't have to be global, Satish Kumar would be on it.
00:42:43.000 He's the founder of the Resurgence Trust, that's an educational charity that seeks to inform and inspire a just future for all.
00:42:49.000 He's the editor of the charity's change-making magazine, Resurgence Anecologist, Satish Kumar entered first into public consciousness in 1962 when he walked 8,000 miles, a global pilgrimage over two years.
00:43:04.000 He started at Mahatma Gandhi's grave and walked to Moscow, Paris, London and the United States where he met Martin Luther King Jr.
00:43:10.000 and I'm very proud to call him a teacher.
00:43:14.000 Satish, thank you very much for joining us on Stay Free today.
00:43:18.000 Thank you for having me, Russell.
00:43:21.000 Satish, you came to prominence in the 1960s where the countercultural movement genuinely seemed like it might change the world before it metastasized into kind of individualism and consumerism that is Still morphing into a tyrannical force, an entirely immersive force across our culture.
00:43:41.000 During the 60s when you came to prominence, people spoke openly about the desire for peace.
00:43:46.000 In this time that appears to be defined by conflict of different kinds, most Obviously, of course, literal war.
00:43:54.000 Do you feel that when there is conflicts that are necessary for the military-industrial complex, one of the most influential and powerful forces on this planet, while there is a war between Ukraine and Russia, when it feels like there are escalating tensions between the USA and China, that peace ought once again become part of our discourse.
00:44:12.000 What are your thoughts on these conflicts that are determining and defining our planet right now, sir?
00:44:17.000 Yes, very good question.
00:44:20.000 I'm very saddened to see war in Ukraine.
00:44:25.000 And as you say, this industrial military complex, which is kind of benefiting maybe perhaps, but at the cost of hundreds of thousands of ordinary people suffering and destruction.
00:44:39.000 So I think, but politicians have forgotten how to be a statesman.
00:44:47.000 The diplomats have forgotten how to practice diplomacy, and religious leaders on all sides have forgotten how to practice religion and love.
00:44:58.000 This is why I've written this book, Radical Love.
00:45:01.000 Radical love, Russell, is when you are able to love even those you don't like and you don't agree.
00:45:09.000 And this is where I think Putin and Biden and Rishi Sunak and Zelensky, they all need to read my book and practice radical love and sit down together.
00:45:20.000 And I have a good solution for Ukraine situation.
00:45:25.000 Well, would you tell us it, please?
00:45:26.000 Because, as you say, it's quite a terrible conflict.
00:45:29.000 Terrible conflict and it's benefiting not anybody.
00:45:33.000 It's just and it's leading towards possibly a third world war because I mean what happened?
00:45:39.000 America could not win in Vietnam.
00:45:42.000 America could not win in Afghanistan.
00:45:45.000 Russia could not win in Afghanistan.
00:45:47.000 Winning these days of war is impossible.
00:45:50.000 So it will go on destroying and there's no win.
00:45:53.000 So what my solution for Ukraine is being like Switzerland.
00:45:58.000 Swiss model, where Switzerland did not go to First World War, did not go to Second World War, did not join NATO, did not join EU.
00:46:07.000 Independent, its own currency, its own system and a very neutral and trading with everybody.
00:46:14.000 So if Ukraine can say to Russia that there's no threat from you, from us, for you, there's no NATO, there's no EU, we are independent, we are neutral, like Switzerland, and Switzerland can be rich because they are neutral.
00:46:31.000 And Switzerland can be home for everybody.
00:46:34.000 International organizations.
00:46:35.000 It's the UN headquarters and many, many World Council of Churches.
00:46:40.000 Many international organizations go to Switzerland because it's neutral.
00:46:44.000 So Ukraine can be like Switzerland and be neutral and friend to Russia, friend to Europe, friend to everybody.
00:46:52.000 Have no enemy.
00:46:53.000 And I think Russia would like it.
00:46:56.000 Russia would say, yes, if you are neutral and not a member of NATO and not a member of EU and independent, trading with everybody, that's welcome.
00:47:03.000 It seems that eventually a solution of that type will have to be reached.
00:47:09.000 Currently, what appears to be driving the conflict is the set of interests that are most obviously going to benefit From the reconstruction of Ukraine, some of our investigations and investigations of others, which we have curated as part of our team, suggest that and it's publicly understood that BlackRock will be participating in the reconstruction of Ukraine.
00:47:37.000 Ukraine want to be 100% digital after this war.
00:47:40.000 And assurances that Ukraine could become a place of neutrality surely would make a difference, as well as providing, if there were anything like Switzerland, another potential venue for WEF to host their globalist events.
00:47:55.000 The problem, Satish, is that it feels like, in reality, the conflict between Ukraine and Russia is about ...territorial and economic interests, not all of which are explicit.
00:48:10.000 And there is an attempt to reduce these conflicts to simple moral stories of, you know, Russian criminality and Putin's evil.
00:48:21.000 And radical love, I suppose, radical love, I mean, it's your book and you wrote it, but for me that suggests an acknowledgement, ultimately, of our fundamental Humanism, of our fundamental shared goals, of our fundamental unity.
00:48:36.000 But those ideas are not profitable.
00:48:39.000 Yeah, but those ideas have to be made at least popular, if not profitable.
00:48:45.000 And profitability is not the everything.
00:48:48.000 Humanity is not just about money and profit.
00:48:51.000 Humanity is about relationship, friendship, love, poetry, music, art, families.
00:48:57.000 There are many, many other important things which we need.
00:49:01.000 And therefore, if we end this idea that Russians are our enemies, Chinese are our enemies, And the separation.
00:49:11.000 We are one humanity.
00:49:13.000 We live on one planet Earth.
00:49:15.000 The whole cosmos is our country.
00:49:18.000 The entire planet is our home.
00:49:20.000 Nature is our nationality.
00:49:22.000 And love is our religion.
00:49:23.000 This is radical love.
00:49:24.000 Love is our religion.
00:49:26.000 Before we are Christians, Muslims, Hindus, we are humans.
00:49:31.000 And before we are Russians and Americans and Chinese, we are members of the planet Earth.
00:49:36.000 One planet home.
00:49:37.000 Unless you have this idea, this profitability, money, what has it led to us?
00:49:42.000 Global warming, climate change, wars, conflict, poverty, homelessness, even in America.
00:49:48.000 This profitability of America's number one economy has not solved any human problems.
00:49:54.000 So realists have failed utterly.
00:49:57.000 Therefore, give idealists a chance.
00:49:59.000 And I'm an idealist.
00:50:01.000 And my radical love book is a book of idealism, but realism is in idealism.
00:50:09.000 These current conflicts, systems, methods and modalities are, as you say Satish, a denial of our fundamental
00:50:18.000 spiritual nature.
00:50:19.000 I would agree. I have heard it said that it is ludicrous to apply these external labels and it becomes clear when
00:50:29.000 looking at a baby, that there is something ridiculous in saying that a baby is
00:50:34.000 Chinese or French, that you might as well say this baby is a Tottenham supporter.
00:50:40.000 A baby doesn't have those attributes. A baby in its evident abundance and evident connection defies these external
00:50:48.000 labels.
00:50:49.000 But increasingly we are governed in technological dictatorship Satish and I wonder what...
00:50:56.000 People are talking about artificial intelligence.
00:50:58.000 are on the dehumanizing effect of automation, surveillance and systems of
00:51:04.000 control like social credit scores which appear to be increasingly discussed and
00:51:09.000 more likely to be introduced in the next few years.
00:51:12.000 You know people are talking about artificial intelligence.
00:51:16.000 I say to them that human intelligence is not used enough. We have so much potential
00:51:24.000 to use human intelligence.
00:51:25.000 Now we are saying that farming will be done without farmers.
00:51:32.000 Factories and workplaces will be run without workers.
00:51:35.000 So Humans don't need to produce anything.
00:51:39.000 They don't need to work.
00:51:40.000 They need to just consume.
00:51:42.000 People, humans don't need to think because artificial intelligence will think for you.
00:51:47.000 So production will be made by factories.
00:51:50.000 Thinking will be done by artificial intelligence.
00:51:54.000 What is the place of humans?
00:51:55.000 Humans are irrelevant.
00:51:57.000 Only place of humans is to consume.
00:51:59.000 So we are no longer thinkers or activists, makers or artists.
00:52:04.000 We are just consumers.
00:52:06.000 And this is a nightmare, Russell.
00:52:07.000 This is a nightmare.
00:52:08.000 I would say technology should be in the service of humanity.
00:52:13.000 Technology should be a tool to help humans, not replace humans.
00:52:18.000 Not replace human thinking, but aid human thinking.
00:52:22.000 So technology as a servant of humanity is good.
00:52:26.000 Technology as a master of humanity and replacing humanity is a disastrous and bad technology.
00:52:33.000 So I want to challenge all the digital dictators that what are you doing is anti-human and anti-nature.
00:52:42.000 It's very beautiful and it reminds me of the analysis of the ego, that the ego is a good servant but a terrible master.
00:52:50.000 That when the persona, the set of ideas with which we most strongly identify dominate us, our lives become more materialistic, more wedded to transitory and ultimately temporal things.
00:53:06.000 It's interesting that you say that.
00:53:09.000 Satish, how can we immediately access a new connection?
00:53:16.000 What ought we do?
00:53:18.000 Ultimately, this is what I'm mindful of and this is what gives me most hope.
00:53:23.000 When we talk about geopolitical ideas, powerful institutions, the march of globalism, corporatism,
00:53:27.000 the military-industrial complex, the vast power of the technological state to spy on us and manipulate us,
00:53:34.000 I sometimes feel a sense of despair.
00:53:36.000 What can we do to reclaim our humanity today?
00:53:39.000 What can we do to reclaim our connection to our own spirit right now?
00:53:43.000 How do you practice this in your own life with a man who has an understanding of these traditions and has lived these traditions?
00:53:49.000 So they are not traditions, they are living practical modalities.
00:53:54.000 What can we do right now, sir?
00:53:56.000 We have to build grassroots movement.
00:54:00.000 And you are doing good work in that.
00:54:03.000 We have to say that ignore these kind of big centralized and technological big organizations.
00:54:12.000 Small is beautiful.
00:54:13.000 Small and elegant and simple is beautiful.
00:54:17.000 So we should, at the grassroots level, people should come together and say we are going to live a human life.
00:54:23.000 Technology as a servant, but human life.
00:54:26.000 And we are going to take a Hippocratic oath, the Hippocratic oath like Dr. State, do no harm, do no harm to nature, do no harm to other people, and do no harm to yourself.
00:54:37.000 If all of us practice that nonviolent Peaceful way of living, the Hippocratic oath, then that Hippocratic oath is oath to loyalty to nature and loyalty to humanity rather than loyalty to business and money and profit and governments and military.
00:54:56.000 Our loyalty has to shift at a grassroots level.
00:54:59.000 So let us create a movement of the hypocrite out. Everyone, you are a businessman or
00:55:06.000 woman or a politician or economist or a scientist, whoever you are, practice non-violence,
00:55:13.000 practice the hypocrite out, doing no harm. That is radical love.
00:55:18.000 It's very hard though Satish to live like that. It's very hard to live only in love.
00:55:24.000 All the great things are hard, Russell.
00:55:27.000 Climbing Mount Everest is hard.
00:55:29.000 Going around the world for two and a half years.
00:55:31.000 I went walking without any money for two and a half years through 15 countries.
00:55:40.000 8,000 miles.
00:55:41.000 That was hard, but that was the real experience.
00:55:44.000 So let's not worry about hardness.
00:55:46.000 What is good, we must practice, even if it is hard.
00:55:48.000 And we will overcome our difficulties.
00:55:52.000 Martin Luther King, who I met, went to prison for 29 times in his 10 years of activism.
00:56:00.000 Nelson Mandela was in jail for 27 years.
00:56:04.000 Mahatma Gandhi was in prison for 12 years.
00:56:06.000 So they were hardworking, great visionaries.
00:56:10.000 So we don't need to worry about hardness and difficulty.
00:56:13.000 We have to do what is the right thing to do, even though we have to sacrifice some comfort.
00:56:19.000 But in the interest of humanity and planet, we have to build a grassroots movement.
00:56:24.000 It would be no good if Gandhi had said, this is too hard going on this sort march.
00:56:30.000 It would have been no good if Martin Luther King had said, I can't do this million man march, it's too difficult.
00:56:35.000 If Malcolm X had said, standing up to the dominated culture is too difficult.
00:56:40.000 If Nelson Mandela said, I can't stay in this prison, it's too hard.
00:56:44.000 I'll do whatever you want.
00:56:45.000 What do I need to say?
00:56:46.000 You're right.
00:56:47.000 This is, I suppose, one of the challenges when you lose your connection to spirituality, which involves things like sacrifice, discipline, focus.
00:56:56.000 When everything becomes tethered to the external, when all of our personal validation, verification is externally sourced, we don't have the cojones no more.
00:57:06.000 We don't have the spiritual stones, the minerals to sort of go Right, I'm gonna suffer now.
00:57:11.000 I'm ready to suffer.
00:57:12.000 I don't like suffering Satish.
00:57:15.000 It's difficult, but I will do it now that you have commanded it on our show.
00:57:19.000 I think suffering will make us strong and resilient.
00:57:24.000 If you take a tree, A tree stands in the winter, in the snow, in the storm, out in the field as a stronger.
00:57:32.000 If you keep a tree in a greenhouse or in a conservatory all the time, the tree will not be strong.
00:57:38.000 So resilience comes when we suffer and we make sacrifice and I have suffered and made sacrifice in my life and I am much more strong for that.
00:57:48.000 So I would not worry about hardship.
00:57:51.000 What is the right thing to do?
00:57:52.000 We should do it.
00:57:53.000 And radical love, it's all about that.
00:57:56.000 When we practice radical love, then we are prepared to sacrifice because we depend on each other.
00:58:03.000 We become lovers.
00:58:05.000 We don't want to have lovers, but we become lovers.
00:58:09.000 And loving is hard.
00:58:11.000 You want to be loved.
00:58:13.000 You want somebody to love you.
00:58:14.000 But you don't want to love.
00:58:17.000 Loving is hard.
00:58:18.000 In loving you have to sacrifice your ego.
00:58:20.000 So we have to move from ego to eco.
00:58:23.000 Change one letter from G to C. Ego to eco.
00:58:28.000 And then You will become a lover, and that's a radical love.
00:58:32.000 I love you, Satish Kumar.
00:58:34.000 You're a very beautiful man.
00:58:35.000 Thank you for your time.
00:58:37.000 Satish's book, Radical Love, is available now.
00:58:39.000 There's a link in the description so you can get it.
00:58:41.000 Satish, I want you to come to Community this year, in the middle of July.
00:58:45.000 Our live festival with Wim Hof, with Vandana Shiva, so people can come together and practice and live these ideas.
00:58:51.000 If you want to join me, I'll be there.
00:58:52.000 You should see me.
00:58:53.000 I'm around everyone, like Willy Wonka.
00:58:55.000 I'm on it.
00:58:56.000 Come there.
00:58:57.000 Satish, will you come?
00:58:58.000 Will you be free, do you think, to come and join us?
00:58:59.000 Yes, I would love to come.
00:59:01.000 Yes, yes, I will look in my diary, but I think I am free, and I would love to come.
00:59:06.000 That sounds like an excuse.
00:59:08.000 Change one letter of the word diary, and it's dairy, and down the dairy, you've got to do what I say.
00:59:14.000 Okay, okay, I will do what you say.
00:59:17.000 I love you, Russell, and this is a radical love.
00:59:21.000 I radical love you too.
00:59:23.000 Satish Kumar thank you.
00:59:24.000 Radical love is to love without expectations, without criticism, without kind of complaining, without expectation.
00:59:36.000 Stop all expectations and love and then through participation you change Ukraine and wars and all these things.
00:59:45.000 Confrontation.
00:59:46.000 You can change that by love.
00:59:48.000 Putin has to be loved.
00:59:50.000 Only through love you can transform Putin.
00:59:52.000 Only through love you can transform Biden.
00:59:54.000 I know you're right.
00:59:55.000 I know you're right.
00:59:56.000 I know that if Gandhi, Malcolm X, if they were around they'd be like, we're going there.
01:00:00.000 We'll saw it out.
01:00:01.000 We're going to cuddle that.
01:00:02.000 We'll cuddle some scents into him.
01:00:04.000 We'll cuddle some scents into a lot of them.
01:00:06.000 One of his own old phones.
01:00:08.000 Yeah, call him up on one of his old little Putin yellow phones.
01:00:12.000 Satish, thank you so much for joining us.
01:00:14.000 We will speak again soon.
01:00:14.000 Thank you for your time.
01:00:15.000 My pleasure.
01:00:16.000 My pleasure.
01:00:17.000 Thank you for having me.
01:00:18.000 Thank you, sir.
01:00:19.000 I love you.
01:00:20.000 Thank you very much.
01:00:21.000 Satish Kumar there, potential guest for Community, our annual festival where we come together to realise these things.
01:00:21.000 Thank you.
01:00:29.000 Yeah, the bit where he said, when you love people you don't have any expectations.
01:00:33.000 I think what he was saying is, I ain't coming to that.
01:00:34.000 I'm not definitely coming.
01:00:35.000 You can't tie me down.
01:00:37.000 Just clean if you go well.
01:00:38.000 Yeah, I just don't want a bad vibe in the interview.
01:00:41.000 It was lovely though, wasn't it?
01:00:42.000 Really nice.
01:00:42.000 Gave us a nice telling off towards the end.
01:00:44.000 It all points to localism, doesn't it?
01:00:46.000 And independence.
01:00:47.000 That's basically what he's saying.
01:00:47.000 It does.
01:00:50.000 Yeah, a lot of these people, they were ahead of the game.
01:00:52.000 People co-opted that movement.
01:00:53.000 Helena Norberg, Hodge, Vandana Shiva.
01:00:55.000 You should eat food that grows where you are, meet your needs wherever you can.
01:00:59.000 Gandhi even said that communities should be independent where possible.
01:01:04.000 All these systems of aggregation.
01:01:06.000 I think about siphoning off profit.
01:01:08.000 Once you create agriculture, of course you meet loads of food needs, but we all know about food wastage.
01:01:13.000 We all know how so many needs go unmet, possibly with the technology we have.
01:01:17.000 Well, there's an essay that I've got to read, actually.
01:01:20.000 Daniel Pinchbeck's always telling me to read it.
01:01:22.000 Oscar Wilde's essay, The Soul of Man Under Socialism, that technology could be used to create Utopias, where we have more time for contemplation, art, and leisure.
01:01:31.000 That all of these tools and technologies, in fact, could be used to create a fairer world, but we'd have to change spiritually.
01:01:36.000 As long as the most powerful institutions and interests and sort of almost systemic magnetism is directed towards selfish goals, as long as the emotional palette that it's drawn from is greed and selfishness, because a lot of that stuff can be distilled into it, it's unlikely that we'll create the utopias that are possible.
01:01:52.000 But what he was saying about things being hard as well, I thought it was really interesting.
01:01:55.000 You know, that's what we've been given.
01:01:56.000 We've been given comfort and convenience over freedom.
01:02:00.000 That's essentially, that's the bargain that we've made.
01:02:03.000 We've entered into that and we kind of forget that we have, but it seems like on the surface, all things are alright and we can get these things and, but that's what they've, that's what they've done.
01:02:11.000 It's a terrible bargain.
01:02:12.000 It's a terrible bargain that we have undertaken.
01:02:12.000 It's not a good bargain.
01:02:14.000 And so, you know, you get to a point where, like we were saying the other day about the pandemic and all these 30% of small businesses closing.
01:02:21.000 It doesn't actually work.
01:02:23.000 We kind of think it does because we've got this kind of supposed comfort and convenience that even in the pandemic, we could order this food that came in half an hour or whatever.
01:02:32.000 Yeah, I liked it.
01:02:33.000 Those businesses that were selling food were not local businesses.
01:02:37.000 No, they were not local businesses and the people delivering that food were not being paid fairly or correctly.
01:02:43.000 It's not right.
01:02:43.000 There is a cost.
01:02:44.000 One of our, we have a great guest on this show, I can't remember her name, that Amazon lady, James, do you remember her name?
01:02:49.000 She used to talk about the sort of invisible labour challenge.
01:02:54.000 Corrie Crider.
01:02:55.000 Yeah, Corrie Crider.
01:02:55.000 She was excellent.
01:02:56.000 She talked about the invisible costs of like big tech, how, in fact, we should get her on again soon, right?
01:03:02.000 Because she talked about like, You think of all these things as sort of frictionless.
01:03:05.000 Apple, Facebook, Google, Amazon.
01:03:08.000 But actually, there is labour going on.
01:03:10.000 There's people toiling down mines.
01:03:11.000 There's people working in warehouses.
01:03:13.000 You know, that's why it was good to have Christian Smalls on, wasn't it?
01:03:15.000 The leader of the Amazon movement from America.
01:03:18.000 Because ultimately, human beings are going to have to come together.
01:03:22.000 And as you say, localise, collectivise, and that point of sacrifice you said the other day.
01:03:26.000 that you would be willing to change your diet if you knew, or pay more, if you can afford to,
01:03:32.000 if you know that it's fairly sourced, not in some bullshit kind of fair trade way.
01:03:37.000 I think people are at the point now where they see past the convenience
01:03:42.000 of being able to have access to any food you want at any time of year,
01:03:47.000 because they recognize that the costs that come with that, the cost to themselves, the cost to the people that make it.
01:03:52.000 And I think people are at the point where they'd say, I'll have like a quarter of that stuff,
01:03:56.000 as long as I know it's from local farmers, that people have been paid enough to do it.
01:04:00.000 And I really believe we're at a point where people will be willing to do that now.
01:04:04.000 Certainly enough people.
01:04:05.000 Certainly a significant number of people.
01:04:07.000 And we're talking to you.
01:04:09.000 It's you.
01:04:10.000 You can change.
01:04:11.000 We can change ourselves.
01:04:12.000 And I believe it was Rocky IV who said, if I can change and you can change, maybe the whole damn world can change.
01:04:16.000 And where did he say that?
01:04:18.000 Russia!
01:04:19.000 So there's hope for us all!
01:04:20.000 Damn it!
01:04:21.000 Uh, hey, on tomorrow's show we've got Callie Means talking about how he's taking on big food.
01:04:26.000 One of the great problems is the food that we are eating is good for the system that generates food, not good for the human body.
01:04:33.000 And if that weren't enough to radicalise you and wake you the hell up, Friday, Dr John Campbell, he of the overhead shot, who quietly, meticulously breaks down the data and has over the course of the pandemic gone from, hey, yeah, I guess, you know, the vaccine, that's good news, to Wait a minute!
01:04:49.000 But he's never done anything incendiary or silly because he's a doctor.
01:04:53.000 If you want to, you can... I'm getting a strike on YouTube.
01:04:56.000 Oh yeah, the WHO ain't having it, let me tell you.
01:04:59.000 Who set the guidelines on YouTube?
01:05:01.000 This stuff ain't nothing.
01:05:02.000 If the WHO, funded by Bill Gates significantly, are able to set the agenda for what's acceptable on YouTube, you're going to get tyranny.
01:05:11.000 Sign up to our Locals community.
01:05:13.000 Every week me and Gareth do a show, Stay Connected, where we answer your questions.
01:05:17.000 Also, if you're on Locals, your comments I respond to, like Dawn1 saying, be here meow.
01:05:22.000 Bit silly, I know that's someone else's name.
01:05:24.000 Love you, love you, Gareth and Russ, Jack, Swiss, IE, me, don't be so dirty.
01:05:29.000 All you guys, we respond to you and we make a show where we show you what we get up to.
01:05:34.000 As well as weekly meditations, I'm going to do... Do you know what I'm going to do every week?
01:05:37.000 I'm going to do a meditation with someone who needs one.
01:05:39.000 First, I'm going to do it with my friend Mick the Ferret.
01:05:42.000 Now, Mick the Ferret has just had a heart operation.
01:05:43.000 I'm going to do a breathing exercise with him.
01:05:45.000 Then, I'm going to respond to people that are in the locals' communities, saying, like, you know, I've just had my heart broken.
01:05:49.000 I'll be on a Zoom call with them, and I'll do the meditation with them.
01:05:52.000 I'll go, right, come on, how are you feeling about your heartbreak?
01:05:54.000 Do a 10-minute meditation, then we'll release it.
01:05:56.000 What do you think about that, Gal?
01:05:57.000 Brilliant.
01:05:58.000 This ferret, it's got a name, has it?
01:05:59.000 It's not a real ferret.
01:06:00.000 It's Mick the Ferret.
01:06:01.000 He has ferrets.
01:06:02.000 He's not a ferret.
01:06:03.000 He's not doing a meditation with a ferret.
01:06:04.000 I misunderstood.
01:06:05.000 Ferrets are, by their nature, jittery.
01:06:07.000 You can't ever get them to relax.
01:06:09.000 It's impossible.
01:06:10.000 All they want to do is go kill a rabbit down a burrow.
01:06:11.000 It's a niche meditation, I would say.
01:06:14.000 Okay, you're a predatory little rodent.
01:06:17.000 Go down that burrow.
01:06:19.000 See yourself getting the rabbit by its neck and draining the life out of it, you little bastard.
01:06:24.000 Sign up to our community.
01:06:25.000 We get weekly meditations just in the manner I've just described.
01:06:28.000 I meant to tell you that, people in production.
01:06:30.000 I had that idea, but I've told you now.
01:06:32.000 And my live stand-up special will be up there soon.
01:06:36.000 We're editing it at the moment.
01:06:36.000 It's very funny, isn't it?
01:06:37.000 Yeah, lots of them.
01:06:38.000 Is it funny enough?
01:06:39.000 Yeah, it's great.
01:06:40.000 Could always want to be a bit more funny.
01:06:42.000 Some jokes for ferrets and stuff.
01:06:44.000 They'll love it.
01:06:45.000 Your new market.
01:06:46.000 Gotta get them little rodents rucking.
01:06:48.000 Are they rodents?
01:06:49.000 I'm pretty sure.
01:06:49.000 Not sure.
01:06:49.000 Is a ferret a rodent made their teeth keep growing?
01:06:51.000 I don't know what defines them anymore.
01:06:53.000 Okay, hey, that's it.
01:06:54.000 Join the community.
01:06:55.000 Join us tomorrow.
01:06:56.000 Not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
01:06:59.000 And until then, stay free.
01:07:01.000 Men switching, switch on, switch off.
01:07:03.000 Men switching, switch on, switch off.